Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1751 ANDREA AVE; ; CB030917; Permit06-&-2003 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Residential Permit Permit No: CB030917 1751 ANDREA AV CBAD RESDNTL SubType: RAD 2071 201 600 Lot #: 0 $1 09,915.00 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: 0 Structure Type: 0 Bathrooms: 0 TRUJILLO RES 1043 SF ADD MSTR SUITE 195 SF DECK Applicant: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N 1751 ANDREA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Status: ISSUED Applied: 03/28/2003 Plan Approved: 06/06/2003 Issued: 06/06/2003 Entered By: SB Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: Owner: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N 1751 ANDREA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Building Permit Addl Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Red. Water Con. Fee $577.36 $0.00 $375.28 $0.00 $0.00 $1 0.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Meter Size Addl Recl. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF PFF (CFD Fund) License Tax License Tax (CFD Fund) Traffic Impact Fee Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fee Housing InLieu Fee Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $62.00 $20.00 $24.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,069.63 Total Fees: $1,069.63 Total Payments To Date: $375.28 Balance Due: $694.35 Inspector: . &d ,, Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICdhat approval of your project includes the "Irnpbsition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "feedexactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK N0.C I! EST. VAL. Lam Plan Ck. Deposit 73 -*- ZpJ -I Validated By /-/3 Date 3 - ?-e3 -3 Address City Statelzip Telephone # issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Codel or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name Address City Statelzip Telephone # State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name Address City Statelzip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date [THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS I$1001 OR LESS) I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100.000). in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. Au to be me subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. DATE by affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation. will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The actor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed ant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. ES ON0 IV ve not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. racted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name I address I phone number I contractors license number): er I contractors license number): ERTY OWNER SIGN ration form or program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 0 YES 0 NO LENDING AGEN re is a construct LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. s over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit is at any time after the APPLICANT'S SIGN DATE building Official under the of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit I ed within 180 days from mit or if the building or work iform Building Code). LLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Inspection List Permit#: CB030917 Type: RESDNTL RAD TRUJILLO RES 1043 SF ADD MSTR SUITE 195 SF DECK Date Inspection Item Inspector 07/27/2004 89 07/27/2004 89 12/04/2003 17 12/04/2003 18 1 1 /26/2003 16 1 1 12412003 14 1 1 /24/2003 1 8 1 1 /20/2003 13 1 1 /20/2003 18 I 1/05/2003 13 1 1 /05/2003 14 1 1 /05/2003 23 1 1 /05/2003 34 10/21/2003 21 1 012 1 I2003 24 1011 612003 13 1011 612003 14 1011 612003 21 1011 5/2003 14 1011 512003 21 10/09/2003 14 10/03/2003 15 07/14/2003 13 07/02/2003 11 Final Combo Final Combo Interior LathIDrywall Exterior LathIDrywall Insulation Frarne/SteeI/BoltingNVeldin Exterior LathIDrywall Shear PaneldHD's Exterior LathIDrywall Shear PanelsIHD's FrarnelSteeVBoltingNVeldin GasTTesVRepairs Rough Electric UndergroundIUnder Floor Roughflopout Shear PanelsIHDs Frame/SteeVBoltingNeldin UndergroundUnder Floor Frame/Steel/BoltingMeldin UndergroundIUnder Floor FramelSteellBoltingMeldin RoofIReroof Shear PanelsIHDs FtgIFoundationlPiers PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY JE JE Act Comments AP RI AP AP AP AP wc CA CA AP PA AP AP AP AP co SEE ATTACHED NOTICE NR wc NS NS CA AP AP 1 106-G5 AP 1 106-G5 Wednesday, July 28,2004 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 07/27/2004 Permit# CB030917 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: TRUJILLO RES 1043 SF ADD MSTR Description: SUITE 195 SF DECK Type: RESDNTL SubType: RAD Job Address: 1751 ANDREA AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N Owner: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N Remarks: Phone: 760434471 8 Inspector: Total Time: Requested By: KIM CD Description Act Comment Entered By: CHRISTINE 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing / 39 Final Electrical I- 49 Final Mechanical Associated PCRdCVs PCR03237 ISSUED TRUJILLO RESIDENCE; TRANSMITTAL DATED 10/15/03 Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 12/04/2003 12/04/2003 11/26/2003 1 1 /24/2003 1 1 /24/2003 1 1 /20/2003 11/20/2003 11/05/2003 11/05/2003 11/05/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 1011 612003 1011 612003 1011 612003 1 1 /05/2003 17 Interior LathIDrywall 18 Exterior LathIDrywall 16 Insulation 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingWelding 18 Exterior LatWDrywall 13 Shear PanelsIHD's 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 13 Shear PanelsIHD's 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 23 GasTTesffRepairs 34 Rough Electric 21 UndergroundlUnder Floor 24 Rough/Topout 13 Shear PanelslHDs 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingWelding 21 UndergroundIUnder Floor AP PY AP PY AP PY AP PY we PY CA PY CA PY AP PY PA PY AP PY AP PY AP PY AP PY CO PY SEE ATTACHED NOTICE NR PY wc PY City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 7- Permit# CB030917 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: TRUJILLO RES 1043 SF ADD MSTR Description: SUITE 195 SF DECK Type: RESDNTL SubType: RAD Job Address: 1751 ANDREA AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N - Owner: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N Remarks: Inslsector: Kk Total Time: Requested By: TRAHILLO RESIDENCE Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 14 FramelSteeVBoltingNVeldrng -~ Associated PCRs/CVs lnslsection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 10/09/2003 14 FramelSteel/Bolting/Welding CA PY 10/0312003 15 RoofIReroof AP PY 0711 412003 13 Shear PanelsIHD's AP JE 1106-G5 07/02/2003 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP JE I I i ! i t i ! I 1 I I j / ! I ! 1 i 6 1 ! i *. BUILDING DEPARTMENT .. OTlCE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE rl FOR INSPECT1 RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? L YES FOR FURTHE PHONE 8 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Structural Inspections A smciai inspection comvGyn 440 Tilling Way, El Cajon, CA 92020 Telephone: (619) 749-4912, Fax: (619) 749-5693, Cell: (619) 770-9559, Pager: (619) 907-351 1 h Inspection Report Project Name: TRUJILLO RESIDENCE Page: 1 of 1 Report #: 01 Project Address Permit #: CB030917 Architect: ARCHITECTURA File #: Engineer: GOLDEN & ASSOCIATES Contractor: Other: DSA #: NIA 11 6 Masonry 1 zj Prisms 0 Concrete 0 MortarIGrout 0 Grout PSI 0 Positions 0 Fireproofing Conc. Cylinders 0 MortarPSI (XI Sizes 0 Other: 0 Fireproof Steel 5/8ALLTHREAD Laps (XI Other: EPOXY Other: 0 Elect.NVire Consolidation 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Fireproof 0 Torque Ft.Lbs: Other: 0 Other: IXI Other: SIMPSONSET IXI Other: lCBO5279 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Other: PERFORMED CONTINUOUS SPECIAL INSPECTION ON THE INSTALLATION OF 2 TOTAL 518 ALL THREAD EPOXY HOLDOWN BOLTS ALONG LINE G. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. VERIFIED BOLT TYPES, SIZES, HOLE SIZES, DEPTH, LOCATION, CLEANLINESS AND EPOXY TYPE REF. ENG. SHEET 2 OF 2 DATED 4/11/03. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All reported work, unless othe specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This rep0 and does not constitute opinion or project control. Inspector: MARIO BATTAGLIA Cert: City of SD #350 .............................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................... ......................................................... ................................................................ ................................................................. ..................... i Day3: Day 2: i : Insp. Date: .) i Dayl: 11/3/03 b I Timestart: i Time Stop: A I 1:30 ; i .......................................................... ...................... > : 12:oo 1 ...................................................................................................................................... * .......................................................... .................................................................. .................................................................. ....................... Copies of report submitted to: Structural Inspections A Smhl Insmion Company” 440 Tilling Way, El Cajon, CA 92020 TeleDhone: 1619) 749-4912. Fax: (619) 749-5693. Cell: f619) 770-9559. Paaer: (619) 907-351 1 I Inspection Report Project Name: SPRINT FARADAY SD55XC014-A Page: 1 of 1 Report#: 01 Project Address: 2200 FARADAY AVENUE Permit #: CB031405 Architect: TELECOM DESIGN SOLUTIONS File#: NIA Engineer: SCOTT L. LARSEN DSA#: NIA Contractor: CHRISTENSEN & GRlFFlTH Other: N/A ItdSPEWN IXI Structural Steel 0 Masonly 0 Concrete Fireproofing IXI Other: FIELD Other: 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Other: PERFORMED I Plans/Specs 0 H.S. Bolts I [XI H.S. Bolts ASTM A325 0 Prisms 0 Mortar/Grout Conc. Cylinders 0 Fireproof 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Conc.PSI 0 Grout PSI H Steel ASTM A36, A492 0 Fireproof Elect.NVire E-7018, E-6011 0 Clearances 0 Positions I 0 MortarPSI 1 IXI Sizes 0 Laps 0 Consolidation 0 Torque Ft.Lbs: 0 Other: 0 Other: I 0 Other: I 0 Other: PECIAL INSPECTION ON THE COMPLETED FILET AND PUDDLE WELDS OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 1 ) 318’’ PLATE TO (E) ROOF TRUSS PER DETAIL 6 / SI. 2) 1 %” x 1 %” x l/qn ANGLE IRON CONTINUOUS ON EITHER SIDE OF OPENINGS PER DETAIL 3 / s2. 3) 3” x 2 %” x ?/’I ANGLE IRON INTERMEDIATE PIECES BETWEEN EACH OPENING. REF. DET. 2 / S2. 4) VERIFIED %” AND 1” ASTM A325 HIGH STRENGTH BOLTED BEARING CONNECTIONS ARE SNUG TIGHT. NOTE: WELDING INSPECTED IS OF THE COMPLETED WELDS. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All reported work, unless othe specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This rep0 and does not constitute opinion or project control. Inspector: MARIO BATTAGLIA Cert: City of SD #350 I Day3: ............................................... .......................................... ............... ................ - ........................................... ............................................... : ............. ................. Copies of report submitted to: EsGil Corporation - DATE: Mtqd3,2003 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 In Partnership with Government for (BuiUing Safety WER 0 FILE SET: I1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue PROJECT NAME: Trujillo Addition 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: i, Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: OK to issue with applicant replacing sheets 1 2 & 6 in s 2 & 6 marked set 111. Only received one set. REMARKS: OK to issue with the applicant submitting a complete to the Building Official or his Deputy, see attached. By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA 0. MB EJ PC 5/9/03 tmsmtl .dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 03-09 17 May 15,2003 - City of Carlsbad BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. 03-09 17 Job Address or Legal Description 175 1 Andrea Avenue Owner Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Lnspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) Carlsbad 03-09 17 May 15,2003 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may goJ employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architecVengineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 .I for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineedarchitect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Signed 1. List of work requiring special inspection: Expansion/Epoxy Anchors 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: A. B. n 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: A. B. C. Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval pr&& beginning work on the job site. DATE: May 15,2003 JURI SDlCTl ON: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 EsGil Corporation In Partnersfiip witfi Government for BuiGfing safety WNT 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE SET: I1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue PROJECT NAME: Trujillo Addition 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes with the jurisdiction’s building codes. when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: 1751 Andrea Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 I 1 Alberto Trujillo Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Alberto Trujillo Telephone #: Date contacted: Ib (by: IC, ) Fax #: Maill Telephone Fax In Person 0 REMARKS: By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 5/9/03 tmsrntl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 I Carlsbad 03-09 17 May 15,2003 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURI SDl CTl ON : Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue SET: I1 DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY I ESGIL CORPORATION: 5/9/03 DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: May 15,2003 REVIEWED BY: Bryan Zuppiger FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? OYes ONo I . Carlsbad 03-09 17 May 15,2003 PLANS NOTE: The items listed below refer to the item numbers from previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of or contained within each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciaVindustria1 projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans. (California Business and Professions Code). Only the effected sheets need be submitted I will insert them into the plans. 3. Final plans, specifications and calculations for designs deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Only the effected sheets need be submitted I will insert them into the plans. t Carlsbad 03-09 17 May 15,2003 5. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, please imprint the attached City form. Section 106.3.2. If not required than please remove from cover sheet. This requirement was based on the previous submittal when the location of the strong wall was unknown. 0 REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS * DES I G N E R-S P EC I F I ED OTHER 0 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 8. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. The glazing in the French doors shall be tempered. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. f 4 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building safety DATE: April 9, 2003 JURI SDl CTI ON: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue PROJECT NAME: Trujillo Addition 0 0 0 WREVIEWER a FILE SET: I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: Alberto Trujillo 1751 Andrea Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Alberto Trujillo (V ,t-i ) Date contacted: 4 I 9 /Os (by: LL ) REMARKS: Telephone #: 760 967 9644 Fax #: Mail/ Telephone 0 Fax In Person By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB EJ PC 3/3 I /03 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 s L Carlsbad 03-09 17 April 9, 2003 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue FLOOR AREA: See Below STORIES: 2 Addition 1043’ Deck 195’ HEIGHT: 24’”’’ at west elev. Page 6. REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURIS D I CTI 0 N : DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW J U Rl SDl CTl ON : Carlsbad DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/31/03 PLAN REVIEWER: Bryan Zuppiger COMPLETED: ADrfi 9.2003 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 03-09 17 April 9, 2003 0 PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciaVindustrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculationsheports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Final plans, specifications and calculations for designs deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 1999 NEC. 5. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, please imprint the attached City form. Section 106.3.2. 0 REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS * EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS OTHER * DES I G N E R-S P EC I F I E D . Carlsbad 03-0917 April 9, 2003 6. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 0 FIRE PROTECTION 7. When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when sleeping rooms are created, show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup in the new and existing construction or provide a note on the plans to this effect, except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered. Section 31 0.9.1 2: a) Inside each bedroom. b) c) On each story. d) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in Section 310.9.1. sleeping areas of the unit. GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 8. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. 0 EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 9. Provide handrail details that are referenced to the floor plan. Section 1003.3.3.6: a) Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not open on both sides). Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-112 inches between the wall and the handrail . Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a handrail at a stair shall be less than 6". b) c) d) e) Carlsbad 03-0917 April 9, 2003 IO. Provide guardrail details that are referenced to the floor plan. Section 509.1 : a) b) c) Shall have a height of 36". Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-6. Openings between railings shall be less than 4". ROOFING 11. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Product namehumber. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. 12. Specify roof slope. 0 FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 13. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. 14. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, sinqle- stow dwellings. Section 1804.5 15. If the soils engineer recommends that helshe review the foundation excavations, note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) b) c) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 16. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 17. Detail deepened footings under all shear walls with deep hardware. Section 1806.3. Consider failure cone in design. Please show the extent of the deepened footing in each direction. Carlsbad 03-09 17 April 9, 2003 18. Specify size, I.C.B.O. number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge and end distances and spacing. Section 106.3.3. Are some walls located at existing construction? 19. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per Section 1806.6.1 : a) Plate washers (minimum size of 2” x 2” x 3/16”) shall be used on each anchor bolt. 20. Show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. Unable to locate the Strong Wall bolts on the plans. 21. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. 22. Show adequate footings under all bearing walls and shear walls. Section 1806.3. Are the Strong Walls located at the stairwell? 0 FRAMING 23. Show all shear wall widths on the framing and foundation plans, some that are indicated on the plans differ in length from the calculations. Please check all. 24. Please analyze beams 1 and 9 for the cantilevered reactions from the deck. 25. The portion of the deck between these beams should be supported. 26. Detail all post-to-beam, beam-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2314. 27. Show edge distance for the nails in the truss gussets. 28. Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 231 5. 29. Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22”x30”, unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30”. Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30” headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 1505.1. 30. Columns and posts located on concrete or masonry floors or decks exposed to the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting 1” minimum above floors, unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2306.5. Carlsbad 03-09 17 April 9,2003 0 MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 31. Show the location, type and size (BTU’s) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. Unfamiliar with a thru-wall heater please submit specifications. 32. Show source of combustion air to furnace, per Chapter 7, UMC. Specify the location and sizes of both of the combustion air openings. 0 ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 33. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. 34. Per NEC Art. 210-1 1 (c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either: a) b) A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets. 35. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the plans that “Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected.” NEC Art. 210-12(b). NOISE INSULATION (DUPLEXES) 36. Show details of duplex common (party) walls and floor/ceiling assemblies to achieve a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating in walls of 50 decibels and an Impact Insulation Class (IC) rating on floor/ceiling of 50 decibels. Title 24. 37. Show how penetrations of assemblies for piping, electrical devices, recessed cabinets, bathtubs, soffits, or heating ventilating, or exhaust ducts shall be sealed, lined, or insulated to maintain required sound transmission rating. Title 24. 0 ENERGY CONSERVATION 38. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower). 39. Note on the plans: “The manufactured windows shall have a label attached certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing compliance with the energy calculations.” Carlsbad 03-0917 April 9, 2003 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 8581560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 03-09 17 April 9,2003 - City of Carlsbad BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. 03-0917 Job Address or Legal Description 1751 Andrea Avenue Owner Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) ' Carlsbad 03-09 17 April 9, 2003 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architecuengineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineedarchitect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Signed 1. List of work requiring special inspection: 0 Expansion/Epoxy Anchors 0 Designer Specified 0 Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: A. B. C. 3. A. B. C. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. Carlsbad 03-09 17 April 9, 2003 TOTAL VALUE VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE 109,915 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: April 9, 2003 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN Air Conditioning Fire Sorinklers Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance I Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance V I I $577.361 I $375.281 --____-___ Plan Check Fee by Ordinancrl Type of Review: FJ Complete Review 0 Structural Only 0 Other 0 Hourly -1 Hour * Esgll Plan Review Fee I $323.32 Comments: Sheet of macvalue.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. 0 A Right-of-way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DATE: q-/%-G?? PLANCHECKNO.: CB 03 - 9/7 BUILDING ADDRESS: /7Sf report of deficiencies sary corrections to plans r compliance with applicable ubmit corrected plans and/or By: Date: By: Date: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: /5v3 D / ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: 7- /7,0 - /f” EST. VALUE: /b?. 3/.j I /I’ I I IZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PE By: Date: ~~ ATTACH ME NTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-way Permit Application Right-of-way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 6023223 27 r/ CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: I 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 - (760) 602-5720 - FAX (760) 602-8562 1 @ Rev. 7liuoO F:\BUIlJiNG PLANCHEW WET FORM.doc ? - ‘I . BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 3RD 0 I. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. No Arrow ht-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets / dng & Proposed Structures riveway widths Street Improvements mxisting or proposed sewer lateral nxisting or proposed water service /Existing or proposed irrigation service asements 0 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: “Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5’ away from building.” B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. 0 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address 6. Assessor’s Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commerciallindustrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION F\BUILLNNG PLANCHECK WLST FORM.dOC 2 Rev. 7/im BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST I ST 0 0 2ND 3RD DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. 0 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 15,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. 0 0 Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %” x 11” plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 75,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the FWJILDING PUNCHEW CKLST FORM.doc 3 Rev. 7/14/W BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST I* 1ST 2ND 3RD checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: . 0 0 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 0 0 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaqed or defective improvements found adiacent to buildinq site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the Citv Inspector urior to occupancv. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading renuirements. Include accurate grading quantitiesJcut, fill import, export). Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Gradinq Permit must approval obtained prior to issuance of a Ti t'JL Ad ' - 11 7b. Grading Permit required. A Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 0 0 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) F:\BUILDING PLANCHECK WET FORM.doc 4 Rev. 7/1UW BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD 0 0 0 7d .No Grading Permit required. 0 0 0 7e. If grading is not required, write “No Grading” on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 0 0 0 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: 0 0 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 0 0 0 10.NPDESPERMlT Complies with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. fi- 1 ls%;:e attached WATER METER REVIEW 0 0 0 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. 0 All single family dwelling units received “standard” 1” service with 5/8” service. F:\BUILDING PLANCHECK WST FORMda 5 Rev. 7/1W BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1 ST 3RD If ownerldeveloper proposes a size other than the “standard”, then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the “meter sizing schedule” to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2” service with a 2 meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2”, suggest the installation of multiple 2” services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled “I”, and potable water is typically a circled “W”. The irrigation service should look like: STA 1 +00 Install 2” service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) 2. If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water FiBUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc 6 Rev. 7IluM) 2ND 0 0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. 