HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-12-18; City Council; Resolution 78421
IMPACT
EIR 84-5
The City
2
3
4 FSPORT FOR STAGECOACH PARK.
Council of the City of Carlsbad, California,
E
:or this study.
PASSED,
:ity Council of
December , la
AYES:
I
l(
1:
1:
1:
1,
1
1
1
APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
the City of Carlsbad held on 18th day of
84 , by the following vote, to wit:
Council "krs Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
1
l!
2(
2:
2;
2
2
2
2
2
2
RESOLUTION NO 7842
oes hereby resolve as follows:
1. Tha~t certain agreement between the City of Carlsbad
nd Cotton/Bela d Associates for preparation of an environmental
mpact report f r Stagecoach Park, a copy marked Exhibit 'A'
hich is attach d hereto, with Attachments 1-3, and incorporated
ATTEST : I
3
,.
a
CONSULTANT.
WHEREAS,
the city agrees to
proposed project
RECITALS
the city, has entered into an agreement wherein
prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the
identified as a Stagecoach Park for 28 acres,
of La Costa Avenue nd Rancho Santa Fe Road and more precisely
shown on the plat m rked Attachment "I", attached hereto and made
WHEREAS, t h e Consultant has the qualifications to pre-
a part hereof: and
vironmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, is understood that the Consultant shall be
an independent actor of the city;
ORE, in consideration of their mutual conve-
hereto agree as follows:
Environmental Impact Report for
with the California Environ-
by the State Guidelines
and by City i 1 Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and
its implementi,ng n resolutions. In carrying out this
obligation the Consultant's duties shall include the
following: ~
EXHIBIT A
."
'I
ments
(a)-. The C nsultant shall (1) make all necessary and
requi ed field explorations, review and tests; (2)
make I 11 necessary and required laboratory tests
of this section. Before preparing the draft
alysis; (3) appear and be prepared to answer
and prepare testimony on the final
repork, the Consultant shall submit five copies of
Plann'ng Director for staff review. The consultant
shall revise the preliminary report as requested by
staff . in order to make it suitable for draft EIR
a pre 1 iminary report (screen check EIR) to the
shall prepare a draft report in compli-
ith the Work Program contained in Attachments
"3" on file at the Land Use Planning
Offic (unless otherwise stated in this agreement),
attac ed hereto and made a part hereof and with
appli able state law and city ordinances. The Con-
sulta t shall submit to city fifty copies (in 3
ring binders) plus a reproducible master of the
draft I EIR to the city.
1 C
-2-
5
Direc
cant
report.
agreement
onmental impact report has been filed.
ltant shall also prepare any responses
or who in turn will discuss with the appli-
the feasibility of continuing with the
The objective of this subsection of the
is to minimize the cost if these adverse
nece sary to matters raised at the public
hear ngs. The written responses shall be prepared
in a form that will permit the responses to be
inco 1 porated into the final environmental impact
repokt.
1
I
make payment to the Consultant as pro-
this agreement.
i -3-
(b) The.City ill make available to the Consultant any do-
udies, or other information in its possession
(3) TERMINATION OF
the proposed project.
ill review the Preliminary Report presented
sultant within fourteen working days of their
make written comments to the Consultant
AGREEMENT
t time period.
hall provide the consultant with copies of
n comments received on the draft Environ-
act Report subsequent to public notice that
prior to the
of termination
other materials
become its
than breach of
reasonable va,ue
the draft1 Environmental Impact Report has been filed
dffective date of the termination. In event
all finished or unfinished documents and
prepared pursuant to this agreement shall
property. Upon termination for reasons other
this agreement City shall pay Consultant the
of the services completed to the date of
and is avhilable for public review.
Any reports,
bled by the
information or other data, prepared or assem-
Ctjnsultant under this agreement shall not be
specifying thd effective date thereof, at least fifteen days
-4-
notice of terkination.
