Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEIR 91-01; RSF RD MASS GRADING; Planning Commission— — - / : 03 43 L SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY S REGIONAL OPEN SPACE PARK 401 "B" Street, Suite 340 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 595-5398 Fax (619) 595-0815 , Nf~, Ogg —Ite 1-3 / V S of S OS S S S Joint Powers Authority The ('sooty oj5an Diego and the Cities of Del Mar Escondido, Ponay, San Diego and Solana Reach This broehare partially underwritten by San Diegaito Rite, / 1 md Conoeri ants I' i/s nit us/isbn an and Friends of the San L)ieguito River Valley tO 1. ( L ' . .' 1/ •H - ,.yc i' ,.1 -- 1 7_kt1i. V. J i ': /r 1' !; j k ' f! : _ij y '; :J ' rt ' ' : J \( J ill \ , dr : i4 rt1 \ 1ir : v tv IF kr." ( j 1 ' t - \ t - 1: I p'k ? ?k'\ , 1 ' ( p, ' L t r / r' ) 1 : ~: ; , ,' L' 1?" i E I T r L ( * , ; t : - ;L j , `* \ ,, -— :4' ' I i ;t ? 4k jfI 1, rr (__ L 2 % * , L • ¶ 4 r . rl~, 4 - ,• ,' ' ' 1 7 t ?- , •4_ q__' ci ' I ç 7J •* c 1 4 i ( • a ' w . ! ' • , .l • , — ~ .I'll / i( (i '' I & , A , *f : /! • . \ #. k L 1; 71k : JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY \ *I ' j , ; ' 3 y ; ? ~ , , , , ., " , , , L f pI ' The County of San Diego p f 11 I I t )11 L , i/ j and the Cities of . 1 _ .. tj L"\ , : DelMar ( ? j (C $ I 11 . r' . ..\ . r , I ift I_ Escondido J ' *_ \ / ¶;q I \ • , ( _ 7114 J . . ' . •' F'- I - ••I % - Poway 4 ; .' , *r:; ; I San Diego , ( I1 I j */ \ t i ¼ .11 4: Solana Beach V jv xt ' ? ~, N - ` -- I if: ø '' -• r: I: ' i:; g /d1 , #/c W/ v 11 i F I & S < I ' . c • I 11 :1 — ,; T L- \y -St \: (T' \ IJ t4 j: , - 1 t 4 , J .. t . . 7 , , . . •p, • • : T7;T;tT;t:::: i 1 ' ) jX",I 11 %- : , , ? d I 4 - I Y ' , •t _i9 f• 1 ? t 71 I 11~- I k Y h i ? + 4 ) I r T1 E ,/ V L r?lQfl , - p r :i q ) ;v , : - _ ; }2 1 I- i AL \ \ & - - u1t hL T 1 1, I - -:_ •:r :± K~--'~~-, ~ - - -, / - - 1 I 17 / DIANE COOMBS - 4 -- ij.. ,; Executive Director n tI=t ( 401 BSt Suite 340, San Diego, CA 92101 - j - - c - - (619)595-5398 Fax(619)595-0815 -< - L '; r7 W' 4 - J(tS & - 4 - - - Hodges Resource Interpretive Center, the restored Sikes Adobe, the San Pasqual Family Farm, Nature Walks, or other interpretive programs developed in the park. Land Trust Fund - Contributions of land, scenic and conservation easements and struc- tures of cultural or historic significance within the park planning area. Cash or other donations may be designated to pay for costs of acquiring and holding park and recreation lands. Additionally, you may be Interested in the San Dieguito River Valley Land Conservancy, a local 'private 501(c)(3) organization" which was formed for the purpose of fundraising and preserving land in the river valley. We urge you to consult your personal tax advisor to make sure that your gift meets your personal and tax objectives. Your individual contribution today to assist us in our efforts to preserve and protect the San Dieguito River Valley's natural and cultural resources will ensure a legacy for everyone to enjoy tomorrow. Please become a partner with us in this challenging and exciting venture now! WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW IN THE PARK? Landis being preserved through direct acquisition as well as through gifts, bequests, easements and dedications gained through the development process. Mitigation offers another opportunity for land preservation and habitat restoration. The JPA will consider "partners" - who have the need to mitigate projects for habitat or wetland impacts. The JPA has purchased 89 acres of wetland habitat just west of I-5 in the San Dieguito Lagoon. If successful, state and local bond measures will provide much needed funds for additional land acquisition. Master plans are being developed in several of the park landscapes. The Lake Hqdges/East Lake Hodges Landscape is the first to have a park master plan. The master plan for the San Dieguito Lagoon and Santa Fe Valley Landscapes will follow. San Pasqual Valley is also a top priority for planning. When a park master plan is developed, planning workshops are held to receive ideas and comments from the public. WHAT RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES ARE AVAILABLE NOW? AA Monthly nature hikes are held in the San Dieguito River Park. Wildlife, native plant or Native American specialists tell you about these - resources as you enjoy your hike in a different area of the valley each frionth. In Lake Hodges, fishing and boardsailing are permitted during the season (mid-February to November). Picnicking and hiking in the Lake Hodges area are great ways to spend the day anytime. In East San Pasqual Valley a number of trails opened in 1991 for hiking and horseback riding. YOU CAN HELP TO CREATE THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER PARK GIFTS AND BEQUESTS TO THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL OPEN SPACE PARK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY ARE DEDUCTIBLE FOR INCOME, GIFT AND ESTATE TAX PURPOSES. R The San Dieguito River Valley Regional Open Space Park Joint Powers Authority accepts and ad- T, ministers donations, gifts, I endowments and bequests for conservation purposes. The Joint Powers Authority was established as a separate public entity similar to a city, or county. Under the federal tax Contributions may also be directed to designated funds for specific purposes. You may be interested in one of the following: . . Trails Fund - This Rind is used for purchasing trail alignments; planning and designing trails; and purchasing or leasing tools, equipment or labor for construction and maintenance. The fifty-five miles of linear trails planned from the ocean at Del Mar to the mountains near Julian, in addition to the many side trails to points of interest, will significantly contribute to the lives of the thousands of people who live, work in and visit San Diego and will use these trails for outdoor exercise, enjoyment and nature education. Tree Fund - This fund enables purchase of trees for planting in the San Dieguito River Park. Many people find this an especially appropriate way to honor the memory of a loved one. Young families can invest in trees to commemorate the a child. Business and social organizations aps can sponsor groves of trees in the Park. d - Contributions to this fund will provide law, contributions to the JPA are as tax deductible as contributions to a private charitable "501(c)(3)" organization. There are several ways to help. Gifts may be by will, cash -or appreciated property, such as real estate or securities. For example, with a Life Estate you can deed your residence or farm property now, realize immediate tax benefits - and still retain use of the property as long as you live. A gift of a conservation easement in other real property will also let you retain use of the property as long as you live. San Dieguito River Park lands will be dedicated as open space and park for all time. Some individuals might find it attractive to establish a educational materials and programs for people of all ages, emphasizing the permanent endowment Rind in their name so that the interest only each importance of our natural and cultural resources. This fund may also be year would be used for park maintenance and improvements. used in the preparation of exhibits for the Lagoon Nature Center, the Lake 4717... .: f1d SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL OPEN SPACE PARK 401 "B" Street, Suite 340 San Diego, CA 92101 Os , Joint Powers Authority The County of San Diego and the Cities of Del Mar, Escondrdo, Poway, San Diego and Solana Beach :JrIlJlertta S.n. [iei:: Pi L:ir.d Cons PnIs: Codohon S so.C: :n Shends of fOe Son LCp.n:iiio PH Printed or Recycled Peper Brochure Design: Jaddeuign it THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY began to flow millenia ago - starting with a percolating spring near modern . day Julian, collecting water from coastal mountain tributaries until at last the meandering stream became a river. i A river that carved its way through the geological eras fifty-five miles to reach the Pacific Ocean near what is now Del Mar. We call it the San Dieguito River. 7 ForThewildlife living there, the San Dieguito River Valley has been a sanctuary; a corridor that fosters natural diversity in living creatures; a fragile but fertile transition between the land and the sea. X For humans it has been a source of life; a place of dramatic natural beauty; a center of belief; a quiet retreat from urban life. GREEN WAY AND OPEN SPACE PARK SYSTEM Modern day Californians have taken a special interest in the San Dieguito River and its many environments. Through combined support of local, state and federal governments, private landowners, charitable organizations and private citizens, an effort is underway to create a 60,000 acre greenway and open space park system along the river's path. To create the San Dieguito River Park, the local governments with land in the river valley created a Joint Powers Authority to: Cultural Resources • Establish Appropriate Recreational Areas • Create a Scenic Trail System - it • Preserve Open Space • Protect, Enhance and Interpret Natural and The Joint Powers Authority is an independent government agency with the power to acquire land, plan, improve, operate and maintain the San Dieguito River Park. The effort to create the San Dieguito River Park is one of the most ambitious and innovative land use projects on the West Coast. It has received state and national attention as a model for the ntotection of ACT NOW TO HELP Preservation and restoration of the San Dieguito River Valley will require the help of landowners, businesses, scientists, environmentalists, legislators and citizens - young and old. I want to be a Park Partner! Enclosed is my $20 annual membership fee for periodic newsletters, a bumper sticker and information on park activities. I would like to contribute $________ to the San Dieguito River Park to be used as needed. I understand my gift is tax deductible. I would like to contribute $________ to the Trails Fund, the Tree Fund, the Education Fund, the Land Trust Fund. (Please circle fund of your choice). I understand my gift is tax deductible. IkiI I am interested in volunteering my time or special knowledge to the San Dieguito River Park. Please contact me. am interested in serving on the San Dieguito River Park Speaker's Bureau. I understand that I will receive special training to be certified as a member of the Speaker's Bureau. I want more information about making a charitable contribution, possibly in the form of a direct bequest, life estate, living trust, gift of land or securities, or "bargain" sale of land to the San Dieguito River Park. 0 Enclosed is my donation for a colorful, San Dieguito River Park $12 T-shirt size - $18 Sweatshirt size $1.00 Bumper Sticker II For information on the San Dieguito River Valley Land Conservancy, write P.O. Box 89, Del Mar, California 92014 For additional information on the San Dieguito River Park, please fill out this card and mail it to the Joint Powers Authority office or call us at (619) 595-5398. Make checks payable to the: - SAN DIEGUITO RIVER PARK JPA. NAME (Please Print) ' - ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP PHONE# - - Conntla St# I FE Project Boundary - ______ AMelLPi1t gvnry Future Roadway EE Existing Roadway ________ Area to be Disturbed by Grading Mo ia Junous acutus Mullis cievelandil ! 