Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2732 LOKER AV WEST; ; CB082053; Permit05-04-2009 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 CB082053 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Occupancy Group Project Title 2732 LOKER AV WEST CBAD Tl Sub Type INDUST 2090812900 Lot# 0 $3631200 Construction Type VN Reference # HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING AREA 480 SF OUTSIDE OXIDIZER PAD Applicant FENTON H G COMPANY 7577 MISSION VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO CA 92108 Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Plan Check* ISSUED 11/10/2008 KG 05/04/2009 05/04/2009 Owner FENTON H G COMPANY 7577 MISSION VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO CA 92108 Building Permit Add I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot Water Con Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot Water Con Fee Reel Water Con Fee Green Bldg Stands (SB1473) Fee $33315 Meter Size $0 00 Add I Reel Water Con Fee $21655 Meter Fee $0 00 SDCWA Fee $0 00 CFD Payoff Fee $763 PFF (3105540) $251 20 PFF (4305540) $0 00 License Tax (3104193) $0 00 License Tax (4304193) $000 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0 00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0 00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0 00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0 00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0 00 Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee $0 00 Redev Parking Fee $0 00 Additional Fees •" HMP Fee TOTAL PERMIT FEES $000 $000 $000 $000 $660 88 $61004 $000 $000 $12480 $11520 $3400 $2000 $000 $000 $15899 $000 $000 77 $2 532 44 Total Fees $2,532 44 Total Payments To Date $2 532 44 Balance Due $000 V Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date ?- P^o ?Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack review set aside void or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad CA 92008 760 602 2717 / 2718 / 2719 Fax 760 602 8558 igov Plan Check Plan Ck Deposit (Sec. 70315 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires i permit to construct, alter, improve demolish or repair any structure "prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for inch permit to tic a signed statement that he islicensed nunuant 10 the provisions of the Contractors License Law {Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code} or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation ofSection 70315 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more thin five hundred dollars {$500}) I^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^H^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^B^^^^^^^B^ManaMBM^MBMM^H^HBI^^mili^^B^B^^^^^^n^^m^HM^HMM^HI WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers Compensation Declaration / hereby affirm under penalty ot perjury one of the following declarations (H Lhave and will maintain a certificate of consent to self Insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued Lj I have and will maintain workers compensation assequired by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My workers compensation insurance earner and policy number are Insurance Co &lV-crJVft)frM'3J^i/rt'lt1^ /ff -yp , Policy NoT^OQOOQfrftvf 6*9 / Expiration Date/// g/ffi This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less C] Certificate of Exemption I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workeis compensationcoverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damags providedforrfTsection 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney s fees & CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION / hereoy affirm that I am exempt from Contractors License Law lor the following reason G I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offeied for sale If however the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) L~l I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractors License Law) D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials lor construction of the proposed properly improvement a Yes O No 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address / phone / contractors license number) 4 I plan to provide portions of the work but I have hired the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone / contractors license number) 5 I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone / type of work) ^"PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or nsk management and prevention program under Sections 25505 25533 or 25534 of the Presley Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act' D Yes D No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control distnct or air quality management district9 d Yes O No Is the facility to be constructed within 1 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site9 O Yes O No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec 3097 (i) Civil Code) Lender s Name Lender s Address APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for reflection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CfTY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMfT OSHA. An OSHA permit B required for excavations over 5 0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories n height EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the Building Official under the previsions of the Code shall expire by Imitation and become null and void if the buildrg or work authorized by such permit s not commenced withn ^APPLICANT S SIGNATURE.DATE City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite [F\fe\ Plan Check # Permit* Project Name Address Contact Person Sewer Dist Inspected, By CB082053 HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING AREA 480 SF OUTSIDE OXIDIZER PAD 2732 LOKER AV WEST DEWIE Phone 7605356201 CA Water Dist CA Lot Date 09/03/2009 Permit Type Tl Sub Type INDUST 0 Inspected By Inspected By Date Inspected Date Inspected Date Inspected G / 1 <3/ 1 . Approved Approved . Approved Disapproved Disapproved Disapproved Comments City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 09/03/2009 Permit* CB082053 Title HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING Description AREA, 480 SF OUTSIDE OXIDIZER PAD Inspector Assignment RB 2732 LOKER AV WEST Lot 0 Type Tl Job Address Suite Location APPLICANT FENTON H G COMPANY Owner Remarks Sub Type INDUST Phone 7605356201 Inspector Total Time CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By DEWIE Entered By CHRISTINE Act Comments Comments/Notices/Holds PCR02235 PCR02236 PCR02248 PCR09058 PCR09078 Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# ISSUED IIITSAMITSU/OCCUP CHANGE DELETE CONTAINMENT PIT & DOOR 501 ABANDOND HIS HISAMITSU CHANGE PLUMBING MATERIAL FROM POLY PRO TO PVC HISAMITSU OPTIONAL MONOLITHIC POUR FOR BOTH OXIDIZER PAD & SHIPPING IIISAMITSU DEFERRED SUUM1TAL ADD COLLECTION SYSTEM & DUCTING FOR ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED Inspection History Date Description Act Insp 08/12/2009 29 Final Plumbing PA RB 08/07/2009 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PC 08/06/2009 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PA RB 08/05/2009 23 Gas/Test/Repairs CO RB 08/05/2009 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PA RB 07/17/2009 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP RB 07/17/2009 34 Rough Electric AP RB 06/19/2009 15 Roof/Reroof AP RB 06/15/2009 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers WC RB Comments OK TO RELEASE GAS METER TEST CHART ATTACHED RESTART 24 HR TEST @ 8 18AM MISSING SHUT OFF VALVE @ UNION CAME BACK 2ND TIME TO START 24HR TEST ^" ' j Unscheduled , _ ,'" ,^ '"'^ Building Inspection : -— ,." v Fv I — *3 i--*/~\ I — •> Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 760-602-2700 ^DATE gj-^-D^ INSPECTOR [^ ^ PERMITS O£^£^SX CONTACT PHONE # JOB ADDRESS ^-7 X 7K Vv>^ £A_ IK^ ^ UOj? ^i^ DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS I c^>/ ^ wjf^T — " ^ ^ " Bldg Inspection Form Page 1 of 1 Rev 06/09 V City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 06/15/2009 Permit# CB082053 Title HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING Description AREA, 480 SF OUTSIDE OXIDIZER PAD Inspector Assignment RB 2732 LOKER AV WEST Lot 0 Type Tl Sub Type INDUST Job Address Suite Location OWNER FENTON H G COMPANY Owner Remarks REBAR & BLOCK Phone 7605356201 Inspector Total Time CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Comment Requested By DEWEY Entered By BARBARA Com ments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# PCR02235 ISSUED HITSAMITSU OCCUP CHANGI: DHLfl I: CON'I'AINMl-N I PIT & DOOR M) I PCR02236 ABANDOND I IIS PCR02248 ISSUED IIISAMII'SU CIIANGh PLUMBING MATl-RIAl FROM POLY PRO'I O PVC PCR09058 ISSUED HISAMIISU OPIIONAI. MONOLITHIC POUR FOR BOTH OXIDI/.PIR PAD & SHIPPING Inspection History Description Act Insp Comments WC RB 3RD LIFT @ SHIPPING RM OK Date 06/05/2009 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 06/05/2009 62 Steel/Bond Beam 06/05/2009 66 Grout 06/03/2009 62 Steel/Bond Beam 06/03/2009 66 Grout 06/01/2009 62 Steel/Bond Beam 05/27/2009 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP AP PA PA PA AP RB RB RB RB RB RB TOP LIFT OXIDIZER PAD & 2ND LIFT @ SHIPPING PAD 1st lift both Bldgs OK FTGS & SLABS FOR BOTH PADS "~f Carl Schmidt Inspection Services, Inc. P.O. Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177-8403 (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project: Address: City; Permit Number:plan File Number: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS Reinforcing Steel _ Reinforced Concrete _ Structural Masonry }( Field Welding Epoxy _ Prestressed Concrete _ Shop Welding _ Bolting _ Fireproofing _ Number of Samples Matenals/DesignMix/Psi Type l *7"<z 1 Date C~b REPORT I, ft Var^c & <cl*ct (« I r^ ec ftf 'f WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TIMEOUT Inspector (Print)Certification # General Contractor Address City Authorized Jf6b Site Contact Signature Phone City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 06/05/2009 Permit* CB082053 Title HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING Description AREA, 480 SF OUTSIDE OXIDIZER PAD Inspector Assignment RB 2732 LOKER AV WEST Lot 0 Type Tl Sub Type INDUST Job Address Suite Location APPLICANT FENTON H G COMPANY Owner Remarks Total Time Phone 7605356201 Inspector Requested By DEWIE Entered By CHRISTINE CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act . Comments Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# PCR02235 ISSUED HITSAMITSU/OCCUP CHANGE DELETE CONTAINMENT PIT & DOOR 501 PCR02236 ABANDOND HIS PCR02248 ISSUED HISAMITSU CHANGE PLUMBING MATERIAL FROM POLY PRO TO PVC PCR09058 ISSUED HISAMITSU OPTIONAL MONOLITHIC POUR FOR BOTH OXIDIZER PAD & SHIPPING Inspection History Date Description 06/03/2009 62 Steel/Bond Beam 06/03/2009 66 Grout 62 Steel/Bond Beam 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 06/01/2009 05/27/2009 Act Insp Comments PA RB TOP LIFT OXIDIZER PAD & 2ND LIFT @ SHIPPING PAD PA RB PA RB 1 st lift both Bldgs OK RB FTGS & SLABS FOR BOTH PADSAP TVf™~-- •" f * Carl Schmidt Inspection Services, Inc. P.O. Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177-8403 (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project: r\^atf/\n<c31? Address: 7?Z? C-r.ker A«e (/ City: Permit Number: 0G?0$>3 Plan File Number: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS Reinforcing Steel Reinforced Concrete Structural Masonry Jc Field Welding Epoxy Prestressed Concrete Shop Welding Bolting Fireproofing _ Number of Samples _ Type Matenals/DesignMix/Psi / Date REPORT Ag />oo . J Jiff*its. WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED & TIME IN 0'* £ TIME OUT Inspector (Print) Certification # General Contractor Address City Authorized Job Site Contact Signature Phone City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 06/03/2009 Permit# CB082053 Inspector Assignment RB Title HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING Description AREA, 480 SF OUTSIDE OXIDIZER PAD Type Tl Sub Type INDUST Phone 7605356201 Job Address 2732 LOKER AV WEST Suite Lot 0 Location Inspector APPLICANT FENTON H G COMPANY Owner Remarks Total Time Requested By DUEY Entered By JANEAN CD Description Act Comments ^ t 62 Steel/Bond Beam /" Com ments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# PCR02235 ISSUED HITSAMITSU/OCCUP CHANGE DELETE CONTAINMENT PIT & DOOR 501 PCR02236 ABANDOND HIS, PCR02248 ISSUED HISAMITSU, CHANGE PLUMBING MATERIAL FROM POLY PRO TO PVC PCR09058 ISSUED HISAMITSU OPTIONAL MONOLITHIC, POUR FOR BOTH OXIDIZER PAD & SHIPPING Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 06/01/2009 62 Steel/Bond Beam PA RB 1 st lift both Bldgs OK 05/27/2009 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP RB FTGS & SLABS FOR BOTH PADS Carl Schmidt Inspection Services, Inc. P.O. Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177-8403 (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project: Hf^&wi/rSC/ Address: 27?? L-ofCer /t\/{ U/ City: Permit Number:Plan FUe Number: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS Reinforcing Steel _ Reinforced Concrete _ Structural Masonry V Field Welding Epoxy _ Prestressed Concrete _ Shop Welding _ Bolting _ Fireproofing _ Number of Samples Matenals/DesignMix/Psi Type Date C "3 " ° 1 REPORT .)>A c\v\a WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED r)(£*v*tfel &nff,'+k tt-W-W TIME IN J',&0 TIMEOUTtf *r Inspector (Print)Certification # General Contractor Address City Authorized Job Site Contact Signature Phone 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 06/01/2009 Permit^ CB082053 Title HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING Description AREA, 480 SF OUTSIDE OXIDIZER PAD Inspector Assignment RB Sub Type INDUSTType Tl Job Address 2732 LOKERAVWEST Suite Lot 0 Location OWNER FENTON H G COMPANY Owner Remarks 1ST LIFT BLOCKS Phone 7605356201 Inspector Total Time CD Description 62 Steel/Bond Beam Act Com f±- Comments/Notices/Holds Requested By DEWIE Entered By CHRISTINE fibte Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# PCR02235 ISSUED HITSAMITSU/OCCUP CHANGE DELETE CONTAINMENT PIT & DOOR 501 PCR02236 ABANDOND HIS PCR02248 ISSUED HISAMITSU CHANGE PLUMBING MATERIAL FROM POLY PRO TO PVC PCR09058 ISSUED HISAMITSU OPTIONAL MONOLITHIC POUR FOR BOTH OXIDIZER PAD & SHIPPING Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 05/27/2009 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP RB FTGS & SLABS FOR BOTH PADS Carl Schmidt Inspection Services. Inc. P.O. Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177-8403 (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project: _JT'/< Address: 7 722 Uker City; Co Permit Number: ieS5 Plan File Number: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS Reinforcing Steel Reinforced Concrete Structural Masonry /< Field Welding Epoxy Prestressed Concrete Shop Welding Bolting Fireproofing _ Number of Samples %L£ Type Matenals/DesignMix/Psi Date t REPORT n WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED kkid 6ani(/el 6ir>#Mi ZtiHcZWH TIME IN 0 '&& TIMEOUT Inspector (Print) t Certification # General Contractor • -~y- ^ 177777 •*• Address Inspector's Stgna^/^ City Authorized Job Site Contact Signature Phone City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 05/27/2009 Permit* CB082053 Title HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING Description AREA, 480 SF OUTSIDE OXIDIZER PAD Inspector Assignment 2732 LOKERAVWEST Lot 0 Type Tl Sub Type INDUST Job Address Suite Location APPLICANT FENTON H G COMPANY Owner Remarks Inspector Total Time CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Comments Requested By DEWIE Entered By CHRISTINE Comments/Notices/Holds Date Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# PCR02235 ISSUED HITSAMITSU/OCCUP CHANGE DELETE CONTAINMENT PIT & DOOR 501 PCR02236 ABANDOND HIS PCR02248 ISSUED HISAMITSU CHANGE PLUMBING MATERIAL FROM POLY PRO TO PVC PCR09058 ISSUED HISAMITSU-OPTIONAL MONOLITHIC POUR FOR BOTH OXIDIZER PAD & SHIPPING Inspection History Description Act Insp Comments Carl Schmidt Inspection Services, Inc. P.O. Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177-8403 (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project: H I S c*. fv\ i J~ j 14 Address: 1~~l32- L 0 l< *-*- c, City: C <f«J- IS PC* </ Permit Number: C P & $ Z OS' 3 Plan File Number: TYPE QF OBSERVATIONS Reinforcing Steel X Reinforced Concrete Structural Masonry Field Welding Epoxy Prestressed Concrete Shop Welding Bolting Fireproofing _ Number of Samples Type Matenals/DesignMix/Psi //- (p /£~ REPORT 4 or Xr, /i /J"z . L /~t -C C O —i C WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TIME IN 2~'3O TIMEOUT Inspector (Pnnt) Certification # General Contractor _ _ Address Inspector's Signature City Authorized Job Site Contact Signature Phone GEOCON INCORPORATED ^^P* GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 696O FLANDERS DRIVE • SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 2974 • TEL (858) 558 69OO «.• FAX (858) 558 6159 FOUNDATION OBSERVATION REPORT PROJECT NAME LOCATION AM* PROJECT NO DATE X ~ IS C. FOUNDATION LOCATION (if not entire building) PLAN FILE NO FOUNDATION TYPE CONVENTIONAL D POST TENSIONED PERMIT NOS D ADDITIONAL OBSERVATION REQUIRED SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE PURPOSE OF OBSERVATION ^Verify soil conditions exposed are similar to those anticipated Severity footing excavations extend to minimum depth recommended in soil report D Verify foundation reinforcement complies with minimum recommended in soil report D Verify slab reinforcement, sand bedding and moisture barrier comply with minimum recommended in soil report HT Verify footings have been extended to an appropriate bearing strata D Other • APPLICABLE SOIL REPORT TITIE • SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON D Expansion Condition D VERY LOW D LOW D MEDIUM \/Fill Geometry (j3*-fp ur-j n Other J DATF D HIGH D VERY HIGH MINIMUM FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ^Footing Depth D 12 Inches D 18 Inches D 24 Inches OTHER Footing Reinforcement D No 4 T&B D 2-No 4 T&B D 2-No 5 T&B D Post-Tensioned OTHER Interior Slab Reinforcement D 6x6-10/10 D 6x6-6/6 D No 3@24lnches D No 3@18lnches D Post-Tensioned <a ' -$tr 4 ensioned OTHE Slab Bedding Material and Thickness Foundation Width &• ~ & ** Au» Vapor Barrier OBSERVATIONS D Substantial conformance with Soil Reports (see "Purpose of Observation") HQ Substantial conformance with Foundation Plans Identify C4 D Other. • COMMENTS Mais' IT IS ASSUMED THAT ALL FOOTING EXCAVATIONS Will BE CLEANED OF LOOSE MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE AND THA'WILL BE MAINTAINED RELD COPIES TO GEOCON INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 6960 FLANDERS DRIVE • SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121-2974 • TEI, (858) 558 69OO • FAX (858) 558-6159 FOUNDATION OBSERVATION REPORT PROJECT NAME LOCATION PAD PROJECT NO DATE -T- FOUNDATION LOCATION (if not entire building) PLAN FILE NO FOUNDATION TYPE )$ CONVENTIONAL D POST TENSIONED PERMIT NOS D ADDITIONAL OBSERVATION REQUIRED SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE > PURPOSE OF OBSERVATION . MH Verify soil conditions exposed are similar to those anticipated H Verify footing excavations extend to minimum depth recommended in soil report [j Verify foundation reinforcement complies with minimum recommended in soil report D Verify slab reinforcement, sand bedding and moisture barrier comply with minimum recommended in soil report.f\fjj Verify footings have been extended to an appropriate bearing strata D Other APPLICABLE SOIL REPORT TITLE DATE SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON D Expansion Condition D VERY LOW Jft Fill Geometry D Other D LOW D MEDIUM D HIGH D VERY HIGH MINIMUM FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS x Footing Depth D 12 Inches D 18 Inches D 24 Inches OTHER _3 !LJ Footing Reinforcement DNo4T&B D2-No4T&B D2-No5T&B D Post-Tensioned OTHER Interior Slab Reinforcement D 6x6-10/10 D 6x6-6/6 D No 3@24lnches D No 3@18lnches D Post-Tensioned Vapor BarrierSlab Bedding Material and Thickness Foundation Width ^ ' & " /»»" ~ ft OBSERVATIONS D Substantial conformance with Soil Reports (see "Purpose of Observation") Substantial conformance with Foundation Plans Identify flTijsic/*rrtvl t faof /'c _ £ — Dejtti D Other COMMENTS iff /*/a/aa/!c. f IS ASSUMED THAT ALL FOOTING EXCAVATIONS WILL BE CLEANED OF LOOSE MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE AND THAT THE SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT WILL BE MAINTAINED U FIELD COPIES TO GEOCON REPRESENTATIVE EsGil Corporation In Partners Hip witK government for <Bui(ifing Safety DATE March 13, 2009 JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 08-2053 PROJECT ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave. West PROJECT NAME Hisamitsu Q APEUCANT JURIJ >LAN REVIEWER a FILE SET IV XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Telephone # Date contacted (by ) Fax # Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS By Eric Jensen EsGil Corporation 13 GA D MB K EJ PC Enclosures 3/09/09 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership witH government for <BmC<£ing Safety DATE February 18, 2OO9 Q/iPPl IQANT JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 08-2053 SET III PROJECT ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave. West PROJECT NAME Commercial/ Industrial Building Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person X3 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Gen Kobayashi 7040 Avenida Enemas, 104-111, Carlsbad, CA 92011 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Gen,Kobayashi Telephones (760)944-1921 Date contacted *V/^?