Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1700 ALGA RD; ; CB891822; PermitBUILDING PERMIT 01/10/90 14:20 Project No: A8903228 Permit No: CB891822 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1700 ALGA RD Str : F1: Ste: Development No: Permit Type: RETAINING WALL Valuation: Parcel No: Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: Description: 3642 SF CRIB WALL 43,704 Class Code: : AVIARA PROJECT BOGUS ADDRESS Status: ISSUED Apr/Issue : 01/10/90 Applied : 11/22/89 Validated By: JPY CONTRACTOR : RETAINING WALLS CO 1531 GRAND AVENUE SAN MARCOS C 2011 PALOMAR CARLSBAD, Ck Lic. C 472093 OWNER : AVIAR LAND AS *** Fees Required **R' ed & Credits *** """""""""""""" ,, ""~"~"""~""- Fees : Adjustments: ,, ., 623.00 Total Fees: 623 .'OO _," .. ~. . '. ,, :bo , ., .oo 244.00 379.00 ', , , ' .'T . .. I, Fee description Ext fee Data ""~""""""""""""""""""~~~~""~~~~~~"~~L"~~~~~~"~""" *, Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee * BUILDING TOTAL , i .a a*' , .. ,;'.;,~'. .'* */ ., ., .b , 376.00 ... ,. ."~. " . ,. ~ ei 244.00 ,. .;-**. *".','". 3.00 . .:r ;:..:;". . .' 623.00 , ', a, _;a__ .,,e ., . ., : ., ~, ..'.'... . ~. 1. "...I. ClTy OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (619) 4381161 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (6191 438-1161 1. PERMIT TYPE A - 0 CCUMERCIAL UWEU UlENANl IMPROVEMEN1 OYUEP &mrn&crm 087 PHONE APPROVED BY i DATE: / /WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant phk: Fihancel ESGIL COFtPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 5601.168 DATE : tA-h-0 JURISDICTION: CWCSOAO PLAN CHECK NO: 87 - ISLL SET: PROJECT ADDRESS: /?OD hLU p,3 PROJECT NAME: CRlrS eA*i s The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. - The Dlans transmitted herewith will substantially comply u with the jurisdiction's building codes when mino; deficien- ~ L-~ cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 0 The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected 0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. . 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: @ Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that 0 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has plan check has been completed. been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone # 0 REMARKS: By : ? r=rstm Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION r-Lh7 OGA OAA Ovw ODM ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92 I23 (619) 560-1068 DATE : 12/6 /&'I JURISDICTION: CICcsLIp3 PLAN CHECK NO: E?- (82-L SET: OUPS PROJECT ADDRESS: I700 AL6A IW ODESIGNER PROJECT NAME: CRra LALLS 0 necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply 0 with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 identified on the enclpsed check list and should be corrected The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the 0 jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been 'sent to: 1 6 0 SA.U CA- 5 1.06q Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. u Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. person contacted: . .&~ . _. % I .,. ate contacted: .. Telephone # 'REMARKS : By : /I F.SCli4X Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION lr/L, DGA OAA Ovw ODM Citp of CarIs6ab JURISDICTION: CKLS BM Date /1/4 PROJECT ADDRESS: 17@ 4~6/4 SO TO: ILtnaN.NC Lhl% Co PLAN CORRECTION SHEET Plan: Check No. &? -/bZLL Date plans received by the jurisdiction Date plans received by plan checker If /L7 Date initial plan check completed I t/c: BY P FtSCh.C.C FOREWORD: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plmbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections baaed on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. modification or change. All circled items have The ita circled below need clarification, to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited cddes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. PLANS @ Le make a11 corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and MY original plan seta that may have bqen returned to yw by the jurIsdIctIon, .. -~c __ . .. t'o;':$.'i. , . &S( , r,O next to each circled item, the aheet of To facilitate rechecking, please identify. the plans upon *rich each correction on this aheet has been made and return this check &est with the revised plans. ... I I I Dates ILk Jurisdiction chXS 6tW Prepared by1 ?I= VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE 0 Bldg. Dept. 0 Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. 