Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1695 FARADAY AVE; ; CB970875; Permitf: !J - ._ f·agc J of Job Address: 1695 PA~ADAY AV F.:1t:i·:.-,,: A(!j~t;~;tn1B:"tt::::: Str<>ri·J M(;tio11 F~e,~ Er:.ter "Y' to A,.tto Enter Trciffic ~mp PaSEi··-·rr1r~;~ Ft::es [ X"/1 Payoff F, ,:;, f: or CPD Entc,r ?,,1::·k Fe(!' Zuru-:. * BUILDI:•iG TOTAL Enter "Y for Plum;:Jing Each:Plw~b~ng Fixt~re or Eacl·: B:~L.ding Se.we:· E.=, ch Roo ·~ Dl:?<;i: :: r, .... ~. r .• -, , .t..' _,.. i,.\ :~E,<::t Install/Repa Water I,ine '·, .E·:iCfL Wct,tf?r ·Heater &rid/.c1:r \/:~r:t Each Vdcuun1 Bre>aker ~~ PIJJMB:!~'(; roTAL ·.Er~t°(i:1·-·:X" ·fo~c 'E:lectric Is::;u,3 F<:~e > ':hrc::>e Pha:,e 48 0 Per AMP > ~ ELECTR~CAL ~OTAL Ehte-r 'Y ~ f()r :1BGb.anic::~: t.~J!::;,i1:-· Fee·, Ede:: Ext1<1ust Fan * M~tHAN~CAL TOTAL . .---r,~ '.' ':'" ") t "-i;.,.':t CITY OF CARLSBAD .-,-.-, .-.. I ;) I ;; 7.0J 7.80 .., .,. ('\ I • •..i..,.., 7. O:_' 2075 Las P~ Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 p ,,, ·::-:''. ~ t P:cn j -qt C 3 t, 7 0 d -,, ';; :ss.UED A~nlf0J: 0~/15/97 'Pll"!:"_./::,·~::'J~,_:=•: ·e;?./07/.9 Et .. ~--e. ~~1J .By: D.:1A .co 3,419,0G ;:, '.2 ) I ') 5 7 , 8 9 . * **' 8>:t fee · Dat,a . ------------ t.;,732.00 J076. co JJ5.CQ 29031:00 v 6820.0C 2.4 8.3 2 . n G ~l '5. :) s :14 s. es :.S<J6o.GO 02: ~, 4 :JO t !) ~'..J 1/1. 2,l. 00 V .· 42.0G 1 '3. O C 5 6. r: n 7.00 21 .. no 168. n (J'._,, :o.co·v. .? on o. r:o JC1.0.0D 15.CG Y. 78.00 9.3 . u :1 - Ll31f J((J°JS- FOR OFFICE USf: ONLY PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 PLAN CHECK No.;J70 8'fi I EST. VAL. 11, Gr 5 l-J s _i Plan Ck. Deposit . q Date_-----"""+-H,---+,-+"_,,_+------,~' ~-,,,, ,,.,.,,.__,,--- Business Name (at this address)_ .... ~.:,. ',_,,.._, Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number [oq 612,c, i'fl,;6DT Na e~ -'Z1 Unit No. Phase No:-Total# of uhH:s: -6 Existing Use Proposed Use \NA~oLJ~f; # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms fmt q~-hr15~g ,..., I If fl"" "'" , --.• ~. State/Zip Telephone# Fax# -' .. ,,:• .'..' City State/Zip Telephone# t¼~A~!~~#i-r :~rki--Y~N>vL6N '41A'! ---CA~d--- Name I Address ""Y -:CA--/f1i:Ot,··· q,iq ~151~ State/Zip Telephone # L~::.:1iP.l\l~i:Q.a.-i::J:)J\!!Pm<:1'1'8ME,:::, ~-~--,Z __ -__ .: .. __ ,_ ... , __ (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Of".12-~$T. &?!>~ ~(ZQ;NCM~ 612-~ J:]o ~N OEM~ f'A 9'Ll'7..1,. '5C/7-1010 Name Address • City tate/Zip Telephone # Designer Name Address ~.:t.eo~~~~~~I'Q;;~~-tt_.: ::,._.:~,:::..-~.--.;.~<., .• w,;.;., _ _,;;.,.fuo. --• ·,_ :" ..... :._,--, • .·.: .. : ... , .. --·--· ,, __ ,, .-. .,. __ ••. :,.,--- Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company______________________ Policy No._____________ Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE. ______________________________ DATE _________ _ I1i.:.< ii~~ta;iiuJ~PJ;ii.oema.!til:l'tf~-:---........ ·.,·------' .: --~··· , __ .... ··-'' ~-" ».~ ~ 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve foi the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted, with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): ___________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name/ adqress / phone number/ type of work):. _____________________________________________________ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE______________________ DATE ________ _ tgQi!em.!L'l'.Hlt'.$J;QJJ.l.f~(Eo~~~JP.:~tt~4:iuJ!flli.w~~PERMit§.l!N~Y-::..::: :~:.:~ ~-~: -~-... : .. : : :~; A :. : ... ,... • • "· :.: .. ::: _ -•• -• , - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES J<:' NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES ~ NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES jg. NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 1s:::--.:,,yoflatRuo,;1ow1:NmN.GJ\"G1:Net.:.-. -: '.'' . ·--. -.---:-----:. -. -·-· , _ .... ,,. ·· --;-._..,":~--:'~; -,,:----:------·---------· ·--.-:· --·-r -; --;,/·--,~----- I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS ffi.;J,__ -~~e.f!JQANI.:.C!E.liilf.lvAilQNt:. , -• ~,. -, -. .:.....::-'.:,;..: "':.-~ -.. , ...... ::__, .. ;,::.:2:-::::.::~::_~·~::~=:. ~=t-=·,.::::-:::-:.-.=;:;:_;:::;;:;:;::::~-=-:=::=:::=:;::::::;:;:~:;;:::;:;==::-:--::-:-::::::=::~::::::::::-:-_. -" I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit\/ of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after ~he..1W>'1< is_coinmenc¥d for,a P?rio1AfJ 8,.~ays (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). Ll / { APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE , , v, _,, 11 += , '1 , v • &.:.,r: -DATE 7 14 91 WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance '01 PERMIT# CB970875 DESCRIPTION: 62080 TYPE: INDUST CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 12/22/97 SF WAREHOUSE-SHELL,SMAC FARADAY AV STE: INSPECTOR AREA TP PLANCK# CB970875 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE IIIN LOT: 109 JOB ADDRESS: 1695 APPLICANT: S.M.A.C. CONTRACTOR: PHONE: 760 929-7575 OWNER: REMARKS: C/ANDY/804-9302 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PHONE: £ PHONE: INSPECTOR-~~---------- TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS--PERMIT# TYPE STATUS SE970077 swow ISSUED AS970074 ASC ISSUED FS970020 FIXSYS ISSUED RW970211 ROW ISSUED FAD97043 FADD ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 29 PL Final Plumbing M::. _fil_ -----------AL!. -------------------------------------- ***** INSPECTION HISTORY***** DATE 120497 120197 120197 112697 111397 111397 110797 110797 110797 110797 110697 110697 110397 103197 103097 101797 100897 100697 100297 093097 092697 091297 090997 090997 090897 DESCRIPTION Const. Service/Agricultural Final Electrical Final Plumbing Final Electrical Rough Electric Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Rough Combo Rough/Ducts/Dampers Roof/Reroof Roof/Reroof Roof/Reroof Underground/Conduit-wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP PI TP NR TP NR TP NR TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP NS TP NS TP AP TP NR TP PA TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP PK NR TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP COMMENTS MTR RELEASE CEIL LITES@ SOFFIT STR FRNT ELECT RM, RESTRM WALLS REST RM, STR FRNT EXHAUST DUCTS REST ROOM RESTRM,MTR RIM, STR FRNT REST RM SI REP FOR ZONE 1 NAILING REQ SECT 3-6, OK TO STOCK SITE LITES POUR STRIP COMPLETE POUR STRIP@ S 1-4, W 3-13 FTNS@ TRK DCK & ST WALL PNLS TRASH PANCI FTGS G3&G4, CONT FTN TRK DOCK AREA 8 LN. B-E CONT FTN PNLS NW 1 & 2 PNLS E 7-13,T 1-11 & 2 SITE PERMIT# CB970875 DESCRIPTION: 62080 TYPE: INDUST JOB ADDRESS: 1695 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST FOR 12/22/97 SF WAREHOUSE-SHELL,SMAC FARADAY AV STE: INSPECTOR AREA TP PLANCK# CB970875 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE IIIN LOT: 109 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY***** DATE 082797 082697 082597 081397 081297 081297 071797 071497 071197 071097 070997 070997 DESCRIPTION Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Conduit-Wiring Ftg/Foundation/Piers Sewer/Water Service Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor ACT INSP AP PK PA PK NR PK AP TP AP TP PI TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP AP TP COMMENTS PANELS AS NOTED 8-26-97 PANELS(N-1-6) (Wl0-12) (E 1-6) SERVICE CONDUIT COVERED W/O I PNLS SEE SI RPT #5 FOR 8/12 STORM DRAIN MAIN PNLS SLAB & ENT FTN CONT FTN A LN SEE CARD 7/11 SEWER MAIN,LAT SPRD FTNS(INT) SPRD FTNS(INT) 05/08/98 INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING FOR PERMIT# CB970875 DATE INSPECTION TYPE INSP ACT COMMENTS 12/22/97 Final Plumbing RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 12/22/97 Final Plumbing TP WC 12/22/97 Final Combo TP AP 12/19/97 Final Combo RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 12/19/97 Final Combo TP co 12/04/97 Const. Service/Agricult TP PI MTR RELEASE 12/04/97 Final Combo RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 12/04/97 Final Combo TP WC 12/01/97 Final Plumbing RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 12/01/97 Final Plumbing TP NR 12/01/97 Final Electrical RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 12/01/97 Final Electrical TP NR 11/26/97 Final Electrical RI RI C/JASON/804-9302 11/26/97 Final Electrical TP NR 11/13/97 Interior Lath/Drywall TP AP ELECT RM, RESTRM 11/13/97 Rough Electric RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 11/13/97 Rough Electric TP AP CEIL LITES@ SOFFIT STR FRNT 11/07/97 Frame/Steel/Bolting/We! TP AP RESTRM,MTR RIM, STR FRNT 11/07/97 Rough/Topout TP AP REST RM 11/07/97 Rough Electric TP AP WALLS REST RM, STR FRNT 11/07/97 Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP WC 11/07/97 Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP AP EXHAUST DUCTS REST ROOM 11/06/97 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RI RI C/JEFF/619/999-5375 11/06/97 Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP NS 11/06/97 Rough Combo RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 11/06/97 Rough Combo TP NS 11/03/97 Roof/Reroof RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 11/03/97 Roof/Reroof TP AP SI REP FOR ZONE 1 NAILING REQ 10/31/97 Roof/Reroof RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 10/31/97 Roof/Reroof TP NR 10/30/97 Roof/Reroof RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 10/30/97 Roof/Reroof TP PA SECT 3-6, OK TO STOCK 10/17/97 Underground/Conduit-Wir RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 10/17/97 Underground/Conduit-Wir TP AP SITE LITES 10/08/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 10/08/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP POUR STRIP COMPLETE 10/06/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/? 10/06/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP POUR STRIP@ S 1-4, W 3-13 10/02/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 10/02/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP FTNS@ TRK DCK & ST WALL PNLS 09/30/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 09/30/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PK AP TRASH PANCI FTGS 09/26/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 09/26/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP NR 09/12/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C. ANDY/804-9302 09/12/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP G3&G4, CONT FTN TRK DOCK AREA 09/09/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 09/09/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP 8 LN. B-E CONT FTN 09/09/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP PNLS NW 1 & 2 09/08/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 09/08/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP PNLS E 7-13,T 1-11 & 2 SITE 09/08/97 Underground/Conduit-Wir RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 08/27/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/JASON/804-9243 HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE ••• .. 05/08/98 INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING FOR PERMIT# CB970875 DATE INSPECTION TYPE INSP ACT COMMENTS 08/27/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PK AP PANELS AS NOTED 8-26-97 08/26/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 08/26/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PK PA PANELS(N-1-6) (Wl0-12) (E 1-6) 08/25/97 Underground/Conduit-Wir RI RI C/ANDY/804-9.302 08/25/97 Underground/Conduit-Wir PK NR SERVICE CONDUIT COVERED W/O IN 08/13/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9302 08/13/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP PNLS SEE SI RPT #5 FOR 8/12 08/12/97 Steel/Bond Beam TP PI PNLS 08/12/97 Sewer/Water Service RI RI C/JASON/635-1526 08/12/97 Sewer/Water Service TP AP STORM DRAIN MAIN 08/12/97 Rough/Topout RI RI C/JASON/DPR/635-1526 07/17/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI C/ANDY/804-9320 07/17/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP SLAB & ENT FTN 07/14/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI R/ 07/14/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP CONT FTN A LN 07/11/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI BJ 07/11/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP SEE CARD 7/11 07/10/97 Underground/Under Floor RI RI B/HUGH/259-9300 07/10/97 Underground/Under Floor TP AP SEWER MAIN,LAT 07/09/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI BJ 07/09/97 Ftg/Foundation/Piers TP AP SPRD FTNS(INT) 07/09/97 Underground/Under Floor RI RI BJ 07/09/97 Underground/Under Floor TP AP SPRD FTNS(INT) HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE ••• FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB970875 PERMIT#: CB970875 PROJECT NAME: 62080 SF WAREHOUSE-SHELL,SMAC ADDRESS: 1695 FARADAY AV LOT# 109 CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/ANDY/804-9302 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: . CA' DATE: 12/04/97 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST BY "--~,+-,J,~;.;.....;..;_.;._-¥--INSPECTED: IN~~DATE /i!:'1fA/' APPROVED ~ 7 DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: __________ INSPECTED: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING <f'rRl;, PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB970875 PERMIT#: CB970875 PROJECT NAME: 62080 SF WAREHOUSE-SHELL,SMAC ADDRESS: 1695 FARADAY AV LOT# 109 CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/ANDY/804-9302 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA DATE: 12/04/97 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST i~ 1_1 DEC = 4 1991 I I ======================= ====='.=;"============;;;;,-=Jb. = INSPECTED B BY: (1 . aJ2.cL INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: P--jiRl9J APPROVED Y--DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED ~· . FINAL·BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE ~ING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB970875 PERMIT#: CB970875 PROJECT NAME: 62080 SF WAREHOUSE-SHELL,SMAC ADDRESS: 1695 FARADAY AV LOT# 109 CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: C/ANDY/804-9302 SEWER DIST:. CA WATER DIST: CA DATE DATE: 12/04/97 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST INSPECTED l ~ l BY: f_ , A.Ju INSPECTED: (2~ 2--Z..-97APPROVED _ DIS~PPROVED ~ INSPECTED L ~ J_ DATE INSPECTED: 1-7-q1 BY: l , · IJI INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: COMMENTS: ~:?Qflfi 70~~ ZS'-(9 j'b6e-=M,/,. hr~MJife@=&M #IJ:t,j!} APPROVED .ls... DISAPPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED "-II /-7-?1 7 --?. Blll vk... »f; J/JJ,t,v {J(J so Mer CC> V &fl, ~ HI tf'/?fTPA!lk# t ~R(p/. -I k_"'fl KLEINFELDER Construction Observation Report Project Name -~s...__.,_M...._..A...,c"" • .___1,.ei"'-'cJ:'---":ll:"-'1...,.0'-''l.__ ___________ ', ________ _ Date 8-.u,-u Client _ __.,~,_...M=.A."-'--".c.,__,.'-------------Project No . .S::1-"tS:oB-ol Project Location l!.'1$ EM?AON< Contractor_ .... 'D'"""P~-=K~-____________ Bldg. Permit No. _'\~1~0,__,'o~J~S:~---- DFR No. _ ___,M~-1~'2-'-------- Time Arrived -~l!~ro~----- Time Departed _i_:co~----- Reviewed by Date Reviewed ----------Travel Time ___ I.O _____ _ Type of Observations D Masonry D Welding D Bolting D Batch plant ~ Reinforcement Steel D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations , D Fireproofing D Metal Decking D Concrete D Soil D Other Documents Referenced ----------------------------------- Summary --------------------------------------- ~Ek t,H, M>1i\C,,E:Nf :ro Qfal1~1 -«:, CH) u:PtAleD v:ll'fr\: -"' 1:1{H:) e-ll '10.e, wl WD HacK. tl.fU1'\\:\t.A.D,Ot,\ ot,l ~7 (") E:DGH ~ \IS MArtHII-¼ "-] lf:lts :>ll>J:' B'( $1PG' Pf!()llloeb 6<( L& Report items comply Repo~ it~~oR1plete D Report items comply with exceptions Acknowledged by~-~..:·_---~..,,.·nc.~_/-= /4 _ _,,~"----~-----fe A'tf _,_,.1 <'7- Kleinfelder Represen~:eS/gnature Page __ of __ Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) (1yi/ F.ngineeringi5UrVf.1Yingif'l.iMinR STUART ENGINEERING 75LS Metrnpnlitan Dri,•e ~u1t1e 306 ~&1n Die-gn, c:aliforii,.:1 9210A (()19) 2%-10'\0 FAX ili'l'J) 2%·9:.!io .=uly 2, 1997 City of Carlsbad Engi:ieering 2075 Las ~almas Drive Ca=lsbad, CA 92009-485~ 716-97-03 SUBJECTi PROJECT NO. 97-0875 CERTIFICATION* OF PAD ELEVATIONS TO WHOM IT M.-r..Y CONCERN: On July 1, 1997, Stuart Engineering de~ermined the elev~tione of the pad in the locations shown on the att~ehed exhibits. The following table ~ummarizes the results of the field evaluation. *P~R STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL COOE, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ACT, SECTION 5735.5 CERTIFICATION IS DEFINRD AS: THE USE OF THE WORD 11 CERTIFY 11 OR 11 CBRTIFICATION11 BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER lN THE PRACTICE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING OR LAND SURVEYING CONSTITUTES AN EXPRESSION OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THOSE FACTS OR FINDINGS WHICH ARE THt SUBJECT O? THE CERTIFICATION, ANC DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OF GtJAAANTEE·1 EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. Sincerely, STUART ENOINEBRING ~~ R.C.E. No. ~7~32 Registration Expires March 311 2001 Sl?/bc c0'd 9lc6 96c 6t9 t£:£1 ~66T-c0-1nr ·1 S.M.A.C -CarlSbad Stuart Engineering Projsct No. 97-0e75 7525 Metropolitan Or. #308 San Diego, CA ;2108 Job No. 71'5-97-03 7/2197 As-Built pad Elevatlons DIFF!MNCE; LOCATION FINISH STRUCTURAL CALCULATl!D BETWEEN OF FIELD FLOOR SECTION l'AD CRADED VARIES BY SHOT PER ELEVATIONS PftOYID!D BY ELEVATION ELiVATIONS AND MOR!THAN EXHIBIT P!II\PLAN-OTHERS ASORADEO PROPOSl!!D 0.1' A2 247.50 0.83 24e.e7 246.59 -0.08 NO A3 247.50 0.83 246.67 2-48.6-4 -0.03 NO A4 247.50 0.83 246.67 24s.e; 0.02 NO AS 247.50 0.83 246.67 24e.ee 0.02 NO A6 2-47.50 0.83 24e.e7 246.75 0.08 NO A7 247.50 0.83 246.67 246.69 0.02 NO B1 247.50 0.83 2-48.87 246.65 -0.02 NO 82 247.50 0.83 246.67 246.63 -0.04 NO B8 2it7.50 0.83 246.67 246.75 0.08 NO C1 247.50 0.83 248.67 246.65 -0.02 NO C2 247.50 0.83 246.87 246.67 0.00 NO C3 247.50 0.83 248.67 246.70 0.03 NO C4 247.$0 0.83 246.67 246.67 0.00 NO C5 247.50 0.83 246.67 246.75 0.08 NO C6 247.50 0.83 248.67 246.65 -0.02 NO C7 247.50 0.83 246.87 246.60 -0.07 NO cs 247.50 O.B3 248.87 248.72 0.05 NO 01 247.50 0.83 246.67 246.76 0.09 NO 08 2-47.SO o.sa 246.67 248.76 0.09 NO e1 247.50 0.83 246.e7 246.78 0.09 NO E2 247.50 0.83 246.67 246.72 0.05 NO e3 2-47.50 0.83 24e.67 246.75 0.08 NO 1:4 2-47.50 0.83 246.67 246.75 o.os NO es 247.50 0.83 246.67 246.78 0.11 YES ' E6 247.50 0.83 24e.e7 24t1.83 0.16 YES E7 247.50 0.83 248.87 246.BO 0.13 YES es 247.50 0.83 246.67 2-4G.69 0.02 NO Page 1 of 1 £0'd 9lc6 96c 6t9 010t-96c-6t9 ~8N3 1~~n1s 2£:£1 ,:,661-c0-717f :>0'd ltl.LO.L @-l ~ I , I -A ·i~ i~. I~ i ~'"" ! ~~ i ~~.., I ~\ -...--------~--3~--+.--~----t----\-~-..._____, i /\· \ ! . \ r~~ ! /3/ I I Iv~ ! ~~ I I • I I I I I I 7----------•----r--·------·-•--I r 1 1 I I ~ I j ! *9,':-! f I 11) I _______ L _______ I _______ J _______ _ i I i I I t\ i I I \,0 I I i n~· ! , , ·v I I I I --•---+--•------I --•~----t----•--- 1 t I I I ,/ . I i ~<y I l I i1 I ____ · --+--------¥------~-------- ' I I I I " I I ' ~ I I I I . I I ~ i'1 · i I i\J ~ I I ~-----',__.,_~----------~---- ! r -,~~ ! .LI~: -! l\i lrF a -I ~ ~0'd 9~26 962 6t9 7-1 1 -1 997 1 0: 1 SAM FROM SM ITH_CONSUL TING-OUT 61 94523907 P.2 ...... SMAC WAREHOUSE .. ,-.... ~.. ~~. 4 .·. · _· Sn1ith ·c9ns·1:11ting . Architects CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER . 7 _1,.a7 SCA Project No.: 96223 -I SCA Date FILE No.' 676 12/19 '97 11:37 ID:CTE ESCONDIDO 760 746 9495 PAGE 2 CoNSTRUCTION ]EsTING & ENGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, GA • Z414 Vineyd Ave. Suite G Esrondld_o; _CA 92029 (76o) 7'1M955 (760) 746-98fl6 FAX Mr. Brian Hunsaker Hunsaker Management 1776 l Mitchell North Irvine. CA 92714 RMRSIPll,CA 490 E. PrlnC1liand Ct, Suite 7 Comnll, C'.A 91719 (909) 371-11!90 (909) 371-2161\ FAX VENTI!RA,CA 1645 Ptdftc Ave. ~Uill! 105 Oxnard. CA .9J033 (805) 486,6475 (805) 4~6-9016 FAX Subject: Review of Foundation and Grading Plans TRAcY, CA LANCASTJ!R, f.A mW. Urth Rd, 42156 10th St. W, Sulw 19 Unit~ Tr.tty, CA 9SH6 Lanr.a.~ter, CA 93534 (209) 839·2890 (805) 72f,9676 (209) 1m-2119t?f'E Jo~s~M2\tI~b'.23 Proposed Carlsbad II PIP Lot 18 Carlsbad Oaks Business Center Hunsaker Development lndustrial Building Reference: Mr. H ~msaker: Carlsbad, California Updated Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Concrete Tilt-up Structure Lot 18 Carlsbad Tract Map 10372 Carlsbad Oaks Business Center Carlsbadt Cnlifornia Prepared by Construction Testing & Engineering, lnc. Dated December 23, 1996 Pursuant to yot1r request, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has reviewed the foundation plans for the proposed Industrial Building prepared by Himes, Peters, Jepson Architects, lnc. dated September 22, 1997 and the project grading plan prepared by CTE dated September 19, l 997. The r(:!view was perfom1ed in an effort to identify potential conflicts with the recommendations contained within the reference reports. Based on our review the project plans were found to be consistent with the recommendations contained within the project geotechnical repo1t. The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any qL1estions regarding our recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully yours, CONSTRlf CTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. {}_J~ Rodney D. Ballard. GE #2173 Geotechnical Engineering Manager RDB:kms E:IPROJECTS\LETTERS\9ALLAllDl1.n>.<l,\I/PP GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION GROUND FAULT SYSTEM TEST REPORT CLIENT: LOCATION: ENGINEER: WITNESS: 0 O 1-t.J TEST EQUIP. ASSET# --z..o -6..:;, ETI JOB NUMBER: "Z.-""Z-73.7l8. DATE: //-/'f-'r? CALIBRATIO)J DATE: -z,--;_t::,.-Cj? SWITCHBOARD MANUFACTURER 5 ICM/d:fU..i SHOP ORDER NO, 6 I 7 -7 ~ 6 / L -1:1 I 6 ,l) 37 l l ~ <.) MAIN OVERCURRENT DEVICE [~lCIRCUIT BREAKER D FUSED SWITCH MFGR, .S/efr/ffNS. TYPE MODEL./CAT, NO. 5[15 5,?J,53-z.o~ CU'RRENT RATING SYSTEM VOL.TAGE .3 °-D6 78 o /z 71 VOL. TAGE RATING {. ~ <.) LJ GROUND FAULT SYSTEM /J D r;i· /<.. <' ..5, NEUTRAL.-GROUND STRAP :1:::::1 ce-R·S-SEEH:M:iNCE MFGR, MODEL CAT. NO PICK-UP RANGE SENSOR/C,T. .> 1'3 .$}J J 2-1"lJ 2o % -J?c I<-< 5 - .SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS ---MAIN BOND)NG JUMPER// GROUND EL.ECTRODE CONDUCTOR L-?<.-x / c 7" r o AWG o PER PHASE NEUTRAL.•GROUND LOCATION E1J~oRRECT D INCORRECT CONTROLPOWERTR~NSFORMER D CORRECTED BYCONTRACTOR /ll /~ MONITOR/TEST PANEL OPERATION ~'.CORRECT D INCORRECT BREAKER/SWITCH REACTION TIME (RT) MCM VA • 0 1/ ~~SECONDS REDUCED VOLTAGE TEST (55% RATED VOLTAGE) OcYCLES /A--//lf D CORRECT D INCORRECT PICK-UP CURRENT MINUS 25% ( __ AMPS) PICK•U1/Ct':1 RENT 'O <Jf.. ,;;.> AMPS ~-NO TRIP (CORRECT) D TRIP (INCORRECT) SYSTEM NEUTRAL INSULATION RESISTANCE TO GROUND ,Io O.? // pc-f3z;, c::> MEGOHMS TIME-CURRENT CALIBRATIOf\l TESTS PRIMARY CURRENT AMPERE-TURNS 6 4/ ~ /l. fr],:;, PERCENT PICK-UP ~l>:) tD ?. ~.? t OTHER TOTAL TIME .. /> fa REMARKS > 6r-_(_ GFSTR/90 ©1990 ETI REACTION RELAY TIME TIME ,o V • f , 6 l ., r --;::;. -> I- MFGR. TOLERANCE --{--/0--;;. -... + ct{ -/(::. cs PAGE __ OF __ 10-i;.1.,j-18&i7 2, 31 PM FROM SMITH_CONSUL.TING-OUT 6194523907 ARCHITECT'S FIELD· BULLE.TIN OWNER ARCHITECT CONSULTANTS PROJECT: S.M.A.C, Warehouse Lot 109 ARCH1T~CTS PROJECT NO: 96223 CONTRACTOR 181 FIELD ~ orHER· D Smith Consulting Architects Architecture and Planning F'IE.LD BULLETIN NUMBER: 7 DATE: 10/3/97 OWNER: S,M.A.C·. CONTRACTOR: DPR Construction This Bulletin directs you to proc.ied ilS indicated: CHANGE AUTHORIZATION: D In order to expedite the work and avoid or mil'\imize delayli1 in the work which may affect Contract sum or Contract Time, the Contract Documents are hereby amended as described below. Proceed with thi$ work promptly and :submit f.inal co:sts for Work involved end oheng~ in Contract Time (if any), for Inclusion In a sub-sequent Change Order. CLARIFICATION NOTICE: [gl Execute promptly the instructions given herein, which interpret the Co.ntract Documents or order minor changes In the work without change In Contract sum or Contr.1ct Tim~. lndloatlil your .acciptarce of theu in$tructions es conilstent with the contre.ot dooument$ end return a signed copy to the e.rchiteot, If you oonsider that a ohange in Contract Sum or Contract Time i1, r~uired, submit an itemized proposal to the architect immediately and before proceeding with this work. If your proposal Is found to be SQti$ft1ctory ;rnd in proper ord~r, this Bull~tln will be superHded by II Chanse Order. REQUEST FOR. PRO!='OSAL: 0 Chang~; d4lscrlb$d herein are b~lng oont;:ic;lered fer lncorporatic'n Into the work. Submit an itemized quote.tion, in format required by the Contraot Documents, in<lioating yo1Jr proposed changes 10 the Contract Sum or Contract Time. Do not proceed with the changes described herein un1ll further written instructions are l$$Ued by th~ Architect. DESCRIPTION: complete revisions to hold-down connections par str-uctural angineet's field visit as documented on the attached sketches, marked FB·7. rchitects P.2 .. i="ROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6194523907 FROM ; DPR CONSTRUCTlOM, rNC. SMAC I_, PHONE NO, : 17608049305 ',_. .' M.._,y ... 1,1,,-~ )11 r;J7 C /;7 µ;r, ~ . .. e ~ :t1tr1~ ~~r. ~~-~~@, " t. .. JL i • t. ,. • .1 P.3 Oct. 03 1997 09:39AM P2 P.OZ .. ..... FROM SMITH_CONSUt...TING-OUT 6194523907 rti fD~ Ml$;AU6JN~r Of' PAtJr;· ~ DwL-t; -.h-<N D £.L,A,e, PWlr·? A, UW IS@ fe-,-1 SH!hf ~~~ui P.4 P-03 19-03-1997 2:33PM ' Oct-03-97 ll:56 ,-' I ! l i I ! f=ROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT Si94523907 ---4. PANEL 4 /=00:iNo eE:LOH I i ~-"4 CONT. EX";;ND l=F<:Cl"'I _..-~ANEL END5 PE~@ OR@ v1 '' o Tl-lF<c ADSD ROD . H/ '$5T' cr'OX~ CONFO~INCI TO IC60 ~~~~:2':S .____· _JJ CONT. e-PEC.lt.L IN5/C>. !lt!!Q'O ft~ tA.Hlt.~t" ~ 4/V) PVVlr Ff.t,~l (--OOT1N&!f P.5 P.06 '•...,./ ,,_,, [~ MISSING! e Soun/ WAtL. pe, .. 1 S\4~1' :s O}:t, {I ·.._I F"ROM SMITH_CONSU:... TING-OUT 6194523907 P.6 'Oct-03-97 11:55 P.05 F',C. PAN.51... PEF2 PLA~ ' E~::V. ~l u:7;:-:::;e:-:-.~-:--·_ F'_O...;..U::.:.R..:...::.5 t..:.R...::1.:._f"...:T...:.Y..:..F...:... _.i,1,... , .... ~ ",(, i+-li-tl::ADED f-;;OD& HAiCH T &PACING WI FAN5l DW!..5 I j l--.i/ '&!::':' :!!=OXY CONFO~MJN<::, «4 D~LS @ 4.El"~.C. , ta" MIN. !..AF TO iC60 "EJiio!-S.27~ , PANEL E:NDS w.c.N.f / CONT 5F'l:C!AL 1NSP .. REa'D , r-4-CONT. _ I , . '1":" \ I . '1 . •y ~ 1 t , CCNC. SLA6 ON I I I ai~A E F':Ft P~AN r· , l ~~Y r - 1 -... '"1 I • . I I / I I : . /. \ : I' ( 1 L..----·-··----...J fix-V\JHE'.'f-' SLA?? pwus A~ MlbStN0 ._,. @ Co\?-M~-Of S-1 !<NV t-lo pe,.. 7 rE, ?h)R., 8.--·IO BY MAl'-.!OOOfC-~'4&,fdT tf oi=,C, ~- FRiJM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6194523907 P. 7 P.07 'Oct-03-97 11!55 '/z"o ~HREADED ROD& kl 'SE i' l;FDOX'r CONFO tfNG TO IC60 "E~-~21~ CONT. &?5CIAL. IN&F', R: 'C:::· ~ N ~ . b, b CONT CA.$i IN F'~,-'l.CE CCNCRETE -F,C .. FA'-;EL ,:,SR PLAN 4 ELEV. TYP. V1' JCiNT ==;;;f.~=~ .4.•4 DO~EL.S (V) F'cOI"' FOOTINC-:1 6E!..Ov-l 10-03-1~97 2:34PM Oct-03-97 11:56 l=ROM SM!TH_COf'..JSU ... TING-OUT 6194523907 ' I I r TfT I • I I, I j ==~-· • I l,.,_....,__,_, I I ·-·--·-··· ·,' ,,---···-·--,.,--,v---· L,i,,--,.,,---11----===== "'"'~llillli, 3. \-0 ''o T~R:!ADED RO::,::, 11'1 4" 0.C. jl,1/ ·~er EF'OX"f' CONFORMING -----. TO iCSO lt!=R-;21ca COl'-li. &PE:ClAL f'!&P. REQ'D '4 DWL.S WI &TC, ';)lZ)' l-l<. ~ EA. END PE!E: ~ 0~ ?J1> ~ ~1 P.8 P.08 Oct-24-97 08:53 P.02 __ --------------------------·--·------------~ i it Nore, RCO: FRAMING ~o~ $~OWN FO~ c_AR.ITY. l NOVEMBER 12, 1997 TIM PHILLIPS CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 LA PALMAS DR CARLSBAD, CA 92009 RE: SMAC -1695 FARADAY AVE. TIM, ALL SWITCHGEAR BUS AND LUG CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN TORQUED AS REQUIRED BY THE MANUFACTURER. INSTALLER: JOHN LUND WITNESS: BOB BEZIO DATE: 11 /5/97 12175 Dearborn Place • Poway, CA 92064 • (619) 486-1585 • FAX 486-4137 • Lie.# 547388 DEC-18-1997 10:41 ,_--.. KLEINFELDER 619 541 1645 P.02/02 Ill KLEINFELDER Ani;mploJ<H ~ tonrp;,ny December 1 s. 1997 Project No. # 51-4508-0 l f\LE COPl City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las l?~mas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 .. . ........ , __ ,..,...__,..,. SUBJECT: REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES PROJECT:. SMAC LOT #109 169.SFARADAYAVENUE CARLSBADt CALIFORNIA 92008 PERl\r1IT # 970875 As requested, y.,e have perfomed special inspection services for the subject project. The scope of our services included: ~, -, 0 I:~ ' (• ?• (~" I',, • Checking tbe placement of' remforcing steel; ... • Observation of field welding; · • Inspection of roof diaphragm nailing; · • Samplin&, testing~ and observation durlng fresh concrete placement; and • LaboratQry concrete compression testing, The work arJd materials that required special inspection was, to the best of our knowledge, perfonned in conformance with the approved project plans, specifications, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the "U!.tlform Building Code". · ..... ' If you have any questions, or need additional ic.formation, please contac:t .. our office. Sincerely, KLEINF'ELDE~ INC. ~l{u/) William C. Siegel~ PE Reaional Manager S l-4508-01/517LG298.DOC Copyright 199'1 Kleinfelder, Ine. December l 8, J 997 KLEINFELOER 955.SChes;irH>llki>l">rlv,• ,;11;1 .. ,n1 <:,"h: .. ,., ... rA n..,,..,., """"' ,r,n,P•• ·-·~ TOTAL P,02 Aug-04-97 09:15 6-~1 -1997 11 : 32AM FROM SMITH_CONSULT!NG-OUT 8194523907 t _?~M : ~~ CO--ST~UCTI Ct-I., l NC. SMAC N PH()',E NO. : 17608049305 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RA NO.: 17 T01 Smith Coruutting __ ,.__ OAT'Ee l-Atig-!7 0~ JOB 1110, 0~-17023-00 PROJ~: SMAC S\.IBJeer: .. e ... o,_~ ... b"""a .. A-lll""'s,,...LOC,,,.....k-ou'""T=-"- Sl"EC S!CTl~IOAAYw1alG NO.IOIIT .ta.I!.: S•4. S--5 S-Ci S• 7 JOl~H eeARING. ANOLES TH4T ARE IN THE SAM'; LOCATION AS Cot\C BAR BLOCK OUTS WIU. HAVE ONLY 2• OF INBECMGNT. CAN WE l.OWER THE CORO BARS AND SI-IORiiN ,.H~ Bl.~o_cx__;.o_u_u _________ _ 't'O AVOJO OIi.AV, IISPL V REO.UIREiO iV: 8/4/87 !IV; ----QC:--------------------------. --···-,. -----.. -~-,-,-....... l't1 Andy OATI:, ____ 91_1_/8_7 ___ _ 'RAM1.;;0.;..~;,;._ _________ _ cc: ---------- P.03 P.2 NOTE: PROViDE·~UJ·.-UJ'..:H6R,:,,. _.. _:: ., .. :.-:,,, W!-fERE·.REQ'D P.ER .. FLAN.' :. ·:.:··:.'.. :··_,··: . ' .~ •, ~· . . \ •", . ' ._: --''-"--7--------..;.....,.~-:.....,.., ~----....:,...;.~__:.,_;_ ___________ ~-L--.11 .' J : · . ·,. ',' '·.' LEDGER PER PLAN AND A.B'S PER~- PLYWOOD PER PLAN 3XNAILER OPEN WEB $TEEL JOIST PER PLAN TYF. <; JT& TYP. 11r,' 4V2' 4Vi' l½' w-S+vW-(o l.0-~t-vW-7 W .. q t-oW-lo w-10 row ... , 1 f-o+u__/ 5/ ocu.i11 ~ s \W . .. ·. '· . :n-1.l~D F.ORT'ICN WHE~ OCCURS FER PANEL_-ELEY:' . . . . . P.C. PANEL PER PLAN 'ELEV. Aug-04-97 09:58 7-31-1997 11:07AM .·{ FROM SMITH_C(.)N;:,ULllNU-UUI bl~"-=~~~'°' P.02 ,.,._~ J~l-31199710:SSAM P2 REQUEST fOR INFORMATION RF! NO.:_._ __ j....,,ie __ _ TO: Smith Conaul1it1g ATTN: CATE: 31•Jul•97 OM .J06 NO. d'f..§foz3-0Q P1IO.it:CT: $MAC SUIJIC'l":•s ... w~w!'l'!al"Jl, ... S .... -Pr'!A"'PN~El:~s.--- ~e $~10NJtlAAWINO NO./OIITAtL: S·3-S-7 ISP SK:--4 OflAIL ON 1$P DRAWINGS (JOIST SMOF DRAWING) HAS 'A TOTAL BEARtNG .OF P-7 ,,s·. DETAIL 2 ON S-7 HAS A 1i• ii.AAING PLATE. HOW LONG SHOU!.0 nus ANQ!L TO 1.\/'QIO Ql:1.AY, Fl.iPI.Y Rt:QUIR!O IY': l't'; ---- QQ; ----------------- SY1AN:ly JIKIN1.;;:;DP;;..;R;.;.._ _________ _ ) Aug-04-97 09:14 • 7-31-1997 11 :07AM . FROM SMITH_CONSU..TING-OOT 6194523907 P.02 P.2 "/:ROM : CPR CIJNSTRl.Cril:JN, Il'-C. Sl'1AC N PMCN: f-0. : l. ~9:30!1 Jul. 31 1997 1.0:~AM n REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RR NO.=--l~\!. __ 1'0~ Smitn Conaunir,g ATTN; C>ATE: 3i•Jul•97 CPR J06 NO. 03•97023•00 PROJECT: JMic ', SU&lreT: .B .. EA ...... Mi""'N .. G'""@'""S,..,-P...,A""'N""'E .... LS.,.._ __ Sl!'CC $1;CTIQNIQA,4WINQ NO,fOl:TA!L: S·3-S-7 ISP SK-4 m:TAIL ON ISP DAAWINQS (JOIST SHOP ORAWINGJ HAS A TOTAL SEARING OF 1"-7 l/8". OETAIL 2 ON S-7 HAS A 12• B.EAFUNG PL.ATE. HOW I.ONG SHOUL.O THIS ANGEL ~ Ti BE? ALSO ARE MORE ANCt40RS Nel:0!07 TO AVQf0 gtl,AY, Fi.iP\.Y RiOUIMt!O SY: l'Y: ---- ~: ------------------- av: AAdV mM:OPR OATJ: __ _c...;7/3..;;....;.119 ___ 1 ___ _ IIC!---------- ..... J.t '' .. 1'" l ) ) I L b --·· ... ·-~ KNEE BRACE OF £).CH CtRDER (TYP) SEE PlAN FOR LOCAflON 'A,S78 SK-1 SK-4 Reviewed for general confonnance to the contract documents. Tus review does not relieve tlw suhcontrnctor of the responsibility of making tl,e work conlonn to th~ requirements of the contract. The subcontractor is respon.siblc for all dimensions, com.'CI fabrication. and accurate fit with the work of other trades. Submittal# ___ /2<.J{B..,,c. _______ _ I)~-'17()25 .-bO > 7-24-1997 2:19PM FROM SMITH_CONSU~TING-OUT 5194523907 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RFI NO.: 12 ------- TO: Smith Consulting ATTN: Mike Platis OATE: · 2$-.Jul-97 OPR JOB NO. 03•97023-00 PROJECT: SMAC sueJEcr: ... A...,Nr-!rc'l"'!'Ao""'R=-:-:i.e=N.,...,o=r""'H ___ _ '5P6C Sl:!CilON/DRAWING NO./OHAIL: S-1 6,7 DETAIL 4 ON S·1 SILL PLATE ANCHOR BOLTS TO HAVE? INCH MIN, EMBEOMENT. DETAIL 1 2 ON S· 7 CALLS OUT 3/4 ANCHOR BOLTS. TO-AVOtD D!LAY, REPLY R!!OUIREO BY: EIY: ----cc:------------------ BY: Andy FIRM: DPR OATE: __ _...;.;7 / ..... 2 ..... 3/_9_7 ___ _ cc: --------- P.5 I r 1-<0M SM ITH_CONSUL T _l NG-OUT S 1 94523907 FROM: DPR CONSTP.UCiION,INC. SMAC N PHONe NO. : 176080~~3es .... ~1····•· ... ~!2_. : \ / I b''°-) ... ,'. ,, rr ~-7 Jul. 24 19~7 12:44PM P2 GLAZlN ,,•• II,,.···: ti:. Ill KLEINFELDER An employee owned company December 18, 1997 Project No.# 51-4508-01 City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 SUBJECT: REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES PROJECT: SMAC LOT #109 "4o95=-F~;A-:Y.=-A:-WNUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PERMIT # 970875 As requeste~, we have performed special inspection services for the subject project. The scope of our services included: • Checking the placement o_f reinforcing steel; · • Observation of field welding; • Inspection of roof diaphragm nailing; • Sampling, testing, and observation during fresh concrete placement; and • Laboratory concrete compression testing. The work and materials that required special inspection was, to the best of our knowledge, performed in conformance with the approved project plans, specifications, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the "Unifonn Building Cod~"· , If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely, KLEINFELDER, INC. ldhm4~ William C. Siegel, PE Regional Manager 51-4508-01/517LG298.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. December 18, 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax i· __ , , _..,__ .,.;;.. --.;;_ --: \ i I': Ill K L E I N F E L.j~ )E R \ J : . . . ... . -"".: ' ~, Constru_ction. O~se.rvation· Repo-rt ' '· • t ' ' - ~-. . r . It ' . Project Name--· -"''-"'*'-''~M:,,__:_:'....::_:_,,' .L'--'-' ----------'-----------'--Date -~/_c __ l_._-/_-_7'_7_ Client------'--~--:-'-'-------Project No. .$;° I-$1,.S:-ot-0 I DFR No ________ _ Project Location S'" b" U J V lt/v l't '-1.. ,.r N J;v 11 v (' l'Uf J..J .tf/J ,(} Contractor O /' le Bldg. Permit No. °I 7 (J f 7 S' Time Arrived _ _,_?~! _5_0---'/t_M __ Time Departed 2 .' J tJ /A;, Reviewed by _____________ Date Reviewed--------Travel Time ______ _ lype of Observations D Masonry D Welding D Bolting D Batch plant D Reinforcement Steel D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations D Fireproofing D Metal Decking D Concrete D Soil D Other Documents·~,-.--------------------------------.,._ Summary O dS.llf'l/~IO wot?l<t!A' ($.) 1.NSrt2,<-,--t:. /(tlor P1>1PIUl/lf,,,m #A-,' £.,'Nb c o/1/ ral(A1/N6 ro :rcao #l?S:tJ -r'£,t IJR11w/Ad .£-3 0A Tfr t> lb -;i ~-t/ 7 ft L (.. /;,JI£ L. o , ·~ b 7 ~ T It€ /JI! f T T fl tf t-tJ It I'( t, O// S:l>f' V If P b-t 61 r o -r11e llf'l" Or /VI y l,-,1 w ; T II /U'1,,,.. A>() V £ ,t:) . Jt-1 0/? f( IVV:1/U £t/ )/J CcJ(),E ,J I D Report items comply · D Report items incomplete Acknowledged by ~~ I 'L)):? Representing -------1"-""'--"-r~fl1'---'-. ________ _ D Report items comply with exceptions -V lfcJt- Page __ of __ F-1 (9/93) Kleinfelder Representative Print Name :,.,, t ·~ \ / -..,._'-/ - '-; J . ' t' . . ; Ill K L E I N F:E ft D:tE R · . · . 