(by^*J Fax # (760) 944-1921 Mail //Telephone Fax j//In Person REMARKS By Sergio Azuela Enclosures EsGil Corporation IEl GA D MB El EJ D PC 2/11/09 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad O8-2O53 February 18, 2OO9 RECHECK CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave West PLAN CHECK NO 08-2053 SET III DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 2/11/09 REVIEWED BY Sergio Azuela DATE RECHECK COMPLETED February 18, 20O9 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations The approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law A To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans B The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items C Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes a NO City of Carlsbad O8-2O53 February 18, 2OO9 1 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 2 All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation This correction will be rechecked at Final Submittal If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation Thank you * ELECTRICAL & ENERGY PLAN REVIEW • 2005 NEC • PLAN REVIEWER Eric Jensen 21 Please specify the wiring methods and equipment ratings for hazardous classified areas per hazardous materials handling report. The letter by ERMI. Inc (updated report) does not address the requirements for electrical hazardous classified areas And the General Note #4 on sheet E-1 does not address the requirements for electrical hazardous classified areas • ENERGY CONSERVATION 22 Please demonstrate compliance with the current energy lighting requirements The plan package still does not address the required lighting energy lighting requirements both inside and outside for both conditioned and unconditioned spaces and the mechanical and envelope energy design for the required heating of the new Shipping Area Please provide Note If you have any questions regarding this Electrical or Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468 To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans City of Carlsbad O8-2O53 February 18, 2OO9 PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER Glen Adamek 23 The final set of corrected drawings to be reviewed for signing and sealing just before the permits are to be issued Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation, even though there are no structural changes, before the permits are issued Business and Professions Code PLUMBING (2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 27 The sheet P-2 shows the total gas demand at the gas meter is 630 CFH But the plan also shows only one gas demand of 300 CFH for the new Thermal Oxidizer Please correct to show the missing 330 CFH existing gas demand and piping Please correct the gas line plans and sizing calculations on sheet P-2 A) The Table 12-6 of the 2007 California Plumbing Code is not a gas line sizing table Sheet P-2 has not been corrected UPC. Table 12-11 is the gas pipe sizing table for Schedule 40 metallic Pipe with 5 psi inlet pressure and 3 5 psi pressure drop Please correct and use the 2007 CPC (that is based on the 2006 UPC) B) Please clearly show in psi the gas pressure of the medium pressure gas system (So the correct gas piping table can be used in the gas line sizing, UPC, Tables 12-8,12-9,12-10 or 12-11?) The sheet P-2 shows a 1 5 PSI inlet gas pressure, but the UPC. Table 12-9 used for the sizing of the gas line at the Oxidizer Equipment is for Schedule 40 metallic Pipe with 2 psi minimum inlet pressure and 1 0 PSI pressure drop Please correct As per the UPC. Tables 12-8 for the 20 foot length and 300 CFH gas demand the % inch gas line is undersized D) A complete review of the gas line sizing will be done when complete corrected gas line plans and calculations are provided 28 Please provide data from SDG&E for the serving gas pressure at the gas meter Provide the building Department a letter that minimum 5 psi gas will be served to the building for the new gas demand, before the permit is issued MECHANICAL (2006 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 30 The plans do not show the "new Kronus 203 RTO" as noted in the letter by ERMI. Inc and required by San Diego Air Pollution Control District Please correct the drawings The Air Pollution Control District letter of approval shows a new Ross Planetary Mixer, Inouekmzokukoyo Co coater and data logger/chart recorder are to be installed But the plans provided do not show locations, details and installation instructions for the proposed equipment City of Carlsbad 08-2O53 February 18, 20O9 34 The new 628 square foot Shipping Area is not mst a storage room The drawings clearly show this is a packaging and shipping work area As per the International Building Code. Code and Commentary book "Heating facilities are required for comfort in all new construction The systems may be either active (such as forced- air furnace) or passive (such as solar systems), as long as the specified performance is achieved The exception recognizes that not all interior spaces are associated with human comfort by the nature of their uses, such as commercial cooler or freezer These and similar spaces would not require heating systems " The Shipping Area does reguire heating system to be provided for the workers Please correct to provide the required heating of the Shipping Area and the required energy design No mechanical plans provided for the required space heating of the new 628 square foot Shipping Area as per Section 1204 1 of the 2007 California Building Code Also provide the required energy design for the required ventilation of the new 628 square foot Shipping Area as per the new 2007 California Mechanical Code Show the size, location, and types of all new and existing heating and cooling appliances or systems 36 A complete mechanical plan check will be done when the required mechanical drawings and energy calculations are provided Note If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing and Mechanical plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (858) 560-1468 To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans EsGil Corporation In (Partners Rip with government for (BuiUing Safety DATE January 5, 20O9 O~-APPL4CANT (Q^ JURIS,) JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 08-2O53 SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave. West PROJECT NAME Commercial/Industrial Building Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes I I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck A] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Gen Kobayashi 7040 Avenida Enemas, 104-111, Carlsbad, CA 92011 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Gen Kobayashi Telephone # (760)944-1921 Date contacted ihl^ (by f*^ Fax # (760)944-1921 Mail V"" Telephone Faxl^ In Person ] REMARKS By Sergio Azuela Enclosures EsGil Corporation IEI GA IEI MB D EJ D PC 12/29/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad 08-2053 January 5, 2009 RECHECK CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO O8-2O53 PROJECT ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave. West SET II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED ESGIL CORPORATION 12/29/08 January 5, 2009 REVIEWED BY Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations The approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law A To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans B The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items C Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list? a Yes a No City of Carlsbad O8-2O53 January 5, 2009 1 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 2 All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation This correction will be rechecked at Final Submittal 13 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans (required by the soil report - page 12) The required letter was not provided Original correction is still applicable If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation Thank you « ELECTRICAL & ENERGY PLAN REVIEW • 2005 NEC • PLAN REVIEWER Morteza Beheshti 20 Please specify outdoor rated light fixtures for the exterior pad lights Also, remove redundant light fixture schedules One on E1 and one on E3 21 Please specify the wiring methods and equipment ratings for hazardous classified areas per hazardous materials handling report • ENERGY CONSERVATION 22 Please demonstrate compliance with the current energy lighting requirements Note If you have any questions regarding this Electrical or Energy plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (858) 560-1468 To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans City of Carlsbad O8-2O53 January 5, 2OO9 PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 23 The final set of corrected drawings to be reviewed for signing and sealing just before the permits are to be issued Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation, even though there are no structural changes, before the permits are issued Business and Professions Code 24 The letter by ERMI, Inc only addresses the existing building to the 2001 California Fire Code, the 2001 California Building Code, and the 2001 California Mechanical Code It does not address the new building addition of 628 square foot Shipping Area and the new Oxidizer Equipment (including new exhaust fan and revised control systems) to show compliance to the new Codes as of the first of January, 2008. Please address the new requirements of the 2007 California Fire Code, the 2007 California Building Code, and the 2007 California Mechanical Code in the updated Please provide a copy of a Technical Report for the existing and all changes to the existing and the changes in the building code for the proposed uses and hazardous materials within the building Provide data on the proposed hazardous materials to be stored and used IBC 414 Present the description of the hazardous materials in a format that coincides with the material classifications found in IBC Tables 307 1(1) and 307 1(2) a) Clearly show the types of hazardous materials being stored or used Provide a list of the proposed hazardous materials, include the material safety data sheets (MSDS), if applicable b) Clearly show the amounts for each type of hazardous material to be stored and in use c) Clearly show the locations in the building where each type of hazardous material is being stored or used d) Note If hazardous materials are present in any amount, forward this information to the mechanical designer for design compliance with UMC Chapter 5 PLUMBING (2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 27 The sheet P-2 shows the total gas demand at the gas meter is 630 CFH But the plan also shows only one gas demand of 300 CFH for the new Thermal Oxidizer Please correct to show the missing 330 CFH existing gas demand and piping Please correct the gas line plans and sizing calculations on sheet P-2 A) The Table 12-6 of the 2007 California Plumbing Code is not a gas line sizing table Please correct B) Please clearly show in psi the gas pressure of the medium pressure gas system (So the correct gas piping table can be used in the gas line sizing, UPC, Tables 12-8,12-9,12-10 or 12-11?) City of Carlsbad O8-2053 January 5, 20O9 C) The gas line sizing calculations do not address the sizing of the gas line from the gas pressure regulator to the connection to the Oxidizer Equipment Please show the pipe length from the gas regulator at the equipment to the connection to the Oxidizer Equipment (looks to be 15 feet?) And the gas pressure after the gas pressure regulator in psi D) A complete review of the gas line sizing will be done when complete corrected gas line plans and calculations are provided 23 The data for the seems to show medium pressure gas at 2 psi is required both gas systems from the gas meter to the gas pressure regulator and from the gas regulator to the Oxidizer Equipment Please correct (1 5 psi minimum at the equipment) Please review Please provide data from SDG&E for the serving gas pressure at the gas meter MECHANICAL (2006 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 29 No mechanical plans provided for the required space heating of the new 628 square foot Shipping Area as per Section 1204 1 of the 2007 California Building Code And no data provided for the new Oxidizer Equipment (including new exhaust fan and revised control systems) and the make-up air system being used for the required supply air for the exhaust air for the new Oxidizer Equipment (revised exhaust system) Please provide Review with the architect the locations that require (fire/ceiling radiation/or fire/smoke) damper and/or shaft protection and identify installations on the mechanical plans themselves See "Architectural PME" items above directly below the PME list heading 30 As per the response provided the letter from the Air Pollution Control District is for the existing building design only Please provide an updated letter for the proposed building addition and the new Oxidizer Equipment(includmg new exhaust fan and revised control systems) and the make-up air system being used for the required supply air for the exhaust air for the new Oxidizer Equipment (revised exhaust system) The Air Pollution Control District letter of approval shows a new Ross Planetary Mixer, Inouekmzokukoyo Co coater and data logger/chart recorder are to be installed But the plans provided do not show locations, details and installation instructions for the proposed equipment 31 No mechanical plans provided for the new Oxidizer Equipment (including new exhaust fan and revised control systems) and the make-up air system being used for the required supply air for the exhaust air for the new Oxidizer Equipment (revised exhaust system) Please provide No mechanical drawings provided showing Thermal Oxidizer supply air ducting from process equipment to the Thermal Oxidizer Please provide complete plans City of Carlsbad O8-2053 January 5, 2OO9 32 No mechanical plans provided for the new Oxidizer Equipment (including new exhaust fan and revised control systems) and the make-up air system being used for the required supply air for the exhaust air for the new Oxidizer Equipment (revised exhaust system) Please provide so the following can be reviewed Detail exhaust ventilation system compliance with UMC Chapters 5 & 6 A) Detail the required make-up air as per UMC 505 3 B) Detail the exhaust outlet clearances as per UMC Section 506 9 (Product conveying) C) Clearly show the type of material to be exhausted by exhaust system D) Clearly show the duct materials are suitable for the intended use UMC 506 1 & 6101 E) Clearly show the exhaust duct material and gage used for each duct size UMC Table 6-7 F) Separate and distinct systems shall be provided for incompatible materials UMC 5051 G) Detail ducts conveying explosives or flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall extend directly to the exterior of the building without entering other spaces UMC 5051 H) Detail duct cleanouts as per UMC Section 506 3 I) Detail duct support as per UMC 506 5 & 610 5 J) Detail fire protection as per UMC 506 6 & 610 6 K) Detail clearances from combustibles as per UMC 506 7 & 610 7 L) Detail protection from physical damage as per UMC 506 8 & 610 8 34 No mechanical plans provided for the required space heating of the new 628 square foot Shipping Area as per Section 1204 1 of the 2007 California Building Code And no data provided for the new Oxidizer Equipment (including new exhaust fan and revised control systems) and the make-up air system being used for the required supply air for the exhaust air for the new Oxidizer Equipment (revised exhaust system) Also provide the required energy design for the required ventilation of the new 628 square foot Shipping Area as per the new 2007 California Mechanical Code Show the size, location, and types of all new and existing heating and cooling appliances or systems 35 No mechanical plans provided for the required space heating of the new 628 square foot Shipping Area as per Section 1204 1 of the 2007 California Building Code And no data provided for the new Oxidizer Equipment (including new exhaust fan and revised control systems) and the make-up air system being used for the required supply air for the exhaust air for the new Oxidizer Equipment (revised exhaust system) And no notes found on the mechanical drawings to address the proposed third party installation report as per the response Please provide listing data and installation instructions for the proposed now Thermal Qxidizer Or, provide the listing data and installation data for the proposed Thermal Oxidizer If not listed, a third party installation report will be required for the approval of the construction and installation of the proposed Thermal Oxidizer to approved standards UMC Sections 302 2 & 304 1 City of Carlsbad O8-2O53 January 5, 2009 36 A complete mechanical plan check will be done when the required mechanical drawings and energy calculations are provided Note If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing and Mechanical plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (858) 560-1468 To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for Quitting Safety DATE November 19, 2008 JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 08-2053 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave. West PROJECT NAME Commercial/Industrial Building Addition ANT JURIS. LArTREVlEWER a FILE I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck X] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person [XJ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Gen Kobayashi 7040 Avenida Enemas, 104-111, Carlsbad, CA 92011 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Gen Kobayashi Telephone # (760)944-1921 Date contacted ^M°^(^4^>} Fax # (760)944-1921 Mailv/ Telephone Fax^ In Person REMARKS By Sergio Azuela Enclosures EsGil Corporation Kl GA IS MB D EJ D PC 11/12/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 pity of Carlsbad O8-2053 November 19, 2OO8 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO O8-2053 OCCUPANCY B, F-l & S-l TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-B ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA SPRINKLERS'? YES REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED November 19, 2008 JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad USE Manufacturing Warehouse ACTUAL AREA 8,703 SF STORIES 1 HEIGHT OCCUPANT LOAD DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 11/12/08 PLAN REVIEWER Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ)' This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Code sections cited are based on the 2007 CBC, which adopts the 2006 IBC The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 105 4 of the 2006 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e. plan sheet number, specification section, etc Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans City of Carlsbad O8-2053 November 19, 2O08 GENERAL 1 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete • PLANS 2 All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation This correction will be rechecked at Final Submittal 3 Provide a note on the plans indicating if any hazardous materials will be stored and/or used within the building which exceed the quantities listed in IBC Tables 307 7(1) and 307 7(2) 4 A complete description of the activities and processes that will occur in this tenant space should be provided A listing of all hazardous materials should be included The materials listing should be stated in a form that would make classification in Tables 307 7(1) and 307 7(2) possible The building official may require a technical report to identify and develop methods of protection from hazardous materials Section 307 7 • SITE PLAN 5 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Sec A106 1 1 Include the following a) Please revise the plans to show the Site Plan scale b) Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan Please show on plans the setbacks to the new proposed structures City of Carlsbad 08-2O53 November 19, 2O08 6 Provide a statement on the site plan stating "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan " 7 Show on the site plan, or provide the grading plans, showing finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to buildings, drainage patterns and locations and gradients of cut or fill slopes Section A106 1 1 • INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISHES 8 Provide a note on the plans or on the finish schedule, stating, "Wall and ceiling materials shall not exceed the flame spread classifications in IBC Table 803 5 " • EXITS 9 Please provide an exit analysis plan (may be 8 1/2" x 11" or any convenient size) Show in this analysis the occupant load of each area, the general exit flow patterns (by using arrows), accumulated occupant loads and required exit widths Section A106 1 2 Please identify clearly on the plans any wall that is new and any wall that is existing Identify existing walls to be removed, existing walls to remain and proposed new walls Does the "1 hr rated lobby", exist to remain or it is a new construction? 