67- I&LL BUILDING ADDRESS /?- ~LGA APPLICANT/CONTACT PHONE NO. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION BUILDING OCCUPANCY - DESIGNER PHONE 7 CONTXACTOR PHONE SUILDINC PORTION VALUE VALUATION BUILDING AREA MULTIPLIER C&lj ' WALCJ 5'3 707 f 2s 3 GVZ I I I I I .. ' ~ ~ ~~ Air Conditionina - Conmercial d Residential I Total Value e Fire Sprinklers @ Res. or Corn. 93 ?OY & ,- ENGINEERING CHECKLIST BUILDING PLANCHECK DATE: /.2-//-G? ITEM COMPLETE PLANCHECK NO. 8?IBZL 0 ITEM INCOMPLETE - NEEDS YOUR ACTION 1 2 3 /7'0 /9L6F? Rcys~ SNR TDD C C C PROJECT ID: cQ&d&~c -/9fl&?A HHH E E E LEGAL REOUIREMENTS ccc K K K Site Plan - X ITEM SELECTED do 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A0 do north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width and dimensioned setbacks. 2. Show on site plan: finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway with percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. fRM0010.DH ~ Discretionary ADDrOVal ComDliance 4. No Discretionary approvals were required. 5. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. 6. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. field Review Conditions complied with by: Date: 7. Field review completed. No issues raised. 8. Field Review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: A. Site lacks adequate public improvements. B. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. C. Site is served by overhead power 1 ines. D. Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate street improvement. 08/29/89 E. Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. F. Other: Dedication Reauirements $ 9. No dedication required. 10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 84" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: Dedication completed, Date: By : ImDrovement Reauirements $,ll. No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaaed or defective imorovements found adjacent to buildinq site must be reoaired to the satisfaction of the Citv insoector orior to OccuDancv. 12. Public improvements required. construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 This project requires of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit. for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities improvements are: Improvement plans signed, Date: By : FRM0010.DH 08/29/89 13. Improvements are required. Construction of the public of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting deferral improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the required improvements together with a recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date By : Gradina Reauiremm 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing. elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). -14. No grading required as determined by the information provided x15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Gradina Permit must be issued and aradinq substantially comolete and found acceotable to the City Insoector orior to issuance of Buildina Permits. on the site plan. Mi scell aneous Permits &16. Right-of-way Permit not required. -17. Right-of-way Permit required. A separate Right-of-way Permit following: issued by the Engineering Department is required for the 218. Sewer Permit is not required. - 19. Sewer Permit is required. A Sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. A20. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. FRMOOlO. DH 08/29/85 - 21.. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Applicantion Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Date: Industrial Waste Permit accepted - By : Fees Reauired &22. Park-in-Lieu Fee Quadrant:" Fee per Unit: b Total Fee: mv. 423. Traffic Impact Fee Fee Per Unit: Total Fee: auk Fee per Unit: - Total Fee%uh -24. Bridge and Thoroughfare Fee &25. Public Facilities Fee required. *26. Facilities Management Fee Zone: /? Fee: *27. Sewer E?