HomeMy WebLinkAbout1751 ANDREA AVE; ; CB030917; Permit06-&-2003
Job Address:
Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation:
Occupancy Group:
# Dwelling Units:
Bedrooms:
Project Title:
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Residential Permit Permit No: CB030917
1751 ANDREA AV CBAD
RESDNTL SubType: RAD
2071 201 600 Lot #: 0 $1 09,915.00 Construction Type: NEW
Reference #:
0 Structure Type:
0 Bathrooms: 0 TRUJILLO RES 1043 SF ADD MSTR
SUITE 195 SF DECK
Applicant:
TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N
1751 ANDREA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Status: ISSUED
Applied: 03/28/2003
Plan Approved: 06/06/2003
Issued: 06/06/2003
Entered By: SB
Inspect Area:
Orig PC#:
Plan Check#:
Owner: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N
1751 ANDREA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Building Permit
Addl Building Permit Fee Plan Check
Add'l Plan Check Fee
Plan Check Discount
Strong Motion Fee
Park in Lieu Fee
Park Fee
LFM Fee Bridge Fee
Other Bridge Fee
BTD #2 Fee
BTD #3 Fee
Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee
Other Building Fee
Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee
Red. Water Con. Fee
$577.36
$0.00 $375.28
$0.00
$0.00
$1 0.99
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Meter Size
Addl Recl. Water Con. Fee
Meter Fee
SDCWA Fee
CFD Payoff Fee
PFF
PFF (CFD Fund)
License Tax License Tax (CFD Fund)
Traffic Impact Fee
Traffic Impact (CFD Fund)
Sidewalk Fee
PLUMBING TOTAL
ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL
Housing Impact Fee
Housing InLieu Fee Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee
Sewer Fee
Additional Fees
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$62.00
$20.00 $24.00
$0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
$1,069.63
Total Fees: $1,069.63 Total Payments To Date: $375.28 Balance Due: $694.35
Inspector: . &d ,, Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICdhat approval of your project includes the "Irnpbsition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as "feedexactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK N0.C I!
EST. VAL. Lam
Plan Ck. Deposit 73 -*- ZpJ
-I
Validated By /-/3
Date 3 - ?-e3 -3
Address City Statelzip Telephone #
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Codel or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001).
Name Address City Statelzip Telephone #
State License # License Class City Business License #
Designer Name Address City Statelzip Telephone
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
0 of the work for which this permit is issued.
0 issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date
[THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS I$1001 OR LESS)
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100.000). in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
Au to be me subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
DATE
by affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation. will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is
within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The
actor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
ant to the Contractor's License Law).
I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. ES ON0 IV ve not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
racted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name I address I phone number I contractors license number):
er I contractors license number):
ERTY OWNER SIGN
ration form or
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district?
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
0 YES 0 NO
LENDING AGEN
re is a construct
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES.
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
s over 3 stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit is
at any time after the
APPLICANT'S SIGN DATE
building Official under the of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work
authorized by such permit I ed within 180 days from mit or if the building or work
iform Building Code).
LLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
Inspection List
Permit#: CB030917 Type: RESDNTL RAD TRUJILLO RES 1043 SF ADD MSTR
SUITE 195 SF DECK
Date Inspection Item Inspector
07/27/2004 89
07/27/2004 89
12/04/2003 17
12/04/2003 18
1 1 /26/2003 16
1 1 12412003 14
1 1 /24/2003 1 8
1 1 /20/2003 13
1 1 /20/2003 18
I 1/05/2003 13
1 1 /05/2003 14
1 1 /05/2003 23
1 1 /05/2003 34
10/21/2003 21
1 012 1 I2003 24
1011 612003 13
1011 612003 14
1011 612003 21
1011 5/2003 14
1011 512003 21
10/09/2003 14
10/03/2003 15
07/14/2003 13
07/02/2003 11
Final Combo
Final Combo
Interior LathIDrywall
Exterior LathIDrywall
Insulation
Frarne/SteeI/BoltingNVeldin
Exterior LathIDrywall
Shear PaneldHD's
Exterior LathIDrywall
Shear PanelsIHD's
FrarnelSteeVBoltingNVeldin
GasTTesVRepairs
Rough Electric
UndergroundIUnder Floor
Roughflopout
Shear PanelsIHDs
Frame/SteeVBoltingNeldin
UndergroundUnder Floor
Frame/Steel/BoltingMeldin
UndergroundIUnder Floor
FramelSteellBoltingMeldin
RoofIReroof
Shear PanelsIHDs
FtgIFoundationlPiers
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
PY
JE
JE
Act Comments
AP
RI
AP
AP
AP
AP
wc
CA
CA
AP
PA
AP
AP
AP
AP
co SEE ATTACHED NOTICE
NR
wc
NS
NS
CA
AP
AP 1 106-G5
AP 1 106-G5
Wednesday, July 28,2004 Page 1 of 1
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 07/27/2004
Permit# CB030917 Inspector Assignment: PY
Title: TRUJILLO RES 1043 SF ADD MSTR
Description: SUITE 195 SF DECK
Type: RESDNTL SubType: RAD
Job Address: 1751 ANDREA AV
Suite: Lot 0
Location:
APPLICANT TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N
Owner: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N
Remarks:
Phone: 760434471 8
Inspector:
Total Time: Requested By: KIM
CD Description Act Comment
Entered By: CHRISTINE
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
/ 39 Final Electrical
I- 49 Final Mechanical
Associated PCRdCVs
PCR03237 ISSUED TRUJILLO RESIDENCE; TRANSMITTAL DATED 10/15/03
Inspection History
Date Description Act lnsp Comments
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
11/26/2003
1 1 /24/2003
1 1 /24/2003
1 1 /20/2003
11/20/2003
11/05/2003
11/05/2003
11/05/2003
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
1011 612003
1011 612003
1011 612003
1 1 /05/2003
17 Interior LathIDrywall
18 Exterior LathIDrywall
16 Insulation
14 Frame/Steel/BoltingWelding
18 Exterior LatWDrywall
13 Shear PanelsIHD's
18 Exterior Lath/Drywall
13 Shear PanelsIHD's
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
23 GasTTesffRepairs
34 Rough Electric
21 UndergroundlUnder Floor
24 Rough/Topout
13 Shear PanelslHDs
14 Frame/Steel/BoltingWelding
21 UndergroundIUnder Floor
AP PY
AP PY
AP PY
AP PY we PY
CA PY
CA PY
AP PY
PA PY
AP PY
AP PY
AP PY
AP PY
CO PY SEE ATTACHED NOTICE
NR PY wc PY
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 7-
Permit# CB030917 Inspector Assignment: PY
Title: TRUJILLO RES 1043 SF ADD MSTR
Description: SUITE 195 SF DECK
Type: RESDNTL SubType: RAD
Job Address: 1751 ANDREA AV
Suite: Lot 0
Location:
APPLICANT TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N -
Owner: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N
Remarks:
Inslsector:
Kk
Total Time: Requested By: TRAHILLO RESIDENCE
Entered By: CHRISTINE
CD Description
14 FramelSteeVBoltingNVeldrng
-~
Associated PCRs/CVs
lnslsection History
Date Description Act lnsp Comments
10/09/2003 14 FramelSteel/Bolting/Welding CA PY
10/0312003 15 RoofIReroof AP PY
0711 412003 13 Shear PanelsIHD's AP JE 1106-G5
07/02/2003 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP JE
I
I i !
i t i !
I
1
I
I
j
/ !
I
!
1
i
6
1 !
i
*.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
..
OTlCE (760) 602-2700
1635 FARADAY AVENUE
rl FOR INSPECT1 RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? L YES
FOR FURTHE
PHONE
8 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
Structural Inspections
A smciai inspection comvGyn
440 Tilling Way, El Cajon, CA 92020
Telephone: (619) 749-4912, Fax: (619) 749-5693, Cell: (619) 770-9559, Pager: (619) 907-351 1
h
Inspection Report
Project Name: TRUJILLO RESIDENCE Page: 1 of 1 Report #: 01
Project Address Permit #: CB030917
Architect: ARCHITECTURA File #:
Engineer: GOLDEN & ASSOCIATES
Contractor: Other:
DSA #: NIA
11 6 Masonry 1 zj Prisms 0 Concrete 0 MortarIGrout 0 Grout PSI 0 Positions 0 Fireproofing Conc. Cylinders 0 MortarPSI (XI Sizes 0 Other: 0 Fireproof Steel 5/8ALLTHREAD Laps
(XI Other: EPOXY Other: 0 Elect.NVire Consolidation 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Fireproof 0 Torque Ft.Lbs:
Other: 0 Other: IXI Other: SIMPSONSET IXI Other: lCBO5279
0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Other:
PERFORMED CONTINUOUS SPECIAL INSPECTION ON THE INSTALLATION OF 2 TOTAL 518 ALL THREAD EPOXY HOLDOWN BOLTS ALONG LINE G.
