Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2010 COSTA DEL MAR RD; ; 86-587; Permit
DECLARATIONS LENDER I I £ ST ^ £j i i3 5 - 75 l—lQ. Q. - 3 _ > z C 2 o I 1 S3?» » w ij ?1 WORKER S COMPENSATION OWNER/BUILDER CONTRACTOR 1 I ag s a ? p l—^gflao byor° H " 3gs§1 (U As a homeownermg conditions exist1 The work2 I have lortor lo c3 1 havelast threeS™oSs^. "f ^055^5^2 a- = sogSH^^S^;,— — re J^ re J;; °S sw'S.&a"1!" S.S3«=Q. — ^ai^kre Ilislf flftl^slili ||Sla^:is|l| ^o3' a = ?"°59°--?«o> ^ * SH3 § S I ^is^iisSlgs"1 g Z |"S - ~ 1 9s|S Saiiogj* j--? Is"o'row w^ra" — 3^^q— S ^ o o usis fifi it-- li|l | til ^ ~ "a<^~!/1 S2j.J(ii2^ r~ro~~ f! till ill l III 1 'Si 1 ill li P!!f ii !:H5 ?- „ S-fSsS =sf^3gs3':s s°5oc/,gs ™p = 3 o?S?= Is 1 !fl-ss iilslS*^ |^|¥|-si|||p |?g.| White — Inspector Green — (1) Finance Yellow — Assessor Pink — Applicant Gold — Temporary File SPECIAL CONDITIONSBUILDINGO CO MECHANICALELECTRICALPLUMBING•n z i- 2i— •n-O^ZDrn 5^ CD1"" •^w im^o mo mrn ^ 2m ^Q ^0 ^^-0 ^O ^""*<i» CJ-DaO PRIATEVENTILATING SYSTEMS•i " s \ 1.m H 1 55 oozo CO CO m CO ~ D o m n m -n -n Zo MECHANK*.* ^D BONDING D POO1—D ELECTRIC SERVICE [u m -D O33 33 r \ N ROUGH ELECTRIC$D ELECTRIC UNDERGROczo c -nm 33 I ELECTRICi-D WATER HEATER D SO 33«5 > ITl-n O CO HmCO TUB AND SHOWER PAN0c D § m n m 33 ( >UNDERGROUND &WA%HI n Hm33 i n COm m33 Zo CD O D _ no )PLUMBINO f I \ \s \ <5 > rs INTERIOR LATH & DRYWj> ^s_ ^ ^>s] sS 7 INSULATION ^/ " ^ i ^ * \ 1 \EXTERIOR LATH,) \FRAME\ "\SHEATHING D ROOFn CO m 33 } COc CD -n 33 m D -n OO n omr zo GUNITE OR GROUTMASONRYREINFORCED STEELK FOUNDATIONs feBUILDING3 m o _4m INSPECTOR^ys ^T"i - , • i >' -•" *• _ •' 1 f ^ F. I r ig* ( • 0op f.j oTI o c> 0 C. 1& £ +^ ^i T«c-i v 1 f !r '• I \ 1 " ^ , / 'Pll ES CAISSONS\\ i ••'1 1 ..1 -- ' ^SPECIAL MASONftYHIGH STRENGTHBOL rsFIELD WELDINGI\ POST TENSIONEn!„ CONCRETE'—' -f / V '' f ^s- f J s ./y,^ . - < " "* - . ^i ,, -T , . V "•-gRESTRESSED£j>)NCRETE1 STRUCTURAL CONCRE1 OVER 2000 PSIm SOILS COMPLIANCEPRIOR TOFOUNDATION INSPINSPECTIONO m moO ^m TI D INSPECTAPPRO'§O in O Hm ^^ ^ "'|_ 'REQUIREO tf)T)mO 3>r~ —Z 5PECTIONen Z CO T) O O TJ CO O— \m CO , ' -, •. ^FIELD INSPECTION3)mOOuo i - i 1 " DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES BUILDING DEPARTMENT 3-11-87 Les Vaughn La Costa Hotel & Spa 2100 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA. 92008 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619)438-1161 CitpofCarlstmt) Re: Plan Check Extension PC# 86-587 Addition to Health Spa In answer to your request of 3-4-87 ,an extension of 180 days has been granted to 11-4-87 Section 304(c) of the 1979 Uniform Building Code prohibits any further extension of time. MARTIN Director Building and Planning MO • ky City of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR / ^^ PERMIT NO -*&'/' f^S' / TIMFx io i>2> /fj ^ <-* nATFv • OWNER AHHRFSS 2-OSV C ,1 C T^ 13 ^L~ AA'?,^ REQUESTED BY Oa ff a /^ PHONE NO/- J-T » BUILDING C FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB D REINFORCING STEEL D MASONRY D GROUT GUNITE n FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING I! ROOF [T SHEAR D FRAME ~ EXTERIOR LATH ^ , G INSULATION f^~ -\ ' // D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL) ' / / D FINAL \ ^ 1 1 1 PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING n SEWER AND PL/CO n TOP OUT PLUMBING D TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER n FINAL I1 " ( PERSON TAKING REPORT ELECTRICAL u TEMPORARY SERVICE D UFFER GROUND D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND D ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING u ELECTRIC SERVICE n FINAL 7^^C// MISCELLANEOUS a CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS U SOLAR HEAT D PATIO D POOL n SPA n SIGN n GRADING D DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Jnspection G Monday GAM #uesday ednesday Z Thursday Friday Cttj> of Cartebao REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR ( ^/ PERMIT NO TIME DATE ^ "^ f *-, -r- /S" _j«- ,- ~ OWNER £-' cL '-<"* ^ ' 3 /'7~J'-^£, •/" -^S J* I? _ ADDRESS -3 £. /^) /^V _S" T"-5 /O^ f— /^ <? ^_ REQUESTED BY PHONE NO PERSON TAKING REPORT BUILDING D FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB L: REINFORCING STEEL U MASONRY ,1 GROUT GUNITE n FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING D ROOF n SHEAR D FRAME D EXTERIOR LATH C INSULATION u INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL L: FINAL ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE D UFFER GROUND C ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND Hi ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING D ELECTRIC SERVICE D FINAL PLUMBING u UNDERGROUND PLUMBING LJ SEWER AND PL/CO D TOP OUT PLUMBING T. TUB OR SHOWER PAN n GAS TEST D WATER HEATER CI1 SOLAR WATER D FINAL MISCELLANEOUS H CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS a SOLAR HEAT r; PATIO D POOL D SPA SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection z Monday DAM D PM Tuesday D Wednesday D Thursday D Friday Citp of Cartebao REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD TIME INSPECTOR / V PERMIT NO ^ (£> ^ / - DATF ' OWNER ^-f — -/-) ADDRESS c^ty/d C^-^—Zt^^^ X^L-<ff ~~7^7<&-^L_^' REQUESTED BY<L- /$ £-:&-^**—&—i^-s PHONE NO <//&? &&-??£<_ J^ BUILDING " G FOUNDATION G FOOTING G SLAB '71 REINFORCING STEEL •71 MASONRY U GROUT GUNITE G FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME 77 SHEATHING D ROOF G SHEAR G EXTERIOR LATH •72 INSULATION •7] INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL LJ FINAL A PERSON TAKING REPORT §:73?^f ELECTRICAL G TEMPORARY SERVICE {_} UFFER GROUND H ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ^ ROUGH ELECTRIC ~J POOL BONDING ^ELECTRIC -ea=t5£tcF-^?«^~^^^ - **• D FINAL // & ]ft~t^^^^b/V/\JPs PLUMBING a UNDERGROUND PLUMBING G SEWER AND PL/CO LJ TOP OUT PLUMBING 71 TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST U WATER HEATER G SOLAR WATER G FINAL MISCELLANEOUS [" CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS G SOLAR HEAT G PATIO G POOL D SPA I7J SIGN D GRADING G DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection DAM G PM Monday Wednesday Q Thursday Friday ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 2O8 SAN DICGO, CA 92123 (619) 5(50-1468 DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: flAPPLICANT PROJECT ADDRESS:Co TL. & S ^> ft. JURISDICTION—•>, QPLAN CHECKER QFILE COPY QUPS DESIGNER PROJECT NAME: VVt£VVVJrt4- .—. The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where I I necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- j^j cies identified ^3S-0u3 are resolved and D D D D checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: D D Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone #_ E> -Z.A- - "T7) C ia L.Q rb By: ESGIL CORPORATION Enclosures: Q VL A- e |\-\ / ' / Datei. * Prepared byt Jurisdiction VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Bldg. Dept. Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. BUILDING ADDRESS Uft APPLICANT/CONTACT . BUILDING OCCUPANCY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION \J-iVJ l-4z)Yi=n_S ptf. PHONE NO. 1 B~DESIGNER PHONE CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION ft.o.o, in 10' y Ur?/;i=-eY?.. Air Conditioning Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value BUILDING AREA - 9^ C2^ 33.°° +• ^6*^ - "77- VALUATION MULTIPLIER Z&0 = 4^fi S.s @ @ @ VALUE 6>(.£/S> 3 ^, 14.^^-7 / &s;^-fcr Fee Adjusted To Reflect Building Permit Fee $ ___ ^ ? I .'