Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2290 COSMOS CT; ; CB880166; PermitLENDERf sr 3 S n-1 3 — m "—'{g ra c/) -a S,1!WORKER S COMPENSATION DECLARATIONS OWNER/BUILDER CONTRACTOR— -III l!!:=ii n 1:1 S §s s i 3i 3 > z icate of consentCompensation3800 Labor Coll IMSifllsS- ssSI?Hg?» = S'§S3-31S^°;3- SsgHJ 3 3 Si s §">^^^^"5—?°^2 ^S—^o^Ta^^^ift;?I I Q 31^"o "3==T= °a5-Sg" o"»lPIf^oca0 rimn^si«3n" — °°O-*:=es<gTt-™z)0_ofill|fSB|JSlslifSiilQ-|E5|To||s^^i^^Q-r ~*hereby alfirm that 1 am exemLicense law tor the followingss and Professions Code Any c«a permii to construct alter iany structure prior to its issuanctor such Dermit to file a siqnedpursuant ro tne provisionsLaw [Chapier 9 commencing wit3 ol the Business and Professionserefrom and the basis fot the allegof Section T031 5 by an applicanapplicant to a civil penalty of notllars ($500ode) or lhat iged iionmit(he Con(Sec 70nty wnicdemohsquires 'heni thaiGont.-action 70) or lhatmpiiona Demitman livenicr rehsn or'he apai he is.-acto' sofCO White — Inspector Green — (1) Finance Yellow — Assessor Pink — Applicant Gold — Temporary File r DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Print And Fill In Shaded Area Only / JOB ., 'ADDRESS <^ / 3 ~ C?S O "" ^Hr ; ASSESSOR'S „ _.„ . i PARCEL NO Z2>tO COSMOS CrT i! OWNER ^/Cy^fj^e^ ~L^-:>~>eJ o/?^v\cJor C^f) , OWNER'S 1 ; MAILING ( / . i. ADDRESS Z.O \O 1 /•^e*A*-\l4Tj-is^ A<v& S>Ae- IbOC* C-TY-T^V*-^ C-Z'P ^OSDZ-TEL/hOs/^-nr CONTRACTOR '•• CONTRACTOR'S i MAILING [ ADDRESS I CITY ZIP TEL STATE BUSINESS LICENSE NO LICENSE NO ^ Xx li LEGAL DESCRIPTION p> lA/V | j <5"&°1 m c^-T 73- ^vn 6o4 S" ^%^ ^ DESCRIPTION OF WORK ^»<4O- /^jc^v.^J^ ^^/ GfJfc,Pi ' j *• V i\T r r CONTACT PERSON (^JL^^ A>Vf^ 0£ ClO^r^_ fl u 0 :y | ADDRESS X. (^'j/vO^rcJrC- lcA./>ld-, * I. ; I. i PLAN ID NO Cr^'KRrOl^t OOii 02/03 0101 OSMisc. 2883-00 > VALIDATION AREA FSTMATFO VAI IIATION /&@i &$* P, AM P.HFP.K FFF 001-8100000-8821 ^^^ IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES WILL BE FORFEITED 3466%^ fe "^ ^^ , \VVicvVs^v1-- --I ttTi^t^^r ^?FCK IF SUBMITTED t; .g^^^^ENERGY CALCS ^^ZjjS^^ 2 1987 ENERGY CALCS " FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS ^f^^ 2 STRUCTURAL CALCS [3^^ 2 SOILS REPORTS Q 2 SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPES DATE GIVEN/ DATE SENT TO APPLICANT LA COSTA LETTER SCHOOL FEE FORM P & E CORRECTIONS LIST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPLICANT'SCSJG NATURE I '/DATE White File Yellow Applicant Pink Finance Gold Assessor DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Print And Fill In Shaded Area Only JOB < ADDRESS ^2i^-^O (2&C/£<}£ C&lSA-T^- ASSESSOR'S „ xX ; PARCEL NO C*Y<3 ~~ O -"-> <-J " ^X i OWNER /^O''~'&/ ^2),£r£/ £10. ' OWNER'S ! MAILING , !; ADDRESS £^20/O/ /ty&W^'/Z?^ .X^'d^ • ^Jyfe&Q CITY^S^C*^ <*- ZIP ^^Zt.2 TEL^^-^-^,^ CONTRACTOR >*,rs _ -v .- / ''• CONTRACTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS ^•••*'£/& &*~ CITY ZIP TEL STATE x / BUSINESS LICENSE NO ^^7<5/P?^ LICENSE NO SURDIVIRION LOT(.Q) -^ LEGAL DESCRIPTION +*r* A*** ?3-S? OF WORK // r\jp_\f i ^ ^3^ T\ c20 f1"1 i TL-MJ^ ; CONTACT PERSON /^Z^^'JT <S'7r<£f?&* c. <£- / \ ' ADDRESS ^*#j#'&'r s$£ '/&£& ' t'^. : CITY ZIP TEL i ^/ vu / (^u / / / PLAN ID NO xT^- / / rf [/ i — () uu CS*T O V\Hi\f &r~~~ — 1612 08/30/88 0001 01 05 Hisc 195.45 VALIDATIOril AREA FRTMATFn VAI IIATinivl ' P, AM HMFP-K FFF 001810-00008821 IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES WILL BE FORFEITED / £~* JA i /o ?• — * . T^ — ^r I ^7 c^ / CHECK IF SUBMITTED ^ 2 ENERGY CALCS n 2 1987 ENERGY CALCS ^ FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS ^ 2 STRUCTURAL CALCS D 2 SOILS REPORTS G 2 SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPES ' DATE GIVEN/ nATF SENT TO APPLICANT LA COSTA LETTER SCHOOL FEE FORM P & E CORRECTIONS LIST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE White - File Yellow Applicant Pink - Finance Gold - Assessor FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS PROJECT NO TYPE OF UNIT CONTACT PERSON. CONTACT TELEPHONE. 389166 DATE 2290 CQsnos C<t UNIT NUMBER NUMBER OF UNITS PHASE NO Rich J531-92S1 a81 dept INSPECTED BY INSPECTED BY INSPECTED BY DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS Rev 1/86 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities PINK Planning GOLD Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS PROJECT NO TYPE OF UNIT CONTACT PERSON. CONTACT TELEPHONE 8801SS DATE 2290 Cosnos Ct .UNIT NUMBER PHASE NO NUMBER OF UNITS PJdh &31-92S1 11-13-8G/11-21I-S i ail dealt / INSPECTED/^, J/ », BY ^^/^^X INSPECTED BY INSPECTED BY / ir^ DATE WAW p 9 lOftfi .^"^^ INSPECTED " ' APPROVED • DISAPPROVED ' DATE INSPECTED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE INSPECTED APPROVED' DISAPPROVED, COMMENTS ..... ';-cai Municipal Water Distr;c! Engnieoiing Depailiuent (619)438-3367 Rev 1/86 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities PINK Planning GOLD Fire PLAN CHECK NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS PROJECT NO TYPE OF UNIT CONTACT PERSON. CONTACT TELEPHONE. FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION 0001(56 RECEIVED uO/2 1 DATE n-10-08 200 .UNIT NUMBER NUMBER OF UNITS .PHASE NO Rich Q31-3261 INSPECTED^ INSPECTED BY INSPECTED BY DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS Rev 1/86 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities PINK Planning GOLD Fire "V •v^'-, 4,-r-.- -.-<~>- r- FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS 88016® PROJECT NO TYPE OF UNIT CONTACT PERSON CONTACT TELEPHONE. DATE Cosmos Ct UNIT NUMBER PHASE NO she88 bSd-a NUMBER OF UNITS Rich 031-9261 ail! INSPECTED BY INSPECTED BY INSPECTED BY DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS Rev 1/86 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities PINK Planning GOLD Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS PROJECT NO TYPE OF UNIT CONTACT PERSON. CONTACT TELEPHONE. 880166 DATE 3290 Cosmos Ct .UNIT NUMBER COMM Tt NUMBER OF UNITS PHASE NO Rich 131-9261 btdq, engin, plan, fina. H2o T1-18-88 INSPECTS BY INSPECTED BY INSPECTED BY DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED APPROVED J APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS ^mi'^• •••.••^•<- Rev 1/86 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities PINK Planning GOLD Fire ^^*%a%^ FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS PROJECT NO TYPE OF UNIT CONTACT PERSON. CONTACT TELEPHONE. 880166 DATE 11-18-88 2290 CtHnos Ct UNIT NUMBER NUMBER OF UNITS PHASE NO Rich 431-9261 ail dept INSPECl BY _UL INSPECTED BY DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED DATE INSPECTED APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS Rev 1/86 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities PINK Planning GOLD Fire Citj> of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR fl t<*Sf PERMIT NO TIME OWNER ^~ ' &) ,£) ,f ADDRESS C^ofay^ £ ^^2^'^Z^---^' (—^-''f/' REQUESTED BY /^/ C* — ^- ^ PHONE NO /Jl5/ ^ C?-^> S BUILDING G FOUNDATION G FOOTING C SLAB G REINFORCING STEEL G MASONRY G GROUT GUNITE G FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME /G SHEATHING G ROOF G SHEAR IT/ FRAME LJ EXTERIOR LATH G INSULATION jQ—M LJ INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL ID FINAL ^ PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING 11 SEWER AND PL/CO G TOP OUT PLUMBING G TUB OR SHOWER PAN G GAS TEST Z WATER HEATER G SOLAR WATER C FINAL V ••^ PERSON TAKING REPOR^^e^a^ ELECTRICAL Z TEMPORARY SERVICE G UFFER GROUND Z ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND G ROUGH ELECTRIC - prxu-««wnTnK , "^ ^^-^L^ MISCELLANEOUS u CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS Z SOLAR HEAT G PATIO G POOL Z SPA G SIGN ~ GRADING D DRIVEWAY G FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection G Monday GAM G PM G Tuesday G Wednesday Thursday f riday €itp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR OWNER. 7/^M-^ BUILDING i I REINFORCING STEEL n MASONRY D GROUT Gl/NlTE U FLOOR Ar/D CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING t/ROO£ 11 SHEAR U FRAME ' ~ EXTERIOR G INSULATION G INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL D FINAL ELECTRICAL ~: TEMPORARY SERVICE : 1 UFFER GROUND n ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND D ROUGH ELECTRIC' PLUMBING U UNDERGROUND PLUMBING U SEWER AND PL/CO Z TOP OUT PLUMBING D TUB OR SHOWER PAN fl GAS TEST L WATER HEATER n SOLAR WATER U FINAL D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS l.!l SOLAR HEAT C PATIO D POOL U SPA LJ SIGN D GRADING D DRIVEWAY D FINAL <?-%& SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection n Monday DAM D PM ;'J Wednesday D Thursday D Friday Citp of Cartefcao REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD >*=-= ' xf ^ -~ —s l 1, ^>J ^ INSPECTOR f f^^^/^C^l & PERMIT NO TIME HATF X~//-ZK OWNFR /^ /? __/__ RFOIJFRTEDBY/XX//^^ — (&(l/[ Gt-^t & ^*< RHONE NO V,"5/ /(^&>/ A/f J BUILDING 1 ] REINFORCING STEEL n MASONRY • 1 GROUT GUNITE ; : FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING 1 ROOF U SHEAR n FRAME ry EXTERIOR LATH -^f- •TrTRTERIOR LATHER DRYWALL n FINAL PLUMBING J UNDERGROUND PLUMBING H SEWER AND PL/CO r TOP OUT PLUMBING ;;j TUB OR SHOWER PAN 3 GAS TEST :.! WATER HEATER •2 SOLAR WATER C FINAL fr^f-/ t-X_^ ^C ^ 1 PERSON TAKING REPORTx/^^^" ELECTRICAL :.l TEMPORARY SERVICE H UFFER GROUND : J ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND T ROUGH ELECTRIC G POOL BONDING G ELECTRIC SERVICE G FINAL ^^^ / /] /} &S &*~sfc / / *** Sf r& / / g--/y^- /^^ MISCELLANEOUS G CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS !J SOLAR HEAT C PATIO G POOL G SPA G SIGN I! GRADING L DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection D Monday DAM U PM G Tuesday G Wednesday G Thursday Cttp 0f Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD A-s J INSPECTOR V £*—'£-> PERMIT NO TIME ^. HATP V~/ b OWNER /x-) ADDRESS /\) , C3-^<^N- / £) ( ^x(^-C2-^>^--6-«^ REQUESTED BY (fOM*JL PHONE NO </3/ — '3-&/ PERSON TAKING REPORT WV_ " BUILDING Z FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB _' REINFORCING STEEL D MASONRY U GROUT GUNITE ~ FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME Ti SHEATHING L ROOF .: SHEAR - FRAME Bl^rtA- to \ " EXTERIOR LATH /O 1 ; D INSULATION /L*^-4^^ : : INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL ri FINAL J2JL //' ELECTRICAL^7 G TEMPORARY SERVICE U UFFER GROUND .iX^LECTRIC UNDERGROUND H ROUGH ELECTRIC T POOL BONDING J ELECTRIC SERVICE L FINAL - ~ x G-/?r&~&^ PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING D SEWER AND PL/CO :j TOP OUT PLUMBING LI TUB OR SHOWER PAN H GAS TEST r, WATER HEATER Ll SOLAR WATER C FINAL MISCELLANEOUS T CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS I 1 SOLAR HEAT ._ PATIO .' POOL D SPA L SIGN II GRADING D DRIVEWAY Z FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Ready For Inspections • Monday^ u AM D PM D Tuesday _. Wednesday _ Thursday D Friday Cttp of Cartebao REQUEST FOFUNSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR. OWNER Jfotr TIME PERMIT NO xO ^r ADDRESS BUILDING .Z FOUNDATION C FOOTINC ^REINFORCING STEEL • : MASONRY .:: GROUT GUNITE u FLOOR AND CEILIN? J SHEATHING U ROOF : : SHEAR _ FRAME D EXTERIOR LATH ~1 INSULATION H INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL LI FINAL ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE H UFFER GROUND 12- ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND =E-CTRIC D POOL BONDING :: ELECTRIC SERVICE ~ FINAL PLUMBING ~1 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING L SEWER AND PL/CO '-J TOP OUT PLUMBING H TUB OR SHOWER PAN Z GAS TEST U WATER HEATER ;..: SOLAR WATER ! : FINAL MISCELLANEOUS ~1 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS - SOLAR HEAT r: PATIO U POOL T SPA Z SIGN ~ GRADING I.! DRIVEWAY H FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection fl Monday GAM LJ P M G Tuesday '.i Wednesday L.i Thursday Citj> of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTO OWNER ADDRESS U TEMPORARY SERVICE ER GROUND LECTRIC UNC8ERGROUND ROUGH ELEC/RIC POOLONDING SERVICE D FOUNDATION H REINFORCINP^STEEL MASONRY LJ GROUT GllNITE D FLOOR AND'S^ILING SHEATHING D RO( C FRAME LJ EXTERIOR LATH n INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL n FINAL PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING G SEWER AND PL/CO D TOP OUT PLUMBING C TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER G FINAL MISCELLANEOUS D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS D SOLAR HEAT D PATIO 'c: POOL n SPA ID SIGN D GRADING D DRIVEWAY I] FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection n Monday DAM D PM D Tuesday D Thursday D Friday Citp of Carteimb REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTO OWNER _ PERMIT NO TIME .DATE /!? /D -.g- X/ ADDRESS REQUESTED!PHONE NO BUILDING D FOUNDATION Z FOOTING D SLAB n REINFORCING STEEL Z MASONRY J GROUT GUNITE Z FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME Z SHEATHING Z ROOF n SHEAR D FRAME n EXTERIOR LATH r: INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL LI FINAL PERSON TAKING REPORT ELECTRICAL Zl TEMPORARY SERVICE Z UFFER GROUND Z ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND D ROUGH ELECTRIC a POOL BONDING ^-ELECTRIC** LI FINAL ^5fe- PLUMBING :~l UNDERGROUND PLUMBING n SEWER AND PL/CO n TOP OUT PLUMBING ~ TUB OR SHOWER PAN T GAS TEST 1 1 WATER HEATER i ! SOLAR WATER U FINAL MISCELLAEOUS C CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS H SOLAR HEAT Z PATIO n POOL r SPA : : SIGN C GRADING II DRIVEWAY Z FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection Z Monday DAM C PM C Tuesday Wednesday n Thursday Friday City of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR. OWNER ADDRESS _ REQUESTED /_ .PERMIT NO TIMT~ . DATE- PHONE NO V L? /- PERSON TAKING BUILDING PI REINFORCING STEEL U MASONRY I ! GROUT GUNITE I ' FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME T SHEATHING D ROOF I 1 SHEAR U FRAME LJ EXTERIOR LATH I 1 INSULATION G INTERIOR LATH OR H FINAL ELECTRICAL Z TEMPORARY SERVICE 7! UFFER GROUND ! 1 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND D ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING -H-E4ECTRIC SERVICE /PLUMBING [.: UNDERGROUND PLUMBING D SEWER AND PL/CO ::; TOP OUT PLUMBING U TUB'OR SHOWER PAN r. GAS TEST H WATER HEATER D SO'LAR WATER U FINAL MISCELLANEOUS L CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS n SOLAR HEAT U PATIO D POOL Z! SPA D SIGN D GRADING U DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection % Monday DAM DPI LJ Tuesday LJ Wednesday ~. Thursday Friday Cttp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR OWNER TIME PERMIT NO r/ XI ADDRESS REQUESTED BY PHONE NO BUILDING D FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB n REINFORCING STEEL D MASONRY D GROUT GUNITE D FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME n SHEATHING D ROOF D SHEAR ~. FRAME U EXTERIOR LATH n INSULATION u INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL T FINAL PLUMBING u UNDERGROUND PLUMBING I I SEWER AND PL/CO LI TOP OUT PLUMBING n TUB OR SHOWER PAN [~i GAS TEST L I WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER (.-] FINAL PERSON TAKING REPO (^ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE Z UFFER GROUND D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND nROJJOtLELECTRIC H POOL BONING ELECTRIC i MISCELLANEOUS iH CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS "! SOLAR HEAT il PATIO G POOL D SPA a SIGN n GRADING D DRIVEWAY H FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection U AM n PM D Tuesday D Wednesday Thursday D Friday Cttp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR /£^PFRMITNO f&V£TIME .DATE ~7~^rf OWNER.xO ADDRESS REQUESTED BY,•/{, 'PJc-( (~0^_/??JS PHONE NO BUILDING LJ FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB L REINFORCING STEEL D MASONRY D GROUT GUNITE n FLOOR AND CEIWNG SUB FRAME U SHEATHIN/G EROOF D SHEAR :1 FRAME LJ EXTERIOR ^ INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL - FINAL PLUMBING U UNDERGROUND PLUMBING l~i SEWER AND PL/CO n TOP OUT PLUMBING U TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST r: WATER HEATER n SOLAR WATER :.! FINAL PERSON TAKING REPORT/A,XJ(<^X?S?' ELECTRICAL" D TEMPORARY SERVICE :_~; UFFER GROUND ~\ ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND U ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING H ELECTRIC SERVICE II FINAL MISCELLANEOUS D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS Z SOLAR HEAT n PATIO 'I POOL ~ SPA D SIGN Z GRADING D DRIVEWAY ~ FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection D Monday QAM D PM D Tuesday D Wednesday D Thursday LJ Friday Citp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR OWNER . PERMIT NO TIME .DATE ADDRESS REQUESTED! C BUILDING Z FOUNDATION ~ FOOTING C SLAB C REINFORCING STEEL Z MASONRY LI GROUT GUNITE r FLOOR ANlb CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING^ ROOF D SHEAR U FRAME "~ n EXTERIOR L D INSULATION n INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL ~ FINAL NO PERSON TAKING ELECTRICAL ~: TEMPORARY SERVICE Z UFFER GROUND _ ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND F ROUGH ELECTRIC G POOL BONDING D ELECTRIC SERVICE D FINAL PLUMBING ~ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING - SEWER AND PL/CO u TOP OUT PLUMBING D TUB OR SHOWER PAN G GAS TEST LJ WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER = FINAL MISCELLANEOUS Z CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS ;_ SOLAR HEAT Z PATIO D POOL n SPA J SIGN Z GRADING Z DRIVEWAY r FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection D Monday DAM C PM ( j2SJuesday/ - Wednesday D Thursday ~l Friday ^- '—^"^ Citp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR (/ A"/^ PERMIT NO TIME DATF 5~~ 3 I -~45a OWNER ^ ADDRESS s\ ZL'3. Jti /'vtya-y?*-*-*-' RFOUESTEDBY V^J^J^Jfr^ PHONE NO 4f_? /— *? c3- 4 / r> PERSON TAKING REPORT \J^\C • BUILDING : REINFORCING STCEL i ' MASONRY " GROUT GUNITE ! 1 FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME : : SHEATHING D ROOF 'C SHEAR n FRAME i i EXTERIOR LATH n INSULATION ili INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL / _ FINAL (•> A//)£ !/^ \ // * ELECTRICAL * D TEMPORARY SERVICE L UFFER GROUND U ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND :~! ROUGH ELECTRIC n POOL BONDING f: ELECTRIC SERVICE £ FINAL lh$ r\ <?&1 } ^ , I'® \Jf^ (/ ' PLUMBING [' UNDERGROUND PLUMBING n SEWER AND PL/CO n TOP OUT PLUMBING !~l TUB OR SHOWER PAN II GAS TEST L" WATER HEATER U SOLAR WATER n FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS-/!: MISCELLANEOUS D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS G SOLAR HEAT D PATIO r POOL i: SPA n SIGN I: GRADING n DRIVEWAY II.I FINAL Ready For Inspection L Monday LI A M U P M l_l Tuesday <^j_We£nesday~~\ D Thursday IJ Friday City of Carls&ab ^^^ REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECOR INSPECTOR ' ' LA-/ L_ PERMIT NO u - — TIME DATF. '*5~~-^?''<£-S OWNER xT9 - ,g ADDRESS /x"*") j j/ I £-^ ^^^/Z£s (—^"^ & S&£& & vZ~*^Ls * REQUESTED ^^^7/^f^J^-^t^- ]&/j£^/~~?7l&' ',£. — ONE NO ^-- ~--- ^ PERSON TAKING REPtj^Kpfe^^g^ ) BUILDING D FOUNDATION n FOOTING i" SLAB n REINFORCING STEEL LI MASONRY I 1 GROUT GUNITE " FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME : : SHEATHING 7" ROOF J_ SHEAR i FRAME U EXTERIOR LATH D INSULATION P INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL ' n FINAL ^ y*u9 ^V ^*s ^.f ^t^* ^ ~ *^f PLUMBING : i UNDERGROUND PLUMBING ! SEWER AND PL/CO l~ TOP OUT PLUMBING ~1 TUB OR SHOWER PAN <7^T -^ /^ 71 GAS TEST I! WATER HEATER ^— .^? H SOLAR WATER C FINAL /- ^S6- u <-( ,c 7^2>c ELECTRICAL C TEMPORARY SERVICE 1 : UFFER GROUND L ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 1 i ROUGH ELECTRIC n POOL BONDING PI ELECTRIC SERVICE 7 n FINAL /i x? x /nx? • T // j? s f S Jy </£&*- ''f7~z6£ .J /? v j^Z^£&^f"^^ f :&> s&? <& '&? MISCELLANEOUS U CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS D SOLAR HEAT U PATIO _ POOL H SPA r SIGN (1 GRADING '.'] DRIVEWAY : i FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Ready For Inspection C Monday U AM U PM Citp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR, OWNER ~7fa^PERMIT NO ADDRESS REQUESTED BY -42ZcJt^-HONE PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING D SEWER AND PL/CO C"J TOP OUT PLUMBING D TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER D FINAL PERSON TAKING REPO BUILDING / ( / D FOUNDATION C FOOTING ^(SLAB n REINFORCING STEEL / ^_J^V<^ u MASUNHV - xf D GROUT GUNITE & Q FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME u SHEATHING D ROOF Z SHEAR D FRAME ,S2v4^ G EXTERIOR LATH U INSULATION /7/^2" /• D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL ,«, D FINAL &'* 1 ? 1 ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE D UFFER GROUND D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND D ROUGH ELECTRIC U POOL BONDING U ELECTRIC SERVICE D FINAL ^< MISCElLANEOjUS fJ CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS n SOLAR HEAT D PATIO D POOL D SPA n SIGN C GRADING C DRIVEWAY C FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection n Monday DAM D PM D Tuesday D Wednesday r, Thursday Cttp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR. OWNER PERMIT NO TIME .DATE. REQUESTED!N E N O BUILDING G FOUNDATION H FOOTING G SLAB G REINFORCING STEEL U MASONRY G GROUT GUNITE G FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME -. SHEATHING 1! ROOF 1 1 SHEAR G FRAME /\) 11 EXTERIOR LATH ^i^L^t LI INSULAIION ^ G INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL G FINAL *z^e ELECTRICAL U TEMPORARY SERVICE G UFFER GROUND ;:i ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND r: ROUGH ELECTRIC II POOL BONDING G ELECTRIC SERVICE y PLUMBING n UNDERGROUND PLUMBING F SEWER AND PL/CO l_ TOP OUT PLUMBING H TUB OR SHOWER PAN n GAS TEST D WATER HEATER U SOLAR WATER ;j FINAL MISCELLANEOUS n CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS L SOLAR HEAT U PATIO G POOL U SPA D SIGN D GRADING 1_ DRIVEWAY n FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection r.J Monday a AM G PM LJ Tuesday I z^zWednesday Thursday G Friday City of Cartebao REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD PERSON TAKING REPORT INSPECTOR OWNER ADDRESS BUILDING i •• REINFORCING STEEL,, v? v * ~ MASONRY ^-^C^^^^y^ '" GROUT GUNITE// ^)"/^-^ ••'.: FLOOR AND C0LING SttB=FRAM'E ' " 1? SHEATHING f ROOF ~_. SHEAR " FRAME Ll EXTERIOR LATH P INSULATION ili INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL ill FINAL 3& ^ ELECTRICAL •:'• TEMPORARY SERVICE •::; UFFER GROUND ._: ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ,": ROUGH ELECTRIC p-TOOL BONDING L ELECTRIC SERVICE u FINAL PLUMBING :~: UNDERGROUND PLUMBING il. SEWER AND PL/CO u TOP OUT PLUMBING L! TUB OR SHOWER PAN 12 GAS TEST D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER ~ FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. \Ready For Inspection^ L /] A M I MISCELLANEOUS ::; CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS Li SOLAR HEAT L'J PATIO G POOL 11 SPA n SIGN Z1 GRADING :: DRIVEWAY n FINAL — Tuesday _, Wednesday n Thursday Friday City of Cartebao REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR OWNER TIME PERMIT NO yO- t PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING I SEWER AND PL/CO D TOP OUT PLUMBING Ii TUB OR SHOWER PAN C GAS TEST D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER D FINAL ADDRESS X) / •** «*- / U <~^r *^rri^+<o O^t REQUESTED BY (K 1_4/fa PHONE NO ^T-.J/'^'/eai^i^ PERSON TAKING REPORT W~' BUILDING D FOUNDATION D FOOTING U SLAB C REINFORCING STEEL II MASONRY I GROUT GUNITE D FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING I ROOF C SHEAR D FRAME D EXTERIOR LATH I INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL "X FINAL // ELECTRICAL U TEMPORARY SERVICE n UFFER GROUND LI ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND : : ROUGH ELECTRIC I..J POOL BONDING D ELECTRIC SERVICE I 1 FINAL / $- £a&&, **// ^/ s/'<& "<5^ ~ // /^ MISCELLANEOUS Li CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS [.] SOLAR HEAT I 1 PATIO :_; POOL c SPA I ! SIGN U GRADING ! 1 DRIVEWAY n FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection D, DAM C PM lx-Mo"nday~^N I 1 Tuesday U Wednesday D Thursday D Friday €itp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR OWNER PERMIT NO TIME .DATE 'REQUESTED BY PHONE NO BUILDING n REINFORCING STEEL D MASONRY Li GROUT GUNITE n FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING D ROOF D SHEAR G FRAME D EXTERIOR LATH I 1 INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL D FINAL PERSON TAKING REPORT ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE D UFFER GROUND C ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND Q ROUGH ELECTRIC u POOL BONDING - ELECTRIC SERVICE D FINAL Zi CONDITIONED AIR SY HEAT l PATIO D POOL Q SEWER AND PL/jSO D TOP OUT PLUMBI D TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST D WATER HEATER SOLAR WATER G FINAL D GRADING |J DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection D Monday GAM nPM D Tuesday D Wednesday U Friday Citj> of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR OWNER G REINFORCING STEEL [j MASONRY G GROUT GUNITE D FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME G SHEATHING G ROOF G SHEAR i 1 FRAME _! EXTERIOR LATH G INSULATION U INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL G FINAL PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING n SEWER AND PL/CO U TOP OUT PLUMBING n TUB OR SHOWER PAN H GAS TEST D WATER HEATER G SOLAR WATER G FINAL G UFFEF D ELBSXRIC UNDERGROUND i; ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING G ELECTRIC SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS G CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS G SOLAR HEAT G PATIO G POOL H SPA G SIGN G GRADING D DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Ready For lnsp< GAM G PM D Tuesday Q Wednesday D Thursday G Friday Cit? of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR (.^/^•'^C^LJC^^ PERMIT NO TIMF _ _. H.TP X-25& OWNER /") S~j . ADDRESS *^S S-?^ '•'S £ ( £? -Sx''?? ^-T (^^/ REQUESTED BY/// *P^& f^C^l^ ^x/^-tXpHONE NO ^/^ X — ^^2-^Xo . - /I ^ BUILDING n FOUNDATION D FOOTING D SLAB U REINFORCING STEEL :.: MASONRY U GROUT GUNITE n FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME U SHEATHING D ROOF D SHEAR H FRAME Q EXTERIOR LATH ^> INSULATION^ / U INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL - FINAL PLUMBING , ^ UJ^CTTCfitrgTp'PLUMBING ^i^U L/U_ LI SEWER AND PL/CO D TOP OUT PLUMBING D TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST n WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER ~ FINAL / OJL&* ' ' \/ / J&^—f^\ PERSON TAKING REPORT^C^5^^-^ (. ELECTRICAL u TEMPORARY SERVICE ~ UFFER GROUND D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND H ROUGH ELECTRIC n POOL BON DING ^CELECTRIC n FINAL r i _ n /; ^ ^1^ <\^&?