HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-01-08; City Council; Resolution 91-7L
i 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DO, sum yz' 13 oclrcb
cjLgg 14
>A2 Q+-U m5'0
a1 >ma ~u6Yo gZk6 16
'kg? E:% 17
Go 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
:s"g
go<<
u ,oLL 15
zoss
9 0
RESOLUTION NO. 91-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A MITIGATED
NEG.ATIVE DECLARATION, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION
MAP (CT 90-23), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT (PUD 90-23) AND HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (HDP 90-29) FOR A 149 LOT PROJECT ON 41.09 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CORTE DE LA VISTA AND EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD AND NORTH OF LA COSTA GOLF COURSE.
APPLICANT: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO: CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29
WHEREAS, on October 3, 1990 the Carlsbad
Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to co.
proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, Tentative Subdiv:
CT 90-23, Planned Unit Development permit PUD 90-23 and
Development Permit HDP 90-29 for a 149 lot 132 sing1
detached home project and adopted Resolutions Nos. 3017, 31
and 3020, respectively, recommending to the City Council
Mitigated Negative Declaration, Tentative Subdivision Map
Unit Development Permit and Hillside Development PC
approved: and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carl
December 18, 1990 held a public hearing to consi
recommendations and heard all persons interested in or 01
CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was :
August 30, 1990 and submitted to the State Clearinghouse
day review period. All comments received from that revic
are fully incorporated into the conditions of approval
tentative map. These conditions will be reviewed t
monitoring program set up for the project.
L.
* 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
io
11
12 :$ :gz 13
o-~:% 14
>32 spg OLL 15 u: #<I >m< gwwo 8 2062 E' 6 l6
gang
zo<<
>5~2 17 p!$ bo 18 ''
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9 0
NOW,, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councj
City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and cor
2. That the mitigated negative declaration on t
referenced project is approved and that the findings and co
of the Planning Commission contained in Resolution No. 301
Exhibit A attached hereto are the findings and condition,
City Council.
3. That the tentative subdivision map of this
(CT 90-23) is approved and that the findings and condition
Planning Commission contained in Resolution No. 3018 marked
B and attached hereto are the findings and conditions of
Council except for the following changes:
A. Change Condition No. 46 to read as fol
"The project irrigation system shall be des easily adapt to a reclaimed water system and when reclaim is available, the project shall connect and use said r
water system."
B. Add to Condition No. 47 the following:
'#Prior to final map, the applicant shall bc
for the removal of the recreation vehicle storage E conversion to an open space lot. Prior to recordation of map, the appli.cant shall also provide a written agreement owner of the Arroyo La Costa property (CT 88-3) that 2,66
feet of R.V. parking will be set aside for use by the homec
the Fairways project in perpetuity. Said agreement :
subject to the approval of the Planning Director a
Attorney. I!
amount to be determined by the City Engineer and Planning
C. Change Condition No. 27 to read:
"Prior to recordation of a final map, the a
shall submit detailed perimeter wall plans along Alicante lots 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16. These pla
provide for a view wall for the residences across Alican The wall shall be constructed of wrought iron not to excee 4 inches in height or a combination of wrought iron with a
practical. *I
2 feet high solid base. Pilasters shall be spaced as far
*
U 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
om sua y?? 13
;:$% so44 14 >iF oc-a: 15 ms’~
LL 825 Giza ~$26 16 zoas ‘SET p3 17
KZEg
0 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9 0
4. Planned Unit Development Permit PUD 90-23 is
and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Cc
contained in Resolution No. 3019 marked Exhibit C and
hereto are the findings and conditions of the City Councj
Hillside Development Permit HDP 90-29 is appi
that the findings and conditions of the Planning Cc
contained in Resolution No. 3020 marked Exhibit D and
hereto are the findings and conditions of the City Councj
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meetii
day of
5.