. ' D Energy Regulations (Fee x 1.1) O Handicapped Regulations (Fee x 1.065) Plan Check Fee $ COM ME NTS- TM 9 1 L 'H- U E - 7- tu I5"t ^) O Y\/l N Stfi A CiSvO"ng^z ujoOUD &i=" 8/4/82 PLAN CHECK NO ZONE: ADDRESS PLANNING SCHOOL DISTRICT: SETBACKS: FRONT TYPE OF PROJECT AND USE: SAN DIEGUITO ENCINITAS SIDE DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS: REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIRED:_ LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: OJ^ ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIRED: *" COASTAL PERMIT REQUIRED: YES ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: OK TO ISSUE: CARLSBAD SAN MARCOS REAR NO DATE: u 4)+-I (0 Q DD. !- CD ? « Q.a E 5 ± u CO n> ENGINEERING LEGAL REQUIREMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFIED? EASEMENTS; 4\ff»Jl EDU'S: APN CHECKED? RIGHT-OF-WAY; A//W ^ / DRAINAGE; Al/ft IMPROVEMENTS:/J/fl FIELD CHECK DATE & INITIALS: PERMITS REQUIRED GRADING: DRIVEWAY:A//A GRADING COMPLETION CERTIFIED: INDUSTRIAL WASTE; FEES REQUIRED PARK-IN-LIEU QUADRANT; A/Af" > FEE PER UNIT: P.F.F.; A///Q TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PER UNIT:_ / FACILITIES MGMT. FEE: TOTAL FEE; 'TOTAL FEE; SEWER FEE (CONNECTION): BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE FEE; SEWER LATERAL; E ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: OK TO ISSUE:DATE: DPD2:DPD6:10/24/81 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 TELEPHONE (619) 438-5523 Clt? Of p,RE DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK REPORT PAGE 1 APPROVED, DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK# PRO.JFCT EFxCrtPttf /IrtnA-i / ARCHITECT nWNFR l.C HoTL-l A*>a Ss,* ^vaAfJdarJ ADDRESS <^O/O OoST/o /)/r/ Af/1/? / 1 ADDRESS PHONE ADDRESS 5/00 r<nr,a 0<?l MA.V PHONE ?A 7T? -/yff/ OCCUPANCY CONST \/-N TOTAL so FT _ STORIES EQSPRINKLERED QKJENANTIMP APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS 1 2 3 4 _X_ 6 X_10 5C11 V 12 13 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS Provide one copy of floor plan(s), site plan, sheets Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project Provide specifications for the following Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systems (,sprTr7i<lers>stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, CO2, alarms, hydrants) Plan must be approved by the fire department*prior tolnstallation The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT (R ( Lie,iT HAIWO The following fire protection systems are required D Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria D Dry Chemical, Halon, C02 (Location D Stand Pipes (Type D Fire Alarm (Type/Location Fire Extinguisher Requirements H. One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each £ extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel D An extinguisher with a minimum rating of sq ft or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest to be located _ D Other 8 Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided EXITS Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the mam exit and doors tiJl/.../ it TI L. -> , /v/o /iio tntrtir IA rissti Ti* **• rtearOAn r r- __ / I 'I EXIT signs (6" x 3/4" letters) shall be placed over all required exits and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors GENERAL Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code Buildmg(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81 14 Additional Requirements ., <-. .15 Comply with regulatiopsjon attached sheet(s) P,an Ex.m,ner ^Y^< Report mailed to architect Met with Attach to Plans cndre orchtedue tand1319slroHbrdcr toJacrd associates ltd design PSF 6 (S> 6. O /. 5"). o 2. O 34-5" l.l 30.31 ' (4-x * T72.. 3o <5llC 90 INTRODUCTION Hit • i' i<niitinii(|p(< compliance forms develop! toi enforcement of these standards have been included in Chap ter 9 It is recommended that designers use copies of these forms to submit to the local building code enforcement agency Any problems or suggested revisions to the forms should be made known to the Commission staff Please mail your suggestions to Buildings/Appliances Office CERCDC, 1111 Howe Avenue Sacramento, CA 95825 9.1 COMPLIANCE FORMS The suggested compliance forms provided m this manuol have b«"*n pitu "cd io allow the designer to demonstrate compliance with each section of th<> stand jr.!., The following forms are provided herein 1 — Building Data Form - Building Envt-lope Compliance 2 — Materials Data Form — Building Envelope Compliance «*TORM 3 — Heat Transfer Coefficient - Proposed Construction Assembly *<*PORM 4 — Documentation Form — HVAC System Compliance FORM 5 — Documentation Form - Building Lighting Compliance •*TORM 6 — Documentation Form — HVAC Equipment Compliance FORM 7 — Documentation Form — Building Se^irp Water Heating Co.npt ^nc1; FORM 8 — Documentation Form — Electric Resistance Heating Life C\c!e Cost Calculations FORM 9 — Documentation Form —Active Solar Energy System FORM 10— Documentation Form - Passive Solar Energy System FORM 11 — Documentation Form - Day-lighting FORM 12 — Documentation Form - V.ind Energy S/strm FORM 13 — Documentation Form — E~»rgy 8udopt Compliance Form FORM 14 — Documentation Form - Mandatory Standards r ito jLT T m LF r r. xERC i SE RM „ i£xi 'H'-i DOC,UMENI ED BY : r, b. H . LOCATION; LA COSTA DAIEs uLT U,,R& PROJFCF Di:..!3iPNr:r\: L<ARTAN'/I cnro ED BYS A,11,.B. LOG AT TON CODE NO,, , I,, 0/1 LAI"3 TUDE 2. DEbREE-DANS HEATING 3. G.F. SOLAR FACTOID 4. DF?IGN '-TMH:. DTF-T. 5., i-::. OCCUPANCY CUDt NO. 6. 04 / GROS-; Hrrn., I-LOUP ARI:A 7. i; (^ NLIMBFR Gf" FLOORS 8. i GROUND Fi OOi; Fl.-r. TMETER FT. 9. O1? LONGEST DIAGONAL DI MENTION FT. 10. ...> I HFTGHr FT 1 1 . WALL C A OFAOUF WALL 12., A WINLUW 1-.. !/• A DOOI^ 14. ^l.:1 'UDTAI.... A 15. Er-:* HEATING U WALL. 16.. . O^; IJ WTNI'DW 1.7. I , , -, U DOOR 3D. -'f COOLING U W 19. :,<>--7 U 20. I. I. ;, U DOOR 21 . „ ::"5 SI IAD 1 N(i UOE FF. GL ASS B.C. 22 „ WE T R H T OF WALL I.B / SH. F1 „ W 23. MASS CORRECT I ON FACTOR MCF 24. rOUWftl EMT TFMP. DTT. TD ECU,, 25, '." ROOF A OPAU'UE ROOF 26. I 60/' A <FI- Yl If-iT .:/, H UR ?8. "<• Bl Yi r LSI if '."••'„ . 0! ',:7-bx«...8 OR u :.'>„ 2ot30 -j.i. :h HEAT [MR U ROOF :'.;•„ ,. <>4 q U SI- YLIGHT 3".. „ .r,L- COOLING U R 74,. , ,1/11 U 3 75. A!:, GHAD i NP r nt:F i~. BI YL i (JHT s. c. : A „ „ L<: > MASS CfJF.r-F. M.C --', I ABBDRF'TAHUL A,,C,, 38. ,7 FLOOR ARLA over; UNS-IELAITD JPACF. 7,9. 3^ LI FLOOR 40., H'rE A T} Ml- DIES I I-.N CR11ERI ON ( STANDARD U OW 43. r?TANDAr.'D U OR .'14. B1ANDARD U OF 45. MAX1MUIM ALLOWABLE U /Ifc. „? bF.D U OW 4?,, . 0859'"' "<« PROPOSED LI 01" 48. „ 0""P !. ;0'3 PROPOSED U OF 49. . V,.. FROP03LD U 0 50,, . IO!-"1 ... -^ COOI.JN6 DEC'IGN CRITERION STANDARD DTTW W 51. M,7 STANDARD OTTV R 52, 4.J SIAMDARD OTI'V 5"" 1 /. s^r,'?o FROPOSLD OTIV W ":i4. ".. 8H6 I iV F R'OF OSCD 0 r ! V f 155. 7. S4 1.1" f!'l r !" OF C.J3LD Q T T V Si>. A. .'{» /AV / MATERIALS DATA FORM BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE Proi«ct Tide Location / A Project Designer Mn JgfXffl H$K>*I Documented by 7T S. g Date Checked by Date Wall Wall Type 1 Weight of wall construction, Ib/ft^ (see Sec 4 1 8) Heat Transfer Coefficient (see Sec 4 1 8) Surface Areas (attach sheets to document any additional compass orientations) W1 1 U1 2 Orientation 3 Area 4 Orientation 5 Area 6 Orientation 7 Area 8 Orientation 9 Area J5L J9/O 10 c Wall Type 2 Weight of wall construction, Ib/ft^ Heat Transfer Coefficient Surface Areas (Attach sheets to document any additional compass orientations) W2 1 1 U2 12 Orientation 13 Area 14 Orientation 15 Area 16 Orientation 17 Area 18 Orientation 19 Area 20 Wall Type 3 Weight of wall construction, Ib/ft^ Heat Transfer Coefficient Surface Areas (Attach sheets to document any additional compass' orientations) W3 21 U3 22 Or.entat.on 23 Area 24 Onentation 25 _ Area 26 Orientation 27 Area 28 Orientation 29 Area 30 MATERIALS DATA FORM - BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE PROJECT TITLE £%£&>C-IS£ J%*1. £JTPAtl3lAAl Page 2 o» Form 2 Wall Type 4 Weight of wall construction, Ib/ft2 Surface Areas (Attach sheets to document any additional compass orientations) W4 31 U4 32 Orientation 33 Area 34 Orientation 35 Area 36 Orientation 37 Area 38 Orientation 39 Area 40 Glass Type 1 Shading coefficient (from Table 3 of Appendix 1 or mfrs data) Heat Transfer Coefficient (from mfrs data) Surface Areas (Attach sheets to document any additional compass orientations) Orientation Area Orientation Area Orientation Area Orientation Area 41 ». 