\ /X-i s"/^* <t\Wffl (A) U KlI^CELL NEOUS ^^ _J CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS LJ SOLAR HEAT n PATIO ~ POOL D SPA D SIGN [ : GRADING FJ DRIVEWAY Li FINAL '"N SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection D Monday CAM D P M D Tuesday ^ n Thursday C: Friday Citp of Cartebao REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR C ""^ PFRMITNO TIME ^/ /, — • DATF <. //£./&/— yx "y<^> OWNER _ . ' / " ADDRESS ly jQ ( O '''t<2-§ f* ' I REQUESTED BY /°( /r 1 PHONE NO l\' t-"7 BUILDING ^X D FOUJilOATION D FOOTING 3-gTAB c6ff^lN FORCING STEEL XT i D MASONRY ^ n GROUT GUNITE Li FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME D SHEATHING D ROOF n SHEAR .^ D FRAME n EXTERIOR LATH L INSULATION u INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL D FINAL K.5 ^^ PERSON TAKING REPORT / f ELECTRICAL fa (^TEMPORARY SERVICE I '.' UFFER GROUND JL/ C ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND /i>ROt)GH ELECTRIC "//^ /9^ty BONDING [/^ FINAL PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING D SEWER AND PL/CO D TOP OUT PLUMBING C TUB OR SHOWER PAN Z GAS TEST D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER D FINAL MISCELLANEOUS !l CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS n SOLAR HEAT !_ PATIO n POOL G SPA D SIGN LI GRADING Q DRIVEWAY n FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For InsR/attion & Monday D AM n Tuesday D Wednesday D Thursday D Friday REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD City of Cartebao /£> ^ X (__ .^rT^^^i^ ' ( ' ' y j^T--^ /j\NSPECJOR t^//i/t^-£-^ p^m\^ OWNER ^-> ADDRESS X^*? ^P-^^ £jT^ -Ox REQUESTED^/ (2-^C- — ' (^^/.d^jZ-^L^ ' 1 sJ ) 'jfl / £> ^y^-/CiX^fcL-^/^ BUILDING U FOUNDATIOry ^FOOTING D SLAB : REINFORCINCTFTEEL ~. MASONRY U GROUT GUNITE T FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME l~l SHEATHING H ROOF _ SHEAR x <>r / /:..: FRAME r\ Al\- LI EXTERIOR LATH |^ fty\ ' T INSULATION \\ {/' >/; I'1 ^ -r'Z INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWAI-L ..ixrfll/v D FINAL U /^} ^ 0 PLUMBING ^UNDERGROUND PLUMBING ~ SEWER AND PL/CO H TOP OUT PLUMBING n TUB OR SHOWER PAN U GAS TEST D WATER HEATER P SOLAR WATER i FINAL NO ??&£ PH '•> -^^-7.^s'&^L- I/'I/ ifP ' /( TIMF DATF ^Z>~ /^~ ~ &G (^& £4 /ZL-T*" QNENja; si ^,- /^BERSON TAKING REPOfn^-4l^^-5 ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE L: UFFER GROUND U ELECTRIC UflpERJorfoUND1 n/\/D ROUGHfELECI/RIC Q Pyty- BONDING ^T^)<£r ^ / i MISCELLANEOUS C CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS : : SOLAR HEAT n PATIO ~ POOL H SPA n SIGN D GRADING D DRIVEWAY ! : FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspecfion U Monday [JAM D PM U Tuesday \ ^Wednesday J :i: Thursday i"! Friday Citp of Cartebab REQUEST FOR INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR S / UL/Ls PERMIT NO TIME DATE v^1 ' £>-<:> ~~O OWNER xO ADDRESS ,=i?';fcP ^ £) ( — - <£> S x^? £P J L^/~ REQUESTED BY/T/ (2^-^i - — (sL^Ztf/f^t JZ-^T S PHONE NO </^/" *-?£?/*> //^^ s, \ ' 1 $^£^r~ry^£ BUILDING D FOUNDATION n FOOTING D SLAB ^4 REINFORCING STEEL U MASONRY "\ LI GROUT GUNITE \ i"; FLOOR AND CEILING SUB FRAME LI SHEATHING n ROOF II SHEAR'X D FRAME \^ H EXTERIOR LATH //^ I 1 INSULATION // L C INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWAIYL JJ i i FINAL \^ * <? ^^l^ PERSON TAKING PfBPOK&^&T^ ) ^*^S _— — "" ELECTRICAL Li TEMPORARY SERVICE i 1 UFFER GROUND D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND n ROUGH ELECTRIC n POOL BONDING P ELECTRIC SERVICE F! FINAL ~^^^ -/ ^) PLUMBING ! 1 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING 1 1 SEWER AND PL/CO I..I TOP OUT PLUMBING f"l TUB OR SHOWER PAN 0 GAS TEST r WATER HEATER G SOLAR WATER C FINAL t •5* MISCELLANEOUS I 1 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS n SOLAR HEAT 1 1 PATIO l~l POOL II SPA n SIGN (~l GRADING D DRIVEWAY D FINAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. Ready For Inspection Jjf Monday ) [] AM G PM ^~~>- D Tuesday i Wednesday I Thursday I ! Friday gr^ FOOTING EXCAVATION OBSERVATION REPORT BUILDINGS Date (s) job Name t< ^M (*. Job Location r/ Contractor.Superintendent Title of Approved Plans -Lie- /"//Plans Prepared By ' **™ '•** Plan File No Date . Building Permit No Reason for Footing Excavation Observation WCC Prelimmary Report Date fs i <* U fa l(( S LIST AND IDENTIFY FOOTINGS EXCAVATION OBSERVATtON Lot No or Footing I D.Type Depth Width Final Report Date Soil or Geological Formation Cleanliness *p0 jf.L taj^ / ~ f,s'i*i«* , .'it^' - - !.«,.' fft* -^ -- SWCC Represantati Client Representative V WCC Project»Manager *File (P) Contractor. (B) Woodwwi-plyCte -j&llJ^r. . H ' *• f' ' FOOTING EXCAVATION OBSERVATION REPORT BUILDINGS Date (s).. Job Name Job Location ' Contractor /* <-••*Superintendent Title of Approved Plans A Plans Prepared By Plan File No a.i V.'. j Building Permit No ,-<./ X ti ; 't! Reason for Footing Excavation Observation . ,^ r/ ? r^^/rrt>4£/ •> / /1> *7 //1 <.r si* i ~>*>WCC Preliminary Report Date ' *ft >' ^ ' / L WCC Final Report Date LIST AND IDENTIFY FOOttNGS EXCAVATtQN OBSERVATION Lot No. orFooting I D Type Depth Width Soil or Geological Formation Cleanliness - >; :i-f••*,•• ,.' t .'f ', »(f '~~ li-'Sil..C-L. r-; i ~ ju- i i. & f •f.e*&£& • 'si si* { ,<fi >t£e Hf- ef^" 'Jl Su'ft Unusual Conditions or Problems WCC ,-, i. . T.tio -/jj.-e. . Client Repwpentative WCC Project Manager (W) WCC File (B) rj.0nt /.- xl Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 Evening Creek Drive South I Suite 218 San Diego, California 92128 (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED DREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED QYPSUM DGLUE-LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OP DREINFORCED MASONRY DPILE DRIVING QOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court OWNER OR PROJECT NAMEWhittaker Command Control CONST*. MAT'U tTYPE.OHADE.ST9.|Cellular Light Weight Concrete DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MPGR.Padre Ready Mix DESCRIBE MAT'U. (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE Al MPGR.I roRN0' 88-079 HNO BUDG. PERMIT NO. 880166 ARCHITECTGilbert AIA & ENGINEER^Ajit Randnova WEEKIN« 8-5 IORR PUAN KIUE NO. Assoc. & Assoc. GENERAL. CONTRACTORAndrex CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK UAB RECEIVING fcTSSTINfJ CflNSTR. MAT'U SAMPLES CONCRETE TECHNICIAN INSPECTION 8-3 ' Inspected the placement and consolidation of 29 cubic yards of concrete, in the following locations: mezzanine floor topping slab at lines 1 to 9 and A to C. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from line 4 at B. Slump test results 10 1/2". Concrete supplied by Padre Transit Mix. Ticket #258204, truck #5. CERTIFICATION OP COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OP THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. SIGNATURE Of REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE Of REPORT REGISTER NUMICH Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699< COVERING WORK PERFORMED DREINFORCED CONCRETE DsY3§JCT STE^^j^g^^LY/f WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY ORE STRESSED CONCRETE DRE\?HJPRCE1^TYPSUM /{^DGLUE LAM FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED MASONRY DPILlNwWING xV' DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2290 Cosmos Court OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE, G RADE. ETC ) Reinforced Concrete DESIGN STRENGTH f'c 2000 DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE Mix Design #152P Rebar ASTM A-615 SOURCE OR MFGR Escondido Ready Mix •DAR GRADE Be MFGR 1 (2500 DSI) Gr-40 ^^^C^t^J^> Von WEEKN° 88-079 ENDING B_20 „ RR BLDG PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO. 88-0166 ARCHITECT Gilbert Aia & Assoc . ENGINEER ARA Engineering GENERAL CONTRACTOR Andrex Development CONTR DOING REPORTED WORK Sierra Cascade LAB RECEIVING fli TESTING CONSTR MAT'L Wyman Testing Labs SAMPLES CONCRETE INSPECTION 5-17 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for slab on grade per details on sheet S-2 of approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 60 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 152P, in the following locations: line A to B at 1 to 3.5 and 6 to 9. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from line A.5 at 2.5. Slump test results 5.5". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #146487, truck #490. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved drawings, project specifications and the UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS -cat. SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE OF nEPOIIT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories INN IMAJUN 1300RECEIVED 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY D N F lgsPRIVING\ *• O DGLUE LAM FABRICATION OOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2290 Cosmos Court N0 88 FOR WEEK ENDING 5_27 «»88 OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control BUDG PERMIT NO 880166 PLAN FILE NO CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE, C R ADE. ETC ) Reinforced Concrete ARCHITECTGilbert AIA & Assoc DESIGN STRENGTH f'c 3000 SOURCE OR MFGR Escondido Ready Mix ENGINEER Ajit Randnava & Assoc DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR ) Chord Bars ASTM A-706 GENERAL. CONTRACTOR Andrex Development Reinforcing Steel ASTM A-615 Gr-60 CONTR DOING REPORTED WORK Sierra Cascade Mix Design #355 LAB RECEIVING & TESTING CONSTR MAT'L SAMPLES Wyman Testing Labs CONCRETE INSPECTION 5-24 Inspected the placement and consolidation of 56 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 355, in the following locations: panels 9-12, 14-20 and 6-7. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel 10. Slump test results 5". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #147600, truck #131. Work inspected is in accordance with the UBC. 5-26 Inspected the placement and consolidation of ^73 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 355, in the following locations: panels 14-23, 36-39, 4, 5, 26, 27. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel 24. Ticket #309271, truck #444. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel 26. Ticket #148077, truck #131. Both slump test results 5". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Work inspected is in accordance with the UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS !•**•• I • iHiS— _,. fl .V* —fI G N A TURE 6e R^G7! DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Viowndge Avenue San Diego O 92123 (619) 263-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valiey Rd San Diego CA Q'M.n (G19) 481-3369 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST!', PROJECT Whittaker Command Control PROJECT ADDRESS 22QQ._Co£jinQS.CQur.L.,.. CaiJbbad_.._ CONTRACTOR Aridrex . .__ _ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _A3lt_Randnava._&_Assoc _ TO BE BILLED Andrex__ . PROJECT NO BLDG PERMIT NO 880166 PI AN FILE NO SAMPLE DATA nr.ponr OF CXCONCRETE n MORTAR LI GROUT n OTHER SUPPLITR _ KscQndidoJRGady_Mix PLACEMENT DA IE MIX DESCRIPTION E/A TICKET NUMB! n 152 PMIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT . TI TIME IN MIXER ___ ADMIXTURE __ AIR CONTENT S- ! 3 -M _308529_ .•50 Mmutcs_ IW/ 322_N _ N/ A LOCATION OF PLACEMENT _ _______________________ ..... _ D E S I G N SI R F r K Slab F.5 @ 8 T H SPEC'AL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 2.000, SAMPLES MADE BY WadeJ^nderson PS I AT 28 [JAYS DATE RECEIVE!» IN LAb LABORATORY DATA ACE LAB FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SO INCHES *7 28 28 WR_3 _WR_6__ WR 7 , 6-10-88 6-10-88 .6.x -12 6 x 12 6 x 12 _ .. 28.. 27 28.27 28,27 M-"vX I OAD 1 l.'lJI-iDS 05,'. 00 88/.00 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2.^15 3075 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPl ING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, CGI7-76 Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE-LAM FABRICATION DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Ct.Carlsbad 88-0753 COR WEEK ENDING 06—10 88 OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control BLDG pen MIT NO880166 PLAN FILE NO CONSTTJ MAT'L (TYPE.CnADB.ETC | Tilt Up Welding RCHITECTGilbert AIA DESICN STRENGTH f'c 3000 SOU I ICE OR MFGR NGINECRAJ IT Haiulnava & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-UAR GRADE & MFGR ) Chord Bars ASTM A-706 #7 GENERAL. CONTRACTORAndrex Development Electrode E-7018 CONTR DOING REROUTED WORK ,Sierra Cascude Coticrete LAB RECEIVING fl< TESTING CONSTR MAT'L SAMPLESWyman Test my,Labs WELDING INSPECTION 6-7 Visually inspected the flare bevel groove welding of chord bar connections Line G at 2, 3 per detail 2 noted on sheet SI.3. Verified the carbon equivalent of rein Lot i, ing steel to be welded with mill certificates. Chord bars are A-706 (#7) requiring no preheat. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans and AWS D1.4. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATUIJjf of RGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMULY DREINFORCED GYPSUM OGLUE LAM FABRICATION QPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS Cosmos Court 88-079 roR WEEK r N D I N c 06-10 .88. OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control BLDG PERMIT NO 880Ib6 PLAN FILE NO CONSTn MAT'L (TYPE,GRADE,ETC ) Tilt UP yieldingIB.Tfc ARCHITECTGilbert AIA Ki Associates DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR ENGINEER Ajit Hanctnava & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE BAR GRADE flc MFCR I Chord bars ASTM A-7Q6 GENERAL. CONTRACTOR Andrex Developmerit Co Electrode E'7018 CONTR DOING REPOHTED WORKSieri-a Ca.sca.de Concrete LAB RECEIVING ft PESTINGCONSTR MAT'L SAMPLES Wyman Test LIU; Labs WELDING INSPECTION 6-8 Visually inspected the flare bevel groove welding of chord connections in the following locations Line G(3 to 9), 100% complete. Line 9 (C thru G), Line C .100% complete. Verified the carbon equivalent of reinforc; ing steel to be welded with mill certificates. Chord bars A-706 #7 & 8, requiring no preheat. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, Length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved drawings and AWS D1.4. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATURE Ol REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE Or REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF OREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE LAM FABRICATION DREINFORCED MASONRY DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court Carlsbad 88-079 I OH WEEK ENDING 6-10 88 OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control BLDG PERMIT NO880166 PLAN PILE NO CONSTR. MAT'U (TYPE,G RADB.ETC |Reinforced Concrete Tilt-up ARCHITECTGiloert A[A & Assoc. DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR ICINEEnAjit Kandnava & Assoc. DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR ) Chord Bars ASTM A-706 :NERAL CON TRACT onAndrex Development Electrode E-7018 CONTR DOING OEPOin i:tl WORKSierra Cascade LAB RECEIVING & TESTING CONSTR MAT'L SAMPLES Mi ASTM A-36 WELDING INSPECTION 6-9 Visually inspected the flare bevel groove welding of chord bar connections in the following locations, panels (2.1 & 22), (22 & 23), (24 & 25), (25 & 26), (34 & 35), (35 & 36), (36 & 37), (37 & 38), (38 & 39), and (40 & 41). Verified the carbon equivalent of reinforcing steel to be welded with mill certificates, noting steel to be A-706 requiring no preheat per AWS D1.4. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved drawings and AWS Dl. .4. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPI ICABI F SECTIONS OF THF PITY OF SAN niFGO 01/1! HING I SIGNATUUE: or DEGISTERPPINSPECTOR Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMULY DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE LAM FABRICATION DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2290 Cosmos Court OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Carlsbad N0 88-068 ron WEEK c N o m G 6 — 10 19 88 Whittaker Command Control BLDG PERMIT NO880.166 PLAN FILE NO CQNSTR MAT'L (TYPE.GRADE,ETCMetal A-36 ARCHITECTGilbert AIA & Assoc. DESIGN STRENGTH SOUHCE OR MFCR ENGINEERAjit Randnava S.E. 2009 DESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE-PAR GRADE ft MFGR ) Rebar A-615 Gr-60 GENERAL. CONTRACTORAndrex Development CONTR DOING REROUTED WORKSierra Cascade LAB RECEIVING Be TESTING CONSTR MAT'U SAMPLES 6-10 Checked parapet, one angle iron to Checked 2.5"x5/8"x2'0" fillet welds, at fit-up and monitored welding on chord splices at at column 1 and D and one at column 1 arid F, 1/4" #5 rebar, 1/4" flare bevel weld. fit-up and monitored welding on steel plate between 3/8" plate and 3/4" base plate, 5/16" Two at column 3-C and four at column 2-C and one column 1-C. Welds were checked cleaning between passes, visually accepted. Welder : Fausto Sarabia Weld Rod: b-7018. for correct type, size, length, location, surface defects and fusion. Welds were G. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOT ED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE or REGISTER NUMBER WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES MJftV' -i(*../i|U1 •. |p] 1:^3 **Q 11 V't'wridrjo Avenue S;m On t|j Cfi 321?'j (01Q) <>fiB 9699 117C.O D SnniMilo V.illey Hi1 ''.dii Du.ijo CA 02121 (619) 4(J1-JJ59 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Wh3ttg.k_er_Canf0nd.._CQntro] PROJECT ADDRESS __ 2200 Cosmos Court., Carlsbdd._ ... CONTHACIOR Andr-jx _ . ... AROHIirCT/LNGINFER AjiL Ltandnnva &..Assrx:. _ . TO BE BILLED _.. .. ._Androx ._ ..._ BI..DG PERMIT NO _._ PLAN FILf NU SAMPLE DATA HEPQHT OF a CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROU I L1O1IIFR SUPPLIER !±->9pngido ..Rearly__Mix_ _ PLACEMENT DA II MIX nF.SORIPriON . . 5.b __sauk ._ . _. - IICKE1 NUMB!. R fvi'X NUMBER 355 I IME IN MIXt" H SLUMP *'".. ADMIXTURE TYPE CEMEN1 _If. .._.._ _ AIROONIEMl UNIT WLIGHT _. N/A . _ DESIGN S1RI-NO, III LOCATION OF PLACEMENT . .. Pan?-l # 40 SPECIAl TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS PP DECT NO _._ 88-D_7cl c;gwi^ V-" "^ IfT» ——.. -. •• j^ |S RECEIVED "~f ^---- Bspartmenf -A— VS,"£*&&&&*L. .Minuses. REQUIRED STRENGTH (Co) ._ .3000 SAMPLi-S MADE BY .... M!-!s:e TofLpn PSI AT.._ DAY1., DATE RECFIVLD IN ! AK LABORATORY DATA AGC FIELD IDFN'I ITY LAB CONTROL NUMBER .6- i-aa DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SO INCHES MAX I OAD BOUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 ?'\ ?8 WR AQ. WR 41 WR 42 6- 7-88 6-28 -88 6-28-88 6 x. 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 ~" " " " ~ " 20.27 ?8.27 28,27 73,(jOO - - - 258Q _. _ LABORATORY DATA REMARKS _.. DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPl ING AND T ESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASFM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69 C39-80, C78-75 C617-76 Fit"VII-WED HY REPORT DATE Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMULY DREINFORCFD GYPSUM DGLUE LAM FABRICATION DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2290 Cosmos Court Carlsbad OWNER OR PROJECT NAME WhLttaker Command Control 88-079 I OR WEEK 6-3 "88 BLDG PETIMIT NO 880166 PLAN FILE NO CONSTR. MAT'U (TYPE, G RADC. ETC ) Reinforced Concrete ARCHITECT Gilbert ATA & Assoc DESIGN STRENGTH f'c 3000 SOURCE OR MFGR Escondido Ready ENGINEERA.iit Kandnava & Assoc. DESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR I Chord Bars ASTM A-706 GENERAL CONTRACT OH Andrex Development Reinforcing Steel ASTM A-615 gr-60 CONTR DOING REPOK I ED WORK Sierra Cascade Mix Design #355 LAB RECEIVING & TESTING C Wyman Testing L CONCRETE INSPECTION 5-31 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for wall panels details of approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Inspected the placement and consolidation ot 150 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 355, in the following locations: panels 13, 29-31, 42, 43, 41, 40, 32, 33, 22, 27. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from panel 40. Slump test results 5". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #309435, truck #450. Work inspected is in accordance with the UbC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR O. (V D A1 E. O r R C I O I) 1 REGISTER NUMBER WYltfAN TEST8NG LABORATORIES 4SI1 Viuwndgc Avenue ban DieCjO CA 92123 (619) 2KB 9699 11760 D Sorrento Ville/ Ra San DICCJO CA 92i:j1 (619) 401-3-359 REPOR , OF COMPRESSION TES1 . PliOJECTNO __.88-f!7.9_ - PROJECT ADDRESS 2290 ...L'osmoa...,_ San Diego.. CONTRACTOR Andrex_&...SQl _ __ ARCHI'i ECT/ENGINFER A_RA_ _ TO BE BILLED Ardrex BLDG PERMIT NO J38Q166 PLAN FILE NO SAMPLE DATA HCPOHT OF HCONCRETE D MORTAR CJ GROUT D OTHER __ SUPPLIER MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP _ _N/A ...._ TYPE CEMENT ...11 UNIT WEIGHT N/A, Escondido.. Ready _.Mi.x- - 5..... sack 3. P ._ _ TIME IN MIXER ...._ ADMIXTURE _ .._ . AIR CONTENI DESIGN S"l RFNG I 5-11=88-5PLACEMEN! DA 1 b TICKET NUMUFR .. 50H117 N/A L'ozz N/A. 2QO.O LOCfi riON OF PLACEMENT . .Line E./_ 3. FooLjrujs SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) _ ............. SAMPLES MADE BY ..... _________ ''J-<?1T™ ^V'-' 200Q Mai'k PS! AT ______ 20 DAYS DATE RECHVHJ IN L Ali S-16-88 LABORATORY DATA AGE FIELD IDENTITY LAB CON! ROL. NUMBER DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SO INCHES 7 28 _28 WR 17 WR 1Q VJR 1'} 5-18-88 6- 8-88 6-_8»88 ... . .. 6 x 12 .. 6 x 12 b _x_.l2.._. 28,27 28,27 28.27 MAX 1OAD POUNDS T/.finn b3,')O.Q 51 ,'>00 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS _ c9Dtractor notif. ied of._two (2) ?8-_d/iy break results_which are .low. ConcreLe is to be cored w.i I h robull: DISTRIBUTION ^.^^ ^™^"-~Nb" told Cylinder sample was nude. __ ^itviL-WED BY ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AS'TM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C3l-(>9, C39 HO, C/8 /'). OC.17 /(.. DA COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI ~""~ Mlli ' WYMAN TESTING LABGRATORJES 4011 Viewriflgo Avenua S0n Diego CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 117GO D Sorrento Valley Rd S.in ni,.go CA92121 (619) 461-33-J'J REPORT OF COMPRESION TFS . .Control .PHO I EC T NO 88-079 PROJECT ADDRESS _.220Q._.Cosmos.Court. ...Carl sba-l CONi PACT OR Andrex __._ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _ _ Aj.it Randnava i. Asspc.. .. TO BE BILLED AnOrex 8LDG PERMIT NO 88.0166 PLAN FILE NO SAMPLL- DATA REPORT OF CiCONCRETE DMORTAR OGROUT CD OTHER SUPPLIER Ebcpnilido Ready t'kx MIX DESCRIPTION ....._5._5_ S_ack__ _.._ MIX NUMBER 355_ SLUMP - ._ ™- - ITTYPE CEMENT ._ UNIT WEIGHT N/A _ _ __ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Pa.Rti!. f_.24 PLACEMEN I DATE TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE AIR CONTEN1 DESIGN STRTNGTH 309271 ________ 42 Mjnutes- Pozz ........ - N/A _____ 3000 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (I'c) SMUPLF-S MADE BY __.Mlk.?_. 3000 PSI AT 2B DACS DATE RECEIVED IN I.AU LABORATORY DATA AGI:;FIELD IDENTITY 7 28 28 LAB CON1ROL NUMBER WR 32 WR 33 wi; 34 DATE HSTED 6- 2-88 6-2-3-88 6-23-88 DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 TEST AREA SO INCHES 28.27 28. 21 28.27 M*X 1 OAD I'OI jlJiJf. r>> ,c,oo COMPRESSIVE S I RFNGT H PSI 23 9S LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION __ REVIF-WFD UV ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C7B-75, C617-^G DATE WYMAN TESTING LABORATORSES 4811 Viowndge Avenue San [Diego CA 92123 (619) 268 9G99 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd Sjn Dieqo CA 921 i:1 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS i Control 2200 Cosmos Court. Carlsbad PHOJECr NO .88=079 CONTRACTOR Andres ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Aiit Rondnava. u Assne TO BE BILLED Jlndrex BLDG PERMIT NO . 880.166 PLAN FILE NO SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF 0 CONCRETE D MORTAR O GROUT Cl OTHEU .. SUPPI IER Jkrondido. Ready ..Mix PLACEMENT DAII: MIX DESCRIPTION _.__5,5 sack TICKET NUMU'R MIX NUMBER SLUMP TYPE CEMENT __ 355 5" 11.. ._ _ N/AUNIT WEIGHT _ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PancUL 2.t>_ IIME IN MIXF.lt ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT DESIGN STRENGTH ...1.40077 ... ... 43 Minutes . Po.z.2 _.. .. JQOQ. SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) ?OOQ SAMPLES MADE BY Hike. Lofton PSI AT 28 . DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAIJ LABORATORY DATA AGP, F IELD IDENTITY LAB CONTROL NUMBER DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SO INCHES 6=-_L=aa MAX i OAD POUNDS CGMPRt-SSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 WK 36 WR 37 WK 38 6- 2-88 b-2 }-88 6-23-88 6 x 32 6 x 12 6 x U 28.27 2a.27 28.27_ ... _ ::::::::.. 6 / . 500 " . J 2385 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION __ ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNA1 IONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-/5, C617-76 REVITWLD HY DA I E Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE LAM FABRICATION DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court Carlsbad N088-079 FOR WEEK ENDING O —^ /,988 OWNER OH PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control 3LDG PERMIT NO380166 PLAN FILE NO CONSTR MAT'L (TYPE,GRADE,ETC )A-b.15 Gr-60 Reinforcing Steel AIA & Assoc. LlESIGN STRENGTH bOUHCE OR MfGR XjGitEEl?andnava & Assoc. DCSCRIDE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE OAR GRADE Ik MFGR )GENERAL CONTRACTORAndrex Development CQNTR DOING REPORTED WORKSierra Cascade LAB RECEIVING (V TESTING CONSTR MAT L SAMPLES REINFORCING STEEL VERIFICATION 5-23 Inspected Hie reinforcing steel installation for precast concrete tilt-up panels P-fa thru 12, 14 thru 18 per details noted on sheet S-l.l thru 1.8 and S-5.1 of approved drawings. Inspected ieinfoici.ng steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Coordinated inspection with Project Superintendent and City Inspector who was on site. 5-25 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for precast concrete tilt-up panels P-17 thru 23 per details noted on sheets S-l.l thru 1.8 and S-5.1. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVFD PI ANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE or nEPoR'i REGISTER NUMHFR Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 EVENING CREEK DR.S, SAN DIEGO, CA 92122 (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED DREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY OPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED GYPSUM DOLUE.LAM.FABRICATION THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OP DREINFORCED MASONRY DPILE DRIVING DOTHER OB AOOREM 2290 Cosmos Court Carlsbad NO.88-079 FOR WEEK KNOINO 06-24, OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker BL.OG. PERMIT NO. 880166 PLAN FILE NO. QNSTR. MAT'L (TYPE,GRADE,ETC.) Steel A-36 Weld Rod E7018 ARCHITECTGilbert Aja STRENGTH SOURCE OR MrGR.ENGINEERAjit Randnava DESCRIBE MAT'U. (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & Ml" OR.)GENERAL CONTRACTORSierra Cascade Concrete CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORKSierra Cascade Concrete L.AB RECEIVING ft TUSTINO CON8TH. MAT'L SAMPLES 6-20 'Checked fit ups and monitored welding 1/2" bent plate to 1/2" embed plated at columns 5.5-A.l. Also rework on columns S-2 and B-2 cut 2' plus beam bucket off S-2 which was 2' too long, cut beam bucket off B-2 which was 2' too short, rewelded the 2' plus beam bucket to B-2, with full penetration weld, and rewelded beam bucket to S-2. Also welded 1/2" plate to embeds at'columns C.1-9.1, A.l- 5.1, and A.1-6.8. All noted welds were checked for correct type, size, length, location, cleaning between passes, surface defects, and fusion. Welds were visually accepted. WELDERS: Fausto Sarabiag and Tim Fairt CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, Si APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. SIGNATURE Of REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY Dpf FORCED GYPSUIVj; VING >*Ny DGLUE LAM FABRICATION DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2290 Cosmos Court OWNER OR PROJECT NAMEWhittaker Command Control CONSTR. MAT'L ITYPC.G n ADE.CTC )Reinforced Concrete DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR f'c 2000 Escondido Ready Mix DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-DAR GRADE & MFGR ) Mix Design #152P (2500 psi) Rebar ASTM A-615 Gr-40 ^--CX-li— ^*" FOR WEEKN0 88-079 ENDING 5_2o »» 88 BLDG PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO 88-0166 ARCHITECTGilbert Aja & Assoc . ENGINEERARA Engineering GENERAL CONTRACTORAndrex Development CONTR DOING REPORTED WORKSierra Cascade LAB RECEIVING 0c TESTING CONSTR MAT'L. SAMPLESWyman Testing Labs CONCRETE INSPECTION 5-16 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for slab on grade per details on sheet S-2 of approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 150 cubic yards of concrete, mix design #152P, at lines E to F and C to D at 1 to 9. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from E.5 at 5. Slump test results 5". Ticket #146062, truck #489. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from C.5 at 4. Slump test results 5". Ticket #308634, truck #450. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved drawings, project specifications and the UBC. 5-17 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for slab on grade per details on S-2 of approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Checked Locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 70 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 152P, line 1 to 9 at B to C. One set o:t 4 test cylinders taken from B.5 at 4. Slump test results 5". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #146244, truck #489. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved drawings, project specifications and the UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE OP REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY QPRE STRESSED CONCRETE ClREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE LAM.FABRICATION DREINFORCED MASONRY DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court OWNER OR PROJECT NAMEWhittaker Command Control CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE. G RADE, ETC )Reinforced Concrete DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGRf'c 2000 psi Escondido Ready Mix DESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN. RE OAR GRADE & MFGR )Mix Design #152P (2500 psi) Rebar ASTM A-615 gr-40 POR WEEKN0 88-079 ENDING 5_i3 »988 BL.DG PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO. 880166 ARCHITECTGilbert AIA & Assoc . ENGINEERAjit Randriava & Assoc. GENERAL CONTRACTORAndrex CONTR DOING REPORTED WORKSierra Cascade LAB RECEIVING Be TESTING CONSTR MAT'LWyman Testing Labs SAMPLES locations, CONCRETE INSPECTION 5-13 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for slab on grade per details on sheet S-2 of approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 150 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 152P, in the following locations: line 1 to 9 at F to G and 1 to 9 at D to E. All concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from F.5 at 8. Slump test results 4". Ticket #308529, truck #282. One set ol test cylinders taken from D.5 at 3, Slump test results 5". Ticket #308549, truck #282. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved drawings, project specifications and the UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATUR-E OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR XDATE OF/REPonT Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 EVENING CREEK DR.S, SAN DIEGO, CA 92122 (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OP Q'REINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY QPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED GYPSUM QGLUE.LAM.FABRICATION GREINFORCED MASONRY DPILE DRIVING GOTHER on ADDRESO f!om-t.f!ar1 shad ^NO.88-079 FOR WEEK UNPINO OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker BLOC. PERMIT NO. 880166 PUAN FILE NO. CONSTR. MAT'U |TYPE,GRADE.ETC.)Steel A-36 Weld Rod E7018 ARCHITECTGilbert Aja DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFCR.ENOINEERAjit Randnava DESCRIBE MAT'U. (MIX DESIGN. RE-SAR ORADE at MFGR.I GENERAU CONTRACTORSierra Cascade Concrete CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORKSierral Cascade Concrete UAB RECEIVING- ft TSSTING CONSTR. MAT'U SAMPUES 6-21 .Inspection continued from 6/20/88. Inspected welds at first floor level at columns A.1-5.8 and C.1-1.1. Noted welds were checked for correct type, size, length, location, surface defects, and fusion. Welds were visually accepted. WELDER: Fausto Sarabiag JUL 1988 RECEIVED BuildingDepartmenl CERTIFICATION OP COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS. & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OP SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS. / SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED JNSPECTOR DATS Of RKPORT REGISTER NUMOER Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE-LAM FABRICATION DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court Carlsbad OWNER OR PROJECT NAMEWhittaker Command Control Systems CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPC.Gn ADE.CTC )Reinforced Concrete Tilt-up DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR )Misc. Steel ASTM A-36 Electrode E-7018 FOR WEEKN0«8-079 ENotNG 06-17 is88 BLDG PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO.880166 Gilbert AIA & Associates AjGitEERandnava & Assoc . GENERAL CONTRACTORAndrex Development §^rRr^01ciicP^eEDdwo°nRcKrete ryVaEr %NsWnT'£a^STR MAT'L 5AM"LES WELDING INSPECTION 6-14 Visually inspected the fillet welding of tiedown plate connections in the following locations* panels, 43 right side, 27 right & left, 33 right & left, and 29 right. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved drawings and AWS Dl.l. 6—15 Visually inspected the fillet welding of tiedown plate connections in the following locations panels 29 left, 31 right & left, 4 both sides, 30 right & left. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved drawings and AWS Dl.l. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNAJJJR'E O'F REGisTgjjCD INSPE~CTOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY ORE-STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE-LAM.FABRICATION DREINFORCED MASONRY DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court Carlsbad OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control Systems CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE, G RADE. ETC ) Reinforced Concrete Tilt-up DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR f'c 3000/2000 Escondido Ready Mix DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE fle MFGR I Rebar ASTM A-G15 gr . 60 Mix Design 3000 355 Mix Design 2000 152 FOR WEEK N°88 079 ENDING Ofi 17 '9R8 BLDG. PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO 880166 ARCHITECT Gilbert AIA & Associates ENGINEER A.i it Randnava & Assoc. GENERAL CONTRACTOR Andrex Development CONTR DOING REPORTED WORK Sierra Cascade Concrete LAB RECEIVING & TESTING CONSTR MAT'L Wyman Testing Labs SAMPLES CONCRETE INSPECTION 6-15 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for perimeter strip per details noted on sheet S-2 of approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 45 of concrete, mix design #152 in the following line 9 from E to C.5 and line C from 6 to 9. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from perimeter strip, C at 8. Slump test results 4". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #151126, truck #190. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved drawings, and the UBC. cubic yards locations. ^f^JBL ai I Building &^ Department tov- " ,**,\ ^OC6Z8^ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATUpjTOF REGISTILReD INSPECTOR -3& Ct*& 5? 7*2, DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY DPRE-STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE LAM.FABRICATION DREINFORCED MASONRY DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court Carlsbad OWNER OR PROJECT NAMEWhittaker Command Control Systems CONSTR. MAT'L (TYPE.G R ADK.ETC )Reinforced Concrete Tilt-up DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGRf'c 3000/2000 Escondido Ready Mix DESCRIBE MAT L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR )Rebar ASTM A-615 gr . 60 Mix Design 3000 355 Mix Design 2000 152 FOR WEEKN088-079 ENDING 06-17 '88 BLDG PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO. 880166 ARCHITECTGilbert AIA & Associates ENGINEERAjit Randnava & Assoc . GENERAL. CONTRACTORAndrex Development CONTR DOING REPORTED WORKSierra Cascade Concrete LAB RECEIVING Bt TESTING CONSTR MAT'LWyman Testing Labs SAMPLES CONCRETE INSPECTION 6-14 Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for panels and perimeter strip per details listed on sheet S-2 of approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearance. Verified member dimensions with inplace formwork. Verified dimensions of excavated locations. Checked locations of embedded items and sleeves. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 9 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 355 in the following locations: 6 panels, 3 stair siding panels and 3 trash enclosure panels. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from back trash panel. Slump test results 4". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #150182, truck # 221. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 45 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 152 in the following locations: perimeter strip; line A from 1 to 4, line 1 from A to B.8 and C.5 to G, line G from 1 to 1.1 and 1.6 to 9. Also, line 9 from E to G. One set of 4 test cylinders taken from 1 at F. Slump test results 4.5". Concrete supplied by Escondido Ready Mix. Ticket #150840, truck #447. Work inspected is in accordance with the approved drawings, and the UBC. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATUTTE OF R EGISTjyrEDTT*S«5«TOH DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories JOB ADDRESS 2290 Cosmos Court Carlsbad OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control CONSTR. MAT'U (TYPE. G RADE, ETC ) Steel A-36 Weld Rod E-7018 DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR ) Rebar A-615 Gr-60 " ^ *" FOR WEEKN0 88-079 ENDING 6-17 '«88 BLDG PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO. 880166 ARCHITECTGilbert Aja AIA ENGINEERAjit Randnava GENERAL CONTRACTORSierra Cascade CONTR DOING REPORTED WORKSierra Cascade LAB RECEIVING ft TESTING CONSTR MAT'L SAMPLES COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONOR DPRE-STRESSED CONCR DREINFORCED MASONRY 4811 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 ^. ASSEMBLY ]REINFORCED SY>SUM DGLUE-LAM.FABR1CATION """ ~ DOTHER 6-13 Checked fit-up and monitored welding on 2.5"x5/8" plates between 3/8" bent plates to 3/4" base plates 5/16" fillet welds. Two at columns 7-C, four at 8-C, and four at 9-C. All noted welds were checked for correct type, size, length, location, cleaning between passes, surface defects and fusion. All noted welds were visually accepted. Certified welder. Fausto Sarabia G. 6-16 Checked fit-ups and monitored welding on 4"x4"x3/8" angle iron to existing 4"x5"x3/8" angle iron ledger located at first floor level. One column at C-8.5, one column at C-9, 1 column at 9-B.5, one at 9-A.5, one at A-9, one at A-8.5, one at A-7.5, one at A-7, one at A-1.5, and one at A-2.5. All noted welds were checked for correct type, size, length, location, cleaning between passes, surface defects and fusion. Welds were visually accepted. Certified Welder: Fausto Sarabia G. 6-17 Checked fit-ups and monitored welding on 4"x4"x3/8" angle iron to existing 4"x5"x3/8" angle iron ledger located at 1st floor level at columns A-l, 1-A.5, 1-B.5, 1-C, C-1.5, A-1.5, A- 2.5, A-3.1, A-3.8, A-4.5, A-5. Also monitored welding of 3/8" plate to embeds at column C- 1.5 and C-8.5. Also monitored welding of 1 beam bucket to embed at column A-l-5.1 at roof line. All noted welds were checked for correct type, size, location, length, cleaning between passes, surface defects and fusion. All welds were accepted. Certified welder. Fausto Sarabia G. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS ( SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPOPT i i m n £• r? Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 EVENING CREEK DR. S. SAN DIEGO, CA 92122 (619) 486-0354 #218 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OP DREINFORCED CONCRETE DSTRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY DPRE-STRESSEO CONCRETE DREINFORCED GYPSUM DQLUE-LAM.FABRICATION DREINPORCED MASONRY DPILE DRIVING DOTHER ADDRKBB 2200 Cosmos Court Carlsbad NO.88-079 FOR WRKK ENDING 7_8 "88 QWNKR OR PNOJKCT NAME Whittaker Command Control BLOO. PERMIT NO.880166 PLAN I'll.* NO. CONOTH. MAT'l (TYPK.ORAOE.CTC.)GifSert AIA & Assoc. DBSION STRKNBTH SOURCS OR MFQR.KNO INKER _ _, 0 .Ajit Randnava & Assoc. DKBCIIIBK MAT'ki {MIX DKBIOE-70XX Series OK ft MPOR.J-oc ASTM A500 gr. B, T.S. 6" x 6" x 3/8"ITKD WORK ASTM A36 Structural Steel LAB RCCKIVINO ft TCiTINO CONBTR. MAT'U IAMPUK* WELDING INSPECTION Visually inspected the fillet welding and square groove welding of T.S. 6" x 6" x 3/8" framework connections in the following locations: storefront area, per details noted on sheet S8.1 of approved plans. Certified welders were observed for proper welding procedures and techniques. Completed welds were inspected for size, length, location, and unless otherwise noted are free of visible defects and in accordance with the approved plans and AWS Dl.l. CERTIFICATION OP COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS. & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS.DATS Of RSPOHT NUMBKIt WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker PROJECT NO RR-079 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 2200 Cosmos Court, Carlsbad Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED Aiit Randnava & Assoc. Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO RR0166 PLAN FILE NO N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF D CONCRETE D MORTAR D SUPPLIER Padre MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMRFR SLUMP TYPE CFMFNT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) . SAMPLFfi MADF RY Q 1/2 sa^k N/A 10 1/2" TT N/A fiRDUT I^DTHFR CELLULAR LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE PI ACFMFMT HATF 8~ 3~88 TITKFT WIIMRFR 25R204 TIMF IN MIXFR 1 Hour 45 M-mMt-^Q ADMIXTURF Calcium Chloric AIR CnNITFNT N/A HFRIRN RTRFNinTH Mezzanine Floor Line 4 @ B OR REMARKS N/A Dan Wyman Pfil AT N/A DAYS DATF RFP.FIVFn INI I.AR ^-^011 12 ^3^\ /*$* A ~$\/& A $\ /? «fp ^ \& j$/8_\^2fg8 s,<A>/ Xv5^?9Z9'J5^x LABORATORY DATA FIELT) CONTROL IDENTITY NUMBER DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD TESTED INCHES SO INCHES POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 30 30 30 *Cylinder cylinder C 495 S1 followec WR 61 WR 62 WR 63 p of test s •s of 6" di :andard Tes in ASTM C 9- 2-88 9- 2-88 9- 2-88 Decimens ameter x t Methods -495-83, 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 should have be< 12" heiaht are . However, all "Compression SI 28.27 28.27 28.27 &n 3" diameter non-standard, other procedui xength of Lictf 26,500 27,500 27.000 x 6" height. and not r^pro •es and test m itweight Insul 935* 975* 955* fenop, stanrlard R(=>ni-?i-l-iT7(=> nf ASTM 2thods were itinq Connrot^." LABORATORY DATA REMARKS The average compressive strength of the three (3) test cylinders is 955 pai +_ 20 psi. DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker Command Control PROJECT NO __88=07.9 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR _22_9Q_ Cosmos Court, San_Diego_ _Ludwig_Masonry_ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _. ..Gilbert f, .Assoc/_Atit_Randnava_&_Asspc. ro BE BILLED Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO 880166 _ PLAN FILE NO N/A SAMPLE DATA I'll PORT OF n CONCRETE EMORTAR LI GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER .. __ _ Ludwig..Masonry PLACEMENT DATE _._ MIX DESCRIPTION N/A _... TICKET NUMBER N/A MIX NUMBER ?'YPeS TMV1E ,N M|XER 7 Minutes SLUMP _.N/A_ ADMIXTURE .._ ..N/A .-9=28=88 Portland.. Plas ticTYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT . LOCATION OF PLACEMENT North West Retaining Wall „ AIR CONTENT N/A- - _ DESIGN STRENGTH 2000- SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS 2000REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) _ SAMPLES MADE BY __..WilJ=iam.__Mc_Gee PSI AT _2.8 DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB .._9=30=88- LABORATORY DATA FIE^J3 IDENTITY 7 20 28 LAB CONTROL NUMBER WR 65 WR 66 WR 67 DATE TESTED 10- 5-88 10-26-88 1Q-26-88 DIMENSIONS INCHES 2x4 2 X 4 2x4 TEST AREA SQ INCHES 3.14 3.14 3.14 MAX LOAD POUNDS 8.000 9,600 10,600 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 254^ 3055 3375 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS __________' DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED BY ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-60 C39-80, C78-75, CB17-76 '-;,A •- '' rj'CH.i C 043345^ jj i' j ^V r / Zs-\ (-t ? /] » * ^sr. - WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS 'HOIECT Whittaker Command Control PROJECT NO 38=079 I'HOJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR __2200_Cosnios. Court ,.._CarlsbacL Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _A]lt Randnava & ) I () B E BIL L E D Andrex _ ____ DG PERMIT NO 880166 PLAN FILE NO N/A. SAMPLE DATA HEPORT OF D CONCRETE D MOR FAR SGROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER SarrentQ._Ready_Mix PLACEMENT DATE 9=29-88- MIX DESCRIPTION 7_sack_ - .._ MIX NUMBER 7030001 _ S LUMP N/A TYPE CEMENT II UNIT WEIGHT N/A TICKET NUMBER .._29054 - -... TIME IN MIXER .. 52 Minutes...... _ ADMIXTURE N/A AIR CONTENT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 3500 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ta i rung Wall At North West Corner SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS 2000REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY William McGee PSI AT . 28 DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB -10=3=88- LABORATORY DATA 7 28 28 WR 69 WR 70 WR 71 10- 6-88 10-27-88 10-27-88 3x1 3x3 3x3 9.984 9.888 8.908 24,000 37,500 37,500 2405 3790 4210 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS _ DISTRIBUTION Al I. SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AS I'M STANDARD DESIGNATIONS r/)1-f)9, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 REVIEWED BY DATE II.'. .Jjr ; 043315 jj l£ 'ZZL^J rv WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker Command Control PROJECT NO 88-Q79L PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 2200 Cosmos Court, Carlsbad Andrex ARCHiTFrvr/FNniNFFpA-|it Randnava & Assoc. TO BE BILLED BLDG PERMIT NO J880166 PLAN FILE NO _N/JL SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF D CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT C OTHER Lightweight Concrete Cores SUPPLIER N/A PLACEMENT DATE 2=20=88 MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER N/A MIX NUMBER N/A TIME IN MIXER N/A SLUMP N/A ADMIXTURE N/A TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT JSl/A_ _N/A_ AIR CONTENT _N/_A_ DFSIfiN STRFNIRTH _12DD_to 1500- LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Lightweight Slab SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS INSULATING "CELDUF DENSITY OF 501bs/cu.ft._+ .IGHT_WETGHT CONCRETE "DF REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 1200 psi (Minimum) per PPSI SAMPLES MADE BY Penhall Dan Wyman DATE RECEIVED IN LAB Llis St. George LABORATORY DATA AGE FIELD IDENTITY LAB CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS NUMBER TESTED INCHES TEST AREA SO INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI N/A N/A N/A N/A The averac Phillis SI WR 73 WR 74 WR 75 WR 76 e of Four . George. ' ^9-20-88. -10- 4-88, 10- 4-88 10- 4-88 (4) test < "he Tnsul; 1..725"_dia 1.724" dia 1.733" dia 1.735" dia :ores compress: \tLng_Cellular_ 2.337 2T334 2.359 2.364 .ve strengths c LightrWeight_I ?r3Rn 9,^n 2.400 2,850 iguals—LQBO ps !oncrete_LS-no inns inQ^ 1 1015 i?n5 1 <f' r- = 19QO as £ l—corrfoTFTn nrr er DISTRIBUTION LABORATORY DATA REMARKS ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 Evening Creek Drive South Suite 218 San Diego, California 92128 (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE OPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE LAM FABRICATION DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOB ADDRESS 2290 Cosmos Ct.Carlsbad N0 88-079 FOR WEEK ENDING 9-30 88 OWNER OR PROJECT NAME Whittaker Command Control BLDG PERMIT NO88-0166 PLAN FILE NO CONSTR MAT'L (TYPE,GRADE,ETC |C90 Hollow Load Bearing CMU Block GoTtDert A.I.A. & Associates DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OFJ MFGR IRandnava & Associates DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, DE-BAR GRADE fit MFGD )C270 Mortar GENERAL CONTRACTORAndrex CONTR DOING REPORTED WORKfl.R. Ludwig Masonry LyftB RECEIVING Be TESTING CONSTR MAT'L SAMPLESWyman Testing Laos MASONRY INSPECTION 9-27 Inspected the laying-up of concrete masonry unit block at full length of West retaining wall to finished height (5'-4" or less) per San Diego Regional Standard C-4. Inspected mortar for proper mixing and handling. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, location, and clearance. 9-28 Inspected the laying-up of concrete masonry unit block at Northwest corner and full length of North retaining wall. Twenty three feet of Northwest corner and the westerly 45' of the north wall are built to Regional Standard C-4 with the execption of one extra course of 8" block bringing the finished height to 6'-0". The remaining easterly portion of the north wall is 8" block to a height of 6'-0" (9 courses) or less, with #4 vertical reinforcing at 16" O.C., two - #4 horizontial bars at 2'-0" (top of third course) and at 5'-4" (top of eigth course). Inspected the mortar for proper mixing and handling. One set of 4 mortar samples taken from Northwest wall. Inspected the reinforcing steel for size, grade', lap, location, and clearance. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPOflT REGISTER NUMBER Wyman Testing Laboratories 13230 Evening Creek Drive South Suite 218 San Diego, California 92128 (619) 486-0354 COVERING WORK PERFORMED WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF DREINFORCED CONCRETE DPRE STRESSED CONCRETE DREINFORCED MASONRY DSTRUCT STEEL ASSEMBLY DREINFORCED GYPSUM DGLUE LAM FABRICATION DPILE DRIVING DOTHER JOD ADDRESS 2290 Cosmos Court Carlsbad OWNER OR PROJECT NAMEWhittaker Command Control CONSTR MAT'L ITYPE.G R ADE.ETC |C90 Hollow Load Bearing CMU Block DESIGN STRENGTH SOURCE OR MFGR DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE-BAR GRADE & MFGR IC270 Mortar C94 Ready Mixed Concrete TOR WEEKN0 88-079 ENDING 9-30 "> 88 BLDG PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO880166 ARCHITECTGilbert A. I. A. & Associates ENGINEERAjit Randnava & Associates GENERAL CONTRACTORAndrex CONTR DOING REPORTED WORKH.R. Ludwig Masonry LAB RECEIVING fie TESTING CONSTR MAT'L SAMPLESWyman Testing Labs MASONRY INSPECTION 9-29 Inspected the laying-up of concrete masonry unit block at retaining wall at Southeast corner to finished height (4'-0" or less.) Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, location, and clearance. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 22.5 cubic yards of grout, mix design # 7030001 in the following locations: North, West and Southeast retaining walls to thier full height. One set of 4 grout samples taken from Northwest wall. Grout supplied by Sorrento Ready Mix. Ticket # 29054, truck #92. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, & APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING LAWS SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Vlewrldga Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker Command Control PROJECT NO PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 2200 Cosmos Court,Carlsbad Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED Ajit Randnava & Assoc. Andrex^ BLDG PERMIT NO 880166 PLAN FILE NO N/A 8R-D7Q SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF ECONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escondido Ready Mix PLACEMENT DATE MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP 5.5 sack 355 4" TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT II N/A Trash TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER _ ADMIXTURE 6-14-88 _15Q812_ 4QMinn±es_ AIR CONTENT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH -3000- SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY Dan Azlin 3000 PSI AT _?J DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB LABORATORY DATA IDENTITY LAB CONTROL NUMBER DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SQ INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 WR 49 WR 50 WR 51 6-21-88 7-12-88 7-12-88 6 v 19 6 x 12 6 x 12 9R.77 9R.97 28.27 ^// Iff Sfft \<a 81,000 100,500 105,500 J^26^^rV ^f ''&£\ rt\\ $00 \ J rltlffontPtvlW KfcjKwfiftl . «o 2865 3555 3730 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ^^L ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 ^(/l-lb- WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker Corrarand Control PROJECT NO R8-07Q PROJECT ADDRESS _ CONTRACTOR 2200 Cosmos Court.Carlsbad Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED Ajit Randnava & Assoc. Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO 880166 PLAN FILE NO N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF SCONCRETE D MORTAR DGROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escondido Ready Mix PLACEMENT DATE MIX DESCRIPTION 5.2 sack TICKET NUMBER _ MIX NUMBER 152 TIME IN MIXER SLUMP 4.5" ADMIXTURE TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT . II AIR CONTENT N/A N/A DESIGN STRENGTH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Perimeter Strip 1 @ F 6-14-88 150840 1 Hour 30 N/A onnn SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 2000 SAMPLES MADE BY Dan Azlin PSI AT 28 DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB LABORATORY DATA AGE LAB FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SQ INCHES POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Vlewrldge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego. CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker Command Control PROJECT NO 88-079 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 2200 Cosmos Court,Carlsbad Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED Anit Randnava S Assoc. Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO 880166 PLAN FILE NO N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF H CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escondido Ready Mix MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP 5.2 sack 152 4" PLACEMENT DATE TICKET NUMBER _ TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE 6-15-88 151126 45 Minutes N/A TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT . II N/A N/A AIR CONTENT DESIGN STRENGTH 2000 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Perimeter Strip SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY Dan Azlin 2000 PS I AT 28 .DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 6-16-88 LABORATORY DATA AGE LAB FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SO INCHES POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 WR 57 WR 58 WR 59 6-22-88 7-13-88 7-13-88 6 x 12 6 x 12 . 6 x 12 28.27 28.27 28.27 XeF /&*8 43.000 67,500 67,500 ^-— =— -^<7^2AJ;^^ ^ "^ Jill 1000 RFfFIVm 1520 2385 2385 x\ i LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 DATE ^-/B-Bt -Cr^- WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Vlewrldge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego, CA 92121 I 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR Whit-taker Command Control 88—Q7S ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED BLDG PERMIT NO 2200 Cosmos Court., Carlsbad Andrex Alit Randnava & Assoc. Andrex 880166 PLAN FILE NO SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF Kl CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escondido Ready Mix PLACEMENT DATE MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP N/A 3P 6" TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER _ ADMIXTURE 148985 52 Minni-ps N/A IITYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT LOCATION OF PLACEMENT AIR CONTENT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH Footinqs-West Side SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 2000 SAMPLES MADE BY Fineberq PSI AT 28 DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB LABORATORY DATA AGE LAB FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SQ INCHES POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 * The ave: reschedult WR 45 WR 46 WR 47 rage of two j hold cyli 6- 9-88 6-30-88 6-30-88 (2) 28-d nder WR 4 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 IV breaks is 1 3 for 56-day b 28.27 28.27 28.27 J70 psi^f'c = :eak on July 2 30,000 55,000 56,500 = 2000 DSI rea 3, 1988. 1060 1945 * 2000 * aired. Therefore, LABORATORY DATA REMARKS for WR 45. Contractor notified of low 7-day break result DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED BY ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80. C78-75, C617-76 DATE WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Vlewrldge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego. CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker Command Control PROJECT NO 8R-07Q PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 2200 Cosmos Court., Carlsbad ..Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED A jit". Ranrlnaya & Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF » CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escondido Ready Mix PLACEMENT DATE MIX DESCRIPTION _ MIX NUMBER 355 SLUMP 5_!!_ 5.5 sack TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT . II N/A LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Panel #40 TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER _ ADMIXTURE 309435 50 Minutes Pozz AIR CONTENT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 3nnn SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 3000 Mike Lofton PSI AT28_.DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 6- 1-RR LABORATORY DATA AGE FIELD IDENTITY LAB CONTROL NUMBER DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SO INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 WR 40 WR 41 WR 42 6- 7-88 6-28-88 6-28-88 6x1? 6 x 12 6 x 12 2R.?7 28.27 28.27 7?,nnn 97,500 97,500 ?SRO 3450 3450 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 BY TESTSMG LABORATORIES 4811 Viewndge Avenue San Diego CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Dieqo CA 92121 (619) 431-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker__Connnand Control PROJECT NO 88.r_Q79_ PROJECT ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court.. Carlsbad Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER jn BF R|i i Fn BLDG PFRMIT NO An it Randnava Andrex 880166 & Assoc. PI AN Fll F ND / ^\f /| le*» \1 T M 1988 RECEIVED n Building tf-n\O>\ •ol3){a* rW SAMPLE DATA ^9191^REPORT OF 0 CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER . SUPPLIER Escondido Ready Mix PLACEMENT DATE 5-16-88 MIX DESCRIPTION 5,L2_sack TICKET NUMBER _308634 TIME IN MIXER 3.0__M.inu.tes. Poz z MIX NUMBER 152 P.. SLUMP 5 " TYPE CEMENT II UNIT WEIGHT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 2500 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Slab 0 C.5 P 4 ADMIXTURE __ AIR CONTENT __ SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 2000 PS I AT 2JL DAYS Wade Anderson DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 5-17-88 LABORATORY DATA AGE FIELD IDENTITY LAB CONTROL NUMBER DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SQ INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI LABORATORY DATA REMARKS 7 28 28 WR 9 WR 10 WR U 5-23-88 6-13-88 6-13-88 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 28.27 28.27 28.27 61,000 88,000 80,500 2155 3110 2845 DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 WYSViAN TESTING LABORATORSES •4811 Viowridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-969S 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT NO PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 22QQ CQsraPS_Court., Carlsbad ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED An it Randnavd & Assoc. Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO 880166 SAMPLE DATA PLAN FILE NO ISk REPORT OF £! CONCRETE Cl MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER _____________ EsCQndKlQ..RCc'.Uy_MjX____ ....... _____________ PLACEMENT DATE __________ 5-16-8.8 ______ MIX DESCRIPTION _______ ..... _... __..._ 5.2.. sack. ______________ ...... TICKET NUMBER ____ 146Q6.2. ____ MIX NUMBER ________________ ....... _. ...... 152 P . ... ............ _ TIME IN MIXER .._. 25. Minutes _______ SLUMP . ...... --------------- ..... _________ ....... _5" ..... ____ ....... _____________ ADMIXTURE ...._. ....... .___POZZ_322. ______ _ TYPE CEMENT 11 AIR CONTENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT. _.._N/A DESIGN STRENGTH _25P_P_ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ..Slab .F,.5ja_5 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS i REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 2000 PSI AT _28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY Wade. ..Anderson DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 5=17=8.8 LABORATORY DATA AGE LAR COMPRESSIVE FILLD CONIROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH '^HI'IL^ N^.M..^I_n_.._I_TFST[:P _ _JNCHES _SQ INCHES_ _ POUNDS PSI 7 .WR..13. 5-23-88 6_x_L2 28.27 56,000 1980 __28 WR.JL4 6r.y-88 6... x_ 12 _2_8_. 27_ 28 HBJL5 6-J 1.-8B 6_x .12 £ 2_8_i27_ LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION _ __.... REVIEWED BY ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATE ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C70-75, CG17-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Viewndge Avpnue San Diego CA 92123 (619) 260-9699 11760 D r.orrcnto Valley Rd San Diego CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PRO JECT whittaker PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED Ardrex__ BLDG PERM IT NO 8B0166 _229.Q. .Cosmos .,,__Sd.n__D Lego .._Andrex....&_._S.CC ARA SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF H CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escondi.da.-Ready-.lUx. PLACEMENT DATE 5=O1=88- MIX DESCRIPTION 5.._sack___ MIX NUMBER 3_P SLUMP N/A _._. TYPE CEMENT II .... TICKET NUMBER 3Q.8417 TIME IN MIXER N/A ADMIXTURE EO2Z.._ AIR CONTENT N/ UNIT WEIGHT N/A_. DESIGN STRENGTH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Line...E_/_3__EoQtinga . SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) _ ........... ____________ . 2.PQQ SAMPLES MADE BY - ____ Sierra Cascade Mark PS| AT ____ 2£L DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 5-16-88 LABORATORY DATA AGE FIELD IDENTI'Y 7 28 28 LAB CONTROL NUMBER WR 17 WR 18 WR 19 DATE TEST ED 5-1 8-88 . 6- Q-Rp 6- 8-80 DIMENSIONS INCHES 6 X 12 __.6_X_12. 6 X 12 TEST AREA SQ INCHES 2 8 ..2 7 20.27 28.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 37,000 COMPRESSIVG STRENGTH PSI 1310 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED BY ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM Sl/MslDAHD DESIGf IATIONS C31-69, 03^-80, C73-7r., C617-.-'6 DATE _. PRELIMINARY REPORT WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Viewndqe Avenue San Dieqo CA 92123 (61')) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS pRn.iFHT Whittaker Command Control ppn.iFnT NO RK-mq PROJECT ADDRESS 22QQ_COSmOS...COUI r.r>NTRATOR Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Ant Randnava & yn PF Pll i FP Andrex BLDH PERMIT NO 880166 REPORT OF (^CONCRETE D MORTAR DC siiPPHFR Escondido Ready Mix MIX DESCRIPTION 5.2 sack MIX NIIMRFR 152 P SI IIMP 5" TYPF CEMENT II IINITWFIfiHT N./A LOCATION OF PLACEMENT . ._ Slab "t, Car] sbad Assoc. PLAN Fll F NO SAMPLE DATA 5ROIIT n OTHER PI ACFMRNT DATE 5-17 TICKET NUMBER 1462 TIME IN MIXER ] Hr sjtftjiasaojiy^ ~/V A ^^\ /V ^"1\ $ «wff 19$ o»\ d jMp^O eSfj\^ tbn\L!£tn8 *°/\A ^•"fauent cSy\<B> ^/ J -JV / -88 ADMIXTURE POZZ 32.2 AIR CONTENT N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 2500 B.5 @ 4 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS _. REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 2QQO_. SAMPLES MADE BY Wade Anderson ___ DATE RECEIVED IN 1 AR 5-1 H-8ft LABORATORY DATA AGE LAB FIELD CONTROL DATE IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED DIMENSIONS TEST AREA INCHES SO INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 WR 20 WR 21 WR 22 5-24-88 6-14-88 6-14-88 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 28.27 28.27 28.27 51 ,000 79i5_00 82j500 IRfV, 2810 2920 DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORBES •1B11 Vlowridge Avenue San Diego CA 92123 |G 19) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valloy Rd Sdn Diego CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS Whittaker Command Control 2200 Cosmos Court , Carlsbad PROJECT NO _flanQ29_ _Andrex SAMPLE DATA KECEI7ED- fii . Building REPORT OF m CONCRETE D MORTAR 0 GROUT O OTHER SUPPLIER _ Escondido Ready Mix PI ACFMFNT DATF MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER . - SI I IMP TYPF nFMFIMT UNIT WEIGHT ... . . 5.2 sack 152 p 5.5" II N/A TIHKFT NUMBER .. TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE AIR OONTFNT _ - DESIGN STRENGTH & Department ^V ^Ljfc^jpt. f^^ts T'relirr'' 30 MI nut^s Pozz 32"> N/A LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Slab-Z.JLJL-A JL SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 2QQI SAMPLES MADE BY Wade_Andersc PSI AT __..28._ DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB .5=20=88- LABORATORY DATA AGE FIELD IDENTITY LAB CONTROL NUMBER DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SQ INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 WR 24 WR 25 WR 26 5-25-88 6-] 5-88 6-15-88 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 28.27 28.27 28.27 57,000 84,000 90,000 2015 2970 3185 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS ._. DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 .JREVIEWBD BY C-^v-Xl ~^*~~'_ T2J^r^1^u^?^—"" 4811 Vlewrldge Avenue \ : fWYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 1m 3] " — '•- san uiego, u« ainiia fl (619) 268-9699 I trp flV/ [T^ San Diego, CA 92121 1 J i i '619' 481"3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PRO.IFCT Whittaker Command Control PROJECT ADDRESS 2200 Cosmos Court., Carlsbad CONTRACTOR Andl-AV AROHiTFOT/FNfiiNFFR Aiit Randnava & Assoc. TO RF RII i FD Andrex PLPrt PERMIT NO 880166 PI AN Fll F NO PROJECTNQ. sfl-rnq /O ^ ^s\ /& 4^ ^fe *^L»\ffo siv& aii\\tfwij» •#/ \^ niofflnP1***" Jt?7 SAMPLE DATA >%>«T ^S^ REPORT OF DTCONCRETE G MORTAR HRRO1IT n OTHFR SIIPPIIFR Escondido Ready Mix PI AOFMFNT DATE MIX DESCRIPTION 5.5sack TICKET NIIMRER MIXNIIMRFR 355 TIME IN MIXER SI 1 IMP 5" ADMIXTURE 5-24-88 147600 1 Hour Pozz TYPE CEMENT II AIR CONTENT N/A UNIT WEIGHT N/A DERION STRENGTH 1 OCATION OF PLACEMENT Panel # 10 RPFCIAI TFST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS RFOI "RED STRENGTH (fn) 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS inon SAMPLES MADE RY Mike Lofton DATE RECEIVED IN i AR 5-25-88 LABORATORY DATA AGE LAB COMPRESSIVE FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD STRENGTH IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SQ INCHES POUNDS PSi 7 28 28 WR 28 WR 29 WR 30 5-31-88 6-21-88 6-21-88 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 28.27 28.27 28.27 74,500 96,500 96,500 ?fi^S 3415 3415 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80. C78-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Vlewrldge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 481-33S9 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR .,_ Whittaker Command Control 2200 Cosmos Court. Carlsbad Andrex PROJECT NO,/&> fa --*e-n7Q *""»*fif>v~rS_* ""<5\ ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED Ajit Randnava & Assoc.J&- Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO 880166 PI AN Fll F NO Vtfl 'wraneBL .C7 SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CkCONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escondido Ready Mix PLACEMENT DATE MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP 5.5 sack 355 5" TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT II N/A LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Panel # 24 TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER _ ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT _NZA_ DESIGN STRENGTH •^-96-RR M 3000 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY Mike Lofton 3000 PSI AT ._28_DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 5-27-88 LABORATORY DATA F,^DE IDENTITY LAB CONTROL NUMBER DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SO INCHES MAX LOAD POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 * The ave: 3000 psi WR 32 WR 33 WR 34 racre of thr required. 6- 2-88 6-23-88 6-23-88 ee (3) co Therefore 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 usecutive sets , concrete is 28.27 28.27 28.27 of 28-day bre, acceptable and 62,000 86,000 83,000 jk rp>snl ts = 1 conforms . 2195 3040 * 2935 * iq^ ppi>f/- - LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69. C39-80. C78-75, C617-76 WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Vlewrldge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT Whittaker Command Control PROJEC PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 2200 Cosmos Court. Carlsbad Andrex ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED A jit Randnava K, Asp.nr;, ffjl V—i—^ .Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO 880166 PLAN FILE NO SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF H CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escondido Ready Mix PLACEMENT DATE MIX DESCRIPTION MIX NUMBER SLUMP 5.5 sack 355 5" TYPE CEMENT UNIT WEIGHT . TT N/A LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Panel #26 TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER _ ADMIXTURE AIR CONTENT DESIGN STRENGTH 5-26-88 148077 _43 Minutes. POP. 7. -M/A- 3000 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY 3000 Lofton PSI AT 28 DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB - 1-Rfl LABORATORY DATA AGE LAB FIELD CONTROL DATE DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAX LOAD IDENTITY NUMBER TESTED INCHES SQ INCHES POUNDS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 28 28 WR 36 WR 37 WR 38 6- 2-88 6-23-88 6-23-88 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 28.27 28.27 28.27 67.500 90.000 90,000 2385 3185 3185 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION WYMAN TESTING LABORATORIES 4811 Viewridge Avenue San Diego CA 92123 (619) 2G8-9uS9 11760 D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego CA 92121 (613) 481-3359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS PROJECT __Wbittaker_CQmvin:l_CQnti'o PROJECT NO PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR 2 20 Q__CQsniQS._£Qurt.-,. ...Carlsbad.. __.-Andrex SAMPLE DATA ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ArpJ-Bandnava. &_Assoc_._ TO BE BILLED _Andrex BLDG PERMIT NO REPORT OF KOONCRETE n MORTAR D GROUT D OTHER SUPPLIER Escgnd.ido_Read.y_.Mi,x PLACEMENT DATE 5-13-88 MIX DESCRIPTION N/A TICKET NUMBER TIME IN MIXER ADMIXTURE ... ... AIR CONTENT 308529 MIX NUMBER CLUMP _152 P 4" 30 Minutes fYPECEMENT UNIT WEIGHT II N/A Pozz 322 N N/A DESIGN STRENGTH 2500_ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT .Slab. F. 5 @ 8_ SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) 2000 SAMPLES MADE BY _. _Wa_de...Anderspn ... PS I AT 28_ DAYS DATE RECEIVED IN LAB LABORATORY DATA AGE FIELD IDENTITY 7 28 28 LAB CONTROL NUMBER .WR.5 WR 6 WR 7 DATE U-S TED V-2U--88 b-10-88 6- i 0-88 DIMENSIONS INCHES (•> x_L2 fa x 12 6 x 12 TEST AREA SO INCHES ... . 28.27 28.27 20.27 MAX LOAD POUNDS 65,5(10 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 2315 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS ... DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED BY ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 DATE PRELIMINARY REPORT WYSU1AN TESTSNG LABORATORIES 4811 Viewndge Avonue S.in Dicqo CA 92123 (619) 268-9699 117faO D Sorrento Valley Rd San Diego CA 92121 (019) 4B1-J359 REPORT OF COMPRESSION TES Hi PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS Whittaker Carenand Control PROJECT NO 8a-02a CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TO BE BILLED BLDG PERMIT NO _2_20Q_Cosmos_CQurt_._Carlsbad- _Andrex _______ ..... ... . .......... ____ _____ A3rt_ _ Andrex 880166 _&.. . ASSOC ___________________ PLAN FILE NO .__ SAMPLE DATA OF 0 CONCRETE D MORTAR D GROUT n OTHER . . .. . SUPPLIER __Rj2MldidQ_ReadY_Mix PLACEMENT DA IE MIX DESCRIPTION . 5_..2__SdOk "1ICKET NUMBf.R MIX NUMBER i5? P TIME IN MIXER JLUMP 5". _ ADMIXTURE TYPE CEMENT II AIR CONTENT _ N/A UNIT WEIGHT N/A __ DESIGN S [ RENG1 H 5=13=88 _______ ."> Minutes Po// 322 N ._ _25QQ LOCATION OF PLACEMENT Slab D.5 @ 3.5 SPECIAL TEST INSTRUCTION OR REMARKS REQUIRED STRENGTH (f'c) SAMPLES MADE BY _ _ 20.QQ Wade_ Anderson.. _. PSI AT ?JL .. DAYS _ DATE RECEIVED IN I. Al'i r>-16-88 LABORATORY DATA AGE FIELD IDENTITY LAB CONTROL NUMBER DATE TESTED DIMENSIONS INCHES TEST AREA SO INCHES MAX LOAD (VillNI)S COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 7 ?8 28 WR 1 k WR 2 WR 3 5-20-88 6-10-88 6-10-88 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 28.27 28.27 28.27 ,000 W),(H'0 1805 -29QO_ 2830 LABORATORY DATA REMARKS DISTRIBUTION ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD DESIGNATIONS C31-69, C39-80, C78-75, C617-76 DATE: ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 • S AN DI EGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1*68 AUG 23 JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: C iTV OF RELX/.SET: IJURISDICTK LAN CHECKER ]FILE COPY ]UPS I DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS; PROJECT NAME: VOuiTTAv<£tg Co6>Motb C-T I — | I _ I D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. ( ) The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ^ Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. r~j Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone # By ;Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION .Tnrisdietion Prepared by« VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Q Bldg. Dept, p Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. "feS-llk Rev; BUILDING ADDRESS 'Z'Zqo APPLICANT/CONTACT . BUILDING OCCUPANCY B-Z TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION "3C-O PHONE NO. DESIGNER PHONE CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION Ropp FRA.M/KJG Air Conditionine Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value BUILDING AREA Reuisioi^s. HOURX.^; ^HRS<2 VALUATION MULTIPLIER 78-l<8x 1,25 = e @ @ ^J^^^J_JJJ^^"— «- pc. ree 1^5.4-5" Building Permit Fee $_ Plan Check Fee $ COM HE N T5- SHEET I OF / 12/87 DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Print And Fill In Shaded Area Only JOB"- •<•''":1^"v" ADDRESS .'.1^ ASSESSOR'S ~-l-:-"£?DARCEL NO '.; " PLAN ID NO j.^-S-.'^ii^•--.' -•"-;•'.'-v-OWNER •*?£••''>/^ ^* >t^-^- /i ^ OWNER'S \;^<-^->;iw^ MAILING -&»;v<^:iJ^X--: -/^? VALIDATI x? / ESTMATED VALUATION 7 PLAN CHECK FFF 001-810-00-00-8821 IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES WILL BE FORFEITED ^^L^^1*^-^^ -J\v%«^f*r-^^?3i'T*'J;if A - « CHECK IF SUBMITTED -D 2 ENERGY CALCS D 2 1987 ENERGY CALCS FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS DESCRIPTION OFWORK 2 SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPES DATE GIVEN/ SENT TO APPLICANT DATE CONTACT PERSON LA COSTA LETTER ADDRESS SCHOOL FEE FORM CITY ZIP TEL P & E CORRECTIONS LIST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE White - File Yellow - Applicant Pink Finance Gold Assessor ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-I468 DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS: CARLSBAO SET: Cosmos C PROJECT NAME; \MniTTA. vCg.?e- CcxoTRgu ION JTEAITCHECKER JFILE COPY QUPS fjDESIGNER D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified _ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: C-A | [ Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. [||1 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has ^ been completed. Person contacted; Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone ft 714 414- I77S By:Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION PLAN CHECK NO. JURISDICTION:ClTV OF= TO:AJA CORPORATE PROJECT DATA OCCOPAHCY: BUILDING USE: [MDUST'L. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: ACTUAL AREA: I > »J£> ALLOWABLE AREA; 32OOQ P£(g. STORIES: HKigTT; SPRINKLERS: OCCUPANT LOAD:_ REMARKS: - 3000 *« FLAH OOKKHJC10H SHEET GENERAL QOMfERdAL Date plans received by jurisdiction Date plans received by Esgil Corp ; /Z-*iJi-%<? Date initial plan check completed: Applicant contact person: AJA Tel.- 4-74- READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. Present California law mandates that construction comply with Title 24 and the applicable model code editions adopted, with or without changes, by the various state agencies authorized to propose building regulations for enforcement at the local level. Code sections cited are based on the 1985 UBC. The circled items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1985 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet, specification, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UP list when you submit the revised plans. NOTE: PAGE NUMBERS ARE NOT IN SEQUENCE AS PAGES HAVING NO ITEMS NEEDING CORRECTIONS WERE DELETED. List No. 80, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, WITHOUT ENERGY OR LOCAL ORDINANCE OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS A. FLAMS y- B. ^3?) © Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to- Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: The jurisdiction's building department. GHBERAL Provide the (site addressJand a vicinity sketch on the Title Sheet. Provide the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner and the responsible design professionals on the Title Sheet. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation.J Please' includetheCalifornialicense number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. Indicate on the Title Sheet whether or not a grading permit is required for this project. >. Show on the Title Sheet all buildings, structures, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included" on the site plan or Title Sheet. p-. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: Occupancy Group Description of Use Type of Construction Sprinklers: Yes or No Stories Height Floor Area /Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-C. (if applicable) Justification to exceed allowable height or stories in Table 5-D. (if applicable) Provide a note with the building data legend stating that yards used for area increases shall be permanently maintained. Provide a note on the plans indicating if any hazardous materials will be stored and/or used within the building which exceed the quantities listed in UBC Table 9-A. C. SITE PLAN Ji^ Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show north arrow, property lines, easements, streets, existing and proposed buildings and structures. Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan". Clearly designate on the site plan existing buildings to remain, existing buildings to be demolished, buildings to be constructed under this permit and any proposed future buildings. Clearly designate any side yards used to justify increases in allowable area based on Section 506. 15^ Show on the site plan all proposed walls, retaining walls and fences. Specify their heights on the plans. Provide construction details if a part of this permit. 16^ Clearly dimension building setbacks from f property lines, street centerlines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. 17x Show and dimension on the site plan all / building projections including eaves, balconies, cornices and similar appendages extending beyond the exterior walls. 18*-' Show on the site plan, or provide the grading plans, showing finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to buildings, drainage patterns and locations and gradients of cut or fill slopes. Show dimensioned parking layout including any required disabled access spaces. 2fK Show the location of any designated flood plains, open space easements, or other development restricted areas on the site plan. 21* Provide a reference on the site plan to any details or specifications for required site improvements to comply with the Title 24 disabled access requirements. 7/29/87 11^ Total width of exits in feet shall be not less than total occupant load served divided by 50. Tributary occupant load from basements and stories above shall be per Section 3303 (b) and the maximum width required for any story shall be maintained. \\y. No point in the building shall be more than 150 / feet (200 if sprinklered) from an exterior exit, horizontal exit, enclosed stairway or exit passageway, measured along the path of travel. This may be increased 100 feet if last 150 feet is in a corridor. Section 3303 (d) (See exceptions). Double acting doors are not allowed when ' serving a tributary occupant load of more than 100, or when part of a fire assembly, or part of smoke and draft control assemblies or when equipped with panic hardware. Section 3304 (b). 1>9. Exit doors should swing in the direction of egrees when serving an occupant load of 50 or more or when serving any hazardous area. Section 3304 (b). See doors _ Exit doors should be openable from the inside without the use of a key, special knowledge, or effort. Section 3304(c) [Note that exit doors serving 10 or less occupants may have a night latch, dead bolt, or security chain per Title 24 2-3304 (c).] Exit doors from assembly rooms with 50 or more occupants shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. Section 3318. All doors and gates, within the exit path from an assembly room to a public way, shall not be provided with latches or locks unless they are equipped with panic hardware. Section 3318. Exit doors should be a minimum size of 3 feet by 6 feet 8 inches with a minimum door swing of 90 degrees. Maximum leaf width is 4 feet. Section 3304 (e). 22^ / 124 ./The net dimension /should' be used (clear width) at doorways in determining exit widths required by Section 3303 (b). Section 3304 (e). In consideration of door thicknesses, panic hardware, door swing, etc., the required exit widths have not been furnished. See door Regardless of occupant load, a floor or landing not more than 1/2 inch below the threshold is required on each side of an exit door. Section 3304 (h). 126. When a door landing serves an occupant load of / 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half its required width. Section 3304 (i). 127y Door landings shall have a length measured in / the direction of travel of not less than 44 inches. Section 3304 (i). Doors should not project more than 7 icnhes into the required corridor width when fully opened, nor more than one-half of the required corridor width when in any position. Section 3305 (d). Revolving, sliding and overhead doors are not permitted as exit doors if the occupant load exceeds 9 or the exit door serves a hazardous area. Section 3304 (g). Ramps required by Table 33-A shall not exceed 1:12; other exit ramps 1-8. Ramps steeper than 1:15 shall have handrails as required for stairways. Minimum size landings and landing clearances must be provided. Section 3307. L. STAIRWAYS 131* Stairway width must be at least 44 inches when ' serving 50 or more occupants; 36 inches when less than 50. Section 3306 (b). 128X 12/ 13/. 132*; 133.13 135. 136. Seventy eight inch minimum headroom clearance for stairways should be indicated on the plans. Section 3306 (p). Note that this is from a plane tangent to the stairway tread nosing. Stairway handrails should not project more than 3-1/2 inches into the required width. Trim and stringers may not project more than 1-1/2 inches. Section 3306 (b). Enclosed usable space under interior or exterior stairways should be protected on the enclosed side as required for one-hour fire- resistive construction. Show 2x@ 16" o.c. nailers. Section 3306 (m) (n). Landings should not be reduced in width more than 7 inches by a door when fully open. Section 3304 (i). Stairways from upper levels which extend below the level from which egress from the building is provided, shall have an approved barrier to preclude exiting into such lower levels. Section 3306 (h) & 3309 (e). Vertical distances between stairway landings are limited to 12 feet. Section 3306 (i). 7/29/87 13 140, 141. All interior stairways and ramps shall beenclosed. In other than H-6 and 1 occupancies an enclosure is not required if serving only one adjacent floor and not connected to stairs or corridors serving other floors. Section 3309 (a). Stairway riser must be 4 inches minimum and 7 inches maximum and minimum run shall be 11 inches. Section 3306 (c). See the exception for private stairways serving less than 10 occupants. Winding and spiral stairways are permitted only in residential occupancies. Section 3306 (d). Stairways should be enclosed as specified in Section 3309: a. Two-hour fire-resistive walls are required in buildings of Type I and II-F.R. construction, and in all buildings over four stories, and one-hour elsewhere. Only exit doors are exit enclosures. allowed to open into c. y,. Doors should be labeled one and one-half- hours or one-hour fire assemblies. Exit enclosures should include a corridor on the ground floor extending to the exterior (see exception). Fire-resistive construction should be as required for the exit enclosure, including protected openings. Only exit doors are permitted to open into the corridor. An approved barrier is required at the ground floor to prevent people from accidentally continuing to the lower level. f. Usable space is not allowed under the stairs. Occupied floors more than 75 feet above the highest grade should have all exits from the building in smoke-proof enclosures. Section 3310 (b). In buildings four or more stories, one stairway must extend to the roof. Section 3306 (o). It must be in a smoke-proof enclosure in buildings over 75 feet in height. A first story as allowed by Section 702 shall be included in determining the number of stories when determining if a stairway to the roof is required. Section 3306 (o). 144/ Handrails are required on each side of / stairways Stairways required to be more than 88 inches wide shall have intermediate handrails. Stairways less than 44 inches wide may have one handrail if not open on both sides. Private stairways (1 tenant), 30 inches or less in height, may have one handrail. Handrails shall be 30 inches to 34 inches above nosing of treads and be continuous and, except for private stairways, at least one rail shall extend 6 inches beyond top and bottom risers, handrail ends shall be returned or shall terminate in a newel post or safety terminal. Section 3306 (j). Note: Title 24 requires handrails on both sides to extend 12 inches beyond the top nosing and 12 inches plus the tread width beyound the bottom nosing where disabled access is required. 145^. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be / not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrai1. Section 3 306 (j). 146./Openings in the exterior wall below or within / 10 feet horizontally of an exterior exit stairway in buildings over two stories shall be protected by a self-closing assembly having a three-fourths-hour rating, unless two separate exterior stairways serve an exterior exit balcony. Section 3306 (1). Openings in exterior walls below or within 10 feet, measured horizontally, of an exterior stair shall be protected by self-closing fire assemblies having a three-fourths-hour fire protection rating when the stair serves a floor level having openings in two or more floors below it. See exception above. Section 3306 (1). Buildings four or more stories in height shall have a stairway numbering system complying with Section 3306 (q). M. CORRIDORS 149. Corridors and exterior exit balconies serving 10 ore more occupants must be a minimum 44 inches wide and 7 feet high to the lowest projection. Section 3305 (b) 150. When a corridor or exterior exit balcony is accessible to the handicapped, changes in elevation shall be made by means of a ramp. Section 3305 (f). 147, / ? OP Tug.To TM& Of=" 7/29/87 151. Corridors serving 30 or more occupants shall / have walls and ceilings of one-hour / construction except: a Corridors greater than 30 feet wide when the occupants have an exit independent from the corridor. b. Exterior sides of exterior exit balconies. c. Corridor walls and ceilings need not be of fire-resistive construction within office spaces having an occupant load of 100 or less then the entire story in which the space is located is equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout and smoke detectors are installed within the corridor in accordance with their listing. Section 3305 (g). 152. One-hour fire-rated corridors shall have door f openings protected by tight-fitting smoke and draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes, except openings in interior walls of exterior exit balconies. Doors shall be maintained self-closing or be automatic-closing by action of a smoke detector per Section 4306 (b). Doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door meets the stop on sides and top. Section 3305 (h). 153. Total area of all openings, except doors, in / any portion of an interior corridor, shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the corridor wall of the room which it is separating from the corridor. Such openings shall be protected by fixed, approved 1/4 inch thick wired glass installed in steel frames. Section 3305 (h). IStf. Elevators serving more than two stories shall / not open into required one-hour exit corridors unless protected by an approved smoke/draft control door system. In high rise buildings refer to Section 1807 (h). Section 3305. 155.I IS/. ' Duct penetrations of fire-rated corridor walls and ceilings shall have fire dampers per Section 4306 (j). One-hour corridors shall not be used as an integral part of a duct system. This includes the space above a dropped ceiling within the one-hour corridor. UMC Section 706 (b). Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, and exterior exit balcony, showing all fire-resistive materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations. Section 3305 (g). Ceilings of combustible materials cannot be suspended below the one-hour corridor ceiling. In types III or V construction fire retardant treated wood may be used. Section 3305 (g). Corridor walls may terminate at the ceiling only if the ceiling is an element of a one- hour fire-resistive floor or roof system Section 3305 (g) 160. When two exits are required, dead end ' corridors and exit balconies are limited to 20 feet. Section 3305 (e). Bar siots (161JI Exit signs are required for exits serving an occupant load exceeding 49. Show all required exit sign locations. Section 3314 (a). 162. Show that exits are lighted with at least one ' foot candle at floor level. Section 3313 (a). Show that the power supply for exit illumination and exit signs is provided by two separate circuits. (Occupant load exceeds 50 in I occupancies, 100 in H occupancies and 300 in all others). Section 3313 (b) 1. 164< Show separate sources of illumination and exit signs, exceeds 999 in A-l, 500 in 0. 1*7, 169. power for exit (Occupant load A-2/2.1, 750 in churches, 100 in I's and 500 in B-2 occupancies used for retail sales or offices). Section 3313 (b) 2. . The exit sign locations as shown are not adequate . Elevators shall be enclosed in a one-hour shaft except in Type I and Type II F.R. construction where the elevator shall be in a two hour shaft. Elevators in other than Group I occupancies need not be in a rated enclosure if serving only one adjacent floor. Section 1706. Every opening into an elevator shaft enclosure shall be protected by a self-closing fire assembly having a one-hour fire rating in one- hour shafts and one and one-half hours in two hour shafts. Section 1706. Elevator shafts extending through more than two floor levels shall be vented to the outside. The area of vent shall be not less than 3 1/2% of the shaft area and a minimum of 3 square feet per elevator. Section 5104. Elevators in high rise with Section 1807(b). buildings shall comply V70. Every elevator lobby or entrance area shall be provided with an approved smoke detector as required by Section 5103(b). 7/29/87 10 172. ' Doors other than the hoistway door and the elevator car door are prohibited at the point of access to elevator car. Section 5106. Revise the number of elevator cars per hoistway enclosure to comply with Section 5103(a). 3. Provide notes, details or specifications to show the elevator will comply with UBC Sections 5102-5106 and Title 24 Section 2-5102 through 2-5105. 174. Provide clear inside elevator car dimensions as / required by UBC. Section 5103(d) 6 and Title 2k. 2-5103(m). a. One elevator in buildings more than three stories or buildings where disabled access is required to upper level(s): 6'-8" by 4' -3" with a minimum clear opening width of 42". b. Elevators other than in (a) above serving an occupant load over 50 shall have a minimum inside platform of 5 feet 8 inches wide by 4 feet 6 inches deep. The minimum clear door width shall be 36 inches. c. Elevators other than in (a) above serving less than 50 occupants shall have a minimum inside platform of 4 feet 6 inches by 4 feet 6 inches and a minimum clear door width of 2 feet 8 inches. P. CTASS AHD CTAZIHS Specify on the window schedule the glass type and thickness to show compliance with Table 54- A and B. Glazing, in the same wall plane as a door, must be safety glazing if within 12" of the door and less than 60" above the walking surface, unless the glazing is leaded or faceted glass. Section 5406 (d) 6. Glass in excess of 9 sq. ft. with the lowest edge less the 18 inches above a walking surface shall be safety glazing or shall have a horizontal number not less than 1-1/2 inches in width and located between 24 and 36 inches above the walking surface. Section 5406 (d) 7. A fire-retardant roof covering is required. See exceptions under Section 3202 (b). 9. Specify roof pitch. 180, Roof pitch is not adequate for roof covering S specified. Specify minimum pitch of ' Specify roof material and application. Specify ICBO, UL or other recognized listing approval number for roof materials not covered in UBC 1S3 Specify roof slope for drainage or design to s support accumulated water. Section 3207 (a) Show roof drains and overflows. Size drains per Appendix D of UPC. Section 3207 (a). 185^/Show the legal basis to allow roof drainage to ' flow onto the adjacent property. 18^ Draft stop roof/ceiling area, attics, / mansards, overhangs, false fronts and similar to limit area to 3,000 sq. ft. or 60 LF (9,000 sq. ft and 100 LF, if sprinklered) Section 2516 (f). 187XB-2 and B-4 occupancies with over 50,000 sq. ' ft. of undivided area and H occupancies over 15,000 sq. ft. of single floor area shall have smoke and heat vents per Section 3206. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Chapter 34 and Section 5207 or provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. Provide plastic roof panel details to show compliance with Section 5206 or provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50 percent of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave or cornice vents. Section 3205 (c). 191. Provide a minunum 22" x 30" attic access ' opening (or 30" x 30" if equipment is in attic). Section 3205 (c). R. Fire sprinklers are required for any story or basement when the floor area exceeds 1,500 sq. ft. and there is not provided at least 20 sq. ft. of opening entirely above the adjoining ground in each 50 lineal feet or fraction thereof of exterior wall on at least one side, or when openings are provided on only one side and the opposite side is more than 75 feet away. Section 3802 (b). sprinklers are required in a basement if any portion of a basement is more than 75 feet from openings in an exterior wall. Section 3802 (b). 194^-Fire sprinklers are required at the top of r rubbish and linen chutes and in their terminal rooms. Chutes extending through three or more floor shall have additional sprinkler heads installed within such chutes at alternate floors. Sprinkler heads shall be accessible for servicing. Section 3802 (b). 7/29/87 11 19S< Fire sprinklers are required in retail sales f rooms where the floor area exceeds 12,000 sq ft. on any floor or 24,000 sq. ft. on all floors or in B-2 retail sales occupancies more than three stories in height. Section 3802. Fire sprinklers are required in H occupancies when exceeding the areas in Section 3802 (f). (206\ Note on the foundation plan that- "Prior to —the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the Building Official in writing that: the building pad was prepared accordance with the soils report; in Iftf. Provide fire sprinklers in drinking and dining establishments when the total area of unseparated rooms exceeds 5000 square feet. Section 3802 (c) 198X Provide fire sprinklers Section 506, 507, 508 or 3802. jurisdiction ordinance. See also 20d. / When serving more than 100 sprinkler heads, automatic sprinkler systems shall be supervised by an approved central, proprietary or remote, station service, or shall be provided with a local alarm which will give an audible signal at a constantly attended location. Section 3803. Provide class _ standpipes per Section 3807. A first story as allowed by Section 702 shall be included in determining the number of stories when determining if standpipes are required. Section 3806. b. the utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and; c. the foundation excavations, forming and reinforcement comply with the soils report and approved plan" Provide spread footings for concentrated loads designed for 1,000 psf soil bearing or per bearing value as determined by an engineer or architect. Chapter 29. 2 08-. Show height ' 23. of all foundation walls. Chapter 209.Show height of retained foundation walls. Chapter 23. earth on all 210x Show distance from foundation to edge of cut ' or fill slopes and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 29. 21 ' 1. Note on the plans that wood shall be 6 inches above finish grade. Section 2516 (c) 7. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 2905. 20?. Specify on the foundation plan or structural ' specifications sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (When required by the soil report). 204. The foundation plan does not comply with the following soil report recommendation(s) for this project _ 205. Provide notes on the foundation plan listing the soils report recommendations for foundation slab and building pad preparation. 212^ Note on plans that surface water will drain / away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 2905 (f). 213. Dimension foundations per Table 29-A. •RBtE NO. 3»-A—FOUNDATIONS FOR STUD BEARMO V REQUIREMENTS'' NUMSUOFnoontUFFORTIBIYTHI 6I 10 6I 10 12 15II Of FOOTMQ 12II 24 iWkaeiuwuul_______________a required in Sccuaa 2907 UV TV (round tute at ftaoc any be acmcd lo the rirattoi of fee up of lh« foctnu. fcffloan Fraud trtnm l oaly stall fee tt rcquind for uippoflag DM float 21W'Note on the plans: "On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevations of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus 2 percent." Provide elevations on the site plan to show compliance. Section 2907 (d) 5. 2!Sf SShow foundation sills to be pressure treated, or equal. Section 2516 (c) 3. 7/29/87 12 266. Cripple wall studs exceeding 4 feet in height shall be 3 inch by 4 inch or 2 inches by 6 inches when supporting 2 stories. Section 2517 (g) fc- 267' Show plywood sheathing over exposed eaves, or ' other weather exposed areas, is exterior grade. Section 2516 (g) 3. 268, Show a weep screed at the foundation plate line on all exterior stud walls to be stuccoed. Section 4706 (e). Ridges, hips, and valleys shall be at least one size larger than supported rafters. Section 2517 (h) 3 268 280XBuildings housing Group A Occupancies shall ' front directly upon or have access to a public street not less than 20 feet in width The access to the public street shall be a minimum 20-foot-wide right-of-way, unobstructed and maintained only as access to the public street. The main entrance to the building shall be located on a public street or on the access way. Section 603. V. 2/00. In open beam construction, provide strap ties across the beams at the ridge support. Section 2501 (b). V.MTSGEUJMCBOUS 27L< Parking garages shall have an unobstructed / headroom clearance of not less than 7'-0" above the finish floor to any ceiling, beam, pipe or similar construction. Section 702 (b). Show light and customarily used by Section 605. ventilation, people, will for areas comply with Provide details of restrooms to show compliance with Section 510 (b), regarding floors, walls and showers. (274.) Provide restrooms for each sex if the number of —employees exceeds 4 and both sexes are employed. Section 705 (B occupancy). 2X5; Show unenclosed floor and roof openings, open ' and glazed sides of landings and ramps, balconies or porches more than 30" above grade or floor, and roofs used for other than service to the building have 42" minimum height guardrail, through which a 6" sphere cannot pass, and designed for 20 Ibs. per lin. ft. applied horizontally at top rail (50 Ibs. for exit facilities serving more than 50). Section 1711. Table 23-B. 6. Provide platform and stage construction, including occupancy separations and roof vents, as per Chapter 39. yt. n&s Pedestrian walkway shall comply with Section 509. Provide at least one drinking fountain for each floor level in Group A occupancies. Section 605. 279< Show that aisles and seats comply with Sections ' 3315 and 3316. h HANDICAPPED ACCESS Provide note and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Handicapped Access Check List. Handicapped access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. X. EHKBGY COHSEKVATIOH 282. Provide mechanical plans, plan details, calculations and completed forms to show compliance with state regulations for energy conservation. 283. Provide electrical plans, plan details, calculations and the completed Form 5 or CF-5 to show compliance with state regulations for energy conservation. 284. Pedestrian walkways 509. shall comply with Section 285. Incorporate in the plans or specifications the attached "Title 24 Mandatory Requirements" and the "Title 24 Construction Compliance Statement Requirements". 286. Please see additional corrections, or remarks, on the following page. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan check for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan check items, please contact at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Enclosures: 1. 2. 3. 07/29/87 15 KNKRCY CONSERVATION CORRECTIONS - LOWRIST OPTICS BUILDINGS fSECOKD CEKERATTOS HOKKESrDEKTlAl, STAKDARPS On January 1, 1987, new standards, and a new design manual, went into effect to govern the energy design for new heated or cooled lowrise office buildings, (i e. 3 stories or less). The new standards and design also apply to alterations or additions involving heated or cooled space in existing lowrise office buildings or existing shell or speculative buildings wherein heated or cooled office space is being proposed or lighting is being extended to new conditioned space The new standards (214 pages) and the new "Designing for Compliance" manual (400+ pages) contain forms and design instructions that are essential to developing a complying design. To order the standards and manual you can contact the California Energy Commission, Accounting Office, 1516 North Street, MS 02, Sacramento, California 95814 (Telephone (916) 324-3014). • Please address the circled items and, when resubmitting, provide a copy of this showing the page, detail, etc. where each circled item has been addressed In new or existing buildings a Certificate of Compliance (Form CF-1) must be completed and imprinted on the plans if HYAC or lighting is being extended to a new conditioned space. (1-13 Manual). A Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) is required to be imprinted on the plans for shell or speculative buildings where lighting, HVAC or other improvements will be made by the tenants. (Manual 1-13) Multiple Certificates of Compliance (CF- 1) are required to be imprinted on the plans for speculative pr shell buildings, where the final occupancy is not known at the tine of the original building permit. The multiple CF-1 documents should address the potential uses, i e. office, retail sales, etc , and should apply the appropriate standards to the specific occupancies. (Manual 1-22) /OB-4J The Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), Page 1, crust be signed in the lov.er right by the licensed person who is attesting that the design complies with the regulations (Manual 1-14) The upper left corner of the Certificate of Conpliance (CF-1), Pages 1 and 2, oust show the name of the documentation author, who need not be a licensed person. (Manual 1-14) The owner of the building must sign in the appropriate place on Page 2 of Certificate of Compliance (CF-1). (Manual 1-14) The design entities (electrical, etc.)* nust sign in the appropriate space on Page 2 of Certificate of Compliance (CF- 1). (Manual 5-4) Note on the plans, near the imprinted Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), "A separate copy of the Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) has been retained by the owner and will be made available to future owners or future tenants." (Manual 5-4) Oari9 On CF-1, Line 1^, show the percent of exterior wall, between conditioned and non-conditioned space, that is glazed, i.e. Line 13 divided by Line 12 times 100 OB?