'EniatingQueathsvenRd 14' Ac Adoiphis cafifomica Future Questhaven Rd Sc ' Selaginella cinorascena 4011111111 So [Brodlaeaorcrrttl F 7 1 Iva hayculana / Inferred Home Ranges of Callforn'fa Gnatoatchers - (identified by MBA) / Ac / 0 ' Ac J AC LA $VMC Inferred Home Ranges of California Gnatcatchers (identified by Sweetwater Environmental Biologists) Existing cadercia 18 4% North inee 800 Mc MV IMO a., C Ja t S C Rancho Santa Fe Road EIR SOURCE! Michael Giandmari Assocmte R'gure5-7 SlIgnif Biotogical Resources wh Grading Ja Stanley Mahr Rsorvoir Ac I / 16 1nD0nk Reservoir ;m. 19 0,0,07, M5 ::•:• — 1 5 9 ORIGINAL ALIGNMENT EXISTING ALIGNMENT (WITH BYPASS) •$IUUIUU FUTURE ALIGNMENT City of Carlsbad RANcHO SANTA FE RD EIR 91-1 ALIGNMENT & MASS GRADING STAFF'S REQUEST 1. Recommendation to the City Council of8',,tdequacy of the EIR including the rniflgations pursuant to CEQA and City, of Title 19 2. Recommendation to the City' Council of adequacy of the findings I k. $ SANCHO SANTA Fe AUGNMENT & MASi,—Q, -A-0— "N 'I City of Carisbid OR 91-.i 4 - - - - - - - - ORIGINAL ALIGNMENT EXISTING AUGMENT (WITH BYPASS) aeuuusaul FUTURE ALIGNMENT 4 City of C*rishad RANICHO SANTA EE ALIGNMENT & MASS GRADING EIR 9IMP1 Molt 011f rojecBOUY II - -Ci -- •' f.. 80 Low-DeflY ResideflUal FUtU(' Qu•*ThYS e1ateQOmm -- 11H1 community 00mm 1 R. Open Space A l nisy MO it: I 0 (I4 Catenate street ) 1400 07 North W 0 Boo RanchO Santa e Road ER sou prct - Fure 63 Hufli\ i irwnrtt pt IX '40tIng:t Ma*.bq$o4Øiry Exis*,qRq.dws Low-Denity Residential 1 ' 'fL iiJittaL 4, • U, -,• OOQ4 ?rofess'iona and OOO4 Relaled Commerciaj [ Community I Commercial fiJ Open Space S QU*$Ibsv,n Road th1vSfl Road Existing Cgd.ng(a SUat Al S •, 52. .Ot.1YPIHAIN RD it 1400 North ' - 4 I lNorth sc*te In feet SOURCE City, of Carlsbad, Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11, MBA.4 i Rancho Santa Fe Road ER COME S Fqur'e;51i General Plan lJ I • fiANCHO $ANT'M'EL,;•' EIR 91 I ALIGNMENT $,; MA$: ''f J ••. •• t "' ' L Meltog, 0mw Eii Ptoei $4r4isy MiesameRt OWrldt Iouiery FuSre Roadway Existing Roadway Disturbed Area Existing Drive ProPosed Cosis 8rI55. Existing Bridge *lstIfl9 OUSStflsyin Road Future Ou.sth.v.n Road Stanley Mettr Reservoir Denk serv Ir Existing Cadencie Street 1 I 1 North scaleinfeet 0 Rancho Santa Fe Road EIR SOURCE: 'Project Design Consultants Figure 3-7 Area of Disturbance 11110 Project Design consultants PLANNING ENGINEERINc; SURVEYING File: 738.10 February 10, 1992 Christer Westman CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SU1JECT: Revised Submittal - Hillside Grading Permit Applicalion for the Rancho Santa Fe Road Mass Grading Dear Christer: Enclosed are the following items you requested for continued processing of the hillside grading permit application in conjunction with the Rancho Santa Fe Road mass grading plans. As discussed in our January 20th meeting, you were not requiring any fees or new land use review application and disclosure statements. I - Acetate of 200-scale mass grading plan. 5 - Slope analysis with existing general plan designations at 1" =200', signed and sealed. 5 - Slope profiles, signed and sealed. 5 Overall grading plan at 1" =200' scale showing cut/fill areas and quantities. 3 - Grading plans. Site plans and building plans are not applicable to this project. This project is to mass grade approximately 372 acres in conjunction with the widening and realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road. - 3 - Preliminary title reports. 1 - Hillside grading summary sheet. San Diego 01 San Diego 619-2fS-041 Temecula 41(iSl Temecula 'Is-69s-i2O0 Recycled B Street Cahtornit FAX 234-i)3t9 Enterprise Circle N California FAX 69--4203 Paper Suite 800 92101 Suite 221 92390 Christer Westman February 10, 1992 Page 2 Christer, based on our conversation with Bill Hofman after he talked with Michael Holzmiller, it is our understanding the City and Fieldstone/La Costa Associates will devise a mechanism that will designate the graded open space area for recreation land use purposes until a General Plan Amendment is approved to modify the land use in that area. Therefore, we are continuing to show grading within the designated open space area. We would appreciate your review of this submittal at the earliest time possible, so that grading permits and the Hillside Permit can be approved by Council concurrently with certification of the EIR on March 24, 1992. Please call Mark Rowson or me if you need additional information. Very truly yours, Karen L. Kosup, P.E. Project Engineer KLK/ch/me Enclosures c: Ivan Simovich - Fieldstone/La Costa Associates Ruth Besecker - Fieldstone/La Costa Associates Bill Hofman - HPA 2P/738- 1 OKK. LTR 20-215 IvIdr1o1 k serigersdriLnego, Inc. A Marathon Transportation Systems Company P.O. BOx 90699, San Diego, California 92169 CAL4-1 56,829 (61 9J 270-6300 'When Time is Money— Service is Everything" TAG# TICKET 501046 DWO TIME CUSTOMER ACCT. REFERENCE 1 HR. 3 HR. ACCEPTED BY CALLED IN BY: - V MESSENGER RUSH /EG ITEM #1—BILL DELIVERY CHARGE TO: PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 701 B ST,480 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 ITEM #2—PICK UP FROM: - - - - 1IP CODE ITEM #3—DEUVERTO: ±JTZr' 20 J ZIPCODE DESCRIPTION OR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: DECLARED VALUE NO. PCS. If no value declared, liability for loss or $ damage to items Is limited to $250.00. Every effort is made for fast service but WEIGHT a reasonable amount of time must be SUBJECT TO ooFRECTCN allowed. C.O.D. bond on file -il 34063. BASE - RATE EXEMPT PLEASE SIGN BELOW TARIFF —LEGIBLY— RATE - - - NON-EXEMPT TIME NO. PCS RET i WEIGHT 10 MIN. FREE - WAITNG TIME x.333 RETURN X TRIP RETURN RECEIVED BY - - TIME - X TOtAL - RECEIVED BY - Ii .. I , F2. ç $i a 1 C) m 0 N) 0 (0 C- z 03 0 0 ic Cl) Cl) 0) C) 0) C, CL 0 Cl) (a Il-I Cl) O.(D CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT/RECORDS MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCANNED/IMAGED SHEET The following documents are scanned and indexed into the Document Management System: INITIAL DOCUMENT(S) IMAGED BY IMAGED DATE 11 - o IMAGED SRI 08 203 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADDED DOCUMENT(S) IMAGED BY IMAGED DATE PAGE Revised March30, 2001 ? I C : t / - ••; i. ;rJ . .; ... . )-. . -, -: .•- : : :.'' \ç; .4,(f • : \\C t .. ..--: : : hk m l 'N 71 I Fiw_lolw~ I c - SR ulll YX IL .,,.\,, .( ,1 C ;' .- - - . . S C ' • • . -. . . : .- / • , . . : 11";1:L I, I .. Notice of Detnination Si 920399 To: X Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of San Diego Attn: Mita From: City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 12 Lr' Anrte J. [vans, Ccrk P0 Box 1750 MAY 2 8 1992 San Diego, CA 92112-4147 BY DEPUT Project No.: EIR 91-1 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152. of the Public Resourc ode. • Rancho Santa Fe Road Realignment and Mass Grading Project Title 90010850 Christer Westman, City of Carlsbad (619)438-1161, ext. 4448 State Clearinghouse Number Lead Agency Area Code/Telephone/Extension (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person From La Costa Avenue north to the existing Melrose Avenue in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. Project Location (include county) Project Description: Assessment District for the realignment and construction of Rancho Santa Fe Road to six lane prime arterial standards. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on May 19, 1992 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. 1. The project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Oveniding Considerations was adopted for this project 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval are available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. ¶5711 /11, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER-' Date TITLE Date received for filing at OPR: COUNTY CL CW:km j)IGO OOTJTTY OW TT DEPUTY _N2. 989 1_ QWE OF CAUFORNIA-TI-1E RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 10609 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CA...I1 RECEIPT DFG 753.5a 6-91) - Lead Agency: . Da;, County/State Agency Ailing: 1Vs%. I - Document No 92O3 ?(:?. Project Title: Project Applicant Name: Phone Number:_________________ Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency [J School District [J Other Special District 0 State Agency Private Entity 0 CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: Environmental Impact Report $850.00 $ YsZ) 06 Negative Declaration $1,250.00 $ Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) $850.00 $ Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs $850.00 $ %i County Administrative Fee $25.00 $ O((5 V3 Project that is exempt from fees TOTAL RECEIVED $8' 7' Signatu,dileofperson receiving payment: -. .....,.- ............................-..--.' n V. '"fl fl'.1 1 r r' . rn, iflIf flr,n,,r,,, .Ini .