1donstruction "· Project Nc)me--.._~(~--'/Vt:;__--'-' ~A._.__,_,_· _C ________________ _ Client ______________ Project No .. S,/ .... 3/$"() J' -6 J Project Location ,,5/0-? ///I /II II Llt!/1/ W/Jo/ C AHL (ML2 Contractor K) /2 If Bldg. Permit No. q 7 0 /' 7 S' Reviewed by _____________ Date Reviewed-------- Date _j~tJ_-_.J_()_-~9_7 __ DFR No ________ _ Time Arrived _/~/J_,a_t;_~~-??-7~- Time Departed _]_;],_' _rJ_/._;A;i_-+- 1 Travel Time---~--'- Type of Observations D Masonry D Batch plant D Foundations D Concrete le.,_ • , •• b wif(cnni.: -~'=" -"CS Reinf3rcemi~f~t~el ' .'.';.'..,;...::..:,C:_.;.:. ' ·cf'Fire·p~o~finb ' • -· o soil' ·i · D Bolting D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Metal Decking D Other Documents Referenced ---------------------------------- Summary Ol,.S£tff/£a WtJt(/(ErlS __ (~) 1-JV~VJLLt'H(;.. ·;r:otJF p/11191/)'IJc,r ... N!J,--t... /µ(,. Co;,,rc;t1vi,·tVt:. TQ J:ci/o ~It$'.;( -/'/tf IJ//./l.jA)'1/f/t:. S-,J_-.. . /,[" [;hAPI/A''A(!,M /1///;i-/#$ Sc11Euv,E. Tw-tJ rJRE>tJS 1!lJ..V£ #_t. 'ZOP£ :/f .:J.. tJ/1/ Suv7'!~ IF'#D.JOF .tfviLIP/#6 -A(,!1~-L//./6. Ca.M~~-e"Tr&J. Z O# If-# :L ;) 1/ fr 61/ /Vlld rtt '?:ff ,,v.o o,C Lf V! Lo ,:.-Vo -/1/A-~·1....'/A/6 Tf/L Jvo1ur :C .. O-ti.f"c/(Vif4 1 M;AJ To 'r>iJ" ({ijr· 6-r ..MY /r,vqtv,Jl!'.06,Jt" &tft:oaM LLJ ; .N'. a c c.o te OA/Vc ~ w, ·;-11 A l"l'fitJI/ E,t;> l"~-"'/V'...t) S~rc,·.r-;CP1 ;-,, ·r:1,,,.,-...r, \ \ D Report items comply D Report items comply with exceptions Page __ of __ Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) ,r,: ' ' -/ ·' ' Project Nam,e-· __ s_· _; _M_·~-~· ~A.__._,,~c_~,~·-------------,-------- Client -------------· ProjectNo. S:i.,;.'iSoi -O/ Project Location . S' fa 7 · //A Al A Lt.. c/V WA y c A ;f/.. .f 4 1t LJ DFR No. ________ _ Contractor __ ..c.c/)'--"-f'--'lf'-'----------Bldg. Permit No. '2 7P I' ? S Time Arrived f' Q{) A-M Time Departed :J ~ 1.d /' A-"1 .· Reviewed by _____________ Date Reviewed _______ _ Travel Time ______ _ Type of Observations \, '. ' .... ,_Jo..,._ -'f, 0 Masonry D Batch plant . D Foundations 1 , ti ~1¥'•"""'-ri4~~~-"''' .,. · ff •••• _,, r· •, I •1~-,.~~ ~ ........ _,., i -•·i.1-1 •' .... ~ •• • D Vveidlng"· r•---D Reinforcerrient 'Steel .......,. . .............,'I"' · . T'.J'i=l°reprdofin'g ' 0 Concrete · o s6,1 . .,. D Bolting D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Metal Decking D Other Documents Referenced --------------------------------- . ', ::- Swm'rr~ry :. tJ.if'p/tl/.ilP · '111(1~-:e, tN f, . ei/(J:uB/IA·d d, .. tf,Y :f.: . M:(i. oft it v,, ;;v" . ' .. ' .. -. "'-·--. D Reportiteriis comply D R~port ite~s-c"orriply with exceptions . Page __ of __ Kleinf"der Representative Print Name F·1 (9/93) ~ I Ill KLEINFELDER L . c·onstruction Observatio.n Report Project Name ___ . .::,:;&c:... .. ..!...~-_,-M~__._---'A"--'-<,-:C"-L ________________ _ Date -"--/_O_-_oJc__=c..J_· -~: '=···_,_7_· _ Client ______________ Project No. r'l-'f.5otl -O I DFR No, ________ _ Project Location .S:-I/J1 YA-# A l.(£11/ felt Y L/tKL..,fif/112 Time Arrived 7; QP A-'i!!'i. Contractor b ll Bldg. Permit No. ·7 7 (J f 7 S Time Departed :) ~ J O /?11'1 Reviewed by _____________ Date Reviewed--------Travel Time _______ _ Type of Observations D Masonry D Welding D Bolting 0 Batch plant D Reinforcement Steel D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations D Fireproofing D Metal Decking D Concrete 0 Soil D Other Documents Referenced ----------------------------------~ Summary ----=CJ'--'A~.£4fi~z =c,.lf..L.l(-'C;t',C....::p:..,______,,,W-"'-"e'-"t."'--"IJ'-'1c.L'fll"'-'-'(.,,,___+f-"'~=/4'=---f'--'' ()"-"/e"--"#,;_r;;_P.:__P _ _,/(c:.....LY _ _,,,,,J..,,,____;::C_,,,,,£'-"'/t"--'T.'--'1'-'L·E,_,,_.,'i!.'--".r 4"'---'W,,:::__:_:t:_::" t..:::.:P.:::__,:t".;,,:,, ... '/?'--'--- /J .1 /p (,. .SP.AW hl/7/-1 E;t-(£/t' 'j1/I./Jl,T&,1f/AL 6 7()/f:, µl.o/#6 \ 'J"oj.f r /tPP -:J'(),·,tr 7tJ .Jf,r.,,-l'lA-T.E &tr PJf/tW'I#(> ,f-6 -· t?£TA,'t., #J -irAl',i-:£ 7<:> .S /2 A-'r ,P L.117",t! /;4,e T ,A,1.,. ll.Al'£7Rn T; a,t;,1 l?tJVlfU 4.& 1,,-.,t'I.. -.tf-V ,S /I-e /U.:. f o O 1Jd(££v£ efJ ?,-h;::,, :,,V, ~ /rtv1f1: /-7!..A T~ r(,) .J/19c--r e'i-t't:TL /.1;,10 If#//£ JS'LA-7/1: 70 SIJ/f7 /1.vQ :7Q/St TtJ SJflfr /L. ~ rf· .#A PRA w,'#6 .C --"1,-PtrAJL 1#:19', Asta Vr-Jf/?,/5'.c? /ILL. (01..u/JA/V °JfA.f£ p'L,&-Tl.!J 'I AJVC.//u;f' t!ot..l..f -j!IVTS d# J,,rH S,"tJlt' t.>/ /'~IJ T£' AND l'JJ?YP'/9-'CM /£/1-<:-1t CO'-V/!A H /1A:..f£ /?lfA' ., / Page __ of __ tftG1'#/lCO Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) ',,1l,-,.-,,~'i't,•~,.f .. ..., • .,,.,,,.1,\,~,,,1,-'l'1"/,1{~,',::,./,/1•,)ft::~ .',,~t~-·~')' •. ,~, •fl..,_,1'"'1,-,,('1i'•'~1'<'•,~•{•:'(Jt • '•t (~-1.,•i':\-,!'hi' "\'1·~1•, ,,• 'l'''i;,,.-"4 ,,f'~,. \ I " 'II • ~ 1. .. ;• r ' '' j ' • .. f< ¥ ,,,_, !-i', ;, : •• / f . , .. ' Iii ~K J E I N }F Ei L D E R . · . l/ Construction Observation · Report , C. At1 .1 t- Project Nam_e _ _, ___ -r_,_,_, __,_M,_,_·,_~ --'-l)_,___• __ .c....l _---'-------------- ' ' ' Date _..,_/~6-~~ol~:J~ .. -..: -"-9~l'---_ Client---------------,,'--· Project rt9. ,...·--~------- Project Location _S __ l=-0---'7--=Y,-='/l._,yil'--,_,_A,--=L,_L='e__,_/V_·_.,1k~ll-"-t--' C=-"-'11-_,_,l/""'L-=.f_._.lt~A_.O __ _ Contractor _ ___./)~e-"/f__,__ _______ -../Hl'dg. R'er~irN'o~:: Cj 70 f 7 r- DFR No. ________ _ Time Arrived 7; 00 A/Yi Time Departed ?/ 3a l°A-'t Reviewed bY-------------Date Reviewed--~-----Travel Time _______ _ Type of Observations 0 Masonry O Batch plant O Foundations O. Concrete D We.lding . · , -Q-Reimfon!:(;)r:nent StEJ'el , . -, 0 'Fir.epri;iqfing. ~ · · . · . Q. Soil ·1 ... ~ · D Bolting O Pre-Post tensioned Tendon D Metal Decking D Other ;...__ _________________ __,. _________________________ _, / Documents Referenced --~------------------------------- .. , -Summary O /1 .. J/t(J(l.? W/!l, o,db eL D fOBMl'.,P fl, Y :t. C/[£7/Et'.t'L2 }#/'(. I:)£ ,f \.J' /I SAn.ttki ·w/111 E,'Lt.1!,,f· MAtcif/At. 6701!. /;vff..b /,,.vc,, c.o.tV.r,srcp ~ ' s ,...· )'' wtt..tJ,, .•. ''i' A I JrJ1.1i:1-11 £,.;19 Or t!ViL I? /N'6 r //LS() O/f$lf/v;(~ L-) . .,.. {lM< r/£ -;roi.( r Wrll(M. W 0/{t<M AN SH,'/" i l 0 Report items comply . Page __ of __ ,F-1 (9/93) iN Kleinfelder Representativ~ Print Name ,, ,. ,A ,, ,, ll 7 G ;1 · ,;, .. ;.~ I Ill tK L/ I N :F E:L D ER -tJ. ,.,: ' ' . ' . . '"···construct1·on Observation Report Project Name __ _.,.,S"'-----'-,._,_M"---'--·---"·._c....:,4_.___,_,_C"'--_'_,_, ·_··-------'--·-~J _____ _ Client--------------ProjectNo. SI~ ~s:of-o I Project Location S: f O 7 VJ.It.I A LI..,€,.,, Wfi Y · CA /11-t/19./) Contractor-,. /) f' If . .Bldg. P\:)rmifNo:...~· q 70 I 7 S Reviewed by Date Reviewed· _______ _ Date _,,/_0_--=r;2.'-----'-/~~----"'7_'7_· · __ Di=R No, _______ _ Time Arrived 7 .' cJ O /IM Time Departed J ; J () //r; • Travel Time ______ _ 'lype of Observations 0 Masonry D Batch plant D Foundations D· Concrete 'D-·Sqil), D Other GJ' Wefd1t:ig · 1 0 Bolting !!i, ReiQforcEjment Sti:,et· D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon ;-Q Fir~prq'qfing , • ; D Metal Decking Documents Referenced -------------------------------- Summary 08SEA'/lej) WIELa,"/1/6,. ecJ(~<>,8,½e'.(') /JY !Wt> (;}) C/.£;ert'r1/:L2 . ' WliL,?M .f' U, r, :Al"-S. M A w 14,11 fr# ·· f, · L(... £ /t M 11-TM /A t.. E '70 / i'r . .,_' I< f I < b,£/t> c So 1111-1 .r,· ,:;>1,; o;c ,tfv,' t:..e, ,:Vt;.. At..!' i) Q;ve ct; CE4z,E,i,t:,r2 ½ /1 l y,._ I' /J J l'I h.1trL12££) wet..o,·µr.,_ $!' Ei L 1.. c r lv~t..oS -2 L.tAJG Tit o Ct'i117£A'J - i If/ f ll,r ;,,,.. ; TT f,,v F rt.. l-f r t,.,,/ ~ tJ,.J ,. t> µ lf X t! It it..£/ o /v C ,'tf .01: If> // d ~/VO Gt(/0 7/i /}Lo,v/2 GIUo 10D 1 ' -SE£ O(ftl,v//1/& S/1££1#-S-J, Trft .. .o t.c.e /v/-.o /f/VP ;:::£) r. co.,.,,,,,,,;v -rHL (N"Q/(I( :C. 0 ,f;J£Y)ft> /,,,/1/ /d Tl-fe 1.!tf..J'J.. or All~ f('/>il)Wt.,1./,0c;,4 />,l:tf' f:'o/f.A'l/!'P / ACC4,;t'PAN'Cd[! µ.,ff/' ,-,//£4(£.f&? /LAe£C/ .[/'.t'c,'c/Chr,mf'; NM"X'fl,Ad(/·/..'J? ,A.Np ('a ,,PE..f D Report items comply D Report items comply with exCeJ?tions Page_of __ F-1 (9/93) . \ A l .. ,· .'. ,. .-. ).. . . ' ' r· . _.k.., -. . ',: ;' ' .,.,,-.,. ,n ~ .; •) l t ¥,. ,, .... .,' ' ' " Project Name---.:_.._.;,,,· L.,_ . ...:...,._/JI/--'-"--'-...:...' _fl._,_.,_,_(.= __ ,__ ____________ _ Client _____________ Project No . .5/~ ks-of'--0 / Date / 6 ~ 02"0 -9 7 DFR No, _______ _ Project Location <.,S/10 7 VA# /J L. (.£ /I/ W /J Y CAtfl..[,4/J .0 Time Arrived 7 ;ao J9 F1"i Time Departed 3 { 1 0 / A'\ Contractor t) p /f Bldg. Permit No. f/ 7 () y 7 $ Reviewed bY-----~-------Date Reviewed _____ __,_ __ Travel Time ______ _ Type of Observations .I, ,'' \ \: D Masonry y' W~ld\pg . . 'i D Bolting D Batch plant !Il1 Rei9forc1men} St9i~I . J, • D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations q flr19pr~·qfing , f' · D Metal Decking q Concrete D:·Soil -• .. I • l \ ,, D Other Documents Referenced __________________________ '_,.\ _______ _ Surnmc;1ry lM>'Z:tv{CS /)lf/-t..1...·/llt:.; c;:t.1'.A;;/,.;&1 AJ'VO 1AIS71J<-.t.,,iv6 ¾ I', J t/££ lib [ a ;fa/I ~ 7tl'f?o11t:, d Av 6' t..l( :Z.;?oA.1 Iv; 7 ti ZJ?a )( y C~/?""1/416. ro .:{,...c,,..ia E/f-S"tfl 11 P~lc ffFI fk-3I '":-/Jh rco /o-9-~f1 - I W tJ RI( .Z OlfU /c 1/£4 I# /J f Lo rd,! _/J,.l'.CT tJ / ~ Y /,1';¥4 W Lt:-<,;Jt; L D Report items comply D Report Hems comply with exceptions Kleinfeldlf Representative Signature Page __ of __ Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) \ I) ,I , ' 1' '' • \ ' ... ""~' .... ' Ill· K t d N F ~ l_ D E R ,J Construction Obse·rva.tion Report Pi:0Je9fName __ S:~'~M_· _,_/t_._C_·_, ~-~----------------Date _·_/_tJ_ .. _)a_·~~-·1_'? __ _ Client ______________ Project No. '.SI -'-i-S-ol -O I Project Location f; f tJ f VA JI/ A l <. £ rv · ~G · C l'J If L J /JI? If) DFR No, ________ _ Time Arrived 7 : J CJ A A< Contractor __ ~/2....__,P_tf~-------Bldg. Permit No. _'1~7_o=--=Ji_7_S __ _ Time Departed '3 : ] 0 f? ~ Reviewed by Date Reviewed _______ _ Travel Time _______ _ Type of Observations ·D Masonry D Welding ·o Bolting D Batc·h-plant Q Reinforcement Steel D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations D fireproofing D Metal Decking 1 D Concrete 0 Soil D Other Documents Referenced ---------------------------------- Summary 0 /l.(lflfll/112 C.e1P1,·e1°E,:; wt:~PC:11" vs,>v'~ S'N<AW w,·7'1 l\'i..1r rlf /liA L . £ 7() II. wuL o/N G ca v..r i/.fr,r,,o QE wi!~J2/#G TO G ill o EA,C 71--11'. ) D Report items comply D Report items comply with exce12tions ~ll4a6- Kleinfelder Representative Signature Page __ of __ Kleinfelder Representative Priat Name F-1 (9/93) ~ J, :.':.:1,.j-....,, .. 1.J,, ....... ' .. ·,. ' ,,,--1,/ ... •• ' .i• r ' ',' '«d-·· ' :. l ,.. . ! \ ...... ... ,-,, . ,;., .... Co11:structio.n _Ollservati'on Re·po·rt ·-. ·-';' . ' ~ Project Name----=· ......... =(,__,_, ....;M_· 0~. =-.~ ,..::.A_,__-__,C'--,-'-,,-'_· ___ ..___.~--'-----,-'~~----Date-· _,__/_l)_-_·y--'--_ -_·_,__f..._.7 __ _ f.: Client-~---~-------Project No: '· .. tJ-• 9SD 1-O / Projectlocation S!tJ 1 llA/11 A l.:LIN WAYJ(6 Cf-A)?L .riAo DFR No, ________ _ \.· Contractor OP If Bldg. ;~rmit N~. ·9 7tJ/'7.C: Time Arrived 2: f O A41 Time Departed I I.' _t c> AM Reviewed by Date Reviewed---~----Travel Time _______ _ Type of Observations D Masonry . D t Wel9i_r:ig 'o'solti~g • _J -' . D Batch plant .. -~-CJ !'leipfOJS§l!JlEint.Steel • .J. ~. .t·y .... -'? .... -• --t:: -'I- D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations • 1,. D ,Eireproofing •• "t -...:: ' D Metal Decking ~ ... ,, -~ • < D Concrete D Soil D Other Documents Referenced ______________ __,:,'--· -------------------- '',:, .... -~ ·----·--------------------------------------------- ~- / 1 D .Report.items q:m:iply Page __ of __ F-1 (9/93) ro ..._~ ,..,..'!"'r""-'" cL/!r,·r,'d'JttJ .... I{ 7,u r, Tl·M /(/1.J'r Kleinfelder Representative Print Name •· ' \I 11 ,, ..... 1 .,, ' l ' -; .. , r' I ',ti'\-,1' ·~~ •:'" ,• •,,, ' ' ·. f , .. ,/ . 111~ K -L ~i-~: ~-F. EL ~-E,,R i t·~ . · .. ~ ~ Co:n_struction Observation Report ' .... l · ProjectNa'me ______ ""__,_,'£'--'-; _._M=-,-, =•f1-1_C=-------------~--- i Date _/_o_.-_l_-_9~7_' __ Client --------------~· Project No. S /-l./>'Oi' ~ 0 I Project Loca,tiOliJ . ; $,:? o ? VA// /It. l# IV 'w11;:4.: ~--CA l(L £.tfd .o DFR No,------~- Time Arrived _?_.'~J_o_-4-~,:._ldf~-_ Contractor--"-'·· _ZJY.~'--"-ll( ________ Bldg. Permit No. o/ 7 Q/' 7-> Time Depar:ted J ,' Jo /'M Reviewed by~-:_''-: ___________ Date Revje'~,ed -~------Travel Time ______ _ .-' _, Type of O~servations '·. 1 D Masonry _ D ,~at,P'} p~an:t::: / ..1.? . D~Weldiogv .:, : .... _Q Reinforc.ement,Steei ,..i. ,. ~ -If " G , • '--• ' l I-~ f . ~1 ,._el-- D Bolting D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations ; D !Fireproofing ·-~ -·-It) -~ -1.- 0 Metal Decking D Concrete -. ;0 Spil·;. D Other Documents Referenced -------------------------------- .• $ummary OJ/..J.elef/t:a :1·. Cp"£7;~F,'E£> .W.¢LP/A" (,IS/µt; 'r(/IW ·w; ti-I · E/L1,,-lf?f,: /4';/4.ulfz°(Jt, ./Vd '.2_~( Ec11 h/ .WA.[._ /9/1/",A?of/E&J. ·AY ·Cfit.//1i(,·. Si>AIC. · fitt :.ll/t..l l'/111-,vt' <o!fVv/rtS47¥ o-4,i · w/-7/t j'OOr -ft.t!VFJ 7/0N~ ,At.I)? C6/t:> C AT £11c1-1. Co,v.MN LdCAT,/t:1,,,.,/ Ir /t fgc£;;Tt!)CtJt..v/ku tt 1 ~ovT// /i')l,I.J> o,-C/ft"O C < /Jt,.·Jo, or'· V1J.,;-_f,:;; ;: 1 7 · .¼,, ;::'J(;,t1/t..$.S,.· "Oi;?;'t,c:i:.WC..-Jr ··c,llf,11-_,;.,,/_,,.;.~ )I ·,-t~~ l,..v-~T,1<.t...~:,,,V(.. _· .P; ,.7/ltt£Atu·a. ·;tops JviTtf E/dl)l.y Co.#rtJflM ,·,v~ la J;.c,<tt} ,G ~-J;.:i71 · It/ r'rd11crvilf11t: e>LT/1/.t. PA-1//.J 10 -J -'!.J-? s11.eirs ,r l-1d 1 £)(-~ s )( -// . A~):.> SJ( -/ ~ I , ' I 7 £ i,Jll ,r ' J.. o.4:.SEd//£1'.7 WA s 7 0 71'"/e ES-T Or' My p Report. i\l3mS comply Acknowleqged bY------'-~,,_,__,,,..._=-».,,__ _____ _ : · D Report items comply vyith. exc$ptions . ~~Id,, fuel ~r Representative Signature ,, Representing __ __.;_..__._ ___________ _ Page_of __ .&G;NALO ./1AY.£S Kh:iinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) •, -: ',, \I :j ., ,,· .,i' ,, ,, 2~· :!:.\' __ ,:-.. ' . ' ')fl . " ~ ,! * ' ~ I -<,,," ,,,,,:''' ', .. , .:.11 ,i 'I'', r.,, ,1' ,-, 1 : ·: ( / . . ! t ''I~" ~ ; l . . ' -... _' ... -' 'r, ' ' ! -'I~~.,.. . >' I 111~ K 1L E::;t i'N F E L D (R - .:·._·c·onstructlon O·b-se~ation Report ' ' . '' . ' r, '• t. ·Projeqt Name __ ·_ .. ~_,(~-~'_'~·/J1_' ~~·-~/r..,_.: _,_· '~(-· _· _.· _·, _· ·~-------'-,-c-~-~-----~ t'-·. Client-------~-----ProfectNo. S/~ '-1.SIJY-_o 1· · Dafe_-"-/,...,,_O~--_,_·--~2~7_· _ DFR No.---~---- Time Arrived,2:J!.: 1 0 ,4 A1 Time Departed 6 ~' d O /' N\ Travel Time------~ ;' :i _ _,_ Project Location :...,Cl D7 VAN /It.. l.,E/11\ WIIY c A tfLS Mo Contractor ___ ~f)-f~Jf _______ Bldg. Permit N9. -~9_7_()~f~7_S __ •,' Reviewed by __ ------------Date Rev:ie~.ed _______ _ . l ' Type of·Observations . D -Masonry·, D Batch pl?J,nt · · ,:/ D Foundations ""'.t I ).:, i ' \. I . ·' . ··~. } o\Neldi~g . t;, : ~ i' D ~eififor~emeht'Sfeel ;{ !'.' .... : '... ~~ [] '.(irep}oofing . · D Bolting J D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Metal Decking '1', D Concrete ,0 Soil-'( • D Other Documents 'Referenced --------------------------------- ,.· ,, ,,. • ,, 1-,.,, , . ;;, . .... ' .. N () lf,Tp WA: C..t_ If,(-/JA;f T" r7 /-I ;VD . .(Jd Tr dM w /; C.Q ; ',,v-, l~~ .0:1' ~, ' ' D Report ifems comply . D Report,items incomplete.. . D Report item~ comply. )Nith exqiptjons .. Acknowle~ged ~Cs . Klelnfeb:::d:L~:df-, Representing '"· _ ~~~ ~ · R £ (;j NA L D R, At£~ Page --of --Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) ;_f, ' ·" ', ,~ \' ',,, .. \ ·, ,, -~-, I , ·c:o.n·st.ru·cti-on 0-bse:rvation Repo·rt '1- .' Pr~jectName _· __ · -""s"'-·'1--,,·mµ·,.__._,,'-.,q-"--,:....' c_·_,.'-· ---------"-'---'--------·10-· ,_·q 7 bate ________ _ yliE/nt .J-' ---------'---'------Project No: S/~ 'f$tJ3 ~ 0 / Project Location S:f tJ I VAN Al LI /II Wfl Y C 11/t L $ /IA.{) Contractor O f I( Bldg. Permit No. q -, /J J 7 _s; Reviewed bY---------'----Date Reviewed-------- DFR No ________ _ Time Arrived _7_:_.J_4_A_A_"'l_· _ Time Departed~]~: J~o_,e'-'~'-'---'--- Travel Time ______ _ , Type of Observations D Masonry l D Batch plant D Foundations D Concrete ,I . " , .. \ t iif D1,:i~1elHlng · ' · 1 t-r• 1, , , 't { .[:j Re/fifiprcem~)1t'Steel '4~ + , 11 n 1 • -., 1 -·•. -· 11 , , · D ' · , 1 ,., ,.,.., •. -·«I!:..) :;f1reproofin·g · -, .• , , Soil 1 D Bolting 0 Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Metal Decking D Other Documents Referenced ---------------'----'------------------, . '- S.,LimmaJy Ot{.f'Rd!l#t?' l/VE_l P1~b , £.E/tri>RM#tti J:1Y. J <:#'AT/~/4.i:J ' _., ,' iv' it. o:i,r ~ ·. ~u {/;;,t;, ' JMAW-.. -Jth' i'ii ·_' f/t ~/.!;,-ht /l7/£iA 4 _· JC'7~~;, . : /,ut lo 1-:V/> · · C oJv· .I ;'$Tl/a -_or. . Jvlf~.d/NC. Jtlf/l'IJ/f St' Zp' .5 # S>; -,.#,6,; , 7 /;v/[La T,. 4 1" -VI" C f)/tl.f7"1'//C r,· tJ/V ;flf-lft:1/'f "' Or ,(fv/L~/#~, ,7o;" ' .... •: Pc;( E'.d,(t,tJf-/# . i;., 0 A<"C Q..lt!a ,l!f#C/ /-v17"/7 ,t9,t'1//(aYL'4 I, J 0 Report'_items ~om ply D 'Repo~rt items inqomP,°lete· _ D_ Report· items comply with excepti9ns Acknowledged by ~ : , . . ... ~ ~I{~ { Klein~~ative Signature , Represe~ting Df~ ~#JC-tO '"'-. -~CWI. "·/ -·· ,<: '}i -----1/½'--'-\: .,__£-=-&_,__,14/'--"'----+-'A'-=L=-=L)'-----'/j"""'-----'-A--'--T.:=-6-=S==------:1~~9:) -of --IQelnfelde, Rep,esentat;ve Priot Name --J '·{ '' ' ,;;; I, •• 111. l<·L EI N FELDER • , I• ,r" • ' . ' . .. Co:nstruction ·, O·bservi:lti<>n· Report. ,•-' . " . -. . ' ' . ·J,. .J ' , .... '>II -... ~ ....... • ... , l, ' ... ~. ''l '·'-::\;· /,_,· ':J···.,.:M .. _·.·,_c)· · •.. ·.·c··_. .. ··-: .· :,, :if•,.,, ' · • -' r : ,_ ~ ;;,, • •• 1P.roject'NJ~rt,~-c'.: __ · '-"",--' ~~.,.,--~~~-----,.~--··..,....r·---,-·.,-· _·,..,..":..,..:-'.~--· ·~.-~~---Date· .,;/4 .,· li~-~t 2 · ' . : ·('' " -• ' • ,. '' , ' ,; ,:.. -.,. ·~ ,J' , · · Client ...c•··--'-'-..,_,,,c,--------'----· Project· No.------~~-PFR No .. _,__-~~--,-- .:;::. ·P'roj'e'ttLC:>cation 'f:fO 7 J/tJ'# ,/!Ll.l.f/i/ WA-.·t r. 'c,1&t.f!l{4t,' Time Arrived 1: ot) ·;9,,.,~ 'ti Contractor ____ :_:/2_,e~·-I[~· ___ ·_·_· __ Bldg.PerrnitN~. 'f 70 f 7 S--Time Departed 3,'J4 /',11 Reviewed by Date Reviewed--------Travel Time ______ _ Type of Observations D Masonry D Welding D Bolting D Batch plant · D Reinforcem~nt Steel D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations D .Fireproofing D Metal Decking D Concrete D Soil D Other Documents Referenced--------------------~------------- Summary 0J£1flf:VEO .f C£.1rr.'f,£n /lllf'L,0/;Jf Uf/µ{,. d'Mdld w,'T/-1 ,F ,.t.L&lf m;.J 7£ff/4t. £ 2r2ld' , i,v.eLo i.;..,{;. Co;/S,,S:/El:) r}f ,11 I< . t, .c p_, I / OA' ON£ L.MO I' If AT C.B,/o C. Tf/REA:o!Jo /rt1t1S Tflteout:li ltM(;.L/.'. Z:/lt>N .b(_/1/-1 cJ?o;<y CouEoAA{u',vb TO :t. C/f6 ~/f-S:!22'11 e~lf rf I--#= 3/ -01t1tf,O lo-1-97 t 1-1 ,: ie: o II" x :r o A .r£ Jt vE o w1tJ . T1J P£J(Fol(Mca /N /JC( O/e/?Ac-c,( 14;rtt w Ok/r& J.>nSJ.l,·e,, A Mt> . ( oot Cr D Report items comply D Report items.comply with exceptions Representing _____ _,,p,,,_,1,__P-,fZ.~ ..... ~ .... --f4-71_,..'!..=M:~~IM-· - ,,/' .t.. A /o/ SJ .f ll C //'/CA I~ d,,,..,, .f_,, Jr-::.-.:~. Page __ of __ . Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) I i ..,,·,' ,,,_II L L \, Ill K_;i E I N F E L D E R 1 ( \ J L~ -} . Construction. Observation Report ? ,:) Projec;tNc1me . :s;. NI, .. It, C.; . Client---,-~---,--~-'----~-Pr6J~~t N·~. S"'l·~·'loi·~ .o· 1. Project location .r:fo 7 VA # . A '-t.' c# ttvl{Y. CA If l.J &* /9 L2 Contractor __ -"'/)""--'P,'--"-')f-'--------~ Bldg, Permit No. ·q 11) ?7 .S: Date_. _/_0_,...._/~_-_9_;_7 __ DFR No,----~---- Time Arriv$d __ /'----.. _,' _J,-'-d_-:...__r.-'--:n_.,1'----- Time Departed :1: JO eM Reviewed by _____________ Date Reviewed-----~---Travel Time _______ _ Type of Observations . ' D Masonry D Welding .. O Boltfng·: D Batch plar:it q Reinforcement Steel : .. CJ. RrEi-Post T({,~si.¢n~d Tencl$n 0 Foundations D Fireproofing __ ; .E~::~tal, Decl<;ing • ; -~ D Concrete D Soil . D. Oth~r Documents Referenced---------------'-,-------------~---~'----- Summary O f1 ~Jf;elflf .O .. ;2 _ C f'.(e Ti 1::''t',l;f P W/[t. t2£,tf' 1.1..t' ,,:,v~ lilL-ihf, _ ~-A:-le(/-1/"t.: . E· ,Zc,/?-, :/(V.l!'L/:? /,N~ . . Ca.,,v .{';"J' 7/.i" ,&:). /~ // 7t> /tNC.L{'. ;J;/a/V '.tf.A-J'/ ./""c,A Tl.f ,& r <:: /f' /p .. e AT /1 /t b OM ()/V{ t;vP t,,~ )':o,·s'f/./J.Wb OT/1£/f /J'#P 0/ :Y1J1'Jr·'· /4,,/!'~L/;("P re G1~'fl2i{,lf /I /{ ' . Ar. h/f'./0 C 1 :1 f t . 71/:£ l,v lJ ,eK :I o a .f;; ,e 1/ tf .o /N'.IL! r o t HI.( L's.Ii r r b E M-Y-fr M cJ w L lfl? 6£. . Pi"7/::;;;. A~·-;p--7'7.r /)~CC()/f·/VM-!-Cl!---·-"f,.,;, -:r:1:r-· ·A ~//?ii 12'.7:.P ' frfi ;tiJ'W~:; · .. --/-2 ~ -~ S , . = ·-··-· ·- l t A) r'f 1 ~ I ,.,J J I -~ ~,t .. --'>r-·---~' • .. ·~ .. . . _, ,., ,, , I._,~·!, J.' ). , . · D R.e~0rl: . .it!=)rns·c0inply ~· ,_ , • ~" I • :' ! , : , ,1 , .,, .. [f Report.items cor:nply· with ·exc~ptions _--~··£~ \, Page __ of __ F-1 (9/93) Kleinfelder ~epresentative Signature Kleinf~lder Representative Print Name •,; ·~ ~-; l . ' : Ill KdEINFELDER 1!1, . i . \\ -·· ~-~.l'4 J.,"4; l ' ,I ' ..... l ' Construction Observa:tio-n Report \ ,, : Proje~t:Narn~-: .. ,s:, M ': t9 i C '. ', . .,, ' D /tJ. -/V..: 7' 7:·: , ate ---'----'"-''-_,.,_...,____,____ __ Client ·. . Prqj~ct !\lb. _...,..._,__.,_ _____ __,___ . ~~~J~ct ~o~afio~~-.,,_/;,__'tf:!L_ ·_,,,i)'--·L,~.~,1/'--', A"-l_,L/v __ ._.L,!.A__,,tc.,,: Lo2°/,,,_,· A..i~· L' :--!!.W'."'-'.:...2Ac,_:V_·_· _: -_,..,· ce:1.' /1'-!..:P-Jf:-='t.'-"S'-,!' :,4""', ·~l'lc.....:Cl=-· --- OFR-No,_· -~---'--'---- Time Arrived _7'-'-; P"--· _u~~~/>'--'-1 __ Time peparted J ! 5 ti /> hi Contractor . D. p /f Bldg. Per.mit _No. <f 7 op S Reviewed by _____________ Date Reviewed--------Travel Time _______ _ Type of Observations D Masonry D Batch plan~ D Foundations D Concrete D Welding, D Reinforcemeot _St~el D Firepr()Ofing D Soil \ _; __ [:] Bolting:_; , . El • J;?re-'Po~t T~nsit,:m~d-Tenct,on --jJ ,Metal Dec,;king, 1,., · , · [JOtb~r .,, ~ '' ...,.,,_ "i ~--~• ,·, ,r, r-, j.,. \· · Documents Referenced----------------------------------- ,, Surr:,ma,ry ___.O;.,<: _,,/],....' ""'S'-"£~',re-<---''-,' 0 V~E~-Oy,' '--. ___,,W=: ~F~'--,......_O-· J=:r,1"'--"'c"--'-_,_:P' __ ,._/,,_,_£_,_I:'.......,' C>.=· /.,.._· ""-'M'-'-'(fc'--'· .P=-._=11'4' Y~_,,..2"'-. -,-'---'C"'-E=l/'..,..,lc.__1,_· L.~..:..J J.>'Jf,.,.O,::_'_" ___ _ ,. ' ' Ar RrJdr l[tEl/A7'io/J:-1 PAM£L w.:t 1 A.NO w.~ f)IC,V,!'°L j,v.::J. • ~ • 1: ' '· . t .,, i: , ,, o· Repqrt items cqmply · .. ,,', ,: f. · ·.Acknowledged .bY---'---f.O,.......,...,,,,,_,~i,.c,-~"-"-"-'-'----'----~ f- Page __ of __ Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1,,(9/93) ,} .·1•. '/, ',• Ill K,(l:i"'NFELDER·-l r f --\' ..:-:v-' i :' \1 ; 1 ,(•' ,, . Con~ruction Observation Report ' \ ,:, ' 'I>-, ,_ , , __r:--:~~: :/\ ·.~·. c . -, ... 'p~oj~~t ~~r.nt;i·-:_' : 'i·.~ , fl ~ .. : ' . , . ' : •1Client ---,.,,----;-~------'--,-----_....~-;-,--.,....,.-'----,,' Riqj·~;t ~:;_, :s l ~' '3/.S:-a}< :. -q I · Prbje,ctL~~at;on· >~~II) .j. ·· "VA Al\ 1-) l i l 111· WAX · C ~f(t U,l'/1, · . ·: :: . Contr~ctor .. D elf Bid~. Permi~ No~ . 'I: 70 rz S· DFRNo:_:. ~·--· _ .. _-,·,....·....,--~· -·· __ ,', .1 I Ti,'.ne Arrived '/;a,; A·~'( Time Departed 3: lo /hi Reviewed hY--------~----Date Reviewed~---------Travel Time _______ _ ~-' , -Type of Observations D Masonry .0 Batch plai;it D Foundations D c'oocrete D Welding D Reinforcement Steel D Fireproofing D Soil ! ' '1 ' -- , . } · ,t ·, : ECJ Ei.oiitng;r · ,:..: ... J:t. tr, fre~_Pb!3HfnSt~nj:lcjTenqo~ , 1: ... ;-i·r;.,,P.J;~~tat Dee)<ip!r~'r '·. , -,' · 0 0th.er • -. I • l'I . ; Documents Referencec;j ~----~----------------------,-------- , I, ' . S~rnr:na,ty ,• 6 8.Sfg·vfl). ~ C t'/?:Ti f/lfa.. tM:l!Lf./ 1£d . ·I.JSl'A((,-'fMA w ' 1,,v;·,·~r11 ;:': . .,., 't/"i .tt 1(·,./tt:i .i r·i If/~ l ... · -': '/E_:· zo /i ,/ .. WiE< 0 /µ ,. . l~tvs';i l 4'°J:J. · c:>~ ', }J ,i·.>p/i-~i.r· :Wr-<:)~:i-·--·-~ <J'~.-:'-~;;vc;·.r1i :~, -w:i!LX'.:;~'i;> ~ o/£ r to ,'•,, '/· i ' T It/!. /J () di( ::;r; 0/t SEAv£a WAJ 1 0 111,t'; ·t,r{r,-., (> f M1Y /f!/41,1 i;,,<'°~6¢ ' fJ£JffoK:E/2' /',I/ rcc.o,-?PA-/VC£ /&ilH /t&Rl~, .. ·n ~Pl.'19.r-/.t~ ... ..; ~, .•. / ...... . ' \ -·. . .. ·~. ~ ' J •_ ~ l,..• I • •~• ,.,"' ., _;, I i· •-~ C .. ' F-1 (9/93) I ~t ' .! ,. •\.t t ,.,. 1 • \ ~ r, ; ,-,._ ,, ~ ···,-" '·, ' l f ~ ~; ., t ! ''-;, .. --.-~ l •'-1 111·~~,J E· I N F E L D E R -.:_:.~:~t.:_l~ , ;I ., ._, , . , I \ ;' • , , ' Consfruction Observation Repo1;t -,, ... ; _,, ·f ;p'rojed ~a~~:·:.-~·>.,~&} ':10-, .ti, c· ·,. . . . ':_,:\:. . . -, ·_ ., · .·61i~~~-..... :;--,-,-··-:,_;:,_·-._.~:_ .. :_ .. _: ~--~"·._'-cc,,_·_:~-,_, _· _· _, ·_·.;_. ~---:~roj~_~;:~-~;::~tl--'ifo ri;:·~/: -:.··_··: ' P~oj~~tl .. o·h~tion' S ft> 1 . IJON A iie /I/ 'f,-.1/1 y' C,e,··-i t..'.s;tf/./ i2: · · Contractor f) I I{ Bldg.-Permit No: t/70 rs: Q~te< /6 ·; jJ ~. ~ 7' PFR ·No.~_,.... __ ...,_,..._~- Time Arrived Z,'(JtJ A~ Time Departed S : 1 0 -/ .IH . Reviewed by Date Reviewed ________ _ Travel Time------~- Type of Observations ; -~ . D Masonry D Batch plant .. D Welding q Reinforcement Steel , _D Bo!tirgi'.~./,,'..:~.~d·1~re_-~ost \~-~s_ia~~~ Te~pq,n,-~ I -~ •' ,, D Foundations D Concrete D Fireproofing D Soil , '01 Metal Decking,,, , . -0 Other, , . , ":~'t'-\V ... 1'1~v,,\·t-•,, ., ' ., '11 \ -.:. f · . 1 , , ., • ) ' • t . 11 , Documents Referer:iced ------------+''-:""'\ -------------------------~i:; l·/:1 .'i. · S'umrnary tJ LS£ R-v~ ,o -Wtf 1. a, ;v. r; · J?i!tt i 111f Mt< a . ffY'. 4.-· C,<Ai ,:),4 ,-'ra "_/Al 1 ~· 12; le . _. . (/5) .# ;:.:: ,, .. ~tirn ~ :w :, },.1 ,' t ';.; ' -~E> ;., ~ If~ : . M;; &d'.~-4 < ·. tf '70/ $(' /1 l,: ___ /A"'tJ01:: 1:' l EVA l r'uN , )1 '' ,;:--,-;~ £ T W Et. b 1 ~/TN("'~{,,.,,~ 7 H'£ I i,,vc?-/.; ,1/-/,e Wo.ll'lr ]: Ol[f..e,lfv:lff:> wAf To 7:11£ t:!£.[T •-E:Jr· .MY.'kAJo:Wc..!!P6L , i ~ .. f • 1: · ~ . ~ t°.t 1r ct) /ff/A .f:t? 1· ;,/ 1' c 6 ·01(0,1t,,v c E t..r , f /-I A/1".Rotp( a . Pl. I?# .Sy .,__,_/ee: C /i ;r\ C' A Ti:.!:;_&.¥ ?,r o-1{ If MJJAI rt;1 / t? : · IJ.-,,v o Ca 1:2 Ls I \ i,l D Report items cqmply Page __ of __ F-1 (9/93) 'i \ ·_t \ \ ti--• ' ,'/-·· .', .. .,, l' ,•,. f '· •; I·;.,, /1, '/ d,· Report item$ comply With-.exceptiQAs ' .'.. . ~ . 1: d. ~;;t_~ ' Klefoktci:Reiresentative Signature · ' ' ' ' :··/tG/N/lla &t,Te.r ~ KleinfeldE:lr Representative Print Name ..,, '\, :, ':• ,· Ill KL}JNFELDER ~ ...... c·on~$~:ru.ct_io·n ·observation. Repo~t . ... ''!' .. ' ' ' -, .. . ' ~. -. •' : ~ : -. '. . ·, . . ~: , . Proi·ect Name· ___ · _,:; ~,_,,.r_;,..,··:'-"-)~"'-'.: "'"':'-"_A-"-·.__,_··;·_<_.-· .... ,,_··_:.:._,.-,_·--_: __ ": -_-,.:_.-_-_· ---=----~~----'-'-- ,Ju "; ,;:: .. - Client -------,,-L---~----Pro]ect No.---~-----DFR No ________ _ Project Location .5 j'h' 1 VA;tl A ( <. EAi !Iv A ,Y C::.A t1 i,,J' AIJ.0 Contractor_' _ _,,0.,_.,__/_,,/1.,_____,_,_. ________ Bldg. Permit No. _fL--..;7'-()--=-f_ . .!...7_,,,S=--- Time Arrived ~li~V_.'_t'_O~A~;//,~'-'i __ Time Departed ~/~;_J_o_/j=y-~~- Reviewed by ____________ Date Reviewed-------.. ~-Travel Time ______ _ Type of Observations D Masonry D Welding D Bolting D Batch plant D Reinforcement Steel ~ D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Foundations D Fireproofing D Metal Decking D Concrete D Soil D Other Documents Referenced --------------------------"-'--:.-------- S-um~ary 0,t/S'µfv £CJ Wlf t. P lu 6 f/J_e/JlrA'I FL2 IJ Y .1 C £.If n ',=, '.Gt) We~ Pil .s us ri¥6 SM d w Iv/ 7 fl · F /L, t, c £ bl l"'1 7""£1( iA i.. E 7tJ/ P. £f_ ... i'5Alf ht LL I) ift/C. !'C lfEO tlj... 1£ # B. J /))f'IJ W,°N(-. S-..i.. . C 6/V T,µd /NG. To lj.llLP Ti'L'T-llfJ CP/I .. C'Z:il1.1<rt"aN jft-fltAG O;/ !!AST~ C/b£; D Report items com~ply . • D °'~> ./ D Report Items comply with e,oe~Joos Acknowledged bY--~=--~==----=-~----~---~ ,tdb · Kleinfei;;t'kepresentative Signature Representing _ _..,."-"'----L--------------_ x,E --'-''~G.~i_,__N'-..LA__,_l-O,___ ...... /<L.<.A_,_,_T-=ce,_~ s=------ Page -of --Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) ., '. --· ~ ,_, tt, • \. ~ :I,''',·.,' ,, K L E I N F E 1L D E R ... ~--(f -, i I I , j I .',~!:;:_.,,. ' . ·. . ., ' ' .. _.. ' . '' ' . ' ' . , .. .J ~construction Observation .. Report . ,; -r , ;a~i -'11 _7 Project Name----.-:..,).-' ,,;_IV\;_____,_,• A~·_,_, --=C"---', __________ .........,,_____ Date'--------'---- Client --------------Project No. CI -t,efro /,-()I DFR No ________ _ Project Location ~ () 7 !IA~ II I.. L ,€µ wD Y C 19 P/..S /IA.A Time Arrived o/ J ld Af};-(J. l)/'/i 971 rr7?~-·--,,~. -. -Cor.J,.tractor' Bldg. Permit No. --'--'--=----"'U--'--_.::_ __ ""-=~~-:"':tiill'}.e peparted -''-''_...,, 3.,..,.,a"---'/.-----'---kf_.___ -Re.vi_ewed PY-------------Date Reviewed _______ _.;.... ~ ·' I_ ('... i ; .----.;._---...---------------,--------------------.---------------, Travel Time ______ _ ' Type of'Observations ·· D Masonry 0 B~teh plant [1] Foundations 0 Concrete ~·-·+-·-., , ~-· ·· : . ·' ·7 -'1,···,r .'.f .·.' :IJ-,'fVelctir.ig,,,,.:r···r-'* .• p,,~eLnf9rg§!IJ1~qt._SJ~aj:, . ~--·,.::-., • ~ 0 ,0 ~irepr~pfirig ""'"· ~· . _,,,_ -,P. Soil __ ,. · .. D ·!;:lolting O Pre-Post Tensiqn·ed Tenc:lon O Metal_ Decking : 0 Other i~~~~.___ __ , .... ::1-____ ~_·."""·, ..... -----------------------------------------'------' ·") Documents Referenced --~------------------------------- \ Summary 04S£Jf(lf/J /f'l{L 1)/11'6 · PfttEOd/lAi!.<:> iJY .:S Ct:Hr;,~,'r-o l!v-.fl.,!J/!../IS· _llS/p/6. _(Mo W t,v/iH 1:,·1-1..-µ.4 h<.A·1'C/fr°.tJL 1 .t 701/; '/ \ ltJILt;,iJl/6 C~iJt(.r/.(iEi2 I>~ w£c..£:,>/N6. l(~-41-hf J1-Z.t£.5 ~ tf S') #() _, ·, # 1} #i/ A/ill> #9,. t:o /1:i{iJ.Lt .Zlfotv /t.f Mt? ';tit -ifA/t w~ t./Jin(,, Scylfou1...,,t #JR, t/?A'Aw;Nt:, .S-I • CaNt:; Nv,Nc.. 70 Rtf./?f()_dM.i-.O iAI A ccot20-A,vc£ J,,J_/Tfl /ifl'Hovtf P /?t.n.-1-4'..J, Sf'EC.11:/<:.&:-7:,a.J...r, .,. ,;,.··~ .. ~--..--.-··· .>~ .. ~·,--...;..) _;i-... _-..... _,.-:!:. +;.-..!.. ... ·-:.~.:;:~ .. -~.,,,,,.. •• __ -r-··/--· ..... ·•"i~ -~-~:-~=-·,~---...t."7_•-<,,1,1-.~---i ,o;. ",!i'f. ·,;;;r. ~ .- HtJll'.k:10AN ..r#,/1' 1:ui10 · Ca".tJ,r, c > ' ;. ' • 1 • -p ~~~, ~ ~<::;, ~~' ' ~<:::>";,<>:,":,'>- --~'<:f-~~o:, • ~v "' -\\. ~ I -~, . D Report items comply 0 Report items comply with exceptions Kl~infelder Representative Signature Representing ___ .......,1-+-.....,.~---------~- .Page __ '' of __ "' Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) JI l •. ' ., .. ' I 'L '~ • •• <t RI K L E :, N ··F E I:. D E R ....::.. ' I \' ,., ' • ~Ji i ~i ' ' ' ' Constructi-on Obse.rvation Report ',- • •j ; Project Name--~S~./v'~. ~·· _A_,_C~-----=--------~--- Client -------;-----------Project No. s:1-'I S-o I· () ,I · Project Location S"' rtJ 7 V 11 /..I IU .. L~.V J11',IJ Y I C n PL Slf A L2 Cor.itractor--~f)~~f'~~tf~------Bldg. Permit No. (j 7 {) I 7 ,$" Reiviewe\;l by _____________ Date Reviewed _______ _ Date_£~' _ ... _]_· 0_-_,~·~7 __ l DFR No ________ _ Time Arrived ?' J rJ. r14 Time Departed /, 1 3 0 ,PM Travel Time ______ _ Type of Observations D Masonry D Batch plant D Foundations D Concrete • , :;_ C ) 1 . • .~-·.. . 3/-~, · -~ ·::i:::~.;:. '{. ·,,,: ·L ·-~ ~/=~~:;::;:~::!::l~:~~- 0 ~~:,, . ~ · { · ~-:::~~~::;~~ · • ·---,;1 L6 ~:~~/ ---~. ___ . ..__... ______ .,...... ____________ ....,... _______ -.-____________ __. '.j Tl _ ......... ~, Documer:its Referenced _______ _,_·-+· -------------------------4 I ,, Summary OJ!, S£,fl/£12 (11/t:t.. a i.«6 PkN £oifl'i"lt o. 8Y 3 C l./f 7,· r ic:o · WEL#/A'S .us,·;.1G SMAW wiTH ,t:",·~t.c'£ .MAr£K,AL,. ·£7tJ/? • • ..... _ <. :~:::~.::::"::pl/42°~ D Report items comply with exceptions /"7~ Representing-_-_~/4~.~·-_· ------------Kleinfeld~r Representative Signature I • /2{ G,i,1)J,1_J:, t!a Ztf.£ Page __ , of __ Kleinfelder Representative Print Name , F-1 (9/93) ·•'\ ' ·~ '•~ ., ',' .. ;;~ ...... ,\ ' l• _, ~ I i ,, :"'1fi"'··-~ • ., ,..,,~ ! , • -.t .. , .. n , Ill ;i.(1 L EJI Nlh~, ELDER . ·<f-- ,. :~-._::-.b'(-~ Con.struction Obs·ervati·on R·ep.o·rt . f ~ ,. • I.. :~ . _: . . ·:-. ' • ' ;1,,'.,,:1, •• ,, • ..-• : Project:Narile _ _:__s;_· . ..,_i _M_/t,c__cc_· _t _________________ _ Client _____ ___.:, ___ ~-----Project No. Project Location _S~/l_,,O,,_J_L___,,V'-'/J~/11~. -~It_.__'-=' E"'-"Nu,:_____;lmrttfi=Jfi!-,t"-· -1-) _ _::,c.:....,11.-,,:£"-'1,'-"'. ... ,""-s--4'i!"-'A=t.J"--- Contractor-~f)"--<'-f-"6-"-·---------Bldg. Permit No. 9 7 a I 7 S" Reviewed:by __ ·1 ---~-------Date Reviewed-------- Date_-_;.·4-p_~ -~--.,i'--· _-·-'-~__,,7'----- DFR No·--------f- Time Arrived 7,'?a .11-A"l Time Departed ': 11" IM Travel Time ______ _ Type of Observations D Masonry D Batch plant-D Foundations D Concrete . ~--·,. ! ·• ' . , . .., ·'· . t " -·,. t. , .. _,' 1·---,-.,r .. -9·-· ... GJ~,.iWelclirl·., 1 •.• ) ; .. D1Fieinfocr,ement.Stee1, _ .. '-'~: l • m .. F,irein, r,00fj11_g ,a .C.•"'\.-s·-'.", n, • SQ,i/-.1· .... ,, .•.. 1 · 9, · -r 1 1. • -· ,-• • • .. , -r-· r -.· , • ~ · · · · \ .. -.. " , \ · ...4-1 · , ... ·. • [] '.Bolting o· Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon D Metal Decking : D Other . ,.. ,., ,, • .._ ___ . __ :-:.,,_1 ____ .... 1:-,..,,·..,.------..,......,,-----------------------...,.,,.---------------' -~ .. . :1, .: ' ' \ . Documents Referenced ----'·,...· -------------------------------1 \ l • J -. ' ' of,.,,, lSwmmary OgCttfl/tto 1µ/lo/111 .. f£flFot<1t"'lfi2 .AV ..l.. Cf,ez,·t=/f;() ~£0£',rf VS;#& ~MA,tiJ ·wi'fH . €:,'Li If.{ Jvr.RT/!;(/,1, £101!, Jv13/C,lJ//J'A,,·, ... Ca.,vJ,:rrElil ' ' • • ' " -. ' ~.,,,,.-., . ~ ,.f< .p'4f' ~ .0 f J;.J f. l,? ,·r,1 GA di.'.~-~~ 11/Jlit~ / 1-wi ~-t. S,-#7.):$:S[ > #.-.'') , ... 4f, t.,. #; q"' .-.7.0 ;.,, .... ,t;t.;. Page __ , of __ Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F-1 (9/93) ' ,, ,,1 -•1 ,,.,, \ I._ , .. ,r, ' -,,,.'' • Ill i L K L E I ~ F E;·.l D E R t '~' ; ' • . ':,,'; -· :, ' . Pr~j~C~ Name ___ '· --=s:o...·:_::· ._/1_,._.I!_, _ _. ,_/-1.,___c~.··_·· .;_' ~--------·i_··_·-_c._ ___ _ Client-'------------Project No. S / ... '150{~ OI Project Location S' IO 1 t/ II Ill At. I.-!Ill W li-'t CA IL ( £AL) Contractor D /'I{ -Bldg. Permit No. q 101'1 ~ Reviewed by _____________ Date Revievy.ed -------- Date. DFR. No, _______ _ Time Arrived ~9~/_3_o~A.c__/-?1_.___ Time Departed _._/ ~,1 _J_a~Ai<-...C.<,m~-~-- Travel Time ______ _ Type of Observations· D Masonry D Batch plant D Foundations D Concrete ' i ' ·) ' \.:. ' J.. ,1} ) []·),;, 1.\J· J ·. I . 'l ' ota· ' f b .L -s' Js,. l ' lh. f' ' ' f' \ I l D . , ·-·' .£i ......... r.,.,, .,...... fvlle"'ing .. ~--.1· ,: .:\.$11'.l,O.r. e.11Je.t:1t ~e~r~ . .-,_ .. ,.·_, .· .-.. :u-1ref:)~bo1r:rg,·1·•·: ·\ .:1., .·S0il··1,·. .. _,,,· ,, .. ,' OtBolting D Pre-Post Tensioned Tendon, D Metal Decking I D Other --... ~--1~..___.......,.¥:r.;:...• ----,-·"-''"'.,:..,~_;;---'· ·.:-; -,-,-'-+----------------------------~-----' .. ,,,... \::f. ,' ••.• ,:~.~:.:oocum~;nts Ref~;inc~d-~) _______________________________ _ . ...... ~ ', } r.·. .1 !,•"'! .. " ___ -c:~i -----'c--F--,---.. _· ______________________________ _ ':u ··~\'-! .... )· Summ.ary •. CJ;Jtfpvta 1;i.11ft.1J/JVC:, (?l;tf".oeM ,r',a IJY · 3 Celfl:lr/t!..o WRit>i;;es-/Jfid-6. S/2:t/l.JI'/, w,'7/I .• E/"-L~,f':· MATl{Rl~ll 'Jf 76 //i',r' ,, .. . . \".'. i-; ·, . D Report items co.mply . cAe,trt;,r ., Acknowledged by __ ~/,__,M_i1---------- R~presenting ________ J) .... f ..... ~ .... ------------ D Report items comply with exceptions 4,~t{ak Kieii<telder Representative Signature \ \ Page __ of __ Kleinfelder Representative Print Name F·1 (9/93) \ EsGil Corporation Professional Plan !R._eview 'E.ngineers DATE: 5/28/97 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-875 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1695 Faraday Avenue PROJECT NAME: S.M.A.C. SET: II D APP~T QJURIS D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. [8J The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [8J Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person [8J REMARKS: 1. City to determine if the curtain boards are required or not. 2. City to approve the special inspection program. By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 5/20 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation Professiona{ PCan !R.!,view '.Engineers DATE: 4/29/97 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-875 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1695 Faraday Avenue PROJECT NAME: S.M.A.C. SET:I ~~NT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's*********** codes. · D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ . .The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Mike McGill 5355 Mira Sorrento Place Suite 650 San Diego CA 92121 [:gl Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that-the plan check·has been completed. -. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check·has been· completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation [gJ GA DCM [gJ EJ D PC 4/17 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 97-875 4/29/97 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-875 OCCUPANCY: S-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 111-N ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: SPRINKLERS?: Y REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 4/29/97 FOREWORD {PLEASE READ): JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: warehouse ACTUAL AREA: 62080 sf STORIES: 1 HEIGHT: -30 feet OCCUPANT LOAD: 124 -DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 4/17 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department.. You. may have ·other corrections based on laws and ordinances ·enforced by the Planning· Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) comforw.dot Carlsbad 97-875 4/29/97 • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. • PLANS 2. Indicate on the Title Sheet whether or not a grading permit is required for this project. 3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and 1994 UBC, UMC and UPC and 1993 NEC. • SITE PLAN 4. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines in south direction. • EXIT SIGNS 5. Show two sources of power for the lamps at exit signs. Section 1013.4. • ROOFS 6. Provide curtain boards location and construction detail on the plan. • FOUNDATION 7. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. 8. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 9. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (When required by the soil report). 10. Provide notes on the foundation plan listing the soils report recommendations for foundation slab and building pad preparation. Carlsbad 97-875 4/29/97 11. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." 12. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 1804.7. • FRAMING 13. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 14. Per UBC Section 2343.6, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. b) The design load. c) The spacing of the trusses." 15. Sheet 67 of the calculation show the pier 2 of panel W-1 is 1 0" thick. The panel elevation appears to not show it. Please check. 16. The panel type for the panels along grid line A is not clearly specified on the pa~el elevation plan . . , 17.' Sheet L-72 and L-73 of the calculation show the concrete beam design. Is this beam identified on the plan? 18. The framing at adjoining panel edge shall be 3 inch where nails spaced 2 inches or 2 1 /2 inches per footnote 2 on table 23-1-J-1. The diaphragm nailing on sheet S-3 appears to not show it.(4?). Please check. 19. Provide calculation to justify detail 15/S7,20/S7 are adequate. • MISCELLANEOUS 20. Note on the plans that "all weather-exposed surfaces shall have a weather-resistive barrier to protect the interior wall covering and that exterior openings shall be flashed in such a manner as to make them weatherproof'. Section 1402. Carlsbad 97-875 4/29/97 21. Note on the plans that new water closets and associated flushometer valves, if any, shall use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush and shall meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard A112.19.2. H & S Code, Section 17921.3(b). 22. Please refer to the following corrections for mechanical, plumbing, energy and electrical items. • TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS 23. Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Acc~ss Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the USC. • ADDITIONAL 24. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 25. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: D Yes D No 26. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any - questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 1. Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the licensed designer. Carlsbad 97-875 4/29/97 • PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2. Provide water line sizing calculations, including the water pressure, pressure losses, water demands, and developed pipe lengths. UPC Section 610.0 3. The horizontal rainwater piping from the roof drains seem to be undersized as per UPC, Appendix 'D' Table 0-2, using 3.3 inches per hour rainfall rate. Please correct. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC + PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen 4. The required clearance in front of the main service is 2 X 3 1 /2', or 7' (If there is no electrical equipment on the opposite wall, then it would be 8'). The distance does not scale off for a seven foot clear distance. 5. The City of Carlsbad does not allow the use of armored cable (ac/bx). Please specify the type of wiring method that will be used at this facility. 6. Add the following note to the plans: "No exposed wiring is allowed on the roof surface of the building without prior approval of the Building Official." 7. Specify what the transformer grounding electrode will be. 8. The transformer grounding electrode conductor is undersized, it may not be smal_ler than #8 copper. Note: #8 copper requires protection of the conductor, note so on the plans if using #8. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 97-875 4/29/97 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS • DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES 1. Revise plans to show that at least one in every 8 accessible spaces are served by an access aisle ~96" in width and designated as VAN ACCESSIBLE, per Section 1129B.4.2. All such spaces may be grouped on one level of a parking structure. • ENTRANCES AND CIRCULATION 2. Revise plans to show that all entrances, and exterior ground level exits, are accessible, per Section 1001.9.1. • SANITARY FACILITIES 3. Note that the doorways leading to sanitary facilities shall be identified, per Section 1115B.5, as follows: a) An equilateral triangle ¼" thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing upward at men's rest rooms. b) . A circle¼" thick, 12" in diameter at women's rest rooms. c) A 12" diameter circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle and within the 12" diameter at unisex rest rooms. d) The required symbols shall be centered on the door at a height of 60". e) Braille signage shall also be located on the wall adjacent to the latch outside of the doorways leading to the sanitary facilities, per Section 1117B.5.9. • GENERAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS • SIGNAGE 4. Where permanent identification is provided for rooms and spaces, raised letters shall also be provided and shall be accompanied by Braille. Section 111 ?B.5. 5. Provide a note on the plans stating that the signage requirements of Section 1117B.5 will be satisfied. END OF DOCUMENT Carlsbad 97-875 4/29/97 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-875 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 4/29/97 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1695 Faraday Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: S-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 111-N BUILDING PORTION BUILDING ARE VALUATION VALUE (ft. 2) MULTIPLIER ($) warehouse 62080 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers 1,595,456.00 TOTAL VALUE (per City) -- [gj 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance:$ 4,731.50 [gl 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 3,075.48 Type of Review: [gl Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive r=:ee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 2,460.38 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 \ t "' 'r . City of Carlsbad 5¥ilt..iih44iih·l•l4·Si4ii,t401 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: 5-7-97 PLANCHECK NO.: CBC/7oJ?75 BUILDING ADDRESS: /_o+ / 0 '1 C...l(c_. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: &?'"2J Q!O 9!-\.)MLf ~ff4(9 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: d-: /t?i --/ .30 -2> £: EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Please see~ attached report of deficiencies marked wit~ Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. 'sin.m~ Date: c5/-; / f 7 'w?-m~,. %11?7 By: Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet I\Laspalmas\sysll.lBRARY\ENGIWORDIDOCS\CHKLST\Bulldmg Plancheck Cklst BPOOOJ Fonn MM doc Date: $/97 ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: Michele Masterson City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619) 438-1161, ext. 4315 A-4 Rev.12126192075 Las Palmas Dr.• Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN r,/) J;J..815 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: rr:;;--g5-~; A. North Arrow ~ D. Property Lines ~ ~ B. Existing & Proposed Structures ./111Ki.J) Easements -~ C. Existing Street Improvements v" Y.L Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets- G. Driveway widths v-- 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will ·provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial -buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 5. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. _______________________ _ 6. All conditions are in compliance. Date: __________ _ 111.aspalmas\sysll.lBRARY\ENGIWORD\DOCSICHKLSnBuikling Planchecl< Cklsl BP0001 Fann MM.doc Rev. 12/26196 a a a BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 7. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ ______ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: ________________ _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: ___________ _ Date: ----- IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 8a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ _______ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: _____________ _ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: _________ _ Date: ----- 8b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ _______ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be . signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: \\Laspalmas\sys\LIBRARYIENGIWORD\DOCSICHKLSl1Bu11ding Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Fonn MM.doc Rev. 12/26/96 " :, a a a a D D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 8c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 8d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 9a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 9b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 9c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) 9d. No Grading Permit required.~ 7f 6-f--Io c;. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 10. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. \\Laspelmas\sys\LIBRARY\ENG\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bulldlng Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form MM.doc Rev.12/26/96 4 ' ---. . ! 0 0 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 11. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 12. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 13. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 14. ~red fees are attached 0 No fees required \\Laspalmas\sys\LJBRARY\ENGIWORO\DOCS\CHKLST\Buildlng PJancheck Cklst 8P0001 Fenn MM.doc Rev. 12/26/96 5 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. ~ Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: Lo± /0 9 C e_c_ Bldg. Permit No.(8 q7Q ~7-5 Prepared by:{Y)lJrf'--Date:~/7/7 7 Checked by: ____ Date: ____ _ EDU CALCULATIONS_;__ List.,tYPiandAquare footages for all uses. ~ " 5 Cl)O Types of Use: · ___ -~· Ft./-61flits-:--(o;l.y 0$'0~EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. 5/, '~~ "7/t>l> i) Types of Use: ~--bA-~~==...::cc...= Sq. Ft./lJtlits":' b:J., ogt;;zf ADT's: ~~_J_O __ FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD:,)(_YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO ~IN~LIEU FEE PARK AREA: ___ _ FEE/UNIT: ____ _ ~AFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: 3 / 0 ~DGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT's/UNITS: ____ _ X NO. UNITS: __ _ X FEE/ADT: X FEE/ADT: ___ _ ~FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ~Q.FT.:b,:2,D 80 ~SEWER FEE ZONE:____,_5=--- X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: • 4-CJ PERMIT No. 0 F q ]Qt) 77 X FEE/EDU: / ~ / Q EDU's: j d O f :l__ BENEFIT AREA: _F,___ __ DRAINAGE BASIN: ..58 EDU's: ) ~.i f:~ X FEE/EDU: >f I°/ ~ DRAINAGE FEES PLDA. ___ _ HIGH ___ /LOW __ _ ACRES: _____ _ X FEE/AC: ___ _ ~SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$ CJ =$ fot S7;2t) =$ -c3 =$ ~~, ¾_fl{) ,/ =$ /02 C/17 , =$ 1~ =$ t:, TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ (o Sj L) 49 *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:IDOCS\MISFORMS\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET REV 01/28/97 ~DD ~DD ~DD PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB q1 , g7 s Address µ f-I{) Cf ~t.c-- Planner Greg Fisher Phone (619) 438-1161, extension 4328 APN: 2 r er _, 1 30 -~ <..f Type of Project and Use: ::C/\-4-:J . LVA-r L)fvu5 ~ Zone: C:--M. Facilities Management Zone: --5------------ CFo:firirout) # _::r-?V ~ One (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) Legend ~ Item Complete (D Item Incomplete -Needs your action Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: YES _ NOf-TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES __ NO x_ TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. _____ DATE__,_( ______ ' __ PROJECT NO. _______ _ OTHER RELATED CASES: __________________ _ Compl_iance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project _site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO~ Carlsbad Permit Authority or CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES__ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8-36 Determine status (Coastal Per~it Required or Exempt): 'Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO • If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. .. ·rvr.·. o .. ·· 0 . 1'nclusiQnary Ho1,1sing, Fee:reqOired: YI;$·--··· NO)( T (Eff~ctive date of lnclusionary,Housirig Ordinance·~ May 21, 1·993.) . \ ' ! 'Dat~ ·En,tt,/ Coi]lpl~,~edl YES -:· ·-. _· NO ~ Site Plfln :, \ -~< • ·: ;~~,-• ' ··.·. ;~o o·-l.. ~rovide a fully dirn,e!lsiqr:ial ,5:it~ .Pl~ri drc1wn to scale. Show.: . North arrow, property li.n1;;~, .~asementsi existing and proposed stn,.1ctures, s;treets, existing str~et impr:o~ements, right-of-Way· width, dimensional setbacks and exi~ting . topographic.~I lines. · · · 2.. Pr:oyiqe legal descripti~n of ,:~roperty· and assessor's parcel number, .Zoning: l. Se~backs: Front: Int. Side: · Required 30:< Shown ;:?c) / ~z~ d/-4 '. · Required Shown " Street Side: ·Requirecl, Shown - Required r---, Shown ,---,--- :~ .O. D 2. Accessory StruciurE;i Setbacks·: · ,:o.o ·~D D ··.fi.oo. .·>~···.·.;40 . . ' ~' -. . - t .. • ' •• Requir . ---'---"-----·shown _____ _ ·· equired Shown ---,,.---,---- Required Shown ---------He qui r: e ci . Shown --------- 3. Lot Coverage-: ,Required Shown ------ ,4. Height; 'Required --'---'--'------Shown ---"-----'--- ---z,1/ . 5. Parking: .. Spac·es· 'Required · :J Shown --::-"::::::::=;:=---------"- ·Gliest Spac~s Required~ Shown -----------'-,--- -1 (:;5 'OK TO ·ISSUE ANO ENTERED'.ARPROVAL INTO .COMPlJ.TER: -. --'-------DATE ....... ___ _ City of Carlsbad 97104 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Date of Report: Wednesday, May 14, 1997 High Piled Combustible Storage ~. )r.J;P9e,""'0~ Reviewed by: ti v1,~C/t;?JiJ!i,., Contact Name Mike McGill Address 5355 Mira Sorrento Pl Ste 650 City, State San Diego CA 92121 Bldg. Dept. No. CB97-875 Planning No. Job Name Lot 109 S.M.A.C. Job Address _1:...:;6_;:_95"-'-Fa=r=ad=a"'--y _____________ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ fl l I \~1 e,~ rf{L Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. ~ Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st~--2nd __ _ 3rd __ _ Other Agency ID CFD Job# __ 97_1_0_4 __ File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 Ill KLEINFELDER An employee owned company June 27, 1997 Project No. 51-4508-01 Mr. Mike Peterson City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 Subject: Project: Change of Responsibility for Geotechnical Engineer-of-Record Systems Machines Automation Components Van Allen Way Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Peterson: Today repres~ntatives of Kleinfeider, Inc. (Kleinfelder) met with the project design team and contractor for the· above .proj.ect. This letter is tQ _formally notify the City of Carlsbad Building Department that Kleinfelder has assumed the responsibility as geotechnical engineer-of-record of the project. We have reviewed the project geotechnical report prepared by Geotechnics Incorporated (Project Nq. 0078-002-00, dated March 28, 1997). We are in general agreement with the findings, conditions, and recommendations of that report with respect to geotechnical site work and foundations for the project. We have no further recommendations at this time. We are currently providing full time observation of the building pad and will submit our "as- graded" building pad report when the pad is completed. Please contact our office should you have any questions with regard to this letter. Sincerely, KLEINFELDER, INC. (iJJ_ £. -e~ Rick E. Larson, PE Senior Associate cc: Andy Dillavou, DPR Construction, -Inc. Mike Platis, Smith Consulting Bob Berry, S.M.A.C. 51-4508-01\517LG135.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. June 27, 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax lfl KLEINFELDER An employee owned company June 19, 1997 Project No. 51-4508-01 Mr. Edward A. Neff Systems, Machines, Automation, Components \5-,g---Q-'7"Tl ·--·k11----w,-.., --_,_y_:_an ·n:_~11----ay, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Change of Responsibility for Geotechnical Engineer-of-Record Systems Machines Automation Components Dear Mr. Neff: This letter is to follow-up our site visits by our staff engineer on June 18 and 19, 1997. As directed, Kleinfelder, Inc. will assume the responsibilities of the geotechnical engineer-of-record. We have reviewed the geotechnical engineering report for the project prepared by Geotechnics Incorporated ~reject No. 0078-002-00, dated March 28,1997). We are in general agreement with the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of that report with respect to geotechnical site work and foundations planned for the proposed S.M.A:C. Warehouse project. However, the Geotechnic's report contains information that we would like to discuss further. • As stated in the Geotechnics soils report, the proposed building location contains a deep fill transition of approximately 40 feet which may result in differential settlements of 1 inch over the length of the building. Since the building has been designed for conventional shallow foundations, instead of deep foundations, we assume that both the owner and the architect are willing to accept that magnitude of differential settlement. If not, Kleinfelder should be notified immediately in writing that the relative amount of differential settlement is unacceptable and that other alternatives should be used. • Also, as stated in the conclusions of the report, we assume that the owner understands that the man-made slopes created by site development will tend to weather and creep over time as a natural result of wetting and drying, biological forces, and gravity. • Section 7 .2.3 of the geotechnical report provides two alternatives of different risks with respect to mitigating the effect of expansive clays on site. The contractor has indicated he plans to follow the second alternative which has the higher risk of the two alternatives. Basically, the contractor intends to overexcavate the existing soils to 3 feet below the building pad subgrade, moisture condition to at least 5 percentage points above optimum moisture content, and recompact to at least 90% of ASTM D1557. We are assuming that the owner and architect have considered this risk in their negotiations with the contractor and are willing to accept the risks. Also, site soils moisture conditioned to 5 points above optimum may be difficult to achieve proper density and stability. • If the moisture conditioning and replacement of Section 7 .2.3 are followed for all exterior slabs and sidewalks, there is a lesser risk for heave of these concrete surfaces than if just the 5 l-4508-0l/5 l 7LG 130.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 1 of2 June 19, 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) S41-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax d ., recommendations of 7.2.2 and 7.8.2 are followed. Exterior slabs and sidewalks constructed directly on expansive soils are likely to move. It is our understanding that the contractor intends to follow the recommendations of Section 7.2.2 and 7.8.2. Kleinfelder accepts no responsibility for the performance of slabs or sidewalks constructed on expansive soil. However, the owner should indicate whether the upper 3 feet of subgrade for the exterior slabs and sidewalks should be removed, moisture conditioned, and recompacted in accordance with Section 7.2.3. • In our conversation with the general contractor and the grading contractor, it is our understanding that the grading contractor will not be responsible for achieving 95% relative compaction in the upper 12 inches of pavement subgrades. We understand that the paving contractor will be responsible for scarifying and recompacting the upper 12 inches of pavement subgrade at the time of paving operations. Kleinfelder' s field technician will be present each day the contractor's personnel are excavating, preparing the subgrade, or placing fills during the rough and final grading operations. An as- grade report for site grading will be submitted at completion of the site grading. Kleinfelder will then perform testing for underground utilities and paving on a part time, as-called basis. Should you have any questions regarding our geotechnical services on the project, please contact us at your convenience. Sincerely, KLEINFELDER, INC. µR~ ~ ~ -£a/lJ(µ ..1,,,.... George M. Binger III ff Staff Engineer Rick E. Larson, GE Senior Engineer GBM:REL:sra cc: Andy Dillavou, DPR Construction, Inc. Mike Platis, Smith Consulting Matthew Fagan, Geotechnics Inc. City of Carlsbad Building Department 51-4508-0 l/517LG 130.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 2 of2 June 19, 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax Ill KLEINFELDER An employee owned company January 12, 1998 Project No. 51-4508-01 Mr. Bob Berry Systems, Machines, Automation, Components \f695~EaradayJ:)tly~ Carlsbad, California 92009 Subject: Project: Report of In-Place Density Test Results SMAC, Carisbad Research Center Lot 109 1695 Faraday Drive Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Berry: In accordance with our agreement, we have performed in-place density testing services associated with post rough-grading earthwork operations performed at the subject project. This report summarizes our test results performed during the period covered by this report. The scope of our services consisted of in-place density testing of the utility trench backfill, storm drain trench backfill, loading dock/trash enclosure subgrade, pavement subgrade, and asphalt paving; laboratory tests for moisture density relationships of the trench backfill and subgrade; and preparation of summaries of compaction test results. In-place density testing services covered in this report were generally performed by our technicians on a near-continuous basis. This report includes in-place density tests 85 through 175. Previous test results were included in an As-Graded Report, dated July 8, 1997 for this project. Our services covered in this report were performed from July 10, 1997 through November 25, 1997. The General Contractor for the project was DPR Construction, Inc. of San Diego, California. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of samples of trench backfill and subgrade soils were evaluated in our laboratory in general accordance with ASTM test procedure D1557. The results of the tests are presented in Table 1 entitled "Maximum Density Test Results:" The maximum density of asphalt concrete was provided by the Contractor. In-place density tests were performed in substantial conformance with ASTM test procedures D2922 and D3017 ("Standard Test Method for Density of Soil and Soil Aggregate In-Place by Nuclear Method (shallow depth) and Water content of Soil and Rock In-Place by Nuclear Methods (shallow depth), respectively) or in general accordance with ASTM test Procedure D1556 (Sand-Cone Method). Results of these tests, at the specific locations tested, are presented 51-4508-01/518LG002.DOC Copyright 1998 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 1 of2 January 12, 1998 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax on Table 2 entitled "In-Place Density Test Summary." Test results were also reported to the General Contractor at the time of testing and daily summaries of test results were given to the General Contractor. Our services have been performed in accordance with the generally accepted testing practices in the San Diego County area at this time. No warranty, express or implied is made. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, 2ZzZi Kevin R. Wells Staff Engineer RCT:KRW:sra Attachments: Table 1 -Maximum Density Test Results Table 2 -In-Place Density Test Summary Ronald C. Thomson Operations Manager cc: Mike Peterson, City of Carlsbad, Building Department Mike Platis, Smith Consulting Greg Finch, DPR Construction, Inc. 51-4508-01/518LG002.DOC Copyright 1998 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page2 of2 January 12, 1998 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax TABLE 1 MAXIMUM DENSITY TEST RESULTS (LABORATORY AND FIELD) 1 Olive/Red-brown Silty Clay (CL) 15.0 2 Tan Silty Clay (CL) 14.5 3 Aggregate Base 6.5 4 Light Yell ow Clayey Silt (ML) 17 .1 5 Yellow-brown Sand (SM) 12.8 6 Recycled Class II Base 7 .2 7* 1/2" Med. AR 4000 A.C. -- *Maximum Density provided by Contractor. 51-4508-01/518LG002.DOC Copyright 1998 Kleinfelder, Inc. Ill KLEINFELDER 115.0 116.0 134.5 116.4 120.2 132.6 145.6 January 12, 1998 kq KLEINFELDER TABLE2 IN-PLACE DENSITY TEST SUMMARY Project Name: SMAC Carlsbad Project No. 51-4508-01 _ PA:rE . --·· ·,' · --. -:":DEJ,>;£'1:i. ·:· , DR'( ·. -¥,Ol~T. . REL; . , . .TE11°{ ~TE~T-'.: · · ·. ~~: .. , . ·-,-,JEfOW-;. -·DENSITY_ CONT->-CQ~ .. :SAMPLE -No:: _.Of'N9:. -... _-.-f ·tocAnow _ ... :,-,,.,iF~G.(f.r) -·(PCF,)'\: (%J··· -:· .C¾r:· ·.N9. 7/10/97 85 NE comer of pad FPG 106.7 16.8 93 1 7/10/97 86 Plumbing trench 0+30 FG 107.3 17.3 93 1 7/10/97 87 NW comer of pad FPG 105.9 20.8 92 1 7/10/97 88 SW comer of pad FBG 105.6 16.1 92 7/11/97 89 85 NE comer of pad FPG 105.9 19.9 92 7/11/97 90 88 SW comer of pad FPG 105.2 21.4 91 7/11/97 91 NW comer of pad FPG 107.3 19.8 93 7/11/97 92 86 Plumbing trench 0+30 FG 122.8 8.0 91 3 7/11/97 93 Plumbing trench I +oo -18 in 112.4 7.9 84 3 7/11/97 94 93 Plumbing trench !+00 -18 in 125.2 7.4 93 3 7/11/97 95 Plumbing trench !+50 -27 in 124.0 8.6 92 3 7/11/97 96 Plumbing trench (lat) 2+50 FG I 18.5 8.9 88 3 7/11/97 97 96 Plumbing trench (lat) 2+50 FG 120.7 9.1 90 3 7/14/97 98 Plumbing trench north/south FG 103.2 15.5 90 7/14/97 99 Plumbing trench north/south FG 103.3 20.2 90 7/14/97 100 Plumbing trench drive lane FG 104.7 17.8 90 4 7/14/97 101 Plumbing trench inlet FG 108.5 19.l 93 4 8/12/97 102 West wall@sta 2+37 237* 108.0 14.0 94 8/12/97 103 West wall @sta 2+41 237* 107.4 16.0 93 8/12/97 104 West wall @ sta 2+43 240* 105.1 11.0 91 8/13/97 105 Stormdrain @sta 1 +30 +2 103.8 12.0 90 8/13/97 106 Stormdrain@sta 1+39 FG 107.1 13.4 93 8/13/97 107 Stormdrain @ sta 1 +42 +1 105.0 10.9 91 8/19/97 108 Stormdrain grate @ NW comer +2 104.0 15.2 91 8/19/97 109 Stormdrain grate @ NW comer +4 103.7 16.0 90 8/19/97 110 Southeast ramp -2 105.0 16.2 91 2 8/19/97 111 N. middle drain FG 107.5 14.8 93 8/19/97 112 South wall @ loading dock -1 103.0 21.7 90 8/19/97 113 South wall @ loading dock . -1 100.2 17.7 87 8/19/97 114 113 South wall @ loading dock -I 106.0 20.2 92 8/19/97 115 South wall @ loading dock FG 104.0 22.0 90 8/19/97 116 South wall @ loading dock FG 103.5 19.7 90 8/21/97 117 Trash enclosure 245 107.0 20.9 93 8/21/97 I 18 Trash enclosure 246 105.5 20.6 91 8/21/97 I 19 Trash enclosure 246 105.7 21.0 91 9/4/97 120 Driveway @ Faraday FSG 102,2 14.3 89 9/4/97 121 Driveway @ Faraday FSG 102.1 16.4 89 10/2/97 122 Line B @ driveway ncirth 238 103.5 8,0 90 10/2/97 123 Line A @ sta 0+58 245 105.3 JO.I 92 10/2/97 124 Line A@ sta 0+38 245 103.5 7.1 90 10/9/97 125 Trash enclosure 246 103.7 17.1 90 10/9/97 126 Trash enclosure 247 106.0 19.0 92 10/9/97 127 Trash enclosure 247 105,0 16.2 91 10/10/97 128 North loading dock -3 106.2 19.9 92 10/10/97 129 North loading dock FG 104.0 20.2 90 1 0/1 0/97 1 30 North loading dock -5 108.1 18.6 94 10/10/97 131 130 North loading dock -3 104.6 21.2 91 10/14/97 132 East ramp driveway FSG 106.9 15.0 93 FG = Finished Grade FBG = Finished Base Grade FPG = Finished Pad Grade FSG = Finished Subgrade • -MSL Elevation Indicated. •• -Density Test from '1oint venture" driveway @ Faraday Avenue as requested by DPR. Accepted engineering and testing procedures were used for these tests. The above data is presented for information purposes only. In the absence of continuous observations of our personnel at the site, we cannot express an opinion as to the adequacy of site preparation or overall fill compaction. We do not undertake the guarantee of construction, nor do we relieve the contractor of his primary responsibility to produce a completed project conforming to the project plans and specifications. 51-450B-01/518MG003.XLS Copyright 1998 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 1 of2 RE-. TESTED·. . =-··, , sv:1-10. !$MARKS 89 Fail (Moisture) 92 Fail (Moisture) Pass 90 Fail (Moisture) Pass Pass Pass Pass 94 Fail Pass Pass 97 Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass 114 Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Off site** Off site** Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass 131 Fail (moisture) Pass Pass January 12, 1998 Ill KLEINFELDER TABLE2 IN-PLACE DENSITY TEST SUMMARY Project Name: SMAC Carlsbad Project No. 51-4508-01 'DATE. : .. . .• .. '• DEPTH' .DRY MOIST. REL. .. TEST' ·. : .,• ... . ·coMP, -· AND• RETEST: .. : .. BELOW '·PE!l!SiTY· ~ONT:· SAMPLE ·. -FSG(ET) . .· TE~H NO. . :OFNb;· · · . · ",I,.OCATION ,. (PCP)· · . '. (%): ;(%) NO. 10/14/97 133 East ramp driveway FSG 104.6 15.8 91 I 10/14/97 134 West side irrigation FSG . 103.7 14.2 90 I 10/14/97 135 West side driveway -4 105.0 16.0 91 I 11/7/97 136 Southwest of building FSG 113.9 13.0 95 5 I 1/7/97 137 SW of building @parking bay FSG 110.0 16.4 96 I I 1/7/97 138 West of building FSG 109.1 17.7 95 I 11/7/97 ·139 West ofbuilding@parking bay FSG 109.4 16.5 95 I 11/7/97 140 West of building FSG 108.7 19.2 95 I 11/7/97 141 West ofbuilding@parking bay FSG 108.8 19.0 95 I 11/7/97 142 Northwest of building FSG 109.7 17.5 95 I 11/7/97 143 NW of building @ parking bay FSG 110.5 16.7 96 I 11/7/97 144 South ·of building FSG 108.9 14.5 95 I 11/7/97 145 Southwest of building FSG 109.0 15.6 95 I 11/10/97 146 North of building @parking bay FSG 111.0 14.9 97 I 11/10/97 147 North ofbuilding@parking bay FSG 109.9 15.4 96 1 11/10/97 148 Northeast of building FSG 109.2 15.9 95 I I 1/10/97 149 East of building FSG 110.0 14.8 96 I 11/10/97 150 East of building FSG 110.2 15.0 96 I 11/10/97 151 East of building@ driveway FSG 109.4 15.4 95 I 11/21/97 152 Westswale FBG 126.4 9.2 95 6 11/21/97 153 North parking bay FBG 126.5 7.5 95 6 11/21/97 154 East of building FBG 118.4 9.0 89 6 11/21/97 155 South of building FBG 128.7 7.0 97 6 11/21/97 156 West ofloading dock FBG 125.5 8.1 95 6 11/21/97 157 Northwest of building FBG 126.2 6.1 95 6 11/21/97 158 Southwest of building FBG 122.6 7.0 92 6 I 1/22/97 159 154 East of building FBG 127.3 8.7 96 6 11/22/97 160 West parking bay FBG 122.4 6.3 92 6 11/22/97 161 Northwest entrance area FBG 126.8 7.2 96 6 11/22/97 162 158 Southwest of building FBG 126.1 7.7 95 6 11/24/97 163 160 West parking bay FBG 125.9 6.4 95 6 11/24/97 164 East driveway FBG 126.6 6.4 95 6 11/24/97 165 East of building near driveway FBG 126.0 6.6 95 7 11/25/97 166 West of building FG 139.8 96 7 11/25/97 167 West of building FG 141.3 97 7 11/25/97 168 West parking bay FG 139.9 96 7 11/25/97 169 West parking bay FG 139.3 96 7 11/25/97 170 West of building FG 138.9 95 7 11/25/97 171 Southwest of building FG 141.0 97 7 11/25/97 172 South parking bay FG 139.0 96 7 11/25/97 173 South of building FG 139.6 96 7 11/25/97 174 South of building FG 138.7 95 7 11/25/97 175 South of building FG 138.4 95 7 .. . . . . .. FG = Finished Grade FBG = Finished Base Grade FPG = Finished Pad Grade FSG = Finished Subgrade Accepted engineering and testing procedures were used for these tests. The above data is presented for information purposes only. In the absence of continuous observations of our personnel at the site, we can not express an opinion as to the adequacy of site preparation or overall fill compaction. We do not undertake the guarantee of construction, nor do we relieve the contractor of his primary responsibility to produce a completed project conforming to the project plans and specifications. 51-4508-01/518MG003.XLS Copyright 1998 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 2 of 2 RE-. TESTED BYNO. REMARKS- Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass 159 Fail Pass Pass Pass 162 Fail Pass 163 Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass JanuafY 12, 1998 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ill KLEINFELDER An employee owned company July 8, 1997 Project No. 51-4508-01 Mr. Bob Berry Systems, Machines, Automation, Components 1695 Faraday Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 Subject: Project: Reference Reports: Reference Grading Plan: Dear Mr. Berry: As-Graded Report Systems, Machines, Automation, Components 1695 Faraday Drive Carlsbad, California Report of Geotechnical Investigation Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 109 Carlsbad, California Prepared by: Geotechnics, Inc. Date: March 28, 1997 Grading Plan for S.M.A.C., Systems, Machines, Automation, Components Lot 109, Carlsbad Research Center Prepared by: Kahr and Associates Dated: May 1, 1997 In accordance with our agreement with Systems, Machines, Automation, Components of June 26, 1997, we have performed geotechnical testing and observation services during site grading at the subject project. This report summarizes our grading observations and test results for the rough grading operations on the project site. Separate reports on the building footings, paving, and underground utilities will be prepared when that work is completed. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site covers an area of approximately 4.1 acres. The lot is roughly rectangular in shape and it is approximately 360 feet wide by 500 feet in length. A one-story, concrete tilt-up, 62,000 square foot, warehouse building will be constructed near the center of the site. Landscaping, plants, and parking lots will be constructed on the remainder of the property. 51-4508-01/517RG 198.