10 Note on the plans "All egress doors shall be readily openable from the egress side without the use of a key or special knowledge or effort" Section 1008 1 8 In lieu of the above, in a Group B, F, M or S occupancies (or Group A having an occupant load of 300 or less), you may note on the plans "Provide a sign on or near the exit door, reading THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED " This signage is only allowed at the mam exit • ROOFS 11 Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 15063 a) ICC approval number, or equal . ACCESSIBILITY 12 Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed "Disabled Access" Review List • FOUNDATION 13 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans (required by the soil report - page 12) City of Carlsbad 08-2053 November 19, 2008 14 The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report" 15 Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- daylight") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills Figure 1805 3 1 16 Note on plans that surface water will dram away from building and show drainage pattern The grade shall fall a minimum of 5% within the first 10 feet (2% for impervious surfaces) Section 1803 3 • STRUCTURAL 17 Please provide structural design calculations for the "Building Separation" between the new "Shipping Area" and the existing building ASCE 7-05 Section 12123 • Construction documents 18 The following design loads shall be clearly indicated on the construction documents (Section 1603 1) • Wind load The following information should be provided, (Section 1603 1 4) o Basic Wind speed (3-second gust), mph o Wind importance factor, I, and building category o Wind exposure o Applicable internal pressure coefficient o Components and cladding (the design wind pressure in terms of psf to be used for the design of exterior component and cladding materials not specifically designed by the registered design professional • ADDITIONAL 19 See attached lists for electrical, energy, plumbing and mechanical corrections City of Carlsbad O8-2O53 November 19, 2008 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e, plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate U Yes U No The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation Thank you * ELECTRICAL & ENERGY PLAN REVIEW • 2005 NEC • PLAN REVIEWER Morteza Beheshti 20 Please specify outdoor rated light fixtures for the exterior pad lights Also, remove redundant light fixture schedules One on E1 and one on E3 21 Please specify the wiring methods and equipment ratings for hazardous classified areas per hazardous materials handling report • ENERGY CONSERVATION 22 Please demonstrate compliance with the current energy lighting requirements Note If you have any questions regarding this Electrical or Energy plan review list please contact Morteza Beheshti at (858) 560-1468 To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CORRECTIONS PLAN REVIEWER Glen Adamek 23 Each sheet of the plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation, even though there are no structural changes, before the permits are issued Business and Professions Code The final set of corrected drawings to be reviewed for signing and sealing just before the permits are to be issued City of Carlsbad 08-2053 November 19, 2O08 24 Please provide a copy of a Technical Report for the existing and all changes to the existing and the changes in the building code for the proposed uses and hazardous materials within the building Provide data on the proposed hazardous materials to be stored and used IBC 414 Present the description of the hazardous materials in a format that coincides with the material classifications found in IBC Tables 307 1(1) and 307 1(2) a) Clearly show the types of hazardous materials being stored or used Provide a list of the proposed hazardous materials, include the material safety data sheets (MSDS), if applicable b) Clearly show the amounts for each type of hazardous material to be stored and in use c) Clearly show the locations in the building where each type of hazardous material is being stored or used d) Note If hazardous materials are present in any amount, forward this information to the mechanical designer for design compliance with UMC Chapter 5 25 For mechanical plan check, include the architectural design detailing the following IBC 716 5 a) Fire Walls b) Fire Barriers c) Shaft Enclosures d) Fire Partitions e) Corridors f) Smoke Barriers g) Horizontal Assemblies h) Exit Passageways i) Vertical Exit Enclosures (Stair & Ramp Enclosures) If thisJenant improvement contains any of the above assemblies, be sure to provide construction details For example Rated corridor construction style - Tunnel VS Full height corridor walls 26 Include, on the mechanical plans, the locations of all required smoke, fire, combination smoke and fire, or ceiling radiation dampers Be sure to include a symbol on the symbol schedule for each damper type IBC 716 PLUMBING (2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 27 The sheet P-2 shows the total gas demand at the gas meter is 630 CFH But the plan also shows only one gas demand of 300 CFH for the new Thermal Oxidizer Please correct to show the missing 330 CFH existing gas demand and piping City of Carlsbad O8-2053 November 19, 2008 28 The data for the seems to show medium pressure gas at 2 psi is required (1 5 psi minimum at the equipment) Please review Please provide data from SDG&E for the serving gas pressure at the gas meter MECHANICAL (2006 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 29 Review with the architect the locations that require (fire/ceiling radiation/or fire/smoke) damper and/or shaft protection and identify installations on the mechanical plans themselves See "Architectural PME" items above directly below the PME list heading 30 The Air Pollution Control District letter of approval shows a new Ross Planetary Mixer, Inouekmzokukoyo Co coater and data logger/chart recorder are to be installed But the plans provided do not show locations, details and installation instructions for the proposed equipment 31 No mechanical drawings provided showing Thermal Oxidizer supply air ducting from process equipment to the Thermal Oxidizer Please provide complete plans 32 Detail exhaust ventilation system compliance with UMC Chapters 5 & 6 a) Detail the required make-up air as per UMC 505 3 b) Detail the exhaust outlet clearances as per UMC Section 506 9 (Product conveying) c) Clearly show the type of material to be exhausted by exhaust system d) Clearly show the duct materials are suitable for the intended use UMC 5061 &6101 e) Clearly show the exhaust duct material and gage used for each duct size UMC Table 6-7 f) Separate and distinct systems shall be provided for incompatible materials UMC 505 1 g) Detail ducts conveying explosives or flammable vapors, fumes or dusts shall extend directly to the exterior of the building without entering other ~ spaces UMC 505 1 h) Detail duct cleanouts as per UMC Section 506 3 i) Detail duct support as per UMC 506 5 & 610 5 j) Detail fire protection as per UMC 506 6 & 610 6 k) Detail clearances from combustibles as per UMC 506 7 & 610 7 I) Detail protection from physical damage as per UMC 506 8 & 610 8 33 Ducts containing hazardous material as described in IBC 414 3 shall extend directly to the exterior without entering other spaces (exception LFL less than 25%) and shall not be installed in plenums City of Carlsbad O8-2053 November 19, 20O8 34 Show the size, location, and types of all new and existing heating and cooling appliances or systems 35 Please provide listing data and installation instructions for the proposed new Thermal Oxidizer Or, provide the listing data and installation data for the proposed Thermal Oxidizer If not listed, a third party installation report will be required for the approval of the construction and installation of the proposed Thermal Oxidizer to approved standards UMC Sections 302 2 & 304 1 Note If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing and Mechanical plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (858) 560-1468 To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT TITLE 24 The following disabled access items are taken from the 2007 edition of California Building Code, Title 24 Per Section 1091, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities NOTE All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California Building Code, Title 24 • REMODELS. ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected, is required to comply with all of the requirements for new buildings, per Section 1134B 2 These requirements apply as follows a) Existing sanitary facilities that serve the remodeled area must be shown to comply with all accessibility features City of Carlsbad 08-2053 November 19, 2008 MULTIPLE ACCOMMODATION SANITARY FACILITIES 59" MIN AT FLOOR-MOUNTED WC WHEN DOOR SWINGS IN 56" MIN AT WALL-MOUNTED WC WHEN DOOR SWINGS IN 54' MIN FLUSH ACTIVATOR ON WIDESIDE The door into the accessible water closet compartment shall be provided with a clearance of at least 18" at the strike side of the door, per Section 1115B 3 1 4 5 Additionally, such doors shall have a clear space of not less than 48" as measured at right angles to the door in its closed position END OF DOCUMENT . City of Carlsbad O8-2O53 November 19, 2OO8 [DO NOT PAY- THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO O8-2053 PREPARED BY Sergio Azuela DATE November 19, 2008 BUILDING ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave. West Hisamitsu/Manufacturing Bldg Add BUILDING OCCUPANCY B, F-l&S-l TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-B BUILDING PORTION Ind Plant Masonry Wall Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq Ft) 628 672 628 cb Rlda Permit FPP bv Ordinance ^ Valuation Multiplier 4545 887 288 By Ordinance Reg Mod / VALUE ($) 28,543 5,961 1,809 36,312 $33315 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review EH Repetitive Feer^T] Repeats Complete Review D Other r-1 Hourly Structural Only Hour* $216 551 Esgil Plan Review Fee $186 56 Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc City of Carlsbad ^ P^HMMHBMNAMMBBi^H^^HBm^^^HMMHHMHiMMHHM lA.o/06DATE BUILDING ADDRESS ±_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Public Works BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO CB ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal, therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued confbrmance with applicable codes Please review carefully aH comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements EST VALUE DENIAL Please see^frie antached report of deficiencies marked wrfn DJrfake necessary corrections to plans or spedtficatibns for compliance with applicable codes and standards Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review By By Date Date w By FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT j ""V* m«XTX f \* J* \ — • ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application 0 Dedication Checklist C3 Improvement Application 0 Improvement Checklist D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Neighborhood Improvement Agreement D Right-of-Way Permit Application [] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet 0 Storm Water Compliance Forms ENGINEERING DEPT CONTACT PERSOI Name Linda Ontivero* City of Carlsbad Address 163S Faraday Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone (760) 602-2773 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No Lots Recordation /O 3 ~7 *2 Carlsbad Tract £f 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92OO8-7314 • (76O) 6O2-272O • FAX (76O) 6O2-8562 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN NO n )2 D sRO D 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Show A North Arrow B Existing & Proposed Structures C Existing Street Improvements ff^\Property Lines ( E JEasements— F Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets G Dnveway widths H Existing or proposed sewer lateral I Existing or proposed water*ervice J Existing or propose^ irrigation service D 2 Show on site plan A Drainage Patterns 1 Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course 2 ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE 'Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building' B Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service <s) that serves the project Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception D Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards D 3 Include on title sheet Number C Legal Descnption For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include total building square footage with the square footage for -each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc ) previously approved EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION R«v 7/02AM BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 2ND 3RD DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE D D 4a Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No CH Q D 4b All conditions are in compliance Date DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm dram or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 17.000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18 40 030 Dedication required as follows Dedication required Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropnate legal description together with an 8 W x 11" ptart map and submit with a title report All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) pnor to issuance of Building Permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engmeenng Department in person Applications will not be accept by mail or fax Dedication completed by Date IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS D 6a All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 82.000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840040 Public improvements required as follows Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropnate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process The completed application form and the requirements on the ..ST BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person Applications by mail or fax are not accepted Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit Improvement Plans signed by Date D D D 6b Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840 Please submit a recent property title Report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $430 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement This agreement must be signed, notanzed and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit Future public improvements required as follows ODD 6c Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement Please return agreement signed and notanzed to the Engineering Department Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by Date HI D 6d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 15 16 010 of the Municipal Code D D D 7a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export) O D D 7b Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached NOTE The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit Grading Inspector sign off by Date D D 7c Graded Pad Certification required (Note Pad certification may be required-even if a grading permit is not required ) 4 7/02AX 3RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 7d No Grading Permit required 7e If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS D D D RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT 8 A Right-of-Way permit is required to do work m City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way Types of work include, but are not limited to street improvements, tree tnmming, dnveway construction, tying into public storm dram, sewer and water utilities To see requirements, visit our website wwwcarisbadca gov/engmeenng Right-of-Way permit required for D D D INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT 9 If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water Distnct, located at 5950 El Cammo Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance Industnal Waste permit accepted by Date D D D NPDES PERMIT 10 Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit The applicant shall provide test management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level poor to discharge to sensitive areas Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first D D STORM WATER COMPLIANCE 10a | Requires Project Storm Water Permit) # PSP I Tier I/Tier II (Requires SWPPP) - Please complete attached forms Q Exempt - Please complete attached exemption form D D 11 ||, Required fees are attached Q No fees required BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ST1 D ,ND RD3' D D D WATER METER REVIEW 12a Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized Oversized meters are inaccurate dunng low-flow conditions If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used • All single family dwelling units receive "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm) A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street) 12b Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (m gpm) prior to approval The developer must provide these calculations Please follow these guidelines • If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets If so, at the water meter station, the demand m gpm may be listed there Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W" The irrigation service should look like STA1+00 Install 2" service and 5 meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument -such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach) Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference In general the calculations will include Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch <PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 6 R*v 7/02/Ot BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST .•si 2ND 3RD • In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA) As long as the project is located within the City recycled water service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future D D 12c Irrigation Use (where recycled water Is available) 1 Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above 2 If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irngate slopes within the development For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority <SDCWA) for a refund However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this D D D 13 Additional Comments Address ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal /W IT Bldg Perm.t No Ot>C<b Prepared by (_-/£? EDU CALCVLA TIONS Types of Use v^p 5 V* Types of Use Types of Use Types of Use APT CALCULATIONS Types of Use \Ntolx Types of Use Types of Use Types of Use FEES REQUIRED ^ Date I Y^S/OB checked by List types and square footages for Sq Ft /Units 62$ &L Sq Ft /Units Sq Ft /Units Sq Ft /Units Jjst types and square footages for Sq Ft /Units*^-"**' Z* Sq Ft /Units ' Sq Ft /Units Sq Ft /Units Date all uses^f W&&& 5$X? R i EDU's (3 EDU's EDU's EDU's all uses ADT's ^ ADT's ADT's ADT's WITHIN CFD MZlYE D 1 PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO NW QUADRANT NE QUADRANT SE QUADRANT SW QUADRANT 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS NE QUADRANT X NO UNITS FEE/APT &O D 3 BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT's/UNITS qi/4 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SO FT ((22$ \/$ SEWER FEE EDU's • /3 BENEFIT AREA & EDU's . / ^ n 6 DRAINAGE FEES PLDA (DIST X ZONE X X X #1 DIST #2 FEE/ADT c=f FEE/SQ FT /UNIT » ^K FEE/EDU / ' f 0&£ FEE/EDUJ^T7 HIGH /LOW DIST #3 ) = $ ) ^2.9^2V .. /^ ^ -. I* *l ACRES FEE/AC =$ D 7 POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION F \FARMER\KATHY\MASTERS\F6E CALCULATION WORKSHEET doc2008 doc Rev 7/14/00 13 , City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM May 16, 2008 TO Deborah Milam, Planning FROM Tecla Levy, Engineering SUBJECT HISAMITSU SHIPPING ADDITION, PIP 86-01 (B) (APN 209-081 -29) Engineering Department staff has completed the review of the above referenced project Staff has reviewed the submittal for completeness and has determined that the project is complete The following are the engineering conditions 1 Developer shall comply with the current City of Carlsbad Storm Water Standards and the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and shall implement best management practices at all times Best management practices include but not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to storm water, receiving water or storm water conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable 2 Developer shall complete and submit to the City Engineer a Project Threat Assessment Form (PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards Concurrent with the PTAF, Developer shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the completed PTAF all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer If you or the applicant has any questions, please contact Tecla Levy at 760-602-2733 cc File APPENDIX A STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire must be completed by the applicant in advance of submitting for a development application (subdivision and land use planning approvals and construction permits) The results of the questionnaire determine the level of storm water pollution prevention standards applied to a proposed development or redevelopment project Many aspects of project site design are dependent upon the storm water pollution protection standards applied to a project Applicant responses to the questionnaire represent an initial assessment of the proposed project conditions and impacts City staff has responsibility for making the final assessment after submission of the development application A staff determination that the development application is subject to more stringent storm water standards, than initially assessed by the applicant, will result in the return of the development application as incomplete If applicants are unsure about the meaning of a question or need help in determining how to respond to one or more of the questions, they are advised to seek assistance from Engineering Department Development Services staff A separate completed and signed questionnaire must be submitted for each new development application submission Only one completed and signed questionnaire is required when multiple development applications for the same project are submitted concurrently In addition to this questionnaire, applicants for construction permits must also complete, sign and submit a Construction Activity Storm Water Standards Questionnaire To address pollutants that may be generated from new development, the City requires that new development and significant redevelopment pnonty projects incorporate Permanent Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs) into the project design, which are described in Chapter 2 of the City's Storm Water Standards Manual This questionnaire should be used to categorize new development and significant redevelopment projects as priority or non-priority, to determine what level of storm water standards are required or if the project is exempt _/ Is your project a significant redevelopment7 Definition Significant redevelopment is defined as the creation, addition or replacement of at least 5,000 square feet of impervious surface on an already existing developed site Significant redevelopment includes, but is not limited to the expansion of a building footpnnt addition to or replacement of a structure, structural development including an increase in gross floor area and/or exterior construction remodeling, replacement of an impervious surface that is not part of a routine maintenance activity, and land disturbing activities related with structural or impervious surfaces Replacement of impervious surfaces includes any activity that is not part of a routine maintenance activity where impervious matenal(s) are removed, exposing underlying soil dunng construction Note If the Significant Redevelopment results in an increase of less than fifty percent of the impervious surfaces of a previously existing development, and the existing development was not subject to SUSMP requirements, the numeric sizing criteria discussed in Table 3 of 2334 applies only to the addition, and not to the entire development 2 If your project IS considered significant redevelopment, then please skip Section 1 and proceed with Section 2 3 If your project IS NOT considered significant redevelopment, then please proceed to Section 1 21 SWMP Rev 6/4/08 SECTION 1 NEW DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY PROJECT TYPE Does you project meet one or more of the following criteria 1 Home subdivision of 100 units or more Includes SFD, MFD, Condominium and Apartments 2 Residential development of 10 units or more Includes SFD, MFD, Condominium and Apartments 3 Commercial and industrial development areater than 100.000 sauare feet incfudma parkinq areas Any development on private land that is not for heavy mdustnal or residential uses Example Hospitals, Hotels, Recreational Facilities Shopping Malls etc 4 Heavy Industnal / Industry areater than 1 acre (NEED SIC CODES FOR PERMIT BUSINESS TYPES) SIC codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, and 7536-7539 5 Automotive repair shoo SIC codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, and 7536-7539 6 A New Restaurant where the land area of development is 5.000 sauare feet or more mcludma oarkma areas SIC code 581 2 7 Hillside development (1) greater than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface area and (2) development will grade on any natural slope that is 25% or greater 8 Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) Impervious surface of 2,500 square feet or more located within, "directly adjacent"2 to (within 200 feet), or "discharging directly to"3 receiving water within the ESA1 9 Parking lot Area of 5,000 square feet or more, or with 15 or more parking spaces, and potentially exposed to urban runoff 10 Retail Gasoline Outlets - servina more than 100 vehicles per day Serving more than 100 vehicles per day and greater than 5,000 square feet 11 Streets, roads, dnvewavs. hiahwavs. and freeways Project would create a new paved surface that is 5,000 square feet or greater 12 Coastal Development Zone Within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1) creates more than 2500 square feet of impermeable surface or (2) increases impermeable surface on property by more than 10% YES NO / V < < V N/ V / / V V v' 1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas include but are not limited to all Clean Water Act Section 303(d) impaired water bodies, areas designated as Areas of Special Biological Significance by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments), water bodies designated with the RARE beneficial use by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments), areas designated as preserves or their equivalent under the Multi Species Conservation Program within the Cities and Count of San Diego, and any other equivalent environmentally sensitive areas which have been identified by the Copermittees 2 "Directly adjacent" means situated within 200 feet of the environmentally sensitive area 3 "Discharging directly to" means outflow from a drainage conveyance system that is composed entirely of flows from the subject development or redevelopment site, and not commingled with flow from adjacent lands Section 1 Results If you answered YES to ANY of the questions above you have a PRIORITY project and PRIORITY project requirements DO apply A Storm Water Management Plan, prepared in accordance with City Storm Water Standards, must be submitted at time of application Please check the "MEETS PRIORITY REQUIREMENTS" box in Section 3 If you answered NO to ALL of the questions above, then you are a NON-PRIORITY project and STANDARD requirements apply Please check the "DOES NOT MEET PRIORITY Requirements" box in Section 3 SWMP Rev 6/4/08 SECTION 2 SIGNIFICANT REDEVELOPMENT 1 Is the project redeveloping an existing priority project type? (Priority projects are defined in Section 1) YES NO If you answered YES, please proceed to question 2 If you answered NO, then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and you ARE NOT subject to PRIORITY project requirements, only STANDARD requirements Please check the "DOES NOT MEET PRIORITY Requirements" box in Section 3 below 2 Is the project solely limited to one of the following a Trenching and resurfacing associated with utility work? b Resurfacing and reconfiguring existing surface parking lots? c New sidewalk construction, pedestrian ramps, or bike lane on public and/or private existing roads? d Replacement of existing damaged pavement? If you answered NO to ALL of the questions, then proceed to Question 3 If you answered YES to ONE OR MORE of the questions then you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment and you ARE NOT subject to PRIORITY project requirements, only STANDARD requirements Please check the "DOES NOT MEET PRIORITY Requirements* box in Section 3 below 3 Will the development create, replace, or add at least 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces on an existing development or be located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1)create more than 2500 square feet of impermeable surface or (2) increases impermeable surface on property by more than 10%? If you answered YES, you ARE a significant redevelopment, and you ARE subject to PRIORITY project requirements Please check the "MEETS PRIORITY REQUIREMENTS" box in Section 3 below If you answered NO, you ARE NOT a significant redevelopment, and you ARE NOT subject to PRIORITY project requirements, only STANDARD requirements Please check the "DOES NOT MEET PRIORITY Requirements" box in Section 3 below SECTION 3 Questionnaire Results MY PROJECT MEETS PRIORITY REQUIREMENTS, MUST COMPLY WITH PRIORITY PROJECT STANDARDS AND MUST PREPARE A STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SUBMITTAL AT TIME OF APPLICATION MY PROJECT DOES NOT MEET PRIORITY REQUIREMENTS AND MUST ONLY COMPLY WITH STANDARD STORM WATER REQUIREMENTS Applicant Information and Signature Box This Box for Cay Use Onfy SWMP Rev 6/4/08 Project Threat Assessment Worksheet for Determination of Construction SWPPP Tier Level Project Storm Water Threat Assessment Criteria'' Construction SWPPP Tier Level Ql Significant Threat Assessment Criteria Q My project includes clearing, grading or other disturbances to the ground resulting in soil disturbance totaling one or more acres including any associated construction staging, equipment storage, stockpiling, pavement removal, refueling and maintenance areas, or, My project is part of a phased development plan that will cumulatively result in soil disturbance totaling one or more acres including any associated construction staging, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas, or, My project is located inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area (see City ESA Proximity map) and has a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water discharge(s) TierS Moderate Threat Assessment Criteria My project does not meet any of the Significant Threat Assessment Criteria described above and meets one or more of the following criteria Q Project requires a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15 16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code), or, Q Project will result in 2,500 square feet or more of soils disturbance including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas and project meets one or more of the additional following criteria • located within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean, and/or, • disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to 1 vertical, and/or • disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse, and/or • construction will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct 1 through April 30) Tier 2 Low Threat Assessment Criteria My project does not meet any of the Significant or Moderate Threat criteria, is not an exempt permit type (see City's list of Permit Types Exempt from Construction SWPPP requirements) and the project meets one or more of the following criteria • results in some soil disturbance, and/or • includes outdoor construction activities (such as roofing, saw cutting, equipment washing, material stockpiling, vehicle fueling, waste stockpiling) Tierl No Threat Proiect Assessment Criteria Q My project is in a category of permit types exempt from City Construction SWPPP requirements (see City's list of Permit Types Exempt from Construction SWPPP requirements) and/or does not meet any of the High, Moderate or Low Threat criteria described above Exempt * The City Engineer may authorize minor variances from the Storm Water Threat Assessment Criteria in special circumstances where it can be shown that a lesser or higher Construction SWPPP Tier Level is warranted in the opinion of the City Engineer Construction SWPPP Standards and Requirements Rev 6/4/2008 Construction Threat Assessment Worksheet for Determination of a Project's Perceived Threat to Storm Water Quality Construction SWPPP Tier Level TierS Tier 2 Tierl Exempt Construction Threat Assessment Criteria* Tier 3 - High Construction Threat Assessment Criteria G Project site is 50 acres or more and grading will occur during the rainy season G Project site is 1 acre or more in size and is located within the Buena Vista or Agua Hedionda Lagoon watershed, inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) or discharges directly to an ESA G Soil at site is moderately to highly erosive (defined as having a predominance of soils with USDA-NRCS Erosion factors kf greater than or equal to 0 4) G Site slope is 5 to 1 or steeper G Construction is initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct 1 through April 30) G Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years Tier 3 - Medium Construction Threat Assessment Criteria D All projects not meeting Tier 3 High Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Tier 2 High Construction Threat Assessment Criteria G Project is located within the Buena Vista or Agua Hedionda Lagoon watershed, inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) or discharges directly to an ESA G Soil at site is moderately to highly erosive (defined as having a predominance of soils with USDA-NRCS Erosion factors kf greater than or equal to 0 4) G Site slope is 5 to 1 or steeper G Construction is initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct 1 through April 30) G Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years G Site results in one half acre or more of soil disturbance Tier 2 - Medium Construction Threat Assessment Criteria G All projects not meeting Tier 2 High Construction Threat Assessment Criteria Tier 1 - Medium Inspection Threat Assessment Criteria G Project is located within the Buena Vista or Agua Hedionda Lagoon watershed, within or directly adjacent to an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) or discharges directly to an ESA G Soil at site is moderately to highly erosive (defined as having a predominance of soils with USDA-NRCS Erosion factors kf greater than or equal to 0 4) Q Site slope is 5 to 1 or steeper 8p Construction is initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct 1 through April 30) G Owner/contractor received a Storm Water Notice of Violation within past two years G Site results in one half acre or more of soil disturbance Tier 1 - Low Inspection Threat Assessment Criteria G All projects not meeting Tier 1 Medium Construction Threat Assessment Criteria - Not Applicable - Perceived Threat to Storm Water Quality High Medium High Medium Medium Low Exempt * The City Engineer may authorize minor variances from the Construction Threat Assessment Criteria in special circumstances where it can be shown that a lesser or higher amount of storm water compliance inspection is warranted in the opinion of the City Engineer Construction SWPPP Standards and Requirements Rev 6/4/2008 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB082053 DATE 11/10/08 ADDRESS 2732 LOKER AVE WEST RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR (< 17, 000. 