42 43 44 -&- 45 S 46 Jfc. 47 & 49 W Glass Type 2 Shading coefficient (from Table 3 of Appendix 1 or mfrs data) Heat Transfer Coefficient (from mfrs data) Surface Areas (Attach sheets to document any additional compass orientations) Glass Type 3 Shading coefficient (from Table 3 of Appendix 1 or mfrs data) Heat Transfer Coefficient (from mfrs data) Surface Areas (Attach sheets to document any additional compass orientations) MATERIALS DATA FORM - BUILDING ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE of Font* 2 PROJECT TITLE Roof Glass Type 4 Shading coefficient (from Table 3 of Appendix 1 or mfrs data) Heat Transfer Coefficient (from mfrs data) Surface Areas (Attach sheets to document any additional compass orientations). Roof Type 1 Weight of roof construction. Ib/ft^ (see Section 418) 81 Heat Transfer Coefficient (see Section 418) 82 Surface Area (Attach sheets to document any additional roof types) 83 Skylight Area 84' Skylight Shading Coefficient (from Table 3 of Appendix 1 ) 85 Skylight Heat Transfer Coefficient (U value) 86 . t*S? Floor Floor Type 1 (floors over non-air conditioned spaces only) Weight of floor construction, Ib/ft^ (see Section 418) 87 Heat Transfer Coefficient (see Section 418). 88 Surface Area (attach sheets to document any additional floor types) 89 Doors Surface Area Heat Transfer Coefficient (U-value, see Table 4 of Appendix 1) IICAF fKANSI Ll< IOLI FIULNT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY FORM 3 CODE f: DOOR 100 DOOR TYPE LIST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS: 1. 1 3/4" WOOD 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. INSIDE SURFACE AIR FILM OUTSIDE SURFACE AIR FILM TOTAL RESISTANCE Rt U-VALUE (1/Rt) COOLING: .68 COOLING: .25 COOLING: 2.89 COOLING: .346============== R-VALUE 1.96 HEATING: .68 HEATING: .17 HEATING- 2.81 HEATING: .356 WEIGHT OF CONSTRUCTION TYPE:4.00 Ib/ft2 HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY FORM 3 CODE I: WALL 450 WALL TYPE LIST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS: 1. 3" BRICK VENEER 2. 1" GROUT 3. R-ll INSULATION 4. 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. INSIDE SURFACE AIR FILM OUTSIDE SURFACE AIR FILM TOTAL RESISTANCE Rt U-VALUE (1/Rt) COOLING: .68 COOLING: .25 COOLING: 13.02 COOLING: .077============== R-VALUE .33 .20 11.00 .56 HEATING: .68 HEATING: .17 HEATING: 12.94 HEATING: .077 ============== WEIGHT OF CONSTRUCTION TYPE: MCF= .75 43.90 Ib/ft2 TDeq= 30 HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY FORM 3 CODE #: ROOF 506 ROOF TYPE LIST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS- 1. 3/8" BUILT-UP ROOF 2. 3/4" PLYWOOD 3. AIR SPACE 4. R-19 INSULATION 5. 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 6. 7. 8. 9. INSIDE SURFACE AIR FILM OUTSIDE SURFACE AIR FILM TOTAL RESISTANCE Rt U-VALUC d/Rt) COOLING: .92 COOLING: .25 COOLING: 22.92 COOLING: .044 R-VALUE: .33 .93 .93 19.00 .56 HEATING: .61 HEATING- .17 HEATING: 22.53 HEATING: .044 WEIGHT OF CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Mc= 1.00 7.80 Ib/ft2 Ac= .79 (GRAVEL) HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY Form 3 Lut of Comtrucbon Componantt Sketch of Construction Assembly WEIGHT: V<& 1C lb/ft2 Check one Wall Roof Floor X- 5 6 7 a Inside Surface Air Film Outside Surface Air Film Total Raiistance R, U-Value (I/R,) cooling cooling /.It cooling hMting ,/r heating healing cooling hcinng ."in!.1 U -> f",i',;" ! \\~t"> 1 i > ! i ii i) '^ DA IE s (.IL"I ,, IS , 8<<> NAME.; LXEIKLISL RM. EXI-'AN LA CU8TA •-?•• i-r ii ". ,Lin DL.JT., r,, HPU/I-I r, Di~n,:r,, cnu/n M WML •-. j *-)-.> ,.// 12 772.46^ 3^ :r:j/,,:.92 i Jr-ll ! r >" l"! f.) (") 'J i;Ji"i! i ".'. •' f") 0 O o 12 JdiJ. 72 J.o 4913. 16 U C o i".' ., ob J2 748 ,,0 , '.'44 1 ,."' Fj-19, Uj5'? , B'. >j 0 : 4 1 174 4 2 1 -j ! V.HJ .170 U" I.',' o n :.I 73., 92 ! •')(•'/ .044 ?/,. 7 4I?6 'j?! 115HI ^, ,,65 1-3.7 9?Vn68 ] I;A; t nr,i. ! i,-. 4Vi>4J .ui , L 9 DOCUMENTATION FORM I 01111 *t HVAC SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE (Complete for each system) Project Title £Xg££Lt*€ KM. ZSPAaiSititJ Documented by 7T^. g. Location LA. gOST-A Date Pioject Designer "BA^TA^y-aT Checked by Data DESIGN CONDITIONS Building occupancy type (Table 1 of Appendix I) & V? Project Latitude (Table 2 of Appendix I) _ Heating Degree Days (Table 2 of Appendix I) c: HEATING LOAD DOCUMENTATION (Attach calculations) Outdoor Design Temperature. Winter, °F Wind Speed, mph r Wind direction Indoor Design Temperature, °F Temperature of adjacent unheated spaces, Ol~ Transmission Heating Losses, Btu/hr JO tfXQtf Infiltration Air, CFM •"• Heat Loss From Infiltration, Btu/hr — Ventilation Air, CFM Sffa Heat Loss From Ventilation, Btu/hr * / 1/28i¥ Outdoor Air for Special Processes, CFM ' . . .. — Heat Loss from Process Air, Btu/hr "•"" .. Other Heat Losses (describe). Btu/hr ~~ Heat Gain from Lights, Equipment, People, e*c Btu/hr -— Total Heat Losses. Btu/hr .Sflf/JS f? COOLING LOAD DOCUMENTATION (Attach calculations) Outdoor Design Temperature, summer, dry bulb, °F 9O Outdoor Design Temperature, summer, wet buib, °F ___j8f. Indoor Design Temperature, °F "If Transmission heat gam, Btu/hr JEXflft Infiltration Air. CFM Heat Gam from Infiltration, Btu/hr • Outdoor Air for Special Processes, CFM Heat gain for process air, Btu/hr Solar Heat Gam Through Windows, etc , Btu/lir Heat Gam from Other Sources. Btu/hr Total Cooling Load, Btu/hr P*0« 2 of Form 4 TEMPERATURE CONTROL Attach manufacturer's data or other, give specification or drawing reference which shows in detail the following information REFERENCE (page or sheet M- I• capability to sequence heating and cooling ! • temperature control device set point limits —CiLlJ!— « temperature set point range between full heating and full cooling —M~ I « setback and shutoff controls , —M *~ 1 • capability to terminate heating at 70°F and cooling at 78fF —M~ I .. Indicate drawing or specification reference where the temperature control device requirements given below are dcxumentdd An automatic temperature control device snail be provided for • each separate HVAC system M" I • each zone ' _—— SIMULTANEOUS HEATING AND COOLING The following requirements apply to the use of new energy and need not be complied with when recovered energy is used to control temperature In each case, when resetting hot and cold deck temperatures, on representative zone may be chosen to represent np more than f ten zones with similar heating or cooling requirements Concurrent operation of independent heating and cooling systems serving common spaces must provide either or both of the controls given below List reference specification page or drawing number where control requirements can be verified i REFERENCE • Sequential temperature control of heating and cooling systems K- \ • Automatic reset of heating temperature, to limit energy input only to that level to offset heat loss due to transmission and infiltration _ M ' I _ Reheat systems — give reference specifications page or drawing number which will show compliance with the following when reheating 20% or more of the total air in the system o When