City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 8th
1991, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
JL!zzLL.&&,IJ- --
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cle
(SEAL)
3
I
I
Y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
< '13
14
15
16
17
18
19
* 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RFSOLUTION NO. 3017
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CIlY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATrVE DECLARATION
FOR A TENTATIVE MAP, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOP A 149 LOT
SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION.
CASE NAME: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO,: CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29
WEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of Octc
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said req
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, tk
Cornmission considered all factors relating to the Mitigated Negative Declai
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, t
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Mitigated Negativ
according to Exhibit "ND", dated August 31, 1990, and "PII", datec
1990, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the follow I
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findin=:'
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that tht
have a significant impact on the environment, provided that tl
conditicms of approval are complied with.
The site has been previously graded pursuant to an earlier environmt
The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by
project,
2,
3.
...
ENF
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
, 17
18
19
4D 0
4. There are potentially Sensitive resources located onsite however n
measures have been added to the project which will mitigate any impacts of insignificance.
That the Planning Cornmission fhds and determines that the Mitigated
Declaration has been completed in conformance with the California En&
Quality Act, the state guidelines implementing said Act, the R
requirement as specified in Public Resources code Section 21081A
provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Muniapal Code and that the
Commission has reviewed, considered and evaluated the information cc the Declaration.
5.
Conditions:
1. As mitigation for the loss of 9.7 acres of California Gnatcatcher habitat
applicant shall provide for the perpetual preservation offsite of 9.7 acre
within the area described on attached Figure 2 and 3 and as certified by
biologist as containing equal or greater habitat value. Prior to recon
final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by th
Director, a detailed mitigation plan which includes the following itc
precise legal description of the area to be preserved, (b) a habitat X plan, (c) fire management plan, (d) appropriate weed control me
appropriate forms of deterrence to access by humans and domest
including fencing if deexned necessary, and (0 adequate measur(
minimization of light and noise impacts to the site. The perpetual pre:
the mitigation area shall be documented by an open space/conservatic
incorporating the mitigation plan in favor of the City for recording (
with recordation of the final map.
... !
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
...
...
"'
...
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 3017 -2-
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
l6 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tl
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of Octobc
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehub McFadden, Marcus and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Cornmissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
*&
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chair
CARLSBAD PLANNING CQI
ATTEST:
b
PC RES0 NO. 3017 -3-
e 0
*
NSITIGATFD NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Corte de la Vista and north of La Costa G
Course.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A residential subdivision of 133 single family lots on 41
acres in the residential density - multiple zone.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described proj
pursuant to the Guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality j
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of s
review, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not hav
significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject projc
Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on tile in
Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments 6
. the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Departrr
within 21 days of date of issuance. *
DATED: AUGUST 31, 1990
CASE NO: CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29
APPLICANT THE FIELBSTONE COMPANY
PUBLISH DATE: SEPTE.MBER 6,1990
Planning Director
m:km
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 (619) 438-'
0 1)
ENvlRO"I'AL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART IX
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CT 90-23/HDP 90-29
DATE: JULY 23.1990
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Fairwavs
2. APPLICANT: Fieldstone Company
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5465 Morehouse Dr. Ste 25
San Dieno CA 92121
4.
5.
DATE EL4 FORM PPLRT I SUBMITTED:
PROJECT' DESCRIPTION: A residential subdivision of 133 sinnle family lots o
in the residential densitv-muItide zone
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the Cit
Environmental Impact Assessment to detennine if a project may have a significant effect on the
The Environmental Impact Assessiment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist.
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposi
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an I
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence thai
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NOI 1
to indicate this determinatiori.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that an
project may cause a sidcant effect on the environment. The project may qualify
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects t
insianificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig" i
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be giver
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be detennlned si&cant.
e 0
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
'ILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR. INDIRECTLY YES YES NO
big) (insigl
. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
X to geologic hazards? - - _.
Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? - - - !.
/ 1
3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
1 either on or off the site? - - -
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
4.