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. VERIFIED BOLT TYPES, SIZES, HOLE SIZES, DEPTH, LOCATION, CLEANLINESS AND EPOXY TYPE
REF. ENG. SHEET 2 OF 2 DATED 4/11/03.
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All reported work, unless othe
specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This rep0 and does not constitute opinion or project control.
Inspector: MARIO BATTAGLIA Cert: City of SD #350
.............................................................................................................................. ..........................................................................................
......................................................... ................................................................ ................................................................. ..................... i Day3: Day 2: i : Insp. Date: .) i Dayl: 11/3/03 b
I Timestart:
i Time Stop: A I 1:30 ; i
.......................................................... ...................... > : 12:oo 1 ...................................................................................................................................... *
.......................................................... .................................................................. .................................................................. .......................
Copies of report submitted to:
Structural Inspections
A Smhl Insmion Company”
440 Tilling Way, El Cajon, CA 92020 TeleDhone: 1619) 749-4912. Fax: (619) 749-5693. Cell: f619) 770-9559. Paaer: (619) 907-351 1 I
Inspection Report
Project Name: SPRINT FARADAY SD55XC014-A Page: 1 of 1 Report#: 01
Project Address: 2200 FARADAY AVENUE Permit #: CB031405
Architect: TELECOM DESIGN SOLUTIONS File#: NIA
Engineer: SCOTT L. LARSEN DSA#: NIA
Contractor: CHRISTENSEN & GRlFFlTH Other: N/A
ItdSPEWN
IXI Structural Steel
0 Masonly 0 Concrete
Fireproofing IXI Other: FIELD
Other: 0 Other: 0 Other:
0 Other:
PERFORMED
I Plans/Specs 0 H.S. Bolts I [XI H.S. Bolts ASTM A325
0 Prisms 0 Mortar/Grout
Conc. Cylinders 0 Fireproof
0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Other:
0 Conc.PSI 0 Grout PSI
H Steel ASTM A36, A492
0 Fireproof
Elect.NVire E-7018, E-6011
0 Clearances 0 Positions I 0 MortarPSI 1 IXI Sizes
0 Laps 0 Consolidation 0 Torque Ft.Lbs: 0 Other: 0 Other: I 0 Other: I 0 Other:
PECIAL INSPECTION ON THE COMPLETED FILET AND PUDDLE WELDS OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
1 ) 318’’ PLATE TO (E) ROOF TRUSS PER DETAIL 6 / SI. 2) 1 %” x 1 %” x l/qn ANGLE IRON CONTINUOUS ON EITHER SIDE OF OPENINGS PER DETAIL 3 / s2.
3) 3” x 2 %” x ?/’I ANGLE IRON INTERMEDIATE PIECES BETWEEN EACH OPENING. REF. DET. 2 / S2.
4) VERIFIED %” AND 1” ASTM A325 HIGH STRENGTH BOLTED BEARING CONNECTIONS ARE SNUG TIGHT. NOTE: WELDING INSPECTED IS OF THE COMPLETED WELDS.
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All reported work, unless othe specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This rep0 and does not constitute opinion or project control.
Inspector: MARIO BATTAGLIA Cert: City of SD #350
I Day3: ............................................... ..........................................
............... ................ - ...........................................
............................................... : ............. .................
Copies of report submitted to:
EsGil Corporation -
DATE: Mtqd3,2003
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917
In Partnership with Government for (BuiUing Safety
WER
0 FILE
SET: I1
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue
PROJECT NAME: Trujillo Addition
0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction’s building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
0 The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to:
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: i,
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS: OK to issue with applicant replacing sheets 1 2 & 6 in s
2 & 6 marked set 111. Only received one set.
REMARKS: OK to issue with the applicant submitting a complete
to the Building Official or his Deputy, see attached.
By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
GA 0. MB EJ PC 5/9/03 tmsmtl .dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 03-09 17
May 15,2003
- City of Carlsbad
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION
Do Not Remove From Plans
Plan Check No. 03-09 17
Job Address or Legal Description 175 1 Andrea Avenue
Owner Address
You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building
Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection
during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet.
The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building
Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a
current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as
Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified.
The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by
personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special
Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building
Code.
The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which
he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate
materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to
submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and
approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Lnspection reports have been
received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department.
Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the
items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet.
(over)
Carlsbad 03-09 17
May 15,2003
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME:
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may goJ employ the special inspector), certify that
I, or the architecVengineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as
required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 .I for the construction project located at the
site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5.
Signed
I, as the engineedarchitect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as
required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above.
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above:
A.
B.
n
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
A.
B.
C.
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval pr&& beginning work on the job site.
DATE: May 15,2003
JURI SDlCTl ON: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917
EsGil Corporation
In Partnersfiip witfi Government for BuiGfing safety
WNT
0 PLAN REVIEWER
0 FILE
SET: I1
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue
PROJECT NAME: Trujillo Addition
0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes
with the jurisdiction’s building codes.
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
0 The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to:
1751 Andrea Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008
I 1 Alberto Trujillo
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Alberto Trujillo Telephone #:
Date contacted: Ib (by: IC, ) Fax #:
Maill Telephone Fax In Person 0 REMARKS:
By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 5/9/03 tmsrntl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
I
Carlsbad 03-09 17
May 15,2003
RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST
JURI SDl CTl ON : Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue SET: I1
DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY I ESGIL CORPORATION: 5/9/03
DATE RECHECK COMPLETED:
May 15,2003
REVIEWED BY: Bryan Zuppiger
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is
based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department
or other departments.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to:
Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris.
B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon
which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the
revised plans.
C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original
correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of
the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding
corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items.
D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of
corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where
they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list?
OYes ONo
I .
Carlsbad 03-09 17
May 15,2003
PLANS
NOTE: The items listed below refer to the item numbers from previous list. These
remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the
end of or contained within each item are to emphasize the remaining problem.
1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list.
Submit three sets of plans for commerciaVindustria1 projects (two sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of
two ways:
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760)
602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468. Deliver
all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad
Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire
Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by
EsGil Corporation is complete.
2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans.
(California Business and Professions Code). Only the effected sheets need be
submitted I will insert them into the plans.
3. Final plans, specifications and calculations for designs deviating from conventional wood
frame construction shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by
the State of California who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of
license. (California Business and Professions Code). Only the effected sheets need be
submitted I will insert them into the plans.
t
Carlsbad 03-09 17
May 15,2003
5. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, please
imprint the attached City form. Section 106.3.2. If not required than please remove
from cover sheet. This requirement was based on the previous submittal when the
location of the strong wall was unknown.
0 REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require
Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code.
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS
* DES I G N E R-S P EC I F I ED
OTHER
0 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
8. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with
Section 2406.4 (see exceptions):
a) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways
where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface.
The glazing in the French doors shall be tempered.
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform
the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
f
4
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building safety
DATE: April 9, 2003
JURI SDl CTI ON: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue
PROJECT NAME: Trujillo Addition
0
0
0
WREVIEWER a FILE
SET: I
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction’s building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to:
Alberto Trujillo
1751 Andrea Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Alberto Trujillo (V ,t-i )
Date contacted: 4 I 9 /Os (by: LL )
REMARKS:
Telephone #: 760 967 9644
Fax #:
Mail/ Telephone 0 Fax In Person
By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB EJ PC 3/3 I /03 tmsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576
s
L Carlsbad 03-09 17
April 9, 2003
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue
FLOOR AREA: See Below STORIES: 2
Addition 1043’
Deck 195’ HEIGHT: 24’”’’ at west elev. Page 6.
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURIS D I CTI 0 N :
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
J U Rl SDl CTl ON : Carlsbad
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/31/03
PLAN REVIEWER: Bryan Zuppiger
COMPLETED: ADrfi 9.2003
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC,
2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02).
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Carlsbad 03-09 17
April 9, 2003
0 PLANS
1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction
list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciaVindustrial projects (two sets of plans
for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be
submitted in one of two ways:
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the
City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA
92008, and (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil
Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculationsheports to EsGil
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123,
and (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and
calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for
routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not
be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until
review by EsGil Corporation is complete.
2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans.
(California Business and Professions Code).
3. Final plans, specifications and calculations for designs deviating from
conventional wood frame construction shall be signed and sealed by the
engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for
their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and
Professions Code).
4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall
comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which
adopts the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 1999 NEC.
5. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection,
please imprint the attached City form. Section 106.3.2.
0 REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also
require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building
Code.
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
* EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS
OTHER
* DES I G N E R-S P EC I F I E D
.
Carlsbad 03-0917
April 9, 2003
6. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall
prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official
for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section
106.3.5. Please complete the attached form.
0 FIRE PROTECTION
7. When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when
sleeping rooms are created, show locations of permanently wired smoke
detectors with battery backup in the new and existing construction or provide a
note on the plans to this effect, except that smoke detectors added at existing
construction need only be battery powered. Section 31 0.9.1 2:
a) Inside each bedroom.
b) c) On each story.
d)
Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms.
In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have
a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway.
NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in
Section 310.9.1.
sleeping areas of the unit.
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
8. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in
accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions):
a) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of
stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above
a walking surface.
0 EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS
9. Provide handrail details that are referenced to the floor plan. Section 1003.3.3.6:
a) Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 44"
wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not
open on both sides).
Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and
be continuous.
The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches
nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting
from walls shall have at least 1-112 inches between the wall and the
handrail .
Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or
bends.
Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings
formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a handrail at a stair shall
be less than 6".
b)
c)
d)
e)
Carlsbad 03-0917
April 9, 2003
IO. Provide guardrail details that are referenced to the floor plan. Section 509.1 :
a)
b)
c)
Shall have a height of 36".
Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal
force prescribed in Table 16-6.
Openings between railings shall be less than 4".
ROOFING
11. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section
106.3.3:
a) Manufacturer's name.
b) Product namehumber.
c) ICBO approval number, or equal.
12. Specify roof slope.
0 FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
13. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed
architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design
recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC
Section 1804.
14. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil
instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, sinqle-
stow dwellings. Section 1804.5
15. If the soils engineer recommends that helshe review the foundation excavations,
note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
a)
b)
c)
The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
16. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report).
17. Detail deepened footings under all shear walls with deep hardware. Section
1806.3. Consider failure cone in design. Please show the extent of the
deepened footing in each direction.
Carlsbad 03-09 17
April 9, 2003
18. Specify size, I.C.B.O. number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion
anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge and end distances and spacing. Section
106.3.3. Are some walls located at existing construction?
19. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per
Section 1806.6.1 :
a) Plate washers (minimum size of 2” x 2” x 3/16”) shall be used on each
anchor bolt.
20. Show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan.
Section 106.3.3. Unable to locate the Strong Wall bolts on the plans.
21. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation
inspection. Section 108.5.2.
22. Show adequate footings under all bearing walls and shear walls. Section
1806.3. Are the Strong Walls located at the stairwell?
0 FRAMING
23. Show all shear wall widths on the framing and foundation plans, some that are
indicated on the plans differ in length from the calculations. Please check all.
24. Please analyze beams 1 and 9 for the cantilevered reactions from the deck.
25. The portion of the deck between these beams should be supported.
26. Detail all post-to-beam, beam-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and
reference the detail to the plan. Section 2314.
27. Show edge distance for the nails in the truss gussets.
28. Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear
walls. Section 231 5.
29. Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22”x30”, unless the
maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30”. Access must be
provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other
readily accessible location and 30” headroom clearance is required above the
opening. Section 1505.1.
30. Columns and posts located on concrete or masonry floors or decks exposed to
the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent
structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting 1”
minimum above floors, unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or
treated wood is used. Section 2306.5.
Carlsbad 03-09 17
April 9,2003
0 MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
31. Show the location, type and size (BTU’s) of all heating and cooling appliances or
systems. Unfamiliar with a thru-wall heater please submit specifications.
32. Show source of combustion air to furnace, per Chapter 7, UMC. Specify the
location and sizes of both of the combustion air openings.
0 ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
33. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the
service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps,
submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations.
34. Per NEC Art. 210-1 1 (c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be
either:
a)
b)
A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or
At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets.
35. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the
plans that “Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected.” NEC Art.
210-12(b).
NOISE INSULATION (DUPLEXES)
36. Show details of duplex common (party) walls and floor/ceiling assemblies to
achieve a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating in walls of 50 decibels and an
Impact Insulation Class (IC) rating on floor/ceiling of 50 decibels. Title 24.
37. Show how penetrations of assemblies for piping, electrical devices, recessed
cabinets, bathtubs, soffits, or heating ventilating, or exhaust ducts shall be
sealed, lined, or insulated to maintain required sound transmission rating. Title
24.
0 ENERGY CONSERVATION
38. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s)
and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower).
39. Note on the plans: “The manufactured windows shall have a label attached
certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing
compliance with the energy calculations.”
Carlsbad 03-0917
April 9, 2003
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number,
calculation page, etc.
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of
8581560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at
Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 03-09 17
April 9,2003
- City of Carlsbad
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION
Do Not Remove From Plans
Plan Check No. 03-0917
Job Address or Legal Description 1751 Andrea Avenue
Owner Address
You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the
Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous
inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of
this sheet.
The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building
Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a
current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as
Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified.
The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by
personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special
Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building
Code.
The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which
he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept
alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is
required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that
he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special
Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department.
Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the
items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet.
(over)
' Carlsbad 03-09 17
April 9, 2003
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME:
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector),
certify that I, or the architecuengineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special
inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction
project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5.
Signed
I, as the engineedarchitect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection
program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above.
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
0 Expansion/Epoxy Anchors 0 Designer Specified 0 Other
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed
above:
A.
B.
C.
3.
A.
B.
C.
Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site.
Carlsbad 03-09 17
April 9, 2003
TOTAL VALUE
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
109,915
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917
PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: April 9, 2003
BUILDING ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
Air Conditioning
Fire Sorinklers
Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance I
Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance V I I $577.361
I $375.281 --____-___
Plan Check Fee by Ordinancrl
Type of Review: FJ Complete Review 0 Structural Only
0 Other
0 Hourly -1 Hour *
Esgll Plan Review Fee I $323.32
Comments:
Sheet of macvalue.doc
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build.
0 A Right-of-way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
DATE: q-/%-G?? PLANCHECKNO.: CB 03 - 9/7
BUILDING ADDRESS: /7Sf
report of deficiencies
sary corrections to plans r compliance with applicable ubmit corrected plans and/or
By: Date:
By: Date:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: /5v3 D /
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: 7- /7,0 - /f” EST. VALUE: /b?. 3/.j
I /I’ I I
IZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PE
By: Date:
~~
ATTACH ME NTS
Dedication Application
Dedication Checklist
Improvement Application
Improvement Checklist
Future Improvement Agreement
Grading Permit Application
Grading Submittal Checklist
Right-of-way Permit Application
Right-of-way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet
Sewer Fee Information Sheet
Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: (760) 6023223 27 r/
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No:
Lots:
Recordation:
Carlsbad Tract:
I
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 - (760) 602-5720 - FAX (760) 602-8562
1 @ Rev. 7liuoO F:\BUIlJiNG PLANCHEW WET FORM.doc
? - ‘I
. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN
3RD 0 I. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:
A. No Arrow ht-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets /
dng & Proposed Structures riveway widths
Street Improvements mxisting or proposed sewer lateral
nxisting or proposed water service
/Existing or proposed irrigation service asements
0 2. Show on site plan:
A. Drainage Patterns
1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: “Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5’ away from building.”
B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography
C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s)
that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second
dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception.
D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per
standards.
0 3. Include on title sheet:
A. Site address
6. Assessor’s Parcel Number
C. Legal Description
For commerciallindustrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
F\BUILLNNG PLANCHECK WLST FORM.dOC 2 Rev. 7/im
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
I ST
0
0
2ND 3RD DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
Project No.
0 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 15,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
0 0
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %” x 11” plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed
by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
0 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 75,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
FWJILDING PUNCHEW CKLST FORM.doc 3 Rev. 7/14/W
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
I*
1ST 2ND 3RD
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by: Date:
.
0 0 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may
prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows:
0 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Neighborhood Improvement
Agreement completed by:
Date:
0 0 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaqed or defective
improvements found adiacent to buildinq site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the Citv Inspector urior to occupancv.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11.06.030 of the Municipal Code.
7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
renuirements. Include accurate grading quantitiesJcut, fill import, export).
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: The Gradinq Permit must
approval obtained prior to issuance of a
Ti t'JL Ad ' - 11 7b. Grading Permit required. A
Grading Inspector sign off by: Date:
0 0 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.)
F:\BUILDING PLANCHECK WET FORM.doc 4 Rev. 7/1UW
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3RD
0 0 0 7d .No Grading Permit required.
0 0 0 7e. If grading is not required, write “No Grading” on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
0 0 0 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-way permit required for:
0 0 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153,
for assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
0 0 0 10.NPDESPERMlT
Complies with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first. fi- 1 ls%;:e attached
WATER METER REVIEW
0 0 0 12a. Domestic (potable) Use
Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized.
Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for
the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used.
0 All single family dwelling units received “standard” 1” service with 5/8” service.
F:\BUILDING PLANCHECK WST FORMda 5 Rev. 7/1W
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1 ST 3RD
If ownerldeveloper proposes a size other than the “standard”, then
owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations,
which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons
per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is
attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the “meter sizing
schedule” to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit.
Maximum service and meter size is a 2” service with a 2 meter.
If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2”, suggest the
installation of multiple 2” services as needed to provide the anticipated
demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit
multiple trenching into the street).