serving multiple zones, controls must automatically reset the cold air supplv to the highest temperature level of the zone requinrg the most , cooling MA • Single zone reheat systems shall be controlled to sequence heating and coolmg ' " Pag* 3 of Form 4 Dual duct or multizone systems - give reference specifications, page or drawing number which will show compliance with the following REFERENCE • Hot deck temperature - must be automatically reset to the lowest temperature necessary to satisfy the zone requiring the most k\ ^ heating • Cold deck temperature - must be automatically reset to the highest temperature necessary to satisf / the zone requiring the most . cooling —I:LO_±— Recoolmg systems - gwe reference specifications page or drawing number which shows compliance with the following if recoolmg 20% or more of the total air in Ihe system • Controls must automatically reset the temperature of heated supply air to the lowest temperature necessary to satisfy the zone requiring the most heating WVAC SYSTEM RESTRICTIONS & SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Several HVAC System types have special requirements or restrictions In this section, the type of system used in the design must be listed and any special restrictions given here referenced to show compliance Supply references to proper specifi cations or drawing page numbers Type HVAC Systems Used - List type of system to be used here (include all systems for heating or cooling in the building) include reference for specifications for each system Constant volume reheat system — when serving both interior and exterior zones — separate cooling coils are required if the exterior zone exceeds 20% of the total air quantity through the cooling coil REFERENCE M A- jaiE/v\ |O saipuj MOIJ ujnujixeiAj IB suej Aiddng jo ajnssojj '."JdO M°id UJPur>B/j IB A) juenQ jiv A|c:dns — (Md) *SPUI aouBujjojjad uej |AJJO 'speon ssaoojj joj paisnlpy AiuuenQ .11^ A|ddng J31BM i° ssipul 'sue'j Aidctng ^o ajnssajj |P}Oj_ IAI.-13 'AiijuenQ J'V A|ddng |eiOj_ uuaisAs SNVd Nl NOIldlAinSNOO U3MOd 30N3d3d3« sfiumado jie uoijsnqaioD ^o ucudaoxa 31(1 I_|IIM spisino aqj 01 s6ui -uado ||B joj pspiAOJd aq isnui sjadujep pajejado A||Bnueiu aiqissaooe Ajipeaj jo oneujoine jaijug - sjoie|i}U9/\ j _Y^ 30N3U3J3U 3JB uv\opjni|s UPJ uo pasop pue pa>po|ja}ui A||eoaeujojnB aje ipiu,AA sjaduieQ — NOIJLV1U.N3A AJ.IAVU9 QNV 1VOINVH03W SI 30N3«3d3« jsoo apAo 3|i| 6uaB|ro|BO p g ouo-j apnpui JQ %gi upqi -;sa| ji oousiajaj 33UE1SIS3J OU;08|3 8L|) ^O JBq\ Sp333xa 1SOO 8]OAD 3)l| LUSiSAS 01BUJD1|B UE SMOgS (|Bnueoi Siqi JO 2 {7 UOaD3S 835) g ujoj 'sisA|Bue ISOD apAo 3ji| e jo AjioBdeo Butjeaq aoeds Boippnq |ejoi 314; jo (juaojad U3i) %Ql UBM1 SS3ISl Ajioedea qi ssa|un pasn aq jou | 30N3U3J3U paujiep si paMOjie suoiidaoxa aqi jo auo ssaf un apAo jszioiouooa UP OABLJ isnoi IAJJQ OOO'S ueip ajoui JO Ju./rqg CXDO'fCl UBLH Jaieaj6 AnoedBD 6ui|OOO jcvoi BUIAPLJ i 'sujajsAs 3uozi)|nuj jo aonp |enp uem -iaip.0 joj 'uoauAs UBJ BuipoD u,Dea JQJ - i a6e>|ca| 3je« ||eqs sjeidaiueu jo |»qe| $,jajn^e^nuey\| paioafqns aq 01 ajnss3Jd uuaisAs ujnujixeuj am ie Buuejado uaqM uadiuep am Aq paipuB^ Ajuuenb jie |pjo; am jo %^ jo e 01 panojij aq ||ens JIB 6ui|00o pue Buueaq jo Buixitu auj jo; pszipin sjadaiep JQJ a6B>)E3| JIB am 'pasn j| aosds )33j sjenbs QCO'Od ueMi -oB-iei s6uip|inq joj pajiqi^oxl aje IQJIUOO ajniBJadaiai JQ^ paxuu A|iuanbasqns aj? suieans JIB IOOD pue ieaq A|$noaue}|num oj Afijaua MSU azijun ipiuM sujaisAs auo^ainiu JO wnp aainpA SW31SAS aNozinniM ONV lona ivna 7 UUO j P»B» 5 of Form 4 c POWER CONSUMPTION IN FANS (continued) Fan Performance Index at Maximum Flow (FPIm), CFM Variable Volume Adjustment Constant Adjusted for Performance Index, FPIa PIPING AND DUCT INSULATION AND DUCT CONSTRUCTION References to the piping insulation, duct insulation and duct construction requirements presented in Section 4 2 of the Energy Conservation Design Manual must be given below REFERENCE toP<£ T>/t>fft DOCUMENTATION FORM & HVAC EQUIPMENT COMPLIANCE Form 6 References giving the specification page or drawing sheet number or manufacturer's data must be submitted to demonstrate com pliance with Division 6 of the standards ELECTRICALLY OPERATED COOLING SYSTEM EQUIPMENT Standard rating capacity. Btu/hr Minimum EER (COP) Reference c ABSORPTION WATER CHILLING COOLING SYSTEM EQUIPMENT COMBUSTION HEATING EQUIPMENT (Oil and gas fired comfort heating equipment- Heat source (check one) Direct fired (gas oil) Indirect fired (steam hot water) Minimum EER (COP) Reference Minimum combustion efficiency at maximum rated output Reference ELECTRICALLY OPERATED HEATING HEAT PUMPS Minimum EER (COP) Reference Supplementary Heater Control Reference ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE SPACE HEATING EQUIPMENT REFERENCE FOR FULL LOAD ENERGY INPUT AND OUTPUT REQUIREMENT FOR MAINTENANCE FOR MANUFACTURER'S MAINTENANCE AND, FULL AND PARTIAL CAPACITY AND STAND-BY INPUT(S) AND OUTPUT(S) SPECIFICATION REFERENCE BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS FOUNDATIONS 6717 CONVOY COURT SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92111 PHIL IP HENKINo BENlON . .. _ ___ PRESIDENT CIVIL ENGINEER ADD I 19, 19/3 TtLLPHVJN t 1/14) 5t>5 K La Costa Land Company Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, California Attention: Mr. Irving Roston Gentlemen: This is to transmit to you five copies of our report of Project No. 73-4-10A entitled, "Soils Investigation, Proposed West End Addition, Health Spa Building, Northwesterly Of The In- tersection Of Costa Del Mar and Estrella De Mar, Rancho La Costa, Carlsbad, California," dated April 19, 1973. If you should have any questions concerning any of the data presented in this report, please contact us. Very truly yours, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. )/? Philip H.' Beri'ton, Civil Engineer SOILS INVESTIGATION Proposed West End Addition Health Spa Building Northwesterly Of The Intersection Of Costa Del Mar And Estrella De Mar Rancho La Costa Carlsbad, California For The La Costa Land Company Project No. 73-4-1OA Apr'' 19/ 1973 BENTON ENGINEERING INC BENTON ENGINEERING. INC APPLIED &OIL MECHANICS FOUNDATIONS 6717 CONVOY COURT SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92111 PHILIP HENKINO BEN TONCKESIDENT CIVIL ENGINEER TELEPHONE (/I4J So£> I f -i -i SOILS INVESTIGATION Introduction This is to present the result of a soils investigation conducted at the site of a proposed west end addition to the existing Health Spa Building located northwesterly of the intersection of Costa Del Mar and Estrella De Mar at Rancho La Costa in Carlsbad, California. The objectives of this investigation were to determine the existing soil conditions and physical properties of the soils in order that recommendations for the safe and economical design of footings for the proposed addition may be presented. In order to accomplish these objectives, three borings were drilled, undisturbed and loose soil samples were obtained for laboratory testing. Field Investigation The three borings were drilled 30 inches in diameter with a truck-mounted rotary bucket- type drill rig at the approximate locations shown on the attached Drawing No. 1, entitled "Loc- ation of Test Borings" that was revised to show the recent borings. Also shown on this drawing are the locations of four borings previously drilled and included in our report under Project No. 64-10-9A. The three recent borings were drilled to a depth of 15.0 feet below the existing ground surface. A continuous log of the soils encountered in these borings was recorded at the time of drilling and is shown in detail on Drawing Nos. 2 to 4, inclusive, each entitled "Summary Sheet." -2- The soils were