-rirr nr.r,rv r.r ri, Mn I I CIT OF CARLSBAD - AGEND BILL AB#_/ TI•: AGREEMENT FOR CON • SULTING 'DEPT. HD._Vd4- MTG. _3/20/90 1 SERVICES TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL I IMPACT REPORT FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF CITY ATT!.!3 DEPT._PLN RANCHO SANTA 'PB ROAD CITY MGR \' RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT Resolution No. APPROVING an agreement with Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc., for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Santa Fe Realignment Project, and APPROVING an agreement with the Fieldstone Company for the funding of the Report. ITEM EXPLANATION Preliminary design plans for the easterly realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road between La Costa Avenue and Melrose Drive have now been prepared and submitted to the City by the Fieldstone Company. Also, an assessment district is being formed to fund the construction of the realigned road. An initial environmental assessment identified the need to prepare a complete Environmental Impact Report for the proposed realignment project. Staff contacted a number of environmental consulting firms to see if they had an interest and the available time to prepare the report. Four firms responded. Statements of qualifications were requested from each of these four firms. Staff reviewed the proposals with respect to a number of factors including similar work, personnel and availability. Based on this review, staff is recommending that the firm of Cotton/Beland/ Associates, Inc., be selected to prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road. C Ui 0. The realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road will result in the need to rearrange land uses in this portion of the City, thereby necessitating a future, subsequent amendment to the La Costa Master Plan. An amendment to the Master Plan is not being requested or approved at this time. However, in order to prepare the Environmental Impact Report, the Report will address the impacts of a conceptual rearrangement of land uses as proposed by the Fieldstone Company. Also, the Fieldstone Company is proposing to do the overall grading for the area surrounding the realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road at the same time the grading for the road is done. The Environmental Impact Report will address this additional grading but, again, City approval is not being given for the additional grading at this time. FISCAL IMPACT z 0 I- C.) -J C.) z 0 C.) Cost for the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report is $61,750 which will be paid for by the Fieldstone Company. Funds will be deposited with the City in a trust account once the agreements are approved and signed. EXHIBITS 1. City Council Resolution No. 2. Agreement with Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc. (Consultant) including Scope of Services 3. Agreement w/Fieldstone Company (Developer) . . RESOLUTION NO. 90-66 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND COTTON/BELAND/ 3 ASSOCIATES; AND THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY, FOR CONSULTING SERVICES TO 4 REVISE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD REALIGNMENT PROJECT. 5 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 7 1. That certain agreements between the City of Carlsbad 8 and Cotton/ Bel and/Assoc iates, Inc., and the City of Carlsbad and The Fieldstone Company, for consulting services to prepare 10 the Environmental Impact Report for the realignment of Rancho 11 Santa Fe Road, copies of which are on file in the office of the 12 City Clerk, and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby 13 approved. 14 2. The Mayor of the City of Carlsbad is hereby 15 authorized and directed to execute said agreements for and on 16 behalf of the City of Carlsbad. 17 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 18 City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 20th 19 day of March , 1990. 20 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kuichin, Pettine, Matnaux and Larson 21 NOES: None 22 ABSENT: None 23 24 CjAffDF A. LAWIS, Mayor 25 ATTEST: 26 1 fz7iJA. 27 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRNZ, City cerk 28 S . AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of 1991, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and COTTON/BELAND/ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT", shall serve to amend the previous contract dated March 26, 1990, attached hereto. All provisions of the original contract shall remain in effect, except that Paragraph 6, Fees to be Paid to Consultant, shall be amended by the addition of $4,255.00 to the contract amount. Paragraph 6 shall read: "The total shall not exceed the fee payable according to Paragraph 6, "Payment of Fees," and shall be $66,005.00" IN WITNESS WHEREOF we have hereunto set our hands and seals. COTTON/BELAND/ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF CARLSBAD JdHN E. BRIDGSJ' AICP Principal APPROVED AS TO FORM: RAYMOND R. PATCHETT, City Manager ATTESTED: -/Vtu~l 2 VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., MICHAEL J. i019MITIAR, City Attorney Planning Director . . A (flfMEff THIS AGREEMENT is made this c2 of 191. between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the State of California, COTTON/B ELAN D/ hereinafter referred to as CITY, and ASSOCIATES INC. hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT. EIQ1TALS FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA WHEREAS, the CITY, has entered Into an agreement with ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP hereinafter called the applicant, wherein the CITY agrees to prepare a(an) ENVIRONMENTAL RANCHO SANTA FE IMPACT REPORT for the proposed project identified as the ROAD REALIGNMENT which Is located in the southeat quadrant of the city of CARLSBADand more precisely shown on the plat marked Attachment 1, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT has the qualifications to prepare the required _ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT and WHEREAS, it is understood that the CONSULTANT shall be an Independent contractor of the CITY; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants and conditions, the parties hereto agree as follows: (1) DUTIES OF THE CONS ULTANT CONSULTANT shall prepare a(an) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT on the subject project In accord with the California Environmental Quality Act as implemented by tho State GuidJinos and by CITY in Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and its impiomonting resolutions. In carrying out this obligation the CONSULTANTS duties shall include the following; . . (a) The CONSULTANT shall, COtlSiSt$rit With the Work Program contained in Attachment 2, (1) make all necessary and required field explorations, reviews and tests; (2) make all necessary and required laboratory tests and analysis; (3) appear and be prepared to answer questions and prepare testimony on the final ENVIRONMENTAL IMPArT at all public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council prior to the certification of the report; (4) make all reports necessary to comply with the requirements of this section. Before preparing the draft report, the CONSULTANT shall submit five copies of a preliminary report (screen check EIR) to the Planning Director for staff review. The CONSULTANT shall revise the preliminary report as requested by staff In order to make it suitable for draft EIR review. (b) CONSULTANT shall prepare a draft report in compliance with the Work Program contained in Attachment 2 on file at the Planning Department (unless otherwise stated In this agreement), attached hereto and made a part hereof and with applicable state law and Ctty ordinances, The CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY fifty copies (In 3-ring binders) plus a reproducible master of the draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT to the CITY, (C) CONSULTANT shall attempt to determine as soon as possible in his study of the area involved, those factors which could severely Inhibit or prohibit the proposod project. If it appears that such factors are 2 . . present, he shell so Inform the Planning Director who in turn will discuss with the ctpplicnt tho feasibility of continuing with the report. The objactive of this subsection of the agreement Is to minimize the cost if these adverse factors exist. (d) CONSULTANT shall prepare and file with the CITY written responses to all comments received subsequent to public notice that the draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT has been filed. CONSULTANT shall also prepare &ny response necessary to matters raised at the public hearings. The written responses shall be prepared in a form that will permit the responses to be incorporated into the fl( ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (2) DUTIES OF THE CITY (a) The CITY will make payment to the CONSULTANT as provided for in this agrooment. (b) The CITY will make available to the CONSULTANT any documents, studies, or other information in its possession related to the proposed project. (c) The CITY will review the Preliminary Report presented by the CONSULTANT within fourteen working days of their receipt and make written comments to the CONSULTANT within that time period. 3 . . (d) The CITY shall provide the CONSULTANT with copies of all written comments received on the draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT subsequent to public notice that the draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT has boon fed and Is available for public review. (3) TERMINATION OFjGREEMENI The CITY may terminate this agreement at any time by giving written notice to the CONSULTANT of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen days prior to the effective date of the termination. In event of termination, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials prepared pursuant to this agreement shall become its property. Upon termination for reasons other than breach of this agreement CITY shall pay CONSULTANT the reasonable value of the services complotod to the data of notice of termination, (4) RELEASE _OF INFORMAI1QJL,P1.DNSULTANT Any reports, Information or other data, prepared or assembled by the CONSULTANT under this agreement shall not be made available to any individual or organization by the CONSULTANT without the prior written approval of the CITY. - All documents and materials prepared pursuant to this agreement are the property of the CITY. The CITY shall have the unrestricted authority to 4 . . publish, disclose, distribute and otherwise use, in whole or In part, any reports, data, or other materials prepared under this agreement. (6) PAYMENT The CONSULTANT will bo paid a maximum of 61 ,750 oodollars for all work necessary to carry out the requirements of this agreement. Actual payment shall be based on the cost of the report based on the costs as set forth In Attachment 2 on file at the Planning Department. The CONSULTANT shall be paid within 30 days, in response to monthly invoice, for up to sixty porcont of the compensable services for the completion of the screen check draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT in accordance with Paragraph I above. The CONSULTANT will be paid up to an additional twenty-five percent upon acceptance by the CITY of the response to comments from the CONSULTANT, the anal fifteen percent will be paid not to exceed the maximum amount provided in its agreement within thirty days after receipt of Invoice, to be submitted after the certification