HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-06-18; City Council; Resolution 8060RESOLUTION NO. 8060
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA DENYING THE APPEAL AND
UPHOLDING THE CITY ENGINEER'S AND LAND USE
PLANNING MANAGER'S DECISION TO DENY A 3 UNIT
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 3376 GARFIELD
STREET AND DENYING SAID PROJECT CP-310/MS-684.
APPLICANT: OCEANVIEW CONDOS
CASE NO, : CP-31 O/MS-684
WHEREAS, the City Engineer and Land Use Planning M n
held a meeting to consider a proposed 3 unit planned development
condominium minor subdivision located at 3655 Garfield street;
and
WHEREAS, the Land Use Planning Manager denied said
project; and
WHEREAS, a timely appeal was filed asking the City
Council to review the staff decision; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted staff's finding that
the project is categorically exempt from environmental review
according to Section 15305.070(11)(4~) of the California
Environmental Quality Act and a Notice of Exemption was filed on
April 18, 1985;
WHEREAS, on June 11, 1985 the City Council of the City
of Carlsbad held a duly noticed public hearing as proscribed by
law to consider said appeal and at said hearing after
consideration of all of the evidence, testimony, argument of
those persons present and desiring to be heard the City Council
determined to grant the appeal,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
s
IC
11
12
t 0 11
l!
2(
2:
2;
2:
28
2
2
2
2
2. That the City Council makes the following findings:
A. That this lot is relatively small (approximatel;
6,300 square feet) and is not adequate to accommodate a project
of the proposed density and intensity of use.
B. That the density of this project exceeds that
allowed by right in the zone making the approval a discretionary
decision for the City Council .
C. That this property is located in a neighborhood
predominantly occupied by single family homes on individual lots
This project is a massive three story, 34 foot high condominium
which is incompatible with the neighborhood.
D. The project does,not contain any of the extra
amenities necessary to qualify for additional discretionary
density. In particular, there is no provision for recreational
space, no provision for recreational vehicle parking, no trash
enclosure and encroachments into the setback.
3. Based on the above findings of fact, it is the
conclusion of the City Council that the appeal of this project bc
denied, that the decision of the Land Use Planning Manager to
deny the project be upheld, and that the project known as the
Oceanview Condos, CP-310/MS-684 is hereby denied because it does
not satisfy the requirements of the Planned Development
Ordinance, it is incompatible with the neighborhood, and it meet:
only minimal standards and does not provide any justification fo.
discretionary approval of a project in excess of the minimum
density.
4. This action of denial is final the date this
resolution is adopted by the City Council. The provision of
2.
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
Chapter 1.16 of the C rlsbad Mi
Judicial Review" shall apply:
nicipal Code, "Tim Limits for
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days
after the decision becomes final a request for the
record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which suck petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or
mailed to the party or his attorney of record, if he
has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City
Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008."
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the 18th day of June 198:
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT:
Council Mahers Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City &lerk
28