Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-08-19; City Council; Resolution 62141 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 6214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA REPEALING RESOLUTION NUMBER 3345 and 3635, AND ADOPTING NEW GUIDELINES TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY OF CARLSRAD ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE OF 1980. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California ias adopted Ordinance No. 9557 adopting Title 19, Chapter 9.04 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code to be known as the City of larlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1980; and WHEREAS, said ordinance provides that guidelines shall be .dopted to establish the procedures for implementation of said lrdinance ; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Resolutions No. 3345 and 3635 lave been superceded by subsequent amendments to the California :nvironmental Quality Act, the guidelines adopted by the State iecretary of Resources implementing said act, and by the provisions )f the City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of -980; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the rity of Carlsbad, as follows: _. That the above recitations are true and correct, 1. That Resolutions No. 3345 and No. 3635 are repealed, ' 10 That Exhibits A thru G , inclusive, attached hereto and made a part hereof are hereby approved and shall constitute the guidelines for implementation of the City of Carlsbad Environ- mental Protection Ordinance of 1980. I// '// /// /// *. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City 'ouncil on the 19th day of Auqust , 1980 by the following .ate, to wit: AYES: Council Members Packard, Casler, Anear, Lewis and Kulchin NOES: None ABSENT: None I /&&,*Ly2? / " L@Li( -RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor TTEST : LETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk& (SEAL) J FEE: $75.00 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Exhibit A to 0 Resolution No. 6214 (To Be Completed By Applicant) Receipt No. GENERAL INFORMATION - Part I EIA NO. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM Name and address of developer or project sponsor: Address of project: Assessor's Block and Lot Number: Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Existing zoning district: Proposed use of site (project for which this forn is filed): BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Give a brief description of the proposed activity (attach any preliminary development plans); include a discussion of site size; square footage of project; amount of off street parking; proposed scheduling and related or associated projects and anticipated incremental development. 2. Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and manmade characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. 3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. specific discussion of energy conservation requirements see of the City's EIR guidelines). (For a more 4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. 6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. I. ENVIRONmNTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach additional sheets as necessary). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11 m 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Yes Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? Could the activity affect the use of a recrea- tional area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? - - - - Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city. Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city. Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the County, State, or Nation? Could the activity significantly affect a histor- ical or archaelogical site or its settings? Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? - - - - Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source of water, etc, for rare or endangered wildlife on fish species? - Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? - Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? _I - Could the activity change existing features of any of the City's beaches? - Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already developed areas? - - No - 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Yes - Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc)? Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any local, State or Federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? - - Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note, surface, ground water, off-shore). Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? Will there be a significant change to existing land form? (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards. No - (b) percentage of alteration to the present land (c) maximum heisht of cut or fill slopes. form. - L Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers drains or streets? - - Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? 11. STATE OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS - If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: 111. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (if additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as may be needed.) Signature (Person completing report) Date Signed: Conclusions (To be completed by the Planning Director). Place ( ) Further information is required. ( ) a check in the appropriate box. It has been determined that the project will not have significant environmental effects. ( ) You must submit a preliminary environmental impact statement by the following date. ( ) You should make an appointment with the Planning Director to discuss further processing of your project, in accordance with Chapter 19.04 of the Municipal Code. DATE RECEIVED : Planning Director, or, mibit B 14 To Resolution No. 67 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM- Part I1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) I. BACKGROUND EIA NO. 1. NAME OF 2. ADDRESS PROPONENT AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPONENT 3. DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED 4. NAME AND FILE NUMBER(S) OF PROJECT 11. ENVIRONmNTAL IMPACTS ON ATTACHED SHEETS.) (EXPLANATIONS OF ALL "YES" AND "MAYBE" ANSWERS ARE TO BE Yes Maybe 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: WRITTEN No a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 0 - Yes Maybe - No 0 f'. Changes in deposition or ero- sion of beach sands, or changes which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the C 1 in siltation, deposition or erosion -. ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? - - - - __ __ 2. - Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration b. The creation of objectionable odors? - - - ' of ambient air quality? - - - 5 c. Alteration of afr movementt moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally - or regionally? - _I 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved - oxygen or turbidity? - - - .. -._ f. Alteration of the direction or.rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interzepti on of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i. water otherwise available for public water supplies? Reduction in the amount of .. -3, 7 - .. *+- ' 0. 9. Natural Resources. Will the pro- - posal result in: - a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? - - ,lo. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal - involve a risk of' an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, radiation) in the event of an acci- . Population. Will the proposal aiter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? oil, pesticides, chemicals or e. dent or upset conditions? - - - - 11. ' 12 . Kou s i ng . existing housing, or create a Will the proposal affect demand for additional housing? -- - 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c.. Impact upon existing trans- portation systems? . f. .. .. d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods? . e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? . .. '. f. . Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? , .. .. -3- .- I. 0 ... Ye s - 4. Will the proposal Plant Life. result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? I of plants (including trees, shrubs, - - - b. any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- . ment of existing species? d. agricultural crop? Reduction of the numbers of - - - 0 - - - Reduction in acreage of any 5. Will the proposal resul’t in: Animal Life. __I_ / a. species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land ‘animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna) ? b. Reduction of the mumbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ( Changes in the diversity of c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in’a barrier to the migration or . movement of animals ? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? -6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? -_ - .7. Light and Glare. Will the pro- posal produce new light or glare? - - - r. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -4- I. \, 0' Yes mybe - No - 14. Public Services. Will the pro- posal have Effect upon, or I result in a need for new or al- tered governmental services in any of the following areas: .a. Fire protection? - . I b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks 6r other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? 15 f. Other governmental services? Energy. Will the proposal result (. a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? res= a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: . .16. Utilities. Will .the proposal I_ . a. Power or natural gas? . b. Communications systems? C. Water? . ""d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? . ""d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? II f. Solid waste and disposal? c 'i 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? - . ,*' 0 18. &esthetics. Will the proposal result i n the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the 'public, or will the proposal re- sult in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity' of' exisitng recreational opportunities? 20. ArcheologicallHistorical. Will the proposal result i n an al'teration of a significant archeological or his- . torical site, structure, object or building? -- -- __ Maybe - .- - No - . 21. ANALYZE THE BASIC ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT. INDICATE WHY EACH OF THE FOLLOWING ISCONSIDERED TO BE A VIABLE ALTER- NATIVE AND/OR WHY IT WAS REJECTED IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. a)' PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT: b) ALTERNATE SITE DESIGNS: C) ALTERNATE SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT: - d) ALTERNATE USES FOR THE SITE: I e) DEVELOPMEN T SOME FUTURE TIME RATHER 0 THAN NOW: la f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE: g) NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE: 22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN- TIAL TO DEGRADE THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL THE DIVERSITY IN THE ENVIRONMENT? b) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN- TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM, ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT- IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE- PERIOD OF TIME WHILE LONG-TERM TERM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INTO THE FUTURE.) c) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED, BUT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE? (A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TWO -. OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES WHERE THE IMPACT ON EACH RE- SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL, BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE TOTAL OF THOSE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) d) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? *. r- . .' - .*' . , ,. .. 111. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVAUJATION IV. DETERMINATION. (TO BE 'COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR)' ._ ~ . On the basis of.this initial evaluation: r;7 ._ . be prepared. - I: find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE- DECLARATION will I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is .required. P .. .. .. Date': * Signature . . ..I .* . For .a' c \ hibit C Resolution No. 6214 GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A PROJECT MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT I. DETERMINING SIGNIFICANT EFFECT (a) The determination of whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment calls for careful judgment on the part of the reviewing agency involved, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data. definition of significant effect is not possible because the significance of an activity may vary with the setting. For example, an activity which may not be significant in an urban area may be significant in a rural area. There may be a difference of opinion on whether a particular effect should be considered adverse or beneficial, but where there is, or anticipated to be, a substantial body of opinion that considers or will consider the effect to be adverse, the public agency should prepare an EIR to explore the environmental effects involved. An iron-clad (b) In evaluating the significance of the environmental effect of a project, the reviewing agency shall consider both primary and secondary consequences. Primary consequences are immediately related to the project (the construction of a new treatment plant may facilitate population growth in a particular area), while