visually classified by field identification procedures in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification Chart. A simplified description of this classification system is presented in the attached Appendix A at the end of this report. Undisturbed samples were obtained at frequent intervals in the soils ahead of the drilling. The drop weight used for driving the sampling tube into the soils was the "Kelly" bar of the drill rig which weighs 2200 pounds, and the average drop was 12 inches. The general procedure used in field sampling are described under "Sampling" in Appendix B. Laboratory Tests Laboratory tests were performed on all undisturbed samples of the soils in order to deter- mine the dry density and moisture content. The results of these tests are presented on Drawing Nos. 2 to 4, inclusive. Consolidation tests weie performed on representative samples in ordei to determine the load-settlement characteristics of the soils and the results of these tests are pre- sented graphically on Drawing No. 5 entitled "Consolidation Curve." Direct shear tests were performed on selected undisturbed samples that were all saturated and drained prior to testing. The results of these tests are presented below: Boring 1 , Sample 1 Depth: 2.0 Feet Boring 2 , Sample 1 Depth: 2.0 Feet Normal Load in kips/sq ft 0.5 1.0 2.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 Maximum Shear Load kips/sq ft 0.54 1.12 1.34 4.23 5.41 5.21 Angle of Internal Friction Degrees 28.0 33.0 Apparent Cohesion Ib/sq ft 280 3900 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC -3- The general procedures used for the laboratory tests are described briefly in Appendix B. Compaction tests were performed on representative samples of the soils below existing fills to establish compaction criteria. The soils were tested according to the A.S.T.M. D 1557-70 method of compaction which uses 25 blows of a 10 pound rammer dropping 18 Inches on each of 5 layers in a 4 inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot mold. The results of the tests are piesented as follows: Maximum Optimum Mois- Boring Bag Depth Soil Dry Density ture Content No. Sample in Feet Description Ib/cu ft % dry wt 1 2 2.0-3.0 Si I ty fine sand with 123.3 11.0 some clay binder DISCUSS1ON,CONCLUS1ONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Soil Strata At Boring 1, a medium firm fill was found undeilying a 2-inch thickness of asphalt pavement to a depth of 1.0 foot. The fill soils consisted of clayey fine to medium sand and the mixture of clayey fine sand and fine sandy clay. The fill was underlain by a medium firm silty fine sand with clay binder to 3.7 feet in depth and merged to compact slightly silty fine sand to the end of boring 15.0 feet. At Boring 2, a 2-inch thickness of asphalt pavement was underlain by a medium firm clayey fine to medium sand and fine to medium sandy clay fill to a depth of 1.5 feet. Below this depth, a very firm clayey fine sand was found to 2.8 feet in depth that was underlain by a very compact slightly silty fine to medium sand to 3.7 feet and by a very compact fine to coarse sand to a depth of 8.5 feet. Below 8.5 feet, a very compact and slightly clayey fine to coarse sand with approximately 10 to 25 percent gravel to 2 inches in diameter was found to a depth of 13.0 feet and then merged to very firm silty fine sand to 14.0 feet that was undeilain by a very compact slightly silty fine sand to the end of boring at 15.0 feet. BENTON ENGINEERING INC -4- At Boring 3, a soft to medium firm clayey fine sand was found to a depth of 1.5 feet. This was underlain by a compact gravelly fine to coarse sand to 3.5 feet, a very compact fine to coarse sand to 6.0 feet, a veiy compact gravelly slightly clayey fine to coarse sand to 12.0 feet, and then merged to very compact and slightly silry fine sand to the end of boring at 15.0 feet. No ground water was encountered in any of the borings drilled. Conclusions It is concluded from the results of field explorations and laboratory tests that the pro- posed construction site is covered with an existing fill to the depths of 1.0 foot and 1.5 feet, respectively, in the areas of Boiings 1 and 2. Also, a soft topsoil of clayey fine sand was found to a depth of 0.5 foot in the areas of Boring 3. These existing fill soils and the soft topsails are unsuitable for footings under present conditions. Recommendations 1. Foundation Bearing Soils It is recommended that all footings be deepened through the existing fills and the soft topsails, and be placed at least one foot into the underlying bearing soils. The recommended bearing soils are the medium firm silly fine sand found below a depth of 1.0 foot in the area of Boring 1, the very firm clayey sand found below a depth of 1.5 feet in the area of Boring 2 and the medium firm clayey fine sand found below a depth of 0.5 foot in the area of Boring 3. 2. Allowable Bearing Values Allowable bearing values of 3500 pounds per square foot and 2200 pounds per square foot may be used for a 2-foot wide square footing and a 1 -foot wide continuous footing, respect- ively, that are placed 1 foot into the recommended bearing soils. The recommended minimum widths of square footing and continuous footing are 1 foot and 2 feet, respectively. The allow- able bearing values may be Increased at a rate of 400 pounds per square foot for each additional BENTON ENGINEERING INC -5- foot of depth below 1 foot for both types of footings. For each additional foot of width at the same elevations, the allowable bearing values may be increased at the rates of 100 pounds per square foot and 120 pounds per square foot, respectively, for the square footings and the con- tinuous footings. The recommended maximum allowable bearing value is 4500 pounds per square foot for both types of footings. The bearing values are for dead plus live loads and may be in- creased one-third for combined dead, live and seismic loadings. 3. Settlements Laboratory test results indicate that total settlements of a one foot wide continuous footing and a 2-foot widesquaie footing placed and designed as recommended are estimated to be on the order of 1/8 inch and 1/4 inch, respectively. 4. Grading and Concrete Slab at Grade In view of the fact that there is a difference in elevation of approximately 3 feet between Boring 1 area in the north and Borings 2 and 3 areas in the south, it is assumed that some grading will be required to provide a level base for the floor slabs on ground. It Is not known whether grading plans contemplate cutting the higher ground, or filling the lower ground. In either case, it is recommended that the existing asphalt concrete pavement be removed. Also, the upper ex- isting fills found in the areas of Borings 1 and 2, and the upper 0.5 foot of soft topsoil in the area of Boring 3 should be removed. In the fill area, the exposed surface should be scarified to a depth of 0.5 foot, moistened or dried as necessary to optimum, and then be recompacted with the excavated soils augumented by select nonexpansive soils properly compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density per A.S.T.M. D 1557-70 method of compaction to proposed finished grade. This method of compact- ion requires the use of 25 blows of a 10 pound hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 layers in a 4 inch diameter mold. Only those excavated soils that are free from asphalt con- crete fragments and are nonexpansive should be recompacted under the proposed building prism. BENTON ENGINEERING INC -6- In the cut area/ the exposed excavated surfaces should also be scarified to a depth of 0.5 foot below proposed subgrade elevation, and should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density. If