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 1 of5 July 8, 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GRADING Grading for the site was performed between June 19 and June 30, 1997. The general contractor for the project was DPR Construction, Inc. of San Diego, California. The grading contractor was Pahla Corporation of San Diego, California. Grading observation and testing of fill soils were performed by our technicians who were on site on a near-continuous basis during grading operations. Site grading was performed in general conformance with the project grading plans prepared by Kahr and Associates and the recommendations of the project geotechnical report prepared by Geotechnics, Inc. The contractor chose the option of excavating the existing fill soils to 3 feet below subgrade, and recompacting those soils at moisture contents of at least 5 percent above optimum moisture content. Prior to grading , the site was stripped of organic debris and topsoil. After the site had been stripped and grubbed, the artificial fill soils underlying the site of the proposed warehouse building were excavated to a depth of three feet below finished pad grade. Below the three foot excavation, one foot of the fill soils were scarified, moisture conditioned and then recompacted. Overexcavated soils within the building pad (plus 5 to 15 feet beyond the building perimeter) were placed in lifts approximately eight inches in loose thickness, brought to near-optimum moisture content, and compacted by mechanical means until the desired final grade elevations were attained. In place density tests taken in various locations indicate the soil was generally compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density and at least 5 percent above optimum moisture content, as obtained by the ASTM D1557 test procedure. All in-place density tests and in-place moisture contents were performed in general accordance with ASTM D2922 and ASTM D3017, respectively. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the recompacted soils are presented on Table 1 included in the rear of this report. The results of in-place density tests are presented on Table 2. CONCLUSIONS The site soil conditions encountered at the subject site were generally similar to those described in the referenced report although the surficial soils encountered were classified in the field as a sandy clay as opposed to the clayey sand classification given in the soils report. Based on our observations, field densities, field moisture contents, and laboratory test results, it is our opinion that the structural fill soils of the building pad have been placed and compacted in general accordance with the intent of the recommendations contained in the referenced report. 51-4508-0 l /5 l 7RG 198.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 2 of5 July 8, 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RECOMMENDATIONS Foundation and Slab Design Recommendations for foundation and slab design should follow the referenced geotechnical report. In addition, due to the medium swell potential of the foundation soils, and the likelihood that the foundation soils will be exposed to drying as construction continues, the surface soils are likely to require additional moisture conditioning before placing foundations, concrete slabs, or flatwork. Twenty-four hours before placing foundations, slabs, or flatwork, we should be contacted so that a member of our firm can test the subgrade soils for in-place moisture content. If the subgrade soils have shrinkage cracks or if the in-place moisture is less than 5 percent above optimum, the surficial soils should be scarified, moisture conditioned to at least 5 percent over optimum, and recompacted to 90% to 93% relative compaction. The depth of scarification and recompaction should extend the entire depth of the soil cracks or the depth of low moisture contents. After the soil has been remoisture conditioned, it should be periodically sprinkled to maintain its moisture until aggregate base or concrete is placed. Surficial Stability and Slope Drainage Erosion potential and surficial instability of on-site soils exposed in slopes are considered moderate. The potential for erosion and/or surficial failure of slopes can be reduced if the measures contained in Section 7.6, Slope Stability, of Geotechnics geotechnical report are utilized in conjunction with the recommendations of the design civil engineer and/or landscape architect. Concrete Pavements and Exterior Flatwork Since the surficial soils are clays with a medium expansion potential, there is some risk that concrete pavements and exterior flatwork may move differentially as the subgrade soils shrink and swell. Areas to receive concrete paving and exterior flatwork should be prepared in similar fashion to the building pad to help mitigate the effects of the expansive soils. The lateral extent of the moisture conditioning should be to at least 2 feet outside the perimeter at concrete paving or exterior flatwork. To further mitigate the impact of the expansive soils on exterior concrete pavement and flatwork, the owner may wish to consider having the contractor modify the upper one foot of subgrade by adding at least 3 percent lime by dry unit weight to the soil. Temporary Fills The grading contractor placed fill in two areas at the site to be removed at a later time. These areas are the catch basin at the northwest corner of the site and the ramp down to Lot I 08 in the southeast quarter of the site. It is our understanding the fill in these areas was placed to aid in construction during the site grading operations. These areas have not been placed, compacted, nor tested as engineered fill. It is our understanding that the contractor plans to remove the temporary fills in these areas at a later time. Although plans indicate that no structures will be placed within the footprint of these fills, these areas should be removed and replaced as 51-4508-0 l/517RG 198.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 3 of 5 July 8, 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I engineered fill in accordance with the project plans and soils report to reduce the risk of excessive settlement in paved areas. Ramp/Sliver Fill in Southeast Quarter of Lot The grading plans show a ramp will be constructed to connect the project site (Lot 109) to the lot immediately east of the site (Lot 108). A IO-foot-high slope constructed at a 2 to 1 slope angle currently separates the two lots. Fill placed for the ramp should be keyed and benched into the existing slope face. A typical detail for keying and benching is attached at the end of this report (see Plate 1). Generally, benches should be four feet in height and one equipment width wide. The toe of the keyway should be cut at least two feet below firm material, as approved by an engineer in the field. They key should be at least fifteen feet wide and slope downward towards the slope at a gradient of 2% or greater. The fill should then be placed as engineered fill in accordance with the project plans and soils report. LIMITATIONS The services provided as described in this report include professional opinion and judgments based on the data collected and our field observations. These services have been performed according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices that exist in the Carlsbad area at this time. No other warranty, express or implied, is provided. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein apply to our work with respect to grading and represent conditions at the completion of rough grading of the site. Any subsequent grading should be done in conjunction with our observation and testing. The term "observation" implies that we observed the progress of the work which was within our scope of services. Our conclusions and opinion regarding compliance with the project geotechnical report are based on our observations, experience and testing. Subsurface conditions and the accuracy of tests used to measure such conditions can vary greatly at any time. If any subsurface conditions are encountered subsequent to grading which are different from those described in our report, our firm should be notified immediately in case any supplemental recommendations may be necessary. We will not accept responsibility for any subsequent changes made to the site by others, by the uncontrolled action of water, or by the failure of others to properly repair damages caused by the uncontrolled action of water. 51-4508-01/517RG 198.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 4 of5 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 July 8, 1997 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I We trust this documentation meets your current needs. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact our office. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service. Sincerely, KLEINFELDER, INC. George M. Binger, III Staff Engineer GMB:REL:mkb Senior Engineer cc: Mike Peterson, City of Carlsbad, Building Department Mike Platis, Smith Consulting Greg Finch, DPR Construction, Inc. Attachments: Plate 1 -Benching Details Table 1 -Maximum Density Test Results Table 2 -Compaction Test Summary 51-4508-0 l /5 I 7RG 198.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 5 of5 July 8, 1997 I KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92123-6300 (619) 541-1145 (619) 541-1645 fax I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Name: ·.:Sample ... : .. Number · .. 1 2 Ill KLEINFELDER TABLE 1 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY TEST RESULTS (LABORATORY AND FIELD) Systems, Machines, Automation, Components Carlsbad, California Project No.: 51-4508-01 : : _,.. . . J)es<:riptioii: . ··: ·:, .... __ _ .. :.:·· .. :· ::.·:· •.-·:--:-.. -· -·:-., .:. Mottled Olive/Reddish Brown Silty Clay Tan Silty Clay _:_'. Optimum Moisture -·· · ·Content (Percent of Dry Weight) 15.0 14.5 Maximum Dry Density 115.0 116.0 51-4508-0 l/5 l 7RG 198.DOC Copyright I 997 Kleinfelder, Inc. July 8, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I k~ KLEINFELDER TABLE2 COMP ACTION TEST SUMMARY Project Name: Systems, Machines, Automation, Components Carlsbad, California Project No. 51-4508-01 DATE '. ,· -·!·: -DRY .. MOIST .. REL; •' .. · .. ,: ~ .... ,, .. . AND TEST RETEST .,_ ~ ·_ .-.: .. -: : -. ELEV. DENSTIY ·coNT. COMP. SAMPLE ., ... --:'.:'i'.&cAnoN·· .... ~ •" · .. .. (Fl) . (PCF) • . · TECH NO: OFNO. . (%) (%) ·NO. AVB 6/19/97 1 NE 4+75, NW 2+25 244.0 101.0 18.5 87.0 I AVB 6/19/97 2 1 NE 4+75, NW 2+25 244.0 104.2 19.6 90.0 I AVB 6/19/97 3 NE 4+70, NW 1+80 243.6 106.7 18.5 92.0 2 AVB 6/19/97 4 NE 4+35, NW 2+80 243.6 104.4 18.7 90.0 2 AVB 6/19/97 5 NE 4+35, NW 1+80 244.0 105.6 17.4 91.0 2 AVB 6/19/97 6 NE 4+50, NW 2+50 244.5 106.7 18.4 92.0 2 AVB 6/20/97 7 5 NE 4+35, NW 1+80 244.0 105.7 19.5 91.0 2 AVB 6/20/97 8 6 NE 4+50, NW 2+50 244.5 l07.8 18.2 93.0 2 AVB 6/20/97 9 8 NE 4+50, NW 2+50 244.3 111.0 16.1 96.0 2 AVB 6/20/97 10 NE 3+70, NW 2+80 243.6 103.3 19.7 90.0 I AVB 6/20/97 11 9 NE 4+50, NW 2+50 244.4 105.7 19.3 91.0 2 AVB 6/20/97 12 NE 4+30, NW 2+15 244.9 l04.7 18.5 91.0 I AVB 6/20/97 13 NE 4+25, NW 1+70 245.4 105.8 20.5 92.0 I AVB 6/20/97 14 12 NE 4+30, NW 2+15 244.8 104.7 20.2 91.0 1 AVB 6/23/97 15 NE 3+60, NW 2+75 245.0 104.7 19.l 91.0 I AVB 6/23/97 16 NE 4+70, NW 2+25 245.6 102.4 17.0 89.0 I AVB 6/23/97 17 NE 3+90, NW 1+65 244.6 109.3 17.7 95.0 1 AVB 6/23/97 18 15 NE 3+60, NW 2+75 245.0 103.5 20.5 90.0 I AVB 6/23/97 19 16 NE 4+70, NW 2+25 245.5 104.7 20.5 91.0 I AVB 6/23/97 20 17 NE 3+90, NW 1+65 245.0 108.1 16.3 94.0 1 AVB 6/23/97 21 NE 4+50, NW 2+30 245.3 104.4 20.3 91.0 I AVB 6/23/97 22 20 NE 3+90, NW 1 +65 245.0 104.4 20.7 91.0 1 AVB 6/24/97 23 .. NE 3+90, NW 1+70 243.5 105.7 18.0 92.0 I AVB 6/24/97 24 NE 3+80, NW 2+50 243.7 103.2 19.4 90.0 1 AVB 6/24/97 25 NE 3+35, NW 1+90 244.7 103.5 19.7 90.0 I AVB 6/24/97 26 NE 3+20, NW 2+55 244.4 104.6 19.7 91.0 1 AVB 6/25/97 27 NE 3+25, NW 1 +55 244.7 102.3 14.7 89.0 I AVB 6/25/97 28 NE 3+20, NW 2+40 245.0 101.2 18.0 88.0 I AVB 6/25/97 29 NE 2+95, NW 2+53 246.1 108.0 16.7 94.0 1 AVB 6/25/97 30 27 NE 3+25, NW 1+55 244.7 104.6 19.7 91.0 I AVB 6/25/97 31 28 NE 3+20, NW 2+40 245.2 101.2 21.2 88.0 I AVB 6/25/97 32 29 NE 2+95, NW 2+53 246.0 103.7 19.8 90.0 1 AVB 6/25/97 33 31 NE 3+20, NW 2+40 245.2 104.4 20.0 91.0 I Accepted engineering and testing procedures were used for these tests. The above data is presented for infonnation purposes only. In the absence of continuous observations of our personnel at the site, we can not express an opinion as to the adequacy of site preparation or overall fill compaction. We do no undertake the guarantee of construction, nor do we relieve the contractor of his primary responsibility to produce a completed project confonning to the project plans and specifications. 51-4508-01/517RG198.XLS Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 1 of 3 RE- TESTED ;, .. BYNO. REMARKS 2 FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIU 7 MOISTURE FAIL/ 8 MOISTURE PASS FAIU 9 MOISTURE FAIU II MOISTURE PASS PASS 14 FA!!. PASS PASS 18 FAIL 19 FAIL 20 FAIL PASS PASS FAIU 22 MOISTURE PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS 30 FAIL 31 FAIL FAIU 32 MOISTURE PASS 33 FAIL PASS PASS July 8, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I k_q KLEINFELDER TABLE2 COMP ACTION TEST SUMMARY Project Name: Systems, Machines, Automation, Components Carlsbad, California Project No. 51-4508-01 DATE-,' -.. . ·-· .. __ :i_.·. "· -·:; . DRY MOIST. REL. .. ... '·· .. · , . 'AND TEST RETEST -. . . -;;~ ELEV . DENSITY CONT. COMP. SAMPLE . " •("• ... TECH NO. OFNO. LOCATION·:.: ,.· : (FT) (PCF) (%) (%) NO. .· A VB 6/25/97 , 34 NE 2+40, NW 2+85 244.4 103.5 21.1 90.0 1 AVB 6/25/97 35 NE 3+00, NW 1+70 243.4 105.6 19.0 92.0 1 AVB 6/25/97 36 NE 4+40, NW 2+80 245.9 107.9 17.1 94.0 I AVB 6/25/97 37 NE 4+50, NW 2+00 245.9 101.2 22.6 88.0 1 AVB 6/25/97 38 NE 4+25, NW 1+75 245.4 109.3 18.2 95.0 1 AVB 6/26/97 39 NE 2+70, NW 1+25 245.9 102.4 22.5 89.0 I AVE 6/26/97 40 NE 2+30, NW l+75 245.5 103.5 22.5 90.0 1 AVB 6'26/97 41 NE 2+40, NW 2+50 244.8 l05.7 19.7 92.0 I AVB 6/26/97 42 NE2+10, NW 2+10 244.5 103.6 20.5 90.0 I AVB 6/26/97 43 NE3+10, NW 1+70 245.5 l03.4 20.5 90.0 I AVB 6/26/97 44 NE 3+o0, NW 2+40 245.4 l05.2 21.0 91.0 1 AVB 6/26/97 45 NE 2+70, NW 1+65 244.5 104.6 21.2 90.0 1 AVB 6/26/97 46 NE 2+25, NW 2+15 244.6 105.3 19.8 91.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 47 36 NE 4+40, NW 2+80 245.5 l07.3 18.0 93.0 I AVB 6/27/97 48 NE 4+05, NW 2+75 245.5 107.0 18.1 93.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 49 38 NE 4+25, NW 1+75 245.2 107.2 15.9 93.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 50 37 NE 4+50, NW 2+00 245.4 105.3 20.0 91.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 51 NE 4+35, NW 2+35 245.5 103.6 20.0 90.0 I 52 AVB 6/27/97 NE 2+10, NW 2+35 245.8 107.0 19.1 93.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 53 NE2+10, NW 1+75 249.7 104.0 18.0 90.0 I AVB 6/27/97 54 52 NE 2+ 10, NW 2+35 245.7 l04.7 20.5 91.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 55 53 NE2+10,NW 1+75 249.7 l04.5 19.9 91.0 I AVB 6/27/97 56 NE 1+80, NW 2+o0 245.7 106.0 19.8 92.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 57 NE 2+00, NW 2+40 245.7 104.6 19.1 90.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 58 57 NE 2+00, NW 2+40 245.9 104.0 20.5 90.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 59 47 NE 4+40, NW 2+80 245.5 104.7 20.0 91.0 I AVB 6/27/97 60 48 NE 4+05, NW 2+75 245.6 103.7 21.0 90.0 I AVB 6/27/97 61 49 NE 4+25, NW 1+75 245.4 104.6 20.8 91.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 62 NE 4+85, NW 1+50 FPG l04.2 20.0 90.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 63 NE 3+30, NW 1+35 FPG 105.8 21.0 92.0 I Accepted engineering and testing procedures were used for these tests. The above data is presented for iqformntion purposes only. In the absence of continuous observations of our personnel at the site, we can not express an opinion as to the adequacy of site preparation or overall fill compaction. We do no undertake the guarantee of construction, nor do we relieve the contractor of his primary responsibility to produce a completed project conforming to the project plans nnd specifications. 51-4508-01/517RG198.XLS Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 2 of3 RE-.. ; .. TESTED BYNO. REMARKS PASS PASS FAIU 47 MOISTURE 50 FAIL FAIU 49 MOISTURE 71 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIU 59 MOISTURE FAIU 60 MOISTURE FAIU 61 MOISTURE PASS PASS FAIU 54 MOISTURE FAIU 55 MOISTURE PASS PASS PASS FAIU 58 MOISTURE PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS July 8, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I k_q KLEINFELDER TABLE2 COMP ACTION TEST SUMMARY Project Name: Systems, Machines, Automation, Components Carlsbad, California Project No. 51-4508-01 DATE . ·-· .. .. DRY MOIST. REL. ' . .. .. AND TEST RETESi-. . .. -ELEV. DENSITY CONT. COMP. SAMPLE . . . . ' .. OFNO.· . ·.LOCATION· TECH NO. ., (FI) (PCF) (%) (%) NO. .. ' AVB 6/27/97 I 64 NE 2+20, NW 1+20 FPG 108.1 17.8 94.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 65 NE 4+30, NW 2+00 FPG 104.7 17.6 91.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 66 NE 3+20, NW I +85 FPG 104.6 19.6 91.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 67 NE 1+85, NW 1+75 FPG 106.9 18.5 93.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 68 65 NE 4+20, NW 2+50 FPG 103.5 21.1 90.0 I AVB 6/27/97 69 NE 3+o0, NW 2+35 FPG 104.6 21.0 91.0 1 AVB 6/27/97 70 NE 2+o0, NW 2+25 FPG 104.7 20.7 91.0 I AVB 6/27/97 71 39 NE 2+70, NW 1+25 246.2 104.6 19.9 91.0 l AVB f.128/97 72 NE 4+40, NW 2+90 FG 105.0 19.9 91.0 1 ...__..,. AVB t:.28/97 73 NE 3+25, NW 2+75 FG 103.7 20.2 90.0 1 AVB 6/28/97 74 NE 2+25, NW 2+50 FG 104.4 19.8 91.0 1 AVB 6/28/97 75 NE 4+25, NW 2+90 FG 105.1 20.2 91.0 1 AVB 6/28/97 76 NE 2+60, NW 2+80 FG 103.4 20.4 90.0 1 AVB 6/28/97 77 NE 4+10, NW 3+25 FG 103.9 19.9 90.0 I AVB 6/28/97 78 NE3+15,NW3+10 FG 104.8 22.0 91.0 1 AVB 6/28/97 79 NE 2+30, NW 2+90 FG 104.1 21.7 91.0 1 AVB 6/28/97 80 64 NE2+20,NW 1+20 FPG 103.2 22.5 90.0 I AVB 6/28/97 81 67 NE 1+85, NW 1+75 FPG 103.8 20.3 90.0 I AVB 6/28/97 82 NE 5+40, NW 3+40 244 107.1 18.9 93.0 1 AVB 6/28/97 83 LOADING DOCK FG 104.3 20.9 91.0 1 AVB 6/28/97 84 LOADING DOCK FG 106.0 19.7 92.0 1 Note: FG = Finished Grade Accepted engineering and testing procedures were used for these tests. The above data is presented for information purposes only. In the absence of continuous observations of our personnel at the site, we can not express an opinion as to the adequacy of site preparation or overall fill compaction. We do no undertake the guarantee of construction, nor do we relieve the contractor of his primary responsibility to produce a completed project conforming to the project plans and specifications. 51-4508-01/517RG198.XLS Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 3 of 3 RE-. TESTED .. . . BYNO. REMARKS FAIU 80 MOISTURE FAIU 68 MOISTURE PASS 81 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS July 8, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' ' . FILL SLOPE REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAi.: BENCH HEIGHT ..------------- CUT FACE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT J. H. KLEINFELDER & ASSOCIATES CEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS MATERIALS TESTINC -LAND ANO WATER RESOURCES DOI"\ IC'l'T llf'I ID NOTES: LOWEST BENCH: DEPTH AND WIDTH SUBJECT TO FIELD CHANGE BASED ON . CONSULTANTS INSPECTION. SUBORAINAGE: BACK DRAINS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. BENCHING DETAILS PLATE . Geotechnics Incorporated TO: S.M.A.C. DA TE: June 26, 1997 \58il'Z Jfao~:AJ!en Yf~Yi . Carlsbad, California 92008 ATTENTION: Mr. Robert Berry REGARDING: CRC Lot 109 GEOTECHNICS PROJ. NO. 0078-002-00 We are transmitting the following attached items by: FAX Mail _x .. FAX No.: ____ _ Messenger_ Number of Pages FAXed: including transmittal letter Copies Date Description Express Mail _ Client Pick-Up 2 6-26-97 CHANGE OF GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT Proposed Commercial Building, Lot 109 Remarks: Please call if you have any questions. Copy To: Signed~ Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. City of Carlsbad, Building Inspection Smith Consulting, Mike McGill .... . . . . . . . . . . ~eotechnics 1 ~Incorporated June 26, 1997 S.M.A.C. Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. Imbriglio W. Lee Vanderhurst 5807 Van Allen Way Carlsbad, California 92008 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. #7-0409 Attention: Mr. Robert Berry SUBJECT: REFERENCE: Dear Mr. Berry: CHANGE OF GEOTECHNICAL CONSUL TANT Proposed Commercial Building, Lot 109 Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad, California Report of Geotechnica/ Investigation, Carlsbad Research Center Lot 109, Carlsbad, California, Geotechnics Incorporated, Project No. 0078-002-00, March 28, 1997. We have recently been informed that another geotechnical firm has been selected to provide testing and observation services during site preparation and earthwork construction. As stated in Section 7.3 of the referenced geotechnical report, the recommendations of the report are contingent upon Geotechnics Incorporated performing observation and testing services during grading. This is because assumptions were made during the investigation that must be confirmed in the field. In addition, the report recommended special site preparation recommendations to mitigate several site constraints, which could have an adverse affect on the planned structures. Depending on conditions observed during grading, modifications or additional recommendations may be warranted. Because the required observations and tests will not have been made by Geotechnics Incorporated, in accordance with the standard-of-practice, we retract all responsibility for the performance of earthworks or structures constructed on the site. In accordance with the standard-of practice and with the requirements of the City of Carlsbad, your new consultant should have reviewed the geotechnical reports, and made any modifications or additional explorations as deemed necessary. They are now the geotechnical consultant of record for the project and should provide the final design criteria for foundations and structures, based 9951 Business Park Ave., Ste. B • San Diego California • 92131 Phone (619) 536-1000 • Fax (619) 536-8311 S.M.A.C. JUNE 26, 1997 PROJECT NO. 0078-002-00 DOC. #7 -0409 PAGE2 on actual conditions observed during earthwork. Their as-graded geotechnical report should document all site preparation and earthwork construction and final recommen_dations. Call at your convenience if your should have any questions reg~rding the above. We appreciate the opportunity to have provided past services and wish you success with this project. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Anthony F. Belfast, P. E. 40333 Principal Distribution: Addressee City of Carlsbad, Building Inspection Smith Consulting, Mike McGill Geotechnics Incorporated ~eotechnics Incorporated -- May 14. 1997 S.M.A.C. 5807 Van Allen Way San Ofego, California 92008 SUBJECT~ FOUNDATION AND GRADING PLAN REVIEW Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 109 Cartsbad, CA Principal 1: P.02 t"l-\1:lt:. UL Anthony f. Betfut Michael P. fmbriglio W. Lee V .,,derhunn Project No. 0078-002..QO Doc. #7-0299 References: "Report of Geotechnical Investigation. Car1sbad Research Center, Lot 109, Carfsbad, Califomia", by Geotechnfcs Inc •• Project No. 0078-002-00, Document No. 7-0192, dated March 28. 1997. Gentlemen: Plan Sheets 1, 2, and S·1through S·7, Foundation and Grading Plans forCRC Lot 109, S.M.A.C. by Smith Consulting Architects and Prime Structural Engineers, dated 5/1/97. This letter confirms that we have reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the referenced foundation and grading plans for the proposed construction at tlie subject site. It is our opinion that the referenced plans adequately incorporate the Intent of the referenced geotechnical recommendations. We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service. Please feel free to contact the office with any questions or com,,,,;;iiiis. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED a;i,~ Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. 40333 Principal Engineer AFB/maf Distribution: (2) Addressee (2) Mr. Mfke McGill, Smith Con~ulting Architects (FAX: 452-3907) 99$1 Businen Park Ave.t Ste. B • San Diego California • 9.2131 Phone (61,) 53(;..1000 • Fax (619) 536-8311 05/14/1997 11:30 ). 619-536-8311 GEOTECHNICS INC. .~eotechnics Incorporated May 14, 1997 S.M.A.C. 5807 Van Allen Way San Ofego, California 92008 SUBJECT: FOUNDATION AND GRADING PLAN REVIEW Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 109 Cartsbad, CA PAGE 02 PrincipaJ5: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. lmbriglio W. Lee Vandcrhun;l Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. #7-0299 References: ''Report of Geotechnical Investigation. Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 109, Carlsbad, California", by Geotechnics Inc., Project No. 0078-002-00, Document No. 7-0192, dated March 28, 1997. Gentlemen: Plan Sheets 1, 2, and S-1through S-7, Foundation and Grading Plans for CRC Lot 109, S.M.A.C. by Smith Consulting Architects and Prime Structural Engineers, dated 5/1/97. This letter confirms that we have reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the referenced foundation and grading plans for the pn;,posed construction at the subject site. It is our opinion that the referenced plans adequately incorporate the intent of the referenced geotechnical recommendations. We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service. Please feel free to contact the office with any questions or comments. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED ~~~ Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. 40333 Principal Engineer AFB/maf Distribution: (2) Addressee (2} Mr. Mike McGill, Smith Consulting Architects {FAX: 452-3907) 9?51 Business Park Ave., Ste. B • S811 Diego California • 9~131 Phone (619) 536·1000 • Fax (619) S36-8311 ~eotechnics Incorporated March 28, 1997 S.M.A.C. --- 5807 Van Allen Way San Diego, CA 92008 Attention: Mr. Robert Berry SUBJECT: REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 109 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. lmbriglio W. Lee Vanderhurst Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc.# 7-0192 The following report presents the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of our geotechnical investigation of the subject site. It is our understanding that the development is to consist of the construction of a single commercial structure with surrounding parking. In general, our findings indicate that the subject site is underlain by Saqti_ago Peak Volcanics and fill materials that are considered suitable to support the proposed structure, providing that the recommended site preparation is performed. There were no unusual or special conditions apparent in investigation which would preclude the construction as planned. our-~ 0 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the existing geotechnical conditions at the site as they relate to the proposed i_mprovements, and to make recommendations regarding site preparation and grading, design of the proposed foundations, retaining walls, and slabs, and the construction of pavements. The recommendations contained herein are based on a surface reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and professional experience in the general site area. Design values may include presumptive parameters based on professional judgement. Our scope of work was limited to: 1.1 Review of available literature related to general geologic conditions. 1.2 A visual reconnaissance and subsurface exploration of the site consisting of the drilling of four borings with a truck mounted eight inch hollow stem flight auger. Bulk, disturbed, and relatively undisturbed samples were collected for laboratory testing. 9951 Business Park Ave., Ste. B • San Diego California • 92131 Phone (619) 536-1000 • Fax (619) 536-8311 S.M.A.C. · March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc.# 7-0192 Page 2 1.3 Laboratory testing of selected samples collected during the subsurface exploration. Testing assisted us in assessing the pertinent engineering properties of the site soils. 1.4 Development of recommendations for site preparation, earthwork construction, remedial earthwork, foundation, slab, and retaining wall design, soil bearing capacities, foundation settlement potential, slope stability, and concrete pavements. 1.5 Assessment of general seismic conditions and geologic hazards affecting the area, and their likely impact on the project. 1.6 Preparation of this report. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site was originally rough graded during mass grading of phases 3 through 5 of the Carlsbad Research Center between July of 1986 and November of 1987 (SDGC, 1988). The original rough graded configuration contained a drainage channel along the east edge of the lot. Consequently, the building pad area was approximately half as wide as it is today. The building pad area was enlarged to the existing configuration during grading operations for Unit 5 of CRC between October of 1992 and·March of 1994 (Geotechnics, 1994). The site consists of a roughly rectangular lot, which averages approximately 360 feet in width and 500 feet in length. The site is located soutl) of Faraday Avenue in the Carlsbad Research Center in Carlsbad, California as shown in the Site Location Map, Figure 1. Elevations of the existing building pad are between approximately 242 and 250 feet above sea level. The site is bordered by Lot 108 on the west, Faraday Avenue on the north, Lot 7 4 on the east, and a detention basin on the south. Various slopes exist along the perimeter of the site. An ascending 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) fill slope separates the site from Lot 108 to the west, and a descending 2: 1 fill slope separates the site from Lot 7 4 to the east. An approximately 15 foot high fill slope separates the site from Faraday Avenue on the north. The southern portion of the lot contains an approximately 60 foot high variable cut and fill slope which descends to the landscaped detention basin. Surface runoff is directed by sheet flow to the northwest at an approximately 1 ½ percent gradient. Minor erosion of the building pad area is evident near the desilting basin in the northwest corner of the building pad. Vegetation on site consists of scattered light weeds in the building pad area, chaparral in the natural slope area, and partially landscaped fill slopes. The property is currently vacant. The layout of the site is shown in the Site Plan, Figure 2. Geotechnics Incorporated S.M.A.C. , March 28, 1997 3.0 P-ROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc.# 7-0192 Page 3 We understand that the proposed construction will include an office and warehouse building with loading areas and associated parking. The development will share the access drive along the western edge of the site with Lot 108. The building is anticipated to consist of an approximately 70,000 square foot concrete tilt-up structure. The preliminary site plan indicates that only minor grading is planned, consisting of cuts and fills of less than three feet. The proposed site layout is shown in the Site Plan, Figure 2. 4.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The Carlsbad Research Center is located within the coastal plain section of the Peninsular Range Geomorphic Province, and consists of Mesozoic metavolcanic rock, with overlying Cenozoic sedimentary sandstone and claystone. Our subsurface investigation indicates that the subject site is underlain primarily by Santiago Peak Volcanics and compacted fill. The approximate locations of the borings made for our investiQation are shown in Figure 2. Logs of the explorations are given in Appendix B. A description of the specific units encountered during our investigation follows. 4.1 Santiago Peak Volcanics The Santiago Peak Volcanics were observed in exposures on the cut slope in the southern portion of the lot. The volcanic rock is believed to underlie the entire site at depth. Santiago Peak Volcanics, as observed on site, typically consist of a mildly metamorphosed, metavolcanic rock. The material exposed in the cut slope was highly jointed, with clay filled joints. This material is dry to moist, very dense, and has a low to medium plasticity when weathered to a soil. 4.2 Fill Fill was encountered during our subsurface exploration in all of the borings to the maximum explored depth of 16½ feet. The fill was derived from the Santiago Formation, the Point Loma Formation, and Santiago Peak Volcanics. Fill materials will var'/ considerably based on their source. The predominant fill observed in our subsurface investigation consisted of a clayey sand with gravel sized rock fragments (SC). The·sand was generally fine to medium grained, and had a medium plasticity. The fill was generally Geotechnics Incorporated S.M.A.C. . March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. # 7-0192 Page 4 gray brown in color, moist, and medium dense to dense. The fill contained considerable amounts of hard, angular, metavolcanic rocks of up to 3 inches or more in diameter, which were clearly derived from the Santiago Peak Volcanics. In addition, the fill contained few fragments of fat claystone (CH) up to ½ inch in diameter. Prior to mass grading, a northwest-southeast trending canyon traversed the site. The initial phase of grading in 1988 consisted of removing deleterious alluvium materials within the canyo~, and filling it in order to create a building pad. Prior to placing the fill; a subdrain was constructed in the canyon invert. Invert elevations indicate that approximately 15 to 40 feet of fill was placed during the initial grading operations. The eastern half of the present building pad was not brought to the present grade during the initial grading operations. Instead, the eastern half of the lot contained an approximately 25 to 40 foot deep earthen drainage channel which ran from Fairway Avenue to the detention basin south of the lot. The bottom of the drainage channel contained a concrete lined ditch, which was situated at approximately the same location ... as the eastern edge of the proposed warehouse structure. The channel had 2: 1 fill slopes on either side which ascended from the ditch to the elevation of the existing building pad. The second phase of grading in 1994 included the removal of the concrete ditch, and the placing of compacted fill within the drainage channel. After the channel was filled to pad elevations, minor cut/fill grading was conducted in order to construct the finish pad. A maximum of approximately 45 feet of fill was placed in the lot during the second phase of grading. 4.3 Groundwater No seepage or groundwater was observed in our investigation. Changes in rainfall or site drainage could produce seepage or locally perched groundwater conditions within the soil or rock underlying the site. It should be recognized that excessive irrigation on the project site could also cause perched groundwater conditions to develop at some future date. This typically occurs at underlying contacts with less permeable materials, such as the interface that exists between the fill and the underlying volcanic rock. Since the prediction of the location of such conditions is not possible, they are typically mitigated if and wh~n they occur. Geotechnics Incoiporated S.M.A.C. ·March 28, 1997 5.0 -GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMICITY 5.1 Geologic Hazards Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. # 7-0192 Page 5 The immediate subject site is not located within an area previously known for geologic hazards, nor was evidence of past soil failures or faulting noted in our investigation. 5.2 Seismicity and Faulting The subject site is located approximately 5.0 miles northeast of the projected offshore trace of the Rose Canyon fault zone. This fault zone is classified as active, and capable of generating a magnitude 6.4 earthquake (maximum probable event). The estimated peak site ground acceleration for such an event is 0.42g. Design of structures should comply with the requirements of the governing jurisdictions, building codes and standard practices of the Association of Structural Engineers of California. Ground-breaking due to active faulting is considered to have a_.Jow potential, due to the distance from known, active fault traces. Geotechnics Incmpomted S.M.A.C. . March 28, 1997 6.0 CONCLUSIONS Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. #. 