HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-10-26; City Council; Resolution 66171
6
7
8
9
20
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1E
1s
2c
21
2;
2:
24
25
2E
27
2E
FSSOLUTION NO. 6617
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 5580 REVISING THE AMOUNT OF FEES TO BE REQUIRED AS A
CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP-
MENT WITHIN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE SAN NARCOS UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 4.7, Division 1, Title 7 of the
California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Carls-
bad, California has adopted a School Facilities Dedication and
Fee Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.55); and
WHEREAS, Section 21.55.150 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
provides that the standards for the mount of fees to be required
pursuant to such ordinance shall be determined by the City Council
and set by resolution.
made after consideration of recommendations from the governing
board of the affected school district; and
The City Council's determination is to be
WHEREAS, the City Council established standards for the amount
of fees to be required pursuant to Chapter 21.55 in Resolution
No. 5580; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is in receipt of recommendations
in regards to revised amount of fees from the San Marcos Unified
School District. Their recommendation is attached hereto as
Exhibit A, and is made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Council fully considered the matter at the
adjourned regular meeting of Oct. 26, 1981, at which the City
Council determined to aoncur in the revised standards as recommend(
by the Board of the San Marcos Unified School District:
//
//
.I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1.0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad as follows:
A. That the above recitations are true and correct.
B. That the standard for the amount of fees to be required
as a condition of approval for residential developments within
that portion of the City of Carlsbad, which is also within the
boundaries of the San Marcos Unified School District, shall be as
contained in Exhibit A.
C. This determination is based upon the City Council's con-
currence in the recommendations made by the Governing Board of
the San Marcos Unified School District, including the facts support
ing such recommendations as contained in Exhibit A.
D. Unless the decision-making body especially determines to
the contrary, the City Council hereby determines that the followinc
findings and requirements shall apply to any residential develop-
ment of fifty units or less:
1. All such developments shall be required to pay fees
in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit A.
2. The City Council has reviewed that portion of the General Plan which applies to the San Marcos Unified
School District and finds that it provides for the
location of public schools,
3. That the fees to be paid shall be used for the
purpose of providing interim school facilities.
4, That the fees to be paid for each unit bear a
reasonable relationship to the burdens placed on
the School District by such u:nit and that the fees
will be used to mitigate that burden.
5. That the school facilities to be funded by the fees are consistent with the City's General Plan.
E. The standards adopted by this resolution do not at this
time require the dedication of land. The San Marcos Unified School
6
.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
12
14
1:
1E
17
1E
1E
2c
21
2:
2;
2L
District is developing standards regarding such dedications.
When the District is prepared to make their recommendation in
that regard, the City Council intends to amend this resolution to
include provisions for requiring the dedication of land as they
determine to be in the public interests.
F. Effective Date. The fee schedule approved by this
Resolution shall become effective on MOV. 1, 1981.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the
- 26th day of October , 1981 by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Menbers Packard, Casler, hear, Lewis and Kdchin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
r.- -- RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
August 1, 1981
C1 erk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008
Exhibit A to Res. 6617
San Marcos School District
270 San Marcos Boulevard San Marcos, California 92069 Phone: (714) 744-4776
Enclosed is the revised fee schedule for interim school facilities under the terms of SB 201 adopted by the Governing Board of the San Marcos Unified School District on March 17, 1981. is the date of your concurrence with the schedule. The effective date of this new schedule
If you have any questions or if I can be of assistance, please call.
/ Business Manager
/ RCC:LG Enclosure
cc: Dr. Wm. Streshly
..
',
Y
..
.. ..
i
L
c
:
[. ..
..
L
< 0
-. DEVELOPERS FEES
Cost of bui 1 ding i ncl udi ng carpet, .ai r condi ti oni ng and installation (960 sq. ft. @ $43.00)
Architectural , Engineering, testing, inspection, state and other fees
Utility hook ups
. ?*
.. Site preparation
Special Education @ 10% (ramps, guard rails, other structural requi rements) ,
I
..
'C Support Services
.. Furniture Restroom - 1 for every 70 classrooms $53,360 f 10 =.