the site is so prepared/ concrete slabs at giade may be placed directly upon the nonexpansive compacted filled ground or the in-place nonexpansive soils comparable to rhe re- commended bearing soils. The concrete slabs on grade may be reinforced with 6x6 - 10/10 welded wire fabric/ if this is considered desirable from the structural standpoint to reduce the possibility of cracking. It is recommended that the select nonexpansive soils meet the following criteria: (a) It shall be a silty sand/ clayey sand/ or sand soil type. (b) It shall have no more than 40 percent passing the No. 200 sieve size. Also/ at least 50 percent shall pass the No. 4 sieve size and it shall contain no gravel larger than 3 inches. (c) The expansion of a one inch high sample of the minus No. 10 material remolded to 90 percent of maximum dry density and then air dried for two days at 105 P/ then loaded to 150 pounds per square foot and sat- urated, shall not exceed two percent. (d) The soil when compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density shall have an allowable bearing value of not less than 2000 pounds per square foot for footings placed 1 foot below the lowest adjacent final compacted ground surface. The grading operations should be conducted under continuous engineering inspection and be in accordance with the applicable sections of the attached Appendix AA/ entitled "Standard Specifications For The Placement Of Compacted Filled Ground." BENTON ENGINEERING INC -7- 3. Footings In Compacted Nonexpanslve Filled Ground Footings may also be placed partly in the compacted nonexpansive filled ground and partly in the in-place recommended bearing soils if proposed finished grades require sufficient thickness of filled ground above existing grade. An allowable bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used for footings placed 1 foot below the lowest adjacent final compacted filled ground if the compacted filled ground is placed as recommended and the minimum widths of both square footing and continuous footing described in Section 1 are maintained. If footings are to be supported partly by the in-place natural soils and partly by the compacted filled ground, then all exterior and interior footings should be reinforced and interconnected continuously with steel bars in order to minimize differential movements between the portions supported on com- pacted fills and those poitions supported by the natural soils. 4. Lateral Resistance Lateral forces exerted on the structure by wind and seismic forces may be resisted by sliding friction on the bottom of the footings in connection with the passive pressures developed by the soils around the footings. The safe passive resistance on the sides of footings cast against undisturbed in-place soils may be assumed to be equal to 460 pounds per square foot at the sur- face of bearing soils and may be increased at a rate of 135 pounds per square foot for each addi- tional foot of depth into the bearing soils. For footings placed in the compacted filled ground, an allowable bearing value of 200 pounds per square foot may be used at a depth of 1.0 foot below the lowest adjacent compacted final ground and this may be increased at a late of 200\ pounds per square foot for each additional foot of depth below 1.0 foot. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC -8- A fricMona! coefficient of 0.4 may be used for friction between the bottoms of concrete footings and the supporting in-place soils or compacted fills. Respectfully submitted, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. S. H. Shu, Civil Engineer Reviewed by PhTlip H'f Ben ton, Civil Engineer Distr: (5) La Costa Land Company Attention: Mr. Irv Roston BENTON ENGINEERING INC REVISED -4-<B- 73, CHANGED PROPOSED B UI L. DINQ TO EXISTING BUU-OIMG AHO SAM DI£GO COUNTY TO CASH-SHAD, PROPOSED ADD/TIOH, T£ST B O ft I A/ <S S /, a., »J fKOJ£<=T /VO 73-4-3A EX/ST//VG BUILDING gk Indicates Approximate Location of Test Boring Project /Vo 73-4-9A • - /AfO/CArfS LOCAT/OfS Of TfST BO&/MGS P /? O i/£ C /" NO 64-tO-3 SC/Hif BU/L.D/MG (JAf/T CAf9L£ BAO PROJECT NO<s-jr - to - ^A 73 - 4 - 3>A BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. DRAWING NO oQcn Ul•5 I 2 OB O p DEPTH/FEETi 2- 3- 4 - 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15-SAMPLENUMBER J1 © 2 3 © ©SOILCLASSIFICATIONSYMBOL• - . •i 1 \2 SUMMARY .SHEET BORING NO ] ELEVATION 44.71' * INCHES THICK s. Brown, Moist, Medium Firm l\ \Dark \ Firm Brown, Moist, Medium Mottled Gray-brown, Light Brown, Light Gray, And Orange i Moist, Medium Firm, Clay Binder \ Lenses of Clayey Fine Sand And \Caliche, Slightly Porous I\ \ Light Gray-brown to Light Gray jDry to Slightly Moist, Compact, 1 Micaceous, Lenses of Fine Sand 11 Occasional Medium Grains i Occasional Lenses of Clayey \f\ne Sand Slightly Moist to Moist Lenses of Silty Fine Sand PROJECT NO 73-4-9A O '**> * A.C. PAVING / CLAYEY FINE TO > MEDIUM SAND /I CLAYEY FINE / SAND AND FINE/ SANDY CLAY / SILTY FINE SAND SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE SAND DRIVE ENERGYFT KIPS/FT6.6 8.8 15.4 17.6 13.2 UJf- ul 5° 10.4 8.1 13.1 3.8 3.6 DRY DENSITYLBS/CU FT01.6 96.9 101.4 95.3 89.8 SHEARRESISTANCEKIPS/SQ FT1 FILL 1 - Indicates Loose Bag Sample - Indicates Undisturbed Drive Sample - Indicates Sample Not Recovered - Elevations Shown Were Furnished By Rick Engineering Company DRAWING NO BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. 2 j :• i i y DEPTH/FEETV 1- 9 .f. 3- 5- 7- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- - -SAMPLENUMBER 1© 1 © ©SOILCLASSIFICATIONSYMBOLIH - s \Bn \B SUMMARY SHEET BORING NO 2 ELEVATION 41 .70' 2 INCHES THICK 3wn, Moist, Medium Firm, ase Material \ Dark Brown, Moist, Medium Firm \ Brown to Gray, Moist, Very \Firm, Porous, Rootlets 1 Light Brown to Light Gray, I Slightly Moist, Very Compact, \Porous, Friable 1 Orange-brown, Slightly Moist, i\ Very Compact, Occasional u Gravel to 2 Inches, Friable 1 Moist, Lenses of Slightly 1 1 Clayey Fine Sand, Micaceous 11 , 1 P \ClayBinder Red-orange-brown, Very Moist, Ve G C ar S ;ry Compact, Occasional ravel to 2 Inches, Lenses of layey Fine to Coarse Sand id Gravelly Fine to Coarse and With 10 to 25 Percent ^ GravelV 1 v \ b 'el low-brown to Orange- rown, Moist, Very Firm \ * • " \ Light Gray to Light Brown, \ Slightly Moist, Very Compact wm° A.C. PAVING / CLAYEY FINE TOy MEDIUM SAND / FINE TO MEDIUM SANDY CLAY / (Merges) / CLAYEY FINE / SAND / SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 1 FINE TO COARSE SAND (Merges) , SLIGHTLY CLAYEY FINE TO COARSE SAND SILTY FINE SAND / SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE SAND J DRIVE ENERGYFT KIPS/FT15.4 •17.6' 13.2 17.6 19.8 FIELDMOISTURE% DRY WT16 ' 6 11 9 .5 .0 .2 .9 5 BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. .7 DRY DENSITYLBS/CU FT01.4 95.8 97.8 95.7 92.5 SHEARRESISTANCEKIPS/SQ FTt "n r—r- 1 DRAWING NO 3 j :> 3 )3 DEPTH/FEET11 2- 3- 4- 5- 6 7- 8- 9- 10- n- 19Iz ia- 14- 15-SAMPLENUMBER |CL) © p»r*\ © ©SOILCLASSIFICATIONSYMBOL» »* » « » » • • • • • • • • • •te . ^ » f £ « » P « V A • •• • < • • • • •4 t * • <4 4 4 A •• V • f »* w f V V • • •• • • • •A f # • % ^ £• A • * # | SUMMARY SHEET BORING NO 3 ELEVATION 41 .70" Gray-Brown, Moist, Soft, \Porous/ Roors, Topsoil Medium Firm White to Lighr Gray And Orange-Brown, SI ighrly Moisf/ Compact/ 20 to 40 Percent Gravel/ Lenses of Fine to ( Medium Sand And Gravelly \Clayey Fine to Coarse Sand Ll£ \Ver Bn 1C M |ht Gray to Orange, Moist, ry Compact, Occasional avei to 2 Inches, Friable awn, Moist, Very Compact, to 20 Percent Gravel, edium Friable Lenses of Very Friable Fine to Coarse Sand Lighr Gray to Yellow-Gray- Brown/ Slightly Moist/ Very Compact/ Micaceous/ Friable - PROJECT NO 73-4-9A CLAYEY FINE SAND GRAVELLY FINE TO COARSE J SAND / FINE TO j COARSE SAND / GRAVELLY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY FINE TO COARSE SAND SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE SAND DRIVE ENERGYFT KIPS/FT8.8 17.6 15.4 11.0 19,8 UJL. 3 = E-"(->•£MCC u. 5° 5s« 12 .8 4.0 8.9 $.