7-0192 Page 6 No geotechnical conditions were apparent during the investigation which would preclude construction of the proposed structure as planned. However, some geotechnical constraints exist which require special design consideration in order to decrease the likelihood of distress to the proposed structure. • The on-site soils include both medium dense fill, and very dense metavolcanic rock. Transitions from rock to fill below foundations and slabs are not recommended due to the different settlement characteristics of the materials, and the resulting potential for differential movements. The preliminary site plans indicate that the proposed structure will be founded entirely on fill. Consequently, cut/fill transitions are not anticipated beneath the structure. However, any changes to the proposed site layout should be re-evaluated by the geotechnical consultant to confirm that the recommendations presented herein remain applicable to the proposed development. • The site contains a deep fill transition. The proposed building will be underlain by · between 5 and 45 feet of compacted fill. It has our experience that even well documented compacted fills may undergo some long term settlement. This may result in differential settlements of approximately one inch across the length of the proposed structure. Such settlement would typically be considered tolerable based on structural considerations. Consequently, conventional shallow foundations are recommended. However, if the risk associated with this settlement is deemed unacceptable, then other alternatives may be used, such as deep foundations. • Our analysis indicates that the existing site slopes are stable with regard to deep-seated failure. However, surface water flow and/or seepage can result in surficial slope failures and erosion. In addition, man-made slopes will weather and creep over time as a result of wetting and drying, biologic forces and gravity. While it is not possible to completely eliminate these effects, recommendations are provided in the following sections which should help to reduce the potential for such behavior. • Laboratory testing indicates that the on-site fill soils have a medium expansion potential. Alternative recommendations are provided which will reduce the potential for detrimental soil heave. Geotechnics Incorporated , S.M.A.C. March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc.# 7-0192 Page 7 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The remainder of this report presents recommendations in detail. These recommendations are based on empirical and analytical methods typical of the standard of practice in southern California. If these recommendations appear not to cover any specific feature of the project, please contact our office for additions or revisions to the recommendations. 7 .1 Plan Review We recommend that foundation and grading plans be reviewed by Geotechnics Incorporated prior to plan finalization. 7 .2 Site Preparation Grading and earthwork should be conducted in accordance with the Grading Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, and Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. All site fills should be placed in accordance with the recommendations given in Section 7.4 of this report. The following recommendations are provided regarding specific aspects of the proposed earthwork construction. These recommendations should be considered subject to revision based on field conditions observed by the geotechnical con·sultant. 7.2.1 General: Clearing of the existing site should include the removal of any pipes, vegetation, or general debris. Any deleterious material, including construction debris, rocks over 6 inches in greatest dimension, or soil containing vegetation should not ·be used in site fills. 7.2.2 Improvement Areas: In all areas of planned improvements, including pavements and exterior flatwork, the surficial 12 inches of soil should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density as determined by ASTM D 1557. The bottom of the excavation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant. The soil within the upper 12 inches of pavement subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction based on ASTM D1557 Geotechnics Incorporated S.M.A.C. · March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc.# 7-0192 Page 8 7.2.3 Building Areas: In all areas of planned structures, including at least five feet outside of the building perimeters, surficial soil should be excavated to a minimum depth of three feet, and replaced in accordance with one of the recommendations discussed below. The following alternative recommendations are presented in order of increasing risk. • Replace the soil within three feet of the building pad subgrade with nonexpansive material. This should include the area within. fiye feet of the building perimeter. This may consist of imported nonexpansive soil, or lime-treated, on-site clay. Lime treatment generally requires from 3 to 6 percent hydrated lime uniformly mixed in the soil. The actual percentage required should be based on laboratory testing of the on-site clays. • Replace the soil within the upper three feet of building pad subgrade at a moisture content that is at least five percentage points above optimum moisture based on ASTM D1557. 7.2.4 Debris Basin: A temporary debris basin was installed during rough grading of the subject site in the northwestern corner of the building pad. Soft sediments have accumulated within the basin since initial construction. All soft sediments within the basin should be removed to a depth where competent material is encountered. The entire excavation should then be brought up to finish surface grade with compacted fill. In the event that the existing storm drain pipes are to be-abandoned, they should be removed and the excavations backfilled. 7.3 Excavation and Grading Observation Foundation excavations and site grading excavations should be observed by Geotechnics Incorporated. During grading, Geotechnics Incorporated should provide observation and testing services continuously. Such observations are considered essential to identify field conditions that differ from those anticipated by the preliminary investigation, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to determine that the grading is accomplished in general accordance with the recommendations of this report. Recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon Geotechnics Incorporated performing such services. Our personnel should perform sufficient testing of fill during grading to support our professional opinion as to compliance with compaction recommendations. Geotechnics Incorporated S.M.A.C. March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. # 7-0192 Page 9 Temporary excavations, such as will be required for utility trenches, are anticipated to be less than 10 feet in depth. Temporary excavations greater than 5 feet in depth should be laid back no steeper than 1 :1 (horizontal to vertical), or shored, prior to allowing workers to enter. All excavations should conform with Cal-OSHA guidelines. 7.4 Fill Compaction All fill and backfill to be placed in association with site development should be accom- plished at slightly over optimum moisture conditions and using equipment that is capable of producing a uniformly compacted product. The minimum relative compaction recommended for fill is 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM D1557, except as modified in previous paragraphs. Sufficient observation and testing should be performed by Geotechnics Incorporated so that an opinion can be rendered as to the compaction achieved. Imported fill sources, if needed, should be observed prior to hauling onto the site to determine the suitability for use. Representative samples of imported materials and on site soils should be tested by the geotechnical consultant in order to evaluate their appropriate engineering properties for the planned use. During grading operations, soil types other than those analyzed in the geotechnical reports may be encountered by the contractor. The geotechnical consultant should be notified to evaluate the suitability of these soils for use as fill and as finish grade soils. 7.5 Surface Drainage Foundation and slab performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The ground surface around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed to achieve this depends on the prevailing landscape. In general, we recommend that pavement and lawn areas within five feet of buildings slope away at gradients of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas should have minimum gradients of at least five percent away from buildings in the first five feet. Densely vegetated areas are considered those in which the planting type and spacing is such that the flow of water is impeded. Geotechnics Incorporated .S.M.A.C. March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. # 7-0192 Page 10 Planters should be built so that water from them will not seep into the foundation, slab, or pavement areas. Roof drainage should be channeled by pipe to storm drains, or discharge at least 5 feet from building lines. Site irrigation should be limited to the minimum necessary to sustain landscaping plants. Should excessive irrigation, surface water intrusion, water line breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones or "perched" groundwater may develop in the underlying soils. 7.6 Slope Stability Various slopes exist around the site, as discussed in Section 2.0. Based on our current understanding of the proposed development, and our recommended slope setback, it is our opinion that the proposed structure will not impose additional loads on the existing · slopes. Therefore, our analysis indicates that the site slopes are stable with regard to deep-seated failure with a factor of safety greater than 1.5. Although the slopes are stable with regard to deep seated failure, they may be susceptible to minor erosion and surficial slope failures. In our opinion, this should not affect the stability of the proposed structure. The surficial slope stability may be enhanced by providing proper site drainage. The site should be graded so that water from the surrounding areas is not able to flow over the top of the slope. Diversion structures should be provided where necessary. It is recommended that the existing slopes be planted with vegetation that will increase their stability. Ice plant is generally not recommended. We recommend that vegetation include woody plants, along with ground cover. All plants should be adapted for growth in semi-arid climates with little or no irrigation. A landscape architect should be consulted in order to develop a specific planting palate suitable for slope stabilization. 7.7 Foundation Recommendations These recommendations are considered generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California. Other alternatives may be available. The foundation recommendations herein should not be considered to preclude more restrictive criteria of governing agencies or by the structural engineer. The design of the foundation system should be performed by the project structural engineer, incorporating the geotechnical parameters described in the following sections. The following design parameters assume that foundations will bear directly on compacted fill as discussed in Section 7.2. Geotechnics Incorporated S.M.A.C. March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. # 7-0192 Page 11 7.7.1 Shallow Foundations on Fill: Allowable Soil Bearing: Minimum Footing Width: Minimum Footing Depth: Minimum Reinforcement: 2,000 psf (allow a one-third increase for short-term wind or seismic loads). 12 inches. 24 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade. Two no. 5 bars at both top and bottom in continuous footings., 7.7.2 Lateral Loads: Lateral loads against structures may be resisted by friction between the bottoms of the footings and the supporting soil. A coefficient of friction of 0.20 is recommended. Alternatively, a passive pressure of 250 pcf is recommended for the foundations embedded into compacted fill. If friction and passive pressure are combined, the passive pressure value should be reduced by one-third. .-, 7.7.3 Settlement: It has our experience that compacted fills will experience hydrocompression settlement on the order of 0.2 percent of fill height due to the infiltration of rain or irrigation water. Consequently, the structure may experience differential settlement on the order of one inch across its longest dimension. 7.7.4 Slope Setback: Foundations for all structures should be setback from descending slope faces a minimum horizontal distance of 8 feet. The setback should be measured horizontally from the outside bottom edge of the footing to the slope face. The horizontal setback can be reduced by deepening the foundation in order to achieve the required set.back distance projected from the footing bottom to the face of the slope. It should be recognized that the outer few feet of all slopes are susceptible to gradual down-slope movements due to slope creep. This will affect hardscape such as concrete slabs. We recommend that settlement sensitive hardscape not be constructed within five feet of the top of slopes. Geotechnics Incorporated S.M.A.C. ·March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc.# 7-0192 Page 12 7.8 On-Grade Slabs Building slabs should be supported by compacted fill prepared as recommended under Section 7.2. Slabs should be designed for the anticipated loading. If an elastic design is used, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 125 kips/ft3 should be used. As a minimum, slabs should be at least 6 inches in thickness and be reinforced with at least #3 bars on 12 inch centers, each way. 7.8.1 Moisture Protection for Slabs: Concrete slabs cqnstructed on soil ultimately cause the moisture content to rise in the underlying soil. This results from continued capillary rise and the termination of normal evapotranspiration. Because normal concrete is permeable, the moisture will eventually penetrate the slab. Excessive moisture may cause mildewed carpets, lifting or discoloration of floor tile, or similar problems. The amount of moisture transmitted through the slab can be controlled by the use of various moisture barriers. To decrease the likelihood of problems related to damp slabs, suitable moisture protection measures should be used where moisture sensitive floor coverings or other factors warrant. The most commonly used moisture protection in Southern California consists of about two inches of clean sand covered by 'visqueen' plastic sheeting. In addition, two inches of sand are placed over the plastic to decrease concrete curing problems associated with placing concrete directly on an impermeable membrane. It has been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 to 12 pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. If this is excessive for the proposed structure, alternative recommendations can be provided upon request. 7.8.2 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs and sidewalks should be at least 5 inches thick and should be reinforced with at least #3 rebars on 24 inch centers, each way ( or alternatively 6" x 6"-W2.9 x W2.9 WWF). Crack control joints should be placed on at least 10 foot centers, each way. Differential movement between buildings and exterior slabs, or between sidewalks and curbs may be decreased by dowelling the slab into the foundation or curb. Geotechnics Incorporated S.M.A.C. . March 28, 1997 Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc.# 7-0192 Page 13 7.9 Expansive Soils The soils observed during our investigation consisted primarily of low plasticity clayey sands (SC) or sandy clays (CL) with gravel. Laboratory testing of representative samples indicates that the site soils have a moderate expansion potential, based on Uniform 1?uilding Code ctiteria. Figure C-3 in the appendix summarizes the expansion test results. 7 .10 Reactive Soils Because of the likelihood that the sulfate content of the on-site soil or groundwater is sufficient to react adversely with normal cement, we recommend that Type II cement be used in all concrete which will be in contact with soil. 7 .11 Earth Retaining Structures Backfilling retaining walls with expansive soil can increase lateral pressures well beyond normal active or at-rest pressures. We recommend that retaining walls be backfilled with soil having and expansive index of 20 or less. The backfill area should include the zone defined by a 1 :1 sloping plane, back from the base of the wall. Cantilever retaining walls should be designed for an active earth pressure approximated by an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 lbs/ft3• The active pressure should be used for walls free to yield at the top at least 0.2 percent of the wall height. For walls restrained so that such movement is not · permitted, an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 lbs/ft3 should be used, based on at-rest soil conditions. with level backfill. The above pressures do not consider any surcharge loads or hydrostatic pressures. If these are applicable, they will increase the lateral pressures on the wall and we should be contacted for additional recommendations. Walls should contain an adequate subdrain to eliminate any hydrostatic forces. Typical wall drain detains are given in Figure 3. Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, based on ASTM D1557. Backfill should not be placed until walls have achieved adequate structural strength. Heavy compaction equipment which could cause distress to walls should not be used. Geotechnics Incorporated S.M.A.C. ·March 28, 1997 7 .12 Pavements Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc. # 7-0192 Page 14 Two traffic types are assumed: areas of light traffic and passenger car parking (Traffic Index = 4.5), and access drives and truck routes (Traffic Index = 6.0). The project civil engineer should review these values to determine if they are appropriate. Laboratory R- Value tests conducted on a representative sample of the on-site soils indicated that an R- Value of 7 should be used for pavement design. Based on the assumed Traffic Index, and the R-Value determined in the laboratory, the following pavement sections are recommended in accordance with the CAL TRANS design method. DESIGN SECTION TRAFFIC INDEX ASPHALT CONCRETE AGGREGATE BASE 4.5 3 inches 8 inches 6.0 4 inches 11 inches Concentrated truck traffic areas, such as trash truck aprons, should consist of six inches of portland cement concrete over native subgrade. Concrete should be reinforced with at least number 4 bars on 24-inch centers, each way. As an alternative to asphalt concrete, portland cement concrete may also be used for the driveways and parking areas. Concrete drives and parking areas should consist of 6 inches of Portland cement concrete over native subgrade. Reinforcement and control joints will reduce cracking and movement potential. As a minimal recommendation, concrete drives and parking areas should be reinforced with at least #3 rebars on 24 inch centers, each way ( or alternatively 6" x 6"-W2.9 x W2.9 WWF). Crack control joints should be placed on at least 10 foot centers, each way. The upper 12 inches of the pavement subgrade should be scarified, brought to about optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95% of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557. Aggregate base should conform to Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, crushed aggregate base, crushed miscellaneous base, or processed miscellaneous base. Geotechnics Incorporated ..... n PANEL DRAIN: MIRADRAIN 6000, MIRADRAIN 6200, TENSAR DC1100, JDRAIN 100, OR APPROVED SIMILAR. CONSTRUCTION SLOPE MINUS 3/4-INCH CRUSHED ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC (MIFAFI 140N, SUPAC 4NP, OR APPROVED SIMILAR) 1 CUBIC FOOT PER LINEAR FOOT 4-INCH DIAM. ADS OR PVC PERFORATED PIPE DAMP-PROOFING OR WATER-PROOFING AS REQUIRED NOTES 1) Subdrain perforated pipe should have a fall of at least 1.5%. Perforated pipe should outlet to a solid pipe carrying the drainage to a free gravity outfall. Slope of outlet pipe should be at least 1 %. 2) Panel drain should be glued or nailed to the wall and spliced in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations. Fabric side of panel should face the backfill soil. 3) Drain installation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant prior to backfilling. Geotechnics Incorporated RETAJNING WALL DRAJN Proposed Warehouse S.M.A.C. Project No. 0078-002-00 Document No. 7-0192 FIGl,JRE 3 \/ \ ~ ~iv~ \ / \ ~/ ', ~7 ,.,y '-'<>---,d' I j:-',f.'~},i . .,,,,P,,:-,._ \ I / ,,&,,.. -~ ) / "::...~ ,. ·--I / / / I ''-J!\!.. ..__ ::.>.,_I I / / f V' ·,-.. I / ~ / ---,1<',. -::-,.. / /4-',, ,'l:.fl '·'Y ',:\ / ~ \ --~-),;,,,--..., .. ./'< / ~7 .,,.,.---'"' .... , .. --: ........ ,_.,.t::.. .. / ~ --/· / ...._ ·Pi)f . ' ~ ..... ;.,,.,~,--_,;-----+....:ir-----------1!--l\.L.ft.~~t.....:;t.......'.!.::.:'....../--..J.--_::::::~.,,.----____ _j[_.:..:.:__.....:.·4~---/ ~~ r·---v.,_.,,;;11 1 H 1 '1 I I 15 \; ~--, I ',, ........... ..... _.,,. l ---..... ....... ...._...._ I --., \ '~. \t;. ~- r.:!:~-l'r I ...... ,, ' 111 I .--_e_n£.C~El~~~--..... i-- lt; \ I ~~ _,/ __ ,,, , ~i'!._r~ \ ~ / J_ g,,,, PA!£,M1 --~~_IJ_.\.AV /' -S) L/ ;J ___ j:gj Ii: ..... oU roRIT Qt. ii A C..:.rn~.. COSmS '"'/ r.t ·R ... , ~ ._. ~ 0 / 'J '. .. / __ / ~tj . / ,,,,.,,..,,,,."' ,.. __ _...~'\ ,--- / ' / ) /' ./ / / ___ _.,,. \\ ' ·, I \ \ I I I I -. I I ·---x / ,,/ -·f ·. .-· l / -'--_ .... J..... ,,___ 7 ,,,,,,-----..... -_,,,.,,,---. ___ _..,,----- // ' ~ r --,' // '~ ..... \ 2B00 --- ,....----~ \ / \ I \ / ~)01 ,R 0 .25 .5 .75 1.0 ADAPTED FROM THE 1996 THOMAS BROTHERS • Geotechnics Incorporated SITE LOCATION MAP Proposed Warehouse S.M.A.C. ~~ I M11es Kliontelehl 0 .5 1.0 Project No. 0078-002-00 Document No. 7-0192 FIGURE 1 --::r;i-__ ---..~--- -236-J ------------------- SCALE: 1 Inch = 50 Feet ...._ Geotechnics Incorporated Faraday Avenue ·~ _______ _..:;,-- SITE PLAN Proposed Warehouse S.M.A.C. -;- ·'· - EXPLANATION ~ B-4 Indicates approximate location · of exploratory boring Project No. 0078-002-00 Document No. 7-0192 FIGURE 2 S.M.A.C. March 28, 1997 8.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Project No. 0078-002-00 Doc.# 7-0192 Page 15 This investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this report. The samples taken and used for testing and the observations made are believed representative of the project site; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between borings. As in most projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant and additional recommendations made, if warranted. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the necessary design consultants for .the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractors carry out such recommenda- tions in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the condition of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards of practice may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. *** GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. 40333 Principal Engineer Geotechnics Incoiporated ~:6if-- Staff Engineer APPENDIX A REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials (1992). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Construction, Volume 04.08 Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1296 p. Anderson, J. G. , Rockwell, T. K., Agnew, D. C. (1989). Past and Possible Future Earthquakes of Significance to the San Diego Region, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 5, No. 2. pp 299-335. Bowles, J. E. (1982). Foundation Analysis and Design, 3rd ed.: New York, McGraw Hill, 816 p. California Division of Mines and Geology (1975). Recommended Guidelines for Determining the Maximum Credible and the Maximum Probable Earthquakes, California Division of.Mines and Geology Notes, Number 43. California Division of Mines and Geology (1982). Recent Slope Failures, Ancient Landslides, and Related Geology of the North-Central Coastal Area, San Diego C(?unty, California, California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 82-12 LA International Conference of Building Officials (1991 ). Uniform Building Code (with California Amendments) Title 23. ' Geotechnics Incorporated (1994). As-Graded Geotechnical Report, Unit 5, Carlsbad Research Center,Carlsbad, California, Project No. 0017-001-01, April 29, 1994. Geotechnics Incorporated (1996). Proposal For Geotechnical Services, Geotechnical Investigation for Commercial Construction, Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 109, Carlsbad, California, Proposal No. 7-056, March 12, 1997. Jennings, C. W. (1975). Fault Map of California, California Division of Mines and Geology, California,. Geologic Data Map Series. Kennedy, M. P., and Peterson, G. L. (1975). Geology of San Diego Metropolitan Area, California: California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 200, 56 p. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. (1988). As Graded Geotechnical Report, Carlsbad Research Center, Phase Ill, IV and V, Lots 76 through 91, 108 and 109, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-2863-006-00-10, April 1, 1988. · Trieman, J. A (1984). The Rose Canyon Fault Zone --A Review and Analysis, California Division of Mines and Geology unpublished report, 106 p. Wesnousky, S. G. (1986). Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazard in California: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 91, no. 812, p. 12587-12631. Geotechnics Incorporated APPENDIX 8 FIELD EXPLORATION Field exploration consisted of a visual reconnaissance of the site, and the drilling of four exploratory borings with a truck-mounted, hollow stem, continuous flight drill rig on March 14, 1997. The borings were 8 inches in diameter, and were drilled to a maximum depth of 16½ feet. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on Figure 2. Logs describing the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on the following Figures B-1 through 8-4. Disturbed samples were collected using a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler (2-inch outside diameter). SPT samples were sealed in plastic bags, labeled, and returned to the laboratory for testing. Relatively undisturbed samples were collected using a 3-inch outside diameter, ring lined sampler (modified California sampler). Ring samples were sealed in plastic bags, placed in rigid plastic containers, labeled,''and returned to the laboratory for testing. The drive weight for both the SPT and the ring samples was a 140-pound hammer with a free fall of 30 inches. For each sample, we recorded the number of blows needed to drive the sampler 6, 12, and 18 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the final 12 inches is shown on the attached logs under "blows pe'r ft." Bulk samples are indicated on the boring logs with shading, whereas SPT samples are indicated with vertical lines, and ring samples with horizontal lines. Boring locations were established in t~e · field by pacing and by estimation using the plans provided. The locations shown should not be considered more accurate than is implied by the method of measurement used. The lines designating the interface between soil units on the test pit logs are determined by interpolation and are therefore approximations. The transition between the materials may be abrupt or gradual. Further, soil conditions at locations between the borings may be su_bstantially different from those at the specific locations explored. It should be recognized that the passage of time can result in changes in the soil conditions reported in our logs. Geotechnics IncoipOrated Logged by JCM Method of Drilling: i=' ._; w w u:-u. _, _, (..) w a:: a. a. w :: :: !::. !:!::. w a. < < ~ ::i: en en en I-~ w ~ en a. 0 2! _, z w a:: :::, w Q _, Q CD Q CD 2 42 3 4 5 29 6 7 51 8 9 10 30 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 -;F. w a:: :::, I-en 0 :: LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 1 Date: 3/14/97 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation: DESCRIPTION FILL: Clayey sand (SC), fine to medium grained, medium plasticity, gray brown, moist, medium dense to dense. Contains some angular metavolcanic gravel and fat claystone chunks. WEATHERED SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS (Jsp): Clayey sand (SC), fine grained, medium plasticity, moist, medium dense to dense. Completely weathered paleosol. Same. Total Depth = 11 ½ Feet No Groundwater or Caving Backfilled 3/14/97 244 LAB TESTS Gradation Atterberg Sulfate Expansion Direct Shear PROJECT NO. 0078-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-1 LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 2 Logged by JCM Date: 3/14/97 Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation: i= i-,: w w ii:' u. ..J ..J (J ~ w 0:: 0. 0. w w w :E :E e:. 0:: !:!::. 0. ct ct ~ :::, :::t: (/) (/) (/) I-I-s: w ~ iii (/) 0. 0 > ..J z 0 w 2 :::, w ~ C ..J C c:a C c:a DESCRIPTION FILL: Sandy clay (CL), medium plasticity, gray brown, moist, hard. 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 8 12 22 ___ ............................................................................................. __ _ Clayey sand (SC), fine to medium grained, medium plasticity, olive gray, moist, medium dense. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 27 11 12 13 43 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Clayey sand (SC), fine to medium grained, medium plasticity, gray brown, moist, medium dense to dense. Contains considerable gravel. Total Depth= 14 Feet No Groundwater or Caving Refusal on Hard Rock Backfilled 3/14/97 PROJECT NO. 0078-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED 245 LAB TESTS FIGURE: B-2 LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 3 Logged by JCM Date: 3/14/97 Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger Elevation: i=-i-= w w U:-LI. .J .J ~ w 0. t) 0 a: 0. w w :E :E e:. 1:!:. w < a: 0. < i:: ::::, :::c: en en en I- I-::: w ~ in en C. 0 ::! .J z 0 w a: ::::, w :E C .J m C CD C DESCRIPTION FILL: Sandy clay (CL), medium plasticity, gray brown, moist, hard. 2 25 3 4 .................................................................................................................................................................. __ ........................................ . 5 Clayey sand {SC), fine to medium grained, medium plasticity, 6 7 8 9 . 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 45 20 50 red brown, dry to moist, dense. ''cl: ·---···········--··--··--···--····--·--···--···----···· ................................................................................ . Sandy clay (CL), low plasticity, dark brown, moist, very hard. Total Depth= 11½ Feet No Groundwater or Caving Refusal on Hard Rock Backfilled 3/14/97 PROJECT NO. 0078-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED 250 LAB TESTS Gradation Expansion FIGURE: 8-3 LOG OF EXPLORATION BORING NO. 4 Logged by JCM Date: 3/14/97 Elevation: 248 Method of Drilling: 8 Inch Hollow Stem Flight Auger i=-..,: w u.. ..J w 0: C. w w :E !!::. C. ct: :z: VJ VJ I-:::: w C. > w 0 c2 0 ..J m 0 2 12 3 ........ . ......... 4 5 24 ......... ......... 6 7 19 8 9 10 69 11 12 13 14 15 30 16 17 18 19 20 w ii:' ..J 0 C. :E e:. ct: ~ VJ ~ en ..J z :::, w m 0 -.F-w 0: :::, I-VJ 0 :E DESCRIPTION FILL: Clayey sand (SC), fine to medium grained, medium plasticity, gray brown, moist, medium dense to dense. Contains some angular metavolcanic gravel and fat claystone chunks. LAB TESTS R-Value .................................................................................................................................................... , ____ ............................................. . Silty sand (SM), fine to medium grained, nonplastic, gray brown, moist, medium dense. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Sandy clay (CL), low plasticity, gray brown, moist, very hard. Same. Same. Total Depth= 16½ Feet No Groundwater or Caving Refusal on Hard Rock Backfilled 3/14/97 PROJECT NO. 0078-002-00 GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED FIGURE: B-4 APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING Selected representative samples of soils encountered were tested using test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials, or other generally accepted standards. A brief description of the tests performed follows: Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Visual classification was supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples and clas- sification in accordance with ASTM D2487. The soil classifications are shown on the Boring Logs. Particle Size Analysis: Particle size analyses were performed in accordance with ASTM D422. The grain size distribution was used to determine presumptive strength parameters used to develop foundation design criteria. The results are given in Figures C-1 and C-2. -.'.\ Atterberg Limits: ASTM D4318-84 was used to determine the liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of a selected fine-grained sample. The results are summarized in Figure C-1. Expansion Index: The expansion potential of selected soils was characterized by using the test method ASTM D 4829. Figure C-3 provides the results of the tests. Sulfate Content To assess their potential for reactivity with concrete, a representative sample was tested for content of water-soluble sulfate minerals using CAL TRANS method 417 (Part I). The results are given in Figure C-3. Direct Shear Test The shear strength of the soil was assessed through a direct shear test on a relatively undisturbed sample performed in accordance with ASTM D3080. The sample was consolidated, and the maximum shear rate was determined in order to avoid pore fluid pressure generation. The results are summarized in Figure C-4. R-Value: An R-Value test was performed on representative pavement area materials in accordance with ASTM D 2844-89. The results are given in the text. Geotechnics Incorporated 100 90 80 .. -§?O ·a:; \o .c I.. Q) .950 LL 1: fjt-0 I.. Q) fl. 30 20 10 0 100 1-1/2" ..., 3/4" 3/8" #4 ----ll!k ------Ill -- - 10 COARSE I FINE I GRAVEL _I SAMPLE ~8 ½/foSlandard ~Uve Sizes :1tc;n #100 #200 -r--m--'m-.., ..... "ltl '--r-... l I-... , __ --"-, --11-.... "--, ,a .,. 1--f--- 1 Grain Size in Millimeters O. 1 COARSE.I MEDIUM I FINE J SAND I UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: SC EXPLORATION NUMBER: B1 SAMPLE LOCATION: O' -2½' DESCRIPTION: CLAYEY SAND Geotechnics SOIL CLASSIFICATION Incorporated Proposed Warehouse S.M.A.C. Hvdrometer SILT AND CLAY 0.01 ATTERBERG LIMITS LIQUID LIMIT: 41 PLASTIC LIMIT: 20 PLASTICITY INDEX: 21 ' 0.001 Project No. 0078-002-00 Document No. 7-0192 FIGURE C-1 100 90 80 .... '§70 'ii, ~o .a '-Q) 1-11L ,$0 LL __ ,_ .... C f}iO '-Q) Q. 30 20 10 0 100 .,, .. ... vfU ... .. --!:!-- I- --c- 10 1t0 U~fa~an~~rct~0ve Sizes ff ~~~ ... -... .... ..... '""_ ,..__ -m-.. --ElS,.._r-- N ~ ...... i"'--... ..........__,,__ -1-f-~ -r--,.,. , __ I- ---1-- :, _,_ 1-1- 1 Grain Size in Millimeters O. 1 COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE GRAVEL SAND SAMPLE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: CL EXPLORATION NUMBER: B3 SAMPLE LOCATION: O' -4' DESCRIPTION: SANDY LEAN CLAY Geotechnics SOIL CLASSIFICATION Incorpor·ated Proposed Warehouse S.M.A.C. " ..... "'""'"'· .... , ~~ 0.01 0.001 SILT AND CLAY ATTERBERG LIMITS LIQUID LIMIT: PLASTIC LIMIT: PLASTICITY INDEX: Project No. 0078-002-00 Document No. 7-0192 FIGURE C-2 SULFATE TEST RESULTS (CAL TRANS 417) I SAMPLE I SULFATE CONTENT I 81 @ 0' -2½' I 200-400 P.P.M. EXPANSION TEST RESULTS (ASTM D 4829) SAMPLE I EXPANSION INDEX I 81@ O' -2½' 80 83@ O' -4' 80 UBC TABLE NO. 29-C, CLASSIFICATION OF EXPANSIVE SOIL EXPANSION INDEX 0-20 21-50 51-90 91-130 Above 130 ·O · Geotechnics Incorporated POTENTIAL EXPANSION Very low Low Medium High Verv hiah Laboratory Test Results Proposed Warehouse S.M.A.C. Project No. 0078-002-00 Document No. 7-0192 Figure C-3- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -, . . NEW SMAC WAREHOUSE CARLSBAD, CA San Diego Detroit Atlanta New Jersey .. · ·- I . : '. : _.;.._;....._;,___.' .....;.__ _ _____,;.. _ __,;.._ ___ _ 8265.-A Yickrns STREET·• :SAN DiEq6. CA 92111 • TEL (619) ··576-6466 ~ FAx (619) 576-6465 · .. ·-' . . . . . , ~ . . I I I A FIRE DESIGN GROUP CO.