00) RETAINING WALL VILLAGE FAIRE POOL/SPA TENANT IMPROVEMENT COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER PIP 86-01 (B) APPROVED PLANNER GINA RUIZ ENGINEER DATE 11/12/08 DATE H \ADMIN\COONTE»/PLANNING/ENGINEEIUNG APPROVAL Carlsbad Fire Department BLDG. DEPT COPY Plan Review Requirements Category TI, INDUST Date of Report 11-13-2008 Name Address Reviewed by Permit # CB082053 Job Name HISAMITSU ADD 628 SF SHIPPING Job Address 2732 LOKER AV WEST CBAD aaequatel^onaul 1 for review is incomplete At this BB^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^necessary plans and/or i review Jh^tg squately conduct a review to carefully all lew and approval Conditions; Cond CON0003156 [MET] APPROVED THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUEANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THIS APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS, ANY REQUIRED TESTS, FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTATIONS, CONDITIONS IN CORRESPONDENCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS THIS APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE HELD TO PERMIT OR APPROVE ANY VIOLATION OF THE LAW Entry 11/13/2008 By MS Action AP ALLIANCE CORPORATION KRONUS 203 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXID1ZER GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLOT PLAN Dote 7-JAN-2007 Sccle 1/4=1-0 integrated Energy Delivery®Systems October 5, 2007 Hisamitsu America 2732 Loker Avenue West Carlsbad, CA 92010 Reference Glenro Proposal Number A2070914 Glenro is pleased to offer this proposal for the supply of a REGENEX™ 2-bed Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) system to treat the exhaust from Hisamitsu America's process source Design Criteria «,«"•"*'•«••• Toluene (Methylbenzene) Solvent Load Heat of Combustion 2 50 Ibs/hr 2 50 Ibs/hr 18,422 btu/lb Notes: Design Destruction Efficiency Destruction Efficiency Guarantee Nominal Thermal efficiency Effective Thermal efficiency Inlet Temperature Job Site Elevation 98 % + 95% 95 % 95 5 % 250 °F Sea level Corporate Headquarters • 39 McBnde Avenue • Paterson, New Jersey 07501-1799 (973)279-5900 • Fax (973) 279-9103 • wwwglenro com Hisamitsu America October 5, 2007 Proposal No 2070914 Page 2 TM The REGENEX™ RTO by Glenro offers the benefits of high heat recovery and process application flexibility of regenerative thermal oxidization, designed in an economical modular package to create an outstanding overall value in emissions control equipment The REGENEX™ is designed such that the valves required to direct the flow through the heat exchange media are incorporated into the oxidizer body The integral valves minimize the oxidizer footprint The entire oxidizer is housed in a single compact box This integral valve feature eliminates the transition ducts often associated with conventional RTO designs and further simplifies the field installation In addition to simplified installation, this proven compacl design also minimizes entrained volume to enhance VOC destruction efficiency Every REGENEX™ RTO is completely pre-assembled including control cabinets, piping, and wiring This pre-assembly reduces the installation effort and maximizes quality control over the finished product Every REGENEX™ RTO undergoes extensive testing, control systems check out and calibration prior to shipment to facilitate short start-up times Every REGENEX™ RTO features state-of-the-art controls The programmable logic controller serial port is fitted with a purpose built paging modem The paging modem allows monitoring of the ladder logic as is done with a conventional modem and the paging modem will automatically call and deliver detailed text messages to the mobile phones of our service and engineering personnel to alert them immediately in the case of any upset condition or warning The paging modem allows us to know of a problem instantly and directly so that we can prepare a quick solution Withjthe paging modem in place we are able to provide extended hour support for the maximum uptime of the system In addition to the paging feature, Glenro remotely monitors the operation and process variables of each system building an archive of the operating history and further optimizing the performance and up time In addition to the performance advantages of the REGENEX™ RTO design there are the added benefits of quality components, craftsmanship and attention to detail by Glenro Each REGENEX™ RTO is completely pre-assembled, calibrated and tested The REGENEX™ RTO ships ready to install and typically our supervision is not required for installation If your firm is capable of off loading the shipment when it arrives and setting the equipment in place, you will have completed most of the installation Generally, all that remains is the utilities and ductwork Of course, Glenro will provide complete turnkey services should Hisamitsu America prefer, however, our goal is to provide equipment completely assembled to simplify the installation and minimize overall project costs The following components and features are included in the proposed REGENEX™ Model 203 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer System v' One (1) REGENEX™ regenerative thermal oxidizer which includes • Two (2) internally insulated integral heat exchange beds with structured heat exchange media for 95% nominal thermal efficiency and low pressure drop • Internally insulated integral combustion chamber • One (1) Maxon 1 1/2" Kinemax burner with natural gas fuel tram and pilot Glenro. Inc Proprietary information Use Pursuant to Company Instructions C°"°'"' ««"">"""" n (TO) 279-5900 . Fax (973) OT-9103 Hisamitsu America October 5, 2007 Proposal No 2070914 PageS • One (1) New York Blower 2204A, 3,500 RPM direct drive combustion air fan with 1 5 HP TEFC motor • Four (4) tegral pneumatic poppet valves • Mam control cabinet with Allen Bradley SLC 5/03 control system, Allen Bradley Panelview graphic operator interface and modem • 7 5 HP Allen Bradley PowerFlex 700 Variable Frequency Drive mounted in mam control cabinet • Skid mounted • Completely shop assembled, piped, wired and painted One (1) New York Blower insulated 194 DH 30, 2,470 RPM forced draft process fan with 7 5 HP high efficiency TEFC motor This fan is sized to provide -2 0" WC for Hisamitsu America collection ductwork (shipped loose) One (1) inlet manifold with pneumatically actuated process block damper, pneumatically actuated fresh air damper and inlet vacuum transducer (shipped loose) Full 12 month warranty, including all parts, labor and telemetry monitoring Engineering drawings to assist customer in installation, start-up, and permitting of oxidizer Recommended Options Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) This option is to precisely control the flow to the needs of the process to optimize operating costs This option consists of an Allen-Bradley PowerFlex 700 Variable Frequency Drive, an inlet static pressure transducer, up-sizing the standard control cabinet and adding an air-to- iair heat exchanger to the control cabinet to dissipate the heat generated (by the VFD Insulated Poppets, This option is for processes that contain condensables and/or Plenums & Process temperatures great enough for concerns for personnel protection This Fan option consists of internally insulating the inlet and exhaust manifolds, plenums and externally insulating the process fan I IKE Integrated Energy Delivery9Systems Glenro, Inc Proprietary information Use Pursuant to Company Instructions Corporate Headquarters Ph (973) 279-5900 • Fax (973) 279-9103 Hisamitsu America Operating Costs The estimated operating conditions for the proposed unit are as follows Case 1 Ready October 5, 2007 Proposal No 2070914 Page 4 Idle Fuel Variables Inlet temperature Process contribution Supplemental burner fuel Pilot fuel Average stack temperature Total natural gas required 1,100 scfm 250 °F 46 055 btu/hr 166 045 btu/hr 0 btu/hr 310 °F 1 66 therms $1 33 hour (64 scfm 70 "F 0 btu/hr 99 099 btu/hr 0 btu/hr 104 °F 0 99 therms $0 79 hour N/A 0 btu/hr 0 btu/hr 0 btu/hr N/A 0 therms $0 00 hour Electricity Variables Oxidizer pressure drop Process fan (with -2"WC upstream) * Combustion air fan Controls Total electricity required Electricity operating cost® $0 055/kWH Total utility operating cost 6 2 we 5 2 bhp 02bhp 375 watts 4 4 kWH $0 24 hour $1 57 hour 2 1 we 1 0 bhp 02 bhp 375 watts 1 3kWH $0 07 hour $0 86 hour 0 0 we 0 0 bhp 0 2 bhp 375 watts 0 6 kWH $0 03 hour $0 03 hour * Based on VFD The above fuel consumption values include burner efficiency and thermal radiation As proce&s solvents increase, natural gas consumption declines Ready Mode is defined as the oxidizer operating at 1600° F and approximately 25% flow while waiting for an input signal from the process to advance to Run Mode [Wing Idle Mode the burner and process fan are simply turned off and the oxidizer is allowed to slowly cool The rate at which the REGENEX™ cools is so slow that very little heat is lost during Idle Mode For example, warm up time after idling overnight is typically less than an hour and less than three hours after idling over a weekend Coy Requirements Electrical service to oxidizer panel Fuel An Compressed air Oxidizer footprint Approximate weight Telephone line 480 volt, 3 phase, 60 hertz, 10 kVA service 300 SCFH of natural gas @ 1 5 psig 8 SCFH of clean, dry compressed air @ 80 psig 10'-1"x8'-3" 22,400 pounds 24 hour direct access Note The electricity and fuel quantities above include adequate margin to ensure operation for the most extreme conditions and are not representative of the expected actual consumption, which is considerably less The dimensions are for the oxidizer skid perimeter only and do not include, access ways, peripherals or ship loose items Integrated Energy Delivery®Systems Glenro, Inc Proprietary information Use Pursuant to Company Instructions Corporate Headquarters Ph (973) 279-5900 • Fax (973) 279-9103 !2§2^U-ox S ^j f= Q M01 5:ulCO(Sbdu 0 «b^ 10-10-84*1 BOOZ-NVP-iON 6ui«OJO I non3U.VO.N3HrmSNI QNV MOTd SSSOOddIVNtGHJ. 3AUVH3N303M C03 SONOiiX PROJECT 1-VlSanniV^.i* CHERT Gt*\n k«l/y LOCATION . ITEM. EmiNEEII Sfcfc DATE ^)Mo J JOB* J SHEET*. MM* M FT,i ooo \Af&,3 T- -JuSi"' , lp~v= ^O fi -«•< P- rMTOT - -2-v/o pif SgMfrft ?&-* ( Qu6 * 1 ioo ft f- -1- = Mi I ps. ^ tJOHNCTON.INC STRUCTURAL 1 CIVIL ENGINEERS 1 LOS ANGELES NEWPORT BEACH PROJECT - CUE*! lOCATIOH _ ITEM _ ENGINEER . _J DATE -J JOB* _ J INEET* OPs i r-Mr^ (20 psf »•- 3 •3 Oc/|e| « . 2.1 li(/ psf ( W } - 1- H Z S ' 4 O-i / 2 5 ' - H ft«j I 0^4 KSf Mvi^i HOT ' %8 O > K^ WUNOOWt JOHNSTON,INC STRUCTURAL 1 CIVIL ENGINEERS LOS ANGELES NEWPORT BEACH Project For No BRANDOW & JOHNSTON. INC Page.:*: 3/6/2008 10 25 AM Eng_ USGS SEISMIC DESIGN VALUES FOR BUILDINGS Java Ground Motion Parameter Calculator - Version 507 Hisamitsu America, Inc 2/6/2008 Conterminous 48 States 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions Latitude = 33 13425 Longitude = -117 25838 Spectral Response Accelerations Ss and S1 Ss and S1 = Mapped Spectral Acceleration Values Site Class B - Fa = 1 0 Fv = 1 0 Data are based on a 0 01 deg grid spacing Period Sa (sec) (g) 02 1 109 (Ss Site Class B) 10 0 421 (S1 Site Class B) Conterminous 48 States 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions Latitude = 33 13425 Longitude = -117 25838 Spectral Response Accelerations SMs and SM1 SMs = FaSs and SM1 = FvS1 Site Class D - Fa = 1 056 Fv = 1 579 Period Sa (sec) (g) 02 1171 (SMs Site Class D) 10 0 664 (SMI Site Class D) Conterminous 48 States 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions Latitude = 33 13425 Longitude = 11725838 SDs = 2/3 x SMs and SD1 = 2/3 x SM1 Site Class D - Fa = 1 056 Fv = 1 579 Period Sa (sec) (g) 02 0 781 (SDs Site Class D) 10 0 443 (SD1 Site Class D) SITE PARMETERS 3313425 11725838 Sos = SD1 = Seismic Design Category I = R= Cd= 0 781 0443 D 1 00 5 35 25 BASE SHEAR COEFFICIENT Assuming To < T < Ts Full 2006 IBC V = SoS* l/R LRFD 016W ASD 011Wp T.0196198 = 04515847 WALL ANCHORAGE LOADS Full 2006 IBC Wall Anchorage Fp= 8'Sos'i'Wp LRFD 062Wp 312 plf mm ASD 045Wp 223 plf mm LRFD Mm = 400*I*SOS or 280# G \08\0810098\ENG\&rFileHSeismic Dpsion Valii CLIEIIT LOCATIOH ENGINEER 0«TE ITEM ______ \ & +« *<* \sum* ... V- H5YM - l(/psf it* * U 3 S p5f- 3 V cWer -»-\ovo V- 3 V"is")18 t MUMDOWlJOHNSrOH INC STRUCTURAL » CIVIL ENGINEERS I LOS' OATS 3/|/)oS jo» oSlocx? fe ITEM MAII L" (/ ?>3l -t' I T-" -& = (v = . -Z-M , ('N *• g <*"* ll/ 5o psjo- ii I . i o - 14 MH.«>0t) II- Ol - .03 6)00* ACT, * 1/1?) BRANDOWt JOHHnON,INC STRUCTURAL I, CIVIL ENGINEERS | LOS ANGELES NEWPORT BEACH PROJECT |NC ____ 1 ENGINEER ____ LOCATION _ ™«__f?Lil J SHEET* _._.._jS \) - - o ? V = o ii w ft INCREASED fPOM to TO 12* WM-l II1 d - 1 tis - i % o 5-o.S = s as * 8 (I* J - /^ c <o = 0 A. « o * vt+ («4<?M8 oc) * O I tt It > I ftBfc *=' 18 BP -- I3SK' * .135 K' -- o H5 (0 '- of C«*IT MIAMDO«mOHM*TOM,»IC STRUCTURAL « CIVIL ENGINEERS LOS ANOELES NEWPORT BEACH GEOTECHMICAL CONSULTANTS January 7,2009 Mr Yasuhiro Ikeura Hisamitsu America, Inc 2732 Loker Avenue West Carlsbad, CA 92010 Subject Plan Review Proposed Oxidizer and Truck Loading 2732 Loker Avenue West Carlsbad, California (K2 Engineering Job No G28005-1) Dear Mr Ikeura As requested by Mr Gen Kobayashi and m compliance with the City of Carlsbad review comments dated November 19, 2008, we have reviewed the plans prepared by Gen Ken Architecture and Design for the proposed oxidized and truck loading area additions The plans were reviewed for general conformance with the recommendations presented in our geotechmcal investigation report dated March 27, 2008 As presented, the plans reviewed, were found to be in general conformance with the recommendations of the geotechmcal report The information in this letter represents professional opinions that have been developed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechmcal consultants practicing m this or similar localities No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this letter Sincerely, K2 ENGINEERING, INC —*fS m - IT f n •! . ^ ^^. Susana Kemmerrer, GE 2287 President 2 copies submitted cc Mr Gen Kobayashi Gen Ken Architecture (via e-mail genken_archdesign@yahoo com) 12595 RAGWEED STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92129 o PHONE (858)484-2347 o FAX (858)484-8682 Yahoo' Mail "\ HisamitSU Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1 38 PM From 'Susana Kemmerrer' <skemmerrer@san rr com> To "'Gen Kobayashi <genken_archdesign@yahoo com> imageOOl wmz (15KB), oledata mso (23KB), Footing Detail G28005-1 pdf (33KB) Gen, As we discussed this morning, the soils at the site are expansive and as such it is very important to keep planting and/or irrigation away from the foundation as noted in the geotechnical report I have enclosed a sketch that illustrates the requirements If you have to conceal the wall I recommend that you consider above ground, waterproof planters and a small concrete sidewalk around the oxidizer wall The use of an underdram will be difficult as it will have to be designed and constructed as an impermeable cut-off wall Let me know if you have any questions Regards, Susana Kemmerrer 12595 Ragweed Street, San Diego, CA 92129 Phone (858)484-2347 Fax (858)484-8682 rittn //n<! mr.'SrV^ mail vahoo cnm/mc/showMessaee^fid=Tnbox Yahooi Mail Hisamitsu Plan review - Part 2 Tuesday, December 16, 2008 i 50 PM From 'Susana Kemmerrer' <skemmerrer@san IT com> To ' Gen Kobayashi" <genken_archdesign@yahoo com> imageOOl wmz (15KB), oledata mso (23KB) Gen, In addition to my note regarding the landscaping please add the following Sheet S-1 1, Note 7 In SOIL TYPE, add to read CONTROLLED COMPACTED FILL All filtfsoils to be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density (ASTM'D 1557-00) at a moisture content of 3 to 6% above optimum moisture content See Detail 11/S1 1 Regards, Susana Kemmerrer 12595 Ragweed Street, San Diego, CA 92129 Phone (858)484-2347 Fax (858)484-8682 htto //us mc563 mail vahoo com/mc/showMessage^fidMnbox 12/17/2008 Footing Detail Hisamitsu G28005-1 Slab \ 3' (mm) Compacted , F G i Slope finish grade to dram away from structure (mm 2% slope for concrete walk 5% for landscaped areas) No planting zone —7' (mm) J No planting zone Minimum of I 7 feet or equal to the maximum 2' (mm) Compacted fill | (extend 5' beyond the footing) ' feet or equal to the maximum height of the proposed plant whichever is greater Formational or compacted fill (NOT TO SCALE) REPORT OF FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION 2732 LOKER AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FOR HISAMITSU AMERICA CORPORATION (K2 Engineering Job No G28005-1) March 27, 2008 MAR 3 1 REC'D BY NGINEERING, INC. EOTECHN1CAL CONSULTANTS REPORT OF FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION 2732 LOKER AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FOR HISAMITSU AMERICA CORPORATION (K2 Engineering Job No G28005-1) 12595 RAGWEED STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92129 • PHONE (858)484-2347 e FAX (858)484-8682 Hisamitsu America 2732 Lokcr Avenue, Carlsbad, California G28005-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Text 1 0 Summary 20 Scope 3 0 Background and Site Conditions 4 0 Project Description 5 0 Subsurface Conditions 6 0 Conclusions and Recommendations 6 1 General 6 2 Foundations 6 3 Excavation 6 4 Earthwork 6 5 Floor Slab Support 7 0 Basis for Recommendations Page No 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 6 8 9 10 12 Appendix A - Explorations and Laboratory Tests List of Plates Site Plan Logs of Boring Unified Soil Classification System Direct Shear Test Data Consolidation Test Data Compaction Test Data Expansion Index Test Data Plate No 1 A-l 1—A-l 2 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 XSEOTECHNGCAL CONSULTANTS March 27, 2008 Mr Yasuhiro Ikeura Hisamitsu America 2732 Loker Avenue Carlsbad, California 92010 Dear Mr Ikeura (Job No G28005-1) We are pleased to present our "Report of Foundation Investigation, 2732 Loker Avenue, Carlsbad, California " The scope of our investigation was planned based on the information provided by Mr Gen Kobayashi of Gen Ken Architecture The results of our field explorations and laboratory tests, together with the results of the engineering analyses are presented m this report Please call us if you have any questions or if we can be of further service to you on this or future projects It has been a pleasure working with you Respectfully submitted, K2 ENGINEERING, INC Susana Kemmerrer, GE 2287 President (3 copies submitted) cc Gen Ken Architecture Attn Mr Gen Kobayashi Repons\G28005-l RPTdoc\SK ck 12595 RAGWEED STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92129 • PHONE (858)484-2347 « FAX (858)484-8682 Hisanntsu America G28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue, Carlsbad, California 1 0 SUMMARY This report presents the results of our foundation investigation performed for Hisamitsu America The purpose of the investigation was to provide earthwork and foundation design recommendations for the proposed shipping area and oxidizer unit additions planned at 2732 Loker Avenue in Carlsbad, California The locations of the proposed additions and the approximate locations of the exploratory borings are presented on Plate 1, Site Plan A summary of findings and recommendations is presented below • Fill soils ranging from 5!