HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-07-10; City Council; Resolution 90-224.
1
2
3
4
5
6
e 0
RESOLUTION NO. 9 O - 2 2 4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIACERTIFYINGACONDITIONALNEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR A GRADING PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT TWO
SEWERLINES AND A STORM DRAIN LOCATED NORTH OF
BATIQUITOS LAGOON AND SOUTH THE AVIARA MASTER PLAN
AREA.
~
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all factors relating to the Conditional 1\
7
Batiquitos Lagoon and south of the Aviara Master Plan Area. 8
Declaration for a grading permit to construct two sewerlines and a storm drain located r
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. That the City Council hereby Certifies the Conditional Negative Dec:
according to Exhibits "ND", dated April 26, 1990, "PII" dated April 20, 1990, and the Mi
Monitoring Program outlined in Appendix "P" attached hereto and made a part hereof, b
the following findings:
FINDINGS:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the projc
have a significant impact on the environment provided that mitigating cor
of approval are complied with.
l9 I 2. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed :
20
21
22
23
3. The field surveys conducted by staff and the cultural and biological asse:
prepared for the project (Sweetwater Environmental Biologist, 1989) dete
that there are sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be impa
this project.
In accordance, this project is approved subject to the compliance with Condit
24
25
27
1. Grading activity shall be prohibited during the rainy season, from Octobe: 26
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Approval 1-6 discussed below:
April 1st of each year.
/// 28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
2.
3.
4.
5.
///
///
///
///
///
///
Construction of the eastern line within the Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub habit
as shown on Figure 5, will be prohibited during the Black Tailed Gnal
breeding season (March 1 - June 1).
All disturbed Diegan Sage Scrub will be revegetated with a representative sf
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall be reql
submit a revegetation program for Planning Director review and a1
Subsequent to the implementation of the revegetation program, the
Carlsbad will conduct site inspections to access contract performance M
revegetation plan. Two additional site inspections; by the City of Carlsbad
conducted at 6 and 18 months following revegetation to evaluate the sua
the revegetation attempts are not deemed successful by the City, then the
applicant shall be required to revegetate the Diegan Sage Scrub area u
habitat is successfully reestablished.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall be reql
submit an exhibit with the grading plans which demarcates all sensitive bic
areas (re: riparian, freshwater marsh and Diegan Coastal Sage Scru
archeological sites within and immediately adjacent to the project areas.
areas shall be verified by a biological and archaeological consultant and :
required to be flagged in the field by a qualified archaeological and bic
consultant. Temporary fencing shall be required to be constructed to I
encroachment by construction equipment. The qualified biologist and archac
will consult with the construction foreman and machine operators to educa
on the constraints of the area prior to the initiation of grading operations
construction, the project biologist will submit a report to the City evaluat
grading/construction operation relative to preservatiion of the above me1
sensitive biological resources. Any amount of impact to riparian habit;
necessitate the project applicant to mitigate with riparian habitat at a 3:
All construction equipment used during construction shall be required to 1
and park outside of all identified sensitive area. No construction equipme.
be parked within 100’ of the wetland.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall be req1
pay agricultural mitigation fees for any agricultural acreage which is elir
through this project. This fee total and structure shall be determined by t
of Carlsbad, consistent with the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort Mas1
(MP-177).
II 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall be req1
submit a full landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval by the PI
Director. AU areas impacted by construction (including steep slopes) s
required to be re-contoured and fully revegetated.
CERTIFIED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the 10 t h
of July , 1990 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
-3 WIS, Mayor ANN J. KULCHIN,. Mayor Pro-Tem
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk \
(SEAL)
EXHIBIT ND
CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The project site is located north of Batiquitos Lagoon
and south of the Aviara Master Plan are upon parcels 215-051-04 and 216-121-01.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A grading permit to construct two sewer lines and a storm
drain.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described
project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a
result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification
for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
21 to 45 days of date of issuance.