$ BENTON ENGINEERING, INC.DRY DENSITYLBS/CU FT94.0 97.2 110.6 94.9 SHEARRESISTANCEKIPS/SQ FTDRAWING NO 4 CONSOLIDATION CURVES 00.2.04 LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT 06 08 10 2 4_ Boring 3 Sample 1 Depth 2' O INDICATES PERCENT CONSOLIDATION AT FIELD MOISTURE • INDICATES PERCENT CONSOLIDATION AFTER SATURATION PROJECT NO. 73-4-9A BENTON ENGINEERING, INC DRAWING NO. 5 BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS FOUNDATIONS 6717 CONVOY COURT SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92111 PHILIP HENKING BENTON PRESIDENT CIVIL ENGINEER TELEPHONE (714) 565 1955 APPENDIX AA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT OF COMPACTED FILLED GROUND 1. General Description. The objective is to obtain uniformity and adequate internal strength in filled ground by proven engineering procedures and tests so that the proposed structures may be safely supported. The procedures include the clearing and grubbing, removal of existing structures, preparation of land to be filled, filling of the land, the spreading, and compaction of the filled areas to conform with the lines, grades, and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. The owner shall employ a qualified soils engineer to inspect and test the filled ground as placed to verify the uniformity of compaction of filled ground to the specified 90 percent of maximum dry density. The soils engineer shall advise the owner and grading contractor immediately if any unsatisfactory conditions are observed to exist and shall have the authority to refect the compacted filled ground until such time that corrective measures are taken necessary to comply with the specifications. It shall be the sole responsibility of the grading contractor to achieve the specified degree of compaction. 2. Clearing, Grubbing, and Preparing Areas to be Filled. (a) All brush, vegetation and any rubbish shall be removed, piled, and burned or other- wise disposed of so as to leave the areas to be filled free of vegetation and debris. Any soft, swampy or otherwise unsuitable areas shall be corrected by draining or removal, or both. (b) The natural ground which is determined to be satisfactory for the support of the filled ground shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least six inches (6"), and until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks, or other uneven features which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. (c) Where fills are made on hillsides or exposed slope areas, greater than 10 percent, horizontal benches shall be cut into firm undisturbed natural ground in order to provide both lateral and vertical stability. This is to provide a horizontal base so that each layer is placed and compacted on a horizontal plane. The initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least 10 feet in width on firm undisturbed natural ground at the eleva- tion of the toe stake placed at the natural angle of repose or design slope. The soils engineer shall determine the width and frequency of all succeeding benches which will vary with the soil conditions and the steepness of slope. APPENDIX AA -2 - (d) After the natural ground has been prepared, it shall then be brought to the proper mois- ture content and compacted to not less than ninety percent of maximum density in accordance with A.S.T.M. D-1557-66T method that uses 25 blows of a 10 pound hammer falling from 18 inches on each of 5 layers in a 4" diameter cylindrical mold of a l/30th cubic foot volume 3. Materials and Special Requirements. The fill soils shall consist of select materials so graded that at least 40 percent of the material passes a No. 4 sieve . This may be obtained from the excavation of banks, borrow pits of any oiher approved sources and by mixing soils from one or more sources The material uses shall be free from vegetable matter, and other de- leterious substances, and shall not contain rocks or lumps of greater than 6 inches in diameter. If excessive vegetation, rocks, or soils with inadequate strength or other unacceptable physical characteristics are encountered, these shall be disposed of in waste areas as shown on the plans or as directed by the soils engineer. If during grading operations, soils not encountered and tested in the preliminary investigation are found, tests on these soils shall be performed to determine their physical characteristics Any special treatment recommended in the preliminary or subsequent soil reports not covered herein shall become an addendum to these specifications. The testing and specifications for the compaction of subgrade,subbase, and base materials for roads, streets, highways, or other public property or righh-of-way shall be in accordance with those of the governmental agency having jurisdiction 4 Placing, Spreading, and Compacting Fill Materials (a) The suitable fill material shall be placed in layers which, when compacted shall not exceed six inches (6"). Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be throughly mixed during the spreading to insure uniformity of mater fa I and moisture in each layer. (b) When the moisture content of the fill material is below that specified by the soils engineer, water shall be added until the moisture content is near optimum as specified by the soils engineer to assure thorough bonding during the compacting process. (c) When the moisture content of the fill material is above that specified by the soils engineer, the fill material shall be aerated by blading and scarifying or other satis- factory methods until the moisture content is near optimum as specified by the soils engineer. (d) After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, It shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than ninety percent of maximum density in accordance with A.S.T.M. D-1557-66T modified as described in 2 (d) above. Compaction shall be accomplished with sheepsfoot rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other approved types of compaction equipment, such as vibratory equipment that is specially designed for certain soil types. Rollers shall be of such design that they will be able BENTON ENGINEERING, INC APPENDIX AA -3- to compact the fill material to the specified density. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is at the specified moisture content. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to insure that the desired density has been obtained. The entire areas to be filled shall be compacted. (e) Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compacting operations shall be continued until the slopes are stable but not too dense for planting and until there is no appreciable amount of loose soil on the slopes. Compacting of the slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling the slopes In Increments of 3 to 5 feet In elevation gain or by other methods producing satisfactory results. (f) Field density tests shall betaken by the soils engineer for approximately each foot in elevation gain after compaction, but not to exceed two feet in vertical height between tests. Field density tests may be taken at intervals of 6 inches in elevation gain if required by the soils engineer. The location of the tests In plan shall be so spaced to give the best possible coverage and shall be taken no farther apart than 100 feet. Tests shall be taken on corner and terrace lots for each two feet In elevation gain. The soils engineer may take additional tests as considered necessary to check on the uniformity of compaction. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the tests shall be taken In the com- pacted material below the disturbed surface. No additional layers of fill shall be spread until the field density tests indicate that the specified density has been obtained. (g) The fill operation shall be continued In six Inch (6") compacted layers, as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and grades as shown on the accepted plans. 5. Inspection. Sufficient Inspection by the soils engineer shall be maintained during the filling and compacting operations so that he can certify that the fill was constructed in accordance with the accepted specifications. 6. Seasonal Limits. No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled If weather conditions increase the moisture content above permissible limits. When the work Is interrupted by rain, fill operations shall not be resumed until field tests by the soils engineer Indicate that the moisture content and density of the fill are as previously specified. 7. Limitlrg Values of Nonexpansive Soils. Those soils that expand 2 .5 percent or less from air dry to saturation under a unit load of 500 pounds per square foot are considered to be nonexpanslve. 8. All recommendations presented in the "Conclusions" section of the attached report are a part of these specifications. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC PHILIP HENKING BENTON PRESIDENT CIVIL ENGINEER BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS FOUNDATIONS 6717 CONVOY COURT SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92111 APPENDIX A Unified Soil Classification Chart* TELEPHONE (714) 369 19BS SOIL DESCRIPTION GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES COARSE GRAINED, More than half of material is larger than No. 200 sieve size.** GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve size but smaller GRAVELS WITH FINES than 3 inches (Appreciable amount of fines) SANDS More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve size CLEAN SANDS SANDS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) II. FINE GRAINED, More than half of material is smaller than No. 200 sieve size.** SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit Less than 50 SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit Greater than 50 III. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines. Poorly graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines. Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel- sand-silt mixtures. Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel- sand-clay mixtures. Well graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines. Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. Silty sands, poorly graded sand-silt mixtures. Clayey sands, poorly graded sand-clay mixtures. Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey-silt-sand mixtures with slight plasticity. Inorganic clays of low to medium plas- ticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. Organic silts and organic silty-clays of low plasticity. Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medium to high plasticity Peat and other highly organic soils. * Adopted by the Corps of Engineers and Bureau of Reclamation in January, 1952. ** All sieve sizes on this chart are U.S. Standard. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS FOUNDATIONS 6717 CONVOY COURT SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92111 PHILIP HENKING BENTON PRESIDENT CIVIL ENGINEER TELEPHONE (714) S6B 19BB APPENDIX B Sampling The undisturbed soil samples are obtained by forcing a special sampling tube info the undisturbed soils at the bottom of the boring, at frequent intervals below the ground surface. The sampling tube consists of a steel barrel 3.0 inches outside diameter, with a special cutting tip on one end and a double ball valve on the other, and with a lining of twelve thin brass rings, each one inch long by 2.42 inches inside diameter. The sampler, connected to a twelve inch long waste barrel, is either pushed or driven approximately 18 inches into the soil and a six inch section of the center portion of the sample is taken for laboratory tests, the soil being still confined in the brass rings, after extraction from the sampler tube. The samples are taken to the laboratory in close fitting waterproof containers in order to retain the field moisture until completion of the tests. The driving energy is calculated as the average energy in foot-kips required to force the sampling tube through one foot of soil at the depth at which the sample is obtained. Shear Tests The shear tests are run using a direct shear machine of the strain control type in which the rate of deformation is approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The machine is so designed that the tests are made without removing the samples from the brass liner rings in which they are secured. Each sample is sheared under a normal load equivalent to the weight of the soil above the point of sampling. In some instances, samples are sheared under various normal loads in order to obtain the internal angle of friction and cohesion. Where considered necessary, samples are saturated and drained before shearing in order to simulate extreme field moisture conditions. Consolidation Tests The apparatus used for the consolidation tests is designed to receive one of the one inch high rings of soil as it comes from the field. Loads are applied in several increments to the upper surface of the test specimen and the resulting deformations are recorded at selected time intervals for each Increment v Generally, each increment of load is maintained on the sample until the rate of deformation is equal to or less than 1/10000 inch per hour. Porous stones are placed in contact with the top and bottom of each specimen to permit the ready addition or release of water. Expansion Tests One inch high samples confined in the brass rings are permitted to air dry at 105° F for at least 48 hours prior to placing into the expansion apparatus. A unit load of 500 pounds per square foot is then applied to the upper porous stone in contact with the top of each sample. Water Is permitted to contact both the top and bottom of each sample through porous stones. Continuous observations are made until downward movement stops. The dial reading is recorded and expansion is recorded until the rate of upward movement is less than 1/10000 inch per hour. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE - 5 C>f CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: X\Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 (457-4985) _ Encinitas Union Elementary 189 Union Street Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4306) Project Applicant: lyQ. Co S Project Address: ,U.fe • San Marcos Unified 207 West San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos, CA 92069 (744-4776) San Dieguito Union High School 625 North Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) APN:- C>1 ) Kdli/" RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area SQ. FT. of covered area Number of dwelling units SQ. FT. of garage area INDUSTRIAL ; SQ. FT. AREA / 7 ^ O Prepared By Date FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 — C Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $ Comm/Indust Fee Levied: $-0— based on based on sq. ft.@ sq. ft.@ 4*V^ScfioolJ Dfs^rf cf Official Title Date AB 2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1.50 per square foot for residential. AB 2926 is capped at $.25 per square foot for commercial/industrial.