0 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. c] 13. Additional Comments: 7 Rev. 7fI*IM) ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB OL% -9\1 Address \X51 AndreA Ad/c Planner Rebeca Vazauez Phone /760) 602-4625 APN: 207 -iZU- \b-Oo Type of Project & Use: &s,ulerh ‘GI had Net Project Density: Zonina: e-\ General Plan: RLYh Facilities Management Zone: \ CFD (idout) #-Date of participation: D U/AC Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: 1 Circle One Leqend: Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAURESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Item Complete 0 I em Incomplete - Needs your action YES - NO TYPE 0 YES ___ NO x TYPE Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YESX NO- CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES- NOX If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 921 08-4402; (61 9) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): fxm& Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES- NO- If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) 2) lnclusionary Housing Fee required: (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Stamp Building Plans as “Exempt” or “Coastal Permit Required” (at minimum Floor Plans). Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. YES - NO x Data Entry Completed? YES - NO - (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst ‘1 ‘I Rev 9/01 /- d/ m$ [7 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). [sa 0 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 4awo 1. Applicability: YES J NO 2. Project complies~~~ J NO Q 0 Zoning : @K 1. Setbacks: Front: Required %3: Street Side: Required 6l-k Shown Rear: Required 13- Shown- Top of slope: Required +!A Shown .-y Interior Side: Required b a 4 0 2. Accessory structure setbacks: P 1 A Front: Shown Interior Side: Street Side: Required Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required Shown m& 0 3. Lotcoverage: Required 40% Shown 28 '/a 0 4. Height: Required a' Shown 2q $I 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2 Shown 2 (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required N !h Shown Additional Comments SUk IlQ rdr mu%+ hz. / t 20.0 -. 2.0 .. / 3 I dy, 7- 1-62 4 d c -1-1 a I ’ . , , I .. .I ..._ . - ... . . -- .. 0 7 I w,= 74 I 34 7 -6 I I 9 I R, 3 PLL 4 U, 5 71 E-15 : .. . I' ~ -99 -- .. . .-, . . -I- @ I -1 I 1 --I 4 -* --@ I E-1J rod24 .. 2 74c IS6 46 17f I 4-3@ b" , 1: x I I- i- \ -4.6 d- 24-7 SHEAR WALL PANEL,SCHEDULE (PER 1997 UBC) WAIL lYPE & NUL SPACING (COMMON OR BOX) ALLOWABLE NHCHOA BOCTS SHEAR, PLF (10' LONG) MA RK 5/8' Dryroll, blockod, with W coolor nailr 7/8* rtucco oyrr pa er bockod loth w/11 Go. i a 1.5' gok. nail 0 & a.c. at top and bottom plotrr, rdgo of roll and in flrld sea nata f3 below 3/13. COX p 115.5 5/8' 0 72' 0 4' O.C. at edges ond field (.175) (*5/8' 0 723 <--- OBL SIDED 180 5/8- 0 72' A edges ond a7( 12' O.C. in field 3/8- CDX plwwood r/8d nail. 0 4' O.C. at odgrr ond 0 12' O.C. In flold 2 eo 5/8' 0 64' ood r/Od nollo 0 6' O.C. ot aoo nata f5 trlor ('520) (*5/8' 0 425 <--- OBL SIDED 380 5/11. o 46' ('760) (,5/8' 0 237 <--- DBL-SIDED 430 5/8' 0 5)' (*sea) (*5/11' o 16') e--- DeL SIOED 3/8* CDX plywood r/8d nallm 0 2' O.C. at Use 3' wide froming member at odjoining , edges and 0 12' O.C. in field 640 5/0' 0 26' pond rdgra ond #Ingle 3' rill plot. ('1280) ('5/B' 0 133 <--- DBL SIDED I . 1 2' Str. I plywood r/lW noils 0 2' O.C. d rdgrr ond 0 12' O.C. In fleld 070 5/8' 0 16' Use 3' wide fromlng member at odJolning pond rdgrr ond mingle 3' 1111 plate ('1740) (.3/4' 0 123 <--- OBL SIDE0 * UPPER FLOOR A35 SPACING SILL WUNC 16d 0 16. 72' (*16d 0 8') 16d 0 8' 40' 16d 0 6' 24' ('1M 0 3') 16d 0 4' 18' ('16d O 2') 14' 16d 0 3.5' (*2-16d 0 3.5') 166 0 2.5' 22' BOTH S:CES ('2-16d 0 2.53 16d 0 2' le' BOW SOES ('2-16d 0 2') Jun 06 03 01:lOp J. Michael Winfield FlIFl (760) 433-4300 P. 1 . ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY 03f03,7 P.O.BOX 1932 EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022- 1932 TELEPHONE(619)147-4747 ROBERT CHAN, RE. May 2, 2oo.i Archi t ura P.0. Box 4453 Carlsbad, CA. 9201 8-4453 Suhjcxt : I’r~$~l Nci. 03- 1 106G5 I~CV~CW 01’ I-’oondiliion Piaii Proposed Residential Uuilding Sitc 175 I Andrea Aveiiuc Carlsbad, California Gentlcrncn ; ’l‘hc undcrsiyricd has rcyic\ved tlic foiriidation plan tbi the proposcd rcsidential huiiding to bc. comlniclcd on suljcct propcrt>. more spccificdly rc1i.rrc.d to as liciiig I No. 16. according to Map thcreof No. 4891 (.4sscssor’s Parcel No. 207-1 20-1 6-00}. in thc City d’ CIarJsbad, Statc of C‘:rlil’omin. L3asecl 011 a rcvicw of the above foundation plan. it Iiw bccn detcrmincd that the lbuudation and slab rccommendatioiis as prcscnted in thc Project Gcotcchnical lnvcstigation Rcporl prcparcd by Our Ilnn, liavc bccri properly incorporated into the ... . .. c c ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY P.O.BOX 1932 EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 TELEPHONE(6 19)447-4747 ROBERT CHAN, RE. P P c P P 7 GEOTECHICAZ INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RES1 ZIENTIAL BUILDING SITE 1751 ANDREA AVENUE CAR1 ,SBD, CALIFORNIA FOR MR. ALHKKI'O S. TRUJILLO AK(:HITUKA PKOJEW 1' ARCHITECT PROJEC'F NO. 03-1 106G5 APRIL 17,2003 c I , ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY -~ c P.O.BOX 1932 EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 c TELEPHONE(6 19)447-4747 ROBERT CHAN, RE. April 17, 2003 c e c c c c c Archi tura P.O. Box 4453 Carlsbad, CA. 9201 8-4453 Subject : Project No. 03-1 106G5 Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Building Site 175 1 Andrea Avenue Carlsbad, California Gentlemen : In accordance with your request, and authorization, we have completed a geotechnical investigation of the proposed two-story addition to the existing residential building on subject property, more specifically referred io as being Lot No. 16, according to Map thereof No. 4891 (Assessor’s Parcel No. 207- 120-16-00}, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California. We are pleased to submit the accompanying geotechnical investigation report to present our findings, conclusions and recommendations relative to the development of the site. The investigation was conducted under the supervision of the undersigned. The scope of our investigation included field exploration, Irihoratory testing and geotechnical analysis. No major adverse soil conditions were encniintered which would prohibit the currently proposed development of the site. c This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Should you haw amy questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. P c c c TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION ........ ........... .......... .......... ....... 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ................................ 1 1 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................. FIELD INVESTIGATION ..................................... 2 LABORATORY TESTS ........................................ 3 3 SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................... SITE GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS 4 4 GROUNDWATER .............................................. TECTONIC SETTING .......................................... 4 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Groundshaking ......................................... Iiquefaction Potential ................................. Landslides ............................................... 5 5 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS c c c 6 6 7 7 8 10 10 10 General ................................................... Expansion Indices of On-Site Soils ................... Sulfate Content of On-Site Soils ....................... Grading ................................................... Foundation and Slab Design ........................... Retaining Wall Design .................................. Lateral Loading .......................................... Concrete Flatwork ....................................... TABLE OF CONTEN'I'S (Cont'nd) 11 11 12 12 UBC Seismic Coefficients ........................ Backfill Over Utility Trenches ......................... Surface Drainage and Maintenance .................... Grading and Foundation Plan Review .................. LIMITATION AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS ............. 13 Figure No. 1 - Site Location Map Figure No. 2 - Approximate Location of Exploratory Borings Figure Nos. 3 to 5, inclusive - Boring Log Sheet Appendix I - General Grading and Earthwork Specifications Appendix I1 - Laboratory Tests . IC c I c c c ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY P.O.BOX 1932 *EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 ROBERT CHAN, RE. TELEPHONE(6 19)447-4747 INTRODUCTION ........................ This report presents the findings and conclusions of a geotechnical investigation P P c P I April 23.2003 conducted at the site of a proposed two-story addition to the existing singlc-story single- GEOTECHNICAL, 1NVESTIGATION family residence located at 1751 Andrea Avcnue, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California. f The location of the property is shoi:n on Figure No. 1, entitled, “Site Location Map”. Subject property is more specifically referred to as being Lot No1 6, according to Map thereof No. 4891 (Assessor’s Parcel No. 207-120-16-00) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT to the rear of the existing residence. The proposed addition will be two stories in height, of woodframe/stucco and slab-on-grade construction. SCOPE OF WORK ---------- ----- --------- The objectives of the investigation were to inspect and determine the subsurface P P c c c Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 2 175 1 Andrea Avenue soil conditions and certain physical, engineering properties of the soils beneath the site, and to evaluate any potential adverse geotechnical conditions that could affect the proposed project, in order that engineering recommendations could be presented relative to the safe and economical development as presently proposed. In order to accomplish these objectives, a total of three exploratory borings were excavated and inspected, and representative samples of the subsurface soils were collected for laboratory testing and analysis. The data derived from the field observations and laboratory test results were reviewed and analyzed, and a summary of our preliminary findings, opinions and recommendations is presented in this report. FIELD INVESTIGATION --------- ......................... The field exploratory phase of our investigation was performed on April 5, 2003, and involved a reconnaissance of the site, and the excavation of three exploratory borings with a motorized continuous flight auger. The exploratory borings were drilled at various locations on the site where the most useful information relative to subsurface soil conditions may be obtained. The exploratory borings were drilled to depths varying from 2.5 to 5.0 feet below existing ground surface. The location of the exploratory borings is shown on Figure No. 2, entitled, “Approximate Location of Exploratory Borings”. c c c c c c. c Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 3 175 1 Andrea Avenue The drilling operation was performed under the direction of our field personnel, and a continuous log of the soil types encountered in the borings was recorded at the time of excavation, and is shown on Figure Nos. 3 to 5, inclusive, each entitled, “Boring Log Sheet”. The soils were visually and texturally classified by the field identification procedures set forth on the Unified Soil Classification Chart. The in-situ densities of the soils encountered were determined at various depths with a Triggs penetrometer. LABORATORY TESTS ...................... --------- The samples collected during our field investigation were subjected to various tests in the laboratory to evaluate their engineering characteristics. The tests were performed in accordance with current A.S.T.M. testing standards or other regulatory agency testing procedures. A summary of the tests that were performed and the final test results are presented in Appendix I1 hereto. The tests that were performed included determinations of the maximum densities and optimum moisture contents, the sulfate content, as well as the Expansion Indices of the soils encountered. SITE DESCRIPTION ------- .................... The property consists of a rectangular-shaped lot of approximately 6,500 square feet, located on the south side of Andrea Avenue, east of Althea Lane. An existing c c c c c Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 4 175 1 Andrea Avenue single-story single-family residence occupies the front, northerly portion of the site. The proposed two story addition will be situated in the backyard adjacent to the existing structure. The topography of the area may be described as relatively level, with surface drainage in a general northerly direction into Andrea Avenue. the Quaternary-age terrace deposits. On sub-ject property, the terrace deposits were encountered in the form of medium dense to dense, light reddish brodlight gray silty sands and clayey sands. The terrace deposits were overlain by a layer of loose topsoils on the order of 6 to 12 inches. GROUNDWATER ........................ No groundwater was encountered in the exploratory borings to the maximum depth of exploration at 5.0 feet. TECTONIC SETTING ----------------- ------------ No evidence of faulting was noted during our surface reconnaissance or in our exploratory borings. A review of available geologic literature did not reveal any major faulting in the area. It should be noted that much of Southern California, including the City of Carlsbad area, is characterized by a series of Quaternary-age fault zones Project No. 03- 1 106G5 Trujillo 04/2 3 f 03 Page 5 1 75 1 Andrea Avenue which typically strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as active while others are classified as only potentially active according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. A review of available geologic maps indicate that the subject property is approximately 37.6 km (23.5 miles) southwest of the Elsinore/Julian Fault zone (Type A Fault), and 9.3 km (5.8 miles) northeast of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone (Type B Fault). GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Groundshaking - The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is ground- shaking as a result of movement along one of the active fault zones mentioned above. ----------------- ---------------- .................... For seismic design purposes, soil parameters per the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code were determined using the UBCSEIS Program, and presented hereinafter. Liquefaction Potential - In consideration of the competent natural soils underlying the site and the absence of high groundwater level, it is our opinion that soil liquefaction does ----------------- ----------- not present a significant geotechnical hazard to the proposed site development. Landslides - Review of available geologic maps of the area and site observations did not reveal signs of any ancient landslides. The terrain of the general area is relatively -_------------ c , c c ic Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 041 1 7/03 175 1 Andrea Avenue Page 6 level, and the potential for landslides on subject and adjacent properties is considered minimal. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General 1. --------------- ...................... ------- ................................. ---------- Based on the results of the investigation, it is our opinion that the currently proposed site development is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint, provided that the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the design plan(s) and are properly implemented during the construction phase. 2. It is noted that some of the recommendations may have to be modified and supplemental recommendations may have to be presented, depending on the actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction. 3. All of the soils encountered on the site are suitable for use as supporting materials for the proposed structure, provided that the recommendations contained herein are followed. Expansion Indices of On-Site Soils 4. -------------- --------- -- ---------- ------ The soils encountered on the site possess medium expansion potential (Expansion Index = 58). Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujilio 04/23 IO 3 Page 7 175 1 Andrea Avenue Sulfate Content of On-Site Soils 5. ---------- ----I---- -- I-----_--- ----- Laboratory test results indicate that the on-site soils are subject to negligible sulfate exposure (sulfate content of 90 ppm). It is recommended that the requirements for concrete exposed to sulfate-containing solutions as presented c in Table 19-A-43 of the Uniform Building Code be followed. Grading 6. ----------- It is recommended that the earthwork be accomplished in accordance with the Grading Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, UBC Chapter A33, Appendix I attached hereto, entitled, “General Grading and Earthwork Specifications”, and recommendations as presented in this Section. 7. Where the recommendations of this Section of the report conflict with those of Appendix I, this Section of the report takes precedence. 8. Grading operation should begin with the clearing and grubbing of the site. All debris should be hauled away and disposed of offsite. 9. After clearing and grubbing of the proposed construction area is completed, it is recommended that the upper 12 inches of the existing soils within 5 feet outside the foundation line of the proposed structure be removed; the bottom of the excavation should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches; the removed soils properly moistened, and uniformly recompacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry c c c c - c c c c Project No. 03-1 106G5 Truj ill0 04/23/03 Page 8 175 1 Andrea Avenue density prior to the placement of any additional fill soils. IO. All fill soils should be properly moistened, placed in layers and compacted until proposed grade elevations are reached. The layers of fill should not exceed 8 inches for adequate bonding. All fill soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density at approximately 120% of optimum moisture content in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557. 