Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2788 JAMES DR; ; CB041572; Permit
i-09-2004 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: Applicant: WRIGHT SAM STEM 2911 STATE ST CARLSBAD 92008 760213-1460 City of Carlsbad 16^5 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB041572 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2788 JAMES DR CBAD RESDNTL 1561424900 $347,250.00 Sub Type: SFD Lot #: 0 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: Structure Type: SFD Bathrooms: 0 RAMIREZ RESIDENCE 3,606 SF HOUSE.660 SF GARAGE.210 SF VERANDA Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: ISSUED 05/11/2004 MDP 07/30/2004 08/09/2004 Owner: RAMIREZ JUAN J&ADRIANA 3859 CORNELL DR OCEANSIDE CA 92056 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,310.40 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $851.76 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $34.73 PFF $0.00 PFF {CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $2,999.00 Housing InLieu Fee D5/8 Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $140.00 $2,004.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $460.60 $519.40 $0.00 $182.00 $60.00 $96.00 $0.00 $4,515.00 $0.00 $0.00 $927.00 $0.00 $14,099.89 Total Fees: $14,099.89 Total Payments To Date:$811.72 Balance Due: $13,288.17 BUILDING PLANS IN STORAGE ATTACHED 8459 08/09/04 0002 01 02 CGF" 13288-1? IT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1,. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. QU( EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date Address (include Bldg/Sutte #) Legal Description Business Name (at this addrtwj;^ AC- ; Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase NowljFTotal # sessor's Parcel # . (4-7.. Existing Use Use Description of Work SQ. FT.#of Stories # of Bedropms # of Bathrooms Name Address Fax* Name Address IP. Address (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name Address State License # License Class Designer Name Address State License # City State/Zip Telephone # City Business License # ^ City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Q I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100} OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE ill I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: n 1, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). CH I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). Q I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. 1 (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A RNAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above Information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN AWY?WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for exceptions EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by th authorized by such permit is not commsjjced withic at any time after the work is commti for a APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 5JO" deefxand demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. under the revisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work 3ays from the paje of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned 3.4.4 Uniform Building Code). YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 09/19/2005 Permit* CB041572 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Description: 3,606 SF HOUSE,660 SF GARAGE.210 SF VERANDA Inspector Assignment: PS Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT WRIGHT SAM Sub Type: SFD 2788 JAMES DR Lot Inspector: Remarks: PM PLEASE CALL WITH TIME Total lime:Requested By: JUAN Entered By: JANEAN CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs PCR04167 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES DEFERRED TRUSS; PCR04203 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES REV STRUCT STEEL; LOCATION AND ADD COLUM Inspection History Date 09/14/2005 05/24/2005 05/12/2005 04/29/2005 04/29/2005 04/14/2005 04/14/2005 04/08/2005 04/07/2005 04/06/2005 04/06/2005 03/31/2005 03/21/2005 03/16/2005 Description 89 17 82 13 16 17 84 84 14 14 84 14 24 24 Final Combo Interior Lath/Drywall Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test Shear Panels/HD's Insulation Interior Lath/Drywall Rough Combo Rough Combo Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Combo Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Rough/Topout Act CO AP AP we AP we AP CO CO CO CO NR AP CO Insp JM PS PD RB RB PS PS PD PS BN BN PS BN PS Comments SEE LIST showers SEE NOTICE ATTACHED RAT PROOFING NOT COMPLETE. MUD RINGS NOT INSTALLED PER NOTICE DATED 4/6/05. FRAMER STARTED YELLING. I LEFT SEE NOTICE ATTACHED not lath & missing lots of fire stops City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 04/08/2005 Permit* CB041572 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Description: 3,606 SF HOUSE,660 SF GARAGE.210 SF VERANDA Inspector Assignment: PS Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 2788 JAMES DR Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT WRIGHT SAM Owner: Remarks: Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: JUAN Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comment 14 . Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Associated PCRs/CVs PCR04167 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES DEFERRED TRUSS; PCR04203 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES REV STRUCT STEEL; LOCATION AND ADD COLUM Inspection History Description Act Insp 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO PS Date 04/07/2005 04/06/2005 04/06/2005 03/31/2005 03/21/2005 03/16/2005 03/02/2005 01/14/2005 11/10/2004 09/13/2004 09/09/2004 09/09/2004 09/02/2004 08/31/2004 08/26/2004 08/20/2004 08/18/2004 08/17/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO BN 84 Rough Combo CO BN 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR PS 24 Rough/Topout AP BN 24 Rough/Topout CO PS 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear AP PY 15 Roof/Reroof CO PS 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers WC PY 32 Const. Service/Agricultural PA PY 81 Underground Combo AP PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PY 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CO PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA PY 21 Underground/Under Floor AP PY 12 Steel/Bond Beam NS PS Comments RAT PROOFING NOT COMPLETE. MUD RINGS NOT INSTALLED PER NOTICE DATED 4/6/05. FRAMER STARTED YELLING. I LEFT SEE NOTICE ATTACHED not lath & missing lots of fire stops TRUSS CALS DO NOT MATCH TRUSSES FLR NAIL. CHANGED FLR JOIST FROM TJI TO B.C. I NEED APPROVAL GARAGE SLAB TPPB (4) POST FTGS FTG NOT PER PLAN C1TY.OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE 7 " LOCATION TIME ft~. PERMIT NO./ C P Top D A ] ¥/* pi H *o. W/T l/t AJT To t>5 op pAQp..&<< btf.fi 3 rl*~ p r . ere .w To C J> Af FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? LJ YES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACTtrr PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 04/07/2005 Permit* CB041572 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Description: 3,606 SF HOUSE,660 SF GARAGE,210 SF VERANDA Inspector Assignment: PS Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 2788 JAMES DR Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT WRIGHT SAM Owner: Remarks: Phone: 9517757430 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: RAMIREZ RES. Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comment 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding (J%S Date 04/06/2005 04/06/2005 03/31/2005 03/21/2005 03/16/2005 03/02/2005 01/14/2005 11/10/2004 09/13/2004 09/09/2004 09/09/2004 09/02/2004 08/31/2004 08/26/2004 08/20/2004 08/18/2004 08/17/2004 Associated PCRs/CVs PCR04167 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES DEFERRED TRUSS; PCR04203 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES REV STRUCT STEEL; LOCATION AND ADD COLUM Inspection History Description Act Insp 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO BN CO BN NR PS AP BN CO PS AP PY CO PS CO PS 84 Rough Combo 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Rough/Topout 24 Rough/Topout 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear 15 Roof/Reroof 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Comments SEE NOTICE ATTACHED not lath & missing lots of fire stops 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers WC PY 32 Const. Service/Agricultural PA PY 81 Underground Combo AP PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PY 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CO PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA PY 21 Underground/Under Floor AP PY 12 Steel/Bond Beam NS PS TRUSS CALS DO NOT MATCH TRUSSES FLR NAIL CHANGED FLR JOIST FROM TJI TO B.C. I NEED APPROVAL. GARAGE SLAB TPPB (4) POST FTGS FTG NOT PER PLAN City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 04/06/2005 Permit* CB041572 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Description: 3,606 SF HOUSE,660 SF GARAGE,210 SF VERANDA Inspector Assignment: PS Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 2788 JAMES DR Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT WRIGHT SAM Owner: Remarks: Phone: 9517757430 Inspector: /JJL> Total Time:Requested By: LEON Entered By: JANEAN CD Description Act Comment j«&14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding «y Associated PCRs/CVs PCR04167 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES DEFERRED TRUSS; PCR04203 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES REV STRUCT STEEL; LOCATION AND ADD COLUM Inspection History InspDate Description Act 03/31/2005 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR 03/21/2005 24 Rough/Topout AP 03/16/2005 24 Rough/Topout CO 03/02/2005 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear AP 01/14/2005 15 Roof/Reroof CO 11/10/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO 09/13/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP 09/09/2004 11 Rg/Foundation/Piers WC 09/09/2004 32 Const. Service/Agricultural PA 09/02/2004 81 Underground Combo AP 08/31/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA 08/26/2004 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CO 08/20/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA 08/18/2004 21 Underground/Under Floor AP 08/17/2004 12 Steel/Bond Beam NS PS BN PS PY PS PS PS PY PY PS PY PS PY PY PS Comments not lath & missing lots of fire stops TRUSS CALS DO NOT MATCH TRUSSES FLR NAIL. CHANGED FLR JOIST FROM TJI TO B.C. I NEED APPROVAL. GARAGE SLAB TPPB (4) POST FTGS FTG NOT PER PLAN CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE LOCATION PERMIT NO. fiu$£L TIME (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE &c/:^S At /»// pi i* oft-_ f> 0 /) ^ f/fl )R INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DU FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ~ PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For. 03/16/2005 Permit* CB041572 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Description: 3,606 SF HOUSE,660 SF GARAGE,210 SF VERANDA Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 2788 JAMES DR Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT WRIGHT SAM Owner: Remarks: Inspector Assignment: PS Phone: 6199210803 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: JUAN Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 24 Rough/Topout Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs PCR04167 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES DEFERRED TRUSS; PCR04203 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES REV STRUCT STEEL; LOCATION AND ADD COLUM Inspection History Description Act Insp Comments 83 Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear AP PY 15 Roof/Reroof CO PS CO PS Date 03/02/2005 01/14/2005 11/10/2004 09/13/2004 09/09/2004 09/09/2004 09/02/2004 08/31/2004 08/26/2004 08/20/2004 08/18/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers WC PY 32 Const. Service/Agricultural PA PY 81 Underground Combo AP PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PY 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CO PS 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA PY 21 Underground/Under Floor AP PY steel/Bond Beam NS PS TRUSS CALS DO NOT MATCH TRUSSES FLR NAIL. CHANGED FLR JOIST FROM TJI TO B.C. I NEED APPROVAL. GARAGE SLAB TPPB (4) POST FTGS FTG NOT PER PLAN CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE ^O-5 TIME LOCATION 2^7 yy PERMIT NO ~ 3 CJ FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? LJ YES FOW=WTHERW=eMATION, CONTACT PHONE ILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 09/02/2004 Permit* CB041572 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Description: 3,606 SF HOUSE,660 SF GARAGE,210 SF VERANDA Inspector Assignment: PS Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 2788 JAMES DR Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT WRIGHT SAM Owner: Remarks: Phone: 6197265466 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 91 Requested By: N/A Entered By: ROBIN Act. * Comment Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 08/31/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 08/26/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 08/20/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 08/18/2004 21 Underground/Under Floor 08/17/2004 12 Steel/Bond Beam PA PY (4) POST FTGS CO PS FTG NOT PER PLAN CA PY AP PY NS PS City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 01/14/2005 Permit* CB041572 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Description: 3,606 SF HO USE, 660 SF GARAGE,210 SF VERANDA Inspector Assignment: PS Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 2788 JAMES DR Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT WRIGHT SAM Owner: Remarks: Phone: 9517754030 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: LEON Entered By: KAREN CD Description 15 Roof/Reroof Act Comment Do Associated PCRs/CVs PCR04167 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES DEFERRED TRUSS; PCR04203 ISSUED RAMIREZ RES REV STRUCT STEEL; LOCATION AND ADD COLUM Inspection History Date Description 11/10/2004 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 09/13/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piere 09/09/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 09/09/2004 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 09/02/2004 61 Underground Combo 08/31/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 08/26/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 08/20/2004 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 08/18/2004 21 Underground/Under Floor 08/17/2004 12 Steel/Bond Beam Act Insp Comments CO PS FLR NAIL. CHANGED FLR JOIST FROM TJI TO B.C. I NEED APPROVAL. PS GARAGE SLABAP WC PY PA PY AP PA CO CA AP NS PS PY PS PY PY PS TPPB (4) POST FTGS FTG NOT PER PLAN CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE. NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME LOCATION PERMIT NO. D T^JL&S djc's FOR INSPECTION C (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? MATION, CONTACT _ YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WILLIAM E. LAND SURVEYOR P.O. BOX 4231, CARLSBAD, CA 92018-4231 (760) 434-6442 AUGUST 28, 2004 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 RE: SETBACK CERTIFICATION FOR HOUSH AT 2788 JAMES DRIVE, LOT 3, MAP NO. 14517 (APN 156-142^*9). ON AUGUST 28, 2004,1 CHECKED THE FOUNDATION FORMS FOR SETBACK COMPLIANCE. 1 FOUND THE FORMS MEET OR EXCEED THE MINIMUM SETBACKS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS CB 04-1572, APPROVED AUGUST 9, 2004. WILLIAM E. BILLINGS, LS NO. 3338 international conference of Building officials JEREMIAH BIETZ CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR SPRAY-APPLIED FIREPROOFINC 1997 Uniform Building code The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in^he category shown, having been so certified pursuant to successful completion of the prescribed written examination. Expiration date: Octobgj^ar^OJ-* -^_i -r „-- ; NO. 5006925-X6 <!_ ^~*-~^A \"~'_ ' . .- International Conference of Building Officials JEREMIAH BIETZ CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR STRUCTURAL MASONRY 1997 Uniform Building Code The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in the category shown havmgbeen so certified pursuant tosuccessful completion of theprescribed written examination.Expiration date: Augusj No 5006925-X4 C ^_^^_^ >-__ yi unless signed bvcSFftfjyte holder ICBO unification attests to competent knowledge ofcodei and standard* fa/e experience should be verified by local jurisdiciians. Jeremiah E Bietz Reinforced Concrete Special Insp - Associate The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in the category shown, having been so certified pursuant to successful completion of the prescribed written requirements. Expiration date: NO 5006925-48 . valid unless signed bvXertificate holder P/, Project Location Contractor __ Reviewed by__ T'A .Bldg. Permit No . Date Reviewed _ Time Departed Travel TYPE OF INSPECTION U Masonry Q Batch plant G Foundations lp Concrete G Welding G Bolting Q Soil G Fireproofmg G Reinforcement Steel . 0» , .. <r tr , i £j _ LJ Q Prc-Post Tensioned Tendon Q Metal Decking ijl Other TCTY^M .^Mt^wX" - ~> ^ V\M5^ \ O ' ' ^ \ Documents Referenced iary \\ _ . 6? A-H r \CV-So THE WORK INSPECTED: gl MET D DID NOT MEET «waw^ c^.\\^uC»'vsci^ \ecTHE REOUIREMEtNTS OF THE DSAAPPROVED DOCUMENTS WAS D WAS NOT INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DSAAPPROVED DOCUMENTS Cc Structural Engineer Salvador Burrola #500 Registered Special Inspector Certified for San Diego City & County Salvador Burrola Reinforced Concrete Special inspector-Legacy The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in Che categorysnown, having been so certified pursuant to successful completion of the prescribed written requirements Expiration date: July is, 2007- / ^ j? NO. 1064115-88 Stdk&vW jj-£€.d&*r-Z^, _ wot valid unless signfed by certificate hold er. !(.< cvrtitit-ation jtic rt kimwh-dge ofcadn and Marida Salvador Burrola Prestressed Concrete Special Inspector-Legacy The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in the category shown, having Deen so certified pursuant to successful completion of the prescribed written requirements., txpiratton date: septempeiyl2, NO. 1064115-S9 ^^^^ •wot valid unless Signed t>v certificate holder. !('< i-cni/Jcauoo Jilisti tf7 r*M«pf«>nf Jtnnw/ctfjir nf codes Salvador Burrola Spray-Applied Fireproofing Special Inspector The individual named hereon is CERTIFIED in the category shown, having been so certified pursuant to successful completion of the prescribed written requirements Expiration date: August M, 2Q07 (•'.•£} . , NO. 1064115-86 J^fc^Af^r^jJL^^i-^ "^ Nbt valid unless signed bv certificate holder, ICC. certification attesu to competent knowledge of codes anrf standards. Page 2 Revised: August 29,2004 iise-esa SO Salvador Burrola #500 Registered Special Inspector Certified for San Diego City & County Salvador Burrola Structural Steel & Welding Special Inspector The individual named riereon is CERTIFIED in trie category shown, having been so certified pursuant to successful completion of the prescribed wntten/equirernents. Expiration date: August stfl, 2O07 / // NO, 1O6«115-S5 •g^h^Wv'l /-> ICC tvmfitaiioi) wot valid unless signed fty certificate holder, •itt to campL'tsnt fenow/ctJgc1 of codes anc Page 3 Revised: August 29, 2004 IIBE-E69 (8SQ)SO Construction Inspections & Materials Testing Consulting 10444 Flanders Cove Cell/Voice Mat! (619) 261-0984 San Diego. CA. 92126 Fax (858) 693-3211 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS UNLIMITED REGISTERED INSPECTORS' DAJLY REPORT TYPPOF INSPECTION REQUIRED Reinforced Concrete PostTensioned Concrete Reinforced Masonry Structural Steel Assembiy: O^ Shop Welding T"l Field Wefding Fire Proofing Epoxy Anchors High Strength Bolting on.jobName Permit Mo.Plan File Type ol Structure Architect Material Description (type, grade, source) A _ -p /• , /! - E.-11T-L Contractor g ^j^ ^ ^^ ( L Inspector Subcontractor // INSPECTION SUMMARY— LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED. JOB PROBLEMS. PROGRESS. REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER. TYPE & /} IDENT, NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED, ETC. - S CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THS ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED J HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE BUB. DING W1WS Continues on next page PAGE SPECIALTY CERTNO.CrTYfSANDEGOS TIME IN TIME OUT All Inspections based Qi a .ninnnu in ."addition. 'J touf show -up minim Approved Oy - . REG HOURS V OT HOURS CYLlNDtRS m of 4 houfs and over 4 houfs - S hour i-iinimsim jm lor iob cancaiaiiore; Project Superintendent (8S8)30 CITY or SAN DIEGO Development Services Department Inspection Services Division 9601 Ridgehaven Court, Suite 220 San Diego. CA 92123 • (858) 492-5070 Call (858) 581-7111 for Inspection Page Circuit Card (Supplemental) - of / THIS CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE FOR THE ROUGH INSPECTION. THE USE OF THIS 'SUPPLEMENTAL' CIRCUIT CARD REQUIRES THE USE OF THE 'PRIMARY' CIRCUIT CARD AS PAGE 1. PERMIT/APPROVAL NO PLAN FILE/PROJECT NO JOB ADDRESS (Print Number, Street Name. Unit No ) CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size 2-*-* A 'ROOMS _/V//'/A/<^ W re S ze / l_ G T c w R y- ' S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size _5-O A -ROOMS ;sc /i //£> of WreSze yj_ G T / c w R S CIRCUIT NO Breakei Size.?-'-"' A -ROOMS U&j* Wire Size <?~ G T c w R / S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Sizev^-c-- A 'ROOMS #&<:>& Wire Size / ^--G T c w R / S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size J^dj A -ROOMS t^Af- i-'/sst* ->ti^Au^r/ Wire Size /'l-"G I c w R 1 S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A 'ROOMS f(/l £L£ JOt»i •• /-*c Cs Wire Size G T ; c *? w R r S f-l CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A 'ROOMS M' jbATtt fa. <••".'-'- •?#/"' W re Size G Tz C h ££.• w R S V" / CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A 'ROOMS sT^-' W re S ze G T f C w R / S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size. A 'ROOMS #AZ *— Wire Size G T C & w £ R S •S' CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A 'ROOMS •STA/'fc Cr Wire Size G T'C 1 w > R S ^ CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A •ROOMS $£& _& Z- &A7~# # t. f^ALi. Wire Size G T f c / Z w / / R 6- S y'/ CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A •ROOMS T'&cs/ £nj Wire Size G T c ? w R 9 S t CIRCUIT NO Bieaker Size A 'ROOMS o^.'V/t/Tfy^ CIRCU Breaker Size A •ROOMS jgf& #^ ^VXtO ^cC^Sf/ g^jff ^ W re Size G T T N c D w R ^- S W re Size G T c / ,-r 7 r w R f— S 7 y/ 7 CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A •ROOMS $£'& ft f/- "C^C/^ £**f~ Wire Size G T 0 & cy ff w / R f- S7 / CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A 'ROOMS TSfrfct-f Atf&' g££- /f2.