£6 On CF-1, Line 15, show the average shading coefficient for all glazing, supported by a CF-2. If only one type of glazing, no calculation is necessary just enter the shading coefficient for the glazing. On CF-1, Line 16, enter the allowed percent of glazing, for the selected package, based on the average shading coefficient shown on Line 15. This entry should be greater than the Line 14 entry. ORf28 On CF-1, Lines 17 through 21 should be S left blank for lowrise office buildings. On CF-1, Lines 22 through 29, enter the proposed area of skylights and the allowed area per the package selected. If nore than 8 skylights attach a separate sheet.» * 6,jr. OB-9 OB-10 Note on the plans, near the imprinted Certificate of Compliance (CF-1), "At the time of permit issuance, the permittee will provide an approved copy of the Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) to the jurisdiction", for filing (UBC Section 302 (a) 7) If a Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) was previously prepared for this entire building, or for improvements or alterations in this building, provide a copy of the approved Certificate of Compliance (CF-1). (Manual 5-t) OB^ll The building is a nixed use building and a Certificate of Compliance (CF-1) must be prepared for each use unless the subordinate occupancies total less than 1,000 S.F. and are less than 10% of the total conditioned floor area. (Manual 1-22) OB/12 On CF-1, Line 1, show the occupancy / type, i.e. lowrise office. 087X3 On CF-1, Line 2, show the occupancy / group B-2. OB-li» On CF-1, Line 3, show the package ' selected, i e. A, B, C, D, E or Performance Approach. OBriS On CF-1, Line iv, floor area being documentation. show the conditioned addressed by the OB-1-6 On CF-1, Line 5, show the proposed or / existing total resistance (Rt) for the roof. If different types of roof, complete CF-2. Complete a CF-3 if only one roof type OB-17 On CF-1, Line 6, show the minimum / allowed total resistance (Rt) for the roof token from the package you selected 08^18 On CF-1, Line 7, show the proposed or existing total resistance (Rt) for exposed floors or soffits separating conditioned space from non-conditioned space, using Form CF-2 Provide a Form CF-3 (Slab-on-grade floors are not considered to be floors for this item ) / OB-19 On CF-1, Line 8, show the minimum / allowed total resistance (Rt) for the floor taken from the package you selected. OBrZO On CF-1, Line 9, if there are different / types of walls, show the proposed or existing average total resistance (R^), using CF-2. If only one vail type, only CF-3 need be completed. /OB,-21 On CF-1, Line 10, complete CF-2 if all opaque walls and doors have the sane heat capacity, generally a Heat Capacity less than four. If there are multiple walls having different heat capacities, this may be left blank". OB»22 On CF-1, Line 11, show the minimum f required total resistance (Rt) for opaque walls and doors. If multiple walls, having different Heat Capacities are proposed, show the area weighted average using CF-2. On CF-1, Line 12, show the total exterior wall area for the entire building or that portion covered by the new standards. The exterior wall area should include opaque walls, doors and windows between the floor and the bottom of the floor, or roof, above, that separate conditioned space from non- conditioned space. Provide a CF-2. On CF-1, Line 13, show the total glazing in walls separating conditioned space from non-conditioned space Provide a CF-2. ELECTRICAL FLAN CORRECTION SHEET DATE: PUUI CBECX MMKER;— / J/. •f. jf, ff. V. 10. 14. Submit complete electrical plans and specifications . Submit plan showing location of all services . Submit complete one- line diagram of service and feeders. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for building service. Indicate ampere interrupting capacities (AIC) of service and subservice equipment. NEC 230-65/110-9. Indicate sizes of fuses and/or circuit breakers . Indicate fuse symbols to show fault currents are limited to 10,000 amps on branch circuits. If fuses are not used to limit fault currents on branch circuits to 10,000 amps, specify method to be used. Submit plan showing location of all switchboards . Indicate dimension of switchboards and control panels rated 1200 amperes or more. NEC 110-16(c). Submit plan showing location of all transformers . Indicate the grounding system to be installed for transformers. NEC 250- 26(c). FLAN CHECKER: WAGGONER OWEN DILLON 1#. Provide overcurrent protection on the secondary side of transformers. NEC 240- 21/384-16(d). j4. Submit plan showing location of all panels. l£. Submit panels schedules. 1/f. Specify conduit and wire sizes. Jn . Specify aluminum or copper conductors and type of insulation. 18. Show approximate length of feeders. . Specify electrode conductor size and type wire, (aluminum or copper) . Submit electrical load calculations. 2X Indicate existing service size. ^2. Indicate existing building load. . Indicate new additional loads. Indicate wiring method. Show exit signs on the electrical lighting plan. Note: Power for exit lights and emergency lighting must conform to the 1985 UBC Sections 3313 and 3314. Provide receptacle(s) within 25' of the roof mounted A/C units. UMC Section 509. . Provide multiple switch lighting controls per CAC, Title 24, 2-5319. Any questions on electrical please contact the plan checker shown above, at Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. 08/31/87 Datei Jurisdiction Prepared by t PLAN CHECK NO. BUILDING ADDRESS 2.436 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK PEE CLr n Eldg. Dept, O Esgil APPLICANT/CONTACT <^iu&gft.r BUILDING OCCUPANCY B- PHONE NO. 7/4- 4-74- 1776 DESIGNER PHONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION -3E-Ki CONTRACTOR PHONE Tn. r- BUILDING PORTION \^T PLV^ 2^D PC.R. Air Conditionine Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value BUILDING AREA I.* OOO ^ GOO ^7,000 VALUATION MULTIPLIER 10. °° 10 °° § (a @ I,150 VALUE SG>O, ooo 1<?O. OOO "5)5,500 74 S, "5oo Building Permit Fee $ Plan Check Tee J COtl tl E N TG SHEET ' OF ' 12/87 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SL 1TE 208 SAN DIEGO. C\ 92123 (619) 56O-1 +68 DATE: APR.M- JURISDICTION: G&R\_S&^P L,PLAN CHECKERCFILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: %%-\l*(o SET: QUPS P. DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS; <2<Z.<?Q CoSMO S C^T" ""* PROJECT NAME; \0mf]- CTJI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where tas necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. I—| The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply I I with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. I—| The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies I I identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. j] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: g| Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. |) Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has — been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone |_ |~"i REMARKS: By; OK, YS -}4L&ts Enclosures ESGIL CORPORATION Datei Jurisdiction BAP Prepared byi VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK Q Elcg. Dept, D Csgil PLAN CHECK NO. 32- BUILDING ADDRESS Zt^Q APPLICANT/CONTACT <6iu&Eg-T AJA BUILDING OCCUPANCY B-'Z. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION PHONE NO. 7/4- 4-74- 1776 DESIGNER PHONE CONTRACTOR PHONE T< u r- BUILDING PORTION |^T PLR. •2UC> F«_R- 3H£u, 8t;/J,DlM& o>Fuo£«£ ^^ TIF =£> (37ooo ^x-^ S/2l06£ ^> 3^000^ /V^/= =5> 37000 Air Cor.ditioninff Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sunnklers Total Value BUILDING AREA >z«s- o&o 3 000 3% 000$ "^Soco *?r ^^!Q-\ -ooft x flwr^ - x^rvc^F - !jd x* 40 /fa ^ ^7, ooo VALUATION MULTIPLIER 'ZO.00 ^20 °° tf/toO= 7^ ED ^Z*0 60 ^ ff ff£ 00 •j r/tfoao @ (a @ 1^° VALUE E>(oO, OOO \ <?O. OOO t; "^5, 5OO 7^5, 5oo Building Pur m it Feu $ Plan Check Fee $ COM II C N TG iO SHEET I OF 12/87 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE if ^Sp? M TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 4859 BLOl/ rk M <619> 438 1161 Office of the City Engineer of TO: DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES FROM: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO., 88. (TRACT or P.E. #) (PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS) (DEVELOPER'S NAME AND ADDRESS) We have inspected the grading for lots O or HAP noosvr phase of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have received rough grading certification from fr/ocxy-u/AW— £/</e, 6£><^£,^/7^uTj . the Soils Engineer, dated /// /0 /Q88 . and from the Supervision Grading Engineer, dated //*.» /&. /98$ and are satisfied_^- ^ that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City standards. Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for 1 ot/<^:>W? /#w ll&VJ or phase _ of pro.iect f» & . li- . $$.&& _ from a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineering concerns including site development, water or sewer availability, or final grading. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, we need to be advised so that we can verify that final grading and landscaping has been completed in accordance with the approved plans for the project. APPROVED: Project Grading Inspector Sr^/ Construction Inspector Project Engineer c: Developer R.E. Wall & AsSOCiateS, IRC., Registered Electrical Engineers 2842A Walnut Ave , Tustm, California 92680 (714) 544-2783 R fc. C E I V E to March 17, 1988 MAR 1 8 1388 GlLBbRl AJA & ASSCC Gilbert Aja & Associates 2 Corporate Park Irvine, CA 92714 Attn: Lindsey Noble RE: Whittaker Shell Dear Lindsey, In response to the City of Carlsbad plancheck corrections, I have the following comments: 1. No conditioned space is illuminated in the shell, therefore no Title 24 electrical compliance is required. 2. The 100A fused switch serving Panel HL will limit the 480Y/277V fault current to below 14,OOOA (actual let- thru is 3,900A per Bussman) . The 15kVA transformer impedance will limit the fault to below 10,OOOA at 208Y/120V. 3. Exit signs will be provided at all paths of egress and exit doorways in the tenant improvement package. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Mike Wall MW/tl ELECTRICAL JPRISDICPOM; PLAH OOKRECUOH SHEET DAZE: PLAH CHECK HttfflKR; ^. Submit complete electrical plans and specifications. ^C Submit plan showing location of all services. jf. Submit complete one-line diagram of service and feeders. }f. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for building service. jf. Indicate ampere interrupting capacities (AIC) of service and subservice equipment. NEC 230-65/110-9. flC Indicate sizes of fuses and/or circuit breakers. Indicate fuse symbols to show fault currents are limited to 10,000 amps on branch circuits. V. If fuses are not used to limit fault currents on branch circuits to 10,000 amps, specify method to be used. jg. Submit plan showing location of all switchboards. 10. Indicate dimension of switchboards and control panels rated 1200 amperes or more. NEC 110-16(c). vf. Submit plan showing location of all transformers. 1ft. Indicate the grounding system to be installed for transformers. NEC 250- 26(c). g^VOLLIE WAGGONER PLAN CHECKER: Q OUER DILUHI . Provide overcurrent protection on the secondary side of transformers. NEC 2<tO- 21/384-16(d). . Submit plan showing location of all panels . . Submit panels schedules. . Specify conduit and wire sizes. Z7. Specify aluminum or copper conductors and type of insulation. 18. Show approximate length of feeders. ~U9. Specify electrode conductor size and type wire, (aluminum or copper) . Submit electrical load calculations. . Indicate existing service size. Indicate existing building load. Indicate new additional loads. . Indicate wiring method. J Show exit signs on the electrical lighting plan. Note: Power for exit lights and emergency lighting must conform to the 1985 UBC Sections 3313 and 331U. . Provide receptacle(s) within 25' of the roof mounted A/C units. UHC Section 509. . Provide multiple switch lighting controls per CAC, Title 2U, 2-5319. Any questions on electrical please contact the plan checker shown above, at Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-11*68. Thank you. AJIT MOUVA S ASSMIATES.O ^ CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS INc4£ |g 2101 SO. ATLANTIC BLVD.. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 9004(C. ^^ TELEPHONE NO. (213) 283-9083. (213) 283-0736 -- 13-gag ^MF^SO^J "tte- JUIT RJUMUVM i ItlOOIATEI CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS BtfC. 2101 SO. ATLANTIC BLVD.. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90O40 (213) 2e3-80«3» 263-0735 JOB* DATE ENGINEJR STRUCTURAL . CALCULATIONS FOR. NHITTAKER COMMAND CONTROL SYSTEM FACILITY AJIT S. RANDHAYA, SE2009 JUIT KAMI1AHJI S AXSI01JITE1 conisutniwa STDUCTURAL dwcuvecfMaio t sa.An>*nc*i.vo.LOSAMG8Xs.CAUFORNiAsao4o (213} 2e3->0«3*2«3-073S JOB / DATE ENGINEER 0 Q « © <D TABLE OF CONTENTS LOADING CRITERIA ROOF FRAMING FLOOR FRAMING COLUMN t FOUNDATION DESIGN SEISMIC DESIGN PANEL DESIGN MISCELLANEOUS SHEET 9 U.t.>tci P.-fc:* "r\^^ C<^Cs*' ^•-S,«, •P.-?(, AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES LOADING CRITERIA 01/26/88 AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES JOB:87130 LOADING CRITERIA ROOF DEAD LOAD W= 3.0 psf 1.5 psf 1.0 psf 1.5 psf 2.0 psf 1.5 psf 1.5 psf 3.0 psf 15.0 psf 2.0 psf 17.0 psf LIVE LOAD 20 / 16 / 12 psf ROOFING PLYWOOD RAFTER PURLIN CEILING SPRINKLERS MISC. & MECH. GYPBOARD DL. FOR PURLIN BEAM & MISC. DL. FOR BEAM AJIT EA8BMVA S ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL EN 2101 SO. ATLANTIC BLVD. LO« ANOCLCS. CAUFONNU 0OO4O TELEPHONE NO. CM* «M »O««. CMS) M3-O73* LOADING CRTTFRTA FLOOR D.L.11.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 1.5 3.0 27.0 3.0 30.0 PSF PSF PSF PSF PSF PSF PSF PSF PLYWOOD JOIST .-.".• CEILING SPRINKLER /..-/ niSCELJLANEOUS AND DRYWALJL D.L. FOR JOIST BEAN PSF D.L. FOR BEAM L.L. SOIL 100 PSF REDUQEABUE . PSF 00 PSF CONTINUOUS SPREAD AJIT RANDHAVA * ASSOCIATES ROOF FRAMING DESIGN = = = = = ==============:==:==: AJIT RANDUVA S ASS86IATES — CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS INC. OATK- 2101 SO. ATLANTIC SLVO, LOS ANOELES. CALIFORNIA «OO4O TELEPHONE NO. 1213) *«-«o«s, (213) 263-073* L Ll - i i- * »—H « U1/26/8E, A JIT RANDHAVA 8t ASSOCIATES JOB;87130 P-- POOF FRAhING DEE IBM ********** A *4*****>t TYP PURLIN: i-1 (DL' = W (LL) = 15 psf 2»> psf SPACING @ S -0" o'- fb= 150'!' p=:i fv= 05 psl E- 17OOOOO psi W (TL'= P * f 12'"' + BENDING plf =x (E*Fb Fb= 1.25 150O - 1E75 THE MAXIMUM SPAf4 CAN FE SIZE 4 L== 102.41 5IZE 4 !_=•= 135.66 SIZE 4 !_=-•= 173.5"' i-q 1G75 '( lo 18 75 1.5 * 280 i= 457.194 L ma;- 1.5 * 2SO j= 605.631 L ma\ 1.5 * 2£'.' )= 774.^02 L ma- GOVERN1' 21.382 ft = 27.837 ft • ••••••ITil 1101 «O. ATLANTIC BLVD, LO« ANOELM. CAUFOftNIA NO. tai»> tM xm. «i»> tm-orss OAT>_ MMMN Tom gfr Lou) t CO t I C£> *4 itfx tcfl QD CO t Cfc r< dl I CD Or- OJL/S6/8S AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES JOB; 87 130 ETUPF Or TED EEAh DE51BN__ _____ ________________ _________ __. _ ___ „ _ __ F' — - j LENGTH 37.00 ft W = ^ 11.00 * 17.00 )+( 11.20 * 17.00 ) DL H- ( ll.OOO * 12.000 ) +(11.200 * 32.000 ) LL 0.3"7 + 0.26e> = 0.644 t If TL M= 1.50 * O.e>44 * 37.00 = = 1322. 0 -^ S= 132::. 04 /i 1.25 * 2.4O )= 440.68 REACTION DL TL USE 5.12? t 24.000 o.98 11.91 Scf= 455.53 CAMBER= 2.25 ****** ********* **** + #*Jf*** ********#*#**************#*****************» SIMPL.V SUPPORTED BEAM DESIGN LENGTH 22.00 ft UJ = i 11. OO * 17.00 ) + ( 11.2O * 17. OO ) DL -*• ( 11.000 31 12.000 ) + .' 11.20O * 12.00O ) LL '.' . 37" + -I . 2t,6 = 0 . 644 t 1 f TL M= x . 50 * O.c44 * 22.OO =• = 467.4 "[ °= 4o"7.4O /( 1.25 * 2.40 )= 155.80 REACTION DL TL USE 5.125 # 18.0OO 4 -j K -'• /••>z^ __„ . _„ —• J__' • * * O — Scf= 264.56 CAMBEP= O.67 0 01/26/88 AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES JOB:87130 BEAM WITH CANTILEVER DESIGN LENGTH BETWEEN ELJPFGPTS =5i.OOO ft LEFT CANT. LENGTH = 9.00 ft RIGHT CANT. LENGTH = 11.5OO ft 1 McL= ( 6.96 * 9.00 i + < O.38 4 McL= ( 11.91 * =.00 i+( 0.64 * McR= ( 4.15 * 11.50 ) + ( 0.38 * McR= \ 7. OB * il.50 )+( 0.64 * M+= ( 0.64 * 51.00 =)/8 -1/2* ( Sreqd= 133.91 +12' f 1 . 25 * 2.4) = ( CHECf SHEAF ) LEFT RIGHT Areqd 16.2t3 13.04 125.85 (CHEC^ SLEMDERNESE EFFECT \ LEFT le= 192.52 Cs= 13. TO F b ' = 2 . 2<L , Sreqd= 5o5.9 #)((**.** ^ * 4 * X ***)*• 4' *****#**.**:*#* 9.0-.: =) /'2 = 7E.12 9.00 =i/2 = 133.27 11.50 =i '2 = 72.70 11.50 3) /2 = 124.01 -'8.12 1- 72. 70 )= 133.91 57 5. ± USE 5.125 „ 27.000 Scf= 569.0 Camber= _1 .4=? S= 622.6° RIGHT le=- 277.22 Cs= 15.46 F b = 2.17 Sreqd= 542 . O 01/26/BE AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES JOB:B713O ****** ******* ****************************** **************************** ~,IMcu v '-:>. IF PUTTED PEAM DESI&N £{—5 LENGTH W = • .1.1.20 i 17. GO ) + ( 13.50 * 17.00 i DL + ( 11.200 * 11.000 )+(13.500 * 12.000 ; LL 0.420 + 0.296 = 0.716 I If TL M= 1 . 5O * 0.736 * 3"T.GO = = 1470.9 "!• 3= 14^i..91 ,( 1.25 # 2.40 >= 490.31 REACTION DL TL USE 5.125 * 25.50O Scf= 510.80 CrtMBEF'.:= 2. uB * # * **# * 3IMPLN SUPFORTED BEAM DESIGN E— 6 LENGTH 21 . 00 f t W = ( 11.20 * 17.00 >+f 13. 5O * 17. OO < DL + ( 11.200 Jf 12.000 ; + (13.500 * 12.OOO j LL 0.420 + 0.2^6 = 0.716 \ If Tu M- i.,50 i O.7x6 * 22.00 = = 520. 0 "I S= 520.03 -'I 1.25 * 2.40 "• = 173.34 REACTION DL TL USE 5.125 * 16. GOG Scf=- 2t4.56 CAM&ER= 0.74 01/26/88 AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES JOB; 87 110 BEAM WITH CANTILEVER DESIGN B-7 LENGTH ECTWEEN SUPPORTS =51.0<X> ft LEFT CANT. LENGTH = 9.00 ft RIGHT CANT. L.ENGTH = 11.5OO ft McL= hcR= ( McR= ' 7. ' 13.25 4 .62 7.88 °.00 i-4-' 0.42 9 . OO 1 •+• ( O . 72 CHECI SHEAF . LEFT RIGHT 1E.OO 14.42 Areqd 9. 00 3 'i / 2 9.00 =) /2 ¥ 11. 5-1' > T < 0 . 42 * 11. 50 = ' * 11.50 i + f '.-.~'2 * 11.50 =. M+= ( 0.72 * 51.00 z)/8 -1/2* ( 86.92 Sreqd= 148.99 *12/ (1.25 * 2.4) = 595.9 USE 5.125 86.92 DL 148.27 TL B'-.'.BB DL 137.98 TL 80.88 )= 148.'(• 1 :e.50o 1.41 in 693.80 (CriECf SLENDEPNESE EFFECT LEFT !<?= 1E2.52 Cs= 14. O~ Fb'= 2.24 Sreqd= t34 . i RIGHT le= Cs= Fb =2.15 617,. 1 01/26/B8 AJIT RANDHAVA $ ASSOCIATES JOB:87130 BEAM WITH CANTILEVER DESIGN B-B LENGTH BETWEEN SUPPORTS =45.0OO ft LEFT CANT. LENGTH = 11. 5O ft RIGHT CANT. LENGTH = 0.OOO ft McL= < McL= ( McP= ( McR= ( M+= ( Sreqd= ( CHEQ LEFT 14.51 4. 7. 0 . 0. 0. 140. t»2 88 OO OO 72 87 * * * * * *1 11 11 0 0 45 2/ ( .50 )-!-< 0.42 * .50 )+( 0.72 * .00 )+( 0.42 K .OO j+( O.72 * .OO =5/8 -1/2* ( 1.25 # 2.4) = 11 11 0 o SO 56 .50 => /2 . 50 =1/2 .OO 3) '2 = .00 =) '2 .88 + 0.00 5= 3. 5 USE 5.125 ; Sc-f- Camber= 8 13 0 . 7. 0 . O. 140. 27 .0 5o9 2 . 88 98 OO 00 87 00 . 0 09 DL TL DL TL I I in SHEAR * RIGHT -1.61 Areqd 112 . 31.' S=c2•— i o9 (CHECf SLENDEFNESS EFFECTi LEFT le= 233.22 Cs= 15.46 Fb'= 2.17 Sreqd= 609." RIGHT le= Cs= Fb = Sreqa= 0.00 0 . OO 2.40 1. ("• AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES J 05:67130 BEAM WITH CANTILEVER DESIGN B-9 LENGTH BETWEEN SUPPORTS =51.OOO ft LEFT CANT. LENGTH = 0.00 ft FLIGHT CANT. LENGTH = 11.5OO ft McL= (, McL= f McR= ; McR= ( M+= ( Sreqd= •' CHECf LEFT -2.13 0. 0. 7. 12. 0. 2OO . GO 00 60 °7 77 35 * * * * * *12/ 0 0 11 11 51 < .00 )+( O.45 * .00 )+( 0.77 * .50 ) + ( 0.45 *' .50 )+( 0.77 * .00 =)/S -1/2* ( 1 r^<=i k ~* A \ —J. • +- *-' T- .k. * T^ ' '.'.OO =) /2 0.00 =) /2 = 11.50 =) /2 1 1 . 50 = j / 2 = O.OO + 117.45 )= 801.4 USE 5.125 ;, Scf = Camber= 0 0 117 200 193 33. £13 1 . OO. oo .45 .35 .02 OOO 1 .3 ."6 DL TL DL TL ^ : ir SHEAR) RIGHT 19.74 1 Areqd 5- 52.86 930 . !<= (CHEC^ SLENDERNESS EFFECT) LEFT FIGHT le= 0.00 le= 233.22 C5= 0.00 CB- 17.17 Fb'= 2.40 Fb = 2.06 0.0 S"-eqd= 933." 01Y 26/88 AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES ,306:87.130 ****.* M * * .4 ****** * * * * SIMPLE SUF-RDFTED BEAM DESIGN ____ .. _____ ___ ___ __ _ __ _ ____ . __ _ _ „„_ tj _ 1/"i O a. *.' LENGTH 33.50 ft W = i 13.50 4. 17.00 ) + ( 13.20 * 17.00 i DL -)• i 13.50'.' * 12'. 000 i + ( 13.200 # 12.000 ) LL 0.454 + 0.330 = 0.7^4 J If TL M= 1.50 * 0.-74 * 33.50 = = 1303.4 "J S= 1303.44 -( 1.25 * 2.40 )= 434.48 REACTION DL TL USE 5.125 * 24 . OOO SC-P= 455.53 CAMBER= 1 . 82 01/26/88 AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES JOB:871Z£i =IMPL\ SUPPORTED BEAM DEB IBM B_ 1 1-L X LENGTH 21.00 ft W = ( 13.50 * 17.00 )+( 13.20 * 17.00 < DL + ( 13.50O * 12.OOO '+(13.200 * 12.00" ^ LL 0.454 + 0.320 =• 0.774 I ]f TL M= 1.50 * 0.774 * 22.00 = = 562.1 " !• S= 562.14 /( 1.25 * 2.40 \= 187.38 REACTION DL TL USE 5.125 * lo.5OO 4 O O Cc/~'• V . o«,_i^_ Scf= 224.4o CAMBEP= 1 .04 *SIMPLY SUPPORTED E'EAM DESIGN LENBTh 24.00 ft = ( 13.50 * 17.00 ii-( 13.20 * 17.00 ) DL + i 13.500 * 12.0OO • -i- ( 13.200 X 12.000 i Li_ = U.454 -i- 0.320 = 0.~"~4 I If TL h= 1.50 * 0.~*74 A 2-1.0O = = dti^.o "t 5= 4,69.00 /( 1.25 * 2.4O i= 223.00 PE ACT I ON DL TL. USE 5.0.15 * a S. OoO K /ic: o --.ow'.*TiJ f m *—~ 5c -f= Io4 . 56 CAMSEF= 1.13 OATK. f 101 SO. ATLANTIC M.VO. LO« AIMCLC*. OAUPOMNA tOO4O TELEPHONE NO. CttSI M> •Oil. OlM tM-O7M L _2 c - C.f ^ ^o9 k to* ^ AJIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES =============:=:=::=:= = =::= = FLOOR FRAMING DESIGN S£_ . «t01 SO. ATLAimC M.VO, LO« : NO. <ti» tM >o«a, dial M«-orM 100) >- - . _ _ i i lllMUTii ttOI M. ATLANTIC M.VO, LO« ANOCLIC. CAUPOfWU ! NO. tlt«) IM •0»g. <t1«I MC-07M f_ ^ J f «--^-,— , ..to. 61 - DATE. 1101 SO. ATLANTIC BLVD. LO« ANOELM. CAUTOMNU : NO. s ^ "6 \ 4 I'.V Ib A •*- i 6 y ^ (- 5- VCP (0 t101 SO. ATLANTIC BLVD. LOt ANOCLIt. OAUPOMNA TCUPMONE NO. <t1») M»-*0«S, <f 1«) tM-07M IL ^ ff*\A) * \b * S • -f la. u-U OATK. ttOI 90. ATLANTIC BLVO, tO« AMOEUU. CALIFORNIA COO4O • NO. ttt« LciR - U) s |. u^ o ^ MM- . J. - AJIT RANDHAVA ?' ASSOCIATES := ============:===:======:== COLUMN & FOOTING DESIGN Oi,'2E/BB AJIT RANDHAVA «• ASSOCIATES *^^INT. COLUMN e FOOTINS DESIGN Fj/Cl P= 23.00 * 50.00 *( I"7. 00 -<- 12.00 ) 20.72 + 14.t>3 = 75.35 I- '= 15 -2" , USE 5" STD. PIPE , W/ 11 -11* 3/4 BASE F- ,_ . W/ 4 - 3/4" A.E'. Pu= 1.4 * 20.71' + 1.7 * 14.63 = 57.85 1- 53 . 88 qu= --------- * 7 . iX = 4.572 \ <s,i 35.35 *i#M*#*******^ INT. COLUMN tj FOOTING DESIGN F2/C2 P= 23.00 * 50. OO * ( I7.00 + 12.0'.' ) 19.94 + 14.08 = 34.J2 I \ 1'= 15'-2" , USE 5 STD. PIPE , W/ ll,:ll;7/4 BASE PL. W/ 4 - 3/4" A.E. Pu= 1.4 * 19. -4 -*• I." * 14. (jP = 51.51-' 51.85 qu= * 3.0J = 4.5"^2 I-sf 34. -D2 1/29/88 - 12: 2:48 **•* SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM NO. 54.1 REV-312B.P1 *** RECTANGULAR FOOTING WITH APPLIED MOMENTS - STRENGTH DESIGN, 1977 ACI F1/C1 ALL INFORMATION PRESENTED IS FOR REVIEW, APPROVAL, INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER ONLY COPYRIGHT BY SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL, 1983. INPUT VALUES LOADS (FACTORED) AXIAL MOMENT-X (KIPS) (KIP-FT) 53.88 0.00 MINIMUM FOOTING DIMENSIONS DEPTH LENGTH-X 1.00 0.00 COLUMN SIZE - (INCHES) LENG1H-X WIDTH-Y 11.00 11.00 MOMENT-Y (KIP-FT) 0.00 - (FEET) WIDTH-Y 0.00 STEEL YIELD STRESS-(KSI) 60.00 MODIFIED(FACTORED) SOIL PRESSURE (KSF) 4.57 STEEL RATIO RHO (OMEGA*F'C/FY) 0.006 CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-(KSI) 2.00 OUTPUT OF FINAL RESULTS FOOTING LENGTH WIDTH TYPE GIVEN GIVEN 1 NO NO MINIMUM FOOTING SIZE: CONSIDERING INPUT DIMENSIONS AND MOMENTS LENGTH WIDTH (INCHES) (INCHES) 12.00 12.00 FINAL FOOTING DIMENSIONS LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) THICKNESS (FT) 3.75 3.75 1.00 3,'-^ SOIL PRESSURE (KSF) AT EACH CORNER FROM FACTORED LOADS CORNER: 1234 (SEE DATA SHEET) 4.04 4.04 4.04 4.04 PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS VALUES - (PSD P/A + MX(C/J) + MY(C/J) = 72.82 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 72.82 ===LENGTH DIRECTION=== MAXIMUM MOMENT (K-FT/FT) ALLOW. STRESS 152.05 3.84 STEEL AREA REQ (SQ.IN./FT.) 0.109 MIN.TEMP. STEEL (.0018) MIN.FLEX. STEEL (200/FY) -MOMENT TRANSFERRED BY FLEXURE (K-FT) EFFECTIVE WIDTH FOR MOMENT ABOVE = BEAM SHEAR (KIPS) = 10.78 0.00 45.0 INCHES 0.259 0.320 0.000 DIRECTION=== MAXIMUM MOMENT (K-FT/FT) fllN.TEttP. STEEL (.0018) MIN.FLEX. STEEL (200/FY) MOMENT TRANSFERRED BY FLEXURE (K-FT) EFFECTIVE WIDTH FOR MOMENT ABOVE = BEAM SHEAR (KIPS) = 10.78 3.84 0.00 45.0 INCHES STEEL AREA REQ. (SQ.IN./FT.) 0.109 0.259 0.320 0.000 *r - 1/29/88 - 12: 2:56 *** SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM NO. 54.1 REV-312B.P1 *** RECTANGULAR FOOTING WITH APPLIED MOMENTS - STRENGTH DESIGN,1977 ACI F2/C2 ALL INFORMATION PRESENTED IS FOR REVIEW, APPROVAL, INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER ONLY COPYRIGHT BY SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL, 1983. INPUT VALUES LOADS (FACTORED) AXIAL MOMENT-X (KIPS) (KIP-FT) 51.85 0.00 MINIMUM FOOTING DIMENSIONS DEPTH LENGTH-X 1.00 0.00 COLUMN SIZE LENGTH-X 11.00 (INCHES) WIDTH-Y 11.00 MOMENT-Y (KIP-FT) 0.00 - (FEED WIDTH-Y 0.00 STEEL YIELD STRESS-(KSI) 60.00 MODIFIED(FACTORED) SOIL PRESSURE (KSF) 4.57 STEEL RATIO RHO (Of1EGA*F'C/FY) 0.006 CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-(KSI) 2.00 OUTPUT OF FINAL RESULTS FOOTING LENGTH WIDTH TYPE GIVEN GIVEN 1 NO NO MINIMUM FOOTING SIZE: CONSIDERING INPUT DIMENSIONS AND MOMENTS LENGTH WIDTH (INCHES) (INCHES) 12.00 12.00 FINAL FOOTING DIMENSIONS LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) THICKNESS (FT) 3^5fl _ 3.50 _ 1.00 SOIL PRESSURE (KSF) AT EACH CORNER FROM FACTORED LOADS CORNER:1 4.44 2 4.44 3 4.44 4 4.44 PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS VALUES - (PSD P/A + MX(C/J) + MY(C/J) = 67.83 ••• 0.00 + 0.00 = 67.83 ===LENGTH DIRECTION=== (SEE DATA SHEET) ALLOW. STRESS 152.05 STEEL AREA REQ, (SO.IN./FT.) MAXIMUM MOMENT (K-FT/FT) niN.TEMP. STEEL (.0018) -MIN.FLEX. STEEL (200/FY) WOflENT TRANSFERRED BY FLEXURE (K-FT) 3.53 0.00 EFFECTIVE WIDTH FOR MOMENT ABOVE = BEAM SHEAR (KIPS) = 9.26 42.0 INCHES 0.100 0.259 0.320 0.000 ===WIDTH DIRECTION*— MAXIMUM MOMENT (K-FT/FT) fllN.TEMP. STEEL (.0018) MIN.FLEX. STEEL (200/FY) MOMENT TRANSFERRED BY FLEXURE (K-FT) 3.53 0.00 EFFECTIVE WIDTH FOR MOMENT ABOVE = 42.0 INCHES BEAM SHEAR (KIPS) = 9.26 STEEL AREA REQ. (SQ.IN./FT.) 0.100 0.259 0.320 0.000 t J 01''28'88 A JIT RANDHAVA & ASSOCIATES #********Mi*****^ INT. CDi_UMN c FOOTING DESIGN F3/C7 P= 25.00 # 50 . GO *( 17.0O + 12.0O ' 22.57 + 15.90 = 36.43 1 '=- 15'-2" , USE 5" STD. FIFE , W 11. il-7 4 EASE FL. U/ 4 - 7/4" H.E. PL..= 1.4 * 22.53 + 1.7 * 15.90 = 58.57 I- 58 . 