&Permi t No. - EDU's -9 Fee: Fee: mu& e28. Sewer Later 1 required: - REMARKS: N/& &%Ou/lk SI6d.H ?Ah?. FRM0010.DH ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT Date: /2/1/8? /I PLANNING CHECKLIST do 0 do 0 Plan Check No. ffi-19- Address /7m&&? APN: A V P1 anner Phone 438- 1161 Type of Project n Use Zone ,&(Name) ek%esekient Zone J* flht?P/ (mm . kmd Item Complete @) Item Incomplete - Needs your action was identified 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number that deficiency Environmental Review Required: YES - NO - TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES - NO /c TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE : PROJECT NO. . OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Coastal : YES - NO >< DATE OF APPROVAL: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval acl 0 00 0 00 cl Landscape Plan Required: YES See attached submittal requirements for landscape plans Site Plan: 1. 2. 3. 4. Zoning: 1. 2. 3. 4. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, ex,isting and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. Provide legal description of property. Provide assessor’s parcel number. Setbacks: Front: Required Shown - Int. Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown - Rear: Requ i red Shown - Lot coverage: Required - Shown Height: Requ i red Shown Parking: Spaces Required Shown Guest Spaces Required Shown - Additional colents and remarks have been made on the building plans. These marked-up plans may be picked up at the Building Department. These marked- up plans wst be resubmitted with the revised plans for this project. Have plans been marked up? YES NO - Additional Colnnents I OK TO ISSUE DATE PLNCK. F RM ' CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet "../a STABILITY CALCUL .- ( 1) OVERTURNING (3) LOCATION OF FORCE RE:SULTANT 2 . 55 < H .." %. 5.10 SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL ENGINEERING a ENGINEERING GEOLOGY July 18, 1989 Aviara Land Associates 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Tony German SURJECT: BEARING CAPACITY FOR CRIB wws Aviara Carlsbad, California Job No. 04-3179-003-09-10 Log No. 9-1875 Gentlemen: As requested by Mr. Steve Crosby of Retaining Walls Company, we calculated the bearing capacity for crib walls founded on 18 inches of crushed rock over formational material. The calculation is based on the assumption that the entire load,of the wall is carried by the 6 inch wide members at the base. .It is assumed that the base of the wall is founded a minimum of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. The crushed rock should extend a minimum of 18 inches below the bottom of the lowest crib members, and should extend a minimum of 18 inches outside the crib members. The allowable bearing capacity for this condition is 5,000 psf. We recommend that the crushed rock contain no particles greater than 3 inches, and no more than 10 percent finer than the No. 4 U. S. Standard Sieve. Some compactive effort should be applied to the rock to ensure the maximum strength of the material. If you have any further questions, undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Project Engineer A SUS- please feel free to contact the v Bryan Danielson, R.C.E. C43494 Registration Expires: 6-30-92 Senior Engineer CONSUI .TING GROUP , INC. SAN DIE00 QEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 1m SOIL ENGINEERING a ENOINEERING GEOLOQY September 11, 1989 Aviara LandiAssaciates .Job NO. 05-3179-003-09-10 2011 Palomar Airport Rad, suit6 206 Log NO. 9*2,090 Carlsbad, Cglifornia 92009 Attention: 1Hr. Tony Goman s0a;wcT: Gentlomen: CRIB hLL DRAINAGE Aviara carlsbad, California At your r+emt, we havo revlewd -6 calculations prepared by Retaining Walls Company for tho pmposod crib walls. In general, the calculations appear to lm in conformancd with the intent of our reOrmPendatiOM. However, the possibility of seepage forces are not accounted for in the design. It is our opinion that either socpage forbs should be accounted for,. or they should be eliminat- ed by installing an appropriate backdrain. The attached Figuro I presents! our recommended crib wall backdrain system. We recommend that these drains be installed behind all walls, or that the walls be backfilled (both behincl the walls, and in the cribs) with freedraining granular material. The material should be tested by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants to determine its suitability! as backfill. 