7
All documents
ment became th property of the city upon payment of the
fees specified in this agreement. The city shall have the
qnd materials prepared pursuant to this agree-
unrestricted adthority to publish, disclose, distribute and
percent will
provided in
of invoice, to
Environmental
otherwise in whole or in part, any reports, data, or
other prepared under this agreement.
be paid not to exceed the,maximum amount
this agreement within thirty days after receipt
be submitted after the certification of the
Impact Report by the City Council or 60 days
(6) PAYMENT
~ The Consultant ~ will be paid a maximum of $10,245.00 dollars
for all work nhcessary to carry out the requirements of this
agreement. Ac ual payment shall be based on the cost of the
report based o the costs as set forth in Attachments 2 and
3 on file at tlpe Land Use Planning Office. The Consultant
f n
shall be paid ixty percent of the compensable services
completed 15 days after receipt of his invoice for
the draft Environmental Impact Report in
accordance with Paragraph 1 above. The Consultant will be
paid percent upon acceptance by the city of the
from the Consultant, the final fifteen
after submission of the final Environmental Impace Report
whichever sha 1 1 occur first.
-5-
(7) TIME OF COMPLETION
Time is of the
agreement . It
ditions may delay
tant will be
Preliminary En4ironmental Impact Report within six weeks of
essence in carrying out the terms of this
is understood that inclement weather con-
the completion of field work. The Consul-
allowed as many additional days as are nec-
the signing of
The consultant
draft Environmhntal Impact Report within ten working days
this agreement by both concerned parties.
shall submit to the city fifty copies of the
The limits of
ment is in the
to be sufficielnt to compensate the consultant for all
the obligation of the city under this agree-
sum of $10,245.00 which amount is estimated
ment. In the
that said sum
of this contract, changes seem merited by
the Consultan4 or the City and informal consultations indi-
event at any time it appears to the Consultant
may not be sufficient, he shall immediately so
-6-
I.
cate that' a ch,
ranted, the COI
the contract.
in the followi
changes shall
inform them of
of estimated c
reaching mutua
agreement shal
City Council.
ineffective or
Changes requir
City shall be
Developmental
Consultant's f
up with a supp
The lump sum a
adjusted for c
scope of work.
(10) HOLD HARMLESS
The Consultant
harmless from
damages on acc
to property re
connected with
I ?ge in the conditions of the contract is war-
sultant or the City may request a change in
such changes shall be processed by the City
3 manner. A letter outlining the required
e forwarded to the City or Consultant to
the proposed changes along with a statement
anqes in charges or time schedule. After
agreement on the proposal, a supplemental
be prepared by the City and approved by the
Such supplemental agreement shall not render
invalid unaffected portions of the agreement.
ng immediate action by the Consultant or the
rdered by the Assistant City Manager for
ervices, who will inform a principal of the
rm of the necessity of such action and follow
emental agreement covering such work.
ounts detailed in this agreement shall be
anges, either additive or deductive, in the
will indemnify the City against and hold it
11 and any cost, expense, or liability for
unt of injury or death to persons or damage
ulting from or arising out of or in any way
the performance by consultant of this agree-
-7-
ment, includin- the defense of any action arising therefrom.
Consultant wil reimburse the City for all costs, expenses
and losses inc rred by it in consequence of any claims, de-
mands and caus i s of action which may be brought against it
$300,000 for
age. The policy
or companies
able except or
L by a person ar+sing out of the performance by Consultant of
any one accident and $50,000 for property dam-
shall be written by a responsible company
to be approved by City, and shall be noncancel-
ten days' written notice to City. Such pol-
this agreement 1
effect or the bremises are occupied by Consultant, cause to
be maintained In force and effect an insurance policy or
policies which will insure and indemnify both City and Con-
sultant againsk liability or financial loss resulting from
injuries occurking to persons or property in or about the
premises or ocmrring as a result of any acts or activity of
Consultant. T e liability under such insurance policy shall
be not less than h $100,000 for any one person injured or
contractor, cdvenants and agrees that he will conduct him-
-8-
.I
omissions of
directly or
is for the acts
by it. Nothirg
contractual
sultant and tie
self consisten with such status, that he will neither hold
himself out as nor claim to be an officer or employee of the
city by reason hereof, and that he will not by reason
hereof, make a y claim, demand, or application to or for any !
its subcontractor and of the persons either
irdirectly employed by its subcontractor, as it
and omissions of persons directly employed
contained in this contract shall create any
relationship between any subcontractor of Con-
City. The Consultant shall bind every sub-
right or privibege applicable to an officer or employee of
the City inclu ing, but not limited to, workmen's compensa-
tion coverage, unemployment insurance benefits, social se-
curity or retirement membership credit.
this contract or any part there-
become due thereunder without the
prior written lconsent of the City.