· ToMEs, VAN RicklEy & AssociATEs San Diego Detroit Atlanta New Jersey I April 10, 1997 I I Colleen Balch Carlsbad Fire Department 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, CA 9?008 RE: SMAC -New Warehouse Article 81 Requirements I Dear Colleen: I This fire protection plan is being sent to you to verify SMAC's compliance with the Uniform Building and Fire Codes, and will assist you during the plan check procedure. This plan is specifically bas.ed on the 1994 Editions of 1 UFC Article 81, UFC Standard 81-2, and the Uniform Building Code. This fire protection report is based on the following info_rmation: · I 1.. Preliminary site plan and roof plans sent to us by Smith Consulting. I 2. Information gathered during several telephone conversations with Bob Berry of SMAC. Uniform Fire Code research. I I I I I I I I 3. GENERAL The new SMAC warehouse is approximately ·62,000 squa,i:e feet in area. Distance ~o exits do not exceed 200 feet at any point in the building (attachment#]). The building is completely ~prinklered and exceed or comply with all applicable standards governing high pile stock warehouses. · Scope: The scope of this report is limited to the.Uniform Fire _Code, specifically Article_81 ·requirements, because of the storage of finished goods made of Group A _Plastics stored above_ six fee~ in height. · · Construction:. The construction of the building is of Type III-N. Occupancy: . . . . . . , . The building occupancy is classified as an S-1 (attachment #2). T4e design density requirements are dictated by the high piled storage of Group·A Plastics. Therefore fir~ sprinkler protection of the building·will not be dictated by the occupancy specified in this se~tion. ' . . . . . . . ' . . . · 8265-A. Vickrns STR~ET • SAN OiECjq. CA ·92111 ~-TEL (619) 57~~6166 .~ FAx (619) 576•6465 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SMAC Warehouse April 10, 1997 Page 2 of 4 Storage:· Polyurethane and Nylon are both considered to be "Group A" plastics. Group A plastics, as finished goods, are categorized as Class V (high h~ard) ~ommodity ( attachment #3). · Class V commodities, if stored above 6 feet, are considered "High Piled Storage," and therefore fall unde~ the requirements set fo~h by Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code (attachment #4). Class IV commodities, such as Group· A Plastic resins (attachment #5), can also be stored in this area since the area will be protected in. accord;mce with the highest haz_ard.· · . ,. . The method of storage used in the SMAC warehouse is rack storage. The height of the storage on racks would be a maximum of 20 feet high. · Fire Protection Systems: . Per Table 81-A of ~he Uniform.Fire Code, the only. requi~ement for high piled storage of Class V commodities is the need to install fire sprinkler system, smoke and heat vents, and draft curtains in accordance with UFC Standard 81-r (attachment 6). · Smoke/Heat Vents and Draft Curtains . . Smoke and heat vents have been provided in accordance with Table 81-B (attachment# 7) at a ratio of 1 square foot of vent area per 5 0 sq~are feet of floor area. It is however requested that draft curtain requirements for this project to be deleted (see attached appeal for details). · Sprinkler Protection for Rack Storage Utilizing the UFC Standard 81-2 the following calculations are made on the sprinkler system: Aisles 8-Feet or Greater Sprinkler Heads 286°F Rated Height of Storage Up to 20 Feet Type of Rack Single and Double Row Commodity Class IV & V (N onencapsiilated) · Shelving Open, Grated and Solid . . A design density of 0.6 gpm per square·foot over a design area of 2,000 square feet shall be provided using ELO sprinklers. This design density is adequate protection for Class V commodities based on.the listing ~f the ELO head. · · · I Flue Spaces:· , . . 'Longitudinal flue spaces will be maintained in thy·back of all double row_racks:The_ width of racks will not exceed 48 inches. · · · · · · · ·. '· · · I I I I I SMAC Warehouse I April_ 10, J 997 · Page 3 of 4 I- I I 1. 1· 48" Maximum Width L ongitlidinal Space Flue AISLE I Transverse flue spaces are require4 on all double row racks regardless of the type shelv~s used. I I I I AISLE Transverse Flue Spaces I It is important that the above r0quirements are followe,fto allow for !'roper sprinJ<ler penetration.: I GENERAL FIRE PROTECTION I No smoking will be Jlermitted in ihe warehoUSe. Aisle ways sho~ld not be blocked.and a minimum of 44" ~learwice·win be m.aintained fo~ all aisles when stocking I . .is being done and merchandise will be J,cept on 011:e ~ide o{th_e.aisle . .--· · -- Exit doors will be kept unobstruct~d and will be opened we~kl;_tq.ensure their.operation.· Exit signs-will be kept I · i~:~~te~ while the buil~ing is o_~cupied and the emergency lighti~_g i~-t_he t~ilding ~n be c~e9ked _ori _a. monthly I I 1 .. I SMAC Warehouse April IO, 1997 Page 4 of 4 ... ,._ I Fire extinguishers wiJl be mo-i:inted three feet to five feet from the floor in a· conspicuous area and identified with a sign. Fire extinguis~ers will ~e placed so that an occupant would not have to travel more than 7 5 feetto reach one. Preferred locations may be designated by the Fire Marshal. Employees will be trained in the proper use of fire I extinguishers. . -._ . ---· · If you have any questions, or; need additional information, do not he;itate to call me., I will call you in ~ few days I to discuss this project with you. -· ,;inc;t~ Elley K.lausbruckner I Fire Protection Consultant I cc: I I I I I I I I I- I Fi_le-:-TVA Bob Berry -SMAC ',, •: Smac7_.wpd . ' . '. .. • :-.. ~ f • •• I .. ·. I ..... . . . ' . -. . . . ,. ,, ' . . . ·. . .· , I . . . . .. : . . . . . . . -.. , . . . . . . .·. . . . . . . . . . . . . -.. , ' . . . I -.. :· __ < -.. · --__ :. -. ~ . -:-· ·-. . ·,_· __ ·· ·: - . . , ' -.. I ·_ ·, ..... · '. . . . . . . I. ~ .... : ATTA_CHMENT # l I . . ' • ~ • " • J • • 1· -.. I· I I I I I . . . I .,.·. : ... . . . . . . . . . . . I _·_,_ -:-·--:· . :-.: -- . -. . . ' .· ' . . . . :·' ' ' .. . ' .. .. . . . . . . ... ,. I ·. . . ·. . : . . . -. . . ·. . . . - . . . . ·. : . . . . . .. . -... •' ' • ' _, .-· • • , ·, :· I . • · • . l .----__ -.-__ ---_. ___ ·· ··-·-__ • --,'> :-.---__ ·, < ', . . . . ' '' _. . . :-' . . . . . ' . -. ' . -- . -' . . ' . . -. -. . .. . . . . ~ -. . . I A-~7-1997 d:d7PM FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 619d523907 P.2 I t};rviP0 · 4 /1 /en I--·-····· .............. -------·--··· ----·--·-........ --·-···----... .. . _.. . .. . . . . . . . . . · ... :~dec;r_ DT~ . . ·. 1.... . ...... . I .. ..~ ·..h~A : . ~ .4.to ~7 .. .. · . ... urr ~o4:>G:Jf:.: . . . ?4.C,'6/4, I . . . .. ~~~.0 pe6J:.; h1! 1 °80 ~ Pr . .. ~l~~N~ tfE1~: J ~~ / -~ f'r .. . -~~µ~ ; ?-l . . .. I . ~'21/0TibN 1',r?G=" ; ccur --1'! fu~, ~11-l]llt~ I .~tz.t'-11-l~ ~ri~r? {.1/1000): &:11 ~~ . . . I . . . fi?~1~ ~1~0 . ... . . ~TPN~~,?: .. f;O grl·U.,? . )C> <gj)>U-Q I ... . C0fv\ f7;.c,r ~· . ....... t1bNt2t ~ e.: . . 6_ ~;,~$ ~ 1· I· I .. 1- 1 · I I I .· 1·· ------. · . f(YFM---: &S ~vi;> . . .. . . . __ {%.-g,b~ ~~tPf"lO})l_ .. -. . . . . .. .... ... . . . . . ... .. 1~crr · l&°l }~ ~~2,~p ~,... ~~ ~~ .. .z1 -~- .. uNrr #~. 1~ ~ ~-~ ~~l/2~P1 ~11 .~ 7P,iu 191.G~" -_~'6-c-G O'f ~'fc,{2,~J~ t ... .~t::1JrJ_G:?. -~ ;~-f> f\1~-J-Z ~1"5 flv.~P IN .. J~ Off l~ cJf .$· -[bu~ t'i UCLJ(lp/!€~ .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . ... .. . . . .P~~;,:;,(t.i~., ~.~~~ .. µ;M.~fl:: .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . ·-.. .. 'ti~ -f?O·~--~ I 4.-~7-1997 4.: 4.8PM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6194.523907 P.3 ,. C I .4.-07-1 997 .4.: A.8PM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J. l ' : } . l . l l l FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 619.4.523907 @ ® @) ' I -< i ... Ji l . l I w p . .a. ;i t1 Sh.' C\I I < ,. C: I .4.-07-1997 .4.: .4.9PM FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 619.4.523907 P.5 I - UJ~N~O M~uyaa)V 4V•11tw~ ~ -~~-1.(Q -.J ·v ·w ·s--: '---------------------OillIH] I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,. =~i--~-~-~~~·1~-n~N~~lr~,~--~~~·1,~·~n~~-~,~+--~,--T1r~r-,r~·17-·r--:r---4~ •"'\ I • i I ; · / I' i I L--~ ·--- C l ., / j r, r, l, r1 f7 j f1~f L--l ~ ~ .,~ i LJ u I LJ 1..i~J ~J l ~ e----,...i-,---V::,-~~--------+---------[~--------+--------: . ------e I ~ ~ i i "i -~: i§ ,, i r, r, j r, r, j r, : u i l ;:-~-.f.-.:n.-l--4=,r1~I -..,....J---J!-b:J-I r1 I ~11-;;\.j---4.,11,1,--_I ~li:;-}--1 -j--:s;l ..------+.:r11 ____ , ®-·-·· J .. ~?----r--=--~:--~-"-h---=---=--f-~--=--~ F _ _: -=-··-11---~H--------@ : f . i ! ! ~ 1' ·..+----,/ r-i ! n n I r1 r1 ! n l ~~ l,,J I I.J LJ ! t..l LJ ! LJ -~ J @-•--t-"1--t:.,....._ 1~:::~~r--~----·--l----------l---·-·----L----·---·-t--~lH-= ~ · l i i. i . l ,: ~ I :,._ __ I 1 r, I I L.J i i i r, r, , r, r, , i LJ LJ I LJ LJ I i i i i I i r, I I 1...1 ; 1 : : l : E>----r--,.--r-~--.----------1----------t-·-----~---1----------t--rl·-·-1;m ---·-1 ,·. v· 1.. 1· tr, ,! u ;g ti 1~ z l ~ l • J : "Hie}! ~: f1 I r: n I [] [] I [J i• u i; p L.J 1· ,· 1' 8 lhtli d~ l l .. i I ~ Ii ~ :· ~~ :·· ®-----+++-1-~;-----~------t---~~-----1----------J.!.:-_______ . \~ i i i ? :,1~11 ~ ' l I ~ ! r, I I L.1 I n n i n r 1 i n : ~ 1 s i ! i ~,J L.J . i ~J . LJ i ·LJ . ; I Iii i i ; 01 ·'1 ·, i:iijJ.H i.::00000 : ~ i~ i i "'~-1-W-~~~--,-:· .µil:I ~---+, "'""'"-. ---+-, -----t~---.J "i"l:rt----JjMi~ f' I l • ' ' . -v l ~!: !1 ! I · r,, I c-, r, ! r, ;, !!i~ !l 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I t t · .-liih ~1= l I ~.1 I LJ · . 1..J ! ~....-4-.---i-;,, ;i.z l = Ii j . ·~~ ; I! l ~ Li ! ~~ ~, .... ~-++----l------.ll!ii;:,--+----1~~~~~9------r----1o------a ! ~---- ® ~~~-®~ < w I d-07-1997 d:d9PM FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6194523907 P.6 I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U. 11,1M2GMGIIYill:i1¥0Y!UUY~ om S NWI • ~ 1~""'1.,.,.tn\''""PP'l1 ....,...Cs • I 1 -____ ·J_·v·w_·s__ ~-< e-- e--- e--- 0-- ®--- • = _· _· i l-i •. re) ----e w I d-07-1997 d:50PM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 619d523907 P. 7 I .1-07-1997 · .1: 50PM FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 6194523907 P.8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I -. IIJJ.Nil~ HQIIYillill owt11n·11 · D i : ·'-~------~-q_~_~~_~_~_-_~~ ____ . ~:;'~----• -·:> ·v ·w ·s .: 511'/DJ KV1-<I 1JS .· .. '·5 ,!: 0 s I ~ i i. -~ ;i i g I A.-07-1997 A.:51PM I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I 1· I I I FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 619A.523907 P.9 :z: 0 6 ... l}l ~ ;;J ~ .. 2 i I 4-07-1997 4:51PM FROM SMITH_CONSULTING-OUT 619.i523907 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l,,U ..I ::, 81 :r: u Vl ~ u OH 0 r 0 i~ ····-1--···-.. ···"'·· l1tia·zt1z11111zz, <ll•••ltllt1••11(!i • •titz1211ttttlllll 1~ .,,1!itl1,111111i;J¥ I >?~?··it??????~~~? • :11.-:i.::••~ .. ~:.a"J..a.;~a:a2 ·00000000®000000©® ;: t:: ( ~ i . :a . iw I § ~ ii l : f ;;! ... ~ ~ I~ ~ i• ' I I i l t! ! ~. i • ! ' i ·h il hd II i P. 10 "Q p S'! u "' I ft 1 ID ! I II Ii ! ~ Ii 2 i • ~ :H t I ?t i ; I .•.. : .... , ... . . . FROM SMITH_QONSULTING-OUT 619d523907 P. 11 I -i •"--·~----· ll~_·"llO_~_.,.a~-· Q¥_~_:) __ Dmf Hr] _ _ ·J ·v "Jt\l ·s -I lli ij . u l lllt :I 1 =~ J -1iti I r--B 1l • 1 flit HI. ~ ; ~ LID ·!!i I l--r--1r-i--r-rl i ~n~ I W: i!M !II I i 1~1 lra:ti H!i~i !~ ! • ~IJ~e J~;J •ll ~ I . . J I lfL~ ~11 JU I I I I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1- I I ·-.:.>:.• .·;- 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1003.1-1003.4 3. Except as provided in Table 10-A, only one exit need be provided from the second floor or a basement within an individual dwelling unit or a Group R, Division 3 congregate residence. 4. When the third floor within an individual dwelling unit or a Group R, Division 3 congregate residence does not exceed 500 square feet (46.45 m2), only one exit need be provided from that floor. 5. Floors and basements used exclusively for service of the building may have one exit. For the purposes ·of this exception, storage rooms, laundry rooms, maintenance offices and similar uses shall not be considered as providing service to the building. 6. Storage rooms, laundry rooms and maintenance offices not exceeding 300 square feet (27.87 m2) in floor area may be provided with only one exit. 7. Elevator lobbies may have one exit provided the use of such exit does not require keys, tools, special knowledge or effort. For special requirements see the following sections: Group A, Section 1016; Group E, Section 1017; Group H, Section 1018; Group I, Section 1019; Rooms Containing Fuel-fired Equipment and Cellulose Nitrate Handling Rooms, Section 1020; Reviewing Stands, Grandstands and Bleachers, Section 1021; Laboratories, Sections 304.2.2 and 305.2.4; and Open Parking Garages, Section 311.9. For stage exits, see Section 405.3.6. Every story or portion thereof having an occupant load of 501 to 1,000 shall not have less than three exits. Every story or portion thereof having an occupant load of 1,001 or more shall not have less than four exits. The number of exits required from any story of a building shall be determined by using the occu-I pant load of that story. The maximum number of exits required for any story shall be maintained until egress is provided from the structure. (See Section 1010.) 1003.2 Width. The total width of exits in inches (mm) shall not be less.than the total occupant load served by an exit multiplied by 0.3 (7 .62) for stairways and 0.2 (5.08) for other exits nor less than specified elsewhere in this code. Such widths of exits shall be divided approximately equally among the separate exits. The maximum exit width required from any story of a building shall be maintained. 1003.3 Arrangement of Exits. If only two exits are required, they shali be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one halfof the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the build- ing or area to be served measured in a straight line between exits. EXCEPTION: The separation between exit doors in the exit enclosures which are interconnected by a I one-hour fire-resistive corridor conforming to the requirements of Section 1005 may be measured along a di- rect line of travel within the exit corridor. Enclosure walls shall not be less than 30 feet (9144 mm) apart at any point in a direct line of measurement. Where three or more exits are requ_ired, at least two exits shall be placed a distance ·apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area to be served measured in a straight line be~ween the exits, and the additional exits shall be ar- ranged a reasonable distance apart so that if one becomes blocked the others will be available. 1003.4 Travel Distance. The maximum travel distance shall not excee·d 150 feet (45 720 mm), unless otherwise allowed by this section. The maximum travel distance may be increased in accor- dance with the following: 1. In a building equipped with an automatic sprinkler sys~em throughout, the maximum travel distance may be 200 feet (60 960 mm). 2. The maximum travel distance of 150 feet (45 720 mm) and the maximum travel distance of 200 feet (60 960 mm) allowed by Item 1 may be increased up to an additional 100 feet (30 480 mm) when this increase in travel distance occurs in the last portion of the travel distance and is entirely within a one-hour fire-resistive corridor complying with Section 1005. 1-175 I I I I I I I ·-:··. I I I I I I I I 1. I I I. . . -~~~.., .... .... -. ~·. . .. :.:. .· f. 1003.4-1004.2 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 3. In one-story buildings classified as Group F, Division 2 or Group S, Division 2 Occupancies, and in one-story Group S, Division 5 Occupancy airplane hangars, the travel distance may be 400 feet (121.9 m) if the building is equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout and pro- vided with smoke· and heat ventilation as specified in Section 906. 4. In an open parking garage as defined in Section 311.9, the exit travel distance may be 300 feet (91 440 mm) in a building not equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout and may be increased to 400 feet ( 121.9 m) in a building equipped with an automatic sprinkler system through- out. Travel distances may be measured to open stairways which are permitted in accordance with Section 1009 .1. Special travel distance provisions are contained in other sections of this code as follows: 1. For atria, see Section 402.4. 2. For Group B office and Group R, Division 1 Occupancies, see Section 403. 3. For Group E Occupancies, see Section 1017. 4. For Group H Occupancies, see Section 1018. 5. For malls, see Section 404.4.3 and 404.4.5. 1003.5 Exits through Adjoining Rooms. Rooms may have one required exit that passes through an adjoining or intervening room which provides a direct, obvious and unobstructed means of travel to an exit corridor, exterior exit door, horizontal exit, exit passageway or enclosed stairway, pro-I vided the total travel distance does not exceed that permitted by other provisions of this code. EXCEPTIONS: I. Rooms within dwelling units may exit through more than one intervening room. 2. Rooms with a cumulative occupant load of 10 or less may exit through more than one intervening room. In other than dwelling units, exits shall not pass through kitchens, store rooms, restrooms, closets or spaces used for similar purposes. Foyers, lobbies and reception rooms constructed as required for corridors shall not be construed as intervening rooms. SECTION 1004 -DOORS 1004.1 General. This section shall apply to every exit door serving an area having an occupant load of 10 or more, or serving hazardous rooms or areas, except that Sections 1004.3, 1004.9, 1004.10 and 1004.11 shall apply to all exit doors regardless of occupant load. Buildings or struc- tures used for human occupancy shall have at least one exterior ex_it door that meets the require- ments of Section 1004.6. Doors and landings at doors which are located within an accessible route of travel shall also comply with Chapter 11. 1004.2 Swing and Opening Force. Exit doors shall be of the pivoted or side-hinged swinging type. Exit doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when I the area served has an occupant load of 50 or more. The door shall swing to full-open position when an opening force not to exceed 30 pounds (133.45 N) is applied to the latch side. For other door- opening forces, see Chapter 11 and Section 905.3. See Section 3207 for doors swinging over public property. EXCEPTIONS: I. Group I, JDiyision 3 Occupancy used as a place of detention. 2. Doors within or serving an i~dividual dwelling unit. 3. Special door conforming with Section 1004.8. Double-acting doors shall not be used as exits when any of the following conditions exist: 1. The occupant load served: by the door is 10q or more. 2. The door is part of a fire assembly. 1-176 ... . .. . . I .. . I . _ ... I . ---.. , '. ·. . ' -: · .· , I 1· . . I I- I.·. I I. I. I _· ... I·: .. · 1 . .-· ... ··. . . ATTACHMENT #2 . . . . . . . ·~ . . .. ' \ . . .. . . . . . . . . ' . . ' . ' , . . ·'· . . . _, .. · . . . . I " . . . . . . . . . .•. : .. ·.. . .·. . ... · . . .· ... • . . . . . . . . . . : . .... J ,. <. ·. · .... ·· ..... ·.·. \ · .... ·. · .... ·.· ·.•· ... -- . : _.:, ,. ·. . . : . ~ .. ~ . -. ',.-. ' ·. . . ·. ·, ·. ·'., . . \ .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·:. 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 310.10-311.1 310.10 Fire Alarm Systems. Group R, Division 1 Occupancies shall be provided with an ap-F proved manual and automatic fire alarm system in apartment houses three or more stories in height ~ or containing 16 or more dwelling units, in hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20 or ~ more guest rooms and in congregate residences three or more stories in height or having an occu-~ pant load of 20 or more. A fire alarm and communication system shall be provided in Group R, ~ Division 1 Occupancies located in a high-rise building. F F EXCEPTIONS: I. A manual fire alarm system need not be provided in buildings not over two stories in F height when all individual dwelling units and contiguous attic and crawl spaces are separated from each other ~ and public or common areas by at least one-hour fire-resistive occupancy separations and each individual ~ dwelling unit or guest room has an exit directly to a public way, exit court or yard. ~ 2. A separate fire alarm system need not be provided in buildings which are protected throughout by an F approved supervised fire sprinkler system having a local alarm to notify all occupants. F The local alarm shall provide an alarm signal with a sound pressure level of 15 dBA above the average ambient sound level in every occupied space within the building. The minimum sound pressure level shall be 70 dBA. The maximum sound pressure level for audible alarm-indicating appliances shall not exceed 110 dB A at the minimum hearing distance from the audible appliance. II For the purposes of this section, area separation walls shall not define separate buildings. 310.11 Heating. Dwelling units, guest rooms and congregate residences shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of70°F. (21 °C.) at a point 3 feet (914 mm) above the floor in all habitable rooms. 310.12 Special Hazards. Chimneys and heating apparatus shall conform to the requirements of Chapter 31 and the Mechanical Code. The storage, use and handling of flammable and combustible liquids in Division 1 Occupancies shall be in accordance with the Fire Code. In Division 1 Occupancies, doors leading into rooms in which Class I flammable liquids are stored or used shall be protected by a fire assembly having a one-hour fire-protection rating. Such fire assembly shall be self-closing and shall be posted with a sign on each side of the door in I-inch (25.4 mm) block letters stating: FIRE DOOR-KEEP CLOSED. SECTION 311 -REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUPS OCCUPANCIES 311.1 Group S Occupa~cies Defined. Group S Occupancies shall include the use of a building or structure, or a portion thereof, for storage not classified as a hazardous occupancy. Storage occu- pancies shall include the following: Division 1. Moderate hazard storage occupancies shall include buildings or portions of buildings used for storage of combustible materials that are not classified as a Group S, Division 2 or as a Group H Occupancy. Division 2. Low-hazard storage occupancies shall include buildings, structures, or portions thereof, used for storage of noncombustible materials, such as products on wood pallets or in paper cartons with or without single-thickness divisions, or in paper wrappings and shall include ice plants, power plants and pumping plants. Such products may have a negligible amount of plastic trim such as knobs, handles or film wrapping. Low-hazard storage occupancies shall include, but are not limited to, storage of the following items: 1. Bee·r or wine (in metal, glass or ceramic containers). 2. Cement in bags. 3. Cold storage and creameries . . 4. Dai.ry products in nonwax-coated paper containers. 5. Dry-cell batteries. 1-51 F F I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·~- 311.1-311.2.2.1 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 6. Dryers. 7. Dry pesticides in a building not classed as a Group H Occupancy. 8. Electrical coils. 9. Electrical insulators. 10. Electrical motors. 11. Empty cans. 12. Foods in noncombustible containers. 13. Fresh fruits in nonplastic trays or containers. 14. Frozen foods. 15. Glass bottles (empty or filled with nonflammable liquids). 16. Gypsum board. 17. Inert pigments. 18. Meats. 19. Metal cabinets. 20. Metal furniture. 21. Oil-filled distribution transformers. 22. Stoves. 23. Washers. Division 3. Division 3 Occupancies shall include repair garages where work is limited to exchange of parts and maintenance requiring no open flame or welding, motor vehicle fuel-dis- pensing stations, and parking garages not classed as Group S, Division 4 open parking garages or Group U private garages. For the use of flammable and combustible liquids, see Section 307 and the Fire Code. Division 4. Open parking garages per Section 311.9. Division 5. Aircraft hangars where work is limited to exchange of parts and maintenance requir- ing no open flame or welding and helistops. For occupancy separations, see Table 3-B. 311.2 Construction, Height and Allowable Area. 311.2.1 General. Buildings or parts of buildings classed in Group S Occupancy because of the use or character of the occupancy shall be limited to the types of construction set forth in Table·5-B and shall not exceed, in area or height, the limits specified in Sections 504, 505 and 506. 311.2.2 Special provisions. 311.2.2.1 Group S, Division 3 with Group A, Division 3; Group B; Group Mor R, Division 1 Occupancy above. Other provisions of this code notwithstanding·, a basement or first story of a building may be considered as a separate and distinct building for the purpose of area limitations, limitation of number of stories and type of construction, when all of the following conditions are met: 1. The basement or first story is of Type I construction and is separated from the build1ng above with a three-hour occupancy separation. See Section 302.3. · · · ,.- 2. The building above the three-hour occupancy separation contains only Group A, Division 3; Group B; or Group M or R, Division 1 Occupancies. ' 1-52 . . I .. . I --- I -__ .-- 1 I I I I_ I I I I - I I 1- . . •, . , . . . . . . · " --ATTACHMENT #3 ' .· . ·' ,. . -.. • 0 < T .., • I -·.. . ·_ ... -.· . . . ·_ -· ·,_ ·. . . , .. --. . . --'' . . , . : . . . . ~ . -. . -. . . . . -. ~ .-,- . .· . . . • ; ' . ' ' . . . . .. -1.·· .. · ;. ·.·.· . • : · ..... · ·. .· ·.· · .. ·. · ................. · .. · .. ·. · .... ·····. . . . . '. . . . -.... ' .. ·, . .. ; ·. . .· . ·-,' ·. . :_,.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '-;:. : 8101.4.1.5-8101.4.2.2 Combustible metal products (solid) Furniture, plastic upholstered Furniture, wood or metal with plastic covering and padding 1994 UNIFORM FIRE CODE Glycol in combustible containers (greater than 25 percent and less than 50 percent) Linoleum products Paints, oil base in combustible containers Pharmaceutical, alcoholic elixirs, tonics, etc. Rugs, foamed back Shingles, asphalt Thread or yam, synthetic or nonviscose 8101.4.1.6 High-hazard commodities. High-hazard commodities are high-hazard products presenting special fire hazards beyond those of Class I, II, III or IV. Group A plastics not otherwise classified are included in this class. Examples of high-hazard commodities include, but are not lim- ited to, the following: Aerosol, Level 3 (see Article 88) Alcoholic beverages, exceeding 80 percent alcohol, in bottles or cartons Flammable solids (except solid combustible metals) Glycol in combustible containers (50 percent or greater) Lacquers, which dry by solvent evaporation, in metal cans or cartons Lubricating or hydraulic fluid in plastic containers Mattresses, foamed rubber or foamed plastics Pallets and flats which are idle combustible Paper, asphalt, rolled, horizontal storage Paper, asphalt, rolled, vertical storage Paper and pulp, rolled, in vertical storage which is unhanded or not protected with an approved wrap Pillows, foamed rubber and foamed plastics Pyroxylin Rubber tires Vegetable oil and butter in plastic containers 8101.4.2 Classification of plastics. 8101.4.2.1 General. Plastics shall be designated as Group A, B or C in accordance with Section 8101.4.2. 8101.4.2.2 Group A plastics. Group A plastics are plastic materials having a heat of combustion that is much higher than that of ordinary combustibles, and a burning rate higher than that of Group B plastics. Examples of Group A plastics include, but are not limited to, the following: ABS (acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer) Acetal (polyformaldehyde) Acrylic (polymethyl methacrylate) Butyl rubber 1-352 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· ·-:. 1994 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 8101.4.2.2-8101.4.3 EPDM (ethylene-propylene rubber) FRP (fiberglass-reinforced polyester) Natural rubber (expanded) Nitrile rubber (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber) PET or PETE (polyethylene terephthalate) Polybutadiene Polycarbonate Polyester elastomer Polyethylene Polypropylene Polystyrene (expanded and unexpanded) Polyurethane (expanded and m;1expanded) PVC (polyvinyl chloride greater than 15 percent plasticized, e.g., coated fabric unsupported film) SAN (styrene acrylonitrile) SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber) 8101.4.2.3 Group B plastics. Group B plastics are plastic materials having a heat of combustion and a burning rate higher than that of ordinary combustibles, but not as high as those of Group A plastics. Examples of Group B plastics include, but are not limited to, the following: Cellulosics (cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, ethyl cellulose) Chloroprene rubber Fluoroplastics (ECTFE, ethylene-chlorotrifluoroethylene copolymer; ETFE, ethylene-tetra- fluoroethylene copolymer; FEP, fluorinated ethylene-propylene copolymer) Natural rubber (nonexpanded) Nylon (Nylon 6, Nylon 6/6) PVC (polyvinyl chloride greater than 5 percent, but not exceeding 15 percent plasticized) Silicone rubber 8101.4.2.4 Group C plastics. Group C plastics are plastic materials which have a heat of combus- tion and a burning rate similar to those of ordinary combustibles. Examples of Group C plastics include, but are not limited to, the following: Fluoroplastics (PCTFE, polychlorotrifluoroethylene; PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene) Melamine (melamine formaldehyde) Phenol PVC (polyvinyl chloride, rigid or plasticized less than 5 percent, e.g., pipe, pipe fittings) PVDC (polyvinylidene chloride) PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) PVF (polyvinyl fluoride) Urea (urea formaldehyde) 8101.4.3 Limited quantities of Group A plastics in mixed commodities. Figure 8101.4-A shall be used to determine the quantity of Group A Plastics allowed to be stored in a package or carton or on a pallet without increasing the commodity classification. 1-353 I . • < ' ' ~ -. . . . -I --~ :---_-·. --·. --. :--__ ----_ .· ~--_ ·: ·--·.: -- • • -l . . . I .. ' ·-.· -. . ,.. .... . . . - . -. .-' . .-. I _ _. :· . . .. · ·-l· ... ·-.. . . _: . ' -. . ' ... ' . . . . . . -. . --. . ' . -. . I . . . . . . . . -.··. . .. -. -·_ . . . . -. ~ . . . . -. --. . . -_ ·-. : ATTACHMENT#4 . -. I -_.. -_ - 1-. ' I I I 1. I -__ -__ · - I~ --_-. I . . . . . . ' .. . . I -. -.· -. . -. ... . . . . . I -____ ,;: __ --: -_---:. :: .-.. ----_-. -. -:· ._-· . -: -_._ ·_ -- -' ' :, . . . -' . . . ~ -·-. . . . . ... . . ' : . . - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·:-. 209 1994 UNIFORM FIRE CODE SECTION 209 -H HANDLING is the deliberate transport of material by any means to a point of storage or use. HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL REACTION is a reaction which generates pressure or byprod- ucts which could cause injury, illness or harm to humans, domestic animals, livestock or wildlife. HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA is land which is covered with grass, grain brush or forest, whether privately or publicly owned, which is so situated or is of such inaccessible location that a fire origi- nating upon such land would present an abnormally difficult job of suppression or would result in great and unusual damage through fire or resulting erosion. Such areas are designated by the chief on a map maintained in the office of the chief. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS are those chemicals or substances which are physical hazards or health hazards as defined and classified in Article 80 whether the materials are in usable or waste condition. HAZARDOUS PRODUCTION MATERIAL (HPM) is a solid, liquid or gas associated with semiconductor manufacturing that has a degree-of-hazard rating in health, flammability or .reactivity of Class 3 or 4 as ranked by U .F.C. Standard 79-3 and which.is used directly in research, laboratory or production processes which have as their end product materials which are not hazardous. HAZARDOUS WATERSHED FIRE AREA is a location within 500 feet ( 152.4 m) of a forest or brush-, grass-or grain-covered land, exclusive of small individual lots or parcels of land located outside of a brush-, forest-or grass-covered area. HEALTH HAZARD is a classification of a chemical for which there is statistically significant evidence based on at least one study conducted in accordance with established scientific principles that acute or chronic health effects could occur in exposed persons. Health hazards include chemi- cals which are carcinogens, toxic or highly toxic materials, reproductive toxins, irritants, corro- sives, sensitizers, hepatotoxins, nephrotoxins, neurotoxins, agents which act on the hematopoietic system, and agents which damage the lungs, skin, eyes or mucous membranes. HEATING AND COOKING APPLIANCE is an electric, gas or oil-fired appliance not intended for central heating. HIGH EXPLOSIVE is explosive material, such as dynamite, which can be caused to detonate by means of a No. 8 test blasting cap when unconfined. HIGHLY TOXIC MATERIAL is a material which produces a lethal dose or lethal concentration which falls within any of the following categories: 1. A chemical that has a median lethal dose (LD50) of 50 milligrams or less per kilogram of body weight when administered orally to albino rats weighing between 200 and 300 grams each. 2. A chemical that has a median lethal dose {LDso) of 200 milligrams or less per kilogram of body weight when administered by continuous contact for 24 hours, or less if death occurs within 24 hours, with the bare skin of albino rabbits weighing between 2 and 3 kilograms each. ·· 3. A chemical that has a median lethal concentration (LC50) in air of 200 parts per million by volume or less of gas or vapor, or 2 milligrams per liter or less of mist, fume or dust, "'.hen administered by continuous inhalation for one hour, or less if death occurs within one hour, to albino rats weighing between 200 and 300 grams each. Mixtures of these materials with ordinary materials, such as water, might not warrant classifica- tion as highly toxic. While this system is basically simple in application, any hazard evaluation which is required for the precise categprization of this type of material shall be performed by expe- • rienced, technically competent perso·ns. HIGHLY VOLATILE LIQUID is a liquid with a boiling point of less than 68°F. (20°C.). I HIGH-PILED COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE is storage of combustible materials in closely packed piles or combustible materials on pallets, in racks or on shelves where the top of storage is 1-26 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '•f, 1994 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 209-210 greater than 12 feet (3658 mm) in height. When required by the chief, high-piled combustible stor-1 age also includes certain high-hazard commodities, such as rubber tires, Group A plastics, flam- mable liquids, idle pallets and similar commodities, where the top of storage is greater than 6 feet (1829 mm) in height. HIGHWAY is a public street or public road. • HORIZONTAL EXIT is an exit from one building into another building on approximately the ~ same level, or through or around a wall constructed as required in the Building Code for a two-hour ~ occupancy separation and which completely divides a floor into two or more separate areas so as to i establish an area of refuge affording safety from fire or smoke coming from the area from which ~ escape is made. s B HOTEL is any building containing six or more guest rooms intended or designed to be used, or ~ which are used, rented or hired out to be occupied, or which are occupied for sleeping purposes by ~ guests. B HPM FLAMMABLE LIQUID is an HPM liquid that is defined as being either a flammable or combustible liquid. HPM STORAGE ROOM is a room used for the storage or dispensing of HPM and which is classified as a Group H, Division 2, 3 or 7 Occupancy. HYPERGOLIC MATERIAL is a material which is capable of igniting spontaneously upon contact with another substance. SECTION 210 -I IDLH (Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health) is a concentration of airborne contami- nants, normally expressed in parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per cubic meter, which repre- sents the maximum level from which one could escape within 30 minutes without any escape-impairing symptoms or irreversible health effects. This level is established by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). If adequate data do not exist for precise establishment ofIDLH data, an independent certified industrial hygienist, industrial toxicologist or appropriate regulatory agency shall make such determination. IME is the Institute of Makers of Explosives. INCINERATOR is a structure, or portion thereof, container, device or other appliance designed, used or intended to be used for the disposal of combustible rubbish by burning. • INCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS are materials which, when in contact with each other, have I the potential to react in a manner that generates heat, fumes, gases or byproducts which are hazard- ous to life or property. INERT GASES are argon, helium, krypton, neon, nitrogen and xenon. INHABITED BUILDING is a building regularly occupied in whole or in part as a habitation for human beings. Inhabited buildings include churches, schools, railway passenger stations, stores, airport terminals for passengers, and other buildings or structures where people are accustomed to congregate or assemble. Inhabited buildings do not include buildings or structures occupied in con- nection with the manufacture, transportation, storage or use of explosives and blasting agents. INSIDE HPM STORAGE ROOM is an HPM storage room totally enclosed within a building and having no exterior walls. INTRAPLANT DISTANCE is the minimum distance permitted between two buildings on an explosives manufacturing site, when at least one of the buildings contains or is designed to contain explosives. 