11. It is our understanding that access to the backyard is limited, and it may not be feasible to bring in grading equipment to perform the work mentioned above. As an alternative, it is recommended that, after clearing and grubbing of the site, the upper soils be properly moistened, and compacted with a light tamper. Foundation for the proposed addition should then be deepened such that it is embedded at least 12 inches into the underlying competent natural soils (on the order of 24 inches below finished grade) Foundation and Slab Design 12. --------------- ----- -------------- It is recommended that a safe allowable soil bearing value of 1,800 pounds per square foot be used in the design and checking of continuous or spread footings that are a minimum of 12 and 24 inches in minimum horizontal dimension, respectively and are embedded at least 18 inches (or 24-inches if alternative under para. 11 above is elected) below the urface of the competent natural or compacted filled ground surface. c , c c Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 9 175 1 Andrea Avenue 13. The above safe allowable soil bearing value may be increased by one third when considering wind and/or seismic forces. 14. The settlement of foundations, when designed and loaded as outlined above, is within acceptable tolerance limits for light residential buildings of this type. 15. It is recommended that all continuous footings be reinforced with 4 #5 rebars; two rebars located near the top, and the other two rebars near the bottom of the footings Isolated pier footings should be reinforced with a minimum of 2 #5 rebars, in both directions, placed near the bottom of the footings. 16. The concrete slab on grade should be 4 inches net in thickness, and be reinforced with #3 rebars @ 18 inches on center, placed at mid-height of slab. The concrete slab should be underlain by 4 inches of clean sand. In areas to be tiled or carpeted, a visqueen-type moisture barrier should be placed at grade and be overlain by one-inch of protective sand cover. This moisture barrier should be heavily overlapped or sealed at splices. Please note that the foundation and slab reinforcement requirements are based on soil characteristics, and should be superceded by the requirements of the project architect. 17. It is recommended that our firm inspect the foundation trench excavations for the proposed structureto ensure proper embedment into competent natural or compacted fill soils. c c c c c L Project No. 03-1 106G5 Truj ill0 0412 3 /03 175 1 Andrea Avenue Page 10 Concrete Flatwork 18, ------------ ----------- Considering the on-site soil conditions, it is recommended that concrete flatwork be at least 4 !4 inches in thickness, reinforced with 6x6-10/10 welded wire mesh at midheight of concrete slab. The concrete slab should be underlain by 4 inches of clean sand. One-inch expansion joints at 15-foot intervals, and % inch weakened plane contraction joints at 5-foot intervals with #4x24" rebars @ 30 inches on center should be provided. Retaining Wall Design 19. ------------- ------ --------- No high retaining walls are proposed for the development of the site. The on-site soil conditions are such that standard cantilever type retaining walls such as those presented in the San Diego Regional Standards or the City of Carlsbad Building Department may be used, where appropriate. All backfill soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density. Lateral Loading 20. ---------- ---------- To resist lateral loads, it is recommended that the pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid weight of 320 pound per cubic foot be used for footings or shear keys poured neat against properly compacted fill soils, or dense undisturbed natural soils. The upper 12 inches of material in areas not protected by floor slabs or pavement should not be included in the design for passive resistance. This value assumes that the horizontal distance of the soil mass extends at least 10 feet c I , Project No. 03-1 106G5 Truj i 1 lo 04/ 23/ 03 Page 11 175 1 Andrea Avenue or three times the height of the surface generating the passive pressure, whichever is greater. 2 1. A coefficient of sliding friction of 0.32 may be used for cast-in-place concrete on competent natural or compacted fill soils. Footings can be designed to resist lateral loads by using a combination of sliding friction and passive resistance. The coefficient of friction should be applied to dead load forces only. UBC Seismic Coefficients 22. ------- --------- --------------- The seismic coefficients in accordance with the current Uniform Building Code were determined using the UBCSEIS Program. The results are presented below : Soil Profile Type : sc Seismic Source Type : B Seismic Zone Factor : 0.4 Near Source Factor : Na = 1.0 Nv = 1 .o Seismic Coefficient Ca = 0.40 Cv = 0.56 Backfill Over Utility Trenches 23. ---------- ------ ..................... It is recommended that backfill soils placed in utility trenches located within 5 feet of any improvements and deeper than 12 inches, or backfill soils placed in any trench located 5 feet or more from a building and deeper than 5 feet, be compacted under our observation and tested to verify compliance with the earthwork specifications for the project. e c e Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23 /O 3 1 75 1 Andrea Avenue Page 12 Surface Drainage and Maintenance ---------- ------------ ----- ---------------- 24. Adequate drainage control and proper maintenance of all drainage facilities are imperative to minimize infiltration of surface water into the underlying soil mass in order to reduce settlement potential and to minimize erosion. The property should have drainage swales which direct storm and excess irrigation water away from the site and into the street gutters or other drainage facilities. No surface runoff should be allowed to pond on the site. Grading and Foundation Plans Review 25. ----------- ----- -- ------------ -------- -------- It is recommended that our firm review the final grading and foundation plans for the proposed site development to verify their compliance with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter A33, as required by the State of California. c I c c c Project No. 03-1 106G5 Tnij il I o 04/23/03 Page 13 175 1 Andrea Avenue only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions beneath the entire site do not deviate substantially from those disclosed in the exploratory borings. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during grading, or if the scope of the project differs from that planned at the present time, our firm should be notified in order that supplemental recommendations can be presented, if necessary. 2. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the Owner, or his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations presented herein are brought to the attention of the Project Architect and Engineer and are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the project. Furthermore, the Owner, or his representative, will also be responsible for taking the necessary measures to ensure that the Contractor and subcontractors properly carry out the recommendations in the field. 3. Professional opinions and recommendations presented in this report are based partly on our evaluation and analysis of the technical information gathered during the study, partly on the currently available information regarding the proposed project, and partly on our previous experience with similar soil conditions and projects of similar scope. Our study has been performed in accordance with the c c c Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/23/03 Page 14 1751 Andrea Avenue minimum standards of care exercised by other professional geotechnical consultants currently practicing in the same locality. We do not, however, guarantee the performance of the proposed project in any respect, and no warranties of any kind, expressed or implied, are made or intended in connection with the study performed by our firm. 4. The findings and recommendations contained in this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of the property could occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or due to man made actions on the subject and/or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated, wholly or partially, by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review by our firm and should not be relied upon after a period of two years. Figure Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, and Appendices I and I1 are parts of this report. 1: SITE LOCATION' MAP I( PROJECT NO. 03-1IO6G5 FIGURE NO, 1 c c c c c c. .. I i I I I I 0 0 s I a. Lu X 0 I BORING LOG SHEET Very light reddish browdlight dry, dense Very dense, cemented c c c SILTY FINE SAND (SM) 35* 64" c FT. m. .. *. BORING NO. 1 DESCRIPTION SOIL TYPE Dark brown, moist, loose SILTY FINE SAND (SM) BOTTOM OF BORING (Refusal on dense natural soil) LEGEND 0 - Indicates representative sample * - Indicates blowcounts/ 10 cm/Triggs penetrometer Granular Cohesive 0 Very loose 0 Very soft 5 Loose 2 soft 11 Medium dense 5 Medium dense 31 Dense 9 Stiff SI Very dense 16 Very stiff 31 Hard Project No. 03-1 106G5 Figure No. 3 c c c c c c c c c c c c c BORING LOG SHEET FT. DESCRIPTION BORING NO. 2 SOIL TYPE -! 