7 1 any bay, inlet or lake? - - -
ambient air quality? - - -
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? - - -
water, ground water or public water supply? - - -
depletion of any natural resources? - - -
10. Use substantial amounts of fuiel or energy? - - -
11. Alter a significant archeologic:al,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object? -
5. Result in substantial adverse effects on
6. Result in substantial changes in air - - -
7. Substantially change the course or flow of
8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface
9. Substantially increase usage cr cause
- -
-2-
dl 0
BIOLOGICAL E”MENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES P
(ns) (Uuls)
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)? - -
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? - -
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance? - -
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
X and insects? - -
introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
16.
migration or movement of animals? - -
HUMANENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES (no (=%I
17.
18. Substantially dext public utilities,
Alter the present or planned land use
of an area? - -
schools, police, lire, emergency or other
public services? - -
-3-
e e
- HuMANE"MENT
ILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
(fil) (mgf
). Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems? - - -
1. Increase existing noise levels? - - -
I. Produce new light or glare? -
X
E
> - -
2. Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? - - -
human population of an area? - - -
for additional housing? - 7 -
5. Generate substantial additional traffic? - 7 -
6.
3. Substantially alter the density of the
4. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand far new parking? - -
:7. Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? - -
18. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? - -
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? - -
emergency evacuation plans? - -
aesthetically offensive public view? - -
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities? -
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor
30. Interfere With emergen-ky respoxw ph or
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
32. -
4-
I) 0
"D,ATORY FINDINGS OF SLGN@"cE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECIZY CIR INDIRECTLY YES YES N
(nd (W@
33. Does the project have the po1:ential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantjdy
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
of California history or prehistory. - -
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact: on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) - -
Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other mt projects, and
35.
the effects of probable futulre projects.) - -
36. Does the project have environmental
either directly or indirectly'? - -
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human kings,
-5-
1) e
. YISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
hvsical Environment
ecause of prior disturbance to the sire extensive amounts of reme&d grading are required. As pro
roject design includes 256,000 cubic yards of balanced cut and fill. The Hillside development (
riteria accepts quantities less than 8000 cubic yards per disturbed acre as reasonable. This projec
pproximately 6230 cubic yards per acre.
;enerally the grading design steps the site down from the north to the south which is in close kef
xisting conditions.
Zffects of the project on erosion, air and water quality, and course or flow of waters will be minir
,lopes which are manufactured and could have the potential to erode will be controlled thrc
Aanting. Manufactured slopes will not exceed a 2:l ratio or exceed a height of 30 feet. Referenc'
15064(i) of the State CEQA Guidelines: "[i]f an air emission or water discharge meets the existi1 :or a particular pollutant, the Lead Agency may presume that the emission or discharge of the PO
not be a significant effect on the environment." Total project emissions will not exceed thresh0
Project location precludes potendal impacts on the come or flow of marine or fresh waters, A I
100 year flood plain is identified within the westerly project boundary however, alteration to rhal
has been avoided through project design. Although natural resources will be used for the consm
project, primarily lumber, maintenance and operational uses of resources, water and oil, can not be
significant. Water consumption will be ultimately determined by the indiV;iual user for dc
landscape purposes. Water conserving irrigation could be installed for commm areas.
Once the project has been occupied the individual consumption of fuel or energy will be detern
user. Active and passive solar design, insulation and the installation of energy saving appliances c
a first step mitigation to reduce the need for excessive amounts of energy.
The site has nor been identified as having any archaeological, paleontological or historic signif
Biological Environment
The site was pr&ously disturbed by the creation of larger pads. Since that time there has been
revegitation of the site.
Vegetation consists predominately of non-native plant species but also includes California S;
Broom Baccharis. There are no mime trees within the proposed grading areas. Early site inspec
did not reveal the presence of any designated sigmficant species. Fully developed surrounding co
isolated the site from areas that are more likely to accommodate sensitive plant and animal spl
found in the Carfsbad area.
