The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980-07-15; City Council; Resolution 62351 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 IC 11 15 2( 2: 2: 2: 21 2! 2t 2' 2I WHEF?EAS , on June 11, 1s the applicatic RESOLUTION NO. 6235 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (PUD-20) FOR A214-UNIT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MELROSE AVENUE EXTENDED, BETWEEN CORINTIA STREET EXTENDED AND ALGA ROAD EXTENDED. APPLICANT: WOODWARD COMPANIES. he Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad did 0 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider of the Woodward Companies for a Planned Unit Development Permit for a214-unit project on property generally located on the'west side of Melrose Avenue extended, between Corintia Street extended and Alga Road extended, more particularly described as : Those portions of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30 and the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, County of San Diego, State of California; and WHEREAS, said Planned Unit Development Permit has been declare to have a nonsilgnificant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has: been prepared and filed in compliance with the requirements of: the City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said hearing the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, adopted Resolution No. 1646; and WEEEREAS, on July 1, 1980, the City Council held a public hearing on the matter to receive all recommendations and hear all persons interested in or opposed to the approval of Planned Unit Development Permit (PUD-20); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlshad as follows: A. That the above recitations are true and correct. B. That the findings of the Planning Commission set forth in ResolutioniNo. 1646 constitute the findings of the City Council in this matter. C. Thai the Planned Unit Development Permit is granted for the reasons set out in Resolution No. 1646 and subject to all applicable requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the satisfaction of the conditions contained in said Resolution No. 1646, dated June 11, 1980, marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, with the exception of Condition No. 17, which has been revised to read as follows: "17. The reclaimed water irrigation system shall be maintained and operated by the San Marcos County Water District consistent with the requirements of the,City of Carlsbad, under a contractural agreement with the homeowner's association to provide the City total assurance that the District will always have the ability to discharge the effluent." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 15th day of Ju1.y , 1980 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Packard, Casler, Anear, Lewis and Kulchin NOES: Nane -1 3 /--> ABSENT: None J i ./ )25iiiiL AYd&zL;/*(- RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor I ATTEST : ALfkAUT!Kg- I (SEAL) 1 -2- I" .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 36 17 3.8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXHIBIT A T()IESOLUTION NO. 6235 I PLANNING I COMC4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1646 OF THE PLANNING COMPIISSION OF RECOMMENDING FOR A GENERALLY ON THE WEST SIDE OF MELROSE AVENUE EXTE~DED, BETWEEN COR~NTLA STREET EXTENDED AND ALGA ROAD EXTENDED. APPL CANT : WOODWARD COMPANIES PU5-20 CASE1 NO: I I WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: Those portions of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30 and the Soubheast Quarter of Section 19, Township 12 South, Ranqe 3 liest, San Bernardino Meridian, County of San Diego, IState of California I I has been filed dith the City of Carlsbad, and referred to .the Planning Conmisdion; and I I WHEREAS, said verified 'application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, t, h' e Planning Commission did, on the 11th day of June, 1980, hold a duky noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to I , consider said rrquest; and WHEREAS , ait said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony a nd arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to Planned Unit Dlvelopment; k and I be heard, said (Commission considered all factors relating to the I NOW, THER+FORE, BE IT HEREBY WSOLVED by the Planning 1 I Commission as follows: A) B) That the pbove recitations are true and correct. That baseb on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commilssion recommends APPROVAL of PUD-20, based on the followin7 findings and subject .to the following conditions: I Findings: 1) The proposed use at the particular 1-ocation is necessary ana desirable to provide a service or facility which will .. 1. 1 2 33 14 1E l'i ZE 2; 21 2: 2'; . .. contribute general well-being of the neighborhood and the the reasons stated in the staff report, be detrimental to the health, safety or or improvements in the vicinity. residing or working in the vicinity in Section 21.45.110 and all set forth in Section 21.45.120 in the staff report. I The grantidg of this permit will not adversely affect and will be codsistent with the general plan for the city, applicableispecific plans, and the adopted plans of any governmental agency, The projecd will not cause any significant adverse environ- mental impacts and the Planning Director has issued a Conditional Negative Declaration (Log No, 688, dated 4/25/80). The project is consistent with all City Public Facility Policies and Ordinances since: a. b. Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the project will be provided by the San Marcos County Water District. The Planning Con-mission finds that sewer service is not available for this development as of the date of this approdal. However, sewer service may be available in the f+ture. of anlappropriate condition to this Tentative Subdivisior Map, insured that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is avail?ble to serve the project. Planning Commission has added a condition that a note shall 1 be placed on the final map that building' permits may nTt be issued for th,is project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available. satisfied that I The Planning Commission has, by inclusion In addition, the the final map cannot be approved and building s cannot be issued unless sewer service remains the Planning Commission is of the Public Facilities Element of the been met insofar as they apply to sewer1 service for this project. , I Conditions: - General I I 1) Approval. is granted for PUD-20, As shown on Exhibit D dated 6/2/$0, on file in the Planning Department and incorporatcd by reference. substantiailly as shown on this exhibit unless otherwise noted in these conditions. Development shall occur I -3- S?C RES0 #1646; 3. 