/2 to 8 feet in thickness with relative compactions of 75% to 92% were encountered at the boring locations The fill soils consisted of clay with a high expansion potential Very dense to hard formational materials were encountered beneath the fill soils • Based on our laboratory test results, the fill soils do not appear to be uniformly compacted and are not considered suitable for foundation or floor slab support in their present condition • To provide more uniform support, removal and recompaction extending at least 2 feet below the bottom of the footings is recommended Footings and slabs may then be supported on the compacted fill • If required, geognd reinforcement may be used to achieve a stable subgrade and to reduce the settlement potential • The clayey soils have a high expansion potential and will shrink and swell with changes in moisture content The use of drainage devices and impervious surfacing around the structures is recommended to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the subgrade soils Finished grades should be sloped to dram away from the structures -oOo- Hisamitsu America G28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue, Carlsbad, California 20 SCOPE Tins report presents the results of a foundation investigation performed to provide recommendations for foundation design and earthwork for the proposed additions The purpose of this investigation was to determine the static physical characteristics of the soils More specifically, the scope of the investigation included the following • A visual reconnaissance of the site • Drilling of two exploratory borings to depths of 14'/2 and 16'/2 feet using limited access drilling equipment • Laboratory tests to evaluate the physical properties of the on-site soils • Providing recommendations for earthwork including site preparation, moisture conditioning, backfilling, and compaction • Recommendations for mitigation of expansion potential • Recommendations for design of foundations Our conclusions are based on our review of available documents prepared by others, and the results of our field explorations, laboratory tests and associated engineering analyses The results of our field explorations and laboratory tests are presented in Appendix A This investigation did not include geologic and seismic hazards studies, however, this does not imply that such hazards will affect the sites Studies to assess environmental hazards that may affect the sites were also beyond the scope of this investigation Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechmcal consultants practicing in tins or similar localities No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report This report has been prepared for Hisamitsu America Corporation to be used solely in the evaluation of the subject property The report has not been prepared for use by other parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or other uses Hisamitsu America G28005-1 2732 Laker Avenue Carlsbad California 3 0 BACKGROUND AND SITE CONDITIONS The site is located at 2732 Loker Avenue within an industrial park in Carlsbad, California According to available information, the site was developed as part of the Carlsbad Crossroads Business Park, by cutting and filling into the previously existing topography Documentation regarding observation and testing during site development was not available for review Fill soils up to 30 feet in thickness were reportedly encountered on the eastern end of the property during an investigation performed at the site by US Testing Engineers (1 990) The existing facilities consist of a single-story industrial-type building Paved parking areas are located to the south, east and west The site is relatively flat A grassy area and descending slope bound the site to the north 40 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Based on the site plan provided by Gen Ken Architecture, the proposed development will consist of the addition of a shipping area and an oxidizer unit to the existing building The shipping area will consist of a 626-square-foot enclosed area to be located on the west side of the building The proposed addition will have J^foot-high CMU walls on the north, south and west sides2Jand will abut the existing building on the east A concrete slab on grade is currently planned According to the information provided, the oxidizer unit will be supported on a 12-inch thick reinforced concrete pad Eight-ftxTt-high CMU screen walls are planned around the oxidizer unit Hisamitsu America G28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue Carlsbad California 5 0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Fill soils 5Vi to 8 feet in thickness were encountered at the boring locations The fill soils consist of soft to stiff clay The clayey soils have a high expansion potential Based on the laboratory test results, at the locations drilled, the fill soils have relative compactions which vary from 75% to 92% of the maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-00) The moisture content of these soils range from 6% to 11 % above optimum moisture content Deeper and/or poorer quality fill may be encountered at other locations not explored Very dense and hard formational materials of the Santiago formation were encountered beneath the fill These materials consist of mterbedded claystone, silty sandstone and siltstone Groundwater was not encountered at the locations drilled However, variations in water level and/or water seepage may occur depending on annual precipitation and irrigation Seepage may occur at hthologic changes within the overburden soils, at the interface between cut and fill 6 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 1 GENERAL Fill soils up to 8 feet in thickness were encountered at the locations drilled The fill soils consist of soft to stiff clay and have a high expansion potential The fill soils do not appear to be uniformly compacted According to the laboratory test results, the fill soils have relative compactions of less than the recommended 90% of the maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-00) Very dense to hard formational materials were encountered beneath the fill soils In their present condition, the on-site fill soils are not considered suitable for support of the proposed additions without improvement To provide more uniform support, these soils should be removed and replaced as compacted fill A minimum of 2 feet^of overexcavation beneath the bottom of the footing is recommended. The limits of removal should extend at least 5 feet beyond the proposed addition footprint wherever possible The proposed footings and slabs may be then supported on the resulting compacted fill 4 Hisamitsu America G28005-1 2732 Laker Avenue, Carlsbad California Geognd reinforcement may be used to achieve a stable subgrade and to reduce the potential for settlement The fill soils have a high expansion potential, and will shrink and swell with changes in moisture content To reduce the potential for moisture infiltration beneath the proposed additions, site drainage should be provided Rain gutters and surface drains are recommended to control surface runoff Finished grades should be sloped to drain away from the structures Furthermore, impervious surfacing such as concrete sidewalks or asphalt paving is recommended around the proposed additions Landscaping and/or irrigation should be kept away from the structures 611 Shipping Area Relative densities within the upper 5 feet were estimated to be 81% to 83% of the maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-00) In their present condition, these soils are not considered suitable for foundation and floor slab support To provide more uniform support and to reduce the potential for damage due to settlement, we recommend that the soils beneath the shipping area be removed and replaced as compacted fill The removal depth should extend at least 2 feet below the bottom of the footings and 5 feet beyond the footprint of the proposed addition The footings and concrete slab may then be supported on the resulting compacted fill If the fill soils exposed at the excavated level have a relative compaction of less than 90%, we recommend that two geognd layers spar.eH vertically 12 inches be placed beneath the footing A minimum distance of 10 inches is recommended between the top geognd layer and the bottom of the footing The geognds may consist of TensarBX6100 or approved equivalent The geognd must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications Even at 90% compaction, differential settlement between the addition and the existing building may be anticipated To reduce the potential for damage due to differential movement, we recommend that means to accommodate the anticipated settlement be provided at the points of contact between the addition and the existing building This may include but not be limited to flexible connections along the roof and wall lmes_ Hisamitsu America G28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue, Carlsbad California 612 Oxidizer Unit Relative densities within the upper 5 feet were estimated to be 75% to 84% of the maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-00) In their present condition, these soils are not considered suitable for foundation and floor slab support To reduce the potential for damage due to differential settlement, the fill soils beneath the oxidizer unit should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill We recommend that the removal depth extends at least 2 feet below the bottom of the footings, and 5 feet horizontally beyond the footprint of the proposed addition The footings and concrete slab may then be supported on the resulting compacted fill Deepening of the footings may be required when they are located near the top of the slope A minimum horizontal distance from the edge of the footing to the face of the slope of 10 feet is recommended We understand that pipe connections between the oxidizer unit and the existing building will be required Even at 90% compaction settlement of the fill soils over time should be anticipated To reduce the potential for damage due to differential movement of the building and the unit, we recommend that flexible connections be provided at the pomt(s) of entry to the building. 62 FOUNDATIONS 621 Bearing Value To provide more unifonn support we recommend that footings for the proposed additions extend at least l feet helnw the lowest adjacent final grade A bearing value of 2.000 pounds per square font may be used for the design of foundations which are at least 18 inches in width and are supported on fill compacted as recommended in this report A one-third increase in the bearing value may be used for wind or seismic loads Since the recommended bearing value is a net value, the weight of the concrete in the footings may be taken as equal to 50 pounds per cubic foot, and the weight of the soil backfill may be neglected 622 Settlement If the footings are supported on fill materials that are compacted in accordance with this report, the total settlement is estimated to be less than Va-inch 6 Hisaimtsu Ameuca G28005-1 2732 Laker Avenue Carlsbad California 623 Lateral Loads Lateral loads may be resisted by friction and by the passive resistance of the compacted fill soils beneath the footings A coefficient of friction of 0 25 may be used between the foundations and the supporting materials The passive resistance of the compacted fill soils may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with an equivalent density of 200 pounds per cubic foot The fnctional resistance and the passive resistance of the materials may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance 624 Footing Observation To venfy that footings are supported in accordance with our recommendations, all foundation excavations should be observed by a qualified geotechmcal firm Any unsuitable materials including, undocumented fill, organic, loose or disturbed natural materials should be removed prior to placement of any steel or concrete Jn areas where geognd reinforcement has been used, any soft or loose soils must be recompacted in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report All applicable requirements of the local governing bodies, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of, 1970, and the Construction Safety Act should be met Inspection of footing excavations may be required by the appropriate reviewing governmental agencies The contractor should familiarize himself with the inspection requirements of the reviewing agencies 625 Backfill All required fill around the foundations and all utility trench backfill should be mechanically compacted in layers, not more than 8 inches in loose thickness, flooding should not be permitted Utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557-00 The exterior grades should be graded to dram away from the structures in order to reduce ponding of water adjacent to structures Hisamitsu America G28005-1 2732 Lokcr Avenue Carlsbad California Compaction of the backfill as recommended in tins report will be necessary to reduce settlement of the backfill and consequent settlement of the overlying improvements and buried utilities Even at 90% compaction (ASTM Dl 557-00), some settlement of the backfill may be anticipated Accordingly, any utilities supported therein should be designed to accept differential settlement, particularly at connection points to the structures In order to reduce the amount of backfill required, the foundations may be cut neat and poured against the excavated fill soils 63 EXCAVATION Temporary unsurcharged vertical excavations less than 5 feet in height may be excavated without shoring Where the necessary space is available, temporary unsurcharged excavations may be sloped back in lieu of using shoring Temporary unsurcharged excavations may be sloped back at 1 1 (horizontal to vertical) The exposed excavations should be observed by a competent geotechmcal firm so that modifications of the excavation cntena may be made if necessary Slot cutting may be required adjacent to the existing building so as not to undermine the existing foundations Slots may be a maximum of 5 feet in width We recommend that a minimum 10-foot spacing be maintained between slots All applicable requirements of the local governments, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, and the Construction Safety Act should be met Conventional earth moving/excavation equipment may be used to excavate the on-site materials Erosion control and drainage devices should be used to prevent water from entering the excavated areas Hisamilsu America G28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue, Carlsbad California 64 EARTHWORK 641 Site Preparation and Compaction The existing fill soils, debris or otherwise unsuitable materials, should be overexcavated to a minimum depth of 2 feet below the proposed foundations Removal in other areas, such as sidewalks, should extend to a minimum depth of 2 feet beneath the proposed finished subgrade Prior to fill placement, the exposed materials should be proof-rolled to disclose any soft and/or yielding areas Any soft and/or yielding areas should be removed and replaced with compacted fill After removal of unsuitable materials, die exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-00) The moisture content at the time of compaction should be maintained about 3% to 6% above optimum The soils should be firm and not pumping A qualified geotechmcal firm should observe the exposed materials to verify the complete removal of unsuitable deposits After removal of unsuitable materials, all required fill should be placed in loose lifts not more than 8 inches thick Any new fill should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density (ASTM D1557-00) The moisture content of the on-site soils should be maintained within 3% to 6% of optimum moisture content during compaction 642 Material for Fill The on-site materials, less any debris, organic matter, contaminated soils, and rocks greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension may be used as compacted fill If required, imported fill soils should consist of relatively non-expansive soils with an Expansion Index of less than 21, an angle of internal friction of at least 33°, and a minimum R-value of 40 The material should contain sufficient fines (binder material) to result in a stable subgrade 643 Earthwork Observation The reworking of the upper soils and the compaction of all required fill should be observed and tested by a qualified geotechmcal engineering firm Imported fill material should be approved prior to use as fill Hisamitsu America 2732 Loker Avenue Carlsbad California G28005-1 6 5 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT If the soils are prepared as recommended, concrete slabs-on-grade may be supported entirely on the resulting compacted fill Concrete floor slabs should be a minimum of 6 inches thick if slabs are placed directly over expansive clay soils Concrete floor slabs should be monolithically placed with the foundations To reduce the potential for water entrapment, and to provide protection against vapor or water transmission through the slabs, we recommend that the slabs-on-grade be underlain by a 6-mch thick layer of Caltrans Class 2 permeable material or crushed rock A suggested gradation for the gravel layer is as follows Suggested Gravel Gradation 90-100 No 4 0-10 No 100 0-3 To provide additional protection against water vapor transmission through the slab in areas where vinyl or other moisture-sensitive floor covering is planned, we recommend that a 10-mil-thick impermeable plastic membrane (visqueen) be installed below die slab To protect the membrane during later concrete work and to facilitate curing of the concrete and to reduce slab curling, a 2-mch- thick, layer of clean sand should be placed over the membrane The vapor barrier should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions We recommend that at least a 2-foot lap be provided at the membrane edges or that the edges be sealed Care should be taken during concrete placement to prevent displacement of the sand A low-slump concrete (4-mch maximum slump) should be used to further minimize possible curling of the slabs The concrete slabs should be allowed to cure properly before placing vinyl or other moisture-sensitive floor covering 10 Hisamitsu America G28005-7 2732 Lokcr Avenue, Carlsbad, California Concrete slab thickness should be provided in accordance with the anticipated use and loadings on the slab and as recommended by the Structural Engineer From the geotechmcal standpoint and due to the expansion potential of the on-site soils, slabs-on-grade should be a minimum of 6 inches in thickness and contain No 4 reinforcing bars placed at mid-height in the slab at 16 inches on center both horizontal directions These recommendations are mmimums only and should be verified by the Structural Engineer Construction joint spacing and placement should be provided by the Structural Engineer Where clay soils underlie concrete slabs, care should be taken during construction to maintain the moisture content of the upper 18 inches of subgrade soils at about 5% above optimum moisture content The clay soils shall be firm and not pumping The soils should not be allowed to dry prior to placement of the gravel layer and/or concrete 11 Hisamitsu America G28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue Carlsbad California 7 0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations provided in this report are based on our understanding of the described project information and on our interpretation of the data collected during the subsurface exploration and field observations We have made our recommendations based on experience with similar subsurface conditions under similar loading conditions The recommendations apply to the specific project discussed in mis report, therefore, any change in building loads, building locations, or site grades should be provided to us so we may review our conclusions and recommendations and make any necessary modifications We request an opportunity to review the final construction documents and specifications for the proposed facility to verify that the recommendations presented are incorporated into the final design The recommendations provided in tins report are also based on the assumption that the necessary geotechmcal observations and testing during construction will be performed by representatives of our firm. The field observation services are considered a continuation of the geotechmcal investigation and essential to verify that the actual soil conditions are as anticipated This also provides for the procedure whereby the Client can be advised of unanticipated or changed conditions that would require modifications of our original recommendations In addition, the presence of our representatives at the site provides the Client with an independent professional opinion regarding the geotechmcal related construction procedures If another firm is retained for the geotechmcal observation services, our professional responsibility and liability would be reduced to the extent that we are no longer the engineer of record -oOo- 12 5(L HI H CO O "~"J s O £2. Q. 9*32s. O -ICQ 0. <S CO (5 Ul 00 z Si £ ZxQ a. o , ^ !jr;:zi::jj[|R jrU |j| Ii :• -iT"^ it --41. /"IP; /" J /-, _ j1 u LLi_L==-j->_4.- -v i K3"~ ..|;-~u>-^3-~£i;~ 3 1^- -!««;,-.— —(."=•(,, i«^n- —Mi1'' i-*™«——"^ifch5^-™1-*?'--——f|i'J it^:'=^±r=r!iir±'': La ii.j i_:-j.-..! K i| /-JS-J ^ B-l - F0CJ1 " 1 A J u 1 ArnSr . ^^^11 V ,i / ,-1 t: S.-- ..... i-.---_, a n ,/g LU O ZLU £ LU A3 8002/iL/EO 31VQ L 900829 8Or Hisatmtsii America C28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue Carlsbad, California APPENDIX A EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS Hisanntsu America G28005-1 2732 Laker Avenue, Carlsbad, California APPENDIX A EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS EXPLORATIONS The soil conditions were explored by drilling two borings at the approximate locations shown on Plate 1 The borings were drilled to depths of 14!