£tj f/At<.. -uj? / ' *" — — J Wire Size G T 7 c or .7 w / R S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A -ROOMS ^7/7 £f/ MASTfJZ&tfh fiATtt iH £ £A7'M #3 Wire Size G T t c w R V3 1 3. f S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A 'ROOMS I' A <v . 1 certify th and that a Company Name (Pr -lectrJcJan/Owner N Electrician/Owner S Wire Size G T att lite nt): ame gna c w R S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A •ROOMS >• -^MJ CIRCU Breaker Size A •ROOMS Wire S ze G T TN C 0 w R A. S / W re S ze G T C w R S CIRCUIT NO Bieaker Size A 'ROOMS W eSize G T c w R S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A 'ROOMS Wire Size G T c w R S CIRCUIT NO Breakei Size A -ROOMS Wire Size G T c w R S CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size A 'ROOMS Wire Size G T c w R S he above information is accurate and complete rminations are properly torqued. (Print): Lire: Date: Development Services Department Inspection Services Division 9601 Ridgehaven Court, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 921 23 -(858) 492-5070 Circuit Card (Primary) Page Of / THE C,TV OP SAN D E(io ^a" <ODO> °° ''' M ' TOr mbpeCUOn THIS CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE FOR THE ROUGH INSPECTION. USE 'SUPPLEMENTAL' CIRCUIT CARD(S) FOR MORE THAN EIGHT (8) GENERAL USE CIRCUITS TOTAL - SEE REVERSE SIDE. PERMIT/APPROVAL NO PLAN FILE/PROJECT NO. JOB ADDRESS (Print Number. Street Name, Unit No ) <^> //jo ^j f\T^i \^ ^ CIRCUIT NO 1 Breaker Size 15 A 'ROOMS Bedroom #1 Hall Bedroom #? Ueijroom #3 Garage 1. ' Name of each 2 List old and new 3 Use circuit spac 4 San Diego Elect of 15 per genera 5 All circuit breake dead fronts. R = Conve (Use actual num Wire Size 14 G T C i i w ^oom where devices on 3s below for rical Policy use circuit rs to be per Tail C nience Rec bers 1,2,3. R ? • 4 & 1 ; de satr ger imit anc man epts . to S 2 (Y) 1 vice e c era S CU 4 p ent eili cle ide CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size /J"A *ROOMS &*A&jA&& i. .A & A siOX-y rtA£t~~ Wire Size A/ G 1 O C / / w / R / / s ¥ 3 CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size //" A 'ROOMS £>FJ —&,** G*AftA&&~F/z&Ajr &Ao£ fa&g Wire Size /'y' G T C w R ft ) 2_ s CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size /^ A •ROOMS ^*7"^/<V.:VC /5"o /(?/•<, j/iVxx^ y/-/ //'^/.C- Wire Size // G T c •1 / Z O w R •'X s .' 2 3 CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size '/ C A *ROOMS /yjti. - f^'Af *</<-?' A? Wire Size / </' G T c <r w R £. f, s ^, CIRCUIT NO 2 Breaker Si^e 20 A -ROOMS <itchen Kitchen Dining Roon'- Breakfast Nook s are located. rcuit-markmg old de light and small app rrent consuming de\ er small appliance (; y labeled at all servi S = Switc ittfy amounts of ea Wire Size 12 G 1 C w R CD 1 1 1 s i/ices thus i :iance circuits only ices to a maximum 0 amp ) circuit. :e and feeder pane Bracket Light h ch device type). CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size /-T A 'ROOMS /*£&&?££/!&% /7//y/A/^. f/At^^ f-' jQjr / O^ Wire Size /<-/ G T / C / •4 w / R / ,> s % / / ,- CIRCUIT NO. Breaker Size /j~" A 'ROOMS /'//" 6"^ /C/ 7 ^y*Z5" Wire Size /</ G T -£ C T w R S •? Z. CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size AT A "ROOMS yiV/vf '£•/•* i,~/ / ,'-7t- /•-47/O WireSze /Y G T C <$* <-'1 w t^ R c, •? CIRCUIT NO Breaker Size J '•- A -ROOMS 7Vi> -,*•,. /J/^^ Wire Size / C G T C w R S V S Fill i Use remark SERVICE (Main) FEEDER #1 FEEDER #2 (Subpanel) (Subpanel) COMPACTOR COOKTOP DISHWASHER DISPOSAL MICROWAVE OVEN RAwae Aytc/ DEmLR fZjC/ LAUNDRY WATER HEATER A/C ^ f HEATING //=•- #^ ^vx n applicable items below s as necessary to describe work NAME PLATE AMPS-KW WIRE SIZE AL CU * •""> / X //': /z (c // /y /X /3~ & 9 /-*. BREAKER SIZE (AMPS) -loo £tt ^0 X.O oX ^ 0"0 /r/\p *.£ ?-£> CfO 7° ^^ REMARKS: /**^* *• - ! * / /£~f(.i / TT X^ c^~ f~ ojL- A^A//-* f* r' /' y5 £A/~ ft-—f Computed Load AMPS AFCI Protected Circuits (list locations): B&J3 1,3- 3 • C/- GFCI Protected Circuits (list locations) ^Aft-AI&f Ji/T'C'fJF'fi ^ (a) D New(/) OR D Existing (/) (b) Bond/Ground Wire(s). Size(s) */• (c) Location of Cold Water Be d) Location o 1 cer and t Company Nan Electrician/Ow Tvpe (/) D AL OR 5/CU &MA&& jJdff & Ground Clamp c-T-<- /^- tify that the above information is accurate and complete hat all terminations are properly torqued. le (Print). ner Name(Prin )• Electrician/Owner Signature California Electrician Certificat on Number. Date /* DS-I779 fRev ?-03) EsGil Corporation In ffarttttrtfiip witR government for toui&Rng Safety DATE: July 28, 2OO4 a. APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O4-1572 SET: IV PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Dr. PROJECT NAME: Ramirez Residence • The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Truss design deferred by Mike P. Set III is Set IV. By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC LOG imsmld 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In fartners&ip witH government for Quitting Safety DATE: July 24, 20O4 a APEUQANT luSis^ JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O4-1572 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Dr. PROJECT NAME: Ramirez Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Wright Design 2911 State St., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Samuel Wright Telephone #: (760) 720-7631 Date contacted:?/2toAy(by: f*X ) Fax #: (760) 720-7634 Ma'tU-^Telephone Fax^ In Person REMARKS: By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 07/15/04 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-1572 July 24, 2004 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Dr. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 07/15/04 REVIEWED BY: Bryan Zuppiger PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1572 SET: IH DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: July 24, 2O04 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ); This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Please see next page. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes'have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad O4-1572 July 24, 2004 PLANS NOTE: The items listed below refer to the item numbers from previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of or contained within each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans. (California Business and Professions Code). This applies to all subsequent submittats. Only the effected sheets need be submitted I will insert them into the plans. 3. Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). This applies to all subsequent submittals. Only the effected sheets need be submitted I will insert them into the plans. • STRUCTURAL 10. Provide a logiblo floor framing plan. I can not read the floor beam numbers as listed in the design calc's. Without the numbers clearly listed on the framing plan I can not accurately determine consistency between the plans and design cafe's. The following is based on the response. b) Please show design for the beams and their supporting beams supporting FB-1. Carlsbad O4-1572 July 24, 2O04 12. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. The City does not defer this item. 13. Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). Section 106.3.4.1. The City does not defer this item. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In fartnersfiip -with government for Quitting Safety DATE: June 28, 2004 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad QPC^NREVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O4-1572 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Dr. PROJECT NAME: Ramirez Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Wright Design 2911 State St., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Samuel Wright Telephone #: (760) 720-7631 Date contacted:^>M^i(by:r^A >c ) Fax #: (760) 720-7634 Mail ""Telephone Fax "^ In Person REMARKS: By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 06/21/04 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-1572 June 28, 20O4 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Dr. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 06/21/04 REVIEWED BY: Bryan Zuppiger PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1572 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: June 28, 2004 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Please see next page. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes Q No Carlsbad O4-1572 June 28, 2004 PLANS NOTE: The items listed below refer to the item numbers from previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of or contained within each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans. (California Business and Professions Code). This applies to all subsequent submittals. Only the effected sheets need be submitted I will insert them into the plans. 3. Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). This applies to all subsequent submittals. Only the effected sheets need be submitted I will insert them into the plans. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 6. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents required by the soil report). Carlsbad 04-1572 June 28, 2004 STRUCTURAL 10. Provide a legible floor framing plan. I can not read the floor beam numbers as listed in the design calc's. Without the numbers clearly listed on the framing plan I can not accurately determine consistency between the plans and design calc's. The following is based on the response. a) Please show design and size the header at the shared bath that supports the Girder truss. b) Please show design for the beams and their supporting beams supporting FB-1. 12. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. The City does not defer this item. 13. Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). Section 106.3.4.1. The City does not defer this item. • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 14. Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets comply with NEC Art. 210-52(c), which reads as follows: GFI protoctod receptacles within 6' of tho kitchen sink. This is required at all kitchen counters. • ENERGY CONSERVATION 16. Provide manufacturers cut sheets for the very high efficiency HVAC unit SEER 15.0 & 16.5 as used in the energy design. I am unfamiliar with a SEER rating this high. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In fPartnersfup with government for ftuUding Safety DATE: 5/25/O4 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O4-1572 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James 0r. PROJECT NAME: Ramirez Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Wright Design 2911 State St., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Samuel Wright Telephone #: (760) 720-7631 Date contacted: S/^fcfos (by: s* ) Fax #: (760) 720-7634 Mail ""'Telephone Fax ^ In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 5/13/04 tmsmfl.** 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-1572 5/25/04 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1572 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Dr. FLOOR AREA: 3606 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 5/25/04 STORIES: two HEIGHT: 23 ft approx. per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 5/13/04 PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 04-1572 5/25/04 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City wili route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Plans, specifications shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 2. Revise the code compliance statement found under General Notes on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 1999 NEC. 3. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: a) On each story. This applies to the first floor of the building. See sheet E1 of the plans. 4. Show the required ventilation for attics (or enclosed rafter spaces formed where ceilings are applied directly to the underside of roof rafters). The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3. Complete the attic ventilation calculations found on sheet GN1 of the plans. FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 5. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, Carlsbad O4-1572 5/25/04 b) The utility trenches have been property backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 6. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents required by the soil report). 7. Provide an updated soil report as noted on page 20 of the report by Coast Geotechnical that limits the validity of the report dated Sept. 23,1999 to 2 years. 8. The foundation plan does not comply with the soils report recommendations for this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as required to show compliance: Slab reinforcement is listed as #3 @ 24 " OC EW on sheet S2 of the plans. The soil report requires #3 @ 18 " OC EW. see page 15 of the soil report by Coast Geotechnical. 9. Hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. • STRUCTURAL 10. Provide a legible floor framing plan. I can not read the floor beam numbers as listed in the design calc's. Without the numbers clearly listed on the framing plan I can not accurately determine consistency between the plans and design calc's. 11. Include in the design calc's the FJ-1 above the Family Rm and Kitchen that supports floor loads and the 2nd floor bearing wall loads along grid line 8. The TJI 360 must be designed for a concentrated load from the bearing wall as well as floor I_L & DL and the TJI 230 above the Kitchen must be designed for the 2nd floor bearing wall load uniformity applied to the joists. 12. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. 13. Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). Section 106.3.4.1. • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 14. Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets comply with NEC Art. 210-52(c), which reads as follows: GFI protected receptacles within 6' of the kitchen sink. Carlsbad O4-1572 5/25/O4 15. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art. 210-12(b). ENERGY CONSERVATION 16. Provide manufacturers cut sheets for the very high efficiency HVAC unit SEER 15.0 & 16.5 as used in the energy design. 17. The water heater tank capacity may not exceed 71 gallons as listed in the energy design. Sheet E1 of the plans lists the tank as 75 gallon. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 04-1572 5/25/04 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1572 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 5/25/04 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2788 James Dr. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION dwelling garage Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA II Valuation ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier 3606 600 3606 cb City Est City Est City Est By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 343,995 $1,298.08 Wan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: CH Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other . Hourly Q Structural Only Hour* Esgll Plan Review Fee $843.75 $726.92 Comments: Sheet! of 1 macvalue.doc DATE: BUILDING'ADDRESS: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:- /<//j - V9 EST. VALUE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please sA the^attached report of deficiencies marked with^TMake necessary corrections to plans or specification^ for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. FOR OFFICIALESE ONLY TION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT:ENGINEERING AUTflO Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad. CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 H:\WORtWJOCSCHKUS7\Buldtag Ptonehw* CUM form (Q«f»rtc).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITTPLAN Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow Existing & Proposed Structures isting Street ImprovemenJ Property Lines Easements Show on site plan: Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets iveway widths • sting or proposed sewer lateral Existing or proposed water service J. Existing or proposed irrigation service Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5* away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. . Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION H:\WOROCOCS\CHKLSrauldlng PlanchKk R«v. 7/14/00 1ST BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No, D D D 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: HDD V DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 y? x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and subrnittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and subrnittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the mwoRCftDocseHKLSTOmuiiig Punchw* CUM Pom <RKHXE - HARVEY 7-u-ooj.ijw; BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST D D D checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by:Date: 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. D n n n n n Future public improvements required as follows: 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement, agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Please return Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. n GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by:Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) mwORDDOCSSCHKLSTOuUdlnQ Planch** CUM Form {Gwttric 7-14-oo),*K BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1s1 D oND D gRD D ODD D D D 7d .No Grading Permit required. 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. ' "—- Right-of-Way permit required for: 9.INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first.. n n 11. a**Required fees are attached Q No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. WWORDM3OCfflCHKLST\Bui(Hng PtancMck CkW Forni (G«nWc).doc 1ST >ND )RD D D D 12b. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST » If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. * Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand! (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) At) irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled T, and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1 +00 Install 2" service and 2. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water mwORnOOCSVCHKLSTOUUIng PtanchM* Cktt Tern Rev. 7/14/00 1ST )ND >RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. D D D 12c- Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) these irrigation 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge, if within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. AVM V1SIA VN3fl8 P A riFr*r^f nAH? r x-TTJ iW-Lj.!™* ij _^ PROPOSED is ! " PER (MP. PUN DWGi •--••- ^02/1^/2004 07;4S FAX 176043S417S CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR PARTI At SITE RELEASE PROJECT in - / LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE / GRADING PERMIT NO. <<~ 0f* A/ 0 - INCOMPLETE OR UNACCEPTABLE 1st [/ is t/ I/ t/ I/ / «j//>~ J 2nd. ^ f C T 3 - 1. Site access to requested lots adequate and logically grouped. 2. She erosion control measures adequate. 3. Overall sto adequate for health, safety and wetfare of puMc, 4. Letter from OwnerfDev. requesting partial release of specHto tote. padsofbkJg. 5. 81A"Xirsrtepten(attachrmrrt)show^ requested tote submit 6. Compaction report from soils engineer subrrttted, (If soils report has been submitted with a previous partial release, a tetter from soils engineer referencing the colls report and ktontifylng specific tots for release lots shall accompany subsequent partial releases). 7. EOW certification of work done wHh finish pad elevations of specific tote to be released. Letter must state lot (s)te graded to wtthfn a tenth (.1) of the approved grading plan. 8. Geologic engineer's tetter tf unusual geologic or subsurface conditions exist 9. Fully functional fire hydrants within 500 feet of buMIng combustibles and an all weather roads access to site is required. £» Partial release of grading for the above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building pern* issuance. Issuance of building permits is stiff subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. O Partial release of the site is denied for the following reasons: 7*65-Project Inspector bate Construction Manager Z/19/04 Dale ~ - PARCEL 2 APN FD. r LP. */ DBK INKED 15 3338* M5M7WE 140.47* FD. V4" W- W OSK WRKEDl54 PER PU 1G987 r 3 J-142-40 8,611.07 sq. ft. 12,422.67 aj. ft GROSS 9.029.86 sq. ft. NET 8.628.26 sq. ft PUBUC DRWMC EASEMENT OHHKDHEREON. N 56-2/00' E 1J8.9Z' M 55-2/00* E 200.99 PUBUC SEIKR EWEMOff CRUffbHERCDN VICINITY MAP CODE E5TAGU5HEDA CHGENERM.PIAN t EXC£B> THE GMWM PIDt 21.90. THE UM) RUI (0-4 fWEUJNG UMTS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estfrftate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. _ Address: & JL/U \ }dU<^&>< fQv. Blda. Permit No. Prepared bv: \\\ Date: //$/u / Checked bv:Ljf / / EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: S vfr^ Sq. FtAln'rts: Types of Use: Sq. Ft/Units: APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: fS\ r\ Sa. Ft./Units: Types of Use: Sq. Ft/Units: FEES REQUIRED: I^^LX \*r f f^ Date: EDU's: EDU's: ADT's: ADTs: ' / <*f 1 \ WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) . PARK-IN-LIEU FEE EE/UNIT:_ PARK AREA &#: X NO. UNITS: 'Z TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADTs/UNITS:I FEE/ADT:=$. ABRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 ' ADTs/UNITS: . FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SQ.FT.; 5. SEWER FEE EDU's: _ DIST. #2 X FEE/ADT: ZONE: / X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: DIST. #3 _<t-*_ FEE/EDU: FIT AREA: EDU's: .X FEE/EDU: 7SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_ CRES: HIGH FEE/AC: /LOW =$. =$_ =$_ =$_ =$. 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE, CONNECTION FE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.