(14) SUBCONTRACTIN
If the Consul nt shall subcontract any of the work to be
performed und r this contract by Consultant, the Consultant
shall be full responsible to the City for the acts and
question approved in writing by the city.
I -9-
..
(15) PROHIBITED
No official of
on behalf of
or to take part
ing any
tion, or material
tion with the
INT~REST
the City who is authorized in such capacity
the City to negotiate, make, accept or approve,
in negotiating, making, accepting or approv-
architectural, engineering, inspection, construc-
supply contract or subcontract in connec-
construction of the project, shall become dir-
attorney,
authorized in
exercise any
tions in
shall become
-1 0-
englneer or inspector of or for the City who is
such capacity and on behalf of the City to
executive, supervisory or other similar func-
connection with the performance of this contract
\jirectly or indirectly interested personally
in this contract
(16) VERBAL AGREEMIZNT
No verbal
or employee of
execution of
the terms or
agreement or
additional
contract.
or any part thereof.
OR CONVERSATION
agrzement or conversation with any officer, agent
the City, either before, during or after the
this contract, shall affect or modify any of
obligations herein contained, nor such verbal
conversation entitle the Consultant to any
payment whatsoever under the terms of this
IN WITNESS
this agreement on t
ATTEST:
1
.I (2 ALETHA RAUTENKRANZ
As%is tant City Attc
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
e day and year first above written.
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of
California
Mayor /
b- City Tlerk
7
:ne y
-11-
i ATTACHMENT 1
STAGE COACH PARK I EIR 84-5
?Ir. Mike Howes,
Land Use Planning
1200 Elm Street
Carlsbad, California 9
Re: Stagecoach Park E
Dear Mike:
Pursuant to our te
to identify the draina
services submitted in
1984. We have talked
support to us in the s
and will be happy to a
The following will
November 7 proposal:
O Determine the dr
O Analyze the impa
channe L ;
Determine approp
lined, revetment
Alternative ways
O General analysis
adjacent pro j ect
This work can be c
$9,245.00 fee quoted i
$10,245.00.
We look forward tc
DAC :mbc
M364 : C
1028 N. LAKE AVENUE SUITE
Beland /Associates
Environmental Planning
November 21, 1984
008-1989
oposal EIR 84-5
ephone conversation of this afternoon, this letter is
e and soils analyses which we will add to the scope of
he Study Plan portion of our proposal of November 7,
ith Jim Laret of San Dieguito Engineering regarding
ils and engineering work. He is familiar with the area
sist us in this project.
be added to the Scope of Services contained in our
inage basin of the stream and calculate the Q;
t of increased stream velocity from narrowing of the
iate channel treatment, e.g., natural bottom, grass
or other;
of reducing stream velocity;,and
of site soils and geology based on soils data from
and existing literature and data.
mpleted for $1,000.00. The addition of this fee to the
our proposal results in a total project fee of
working with you on this project.
Do%ald A. Cotton, AOCP
P r inc ipa 1
07. PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91104. (818) 791-7682. (213) 681-2061
mi .I
Cotton / Beland /Associates
Urban 4 Environmental Planning
I November 7, 1984
Land Use Planning Man ger
Mr. Michael Holzmille
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California q2008-1989 1
Re: Stagecoach Park EIR 484-5
Dear Mr. Holzmiller: I
We are pleased to respond to your request for a proposal for the prepara-
tion of an Environmen a1 Impact Report for the 28 acre Stagecoach Park pro-
posed for constructio by the City. We are responding under our new corporate
name which reflects
Cotton Associates.
i
t e recent merger of BelandfAssociates with Donald A.
We have met with ike Howes and have talked with Mark Styer regarding the + project. We have vis ted the site to assess existing conditions, and have
reviewed the material submitted to us describing the project. We understand
from our conversation with you that the City is requesting that an EIR be
prepared, with partic lar emphasis on the following issues: biology,
drainage, archaeology land use compatibility, traffic, and soils.
Based on our revi of the RFP, our visit to the site and our experience
on similar projects,
and approach we consi appropriate to complete the EIR. This information is
contained in our prop work program.
have determined the data requirements, methodology,
In addition to proposal prepared for this specific RFP, we have
included general mation describing similar projects for which we have
prepared EIRs, references, and resumes of our staff. Similar infor-
mation is also for our subconsultants.