/2 and 16'/2 feet, using 6-mch-diameter continuous-flight auger drilling equipment Caving did not occur after removal of auger After completion of drilling, the borings were backfilled using the soil cuttings The soils encountered were logged by our field engineer, who obtained relatively undisturbed and bulk samples for laboratory observation and testing The logs of the borings are presented on Plates A-l 1 and A-l 2, the depths at which undisturbed samples were obtained are indicated to the left of the boring logs A California-modified sampler was used to retrieve relatively undisturbed samples This sampler consisted of a brass-nng-lmed split-tube with an inside diameter of 2'/2 inches and an outside diameter of 3 inches The hammer used to drive the sampler weighed 140 pounds, and a drop of about 30 inches was used The number of blows required to drive the sampler 12 inches is indicated on the logs The soils are classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described on Plate A-2 LABORATORY TESTS The field moisture content and dry density of the soils encountered were determined by performing tests on the relatively undisturbed samples The results of the tests are shown to the left of die boring logs Direct shear tests were performed on a remolded sample, compacted to 90% of the maximum dry density near optimum moisture content The tests were performed at various surcharge pressures after A-l Hisamitsu America G28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue, Carlsbad California saturation The yield point values determined from the direct shear tests are presented on Plate A.-3, Direct Shear Test Data To evaluate die compressibility of die soils, a confined consolidation test was performed on one remolded soil sample compacted to 90% of the maximum dry density near optimum moisture content Water was added to die sample during the test to evaluate the effects of moisture on the compressibility The test results are presented on Plate A-4, Consolidation Test Data The optimum moisture content and maximum dry density of die upper fill soils were determined by performing a compaction test on a sample from Boring B-2 The results of the test are presented on Plate A-5, Compaction Test Data The Expansion Index of the soils was determined by testing one sample in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard No 18-2 method The results of the test are shown on Plate A-6, Expansion Index Test Data A-2 LUoc ^0co cco LU CD ^u(O h- LL 00Oo(N § « LU < O INote The log of subsurface conditions shown hereon applies only at the specific boring location and at the date indicated IIt is not warranted to be representative of subsurface condltlonsat other locations and times I*ELEVATION (ft )£ 1 LU Q b 1 U i- 1 K -I O - on£(j - OK -<LV r oU • - T K -OU \-Ar\-Q-U rRELATIVECOMPACTION %?J- 83 n.MOISTURE{% of dry wt )m$ w$ Z£T$. 16;;9 Wi i IDRY DENSITY(Ibs leu ft )& ?2 IPS l£? 1®I**BLOWS/FOOTSPT "N" VALUES?I IS IS '73 SOT | SAMPLE LOC: ' BORING B-1 DATE DRILLED 2/26/2008 EQUIPMENT USED 8-inch diameter contmuous-flight-auger ELEVATION 4m .[= |S=E=a i>yi!:^y 10 CL CL SP G 0 3 ' Asphalt Paving - 9 Decomposed Granite FILL - SANDY CLAY - medium stiff to stiff, moist to wet yellowish brown and grey Medium stiff, moist, greenish grey and brown Stiff dark brown and grey SANDY CLAYSTONE - very stiff, weakly cemented thinly bedded, moist, light yellowish brown Light orangish brown and grey SILTY SANDSTONE/SANDY SILTSTONE interbeds, fine grained, weakly cemented, light brown and grey <HARD DRILLING/SLOW PROGRESS> Some Clay, orangish brown BORING TERMINATED AT A DEPTH OF 14-1/2 FEET DUE TO HARD DRILLING AND SLOW PROGRESS NOTES Groundwater not encountered No caving Dl ATP A_1 1 > UJcc •mo CO cc u •O<»+*reu •5c 0)+*(0•o 0.c+J +Jm •DCro u>c 2o E 4^ ^cn8 •=o c— (O D) (A C Cw Oo p ^ (Q a § 1 |£ 5« 0 0) „ £ 8 CO ^, u(A H LU 00O § PJ CO UJ ^g •w C1C O > 5 •c •? 0 0(A 0(1)^ a>a o &-Sc %•r (0 2^dj co 1 o1 1r- +*-E ra CO ^« «i I 1 *0 Jg 1> _8 8t -o 3 £11n •- •8 Isia> y, £. - 1- £ *OZ ^rf ELEVATION (f4= £ \LU Q - - 10 - I o - - 20 - - 25 - - 30 - - 35 - #RELATIVEOMPACTIONo -75 84 MOISTURE(% of dry wt ;2?W 2*f-l vr-» 23 •* 2^5 Q ~ m m IIS",.,. 103*•"'•* K |_ (A*T in *BLOWS/FOOPT N" VALUI* C/) m m m,,., mv'~" m jii SAMPLE LOGBORING B 2 DATE DRILLED 2/26/2008 EQUIPMENT USED 8-inch diameter contmuous-flight-auger ELEVATION '/// /^m // H W 1 1 i/XXx T i : : ; : ; ',* , r F ' Ni ;1 F : E 1 * ':j '•[ J=T —i—F=I E=i J ]1i CL SM CL FILL - SANDY CLAY - soft to medium stiff, wet, porous, light brown and grey Medium stiff, moist, light orangish brown and greenish grey SILTY SANDSTONE - fine grained, weakly cemented, very dense some seashells, light yellowish brown and orangish brown SILTY CLAYSTONE - very stiff, thinly bedded moist, grey and brown Interbedded with layers of SILTY SANDSTONE - fine grained. weakly cemented, light orangish brown NOTES Groundwater not encountered m LOG OF BORING I t3$ li No caving ^j^kfijH^W^^|W^B^ra!PJ^H|s5^! Dl ATP A-1 9 MAJOR DIVISIONS COARSE GRAINED SOILS (More than 50% of material is LARGER than No 20 sieve size) FINE GRAINED SOILS (More than 50% of material is SMALLER than No 200 sieve size) GRAVELS (More than 50% of coarse fraction is LARGER than the No 4 seive size) SANDS (More than 50% of coarse fraction is SMALLER than the No 4 seive size) CLEAN GRAVELS (Little or no fines) GRAVELS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) CLEAN QAwnQ (Little or no fines) SANDS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid limit LESS than 50) SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid limit GREATER than 50) HIGHLY ORGANIC SC ILS GROUP SYMBOLS HiH SI miiart;m i1 r$£ji)jsjig assi?ss $*was>g jj SSBfilW GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH Pt TYPICAL NAMES Well graded gravels or gravel sand mixtures little or no fines Poorly graded gravels or gravel sand mixtures little or no fines Silty gravels gravel sand silt mixtures Clayey gravels gravel sand - clay mixtures Well graded sands gravelly sands little or no fines Poorly graded sands gravelly sands little or no fines Silty sands sand silt mixtures Clayey sands sand clay mixtures Inorganic silts and very fine sands rock flour silly or clayey fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity gravelly clays sandy clays silty clays lean clays Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticiy Inorganic silts micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils elastic silts Inorganic clays of high plasticity fat clays Organic clays of medium to high plasticity organic silts Peat and other highly organic soils BOUNDARY CLASSIFICATIONS Soils possessing characteristics of two groups are designated by combmaions of group symbols Key California Sampler Standard Penetration Test No Recovery Dl Continuous Auger Coring HQ Coring PLATE A-2 05 0607080910 LOAD in Kips per Square Foot 20 30 40 5060708090 Boring B2 @ 0 - 5 FILL - SANDY CLAY REMOLDED SAMPLE COMPACTED TO 90% 007 NOTE Water added to the sample after consolidation under a load of 2050 pounds per square foot CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA ,\', ENGINEERING, INC. PLATE A - 4 BORING NUMBER AND SAMPLE DEPTH SOIL TYPE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (Ibs per cubic foot) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (% of dry weight) Job No G28005-1 B2 @ 0 - 5' SANDY CLAY 112 177 COMPACTION TEST DATA PLATE A - 5 BORING NUMBER AND SAMPLE DEPTH SOIL TYPE CONFINING PRESSURE (Ibs per square foot) FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY (in pounds per cubic foot) EXPANSION INDEX B2 @ 0 - 5' SANDY CLAY 144 327 93 89 EXPANSION INDEX TEST DATA (UBC Standard 18-2) Job No G28005-1 PLATE A-6 1Z7 Johns Man vilie Commercial/Industrial Roofing Systems Built-Up Roofing Specifications Specification 4GNC Four Ply Mineral Surfaced Fiber Glass Built-Up Roof For use over wood or other nailable decks on inclines of up to 6 per foot (500 mm/m) Materials per 100 sq ft (93 m2) of Roof Area Sheathing Paper Wood board decks only 1 layer Fete GlasBase Plus PermaPly 28 or Ventsulation Felt 1 ply GlasPly Premier or GlasPly IV 2 plies GlasKap 1 ply Asphalt (Interply) Trumbull®* or other JM Approved Asphalt Incline per foot Up to! "(83 mm/m) 1"to3 (83 to 250 mm/m) 3" to 6" (250 to 500 mm/m) Up to 6 (500 mm/m) Asphalt 170°F(77°C)Typell Rat 190°F (88°C) Type III Steep 2200F(104°C)TypelV Special Steep PermaMop Nominal Weight 69lbs(31kgs) 69 Ibs (31 kgs) 69 Ibs (31 kgs) 69Ibs (31 kgs) Approximate installed weight 175 260 Ibs (79 118 kgs) General This specification is for use over any type of approved structural deck (without insulation) which can receive and adequately retain nails or other types of mechanical fasteners that may be recom mended by the deck manufacturer Examples of such decks are wood and plywood This specification is not for use directly over lightweight, insulating concrete decks Design and installation of the deck and/or substrate must result in the roof draining freely and to outlets numerous enough and so located as to remove water promptly and completely Areas where water ponds for more than 24 hours are unacceptable and are not eligible to receive a JM Roofing Systems Guarantee Note All general instructions contained in the current JM Commercial/ Industrial Roofing Systems Manual should be consid ered part of this specification Flashing details can be found in the "Bituminous Flashings section of the JM Commercial/Industrial Roofing Systems Manual Application Over wood board decks one ply of sheathing paper must be used under the base felt and on top of the wood board deck Note On roof decks with slopes up to 1 per foot (83 3 mm/m) the roofing felts may be installed either perpendicular or parallel to the roof incline On slopes over 1 per foot (83 3 mm/m) refer to Paragraph 611 of this section for special requirements Using GlasBase Plus PermaPly 28 or Ventsulation start with a 12" (305 mm) width (a specific base sheet may be a condition of Guarantee) The following base sheet courses are to be applied full width lapping the preceding felt 2" (51 mm) on the side laps and 4" (102 mm) on the end laps Nail the side laps 9" (229 mm) o c Down the longitudinal center of each felt, place two rows of nails spaced approximately 11" (279 mm) apart, with the nails staggered on approximately 18" (457 mm) centers Use nails or fasteners appropriate to the type of deck with 1" (25 mm) minimum diameter caps For additional fastener information refer to the Fastener Data in the Roof Deck section of the current JM Commercial/Industrial Roofing Systems Manual NailaWe Deck Sheathing Paper (If Required) GlasBase Plus 'PermaPly 28 or Ventsulation 4GNC Using GlasPly Premier or GlasPly IV apply a piece 18 (457 mm) wide then over that a full width piece The following felts are to be applied full width overlapping the preceding felts by 19 (483 mm) so that at least 2 plies of felt cover the base felt/substrate at all loca tions Install each felt so that it is firmly and uniformly set without voids into the hot asphalt (within ±25°F [±14°C] of the EVT) applied just before the felt at a nominal rate of 23 Ibs per square (11 kg/nf) over the entire surface Surfacing Prior to application of GlasKap cut the cap sheet into handleable lengths (12 181366m 5 50 m]) Lay the material out on the roof and allow it to relax and flatten To accommodate a full width sheet apply a mopping of hot asphalt approximately 20°F (11°C) above the EVT, at a nominal rate of 23 Ibs per square (11 kg/nf) (The higher temperature of asphalt maximizes the bonding of the cap sheet to the ply felts) Then flop the cap sheet into the hot asphalt On subse quent courses the cap sheet is positioned upside down directly over the sheet in the preceding course such that the side lap area of the preceding sheet is exposed Care should be taken to maintain 2" (51 mm) side laps and 4" (102 mm) end laps Asphalt is applied in the same manner as before making sure to also cover the 2 (51 mm) exposed side lap Asphalt may also be applied to the exposed upside down cap sheet prior to "flopping" it into the hot asphalt. The cap sheet must be firmly and uniformly set, without voids into the hot asphalt with all edges and laps well sealed Asphalt Asphalt should meet the requirements of ASTM D 312 JM Guarantees require the use of TrumbulP* asphalt or another JM Approved Asphalt Check with a JM Technical Service Specialist for special asphalt requirements in hot climates Refer to the Material Safety Data Sheet and Product Label prior to using this product * Trumbull is a registered trademark of Owens Corning RS2049 8 04 (New) Mar 20 09 04 48a Gen-Ken Arch/Design HAR-18-2008 THU O/ W flrl CITY «• CflKbLHW 760-944-1921 NU, (bU bU<f ttbb» P4 City of Carlsbad Building CERTOTCATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OE OTfffnq flffftGATION This form must be completed by the Cfly, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the Crty prior to issuing a buildBig permft. The CRy will ml issue any budding permit without a completed school fee form Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number Project Address A.PN- Project Applicant (Owner Name) Project Descnpton- Buildlng Type: Residential Second Dwdpng Unit: Residential Additions Commercial/Industrial City Certification of Applicant Information: HISAMITSU CBOB2053 2732 LOKERAV WEST 209-081-29-00 H. G. FENTON CO ADD NEW SHIPPING DOC INDUSTRIAL New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area m New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Net Square Feet New Area 628 Square Feet ROOT Area ^ Date 7 I DISTRICTS WITHIN TWCITY OF CARLSBAD Cftifabad VitHlcd Sdxnl Dlcdrkt ^77^ Ei Camoc Rtfli Orlstad CA 82009 (331-SOOO) Vhta Dallbd School Dbtrlct 1234Areadi»Dnve VttttCA. 92083 (72&-2170) Sin MMVM VnOed Scbort Dbtrtct 2l5M»»Wry San Mureos, CA 92069 (290.2649) Contact Nancy Dolce (By Appt Only) Ercinite Onlm Sebod OMrki 101 Soufli Raaell* Smte Fe IU EnettMBs, CA. 9Z024 (944-4300 ea 166) SID Ob«uin> imion JBDgto School Ojctrict 710EncuuasBiv4 Enetmtta, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certfficatwn of Appflcant/Ownera. The person exacuUng this dadaraton (•Owner'} csiWics undar panaBy of parMy thai (1) the (nfarmaflon pravUfld above is carved and true to the be* of me Owner's knowJode* and that the Owner wifl We an amoncted cmtficataMi of payment and pay tha additional fe« rf (Iwnar raquesta an increase In the number of dwelling unite or square footage after Ida building permit • issued or if the inUal (Manmlnatign of unH» or square footage Is found to be Incorrect and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above dascnbed preiectfc), or that Bw> person exacimng thb dederalion ts authonzad to «ffi on behalf of the Owner Datr HAR-19-2009 THU 07 35 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P 04 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s))*«»•»•»*»**********+***»*»•*»•*»»*»**«**»****»**»»«••»•****»*******#******•*••«•«****************** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE: SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The undersigned, being duly authonzed by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL WALTER FREEMAN TITLE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 DATE PHONE NUMBER Revised 3/30/2006 Intertek 25791 Commercenter Dr Lake Forest Ca 92630 Telephone (949)448-4100 Facsimile (949)4484111 www mtertek-etlsemko com August 25 2009 Mike Gehns Hisamitsu America Inc 2730 Loker Ave Carlsbad, CA 92010 Phone (760) 431-4670 ext 144 E-mail mgehns@hisamitsuca com Subject Field Evaluation Report of an Alliance thermal oxidizer Intertek Project No 3181494 Intertek Report No 3181494LAX-001 Dear Mr Gehns This letter concludes and represents the results of the evaluation and tests of the above referenced equipment to the requirements contained in the following standards Standard for Ovens and Furnaces NFPA 86, issued 7/18/2003 with the Standard for Commercial - Industrial Gas Heating Equipment UL 795, Issued 7/27/1999 used as a collateral standard GENERAL This report gives the results of the inspection tests and evaluation of an Alliance thermal oxidizer for compliance with the standards listed above This investigation was authorized by signed application The investigation was begun on 05/27/2009, and concluded on 08/25/2009 New, installed units in good condition were provided by the client on 05/27/2009, and evaluated at the installation site at Hisamitsu America Inc 2730 Loker Ave , Carlsbad CA 92010 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at your convenience We are looking forward for future opportunities to work together Sincerely, John Wyer Project Engineer Intertek - NFL This -"sport ts for the exclusive use of .Intertek 5 Client' and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek end its Client Intsrtek .v resptjns.'fcifriy c?nrf liability are lim.teil to the tenrs and ccnti'tions of the agreement Intertek assume*, no liability ro any party othpr t-rsn to * '< \,!~hc Client .-n accordance /«• th the c.gn?eme.it for any !nss expense or Jumage occasioned by the- use of this report Oxlv the O-ent •* y' .' dutn3n7C(1 co porrmt copying or distribution of this report jnd then only in an entirety Any use of the fntcrtsk name or cne of its marks for \. the sate or advertisement of the tested material product or scn'.ce must first be approved m wnttng by Intcrtek The ob^crvj^ons and test '• ' ; results in this report 3''e nzlevant only to the sam/j.'e tested This report by itself aoes not imply that the material product or service is or has ever been under sn Intertek certificat'cn program Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc SO 8 8 I (9/17/07) Mandatory Intertek Page 2 of 11 Report No 3181494LAX-001 Field Evaluation Report No 3181494LAX-001 August 25 2009 Rendered To Hisamitsu America Inc 2730 Loker Ave Carlsbad, CA 92010 Contact MikeGehns (760) 431-4670 ext 144 Performed By Intertek - ETL SEMKO 25791 Commercenter Dr Lake Forest, Ca 92630 Phone (949)448-4100 Fax (949)448-4111 Products Covered Alliance thermal oxidizer Inspection Site Hisamitsu America Inc 2730 Loker Ave Carlsbad, CA 92010 Results The equipment noted in this Report has been investigated to the following Standards as far as practical in the field and has been found to be in essential compliance with those requirements Standard for Ovens and Furnaces NFPA86, issued 7/18/2003 with the Standard for Commercial - Industrial Gas Heating Equipment, UL 795, Issued 7/27/1999 used as a collateral standard The installation methods and final approvals at the installation site are the responsibility of the Authority Having Jurisdiction Complete investigation information is on file at this office Please note this Letter of Compliance does not represent authorization for the use of the ETL Mark In Charge of Testing Approved by -\J -UJLO John Wyer Project Engineer Intertek - NFL Allen Pirro Chief Gas Engineer Intertek - Cortland Inleriek Testing Services NA, Inc SDX8 I (9/l7/07)Mand:iloi Intertek Page 3 of 11 Report No 3181494LAX-001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 3 1 0 Scope 4 2 0 Product Evaluation Procedures 4 2 1 Standards 4 2 2 Visual Inspection 4 2 3 Product Type Testing 5 2 4 Resolution of Deficiencies 5 3 0 Products Evaluated 6 3 1 Equipment Identification and Field Label Number 6 3 2 Conditions of Use and Acceptability 6 3 3 Photographs and Schematics 7 Intertek Testing Services NA. Inc so a $1 (W17/07) Manduioi ntertek Page 4 of 11 Report No 3181494LAX-001 10 Scope This Final Field Evaluation Report provides the results of the evaluation of non-certified or other special equipment as noted in this report The purpose of these inspections is to provide a review of the electrical constructions of the subject products and provide a degree of assurance that the constructions comply with the requirements of appropriate standards This evaluation is limited to the equipment itself and is not specifically intended to identify issues with the field installed wiring other than how it interacts with the equipment 2 0 Product Evaluation Procedures 2 1 Standards The standards noted on the cover page were used to evaluate the subject products 2 2 Visual Inspection A visual inspection of the product is conducted, comparing product construction to requirements of the applicable product standard Any unlisted/unmarked components are identified and evaluated Visual inspection includes any directly connected loads to the product evaluated Complete inspection records are on file at the Intertek office Overcurrent Protection All overcurrent protection provided in the unit was of the proper type Wiring Ampacities All wiring is certified and used within its voltage and temperature ratings All external wiring also complies with size requirements in the NEC Grounding All dead metal parts of the equipment have been checked and determined to be suitably bonded with each other Grounding of the incoming grounding lead is properly done Wiring Methods All internal wiring is routed properly and splices are made with means acceptable to the standard Field Wiring means are in compliance with the standard and appear to be wired properly in the product Guarding of Equipment All possible casualty hazards and any live parts are guarded or warnings provided in accordance with the standard Damaged Components Any component or part of the equipment that was or appeared to be damaged was checked and determined to be acceptable for use General Engineering Practices The product was constructed in a workmanlike fashion and was new or in cleaned condition Inlertek Testing Services NA. Inc SD 8 s I (9-17/07) Mandatoi Intertek Page 5 of 11 Report No 3181494LAX-001 2 3 Product Type Testing The following non-destructive tests required by the applicable product standard were conducted with satisfactory results Test results are on file at the Intertek office TEST PERFORMED Combustion Flue gas temperature Burner and ignition operating characteristics Combustion air failure Power interruption PARAGRAPH UL795 51 1 51 1 4 51 1 6 51 2 51 4 2 4 Resolution of Deficiencies The following deficiencies were identified on the equipment during the initial evaluation Methods of resolution by the client have been reviewed, agreed upon, and verified by Intertek Deficiency None Approved Resolution N/A Inleriek Testing Services NA, Inc SDH X I (9/l7'()7)Mjndaloi Intertek Page 6 of 11 3 0 Products Evaluated 3 1 Equipment Identification and Field Label Number Report No 3181494LAX-001 Manufacturer Alliance Model Kronus 203 Serial No 07-1478-203-0035 Ratings 300,000 btu/hr 460V, 18 A ETL Label 274515 3 2 Conditions of Use and Acceptability This product is intended for use and installation in a non-classified (non-hazardous) location and for connection to the appropriately sized branch circuit The installation methods and final acceptability at the installation site are the responsibility of the Authority Having Jurisdiction Intertek Testing Services NA. Inc SONS I (.