** 1of2 Rev. 7/14/DO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: S *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 2of2 F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Joe Rev. 7/14AX) 4 c a s O 0 Oc c c ill D D PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB^/^/57 2 Planner APN: Address Phone (760) 602* Type of Projects Use: Zoning- /C~/ General Plan: CFD (In/out) #_Date of participation: Net Project Density:_DU/AC Facilities Management Zone: Remaining net ctev acres:. Circle One {For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ; ) Legend: ^ Item Complete Q Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO ^ TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAURESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES NO TYPE DATE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: NO /{ Q D Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES_ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES. If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #; Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Looas needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required: (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ord NO _ May 21,1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES A NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: H:\AOMIN\eOUNTER\BWgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 [3 C3 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show:, North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). D D 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. ID ODD Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES V^ NO 2. Project complies YES X> NO ODD Zoning: 1 . Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: 2*i Accessory structure setba \FrontXx^ Interior Side: Sfijeet Side: /Hear: Structure separation: 3. Lot Coverage: 4. Height: 5. Parking: Spaces (breakdown by Residential Guest Spaces Rei Required *~ j± Shown ^ . Required ^5 ^ Required ~~ Required 1 / '& Required - — • cks: Required Required Required Required Required Shown *7 ' Shown ~; Shown ^^ ' Shown — Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown / L/Q °/^ />f) °/^ Required 7 ' Shown &u I Required — 3 0 Required ^Z^ uses for commercial and auired f -7-) t Shown *- / *7Shown *~ industrial projects required) Shown Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst / VV DATE *5 / Z *"# Y Rev 9/01 ^ 0V OVTO^^ MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (Revisions) Project: Ramirez Residence James Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for: Samuel B. Wright Wright Design 2911 State Street Carlsbad, California 92008 Project No.: 04083 Date: July 2, 2004 335 15th Street San Diego, California 92101 Tel. (619) 53\07 MIKE SURPRENANT ' SHEETNO i_ OF &ASSOCIATES CALCULATEDBY 3:<S. n^ 7/1 Consulting Structural Engineers CHECKED BY DATE. SCALE- STRUCTURAL CORRECTIONS / REVISION a CORRECTION #10 Designer to label beams as specified on the original mark-up sheet provided to designer. Girder truss over the shared bathroom is supported by the girder drag truss running north and south by a "THA" hanger, see framing plans. a CORRECTION #11 Second story bearing lines along line 8 are supported by floor beams and not TJI joist, see floor framing plans specifically floor framing @ kitchen and Family Room. a RE VISION #1 Revise shearwall along gridlines F, H & G @ second story per a new 2 ft. wider window opening @ the master bedroom. D PRODUCTM7 MIKESURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY, CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. J£ Story Shearwalls £"— W Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = '/5 prf Oridlln^FG 3 H- Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): , Lateral Load (Level Above): ShearwalWsl Length. L = 3n~ "" -2. ~ Unit Wall Shear, v = F./L = 2 > ^ plf Shearwall Tvpe: (1 f o^^*Y\ Overturning: L= 5 ft. Uplift = (~^~^ ^ X ^ ^ *^" /&/& sq. ft. 75V J Lbs — Lbs Total Load (All Levels'). F,= 7.575" Lbs 3^- ft. AL<_ cp^*H 6j /2* S/ro^TBL Okay by Inspection 2//> Lbs Holdown AnctibT Type:x v na / . 1Iffl ^ST^fo -^ o^A*/ I, Oridline Tributary Area fThis Level): Lateral Load fThis Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length. L = Unit Wall Shear, v = FJL = plf Shearwall Tvpe: ( f Overturning: L = ft. Uplift = Holdown Anchor Type: i — i Gridline Tributary Area fThis Level): Lateral Load ("This Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shear walKst Length. L = Unit Wall Shear, v = F./L = plf Shearwall Tvpe: ( f Overturnine: L = ft. Uplift^ Holdown Anchor Type: i — i sq.ft. Lbs Lbs Total Load (All Levels). F. = Lbs ft. Okay by Inspection Lbs sq.ft. Lbs Lbs Total Load (All Levels). F. = Lbs ft. Okay by Inspection Lbs PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS r Project: Ramirez Residence James Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for: Samuel B. Wright Wright Design 2911 State Street Carlsbad, California 92008 Project No.: 04083 Date: April 30,2004 335 15th Street San Diego, California 92101 Tel. (619) 531.0757* Fax. (619) 531.0758 JOB.E- 2. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO. CALCUUTED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. PROJECT SCOPE .......................................................................................... 2. DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY ........................................................................ _^5 3. DESIGN LOADS ........................................................................................... ' 4. VERTICAL ANALYSIS: — A. HORIZONTAL MEMBER DESIGN (BEAMS, HEADERS, JOISTS, ETC.) ......... _^ B. VJIRTICAL MEJ\ffiER DESIGN (COLUMNS, STUDS, ETC.) ......................... 5. LATERAL ANALYSIS: . A SEISMIC /WIND LOADS ..................................................................... _Ji B. LATERAL LOAD DISTRIBUTION .......................................................... C. LATERAL LOAD-RKISTING DESIGN: I. SHEARWALL DESIGN ............................................................... H. CANTILEVERED STEEL COLUMN ELEMENTS .............................. JH. STEJiL MOMENT FRAMES ......................................................... D. REDUNDANCY FACTOR VERIFICATION ............................................... 6. FOUNDATION DESIGN: A. CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS ................................................................... B. SPREAD FOOTINGS ........................................................................... C. RETAINING WALLS .......................................................................... D. SPECIAL SYSTEMS ........................................................................... I. GRADE BEAMS ....................................................................... H. DEEPENED PIERS .................................................................... 7. SCHEDULES ................................................................................................ A. SHEARWALL SCHEDULE ................................................................... B. HOLD DOWN SCHEDULE .................................................. - ................ C. SIMPSON STRONGW ALL SCHEDULE ................................................... D. SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE ........................................................... PfWDUCT207 JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT SHEETNO n_ OF. & ASSOCIATES CALCULATED DATE. Consulting Structural Engineers CHECKED BY DATE. SCALE PROJECT SCOPE Provide vertical & lateral load calculations for a proposed approximate 3,800 sq. ft. two-story single- family resides with a 660 sq. ft. attached garage to be constructed at James Drive Carlsbad, California 92008. Residence to be constructed utilizing primarily wood-frame construction. Roof framing to consist of pre-fabricated wood trusses to be designed by other, floor framing to be manufactured plywood "I"-joists, and the foundation system to consist of a concrete slab-on-grade with deepened perimeter footings. These calculations have been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr, Ramirez and his design consultant for the specific site listed above. Should modifications be made to the project subsequent to the preparation of these calculations, Mike Surprenant & Associates should be notified to review the modifications with respect to the recommendations/conclusions provided herein, to determine if any additional calculations and/or recommendations are necessary. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. PRODUCT 207 JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY GOVERNING CODE: CONCRETE: MASONRY: MORTAR: GROUT: REINFORCING STEEL: STRUCTURAL STEEL: WELDING: SAWN LUMBER: I-JOISTS: MICROLLAMS/ PARALLAMS/ TIMBERSTRAND GLULAMS: 2001 C.B.C. f c = 2500 PSI, NO SPECIAL INSPECTION REQ'D, (U.N.O.) ASTM C90, Fm = 1500 PSI, NO SPECIAL INSPECTION REQ'D, (U.N.O.) ASTM C270, f c = 1800 PSI, TYPE S ASTM C476, f c - 2000 PSI ASTM A615, Fy = 40 KSI FOR #3 AND SMALLER ASTM A615, Fy = 60 KSI FOR #4 AND LARGER (U.N.O.) ASTM A992, Fy = 50 KSI (ALL 4W SHAPES, ONLY) ASTM A36, Fy = 36 KSI (STRUCTURAL PLATES, ANGLES, CHANNELS) ASTM A500, GRADE B, Fy = 46 KSI (STRUCTURAL TUBES-HSS) ASTM A53, GRADE B, Fy = 35 KSI (STRUCTURAL PIPES) E70-T6-TYP. FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL E90 SERIES FOR A615 GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS DOUG FIR LARCH, ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES PER 1997 UBC. TrusJoist MacMillan - ICBO PFC-4354 (TJI & TJI/PRO MEMBERS) TrusJoist MacMillan - ICBO PFC-4354 - (LVL/PSL/LSL MEMBERS) DOUGLAS FIR OR DOUGLAS FIR/HEM GRADE 24F-V4 (SIMPLE SPANS) GRADE 24F-V8 (CANTILEVERS) son/.EXISTING NATURAL SOIL VALUES PER UBC TABLE 18-1-A SOIL CLASSIFICATION - __^__^_^ SOILS REPORT BY: DATED: ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE (CANTILEVER) ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE (RESTRAINED) PASSIVE SOIL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION PSF PCF 42- PCF PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT j/ & ASSOCIATES SHEETNO ! OF Consulting Structural Engineers CALCULATED BY DATE. CHECKED BY DATE. SCALE DESIGN LOADS CASEl CASED MATERIAL: ROOF SLOPE: 4'.!^- DEAD LOAD: ROOFING MATERIAL , fo,« PSF PSF SHEATHING 1.5 RAFTERS/C.J. (or) TRUSSES 4.0 INSULATION 1.5 DRYWALL ! 2.5 OTHER (ELEC, MECH., MISC.) 0-5 TOTAL DEAD LOAD: Z^ .0 LIVE LOAD: ^ -0 TOTAL LOAD: 3C .0 PSF .0 PSF FLOOR FLOOR MATERIAL: DEAD LOAD: FLOORING FINISH 4 .o PSF 4.* PSF LT. WEIGHT CONCRETE ( in.) — SHEATHING 2.0 2.0 JOISTS 3.5 3.5 DRYWALL 2.5 2.5 OTHER (ELEC, MECH., MISC.) 3.0 lp_ TOTAL DEAD LOAD: / 5 -0 PSF /5.0 PSF LIVE LOAD: 4-g> .0 PSF f° .0 PSF TOTAL LOAD: 55 .0 PSF J5.0 PSF EXTERIOR WALL FINISH: STUDS 1-0 PSF 1.0 PSF DRYWALL 2.5 2.5 INSULATION - - 1-5 1.5 EXTERIOR FINISH /*.0 .0 OTHER 1-0 L0_ TOTAL LOAD: /£ -0 PSF .0 PSF INTERIOR WALL STUDS 1.0 PSF DRYWALL 5.0 OTHER LQ TOTAL LOAD: 7-° PSF PRODUCT 207 JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE DATE HORIZONTAL MEMBER DESIGN LEVEL: R o o ^ / Ft-o o RE- MEMBERS: "£ &>*£. LABEL: K&~\ SPAN= ^.5> FT. H^UNIFORM LOAD D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) LJ CDS TOM LOADING (SBH DIAGRAM) nr fe%< ^f3'*''O" ^>J<2- P*-^ ..{- Pi = P, = R, =: K^»> IbS VMAX = 1 ^ ^ 5 ibs MMAX = ( 1*7^ ft-lbs USE: 4 X6 GRADE: **• C: ALT: GRADE: C: LABEL: FB-- 1 SPAN= 1 T FT. OUNIFORM LOAD D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) LJ CUS'IDM LOADING (SEt DIAGRAM) Pi = P2 = R,, - /5/ ~2- ibs VMAX = f^f 2- Ibs ^» JVlMAX s ^) ^- i ~/ It "IDS USE: 3 >^ X M ''fe GRADE: I>5 L- C: ALT: GRADE: ' C: LABEL: f^-?- SPAN= /5,5 FT. H^UNIFORM LOAD D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) LJ CUSTOM LOADING (SEH DIAGRAM) p — P, = R, - 71^ Ibs VMAX - 7 1 5 *? Ibs . ^ MMAX- 30, df^ ft-lbs USE: ~7 X 1 ' '^ GRADE: f S »- C: ' ALT: 5y*y ^V GRADE: *>S*- C:' ( / RD= 1435 IbS E - \Ueo ksi IREO-D = | ^L . in4 E = ^° oQ ksi IREO'D = / 3 3 in4 x > Rn = 7/57 Ibs E a ZOO<? ksj IREO'D = o^* in4 PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO..OF. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. LEVEL: pc«e*- MEMBERS: £E**S LABEL: Ffc- > SPAN= "2«=* FT. fi D UNIFORM LOAD , r U POINT LOAD (CENTERED) 1 ^_ A ft/ ^F \ VMAX= 05T5 lbs MMAX- / 4 2-^0 ft-Ibs USE: "7 X 11 '*%% GRADE: PS L. C: I , - * W / ALT: S-V* 1C 1 V GRADE: -?5C- C: jJ -^ :- _ ( d ffl^t LABEL: f~&-+ SPAN= 2« FT. F( D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) &t H" CUSIUM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) ! ^l~tYf ^C2-^-)^-^^0)" ^ i^-PL*~ ^ f <> ' VMAX = /* 4 7 £ lbs . MMAX- ^l<:|^o ft-lbs USE: 7X1^ GRADE: f5L C: ALT: GRADE: C: LABEL: f"k-$ SPAN= H.5 FT. D IFNIFOPMljOAD _ D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) ^u , B CUS 1 UM LOADING (SEB DIAGRAM) ' fT7* \fe*.^~ TO?1^, e / ?:^!5>KWU")ni'4*i'''"; "/;"ftJ" ^ ^^ VMAX* ^6*^2. ibs r, ..— MMAX- 2T5(^> ft-lbs USE: > /! X U '-6 GRADE: />Su C: ALT: 3ifcX 14- GRADE: J5S(_ C:r U),L s RB= ^«^T Ibs E a ioesO ksi IltEO'D = 5V T- in4 1y _o ^ , \^^Lt--* //p^T^-AJy rr^ ^z. R.= 5727 ibs E = 2oo« ksi XltEO'D as //j7 in4 tou ]' >'I ^ IKEQ'D =: 57 © in4 PROOUCTZ07 MIKESURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers .inn *" \*"-*t^ SMPPT NO nAlfllllATPnHY r-HfCKED BY STAIP FIATF LEVEL: Fi-&<* P- MEMBERS: T^e*^ M> LABEL: F^-^ SPAN= /I FT. (c^T-^lf^ ) ?1 * D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) d^ IhT CUSTOM LOADING (SKK DIAGRAM) .1w (l}( JC 0 j ~ / 44 ^*- ^ . i-i-^ x Wz = /,fe V*3£.«}~l ty>~\~f1&L-b> tfwl* /O VMAX= ^2.06 Ibs MMAX= f 3^ w^ ft-lbs USE: 7 X14~ GRADE: P^t- C: j -1:" y» ALT: GRADE: C: an|M- -vr - F^^ LABEL: FF"! SPAN= /^i5 FT. a UNIFORM LOAD D POINT.LOAD (CENTERED) y- CUS'IUM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) W 'W,- <» ( , P7 = R. - 3"Vcx=» Ibs VMAX = 37 °° Ibs T MMAX= ^J"7Jifio ft-lbs USE: ~7 X 1*'^ GRADE: fS^ C: ALT: 5 >*»- V \ T GRADE: ?S<- C:— i — i i . 1 LABEL: ^3-0 SPAN= H.5 FT. P D UNIFORM LOAD D _ POINT LOAD (CENTERED) |*f CUITIOM LOADING (SHH DIAGRAM) p = 2*if°^-^ ''^ P7 3 R, = ?>' 3^_ ibs VMAX = 1~l((o Ibs MMAX- 2.3 &X ft-lbs USE: "7 X M '-fe GRADE: ^5 U C: ALT: 5Xf Jf \ V GRADE: '^Sc C: ' PL ,r fi. RD= 4^54 ibs E = /£<*& ksi IRBO'D = /2O@ m4 . »^ ~ *? 3 O f *^S "^ I » '•• • ' / 1 X RD= 21 0T- Ibs E = 2ooO ksi IBEO-D =74? in4 1 1 * (*J^ • \ >1 /' ^i 2i* R.= 47/^» Ibs E = 2oo C? ksi laEO'D = ©<3£ in4 D PBOOUCTZ07 MIKE SURPRENANT Consulting Structural Engineers SHFPTNO A CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. LEVEL: Fl**o £- MEMBERS: LABEL: F/^-2_ SPAN= /fr.^ FT. LJ UN1HJRM LOAD D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) \+->\ iy- CUS1UM LOADING (Sbb DIAGRAM) """" P7 = R,,^ 562.0 ibs VMAX = u» 5 5 <L lbs . MMAX- 3l5c3<=> ft.ibs USE: ^ V^-X" IT GRADE: ?>*- C: ALT: GRADE: ' C: LABEL: F7*'f SPAN= "7 FT. ?| D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) UJ" L'US'lUM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) ' 1 / ^ )/"«5^ 1 fa)(lt *) ~ ^^0f>£-fS= P, = R,= T^^t? lbs VMAX* f<S>?6> lbs . MMAX= SH& ft-lbs USE: 3/^XU-»fe GRADE: ^^ C: ALT: GRADE: C: LABEL: SPAN= FT. D UNIFORM LOAD D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) LJ CUSTOM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) W2 =Pi = P?I = R, = lbs VMAX = lbs MMAX=* ft-lbs USE: GRADE: C: ALT: GRADE: C: fr. r UJl. r S "" S Rft= 655 "2- lbs E = Zo*0 ksi IREO'D = *7?7 in* i*-'/ R»= 20 f0 lbs E = 2.^0° ksi IREO'D = 7^* in4 x R»= lbs E = ksi IREO'D = in4 PRODUCT 207 «' r Business TJ-Beam(TM) 6.10 Serial Number 7003005810 FLOOR JOIST (FJ-1) 11 7/8"TJI®360@16"o/c THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED 20' Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Joist Member. Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 40.0 Live at 100 % duration, 15.0 Dead SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Live/Dead/UplinVTotal 3.50" 2.25" 533120010 / 733 3.50" 2.25" 533120010 i 733 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" x 11 7/8" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" x 11 7/8" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board DESIGN CONTROLS: Shear (Ibs) Vertical Reaction (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Load Defl (in) Total Load Defl (in) TJPro Maximum 718 718 3515 Design -712 718 3515 0.402 0.553 34 Control 1705 1202 6180 0.490 0.979 30 Control Passed (42%) Passed (60%) Passed (57%) Passed (L/584) Passed (L/425) Passed Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading Bearing 2 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading Span 1 -Deflection Criteria: STAr4DARD(LL:L/480,TL:U240). -Deflection analysis is based on composite action with single layer of 19/32" Panels (20" Span Rating) GLUED & NAILED wood decking. -Bractng(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2' 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate, -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code UBC analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Copyright O 2003 by Trua Joist, a Weyerhaeuser Business TJI® and TJ-BearoB are registered trademarks of Trus Joist. e-I Joist*",Pro™ and TJ-Pro1" are trademarks of Trus Joist. OPERATOR INFORMATION: JUAN GARCIA MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES 335 15th STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 Phone:(619)531-0757 Fax : (619) 531-0758 JUAN@MSAENG.COM -53 FLOOR JOIST (FJ-2) TJ-Beam(TM) 6.10 Serial Number 76b3605810S 11 7/8 TJI® 230 @ 16 O/C THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED 19' Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Joist Member. Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 40.0 Live at 100 % duration, 15.0 Dead SUPPORTS: Input Bearing Vertical Reactions Ply Depth Nailing Detail Width Length (Ibs) Depth Live/Dead/Uplift/Total 1 Timberstrand 5.25" Hanger 513/192/0/705 N/A N/A N/A H1: Top LSL Beam Mount Hanger 2 Stud wall 3.50" 2.25" 501 /188 / 0 / 688 N/A N/A N/A A3: Rim Board -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): H1: Top Mount Hanger,A3: Rim Board HANGERS: No Manufacturer Selected Support Model Other None 1 Ply1 1/4" x 11 7/8"0.8ETJ- Strand Rim Board® 1 Slope Skew Reverse Top Flange Top Flange Support Wood Flanges Offset Slope Species H1: Top Mount Hanger NONE FOUND 0/12 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A DESIGN CONTROLS: Shear (Ibs) Vertical Reaction (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Load Deft (in) Total Load Defl (in) TJPro Maximum 673 673 3088 Design 673 673 3088 0.398 0.548 31 Control 1655 1157 4015 0.459 0.918 30 Control Passed (41%) Passed (58%) Passed (77%) Passed (L/553) Passed (L/402) Passed Location Lt. end Span 1 under Floor loading Bearing 2 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading Span 1 -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480.TL:U240). -Deflection analysis is based on composite action with single layer of 19/32" Panels (20" Span Rating) GLUED & NAILED wood decking. -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2' 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. PROJECT INFORMATION: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE OPERATOR INFORMATION: JUAN GARCIA MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES 335 15th STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 Phone:(619)531-0757 Fax : (619) 531-0758 JUAN@MSAENG.COM Copyright ® 2003 by Trus Joist, a Weyerhaeuser Business TJI®,TJ-Beam» and TimberStrand® are registered trademarks of Trus Joist. e-I Joist*", Pro*" and TJ-Pro"1 are trademarks of Trus Joist. F:\ProjectsSFoldors\01-Misc\Wriqht Design\Ramirez-04083\FJ-2.sm3 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE ll OF DATE. DATE. LATERAL ANALYSIS / DESIGN (SEISMIC / WIND LOADS) AREA: Seismic: V * (2.5 C. I/ R) W. - (Governs) 1.4 (ASD) Seismic Zone V Z = O. fr Soil Profile = Sb N,= I • <? C> .4* I =1.0 (Standard Occupancy) R _ 4-. ^— T I * Wt = Total Seismic Dead Load BASE SHEAR: V = . II 5 W. (ASD Load) (Assume p = 1.0, Verification to Follow) Wind: P = C«Cqq,I Method Exposure h™, =ft Basic Wind Speed , UBC Table 16-G , UBC Table 16-H psf mph Iw = 1.0 (Non-Essentiat Facility) P = C.C,a.I= /1,4 nsf ROOF WEIGHT: Diaphragm =4-t1 Exterior Wall Weight =(l°lo' ) f Sj Interior Wall Weight = (l°0> ) ( /i) ( 7>° ) =, O o 0 Total Weight (Tributary to Diaphragm) = FLOOR WEIGHT: Diaphragm = Exterior Wall Weight = Interior Wall Weight = . (/I *')f'% (/S0 '}('%-)(l>*) f 7, P°° " Total Weight (Tributary to Diaphragm) = FLOOR WEIGHT: Diaphragm = Exterior Wall Weight = Interior Wall Weight = . Total Weight (Tributary to Diaphragm) = TOTAL DEAD LOAD, Wt = BASE SHEAR, V = 0.H5 Wt = UNIT SHEAR, v = V / Area (Applies to single level structures only) = .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS .LBS PSF PfWOUCT207 <i^^^ MIKE SURPRENANT ,_, .,, 4t^ X "7§ " t ff/^-r-T t^™-^ SWPPTNCV let- r* £>O JP^- DIAPHRAGM LEVEL ROOF 2JH.FLOOR FLOOR 2 OL /TJiJVyVjl/llliO nsultinu Structural Eneineers nAi n a ATFH RY RATP HHPnUFH BY nATC ST.AI P LATERAL LOAD DISTRIBUTION Fm= wxhx(V) (k) (ft") (k-ft) Swih, (Ibs)' ' (ft2) * (ps'f) ^/."^ O / *^* ,b\ /^/ZIO 2ot*> 7. 5 g>l."> H ^1f / 31 7,725 25^9 3. g> •HH0 2.30Z- 1.00 v= z^/^35 ibs ISHEARWALL DESIGN LATERAL LOADS) WIND LOAD = PRESSURE (P) K PROJECTED VERTICAL HEIGHT (h) SEISMIC LOAD = STORY SHEAR (vj x DIAPHRAGM DEPTH (d) ROOF DIAPHRAGM A= Z***^ (ft2) N-S: WIND: SEISMIC: E-W: WIND: SEISMIC: P //' & (psflx /»»5 (ft) = /24" (plf) vx 7.5 (psflx -f^ (ft) = 336? (plf) .5£)>niC~ GOVERNS p //.ft (psfix /0.5 (ft) = y2-t~ (pif) VTI 7,5 (psflx 4^ (ft) = ^o^(plf) Sa 5 MIC_ GOVERNS LEVEL DIAPHRAGM: A= 2S&^ (ft2) N-S: WIND: SEISMIC: E-W: WIND: " SEISMIC: P //'* fpsflx /« (ft) = //^ (plf) v, 3,-S (psflx f? (ft) = HI (plf) St)^"'^ GOVERNS P //. $ f psflx /* (ft) = //^ (plf) Vj[ 3,d (psflx 42- (ft) = /£<? fpif) 5<^?5^l^ GOVERNS LEVEL DIAPHRAGM: A = (ft2) N-S: WIND: SEISMIC: E-W: WIND: SEISMIC: P (psfl x fft^ = (plf) vs (psf) x (ft) = (plf) GOVERNS P (psfl x (ft) = (plf) v. (osfl x (ft) = folfl GOVERNS MIKE SURPRENANT Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF. nATP ^ Story Shearwalls Gridline ^ Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): _ Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L = Shearwall Type: Overturning: L = Uplift = SHEARWALL DESIGN f"l~^ Direction Unit Lateral Load, v =Dsf Total Load (All Levels), Fs = ft. Lbs — Lbs /V^Lbs /f7 Plf ft.. Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type: i—i Gridline t Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): _ Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = Shearwall Type: Overturning: L = Uplift = Total Load (All Levels), F* =&> ft. /QS^ Lbs — Lbs 10 5° Lbs plf ft.Okay by Inspection Holdown Anchor Type: Oridline & Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): _ Lateral Load (Level Above): Lbs /7fr f T"?/f sq.ft. Lbs — Lbs Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L = Shearwall Type: Overturning: Uplift = Q Total Load (All Levels), Fx =n a.& 5 5 Lbs Pif ft. Ff7,o) pkay byjnspectionn/2.