12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior
to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow
these guidelines:
1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent
improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on
the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in
gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled “I”,
and potable water is typically a circled “W”. The irrigation service should
look like:
STA 1 +00 Install 2” service and
1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm)
2. If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building
plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case
irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry
Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared,
but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once
you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for
your reference. In general the calculations will include:
Hydraulic grade line
Elevation at point of connection (POC)
Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve
Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be
irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with
no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water
FiBUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc 6 Rev. 7IluM)
2ND
0
0
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
3RD
service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation
services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future.
0 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available)
1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above.
2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be
connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For
subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the
improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the
applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water
Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is
there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego
Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is
charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a
refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund.
However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and
they must deal with the SDCWA for this.
c] 13. Additional Comments:
7 Rev. 7fI*IM)
~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plan Check No. CB OL% -9\1 Address \X51 AndreA Ad/c
Planner Rebeca Vazauez Phone /760) 602-4625
APN: 207 -iZU- \b-Oo
Type of Project & Use: &s,ulerh ‘GI had Net Project Density:
Zonina: e-\ General Plan: RLYh Facilities Management Zone: \
CFD (idout) #-Date of participation:
D U/AC
Remaining net dev acres:
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this
permit: 1 Circle One
Leqend:
Environmental Review Required:
DATE OF COMPLETION:
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Discretionary Action Required:
APPROVAURESO. NO. DATE
PROJECT NO.
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Item Complete 0 I em Incomplete - Needs your action
YES - NO TYPE 0
YES ___ NO x TYPE
Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YESX NO-
CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES- NOX
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103,
San Diego CA 921 08-4402; (61 9) 767-2370
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): fxm&
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES- NO-
If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #:
Follow-Up Actions:
1)
2)
lnclusionary Housing Fee required:
(Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.)
Stamp Building Plans as “Exempt” or “Coastal Permit Required” (at minimum Floor Plans).
Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
YES - NO x
Data Entry Completed? YES - NO - (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing
Enter Fee, UPDATE!)
Site Plan:
H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst
‘1 ‘I
Rev 9/01
/-
d/ m$ [7 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines,
easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way
width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard
slopes).
[sa 0 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 4awo 1. Applicability: YES J NO
2. Project complies~~~ J NO Q 0
Zoning : @K 1. Setbacks:
Front: Required %3:
Street Side: Required 6l-k Shown
Rear: Required 13- Shown-
Top of slope: Required +!A Shown
.-y Interior Side: Required b
a 4 0 2. Accessory structure setbacks: P 1 A
Front: Shown
Interior Side: Street Side: Required Rear: Required Shown
Structure separation: Required Shown
m& 0 3. Lotcoverage: Required 40% Shown 28 '/a
0 4. Height: Required a' Shown 2q
$I 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2 Shown 2
(breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required)
Residential Guest Spaces Required N !h Shown
Additional Comments SUk IlQ rdr mu%+ hz. /
t
20.0
-.
2.0
..
/
3
I dy,
7- 1-62
4
d
c
-1-1
a
I ’ . , ,
I .. .I ..._ . -
... . . --
..
0
7
I w,= 74 I
34 7 -6
I
I
9
I R,
3 PLL
4
U, 5
71
E-15 :
.. .
I'
~ -99
-- .. . .-, . .
-I-
@
I -1 I
1
--I 4
-* --@ I
E-1J rod24
..
2
74c
IS6
46
17f
I
4-3@ b"
,
1: x I
I- i-
\
-4.6
d- 24-7
SHEAR WALL PANEL,SCHEDULE (PER 1997 UBC)
WAIL lYPE & NUL SPACING (COMMON OR BOX) ALLOWABLE NHCHOA BOCTS
SHEAR, PLF (10' LONG) MA RK
5/8' Dryroll, blockod, with W coolor nailr
7/8* rtucco oyrr pa er bockod loth w/11 Go. i a 1.5' gok. nail 0 & a.c. at top and bottom plotrr, rdgo of roll and in flrld sea nata f3 below
3/13. COX p
115.5 5/8' 0 72'
0 4' O.C. at edges ond field (.175) (*5/8' 0 723 <--- OBL SIDED
180 5/8- 0 72'
A edges ond a7( 12' O.C. in field
3/8- CDX plwwood r/8d nail. 0 4' O.C. at odgrr ond 0 12' O.C. In flold
2 eo 5/8' 0 64' ood r/Od nollo 0 6' O.C. ot
aoo nata f5 trlor ('520) (*5/8' 0 425 <--- OBL SIDED
380 5/11. o 46'
('760) (,5/8' 0 237 <--- DBL-SIDED
430 5/8' 0 5)' (*sea) (*5/11' o 16') e--- DeL SIOED
3/8* CDX plywood r/8d nallm 0 2' O.C. at
Use 3' wide froming member at odjoining
, edges and 0 12' O.C. in field 640 5/0' 0 26'
pond rdgra ond #Ingle 3' rill plot. ('1280) ('5/B' 0 133 <--- DBL SIDED I
. 1 2' Str. I plywood r/lW noils 0 2' O.C. d rdgrr ond 0 12' O.C. In fleld 070 5/8' 0 16' Use 3' wide fromlng member at odJolning pond rdgrr ond mingle 3' 1111 plate ('1740) (.3/4' 0 123 <--- OBL SIDE0 *
UPPER FLOOR A35 SPACING
SILL WUNC
16d 0 16. 72' (*16d 0 8')
16d 0 8' 40'
16d 0 6' 24'
('1M 0 3')
16d 0 4' 18' ('16d O 2')
14' 16d 0 3.5'
(*2-16d 0 3.5')
166 0 2.5' 22' BOTH S:CES
('2-16d 0 2.53
16d 0 2' le' BOW SOES
('2-16d 0 2')
Jun 06 03 01:lOp J. Michael Winfield FlIFl (760) 433-4300 P. 1 .
ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY
03f03,7
P.O.BOX 1932 EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022- 1932 TELEPHONE(619)147-4747 ROBERT CHAN, RE. May 2, 2oo.i
Archi t ura
P.0. Box 4453
Carlsbad, CA. 9201 8-4453
Suhjcxt : I’r~$~l Nci. 03- 1 106G5
I~CV~CW 01’ I-’oondiliion Piaii
Proposed Residential Uuilding Sitc
175 I Andrea Aveiiuc
Carlsbad, California
Gentlcrncn ;
’l‘hc undcrsiyricd has rcyic\ved tlic foiriidation plan tbi the proposcd rcsidential huiiding
to bc. comlniclcd on suljcct propcrt>. more spccificdly rc1i.rrc.d to as liciiig I No. 16.
according to Map thcreof No. 4891 (.4sscssor’s Parcel No. 207-1 20-1 6-00}. in thc City d’
CIarJsbad, Statc of C‘:rlil’omin.
L3asecl 011 a rcvicw of the above foundation plan. it Iiw bccn detcrmincd that the
lbuudation and slab rccommendatioiis as prcscnted in thc Project Gcotcchnical
lnvcstigation Rcporl prcparcd by Our Ilnn, liavc bccri properly incorporated into the
... . ..
c
c ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY
P.O.BOX 1932 EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932
TELEPHONE(6 19)447-4747 ROBERT CHAN, RE.
P
P
c
P
P
7
GEOTECHICAZ INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED RES1 ZIENTIAL BUILDING SITE
1751 ANDREA AVENUE
CAR1 ,SBD, CALIFORNIA
FOR
MR. ALHKKI'O S. TRUJILLO
AK(:HITUKA
PKOJEW 1' ARCHITECT
PROJEC'F NO. 03-1 106G5
APRIL 17,2003
c
I ,
ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY -~ c
P.O.BOX 1932 EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932
c TELEPHONE(6 19)447-4747 ROBERT CHAN, RE.
April 17, 2003
c
e
c
c
c
c
c
Archi tura
P.O. Box 4453
Carlsbad, CA. 9201 8-4453
Subject : Project No. 03-1 106G5
Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Residential Building Site
175 1 Andrea Avenue
Carlsbad, California
Gentlemen :
In accordance with your request, and authorization, we have completed a geotechnical
investigation of the proposed two-story addition to the existing residential building on
subject property, more specifically referred io as being Lot No. 16, according to Map
thereof No. 4891 (Assessor’s Parcel No. 207- 120-16-00}, in the City of Carlsbad, State
of California.
We are pleased to submit the accompanying geotechnical investigation report to present
our findings, conclusions and recommendations relative to the development of the site.
The investigation was conducted under the supervision of the undersigned. The scope of
our investigation included field exploration, Irihoratory testing and geotechnical analysis.
No major adverse soil conditions were encniintered which would prohibit the currently
proposed development of the site.
c This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Should you haw amy questions
regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
P
c
c
c
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
INTRODUCTION ........ ........... .......... .......... ....... 1
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ................................ 1
1 SCOPE OF WORK .............................................
FIELD INVESTIGATION ..................................... 2
LABORATORY TESTS ........................................ 3
3 SITE DESCRIPTION ...........................................
SITE GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS 4
4 GROUNDWATER ..............................................
TECTONIC SETTING .......................................... 4
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
Groundshaking .........................................