<•)'17/07) Mandaloi Intertek 3.3 Photographs: Page 7 of 11 Report No. 3181494LAX-001 Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc.SD8.8.1 (9/17/07) Mandate. Page 8 of 11 Page 9 of 11 Page 10 of 11 Page 11 of 11 07-29-2009 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No PCR09078 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Reference # PC# Project Title 2732 LOKER AV WEST CBAD PCR 2090812900 Lot# 0 $0 00 Construction Type 5B CB082053 HISAMITSU-DEFERRED SUBMITAL- ADD COLLECTION SYSTEM & DUCTING FOR Applicant DON RITTER 1521 VIA LOS COYOTES LAHABRACA 90631 714 525-4034 Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Owner FENTON H G COMPANY 7577 MISSION VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO CA 92108 ISSUED 06/18/2009 RMA 07/29/2009 07/29/2009 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $12000 $000 Total Fees $12000 Total Payments To Date $12000 Balance Due $000 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack review set aside void or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specif ed fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired City of Carlsbad Plan Check Revision Project Address Building Department Original Plan Check No Name of Business at Project Address Contact Contact Address /$".£/ I//* Lex FlxV5'Z5--W7'/ Email City_ <? 3 Zip General Scope of Work 3:~isr*./.f_ /2~rp c 7 Original plans prepared by an architect or engineer, revisions must be signed & stamped by that person 1 Elements revised Plans Calculations Soils Energy Other. Don Ritt Offiie 7 Fax* 7 Mobile 3 dntter@3 2 Describe revisions in detail DWW^X s,^,,C*/ Xv ^<^<T3 ADQ.-^ ^//**^$Ji£^/t>i,*t.,^4~) »~*/ ATL) ^.s/,t,*,~ A^^Lt^i ' ^i •[ •»- < Engineering Inc. i 1 4-525-4034 1 52 1 Via Los Coyotes 14-525-4074 La Habra CA 90631 23240-8261 dgrengineermg com wm Sdgrengmeenng com j 3 List page(s) where each revision is shown AtoM-0? 4 List revised sheets that replace existing sheets ft£P 3 5 Does this revision in any way alter the exterior of the project? [X[ Yes 6 Does this revision add ANY new floor area(s)? HH Yes H No 7 Does this revision affect any fire related issues? I I Yes I I No 8 Is this a complete set? ghres ^ No (^A^^J(^jf- ft- / f) ifr ~O \ ^**~t — \ ^Signatur No 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Phone 760-602-2717/2718/2719 Fax 760-602-8558 EsGil Corporation In (partnership ivitfi. government for <Buif<fing Safety DATE 06/23/2009 JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO O8-2053(PCR09-078) SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave West PROJECT NAME Deferred Submittal Ductwork and anchorage of Oxidizer XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to ••A*,-X3 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Telephone # Date contacted (by ) Fax # Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS By Aaron Goodman Enclosures EsGil Corporation [X] GA [X] MB D EJ D PC 06/22/2009 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 *• Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad O8-2O53(PCRO9-O78) 06/23/2OO9 [DO NOT PAY- THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION City of Carlsbad 078) PLAN CHECK NO O8-2O53(PCR09- PREPARED BY Aaron Goodman DATE 06/23/2009 BUILDING ADDRESS 2732 Loker Ave West Set I BUILDING OCCUPANCY F-l TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-B BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code Rlrln Pprmit FPP hv Orrhna AREA ( Sq Ft ) cb Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance nrp i ^ Reg Mod VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance ' ^ | Type of Review D Complete Review PI Repetitive FeeRepeats D Other |—I Hourly EsGil Fee Based on hourly rate Comments $107 50 fj Structural Only $8600 Hr $8600 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc + PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER PC 09-78 DATE 6/18/09 ADDRESS 2732 LOKER AV W RESIDENTIAL ADDITION- MINOR (<17,000.00) RETAINING WALL VILLAGE FAIRE POOL/SPA TENANT IMPROVEMENT COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER OXIDIZER STACK APPROVED PER PIP 86-OKB) PLANNER GINARUIZ DATE 6/25/09 ' ff SC DATE //LENGINEER^ 7 Carlsbad Fire Department BLDG. DEPT COPY Plan Review Requirements Category PCR , Date of Report 07-15-2009 Name Address Reviewed by Permit # PCR09078 Job Name HISAMITSU-DEFERRED SUBMITAL - Job Address 2732 LOKER AV WEST CBAD ig item you have submitted for review is incompk Tot ?mit the necessary plans icable codes and/or standards Please review langes "clouded", adequately conduct a revie\ carefully all comments attag to ^Conditions Cond CON0003529 [NOT MET] Inadequate information provided Please submit more information on operational process as well as equipment listings Also please provide pertinent code references Any other information you may have that will assist me in this review would also be appreciated Entry 06/25/2009 By Soderber Action CO Cond CON0003561 [MET] APPROVED THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUEANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THIS APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS, ANY REQUIRED TESTS, FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTATIONS, CONDITIONS IN CORRESPONDENCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS THIS APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE HELD TO PERMIT OR APPROVE ANY VIOLATION OF THE LAW Entry 07/15/2009 By Sodeberg Action AP BLDG DEPTCOPY Carlsbad Fire Department Plan Review Requirements Category PCR , Date of Report 06-25-2009 Reviewed by Name Address Permit # PCR09078 Job Name HISAMITSU-DEFERRED SUBMITAL - Job Address 2732 LOKER AV WEST CBAD INCOMPLETE The item you have submitted for review is incomplete At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and/or standards Please review carefully all comments attached Please resubmit the necessary plans and/or specifications, with changes "clouded", to this office for review and approval Conditions Cond CON0003529 [NOT MET] Inadequate information provided Please submit more information on operational process as well as equipment listings Also please provide pertinent code references Any other information you may have that will assist me in this review would also be appreciated Entry 06/25/2009 By Soderber Action CO IQHPALOSHffVERDES• Engineering Civil and Siiucfural Consulting O Please Respond To 6027-1 Paseo Dehcias PO Box 2211 Rancho Santa Fe California 92067-2211 858 759 2434 858 759 8324 FAX ranchosanlafe@pvec com D Please Respond To 27520 Hawthorne Blvd Suite 250 Rolling Hills Estates California 90274 3512 310541 5055 3105410321 FAX mfo@pvec com Structural Calculations Anchorage Analysis Prepared For Hisamitsu 2732 Loker Avenue West Carlsbad, CA 92010 Project Hisamitsu 2732 Loker Avenue West Carlsbad, CA 92010 PaulS Chnstenson,RCEC57182 PROJECT ENGINEER June 8, 2009 PVECFiIeNo 24-09-291 PALOS VERDES ENGINEERING CORPORATION 6027-1 Paseo Dehcias * P O Box 2211 * Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 - Fax (858) 759-8324 V 1 0 Design Criteria Code Timber Hisamitsu 24-09-291 2007 California Building Code - ASCE 7-05 Douglas Fir-Larch (DF-L), WWPA or WCLIB 2x Wall Framing DF-L #2 (unless noted otherwise) 2x Rafters & Joists DF-L #2 " Posts & Beams DF-L#1 " Glue-Lam Beams Sheathing Engineered Framing Concrete Concrete Block Mortar Grout Reinforcing Steel Structural Steel Simple Span Cantilevers Grade 24F-V4 (DF/DF) Grade 24F-V8 (DF/DF) Mm APA-Rated Sheathing, Exposure 1, Plywood or OSB (UNO) Wood I-Joists LVL, PSL TJI 110,210,230,360,560 ICCESR-1I53 1 9E Microllam, 2 OE Parallam ICBO ER-4979 Compressive Strength @ 28 days per ASTM C39-96 Footings f c = 2500 psi Grade Beams f c = 3000 psi Grade N-I per ASTM C90-95, f m = 1500 psi per ASTM E447-92 Type S Mortar Cement per ASTM C270-95, Mm f m = 1800 psi @ 28 days Coarse Grout w/ 3/8" Max Aggregate per ASTM C476-91, Mm f m = 2000 psi @ 28 days #4 & Larger #3 & Smaller ASTM A6I5-60 (Fy = 60 ksi) ASTM A615-40 (Fy = 40 ksi) 'W' Shapes ASTM A992, Fy= 50-65 ksi Plates, Angles, Channels ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi Tube Shapes ASTM A500, Grade B, Fy= 46 ksi Pipe Shapes ASTM A53, Grade B, Fy=35 ksi Welding Electrodes Bolts Soils References Structural Steel A615-60Rebar E70-T6 E90 Series Sill Plate Anchor Botls & Threaded Rods Steel Moment & Braced Frames 1000 psf Bearing Pressure A307 Quality Minimum A325 (Bearing, UNO) ) j -*- :*u i_r ^<* J j — L V 3( •? oSj* Si, 1 iS S- g -=>- "I 5 - j j I Ai *%p*?~• -!>&<:& *§ fi ^ «" O 3 H « N S ?? + *«, Nl * 5 g »Q II! ALLIANCE CORPORATION KBONUS 203 BEeENE«AA« THEB.1AL C.VBS Cfi 8 FEB-3008 Sole WI-C I 1 jUl| Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation 1 ••VHH Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-1 Paseo Delicias • P O Box Telephone (858) 759-2434 • Fax 1 Project Hisamitsu - Oxidizer Address 2732 Loker Ave W Carlsbad, CA 92010 Equipment Weight 22400 Ibs Horizontal, ACph = 0 40 Vertical, ACpv = 014 2211 • Rancho Santa (858) 759-8324 Anchor Anchor Size Special Insptn # of Anchor Tension Cap = Shear Capacity = q = r = Fe, CA 92067 Anchor Bolt 1/2" No 4 1100 Ibs 2400 Ibs 2 2 JOB 3-^ «VTtl SHEET NO !> CALCULATED BY £ CHECKED BY SCALE Ap = 1 0 Rp = 25 Ip =15 Sds = 08 z/h = 1 0 Honz Acph = VertAcpv = OF 7 >>C DATE $.*& «? DATE 040 0 14 HVAC EQUIPMENT SCHEMATIC fq ANCHOR fiff" t / CphW ~^"cphV 1 1. _ |r ANCHOR FLOOR-LINE Cpvff PLAN VIEW ELEVATION VIEW (K), in 44 (L), in 120 (M), in 99 Horizontal Shear Load (ACpH x W) Shear Load = 0 402 x 22400 Shear Load/ Anchor Qty = 89971 / 4 Shear Rating / Shear Load = 2400 / 2249 3 8997 1 Ibs 2249 3 Ibs 1 07 Vertical Pullout at Anchor AB Resulting from X-X Load Uplift ((W/T) x (ACpv -09)= ( 22400 / 4 ) x ( 0 14 - 0 9 ) Pn Overturn (ACph x Wx K)/(L xq) =( 04017 x 22400 x 44)7(120x2) -42560 Ibs 16495 Ibs Vertical Pullout at Anchor AB Resulting from Y-Y Load Uplift ((W/T) x (ACpv-0 9) = ( 22400 / Pn Overturn (ACph x W x K) / (L x q) = ( 0 4017 x 4 )x( 014 - 09) 22400 x 44 ) / ( 99 x 2 -26065 Ibs -4,2560 Ibs = 1,9994 Ibs -2,2566 Ibs I USPalos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers cIcuLATEplw *C~Z^vi JOB_ SHEET NO Ul OF 6027-1 Paseo Dehcias • P O Box 2211 • Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 CHECKED BY DATE Telephone (858) 759-2434 • Fax (858) 759-8324 SCALE Curb to Material Connection To Concrete 1/2" dia expansion bolts x 6" l< (Vail = 2400 # x10 = 2400 Ibs ) # of bolts required = 8997 1 Ibs / 2400 = 3 75 bolts Use 1/2" dia red head anchors w/ 4 1/2" emb @ each corner (mm 4 bolts total) - ITW Red Head Trubolt + Wedge Anchor (ICC - ESR-2427) Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-1 Paseo Delicias • P O Box 2211 • Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 • Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB SHEET NO C CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCALE OF 7 DATE DATE Project Hisamitsu - Fan Address 2732 Loker Ave W Carlsbad, CA 92010 Equipment Weight Horizontal, ACph = Vertical, ACpv = 1000 Ibs 040 0 14 Anchor Anchor Bolt Anchor Size 1/2" dia Special Insptn No # of Anchor 4 Tension Cap = 1100 Ibs Shear Capacity = 2400 Ibs q = 2 r = 2 Ap = Rp = IP = Sds = z/h = 1 0 25 1 5 08 1 0 Honz Acph VertAcpv :040 0 14 HVAC EQUIPMENT SCHEMATIC PLAN VIEW FXOOR-UNE CpvW CphW ELEVATION VIEW (K) in 48 (L), in 20 (M), in 20 Horizontal Shear Load (ACpH x W) Shear Load =0402 x 1000 = 4017 Ibs Shear Load/AnchorQty = 401 7 / 4 = 10041 Ibs Shear Rating / Shear Load = 2400 / 10041 = 2390 Vertical Pullout at Anchor AB Resulting from X-X Load Uplift ((W/T) x (ACpv-0 9) = ( 1000 / Pn Overturn (ACph x W x K) / (L x q) = ( 0 4017 x 4 )x( 014 - 09) 1000 x 48 )/( 20 x2) -1900 Ibs 4820 Ibs 2920 Ibs Vertical Pullout at Anchor AB Resulting from Y-Y Load Uplift ((W/T) x (ACpv-0 9) = (1000 / Pn Overturn (ACph x W x K) / (L x q) = ( 0 4017 x 4 )x( 014 - 09) 1000 x 48 )/( 20 x 2 -1900 Ibs 4820 Ibs 2920 Ibs IDSBB JOBPalos Verdes Engineering Corporation ^ u c, , , ,-, SHEET NO & OF 7Consulting Structural Engineers —CALCULATED BY $*£ DATE 6027-1 Pasco Dehcias • P 0 Box 2211 • Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 CHECKED BY DATE Telephone (858) 759-2434 • Fax (858) 759-8324 SCALE Curb to Material Connection To Concrete 1/2" dia expanstion bolts x 4 5' (Vail = 2400 # x10 = 2400 Ibs ) # of bolts required = 401 7 Ibs / 2400 = 017 bolts Use 1/2" dia red head anchors w/ 4 1/2" emb @ each corner (mm 4 bolts total) - ITW Red Head Trubolt + Wedge Anchor (ICC - ESR-2427) Conterminous 48 States 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions Latitude = 33 134 Longitude = -117 258 Spectral Response Accelerations Ss and S1 Ss and S1 = Mapped Spectral Acceleration Values Site Class B - Fa = 1 0 ,Fv = 1 0 Data are based on a 0 01 deg grid spacing Period Sa (sec) (g) 02 1 109 (Ss, Site Class B) 10 0420(81 .Site Class B) Conterminous 48 States 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions Latitude = 33 134 Longitude = -117 258 Spectral Response Accelerations SMs and SM1 SMs = Fa x Ss and SM1 = Fv x S1 Site Class D - Fa = 1 057 ,Fv = 1 58 Period Sa (sec) (g) 02 1 172 (SMs, Site Class D) 10 0 664 (SM1, Site Class D) Conterminous 48 States 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions Latitude = 33 134 Longitude = -117 258 Design Spectral Response Accelerations SDs and SD1 SDs = 2/3 x SMs and SD1 = 2/3 x SM1 Site Class D - Fa = 1 057 ,Fv = 1 58 Period Sa (sec) (g) 02 0 781 (SDs, Site Class D) 10 0 443 (SD1, Site Class D) 05-13-2009 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No PCR09058 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Reference # PC# Project Title Applicant GEN KOBAYASHI 760944-1921 2732 LOKER AV WEST CBAD PCR 2090812900 Lot# $0 00 Construction Type 0 NEW CB082053 HISAMITSU-OPTIONAL MONOLITHIC POUR FOR BOTH OXIDIZER PAD & SHIPPING AREA Status ISSUED Applied 05/13/2009 RMA 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Owner FENTON H G COMPANY 7577 MISSION VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO CA 92108 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $000 $000 Total Fees $0 00 Total Payments To Date $0 00 Balance Due $000 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack review set aside void or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired City of Carlsbad Building Department Plan Check Revision No (f ^\{ OiQ UJ Original Plan Check No £& Project Address ..... ? 732. Lafat-. ^At//*. fa/ ___ ......... _____Date Name of Business at Project Address.__ Contact / Fmail *Contact Address /06-Q &J&UA?Zip General Scope of Work Original plans prepared by an architect or engineer revisions must be signed & stamped by that person 1 Elements revised Plans Calculations Soils Energy Other Describe revisions in detail List page(s) where each revision is shown List revised sheets that Kcplocc (p existing sheets T?>S3/S/. /52 5 Does this revision, in any way alter the exterior of the project? O Yes 0 Does this revision add ANY new floor area(s)? O Yes Q^No 1 Does this revision affect any fire related issues? Q Yes Q^o 8 Is this a complete set? O Yes Q'No ^Signatur No 1635 FaradaV Avenue Carlsbad CA/92 Phone 760-602-2717/2718/2719 Fax 760-602-8558 G28005-1 2732 Loker Avenue, Carlsbad, California 6 5 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT If the soils are prepared as recommended, concrete slabs-on-grade may be supported entirely on the resulting compacted fill Concrete floor slabs should be a minimum of 6 inches thick if slabs are placed directly over expansive clay soils Concrete floor slabs should be monolithically placed with the foundations To reduce the potential for water entrapment, and to provide protection against vapor or water transmission through the slabs, we recommend that the slabs-on-grade be underlain by a 6-mch thick layer of Caltrans Class 2 permeable material or crushed rock A suggested gradation for the gravel layer is as follows Suggested Gravel Gradation No 4 0-10 No 100 0-3 To provide additional protection against water vapor transmission through the slab in areas where vinyl or other moisture-sensitive floor covering is planned, we recommend that a 10-mil-thick impermeable plastic membrane (visqueen) be installed below the slab To protect the membrane during later concrete work and to facilitate curing of the concrete and to reduce slab curling, a 2-inch- thick, layer of clean sand should be placed over the membrane The vapor barrier should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions We recommend that at least a 2-foot lap be provided at the membrane edges or that the edges be sealed Care should be taken during concrete placement to prevent displacement of the sand A low-slump concrete (4-inch maximum slump) should be used to further minimize possible curling of the slabs The concrete slabs should be allowed to cure properly before placing vinyl or other moisture-sensitive floor covering 10 r GEN °KEN ARCHITECTURE / DESIGN DATE. 7D4D Auenida Enemas Suite 1Q4 111 UNDOW & JOHNSTON, INC.^= structural & Civil Engineers 7-' 444 South Flower Street, Suite 400 LOS Angeles CA 90071 r DET , D&T Tl I GEN KEN ARCHITECTURE / DESIGN 7CMO Avenyla Fncinaa DATE. ^7iTo<j BRANDOW & JOHNSTON, INC. -Structural & Civil Engineers South Flower Street Suite 400 - Los Angeles CA 90071 Suite 104 111 Cahl 92O1 1