57 qu= --------- * 7.00 = 4.572 I sf 35 .43 #*****#*******»***# *#***#*#**##*#)UM##***#*****^ INT. COLUMN ? FOOTING DESIGN F4/C4 P= 25.00 * 50.OG *( 17.GO + 12.OO • 21.89 + 15.45 = 37.34 t '= 15 -2" , USE 5" STC. PIPE , W/ il,;ll'7,4 BASE PL. t*j/ 4 - 7/4" A.E-i. Pu= 1.4 * 21.89 H- 1.7 * 15.4rj = =.o.°l 56. °1 qu= t 3.00 = 4.572 t sf 37.34 1/29/88 - 12? 3: 4 **•* SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM NO. 54.1 REV-312B.P1 *** RECTANGULAR FOOTING WITH APPLIED MOMENTS - STRENGTH DESIGN, 1977 ACI F3/C3 ALL INFORMATION PRESENTED IS FOR REVIEW, APPROVAL, INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER ONLY COPYRIGHT BY SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL, 1983. INPUT VALUES LOADS (FACTORED) AXIAL MOMENT-X (KIPS) (KIP-FT) 58.57 0.00 MINIMUM FOOTING DIMENSIONS DEPTH LENGTH-X 1.00 0.00 COLUMN SIZE - (INCHES) LENGTH-X WIDTH-Y 11.00 11.00 MOMENT-Y (KIP-FT) 0.00 - (FEET) WIDTH-Y 0.00 STEEL YIELD STRESS-(KSI) 60.00 MODIFIED(FACTORED) SOIL PRESSURE (KSF) 4.57 STEEL RATIO RHO (OMEGA*-F'C/FY) 0.006 CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-(KSI) 2.00 OUTPUT OF FINAL RESULTS FOOTING LENGTH WIDTH TYPE GIVEN GIVEN 1 NO NO MINIMUM FOOTING SIZE? CONSIDERING INPUT DIMENSIONS AND MOMENTS LENGTH WIDTH (INCHES) (INCHES) 12.00 12.00 FINAL FOOTING DIMENSIONS LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) THICKNESS (FT) 3.75 3.75 1.00 B>'-S$y\:i SOIL PRESSURE (KSF) AT EACH CORNER FROM FACTORED LOADS CORNER:1 4.38 2 4.37 3 4.37 4 4.37 PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS VALUES - (PSI) P/A + MX(C/J) + MY(C/J) = 79.16 •»• 0.00 H 0.00 =• 79.16 ===LENGTH DIRECTION=== (SEE DATA SHEET) ALLOU. STRESS 152.05 STEEL AREA REQ, (SO.IN./FT.) MAXIMUM MOMENT (K-FT/FT) niN.TEMP. STEEL (.0018)'MIN.FLEX. STEEL <2oo/FY> MOMENT TRANSFERRED BY FLEXURE (K-FT) EFFECTIVE WIDTH FOR MOMENT ABOVE = BEAM SHEAR (KIPS) « 11.71 4.18 0.00 INCHES 0.119 0.259 0.320 0.000 ===WIDTH DIRECTION=== MAXIMUM MOMENT (K-FT/FT) fllN.TEMP. STEEL (.0018) MIN.FLEX. STEEL (200/FY) MOMENT TRANSFERRED BY FLEXURE (K-FT) 4.18 0.00 EFFECTIVE WIDTH FOR MOMENT ABOVE = 45.0 INCHES BEAM SHEAR (KIPS) = 11.71 STEEL AREA REO. (SQ.IN./FT.) 0.119 0.259 0.320 0.000 4- 1/29/88 - 12: 3:11 •<•** SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM NO. 54.1 REV-312B.P1 *** RECTANGULAR FOOTING WITH APPLIED MOMENTS - STRENGTH DESIGN, 1977 ACI F4/C4 ALL INFORMATION PRESENTED IS FOR REVIEW, APPROVAL, INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER ONLY COPYRIGHT BY SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL, 1983. INPUT VALUES LOADS (FACTORED) AXIAL MOMENT-X (KIPS) (KIP-FT) 56.91 0.00 MINIMUM FOOTING DIMENSIONS DEPTH LENGTH-X 1.00 0.00 COLUMN SIZE - (INCHES) LENGTH-X WIDTH-Y 11.00 11.00 MOMENT-Y (KIP-FT) 0.00 - (FEET) UIDTH-Y 0.00 STEEL YIELD STRESS-(KSI) 60.00 MODIFIED(FACTORED) SOIL PRESSURE (KSF) 4.57 STEEL RATIO RHO (OMEGA*F'C/FY) 0.006 CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH-(KSI) 2.00 OUTPUT OF FINAL RESULTS FOOTING LENGTH WIDTH TYPE GIVEN GIVEN 1 NO NO MINIMUM FOOTING SIZE: CONSIDERING INPUT DIMENSIONS AND MOMENTS LENGTH WIDTH (INCHES) (INCHES) 12.00 12.00 FINAL FOOTING DIMENSIONS LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) THICKNESS (FT) , 3^23 3.75 1.00 S'^ ^ *ia SOIL PRESSURE (KSF) AT EACH CORNER FROM FACTORED LOADS CORNER?1 4.26 2 4.26 3 4.26 4 4.26 PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS VALUES - (PSI) P/A + MX(C/J) + MY<C/J) = 76.92 ^ 0.00 + 0.00 = 76.92 •===LENGTH DIRECTION=== (SEE DATA SHEET) ALLOU. STRESS 152.05 STEEL AREA REQ, (SO.IN./FT.) project NO. 8751424W UDOi Woodward-Clyde Consultants UPDATE SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED LOT 5 ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Andrex Development Company 20101 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 3000 Torrance, California 90502-1319 3467 Kurtz Street San Diego, California 92110 (619)2242911 Woodward-Clyde Consultants December 15, 1987 Revised March 17, 1988 Project No. 8751424W-UD01 WAR GILBERT MA Andrex Development Company 20101 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 3000 Torrance, California 90502-1319 Attention: Mr. Steve Welsh UPDATE SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED LOT 5 ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Gentlemen: Wood ward-Clyde Consultants is pleased to provide the accompanying report, which presents the results of our update soil investigation for the project. This study was performed in accordance with our proposal dated October 29, 1987 and your authorization of November 23, 1987. This report presents our conclusions and recommendations pertaining to the project, as well as the results of our field explorations and laboratory tests. If you have any questions or if we can be of further service, please give us a call. Very truly yours, WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS Richard P. While R. E. 21992 REW:al (3) Andrex Development Company (2) Gilbert AIA Associates Architects (2) West Coast Design Consulting Engineers Geologists and Environmental Scientists Offices in Other Principal Cities S/RPW10R Project NO. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS 2 PREVIOUS PRELIMINARY STUDIES 2 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface Conditions 2 Subsurface Conditions 3 Existing Fill 3 Current Fill Conditions 3 Groundwater 3 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 Groundwater 3 Slopes 4 Soil and Excavation Characteristics 4 Grading 4 Drainage 5 Foundations 5 Settlements 6 Resistance to Lateral Loads 7 Pavements 7 UNCERTAINTY AND LIMITATIONS 8 Appendices Appendix A - Field Investigation A-l Appendix B - Laboratory Tests B-l Appendix C - Guide Specifications for Earthwork C-l S/RPW10R Woodward-Clyde Consultants UPDATE SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED LOT 5, ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION This report presents the results of our update soil investigation at the site of a proposed office building. The site is located north and adjacent to the cul-de-sac of Cosmos Court which leads off Corte de la Pina in Carlsbad, California. This report has been prepared exclusively for Andrex development in evaluating the property and project design. This report presents our conclusions and/or recommendations regarding: 0 General subsurface soil conditions; 0 General extent of identified existing fill soils; 0 Conditions of areas to receive fill; 0 Characteristics of proposed fill material; 0 Presence and effect of expansive soils; 0 Groundwater conditions within the depths of our subsurface investigation; 0 Cut and fill slopes; 0 Grading and earthwork; 0 Types and depths of foundations; 0 Allowable soil bearing pressures 0 Settlements; 0 Design pressures for retaining walls; 0 Flexible pavement design; DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT For our study, we have discussed the project with you. We have also been provided with a plan entitled, "Andrex-Whittaker-WCCS," dated October 21, 1987, prepared by Gilbert AIA Associates Architects. We understand that the proposed project will include regradmg the existing - 1 - S1/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants split level pad into one large single-level pad. A single- or two-story tilt-up reinforced concrete wall building with truss roof supported on interior columns is proposed. Paving and landscaping will be provided around the structure. The location and layout of the project are shown on the Site Plan (Figure 1). FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS Our field investigation included making a visual reconnaissance of the existing surface conditions, making 4 test borings on November 24, 1987, and obtaining soil samples. The test borings were advanced to depths ranging from 29 to 39 feet. The locations of the test borings are shown on Figure 1. A Key to Logs is presented in Appendix A as Figure A-l. Final logs of the test borings are presented in Appendix A as Figures A-2 through A-8. The descriptions on the logs are based on field logs, sample inspection, and laboratory test results. Results of laboratory tests are shown at the corresponding sample locations on the logs and in Appendix B. The field investigation and laboratory testing programs are discussed in Appendices A and B. PREVIOUS PRELIMINARY STUDIES The following preliminary studies have been made on projects which include the subject site. 0 "Preliminary Engineering Geological and Soil Study - Cabot, Cabot and Forbes Industrial Park, San Diego County, California," prepared by Woodward-Gizienski and Associates, dated June 14, 1973. 0 Geotechnical Investigation C. C. and F. Palomar Airport Busi- ness Park, Plan I," prepared by Lowney Kaldeever Associates, dated February 26, 1974. 0 Update Soil and Geologic Investigation for the Proposed Howard Mann-16 Acre Site, Palomar Airport Business Center, Carlsbad, California," prepared by Woodward-Clyde Consultants, dated December 16, 1980. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The subject lot is a graded split level parcel covered by a moderate re- growth of native grasses and weeds. The difference in levels is approxi- mately 5 feet. An existing cut slope borders the site on the east and an - 2 - S1/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 upsloping fill slope forms the north boundary. The cut slope is 1-1/2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in inclination and about 35 feet high; the fill slope is inclined at 2 to 1 and is about 40 feet high. The slopes are landscaped and, apart from some erosion, appear to be in good condition. Subsurface Conditions As indicated by the test borings, the subsurface soils beneath the proposed building consist of compacted fill soils underlain by natural formational soils of Tertiary age. Minor loose dumped fill and debris is scattered over the site. Existing Fill The fill soils are composed of lean to fat clay soils with some clayey and silty sands. Records on file indicate most of the fills were compacted and placed in 1974. A report of Fill Compaction was prepared by Lowney Kaldeever Associates and is dated October 11, 1974. A later period of grading consisted of recompacting the surface of previously placed soils and minor changes in grade. A report of this grading was prepared by Woodward-Clyde Consultants and is dated December 17, 1981. Current Fill Conditions The range of depth of fill is from 30 feet at boring 1 to 12 feet at boring 3. The fill soils at existing grade are expansive in nature. Penetration values in the fill ranged from 19 to 53 blows per foot which classifies the soil as medium dense to dense. The existing moisture content of the fill ranges from 10 to 24 percent. The average of these values is approxi- mately 3 percent over optimum conditions. Groundwater No groundwater was encountered in the test borings at time of drilling. DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS The discussions, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are based on the information provided to us, results of our field and laboratory studies, analyses, and professional judgment. Groundwater No groundwater was noted in the test borings at the time of drilling. In addition, no water seeps or marshy areas were noted during our surface reconnaissance of the site. - 3 - S1/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Slopes The stability of the existing cut and fill slopes bordering the site have been addressed in the previous preliminary studies. Our examination of the slopes recently indicate no evidence of instability other than erosion where slopes are not covered with landscaping. We recommend that the erosion gully be cleaned of loose soil and filled with compacted native soil placed in accordance with earthwork specifications. Previous analyses and our experience have shown that, typically, cut and fill slopes, such as those composed of the materials present on the site, are grossly stable; nevertheless, there is a finite possibility that such slopes could become unstable. In our opinion, the probability of slopes becoming unstable is low. Slopes, especially those constructed at inclinations steeper than 2:1, are particularly susceptible to shallow sloughing in periods of rainfall, heavy irrigation, and/or upslope surface runoff. Periodic slope maintenance may be required, including rebuilding the outer 1£ to 4 feet of the slope. Soil and Excavation Characteristics Compacted fills placed with the observation of Woodward-Gizienski and Associates and Woodward-Clyde Consultants have been documented and provided to you, however, we have not observed or tested soil compaction placed with the observation of Lowney Kaldeever Associates and have no knowledge as to its condition except for the report from Lowney Kaldeever Associates. However, the materials at grade are moderately expansive as indicated by the Expansion index test which yielded an index of 100. Special consideration is recommended in designing foundations on these soils. The soils on site within the proposed grading depths of 5 feet can be excavated by moderate ripping with heavy-duty excavating equipment. The upper 1 to 2 feet of soil on the lot appears to be loose due to season- al wetting and drying. Grading We recommend that all earthworking at the site be done in accordance with the attached "Guide Specification for Earthwork." The grading at the site should be observed and compacted fills tested by Woodward-Clyde Consul- tants. All grading and foundation plans should be reviewed by WCC. A precon- struction meeting should be held at the site prior to equipment move on. We recommend that in general the upper 2 feet of fill on the lot, wherever not removed by design excavation, be excavated and recompacted in accor- dance with specifications. We further recommend that the moisture content of this zone of soil be adjusted to at least 3 percent over optimum moisture content before compaction. - 4 - S1/RPW10R Project No. 8751424V7-UD01 In order to more effectively reduce the effects of heaving of the moderate- ly expansive clayey fill, we recommend that in the building area, these soils be excavated to a depth of at least 3 feet and replaced with properly compacted import select soils. The building area is defined as the foot- print of the structure plus a minimum distance of 5 feet outside these limits. Select soil is defined in the attached earthwork specifications. Special foundations are recommended if a select soil "cap" is not provided in the building area. Drainage We recommend that positive measures be taken to properly finish grade the pad so that drainage waters from the pad and adjacent properties are directed off the pad and away from foundations, floor slabs, and slope tops. Even when these measures have been taken, experience has shown that a shallow ground water or surface water condition can and may devel- op in areas where no such water condition existed prior to site develop- ment; this is particularly true where a substantial increase in surface water infiltration results from landscaping irrigation. To further reduce the possibility of moisture related problems, we recom- mend that all landscaping and irrigation be kept as far away from the building perimeter as possible. Irrigation water, especially close to the building, should be kept to the minimum required level. We recommend that the groundsurface in all areas be graded to slope away from the building foundations and floor slabs and that all runoff water be directed to proper drainage areas and not be allowed to pond. A minimum ground slope of 1 percent is recommended. In order to provide a subsurface barrier to reduce the potential for mois- ture migration, we recommend that the structures be provided with a continuous perimeter concrete footing extending at least 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Recommendations for floor slab underlays are provided later in this report. Foundations Foundations for structures founded in a properly compacted select soil may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf (total dead plus live load). Foundations should extend a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent rough pad grade and be a minimum of 12 inches in width. Steel reinforcing is recommended in all footings (at least one bar top and bottom in continuous wall footings and at least one mat in column footings). Concrete Floor slabs underlain by select soil should be at least 4 inches in thickness and reinforced at the midpoint with steel wire or bars. The actual thickness and reinforcing of floor slabs should be de- termined by the structural engineer based on design loads. We recommend a plastic vapor barrier and a protective wetted sand layer be placed beneath the slab wherever moisture sensitive floor coverings are to be used. - 5 - S1/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants Special foundations are recommended for footings placed in moderately expansive soils. We recommend that all footings be founded 24 inches below lowest adjacent rough pad grade and be reinforced top and bottom with at least #5 steel bars. The concrete slab-on-grade floors should be at least 5 inches thick and reinforced at the mid point with at least #4 steel bars 24 inches on center both ways. We further recommend that #4 steel dowels be placed in the foundation 24 inches on center and bent down and extend into the slab at least 18 inches. These recommendations are intended only to reduce the effects of heaving; footings founded in expansive soils also should be expected to heave. We recommend that all foundations and other structures that cannot with- stand differential movement not be located within 8 feet of the top of a slope. Structures located within this area or on slopes should have their foundation depth extended until the outside bottom edge is at least 8 feet horizontally from the slope face. Settlements Compacted fills typically increase in moisture and settle sometime during their lifetime. It is not possible to accurately estimate settlements of fills because environmental conditions within and below the fill usually change with time. The settlements are frequently found to be on the order of 0.2 percent to 0.5 percent of the depth of the fill for nominal moisture in- creases. The lower value of settlement is often typical of more granular (sandy) soils and the upper value is more typical of cohesive (clayey) soils. The results of compaction tests presented in the October 11, 1974 report indicate that the average as-placed moisture content of the fill soils was about li percent below optimum moisture conditions. According to recent moisture determinations, the fill is currently at an average moisture con- tent about 3 percent above. Using this data and the relative soil type of the fill, we have estimated a design settlement factor of 0.4 percent of the depth of fill for the conditions found in our recent study. We estimate that for the current moisture conditions, fills and any sup- ported structure will settle on the order of 1£ to 2 inches over an ex- tended period of time. Differential settlements are expected to be on the order of 25 to 50 percent of the total values. The effect upon specific structures will depend upon structural design of foundations and the design of the structure to accommodate movements. If subsurface moisture increases in the future, greater settlements of fills and supported struc- tures should be expected. If these settlements cannot be tolerated, we recommend that any structure on fill be supported on a pier foundation with piers extending through the fill into dense, formational soils. Recommendation for deep foundations can be given in an addendum report upon request. - 6 - S1/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants If the settlements can be tolerated, we recommend as a minimum that the foundation system be tied together and stiffened such that the foundation system acts as a unit resisting separation of foundation elements. Resistance to Lateral Loads We recommend that passive pressures on footings and shear keys be cal- culated from an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pcf for footings placed in properly compacted fill soils. The upper 12 inches of soils not protected by pavement or floor slabs should not be included in the design of passive resistance. This recommendation is based on the assumption that the adjacent ground surface is horizontal for a minimum distance of 10 feet or three times the height of the surface generating passive pressure, which- ever is greater. We recommend that a value of 0.4 be used as the allowable coefficient of friction between footings and compacted fill. If both frictional and passive resistance are used in design, the friction coefficient should be reduced to 0.3. Pavements A sample of near surface soil was selected and an R-value determination was made. We understand that moderate truck traffic and light car park- ing will occupy the paved areas. For our calculations, we assumed traffic indices of 4.5 for car parking and traffic and 5.5 for light to medium truck parking and access roads. We also assumed that Class 2 untreated base would be used. The R-value tests were performed by American Engineering Laboratory and the results are attached. The results of the R-value determination re- vealed that near-surface soils are clayey and have low R-values; an R-value of 10 was obtained. For these conditions and the assumption stated above, we give the following design recommendations: Asphalt Class 2 Concrete Untreated T.I. A.C. Base 4.5 3.0 7.5 5.5 4.0 10.5 If selective grading and import material having a minimum R-value of 30 is employed, we recommend that the following pavement sections be used. - 7 - S1/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants Asphalt Class 2 Concrete Untreated T.I. A.C. Base 4.5 3.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 We suggest that consideration be given to using concrete pavements in areas where dumpsters will be stored and picked up. Our experience indicates that refuse pickup trucks can shorten the useful life of asphaltic concrete sections. We recommend that in these areas, 6 inches of 3,000 psi Portland cement concrete be used over the prepared subgrade surface. We recommend that mix designs be made for asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete by an engineering company specializing in this type of work, and that the paving operations be inspected by a qualified testing laboratory. We recommend that adequate surface drainage be provided to reduce pond- ing and infiltration of water into the subgrade materials. We suggest that paved areas have a minimum gradient of 1 percent. As much as possible, planter areas next to pavements should be avoided; otherwise, subdrains should be used to drain the planters to appropriate outlets. It is impor- tant to provide adequate drainage to reduce ponding and possible future distress of the pavement section. Class 2 aggregate base should conform to the latest edition of the State of California "Standard Specifications," Section 26.1.02 B. Asphaltic concrete should conform to the Standard Specifications, Section 29-2.01 for the asphalt and Section 39-2.02 (Type B) for the aggregate. The aggregate base material should be placed at a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Portland cement concrete should conform to Sections 40 and 90 of the "Standard Specifications." Cement treated base should conform to the City of San Diego standard requirements. We recommend that the upper and lower 6 inches of the subgrade soil in pavement areas be scarified and properly compacted to at least 95 and 90 percent, respectively, of the maximum laboratory dry density prior to placing base material. UNCERTAINTY AND LIMITATIONS We have observed only a very small portion of the pertinent soil and groundwater conditions. The recommendations made herein are based on the assumption that soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those found during our field investigation. We recommend that Woodward-Clyde Consultants review the foundation and grading plans to verify that the intent of the recommendations presented herein has been properly inter- preted and incorporated into the contract documents. We further recom- mend that'Woodward-Clyde Consultants observe the site grading, subgrade — 8 — S1/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 M . ^ „ AWoodward-Clyde Consultants preparation under concrete slabs and paved areas, and foundation exca- vations to verify that site conditions are as anticipated or to provide revised recommendations if necessary. If the plans for site development are changed, or if variations or undesirable geotechnical conditions are encountered during construction, we should be consulted for further recommendations. This report is intended for design purposes only and may not be sufficient to prepare an accurate bid. California, including San Diego, is an area of high seismic risk. It is generally considered economically unfeasible to build a totally earth- quake-resistant project; it is, therefore, possible that a large or nearby earthquake could cause damage at the site. Geotechnical engineering and the geologic sciences are characterized by uncertainty. Professional judgements presented herein are based partly on our understanding of the proposed construction, and partly on our general experience. Our engineering work and judgements rendered meet current professional standards; we do not guarantee the performance of the project in any respect. Inspection services allow the testing of only a small percentage of the fill placed at the site. Contractual arrangements with the grading contractor should contain the provision that he is responsible for excavating, placing, and compacting fill in accordance with project specifications. Inspection by the geotechnical engineer during grading should not relieve the grading contractor of his primary responsibility to perform all work in accordance with the specifications. This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not direct the contractor's operations, and we can not be respon- sible for the safety of personnel other than our own on the site; the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor should notify the owner if he considers any of the recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe. - 9 - S1/RPW10R D. Indicates approximate location ^ x of test boring.Site Boundary ^ 40 80 Graphic Scale (Feet) I i SITE PLAN VNDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT LOT 5 BY cb I CHECKED BY |FIGURE NO 12-14-87 I PROJECT NO 8751424W-UD01 WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS Project No. 8751424W-UD01 .... ^ ~, ^ ** •* *Woodward-Clyde Consultants APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION Four exploratory test borings were advanced at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan (Figure 1). The drilling was performed on November 24, 1987, under the direction of a geologist from our firm, using a 8-61 mobile drilling rig. Samples of subsurface materials were obtained from the borings using a modified California drive sampler (2-inch diameter and 2^-inch outside diameter) with thin brass liners. The sampler was generally drive 18 inches into the material at the bottom of the hole by a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches; thin metal liner tubes containing the sample were removed from the sampler, sealed to preserve the natural moisture content of the sample, and returned to the laboratory for examination and testing. The locations and elevations of all test borings are approximate and were estimated by reference in the plan provided and plan on file. A-l S2/RPW10R Project: ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT LOT 5 Date Drilled Water Depth Type of Boring Type of Drill Rig Hammer £ §"£ Q <£o. nCO c in 0m KEY TO LOGS Measured MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation — 5~ _ - 10- 15- - - 20- 25- 30-^ 7 1 1 I ^^ ^^A % Proj No 8751424W-UD01 DI^TI IRRFD ^AMPI F 1 OPATION Obtained by collecting the auger cuttings in a plastic bag DRIVE SAMPLE LOCATION Sample with recorded blows per foot was obtained with a Modified California drive sampler (2" inside diameter, 2 5" outside diameter) lined with sample tubes The sampler was driven into the soil at the bottom of the hole with a 140 pound hammer falling 30" Fill Sand Clay Silt Woodward-Clyde Consultants - — ^90) ^1 3 "=tn a> £ = ^> Q0 >> tn <D "OQ a. Q r- tn OH Figure A-1 Project: ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT LOT 5 Date Drilled 11-24-87 Water Depth Dry Log of Boring No. 1 Measured At time of drilling Type of Boring 8" H S A Type of Drill Rig B-61 Hammer 140#at30" for Q CO0) Q. COCO Blows/FtMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation - 5 ~~ - 10- 15- 20- 25- - 30- 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 1-6 1-7 I X M l I I I 19 42 42 26 53 49 Moist, pale olive gray, silty lean clay with some fine sand FILL Moist, mottled olive gray, olive brown and gray brown, silty lean clay with some fine sand and local zones of brown, fat day FILL Moist, light brown, fine sandy lean clay sand FILL with some clayey fine Moist, olive brown to olive gray, silty lean to fat clay FILL Some root fragment at 14' Moist, dark gray brown, silty to clayey fine sand with some root fragments FILL Moist, dark gray brown to black, silty fat clay FILL Moist, mottled gray brown, light brown and light reddish brown, clayey fine sand with some sandy lean clay FILL Moist, olive brown to olive gray, fat clay with some gypsum crystals FILL - — - - — — - — ProjectNo 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants MoistureContent, %24 16 19 12 15 23 to Q 98 103 104 102 109 102 5 *tl O H - Figure A-2 Project: ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT , , 0 • M -• /~ A,^\J LOT 5 Log of Boring No. 1 (Cont d) §"£Q 35- - 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- <D Q. flj 1-8 1-9 I 0 A Blows/Ft59 89 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION IHard, moist, light olive , silty lean to fat clay (CL/CH) with reddish brown and dark red mottles and zones of gypsum crystals DELMAR FORMATION Very dense, moist, pale gray, silty sand (SM) DELMAR FORMATION Bottom of Boring at 38 5 feet . - _ - - — - — — FrojectNo 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants MoistureContent, %26 I'S. Q 100 6 H Figure A-3 Project: ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT LQg Qf ^ ng NQ 2 Date Drilled 11-24-87 Water Depth Dry Measured At time of drilling Type of Boring 8" H S A Type of Drill Rig B-61 Hammer 140#at30" 0 000) O. co Blows/FtMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation 5- Irt 0 15- 20- 25- 30- 2-1 2-2 2-3 " 2-5 2-6 2-7 ( X ' I 24 76 31 43 53 92 'i & % Moist, pale gray, fine sandy lean clay FILL Moist, brown, fine sandy fat clay FILL Moist, mottled brown, gray brown and olive gray, fine sandy lean clay FILL Moist, light brown, clayey sand with some small rock fragments and gravels FILL Moist, light brown to brown, clayey sand with rare gravels and zones of olive gray, fine sandy lean clay FILL Stiff, moist, olive, silty fat clay (CH) with some slickensided surfaces and zones of reddish brown, iron oxide DELMAR FORMATION KHard, moist, olive gray, silty fat clay (CH) with yellowish lamonite streaks DELMAR FORMATION / Very dense, moist to wet, brown, clayey sand (SC) with some zones of sandy lean clay (CL) and small claystone clasts DELMAR FORMATION Very dense, moist, pale olive gray, fine sandy silt (ML) DELMAR FORMATION Stiff to hard, moist, olive brown to olive gray, silty lean to fat clay (CL/CH) with reddish brown mottles DELMAR FORMATION - — — ProjectNo 8751 424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants MoistureContent, %16 10 17 16 <n Q 106 104 100 112 • 6 H - Figure A-4 Project: ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT , , n . Nl ~ ,~ .,„J LOT 5 Log of Boring No. 2 (Cont d) .c Q. «-(D U. Q - 35- 40- 45— 50- 55- 60- ina>"5. CO 1-8 K Blows/Ft78 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION I (Continued) Stiff to hard, moist, olive brown to olive gray, silty lean to fat clay (CL/CH) with reddish brown mottles DELMAR FORMATION Bottom of Boring at 33 5 feet - - - - — — — - FrojectNo 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants MoistureContent, %>. tn lU £•Q « m WQ) •«— • •= S50)1- - Figure A-5 Project: ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT , , D . M 0LOT 5 Log of Boring No. 3 Date Drilled 11-2-87 Water Depth Dry Measured At time of drilling Type of Boring 8" H S A Type of Drill Rig B-61 Hammer 140#at30" .c 8-co — - 5 - - 10- - •1 f7 - - 20— _ - - 25- ; - 30— COo•5. E CO £ om MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation 3-1 \l (= 3 0 3-3 3-4 3-5 3-6 3-7 Y ^ I/ r\ K K * )( 23 32 31 61 507 3" 507 4" yA fy '// // ^%y/,y/ Moist, light brown, silty lean to fat clay Moist, light brown to pale gray, fine sandy silt FILL Moist, brown to gray brown, fine sandy lean clay with zones to clayey sand and brown, silty sand FILL Moist, olive gray to olive brown, silty fat clay with zones of brown, sandy lean clay FILL Moist, dark gray brown, silty fat clay \ FILL / R^ Moist, dark brown, clayey sand with some root fragments / Medium dense, moist, dark brown, sandy fat clay (CH) with root / fragments WEATHERED DELMAR FORMATION /NDense, moist, light brown to light yellowish brown, clayey sand / (SC] DELMAR FORMATION / Hard, moist, olive brown to olive gray, silty lean to fat clay (CL/CH), fractured with yellowish limonite in fractures DELMAR FORMATION Very dense, moist, white, silty fine sand (SM) with some light reddish brown staining |^ DELMAR FORMATION Concretion Bottom of Boring at 28 5 feet - - - - — - ~ - _ - - - — _ - — Project NO 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants 0 5 •£ <2 5JO C28 15 23 11 .^ c. O Q. >. O 105 97 97 CD £~ <5O (- - Figure A-6 Project: ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT LOT 5 Log of Boring No. 4 Date Drilled 11-24-87 Water Depth Dry Measured At time of drilling Type of Boring 8" H S A Type of Drill Rig B-61 Hammer 140#at30" JC Q Q.Blows/FtMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation 5- 10- 4 f- 20- 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 IV M* ••• i I ^ ^ 20 24 ; 23 33 39 Moist, light brown to light gray, fine sandy lean clay FILL Moist, mottled light gray to light brown, fine sandy clay and clayey fine sand FILL KA * 1 U U 4 « 1 \ FILL / ,. Moist, brown, silty fat clay >v FILL / Moist, olive brown to olive gray, silty fat clay FILL Moist, black, sandy lean clay to clayey (odorous) FILL sand with root fragments Moist, light brown to brown, clayey fine sand with some sandy lean clay FILL Moist, brown with gray brown mottles, fine very clayey fine sand FILL 4" lens of wet, brown, clayey sand Very dense, moist, pale olive gray, fine DELMAR FORMATION sandy silt (ML/MH) — — - Project NO 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants MoistureContent, %17 21 20 15 a> Q 97 104 103 106 j= « - Figure A-7 Project: ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT , rD . M A ,~ .,,xJ LOT 5 Log of Boring No. 4 (Cont d) ^o> en Q 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- <Dex w 4-7 4-8 I Blows/Ft\ / / / / 93 / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION I (Continued) Very dense, moist, pale olive gray, fine sandy silt (ML/MH) DELMAR FORMATION Hard, moist, olive gray, fat clay (CH) with some silt and fine sand, well fractured /. DELMAR FORMATION f '/ Hard, moist, pale olive, silty lean clay (CL) / DELMAR FORMATION / / ,/ Bottom of Boring at 33 5 feet — - — FrojectNo 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants MoistureContent, %18 inc.0) y ^^ 0 111 *^" t/) Figure A-8 Project No. 8751424VV-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTS The materials observed in the test borings were visually classified and evaluated with respect to swelling characteristics, dry density, and mois- ture content. The classifications were substantiated by performing grain size analyses and evaluating plasticity characteristics of samples of the soils. Fill suitability tests, including a compaction test, expansion index test, and grain size analyses, were performed on samples on the probable fill soils. The strength of the soils was evaluated considering the density, moisture content of the samples and the penetration resistance of the sampler. Swelling characteristics were estimated by performing an expansion index on a recompacted sample. The suitability of soils for use as pavement subgrade was evaluated by performing a R-value test. The results of the tests on drive samples are shown with the penetration resistance of the sampler at the corresponding sample location on the logs, Figures A-l through A-8. The grain size distribution curves are shown on Figure B-l. The results of the fill and expansion index test are reported in Figure B-2. The results of the R-value test, as submitted to us by American Engineering Laboratory, are presented in Figure B-3. B-l S3/RPW10R COBBLES GRAVEL Coarse Mesh Opening Fi ne SAND Coarse) Medium Fine SILT and CLAY - Ins Sieve Sizes Hydrometer Analysis yu 80 70 S 60 CO Q. UJ CC UJ °" un oU 9OZU in 0 76 3 I 2 132 74 UJ 16 20 30 MO 60 80 1 MO 200 |I >A.if,.- 1 | |^ | | 5, ,— •( JL X ) \)\Vjs> \ V\\ \\ \\kNk•7 VvVv\< 1 )\ \\ V>V N ^ * NX\\ •• >v X>s. \\ "N —^\ ^yj V ~\f "XXx^\ '^X> 100 50 10.0 5.0 |00 O.I 0.05 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 0.01 0.005 10 20 30 MO 60 LLJoae 60 70 80 90 100 0.001 SAMPLE Oi_! O4-1 CLASSIFICATION AND SYMBOL Lean clay (CL) Lean clay (CL) *LL 44 42 *P1 29 28 *LL - Liquid Limit *PI - Plasticity Index GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT LOT 5 DRAWNBY cb | CHECKED BY | PROJECT NO 8751424W-SI01 | DATE 12-14-87 ) FIGURE NO.B-T WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS 1CC-GS-76 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS Liquid Limit, % Plasticity Index, % Classification by Unified Soil Classification System V V\ >\DRY UNIT WEIGHT, pcf\ \\ V\\\\ \V\A\\\AV\ / 1-1 44 29 (CL) ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES — 28C 2 t \ \\ \ A \ \ \> ^/ \ A \\AV i \\ -U Maximum Dry Density, pcf Optimum Moisture Content, % )SC 70S 26C V A \1 A \ O \ cf >G )SG 50 SG V \ \\A\^ \ v^ , A \\ YASA\\'r> \ i ATV \ V\VA\ NMs. \v\ JOAV > \\V xx^Sooi-i V 114.0 15.0 \ MOISTURE CONTENT, % 100 PERCENT PASSING80 60 40 20 0 10 CO...... GRAVEL SAND c f c m f ~c 1 II 11 X\ (. 1 I L SILT 4 CLAY QV^ \ i •~vV 00 100 10 10 01 001 GRAIN SIZE, mm MECHANICAL ANALYSIS DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA Dry Density, pcf Initial Water Content, % Final Water Content, % Apparent Apparent Cohesion, psf Friction Angle, degrees ^ I) 0001 DBC EXPANSION INDEX Initial Dry Density, pcf Initial Water Content, % Final Final Load Dry Density, pcf Water Content, % , psf Expansion ^s\ s\\ ^\\\\s ^ ^ \ sX \] Index 3-1 102 11 91 28 144 121 - SAMPLE LOCATION 10 20 30 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST 40 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST METHOD ASTM-D 1557-7R& FILL SUITABILITY TESTS ANDREX AT PALOMAR AIRPORT LOT 5 DRAWN BY cb | CHECKED BY | PROJECT NO 8751424W-SI01 | PATE 12-14-87 | FIGURE NO- B-2 WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS American Engineering Laboratories. Inc. 7940 Arjons Dnve, Suite A, San Diego, CA 92126 (619)695-3730 RESISTANCE "R" VALUE CA TEST 301 Report AEL #7M-362 File No 521 Client WOODWARD CLYDE CONSULTANTS 3467 Kurtz Street, San Diego, Ca 92110 Project Designation Andrex at PA lot 8 pad 5 #8751424W-U001 Date 12-11-87 RV# 786 Sample Identification Sample No. 4-1 Lot 8, pad 5 B Compactor Pressure, psi Moisture @ Compaction, % Density, pcf R-Value Exudation Pressure, psi Stabilometer Thickness, ft Expansion Pressure Thickness, ft 125.00 18.80 105.90 18.00 530.00 1.18 0.60 75.00 21.50 100.40 10.00 330.00 1.29 0.13 60.00 22.40 99.40 9.00 210.00 1.31 0.13 Traffic Index (Assumed) — R-Value - Exudation Pressure 10 R-Value - Expansion Pressure 28 Sand Equivalent R-Value (At Equilibrium)10 2-Woodward-Clyde Consultants AMERICAN ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, INC Reviewed by WILLIAM L. COCHRANE, R.C.E. #24445 Fig. B-3 Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants APPENDIX C GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR EARTHWORK ANDREX - LOT 5 NOTE: These specifications are provided as a guide for preparation of the final grading specifications for the project, which with the plans constitute the project documents. These guide specifications are not intended for use as final grading specifications. 1. GENERAL 1.1 The work of the Contractor covered by these specifications consists of furnishing labor and equipment and performing all operations necessary to remove deleterious and undesirable materials from areas of grading, to properly prepare areas to receive fill, and to excavate and fill to the lines and grades shown on the plans or as directed in writing by the Owner. 1.2 The Contractor shall perform the work in strict accordance with these specifications and the Contractor shall be responsible for the quality of the finished product notwithstanding the fact that the earthwork may be observed and tests made by a Geotechnical Engineer. Deviations from these specifications will be permitted only upon written authorization from the Owner. 1.3 The data contained in the soil report and in any following addenda indicating subsurface conditions is not intended as representations or warranties of the accuracy or continuity of subsurface conditions between soils borings. It shall be expressly understood that the interpretations or conclusions drawn from such data are the responsibility of the Contractor. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Contractor shall mean the contractor performing the earthwork. 2.2 Owner shall mean the owner of the property or the party on whose behalf the earthwork is being performed and who has contracted with the Contractor to have the earthwork performed. 2.3 Civil Engineer Architect shall mean the engineer as architect who has prepared the grading plans and who is the Owner's representative concerning the configuration, quantities and dimensions of the earthwork and who usually sets basic surveying data at the site for the Contractor's conformance. C-l S4/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants 2.4 Geotechnical Engineer shall mean a licensed civil engineer authorized to use the title "Geotechnical Engineer" in accordance with Section 6736.1, Chapter 7, Division 3, State of California Business and Professions Code. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be responsible for having representatives on site to observe and test the Contractor's work for conformance with these specifications. 2.5 Green Book shall mean the most recent edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, prepared by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter, American Public Works Association, and Southern California Districts, Associated Contractors of California. 2.6 Standard Special Provisions shall mean the most recent edition of the Standard Special Provisions, prepared by County of San Diego, Department of Public Works. 3. OBSERVING AND TESTING 3.1 The Geotechnical Engineer shall be the Owner's representative to observe and make tests during the foundation preparation, filling, and compacting operations. 3.2 The Geotechnical Engineer shall make field density tests in the com- pacted fill to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the fill material has been compacted to at least the minimum relative compaction specified. The basis for this opinion shall be that no tests in compacted or recompacted areas indicate a relative compaction of less than that specified. Density tests shall be made in the compacted material below any disturbed surface. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the specified density, the particular layer or area represented by the test shall be reworked until the specified ~ density has been achieved. 3.3 Testing shall conform to the following standards as pertinent: 0 ASTM D2922-81,"Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate in place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)" 0 ASTM D3017-78, "Moisture Content of Soil and Soil-Aggregate in place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)" 0 ASTM D1556-82, "Density of Soil in place by the Sand-Cone Method" 0 ASTM D1557-78, "Moisture-Density Relations of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixture Using a 10-lb. Hammer and 18-inch Drops," Methods A, B, and C. C-2 S4/RPW10R Project No. 8751424VV-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants 0 AASHTO T 224-67 (1982), "Correction for Coarse Particles in the Soil Compaction Test" (modified for coarse particles larger than 3/4-inch). 4. CLEARING AND PREPARING AREAS TO BE FILLED 4.1 Clearing and grubbing shall be in accordance with Section 300-1 of the Green Book and, in addition, all trees, brush, grass, and other objectionable material shall be collected from areas to receive fill and disposed of off-site prior to the commencement of any earth moving so as to leave the areas that have been cleared with a neat and finished appearance free from debris. 4.2 All loose or porous soils shall be removed or compacted as specified for fill. The depth of removal and recompaction shall be approved in the field by the Geotechnical Engineer. Prior to placing fill, the surface to be filled shall be free from uneven features that would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. It shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth as required and in no case less than a minimum depth of 6 inches. 4.3 After the foundation for the fill has been cleared, plowed or scarified, it shall be disked or bladed by the Contractor until it is uniform and free from large clods, brought to the specified moisture content, and compacted as specified for fill. 5. SUBGRADE PREPARATION IN PAVEMENT AREAS 5.1 Subgrade preparation shall be in accordance with Section 301-1 of the Green Book, except that relative compaction of subgrade shall be in accordance with Section 12 of these specifications. Scarifi- cation and recompaction requirements may be waived by the Geo- technical Engineer in subgrade areas with naturally cemented forma- tional soils. 5.2 All areas to be paved shall be proofrolled in accordance with Section 301-1.3 of the Standard Special Provisions. 6. MATERIALS - GENERAL FILL 6.1 Materials for compacted fill shall contain no rocks or hard lumps greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension and shall contain at least 40% of material smaller than 1/4 inch in size. Material of a perishable, spongy, or otherwise improper nature shall not be used in fills. 6.2 Select soil, to be used at finish grade to the depths and at the locations specified on the grading plans, shall consist of material that contains no rocks or hard lumps greater than 6 inches in C-3 S4/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants maximum dimension and that has an Expansion Index of 30 or less when tested in accordance with UBC Standard 29-2. 6.3 Samples of materials to be used for fill shall be tested in the laboratory by the Geotechmcal Engineer in order to evaluate the maximum density, optimum moisture content, classification of the soil, and expansion index, as required. 6.4 During earthwork operations, soil types other than those analyzed in the report of the soil investigation may be encountered by the Contractor. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be consulted to determine the suitability of these soils. 7. MATERIALS - PAVEMENT SUBGRADE 7.1 Pavement subgrade shall be defined as the top 12 inches of soil, excluding aggregate base, in areas to be paved with asphalt concrete or Portland cement concrete. 7.2 Materials for pavement subgrade shall contain no rocks or hard lumps greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension, and shall contain at least 40 percent of material smaller than 1/4 inch in size. Material of a perishable, spongy or otherwise improper nature shall not be used in fills. 8. MATERIALS - TRENCH BACKFILL 8.1 Trench backfill materials above pipe bedding shall be in accordance with Section 306-1.3 of the Green Book. 8.2 As an alternative, cement slurry may be used to backfill trenches. The slurry shall have a minimum cement content of two sacks per cubic yard within the building limits and zone of influence of foundations and other settlement-sensitive structures. A minimum one sack per cubic yard slurry shall be used elsewhere. 9. MATERIALS - WALL BACKFILL 9.1 Wall backfill materials shall be in accordance with Section 300-3.5 of the Green Book. 10. COMPACTION EQUIPMENT 10.1 Compaction shall be accomplished by sheepsfoot rollers, vibratory rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other types of compaction equipment made specifically for the purpose of compacting soils. Equipment shall be of such a design that it will be capable of compacting the fill to the specified density at the specified moisture content. C-4 S4/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants 11. PLACING, SPREADING, AND COMPACTING GENERAL FILL MATERIAL 11.1 After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted by the Contractor to a relative compaction that is indicated by test to be not less than 90 percent. Relative compaction is defined as the ratio (expressed in percent) of the in-place dry density of the compacted fill divided by the maximum laboratory dry density evaluated in accordance with the ASTM D1557-78. Unless otherwise specified, fill material shall be compacted by the Contractor while at a moisture content at or above the optimum moisture content determined in accordance with the above test method. 11.2 The fill material shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that, when compacted, shall not exceed 6 inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain uniformity of moisture and material in each layer. The entire fill shall be constructed as a unit, in nearly level lifts start- ing up from the lowest area to receive fill. Compaction shall be continuous over the entire area, and the equipment shall make sufficient uniform trips so that the desired density has been ob- tained throughout the entire fill. 11.3 When the moisture content of the fill material is below that specified by the Geotechmcal Engineer, water shall be added by the Con- tractor until the moisture content is as specified. 11.4 When the moisture content of the fill material is above that specified by the Geotechmcal Engineer or too wet to achieve proper com- paction, the fill material shall be aerated by the Contractor by blading, mixing, or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is as required to permit compaction. 11.5 Properly compacted fill shall extend to the design surface of fill slopes. The surface of fill slopes shall be compacted in accordance with Section 11.1 of these specifications. 12. PLACING, SPREADING, AND COMPACTING PAVEMENT SUBGRADE 12.1 Subgrade materials shall be placed, spread, and compacted in accordance with Section 11 of these specifications, except that the top 6 inches of sub grade material shall be compacted to a relative compaction that is indicated by test to be not less than 95 percent. 13. PLACING AND COMPACTING TRENCH BACKFILL 13.1 Backfilling and compacting shall be in accordance with Section 306-1.3 of the Green Book, except that jetting or flooding shall not be allowed and that all backfill shall be compacted to a relative compaction that is indicated by test to be not less than 90 percent. C-5 S4/RPW10R Project No. 8751424W-UD01 Woodward-Clyde Consultants 13.2 All trenches 5 feet or more in depth shall be sloped or shored in accordance with OSHA safety requirements. Trenches less than 5 feet in depth shall also be so guarded when examination indicates hazardous ground movement may be expected. 13.3 No compaction testing shall be required for portions of trenches backfilled with cement slurry. 14. PLACING AND COMPACTING WALL BACKFILL 14.1 Backfilling and compacting shall be in accordance with Section 300-3.5 of the Green Book, except that ]ettmg or flooding shall not be allowed. 14.2 The Contractor shall be responsible for using equipment capable of compacting the backfill to the specified relative compaction without damaging adjacent walls or other existing improvements. 15. PROTECTION OF WORK 15.1 During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. When earthwork operations are interrupted, the Contractor shall reestablish specified compaction to the depth necessary before placing new fill. The contractor shall control surface water to avoid damage to adj'oimng properties or to finished work on the site. The Contractor shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas and until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control features have been installed. 15.2 After completion of the earthwork and when the Geotechnical Engineer has finished observation of the work, no further excava- tion or filling shall be done except under the observation of the Geotechnical Engineer. C-6 S4/RPW10R