Iiquefaction Potential .................................
Landslides ...............................................
5
5
5
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
c
c
c
6
6
7
7
8
10
10
10
General ...................................................
Expansion Indices of On-Site Soils ...................
Sulfate Content of On-Site Soils .......................
Grading ...................................................
Foundation and Slab Design ...........................
Retaining Wall Design ..................................
Lateral Loading ..........................................
Concrete Flatwork .......................................
TABLE OF CONTEN'I'S (Cont'nd)
11
11
12
12
UBC Seismic Coefficients ........................
Backfill Over Utility Trenches .........................
Surface Drainage and Maintenance ....................
Grading and Foundation Plan Review ..................
LIMITATION AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS ............. 13
Figure No. 1 - Site Location Map
Figure No. 2 - Approximate Location of Exploratory Borings
Figure Nos. 3 to 5, inclusive - Boring Log Sheet
Appendix I - General Grading and Earthwork Specifications
Appendix I1 - Laboratory Tests
.
IC
c
I
c
c
c
ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY
P.O.BOX 1932 *EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932
ROBERT CHAN, RE. TELEPHONE(6 19)447-4747
INTRODUCTION ........................
This report presents the findings and conclusions of a geotechnical investigation
P
P
c
P
I
April 23.2003
conducted at the site of a proposed two-story addition to the existing singlc-story single-
GEOTECHNICAL, 1NVESTIGATION
family residence located at 1751 Andrea Avcnue, in the City of Carlsbad, State of
California.
f
The location of the property is shoi:n on Figure No. 1, entitled, “Site Location
Map”.
Subject property is more specifically referred to as being Lot No1 6, according to
Map thereof No. 4891 (Assessor’s Parcel No. 207-120-16-00)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
to the rear of the existing residence. The proposed addition will be two stories in height,
of woodframe/stucco and slab-on-grade construction.
SCOPE OF WORK ---------- ----- ---------
The objectives of the investigation were to inspect and determine the subsurface
P
P
c
c
c
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 2
175 1 Andrea Avenue
soil conditions and certain physical, engineering properties of the soils beneath the site,
and to evaluate any potential adverse geotechnical conditions that could affect the
proposed project, in order that engineering recommendations could be presented relative
to the safe and economical development as presently proposed.
In order to accomplish these objectives, a total of three exploratory borings were
excavated and inspected, and representative samples of the subsurface soils were
collected for laboratory testing and analysis.
The data derived from the field observations and laboratory test results were
reviewed and analyzed, and a summary of our preliminary findings, opinions and
recommendations is presented in this report.
FIELD INVESTIGATION --------- .........................
The field exploratory phase of our investigation was performed on April 5,
2003, and involved a reconnaissance of the site, and the excavation of three exploratory
borings with a motorized continuous flight auger. The exploratory borings were
drilled at various locations on the site where the most useful information relative to
subsurface soil conditions may be obtained. The exploratory borings were drilled to
depths varying from 2.5 to 5.0 feet below existing ground surface. The location of the
exploratory borings is shown on Figure No. 2, entitled, “Approximate Location of
Exploratory Borings”.
c
c
c
c
c
c.
c
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 3
175 1 Andrea Avenue
The drilling operation was performed under the direction of our field personnel,
and a continuous log of the soil types encountered in the borings was recorded at the
time of excavation, and is shown on Figure Nos. 3 to 5, inclusive, each entitled, “Boring
Log Sheet”.
The soils were visually and texturally classified by the field identification
procedures set forth on the Unified Soil Classification Chart. The in-situ densities of the
soils encountered were determined at various depths with a Triggs penetrometer.
LABORATORY TESTS ...................... ---------
The samples collected during our field investigation were subjected to various
tests in the laboratory to evaluate their engineering characteristics. The tests were
performed in accordance with current A.S.T.M. testing standards or other regulatory
agency testing procedures. A summary of the tests that were performed and the final test
results are presented in Appendix I1 hereto.
The tests that were performed included determinations of the maximum
densities and optimum moisture contents, the sulfate content, as well as the Expansion
Indices of the soils encountered.
SITE DESCRIPTION ------- ....................
The property consists of a rectangular-shaped lot of approximately 6,500 square
feet, located on the south side of Andrea Avenue, east of Althea Lane. An existing
c
c
c
c
c
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 4
175 1 Andrea Avenue
single-story single-family residence occupies the front, northerly portion of the site. The
proposed two story addition will be situated in the backyard adjacent to the existing
structure.
The topography of the area may be described as relatively level, with surface
drainage in a general northerly direction into Andrea Avenue.
the Quaternary-age terrace deposits. On sub-ject property, the terrace deposits were
encountered in the form of medium dense to dense, light reddish brodlight gray silty
sands and clayey sands. The terrace deposits were overlain by a layer of loose topsoils
on the order of 6 to 12 inches.
GROUNDWATER ........................
No groundwater was encountered in the exploratory borings to the maximum
depth of exploration at 5.0 feet.
TECTONIC SETTING ----------------- ------------
No evidence of faulting was noted during our surface reconnaissance or in our
exploratory borings. A review of available geologic literature did not reveal any
major faulting in the area. It should be noted that much of Southern California, including
the City of Carlsbad area, is characterized by a series of Quaternary-age fault zones
Project No. 03- 1 106G5 Trujillo 04/2 3 f 03 Page 5
1 75 1 Andrea Avenue
which typically strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault zones
(and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as active while others are
classified as only potentially active according to the criteria of the California Division
of Mines and Geology.
A review of available geologic maps indicate that the subject property is
approximately 37.6 km (23.5 miles) southwest of the Elsinore/Julian Fault zone (Type A
Fault), and 9.3 km (5.8 miles) northeast of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone (Type B Fault).
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
Groundshaking - The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is ground-
shaking as a result of movement along one of the active fault zones mentioned above.
----------------- ----------------
....................
For seismic design purposes, soil parameters per the 1997 edition of the
Uniform Building Code were determined using the UBCSEIS Program, and presented
hereinafter.
Liquefaction Potential - In consideration of the competent natural soils underlying the
site and the absence of high groundwater level, it is our opinion that soil liquefaction does
----------------- -----------
not present a significant geotechnical hazard to the proposed site development.
Landslides - Review of available geologic maps of the area and site observations
did not reveal signs of any ancient landslides. The terrain of the general area is relatively
-_------------
c ,
c
c
ic
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 041 1 7/03
175 1 Andrea Avenue
Page 6
level, and the potential for landslides on subject and adjacent properties is considered
minimal.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
1.
--------------- ...................... ------- .................................
----------
Based on the results of the investigation, it is our opinion that the currently
proposed site development is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint,
provided that the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into
the design plan(s) and are properly implemented during the construction phase.
2. It is noted that some of the recommendations may have to be modified and
supplemental recommendations may have to be presented, depending on the
actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction.
3. All of the soils encountered on the site are suitable for use as supporting materials
for the proposed structure, provided that the recommendations contained herein
are followed.
Expansion Indices of On-Site Soils
4.
-------------- --------- -- ---------- ------
The soils encountered on the site possess medium expansion potential (Expansion
Index = 58).
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujilio 04/23 IO 3 Page 7
175 1 Andrea Avenue
Sulfate Content of On-Site Soils
5.
---------- ----I---- -- I-----_--- -----
Laboratory test results indicate that the on-site soils are subject to negligible
sulfate exposure (sulfate content of 90 ppm). It is recommended that
the requirements for concrete exposed to sulfate-containing solutions as presented
c
in Table 19-A-43 of the Uniform Building Code be followed.
Grading
6.
-----------
It is recommended that the earthwork be accomplished in accordance with the
Grading Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, UBC Chapter A33, Appendix I
attached hereto, entitled, “General Grading and Earthwork Specifications”, and
recommendations as presented in this Section.
7. Where the recommendations of this Section of the report conflict with those of
Appendix I, this Section of the report takes precedence.
8. Grading operation should begin with the clearing and grubbing of the site. All
debris should be hauled away and disposed of offsite.
9. After clearing and grubbing of the proposed construction area is completed, it is
recommended that the upper 12 inches of the existing soils within 5 feet outside
the foundation line of the proposed structure be removed; the bottom of the
excavation should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches; the removed soils properly
moistened, and uniformly recompacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry
c
c
c
c
-
c
c
c
c
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Truj ill0 04/23/03 Page 8
175 1 Andrea Avenue
density prior to the placement of any additional fill soils.
IO. All fill soils should be properly moistened, placed in layers and compacted until
proposed grade elevations are reached. The layers of fill should not exceed 8
inches for adequate bonding. All fill soils should be compacted to at least 90
percent of maximum dry density at approximately 120% of optimum moisture
content in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557.
11. It is our understanding that access to the backyard is limited, and it may not be
feasible to bring in grading equipment to perform the work mentioned above. As
an alternative, it is recommended that, after clearing and grubbing of the site, the
upper soils be properly moistened, and compacted with a light tamper.