1-27 I .. I I I . 1· I. I I I I I I I I AJTACHMENT#5 . . . . . . . ·1 --.·. . . . . . . .. ., . I-.. _·. ___ , _ .. -_· . ·. ._ -.: -·-.. -. -. . ·_ -, . ·. ·_ .. -. . . . . . ·.' . . . : '. . . . ·. ·... . . . . . . . . . . . . · .. ... . ' . . . . ' -• ,..J • ~ . ·, : . ' . . ~ ' ' ~ . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1994 UNIFORM FIRE CODE . 8101.4.1.4-8101.4.1.5 8101.4.1.4 Class III commodities. Class III commodities are commodities of wood, paper, natu- ral fiber cloth, or Group C plastics or products thereof, with or without pallets. Products are allowed to contain limited amounts of Group A or B plastics, such as metal bicycles with plastic handles, pedals, seats and tires. Group A plastics shall be limited in accordance with Section 8 IO 1.4.3. Examples of Class III commodities include, but are not limited to, the following: Aerosol, Level 1 (see Article 88) Combustible fiberboard Cork, baled Feed, bagged Fertilizers, bagged Food in plastic containers Furniture: wood, natural fiber, upholstered, nonplastic, wood or metal with plastic-padded and covered arm rests Glycol in combustible containers not exceeding 25 percent Lubricating or hydraulic fluid in metal cans Lumber Mattresses, excluding foamed rubber and foamed plastics Noncombustible liquids in plastic containers having a capacity of more than 5 gallons ( 18.9 L) Paints, oil base, in metal cans Paper, waste, baled Paper and pulp, horizontal storage, or vertical storage that is banded or protected with approved wrap Paper in cardboard boxes Pillows, excluding foamed rubber and foamed plastics Plastic-coated paper food containers Plywood Rags, baled Rugs, without foamed backing Sugar, bagged Wood, baled Wood doors, frames and cabinets Yams of natural fiber and viscose 8101.4.1.5 Class IV commodities. Class IV commodities are Class I, II or III products containing Group A plastics in ordinary corrugated cartons and Classes I, II and III products, with Group A plastic packaging, with or without pallets. Group B plastics and free-flowing Group A plastics are also included in this class. The total amount of nonfree-flowing Group A plastics shall be in accor- dance with Section 8 IO 1.4.3. Examples of Class IV commodities include, but are not limited to, the following: Aerosol, Level 2 (see ArticJ1:; 88) Alcoholic beverages, exceeding 20 percent but less than 80 percent alcohol, in cans qr bottles in cartons Clothing, synthetic or nonviscose 1-351 I .. . ' .. . . ' . I I ... ,. . . .· .... I I . ATTACHMENT#~ . · I I I I I I I I .. . . I . . .. I_: . ' .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . -,., . ' ' ... I .. · .. · ...... . --. . . ' . . . . ......... · ...•..... >.·.··· ... ··•···••······.·•··.· .. · •. · <··· ····.·• ... ·, .•.. ·. • • l : : • . . . . . . . . ·, . • ~ • • I . -- .... ·,--,·i).",'' ·-· -------------'){::·:: :;> :1:· .... l, 0) 0 TABLE 81-A-GENERAL FIRE-PROTE_CTION AND LIFE-SAFETY REQUIREMENTS SOLID·PILEO STORAGE, SHELF STORAGE AND ALL STORAGE AREAS (See Secllons 8102, 8103 and 8104)2 PALLETIZED STORAGE (See Secllon 8103.3) Maximum SIZE OF HIGH-PILED Automallc Fire· Flre-detecllon Building Smoke and Small Hose Maximum Permissible STORAGE AREAl (sq. II.) Pile Dimeo-Storage Maximum Pile (See Section 8102.2) extinguishing System (See Access (See Heat Removal Curtain Boards Valves and Sta-slon4(ft.) Heights (11.) Volume (cu. It.) COMMODITY x 0.0929 for m2 System ~See Secllon Section (See Secllon (See Secllon lions (See Sec-x 0.0283 for m3 CLASS Secllon 8 02.3) 8102.4) 8102.5) 8102.6) 8102.7) lion 8102.8) x3048 for mm I-IV 0-500 NR NR NR6 NR NR3 NR NR NR NR 501-2,500 NR Yes NR6 NR NR'3 NR 100 40 100,000 2,501-12,000 Yes NR NR6 NR NR3 NR 100 40 400,000 Public accessible 2,501-12,000 Yes NR NR6 NR NR3 NR 100 40 400,000 Nonpublic accessible (Option I) 2,501-12,000 NR Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 100 307 200,000 Nonpublic accessible (Option 2) 12,001-20,000 Yes NR Yes Yes Yes•-, Yes 100 40 400,000 20,001-500,000 Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes 100 40 400,000 Greater than 500,0008 Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes 100 40 400,000 (:ili 0-500 NR NR NR6 NR NR3 NR 50 NR NR :) 501-2,500 Yes NR NR6 NR NR3 NR. 50 30 75,000 Public accessible 501-2,500 Yes NR NR6 NR NR3 NR 50 30 75,000 Nonpublic accessible (Option I) 501-2,500 NR Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 50 20 50,000 Nonpublic accessible (Option 2) ' 2,501-300,000 Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes 50 30 75,000 300,001-500,0008,9 Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes 50 30 75,000 NR = Not required. lToe size of the high-piled storage area to be considered when using this table shall include the high-piled storage area and all portions of the building not separated from the high-piled storage area in accordance with Section 8102.2. 2For aisles, see Section 8102.9. 3Curtain boards shall be installed as required by the Building Code. See U.B.C. Section 906. ~ / - 0:, .... )> · ..... (0 (0 .I>, C z ~ :0 :1: "Tl :ij m 0 0 0 m --- I I I ·_, . : _·-·.__ . . . . . . . 1· I I I I I I - I I I - ' . . . - ' . . . -.. ' .. } ' . . , , . '. ~ . . . . -. . . ' . . ' ATTACHMENT #7 I .. · .. · .. ··· .· . , .... ·. . . . •.. · ...... · .· ... -. · .... . • • • • J ., ' •• •• •• • • • . . ' I ---. ------_ : :-. ----. : .. _. _· --. : -. -_ ---_-: -_ _· -·_ -. -----_ -----_ ----- • .. ·. . . ~-. . , I . . .. . -. . .... . . '. '-' . . -. ~' . ' • • : • :·, : J • ' ·-••• • .. • ,., • • • --,· -. • • • •• '. :, . . . . . .. _·. ·, .. . . .· . .. ,. . -. --,, ' . - .:· -------------- .... 6) a, .... pP,•- 4Piles shall be separated by aisles complying with Section 8102.9. 5Forstorage in excess of the height indicated, special fire protection shall be provided in accordance with Footnote 8 when required by the chief. See also Articles 79 and 88 for special limitations for flammable and combustible liquids and aerosols. 6Section 902.2 shall apply for fire apparatus access. 7For storage exceeding 30 feet (914 mm) in height, Option 1 shall be used. 8Special fire-protection provisions such as, but not limited to, fire protection of exposed steel columns; increased sprinkler density; additional in-rack sprinklers, without associated reductions in ceiling sprinkler density; or additional fire department hose connections shall be provided when required by the chief. 9High-piled storage areas shall not exceed 500,000 square feet ( 46 451.5 m2), A two-hour area separation wall shall be used to divide high-piled storage exceeding 500,000 square feet (46 451.5 m2) in area. COMMODITY CLASSIFICATION I-IV (Option 1) I-IV (Option 2) High hazard (Option 1) High hazard (Option 2) TABLE 81-B-REQU!ftEMENTS FOR CURTAIN BOARDS AND SMOKE VENTING1 (See Sections 8102.6.4 and 8102.7.3) MAXIMUM AREA FORMED MAXIMUM SPACING DESIGNATED STORAGE CURTAIN BOARD BY CURTAIN BOAROS2 OF VENT CENTERS HEIGHT(ft,) DEPTH (ft.) (sq. ft.) VENT AREA TO FLOOR (ft.) MAXIMUM DISTANCE TO VENTS FROM WALL DR CURTAIN BOARDS3 (ft,) x3048lormm x 0.0929 for m2 AREA RATIO x3048formm 20 or less 6 10,000 1:100 100 60 over 20-40 6 8,000 1:75 100 55 20 or less 4 3,000 1:75 100 55 over20-40 4 3,000 1:50 100 50 20 or less 6 6,000 1:50 JOO 50 over 20-30 c---6---.---6,000 --1:40 90 45 20 or less ·--4--4,000 1:50 100 50 over 20-30 ·-4 2,000---, 1:30 75 40 1 For rack storage heights in excess of those indicated, see Section 8 I 04.5:For solid-piled storage heights in excess of those indicated, an approved engineered design shall be used. 2When curtain boards are provided in buildings equipped with early suppression-fast response sprinklers, the curtain boards shall be located only at the perimeters of sprinkler systems. 3Tue distance specified is the maximum distance from any vent in a particular curtained area to walls or curtain boards which form the perimeter of the curtained area. - ..... (0 (0 ~ C: z ,; 0 :IJ :::: !! :IJ m 8 C m CX) .... t ..... ti, --- I I A FIRE DESIGN San Diego Detroit Atlanta New Jersey I TOMES, VAN RickLEyGt<l!!~c~~~ I I I SMAC CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA DRAFT CURTAIN APPEAL On behalf of the SMAC, we are requesting to delete the draft curtains requ1red by Section 906.6 of the 1994 I Uniform Building Code and Section 8102.7 of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code at the new SMAC warehouse. This request is based on the latitude given in Secti9n 103.1.2 of the Fire Code and Section 104.2.8 of the Building Code. A compilation of code history, scientific prediction, and full-scale tests on draft curtains is used as _basis for this I request. I CODE BACKGROUND The history of smoke/heat vents and curtain boards in buildings used for high-piled stock is somewhat ambiguous. I The first use of these devices, although not documented, was reported to be in 1966 by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. This application was based upon judgment. by the fire marshal. There was no fire testing to confirm this decision. Roof vents and· curtain boards were originally used as an aid to fire fighting in unsprinklered I buildings. In unsprinklered buildings, roof vents, augmented 1Jy curtain boards can sometimes relieve smoke accumulation by containing radial movement of smoke along the ceiling and by permitting the smoke to escape. I Vents and curtain boards are of much less value for fires in sprinklered buildings. In the 1971 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code, Article 35, High-Piled Combustible Stock was introduced. I Requirements for smoke/heatvents and curtain boards were introduced in this edition. Smoke/heatvents and curtain boards were required in all buildings used for high-piled stock regardless of automatic fire protection. Section 35.107 stated "curtain boards shall be provided to limit the area of sprinkler operation and to aid the operation of I roof vents." No fire testing or research was done at that time to justify this position. Article 3 5 remained unchanged in the 1973 and 1976 Editions. - I A major revision of Article 35, which was later changed to Article 81, was undertaken for the 19?9 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code. Research conducted during this revision indicated that a mechanical smoke removal system was preferred and that smoke/heat vents and curtain boards were not required in buildings protected by an approved I fire-extinguishing system [Section 81.107 (a)]. S~oke/heat vents and curtain boards were also not required in fully sprinklered buildings _in the 1982 Edition_ of the UFC. -· · - I The 1985, 1988, and_1991 Editions of the Uniform Fire Code have ~gain changed the smoke and heat vent and curtain boards requirements. These codes require smoke/heat vents ~d Gurtain boards in buildings used for high- I piled stock storage regardless· if the building is sprinklered or not: No new resyarch or fire_ te.sting· was done to support this change in position. · . _ · · . · · ., . _ -· _ · -_ -_ I 8265-A Vi~krns srn~ET • SAN DiEc;o. CA nm • TEl (619) -576-.6~66 • FAx (619l 576-6465 I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I SMAC -Carlsbad, CA Draft Curtain Appeal Page 2 of 5 FULL-SCALE TESTS On February 1 7, 1994 large scale fire tests were conducted on Group A plastics commodities at the F a<;tory Mutual test·facility in West Gloucester, Rhode Island. The tests were designed to simulate storage situations found in warehouse or warehouse-type display retail operations and involved ra~k storage arrangements of a Group A plastic commodities located in a nominal 27 ft. high building: Test No. Array Height Ignition Location Curtain Maximum No. Sprinklers (ft) (with respect to ceiling boards Ceiling Temp. Opened sprinklers) Installed (Of) 1 20 Between Two No 1107 4 6 20 Between Two Yes 1575 35 3 15 Under One No 965 7 7 15 Under One_ Yes 1162 18 Two large-scale fire tests were performed with curtain boards during a series of tests for the Group A Plastics Committee. These tests were exact repeats of earlier tests from the test program. By changing only ll single test variable (curtain boards), the tests permit the analysis of the effects of curtain boards within a building_protected with fire· sprinklers and rack storage. Test No. 1 -Four sprinklers operated to controlled the fire. Test No. 1 was considered to be an ovei;whelming success. The fire was ignited at the bottom-center of a double-row rack (main array) which was paralteled by two single-rowracks on the either side (target racks). The fire intensified very quickly to a point where flames reached nearly the top of the rack. The first sprinklered operated at 2:03 minutes with the fourth and final sprinkler operating at 2: 12 minutes. During this time, the fire was significantly reduced and confined by the four operating sprinklers. Over the next few minutes, the fire was· reduced to a smolder and ortly required mop-up operatio]Js · for final extinguishment. Visibility was good in the test site up to approximately-12·:oo minutes which then declined during the next 10:00 minutes. Test No. 6 -This test was~ repeat of Test No:_ 1 in every aspect except the addition of curtain boards. Two intersecting 6 ft. deep curtain boards were installed. Test No. (j was considered to be an ove~helmil}g· fa~lure and the failure is contributed to the installation of curtain boards. A total of_35 sprinklers operated. The· fi_rst sprinkler operated at 1 :25 minutes with last sprinkler operating at 15 :54 minutes. The fire burne~ to the south end test array and temperatureswere'significantlyhighetthanin Test No. 1. The riumberofpalletloads consumed w~s 12 verses 3_ for Test No. 1. The sprinklers operated in each of the for quadrants of the cuitairiboards as though there ·was four separate and. distinct fires. Th~ curtain boards acted as walls and channeled the smoke and h~at within the quadrant of the fire origin. Th~ first eleven sprinklers operated within the northe_ast quadrant. However, many of the sprinklers operated well beyond the fire area due to heat _and smoke being driven oµJ and ·away from the fire are~ because of the curtain boards. The curtain boards prevented pre-wetting of the adjacent commodities and, therefore, a larger fire developed. The fire spread to the northwest_ quadrant ·where the fire again developed as it 9-id ii:i ·the first quadrant. 'Another eight sprinklers operated within the northwest quadrant with many of the operating sprinklers we11 beyond the fire area. The .fire then moved to the southeast qu,adrant and then to the southwest quadrant. The . . . .· '.. . . . . , . ' .· . . . ., : ... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SM}\C -Carlsbad, CA Draft Curtain Appeal Page 3 of 5 curtain boards significantly effected the usually symmetrical smoke and heat movements along the ceiling. The smoke and heat was channeled along the curtai~-boards and then forced down and under curtain boards. Due to the larger fire and large number of sprinklers operating, smoke generation was significantly greater than in Test No. 1. The smoke layer was driven to_20 ft. below the ceilip.g at 3:00_ minutes in several areas of the test site and to 27 ft. (floor level) by 5:30 mirmtes. By 7:30 minutes, all view of the fire was obscured. Test No. 3 -As predicted, the first sprinkler operated early during the test, at 1 : 12 minutes. The fire then grew and developed over the next4:32 minutes before the operation of the next sprinkler, at 5:44 minutes. The seventh and final sprinkler operated at 6:34 minutes. This delay in the operation between the first and second sprinkler permitted the development of a larger fire. Temperature were slightly higher in this test compared to Test No. 1 and the fire consumed6 pallets loads of fuel. Though not as dramatic as Test No. 1, this test was controlled by seven sprinklers and was a success. -· Test No. 7 -This test was identical to Test No. 3 in every aspect except that curtain boards were provided. Again, two intersecting 6 ft. deep curtain boards were installed. However, the curtain board running north-south was moved to the west directly over the west edge of the main, test array. Test No. 7 was also considered to be an overwhelming failure and the failure is again contributed to the installation of curtain boards. A total of 18 sprinklers operated. The first sprinkler operated at 0:52 minutes with last sprinkler operating at 14:08 minutes. The fire burned to the north and south end of the test array and to the east and west sides of the test array. The fire also jumped the aisle and scorched the east target array and involved the west target array. It was obvious tha~ the curtain boards were affecting the ceiling gas flow and obstructing the sprinkler water discharge due to the size and extent to which the fire was growing. This test included the three primary factors used to identify a test failure:· 1) the fire burned to the ends of the main test array, 2) the fire jumped the aisle, and 3) a large number of sprinklers operated. Temperatures were significantly higher than in Test No. 3 due to the large fire size and the number of pallet loads consumed was 13 verses 6 for Test No. 3. All of the negative phenomena observed due to the installation of curtain boards in Test No. 6 also occurred in this test; the sprinklers operated in each of the for quadrants of the curtain boards as though there was four separate and distinct fires; the curtain boards acted as walls and. channeled the smoke and heat within the quadrant of the fire origin; many of the sprinklers which operated in each quadrant were well beyond the fire area due to heat and smoke being driven out and away from the fire area because of the curtain boards; and the curtain boards prevented pre-wetting of the adjacent commodities and, therefore, a larger fire developed. Similar to_ Test No. 7, smoke was also channeled along the curtain boards and was driven down below the curtain boards. . ' . ' , I In sullliliary, curtain boards changed two overwhelming successful _tests into failures. It has been clearly demonstrated that curtain boards have severe adverse effect~ on.the fire ·sprinkler system (the primary defens~ I against fire), however, there is no testing, computer mode'!, or engineering analysis to demonstrate any benefit to . fire protection with the installation of curtain boards. In fact, the test data indicates that curtain boards should not I I I be installed in: sprinklered buildings. -· · - I I SMAC -Carlsbad, CA . Draft Curtain Appeal I Page 4 of5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I 1· JUSTIFICATION Numerous concerns have been brought to ljght as a result of investigation into current information available on smoke venting and curtain b~ards in sprinklered buildings: (1) (2) Curtain boards prevent pre-wetting of commodities by the sprinkler system. This would occur as a fire advances down a rack towards the curtain boards. The curtain board will keep the sprinkler heads from operating beyond the fire area (see illustration). This in turn will prevent prewetting of commodities beyond the fire area. Full scale fire testing has demonstrated the importance of pre-wetting in controlling high-piled combustible stock fires. Thickness of the Upper Smoke Layer. A major concern has developed with the thickness of the upper smoke layer at the ceiling over the fire. Tests have shown that smoke logging in the designated storage area can be caused by pulling the smoke layer down when the operating ceiling sprinklers go through the layer. This issue was brought to our attention by the National Institute of.Standards and Technology Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST) Test Program called LA VENTS (Link Activated Vents and Sprinklers). It simply demonstrated that if the ceiling smoke layer above the fire gets to a certain depth or thickness, it can actually _cause the smoke a:t?-d heat to be drawn down by the cooling action created by the water from operating sprinkler heads going through the layer (see illustration). Although the actual critical depth of that smoke layer is not specifically known, it is thought to be 3 ft. or less·. By adding 6 ft. or 4 ft. curtain boards, the thickness of the smoke layer is increased where the sprinklers are operating. This thickened smoke layer will encourage smoke logging throughoutthe building. This phenomena was recently observed at a full scale fire test at Underwriters Laboratories. This will hinder firefighters from getting to the seat of the fire which is a large component of high-piled stock fire protection. Often the complete extinguishment of these types of fires is dependent upon firefighter_s with hand hose lines: Co modities · In Racks Fire Origin Ceiling Fire Advanc~ "A" Commodite In Racks I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SMAC -Carlsbad, CA Draft Curtain Appeal Page 5 of 5 3) Skipping Sprinkler Heads. The activation of sprinklers· are affected by many factors, including the ceiling temperature and ceilingjetstream or heat velocity. Computer modeling has shown that.installing curtain boards will cause turbulence as the ceilingjetstreamreaches the curtain board. This turbulence could effect the response of the sprinklers and cause skipping of adjacent sprinkler heads. As fire advances on a curtain board, there is a concern that a downward draft of the heat coiumn would be created by the curtain board which would prevent the operation of the sprinkler heads on the non-fire side. This concept is confirmed in NFP A 13, which requires smaller sprinkler head placement (130 sq ft maximum) for_ sprinklers located below panelized roof systems than sprinklers located below a smooth ceiling (200 sq ft maximum). It is thought that due to the irregularities in the surface below the panelized roof system pocketing of heat and the above-mentioned turbulence can cause skipping of adjacent sprinklers. Thus sprinklers are placed within these pocket areas. It "is also important to consider that the justification for the installation of smoke and heat vents within sprinklered buildings is highly theoretical. All of the large scale fire testing conducted to develop the design criteria for Class I through V commodities are based upon smoke and heat vents and curtain boards not being used. This is detailed in Chapter 3-3 ofNFPA 231 C. Also, NFPA 204M, Smoke and Heat Venting, Chapter 6 also recognizes the fact that appropriate testing has not been conducted and a design standard with smoke venting in sprinklered buildings has not been developed. CONCLUSION The result of present testing and analysis of fire data clearly indicate that draft curtains provide no benefit in a sprinklered building. However, they could actually have a detrimental effect by increasing burning intensity and spread caused by lack of pre-wetting and skipping of the sprinkler heads. Smoke curtains can have a detrimental effect by actually increasing burning intensity and spread caused by lack of prt::-wetting and skipping of the sprinkler heads. Furthermore, the entrainment of the upper smoke layer (contained within the smoke curtain area) by the water from operating sprinkler heads can pose a serious danger to the lives of firefighters. We believe that, based on the history of smoke curtains and the above-mentioned test results, the elimination of the curtain boards, in conjunction with increased venting, will provide superior fire protection for this facility. ' . G:\personal\klaus\wpdocs\gprojects\drftctn.94 JUL-03-97 THU 09:14 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX NO. 4380894 P. 04 NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE: Non-Residential Land Owner, please read this option carefully and be sure you throughly understand the options before signing. The option you choose will affect your payment of the developed Special Tax assessed on your property. This option is available only at the time of the first building permit issuance. Property owner sign;3ture is required before a building permit will be issued. Your signature is confirming the accuracy of all parcel and ownership information shown . .$#'.-K&r.,,.,.u,2 LP' {JP1J2f2.~ 7~ Name of Owner Telephone ' Ar?:17 :::: ~d:H l#y ~~ress~&c;(o/ ~? Rf: 9J..,-;tt:JT Carlsbad CA 9200$:" City State Zip Code City State Zip Code · 7-~ 1.. ... \ 3c -5 ':i Assessor's Parcel Number, or APN and Lot Number if not yet subdivided. Building Permit Number As cited by Ordinance No. NS-155 and adopted by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California. the City is authorized to levy a special Tax in Community Facilities district No. 1. All non-residential property, upon the issuance of the first building permit, shall have the option to (1) pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ONE- TIME or (2) assume the ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX· DEVELOPED PROPER.TY for a period not to exceed twenty- five (25) years. Please indicate your choice by initialing the appropriate line below: OPTION (1}: OPTION (2): I elect to pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ONE-TIME now, as a one-time payment. Amoun~of ~-Time Special Tax: $ lc;:o 'Z...I ~. 8'\" · . Owner's Initials 1.l . / ' I erect to pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ANNUALLY for a pe~~ not to exceed twenty-five (25) years. Maximum Annual Special Tax: $ l er, s~l . . Owner Initials · . I DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENAL.TY OF PERJURYTHATTHE UNDER.SIGNED IS THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT I UNDERSTAND AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS AS STATED ABOVE. Print Name / Date/ The City of Carlsbad h~s not independently verified the information shown above. Therefore, we accept no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE ---.. - CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 0 CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No.f _ 7o87.J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: X Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad CA 92009 (434-0661) Encinitas Union --101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300) Project Applicant: Project Address: San Marcos Unified --1290 West San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos CA 92024 (744-4776) --San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area _____ number of dwelling units ______ _ SQ. FT. of covered area _____ SQ. FT. of garage area ______ _ COMMERCIAi/iNDUSTRiAL: SQ. FT. AREA G208o &F '7' 1 I/ 1 I l ,I ;;_ Prepared by J dhv-. #vttt,d&;//4-~ . Date __ 7i.;...o.fL._~_p--=<i'---7..__ ____ _ FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) ---Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Cod~ 53080 ---Project is subject to an existing fee agreement --Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 . Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. --(other school fees paid) Other ------------------------------- Resident i a I Fee Levied: $ / ~, {p'Jtf: ()D based on e{i~, DoO sq. ft. @ __ 3=--tJ-<f+---· -- Com lndust Fee Levied:$ _____ based on ________ sq. ft.@ v{_ () I) • -J. H. Blair ------- __ "T"' J~ Assistant Supt 7 l q ervices School District Official ... Title June 27, 1997 Michele Masterson CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbaci, CA 92009 RECEIVED JUL O 1 1997 ENG\MEERING DEPARTMENT Re: SMAC Warehouse -Industrial Discharge Permit 1695 Faraday Avenue, Lot 109, CRC Plan File Number: CB97-0875 SCA Project Number: 96223 Dear Ms. Masterson: Smnih C<0>nsl!l lii:u ng Architects Architecture and Planning This letter is to serve as notification that the application forms required to be filed for an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit have been delivered to Mr. Bob Berry of S.M.A.C. The forms will be completed and delivered to the City of Carlsbad Water District along with the required permiflees as soon as possible. It is my understanding that Engineering Department plan check approval is contingent upon receipt of this letter. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, \ ~/4~ Michael S. McGill Project Architect MSM/bjk u:\data\office\project\96files\96223\"."'astprmt.doc 5355 Mira Sorrento Place • Suite 650 • San Diego, California 92121 ° (619) 452-3188 • Fax (619) 452-3907 A FIRE DESIGN GROUP CO. TOMES, VAN RickLEy & ·AssoclATEs SMAC CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA DRAFT CURTAIN APPEAL San Diego Detroit Atlanta New Jersey On behalf of the SMAC, we are requesting to delete the draft curtains required by Section 906.6 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code and Section 8102.7 of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code at the new SMAC warehouse. This request is based on the latitude given in Section 103.1.2 of the Fire Code and Section 104.2.8 of the Building Code. A compilation of code history, scientific prediction, and full-scale tests on draft curtains ~s used as basis for this request. CODE BACKGROUND The history of smoke/heat vents and curtain boards in buildings used for high-piled stock is somewhat ambiguous. The first use of these devices, although not documented, was reported to be in 1966 by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. This application was based upon judgment by the fire marshal. There was no fire testing to confirm this decision. Roof vents and curtain boards were originally used as an aid to fire fighting in unsprinklered ,~ buildings. In unsprinklered buildings, roof vents, augmented by curtain boards can sometimes relieve smoke ~ \, accumulation by containing radial movement of smoke along the ceiling and by permitting the smoke to escape. V Vents and curtain boards are of much less value for fires in sprinklered buildings. In the 1971 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code, Article 35, High-Piled Combustible Stock was introduced. Requirements for smoke/heat vents and curtain boards were introduced in this edition. Smoke/heat vents and curtain boards were required in all buildings used for high-piled stock regardless of automatic fire protection. Section 35.107 stated "curtain boards shall be provided to limit the area of sprinkler operation and to aid the operation of roof vents. 11 No fire testing or research was done at that time to justify this position. Article 35 remained u~changed in the 1973-and 1976 Editions. A major revision of Article 35, which was later changed to Article 81, was undertaken for the 1979 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code. Research conducted during this revision indicated that a mechanical smoke removal system was preferred and that smoke/heat vents and curtai~ boards were not required in buildings protected by an approved fire-extinguishing system [Section 81.107(a)]. Smoke/heat vents and curtain boards were also not required in fully sprinklered buildings in the 1982 Edition_ of the UFC. · · · The 1985, 1988, and_1991 Editions of the Uniform Fire Code have again changed the s~oke and heat vent and curtain boards requirements. These codes require smoke/heat vents and curtain boards in buildings used for high- piled stock storage regardless· if the building is sprinklered or not. No new res~arch qr fire_ te.sting· was done to support this change in position. · · · · · · · · · •. :-.. CC3·'t7·-c-lln ~ 8265-A Yi~kERS STREET • SAN DiEqo •. CA 92111 • TEL (619) ·576-.646{:, • FAx (619) 576-6465 I I I SMAC -Carlsbad, CA I Draft Curtain Appeal 1 Page 2 of5 · :ii 11i FULL-SCALE TESTS On February 17, 1994 large scale fire tests were conducted on Group A plastics commodities at the Factory Mutual test facility in West Gloucester, Rhode Island. The tests were designed to simulate_ storage situations found in warehouse or warehouse-type display retail operations and involved rack storage arrangements of a Group A plastic commodities located in a nominal 27 ft. high building: Test No. Array Height Ignition Location Curtain Maximum No. Sprinklers (ft) (with respect to ceiling boards Ceiling Temp. Opened sprinklers) Installed (OF) 1 20 Between Two No 1107 4 6 20 Between Two Yes 1575 35 3 15 Under One No 965 7 7 15 Under One Yes 1162 18 Two large-scale fire tests were performed with curtain boards during a series of tests for the Group A Plastics Committee. These tests were exact repeats of earlier tests from the test program. By changing only a single test ,_ variable (curtain boards), the tests permit the analysis of the effects of curtain boards within a building protected with fire sprinklers and rack storage. Test No. 1 -Four sprinklers operated to controlled the fire. Test No. 1 was considered to be an overwhelming success. The fire was ignited at the bottom-center of a double-row rack (main array) which was paralleled by two -single-row racks on the either side (target racks). The fire intensified very quickly to a point where flames reached nearly the top of the rack. The first sprinklered operated at 2: 03 minutes with the fourth and final sprinkler operating at 2: 12 minutes. During this time, the fire was significantly reduced and confined by the four operating sprinklers. Over the next few minutes, the fire was reduced to a smolder and only required mop-up operations for final extinguishment. Visibility was good in the test site up to approximately 12:00 minutes which then declined during the next 10:00 minutes. Test No. 6 ·_ This test was a repeat of Test No. 1 in every aspect except the addition of curtain boards. Two intersecting 6 ft. deep curtain boards were installed. Test No. 6 was considered to be an overwhelming· failure and .. the failure is contributed to the installation of curtain boards. A total of 35 sprinklers operated. The· first sprinkler operated at 1 :25 minutes with last sprinkler operating at 15 :54 minutes. The fire bume4 to the south end test array and temperatures were significantly higher than in Test No. 1. The number of pallet loads consumed was 12 verses -3 for Test No. 1. The sprinklers operated in each of the for qmidrants of the curtain boards as though there was four separate and distinct fires. TJ:i~ curtain boards acted as walls and channeled the smoke and heat within the quadrant of the fire origin. The first eleven sprinklers operated within the northeast quadrant. However, many of the sprinklers '-operated well beyond the fire area due to heat and sm9ke being driven ou~ and away froni the fire area because of the curtain boards. The curtain boards prevented pre-wetting of the adjacent commodities and, therefore, a larger fire developed. The fire spread to the northwest quadrant where the fire again developed as it ~id in the first quadrant. ·Another eight sprinklers operated within the northwest quadrant with many of the operating sprinklers well beyond the fire area. The .fire then· mov~d to the southeast qu_adrant and then to the southwest quadrant. The I l . . . . . . . . . . . ' .. !fAC -Carlsbad, CA ·aft Curtain Appeal ge 5 of5 Skipping Sprinkler Heads. The activation of sprinklers are affected by many factors, including the ceiling temperature and ceilingjetstream or heat velocity. Computer modeling has shown that.installing curtain boards will cause turbulence as the ceilingjetstream reaches the curtain board. This turbulence could effect the response of the sprinklers and cause skipping of adjacent sprinkler heads. As fire advances on a curtain board, there is a concern that a downward draft of the heat column would be created by the curtain board which would prevent the operation of the sprinkler heads on the non-fire side. This concept is confirmed in NFPA 13, which requires smaller sprinkler head placement (130 sq ft maximum) for.sprinklers located below panelized roof systems than sprinklers located below a smooth ceiling (200 sq ft maximum). It is thought that due to the irregularities in the surface below the panelized roof system pocketing of heat and the above-mentioned turbulence can cause skipping of adjacent sprinklers. Thus sprinklers are placed within these pocket areas. :; also important to consider that the justification for the installation of smoke and heat vents within sprinklered I dings is highly theoretical. All of the large scale fire testing conducted to develop the design criteria for Class rough V commodities are based upon smoke and heat vents and curtain boards not being used. This is detailed :hapter 3-3 ofNFPA 231 C. Also, NFPA 204M, Smoke and Heat Venting, Chapter 6 also recognizes the fact that ,ropriate testing has not been conducted and a design standard with smoke venting in sprinklered buildings has been developed. CONCLUSION ~ result of present testing and analysis of fire data clearly indicate that draft curtains provide no benefit in a nklered building. However, they could actually have a detrimental effect by increasing burning intensity and !ad caused by lack of pre-wetting and skipping of the sprinkler heads. Smoke curtains can have a detrimental ·ct by actually increasing burning intensity and spread caused by lack of pre-wetting and skipping of the sprinkler ds. Furthermore, the entrainment of the upper smoke layer ( contained within the smoke curtain area) by the er from operating sprinkler heads can pose a serious danger to the lives of firefighters. believe that, based on the history of smoke curtains and the above-mentioned test results, the elimination of t~e .ain boards, in conjunction with increased venting, will provide superior fire protection for this facility. sonal\klaus\wpdocs\gprojects\drftctn.94 '. ':, :·· :· ! ·• .. - 1,• : .. ' . i .... I .:• '' : ·:, '. : .