of the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT by the City Council. (7) TIME QF COMPLETION Time Is of the essence In carrying out the terms of this agreement. It 18 understood that inclement weather conditions may delay the completion of field work. The CONSULTANT will be allowed as many additional days as are necessary to compensate for days lost due to Inclement weather. The CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY five copies of the Preliminary 5 DRAFT EN•NMENTAL I IMPACT REPORT 70 WORKING within DAYS of the signing of this agreement by both coricoirid portios, Tho CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY fifty copio5 of tho draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTWithIn15 - working days of the completod staff review of the Preliminary DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (8) LIMITS _OF THE QOLIGATIQ.0 The limits of the obligation of the CITY under this agreement is in the sum $61,750.00 of which amount is estimated to be sufficient to compensate the CONSULTANT for all services performed hereunder during the terms of this agreement. In the event ct any time it appears to the CONSULTANT that said sum may not be sufficient, he shall Immediately so notify the Planning Director. Ho will not pcilorm any work or incur any obligation beyond said sum o f$61,750.00 without appropriate amendment to this agreement. (9) CHANGES IN WORKII If, In the course of this contract, changes seem merited by the CONSULTANT or the CITY and informal consultations indicate that a change in tho conditiorie of the contract is warranted, the CONSULTANT or the CITY may requeot 3 chingo in the contract. Such changes shall be processed by the CITY in tho following manner. A letter outlining the required changes shall bo forwarded to tha CITY or CONSULTANT to Inform them of the proposed changes along with a statement of estimated It . 01- changes in charges or time schedule. After reaching mutual agreement on the proposal, a supplemental agreement shall be prepared by the CITY and approved by the City Council. Such supplemental agreement shall not render Ineftective or Invalid unaffected portions of the agreement. Changes requiring immediate action by the CONSULTANT or the CITY shalt be ordered by the Planning Director who will inform a principal of the CONSULTANT'S firm of the necessity of such action and follow up with a supplemental agreement covering such work. The lump sum amounts detailed in this agreement shall be adjusted for changes, either additive or deductive, in the scope of work. (10) HOLD HARML3 The CONSULTANT will indemnify the CITY against and hold it harmless from all and any cost, expense, or liability for damages on account of injury or death to persons or damage to property resulting from or arising out of or in any way connected with the negligent or intentionally wrongful performance by CONSULTANT agreement, including the defense of any action arising therefrom. CONSULTANT will reimburse the CITY for all costs, expenses and losses incurred by It In consequence of any claims, demands and causes of action which may be brought against it by a person arising out of the performance by CONSULTANT of this agreement. 7 . . (11) MAINTAIN INSURANC E CONSULTANT shall, at all times that this agreement is In effect or the premises are occupied by CONSULTANT, cause to be maintained In force and effect an insurance policy or policies which will ensure and iridemnify both CITY and CONSULTANT against liability or financial loss resulting from injuries occurring to persons or property in or about the premises or occurring as a result of any acts or activity of CONSULTANT. The liability under such Insurance policy shall be not less than $100,000 for any one person Injured or $300.000 for any one accident and $50,000 for property damage. The policy shall be written by a responsible company or companies to be approved by CITY, and shall be noncancelable except on ten days' written notice to CITY. Such policy shall name CITY as additional insured and a copy of a certificate describing such policy shall be filed with the CITY. (12) INDEPENDENT QQNTRACTQ CONSULTANT in accordance with his status as an independent contractor, covenants and agrees that he will conduct himself consistent with such status, that he will neither hold himself out as nor claim to be an officer or employee of the CiTY by reason hereof, and that he will not by reason hereof, make any claim, demand, or application to or for any right or privilege applicable to an officer or employee of the CITY including, but not limited to, workmen's compensation coverage, unemployment insurance . I benefits, social security coverage, or retirement membership credit. (13) ASS1GNMENtOF CONICi CONSULTANT shall not assign this Contract or any part hereof or any monies due or to becomo due thereunder without the prior wrItten consent of the CITY. (14) SUBCONTRACTING If the CONSULTANT shall subcontract any of the work to be performed under this contract by CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to the CITY for the acts and omissions of Its subcontractor and of the parsons either directly or indirectly employed by Its subcontractor, as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by it. Nothing contained in this contract shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor of CONSULTANT and the CITY, The CONSULTANT shall bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontractor by their terms of this contract applicable to its work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract in question approved In writing by the CITY. (15) PROHIBITED INTERSI No official of the CITY who is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the C11y to negotiate, make, accept or approve, or to take part In negotiating, making, accepting or approving any architectural, engineering, inspection, construction, or material supply contract or subcontract In connection with I . the construction of the project, Shall become directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or in any part thereof. No officer, employee, architect, attorney, engineer or inspector of or for the CITY who is authorized in such capacity and on behalf of the CITY to exercise any executive, supervisory or other similar functions In connection with the performance of this contract shall bcomo directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or any part hereof. No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent or employee of the CITY, either before, during or after the execution of this contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained, nor such verbal agreement or conversation entitle the CONSULTANT to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this contract, 10 . S IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written, crn' OF )/:? M,!'1Porkoration of the Stato of By: A. LEWIS Mayor By; d424J CONSULTANT DONALD A. COTTON ATTEST; - I ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZClerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: N VINCENT F. MNDOI J City Attorney 11 RA C) o' >7 Q)CI)Q) C- z (4 (0 —. C) 0 (Dr'. li ATTACHMENT 1 f -- C 3 bad/ Sal s I , Cij 5Oo3dat'/ 11•'],,, I? ....... '1 1(111 .................I. .........IJj( .. .3 COSt.) M03c10w3 Or \ / PnoPOSCI) Itt,AI) •\ \ ___- PO3Q3Cd OIdgo AcroS) Ski Cr.t.,k - FUTURE ROAD O(STURBRI) An(: t / I •\ ,--1 / R03I90mant IV / S ATTACHMENT 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES Cotton/Beland/Associates, inc. (CBA) will provide the following basic services In preparation of the Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Santa Fe Road Real ignhment/Project Grading. Data collection and analysis will focus on the specific impact areas identified In Task 2, Section 3. Project days refer to work days. The Scope of Services includes the following assumptions: 1. City of Carlsbad will prepare Notice of Preparation; 2. City of Carlsbad will provide copies of all current project-related documents, including aerial photographs and topographic maps of project area; 3. Draft EIR and Final EIR will be incorporated into a single set of 50 CBA-provided three-ring binders; 4. Time estimates for completion of the Draft and Final EIR assume completion of biological impact analysis under separate contract by City-selected biologist and transmittal to CBA two weeks prior to Project Day 56. 5. Biologist consultation (not permit acquisition) with Departments of Fish & Game and Fish and Wildlife. Task 1. Reconnaissance Objective The purpose of this task is to familiarize the project team with the project, existing conditions in the project area and the available data base. Products Product Project Day EIR Mockup 14 Subtasks 1.1 Review Available Documentation. Cotton/Beland/Associates will collect necessary available information related to the project from City staff. Materials to be reviewed include the City General Plan, road realignment studies, other project EIRs, zoning maps and ordinance, utility maps, aerial photos and other available Information. 1.2. Inspect Project Area. CBA will survey the project area and surrounding areas to identify local conditions of the natural environment, land use, noise, traffic and general environmental setting of the project. 1 . S Task 2. Prepare Administrative Draft EIR Objective The purpose of this task Is to prepare a complete draft of the project EIR for review by -the City staff prior to publication. The administrative draft will include all text, tables and figures. Products Product Project Day Project Description Memo 14 Cumulative Project List 14 Administrative Draft EIR (10 copies) 56 2 . . Subtasks 2,1 Draft Project Description. CBA will prepare a draft project description in the format to be included in the Draft EIR. The project description will include maps, tables and diagrams describing the project and principal project alternatives. The project description will describe existing and anticipated land uses in the project area in acres and intensity of development measures (dwelling units, square footage). A quantitative project description, even though it may be a "best estimate," is crucial in identifying potential impacts. 2.2 Cumulative Project List. CBA, in consultation with City staff, will prepare a cumulative projects list to identify related projects and projects which must be considered for cumulative effects. Surrounding cities and San Diego County will be consulted, and the SANDAG growth forecast policy will be considered in identifying cumulative effects. 