- •Holdown Anchor Type: PKXXKTZ07 MIKESURPRJENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers OF. OHFCKFD RY ^, Story Shearwalls Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = "7.5 psf Gridune__^ Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): __ Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = F^/L = Shearwall Type: sq.ft. 5-32.0 Lbs Total Load (All Levels), Fs = ft. plf Overturning:. L = //* Uplift = _f ft.Okay by Inspection 3575 Holdown Anchor Type: Gridline " Tributary Area (This Level):. Lateral Load (This Level): _ Lateral Load (Level Above):. Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = FA = Shearwall Type: \l_f f/Of ('suro- A3f- Dlf Total Load (All Levels), Fx = /O ft. Overturning: L = Uplift = ft.. Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type: Gridline Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): _ Lateral Load (Level Above): i — i Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = F,/L = Total Load (All Levels), Fx= ft. plf Shearwall Type: <3 Overturning: L = Uplift = ft.Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type:i — i — Lbs Lbs .sq.ft. .Lbs Lbs .sq.ft. .Lbs .Lbs Lbs PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers .inn BHFFTMT)OF. CALAMI Aim HY DATE. RfiAIF -?*J>C Story Shearwalls Gridline /" Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L =± Unit Wall Shear, v = F^/L = Shearwall Type: \2.f Overturning: L = Uplift^ fe/ frH Holdown Anchor Type: C S <l *!•Gririllne f / <3 f *l " Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L = Unit Wall Shear, v = F,/L = Shearwall Type: (^ f Overturning: L = Uplift= f2.Z\ Jf Holdown Anchor Type: Gridline Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L = Unit Wall Shear, v = FA = Shearwall Type: ( f Overturnine: L = Uplift = Holdown Anchor Type: €"- t«/ Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = 7 , > v psf (4. 4 / \/~ i \ffA)(to)- 6&o M-(L (» &0o Lbs Lbs Total Load f All Levels). F, = ££o ° Lbs 2.1 ft. 3/1- plf 4 1*7 ft. Okav bv Inspection** \-»- Pifi?6! iu™ 1 t& f-\ Lbs E r>5Ttft> ^fl^t*) r^^lO^)-- /<=>/<? SQ>ft. 75/S Lbs — Lbs Total Load f All Levels). F. = 7 5/ 5 Lbs ^4- ft. Z£) plf 5 ft. Okav bv Inspection ^ }" /'P&J Lbs 0 ^Tt fo sq.ft. Lbs Lbs Total Load f All Levels). F,= Lbs ft. plf ft. Okay by Inspection Lbs D PRODUCT 207 ^ 0* tQJaxSJP MIKE SURPRENANT ./ *u-a TV^I^ Jt A t W""T ATI7C RHPFTMO l(f> OP *-'•' r**! N^STV Consulting Structural Engineers nAtcuuiTEn RY n*re CHECKED BV naTP snAiP 1 Storv Shearwalls NJ- > Direction Unit Lateral Load* v = * ' Gridline J_ / . -x^ \ Tributary Area fThis Level): L /*- A 1 *• J ~ ^ / 2 Ct» Lateral Load fThis Level): 97? Lateral Load (Level Above): ' 3 "^c Total Load CA11 Levels'). F, = / 7 IT Shearwall(s) Length. L . = T ft. Unit Wall Shear, v = F./L = /-So Dtf Shearwall Type: <J^ S UJZ t X \o 5/ M ^So -O S?to^ C, U>^tLS Overturning: L = ft. Okav bv Inspection Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type: r^t )r\ &&— W ^**J \J r^ Gridline ^ / * v ^ Tributary Area (This Level): V2A.)(l2' Ju^M ^fi~l ) t^ ^(1 ) tfl^&^/f JX)/^7 ~ ^3& Lateral Load (This Level) : . 3 / 5^7 Lateral Load (Level Above): ^/OS^ ;f 3^i7 ) + f6fl>5> tf '"^7 ) - Sf^5-i Total Load (All Levels). F, = ~7; 4- 1 0 ShearwaH(s) Length. L = ft. f^oL ~ 7;4/O X$?> yJ_ = 7^7^ ^^ 0 Unit Wall Shear, v = F^/L = plf 2,2. *"' ^k Art j- l,t(.Xt°Jfl2- - / 39 Shearwall Type: < /§ / «o Overturning: L= ft: Okav by Inspection " M Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type: r^ Gridline 1 / *n / \ / 3 i Tributary Area (ThisLevel): V /S- )( H )"/" ( -^_ / lo ") ~ fi34 Lateral Load (This Level): , ' . . ' 3 i ^1 Lateral Load (Level Above): ( £»&5> Y 1/^7 )t ('*'?&> )(ll/io )- 5"517 Total Load (All Levels). F, = #7& fo Shearwall(s) Length. L Z-^ ft. Unit Wall Shear, v = F./L = 35 I plf Shearwall Type: (3^ Overturning: L = • ft. Okay by Inspection Uplift= (?5»Kio)fc .35/0 Lbs Holdown Anchor Type: rp-i ^^ Ufe3 psf sq.ft. Lbs Lbs Lbs sq.ft. Lbs Lbs Lbs t-Crtj ^(^ sq.ft. Lbs Lbs Lbs D PROOUCT207 •Ol&m^r* MIKESURPRENANT irVl & ASSOCIATES r*i yg=kx Consulting Structural Engineers •sg., . • IT V I 15 ' CStorr Shearwalls f*J - > Gridline y /j ^ » /• > Tributary Area (This Level): V, 7*- /V Lateral Load fThis Level): Lateral Load ( Level Above): ( 5 5 2-° ] Shearwall(s) Length. L = Unit Wall Shear, v = F^/L ~ plf Shearwall Tvpe: \/P Overturning: L = ft. Uplift = Holdown Anchor Type: rj* Gridline /O , Tributary Area (This Level): ^"^X * ) Lateral Load fThis Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): SheanvallCsl Length. L = Unit Wall Shear, v = FJL = 45? plf Shearwall Tvpe: ( 1 i Overturning: L = ft. Uplift = Holdown Anchor Type: i — i Gridline Tributary Area fThis Level): Lateral Load fThis Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L = Unit Wall Shear, v = F^L = plf Shearwall Type: ( f Overturning: L = ft. Uolift = Holdown Anchor Type: i — i OHFFT MO (• I nF nAIRIIIATPnBY nATF nHFr.KFn nv HATF SHALE Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = ?*& ) *" 4^°17 1® (V/z* ) — 22-o€> Total Load (All Levels'). F. = 31 5 1> ft- Fc ~ *3-^5Ce *4-^ K\~ * 0^6 L Okay by Inspection ^^ » h4T"-° °T Lbs - So 3o4• — Total Load (All Levels'). F. = 3 o V ft. ...K^Okay by Inspection Lbs Total Load f All Levels). F,= ft. Okay by Inspection Lbs psf sq. ft. Lbs Lbs Lbs 5> besiCitJ Lbs Lbs Lbs sq. ft. Lbs Lbs Lbs PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers .inn SHFFT MO TO OF.•S3 DATE. DATE. STAIP __ / Storv Shearwalls Gridline *» Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L = Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L = Shearwall Type: (+f Overturning: L = Uplift = (^3 C Y Holdown Anchor Type: Gridline B Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load fThis Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L = Unit Wall Shear, v ~ Fx/L = Shearwall Type: \\ f Overturning: L = Uplift = Holdown Anchor Type: Oridline ^ Tributary Area (This Level): Lateral Load (This Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwall(s) Length, L = Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L = Shearwall Type: (\_J Overturning: L * Uolift = Holdown Anchor Type: c~ w Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = 3 , &> pgf ^VDOOrOK^J^XXi)- **l /7/f Lbs 6to<3 Lbs Total Load (All Levels). F, = &3/3~ Lbs /^'5 ft. "5^C» pif 5-5 ft. Okay by Inspection »« )- 53 1« Lbs 0 ^*b (*//a-)f'io)= -zoo sa.ft. 7t>« Lbs """• Lbs Total Load f All Levels). F, = ~7^° Lbs f<* ft.*e oif ft. •|XOkay by Inspection Lbs D [ ' /? l{'°/i \'t< Y ft ) = /£* •> ^\ *- (^ . / ' V XiA. ^ ) /" *- sq.ft. C t 7. Lbs — Lbs Total Load f All Levels). F. = 6 9 ^- Lbs 7.5 ft. 73 plf ft. r Okay by Inspection Lbs D PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. / Storv Shearwalls F-** Gridline £> t Tributary Area (This Level): I TVL ) Lateral Load fThis Level): Lateral Load (Level Above): Shearwallfs) Length. L = Unit Wall Shear, v = FJL = ^ f~ plf Shearwall Tvpe: (\J • Overturning: L = ft. Uplift = Holdown Anchor Type: I — I Cridlme rF / - Tributarv Area fThis Level): IT ^2- A '* ) Lateral Load fThis Level) : Lateral Load fLevel Above}: (>'2-*//l_A Shearwallfs) Length. L = Unit Wall Shear, v = F,/L = ^ 2^? plf Shearwall Type: \^j Overturning,: L= & ft. Uplift = ( f^C» Y /o > - ,1 Cf/«X7 Holdown Anchor Type: rpn Gridline H~ , Tributary Area (This Level): ( ^T**- Lateral Load (This Level): Lateral Load fLevel Above): Shearwallfsl Length. L = Unit Wall Shear, v = F^L = 2. 5 2- plf Shearwall Type: \2.f Overturning: L = C? ft. Uplift= (2-5 ^Y lo)^ Holdown Anchor Type: rTTj Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = 5 > & psf f2-"*- > ~ S^^> sq.ft. /?23 Lbs — Lbs Total Load ( All Levels). F, = /?2-3 Lbs ?^,5 ft. _J^TOkay by Inspection Lbs 4-f/%)fA\ -l-fZQS-* }f->t*\l~fe'34 Vft^ //^ ^r\' ^i-A & ) r^^^X io 7r ' /2-/( °y 66^3 sq.ft. 2 Soft Lbs /\ * ' -^ t f ** ^•* i_<DS Total Load f All Levels). F.= 34o6> Lbs & ft. Okay by Inspection )ttV*.if/5.oJII f ~ 33C?o Lbs >^ ^56N^ 2 2^7" Lbs V5/^ Lbs Total Load f All Levels). F^ = ^T/^ Lbs30,^ ft. Okay by Inspection .2? 2* Lbs ^ PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES 33515th STREET SAM DIEGO, CA 92101 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Dsgnr JG Description : Scope: Job #04083 Date: 12:25PM, 27 APR 04 Rev: 560100User KW-0603057. Ver 5.6.1, 25-Oct-2002(c)1983-2002 ENERCALC Engineering Software Steel Column Page 1 f:\projects\folders\Q1 -mistflwright designtam Description STEEL COLUMNS a LINE 5 General Information Calculations are designed to AISC 9th Edition ASD and 1997 UBC Requirements \ Steel Section TS14X4X1/4 Fy . 46.00 ksi X-XSidesway: Sway Allowed Duration Factor 1 .330 Y-Y Sidesway : Sway Allowed Column Height 10.000 ft Elastic Modulus 29,000.00 ksi End Fixity Fix-Free X-X Unbraced 10.000 ft Kxx 2.100 Live & Short Term Loads Combined Y-Y Unbraced 10.000 ft Kyy 2.100 Loads Axial Load... Dead Load Live Load Short Term Load 1 -70 k Ecc. for X-X Axis Moments 1 -80 k ECC. for Y-Y Axis Moments k 1 0.000 in 0.000 in Point lateral Loads... Along Y-Y (strong axis moments) Along X-X (y moments } DL LL 7.578 k k 1 Summary 1 Section :TS14X4X1/4, Height = 10.00ft Unbraced Lengths: X-X = 10.00ft, Y-Y Combined Stress Ratios AISC Formula H1 - 1 AISC Formula H1 - 2 AISC Formula H1 - 3 Axial Loads: DL = 1.70, LL = = 10.00ft Dead Live 0.0280 0.0297 Column Design 1.80. ST= 0.00k, Ecc. = O.OOOin DL + LL DL + ST + (LL if Chosen* 0.0577 0.9609 OK XX Axis: Fa calc'd per Eg. E2-2. K*Ur > Cc YY Axis : Fa calc'd per Eq. E2-2, K*Ur > Cc YY Axis : Aoodx B. Tube. In-Plane Slenderness Recalculated Stresses \ Allowable & Actual Stresses Fa : Allowable fa : Actual Fb:xx: Allow [F3.1] fb : xx Actual Fb:yy: Allow [F3.11 fb : yy Actual Dead 7.06 ksi 0.20 ksi - 27.60 ksi 0.00 ksi 30.36 ksi 0.00 ksi Live DL + LL DL + Short 7.06 ksi 0.21 ksi 27.60 ksi 0.00 ksi 30.36 ksi 0.00 ksi 7.06 ksi 9.39 0.41 ksi 0.41 27.60 ksi 36.71 0.00 ksi 33.68 30.36 ksi 40.38 0.00 ksi 0.00 ksi ksi ksi ksi ksi ksi Analysis Values \ F'ex : DL+LL F'ey : DL+LL F'ex : DL+LL+ST F'ey : DL+LL+ST Max X-X Axis Deflection 51,739 psi Cm:x 7,063 psi Cm:y 68,813 psi Cm:x 9,394 psi Cm:y -0.796 in at 10.000ft DL+LL "* 0.85 DL+LL 0.85 DL+LL+ST 0.85 DL+LL+ST 0.85 Max Y-Y Axis Deflection Cb:x DL+LL Cb:y DL+LL Cb:x DL+LL+ST Cb:y DL+LL+ST O.OOOin at 0 1.75 1.75 1.00 1.75 000ft MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES 33$ 15th STREET SAM DIEGO, CA 92101 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Dsgnr JG Description: Scope: Job #04083 Date: 12:25PM, 27 APR 04 Rav: 560100User KW-0603057, V«r 5.6.1, 25-Oct-2002(c)1983-2002 ENERCALC Engineering Software Steel Column Page 2 f:\pfoj«cts\folders\01~misc\wright designVam Description STEEL COLUMNS a LINE 5 Section Properties TS14X4X1/4 Depth Width Thickness 14.00 in 4.000 in 0.250 in Weight Area 29.18#ffi 8.59 in2 l-xx l-yy S-xx S-yy r-xx r-yy 189.00 in4 25.80 in4 27.000 in3 12.900 in3 4.691 in 1.733 in Sketch & Diagram Aw* Dl-1.7k AxiiH.L-1.8K AialST-Ok (3): X-X AH* Point Load: DC-O, LLHta, ST-7.5TBH Q 10ft MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES 335 15th STREET SAM DIEGO, CA 92101 Title : RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Dsgnn JG Description : Scope: Job #04083 Date: 12:25PM, 27 APR 04 Rev: 560100 User KW-0603057. VBT 5.6.1,25-Oc(-2002 (0)1983-2002 ENERCALC Engineering Software Steel Column Page 1 f:\projsds\folder3\01~mi9C\wTigMdesigri\ram Description STEEL COLUMNS @ LINE 9 General Information Steel Section TS1 2X4X1/4 Column Height 10.000ft End Fixity Fix-Free Live & Short Term Loads Combined Loads Axial Load... Dead Load 1 .00 k Live Load 1.50k Short Term Load k Point lateral Loads... Along Y-Y (strong axis moments) Along X-X ( y moments ) Calculations are designed to AISC 9th Edition ASD and 1997 UBC Requirements 1 Fy . 46.00 ksi Duration Factor 1.330 Elastic Modulus 29,000.00 ksi X-X Unbraced 10.000ft Y-Y Unbraced 10.000ft Ecc. for X-X Axis Moments Ecc. for Y-Y Axis Moments DL LL ST 4.046 X-X Sidesway : Sway Allowed Y-Y Sidesway : Sway Allowed Kxx 2.100 Kyy 2.100 l 0.000 in 0.000 in Height k 10.000 ft k ft 1 Summary • Section :TS12X4X1/4, Height =10.00ft, Axial Loads: DL = Column Design 1.00, LL= 1.50, ST= 0.00k, Ecc. = O.OOOin OK Unbraced Lengths: X-X = 10.00ft, Y-Y = 10.00ft Combined Stress Ratios AISC Formula H1 - 1 AISC Formula H1-2 AISC Formula H1 - 3 Dead.^ 0.0191 Live DL + LL DL + ST + f LL if Chosen} 0.0286 0.0477 0.6607 XX Axis: Fa calc'd per Eg. E2-2, K*Ur > Cc YY Axis : Fa calc'd per Eq. E2-2, K'Ur > Cc YY Axis: Appdx B. Tube. In-Plane Slenderness Recalculated Stresses | Allowable & Actual Stresses Fa : Allowable fa : Actual Fb:xx: Allow [F3.1] fb : xx Actual Fb:yy: Allow [F3.1] fb : yy Actual Analysis Values Pex : DL+LL F'ey : DL+LL Pex : DL+LL+ST Fey : DL+LL+ST Max X-X Axis Deflection Dead 6.91 ksi 0.13 ksi 27.60 ksi 0.00 ksi 30.36 ksi 0.00 ksi 39,347 psi Cm:x 6,909 psi Cm:y 52,332 psi Cm:x 9,189 psi Cm:y Live DL + LL DL + Short 6.91 ksi 0.20 ksi 27.60 ksi 0.00 ksi 30.36 ksi 0.00 ksi DL+LL 0.85 DL+LL 0.85 DL+LL+ST 0.85 DL+LL+ST 0.85 -0.633 in at 10.000ft Max Y-Y Axis Deflection 6.91 ksi 0.33 ksi 27.60 ksi 0.00 ksi 30.36 ksi 0.00 ksi Cb:x DL+LL Cb:y DL+LL Cb:x DL+LL+ST Cb:y DL+LL+ST O.OOOin at 9.19 ksi 0.33 ksi 36.71 ksi 22.94 ksi 40.38 ksi 0.00 ksi i 1.75 1.75 1.00 1.75 0.000 ft •35 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES 335 15th STREET SAM DIEGO, CA 92101 Title: RAMIREZ RESIDENCE Dsgnr JG Description: Scope: Job # 04083 Date: 12:25PM, 27 APR 04 Rev: 560100 User: KW-0603057. Ver 5.8.1, 25-Oct-2002 (c) 1983-2002 ENERCALC Engineering Software Steel Column Page 2 f:\projectstfolders\01-misc\wright desjgn\ram Description STEEL COLUMNS @ LINE 9 Section Properties TS12X4X1/4 Depth Width Thickness 12.00 in Weight 4.000 in Area 0.250 in . 25.78 #/fl l-xx 7.59in2 l-yy S-xx S-yy r-xx r-yy 1 27.00 in4 22.30 in4 21.167in3 11.150in3 4.091 in 1.714 in Sketch & Diagram An* DL - 1kAMlLL>l.Sk * I*)1 <3):X-XAri*PofmLOMhDL»Q,LL»0>,$TM.M« Q10fl JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO.OF. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. REDUNDANCY FACTOR CALCULATION (UBC 1630.1.1) FLEXIBLE DIAPHRAGM WITH WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEARWALLS Vmax = @^ T Lbs (Total lateral load at Gridline "_LL_") lw = I *? >5 ft (Total Sum of Lengths of Shearwalls at Gridline) Lbs (Story Shear) AB =.sq.ft. (Ground Floor Area of Structure) CALCULATIONS: rmax ~ rmax = p = 2-20 max 1.0 OKAY MIKE SURPRENANT Consulting Structural Engineers CAI ™ n ATFH BY DATE. DATE. SCALE FOUNDATION DESIGN ALLOWABLE APPLIED LOADS Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure (ASBP) =psf (Per Design Criteria) CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS |wr MARK: CF-1 Ftg. Width (b) = //Z3 ft. = ASBP (b) Depth of Ftg. (h) = // ^ ft. pif USE:" WIDE x /6 " DEEP. WITH 2- # 4 TOP & BOTTOM MARK: CF-2 ft. Depth of Ftg. (h) =ft. W*.,««, = ASBPnrt = USE: " WIDE x WMAV @ Gridline = WMAX @ Gridline = WMAX @ Gridline = WMAX @ Gridline = " DEEP. WITH plf plf plf plf . plf # USE USE USE USE TOP & BOTTOM : CF- : CF- : CF- : CF^ MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE, DATE. CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS - MAX POST LOADS MARK: CF-1 PMAX - ASBP(b)(2h) = 2h (ft.) h (ft.) LBS. MARK: CF-2 PMAX = ASBP(b)(2h) =_LBS. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY, CHECKED BY SCALE OF__ DATE. SPREAD FOOTINGS - MAX. ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATED LOADS MAX MARKrP-1 bfft.1 PMAX = ASBP (b)2 = \~SQQXZ -LBS. h(ft.) USE: 24" SQUARE x 11" DEEP WTIH (2) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK:P-2 PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =LBS USE: 30" SQUARE x 16» '* DEEP WTTH (3) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK: PMAX =ASBP LBS. USE: 36" SQUARE x / 6 " DEEP WITH (4) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK:P-4 PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =LBS. USE: 42M SQUARE x /6 " DEEP WTTH (5) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM =ASBP(b)2 = USE: 48" SQUARE x / 0 " DEEP WITH (6) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM JOB.W0&5 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers OF. DATE. CONCRETE BEAM REINFORCEMENT INPUT PARAMETERS b = h = d = OTM = 15 in. 18 in. 15 in. GRADE BEAM @ STL. FLAGPOLES 4> = 0.9 f; = 60 ksi f, = 2.5 ksi 37.1 k-ft (UNFACTORED) CALCULATED OUTPUT Mu= 1.4OTM = Muxl2 = a= 0.875 (trial) Mu = ASREQ-D* AspRov = 51.94 k-ft 0.879 in2 0.884 in2 a=1.664 in. 0.85 fcb jd = d-a/2 AS w/ revised jd jd- 0.945 d AsRE{yD= 0.815 in2 AsPROv= 0.884 in2 Pmin= 0.0033 Pmin ~ 200 pprov= 0.0042432 OK (2) #6 T & B (2) #6 T & B OK Use:2 - #6 OK As = .884 in2 D PROOUCTZ07 JOB MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES SHEETNO fltj— OF- Consulting Structural Engineers CALCULATED BY DATE. CHECKED BY DATE. SCALE SCHEDULES "ig^yiip MIKE SURPRENANT HIT VI & ASSOCIATES ^r^n _.__\j£gL.L_ Consulting Structural EngineersTT, . • F \ _JT~ SHPBT MO HALrill ATPHRY rni:r.kcn BV 5W^A1F ^^ HATE H4TP aEuCO ffiC/3 ae. © 1 ® ® 'si *Q ll ©©©©© ©© ©®©©© DCWU trr -vn MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE jO_ OF. DATE. DATE. HOLD-DOWN SCHEDULE B 4x POST W/ MSTC40 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W MSTC52 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W/ MSTC66 FLR-To-FLR HaD-DOWN 4x POST W/ MSTC75 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN Ax POST W/ O1STI4 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN (34' END LENGTH * (74) Ifcd TO EA. POST) 4x POST W/ CMST12 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN (45" END LENGTH * (100; 16d TO EA. POST; 4x POST W/ STMDft HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W STUDIO HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W/ STMDI4 HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W/ PHD2 ON SSTBlfc A3. 4x POST W PHD5 ON SSTB24 A.B. 4x POST W/ PHD6 ON SSTB28 A.B. 4x POST W/ PHD8 ON SSTB28 A.B. 4X.POST W/ HDftA ON SSTB2B A.B. 4x POST W/ HDIOA ON SSTB28 A.B. 4x POST W/ HDI4A ON SSTB34 A.B. NOTES: 0 HOLD DOWN ANCHORS MUST BE TIED IN PLACE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION. 2; DEEPEN FOOTINGS TO PROVIDE 31 fllN. CONCRETE COVER WHERE HOLD DOWN ANCHORS ARE LONGER THAN THE FTG DEPTH, 3) USE (Rj; OPTION ON STHD HOLD-DOWNS FOR RAISED WOOD SUB-FLOOR CONDITION. REV. JAN. 2001 PRODUCT 207 JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE-. DATE. DATE. SIMPSON STRONGWALL REV. SEP. 2002 A SUflfex1-4HD SU122x6-4 SUC2x8-6 <£>911)24x9 UJ SU124xl2xfc J 60118x0 R SlU32x9 X 5(152x12x6 < 6UJ24x8 S SUM8x9 T 9UI48x!2x6 H SUJ22x1-4 6032x8 SUJ24x!0 M 60148x8 SUD2xl0 SIMPSON STRONSUJALL FOOTNOTES: 'APPLY TO ALU © ICB0*FFC-&486 © FOR 5INQLE POOR APPLICATIONS, USE 9STB28 HOLDOUN ANCHOR BOLTS AND 5/8' x t2( OflUJ MLDSIU. ANCHORS. © FOR TWO-FOUR APPLICATIONS, USE SSTB34 HOLDOUN ANCHOR BOLTS AhD 5/B1 x 16'fMNJ MUDSILL ANCHORS. © PLACE ALL ANCHORS USN3 A STROH3UIALL TEMPLATE APPROPRIATE FOR THE APPLICATION AND LENGTH OF WALL FOR EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS, USE -SW TYPE TEMPLATES FOR INTERIOR APPLICATIONS, USE 19tfTI1 TYPE TEMPLATES FOR PANEL FORM APPLICATIONS, USE 'SlinpF TYPE TEMPLATES ® USE ALL PROVIDED HARDUMR5 FOR ANCHORAQE TO FOUNDATION. ® USE PROVIDED SCREWS AND SHMflF PROVIDED^ FOR CONNECTION TO DBLTOPPLATE © FOR OARA(£ PORTALS, CCt*€CT 4X0 fMNJ HEADER AT TOP OF III4U UITH PROVIDED SCREIUS, PROVIDED •HST STRAP WITH <W \0d COMMONS, AND PANEL EXTENSION IUTH 10d COMMONS « 3' otc. fVERTJ I 4' o/e. ^HORtZJ © NO HOLES, NOTCHES, CUTS, OR OTHER MODFICATIONS SHALL BE MADE TO THE STRONQIUALL IN ANT CASE EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY SIMPSON STRONG-TIE, WC. AND ICBO REPORT. © -RF DENOTES RAISED FLOOR OPTION CF &TRON3U4LL. PLEASE MAKE NOTE OF THIS WHEN ORDERING MATERIALS. ALL -FF MODEL STRCNGUIALLS SHALL USE A SIMPSON TUD 1/8-1' (NOT SUPPLIED; AT EACH HOLDOllN ANCHOR PRODUCT 207 JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED 8Y SCALE OF_ DATE DATE SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL <8> <8> <8> <S> <8> SIZE AND REINFORCEMENT 24' SQUARE X |$" DEEP W/ (2) 30* SQUARE X 16 ' DEEP W (3) 36* SQUARE X \6 " DEEP W (A) 42' SQUARE X \& ' DEEP W/ (5) 48' SQUARE xl^ " DEEP W (&) * 4 EACH WAT * 4 EACH WAY * 4 EACH WAT * 4 EACH WAT * 4 EACH WAY COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS June 30, 2004 Juan and Adriana Ramirez 3 859 Cornell Drive Oceanside, CA 92056 Subject: FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW f Proposed Residential Structure James Drive Lot3 Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ramirez. As requested, we have reviewed the project foundation plans, Sheets S-3 and SD-4, dated May 10, 2004, prepared by Wright Design, and observed that they have, in general, included the recommendations presented in our Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Rough Grading Report, (Job Nos. P-304099 and G-304099). COMMENTS 1) All footings should be founded the designed depth below the lowermost adjacent grade, at the time of foundation construction. •A 779 ACADEMY DRIVE * SOLANA BEACH, CAL/FORNIA (858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 755-91E6 r Coast Geotechnical June 30, 2004 W.O. P-427064 Page 2 LIMITATIONS The findings and opinions presented herein have been made in accordance with generally accepted professional principals in the fields of engineering geology and geotechnical engineering. No warranty is expressed or implied. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact our office. Reference to our Job No. P-427064 will help expedite a response to your inquiry. Respectfully submitted COAST GEOTECI^ Mark Burwell, C.E. Engineering Geologi y /V" "<xV/£? v-^'^ 2109 MCfl' Exp.5-31-06 !->'CERTIFIEDENGINEERINGGEOLOGIST/ ^OFC^ Vithaya Singhanet Geotechnical Engi Coast Geotechnical June 30,2004 W.O. P-427064 Page 3 REFERENCES 1) ROUGH GRADING REPORT Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California Prepared by Coast Geotechnical Dated January 7, 2004 2) GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE LETTER Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California Prepared by Coast Geotechnical Dated March 12,2001 3) PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California Prepared by Coast Geotechnical Dated September 23, 1999 r- COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS January 7, 2004 Brooks A. Worthing BA Worthing, Inc. 690 Carlsbad Village Drive, Suite 201 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: ROUGH GRADING REPORT Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California References: 1) GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE LETTER Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California Prepared by Coast Geotechnical Dated March 12, 2001 2) PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California Prepared by Coast Geotechnical Dated September 23, 1999 Dear Mr. Worthing: In response to your request, we have performed field observations and testing during the rough grading phase on the above referenced property. The results of our density tests and laboratory testing are presented in this report. This report covers the rough grading of the five (5) residential lots. Additional reports will be required for street improvements and utility trench backfill which are currently under construction. 