*I Total costs
$61,724.00 +, 30 students' :+ .
..
1 Bdr. . 2 Bdrs.
Single family dwelling unit @ .77 $528.00 $1,056 .OO
Attached .. family dtrelling unit @ .28 $288.00 . $576.00
Fami.ly mobile home parks - /. . . $528.00 $1,056 .00
Single family mobile home/single lot' -$528.00 $1,056.00
$41,280.00
. 7;302.0Q
7,200.00
650.00
4 ,I 28.00
$53,360.00
$5,360.00 I
3,000.00
. $61,720.00
$2,057.33
3 Bdrs.
$1,584.14
..
kritt?t mobile home parks (flat'fee) - $350.00 'per space
Exemptions
Industrial, commercial, convalescent hospi tgls and retirement homes, (retirement home definition - a home with a staff who provide 24 hour supervision. homes provide medi cal , dietary and phannaceuti cal care a1 ong with physical acti vi ties) and churches.
These .
.. Fees to be collected prior to building permit issuance, -. . ..
,
August 1, 1981
ExhibitA to Res. 6617
San Marcos a ified School District
270 San Marcos Boulevard
San Marcos, California 92069 Phone: (714) 744-4776
C1 erk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008
Re: Recertification of School Overcrowding Conditions Under SIB 201 - San Marcos Unified School District
This letter is to comply with the requirements of Government Code Section 65970 et seq. and Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21 .,55.120 et seq. by certifying that the conditions of overcrowding of some of the schools of the San Marcos Unified School Distirct continues. The schools of the District which are overcrowded are as follows:
a) San Marcos High School
b) San Marcos Junior High c) San Marcos Elementary
d) Alvin Dunn Elementary
e) Woodl and Park El emen tary
Please find enclosed an amended Resolution Re Conditions of Overcrowding in the San Marcos Unified School District school attendance areas passed and adopted by the Governing Board of the San Marcos Unified School District on July 21, 1981.
A1 though the Governing Board has approved the uti1 ization of voluntary secured agreements between school district and developer, the San Marcos Unified School District requests that fees under terms of Senate Bill 201 (Government Code Section 65970 et seq.) be collected until agreement iis reached between the Carlsbad City Council and the school district and the Carlsbad City Council grants the school district authority to collect developer contributions as part of the City of Carlsbad’s Public Facility Element.
/Bus i ness Manager
-/i RCC:LG Enclosure
cc: Dr. Wm. Streshly
r. '-
,
I
0 0 Resolution # 81-4
RESOLUTION RE CONDITIONS
OF OVERCROWDING
IN SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AREAS
On a motion of Member Katz , seconded by Member Ford , the following resolution is adopted:
WHEREAS, for some time Dast there has'been a continuinq and substantial increase in population within the' boundaries of the
School District to the extent that the school facili-ties of this district have San Marc& Unified
become overcrowded; and
WHEREAS , a very si gni fi cant proportion of the increase in popul ati on in this district results from construction of residential units in new housing . developments within the district; and
WHEREAS, in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions or dedications of land from the developers of such new residential developments this district would not have financial resources adequate to provide porper educational facilities for all the children residing in this district; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970; added by Stats. 1977,
Chapter 955) Division 7, Title 7 to the Government Code making provision for financial or other assistance by developers to school district if the governing board of a school district has made a finding that condiditions of overcrowding exist in one or more attendance areas of the district including the specific data specified in Government Code Section 65971 ; NOM THEREFORE
IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that, pursuant to Government Code Section 65971, this governing board makes the following findings:
u
(7) Conditions of overcrowding exist in the following attendance areas of the San Marcos Unified SC~OG~ Distirct which will impair the normal functioning of educational programs in those areas:
(a) San Marcos High School (b) San Marcos Junior High (c) San Marcos Elementary School
(d) Alvin Dunn Elementary School (e) Woodland Park School
(2) Reasons for the conditions of overcrowding in the above-mentioned attendance areas include the fol 1 owing :
(a) The existing enrollment, the anticipated additional enrollment", total enrol lment, school capaci ty , and the anticipated enrollment exceeding school capacity for each of the above listed attendance areas is as follows:
Present Anticipated Total Capaci ty An ti ci pa ted Enrollment Enrollment * Enrollment - of School Excess
San Marcos
High School 1260 79 1339 1350 0
Alvin Dunn School 6 81 37 . 71 8 6 84 34
Richland School 727 20 747 76 0 0
Wood1 and Park School 829 22
San Marcos El emen tary 651 33
San Marcos Junior High 774 20
85 1
6 54
794
829
659
782
22
25
12
New Horizons 121 10 131 130 1
* The anticipated additional enrollment is derived from yield factors applied to residential units under construction.