However, recent sitings and observations have been made of a pair of nesting Califom
Gnatcatchers. The Gnatcatcher is a category 12 listed species on the Federal Register and ma1
endangered status by that agency,
-6-
e 0 . Biolodcal Environment (cont'dl
A study was conducted by Bary Jones, Senior Biologist with ERC Environmental and Energy Ser
was concluded that gendy the overall wildlife value of the habitat onsite was low and ths
mitigation measure would reduce the impact on the habitat to a level of insignificance. Thf proposed requires a revegitation of coastal sage adjacent to a future high school and residential dc
There are no other identified sensitive species. The introduction of plants and animals usually residential development will not have detrimental effects or create a barrier to movement of otl
species.
The site has not been identified as agricultural land and has not been used as such.
Human Environment
The site cames a medium density general Plan designation which allows a density range of 4-8 d
per acre. zoning on the property is Residentid Density - Multiple Zone. The General Plan
Medium density as small lot single family homes as well as duplexes and town homes. No ZOI;
Plan amendments are proposed.
Public utilities and services, such as sewers, schools, police, fire and emergency, can be prc
individual responsible agencies. Letters of service availability are on file with the City.
Noise and light levels will increase however not to levels of significance. Noise sources after cc
be hunian voices, radio and television, household and maintenance related appliances and ai
truck traffic. Construction noise will be short term and acceptable noise levels will be govern(
of Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Lighr reflectivity will change due to recontouring and the future existence of residences vs. va
New light sources will be established by street lamps and individual home exterior and interior 1
sources within the public right-of-way will be subject to City designated standards for intensi
The use of hazardous substances in significant quantities is not a part of this project, nor is it a
there will be storage of hazardous and/or volatile materials.
implementation of the project wiU not create a need for additional housing however it will ha
existing housing in the general vicinity. Those impacts will be primarily economic. The
intended for first time buyer or low to moderate income households.
Traffic Will be increased by appnxhately 1300 average daily trips (ADT). This projection
sewice levels of the adjacent existing street system. No new mass transportation routes (
required by the transit district. Streets and sidewalks have been designed to accommodate fo
automobile traffic without compromising safety.
The project has been designed to follow the general existing topography. As development n
elevations are lowered. The result reduces the visual effect of the development as seen Erom IC
i.e. La Costa Golf Course. Viewtj from the development can also be maximized.
-
I
-7-
II) 0 - uman Environment
-he proposed architecture is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and buildings will b
om the slope tops sufficientty SO that the visual impact on the surrounding area is eliminated or sig
2duced by the slope.
ach lot will have a private yard in excess of a minimurn 15’ x 15’ flat area. In addition corn
mce/passive recreation lots have been incorporated throughout the site. No common active fac
eing proposed. Although the site is adjacent to the La Costa golf course there is no reciprocity bel
NO. However other public recreation facgties are in close proximity.
-8-
e 0
-ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
f> alternate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project alternative.
e) development at some future time rather than now,
a) The project is proposed as phased development. Because there are no signxficar circulation or impacts to services there is no environmental advantage to delay l
other than postponing ultimate service needs.
b) Alternate site designs could further reduce visual impacts as seen from adjacer Because street design generally follows the existing land contours, changing st]
would require additional grading.
c) If an alternate scale of development were proposed relative impacts would change
in the number of units would decrease density below the General Plan designal
purchase price of the units, reduce all secondary impacts such as on traffic and s
the number of units were increased a different product type would be necessary. townhomes could be an option. The result could reduce the cost of units hc increase impacts on generation issues such as traffic and air quality. Clustering the
at the same density would have generally the same secondary impacts hawevere
impacts to grading and visual (onsite and offsite).
d) The General Plan and Zoning Ordinance designate this parcel as suitable f
development. Other uses such as Bed and Breakfasts, childcare nurseries and pl
permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. The appropriateness of any of these u
determined at this time because of the lack of information.
e) Future development rather than now would not appear to have any significz Services and facilities are available now.
f) Other sites may be aivailable with the same zoning and general plan designations
as with the no project alternative it does not preclude development at some c
similar project with similar impacts.