DATED: April 26, 1990
CASE NO: EM 90-3
MICHAEL J.&OLZkfILLER
Planning Director
APPLICANT: Hillman Properties
PUBLISH DATE: April 26, 1990
CDD:lh
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (61 9) 438-1 16'
0 0 EXHIBIT PI:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMJ?ACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART JI
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. EIA 90-3
DATE: APRIL 20, 199
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: HILLMAN PROPERTIES WEST, INC.
2. APPLICANT: HILLMAN PROPERTIES WEST, INC.
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
SUITE 206
(619) 931-1190 Carlsbad, CA 92008
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: APRIL 12, 1990
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City cor
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the envi
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checkli
checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the 1
project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to pn
Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that th,
or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO
checked to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspc
project may cause a si&ficant effect on the environment. The project may quahfy for a :
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be
insisznificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig" and "Y
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of 1
under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to d.
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
0
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
2. Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
5. Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
6. Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
7. Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
9. Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
11. Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
-2-
0
YES YES
tsid (insig)
X
NO
X -
X -
X -
-
X -
X -
X -
X -
3
3
-
-
s -
e 0
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
16. Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
HUMANENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services?
YES YES NO
(sig) (in.%)
YES
(sig)
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
YES NO
(insig)
X -
X -
-3-
e
HUMANENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
20. Increase existing noise levels?
21. Produce new light or glare?
22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
23. Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
25. Generate substantial additional traffic?
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
27. Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
32. Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
-4-
0
YES
(Sk)
YES
(in&
NO
2
X
X
-
-
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
e e
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
YES YES NO
(sisl (insig)
X -
X -
x
x
-5-
0 W
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (CONTINUED):
This project entails the construction of 2 sewer lines and a storm drain necessary to service a1
approved developments within the Aviara Master Plan. The previously approved offsite aligm
for these proposed public facilities have been determined to be undesirable for environmental re;
These public facility alignments proposed with this project are regarded as environmentally prefe:
1. EARTH: The proposed public facility alignments are associated with two land forms.
The southern area of the project includes low-lying ground above the edge of a salt
marsh that occurs along the northern shore of Batiquitos Lagoon. The northern
extension of the alignment follows a north-south oriented terrace, averaging 90’ MCS
in elevation. The western half of the project site is relatively flat. This portion has
been extensively altered by agriculture and a nursery. The eastern alignment is
proposed in an area which is more diverse and bisected by a knoll. Some native
vegetation remains in this alignment. A San Diego Gas & Electric power line bisects
the eastern third of the property.
Construction of these public facilities will require 7,100 cubic yards of grading (fill).
Construction would also necessitate trenching 25-100 feet in width for the two facility
alignments. Although construction of the rip-rap discharge structure will create a minor
localized change in landform, the overall landform for the vicinity will be unchanged.
The landform effects from the construction of the sewer lines and storm drain will be
minimal in that these facilities will be placed subgrade.
There are no unstable earth conditions or unique geologic substructures in the project
area. The project has been conditioned to incorporate adequate erosion control
measures (i.e. hydroseeding, strawbales,) to mitigate erosion impacts. An erosion
control plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director prior
to the issuance of grading permits. Construction will also be limited to the nonrainy
season to minimize erosion impacts. All graded areas will be fully landscaped to
minimize erosion.
2. AIR: Air quality impacts (dust generation) for this project will be short term (during
construction) and insignificant. Once completed, revegetation of the disturbed areas
would minimize any dust generation impacts.
3. WATER: Development of this project will have little if any impact upon water runoff,
velocities or absorption rates. The proposed storm drain, rip-rap discharge structure,
and erosion control measures will function to mitigate any significant impacts to
Batiquitos Lagoon from surrounding development.