Foundation for the proposed addition should then be deepened such that it is
embedded at least 12 inches into the underlying competent natural soils (on the
order of 24 inches below finished grade)
Foundation and Slab Design
12.
--------------- ----- --------------
It is recommended that a safe allowable soil bearing value of 1,800 pounds per
square foot be used in the design and checking of continuous or spread footings
that are a minimum of 12 and 24 inches in minimum horizontal dimension,
respectively and are embedded at least 18 inches (or 24-inches if alternative
under para. 11 above is elected) below the urface of the competent natural or
compacted filled ground surface.
c ,
c
c
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 9
175 1 Andrea Avenue
13. The above safe allowable soil bearing value may be increased by one third when
considering wind and/or seismic forces.
14. The settlement of foundations, when designed and loaded as outlined above, is
within acceptable tolerance limits for light residential buildings of this type.
15. It is recommended that all continuous footings be reinforced with 4 #5 rebars; two
rebars located near the top, and the other two rebars near the bottom of the
footings Isolated pier footings should be reinforced with a minimum of 2 #5
rebars, in both directions, placed near the bottom of the footings.
16. The concrete slab on grade should be 4 inches net in thickness, and be reinforced
with #3 rebars @ 18 inches on center, placed at mid-height of slab. The concrete
slab should be underlain by 4 inches of clean sand. In areas to be tiled or
carpeted, a visqueen-type moisture barrier should be placed at grade and be
overlain by one-inch of protective sand cover. This moisture barrier should be
heavily overlapped or sealed at splices. Please note that the foundation and slab
reinforcement requirements are based on soil characteristics, and should be
superceded by the requirements of the project architect.
17. It is recommended that our firm inspect the foundation trench excavations for the
proposed structureto ensure proper embedment into competent natural or
compacted fill soils.
c
c
c
c
c
L
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Truj ill0 0412 3 /03
175 1 Andrea Avenue
Page 10
Concrete Flatwork
18,
------------ -----------
Considering the on-site soil conditions, it is recommended that concrete flatwork
be at least 4 !4 inches in thickness, reinforced with 6x6-10/10 welded wire mesh
at midheight of concrete slab. The concrete slab should be underlain by 4 inches
of clean sand. One-inch expansion joints at 15-foot intervals, and % inch
weakened plane contraction joints at 5-foot intervals with #4x24" rebars @ 30
inches on center should be provided.
Retaining Wall Design
19.
------------- ------ ---------
No high retaining walls are proposed for the development of the site. The on-site
soil conditions are such that standard cantilever type retaining walls such as those
presented in the San Diego Regional Standards or the City of Carlsbad Building
Department may be used, where appropriate. All backfill soils should be
compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density.
Lateral Loading
20.
---------- ----------
To resist lateral loads, it is recommended that the pressure exerted by an
equivalent fluid weight of 320 pound per cubic foot be used for footings or shear
keys poured neat against properly compacted fill soils, or dense undisturbed
natural soils. The upper 12 inches of material in areas not protected by floor slabs
or pavement should not be included in the design for passive resistance. This
value assumes that the horizontal distance of the soil mass extends at least 10 feet
c I ,
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Truj i 1 lo 04/ 23/ 03 Page 11
175 1 Andrea Avenue
or three times the height of the surface generating the passive pressure, whichever
is greater.
2 1. A coefficient of sliding friction of 0.32 may be used for cast-in-place concrete on
competent natural or compacted fill soils. Footings can be designed to resist
lateral loads by using a combination of sliding friction and passive resistance.
The coefficient of friction should be applied to dead load forces only.
UBC Seismic Coefficients
22.
------- --------- ---------------
The seismic coefficients in accordance with the current Uniform Building Code
were determined using the UBCSEIS Program. The results are presented below :
Soil Profile Type : sc
Seismic Source Type : B
Seismic Zone Factor : 0.4
Near Source Factor : Na = 1.0 Nv = 1 .o
Seismic Coefficient Ca = 0.40 Cv = 0.56
Backfill Over Utility Trenches
23.
---------- ------ .....................
It is recommended that backfill soils placed in utility trenches located within 5
feet of any improvements and deeper than 12 inches, or backfill soils placed in
any trench located 5 feet or more from a building and deeper than 5 feet, be
compacted under our observation and tested to verify compliance with the
earthwork specifications for the project.
e
c
e
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23 /O 3
1 75 1 Andrea Avenue
Page 12
Surface Drainage and Maintenance ---------- ------------ ----- ----------------
24. Adequate drainage control and proper maintenance of all drainage facilities are
imperative to minimize infiltration of surface water into the underlying soil mass
in order to reduce settlement potential and to minimize erosion. The property
should have drainage swales which direct storm and excess irrigation water away
from the site and into the street gutters or other drainage facilities. No surface
runoff should be allowed to pond on the site.
Grading and Foundation Plans Review
25.
----------- ----- -- ------------ -------- --------
It is recommended that our firm review the final grading and foundation plans for
the proposed site development to verify their compliance with the Uniform
Building Code, Chapter A33, as required by the State of California.
c I
c
c
c
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Tnij il I o 04/23/03 Page 13
175 1 Andrea Avenue
only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil
conditions beneath the entire site do not deviate substantially from those disclosed
in the exploratory borings. If any variations or undesirable conditions are
encountered during grading, or if the scope of the project differs from that
planned at the present time, our firm should be notified in order that supplemental
recommendations can be presented, if necessary.
2. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the
Owner, or his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations
presented herein are brought to the attention of the Project Architect and Engineer
and are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the project.
Furthermore, the Owner, or his representative, will also be responsible for taking
the necessary measures to ensure that the Contractor and subcontractors properly
carry out the recommendations in the field.
3. Professional opinions and recommendations presented in this report are based
partly on our evaluation and analysis of the technical information gathered during
the study, partly on the currently available information regarding the proposed
project, and partly on our previous experience with similar soil conditions and
projects of similar scope. Our study has been performed in accordance with the
c
c
c
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 14
1751 Andrea Avenue
minimum standards of care exercised by other professional geotechnical
consultants currently practicing in the same locality. We do not, however,
guarantee the performance of the proposed project in any respect, and no
warranties of any kind, expressed or implied, are made or intended in
connection with the study performed by our firm.
4. The findings and recommendations contained in this report are valid as of the
present date. However, changes in the conditions of the property could occur
with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or due to man
made actions on the subject and/or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in
applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from
legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this
report may be invalidated, wholly or partially, by changes outside of our control.
Therefore, this report is subject to review by our firm and should not be relied
upon after a period of two years.
Figure Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, and Appendices I and I1 are parts of this report.
1: SITE LOCATION' MAP I(
PROJECT NO. 03-1IO6G5 FIGURE NO, 1
c
c
c
c
c
c.
..
I
i
I
I
I
I
0
0 s
I a.
Lu X
0 I
BORING LOG SHEET
Very light reddish browdlight
dry, dense
Very dense, cemented
c
c
c
SILTY FINE SAND (SM)
35*
64"
c
FT. m.
..
*.
BORING NO. 1
DESCRIPTION SOIL TYPE
Dark brown, moist, loose SILTY FINE SAND (SM)
BOTTOM OF BORING (Refusal on dense natural soil)
LEGEND
0 - Indicates representative sample * - Indicates blowcounts/ 10 cm/Triggs penetrometer
Granular Cohesive
0 Very loose 0 Very soft
5 Loose 2 soft
11 Medium dense 5 Medium dense
31 Dense 9 Stiff
SI Very dense 16 Very stiff
31 Hard
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Figure No. 3
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
BORING LOG SHEET
FT. DESCRIPTION
BORING NO. 2
SOIL TYPE
-! 1 0 I Dark brown. moist. loose
1-1 I I I cemented
Very light reddish browdlight gray,
moist, dense
SILTY FINE SAND (SM)
SILTY FINE SAND (SM)
41 *
54*
CLAYEY SAND (SC)
58*
63 *
BOTTOM OF BORING (No refusal)
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Figure No. 4
BORING LOG SHEET
c BORING NO. 3
FT. DESCRIPTION SOIL TYPE -
c
c
BOTTOM OF BORING (No refusal)
Project No. 03- 1 106G5 Figure No. 5
APPENDIX I
c
c
c
c
c
c
GENERAL GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
1.0 General ----------
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
These recommended grading and earthwork specifications are intended to
be a part of and to supplement the Geotechnical Report(s). In the event of
a conflict, the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report(s) will
supercede these specifications. Observations during the course of
earthwork operations may result in additional, new or revised
recommendations that could supercede these specifications and/or the
recommendations in the Geotechnical Report(s).
The Owner or his authorized representative shall procure the services of a
qualified Geotechnical Consulting Firm, hereinafter to be referred to as the
“Geotechnical Consultant” (often the same entity that produced the
Geotec hnical Report( s)).
The Geotechnical Consultant shall be given a schedule of work by the
Earthwork Contractor for the subject project, so as to be able to perform
required observations; testing and mapping of work in progress in a timely
manner.