2.3 Prepare Administrative Draft EIR CBA will prepare an administrative draft EIR in accordance with CEQA and City EIR guidelines. The administrative draft will be provided for staff review prior to publication of the official draft EIR. The EIR will be formatted to include the following sections: Executive Summary. The Executive Summary will identify each significant effect of the project, with proposed mitigation measures which would reduce that effect; areas of controversy including issues raised by agencies and the public; and issues to be resolved including the choice among alternatives and whether or how to mitigate significant effects. Introduction. The Introduction will summarize the legal role of the EIR In the development process. Section 1. Description of the Proposed Project, The project description will include a description of the project and key project alternatives. The project description will include maps or diagrams Illustrating the proposed project and may include a table summarizing the differences among the project alternatives. The project description will include a list of all actions for which environmental clearance is being sought. . I Section 2, Description of Environmental Setting. This section will briefly describe the environmental setting of the proposed project. A more detailed description of the environmental setting will be included in the following section discussing project impacts and mitigation measures. Section 3. Environmental Impact. This section will discuss the environmental setting, significant environmental effects, mitigation measures and appropriate City findings for each of the project impacts outlined below, organized In accordance with the environmental impact checklist In the CEQA guidelines. CBA recommends this organization For the EIR in order to clearly demonstrate compliance with CEQA in reviewing a complete list of project impacts. The E1R will emphasize both site specific and regional, cumulative and growth-inducing impacts of the project. Mitigation measures will be identified for these impacts and for anticipated project-specific impacts. .1 Earth. Grading impacts including disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcovering of the soil in the project area will be reviewed. Unique geological conditions that may affect development in the project area will be Identified based on the supplemental soil and geologic investigation prepared for the project by GEOCON (January 1990). The GEOCON study includes' suggested mitigation measures to reduce or avoid impacts and includes a Woodward-Clyde Consultants assessment of Impacts to the Stanley Mahr Reservoir which will be included in the section discussion. 3.2. Air. Existing and historic air quality in the Carlsbad area will be discussed, and the potential for this project (individually and cumulatively with other projects) to adversely affect air quality will be estimated using recognized air quality Impact assessment techniques. CBA's Callrie 3 air pollution assessment model will be used to identify pollutant emissions from natural gas combustion, electric power generation and motor vehicle trips. Emissions wil.l be related to estimated emissions from the source/receptor area in which the project Is located. Tables and/or graphs will be included to illustrate historic air quality, emission factors, emission estimates, and the relation of emissions to source/receptor area emissions. 4 S . The California (Caline) Line Source Model will be utilized to estimate air pollutant concentrations on arterials. Concentrations will be related to existing levels and ambient air quality standards to indicate potential increases in number of days exceeding standards. Mitigation measures in accordance with ARB and San Diego County ,Air Pollution Control District guidelines will be identified. 3.3 Water. The potential for drainage and water quality impacts in the project area will be assessed by Luke-Dudek, Civil Engineers. The potential for the project to Increase ground coverage by impervious surfaces will be estimated and the effect on the rate and amount of runoff from the project area discussed. Storm drain improvements included in the project and standard project-level mitigation measures (such as adequate site drainage and onsite detention) will be identified as mitigation measures. 3.4 Plant and Animal Life. The environmental resources considered under this category will be identified through the preparation of a study by a City-selected biologist under separate contract administered by the City. The study is assumed to provide all information necessary for preparation of this section of the EIR, including wetland delineation, detailed California gnatcatcher assessment, full biological survey report, recommended mitigation measures, and draft biological text for the EIR. 3.5 Noise. Construction noise impacts including those associated with portable rock-crushing equipment will be briefly discussed and construction noise mitigation measures identified. The potential noise impact resulting from traffic increases on Rancho Santa Fe Road will be described using information contained in the City's Noise Element (as amended). Mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts will be identified and their effectiveness discussed. Mitigation measures to be considered will include structural siting., barrier walls and others as appropriate. 3.6 Light and Glare. Light and glare impacts will be briefly discussed and mitigation measures Identified as they relate to street lighting associated with roadway improvements. 5 . I 3.7 Land Use. Quantitative estimates of intensity changes resulting from any planned land use location adjustments associated with the road realignment wl1.1 be described. Intensity of development (dwelling units and square footage or nonresidential uses) will be estimated based on General Plan land use and Local Facilities Management Plan assumptions for intensity/density. Land uses will be tabulated in General Plan land use categories sufficiently specific to make meaningful estimates of impacts on traffic and public facilities. Anticipated development will be compared to the current General Plan and Zoning. 38. Traffic Circulation. Traffic considerations associated with the project will be reviewed by Weston Pringle & Associates to identify potentially significant traffic impacts. Existing traffic conditions in the area will be documented, Including the average daily traffic volume on arterial streets. The data used in this analysis will be obtained from the General Plan Traffic Circulation and Facility Management Plans, and other available traffic studies. The analysis of future traffic conditions will include average daily traffic volumes on arterial streets and will also rely on the General Plan Traffic Circulation and Facility Management Mans. Traffic growth from the existing condition will be estimated, based on the future land use scenario developed for the General Plan plus growth in background traffic. Traffic operational and safety concerns including truck routing adjustments will be considered. Potential mitigation measures will be identified for achieving acceptable short- and long-term future conditions: Should design revisions to road configuration occur (for example, modification to the Melrose/Rancho Santa Fe Road intersection) and additional analysis be required, adjustment of the scope of work and cost may be necessary. 3.9. Public Services. The potential for the project, cumulatively with similar projects in the vicinity, to add fire, police and other service requirements will be identified through discussions with the appropriate agencies. Specific mitigation measures will be Identified based on these discussions. G . . 3,10. Utilities. Utility impacts, particularly those on water, sewer, storm drains, power, natural gas and solid waste disposal systems will be identified based on discussions with service providers. System demand will be estimated based on recognized engineering design factors, and demands related to available system capacity, If known, to Identify deficiencies. Specific mitigation measures for each system will be identified based on discussions with service providing agencies. Construction components (drainage structures, utility underyroundlng, etc.) included in the proposed project will be included as mitigation measures. 3.11. Aesthetics/Landform Alteration. Potential aesthetic Impacts will be identified and discussed in terms of alterations to the natural setting and landform. Specific attention will be devoted to vegetation removal and grading Impacts as they relate to the City's Hillside Review Ordinance. Mitigation measures to deal with potential impacts will be identified and methods of implementing mitigation measures recommended. 3.12. Archaeological/Iilstorical. An archaeological field survey of the 684 acre project area and record searches will be conducted by Roth & Associates to identify site locations and possible resources. This Initial survey will confirm the location of some or all of the 28 sites previously identified by FRC as being within a one-mile radius of the planned road realignment. Evaluation of the importance of the sites may result in recommendations for subsurface testing and significance determinations. Costs associated with such testing cannot presently be estimated and are not included In this proposal. This portion of the scope of work does not presently include an assessment of paleontological resources. This assessment can be included at additional cost if desired by the city. Section 4. Alternatives. The Impacts of key project alternatives will be addressed In discussion and summary table. Alternatives addressed will include the no project alternative, road widening In the existing alignment, and road realignment without residential area grading. Alternatives will be reviewed with the City, and minimum of three alternatives will he discussed In some detail in the EIR. Additional alternatives will increase EIR costs. 7 S . Section 5 Areas of flo Significant Impact. This section will include identification of those Impacts not found to be significant and not further discussed in the EIR. Section 6. Short and Long Term Environmental Impact. The potential for the project to achieve short-term objectives at the expense of long-term goals will be reviewed. Section 7. Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes. This section will identify significant irreversible environmental changes which may result from the proposed project. Section 8. Growth-Inducing Impacts. The potential for the project to induce growth or remove barriers to growth will be identified. Section 9. Cumulative Effects. The cumulative Impact of this project with other known projects and development in accordance with the General Plan will be identified. Specific areas to be emphasized in discussing cumulative Impacts Include traffic, air quality, noise and public facilities and services impacts. Section 10. Organizations and Persons Consulted. This section will Identify those organizations and persons consulted In preparation of the Draft EIR. Mitigation Monitoring Program. A mitigation monitoring program will be incorporated into the Elk in accordance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and will be included as an appendix to the Elk. El . I Task 3. Publication Draft EIR Objective The purpose of this task is to prepare a final Draft EIR for publication by the City. Products Product Project Day Agency Markup (staff product) 68 Publication Draft EIR (50 copies) 82 Subtasks 3.1. Review Administrative Draft. (City task) The City will review the administrative draft EIR and prepare revisions in the form of a marked-up copy of the administrative draft EIR indicating all desired changes, corrections and areas for expansion, etc. The scope of work assumes only one administrative draft review. Should additional reviews of administrative drafts be desired by the City, additional costs will be incurred. 3.2. Prepare Publication Draft EZR. CBA will Incorporate City comments In the draft EIR and prepare a final Draft EIR for publication. CEA will incorporate comments and prepare a final draft within 15 working days of receipt of comments on the Administrative Draft EIR. CI3A will provide 50 copies of the DEIR to the City for distribution. . S Task 4. Response to Cornuents, Final EIR Objective The purpose of this task is to prepare responses to comments by the public and public agencies on the Draft EIR, and to prepare a final EIR Including changes in response to comments received, and summarizing comments on the draft EJR and responses to those comments. Products Product Project Day Final EIR (50 copies) 150 Subtasks 4.1 Final EIR. CM will prepare new EIR sections as a supplement to the Draft EIR Including the following: Revised cover page. Revised Table of Contents. Revised text of the EIR incorporating changes In response to new Information or comments received. Response to Comments. Comments Received. CBA will Incorporate changes to text from the listing of changes into a final EIR. Within 15 working days of receipt of final City comments, CBA will provide 50 copies of the Final EIR. Our schedule and budget for response to comments is based on the assumption that the project will involve on]y moderate controversy. Hours budgeted for the portion of Task 4 include 30 hours of CBA time and 27 hours of subconsultant time; and should be sufficient to respond to 10 letters of comment. If the project proves highly controversial, develops organized opposition, or involves responses requiring additional technical analysis not anticipated in the original work scope, the allowance for response to comments is likely to be exceeded and additional costs will be incurred. ic. I I Task 5. Hearings Objective The purpose of this task Is to provide expert testimony at public hearings on the Draft EIR. Task 51. Hearings. CBA's principal-in-charge or project manager will attend two public hearings or meetings to present the findings of the EIR and respond to questions from the public and City officials. If additional hearings are required, these hearings will be attended as additional services not included in the fixed fee proposal amount. 11 . . PROJECT SCHEDULE The Table below summarizes CBA's recommended schedule for this project. CBA will maintain the project schedule outlined in the Scope of Services, subject to timely provision of information and response to draft materials by the City. Day 1 Agency Authorization Day 14 Project Description Memo Cumulative Projects List Day 42 CBA Receipt of Biological Analysis Day 56 Administrative Draft EIR to City Day 58 City comments on Administrative Draft to CE3A Day 82 Final Draft LIR to City for distribution Day 136* EIR comments to CBA Day 150* Final EIR *Estimated date, Actual date depends on hearing schedule and comment period. The above schedule depends on City agreement on the project description at the date specified. Changes to the project description following agreement may result In additional work and delays in the submittal of administrative drafts. 12 . . PROJECT BUDGET The budget below represents CBP's estimate of the labor and other costs required to complete the Scope of Services outlined. For all items described in the Scope of Services, with the exception of response to EIR comments, services will be provided on a fixed fee basis. For response to EIR comments, an allowance has been provided which is generally sufficient to deal with projects which are not highly controversial. For controversial projects, or projects in which new issues are raised requiring technical analysis not anticipated in the scope of services, this estimate is likely to be exceeded. This proposal is a firm offer by CBA to complete the Scope of Services outlined for the total budget amount. The total fee required for completion of the EIR Is $61,750. Component costs are given in the following chart. 13 S S COST BREAKDOWN A. Staff Costs CBA Personnel (Person-Hours) 1. Reconnaissance 2 15 28 2. Admin. Draft 25 80 200 Subconsul tants cumulative (Pptn_Wrinr'c '% 20 50 30 $ 8,265 80 100 60 1 31,225 3. Publication Draft EIR 10 15 30 16 17 17 6,315 4. Responses, Final EIR 10 20 35 16 16 16 6 1 825 S. Hearings 8 - 8 - - 1 1 160 Subtotal 55 130 293 1 140 183 123 J $53,790 B. Other Costs 1, Word Processing (80.0 hours) $2,240.00 2. Graphics (70.0 hours) 2,380.00 3. Support Person 540.00 4. Travel, phone, postage 600.00 5. Printing (Screen, Draft Final) 2,200.00 Subtotal $ 7..,960 TOTAL $61,750 NOTE: No reimbursable expenses are expected to be incurred unless changes In project description occur, additional technical studies not presently identified or additional document copies are required, or responses to comments requirements exceed budgeted time. DAC - Donald A. Cotton WP Weston Pringle & Associates JEB John E. Bridges RA - Roth & Associates SCA - Shawna C. Anderson LD - Luke-Dudek Services, Civil Engineers 14 I LLG$ffEM E1'f r THIS AGREEMENT is macia this 'day of between the CITY OF CAflLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHI referred to as Y9 APPLICANT. J3JC ETA L WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has flied with CITY a request for approval of RANCHO SANTA FE a proposed project identified OS the ROAD REALIGNMENT requiring an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT and WHEREAS, CITY has determined that its current staff is inadequate in ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT number to process the proposed in a timely and thorough manner; and WHEREAS, APPLICANT in ordor to ensure the expeditious processing of said ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT desires to pay to CITY the amount necessary to hire a Consultant, NOW, THEREFORE, in conaidoration of the covenants and conditions, it is agreed as follows; 1. The CITY will engage the firm of COTT ELA1ssoC , INC hereinafter roferred to v.s 'Consultant" to perform the necessary work In the— PREPARATION of the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for that area moro parilcularly depicted upon a site map attached os Attachment -- and made a part of this . . agreement. 2. It Is understood that the Consultant services shall conform to the Proposal attached au Attachment 2 and made a part of this agreement, and may require: (a) Field exploration; (b) Weekly communication with the CITY staff; (c) Written reports; and (d) Such other work necessary to properly evaluate the proposed project as directed by the Planning Director. 3. It Is understood that the CITY will direct the ConsuItant to complete ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT a draft and final at the earliest feasible time. The CITY will advise the APPLICANT in writing of any impacts which may render the proposed project unfeasible within a reasonable time after CITY has received the Consultant's conclusions in writing. 4. The APPLICANT shall pay to the CITY the actual C08t of the Consultant's services. Such cost shall be based on the costs sat forth in Exhibit 1 , The APPLICANT has advanced the sum of $61,750.00 as payment on account for the actual cost of the Consultant's servicos; in the event it appears, as the work progresses, that said sum will not be sufficient to cover the actual cost, the CITY will noth'y the APPLICANT of the difference between S . the amount dapasitod and the new estimated cost. CiT'' will ensure, to the ax-tent feasible, that no further work will be performed by the Consultant incurring an obligation beyond the amount advanced without an appropriate amendment to this Agreement. If the actual cost of preparing the report is less than the APPLICANT'S advance, any surplus will be refunded to APPLICANT by CITY. 5. It Is understood that the Consultant shall be an Independent contractor of tho CITY. The APPLICANT agrees to permit the Consultant to enter upon his property and to perform all work thereon as the Consultant deems necessary to complete the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPO RIt is agreed that the APPLICANT will not Interfere with the consultant in the performance of such work or attempt to Influence such Consultant during the course of his investigation and report. 6. It is understood that the CITY will attempt to bring the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT to Planning Commission and City Council as soon as possible, barring no delays from the APPLICANT. [ci . S IN WITNESS WHEREOF, th partics hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first abovo written. CT'? OF CARLSAD I a Municipal Corporation of the State of California APPLICANT: FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A California Limited Partnership BY: THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY, A California ATTEST; ALETHA L. RAUTEN ROVED AS-t0 FORM: VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR. City Attorney 4 R.D.HrisHw R s;ac:TIE TEL No. 61g-20-163 7 Mar. 50 13:36 P02 S 0 Uv ii ATTACHMENT A.IoIo oil/ .'dIl.y I.., .." 1.. I .. II ,..,,f• ItttylJ ,,..It,, 1,1._JIll 1,1,1'', L 'uOd0 l'l(L!' 0 5 f, 1) l.U,sl PlOOtOIJIt lJl,o.. toys. ,.. 3J C''. 