1 0 I Dark brown. moist. loose 1-1 I I I cemented Very light reddish browdlight gray, moist, dense SILTY FINE SAND (SM) SILTY FINE SAND (SM) 41 * 54* CLAYEY SAND (SC) 58* 63 * BOTTOM OF BORING (No refusal) Project No. 03-1 106G5 Figure No. 4 BORING LOG SHEET c BORING NO. 3 FT. DESCRIPTION SOIL TYPE - c c BOTTOM OF BORING (No refusal) Project No. 03- 1 106G5 Figure No. 5 APPENDIX I c c c c c c GENERAL GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 General ---------- 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 These recommended grading and earthwork specifications are intended to be a part of and to supplement the Geotechnical Report(s). In the event of a conflict, the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report(s) will supercede these specifications. Observations during the course of earthwork operations may result in additional, new or revised recommendations that could supercede these specifications and/or the recommendations in the Geotechnical Report(s). The Owner or his authorized representative shall procure the services of a qualified Geotechnical Consulting Firm, hereinafter to be referred to as the “Geotechnical Consultant” (often the same entity that produced the Geotec hnical Report( s)). The Geotechnical Consultant shall be given a schedule of work by the Earthwork Contractor for the subject project, so as to be able to perform required observations; testing and mapping of work in progress in a timely manner. The work herein includes all activities from clearing and grubbing through fine grading. Included are trenching, excavating, backfilling, compacting and grading. All work shall be as shown on the approved project drawings. The Geotechnical Consultant or a qualified representative shall be present on site as required, to observe, map and document the subsurface exposures so as to verify the geotechnical design suppositions. In the event that observed conditions are found to be significantly different from the interpreted conditions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall notify the Owner, recommend appropriate changes in the design to suite the observed conditions and notify the agenc(ies) having jurisdiction, where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnically observed, mapped, record elevations or tested include cleared natural ground for receiving fill or structures, “remedial removal” areas, key bottoms and benches. c 1 , APPENDIX I Page 2 1.6 The guidelines contained herein and any standard details attached herewith represent this firm’s recommendations for the grading and all associated operations on the subject project. These guidelines shall be considered to be a part of these Specifications. 1.7 If interpretation of these guidelines or standard details result in a dispute(s), the Geotechnical Consultant shall conclude the appropriate interpretation. 1.8 The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the processing of subgrade and fill materials and perform the required compaction testing. The test results shall be provided to the Owner and the Contractor and if so required, to the agenc(ies) having jurisdiction. 1.9 The Geotechnical Consultant shall not provide “supervision” or any “direction” of work in progress to the Earthwork Contractor, or to any of the Contractor’s employees or to any of the Contractor’s agents. 1.10 The Earthwork Contractor : The Earthwork Contractor (contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture-conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the plans and spec i ficat ions. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of “spreads” of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the Owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading c c c c c c APPENDIX I Page 3 plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soils, improper moisture conditions, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc. are resulting in a qualify of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the Owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. 2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 2.1 ---------------- -- -------- -- --- ------- Clearing and grubbing : vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the Owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lifts shall contain more than 5 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. Materials used for fill, either imported or on-site, shall not contain hazardous materials as defined by the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, Article 9 and 10; 40CRF; and any other applicable local, state or federal laws. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the identification or analysis of the potential presence of hazardous materials. However, if observations, odors or soil discoloration cause Consultant to suspect the presence of hazardous materials, the Consultant may request from the Owner the termination of grading operations within the affected area. Prior to resuming grading operations, c c c APPENDIX I Page 4 the Owner shall provide a written report to the Consultant indicating that the suspected materials are not hazardous as defined by applicable laws and regulations. 2.2 Any asphaltic pavement material removed during clearing operations should be properly disposed of at an approved off-site facility. Concrete fragments which are free of reinforcing steel may be placed in fills, provided that they are placed in accordance with Section 3.2 of this document. 2.3 During grading, soil or groundwater conditions other than those identified in the Geotechncal Report may be encountered by the Contractor. The Consultant shall be notified immediately to evaluate the significance of the unanticipated condition. 2.4 Processing : Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. 2.5 Over-excavation : In addition to removals and over-excavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic-rich highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be over-excavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.6 Benching : Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5 : 1 (horizontal : vertical), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5 : 1 (horizontal : vertical) shall also be benched or otherwise over-excavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2.7 EvaluatiodAcceptance of Fill Areas : All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, APPENDIX 1 Page 5 c c 3.0 4.0 mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of processed areas, keys, and benches. Fill Material 3.1 General : ----- ----------- Materials to be used as fill shall be essentially free of organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. 3.2 Oversize Material : Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 inches shall not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials and placement methods are specifically accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant. Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. 3.3 Import: If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The potential import source shall be given to the Geotechnical Consultant at least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its suitability can be determined and appropriate tests performed. Fill Placement and Compaction 4.1 ----- ------------- ----- --------------- Fill Layer : Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near horizontal layers generally not exceeding 8 inches in thickness when compacted. The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates that the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughly to attain relative uniformity of material and moisture throughout. APPENDIX I Page 6 c c c 4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning : Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557). 4.3 Compaction of Fill : After each layer has been moisture-conditioned, mixed and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D1.557). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes : In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum dry density per ASTM Test Method Dl 557. 4.5 Compaction Testing : Field tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant’s discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). Frequency 01’ Compaction Testing : Tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each IO feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. 4.0 4.7 Compaction Test Locations : The Geotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. ‘The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that c APPENDIX I Page 7 sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum, two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided. 5.0 Subdrain Installation ------------- -------------- Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be allowed by the Contractor for these surveys. 6.0 Excavation -------------- Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-overcut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slopes shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.0 Trench Backfill ---------- ---------- 7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OSHA and CaYOSHA requirements for safety of trench excavations. 