-6-
0 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (CONTINUED):
4/5. PLANT/ANIMAL LIFE: A biological survey conducted upon the subject property
(Sweetwater Environmental Biologists, 1989) concluded that the construction of the
eastern sewer line will impact sensitive Diegan Sage Scrub vegetation (1.98 acres) and
the Black Tailed Gnatcatcher which uses this scrub for its primary habitat. The
following mitigation measures will however be incorporated into the project to mitigate
this impact:
1) Construction within the Diegan Sage Scrub habitat area will take place
during periods other than the Black Tailed Gnatcatcher breeding season
(March 1 - June 1);
2) All disturbed Diegan Sage Scrub will be revegetated with a representative seed
mix. City staff will; (1) review engineering plans and a revegetation program for
acceptability prior to the issuance of a grading permit, (2) complete a site
inspection to access contractor performance with respect to this revegetation and,
(3) a site inspection 18 months after revegetation to assess success. If the
revegetation attempts are not deemed successful, subsequent revegetation will be
mandated.
Construction of the rip-rap discharge structure at the southern terminus of the eastern
sewerline, within the 100 foot wetland buffer has been conditioned to prohibit
accidental encroachment into the adjacent riparian habitat as follows:
1) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit; (1) Riparian habitat located adjacent
to the proposed rip-rap discharge structure shall be flagged by a qualified
biologist, and (2) a temporary fence will be constructed to clearly delineate this
sensitive riparian habitat area.
2) The qualified biologist will consult with the construction foreman and machine
operators to educate them on the constraints of the area prior to the initiation of
grading operations.
3) After construction, the project biologist will submit a report to the City evaluating
the grading/construction operation relative to the preservation of the above
mentioned sensitive resources. Any amount of impact to riparian habitat shall
necessitate the project applicant to mitigate with riparian habitat replacement at
a 3:l ratio.
Otherwise; (1) the sewer line construction will be restricted to narrow corridors,
(2) no grading will be permitted during the rainy season, (3) sensitive areas will be
demarcated to ensure the avoidance of inadvertent encroachment during construction
and (4) all heavy equipment used during construction will be required to be parked
outside of the surrounding wetland areas.
-7-
0 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (CONTINUED) :
Any agricultural land which is eliminated by the construction of any part of the project
will be mitigated through the payment of Agricultural Conservation Mitigation fees,
permitted under the Mello I1 LCP. This project has been conditioned accordingly.
6. - NOISE: Short-term noise may be associated with construction equipment during construction of this project. In view of the short term nature of this noise impact, it is
regarded as significant.
7. LIGHT AND GLARE: This project will not produce any new light or glare.
8. LAND USE: This project was specified and sized in accordance with the Zone 19 Local Facili;
Management Plan. The proposed facilities will be necessary to service the already appro’
Aviara Master Plan Area. Although these facilities will have to extend across two ot
relatively undeveloped properties, the facilities are not expected to encourage any developm
upon these properties which is not anticipated under the existing General Plan.
9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Implementation of the proposed project will incrementally contrib
to the depletion of fossil fuels and other natural resources required for project constructi.
This short term construction impact is not regarded as significant.
10. RISK OF UPSET: This project does not increase the risk of an explosion or the release o
hazardous substance.
11. POPULATION: Implementation of this project may promote (allow) growth within the proj
area. However, since, under the Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan, all required pul
facilities and services must be available, concurrent with need, no growth related impacts i
anticipated.
12. HOUSING: See 11 above.
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: This project will result in no circulation impacts
proposed.
14. PUBLIC SERVICES: In that this project will construct public facilities required by the Zone
Local Facility Management Plan, no impacts are anticipated.
15. ENERGY Incremental (non-substantial) mounts of energy (fuel) will be used during projl
construction. This incremental increase in energy usage is not regarded as significant.
16. UTILITIES: See 14 above.
-8-
0 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (CONTINUED):
17. HUMAN HEALTH: No human health impacts associated with the construction of this projc
are anticipated. In contrast, by providing required public facilities, the quality of human hea
should be improved.