The work herein includes all activities from clearing and grubbing through
fine grading. Included are trenching, excavating, backfilling, compacting
and grading. All work shall be as shown on the approved project
drawings.
The Geotechnical Consultant or a qualified representative shall be present
on site as required, to observe, map and document the subsurface
exposures so as to verify the geotechnical design suppositions. In the
event that observed conditions are found to be significantly different from
the interpreted conditions during the design phase, the Geotechnical
Consultant shall notify the Owner, recommend appropriate changes in the
design to suite the observed conditions and notify the agenc(ies) having
jurisdiction, where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnically
observed, mapped, record elevations or tested include cleared natural
ground for receiving fill or structures, “remedial removal” areas, key
bottoms and benches.
c
1 ,
APPENDIX I Page 2
1.6 The guidelines contained herein and any standard details attached
herewith represent this firm’s recommendations for the grading and all
associated operations on the subject project. These guidelines shall be
considered to be a part of these Specifications.
1.7 If interpretation of these guidelines or standard details result in a
dispute(s), the Geotechnical Consultant shall conclude the appropriate
interpretation.
1.8 The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the processing of subgrade and
fill materials and perform the required compaction testing. The test results
shall be provided to the Owner and the Contractor and if so required, to
the agenc(ies) having jurisdiction.
1.9 The Geotechnical Consultant shall not provide “supervision” or any
“direction” of work in progress to the Earthwork Contractor, or to any of
the Contractor’s employees or to any of the Contractor’s agents.
1.10 The Earthwork Contractor : The Earthwork Contractor (contractor) shall
be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics,
preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture-conditioning
and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review
and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior
to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible
for performing the grading in accordance with the plans and
spec i ficat ions.
The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Owner and the
Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of
earthwork grading, the number of “spreads” of work and the estimated
quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to
commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the Owner and
the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to
the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that
appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The
Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of
all grading operations.
The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate
equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with
the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications,
and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and
grading
c
c
c
c
c
c
APPENDIX I Page 3
plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory
conditions, such as unsuitable soils, improper moisture conditions, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather,
etc. are resulting in a qualify of work less than required in these
specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may
recommend to the Owner that construction be stopped until the conditions
are rectified.
2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled
2.1
---------------- -- -------- -- --- -------
Clearing and grubbing : vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other
deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of
in a method acceptable to the Owner, governing agencies, and the
Geotechnical Consultant.
The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals
depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain
more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lifts shall
contain more than 5 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic
materials shall not be allowed.
If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall
stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be
informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these
materials prior to continuing to work in that area.
As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum
products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have
chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such,
the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may
constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and
shall not be allowed.
Materials used for fill, either imported or on-site, shall not contain
hazardous materials as defined by the California Code of Regulations,
Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, Article 9 and 10; 40CRF; and any other
applicable local, state or federal laws. The Consultant shall not be
responsible for the identification or analysis of the potential presence of
hazardous materials. However, if observations, odors or soil discoloration
cause Consultant to suspect the presence of hazardous materials, the
Consultant may request from the Owner the termination of grading
operations within the affected area. Prior to resuming grading operations,
c
c
c
APPENDIX I Page 4
the Owner shall provide a written report to the Consultant indicating that
the suspected materials are not hazardous as defined by applicable laws
and regulations.
2.2 Any asphaltic pavement material removed during clearing operations
should be properly disposed of at an approved off-site facility. Concrete
fragments which are free of reinforcing steel may be placed in fills,
provided that they are placed in accordance with Section 3.2 of this
document.
2.3 During grading, soil or groundwater conditions other than those identified
in the Geotechncal Report may be encountered by the Contractor. The
Consultant shall be notified immediately to evaluate the significance of the
unanticipated condition.
2.4 Processing : Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for
support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a
minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall
be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification shall
continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods
and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven
features that would inhibit uniform compaction.
2.5 Over-excavation : In addition to removals and over-excavations
recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan,
soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic-rich highly fractured or
otherwise unsuitable ground shall be over-excavated to competent ground
as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading.
2.6 Benching : Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper
than 5 : 1 (horizontal : vertical), the ground shall be stepped or benched.
Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest
bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep,
into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant.
Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into
competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical
Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5 : 1 (horizontal :
vertical) shall also be benched or otherwise over-excavated to provide a
flat subgrade for the fill.
2.7 EvaluatiodAcceptance of Fill Areas : All areas to receive fill, including
removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed,
APPENDIX 1 Page 5
c
c
3.0
4.0
mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the
Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall
obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill
placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for
determining elevations of processed areas, keys, and benches.
Fill Material
3.1 General :
----- -----------
Materials to be used as fill shall be essentially free of
organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by
the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality,
such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential or low
strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant
or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material.
3.2 Oversize Material : Oversize material defined as rock, or other
irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 inches shall
not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials and placement
methods are specifically accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant.
Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does
not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by
compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within
10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or
underground construction.
3.3 Import: If importing of fill material is required for grading,
proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The
potential import source shall be given to the Geotechnical Consultant at
least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its
suitability can be determined and appropriate tests performed.
Fill Placement and Compaction
4.1
----- ------------- ----- ---------------
Fill Layer : Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to
receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near horizontal layers generally not
exceeding 8 inches in thickness when compacted. The Geotechnical
Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates that the grading
procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer shall be
spread evenly and mixed thoroughly to attain relative uniformity of
material and moisture throughout.
APPENDIX I Page 6
c
c
c
4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning : Fill soils shall be watered, dried back,
blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture
content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil
moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557).
4.3 Compaction of Fill : After each layer has been moisture-conditioned,
mixed and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than
90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D1.557). Compaction
equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for
soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified
level of compaction with uniformity.
4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes : In addition to normal compaction
procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished
by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet
in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results
acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading,
relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90
percent of maximum dry density per ASTM Test Method Dl 557.
4.5 Compaction Testing : Field tests for moisture content and relative
compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical
Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant’s
discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test
locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test
locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in
areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close
to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches).
Frequency 01’ Compaction Testing : Tests shall be taken at intervals not
exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill
soils embankment. In addition as a guideline, at least one test shall be
taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each
IO feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill
construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the
Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the
earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met.
4.0
4.7 Compaction Test Locations : The Geotechnical Consultant shall document
the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location.
‘The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that
c
APPENDIX I Page 7
sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant
can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum,
two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically
less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided.
5.0 Subdrain Installation ------------- --------------
Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical
report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical
Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain
extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during
grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor/civil engineer for line
and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be allowed
by the Contractor for these surveys.
6.0 Excavation --------------
Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated
by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown
on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be
determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of
exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-overcut slopes are to be graded,
the cut portion of the slopes shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the
Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the
fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical
Consultant.
7.0 Trench Backfill ---------- ----------
7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OSHA and CaYOSHA requirements for
safety of trench excavations.
7.2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be done in accordance
with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works
Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than
30 (SE > 30). The bedding shall be placed to 1 foot over the top of the
conduit and densified by jetting. Backfill shall be placed and densified to
a minimum of 90 percent of maximum dry density from 1 foot above the
top of the conduit to the surface.
c
APPENDIX 1
c
c
c
Page 8
7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the
Geotechnical Consultant.
7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative
compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench
and 2 feet of fill.
7.5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the
Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the
Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift
can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative
equipment and method.
c
c
c
PROJECT MINIMUM
I
Flt L
UNSUI'I bL
SLOPE
'ABLE
CUT FACE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT TO ASSURE ADEQUATE GEOLOGIC CONDlTlONS
CUT FACE TO BE
CUT-OVER
FOR SUBDRAINS SEE STANDARD DETALL C
' DESIGN SLOPE
BENCH BENCHING SHALL BE DONE WHEN SLDPES ANGLE IS EQUALTO OR THAN 5:l MAXIMUM BENCH HEIGH
SHALL BE 4 FEET MAXIMUM FILL WlDTH SHALL BE 8 FEET.
KEY DEPTH BENCH(KEY1
KEYING AND BENCHING
DETAIL, A
ALLIED EARTH
TECHNOLOGY
_I
J
J
J
FINISH GRADE /
.
*
e
.
.
OVERSIZE ROCK IS LARGER THAN 8 INCHES IN LARGEST DIMENSION
EXCAVATE A TRENCH IN THE COMPACTED FILL DEEP ENOUGH TO BURY ALLTHE ROCK.
BACKFILL WITH GRANULAR SOIL JETTED OR FLOODED IN PLACE TO FILL ALL THE VOIDS
Do NOT BURY ROCK WITHIN 10 FEET OF FlNlSH GRADE
WINDROW OF BURIED ROCK SHALL BE
PARALLEL TO THE FINISHED SLOPE FILL SECTION "A A"
PROFILE ALONG WINDROW
JETTED OR FLOOEO
GRANULAR MATERIAL
I OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL
J
d
t DETAIL-B
ALLIED EARTH
TECHNOLOGY
\ yNATURAL GROUND
12"MIN, OVERtAP FROM ME HOG RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET
CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE OR u2 ROCK (3Cu.FT/ FT.)WRAPP€D IN FILTER FABRIC
EQUIVALENT I \/ \COLLECTOR PIPE SHALL 6E MINIMUM 6" DIAMmER SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE SEE STANDARD DETAIL D FOR PIPE SPEC I FIC AT KIN
CANYON SUBDRAIN OUTLET DETAIL
PERFOhATE PIPE 6" MIN.