The fee to the EIR, as described in Part IV of our proposal,
is $9,245. The Draft EIR for staff review can be submitted to the
City within 45 authorization to proceed is given.
1028 N. LAKE AVENUE * SUITi 107. PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91104. (818) 791-7682. (213) 681-2061
Mr. Michael Holzmiller
We believe we have
questions, we will be 1
specific questions. WI
required, and look fori
project.
- 2- November 7, 1984
been responsive to your request, but if you have any
appy to provide additional material or respond to
,ard to working with you and the City staff on this
are most interested in providing the services
Very truly yours,
Donald A. Cotton, AICP
Principal
LH : DAC :mbc
BDC :E
Enclosures : Proposal
Resumes
in Environmental
Analyses,
..
study as they
described.
Technical Appr
This section
particular
analyze and
applicable to
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
relate to these tasks are
)ach:
iicludes a description of
teciniques our firm utilizes to
pt'ssent information, as
this EIR.
Sect ion
I.
11.
111.
IV.
V.
This- section d fines the characteristics of
the project an
the scope of w rk anticipated in the
Introduction:
provides an overview of
preparation of i the EIR. "
The scheduling and coordination of special
studies needed for the EIR is presented in
this section, long with detailed cost and
manpower requirements for each task, as
described in t : e Study Plan.
costs :
Schedule and
This section schedule for
completion of
the personnel
project.
the work and identifies
vho will participate in the
Page
i
2
7
a
10
I. INTRODUCTION
We understand the Cit?
one-quarter mile soutb
Fe Road as a coaununitj
proposed park at this
environmental impacts
particular concern inc
suspected historical a
compatibility conflict
immediate and surround
However the Draft EIR
Further, we understand
will be available to I
soils studies in the a
Plan. We will review
conclusions of the ref
PROPOSAL FOR THE
PREPARATION OF
W ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR STAGECOACH PARK
CITY OF CARLSBAD
is proposing to develop the 28 acre site approximately
3f the intersection of La Costa Avenue and Rancho Santa
park. The staff has noted that construction of the
xation may result in significant and/or adverse
hich require mitigation. Environmental issues of
ude a previously identified riparian habitat, known and
3 archaeological sites, potential land use , potential traffic and circulation impacts on the
ng area and potential soils and drainage impacts.
s to consider all potential impacts.
that certain materials and reference documents are or
including the proposed park development plan, recent
ea, the Carlsbad General Plan and the La Costa Master
hese carefully and may incorporate the findings and
fence material as we determine to be appropriat.
1
11. STUDY PLAN
If selected to prepare 11 conduct the analysis accorl
tasks described-below. I CBA staff will be responsible for necessary
the EIR, CBA w ing to t
contacts
review and comment as
are agreed on by all
with the app-licant and City department staff as needed to obtain information
for the report. The s udy plan assumes that City planning staff will provide
advisory assistance re arding City policies and procedures, will provide all
plans, maps and report relevant to the study and will handle processing of
the EIR (i.e., notices of preparatibn and completion, meeting notices etc.) as
needed to fulfill CEQA i requirements.
early as possible to assure the project characteristics
parties.
Task 1: Prepare Detailed Project Description
Task 2: Collect Data,
Related Impacts
The focus of this task is to obtain detailed and specific information about
the proposed park and urrounding environs so that all of the ramifications of the project can be asslessed. I
Define Existing Conditions and Evaluate Project-
We will meet with City staff persons to discuss the concerns of the staff and
the unique features of this project in terms of access, road alignments,
topography, riparian abitat, and historical and archaeological resources.
The purpose of this t sk is two-fold: (a) to obtain baseline information
against which changes resulting from the project can be evaluated; and
(b) to identify proje t-related impacts and evaluate the impacts in
terms of level of sig
Baseline information n all areas of potential impacts will be collected
with a particular foc s on biological resources, historical and archaeological
resources, land use c mpatibility, traffic and circulation, and soils and
drainage. Inquiries ill be made of public service and utility agencies or
departments to determ ne existing conditions and an official view of probable
impacts on service or t infrastructure.
1
CBA uses a format for EIiis (as further described in Section 111, Technical
Approach) which prese ts this baseline information in a brief "setting"
section for each topi area (i.e., energy, land use, etc.). General setting
information is held t a minimum and is described in terms of:
0 regional and oca1 setting; h O related proje ts; and
0 consistency w[th local plans and policies.