9240TRA~PLAC€SU1TE100~SANDIEG0,CA92126~(6191S36~11O~~fAX(619l638~1306 A SUBSIOIARY Of THE IRVlNe CONSULLlNQ GROUP, INC Aviara Land Associates Septenber li, 1989 Job NO. 04-3179-003-09-10 i Ug NO. 9-2090 Page 2 If you hve'any further questions, please feel free to contaot me undersignned: at your convenienco. ! vw mly +our8, SM.DIEGO G@ECRNICAL CONSWU" Project Eng$neer Registratlon Cxpiros: 3-31-91 Principal Engineer CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet ! I // CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet GZAL - .i 899-05-39 , ~ ~~~~~ . __ CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet YL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1WALL DESIGN. AS SHOWN HEREON. IS BASE0 ON TOPOGRAPHY. SOIL INFORMATION. AND GRADING ELEVATIONS FURNISHED TO RETAINING UALLS COMPANY BY OTHERS AS CORRECT. ANY SUBSEOUENT CHANGES IN FIELD TOPOGRAPHY. DESIGN GRAOES OR SOIL CONOITIONS MAY RESULT IN VARIATION OF WALL SIZE AS FINALLY CONSTRUCTEO. ZINSTALLATION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BY OTHER THAN RETAINING WALLS COMPANY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY COVERED IN ERECTION CONTRACT. 31F BUILOING FOOTINGS ARE TO BE PLACE0 IN ZONE OF MUST VERIFY AOEOUACY OF THIS MATERIAL. AS CONSTRUCTEO. COMPACTED SOIL BEHINO CRIBWALL. SOIL TESTING FIRM TO SUPPORT THE BUILOING. E HEADER ?BACK. STRETCHER TYP.YFALSE HEADER II I' I LFRONT STRETCHER TYP. PLAN VIEW BASE COURSE TYPIC.AL. TR.IPLE DEPTH Not to Scale TYPICAL PROFILE Not to Scele 2.5' HEAOER CENTERS TYPLCAL PWFILE FRONT STRETCHERS 5.0' STRETCHER LENGTHS NOTE: HEADERS HARKED v ARE FgLL HEAOERS. ALL ARE FALSE HEADERS. A s 2.5' W = 1.25' . OTHERS ITH "X" t t A CLR. TYP. STRFTCHF 4b HEADERS """"""" G-"" . 5 I' 4.5' HEADER K FALSE HEADER 1. STRENGTH OF MATERIALS A. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTI-! OF CONCqETE f'c= 3250 PSI 8. YIELD STRENGTH OF STEFL:Fy=60.000 PSI I DIMENSIONS I I B I 7" I 7' I 4' I 4 I' I G H 6' - J I jK - 4' - - .25' .25 " 2.5" - 4" - - - - - - - ! - 1.5" c RE-BAR 95 LBS. I 135 LBS. I 125 LBS. 30 LBS. UEIGHTS #4 I #4 ! 14 - TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS Not to Scale TYPICAL CROSS SECTION Not to Scale TOP OF WALL .. a JiJ 40 *Z a H > I- SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. SOIL ENGINEERING 8 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY July 18, 1989 Aviara Land Associates 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206 carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Tony German SUBJECT : BEARING CAPACITY FOR CRIB WALLS Job No. 04-3179-003-09-10 Log NO. 9-1875 Aviara Carlsbad, California I Gentlemen: As requested by Mr. Steve Crosby of Retaining Walls Company, we calculated the bearing capacity for crib walls founded on 18 inches of crushed rock over formational material. The calculation is based on the assumption that the entire load of the wall is carried by the 6 inch wide, members at the base. It is assumed that the base of t,ie wall is founded a minimum of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. The crushed rock should extend a minimum of 18 inches below the bottom of the lowest crib members, and should e%tend a minimum of 10 inches outside the crib members. The allowable bearing capacity for this condition is 5,000 psf. We recammend that the ,crushed rock contain no particles greater than 3 inches , and no more than 10 percent finer than the No. 4 U. S . Standard Sieve. Some compactive effort should be applied to the rock to ensure the maximum strength of the material. If you have any further questions, undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, I SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. ~ ~~ Project Engineer RMP/BD/rp please feel free to contact the U Bryan Danielson, R.C.E. C43494 Registration Expires: 6-30-92 senior Engineer CONS UL ,TlNG GROUP , INC.