-9-
0 a
?TERMINATION (To Be Completed E5y The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
- I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a sigruficant effect on the environment, and a NE
DECLARATION vd be prepared,.
- < I find that although the proposed project could have a sign%cant effect on the elIvirOn.ItIent, t not be a sigmficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attac
sheet have been added to the project. A Mitigated Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
- I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIROB
tMPACT REPORT is required.
- Signature
@9Q4&
Date *
@/a@ Jw
Date
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE]
A'ITACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLlcABLEl
-10-
a 0
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WrrH MITIGATING MEASURE S
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REWEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT'.
7kJ776) A// -16
Date Signature
cw:h
-11-
Ayrmvm r -o&& MITIGATION MONITORING &= Page
PI B *g A 2 % sp7 c( .4 c M$
Q) a 3.2 s E v)+ mzm -2 =: 3 -g ma
o=* - -a
0 @SE ZZ% ozq .5 -5 0 n ;$E
;;j &ma -8 ? fq g 2 g5 Y
& -e 5j ti g *: =,.zy L aJ E my >-gg p iis 5 I
Q'cj QZ.3 71 ..a MY.
v) dZ.=g.2 gsm >e 0 22 gu0 55 g2.2 0 wug ZE aIz yo. e gs E: g 0 .c .- 3 a 5 zsz Y ea
cpw -2 e;
&a cp 3 6% afom p -EA-& 3EhO
Ec,5
-%% m -oa55i 3 L- t '$ $
LL b.!
0 4 0 .5
6 2
Y 8 0 'C a E
9 0
p. Y
I -9 v) Q)
e
0
P E om
e WE m %sz %2
s
75
W w w E E -5 m
P CI
-5
E53 E
cp CI sgg .sg E a
v)- 0 &z g '2 a 0, Y e:
3- s -2 $3 2 g i3 4J%-
'U m*bEz 61s 5b&~uu~y~uo z boY,rcr-a x M&% 5 2 iq
0 .5 3 q%#S$,- rn =e uoe:w w a E3 g 65 E 2s
g2 u &-sf 8 c: C) --e( 3 54 am $2 u-c 0 E &w 3 u- u 5 =.: (0 $3
22.g b.2 ds.5,q u ' E e z u= 1 3 -*a oocc m a
",~QJ wa3 E+ 33.g gz.5 16 %$E 4-2 $::z % ET 9 Wa 2 LL $;& woa8q~T-g~uJ:Q,ma,uxu 42 mn*3-+ a
wg 5Bg -aa aJ 2 0 2% """Sa eJ: g uya ,'&h* L. g m 0 O'(1 c (op g@ZE w-WL.3: @z-s'C'E muc mu ma 2 0 e 2.5 a'5! u3 8
$ *Z$:s a & L. 2 5 *a% Muas aJ'5 uzz 0 Q-S~-w us ;; E w=o$zz 3%- rn MQ) "852 e:& wo sop$ m= Q, 3
01
v)
cn
-.sgz E $2
W"* a
M
ea
rcru ow
5% 'f 4
wE a- - au% m e:
rn '5
'$&?J! ~~Z~Y';IXE Ogo~ &:SO :P
mu-
UE
E .d
33 v m fil *I' Im gg: gg BPg p.g w~qhZ aw.g-z (0
&a
E: *'
a $*w-g+ %^a.s.aca z g #,o Q) g aJ o a) aJ us E rgE.5 25 c.0- ch t!a
3 .s su st!