(3) A1 1 reasonable methods of mi ti gating condi tions of overcrowding kave been evaluated and no feasible method for reducing such conditions exists except (a) below. reduce the overcrowded conditions include the fo11 owing; Mitigation measures considered by the governing board of this district to
(a) Agreements between subdividers and the district whereby temporary use buildings are leased to the school district with funds made avai 1 ab1 e by subdi vi ders .
(b) The use of temporary use buildings or relocatable structures. The use of such buildings is a feasible solution to part of the housing needs of the district but they are not suitable for all types of classes, particularly at the secondary level. rooms are not adequate in size for the average class size of 31 students. Furthermore, the funds to obtain such relocatable classrooms would have to be made available to the district either by agreements with subdividers or by'supplemental district financing such as a bond issue.
Mobile home type portable class-
(c) Student busing. in that there is no space which the students may be a considerable added cost
Student busing is not a feasible a1 ternative available in other schools of the district to transported. to the district for buses and drivers. Busi ni ng students would a1 so requi re
..
(d) the instructional time for each student is reduced and students are required to attend school at times of the day that are not most conducive to learning. cause excessive wear on school facilities.
native in that a citizens committee recommended that year-round school not be considered as a feasible educational system at this time and the Board of Trustees has found no reason to disagree with this Finding.
Double sessions. This is not a feasible alternative in that
Double sessions also disrupt the home life of families and
(e) Year-round schools. This is not considered a favorable alter-
(f) School boundary readjustment. This is not a favorable alter- native in that there is not space available in any of the attendance areas of the elementary schools or in the high school attendance area. Boundary readjustments should not be made frequently as they disrupt the identification of students and families with a particular school.
(9) Elimination of low priority school facility uses. This is not an a1 ternative in this district inasmuch as there are no low priority faci 1 i ti es .
(h) With the advent of Proposition 13, the local tax rate is severely limited and unable to support the regular district operations. To divert any of the operating funds of the district to housing would severely ctirtail the district’s ability to provide a quality education.
March 7, 1978; it failed to pass. qualified electors to pass a bond issue. achieve.
1 The governing board of this district called a bond election for
Proposition 13 requires 2/3 of the This would be impossible to
(i) district real property and other available funds. This is not a feasible alternative in that the district does not have funds available from other sources and does not have surplus real property available for sale.
(4)
The use of funds available from the sale of surplus school
The conditions of overcrowding in this district and the explosive population growth projected for this area can only be accomodated by new schoo!s far the long-term; placement of temporary use bujfdings/relocatable structwes and busing of students are stcp-gap rrieasures for the near-term only and in and of themselves do not significantly reduce the conditions of overcrowding. Support by developers in the form of financial contributions or dedications of land is necessary in order to try to keep abreast of population growth, and even with such assistance, any si gni fi cant reduction in conditions of overcrowding wi 11 be difficult until permanent additional classroom buildings can be constructed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Secretary of this Board 'del i ver certi fied copies of this resol uti on to the ci ty counci 1 s and/or Board
of Supervisors of all cities and county within whose boundaries the school district lies together with copies of this District;s policy Ion the subject of developers', subdividers' , and builders' contributions to mitigate impact on school facilities, a!id to indicate the type and scale of assistance considered appropriate to meet the needs of this district.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Governinq Board of the .- - San Marcos Unified School District of San Diego County, California, this 2lsr day of July , 1981. '
Secre
Governing Board of Trustees
Members of the Governing Board of the San Marcos Unified School District