779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075 (858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 755-9126 Coast Geotechnical January 7, 2004 W.O. G-304099 Page 2 Based on the results of our testing, it is our opinion that the fill was placed in an adequate manner and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. The control of drainage from lot development is essential to the future performance of proposed residential structures. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (858) 755-8622. This opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. Respectfully submitte COAST GEOTEC Mark Bunvell, C.E1 Engineering Geolo &\ON>V\<?Vx^-"",2109 MtO' -f Geotechnical EnMeer ROUGH GRADING REPORT Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California Prepared for: Brooks A. Worthing BA Worthing, Inc. 690 Carlsbad Village Drive, Suite 201 Carlsbad, CA 92008 January 7, 2004 W.O. G-304099 Prepared by: COAST GEOTECHNICAL 779 Academy Drive Solana Beach, California 92075 Coast Geotechnical January 7, 2004 W.O. G-304099 Page 4 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our observations and field density testing on the subject property during rough grading. The project included the removal and recompaction of soil and weathered terrace deposits, and the placement of fill materials in five (5) residential lots. The approximate locations of field density tests are shown on the enclosed Grading Plan, prepared by Land Space Engineering. LABORATORY TEST DATA The laboratory standard for determining the maximum dry density was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557-91. Field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1556. The results of the laboratory maximum dry density, for the soil type used as compacted fill on the site, is summarized below: Maximum Dry Density Optimum Description (p.c.H Moisture (%) Soil Type Tan to brown silty, fine and medium-grained sand 127.8 10.2 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS The property is underlain at shallow depths by Pleistocene terrace deposits. The terrace deposits are underlain at depth by Eocene-age sedimentary rocks which have commonly been designated as the Santiago Formation on published geologic maps. The terrace deposits are covered by residual soil. Coast Geotechnical January 7, 2004 W.O. G-304099 PageS DISCUSSION The grading contractor on this project was Mike Warner Grading. Grading was performed from January to April 2003. The following is a discussion of the general grading operations, as they were performed on the project. 1) All surface deleterious material was removed in the residential lots, prior to removals. 2) The soil and weathered terrace deposits were removed in the five (5) residential lots and stockpiled. The removals extended to a depth of approximately 2.0 to 3.5 feet below grade and generally extended to within 2.0 lateral feet from the property line. 3) Stockpiled soils were generally mixed and placed in loose lifts of approximately 6.0 inches, moistened to about optimum moisture content and compacted. Compaction was accomplished by track and wheel rolling with a Caterpillar 963 and 613 loaders, and a D-4 dozer. 4) Additional soils needed to achieve pad grade were generated on-site, predominantly from the proposed street, James Drive. Minor imported sandy deposits were also used. 5) The depth of fill on each of the residential lots is approximately 3.5 to 4.0 feet. Coast Geotechnical January 7, 2004 W.O. G-304099 Page 6 6) Based on our experience and laboratory testing, the fill deposits have a potential expansion in the low range. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1) Based on selective testing, the fill was placed to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density as suggested by our test results. 2) The soil parameters recommended in the referenced Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for foundations and slab design remain valid. However, seismic design parameters have been updated as indicated below. Seismic Design Parameters (1997 Uniform Building Code) Soil Profile Type - SD Seismic Zone - 4 Seismic Source - Type B Near Source Factor (Nv) -1.1 Near source Acceleration Factor (NJ - 1.0 Seismic Coefficients Ca = 0.44 Cv = 0.67 Design Response Spectrum Tg = 0.612 T =0.122o Nearest Type B Fault Newport-Inglewood 5.4 miles Coast Geotechnical January 7,2004 W.O. G-304099 Page? 3) The following pavement section is recommended for the proposed driveways: 3.0 inches of asphaltic paving or 4.0 inches of concrete on 4.0 inches of select base (Class 2) on 12 inches of compacted subgrade soils Subgrade soils should be compacted to the thickness indicated in the structural section and left in a condition to-receive base materials. Class 2 base materials should have a minimum R-value of 78 and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Subgrade soils and base materials should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of their laboratory maximum dry density. The pavement section should be protected from water sources. Migration of water into subgrade deposits and base materials could result in pavement failure. 4) We recommend that all utilities be bedded in clean sand to at least one foot above the top of the conduit. The bedding should be flooded in place to fill all the voids around the conduit. Imported or on-site granular material compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction may be utilized for backfill above the bedding. The invert of subsurface utility excavations paralleling footings should be located above the zone of influence of these adjacent footings. This zone of influence is defined as the area below a 45 degree plane projected down from the nearest bottom edge of an adjacent footing. This can be accomplished by either deepening the footing, raising the invert elevation of the utility, or moving the utility or the footing away from one another. Coast Geotechnical January 7, 2004 W.O. G-304099 PageS 5) Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond or seep into the ground or migrate under concrete flatwork or pavement sections. 6) A copy of the residential plans should be submitted to this office for review, prior to construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time. 7) All the recommendations in the referenced Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation which are not superseded by this report remain valid and should be implemented during the construction phase. Coast Geotechnical January 7, 2004 W.O. G-304099 Page 9 LIMITATIONS This office assumes no responsibility for any alterations made without our knowledge and written approval, subsequent to the issuance of this report. All areas of disturbance which require the placement of compacted fill to restore them to the original condition, will not be reviewed unless such backfilling operations are performed under our observation and tested for required compaction. It should be noted that density (compaction) testing is conducted on a very small volume of the fill. The intent is to provide an opinion, based on selective testing and observation during fill placement. This study has been provided solely for the benefit of the client and is in no way intended to benefit or extend any right or interest to any third party. This study is not to be used on other projects or extensions to this project except by agreement in writing with Coast Geotechnical. Enclosures: Table I Grading Plan ENCLOSURES FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE I Field Dry Density and Moisture Content Date 02/04/03 02/04/03 02/04/03 02/05/03 04/22/03 04/22/03 04/22/03 Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Test Location Lot 4 Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot 4 5 3 1 2 1 Height Of Fill Approx . 3.0' 2 2 2 4 4 3 .0' .0' .0' .0' .0' .0' Moisture Content o,"6 9 10 11 10 8 9 9 .8 .9 .0 .0 .9 .1 .2 Dry Relative Density % (pcf ) Compaction 122.3 96 121 119 118 116 115 115 .1 .5 .9 .7 .5 .6 95 94 93 91 90 90 Soil Type A A A A A A A G-304099 COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS September 23, 1999 Brooks A. Worthing BA Worthing, Inc. 690 Carlsbad Village Drive, Suite 201 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Worthing: In response to your request and in accordance with our Proposal and Agreement dated August 16, 1999, we have performed a preliminary geologic and soils engineering investigation on the subject site for the proposed minor subdivision. The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for site development and foundation design are presented in this report. From a geologic and soils engineering point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented during the design and construction phases. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (858) 755-8622. This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. Respectfully submi COAST GEOTEC Exp,5-31-04 CERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGISTMark Burwell, C. Engineering Geolo ^:''>^ Vithaya Sii Geotechnical Engineer; 779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075 (858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 755-9126 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Five (5) Lot Subdivision Portion of Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169 Carlsbad Tract 98-16 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, California Prepared For: Brooks A. Worthing BA Worthing, Inc. 690 Carlsbad Village Drive, Suite 201 Carlsbad, CA 92008 September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Prepared By: COAST GEOTECHNICAL 779 Academy Drive Solana Beach, California 92075 TABLE OF CONTENTS VICINITY MAP INTRODUCTION 5 SITE CONDITIONS 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 5 SITE INVESTIGATION 6 LABORATORY TESTING 7 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 8 CONCLUSIONS 11 RECOMMENDATIONS 12 A. GRADING 12 B. BUILDING PADS-REMOVALS/RECOMPACTION 13 C. TEMPORARY SLOPES/EXCAVATION CHARACTERISTICS 14 D. FOUNDATIONS 14 E. SLABS ON.GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) 15 F. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS 15 G. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 16 H. UTILITY TRENCH 16 I. PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN 17 J. DRAINAGE 17 K. GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATIONS 18 L. PLAN REVIEW 18 LIMITATIONS 18 REFERENCES 21 APPENDICES APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS EXPLORATORY TRENCH LOGS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (REAR POCKET) APPENDIX B EARTHQUAKE FAULT ANALYSIS REGIONAL FAULT MAP APPENDIX C GRADING GUIDELINES VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1:11,200 Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 5 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation on the subject property. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics of the earth materials underlying the property, the engineering properties of the surficial deposits and their influence on the proposed five (5) lot residential development. SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is located just west of Valley Street, along the north side of Buena Vista Way, in the city of Carlsbad. The site includes approximately 1.5 acres of gently sloping terrain which topographically forms a shallow basin. Maximum relief on the site is ten (10) vertical feet. The property is bounded along the east by developed residential lots and to the immediate west by vacant land. The southern and western portion of the property has been used to stockpile isolated mounds of soil and construction debris. Vegetation in this area is limited to bushes and several palm trees. The eastern portion of the property has been recently disced and includes several mature palm trees. Drainage is generally by sheet flow to the south. However, due to the shallow basin terrain, a considerable amount of ponding and infiltration probably occurs during periods of prolonged rains. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Plans for the proposed development of the property were prepared by Land Space Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 6 Engineering. The project includes dividing approximately 1.5 acres into five (5) separate lots. Access to the lots will be via a proposed road along the western property line. The proposed road (James Drive) will extend approximately 300 lateral feet to the north from Buena Vista Way to a proposed cul-de-sac. The proposed road will provide direct access to Lot Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5- Access to Lot 2, a flag lot, will be via a driveway extending 17Q± feet east from the proposed road. Grading for the proposed road will include 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) cut and fill slopes up to 7.0 feet and 5.0 feet, respectively. Grading of residential lots will include minor cuts and fills up to 2.5 feet. SITE INVESTIGATION Site exploration included four (4) exploratory trenches excavated with a tractor-mounted backhoe to a maximum depth of 10 feet. Earth materials encountered were visually classified and logged by our field engineering geologist. Undisturbed, representative samples of earth materials were obtained at selected intervals. Samples were obtained by driving a thin walled steel sampler into the desired strata. The samples are retained in brass rings of 2.5 inches outside diameter and 1.0 inches in height. The central portion of the sample is retained in close fitting, waterproof containers and transported to our laboratory for testing and analysis. i Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page? IABQRATORY TESTING Classification The field classification was verified through laboratory examination, in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The final classification is shown on the enclosed Exploratory Logs. Moisture/Density The field moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each of the undisturbed soil samples. This information is useful in providing a gross picture of the soil consistency or variation among exploratory excavations. The dry unit weight was determined in pounds per cubic foot. The field moisture content was determined as a percentage of the dry unit weight. Both are shown on the enclosed Laboratory Tests Results and Exploratory Logs. Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined for selected samples of earth materials taken from the site. The laboratory standard tests were in accordance with ASTM D-1557-91- The results of the tests are presented in the enclosed Laboratory Test Results. Shear Test Shear tests were performed in a strain-control type direct shear machine. The rate of Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 PageS deformation was approximately 0.025 inches per minute. Each sample was sheared under varying confining loads in order to determine the Coulomb shear strength parameters, cohesion and angle of internal friction. Samples were tested in a saturated condition. The results are presented in the enclosed Laboratory Test Results. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS The subject property is located in the Coastal Plains Physiographic Province of San Diego. The property is underlain at shallow depths by Pleistocene terrace deposits. The terrace deposits are underlain at depth by Eocene-age sedimentary rocks which have commonly been designated as the Santiago Formation on published geologic maps. The terrace deposits are covered by relatively thin residual soil deposits. A brief description of the earth materials encountered on the site is discussed below. Dump Fill The southern and western portion of the site is covered, in part, by eight to ten isolated mounds of fill which have been dumped on the property. The isolated mounds do not exceed 3.0 feet in height and are composed of various, soil types ranging from silty.sand to sandy clay. Intermixed with some of the mounds is construction debris ranging from concrete and block fragments to roots and plastic. Residual Soil Approximately 1.5 to 2.0 feet of brown silty and fine-grained sand was encountered in the 1 Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 9 exploratory excavations. The soil is generally dry and loose. The contact with the underlying terrace deposits is gradational. Numerous large rodent borings extending to a depth of 18 inches or more were observed in the eastern portion of the property. Terrace Deposits Underlying the surficial materials, Pleistocene terrace deposits are present. The sediments are composed of reddish brown weakly cemented, fine and medium-grained sand. The upper 2.0 feet of the sedimentary unit is generally dry and weathered. Below this zone, the terrace deposits become increasingly moist and dense. Regionally, the Pleistocene sands are considered flat-lying and are underlain by Eocene-age sedimentary rock units. Expansive Soil Based on our experience in the area and previous laboratory testing of selected samples, the soil and terrace deposits reflect an expansion potential in the low range. Ground Water No evidence of perched or high ground water tables were noted during exploration. However, the Pleistocene terrace deposits are relatively pervious and infiltrated water generally migrates down to and along the terrace deposit/Santiago Formation contact. It should be noted that seepage problems can develop after completion of construction. These seepage problems most often result from drainage alterations, landscaping and Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 10 over-irrigation. In the event that seepage or saturated ground does occur, it has been our experience that they are most effectively handled on an individual basis. Tectonic Setting The site is located within the seismically active southern California region which is generally characterized by northwest trending Quaternary-age fault zones. Several of these fault zones and fault segments are classified as active by the California Division of Mines and Geology (Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act). Based on a review of published geologic maps, no known faults transverse the site. Several steeply dipping short fault segment have been mapped in the regional area of the site. These northeast trending faults are exposed in the Eocene-age rocks of the Santiago Formation but not in the overlying Pleistocene terrace deposits and are presumably inactive. The nearest active fault is the offshore Rose Canyon Fault Zone located approximately 5.4 miles west of the site. It should be noted that the Rose Canyon Fault is not a continuous, well-defined feature but rather a zone of right stepping en echelon faults. The complex series of faults has been referred to as the Offshore Zone of Deformation (Woodward- Clyde, 1979) and is not fully understood. Several studies suggest that the Newport- Inglewood and the Rose Canyon faults are a continuous zone of en echelon faults (Treiman, 1984). Further studies along the complex offshore zone of faulting may Coast Geotechnical September 23,1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 11 indicate a potentially greater seismic risk than current data suggests. Other faults which could affect the site include the Coronado Bank, Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas Faults. The proximity of major faults to the site and site parameters are shown on the enclosed Earthquake Fault Analysis. Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is a process by which a sand mass loses its shearing strength completely and flows. The temporary transformation of the material into a fluid mass is often associated with ground motion resulting from an earthquake. Owing to the moderately dense nature of the Pleistocene terrace deposits and the anticipated depth to ground water, the potential for seismically induced liquefaction and soil instability is considered low. CONCLUSIONS 1) The subject lot is located in an area that is relatively free of potential geologic hazards such as landsliding, liquefaction, high ground water conditions and seismically induced subsidence. 2) The existing dry soil and weathered terrace deposits are not suitable for the support of structural footings or concrete flatwork. •-I Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 12 3) In order to provide a more uniform support for proposed footings and slabs, the soil and weathered terrace deposits in the building envelope should be removed to a minimum depth of 3.5 feet below the existing grade and replaced as property compacted fill. The removal depth should be such that a minimum of 18 inches of compacted fill underlies the base of proposed footings. RECOMMENDATIONS Grading A minimum 12 foot wide key excavated a minimum of 2.0 feet (along the outside edge) into competent formational rock should be constructed along the base of the proposed fill slope. All fill should be benched into the underlying competent formational rock units. The existing earth deposits are generally suitable for reuse, provided they are cleaned of all roots, vegetation, debris and rocks larger than 6.0 inches, and thoroughly mixed. Fill should be placed in 6.0 to 8.0 inch loose lifts, moistened as required to 1.0- 2.0 percent above optimum moisture, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Fill and cut slopes should be constructed at a maximum gradient of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). A V-type interceptor drain or brow ditch is recommended along the top of the cut slope in order to prevent drainage from flowing onto the slope face. Additional recommendations will be presented should any unforeseen conditions be encountered during grading. Imported fill, if necessary, should be approved by this firm. Additional recommendations for road subgrade preparation Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 13 and pavement section design may be necessary during the grading phase. A copy of our grading guidelines is included and should be considered as part of this report. Building Pads-Removals/Rccompaction The existing soil and weathered terrace deposits should be removed to a minimum depth of 3-5 feet below the existing grade and 18 inches below the base of proposed footings and replaced as properly compacted fill. Removals should include the entire building pad extending a minimum of 10.0 feet beyond the building footprint. Consideration should be given to extending removals and recompaction in areas of exterior concrete flatwork, pavement and other structures sensitive to settlement. Most of the existing earth deposits are generally suitable for reuse, provided they are cleared of all vegetation, debris and thoroughly mixed. Prior to placement of fill, the base of the removal should be observed by a representative of this firm. Additional overexcavation and recommendations may be necessary at that time. The exposed bottom should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6.0 inches, moistened as required and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Fill should be placed in 6.0 to 8.0 inch lifts, moistened to approximately 1.0 - 2.0 percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Imported fill, if necessary, should consist of non-expansive granular deposits approved by the geotechnical engineer. Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 14 Temporary Slopes/Excavation Characteristics Temporary excavations which exceed a vertical height of 3-5 feet should be trimmed to a gradient of 1:1 or less. The Pleistocene Terrace deposits may contain hard concretion layers. However, based on our experience in the area, the sandstone is rippable with conventional heavy earth moving equipment in good working order. Foundations The following design parameters are based on an anticipated expansion potential in the low range. Footings for proposed residences and garages should be a minimum of 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 and 18 inches below the lower most adjacent subgrade at the time of foundation construction for single-story and two-story structures, respectively. A 12 inch by 12 inch grade beam should be placed across the garage opening. Footings should be reinforced with a minimum of four No. 4 bars, two along the top of the footing and two along the base. Footing recommendations provided herein are based upon underlying soil conditions and are not intended to be in lieu of the project structural engineer's design. For design purposes, an allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot may be used for foundations at the recommended footing depths. The bearing value indicated above is for the total dead and frequently applied live loads. This value may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the effects of wind and seismic forces. Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 15 Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead- load forces. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth of approved fill penetrated to a maximum of 1500 pounds per square foot may be used. Slabs on Grade (Interior and Exterior^ Slabs on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced in both directions with No. 3 bars placed 18 inches on center in both directions. The slab should be underlain by a minimum 4.0-inch clean sand blanket. Where moisture sensitive floors are used, a minimum 6.0-mil Visqueen or equivalent moisture barrier should be located in the center of the sand blanket. Utility trenches underlying the slab may be backfilled with on-site materials, compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Slabs including exterior concrete flatwork should be reinforced as indicated above and provided with saw cuts/expansion joints, as recommended by the project structural engineer. All slabs should be cast over dense compacted subgrades. Settlement Characteristics Estimated total and differential settlement is expected to be on the order of 3/4 inch and 1/2 inch, respectively. It should also be noted that long term secondary settlement due to irrigation and loads imposed by structures is anticipated to be 1/4 inch. Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 16 Seismic Considerations Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, the property will be exposed to moderate to high levels of ground motion resulting from the release of energy should an earthquake occur along the numerous known and unknown faults in the region. The Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone is the nearest known active fault and is considered the design earthquake for the site. A maximum probable event along the offshore segment of the Rose Canyon Fault is expected to produce a peak bedrock horizontal acceleration of 0.34g and a repeatable ground acceleration of 0.22g. Utility Trench We recommend that all utilities be bedded in clean sand to at least one foot above the top of the conduit. The bedding should be flooded in place to fill all the voids around the conduit. Imported or on-site granular material compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction may be utilized for backfill above the bedding. The invert of subsurface utility excavations paralleling footings should be located above the zone of influence of these adjacent footings. This zone of influence is defined as the area below a 45 degree plane projected down from the nearest bottom edge of an adjacent footing. This can be accomplished by either deepening the footing, raising the invert elevation of the utility, or moving the utility or the footing away from one another. Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 17 Preliminary Pavement Design Testing by this firm suggests an R-value of 43 for Pleistocene sands. The following pavement design should be considered preliminary and may need to be revised based on actual conditions encountered during grading. 3-0 inches of asphaltic paving on 4.0 inches of select base (Class 2) on 12 inches of compacted subgrade softs Subgrade soils should be compacted to the thickness indicated in the structural section and left in a condition to receive base materials. Class 2 base materials should have a minimum R-value of 78 and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Subgrade soils and base materials should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of their laboratory maximum dry density. The pavement section should be protected from water sources. Migration of water into subgrade deposits and base materials could result in pavement failure. Drainage Specific drainage patterns should be designed by the project engineer or architect. However, in general, pad water should be directed away from foundations and around the structure to the street. Roof water should be collected and conducted to hardscape or the street, via non-erodibie devices. Pad water should not be allowed to pond. Coast Geotechnicai September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 18 Vegetation adjacent to foundations should be avoided. If vegetation in these areas is desired, sealed planter boxes or drought resistant plants should be considered. Other alternatives may be available, however, the intent is to reduce moisture from migrating into foundation subsoils. Irrigation should be limited to that amount necessary to sustain plant life. All drainage systems should be inspected and cleaned annually, prior to winter rains. Geotechnicai Observations Structural footing excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm, prior to the placement of steel and forms. All fill should be placed while a representative of the geotechnical engineer is present to observe and test. Plan Review A copy of the final plans should be submitted to this office for review prior to the initiation of construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time. LIMITATIONS This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the owner's representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to the attention of the project's architects and/or engineers so that they may be incorporated into plans. Coast Geotechnical September 23,1999 W.O. P-304099 | Page 19 Ii If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in i this report, our office should be notified so that we may consider whether modifications \ are needed. No responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts, specifications or recommendations given in this report is assumed unless on-site review is performed during the course of construction, i The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure described I herein are based on individual exploratory excavations made on the subject property. The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure discussed should in no way be construed to reflect any variations which may occur among the exploratory excavations. i Please note that fluctuations in the level of ground water may occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported herein. Coast Geotechnical assumes no responsibility for variations which may occur across the site. The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In time, however, changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature on this or adjoining properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be brought about by legislation or the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the ' conclusions and recommendations of this report may be rendered wholly or partially Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 20 invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore subject to review and should not be relied upon after the passage of two years. The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of the technical data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction and partly on our general experience in the geotechnical field. However, in no respect do we guarantee the outcome of the project. This study has been provided solely for the benefit of the client and is in no way intended to benefit or extend any right or interest to any third party. This study is not to be used on other projects or extensions to this project except by agreement in writing with Coast Geotechnical. Coast Geotechnical September 23, 1999 W.O. P-304099 Page 21 REFERENCES 1. Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Cramer, C.H., Cao, T., Reichle, M.S., Frankel, A.D., Lienkaemper, J.J., McCrory, P.A., and Schwartz, D.P., 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Open File Report 96-08, 59 page. 2. Hays, Walter W., 1980, Procedures for Estimating Earthquake Ground Motions, Geological Survey Professional Paper 1114, 77 pages. 3. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., 1970, A Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential: Earthquake Engineering Research Center. 4. Tan, S.S., and Giffen, D.G., 1995, Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, Plate 35A, Open-File Report 95- 04, Map Scale 1:24,000. 5- Treiman, J.A., 1984, The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, A Review and Analysis, California Division of Mines and Geology. MAPS/AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS 1. Aerial Photograph, 1982, Foto-Map D-7, Scale 1"=2000'. 2. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1994, Fault Activity Map of California, Scale 1"=750,000'. 3. Geologic Map of the Oceanside, San Luis Rey and San Marcos 7.5' Quadrangles, 1996, DMG Open File Report 96-02. 4. Land Space Engineering, 1999, Carlsbad Tract No. 98-16, Por. Lots 3 and 4, Map 2169, Scale 1"=40'. 5. U.S.G.S., 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Topographic Map, Digitized, Scale Variable. 1 1 APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE I Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content (Laboratory Standard ASTM D-1557-91) Sample Location T-l @ 1.5'-3.5 Max. Dry Density (pcf) 127.8 Optimum Optimum Content 10.2 TABLE II Field Dry Density and Moisture Content Sample Location T-l @ 3.0' T-l @ 5.0' T-l @ 7.0' T-2 @ 1.0' T-2 @ 3.0' T-2 @ 4.0' T-3 @ 2.0' T-3 @ 4.0' T-4 @ 2.5' T-4 @ 3.5' T-4 @ 6,0' Field Dry Density (DC£) 115.9 114.6 112.9 96.2 105.5 118.2 98.3 108.0 117.9 122.4 118.0 Field Moisture Content 6.5 12.0 14.2 6.2 9.9 13.0 8.2 11.2 8.0 9.4 12.6 (Page 1 of 2) TABLE III Direct Shear Test Results Sample Location Angle of Apparent Cohesion Internal Friction 0 (psf) T-l a 1.0f-3.0' 30 Degrees 120 (Remolded) P-304099 (Page 2 of 2) -J LOG OF EXPLORATORY TRENCH NO. 1 ! S158&Q 115.9 114.6 112.9 <— * £•* & 1OU 5g 2S 6.5 12.0 14.2 PS § w ^is en §£ §1wCOCOO 1 <1 g oo2 5« "2 § ill§ 1 WO 158.00 _ 0.00 — 157.00 _ 1.00 — 156.00. ioo § a 52o |j| ;|| if I 010011 •mIHHHH — 155.00 MM 3.00 MW — BBs— MMIIBHS~ 154.00 EH8&? 4.00 HHH— mm — 153.00 I^E 5.00__HBUjBugBBSS••HUM******* — 152.00 ffi£9! 6.00 MW — ^m— 151.00 VS&K7.00 HSSi— HPgDI^^D — iso.00 tlSm ^ UCOD t/)5u do00 SM SM PROJECT NO. P-304099 DATE EXCAVATED: 09-23-99 SURFACE ELEV.: I58'(approx.) LOGGED BY: MB GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION SOIL (Qs): Brown silty sand, dry, loose, slightly clayey Note: Numerous rodent borings Graditional Contact TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Reddish bin., fine and med- grained sand, i • i_ *1 1slightly clayey Dry and weathered in upper 2' From 3.5', Pleistocene become increasingly moist END OF TRENCH® 9' 1.00 TRENCH SKETCH N60E 23 Qs Qt ^•-; I'Atil- I 01- I COAST GEOTECHNICAL LOG OF EXPLORATORY TRENCH NO. 2 o£ MiSS 050 96.2 105.5 118.2 f~tv« [ * 1O S K352 6.5 9.9 13.0 w ££ Ulya V]g V) QLU SUJCAfflO 12< ^Q g O fjg 5 CO 2B $ a ^.is u3 Q 158.00 _ 0.00 — 157.00 : 1.00 — 156.00 _ 2.00 — 155.00 , — 3.00 — 154.00 4.00 — 153-00 5.00 — 152.00 6.00 151.00 7.00 — 150.00 8-J SX So fi |j]i iHmft ffl^ff HI BHBm ^^maUJBHfliESfBSIBnBBBta^HE iflniral jfflg HHn PHI inm ^* V)UCOD CO ^u do SM SM PROJECT NO. P-304099 DATE EXCAVATED: 09-23-99 SURFACE ELEV.: 158'(approx.) LOGGED BY: MB GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION SOIL (Qs): Brown silty sand, dry, loose, slightly clayey Note: Numerous rodent borings Graditional Contact TEkRACK DEPOSITS (QQ: Reddish bm , tine and med-grained sand, slightly clayey Dry and weathered in upper 2' From 3.5', Pleistocene become increasingly moist END OF TRENCH @ 9' 8.00 TRENCH SKETCH N60E _ Q?_ --'-L'--------^ Qt 'AOI:COAST GEOTECHNICAL LOG OF EXPLORATORY TRENCH NO. 3 IL £5a KQ 98.3 108.2 *2 — *j * 1Ou g . 225S 8.2 11.2 DS < U <5 1 §Crt w? mo;* UJr* ^« % Q g £O OHO JX, yj & ? » zB 1?s w5 160.00 0.00 ~ 1S9.00 _ 1.00 151.00 2.00 157.00 3.00 ' — 156.00 4.00 155.00 5.00 154.00 6.00 8 wa 2o i|i^ P :'fe1slsl '$il |||| ssi OnBBS|Q ••H 1HBai i ^ uCAB CO u do« SM SM PROJECT NO. P-304099 DATE EXCAVATED: 09-23-99 SURFACE ELEV.: 1601 (approx.) LCX5GEDBY:MB GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION FILL (af): Bm., silly sand with fragments of cone., wood, plastic Trash Fill thickens lo 3* along N end of trench SOIL (Qs): Brown silty sand, dry, loose, slightly clayey Graditional Contact TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Reddish brn , fine and med -grained sand, slightly clayey Dry and weathered in upper 1 .5* From 4.0', Pleistocene become increasingly moist END OF TRENCH @T 7.00 TRENCH SKETCH N20W j^af -v Qt af COAST GEOTECHNICAL LOG OF EXPLORATORY TRENCH NO. 4 f £T 1Pii Q o43 117.9 122.4 118.0 -5- H 1 OU C2 EOs 8.0 9.4 12.6 rt < a -J IES CO QU KUCOCO ai 5 ^D § § O ^ 2 « z§ H ^W ^s Q 160.00 — 0;00 ^ 159.00 1.00 — 151.00 — 2.00 — 157.00 — 3.00 — — 156.00 — 4.00 — 155.00 — 5.00 — 154.00 — 6.00 —— 153.00— foo = 152.00 — 8.00 —— 151.00 — 9.00 — 150.00 1 g2 OCflK sO !S3'fiftitm.ffffi B^R •™^^s HB8M 9WSHBS RUB HBa ^^ W ffiffBH •9BnS fflTO m m CO COD enCO C__J dO CO SM SM PROJECT NO. P-304099 DATE EXCAVATED: 09-23-99 SURFACE ELEV.: 160'(approx.) LOGGED BY: MB GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION FILL (af): Bm., silly sand with fragments of cone., wood, plastic SOIL (Qs): Brown silty sand, dry, loose, slightly clayey Graditional Contact TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Reddish bm., fine and mecL-grained sand. slightly clayey Dry and weathered in upper 2' From 4.0', Pleistocene become increasingly moist tNUUr ItvbNLn (gj IU 10.00 TRENCH SKETCH N30W zz 7 DUMP FILL diickcm lo 3' Qt IVUil- 1 Of 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX B j j DATE: Saturday, October 2, 1999 * * * EQFAULT * * * * Ver. 2.20 * * * * * (Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration From Digitized California Faults) SEARCH PERFORMED FOR: WORTHING JOB NUMBER: P-304099 JOB NAME: P-304099 SITE COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 33.169 N LONGITUDE: 117.337 W SEARCH RADIUS: 60 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 2) Campbell & Bozorgnia (1994) Horiz. - Soft Rock UNCERTAINTY (M=Mean, S=Mean+l-Sigma): S SCOND: 0 COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CDMGSCE.DAT SOURCE OF DEPTH VALUES (A=Attenuation File, F=Fault Data File): A DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS Page ABBREVIATED FAULT NAME SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK SAN JACINTO-ANZA SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VA SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN ELSINORE-JULIAN ELSINORE-TEMECULA ELSINORE-GLEN IVY WHITTIER CHINO-CENTRAL AVE. (Elsino EARTHQUAKE VALLEY CORONADO BANK NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshor ROSE CANYON NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Bas PALOS VERDES COMPTON THRUST ELYS IAN PARK THRUST DISTANCE mi (km) 52 ( 84) 46 ( 74) 46 ( 74) 59 { 94) 58 ( 94) 24 ( 38) 23 ( 37) 33 ( 53) 50 ( 81) 47 ( 76) 44 ( 70) 22 ( 35) 5 ( 9) 6 ( 9) 45 { 73) 36 ( 57) 55 ( 89) 57 ( 92) MAX. ( MAX. CRED. MAG. 6.80 7.20 6.90 6.70 6.80 7.10 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.70 6.50 7.40 6.90 6.90 6.90 7.10 6.80 6.70 :REDIBLI PEAK SITE ACC. g 0.049 0.083 0*063 0.037 0.041 0,179 0.147 0.095 0,051 0,051 0.048 0.238 0.608 0.599 0.065 0.109 0.065 0.056 2 EVENT SITE INTENS MM VI VII VI V V VIII VIII VII VI VI VI IX X X VI VII VI VI MAX. 1 MAX. PROB. MAG. 6.20 6.90 6.80 6.70 6.20 6.40 6.30 6.30 5.90 5.50 5.70 6.30 5.80 5.70 5.60 6.20 5.80 5.80 >ROBABL! PEAK SITE ACC. g 0.029 0.064 0.058 0.037 0.024 0.107 0.100 0.062 0.023 0.020 0.023 0.110 0.335 0.300 0.020 0.050 0.029 0.027 S EVENT SITE INTENS MM V VI VI V .V VII VII VI IV IV IV VII IX IX IV VI V V **************** -END OF SEARCH- 18 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 5.4 MILES AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM-CREDIBLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.608 g LARGEST MAXIMUM-PROBABLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.335 g ttlllli ioI • 1 tSiiiilHfii-Jiiih IIIs" g'•I iiii! I II i i! 1ii* * j *J i i ]I 2 2 2 HiH miill '1 f M 'Ml11 it id 1 APPENDIX C GRADING GUIDEUNES Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing agencies, Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code, the geotechnical report and the guidelines presented below. All of the guidelines may not apply to a specific site and additional recommendations may be necessary during the grading phase. Site Clearing Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the site. Non-organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction of the Soils engineer. Subdrainaae 1. During grading, the Geologist and Soils Engineer should evaluate the necessity of placing additional drains (see Plate A). 2. All subdrainage systems should be observed by the Geologist and Soils Engineer during construction and prior to covering with compacted fill. 3. Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project surveyors. Outlets should be located and protected. Treatment of Existing Ground 1. All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials should be disposed of off site. 2. All surficial deposits including alluvium and colluvium should be removed unless otherwise indicated in the text of this report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial areas may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report may be necessary due to saturation during winter months. 3. Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of six inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill standards. Rll Placement 1. Most site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special processing or handling may be required (see report). Highly organic or contaminated soil should not be used for compacted fill. (1) J 2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a horizontal plane, unless otherwise found acceptable by the Soils Engineer. 3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soils engineer, the Contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the following: a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture. Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre- watering of cut or removal areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils. b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91. 4. Side-hill fills should have a minimum equipment-width key at their toe excavated through all surficial soil and into competent material (see report) and tilted back into the hill (Plate A). As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial deposits and into competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the Soils Engineer. 5. Rock fragments less than six inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided: a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets; b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the rocks; c) The distribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soils Engineer. 6. Rocks greater than six inches in diameter should be taken off site, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. 7. In clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess of six (6) inches minimum dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks. (2) 8. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment. If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained throughout construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor should slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades. Compaction equipment should compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built. Density tests should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the fill three to five feet horizontally from the face of the slope. In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of the slope should be performed after construction is complete. Each day the Contractor should receive a copy of the Soils Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering Report" which would indicate the results of field density tests that day. . 9. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following manner; a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the cut-fill interface. b) A key at least 1 equipment width wide (see report) and tipped at least 1 foot into slope should be excavated into competent materials and observed by the Soils Engineer or his representative. c) The cut portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement to evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be responsible for any additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut excavation. 