2
Issues to be evaluated in the EIR will be discussed in a level of detail
factors will be used tL quantify impacts where feasible (e.g., traffic, air
quality) to provide an/ objective evaluation of potential impacts.
commensurate with the d egree of significance of the impact. Standard accepted
O significant
O mitigation measures
impacts reduced * beneficial impacts.
For each environmental
significant environmental
City staff in preparing
project is approved.
impacts as defined by CEQA;
included in the project;
below the level of significance by mitigation; and
issue, CBA will clearly identify unavoidable
impacts and, if any are identified, assist the
a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" if the
Efforts associated wi h this task are described below in terms of the specific
approach to major imp
Biology:
threatened or endange ed species that may be recorded on the project site, as
well as a field surve 1 involving an inventory of the plant and animal species
present on the proper y and a search for any sensitive species uncovered by a
records check. A biological report discussing the findings will follow the
field work, and will 'nclude discussions of potential impacts and appropriate
mitigation measures. Particular attention will be paid to the anticipated
Our biologist will conduct a literature survey for any rare,
impacts of site gradi I g on existing habitats. Should any rare, threatened or
endangered species be identified on the site, additional services may be
required to catalog a d report the extent to which the habitats exist.
Drainage and Soils: e understand extensive site modifications will be
necessary to the prop rty for park construction as proposed. These
modifications will re ult in changes to existing topography and drainage
patterns. Soils repo ts for nearby properties with similar characteristics
have identified known and potential landslide areas. CBA will assess impacts
on drainage and soils and develop appropriate mitigation measures.
Archaeology: Histori a1 adobe ruins have been identified in the central
portion of the site. While the design of the proposed park attempts to
preserve these ruins, other historical or archaeological sites may exist on
the property. CBA wi 1 conduct a field survey for these sites and conduct a
literature survey to
resources are negativ i ly impacted.
nsure no known or potential historical or archaeological
: Although the site has been identified for park
long-range plans for the area, there is concern that,
ssed, the proposed park may result in negative impacts
g and proposed residential uses. CBA will assess the
lopment to result in noise impacts, glare from park
ent of park users onto adjoining properties.
3
Traffic and Circulation:
resulting from park
Our traffic engineer will assess potential impacts
development in accordance with the following:
Task 2: Based on available trip generation factors and projected park
usage data, a geo raphic trip generation usage pattern will be developed
for the site. The projected service area and future surrounding land use
patterns will be included. Estimates of the projected traffic will be
assigned to the s reet system in conformance with the previously
identified distri i ution system.
Task 1: All available
and assembled
existing traffic
surrounding land
consulting team to
description. While
task to identify
undertaken.
Contact will be with City staff after completion of Task 1 and 2 to
verify issue concerns. The traffic engineer will meet and
discuss these the City traffic engineers.
pertinent data and information will be collected
including: park development plans, park usage projections,
volumes, existing and proposed streets in the area, and
use data. Contact will be made with other members of the
review the data collected in Task 1 and the project
a field reyiew will be made in conjunction with this
existing conditions, field data collection will not be
Task 3: The results of Task 2 will be combined with existing traffic and
traffic from know n and projected land uses in order for an analysis to
If appropriate, technical
preparation of the
Other reference material
the EIR and referenced.
appendix will be prepa.red
but will be provided
However as required by
appendix will be inclL.ded
review.
-- simulate completion of the park be performed. Specific
to park access provisions and park impacts upon
development. Proposed parking provisions will
be examined to in ure adequacy of onsite parking. Potential problem areas
will be identifie as a result of this analysis and mitigation measures
identified as
reports prepared for the project or as part of the
or supporting documents will be clearly identified in
EIRwill be compiled in a technical appendix to the EIR.
in the text. A limited number of copies of the
in a separate volume from the basic EIR document,
t.o the City to be made available for public examination.
in the copies of the EIR sent to clearinghouses for
Section 15147 of the "State CEQA Guidelines," the
Task 3: Recommend Midigation Measures I
In instances where mi igation measures have been incorporated by the City in
the design of the pro osed park which serve to reduce potentially adverse
impacts, these will b 1 described as mitigation measures already included in
the project. Additio a1 mitigation measures specific to the project and the
nature of the impact ill be identified which will reduce the impact below the
"significant" level. Finally, mitigation measures recommended to further
reduce adverse projec impacts will be identified. The City may, at its
option, include these t as "conditions of approval" when acting on the project.
i
4
23
Task 4: Analyze Alternatives
Each alternative will be analyzed to determine potential impacts and to
compare these to impa ts anticipated to occur with the proposed project.