secondary consequences are related more to primary consequences than to the project itself (an impact upon the resource base, including land, air, water and energy use of the area in question may result from the population growth). (c) A project will normally have a significant effect on the environment if it: 1. Is in conflict with environmental plans and goals that have been adopted by the community where the project is to be located; 2. Substantially affects a rare or endangered species of animal or plant, or habitat of such a species or substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife or plants; 3. Causes substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; 4. Has a substantial and demonstrable negative aesthetic effect; 5. Breaches any published national, standards relating to solid waste or litter control; state or local 6. Results in a substantial detrimental effect on air or water quality, or on ambient noise levels for adjoining areas, or violates any ambient air quality standard: 7. Involves the possibility of contaminating a public water supply system or adversely affecting ground water; 8. Could cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation; 9. Is subject to major geologic hazards; 10. Could disrupt or adversely affect a prehistoric or historic archaeological site or a property of historic or cultural significance to a community or ethnic or social group; or a paleontological site except as a part of a scientific study. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Could create a potential public health hazard or involve the use, production or disposal of materials which pose a hazard to people or animal or plant populations in the area affected; Would convert prime agricultural land to non- agricultural use or impair the agricultural productivity of prime agricultural land; Induce substantial growth or concentration of population; Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system; Displace a large number of people; Encourage activities which result in the use of large amounts of fuel, water, or energy: Use fuel, water, or energy in a wasteful manner; Increase substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas; Cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation: Expose people or structures to major geological hazards ; Extend a sewer trunk line with capcity to serve new development; 2. 22. Could substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife or plants; 23. Could disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community; 24. Could create a public health hazard or a potential public health hazard; 25. Would conflict with established recreational, educational, religious or scientific uses of the area: 26. Would violate any ambient air quality standard, contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, or expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. (d) To help determine if the project will cause a significant effect on the environment, the following questions should be answered: 1. Does the project significantly change present uses of the project area? The project area includes the immediate location of the project as well as more remote areas that may be directly or indirectly affected by construction and/or operation of the project. 2. Will the project affect areas of historical, archaeological or aesthetic value? The setting of such sites includes surrounding areas, the nature of which are important to the understanding and enjoyment of the site itself. 3. Will the project accelerate the development of adjoining non-urban areas? Examples include the introduction of facilities such as streets, roads, water mains or sewerage lines in such a manner as to facilitate develop- ment or intensification of the use of an area. 4. Will the project alter the character of existing communities? Examples include, but are not limited to: 3. Changes in traffic patterns Effects on access within the community to commercial establishments, schools, parks, etc. found within the community. Introduction to activities not presently 5. Could the project significantly affect the potential use, extraction or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Examples include, but are not limited to: Developments which effectively preclude the extraction of the region's rock, sand, gravel or other mineral resources. use of regional national resources in scarce supply. or availability of regional natural resources that are in scarce supply. Uses which effectively preclude the multiple Activities which tend to diminish the supply 6. Are any of the natural or man-made features in the project area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the City, County, State or Nation? Unique features include those areas, structures, biological phenomena, etc., that exhibit distinguishing characteristics not found in other areas, or only in a small number of other areas. Such features can be either good or bad for human health, safety, comfort or convenience. 11. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (a) A project shall be found to have a significant effect on the environment if: 1. The project has the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitate of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 4. 111. 3. The project has possible environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other projects, and the effects of probable future projects. 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. CONSULTATION WITH RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES When the City is acting as Lead Agency for a project, the Planning Director shall consult with all other public agencies involved in carrying out or approving the project before making his determination regarding significant effect. Any comments received in response to such con- sultations shall be considered by the Planning Director in arriving at his decision. IV. MULTIPLE OR PHASED PROJECTS Where an individual project is a necessary precedent for action on a larger project, or commits the citizen or the applicant for action on a larger project which would have significant environmental effects, the Planning Director shall make his significant effects determination in terms of the larger project and, when a project is one of several similiar City projects, he shall consider the combined effect. 