DESIGN GRADE FILTER FABRIC MIRAR 140 N OR APPRUVED EQUIVALENT1
CK WRAPED IN FILTER FABRIC OR CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE.
CANYON SUBDRAINS ALLIED EARTH
TECHNOLOGY
DETAIL ,C
L
I L
L
L
1
L
L
I- 1
L
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SUBDRAIN INSTALLATlON - SUBDRAIN COLLECTOR PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH PERFORATIONS DOWN OR,UNLESS OTHERWlSE DESIGNATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT.
HOLES ARE USED.ALL SUBDRAIN PIPES SHALL HAVE A GRADIENT AT LEAST 2YoTOWARDS THE OUTLET
0urt-n- RPE SHALL BE NON ,PERFORATED PIPE .THE SUBDRAIN PIPE SHA ?E RFORATIONS UNIFORMLY SPACED PER FOOT. PERFORAVON SHALL BE I
ALL OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE PLACED IN A TRENCH NO WIDER THAN TWICE THE SUBDRAIN PIE, PIPE SHALL BE IN SOIL OF SE > 30 JETTED OR FWODED IN PLACE EXCEPT FOR ME OUTSIDE 5 FEET WHICH SHALL BENATIVE SOIL BACKflLL
I BUTRESS OR REPLACEMENT FILL L SUBDRAINS
1 DETAIL ,D
ALLIED EARTH
TECHNOLOGY
1
c
c .
I
Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/ 1 7/03
175 I Andrea Avenue
APPENDIX I1
Laboratory Test Results
1. The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill soils, as
determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557, Method A, are presented as
follows :
Maximum Optimum Moisture
Soil Dry Density Content
Description (lbs./cu.ft.) (% Dry. Wt.)
Boring #2 Light reddish brown 120.0 10.5
Sample #1
Depth 2.5’
silty fine sand (SM)
2. The Expansion Index of the most clayey soils was determined in accordance with
UBC Test No. 18-2. The results of the test are presented as follows :
Soil
Description
Expansion
Index
Boring #2 Very light reddish brown clayey 58*
Sample #2 fine sand (SC)
Depth 4.0’
* Considered to have MEDIUM expansion potential
3. The sulfate content of the soils were determined in accordance with
California Test No. 41 7. The results are presented below :
Sulfate
Soil Content
Description (PPm)
Boring #2 Light reddish brown silty 90
Sample #1 fine sand (SM)
Depth 2.5’
Negligible
t
CARLSBAD, CA *v6.01* RON MOORE * * * * * * * Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Calcs. 4152 Chasin Street Oceanside, CA 92056 760-806-1026
. ,
Building Permit # ,
Plan Check / Date
Field Check/ Date
Project Title ..........
Project Address ........
Documentation Author ...
Climate Zone ........... Compliance Method ......
ADDITION/ALTERATION WORKSHEET - COMPUTER PERFORMANCE
--------------------------------------*-------------
EXISTING File Name .................. TRUJILOl - TRUJILOl Conditioned Floor Area ..... 1458 sf Standard Design Energy Use. Proposed Design Energy Use.
File Name TRUJIL02 - TRUJILO2 Conditioned Floor Area 2501 sf Standard Design Energy Use. 5.82 kBtu/sf-yr Proposed Design Energy Use. 16.80 kBtu/sf-yr
5.41 kBtu/sf-yr 28.61 kBtu/sf-yr
.................. NEW (EXISTING PLUS ADDITION/ALTERATION)
.....
FLOOR AREA RATIO Floor Existing New Area Floor Area Floor Area Ratio -_-__-_--- --------_--_- - - - - - - -
1458 / 2501 = 0.583
DESIGN ENERGY USE FOR NEW (EXISTING PLUS ADDITION/ALTERATION)
Floor Addition/ New Area Existing Existing Alteration Standard Ratio Proposed Standard Design ------------- - - - - - - - -------- -------- - - - - - - - -
5.82 + 0.583 x ( 28.61 - 5.41) = 19.34
Note: If (Existing Proposed - Existing Standard) is negative, this difference is set to zero.
City of Carlsbad
B-m, - -
CERTIFICATE OF COM!
PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City
Date: &
prior to issuing a building permii. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form.
6
Project Name:
Building Permit
Plan Check Number:
Project Address:
A.P.N. :
Project Applicant
(Owner Name(s):
Project Description:
BUILDING TYPE:
Residential:
J
Number of New Dwellincl Units
Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling
Second Dwelling Unit: ~~ ~ Square Feet of Living Area in SDU
Residential Additions:
Commercial/lndustrial:
City Certification of
applicant‘s information:
Net Square Feet New Area [;@q3 ,a
_- SCHOOL- ICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
San Marcos Unified School District
21 5 Mata Way
San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649)
San Dieguito Union High School District
710 Encinitas Blvd.
Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491 )
Encinitas Union School District
101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300)
Certification of ApplicanffOwners. The person executing this declaration (“Ownet‘) certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner’s knowledge, and that the Owner will file an
amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units
initial determination of units or square footage is found to be
e above described project(s), or that the erson executing this
1’-
I FI Date: CAT1 & 0 N
(To be rhfhpieted by the school district(s))
1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad, CA 92008-731 4 - (760) 602-2700 - FAX (760) 602-8560 @ RDViCDd All 7/fUl
1
THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT
HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED.
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the
developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify
that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school
mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this
project.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL
DISTRICT OFFICIAL
TITLE
NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT
DATE
PHONE NUMBER
LBERTO TRUJILLO OR 3429 KIM TRWILLO
CARLSBAD. CA moa 90-7ieamz 1751 ANDREA AVE.
FAY 10 TllF f MWPhA
5
10-30-2003
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
Plan Check Revision
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Permit No: PCR03237
Job Address:
Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED
Parcel No: 2071201600 Lot #: 0 Applied: 10/16/2003
Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: MDP
Reference #: CB03-917 Plan Approved: 10/30/2003
Issued: 10/30/2003
1751 ANDREA AV CBAD
Project Title: TRUJILLO RESIDENCE
TRANSMllTAL DATED 10/15/03
Applicant: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N
1751 ANDREA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Owner: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N
1751 ANDREA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Plan Check Revision Fee
Additional Fees
$1 20.00 $0.00
Total Fees: $120.00 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $120.00
FI VAL
DATE CLEARANCE
SIGNATURE
*
PERMI; APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK NO. !)cLq%- a7
EST. VAL.
Plan Ck. Deposit
Validated By
Date I . B 1, r L/e L
4J this address)
Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number
Assessor's Parcel t Existing Use Proposed Use
Name Address
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code1 or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001).
Name Address City Statelzip Telephone I
State License t License Class City Business License #
Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone
State License # m@@m Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
0 of the work for which this permit is issued.
0 issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 181001 OR LESS)
0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, 1 shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars (8100.000). In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
SIGNATURE DATE
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
0
1.
2.
3.
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
I am exempt under Section
I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES UNO
I (have I have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):
Business and Professions Code for this reason:
~~ ~~
4.
number / contractors license number):
5.
of work):
I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name I address I phone
I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Takr Hazardous Substance Account Act?
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain e permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? YES 0 NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
0 YES 0 NO
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit) of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is requ
EXPIRATION: Every permit i
authorized by such permit is n
at any time after the work fcomm
tions over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
itation and become null and void if the building or work
ing or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
DATE
ELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
*
L
- EsGil - Corporation
In Partnership with government for SuiGGqj Safety
DATE: October 28,2003 0 APPLICANT
JURIS Dl CTl ON: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 REV (PCRO3-237)
0 FILE
SET I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue
PROJECT NAME: Trujillo Addition
cl
0
0
cl
H
H
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction’s building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to:
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #:
REMARKS: Reviewed Delta 4, 5 81 6 items only.
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation 0 GA MB 0 EJ 0 PC 10/20/03 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (858) 560-1468 Fax (858) 560-1576
. *
Ckrlsbad 03-09 17 REV (PCRO3-237)
October 28,2003
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE .I h
JURIS D ICTlO N: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 REV (PCRO3-237)
PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: October 28,2003
BUILDING ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
Jurisdiction Code Icb IBy Ordinance I
Type of Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Structural Only
Repetitive Fee Repeats
0 Other
Hourlv Hour*
Esgll Plan Review Fee
I $120.001
Based on hourly rate
Comments:
Sheet of
macvalue.doc
i
4. ..
I -
. .- ..
k 3 ;3 J
-* J?
3