7.2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE > 30). The bedding shall be placed to 1 foot over the top of the conduit and densified by jetting. Backfill shall be placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum dry density from 1 foot above the top of the conduit to the surface. c APPENDIX 1 c c c Page 8 7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of fill. 7.5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. c c c PROJECT MINIMUM I Flt L UNSUI'I bL SLOPE 'ABLE CUT FACE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT TO ASSURE ADEQUATE GEOLOGIC CONDlTlONS CUT FACE TO BE CUT-OVER FOR SUBDRAINS SEE STANDARD DETALL C ' DESIGN SLOPE BENCH BENCHING SHALL BE DONE WHEN SLDPES ANGLE IS EQUALTO OR THAN 5:l MAXIMUM BENCH HEIGH SHALL BE 4 FEET MAXIMUM FILL WlDTH SHALL BE 8 FEET. KEY DEPTH BENCH(KEY1 KEYING AND BENCHING DETAIL, A ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY _I J J J FINISH GRADE / . * e . . OVERSIZE ROCK IS LARGER THAN 8 INCHES IN LARGEST DIMENSION EXCAVATE A TRENCH IN THE COMPACTED FILL DEEP ENOUGH TO BURY ALLTHE ROCK. BACKFILL WITH GRANULAR SOIL JETTED OR FLOODED IN PLACE TO FILL ALL THE VOIDS Do NOT BURY ROCK WITHIN 10 FEET OF FlNlSH GRADE WINDROW OF BURIED ROCK SHALL BE PARALLEL TO THE FINISHED SLOPE FILL SECTION "A A" PROFILE ALONG WINDROW JETTED OR FLOOEO GRANULAR MATERIAL I OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL J d t DETAIL-B ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY \ yNATURAL GROUND 12"MIN, OVERtAP FROM ME HOG RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE OR u2 ROCK (3Cu.FT/ FT.)WRAPP€D IN FILTER FABRIC EQUIVALENT I \/ \COLLECTOR PIPE SHALL 6E MINIMUM 6" DIAMmER SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE SEE STANDARD DETAIL D FOR PIPE SPEC I FIC AT KIN CANYON SUBDRAIN OUTLET DETAIL PERFOhATE PIPE 6" MIN. DESIGN GRADE FILTER FABRIC MIRAR 140 N OR APPRUVED EQUIVALENT1 CK WRAPED IN FILTER FABRIC OR CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE. CANYON SUBDRAINS ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY DETAIL ,C L I L L L 1 L L I- 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBDRAIN INSTALLATlON - SUBDRAIN COLLECTOR PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH PERFORATIONS DOWN OR,UNLESS OTHERWlSE DESIGNATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. HOLES ARE USED.ALL SUBDRAIN PIPES SHALL HAVE A GRADIENT AT LEAST 2YoTOWARDS THE OUTLET 0urt-n- RPE SHALL BE NON ,PERFORATED PIPE .THE SUBDRAIN PIPE SHA ?E RFORATIONS UNIFORMLY SPACED PER FOOT. PERFORAVON SHALL BE I ALL OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE PLACED IN A TRENCH NO WIDER THAN TWICE THE SUBDRAIN PIE, PIPE SHALL BE IN SOIL OF SE > 30 JETTED OR FWODED IN PLACE EXCEPT FOR ME OUTSIDE 5 FEET WHICH SHALL BENATIVE SOIL BACKflLL I BUTRESS OR REPLACEMENT FILL L SUBDRAINS 1 DETAIL ,D ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY 1 c c . I Project No. 03-1 106G5 Trujillo 04/ 1 7/03 175 I Andrea Avenue APPENDIX I1 Laboratory Test Results 1. The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill soils, as determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557, Method A, are presented as follows : Maximum Optimum Moisture Soil Dry Density Content Description (lbs./cu.ft.) (% Dry. Wt.) Boring #2 Light reddish brown 120.0 10.5 Sample #1 Depth 2.5’ silty fine sand (SM) 2. The Expansion Index of the most clayey soils was determined in accordance with UBC Test No. 18-2. The results of the test are presented as follows : Soil Description Expansion Index Boring #2 Very light reddish brown clayey 58* Sample #2 fine sand (SC) Depth 4.0’ * Considered to have MEDIUM expansion potential 3. The sulfate content of the soils were determined in accordance with California Test No. 41 7. The results are presented below : Sulfate Soil Content Description (PPm) Boring #2 Light reddish brown silty 90 Sample #1 fine sand (SM) Depth 2.5’ Negligible t CARLSBAD, CA *v6.01* RON MOORE * * * * * * * Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Calcs. 4152 Chasin Street Oceanside, CA 92056 760-806-1026 . , Building Permit # , Plan Check / Date Field Check/ Date Project Title .......... Project Address ........ Documentation Author ... Climate Zone ........... Compliance Method ...... ADDITION/ALTERATION WORKSHEET - COMPUTER PERFORMANCE --------------------------------------*------------- EXISTING File Name .................. TRUJILOl - TRUJILOl Conditioned Floor Area ..... 1458 sf Standard Design Energy Use. Proposed Design Energy Use. File Name TRUJIL02 - TRUJILO2 Conditioned Floor Area 2501 sf Standard Design Energy Use. 5.82 kBtu/sf-yr Proposed Design Energy Use. 16.80 kBtu/sf-yr 5.41 kBtu/sf-yr 28.61 kBtu/sf-yr .................. NEW (EXISTING PLUS ADDITION/ALTERATION) ..... FLOOR AREA RATIO Floor Existing New Area Floor Area Floor Area Ratio -_-__-_--- --------_--_- - - - - - - - 1458 / 2501 = 0.583 DESIGN ENERGY USE FOR NEW (EXISTING PLUS ADDITION/ALTERATION) Floor Addition/ New Area Existing Existing Alteration Standard Ratio Proposed Standard Design ------------- - - - - - - - -------- -------- - - - - - - - - 5.82 + 0.583 x ( 28.61 - 5.41) = 19.34 Note: If (Existing Proposed - Existing Standard) is negative, this difference is set to zero. City of Carlsbad B-m, - - CERTIFICATE OF COM! PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City Date: & prior to issuing a building permii. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. 6 Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N. : Project Applicant (Owner Name(s): Project Description: BUILDING TYPE: Residential: J Number of New Dwellincl Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: ~~ ~ Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Commercial/lndustrial: City Certification of applicant‘s information: Net Square Feet New Area [;@q3 ,a _- SCHOOL- ICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD San Marcos Unified School District 21 5 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491 ) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) Certification of ApplicanffOwners. The person executing this declaration (“Ownet‘) certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner’s knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units initial determination of units or square footage is found to be e above described project(s), or that the erson executing this 1’- I FI Date: CAT1 & 0 N (To be rhfhpieted by the school district(s)) 1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad, CA 92008-731 4 - (760) 602-2700 - FAX (760) 602-8560 @ RDViCDd All 7/fUl 1 THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER LBERTO TRUJILLO OR 3429 KIM TRWILLO CARLSBAD. CA moa 90-7ieamz 1751 ANDREA AVE. FAY 10 TllF f MWPhA 5 10-30-2003 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Permit No: PCR03237 Job Address: Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2071201600 Lot #: 0 Applied: 10/16/2003 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: MDP Reference #: CB03-917 Plan Approved: 10/30/2003 Issued: 10/30/2003 1751 ANDREA AV CBAD Project Title: TRUJILLO RESIDENCE TRANSMllTAL DATED 10/15/03 Applicant: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N 1751 ANDREA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Owner: TRUJILLO ALBERTO S&KIM N 1751 ANDREA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $1 20.00 $0.00 Total Fees: $120.00 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $120.00 FI VAL DATE CLEARANCE SIGNATURE * PERMI; APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. !)cLq%- a7 EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date I . B 1, r L/e L 4J this address) Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Assessor's Parcel t Existing Use Proposed Use Name Address (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code1 or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name Address City Statelzip Telephone I State License t License Class City Business License # Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # m@@m Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 181001 OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, 1 shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (8100.000). In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 1. 2. 3. I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is I am exempt under Section I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES UNO I (have I have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): Business and Professions Code for this reason: ~~ ~~ 4. number / contractors license number): 5. of work): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name I address I phone I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Takr Hazardous Substance Account Act? Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain e permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 0 YES 0 NO I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit) of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is requ EXPIRATION: Every permit i authorized by such permit is n at any time after the work fcomm tions over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. itation and become null and void if the building or work ing or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned DATE ELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance * L - EsGil - Corporation In Partnership with government for SuiGGqj Safety DATE: October 28,2003 0 APPLICANT JURIS Dl CTl ON: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 REV (PCRO3-237) 0 FILE SET I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue PROJECT NAME: Trujillo Addition cl 0 0 cl H H The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: REMARKS: Reviewed Delta 4, 5 81 6 items only. Mail Telephone Fax In Person By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA MB 0 EJ 0 PC 10/20/03 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (858) 560-1468 Fax (858) 560-1576 . * Ckrlsbad 03-09 17 REV (PCRO3-237) October 28,2003 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE .I h JURIS D ICTlO N: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0917 REV (PCRO3-237) PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: October 28,2003 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1751 Andrea Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code Icb IBy Ordinance I Type of Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Structural Only Repetitive Fee Repeats 0 Other Hourlv Hour* Esgll Plan Review Fee I $120.001 Based on hourly rate Comments: Sheet of macvalue.doc i 4. .. I - . .- .. k 3 ;3 J -* J? 3