HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-07-21; City Council; Resolution 1054I -. - . ,-.
,
4
1 I
4
4
I
6
7
a
9
3.Q
1P
12
13
14
3.5
16
3.7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2E
2E
2%
3:
31
0
RESOLUTION NO, 1054
A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING AND DECLARING FINDINGS, AND DENYING AN APPEAL FROM THE VARIANCE GRANTED
EDDIE R, VASQUEZ.
BY THE PLANNING ~QMMISSION TO
"54S, on April 4, 1964, EDDIE Re VASQUEZ did apply for a
iriance for reduction in front yard setback from 20 feet to 5 feet
L real property in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
;ate of California, commonly known as Northerly side of Normandy
me between Mountain View Drive and Garfield Street, and more
3rticularly as Lots 37, 38, and 39, Granville Park, Map 1782, in
le City of Carlsbad,
WHEBEAS, notice of the public hearing of the proposed vari-
ace was published on the 2nd day of April, 1964; and
WHEREAS, on the 14th day of April, 1964, the Planning Com-
of the City of Carlsbad held and conducted a duly adver-
hsed hearing on said proposed variance; and
WHEREAS, at said meeting of the Planning Commission Resola-
ion No, 352 was adopted wherein a variance from '20 feet to 7 1/2
eet was granted; and
WEREAS, on the 5th day of May, 1964, a written appeal was
eceived by the City of Carlsbad from Willard D. and Lillian Me
arrett. et a1 which appeal in effect requested the City Council
f the City of Carlsbad to deny the grant of variance to Eddie . Vasquez; and
WEREAS, on May 14, 1964, notice of a public hearing on
)aid appeal was published ; and
WHEREAS, OR June 3, 1964, a public hearing was held in the
Xty Hall of the City of Carlsbad, 1960 Pi0 Pic0 Drive, Carlsbad,
ialifornia, at 7:30 o'clock P,M., at which time the appeal was
ionsidered by the City Council and evidence and arguments were
)resented by all interested parties,
e 0
NOW, THEREFOE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
is so found by the City Council of the
he following facts and reasons require
anted by the Planning Commission, be
out the general purpose of Ordinance
necessary for the preservation
antial property right possessed by
me vicinity and zone but which is denied
1 2, That the granting of such variance will not be materially
lfare or injurious to the property
nity and zone in which the property
3. That the granting of such variance will not adversely
a1 plan. .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing reasons, the
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk, be, and she
a certified copy of this resolution
ts, and a copy of this resolution to
Commission file and returned to the
anent filing.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad held rin the 21st day o€
vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmen Atkinson, Neiswender, Jardine and Hughes.
NOES: None
ABSENT : None
ABSTAINED: Councilman Dunne