18. AESTHETICS: Since little land form alteration is proposed no significant visual impacts i
anticipated. Any visual impacts associated with grading and land clearing will be mitigal
through slope recontouring and landscaping.
19. RECREATION: N/A since the project will have no effect upon recreational amenities.
20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL: Cultural resource investigations conducted upon the subjc
property (see attached letter) conclude that no significant cultural resources exist upon t
subject property. However a condition will be included to require that archaeological si1
within areas adjacent to the site be staked to prohibit encroachment by construction activiti
-9-
e 0
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
A. In view of the fact that the public facilities proposed (2 sewerlines and 1 storm
drain) are necessary to service already approved projects, phasing is not likely.
B. A number of site designs were evaluated to provide these public facility
improvements. The one selected was identified as the most environmentally
preferable.
C. The size of the facilities was selected relative to anticipated demands.
D. Either residential (if feasible) or undeveloped.
E. N/A - Since these facilities are necessary to service already approved projects.
F. See "B" above.
G. No project would be inconsistent with the Zone 19 Local Facilities Management
Plan.
-10-
e m
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
- I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environmenl
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environme:
will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposec
- I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
4” 19- 70 ci4.W &a
Date Signature
+!zo/qD I
Date I
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
1. This project is approved subject to compliance with the following conditions of approval:
a. Grading activity shall be prohibited during the rainy season, from October 1st to
April 1st of each year.
b. Construction of the eastern line within the Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub habitat area, as
shown on figure 5, will be prohibited during the Black Tailed Gnatcatcher breeding
season (March 1 - June 1).
c. All disturbed Diegan Sage Scrub will be revegetated with a representative seed mix.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall be required to
submit a revegetation program for Planning Director review and approval. Subsequent
to the implementation of the revegetation program, the City of Carlsbad will conduct
site inspections to access contractor performance with the revegetation plan. Two
additional site inspections; by the City of Carlsbad will be conducted at 6 and 18
months following revegetation to evaluate the success. If, the revegetation attempts
are not deemed successful by the City, then the project applicant shall be required to
revegetate the Diegan Sage Scrub area until the habitat is successfully reestablished.
-11-
e w
MITIGATING MEASURES (CONTINUED) :
d. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall be required to
submit an exhibit with the grading plans which demarcates all sensitive biological areas
(re: riparian? freshwater marsh and Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub) and archeological sites
within and immediately adjacent to the project areas. These areas shall be verified by
a biological and archaeological consultant and shall be required to be flagged in the
field by a qualified archaeological and biological consultant. Temporary fencing shall
be required to be constructed to prohibit encroachment by construction equipment. The
qualified biologist and archaeologist will consult with the construction foreman and
machine operators to educate them on the constraints of the area prior to the initiation
of grading operations. After construction, the project biologist will submit a report to
the City evaluating the grading/construction operation relative to preservation of the
above mentioned sensitive biological resources. Any amount of impact to riparian
habitat shall necessitate the [project applicant to mitigate with riparian habitat at a 3:1
ratio. All construction equipment used during construction shall be required to
operate and park outside of all identified sensitive areas. No construction equipment
shall be parked within 100’ of the wetland.
e. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall be required to pay
agricultural mitigation fees for any agricultural acreage which is eliminated through this
project. This fee total and structure shall be determined by the City of Carlsbad,
consistent with the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort Master Plan (MP-177).
f. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall be required to
submit a full landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval by the Planning
Director. All areas impacted by construction (including steep slopes) shall be required
to be recontoured and fully revegetated. The proposed desiltation basin will also be
required to be heavily landscaped around its perimeter to mitigate visual impacts.
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-12-
0 W
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
A ” @&W igKature L,
PNb $4 IYdW
D[&EWW Q-6 ?WIJkG.
Av\a bo Ass ~CIWES
CDD:lh
-13-
ENV~MENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING &mT nrrmuu r
O I 0 Q,
e
W W
..
v) e W
E 3 z
W 2
LL
c, S a
m
U
E
7
.?