10. Transition lots (cut and fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with a four foot thick compacted fill blanket (or as indicated in the report). 11. Cut pads should be observed by the Geologist to evaluate the need for overexcavation and replacement with fill. This may be necessary to reduce water infiltration into highly fractured bedrock or other permeable zones,and/or due to differing expansive potential of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation should be at least three feet. Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in some cases. (3) 12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located. Grading Observation and Testing 1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the Soils Engineer during the progress of grading. 2. In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill height or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending on soil conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of field density tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and moisture content is generally being obtained. 3. Density tests may be made on the surface material to receive fill, as required by the Soils Engineer. 4. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations,subdrains and rock disposal should be observed by the Soils Engineer prior to placing any fill. It will be the Contractor's responsibility to notify the Soils Engineer when such areas are ready for observation.. 5. A Geologist should observe subdrain construction. 6. A Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill. Utility Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards: 1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill. 2. As an alternative, clean sand may be utilized and flooded into place. No specific relative compaction would be required; however, observation, probing, and if deemed necessary, testing may be required. 3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:1 plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless it is similar to the inplace fill, should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas. Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired results. (4) TOP8OH.-8LOPEWASH _ 6' MIN. OVERLAP 3/4'-1-1/2* OLE AW GRAVEL (HUSH. MIN.) ffi £LNOMPCTFORATEO WPC LATERAL TO BtOPEFACEATlOO'MTEflVALS 4-0 NON-PERFORATED FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)* 0* MIN. COVER 4*0 PERFORATED PIPE 4* MIN.BEDDING SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL KEY, BENCHING AND SUBDRAIN DETAIL PLATKA MN JlUU FH UliY UF hO. 7BU 8b58 P, 02 City of Carlsbad • • ^ ~V«mBl^MM^H>VHB^HHHMMMMMB (i 11 <| i n*j O tM> 'i r 11u e n t CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by fr* City, the applicant and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not Issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential: T\ftir i Kltimhftr nf New Dwelling Unite Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling ,3. Second Dwelling Unit* Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information: Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) Date: S WITHIN THB CITY OF CARLSBAD San Marcot Unified School District 2l5MataWay San Mareos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By Appt. Only) Encinit» Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encmitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166} San Dieguiw Union High School District 710 Enclnias Blvd. Encinttas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Appttcant/Ownws. Th> person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penally of perjury that (1) the information orovided above is correct and true to the best of thft Owner's knowledge, an3 tun the owner will til* an amendwl certification of payment and pay tne additional fee rf Owner requests an increase TV ma number of dwelling units or square footage after the buildina^ermrt isjasuftd o^if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be Jncowct, and that (2) the Owner is^f ownerfcj]§felopj^ the above described projects), or ttat the person executing this dedaration is authorized to sign Signature: Revii^J 4/20/03 Carisbad, CA 92008-73T4 • (760) 6O2-27OO <76O) 6O2-2719 • FAX (76O) 602-6558 AUG-Q2-2QQ4 MON 01:11 PM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 03 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school drstrict(s)) ********************** *************** **#»**»»*»»»*M««»«w««»»xirtr**irtWMW**M THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District, The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE A FREEMAN ur NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 625 & CUOMO RENL DATE Revised 4/20/iXJ 10-28-2004 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR04167 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2788 JAMES DR CBAD Permit Type: PCR Parcel No: 1561424900 Uot#: Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: Reference #: CB041572 Project Title: RAMIREZ RES DEFERRED TRUSS 0 NEW Status: ISSUED Applied: 10/01/2004 Entered By: SB Plan Approved: 10/28/2004 Issued: 10/28/2004 Inspect Area: Applicant: WRIGHT SAM STEN 2911 STATE ST CARLSBAD 92008 760213-1460 Owner: RAMIREZ JUAN J&ADR1ANA 3859 CORNELL DR OCEANSIDE CA 92056 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $120.00 $0.00 Total Fees:$120.00 Total Payments To Date:$0.00 Balance Due:$120.00 4310 10/28/04 0002 01 02 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: 120., NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the 'Imposition'1 of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a}, and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this._or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO.JJ EST. VAL Plan Ck. Deposit Validated Date Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Assessor's Parcel # Description of Work Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number> Existing Use SQ. FT. - #of Stories Unit No, Phase No. Proposed Use If of Bedrooms Total ff of units # of Bathrooms (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars i$500l). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. _ Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF TH- PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) C] CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation .aws of California. WARNINO: Failure to aecura workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fine* up to one hundred thousand dollars (9100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: n I. as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for salg. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractors) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 26505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I certify that I have read the application and state that the abova information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN AJOJWAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations OJ^T 5JD" deep\nd demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by th/buildingJBfficiaTiunder the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced withu/1 SQxfays from the dele of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comrnptfipd for a g^luMff 180 days fftedon IQg-4.4 Uniform Building Code). er\ / I APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE / SW^ T \ £>, l/fA A hATF CS^f' ' , O WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for Quitting Safety DATE: October 12, 2O04 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1572 REV (PCR04-167) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Drive PROJECT NAME: Ramirez Residence • The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Revision consists of truss package. By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 10/04/04 tmsmtwot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 *• San Diego, California 92123 *• (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-1572 REV (PCR04-167) October 12, 2004 [VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: O4-1572 REV (PCR04-167) PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: October 12, 2004 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2788 James Drive BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq.Ft.) cb ffijt Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $120.00 Type of Review: D Repetitive FeeRepeats D Complete Review D Other m Hourly Structural Only Hour* Esgll Plan Review Fee $96.00 * Based on hourly rate Comments: macvalue.doc u S Li! < LO °? CO CM O rf CM CM O) C) • CO X Q0_ Z Si OOQ -co 1 0) w fjl \ff o H </>c .2 "cooo— J ..... c 0)*E 0) ^c 8 oc V-COc CD CD 1 CO CD £ CO fi 5 "T-<^- 00 CO CD Oo> o CD 00 Oi 00 CO CM ccT CM CD >, JU "CO COou U) £ co0. O)c Z >rd > H LO CO CM LO CD CO O CD h- ^_ 00 LOr^- CD CO o CD t- >, .0. CO ^> "o.Q. oCOCD CD O)co_J o CM N- N- ""sf CM CD N- ":^ C\i T 1 CO CO ^CM CD LO ence review (jg <mly for general conformance aod correlated at o CNJ concept of the project gat e with the infccm«ioia give Documents. Coirectioiif with the design general compliat in the Contract Comments made on this review do no. .V..JVTT ww-yy 1 compliance with the requirements of the pw» and specification;. Approval of a specific i ten shall not incfftle approval of an a*«mbl;ro! which the itejp i- a component, ContracUUJ responsible foT: dimensions to be confirfMfi t+,t „,,.. 1 - - - -1 - - * " *I he jobsile; ioformatioaormaoa itlpertains solely to the fabrication proceMel •« to the means, meihods, techoiqiw*, and procedures of construction; of his dr-her Worl^with that and for performing all w satisfactory manner. 4/12 Roof Pitch Flat Ceilings 2' O.C. Spacing 18" Overhang ,. /uoicet Olfl W < tu < O O -P« 01 o o o o . _t-i -o ->• —I n eore a ro o 3 in<Q = 3 CL rs) coNJA n io i _ I2fit3-D7)> rti m ~g :c ~c ^iu -«.x 3 r™ro r" IB ira ^ H-JHUBa? 3 < IH rn u ~i-• in rt) za »-i--i n—'•>3 O A t* ^" m 1/1 M -"•C &U1 DSU O 3-i' o 3 -u rf nT < O.OBI mw _ID ID IB Z- ' -rm o-z-h £i -n.-j o;oH-.-i-o -hi—i mo —' artc o ju o m-J-3 rf £1—13 nm cQ_fD T T ftlj.n U it «3 rt — >< roIQ _i. rB O --3 OQ.3 O r» £ ^--Tcsoaz 3*1?IP IB -fci—" Mft| D> c M a rl J- in c PDIQ 0 IB —I Irt 3 (QBJ =KBJf-CQ.MD-l-IBO.3-Drmo nm-hr-i/13 D.VI Q.IB O • ID IB tu -.IB 3 -O O 1 3"3 pj -j. W &T 3-i.in tuio o IP e c-4l^-ID —• rt r*IB rlln 33 n•H-hC IB 3 IB QC Q. l-l Sr» 3 n h"us n j O- : oo a' w o IB a> r-3ra o a 3 o r> ni3 -wo IB n ->o i -"-3-3-prmi »Ib IB n ^'IB • •—' ^- n IB Q a. ' J-ti n mrf 3j- za. 3-rtnlio JOO, b"! OO o f I' " i 2 3 ff D m Q • M n1 S 'Hi'I i-a ^ Q. ro D. ro ooo o o o •o -a -a -a IQ VI 3 3 3 fil3Ti cr IT cr npi 1 -I -I HIH i/tnM TJ -J. H n CDn 3 n o 3 r—nin 3 3 o. iin -a v-i c: rj 100 • • - -nH -M I M M M IO O in M * 2 P I-s IS . . uwuiII m rtli • • M•~s -i I/II^INIB to oomU : :n crHW b, ^K ;o^M s O-« HrTnID 0.. • OBi _uiui -I OOOO3 r-10 -C IuaDr~*s-^, m i micr-i.x a 10smrn—i.x a .-•< -nria-iBIBO u 3 <ID mnn IB-O-^ -i.n —•-'O n u3 rf-rt-i y% n rts'n " txijj aj . %%**5^*mu o-vi u |o.S-i.o lt> ID n>3- l"1^O B O ->'Nn ^~1l£ IDJ-Q. 3 ElN -I'tTlB On»-"-O 3-o<-» rtS™ ^rtOfJfONJ->-7*i x x xMO Ji* An: (U JU i » 3-w nn » X itO o -"-33 3 rt W rt r.-1-C -i-3-ai" —'n S0> rB-'rt DOD_ .t>" -n-rniwH--'r"r-r"mo —ii«-imit unc^dlt >T 3--HH1-'»6J m *Hna ID r-:r> i-t Hn 53 -h-< ID ID trw -o £.•<tt. rt c oSlfl TIVno. . r i i/i •Q.-1-O1O O -h« m-i •or- H HaCg^= =•!« -HQ-r-l"IO -"'V -"•Hi* H in 3 10ZQ-Hia-'-iB a. 3 & r-z m 3 IB OO>HC Q.CL OTJ .i-t 3 IB 2 S= m n o o -4mo i/>no u ft -Dma • oc Q. M X I 23 -'•Un 3«3 n !-•i-o <5 aj n iC3 fl-h O MSin IHO^COme — l-i n 3 o 30T rt njIt 303-IB -I, o -"fiTl —IQ.rF m ^-vi u W O IB BJ r-31C O 3 3 O n f3 -hua n n —icrt rt-^ft* O C->-3-3-on if flOf ID n -'-IB »—>->•( IB O Q.ua M 3 T13- 3 IIBJ r+Oo I —i 0= e vi-•- ore rt-rl l-i•< NJ -ft II m M C C -nr-o-a -HO-OO O 70 JOO , o"i on w g? o o o o i -o -"• -I n ooi ra 3 ID o ^nia 3. 3 ei- P 3"' So io i—< Etr= X B> ME ELh (BO —jo(C -hr »1 A. -L —• rt B> I-H-C O £ 1-1_ o n c\c oi/i0 -i.zu -D01 S3 mrtt/in—IMMM^J —"3 Cmj»i*aIB D.1 XVI 3 m O—ua tflBi 3 • OOOOCJ IBOC-I^I a-n-n-n-j —'U ELM r OIB OOO10 - njrt -i-r-—JtOO 3 m IB I*m rt r OBI T p—1«O < Ji/i jr Emn— (_,MZTJ > >3 Ot i- ceg i-i- i mu i MO s n £ :n rt 3-iB -hwo o C 3 ELrt-J-IB io m CICOZHDC-I npo.-ica.n-1- m in nc o o ;a f -i -i rO EL VI rt rt! I/I O IB BlIB O 3 3 _ . . ._3 -MO (0 A —"3 If rOrt • n n> a'ELEb 3-T13-' f _.oi- BI rt Bi rt M • n O 3 S|T3Bl-O -I. f*« EftJ3 O iflilB rt- i- o rt- 3 BIm<B 3 IID7)33N o K 3 *•? s I s i i ! *»fl,SS»53'm*| « !* 5 ' a U,1 Hii1! *is f aI • j I 51 a s *Q f 5O5 o r- o r- O. » Q. n O O A 01 boobo o o o •o -a -o -a<n in w w-ti -h -h -ti 10 (u3-a tr a- tr nB> T n -i in- <*>" . _M 13 -*• H l~l COO n 3 ID O 3 I—ft 1C 3 3 O. IIin "5 I-1 C kiNJ en rj u-i•i* n i~ I _ I- ^ M100 • • • -o—I -si I l-i l-i H HO O wi t- ro r sPS: * o1= o 5 S ^•a.t/f& ^is:sa ^ J.^110*10fi>1-0 »«BJ-H 3 39 1 IStTO-I O :.I •Drli-'01 O 33 -Or!Bl mftt _—i;0rt J^NJMhJ•< -i-Wx x x w Ti-n-n IB nO.C3. _o-"r>aoa-* •o ;OHT moI/!-" I S-HHH-I IB 'IB O3 IB :**311 IB M 3 :cn rt Mf n ~\-I 73 -*-< & -L -'•onn 36 a.•< H A, -L5 >a> ciH0rt-'-v>Ho.r-1/im j-u! -i.MIB —( if 3 inZaiHO-'-IB O.3o ^nno IB IB-hi-tns ain Q.M o m M IB IB -". O-O rt 3 IV ZZl/>O—I rt m in_-n> = P MC\ Lnmn ^3^»3 m n o o —(mo uioo a> " TJma • be °- Mz i 3a ->-Bn -grt a n i->i-o o o n i= 3 i/i-li o ryan MO f-.c ome Hin 3 o »T rUB_IB ^3-IB-h O-rl-•IB£i S1^,in O IIB O : P> r> 00a. en,-J O3 i->• OrB i i o a. i/> >i w mi-ie . -i. -urn 0 3C-0 rng"-Q/a 'M?O rl3 Um 3 H<as ?.»*.-<WOO• H•o o« on ^ « ro Nminia*alS5fl&ZSaf ||<3|f*<>8Mi|2milIsIIIm3li i|I|fs§5i|||^ Sa^g'-niits's!s£!|tg|&=r n m —i ? -y .3- o ^k J11 o w < w <CL (TJ D. fD ooo o o o •a -a -a -ain in in in M -o -i. H n ooO ra n (P O D r—•• nio 3 3 o. i * s>~ Po *« O O O *. < Ifl 4- IB > -hOO i ib +• -"-3 T I/1JO-~ ~ +6) O I3 -Ort rt O(->3r-" ^+ -N MO O IB —<lt O 3IQ •o-< o' rt^-f w mw •< o _cmo + -< -j-nx K x mo c o rf I rt O10. EL ~iD rt - - - O1 Tru IB on rt IB ID.OJ + in 73B* ro i+ IB O3 IB I 0*+ rt IB 5 S ~ b 3-Q.+ -"-me o c n-n rt So.(BUT 3-O * >< -ju t Q.IB . l-< >BJ CH-I H-IHIB ^l/l(B -i. Z Q. M D -" S 1/13 O.IB EB.VI Q.10 -•---rao rniH 8 . _ - _ .mMO 33 -iOO>MC Q.Q. Q"C rt 3 IB £ TlGStu HI w 3 m n o o *4mo '/'Qo * rt -g r-o O 10 A i 3n MO/-.COCDC HT n 3 o »T rt IB >rt 1/IW---1 _IB o 3 3 o n nc o o3 -*nO IB r> —«o Vi -i nrt rt-^b o D.UI rt rt-- Web DffMa.rt a.o rt. . 3 u' 10 rnn 3 Dt3.t>73D) Off r °-S a 01 03 DO -I Hn n n n o o o oo o o o in w in in O to 3 ID o 3 r-nio 33 a. iiin "3 H> fg £ it? • mo.T mz>iBOM-nit rt 73 U Z- OrTHH feM,3.PNrtn • Q. "< ™> + -1 Jj d'g -i- T fll It Bl + rt P C1 -J-ti rt C3 <-"L o o + tfi m o~ i 1/1 ;o -"•+ 01 O 33 "Ortrt•?+ ftl inu' :ito + 1< -'•X: IB ri: it o ro ^B 'u 3 u O2--' rt II M^ O ft —'IB O "Q.mw iQ-JI -fv L+ O JDH-.I.Q.3 T mo O rlT -I It p (0 1/1 g * 4» 3rt7O-O. IQ n?°mitlHw uiin*-'rt +rBOrt • • - O -" 31 3"&i IB on rtO 3-Q.+ i + -. I IB H T 3-0 +•< 1- ro ( I -i lu r--i 3 in rt HO + i-f IB —I111 T 73 -t,-<ra.+ j.mc on -pt/> "i _no 3^ 3"is>BJ ShHOrl -<•»-la-r-i^m -"-w ->•MfD -H VI 3 1CZQ.HO — 40.3o -omio IB IBHii~</ia Q-VI a.n o rn M m rt --«T £^T^ta-aC^_ ro = m Otflln (B o >5-0 ,rt 3 It S:wnH rt w tn^•"5;=K-'3J? no t/iQO si rt "013 • QC Q. M: i S3 -"-u H CDOC 3O -"£>•n —iQ-rt-i. IB3 -I•O 3 I <C Hme: j E o.r I/I 'I O ID U 1-3 IP O 3 3 O n n3 -hua it n —10rl rt-^si O O,-"-a-s-Orun it i o a.<a-IIr n Ior- -<I • ---ZIBQ= O Ulom rt-.1 Jrt "g1 J- ZO.'Oj o oen..O-rt a.O rt - 10 mm 5r~ _ x n03 to nt>-a _i. 5.3-Q.O -nrib BJI 3-rf nII « rtI la oBO T . »*^rJOO n c C -n-< -"• is 3 i**HJ*i^dilif u, 9 £ -2. 5! 1 tf I «S5-fIaI"SuoS-al*ill HIM:|g3^||5ll allMS^Sf I ^ i 11 s * 8P— Z u -v n ?i en ^nfiiff* i* -ff a c g BMU»I'S j1 *j * P-A — » isM:?^ : D O = 3 PI*i I *5lB0= 3oJfca'(Qs> !oI P < tu < o o o oo o o o •a -o -a -a a am w • n n A c-n 01 fro -o -o T— _i.. -n "O Wl 3 3 3 (u3-D a- o- a- nW n -i T ini/inM -a -j. H n enfB o s i—3 3 Q. n- TONJn io i i 4fc O I " OO1-1 O1^1 O ^"5aS 1? 5ml rl §^ |g i|32 tfsi 1ff§ ' 5isr-ico_-O ?CTtmre I j O -iO i, 1 = X BJ MC M is O —'Km 3> 3 ^3 Ul ID r-Can OP (=3 ' t l/i(t L^3O- . _. —-BI c.1 <ra mo-i. ID mm !£^,—ffil CL^ miDWO lH-h>T- o 6jcrine o Oo 3 mft Oft •oz -I HOnm XX =•*>lt CMDrf -"-!«H^r—v>» J-u> -J*M H v 3 »oZ13 MO-1-™ D-3 ->rf 3 IS Z • QtK i: 1$',m •rl I.»3-m -h 3 -wo irl rt-1.3-3-v S 01- bs'o Dl-' O ^ . 10 mmi- x S^S0 0.3-0.0 O',O1 cCO(A 5 DO sK -_ TJOU) 11ClIXlw-m OQ*VH 8NJ §X)M*lISt/i*T]i—v^I o 3> Hlr a a X* ff' T "r B I|l*al 111 * s i~ g z a a J . I 8 5 . ? ? 3 i f 3-TS1 S ^ a § 59 3 ^ a 6 * a a? :. %BJ < fu < o oo o o o I/I W W I/I CO 3) 73 73to • n> n> fD M -a ->• -I rt DOO fD 3 n o 3 ^oia D 3 o. iw -a i-> c: NIrvj co ro ui* n io i _ H i-11-1 IDO . . . -Q-si | )_> h-> I-* HO O v i—O Kl ?Snr 3i-i-3ro m r w 3S3sSM M = 3gT3<n tua) 5rol spoaEu^ si3XnjW<o laWT! 2.as £3 " CC" KKo i-i-g f-j-nS SSS *4.3-=1^SaiGain MMU> ooui r^Oll;OO HHO MHO —1<" V ' 1 1 IT(P MMfTIg D.- • O-JOOOOTJT3 73K05H-- _^IrtOfONJKJ•"•n x x xOMO -b-fc-b£33 s C CLCL1VI t O >ri 3 10 z MO r-.C OHnn 3 o H BIOC 3O -"£>-n ^a.rr I. IT UJ EC' > O O II O 3 L _ .. .i -Ha (B r> —iqI rl-^W1.3-3-Oi-t ... _o 3 a o n nc o oJOWTTO.W rt rt i rt On Ii Ol-i. u . ^.35J O= O'• OIO rf MOO• <•o o» Of or,o-I7)01 00 10 = S II :3 S§? SS ?1 J m!iuhi= « =• e g-n -< = • 05wa«a»S»SliinlniS*S|tHHISSMM3*JoMsBSaS l^lflfll 0-^Wo.O w'Q.S.g' !-tMi!fS-ta^S srS-™*5H^sllo 5 T Q ff||| s i 1 a I £££a I* I1!!!!!^ O T U i%£ 9 il I ^ f = !|li|Si i 3 § D) &0 »?iS i § »| i* fSS! g8 3 8!oI o oo o o o in I/I M in O CD^?«lQJ3 4 i^sis as M Ss^= °^». 1X093^ I'T 3b S9 M t3ffll p ieas SII WW"Osa 03gu^Eajo —2 lOX CUDOO-'J^'-nilohJi-iCIMl «= ffOIOD3-33 >mm mF^i-1*-1OM-n 0eiMO<£vivi*rMOoc joro-si»o^u>i-ivih» rrn.fraoHLO'-'Ji-'i'iooroo§3HKHMD r1 I—'Q K-'l-'MI-'O —1^"&) UJOJOJWWWiUUJUJLaihjotrnn ki fl>5 ai<nhjkj» " ^ ** hSSS&rf S SC. SSiJSo ' m IB oooooooqqroaoo ooo_ oooo ' r» ^ J IE Mb 1. tl » Q. O-i Qoqoqqooooon HI>-IM«I ..it I—< fTQ-r»iO o m -TX fll MC OJ CLV-era o- z w —i -L .m o —>on> ^-hr"vi3 if am n i in IB ft ( o mM J rt (u I-H.O ni io n cic T1 J-ZW-"- .irl O l^if ro Grt I ro O c ^^ •rt 11 -• —' -Bi CL-I <ra : i in §MI 3MI-D .•3 IB r m««»>_•*' IH&I fTlDI Cl u y> > n> cn x -'•at o.: 3 C.VI Cro rB -i-C3 *->T^lOT l/lTJ-'-S 3O 3 C Q.O. IP _ rl 3 IS Zft In I_ -< -'•net iC\Vi N KHO r> ^3 ^99C (Bri3 Of] OO -rms ixgw m o u ft •mu o —'ft c n. izo -h m 3 ^-ftiT o 5D-H J-ft 3 n i =.-. tn—' •* o i T-C-I n ' w ^ K-i. ^ D.ft-•-ro3 i1C 3 elSll I l/l l/l l/l l/lt/l 10cccccc-t^^Ti-o-a-n-i -o -a -a -S o 3 3 o n nc o o o o o oH*O nj n ^o wnTTT*iTft ft "i. Bi O CL If f* ft ft rl ft rt-- t> ft op un or~ ^J- 1 • -i. z i-I 03 O M-"• Oro rt- r+W3-rtfl roIU* O> -I00 i^JOO , b"i on 3 UJOCTII-'WIO- o*.o-,3<D'i CO(0 5 O IS a I? s 5 a.H£ CD CO -i -i a. n a. n o o o oo o o o ft" >3 Ort I-Cn ca ww m ot/i;o -••BJ o 33 TJi-f rtfii mDj i mo —' IB Q3 IB I—3 =cn i-f Mrt IB H-l 71 -h-< •or- H -4pr-03e3 a-fi>W CMOrt -"-in MIB H w 3' iC o -cmo IB IB-I1I-VI3 O.VI Q. & ^ Z_ IB 3 IBm^p 33 -iOO>MC Q.Q.&i^w IB o > mo i/ifio uI • QC Q. I-23 J'Pi 3«=> " I- IB »3-|B -n• 3 m -•••o o• rt LOW^J-I i.w ic c c -n — TO-a.. 11 - -i —>o3 o n nc o o : _< Q=l i-j- on i u« za.1 oen NJH.-'- o II 1CM OO T • **•< 2 «C«O.-'—Iera- o*,O"zfl)3.CD C<n<A 5 O N) 2 p o o *>. 01 in m i/i i/i OO 73 •*> 7iro - rD fv n>w rra -B -a -a -i. H n coro a n o a inia a i a. -J i O O O U * 2 SECCCCCPPPSMO I ' KP i Ki i i h-5K*MOi p.n'ijfjp KCfS«KBKPS^2 QfJT"T*""^i HH"o^nvi^vir^ OH :=3 *B( nNiMCl2UOIJrrv_ . H-T1OH,ozi-mzr-r,,C ,C,,&l_IOI|-'MMrJM~Q *-rJ*JOld»-O LM--,II-IL*. ,=._ r ^.rr . __r_;-k/iU^U>^iAps>u. roho^jgaw. M>^«HOiur<j> 3C 3Q 3QC -g rrrrr? PPrPPrrrsBpSMoSHSS' MO7S mmtnoi^a MNhUvUhiavoiio IT Q IT O_rn*f*»n1 M Xc ;ooa^j r O'O1I•OD3:'r 2 tt> IB !»SoaHn> mnn-titnO U 3 < HHO-ftl -'•Vl» ftl 3 m&l 1?rt 3 in ro zrc « 3 IH< 3 wo x3-<-•-! O- e ^s ID ID in —' < i' rtre m ^ o if -f.oH33mii>3O 101 D U O -'•Q^ — IB ^J-Q. 3m =c o1 i N -j-erit m 3-1= 3 - rire D.ZO <XBJ i •< -"-ox x x•a N MO *a A'•-i n os p1 D O-COW A< O—'rtooo . . _:-D m CLO »H-">^o o -hr— n T -i.t/i—1£ IB T mo —O3loe=- 3M-"-ca i/i—'uu TI 310-^.3 -1- rt •-n.—iri CDC c -to -t rf n T 3-—th-'l-' i rt X 73 i'<- - -j>w m n .. 5P<w m M3 m r—BI 3 in rt > rt o-o T » -ti-JIB-< _i._i.mc o IB n: Jt CTftl^ Q-- '. Q.-1.O E ID O -hO cxraxHacH nw O.T c o-n-1- n> n m »•< m ™ m m o-1-I-1TO-I-I-1-1-I. irt rt r+it IB rt t rt n T I OSOWp; 1OOO- 3ua •m o it w r—3 TO-O .. O 3 3 O n n " " -3 -WO IB n —'O-.^B, - -•Qrt '-. II (/I1/1MO"^ n o : 3U IB IniQ m-jit ii-aTO-OOC O O 70O in T i mBi O O.U1 rt rt > 01 iOl—I. . . o-<T>OOM AOf u :-n3- 3 H- OOoOoO !-'>-'ooooooeoo-yoo •sl-slOOl—OOOI I I I O oooo • • • • SSSS £«->-> • -"-zit>m—' O3 O In-•- om i-»-•»rf Mh*< M -ti n m M. - - • rt 33o D J»- za.*aHI-I maoo o otu i/nrt 05 r-JT Oa.rt Q. 3 Wz - ID m A 3r- ^x n •_ -o5D.3-o.(-i -n 3-rt nIt rtII id o IB ^>In i i L IO MIW3 ~JOQ-n o-o- ID It -S-1'Old n 33-IB nQ.3-c oh—'Ti ID a. j AOKJO-hl/l II vivioaoe ii i i i ya iMI--oo-sior-I I I I O .n iOOOO I oooor- i JOO II I b" M c(0(0 5 O O 10 S- SSSSSOOOOQOQHl-DOOM CUGIHOH-i.Q.r-M=J IB H VI 3I-HD-'-omo a po w 73 ja am fp "_ ftt n (6 c•n i/i rca "a TJ -i i st| 3*£#$i/i -n<n|f"MB)0 - T*•m ooH!:d <*01 -N ?igX3:*3^'""Ns»£T|r^v«/ W < B) <a. n o. n o o -U en b o o oo o o o •o -a -a "oUl W I/I W ao :ofB - rDw 013 l/i n_ TJ -i. -I n ooO n 3 n o 3 i—nio D 3 a. n n iI K t-' M100 • • •-si I O O O -"• On < w2; r s•< r s<a nv -i O'CTzfl>3 S^NMO l/i "a_1 O O—irl—i a: 3 o B- si >"o -i -h uo oo - fB n S'O* o »H j.r-1-r- O.H • 3'M-"-c in—i 3 z o e c -lip -n o > -i 3- H i OCT—irtilM 0-fB O3 It F-II rDIB rt 3Eni-fKH^ (r O-ftl M */*("•.** A -J o ra 3-rJiB^-i-mc o OOO O rt Q.OZC < rt -i rJMr in ±O.Cvn O < ii O B) 3 < MB. •CLBJ CLMO^-|V O.3 o -i-o 3 n>-IT < O.QWT3 r»il CTTJni nt at -•• — >oc IBISI3" in— II -"• •o fti o -!.£ -i-fm -r+rBO-ZET-i.—i -< -O 3 Cftl BJEL— Irt i-l ->•!3-c.ln _i( re ft VI O r-i m iO-U'O B.- I It O, J1.CL3 < rt c O rldice ;c a.£3 -j-(art 3 ' Ow nfe" ni • mfD rrEni-iruiuH^j OITJ wio-j^jwo ^0*^*5 LJ,*S 5-»P3 ^T,K? 5m I-.^^M mviNJAiMruroviz ^AOig>iMZu«t»«-bHC>tfn oivotAOViOQOH-bNiBOf 4^iD9rsilO^J- 1/1J-+ -o si ft r- m ySwraA -h1—'W o-ni >_-hOrt-'-inn) cr E? |?1| a. o 5ils- 31 o. ro a. n o oo o o o -a -". H o DO P S 32 aD II ?•" « d ft v-wi.fr 4. ujCdBo1^O'o-zD)3'(D > jornom- ;x OJCVo 5-i* o — > ESI i Clx^ TO HO f I _i _' H 3; IB (D ^- in -J- [B* IB m n* T in 3 ic CT1. -D S -'•n Q.3 In I3"—' < -"-rHO l& IB rt Bl i ft W • =n 0^j. =BI -o ndBJ Sa- J I i-msio-o o-a a2.g 3 = IT1 3 c Q.Q- Q.