1. LII Ull. .IOAL) C,1311JR.I 1 Atli k ,J t / / •../ / ./'f. . t/. ( x . RANCHO SANTA [':Z:no,i / \ •i:; CAIjvOHALfGr.iMn /.' c C, ' '.3 (II ATTACHMENT 1 F10 '1l'.,I'o.,I P. t.,. M,I,ou A.nu ' . . SCOPE OF SERVICES Cotton/Beland/Assaciates, Inc. (CBA) will provide the following basic services in preparation of the Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Santa Fe Road Reallgnhment/Project Grading. Data collection and analysis will focus on the specific impact areas identified in Task 2, Section 3. Project days refer to work days. The Scope of Services includes the following assumptions: 1. City of Carlsbad will prepare Notice of Preparation; 2. City of Carlsbad will provide copies of all current project-related documents, including aerial photographs and topographic maps of project area; 3. Draft EIR and Final EIR will be incorporated into a single set of 50 CBA-provided three-ring binders; 4. Time estimates for completion of the Draft and Final EIR assume completion of biological impact analysis under separate contract by City-selected biologist and transmittal to CBA two weeks prior to Project Day 56. 5. Biologist consultation (not permit acquisition) with Departments of Fish & Game and Fish and Wildlife. Task 1. Reconnaissance Objective The purpose of this task is to familiarize the project team with the project, existing conditions in the project area and the available data base. Products Product Project Day EIR Mockup 14 Subtasks 1.1 Review Available Documentation. Cotton/Beland/Associates will collect necessary available information related to the project from City staff. Materials to be reviewed include the City General Plan, road realignment studies, other project EIRs, zoning maps and ordinance, utility maps, aerial photos and other available information. 1.2. Inspect Project Area. CBA will survey the project area and surrounding areas to identify local conditions of the natural environment, land use, noise, traffic and general environmental setting of the project. 1 ATTACHMENT 2 . . Task 2. Prepare Administrative Draft EJR Objective The purpose of this task Is to prepare a complete draft of the project. EIR for review by the City staff prior to publication. The administrative draft will include all text, tables and figures. Products Product Project Day Project Description Memo 14 Cumulative Project List 14 Administrative Draft EIR (10 copies) 56 . . Subtasks 2,1 Draft Project Description. CBA will prepare a draft project description in the format to be included in the Draft EIR. The project description will include maps, tables and diagrams describing the project and principal project alternatives. The project description will describe existing and anticipated land uses in the project area in acres and intensity of development measures (dwelling units, square footage). A quantitative project description, even though it may be a "best estimate," is crucial in identifying potential impacts. 2.2 Cumulative Project List. CBA, in consultation with City staff, will prepare a cumulative projects list to identify related projects and projects which must be considered for cumulative effects. Surrounding cities and San Diego County will be consulted, and the SANDAG growth forecast policy will be considered in identifying cumulative effects, 2,3 Prepare Administrative Draft EIR CBA will prepare an administrative draft EIR in accordance with CEQA and City EIR guidelines. The administrative draft will be provided for staff review prior to publication of the official draft EIR. The EIR will be formatted to Include the following sections: Executive Summary. The Executive Summary will identify each significant effect of the project, with proposed mitigation measures which would reduce that effect; areas of controversy including Issues raised by agencies and the public; and issues to be resolved including the choice among alternatives and whether or how to mitigate significant effects. Introduction. The Introduction will summarize the legal role of the EIR in the development process. Section 1. Description of the Proposed Project. The project description will include a description of the project and key project alternatives. The project description will include maps or diagrams illustrating the proposed project and may include a table summarizing the differences among the project alternatives. The project description will include a list of all actions for which environmental clearance is being sought. 3 . . Section 2. Description of Environmental Setting. This section will briefly describe the environmental setting of the proposed project. A more detailed description of the environmental setting vii il be included in the following section discussing project impacts and mitigation measures. Section 3. Environmental Impact. This section will discuss the environmental setting, significant environmental effects, mitigation measures and appropriate City findings for each of the project impacts outlined below, organized in accordance with the environmental impact checklist in the CEQA guidelines. CBA recommends this organization For the EIR in order to clearly demonstrate compliance with CEQA in reviewing a complete list of project impacts. The EIR will emphasize both site specific and regional, cumulative and growth-inducing impacts of the project. Mitigation measures will be identified for these impacts and for anticipated project-specific impacts. 3.1 Earth. Grading impacts Including disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcovering of the soil in the project area will be reviewed. Unique geological conditions that may affect development in the project area will be identified based on the supplemental soil and geologic investigation prepared for the project by GEOCON (January 1990). The GEOCON study includes suggested mitigation measures to reduce or avoid impacts and includes a Woodward-Clyde Consultants assessment of impacts to the Stanley Mahr Reservoir which will be included in the section discussion, 3.2. Mr. Existing and historic air quality in the Carlsbad area will be discussed, and the potential for this project (individually and cumulatively with other projects) to adversely affect air quality will be estimated using recognized air quality Impact assessment techniques. CBA's Calirie 3 air pollution assessment model will be used to identify pollutant emissions from natural gas combustion, electric power generation and motor vehicle trips. Emissions will be related to estimated emissions from the source/receptor area in which the project is located. Tables and/or graphs will be included to illustrate historic air quality, emission factors, emission estimates, and the relation of emissions to source/receptor area emissions. . . The California (Calirie) Line Source Mode' will be utilized to estimate air pollutant concentrations on arterials, Concentrations will be related to existing levels and ambient air qual ity standards to indicate potential increases in number of days exceeding standards. Mitigation measures in accordance with ARB and San Diego County Air Pollution Control District guidelines will be identified. 3,3 Water. The potential for drainage and water quality impacts in the project area will be assessed by Luke-Dudek, Civil Engineers. The potential for the project to increase ground coverage by impervious surfaces will be estimated and the effect on the rate and amount of runoff from the project area discussed. Storm drain improvements included in the project and standard project-level mitigation measures (such as adequate site drainage and onsite detention) will be identified as mitigation measures. 3.4 Plant and Animal Life. The environmental resources considered under this category will be identified through the preparation of a study by a City-selected biologist under separate contract administered by the City. The study is assumed to provide all information necessary for preparation of this section of the EIR, including wetland delineation, detailed California gnatcatcher assessment, full biological survey report, recommended mitigation measures, and draft biological text for the EIR. 3.5 Noise, Construction noise impacts including those associated with portable rock-crushing equipment will be briefly discussed and construction noise mitigation measures identified. The potential noise impact resulting from traffic increases on Rancho Santa Fe Road will be described using information contained in the City's Noise Element (as amended). Mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts will be Identified and their effectiveness discussed. Mitigation measures to be considered will include structural siting, barrier walls and others as appropriate. 3.6 Light and Glare. Light and glare impacts will be briefly discussed and mitigation measures Identified as they relate to street lighting associated with roadway improvements. 5 . S 3.7 Land Use. Quantitative estimates of intensity changes resul ti[ from any planned land use location adjustments associated with the road realignment will be described, Intensity of development (dwelling units and square footage or nonresidential uses) will be estimated based on General Plan land use and Local Facilities Management Plan assumptions for intensity/density. Land uses will be tabulated in General Plan land use categories sufficiently specific to make meaningful estimates of impacts on traffic and public facilities. Anticipated development will be compared to the current General Plan and Zoning. 3.8. Traffic Circulation. Traffic considerations associated with the project will be reviewed by Weston Pringle & Associates to Identify potentially significant traffic impacts. Existing traffic conditions In the area will be documented, including the average daily traffic volume on arterial streets. The data used in this analysis will be obtained from the General Plan Traffic Circulation and Facility Management Plans, and other available traffic studies. The analysis of future traffic conditions will include average daily traffic volumes on arterial streets and will also rely on the General Plan Traffic Circulation and Facility Management Plans. Traffic growth from the existing condition will be estimated, based on the future land use scenario developed for the General Plan plus growth in background traffic. Traffic operational and safety concerns including truck routing adjustments will be considered. Potential mitigation measures will be identified for achieving acceptable short- and long-term future conditions. Should design revisions to road configuration occur (for example, modification to the Melrose/Rancho Santa Fe Road intersection) and additional analysis be required, adjustment of the scope of work and cost may be necessary. 