5. TO RESOLUTION NO. 6214 EXHIBIT D Reducing Delay and Paperwork In order to ensure that the goals, policies and requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1980 are efficiently and effectively met: to insure that the environmental review process does not create unnecessary delays and burdens upon project developers; and to help limit the extra cost that environ- mental review may add to a project, which in turn may add to the cost to the consumer, including home buyers and renters; the City Council declares that it is the policy of the City to reduce delay and paperwork by: Integrating the environmental review process into early planning. Identifying projects which fit within categorical exemptions and are therefore exempt; from further environmental review, Using initial studies to identify significant environmental issues and to narrow the scope of EIRs. Using a negative declaration when a project not otherwise exempt will not have a significant effect on the environment. Allowing applicants to revise projects to eliminate possible significant effects on the environment, thereby enabling the pro- ject to qualify for a negative declaration rather than an environmental impact report. Integrating environmental review requirements with other con- sultation requirements. Emphasizing consultation before an environmental impact report is prepared, rather than submitting adversary comments on a completed document. Combining environmental documents with other planning documents. Eliminating repetitive discussions of the same issues by using environmental impact reports on programs, policies, or plans and tiering from statement of broad scope to those of narrower scope. Preparing analytic rather than encyclopedic environmental impact reports. Mentioning only briefly issues other than significant ones in EIRs. Writing environmental impact reports in plain language. Following a clear format for environmental impact reports. Page 2 Continued (n) Emphasizing the portions of the environmental impact report that are useful to decision makers and the public and reducing emphasis on background material. (0) Using incorporation by reference. (p) Making comments on environmental impact reports as specific as possible. EXHIBIT E TO RESOLUTION NO. 6214 Contents of Environmental Impact Reports Environmental Impact Reports prepared by or on behalf of the City according to the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1980, shall contain the information outlined in Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 9 of the California Administrative Code as amended (State guidelines Section 15140 et seg.) 1. EXHIBIT F TO RESOLUTION 6214 ENERGY CONSERVATION The impact of each project on energy conservation shall be analyzed Exhibit shall provide guidelines for such analysis. This I. Introduction The goal of conserving energy implies the wise and efficient use of energy. The means of achieving this goal include: (1) Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption, (2) Decreasing reliance on natural gas and oil, and (3) Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources. In order to assure that energy implications are considered in project decisions, the California Environmental Quality Act requires that EIRs include a duscussion of the potential energy impacts of proposed pro- jects, with particular emphasis on avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy. Energy conservation implies that a project's cost effectiveness be reviewed not only in dollars, but also in terms of energy requirements. For many projects, lifetime costs may be determined more by energy efficiency than by initial dollar costs. 11. EIR Contents Potentially significant energy implications of a project should be considered in an EIR. The following list of energy impact possibilities and potential conservation measures is designed to assist in the prepara- tion of an EIR. In many instances, specific items may not apply or additional items may be needed. A. Project Description may include the following items: 1. Energy-consuming equipment and processes which will be used during construction, operation, and/or removal of the project. If appropriate, this discussion should consider the energy intensiveness of materials and equipment required for the project. 2. Total energy requirements of the project by fuel type and end use. 3. Energy conservation equipment and design features. 4. Initial and life-cycle energy costs or supplies. E. C. Environmental Setting may include existing energy supplies and energy use patterns in the region and locality- Environmental Impacts may include: 1. The project's energy requirements and its energy use efficien- cies by amount and fuel type for each stage of &he project's life cycle including construction, operation, maintenance and/or removal. If appropriate, the energy intensSveness of materials may b.e discussed. 2. The effects of the project on Local. and regional energy ' supplies and on requirements for additional capacity. 3. The effects of the project on peak and base period demands for electricity and other forms of energy, The degree to which the project complies with existing energy standards . The effects of the project on energy resources, 4. 5. D. Mitigation Measures may include: 1. Potential measures to reduce wasteful, inefficient and un- necessary consumption of energy during construction, operation, maintenance and/or removal. The discussion should explain why cettaiil neasures were incorporated in the project'and why other measures were dismissed. 2. The potential of siting, orientation, and design to minimize energy consumption. 3, The potezltlal for reducing peak energy demand, . 4, Alternats fuels (particularly renewable ones) or energy s ys rems * Energy conservation which could result from recycling efforts. Alternetives should be compared in terms of overall energy consump- tion and ia tens of reducing wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary consmption of energy. 5. E, F. Unavoidable .4dverse Effects nay include wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary consumption of energy during the project construction, operation, maintenance and/or removal that cannot be feasibiy mitigated . G. Irreversible Commitment of Resources may include a the project preempts future energy development conservation. d i scus s ion or future of how energy PPE-2A: 14 d' 9 I-- -%. ;: H. Short-Tern: Gains Versus Lon@-Term Impacts can be coatpared by calculating the energy costs over the lifetime of the project, I. Growth-Inducing Effects may include the of growth induced by the project. estimated energy consumption EXHIBIT G TO RESOLUTION NO. 6214 FEE SCHEDULE The follwing fee schedule is adopted to cover City costs in processing projects under the City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1980. Process Environmental Impact Analysis . . . ,$lOO.OO Process Environmental Impact Report Minimum Fee . , . . .$300.00 plus actual cost Supplemental Environmental Impact Report . . $150.00 plus actual cost Copy of Title 19 (Environmental Protection Ordinance) . . . . e . . . .$ 2.00 Copy of Exhibits to Title 19 . . . . . . . . $ 1.50 Requests for Environmental Documents . . . . $ 0.05 per page plus mailing cost Mailing of notice on request . . . . . . . . $60.00 per year (Clerk) Mailing of notice on request . . . . . . . . $60.00 per year (Planning Director)