-1 ^ rt 3 EB £0^4? W N MO O —"3^,1lrflBO3OriO OH- D. O-Jr-l c d. Ml: In -ti Bl 3 -"-» ) B mm I rt IB " IB ' -"-I h nJ i ]-» ni rr rp 913 zri rt 3-IB -li ~J—i i -"-me o .i n -riUi Tr-J-diti n-hio 3-s^ H !m d9dnn3:>or-rnmoS n IB a i m W O IB U 1—3[B O 3 3 O n O3 -HO IB n —'O- S^- oeor- «_••'m^ rl COon • -"•__ rn-" 03oo ->• OIB- n mooo o^ ^IIB 03 I*-<U -*—^ Ifi o-i-i D- : J"d°^ f n <c•> oi -iOQA<< yi/iMnn .IB IB -h-1-O1O 100- ic o.'ooni i. (n ODeo-- n a3-CL—I—I OO teat»o- o-o- ooo .I I 1 oo O--JO oo L IB I oo oor- ! I -O O h-i in Sn • M (A 5 D TO O II3 Nil- , gt • 'III! o ifIHI Ms» !f o o oo o o o in l/i i/l Ul-H -h -h -0 r ?. Kffs» ua 8£ Si B si 5* 5^ Isa a HFrrsz TT'S'i^rtioirjja n mSSSS^j iooatpQQQOO otja OOOOHCBMujujMoat-'G SJUI92*''* !&***G £jOOQOQOOO ooo Crm i-'i-'fHM. tl f~,f~, mmi H ;o e co Ha--i.x 3 IB sa: IB mno-< -hrtQ.m c=w -henIB•"r-i/iaiB« „ H frt 3 VI ID'O HHOX•omO 61 3 <I VI IB >O rl _ , ,.3 ->.rt mM O BJ O O rIV I-IS13 O~ ' ' ~HCC13 uft* in r—z oft"-' p »-"-(Tin Bi SMO -O 3< D.CJ • «m -io'o -*O 3u w rB -JQHtOrJrwhjin •< > 3: -J-O XXX-'•NVimo ttiAAia fO rn 3 o3 o-u^nw n•CTfB • O—'rtOOOw -n-n-n I £ O 19 n m x mO O -'B3 3 rt U rt rl--"C ->•3-Q.ln _ir, IB IB D-^j-Q ^rf T v 'D.-..0IB O -tlO «•< H<B bnCMIt-i-l 3--ll-'l-'m» IB M on rt Mnm Hn -«•< Bi rt ZO. -'•It Q.3 In -iCl <IO IB IP rt fti~h^3 ckin a&> n TlMl/13 3 T TCJO C CLQ. Q.-1-ain to o > IBOTllTIrt 3 1C ZQ_C ma* n rt -•- -03 on o o HJ.IB ms Oc a. MmZ I 3 -"Bl BIn -o rt 3 n Hi-, rt iBO33onncoo*):3 -no iBn-'oinrt rt--s»i o am r J-3-3"prt I" IB —i -•• n IB o n. m r -T13- 3U i II OB'O" t >3 O-n IBHrt Bi*MT -185 S-r->U!ia -"•I ^> 5S rt-'rt M•< hi Hi « flH 00- Z Q.T3SOa O On MTp> -t.-- O rtQ.rt D. 3 Su- ID m A 3I— x n03 X*> IB O 3-i a.rtn cr O'.cr Oen 10 *m oo Si o M H IIfflf i*S 5NU I 3 g i a 5 ^P IB =• ^< _ »B -3 » S §.iltlg',g 5 » 5 S ,rlHi• I» D. fD D. (B 00*01 o b o bo o o o •a -a -a -ain w w in a oo 73 7i 7i afi» * in re (D cw rt-o -o -o T 1-1 TJ ->• -I O CDO (D 3 A O 3 I"niD 3 3 D. I r 32-*£ -hrt aiBBl 3 <3-< -"--1 iJTjm s?sa=»-h03•a MOX. -j-om^'rto rt B) r-i/ia o-•rt P1MCn IB C13 «-" n IB x IBo -" =3 rt U rt I O -i-u rtax jig P I BJ -n-n-n moi ID w3 IB r- mm H or~ft» >» >Ort---H™ -j-urn m m 0.3 ui Tit » rf aiO.SU (13 -"•O1O-O O.3- - - .oso i— m IB>T CTO(/> m IB cio c Q.Q. D.-I•ow IB o > n>O~c mrt 3 rB z n r> _C! MO —'3^-UJo a nn o o -(-".fllO DO 01 rt TJ-J a -liiQ IB n -JO in -i Trt rt-^JU O Q.W rt rt-"•3-3-Qrf l/i (BOi IB n — • IB • ^--l-"-ll IB O 0. W M1-> OIB rl- Jrt Sa1 e- ZQ.1J o a *:-a IB(u-O -. N ua' O? -1OQi^JOO• III Oi on 3 OO-IBO.-.—1<rv oO1z».ID.73Dl OO) O 01 ^i E K ^ Q -g 2 ol TJ «f3! i- I. oooooooo I/I I/I M Ul a oo 7373 71rn UD • fD (ft (0•n t/i era "a "a--• Hi/inM -o -"• H r> DOo n 3 ro o 3 i—n>O 3 3 CL BI/I ^O (-J C INJINJ ro r-j i_n* n iI l_l ,_! |_1 ICO . . . -D—I -sj I (-I 1-1 1-1 (I O O O r->o hJ < £>r sp 3;10 n 5<Ps5 I'z OG 5?a«as^ ?sdXor-. It |S§i33 ^t^^i^Mh'^ttew'"* t^i^^t;™ ••4oiwi*unwn I/I * (DO ICCCS" 'Hi<o, , , ,8 A*ssg* -•-»r^f^^^F*^-h-r-r-rJr-Hr-l-'r-l-Ha h-r-Hr-O H H H H M M H ObH-niB i-r^fti z^zr-ui ^=S= rn-'-rtinomS-|3 iMQ :B^NihJr-'OI-'l-'rtjrM-frl-^ u^^uin HH*kAAW<^4J)&U<U>^JI-IO'H l£Vl£M>-l 4V 5S in o> HH« m Mi-*rnOOC3rtO BJ 3 < ftl •"I in IB O. I: -j-n n>mm weti it IB > -henr n —'H3iDi-l 3 in IB O. 1/1 O.-O X IB1-'O rfJl LUT ELB) >3 O --'IB si rt-"o o in rn o -hE ITl/l • Q.-I Bl O 3 -1 -I < CUBITS rt-C W mpIB IB IB -J-—'O C —>;c rtnOI-Jf-J I-J3" III --11 -*< ->-?Sx X X -1 Q.-1IC 3 (B 3" IB ID 1*13 a -j—i •< o 3-x O Jon-"??? OO -i.uiM— irl3mr>M3 3 rt U O1Q in rf IS HIf -I -•!+ £ T » -ti^ T 1U i —i ft -S I" SI rt Ia.-i. a . B> iID o -ho -D :- 3 ---3 IB —IIP_|_J3 - -IB-C a.3 IB Q,n O nai-_H Ha!HO -1 O 2X 3"IBri3 U U Ch-IOH-J-tflr* -1- Q. I— Vt IB -*• in -^.(u -1.3 IB H in 3 IQ IZ Id ^ fT*O ID TO^'O ID -hi—1/>3 O-ln Cu3C OITIIHIBIB^-iCLtn 3-i OTa<D-o->• C I-Z IB 3 IBn —'i/i i-'O 33 T< U ftl i-rO>MC Q.Q.(Hrt ai/!VltI!O£IBEBU"^ rt3IBZad.-i HI on OH rr tfi 4/>- tu -n>zfli Hj —fa (/>mn —|3'S "3-1 < 3 • Oc a. n «ftQ_n ^rtsri*-1 O us 1 <l>n-ti O *JMO r-iC OHT n 3 o i rt Q.I -I t: rl O Ian o 3 • -n TOOC 3O -'•id- (DIB —'C -1nB) ELT C3IO -I Ulm ->.w i O IB ft)i O 3 3i -hid IB I (SM/ltHt*C C Tli-a-n -4 IB O 3 3 O n DC O O 73..a o irort in n. .. ff-i.iB-->-"-» » o D.ftl IB W rl 00 n n i g o-: t U -i. n • -i-z m-i 03 O in-i. OlB rl-rt H>-< ^J-JH mM -J- ZQ.13SA O OCD MTH -h—"" O rtD-r+ Q. 3 U- O miB 3 O 3 XT3 Iftftl-O ->•0.3-0.0 -nrl Bl a \- O 3 fD1O- Id Q.'on 3 OO-IBQ.-I—iiro- O1O"zfi>.3CD V)(A P O s <^*>?: o*.w JS1/1 TT• IflBl Il|>1 S?<1*5C3 Is — ft q ^ Q0 = 3—-?5 S £•f 5 a"1"1 8"*^J|aS"l&?O Ilia« la?i I f £ I s j ft m DJ CO -I H a. re o. a, o o o oo o o o •a TI -a -ain in vi ui r 3: OB^J-jQMnUi A*L*fM*4H FjpO* -^lOtVAVKKKCCt:PSSSiiS GCPS" iJj*G. .O*o-z§'(D71fi)3<DN W(n aoo I > f f * Jla|« * 5 •^ 2 ? » D* I" iif i » G S8 § Ia * a 3- I.*&m ?<Q f IO if (u < Si <D. ro o. n o o o o -h -h -ti -h a ao M » 33 an> • rt" fl> fD cw rro ~a -a -t 10 in 3 2- " -PJ—I i/m- nio 3 3 o. n- * e ^as r,3i s£ft £tfs^ sS1 «"Osa ecccccpss ,iS M i us rt-a :*m2JMOHU! i i Ehjhj£gj«*jf viOOviHUJke**HSSK8SOOOQQ26 2-PLYS '132 REQUIRED05W «!hgihjgi&hjr-J^3S"jSSi3^/l/~iMMHwCLnHSQa^^OO-^i/*hhJU>-^h'0>V'JjSSSSSwQQOOOOO3OH*J-fruJoL*1 w w i. A. O Q ->1 71 01 71 Vw en6 m notoo o Ci 3:3-^1 *.11118 iljiluAww Q*QM-ntt S:D£J£ O^1*CT^JJBIO- AMOBph->i-iuj- i 2; r>o o *^ID ;be 70 <-njSSSS- SEEKESE- g H-z0"™ °»H3 z*1*^.^"s^-^ ^x^'X^^XV^go I rtO -J-m * rtl/lQ. j-itfl -to ffl PJ|\H _|lXl-'WT3 3 m T HI Ml*rjiirjm m--O ft» 3~j— iZ J.JWIP-^SfioS SSS^B S -y~i3 O tfl CT Bl g *ONP^JVV- oirwoiefl^JMfc- VH^"'— -^z S^aujuiJ^i' SoSSSSS- , ^^ ^^ ^ m j-p OCO fii f& D ft) -cooo ooooooo • —1*1 n ^^C»viiO MHU>WJ-^rJoQ K —lO ^"So6t»^H 5£^ioEi-BM °£ ^^ o'raMt-a? <D n." -ttfl, ft] I^IU•fl -t -t OOC• m ---z J3 r*A -</^i*^ miTTD n "^OZTJ ^£ccr-"-x 3 jr*3 ^^^ ro-jror- »g^ft) -4W rt ST 3 -• — "H3(DCJ 3 < MCLIU ^-l/M? W 3 mftJ -If 3Wf«ZAU%2tH<3bf^3 X ^-'Ort -*-o-3'3afljjkj>ac> -itfin>wcn/iKH 3fi>c3u A jn rv z Q nL^ ic ^'3 A — i^rtor^r < b o -"-orv ^ 3 ^ N MO **• & sm =cffTr*^OQ.coatfDl-*'CTrt>m BT O < O^r*OC• rt H> Q-Z O O~ft* £"^ T -J'^1 ftJ "T| " — 'O o -hr~nn -»-i/i —La fo T rno ^ D. — i rt m c c -}tQ -irtngT^— H- OO -"- m rt &J33:rir*H33 r+6*<[flO'6iM ISi*~. < rt ft H O'zICD.CDN tl HM- HOrt-i-ttfi ^-vt i o > I It Z V) (A O CO CD IB '= -ID3C-l C. . J n -JOB 3- -gnw O.T c 0.0--- i-- IB" m" IB" nfx rf |f if IB" o j rn ->-w ID c c TJ « o ™ w r-s -i-o-aIB o 3 3 o n nc o o yartrtrtrtlBrtrtrtrt .in IB OOU3OU1 souio- >—i-i. IIBOI• • • TJ & ID B> 3lOOJO-J -T13" 3lOluO-hOAl rt OS N M m—' Q3Oln ID Otw -•O-JDOO -•- OIB rt. 3wvg..I I i I r->Hrt M » < . I I I o C O- at D.-Oncno-j o o-OOOO t/l!B 03 MTI JHW -«—" O rt Z - ID miB 3M i- x ni Ol i Ol 331-O 3 fa IB-oootsio. own -i- "Ubaio2ciD"3"S'P u1 • i NJOO)r- i • to i -n on i in or IB o0,3-C O ooooi- i n*O*.3°$t/l" £?b .*!< Om O£" «^) !liH|!l!|IS|S|m"** BT — =TT |§ ^31S <Q | !o 9 o o o o -o -o -a TJVI I/I M Ul _ aom ID • ID ID ft)Tl in OTJ TJ TJ nio 3 3 a. u p j. IQ ID f. (TS =3. H o-B).•*(D•^d -<5 "~' X:E 3-IB IB <I H VI 3 1O SO HH(1»Ll-Hn^.iBO.3 QZQZ-n-nrnio 10 u <><?!—'• i re O>MC a.a. 3rl3O 10w-h • a oT oa^-rr r*c3->3 IB eg u o o~i b 03^-. J-3-Ortrt ui o'S^'Sn --Srtj•< -"-flu x xn N MO *•.&*: IB ns p !-• O OOI 0> ^'I rj Q.-I I IB ID33:Or*MC <-hr^ IB —1T3-1 >O 1 70 -n-< H3 era n3Oom ---< 1/ilB rl HOCMMOX:wznom.im- i*s .I--DH m-ooji-'o y>tMm-v, zELnI- hJH>nm> M :a!l-lLfl- urn m 0)(A D O I/I O IB III IIB O 3 3S -MO ID 10 IB OW 3 u i-roo itn 01— —' O3 O-"- OIB rtr+t-* ' Jt~ 7CO. il -ti-J- OO.1-1 O. 3 r-" XO 3 CT3 Q.3-0.'|->rl UII 3-rtI IBH<£M OO T• 00*.-<MOO• H•O Oui on nc o o o 71o in T T T pQ.W i-t rt rt ; 3 OOi-IJS-IBO.—I—I—Io-D-tr 10 10o>o> • f'PMo !f^ui< Q! If I „ tS > « n, s S 3 « O, a <Q TJ S •* i X & > 3 3 19 2 d " a s a. m o. IB o o oo o o o O OO TO TO 73m ai • re rc tow OTJ T3 -a •o -"• -i n mo n 3 to o arno - O85 l o-O"Imfti -i in S i—' < ->- riU >3 O~ _ 3 -Orl rfOft* mttz-ijorioiwroi-j_•< ---nx x xHNMO AAAxin ns a m o—"rioooz-h_ ti-n-n-no JOH---I-I-I-i—i mo -"c: i/i—'no mm tsic=4k* /in'36 a.•< -I m i—< o.r-wifmio o it H tIX 01 ME Q.MO-rvo trzvi -orrwIB o --Clio -f,r-i/>: t Q.o-r .l tsilt—'rl U wa OSMC Q._ o n <nc o^iiii nP_ -i-Z(u -O rf 3fti S 3 mrfl/in-l rlojJ*Q Mm -ni.a:w n Q-T iw 3 m _ n o IB o c • 8*Mr* •pO i I 1/1IU 3;_H-a i i <re o L^ nM-hC 3rl 3ial^-tl H^^m ii-r ic»3"ft w o ID a i~5 o a 3 oa -t*n is n~ —' -1- n n o Q.ID U 3T13- 3 IU rl 00 nn 01— -<-••I • -••Z(D~" 03 O VI-1- OIB rt-l-l M•< M-li H FT1M- • i-l 33Ol- ZO.-5aoi o on a rsiiU -t,_!- o rln-rt a. 3 u i- x n0 a fi nu-a j.0.3-o.n -nrl BJ M1 3-rf i-lH n rFi <a oe ° iO -l• oo*^JOO Sn C(fl0) 5 m Ft* N o oo 5 in tn tn ui 0 ffl a <B O a r—•• nio = a o. iw-3 *-• -x t= roro COM ui1 n io i H> t-1 MIOO • . . -rjH ^j i (-J hJ |j «n o oo RoM e J Bl'3D)3N R -i Oc CLi3 -1- (0(0 m 10 CD* -JC -I - .OBI Q.-1 B O.O w -i i-n nvin o IB u 1-3IB o 3 3 o n i tflM15 -n±rBt r+fl -J-d _—i O3 O r+Oo01-J-U on .?00«i<<OO 8 ro isMH«ejb-; 5 a ap J I I= i 3 s ^_»55« "i-S ff ^ rt|S| |*i| ?^ !ilt*!*|>! llfilllifS~ ! S ^ f 1 I e I 3Dl»i?aiqlSmgiin|ii|si Us H||S 1 Q.|ll?IIlR?a, o oo o o o ft) -I 1 -J Ul o o o i-1 ^ £w o tuq ^^ffjs»as ^ij OG 5?ab *£ ft Ki9 ^1ffxSK ^(D s!3Sssissi •J^JCTQAM' OlVlpQQ- ULUW^i- j, ^!?PPPPPS PPppM'S HHMMQ rHS"*".,:.,: ,E -™8 888J-P "m ""oooooo ooooo oppo n it oooomU 1 1 I In a-=•8CTIB H H M h1 m(t Q.. . . . O-i oooooo O'o-zu.9ID.7)1aN J 1 1/1->•+capo 3t = eIB -h>—'Mil -I U Cl-ir O-o o-zin —' -omwm o —"On ' si1 i ctcrmLi -i \f<tJr+ W MJ o mi-i'-I Cl a----ai TOM -i -n>m x x x-13 tifnj.Aj.j. it> c: rt rti o i/ifi?—U9I/1UBI3- ODDODo c —ra n i 3E-riTi-mi u Q.-I <reID ml/no :^Bi Q.7D rwa M-h-ieroet^oo-i miHi-i J.ui BJ ID WHHnmoecvopfs mHH00- ">BI ---rt 01-^-^o mtro ctsirf ->.i-—o to r-00 3 ma> in n H01 rl • I— «« S-p —^_j^J4^^.r__ fu >3 e >3 IB 1=3 i.tnr* W m C.m IB 1/131 -1-a-i ju o 3-«'3 -or* rt _ •< ---OQVI N MO3J C IB O3 aIT1T3 Q.CDJU IBS-O O—'rl * "*" -jS: r-ri -i mo -J' co'-'n C-i =•- IB 3 Xil rt :<-fcrf IB - C D.O.Ifl IB O >rt 3 fD Z fl O Ooiurf-CD. o* D.-I e n.n-3IQ -1 VIIQ if vi in in I/HH in o n fu» o 3 33 -wo «o n nc o o o o ; •^.IM O Q.(n rli-t rti-t .Ort V* n iO -'•It • -••gOQ. W*.UJM1-.I CJ rtOQ I "•I P[J.ZJ—< O3 O M-"• O(H it- IB JOO I Oi on H c (A O 50m oo Bl < BI < •a -a -a ~aIf Ifl If Ul IQ VI X 3 X U53T3 O" O" O" f>(u T T 1 Irt •a -•• H i~i TOrt» 3 rt» o 3 ^n<a 3 3 a. u too • • •"si I |-> l-> l~>O O ui n <(u rt>n I »3ajB iS P8=0,3 °%P* tncq &-. <B^«c SBSft U- coin if-I -id-1 •OTW«>I«S m..tn B> -i.3-MiI *^**-^Z i^\3 ttJ g -"J-•a •<z-o WEOIHIB r ro rfii-in U >3 0 It <=3 <-<vi m owi^-i. U O 3a -^i-f r+at mmj;ort.l•< -M IB ns i -MIB H WZCLMD^--Cl -omc ID re-hi- 1/13 a.01 O m M IB IB13 a. iIB IBT^1_ nMO 33OOOC/^VO-o ,zi/>n-*- b rt •- Q. 13-.fi,ssa.3^ 3 n*» n ^ wi. l/l O IB U I-re o 3 3 oa -wo n n 2-3-?Ortin IB n -••—' j. H re ou 3T13- 3fil rt OB I —i O3 O~-- on rtrt M•< HHil m- • rt 3<e- zo.OH OIS to n CLi-t Q. 3• 10 mre o a c-a JOO F Oi on I in l/ik/11-1IP e c -n•slrtgu -H nc o o » O.IA rt rt O'zQ).CD ro 1 <D W < P <a. IB o. to O O O Oo o o o Op 73 •n w 'n-a • a £M o n < osi r s * P 5 <O IDW n v,. , -^j, ^ rtOOIOCJB"^ *SKigfelrtf?^i5!w^S sQcwioi-'i^r^^ggaSinKS' MOM«M.j5™r o m-fcujAviwiisiui. TI Z3 Z• fi^fi i "J fc -I^•^^^•-So i rtcn/i »M- win A m-ll/ir* T3-1VI1OIO>^ m..in U -".B'l-'l-'nsSS? =P£^|'S"J~Il3"W WOJIBm rtW • J _, o A -W-JMIU u curm r—< o-i-i/nIBtC O » H C:X a MC O.MOT A o -JOA -iir'm3 tn n o mM -IO.OTT1Q. r-Zi" -< 'ntft MOHi O>Mo n i i mr> inf -m =H- o win-LQtnBJS. oo c H-O i S- oo 3 mm n H EA r~ A 3-10A >_-h?'rt-i-in—1—'H3 ID A ^-tfi -J-M mfti "i yi a 10ZQ X J-lt O.3 CD rt ^ C S A -i- rn tstyo^'3 3 ~iOb O 3 £ Q-Q.r^S?S fe _•< -'•nw w(TIN MO rl -"3-< m o-irt C c. M fTl -l.Ul US ^ = 3] V> O fl) b 1-3 TDT3n o 3 3 o n oc COM rf rf^ai o tlfl r* rt >-1-3-3-prHflA Q ^'-'•NIDO^ IniUr'IH1C V 3 Q-T13- 310. ZV rf OS n A i-<n Or- -< w i i in_i.n . ->.ZA J.uiw^--• O3 O in <G MMJ- OA rt- 3 *.*.-r* H A?rrT"?M ^5;<D- Z O.13 COH' O O inIT 03 M *t -I-b Hi—k- O rt 3frrt O- 3 b ID- o mn 3i- _x n rto 3 CTJ rt ft-a _i. no-3-o.n -nrt b su MOO S Sr zu.3 2 oft<_ NJ V1/1 13£?in 01 S 5 5 as 3 N|Silia 5 5 r*' ooO o o o VI VI M M ^ *" ' ' . ^1-1 -o -i. —I O reO a a ffi o 3 i—n<o 3 _3 o. NV^ "O I-1 , c rJNJ CD rvj kn* n io i i-> (-> MICQ • • • -D—I -si I pi 1-1 |-i |00 1/.H"O Kl f^ S i.'* i/i|"SS g*s I OlCTllrooon?! oo- ll i CTIB MMrnm o.- • OBJ ^IVI --I QOOO3 I—•O-^ 30£CO-Hrr n> mnA>>_-hoiHHKBMmw T OHO «4k^ =Mg« WO-i-IS•OfTKO £LIS•oto 3 (/I lODz-dncHUBl — 1C T — IBB3-w a--i c o.n-'- l/lOWft'I~3 TWOn o S a O n nc o o M3 -tiia it n — 'o w -i T rnrt rf^ a> o a, w rt r* >•J-3-!TO« W IB Sbj is n -"-is t ^' H— <-J- I IT O O. VI KIM M n 01- -< miii,-••« . -.ZIB -i.|s»M>.—i Q3 O I/I IQ V1V--i- orcrt- 3^i-si< 5C-h« mM S.^_.. . ,-t 33 Q-O- Oh-i O O Wl(6 co isn -i. o.r+0. aw ID- * U1(S 3r- _x n riO 3 ^^ * 3"BJ -a J- _ is0.3-0.0 -n II .r+u- o Oro 0 10 0-jm ooCTl NJji I § i -r'$ Q. ID Q. ID in ui in 1/1 E. wi^lOO 1} -I W I£££££_°S I"1*"1? I"1!"1?O- LHUI- OO-HS..,»3WW«A A oorn 1 QMO D . .eGk/l 1-1/1=1 Q.VI a.m M IB » -"•S-ITJ ID -a_ it 3 is§33 1WC 0.0.1/>I/| /D O >rt 3 ID Z MO/-*C oHi n = 3 >C -1 —I(D=T-TCQ-n-1--I VI IB I VI I ID o 3 a o n nc o o so3 -wo « n —'b «i -i -i mr> rt-^W O D.U1 rl rt >-p.3-3-Ortu Bl rt 00 |n or- -<J- I • ->-Z ID-J O3 O VI-J- OID r+- OM O Oft CO IMTU -h-" O rfO.rt D. 3 Bl r- x nO 3 f-O IDWO J.0.3-O.O 11 hJOO S Sn OO1ED-3(D OCO Ol j 2H 3SPmiiiiuiiH^38= a^-fre* t^351f*S ? •si ?ii w < a < o o o oo o o o -h -h -ti -h OO 73 70 7*ra • <D in ID-n m rro -o -a H -4 i i-> i-> i-1 a 6-crz9.7*0)(DN V)W 5 o w 00 o ' S tt_j-5s«Ssl3's^lHll^lg1 n n n n o i- o r~» _i. n -•• O. 19 Q. (0 l/i in i/l U1 r op » ^ TO g ~n i/i o^ ^ ~b i ic'i/t 3 3 sc w;p 3-0 CT o- o- n .O IB 3 » O n <pJ (DT ( ,3£3aizaQ)N•DXTJ RJCTOS-I l as ; x x 'IP Q? Pn&Dfti IDn O-"rlOOO:-h .w -n-n-no ;oH—'i-i-i- jofto f^3 *o r~3 -El-i rlM<« (• H>T » -h-<l- (A (A 6 x 3 -WQ IPrl rl--s-"•3-3-O«i * n-"-"•I IBIQ BJ-na1 a&:?=_i oa-i. oi»i-t MX PJ-»iB ' U*OO1 O U -h-i-D.r> Q. H IOO SS^• HOon co co —1 Hr~t o n n 5* 5. 13 TJ T) tJtn ui uv vt-h -h -h -h po 30 jo -ya o*p • fD n> n> c M ntJ T3T3 -I _,-1 l/inhH -O -J. —| n CDO n 3 re o s r~nio a 3 o_ n- n <u roT K ££5.^£S ^3*Sn K iW !8 il e-j-j->jQ?>3l 3 n^r-so OD erfgi^fiaSK,r-sM 1 IO rtQOIOO3-;0>• mrti mNi^MMTI ooo— i-rieS i i -im M Xnc joooi-i iii i .1 H*rt HI i i ^gpIH1" i £«3 3D^ _-j_w i ' -irtl/i WH^M -O n Ifl I2l^>— - - fti -.3-K-J|rfQrt 61 • • MT VH/1Mm Q.. •T ooo3 I-10 -<CflBl T tt'>3"of r-t PCrv c:3 *_i i/>n^>Bl O 33 -on if0* mn* 2» , „T mo —it/<—'n mm </>n >i a-A JOB' 1 <<n -i i" 3 <g£&MO-'''D &9T "^ mo n IB • i ID -i •a ia TSi r-z_ n> 3 flTMO 33 -ISOSMC 0.0.O^VI ft O > mo OC O. I 3rt 3 O Iid nl/>Hi O I tnc HT n 3 i r-o mo H DSOuii- _ c 3• i- O -"O- IB O 3 3 Oi O IP BlI O 3 3i -HD m -"•3-3-prfU m n -< ; M-«n mUK«3.3O1 OI CO [SI -h-« oLrt Q. 3 •a ow Sf <fltfl a x 10 p;=sljllKlop SlSifPil IP^SKy o'" iinD02_° P-.., 3 a'"™aaS . S Sr^2 "'CSC1 — Lji?TiTiiT'-nr^'«QQ« o*»i*i -- 3— '^Cii/i Z^*" -*C- OO-'^'tifj -i-- _i/l <"~O •S^£°'|?t2Hk3^?" 5l~'7^3'3SC?av^o5 5*^D-Sn™i»'zS""'S3 J_^O<"--— <fl;;*-,rrtp» - '-^^^--S^^W^SA =1 o fij'y 3 §. 3 o3 —sO.in 2p VIn O 1» o I J KJ•u * 3 f* 2f* 3 " o 3 | '^ O o inEJ1 (TOOq na. West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau Portland Office Fountain Valley Office P. 0. Box 23145 P. 0. Box 9773 Portland, Or 97281-3145 Fountain Valley, Ca 92728 (714) 962-9994 (408) 993-1633 SUPERVISORY FIELD INSPECTION REPORT Licensed Plant: Bear Lumber Date of Inspection: April 21.2003 Quality Control Inspector: Dave Long Time of Inspection: 1:00 PM NON-SCHEDULED TN-PLANT WOOD TRUSS INSPECTION As per Uniform Building Codes Standards Sec. 2311.6 and Sec. 2343.7 in accordance with engineered plan specifications. Lumber Grade <fc Storage Connector Plates Workmanship Accuracy of wood cuts Bearing of wood joints Knots in plate area Split limitation Position of plates Condition of plate teeth Plate to Wood tolerance In-PIant Handling & Storage Bundling, Loading & Delivery Marking Legibility Jig & Press Adequacy Number of Trusses Inspected In Accordance X JL JLx X JLx JL x X X 25 Non-Conforming General Appearance and Condition of Inventoried Trusses: Excellent X Good Satisfactory Poor, REMARKS: Dave Long wa on vacation. I spoke to the foreman. Not Acceptable. Inspector 01-04-2005 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR04203 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: 2788 JAMES DR CBAD PCR 1561424900 Lot #: $0.00 Construction Type: CB041572 RAMIREZ RES REV STRUCT STEEL AND ADD COLUM 0 NEW Status: ISSUED Applied: 11/12/2004 Entered By: SB Plan Approved: 01/04/2005 Issued: 01/04/2005 Inspect Area: +*rr~~~*>^-ApplicAntT RAMIREZ JUAN J&ADRIAN; 3859 CORNEL 92056 Owner: RAMIREZ JUAN J&ADRIANA 3859 CORNELL DR OCEANSIDE CA 92056 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $120.00 $0.00 Total Fees:$120.00 Total Payments To Date:$0.00 Balance Due:$120.00 8948 01/04/05 0002 01 0? CGP ""120-00 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul iheir imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES (T APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously beenojven a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise .expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated Date _ | Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing US Proposed Use Description of Work so. FT:#of Stories of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name ^lllSlli^lPi®lottlrti!tp!i' Address City State/Zip Telephone #Fax# Name Address Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name Address State License # License Class Designer Name Address State License # mffiimfflmwmmm* - City State/Zip Telephone # City Business License # City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: O I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: n I. as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). O I. as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). O I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demotion or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the b/l3 authorized by such permit is not commence/witl at any time after the work is commenced (/ a pe AAPPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ng Official in 180 da riod of i der theprovisions/of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work roWfTtTgbte of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned lay/fSjiaion 1jre.4.4 Uniform Building Code). DATE HITE: File/XELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation In Partnership -with government for Quitting Safety DATE: December 23, 2O04 Q APPHQANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O4-1572 REV (PCRO4-203) SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Drive PROJECT NAME: Ramirez Residence • The plans transmitted herewith have, been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person I REMARKS: Revision consists of steel column addition and relocation. Reviewed sheets S3, S4 & SD4, Delta 3 only. Received one set only. By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA [3 MB D EJ D PC 12/16/04 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4- (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In (Partners flip witR government for <BuibRng Safety DATE: November 24, 2O04 Q APPLICANT iRli JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q~PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O4-1572 REV (PCRO4-203) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Drive PROJECT NAME: Ramirez Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Juan Ramirez 3859 Cornell drive Oceanside CA 92056 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Juan Ramirez Telephone #: 619 921 0803 Date contacted:M/24/c*j(by: j^ ) Fax#:£sSff) 90^, oZ^1-/ Mail Telephone-^ Fax—^ In Person REMARKS: Revision consists of steel column addition and relocation. By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 11/16/04 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O4-1572 REV (PCR04-203) November 24, 2004 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK #.: 04-1572 REV (PCR04-203) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2788 James Drive SET: I DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION: 11/16/04 November 24, 2004 REVIEWED BY: Bryan Zuppiger _^___^ FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep-a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes aNo Carlsbad 04-1572 REV (PCR04-2O3) November 24, 2004 • PLANS 1. Please make alt corrections on the originals and submit two new complete sets of prints to Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (858)560-1468. 2. Please submit full-size plan sheets that reflect the alterations in the cut-sheets. 3. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans. (California Business and Professions Code). This applies to all subsequent submittals. 4. Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). This applies to all subsequent submittals. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 04-1572 REV (PCR04-203) November 24, 2004 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: O4-1572 REV (PCR04-203) PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: November 24, 2O04 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2788 James Drive BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq.Ft.) cb Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Ran Check Fee by Ordinance $120.00 Type of Review: D Repetitive FeeIBi Repeats Complete Review D Other m_ Hourly Structural Only Hour* Esgll Plan Review Fee $96.00 * Based on hourly rate Comments: macvalue.doc MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (Revisions) Project: Ratnirezi Residence James Drive Oceanside, California 92008 Prepared for: Samuel B. Wright Wright Design 2911 State Street Carlsbad, California 92008 Project No.: 04083 Date: October 20, 2004 335 15th Street San Diego, California 921O1 Tel. (6 ^r? MIKE SURPRENAiN ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers PRODUCT M7 MIKE SURPRENANT St. ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers CALCULATED 3Y, CHECKED BY SCALE OA7E. OATS, 0 PBOOUCT207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB, 3HEET NO CALCULATED 8V_ CHECKED 9Y SCALE DATE, DATE. SLAB 14' X 4' X 1/4' STEEL COLUMN RILL PEN 24' X 6' X I-3/S' THICK STEEL BASE PLATE OVER I1 DRTPACK -(E) CONC. FLATUJORK ^^^ 7 C4;. 3/41* ALL THREAD ROD I ^/ TUJO EA. SIDE 1 T^ EPOXY m/ SIMPSON 'SET' EPOXT (\CB.O. "5219; 10' MIN. EMBED. CE; FOOTING- BASE PLATE CONNECTION DETAIL D pfwoucrao? MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO.OF.. CALCULATED 9Y_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. CE^BEAM 5/S1 TMICK STEEL PLATE UI/ (1) 3/4' * LAGS (& MIN, EMBEDJ 14' X 4' X 1/4' 6TEEL COLUMN STEEL COLUMN CONNECTION DETAIL 0 PRCXXJCT207 MIKE SUHPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO.. CALCULAFED 3Y^ CHECKED BY ..— SCALE OF. DATE. DATE, SHEAR PANEL PER PLAN FLUSH BEAM PER PLAN 2x STUDS * 16'O.C. BTM. PLATE iu/ ATTACHMENT PER SHEARUJALL SCHED. -FLOOR SHEATHING PER PLAN -FLOOR JOIST PER PLAN UJ/ 'ITT1 HtSRS CONNECTION DETAIL PRODUCT 207