<
L a I
v)
a
W S m
c
m L
-?
n
E
c, 0
v)
V
a?
7 n
n 3
I
ET m E 7
7 -r I .. W z s
I- V W 3 0 e n
..
0 W n
a W z
d 2 E! t; n z 0 V
ez 0
er
W U
0
Q,
Q,
1-(
W N
7 .? L
<
W I-
..
2s
2
> <
e 0
P n e
-r or SLa c, ccc, uc, v) a 0- ".? 7
LA% 0 7 -- PV-
oxcc . a3
-I- v
c,w= . a md LE: a3
cc .? 4
r ws
0 mw-o
*$N
mvcc >SUO 0 m z.r
a=- u
@%.Em
0 =e €20
E"5n -?a% a
v- s2 2(+3
0 0.: 51
Q s7 Q)
a " Epe c,z &
3 kg2
7
L C,
Pa PQ)
*-
WO 0
c,
z -- V
7
-t- gnu s" an
73- v)o ,%x, a ma3
?$ :z
-r =mE>
2G.Z g g3zz
v) z.9
2 .E E c,
m-.:z amrg Ep v) c ac, Q)
-r OEmL c, Ezs
w.:G
c,cc.: E
EW v) Q)
>WEE zs S"
3Emg 0 - 0'5 E
CLEF
m La 0- Ll-
o a ma
0 sn
0- a
a pQ 0
v)
mL Q
">a3 m., v) .r
'"am" - Sc,
E
-a= a m --
S -r L wc, a" ESL3 =a3u
*I- a .? m L
mo L m-r .I- 0
.r .? m -?
=wc,c, - c, -?
au vc, ar h
r L mer I- 0 av
W a
%
L
> a
-?
-?
m S
L 0 C,
S 0
-7
'?
x
Y v)
L m E e
S 0
c,
c, m
S a
-r
E
7 n E U
v) S m
7 a
S 0
t : r
v)
c,
a n
a
z I-
a L 3 v) m
E a
S 0
c, m U
c,
E
.?
*?
.r
cc 0 Q) 0 S mc, : E v)L .? a P 0 c,m
L -?
S
-r m ow
nm LL
m S
S S m
n
.r
F
a Lm
ccv) om
S7 mm r-c, nv)
SO m
00
-F
c,S mm c,m
me?
aa
> an
&W La P c,L .? Zn
nv)L Ec, 3
v)UW Jar v
d
L LG aC, rc, m 0 m- c, -? - Sc, v) a m v)T Sc,Zc, uac, S a ms 0 WaOE
-en w E L3a a3
c, ov) LWd
.?h hh S4 NO
E ou uu
m S
c c m
-r
F a
W W
L
c, 3
v)
W
ccm oa L
n
.?
Sa n .T n c,3 mL -vu
m am
ti- a >m am Lv)
Lr-
&c, om .? v) sm 00 EV
N
* 0 a v 5% *E *a '7 P
Page S -- c, 0 c, -? a€
a? a, c,L
sa .- m 0s
L -- LL m
om
SF c,g
-? m
am LL
OW
0, S
S E m
-r - a
n
7
U?
m
-? n m 0 wc, r- am
-wmm c, c 0 .Y.?
nac,oas m.
0. acn-nm
n-? ,-mc,,-
c,WL 0 v
-r > mw a0.r
-C-r a-? v ma '-4I"Q)T P
XWv-Lcm a S *r (d -I-
C, v) on-~ rn amw 0%
n s a,- 3" m mc, bc, a
v)c,-CT v) L v
c,VL DLL m v W-r m 3
CLmWOOc, rdm KivQv)
-I- a r L-I- a 0 v€wao€S
a P.