2 3 4. 5 6 ;i e 9 1c 3-3. 12 1 2 14 15 3-f * 1'; I€ II 2( 22 2: 2; 21 ' 2! 2t 2' 2t - l e Prior to thy issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submiti a final Planned Unit Development Plan, incorporati g all changes required herein, for the approval of the Planning Director. I The applicadt shall establish a homeowner 's association and covenan-tis, conditions and restricti-ons subject to the approval! of the Planning Director. prohibit stcbrage of recreational. vehicles in the front yards, private drijes, private streets or public streets of the project. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan for the entire site must be approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval of Phase I. Prior to thy approval of the final map, for Phase I, the applicant shall submit plans for the proposed Community Ifientity Signs subject to the approval of the Planning DiLector. by referencp and shall be strictly complied with as part of this approval. Said CCSrR'S shall i All conditions Of CT 80-9 and SDP 80-6 are incorporated herein >evelopment Standards j - The standar/ds of the RD-M zone regarding permitted-uses, conditionali uses, building height, placement of buildings and yard rekpirements shall apply to the subject property unless othekwise stated herein or shown otherwise on all approved exhibits, All buildings backing or siding onto Mefrose Avenue shall maintain a building setback of 35' from curb line, ~ block walls shall be erected for these noise from vehicular traffic from shown on Exhibit "B" dated 6/2/80, shall be irrigated at the cumulative 225 square feet. All other slo2es with ground cover per require- Director. The parkind bay located adjacent to lot 10 of Phase 2 shall be redesigned subject to the approval of the Planning Di,rector pqior to final map recordation of Phase 2, Units on lqts 6 through 13 private stqect shall bc setback 25' from the curb line. with garages facing a located in Phasc 7 shall be fully pedes triarr access to all. built out improved, phases, pr phase 4, 5 final occupancy of any units in either PC RESO #l646 I I -3- \ I that equals by'the project . ,, or exceeds the amount of sewage generated or otherwise approved by the City Engineer. .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 '9 10 11 114 16 ' 17 " 318 3-9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i. i e .I .. . .. I i Environmental Reyiew 12) The followi g conditions of the Negative Declaration issued for his project (EIA No. 688, dated 4/25/80) shall be cohplied with: a) Clearing operations shall occur only immediately prior: ;to grading activities. shall. be immediately hydroseeded or otherwise stablized for erosion control inmediately upon completion of grading activities, The timing of all grading activities shall be restribted as required by the City Engineer on the grading permit. All disturbed slopes I b) 1 , c) Drainabe facilities shall be constructed concurrent with grading activities, d) In ordkr to mitigate potentially significant traffic impactk, the intersection of Corintia Street and Melrosk Avenue shall be designed and constructed, as required by the City Engineer, in order to accommbdate projected vehicular trips at this intersection. Energy1 conservation measures as stipulated in -EIR-307 shall. pe included in this project . l e) I i Fire Safety j ~ 13) All drivewabs and emergency vehicle easements shall be improved to/ minimum standards as required by the Fire Chief and City Engineer. In order to/ provide for fire protection during the construction period, the applicant shall maintain passable ve icular access to all buildings. In addition, other fire lsafety measures shall be installed as required by the Firel Chief or his designee. ~ 14) adequate fi k e hydrants with required fire flows and/or I I I Reclaimed Water Use 16) The applicaint shall prepare, to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Director and the City Engineer, a document 8 methods of "Type I" reclaimed water use. shall contain a plant list of salt and d vegetation, water absorption rates per the gallons'of water per acre ~ I' PC RES0 #1646 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 E 'i E s IC 13 a: 1; 11 l! It 1' ll I! 21 2' 2) 2 2 2 2 2 2 .. t/ needed to a program, 7. operating, and system. final map f The reclain and operate consistent under a cor associatior that they P the effluer Cons tructic with Title Code by re( pipe connec utilized ai that there The RV sto: (Exhibit either Pha, PASSED, AP: 'lanning Commis :he 11th day of AYES: Sch NOES: Non . ABSENT: Ro ABSTAIN : ATTEST : PC RES0 #1G46 e :cormodate the proposal and a soil-flushing ie document shall also include criteria for iaintaining and. monitoring the irrigation area )r Phase I. :d water irrigation system shall be maintained 1 by the San Marcos County Water District Jith the requirements of the City of Carlsbad, xactural agreement with the homeowner Is that is to give the district total assurance xild always have the ability to discharge 1 of the reclaimed water system shall comply 17 of the California State Administration iiring a water master on the job to monitor Zions, Low trajectory sprinklers shall be 3 the irrigation rate shall be regulated so :Jill be no runoff. 2ge area indicated on the tentative tract map ") shall be installed prior to final occupancy of 3 6 or 7, whichever occurs first. This shall be done prior to approval of the -. a' ROVED AND ADOFTED at a regular meeting of the ion of the City of Carlsbad, California;' held on June, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: ck, Larson, Friestedt', Marcusr Leeds and Jose botis one CARLSBAD PLANNING Cbbb4ISSION 'A -5- ,