3.9, Public Services, The potential for the project, cumulatively with similar projects in the vicinity, to add fire, police and other service requirements will be identified through discussions with the appropriate agencies. Specific mitigation measures will be identified based on these discussions. G . S 3.10. Utilities. Utility impacts, particularly those on water, sewer, storm drains, power, natural gas and solid waste disposal systems, will be identified based on discussions with service providers. System demand will be estimated based on recognized engineering design factors, and demands related to available system capacity, If known, to identify deficiencies. Specific mitigation measures for each system will be identified based on discussions with service providing agencies. Construction components (drainage structures, utility undergrounding, etc.) included in the proposed project will be included as mitigation measures. 3.11. Aesthetics/Landform Alteration. Potential aesthetic Impacts will be identified and discussed in terms of alterations to the natural setting and landform. Specific attention will be devoted to vegetation removal and grading impacts as they relate to the City's Hillside Review Ordinance. Mitigation measures to deal with potential impacts will be identified and methods of implementing mitigation measures recommended. 3.12. Archaeological/Historical. An archaeological field survey of the 684 acre project area and record searches will be conducted by Roth & Associates to identify site locations and possible resources. This Initial survey will confirm the location of some or all of the 28 sites previously identified by FRC as being within a one-mile radius of the planned road realignment. Evaluation of the importance of the sites may result in recommendations for subsurface testing and significance determinations. Costs associated with such testing cannot presently be estimated and are not included in this proposal. This portion of the scope of work does not presently include an assessment of paleontological resources. This assessment can be included at additional cost if desired by the city. Section 4. Alternatives. The impacts of key project alternatives will be addressed in discussion and summary table. Alternatives addressed will include the no project alternative, road widening in the existing alignment, and road realignment without residential area grading. Alternatives will be reviewed with the City, and minimum of three alternatives will be discussed In some detail in the EIR. Additional alternatives will increase EJR costs. 1 . . Section 5. Areas o flo Significant Impact. This section will Include identification of those Impacts not found to be significant and not further discussed in the EIR. Section 6. Short and Long Term Environmental Impact. The potential for the project to achieve short-term objectives at the expense of long-term goals will be reviewed. Section 7. Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes. This section will Identify significant irreversible environmental changes which may result from the proposed project. Section 8. Growth-Inducing Impacts. The potential for the project to induce growth or remove barriers to growth will be identified. Section 9. Cumulative Effects. The cumulative impact or this project with other known projects and development in accordance with the General Plan will be identified. Specific areas to be emphasized in discussing cumulative impacts Include traffic, air quality, noise and public facilities and services impacts. Section 10. Organizations and Persons Consulted. This section will identify those organizations and persons consulted In preparation of the Draft EIR. Mitigation Monitoring Program. A mitigation monitoring program will be incorporated into the EIR in accordance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and will be included as an appendix to the EIR. 8 I . Task 3. PublicaLion Draft EIfl Objective The purpose of this task is to prepare a final Draft EIR for publication by the City. Products Product Project Day Agency Markup (staff product) 6 Publication Draft [JR (50 copies) 82 Subtasks 3.1. Review Administrative Draft. (City task) The City will review the administrative draft EIR and prepare revisions in the form of a marked-up copy of the administrative draft EIR indicating all desired changes, corrections and areas for expansion, etc. The scope of work assumes only one administrative draft review. Should additional reviews of administrative drafts be desired by the City, additional costs will be incurred. 3.2. Prepare Publication Draft EIR. C8A will incorporate City comments in the draft EJR and prepare a final Draft EIR for publication. CBA will incorporate comments and prepare a final draft within 15 working days of receipt of comments on the Administrative Draft EIR. CBA will provide 50 copies of the DEIR to the City for distribution. 9 . . Task 4. Response to Comnrnnts, Final EIR Objective The purpose of this task is to prepare responses to comments by the public and public agencies on the Draft EIR, and to prepare a final EIR including changes in response to comments received, and summarizing comments on the draft EIR and responses to those comments. Products Product Project Day Final EIR (50 copies) 150 Subtasks 4.1 Final EIR. CBA will prepare new EIR sections as a supplement to the Draft EIR including the following: Revised cover page. Revised Table of Contents. Revised text of the EIR incorporating changes in response to new information or comments received. Response to Comments. Comments Received. CBA will incorporate changes to text from the listing of changes into a final EIR. Within 15 working days of receipt of final City comments, CBA will provide 50 copies of the Final EIR. Our schedule and budget for response to comments is based on the assumption that the project will involve only moderate controversy. Hours budgeted for the portion of Task 4 include 30 hours of CBA time and 27 hours of subconsultant time; and should be sufficient to respond to 10 letters of comment. If the project proves highly controversial, develops organized opposition, or Involves responses requiring additional technical analysis not anticipated in the original work scope, the allowance for response to comments is likely to be exceeded and additional costs will be incurred. 10 . . Task 5. Uearings Objective The purpose of this task is to provide expert testimony at public hearings on the Draft EIR. Task 5.1. Hearings. C3A's principal-In-charge or project manager will attend two public hearings or meetings to present the findings of the EIR and respond to questions from the public and City officials. If additional hearings are required, these hearings will be attended as additional services not included in the fixed fee proposal amount. . . PROJECT SCHEDULE The Table below summarizes CBA's recommended schedule for this project. CBA will maintain the project schedule outlined in the Scope of Services subject to timely provision of information and response to draft materials by the City. Day 1 Agency Authorization Day 14 Project Description Memo Cumulative Projects List Day 42 CBA Receipt of Biological Analysis Day 56 Administrative Draft ER to City Day 68 City comments on Administrative Draft to CE3A Day 82 Final Draft EIR to City for distribution Day 136* EIR comments to CBP Day 150* Final EIR *Estimated date. Actual date depends on hearing schedule and comment period. The above schedule depends on City agreement on the project description at the date specified. Changes to the project description following agreement may result in additional work and delays in the submittal of administrative drafts. 12 . E not:ci DUDET The budget below represents CI3P's estimate of the labor and other costs required to complete the Scope of Services outlined. For all items described in the Scope of Services, with the exception of response to EIR comments, services will be provided on a fixed fee basis. For response to EIR comments, an allowance has been provided which is generally sufficient to deal with projects which are not highly controversial. For controversial projects, or projects in which new issues are raised requiring technical analysis not anticipated in the scope of services, this estimate is likely to be exceeded. This proposal is a firm offer by CBA to complete the Scope of Services outlined for the total budget amount. The total fee required for completion of the EIR Is $61,750. Component costs are given in the following chart. 13 I I COST flREAKD0t:i A. Staff Costs 1. Reconnaissance 2. Admin. Draft 3. Publication Draft EIR 4. Responses, Final EIR S. Hearings 10 15 30 16 17 17 6,315 10 20 35 16 16 16 6,825 8 - - 8 - - 1 1 160 CBA Personnel LPerson - Hours 2 15 28 25 80 200 Subconsultants Cumulative (Person -Hours)-- - - Costs lIE M 20 50 30 $ 8,265 80 100 60 31,225 Subtotal 55 130 293 1 140 183 123 J $53,790 B. Other Costs 1. Word Processing (80.0 hours) $2,240.00 2. Graphics (70.0 hours) 2,380.00 3. Support Person 540.00 4. Travel, phone, postage 600.00 5. Printing (Screen, Draft Final) 2.200.00 Subtotal 'I TI M TOTAL $61 7 750 NOTE: No reimbursable expenses are expected to be incurred unless changes in project description occur, additional technical studies not presently Identified or additional document copies are required, or responses to comments requirements exceed budgeted time. DAC - Donald A. Cotton JEB - John E. Bridges SCA - Shawna C. Anderson WP - Weston Pringle & Associates RA - Roth & Associates LO - Luke-Dudek Services, Civil Engineers 14 / --- -- -------------------- PR 08 '92 08:13 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA T5..-..-P.2/5 ( Prcfect i?osign CcnsuItaus -, MEMORANDUM. DATUs • April 7 1 1992 pzzi 738.10 TO: See Distribution List Below PROM: Mark J. Rowson - SUBEQT: Rancho Santa Fe Road North -Mass Grading Permit and Agenda . . Attached. is an updated Mass Grading -Permit Schedule and Agenda. The schedule can be used in our follow up meetings- to track our progress. If you have any ref inentets which we can make prior to our next City meeting of April 8, 1992 at 3:30 p.m., please 1ei-me knoz S NJR/fqf Attachments —DISTRIBUTION LIST ;- David Hauser - City of Carlsbad/Engineering Sherri Howard - City of Carlsbad/Engineering Doug Helming - Heluiing Engineering 0 Ivan Simovich — Fieldstone/La Costa Associates Doug Avis - Fieldstone/La Costa Associates Ruth Besecker - Fieldstone/La Costa Associates Bill Hofman - -Hofmari Planning Associates . Doug Paul - Project Design Consultants Brad Smith - Project Design Consultants P/736-ThGP.MEI4 (0-05) San LL43Ø '(il •aafl tNa3c.. • • ($).2i.c.7i • muLa 4iI • Imuia • 13 .3Z(ca (-:JLara4 • Hn"terprise N. Cmhform,2 • • FAX 4.410 • aQ•) sulte -•'-q 02190• • • -