The discussion of alt rnatives will focus on alternatives capable of
eliminating any signi icant adverse effects, or reducing them to a level of
insignificance. The pproach CBA uses to evaluate and present the evaluation
of alternatives is fu ther detailed in Section 111.
State and local guidelines
alternatives to the
project is not implemented,
Other alternatives to
layout and design to
constraints analysis
require that the EIR include an examination of
pAoject. The probable future use of the site, if this
is considered under the "no project" alternative.
be evaluated will include modification of the site
require little or no grading and an opportunities and
alternative where the objectives of a park location in
In this task, the eff cts of the Statecoach Park project, combined with the
effects of other proj cts planned or proposed for the area (if any) will be
considered. The cumu ative effec'ts of these projects on each issue area
(i.e., drainage, traf i ic, etc.) will be evaluated and presented in the report.
Also discussed will b the combined effects of the various project components
and the project-relat c! impacts. These discussions will include: i
Task 5: Identify
Impacts
A. Significant en ironmental impacts that can be mitigated or avoided. As
required by Se tion 15088(b) of the recently revised "State CEQA
Guidelines," tve City must make findings if the project is approved.
t
Sigr'ificant, Cumulative, Long-Term and Growth-Inducing
8. The relationsh p between short-term uses of the site and the
maintenance enhancement of long-term productivity.
project .
C. Any significan irreversible environmental changes which
would be invol ed if the project is approved. These changes
include the us of nonrenewable resources and the commitment
of the site to a long-term use.
D. A statement of project justification by the City regarding the
project's appr priateness at this time, what benefits may accrue,
and what needs b are met by the project.
5
Task 6: Compile Scree1 Draft Document
We will compile the
of the Draft EIR for
10 working days of our
CBA then will provide
binders for circulation
reproducible master set.
As required by the "State
each significant eEfect
avoid that effect, areas
the choice among
Task 8: Prebare Finai EIR
fi,idings into a draft document and print 5 screen copies
review by City staff. CBA will revise the report within
receipt of all staff comments on the screen Draft EIR.
50 copies of the Draft EIR in three-ring loose-leaf
by the City, and deliver these along with one
CEQA Guidelines," the EIR will include a summary of
of controversy, and issues to be resolved, including
with mitigation measures and alternatives to reduce or
alternatives and whether, or how, to mitigate significant
Task 7: Attend Hearidgs
The CBA Project Manager
the CEQA process, will.
A total of 8 hours of
additional meetings be
6
or a staff member of CBA familiar vith the report and
attend a total of 2 public hearings on the Draft EIR.
required, costs of the additional time will be billed
time has been budgeted for this purpose. Should
notes showing that
CBA will provide 25
copies of each page
Final EIR.
is revised in the response to comments.
opies of the summary of comments and responses and 25
equiring a margin note to the City for inclusion in the
111. TECHNICAL APPRO CH
briefly describe the
specific area. Next,
maximum probable impaat.
A. Analysis of Impacfts
environmental.setting and other relevant aspects of that
we identify and quantify, to the extent possible, the
Finally, we describe the mitigation measures already
considered environmentally
comparison, a table
We have utilized this approach in a numerous of EIRs and have found it to be
effective. It also h s the advantage of identifying for the lead agency,
specific mitigation m asures which can be included in the project to eliminate
significant or advers t impacts.
superior to the proposed project. For ease of
is prepared Summarizing the impacts of each alternative.
B. Analysis of Cumul i tive Impacts
The approach we utili e in the analysis of cumulative impacts is designed to
provide concise quant tative information on the effect of the project in
combination with othe projects planned or proposed in the area. First, with
the assistance of Cit staff, we prepare a list of projects in the immediate
area which may have i pacts interrelated to, or cumulative with, the proposed
project. The charact ristics of this project are described and the locations
of related projects a e mapped. The quantitative impacts of the related
projects, combined wi h the impacts of the proposed project are summarized in
a table and are discu sed in the text. Where cumulative impacts are
particularly importan (e.g., in rapidly growing areas), these impacts are
I
discussed and evaluat i d in terms of each issue in the text.