.? Sa € mzl- accw
-n mas+ v
am n v
O
-r Lcc no
m S
S E: m
-I- - a
7
c,
3
v) S 0 u
vr m 4€ v)a .? L m0 0%
OS wo
rc, m -r
vu L3 <L
7
x
-I- 0 v)s
mG
-r 0
Oc, z '5
d
1 - of 2
m
0 cn
I
5 W
..
v) cz W
E 3 z
W J
LL
c, E a
m
U
E
I-
.r
a
L W s
v)
U S m
S
m L
-r
n
E 0 c,
v)
V *r
I- n
n 3
I
S m E
I-
I- -r I
Y v)
L m E a cz
S
-0 .I- O
Qlc, .r m rcc,
*r s La a€ >a
Q E .. I-
0 W U
n
a v) W S z m
J I- n 9 S E t,
0
S
n 5 z 0 0
cz m 0 S
cz L
W 0. c,c, -,- 9, caJ
E
r
v)
.C
U
on
a
r I-
O cn cn d
(D N
I- -r L
a a L 3
v) .. w MI-
z
I-
wo
..
z3
04 J
9z on ccn na
m a E
S 0 4 c,
.r E
l
~
ENV~MENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING &LIST nrrmu1A r rc cc 0 0 aJ Q) Page 2 of 2 V V zz E+ 2 E
4 -r 2: v)k
4L 3 sp SF
LS a0
rc4 mu -r n "n
-r c, L .r L"
ms Em -r m -r m OD ow
v)v 30 LL LL nm am
U
c, W
U m
D S m
a .w *w
Lmt- 36m
v) c, .r m mc, a, -a 'F ES
ss s q -r .
omwo -,- n -- c,u c, m WI- m ~-II-I- E -r m -7 L 2s 32 E-r s s
L-r 3 E: Est-
I-wow m I-L
.VI- v) 0 V c, xn v-c
c, I- -r L-r-c L rd 3-Q 0 n s- rc
m ED L
077 c, sa0
80s - -rva,w L EL oww3
&-VI- v)
-FJ= nrd S4 E a, 0 -r E En
0-I m S S
C S S S
m m
.r .F
rcs 00
c,c, sm am E -r
-r
2z n~
m S
c E
m
.F
I- t- 7 n n n
c, -r E
3 arc 0 c, I-
-70 L v)s m
m-r v) 3
I-mu I-
owa c,
O>L 7 aL3 v
-cv)v) LW ma0 -rv)
vaw mw LLL mcc
n
en '$.A
-r cc v) 0"
m& -r 0 Lc, I-OS
-r au o na
a L-~
In
S m
I- n
S 0
c, m m
L L
-r
-7
H 2 n m V
-0 v)
S m -J
c,
E -r
n J
v)
rD h
v)
8
W m W I *
-7
.r
7 c, 1
W
-
LSa,O v,ss
0 rd w-r cc-n~ nrb a VJm &- s m.; nos:+-,
VJSWE S3L 003m n-c v, s v, v) C-G" a, wo Lw€m -- E
?W 0 - so
s Sc, 0 v L"rc
acnm
-r .C
* 6% mv, a< a,*- 3
-r L > E&@
C, 0 S E4 " m
I- --r s mov)
3w.Q a, m E S mr S 3 w m3.r
c, 4 li *r
m,Ca E S U -L.r L
-r a, s -r w
m rm 8 II 3c, L 0 so * II arc
UEV- n
sn ov)
on a,eu
c, nv) a, m
wn m nL
-4 E
v w st- a, .r) YE< 0 ma- LS II a" STY Lowm II 0 -r & c, scc L w -7 3 -r m
h0Z a, a, I-Ev)>cz
as o L E
-"""_
W
-"------"~""""
I I
i- __-_____-__-- --------- ""-
a 3 L
b) a L 0
(b I
ea 0
L 0
E
0
C
L
I b 0
ntc P
z q"J w w
9 rr
:%
"a (i
Qm L
as m " 23 I.: :;
0- c= a- - 0
:::
no BR ,& :OD0
-