· ! ; .. l.'• l '.·:·.:. : .. · ,, .. t.·.--·-.,_ .: ... :~. :t·: ' .. :t .· ' .. i· .· 1·_· SMAC -Carlsbad, CA Draft Curtain Appeal Page 3 of 5 curtain boards significantly effected the usually symmetrical smoke and heat movements along the ceiling. The smoke and heat was channeled along the curtain boards and then forced down and under curtain boards. Due to the larger fire and large number of sprinklers operating, smoke generation was significantly greater than in Test No. 1. The smoke layer was driven to 20 ft. below the ceiling at 3:00 minutes in several areas of the test site and to 27 ft. (floor level) by 5:30 mir~.utes. By 7:30 minutes, all view of the fire was obscured. . . Test No. 3 -As predicted, the first sprinkler operated early during the test, at 1 :12 minutes. The fire then grew and developed over the pext 4:32 minutes before the operation of the next sprinkler, at 5:44 minutes. The seventh and final sprinkler operated at 6:34 minutes. This delay in the operation between the first and second sprinkler permitted the development of a larger fire. Temperature were_ slightly higher in this test compared to Test No. 1 and the fire consumed 6 pallets loads of fuel. Though not as dramatic a~ Test No. 1, this test was controlled by seven, sprinklers and was a success. Test No. 7 -This test was identical to Test No. 3 in every aspect except that curtain boards were provided. Again, two intersecting 6 ft. deep curtain boards were installed. However, the curtain board running north-south was moved to the west directly over the west edge of the main test array. Test No. 7 was also considered to be an overwhelming failure and the failure is again contributed to the installation of curtain boards. A total of 18 sprinklers operated. The first sprinkler operated at 0:52 minutes with last sprinkler operating at 14:08 minutes. The fire burned to the ·north and south end of the test array and to the east and west sides of the test array. The fire also jumped the aisle and scorched the east target array and involved the west target array. It was obvious that the curtain boards were affecting the ceiling gas flow and obstructing the sprinkler water discharge due to the size and extent to which the fire was growing. This test included the three primary factors used to identify a test failure: 1) the fire burned to the ends of the main test array, 2) the fire jumped the aisle, and 3) a large number of sprinklers operated. Temperatures were significantly higher than in Test No. 3 due to the large fire size and the number of pallet loads consumed was 13 verses 6 for Test No. 3. All of the negative phenomena observed due to the installation of curtain boards in Test No. 6 also occurred in this test; the sprinklers operated in each of the for quadrants of the curtain boards as though there was four separate and distinct fires; the curtain boards acted as walls and-channeled the smoke and heat within the quadrant of the fire origin; many of the sprinklers which operated in each quadrant were _well beyond the fire area due to heat and smoke being driven out and away from the fire area because of the curtain boards; and the curtain boards prevented pre-wetting of the adjacent commodities and, therefore, a larger fire developed. Similar to Test No. 7, smoke was also channeled along the curtain boards and was driven down below the curtain boards. In summary, curtain boards changed two overwhelming successful tests into failures. It has been clearly demonstrated that curtain boards have severe adverse effects on the fire sprinkler system (the primary defense against fire), however, there is no testing, computer model, or engineering analysis to demonstrate any benefit to fire protection with the installation of curtain bo~ds. In fact, the test data indicates that curtain boards should not be installed in sprinklered buildings. · SMAC -Carlsbad, CA Draft Curtain Appeal · Page 4 of 5 JUSTIFICATION Numerous concerns have been brought to light as a result of investigation into current information available on smoke venting and curtain boards in sprinklered buildings: · (1) Curtain boards prevent pre-wetting of commodities by the sprinkler system. This would occur as a fire advances down a rack towards the curtain boards. The curtain board will keep the sprinkler heads from operating beyond the fire area (see illustration). This in tum will prevent prewetting of commodities beyond the fire area. Full scale fire testing has demonstrated the importance of pre-wetting in controlling high-piled combustible stock fires. (2) Thickness of the Upper Smoke Layer. A major concern has ·developed with the thickness of the upper smoke layer at the ceiling over the fire. Tests have shown that smoke logging in the designated storage area can be caused by pulling the smoke layer down when the operating ceiling sprinklers go through the layer. This issue was brought to our attention by the National Institute of Standards and Technology Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST) Test Program called LA VENTS (Link Activated Vents and Sprinklers). It simply demonstrated that if the ceiling smoke layer above the fire gets to a certain depth or thickness, it can actually cause the smoke and heat to be drawn down by the cooling action created by the water from operating sprinkler heads going through the layer (see illustration). Although the actual critical depth of that smoke layer is not specifically known, it is thought to be 3 ft. or less. By adding 6 ft. or 4 ft. curtain boards, the thickness of the smoke layer is increased where the sprinklers are operating. This thickened smoke layer will encourage smoke logging throughout the building. This phenomena was recently observed at a full scale fire test at Underwriters Laboratories. This will hinder firefighters from getting to the seat of the fire which is a large component of high-piled stock fire protection. Often the complete extinguishment of these types of fires is dependent upon firefighter_s with hand hose lines: Co modities · in Racks Fire Origin Ceiling Fire Advance "A" .... Commodite In Racks . I J J J J J J J J J J I I I i I I lo q S ""7" A1lAfJll 'f It V -s , fVI. • fh L../ ltJr tt:>'j -{;:, '7-...1 OJ'O tfJ S {f UL-W At,,<Utt1vSG '1 / D t7r lf (1 s-f ,17 -fO ':f ~ [5 b I L1 C,_df 0/ nt'J/1/Jc. ~ 51'-...II cx-v r>--4-L-C,rG(S If 7'!~u ltt.Jo) Y ' · · APPROVALS I -? /,.,., /1J ft{-(i ;~ C, {""'-. . Da~ , /_ , . (' FINALED 7 Bc 4 'ding6J{}Jtl'•iZ-~j Y /7.. '-t 'l 1,,. C, l-((A . . i \ 7 P'.;;'.:lng, ( , ,/ E, .,.eermg'-{~ 5( llb , 'i 1 -~ (M,,c\ &If/, Jcl:J ?_d;Jj _ c,:;v J .zd.,{,M , sp-e,:., • 'f?.o ~'), a..w.,, _J[ 7 1 'l ~ o!al -6 G-s7 f l c,f3fv.._,.,--t,t:_Je,,; IL,:: ct= LJ > u<y JI fJJ 17/4,,. t € "}.. ==== Hc:.::h ~tk-J p.,-,,,ft ((,,(fu:,, ~{ /2, -R;c_,,__, 7~i~v& 1/JkfJ .1 t;(N(Cz7,_,, C<,,tk/;__ ~ ·-r.-- l I 4G,&n tr" 71-, @) fr•~ cO-')v . 7 I 3 frr 7 ~d ~ I~ ,,-(Pl)£:/¥-~ __ p ~ 7/7/17-l)f u-w I WCOMP FIRE PLANS =======::::::::: ASSESSOR PLANS ---------COFO I ·, {:~J - B U I L D I N G P E R M I T PCR No: 'PCR97042 Project No: A9701144 Development No: 08/08/97 14:09 Page 1 of 1 Suite: Job Address: 1695 FARADAY AV Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: 212-130-34-00 Valuation: O Occupancy Group: Lot#: 109 ~ -......... , .,.:· ~ . \ ,, . Description: ROOF TRUSS SUBMITTAL : PERMIT CB97-875 Appl/Ownr: PLATIS, MIKE Reference#: 5355 MIRA SORRENTO PLACE#650 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92121 Construction Type: CT 85-24 Status: Applied: Apr/Issue: Entered By: 619 452-3188 ~ ·-. ' . IIIN ISSUED 07/23/97 08/08/97 RMA *** Fees Required *** · · *** Fee·s,,Collected & Credits *** 1 ___________________________ / '----, =:.:-.-------,, __________________________ _ Fees: Adjustments: Total Fees: / 16:3,00 . 0.0· _163.0,0, If ;'• ,, ' ' , ~· ', "'- . ··Total ·credi'ts: . 00 . / ,, ' Total Payments: .oo ' '',--' ' /· : . :.B~~aricJ / r:>~e ~.. . 16 3. O O Fee description ·' ·· "· ,,.,Unit·s, ,·,Fe.e/Uhit Ext fee Data -----------------------------------· -. -~;:. -----' _ \ ~· : ~ --', ------------------ Plan Check Revision Fe·e > -· 163 0.0, ' <:; 163. 00 ' . ~,,.:)<:,>>~::-;/ . . ;-.' ... " ·; . "I ..,, _, . f \~ / / (,,~·~·:,:. : \ ' 't 1t-:c0:=,r(::::1 ~-t;_:o . . ~. .., - .. --... ' / ,' '\ ; . l ; ( , ' I,/,· ·, ,, ~ \ \. ' ./ ~/ /' ; ·, ', \ ", ', \ ' '' ..., ,,,. r t ~'-) / '·' ./ FINAL APPROVAL :n ! • ..,, __ DATE ~JEARANCE --............ CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 y ... DATE: 8/4/97 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-875 rev EsGil Corporation Professional Pum !l{eview 'E11fJineers SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1695 Faraday Avenue PROJECT NAME: Roof Trusses For S.M.A.C. D APPLICANT et JURI~. D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE ~ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information: The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Mail Telephone Fax In Person i::g:j REMARKS: PCR 97-42 By: David Yao Esgil Corporation D 1GA' D CM D EJ D PC Fax#: Enclosures: approved plan 7/24 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 97-875 rev 8/4/97 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-875 rev PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 8/4/97 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1695 Faraday Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft.2) MULTIPLIER ($) roof trusses 1.5 hr Air CoriditioninQ Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE D 1'99 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ ~ 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 163.41 Type of Review: D Complete Review ~ Structural Only [gj Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 130.73 Comments: 87 .15x1 .5=130. 73 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 .~ . ~ City of Carlsbad 97104 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Wednesday, July 16, 1997 Reviewed by: Contact Name Mike McGill Address 5355 Mira Sorrento Pl Ste 650 City, State San Diego CA 92121 Bldg. Dept. No. CB97-875 Planning No. Job Name S.M.A.C. ------------------ Job Address _1_6_95_F_a_ra_d_a.,,_y _____________ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ ~ Approved -The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved -Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st. __ _ 2nd. __ _ 3rd __ _ Other Agency ID CFO Job# __ 97_1'-'-0-'-4 __ File# ___ _ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 r·~ , -~ City of Carlsbad 97104 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention General Comments: Date of Report: Wednesday, July 16, 1997 Contact Name Mike McGill Address 5355 Mira Sorrento Pl Ste 650 City, State San Diego CA 92121 Bldg. Dept. No. CB97-875 Planning No. _____ _ Job Name S.M.A.C. ----------------- Job Address 1695 Faraday ___ ____;; ____________ _ Ste. or Bldg. No. ____ _ revised tech report appvd jc, 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 Smith Consulting Architects Architecture and Planning TRANSMITTAL To: Date: 7-?,:Z-97 Project No: C/ 6 Z 2 3 Company: .-C/7'1 op CAtll.£/3AD /3;{d)C;-. 'J)fU>7: Project: 5, /Y}. A , Ci uJ/>J1Ut-ito use... ATTACHED: No. Copies I I I D · FAX (Sheet 1 of__) Fax No. For your approval ---- TRANSMITTED VIA: ~ ACTION 0 Mail D For your review and comment \d Messenger D As requested '5 Overnight Delivery D For your use/ files D Other D Reviewed as noted D No exceptions taken REMARKS: DISTRIBUTION: SCA File D Revise/ Resubmit With Encl. D D D D BY:~;?PdZJ W/O Encl. D D D D _ 5355 Mira Sorrento Place• Suite 650 • San Diego, California 92121 • (619) 452-3188 • Fax (619) 452-?907 . . ~~-----------------,,. ~ fi' ~ ' ,z <: ~ '. ::_ f 't DATE: SHEET DWG: ICKD. BY,' ·.1i ·: 7h..'1f=-GIRDERS BILL OF MATERIAL ot;-z7. _q1 \ OF 'Z-l-:e,e-\o ., ' I l " '~ I I . -JOB #: t:::f l -Z.c:> 2.. REV: PAINT: ~J::> DIPS:c:c-rD L,: 1'12 N0lfflf ll!S\ sum; 219 IL PMO, TIC. 7Nl2 JOB NAME: ~ ~ A-C PHONE (100)492-4n2 (016)532-4414 (1100)4112-.UU LOCATION: c--AQ..l-"58,AD,,. GA- PNC (tl&)!l32-4728 FOR: -o. A u.., *\TAGY2-6 ,.,., 5/ + ){4r2. )( ~'-3 . --4 1( q rlAf1 ~-i,-·. 2) '·(j-l?LD · CLEAR ,2-1' ·-1. • 1.:::.. LEFT END . ..,_ 6.6. RIGHT END 66.6. BOTH ENDS CHECK PANEL * LEFT END **RIGHT END --1-P"* I v~rn .. r. uSE ONLY QTY: _B 1. -ALL GIRDERS TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF ~C>O~Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. NOTES: .. .. . KNIFE PLATE "***BOTH ENDS QlY IDESCRIPTION IMARK (BASE-LENGHTI ~~~f?:!~e::ITS.s.~ I J!sx_wl J_B_c~_L L.l~S~.~LJ OAL TOP-CHORD-HOLES I SE'AT-HOLES TLE I TRE I GA~ I J-ILE ]HRE:]GAH , .1~1N11.111.{,~ 1 c:, 1 115,'-&>14-I&> I h I -I I 111 '*"' 1l2--T.-Z:l4 1~lzls1'-,'4 -. -rs IS> 14-ISZ6i7Nl).I i/4.&ILI GZ-I 51 i_q I & I &, I I'' ~rl 111 1~i==1 4 12-I z...l 4 1-z-lz Is, '-II I-IT'-i I 4-_ I s I s I z:; ~- l l~sN11.,~}4.(p~-43 l-:s8'-4 I <P I~ l~t'' l~FL?~2-lsd 4':i-1-zl')~ 1'2-·I :Y1 ~3'1:.I l'z. 1-14-I~ I-Is I I I l48U"1Cf-8\(/4.0~I Ct4 '141'-z:~I ~ I LJ? I -I I I" ~i=:I 1(2-l,z,I 41,i.f 2-141'-01'4-I -I\'~ I .+r=-I 5 Is ,. ( ___ :I· '2-)4C&i5Nl\.\1<-/4.t,~1 t\-? I 3q !..?~;::,~ I ~-J~ I I'' I;;) -I I 41~ 1~1 l/7,,-l'Z--l 3q'.-~18-I \ \2...I I + Is I -Is PANEL-LAYOUT AOOITIONAL CONCENTRATED -l()AI:)$ C5) NET. ~ AXL4L "LOAD I ' ,,_._., ,m,~-.m ~ (DI MARK A B LOAD DIST. LOAD DIST. PU_ . TC. I BC_ . I I t:1 1 h~1~41 LS 18'-o f3~/ot)\.21t--l7'-,~.a.J I l10.ei1~(33-ofl -t qt1F ~v<" um,.=<l), 'ATERAL MOMENT<l>, "l!IN I REMARKS LE I RE LE I RE 1 0 "* A A ' o'l-~~,olzf s lzf ~ (7~1olz-(fl, 2~J, ···· ,-~,-. --Vo.ofLf:31.c,IL( u-e f P TG I I I I I A A-~ c;3 17~,o~~lB'-o 17'-4-l:2.J584\5'...io~ I l1ei-01L'3,.o"-I -I I I IAb.A 64-11 ~<+-14-1~'-0 f2LL01i-J Lei ~~r-z~'-+r I _{O. O/lfj7b/4 I I I I I+ AA Ci 5 l71-1o!z.T? le'~ o-l~'-t l:2.. e,~~ ,~~ 10':;I I ,q l!-6, ~,o'd /b -oil-l.,1.0 ,4 I I I I la*¥ n·. ~ l l: ,' :i ! l. , :I : , tf• . \, J< .. ··-. I 1 ' i 'I i ·{ I·' ~ I_; l ,. i ~-- ' I 11" l'1. L I ' ' DATE: GIRDERS BILL OF MATERIAL loro-e.1 -Cl7 SHEET "2:-0F 'Z-- DWG: _L_, I CKD. BY. 'eEr ID 'JOB #: ,q 1 -2-c:> 2.. I REV: --PAINT: eseJ:> OIPS:~"TD OFFICE USE ONLY •u• NOltllf ll!M sum: au, IL PMO. 'IX. 7"12 JOB NAME: ::;;,~A-C w ==~~ I LOCATION: c,,.,A t2-L--S e AD" GA- . (800)482-4412 P'AIC . ce1a,a2-4na FOR: -o. A u.:> tr\TAc.-r2-6 ... ?1/ + l(~-2. )( ~'-:3> ' : HOLD· CLEAR iZ.1' "" t::. LEFT ENO "" . b.l::. RIGHT ENO 6.b.b. BOTH ENDS CHECK PANEL * LEFT END **RIGHT END KNIFE PLATE .. * * * BOTH ENDS BASE-LENGHl SF"A.TS TC'lt'I TCXR QTY DESCRIPTION MARK BDL BDR LGTH 11Y It TH I . 3~5Nlt.1~/4.tol _Gib t36!... ,is~ ft:;. b l" 'SF" " BCXL TY l~TH st: , lz_ 40(.,L 0\Lew L-~ t--,\. =:) :5t'e' «s!L-' .. ~_. ,. ~ ' . MARK PANEL-LAYOUT AODITIONA(. CONCENTRATED LOADS (3) NET (3) AXIAL LOAD A I# I N I B LOAD DIST. I LOAD I DIST. UPUFl TC I BC I:.{/ t--;f ~J 3 I g :..oJ 7 ~,dz 1.2-~_1 I I IO.D~ r,n,o ¥,.-f ~ t!,, \1 1-3?, ~ ltl '-'"319-,, I I I I . I .. I I I I I . . I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I TY <- QTY: 1 • -ALL GIRDERS TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF?000_Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. NOTES: BCXR TOP-CHORD-HOLES ScAT HOLES ' LGTH TY OAL TLE TRE I GA HI F'" HRE t"'..AH I 4'2-'2. oio ~3'$f3 --\'i...1·4-·. -5 .5 I I I I FIXED MOMENT ct) LATERAL MOMENT (D MIN REMARKS LE I RE LE I RE 1"0 I ' * /J.. A I I I I I I I I 1 1.· ! i ' \_,. JOIST BILL OF MATERIAL SSR/SSC/LSJ lsH,EE~F-, DATE: ID~G: ' I CKD. BY. Cb-'2..~-D!71 ~ PAINT: l?::5D DIPS '5 •• .... , 'JOB #: q, -'2-0 2.. I REV: --1------------, 8112 N0R1H MESA SUITE 215 l!L PASO, nc, 711112 PW0Nli: (1100)4112-4772 (015)1132-4414 (800)452-4412 rAX (015)532-47211 JOB NAME: c:::,MA-C. OFFICE USE ONLY LOCATION: C-A 12.-L..S e.A-D.,. C../-\- D.A. ~t\-l'T"A~1<..(e: OTY:_l1- 24" o.c ~\.7GERED @ ·_12" O.C. 2-4 'Z-fi!_.T4P CHECK ECCENTRICllY 1 .-ALL JOIST TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF JOOO Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. QTY ' .Zif '2-- I I MARK .J ' .Jl_ .J~ _J 4- _j5 * LEFT END **RIGHT END NOTES: SPLICE ... ..,, "¢ BAR TYP. NOT BY I.S.P. DESCRIPTION MARK Z8 ~'2?.x. rZS ...11 Z-8 ;:...zei 2-I z8 f._l z. 2B f '2-3Z/ l'ZB, J 3 (5"_ BASE-LENGW 47 ,_ -~;?4- 471-3>~4 * * * BOTH ENDS i-.,.----i-----1 ~ A SEATS TCXL TCYR BCXL BCXR BDL BDR I GTH 1Y I C:1H 1Y I ~TH 1Y I C:TH 7)' '3 r:i, ~ ' 47:.3'4 ~ ~ 26 ll-23'2/ l2f} J 4-,.. '4-(s, '-734-I ~. 3 7 l'Z--"?f. ~ llY ' . lr-~C, t.. t> C-t....eAQ... "'.p.:>E ,o \l-N \ 'F <=-" ?t.,P....T~ F-· €' dJ.8JC..'Z3'2. /ii[j .-0 _ 4-5(_ 034-f 3 3 -;;:(7B bi:=--- l f=\J L{._ '3\L..'eu..> f2-.,E"" N. '::) $;t:::,e" ~I'---z SSB ADDITIONAL LOAD O TC FROM BL LE. OAL SEAT-HOLES HLE I HRE I GA 41 1-334 I I 4,1-334 I I 47~34-\ '4 I 13141 41'--'3'4-J/41 I 3' 4-1 4-5'-~~ I I NET@ . AXIAL G WINO SLOPE HIGH BC RATE END LYY I (')ll.l"'I # LOAD ~ I DIST. I LOAD G I DIST. I LOAD (3) I DIST. I LOAD (3). I DIST . UPLIFT TC G> BC G> REMARKS 4l?PLFI I I I I I I 201 f'L'f-b-3pl "*k . I I I I I ) I 2CJl PLY G,.:,t_ J ** I I I I 1 I I 'ZDl }T>L P /p. ~}l.-1 ** . lhoft.F-1 I e> · 4B l!-1 z'3 ~ 11 ·14-I I I I '2:'U7 (?1-..f= C.-3'LI ** ~1 ' I I o.4r!>Jl. I~~ IP4l I I I ,z.c.n Pl., r &.2i~I J\': * i : i I I",; '}: "~ ,: ; ~- i I i I. 8112 NOlfflt MEll', SUITT: 2115 EL PASO, TX. 7n12 PHON£ (1100)4112--4772 (11111)1532-«1-4 (1100)452-«12 F'AX (111!5)532-47211 JOIST BILL OF MATERIAL SSR/SSC/LSJ SHEET OF 1JoB #: q,_zoz. IREV: __ JOB NAME: ~MI'\:-C.. LOCATION: c:::::-A l2-\....S P-:>A-D,.. c.-A- FOR: D.A. ~\-\-\."t""Ac.,1<..e QTY: j DATE: jDWG_:_1 . I CKD. BY. c:to-e-i -D!il e;E1D PAINT: ~ DIPS Sp ,,1 OFFICE USE ONLY )&. TC WIDTH 5" t:-'ilN. ~ 3/8" HOLES @ TC 24" O.C STAGGERED @ ·_12" O.C. 2,.4 ff ~ Tt.tP CHECK ECCENTRICllY * LEFT END **RIGHT END 1 .-ALL JOIST TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF JOOQ.Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. QlY SPLICE "' ., "~ BAR TYP. NOT BY I.S.P. 14~MILlPOIJ ff NOTES: * * * BOTH ENDS ti, C,:, ~A I -·i. ·· --1S·L·OPE·'·Hl·G·· HIBC I . RATE END 'z._. -zu1_1 I SIC--,z_ \rp_'-b. ~ I'--'2. ~u L '-s t'..t\-L) L-e-µ. s s Ee s ~-3: '~ I 5 f ~FW'I-/ I &,0 IJ ,o 3 \l t.q NET @) I AXIAL a> WIND I SSB 1 #,LOAD !;»I DIST. I DIST. DIST. LOAD (3) .. I DIST. LJPUFT TC a> BC a> REMARKS () . Z; !...\}~1 .Zo, Pl F I & ·.3 re. I I ~ * y; -'2'01 Pt.FI b.3t ** J 8, '2CT7 P<..FI c,. ~ ~ *~ -.J DJ r-zDl Pt:P lb-;;-¥ * JlD 101 flY l~-"b¥ ~ .>i\E>\t ------------~-----------·--------. - l . I t ' i ' \ .__. __ ,..~ 11112 N0lfflf MESA SUITE 2111 EL PASO, TIC. 7ff12 PHONE (800)452-4772 (0111)1132-4414 (ll00)4!12-4402 f'AX (01!1)!132-47211 J2( TC WIDTH 5" ~IN. JOIST BILL OF MATERIAL SSR/SSC/LSJ JOB #: Cf t -'2-02.. J 08 NAME: (;:::, M 64:-C.. LOCATION: C-A 12-L-S l:oA-D.,. c...A- FOR: D. A. 0-.;> \-\ t T" A c...Re re., Tt.tP SHEET _;3 OF 7 DATE: IDWG:_ I . I CKD. BY. C;fp-Z-J -C£71 ~ REV: PAINT: f:::E.....D DIPS 'S r ,..,1 OFFICE USE ONLY QTY:~ _!;( 3/8" HOLES ~ TC 24" O.C STAGGERED @ _12" O.C. ..... 1r=_SPUCE • CHECK ECCENTRICl1Y * LEFT END **RIGHT END 1 .-ALL JOIST TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF _!000 Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. NOTES: QTY 4- -zz_ ..J ..11 Z- 13 .Jl4 .Jt5 Ur. "¢ BAR TYP. . . (; NOT BY I.S.P. DESCRIPTION I MARK I HD JL'Z-3Z-rz.e -::..in l?4~e82/1z0IJ12-f 3s'-13 4-I -3 13 2, l-5 I * * * BOTH ENDS ~ ~A I I q'~J;<=f I I U-eA-1'2. Pt:> e TO \<... _t-l\ t=i::-"Ft-/1."Tl.;:- 3 I; I I I I I I I 1'-\1'2-f '/213 I I I I I I I SSB ;, OAL sEAT-HoLEs Js_ Lo_P_ E __ JH1GHIBc HLE I HRE I GA -RATE END 35'-_""13A 3S'-73 [ 135 ,_3, tt.' 11 ii-r -l;,t + ·R. ·E I I 4i-il lz__ I l4741 1Z-I I I NET@ AXIAL G WIND #· DIST. I LOAD G> I DIST. I LOAD a>.ro,si=:---, UPLIFT TCG> BC a> REMARKS 'ZOJ ~t..f_ &-31L * ,IC; 6 PL-'f o. 3CS l'-I '3 c: '-1 r1 w-, fl-F I {r?. '3 I'-*t CJ,35 }'.:-I 32 1-\\4-107 FL-r I yZ:1.1\· wcPLr--'!:I l'.'.- C).U))L 'Wl f'L~ I G:,._3.~ •\ 'i ,: a 1: ·1 : '•, ,. JOIST BILL OF MATERIAL SSR/SSC/LSJ l~EE~F 1 DATE: IDWG~_1. I CKD. BY. ~-z-r -0(71 ~ jJOB #: q -J -,zo 2.. I REV: PAINT: f2-e_D DIPS -S ~I 5112 IIOlffli MESA SUIT£ 2111 EL PASO, TX. 711112 Pll0N£ (1100)4112-4772 (9111)1532-4414 (800)4!12-4412 f'A)( · (~111)1132-47211 JOB NAME: '::::>M~C... OFFICE USE ONLY LOCATION: c:::-A 12-L.S e>A-D,.. c...A- FOR: D . .A. ~ \-\-l TA c..1<..e QTY: a )2( TC WIDTH 5" ~IN. 9K 3/8" HOLES ~ TC 24" O.C STAGGERED @ _12" O.C. -:z.4 reTt.tP CHECK ECCENTRICITY * LEFT END **RIGHT END 1.-ALL JOIST TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF JOOO Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. NOTES: -, ]~ .... . ' } '-SPLICE 6". * * * BOTH ENDS "¢ BAR TYP. NOT BY I.S.P. (i, C? ~A QTY IOESCRIPTION IMARK IBASE-LENGHl] -~'-[':_~ I.'><"_\:: I .I fy(\[5 I J u_~"L. L 1°'-'""L .I 25¥-2:32./ t2-4-'1~ 10'~ ..z l~Bll-'232/)Wl 1(/i I 47'---/l 1L I 3 13 .-Z.. IZB1£.Z~'ZLl?if.J1q 14-7 1-\l'z.l ~-13' ,. 47LII 1i '-1\ l'L. \B\Li&4'.-/t&c] )~u I &-1'-4 14-1 JC) '-71;') -\FULL 6~"eu.J SSB I 1 # I LOAD ::::,E"E e,\L.--4- DIST. LOAD C) .. I DIST. N .. ET @ I AXIAL a> WIND LJPJ,..1 FT TC C5> BC a> z.e, PLF I ~-o ll:-- REMARKS µ . B I I I q>O PLP I I 0-48 t-J, I I L. .. ·--____ ..I I 20, f~ f ... .L0._· 3_~------------- & ~-\-,1--D.0 '?t\EA·C _jtq D.~ -z.cr1 f'L r-I & . 3 IL (!!,, f&. t-11-D!) b~-A-rz.. JW -Z.b 7 ~t,;F-I to. 3 ~ * \. ·-.t _j. l. I 8112 NOKIH MESA sum: 2111 EL PISJ, lX. 7ff12 PHONE (1100)452-4772 (015)~2-4414 (II00)-4!12-4412 FAX (015)532-47211 JOIST BILL OF .MATERIAL SSR/SSC/LSJ JOB #: C/1-202.. JOB NAME: -&Ml4:-C.. LOCATION: C-A t2-L-S l:oA-D r c..A- FOR: D. A. u...? \\ l TA c..1<...e 2.4 ~ Tt.tP SHEET OF REV: QTY: ~ DATE: IDWG:_1 . I CKD. BY. (!;)/.o-Z-? -C(il ~ PAINT: ~ DIPS '$' .,__ OFFICE USE ONLY ~ TC WIDTH 5" ~IN. ~ 3/8" H~LES @ TC STAGGERED @ ·_1 2" 24" o.c. o.c CHECK ECCENTRICITY 1 .-ALL JOIST TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF JOOO Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. -1. * LEFT END **RIGHT END NOTES: '\._.. SPLICE ]~ '" f5'_ * * * BOTH ENDS ~ ~ . "<& BAR TYP. NOT BY I.S.P. t;,,, e,,,. ~ A QTY I DESCRIPTION I MARK IBASE-LENGH 11 ... ~.::.:::.~I; x:.&:: 1_,1 .' '!:£.') LJ ,-_-:_-:.~ L,l ':"':::'..::.'~1-,1 OAL SEAT-HOLES HLE I HRE I GA 2-7 I 28~'32-/JZB I JZ.I 4, '... \I ''Z.-'1 .'..-'\ 'Z. 2-e; pv.;2/rze I J22-141 ~\I'" I 3 I ~ 1!... IO'z.l 3 I 3 41 ,_ \0 't-I ( I 4 ia ,l f~/1 J 1-\\1e..l3' 13 ~:.. l(li.. \ ....._.., z.. . 41 '-,o'-2.1 J, · 13 41 '-10'-z) I 1 4-I I' 4-!"=? # .. ---DIST . ADDITIONAL LOAD O TC FROM BL LE. LOAD G> I DIST. I LOA[) <3> I DIST. NET @) I AXIAL & WIND I REMARKS LOAD C3>TotsT~ -I UPLIFT TC G> BC G> <201 fLF ...\2.l. (pOP1.-r -, ~r=-1 ft,. 3 \L J,Z..3 '71\, FLY I '1 2. q 11-IA jz4-Q .,'2,\L 2.D7. PLP I &-3t- (!!,,, 4:, +-ADO ${+£"A~ .JZ-..G l). '2. \L zt>-i f'L~ I Ct?-3 ~ ~-4' ,,-, .L A-nr, _. ~.l.-r:=;,a..(J -----------------·--------·-------t ! JOIST BILL OF MATERIAL SSR/SSC/LSJ SHEET (p OF/ DATE: ID~G: ' . I CKD. BY. eto-z-r -Cit! ~ IJOB #: Cf,-202.. IREV: PAINT: f?-e.J:> 1112 HOll'IH MESA SUIT!: 2111 EL PASO, TX. 7Hl2 PHONE (800)452-4772 (915)1132-4414 JOB NAME: ':;:, 't"'\'4:--C. OFFICE USE ONLY LOCATION: C-A tl-L-S EoA-D r c..A- (eo0)4!52-4492 FAX . (01!5)!532-4728 FOR: D.A. ~ \-\-t TA~Re QTY: --3......, ~ TC WIDTH 5" ~IN. 1 3 /8" HOLES ~ TC STAGGERED @ 1 2" -1,' \_ .. SPLICE 24" o.c o.c. [ ' "GS BAR lYP. NOT BY I.S.P. OlY I DESCRIPTION I MARK \ .. I 'ZS t ,z:PZ.-1 \~ I Je:.& I ~:. \ D 18 ~'Z&4 I l&o 6".. -Z..,4- ~T4P CHECK ECCENTRICITY * LEFT END **RIGHT END * * * BOTH ENDS ~ ~ ~A ~ee ,::;;;.it--4 1.-ALL JOIST TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF JOOO Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. NOTES: OAL 47':.. to'~ )'3.!,_.\'2- .1 I Z-all-'2gz./ t•z.B L!-ze J '1-'2-'-"?fi I ?:::> I ~ I P-3 Jf lsrl I I I I · .I I 4.i ~ 7 4 $e-e. ~-4 z_. '37-126 41~??4 ,~ 13 4 7 1--3? MARK SSB #-DIST. LOAD DIST. DIST. LOAD al NET® AXIAL G WIND DIST. I UPLIFT TC C3> BC G> REMARKS Ji&, '2b Lr &.31,'.:.. j~l 'f,67 fl\==-lt;,.=:,JL -1Z: 201 fc...t==-I &-s ~1 I*' _jZ-1 iP1 f'LF I W_· ?~ e.-4:c+-At;JJ 6#e4rL ,J~ . -· I I I I I I I I 7o1 PL F I (p. 3~, I * l i· l. I 8112 NOfrlH MESA SUITE 2111 !1. PASO, TIC. 7ff 12 PH0N£ (800)452-4772 (9111)1132-4414 (1100)452-4412 FAX (01!!)532--47211 JOIST BILL OF MATERIAL SSR/SSC/LSJ 1 5~E~F 'JOB#: Cf1-Z02.. jREV: __ JOB NAME: ~ M 14-:-C. LOCATION: C-A ~L-S 2->A-D r c..A- FOR: D.A. U,..?\\lT'AC..1<..e QTY: U? DATE: IDWG_:__J. I CKD. BY. C{o-'Z..-t -C(t1 ~ PAINT: e-e--o DIPS 'S .,._,1 OFFICE USE ONLY )a: TC WIDTH 5" ~IN. -z..4 ~ Tt.tP 1.-ALL JOIST TO HAVE AN ADITIONAL LOAD OF JOOO Lbs. AT ANY PANEL POINT. '·~-- ·~- _9( 3/8" HOLES @ TC 24" O.C STAGGERED @ 12" O.C. ..,,_ ][ ., SPLICE . "¢ BAR TYP. NOT BY I.S.P. ~ QlY DESCRIPTION MARK BASE-LENGHl \ ~eLi~zhz.e, -...I~\ -4,'-'3.14 3 26~232 1'28 J:?Z-41!..34 ~ 'Z-f3tt..zaz I 128 _j '3? 411--:,3-4 '" ' SSB CHECK ECCENTRICl1Y * LEFT END **RIGHT END NOTES: * * * BOTH ENDS -----i~ A . :• SEATS TCXI TC:XR BCXL BCXR BDLIBDR LGTH TY Ir.TH ITV lt::TH TY I t::TH 1Y OAL ·? 17=> 4? ~ '3 \4- ~13 . .,-·f ... 34 "313 -41 1...-°?34 I . I .. SEAT-HOLES HLE I HRE I GA 11 1413 14 lf''i-1:,'4 I I I I I I ADDITIONAL LOAD O TC FROM BL L.E. NET® AXIAL G) WIND SLOPE HIGH BC RATI=" END ILYY MARK 1 nAn # LOAD (3) I DIST. I LOAD G) I DIST. I LOAD (3) I DIST. I LOAD G .. I DIST. UPLIFT TCG BCG REMARKS ,...\~I I I I I I I I . 'Z07'f'LF 4fo.S~I ~ .A . J3zJ l . I I I I I I '2()1 P<-F h-3~1 4( __j3~ b. ~}C--1 I I I I I I ~lfVF tt,.3JL I it ' 4. la, ~ +;,-o...o >-tt-e-Arz.... I I I I I l I I ' l I I I I I I I -·-__ .. _, ... a112 _.. _ aum; 11 JOB NAME: -S "MA-C. OFFICE USE ONLY a. -'IX. 7N12 -= LOCATION: e--A-vZ.-L--S.12,A-D ,· c...,A-, P'AX ==== FOR: '"[::). A \..(..?\7\· LT°A-LR....E- TYPE X-WELDED (SSJ OR LSJ) X-BOLTED (LSJ ONLY) X-BOLTED (SSJ ONLY) .. . D , ~ ~ ~ . . .. A ~ I Lil E 11/111" HOLES ac SI.OT e DETAIL 28 7/1tr'x1 1n SlOf 9/1~ HOLES 41< SLOT e DETAIL 2A £""'000, 7/Ht' HOL£S 41, SLOT • DETAIi. 2 * HOLE 1 1/Z' SV)Tl * HOLE V T i----£·~ -~-t~ 6 41 .. .. A .. DETAIL 1,1A DETAIL 2,2A,2B DETAIL COPED V • DIM A• le:'.'. /I ;, I I r--·-·1--.....:!, JOIST SIZE OR ;t I I P BEAM DEPTH ·--_____ __./ DIM "r:I' DIFF • . ·,·r X 7r{" IN ELEVATION L m I :::i; • ::e 5 I I 0 s • 7t. __J_L , .J.L_ -·~~ I ' I PIECES MARK ANGLE SIZE DETAIL DIM ",;_• DIM "13" DIM "C" DIM "D" 4D ~1=3 2..xZ..-x'~ ~ !....o ~ 1T'3e-J\U:: --ST!) '2~~ (1 ?? JC)(~j) I L,, lir eoA/t:-~t-C 24¥-(b Jci,<aT) r rrei>..J1 e ~,"'\:) l~~(A Jo,~t) \,. n-Bo.Ale ~T!:> l't-K--(--1 j"~~-t-J _) ~ ITT Pi{2.ftLt=" _t;,D \.0 I'--( l JcH"?+J ( MK#_:~~- #---.--~-# ar1~ 202: BACKSHEET HOLD FOR WEBS CLEAR SPRINKLER DIST. FROM TAG END BL . 5'.,.J134-'Zf--~ ~\lL~\Z-_1J)~_,Jf4cilS1J)~,J\7'1 JlB rJl'i 11 \-~'i... '2~ :...f1'2-~ '2-D • ? ~ \\341\7~\r'4 Z1 ! \134 'Tl I_ ))3 jz_ \ 1 .:i Z.. 'Z I J '2-"3, ,·YZ.-4 I j '2...5 r j 'Ch S~'t\7 1-4-zt\1-f 4l'-4-J I ~O,J 3 1rJ3&rJ~~ t; t_ \ C) 3ei--.d '2--i o'-"1 14, ri'-11 ~, '2.4',.::t'4, ,. VAK\(5 LINES 3 {v-8 2 3 348''---------+------------------4-----------------+------------~r l'----------418,'~------_,_--------'5~ .• 2~· --------+-----------5:..2~-------1----------5~2~-------t--------'5:2''-----------.ie----------5-:2''---------le-------r-41,'0' . 4 1 ~ . . 7'-4 1/2 1 ,;~ ..L $ 7 1/'t' SPA O 8'-0"=40'-Q"'----->~---..,.--.;; ~A ~ 8'-~:;;·-0" • ' -SPA ;(r.:,~:.:1:0" : SPA o1~~.·-Q"~1/' ' ' 6 SPA 0,-(;;;,·-;11/ : SPA 0,,1&1:: 8'-~--~~~-----t-+,/>-4~''+-----4 SP .A ;:~:•32'-Q" < ,; PL.ATEl/2"' + Ah.....'."~=c.....J1.-=4~=---'---'=~-==-c.-==fi'=~·,==(/)~:::>=~'"ti~:...~:=;===;===l=±=ll===;==;::=w·~-i=!!!"'=;==,===l===;===;===1a I ~,~ { J -~; S41 SIM I "'t' i--, '-I I 0 ... I !'- -, I ., N -..... N .., N " ., N 11 · 2BK232 128-J2 .., , I re .:::: N .., N "' ., "' I 12 28K232 128-J2 I ' 11 ":.½, I ~ ..... --1---\j 6-BK232/ 28-J2 ..._ .n co f---+--=-+:.="--1::::...=-+--l I l l : i ., ~ I E ~I ~ ~ ~ re ~I ~ ' L8X6X7 6X2'-6" lb!' KNIFE PLATE 10K264 1 160-J9 KNIFE PLATE 3/4 x 2-112 x, ·-s N.B.I.S.P. 1 X 12"" X 1 '-400 16 X 1 1/2"' SLOT-S"GA -~--, ~ IS2G71 11.1K/•.6K-G1 S2G7N 1.1K/46K-G2 I S2G7N 1.1K/46K G21 S2G7N1 .lK/4. K-G2 I ~·vw+-, .. ~+-rl~~+a-+=~~~l~-,~~~,-+--4--~a~~~~,-4--4-S2G7N 1.1K/• .6K-G2 I I TS BXB I ;i; ., .. 40 SN 11. I/ 4.6K G3 ~ l 1~=.::....·3 I : - 0 ..L C' N . , - T 0 ., 0 ... .' " ... ' "' '-V I 5 BK264 60 JlO~ ___!" ur-- I 2-2 K232/1 8-Jll ,~ ~ , J, I.!. N IS 2-2 K232/1 B-J11 ( • • ,'.'.1 I~ ] I ;!; N -, I ., N -~ "' N 15 N 4-28 232/12 -J14 , "' -, I " N :::: N "' ~ i=l ~ ~ ere 4-28 232/12 J14 t::J 395# i DE""'"S KNE ~ I : ' i=i r 8 t::J 395# BRACE TYP) ~- ::-~/M 1: I \ /o M) SPAN ,::S2:::G::.:7~N:j:.:.1.:.!1!.:KQ/.,:::6K:.:,-;_;G::,2:\!-----l_;._;.' _.·,~-•-a -4,:::S2::,G::.:7~N~1 :.!· 1:.,:Ki:../•4::;;,::6:.:.K-_;G,::2;.,l,!--4-----+--,-I 1 I S2G7N ~2 .i ,...."'ILJ._ (/) -"' , I ., N ' ~ N " ., N I (/) I I I~ ,i N I~ I~ I re -N , I ., N ~ N .., N "' ., N -N 7 ., N .:::: N .., N " ., N .., N , I ., N .:::: N .., N 3 ., N GRI I B ! ... N , 5 28 232112 J21 I 4-2RK232/1 •-J21 I :' ., N :::: :: N .., N l=l "' ., e N t::J 395# / ~ ' I ' 5-'8K232 128 JI 1.1 K/4 6K G2 I I '! ; 5· 8K232 128-J21 :; • : = i i 232/12 i -4-28 J14 [ ' i p t 91 i t::J 395# S2G7N1 .1K 14_ K G2 I a I ... ... N ! N , , I I ., K232/1 ., N 4 2 8 J21 N .:::: ' N \ "' .., .., l=l \:! N "' ere ., N I t::J 395# ' ; i 4-28 232/12 -J14 ~ i=i r e t::J 395# S2G7N 1.1K/• .6K I 1 ... N , :' ~ I K232/1 ., 4-2 8-J21 N .:::: N .., p e N " ., N t::J 395# t::J 395# t i pr e t::J 395# "' N , I ., N ' N "' N " ., N ~ I -N , I ., N .:::: N .., "' " ., N I , I "' I I ~1 :; r I ili I N I I I I I I N I I ~~ : ll-$_!_:1~ :~ 3~G5N,il. l/4.61-G,r-S2G7N 1.1K/•.6K-G21 ' 52G7N 1.1K/46K-G2 I S2G7N 1.1K/ .6K-G21 40 SN11.1 114.6K GS t::J 395# I 6K-G2 I I I S2G7N 1.1 K/4 52G7N1 .1 K / 4. K G2 a I ' ' ~ I 1 ' Li-E) -;; \! ' " I I 1C ~~=r.--~. -----,t-a -i-::==.;=;.:i:...:.;:::.:....=.i,...I --1----+-,-I I ~ (/)-I " I t --~ (/) .... _ 1BK2s•11so J21 _,,,,. I I r---\-~i~~ ~ I I I S2 I GRI ' B --.. 1-,:.£> I ' I ~K-4:_ ' ~ I g r ~ ~ ; g ~ 1 1 ~ ::: I , ,, , ,, . ,, ., 1 7 , 1 7 m m 12 28 232/12 -::,Je,30"-+-----lf--+--+---l m ~-+--+----f--+'ce2c:c2e:,8 232'12 -JJO m i--+-"6::,2,s8e,_K'l'3~2L.!f.'12~8:j'J'=JO"-'.--f---l ) m m ' I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~I ~ ~ / I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ o,1. ~ ~ ~ -a ~ ~.,,1.,~ ~ 11 ' I I • I ,, I I I I I A ~ 3/4~ OCOL 1/4" 2-9/151t1 1 2 SLOTS J 1/4 GA. .Jr-PL1/rx:J-1/rx1 ·-g-0s7B PL3 4"X4-1 2"X2'-3"'0S7A 0 COL. LINE ONLY S7,S7A1S78 Pll 2XPANEL THK KNEE B~E OF" £.a.CH GIRDER {TVP) SEE ?LAN FOR LOCA.ftON ~ re re re ~ ~ N N re,~~ '11 ' : 100~ ~ f\ ;} I I ~ II E ~~~=-+=--=-~r-=~=;!I b=b=~::::!b~b=-~=k=b::::!'=='=~~r,,p=:h=~'==:h=:h=:h=:h=:h===ll!imlll=:h=:h=:h=d,,==;~1:~~='=~!l!E,=k=k=k="==="===-Ji~="==="===!c=:!c=:=!c=:=!j,==!c:::=-~d 3/4" .... I 2-3 (; ~ ~ -v r~ Lr.. V ~IL "-r;,,., 0 ~ I ;Ji : ~ >---2•·-ir-'-------23"-•·-----7.t-~""ot--i":t,t' a\l--ir..r~ ~ tw.,,_::A·. 1ji ~· -r~ , ~ ....., to" -~,-IUl"! ~ /l'f,,,• CONCENTRATED LOI,!) ROOF JOIST PLACING GIRDERS TAG END TO LEFT OF DRWG. U.N.O. JOIST TAG END TO BOTTOM OF DRWG. Q DENOTES # OF ROWS OF "Tl" BRACES -----DENOTES SPRINKLER MAIN I PLAN BY ALL CLOUDED AR[AS AR[ V[RIFl[S, AND IF NOT MARKED SHALL B[ FABRICATED ACCORDING TO DIMENSIONS SHOWN ' Reviewed D Furnish as Corrected 0 Re:ected D Revise and Resubmit ¢0Ma1lt1 ~~' .w@J1lt . Thi~ review i~ J11~;f~r senenl conform•11cc "'i!I, !he design concept or the project and i;ener~? eomplince with lhe inform•tion given in the Contn.c\ Documents. Correcli011$ Of n,;nments made Oil the shop dn.l"ings duriD,g t~. ii review do not re lien contractor from eor"f,l;ince with the requirements of the plim~ nnc' specificationt. Approval of a 1pecific item ~h:I! not in dude •ppronl ofu1 anernhly of >1·h,ch the item i~ a component. Contractcr is r.:Tut:~ible for; dimen~ions lo be confirmed "' d eorreloled •t the jobsite; i11format[Oll that . ;,_:tt~ii:s sc,!el~ to the fabrication processes or I t,, 1~,,-m~ans, ,,,ethod~. techniques, &equences at~ rwce,hire, of construction; coordina1ion ! o' ,_, ·· or h~r Work wi!h that of all other lrades; ;,,-perfc•rmillf all work in •safe and " s~,;,:~~!m'; Ul~t:uet. f:~!MI! 6TUUCTURAL ENGINEERS APPROVER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFIES FAILURE TO ANSW[R SUPPLIES WILL RESULT IN FABRICATION DELAYS ANO OR ERRORS HANGING LOI,!) EXTRA MEMBER DETAIL L 1-1/2X1 -1/2X.138 TT BRACE BY I.S.P. 11 16 0 HOLES WHERE IS REQ'D "Tr BRACES (4) 3/16 0 HO w4-10d NAILS BENO IN AELD WASHER M ·--,,f'---~~· -.,_ 7-1/2" ~ SK-1 I - SK-2 SK-3 ATTENTION sTHIS JOB MUST BE RECEIVED BACK BY DATE: JUL 211997 OTHERWISE WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THE QUOTED DELIVERY SCHEDULE dQ€DIM) 5l'M. (F IIGLMD) IS FOlt OPOf WEit srm. JDIIST-.osr QIIOERS" • ll'IDC' · o,11u: NO Cl7H8t l"IIQDUC'rS ~ omTa M£ CO\OE1> rr JNS ~ ISP ACaPJS HOA' U'lJES N« ~ FOR flROllUC'l"S 01HE1f ~ .IOIST • .x,,sr Gll!lPS • lflDG, RIINE!HD SY ISP. • ACCQIDWC% lffll S,11. HBtSP-HOT Bf HITL S1RUC. PROOUCTS. 81. -8(5£ I.ENC1H TeX• TOP CHORD EXTENSION CMJE' FOR 633,.l Greenwich n,, Sui,e 170 San Diego. C,'i 92122 al9·s<l7-7(170 i-dx 619-597-7001 ,., u ..... --\:, \:, I ;,-!" "' I I ~ SK-4 Reviewed for general cc,nform.1nce to the contract l d,,cumt11t<--. This n.'\'leY,d0<.<aMt1"1ieveth•,11h,rntri1LiOr : of the resp<•>Sibility of makillf; 11,e v,orl <'mlorm ~, the• · 1eq11in-m,•nts o/ lhe e<m!ract. The subcontractor is W<f"'J'l<ible for all dimension.,;, rorrect fabrication, and accurat,, ht with th,,work of ot!u>r tuJe-, ex• CCJL.WG EXTENSION 06-27-97 AT BCX• BOTTOM CHORD EXIDISION• ----+~'.;::'.;::~l-_!~~;;--'~0--_-_-_-_-~---_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_--lt_-_-i_r_j SS • SHORT SP~ JOIST ·r SHP TO ~= = SPAN JOIST , E.it/\ CH£CKED SY I-JOB~ __ _:;SM:;OC::,-_________ -4_+--I BM.• 8ENI 010<£Rl.,.,I I----AT CAALSSM>,CA U.H.O.-UHl£SS NOTED DATE HORZ• HORIZONTAL. BRDG• BRIOGING JOB No. 97-202 DRWN No. 1 Of. 1