C. Analysis of Alterhatives
7
IV. COSTS
The EIR will be prep,
It is expected that
our authorization to
completed after comm
any necessary public
within 10 days of ou
Responses to comment
within 10 days of ou
EIR.
The costs to complet
person-hours require
such as printing and
spent by each CBA st
following Cost Break
EIR is $9,245.00. C
2d in the eight tasks described abov in the Study Plan.
2 Screen Draft EIR will be completed within 45 days of
roceed. The completion of Tasks 7 and 8 will be
ts are received on the Draft EIR and the completion of
2arings. CBA will submit the Draft EIR for circulation
receipt of staff comments on the Screen Draft EIR.
the Draft 'EIR will normally be provided to the City
receipt of all written and oral testimony on the Draft
this study plan have been determined on the basis of the
to complete the work and the non-labor costs incurred,
ravel. The approximate number of person-hours to be
E member and by our subconsultants is given in the
an chart. The total fee required for completion of the
ponent costs are given in the chart.
8
.'
A. Staff Costs CBA Personnel Subconsultants
(Person-Hours) (Person-Hours) Task
Cotton Hinshaw Perske Pringle Beecham
COST BREAKDOWN
Cumulative
cost
1. Project Desctiptidn
2. Collect Data and
3. Mitigation Measures
4. Alternatives
Impact Analysis
5. Cumulative and
6. Compile
7. Hearings
8. Final EIR
Inducing Impact,
- - - 2 4 - 8 15 30 25
- 8 10 16 5 - 4 4 8 1
Conduct
- - Growth- - 2 4
4 - - - 2 4 - 8 -
4 2 1
Subtotal ~
B. Other Costs I
2 40 41 I 56
1. Word processing (
2. Graphics (5.0 hou
3. Travel, phone, PO
4. Printing (screen,[Draft and Final EIR)
$1,000
125
150
450
$1,725
$ 170
3,500
1,500
75 0
240
440
440
480
32 1 $ 7,520
$ 1,725
$ 9,245
Subtotal 1
TOTAL
9
V. SCHEDULE AND PERZ
A. Schedule
The Task Schedule Cha
milestones for the E1
Week
Work Day
Calendar Day
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Task 5
Task 6
Staff Work
1
1-5
1-7 -
_-- Report Revision ai
* Submission of Scrt
0 Submission of Dra.
?NEL -
:, shown below, illustrates the sequence of events and
prepara t ion.
TASK SCHEDULE CHART
9
41 -4
57 -6
-
Printing
n Draft EIR to City
EIR to City
10
B. Personnel '
1. Cotton/Beland/Ass
O Phil Hinshaw wi
day-to-day basi
environmental s
residential and
Hinshaw is expe
subcontractors
the final proje
manager, will a
and mitigation
that it meets t
O Keith Perske wi
has experience
several project
O Paul Secord wil
experience in c
projects, parti
archaeological
Bill Carlson wi
preparing chart
clarify the maj
experience and
concise visual
2, Subconsultants
CBA will contract for
reports dealing with
described in the Stud
The specialists we ha
Traffic and Saf
Biological anal
We have worked with e
found their staff to
and quality of their I
is included in the br
ciates, Inc.
I be responsible for managing this project on a . He has served as project manager of many
udies, including a major office park and various
nixed use projects in San Diego and Los Angeles. Mr.
ienced in coordinating the work of staff members and
hile participating in the production of materials for
t. Mr. Cotton will act as advisor to the project
sist in the initial identification of potential impacts
easures, and will review the screen document to assure
4 firm's standard of quality.
I assist in the work on portions of this EIR. He
n collecting data and evaluating impacts on , particularly for land use compatibility and drainage.
has - assist in the work on portions of this EIR.
llecting data and evaluating impacts on several
Jlarly for identification and documentation of
id historical resources.
1 assist in the preparation of the report by , graphs and maps as needed to illustrate and
t findings of the study. He has extensive graphic
s adept at interpreting information in clear and
2rmats.
the services of specialists to prepare technical
caffic and safety and noise. These services are
5 selected include:
Plan and included in the Schedule and Costs section.
ty analysis by Weston Pringle Associates
;is by Pacific Southwest Biological Services
:h of these firms extensively on other EIRs and have
? highly qualified and reliable both in the scheduling
irk. Further information on these firms and their staff
,:hures and resumes submitted with this proposal.
11