warn -g.sggd MZE BhZE g, g* '0 1
2 2
$! 3 v) 2 2 z3z
.. -3 ou'e a c ;
eap u3 u 3 d
d cuJ: 0) M q
-2 g
*g * aJ;1rno - .%
t! 5za,"=& - f' 1 "S ac.2 aOu 0 '' z M2%8 ' .Z@e.Ja$g
-d
$2 e.,Ed z ~~~.Ccool~h~.=P~-~~o~~~
& *G w
*h 'E 5 f 3 u 1 8 ; 3 E a 5 ss 8 \c p! &$ Oa 4J.g Q g :g mmuwo QI a 4J
1 Of L
v)
.S x 2 v; cs~ 0 -- s
%
c Q,
w
0 0
c The IFairways Pmject Location and Proposed Mitlgation Area as Depicted on USGS 7.5’ Encinitas and Rancho Santa Fe Quadrangles
# ERC s Environmental and E~~~~
Services Co. I 1
0 m
___ . _...
- - -..---- --. -
LEGENO lCHP
coll80( sl0, Saub p:::;::::;j ...'"L:. ' , '
Q Brodiaea orcuttii
0 ~~vnin~
@ Muilla elmlandii
0 waginat* cinmranc!
BtG WikmmGnuntekr FEET
Q 400
Do Oudlwa blochmania0 SAP.
lochmanin
0 c r I ERC .. 3 Environmental Offsite Mitigation Location for the FaiwaYs and Energy Services Co.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
a 0
- F'L,AN"G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3018
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 149 LOT SUBDMSION ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CORTE DE LA VISTA AND
EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD AND NORTH OF LA COSTA GOLF
COURSE.
CASE, NAME: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO.: CT 90-23
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, according to map thereof filed in the
office of the County Recorder of san Diego County on October
10, 11981 as file no. 81-322184 of official records.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Cods
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provic
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
I.4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2%
I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of Oct
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said requ
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering i
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission c(
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
-
as follows:
A)
B)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
recommends APPROVAL of CT 90-23, based on the following finding
to the fo'llowing conditions:
...
En
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
, 17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a 0
Findings:
1. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan since the proposed der
indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or bel
growth control point of 6.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development si
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential developmer
density proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition
project, ensured building pennits will not be issued for the project unless
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cam(
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the E
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Eleme
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in
Marcos School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary pdblic improvements have been provided or will be re(
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an ap
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and
of the fee vdl enable this body to find that public facilities will be
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the City's Planned Development (
and also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land
SUrrOUnding properties are designated for residential development on ti
Plan.
Because the project is a Planned Development and is consistent with the (
requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance it contxibutes to F
open space facility performance standard for LFM Zone 6 at buildou
development as approved will not preclude the provision of perforxnanc
open space at buildout of Zone 6.
4.0 du'dacre is within the density range of 4-8 du's/acre specified for the
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. I
9.
10.
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
. 17
l8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
11. This project Will not cause any si@cant environmental impacts and a
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on Augus
and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on Ocrobe
In recommf?nding APPROVAL of this Negative Declaration the Planning C
has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigatiol
and any written comments received regarding the sigmficant effects 1 could have on the environment.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public fac
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abj
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management P1;
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumular
created by the project.
his project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinar
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part (
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 6.
This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Cc
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure
treatment of the City's hillside resources.
12.
13.
14.
Planning Conditja:
1. Approval is granted for CT 90-23, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "II", d;
3, 1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise ni
conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", I
the Tentative Map as approved by the Phdng Commission. The t shall refllect the conditions of approval by the City. The map c
su6mitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or
plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
A 500' scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning
to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and
and adjacent to the project.
1 2, I
3.
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
' 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a a
4. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits I
be issued for development of the subject property unless the City E
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application fi sewer pennits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. TI
shall be placed on the final map.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28,1987 and as a
from time to time, and any development fees established by the City
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other o
adopted to implement a g~owth management system or facilities and impr plan and to fulfill the subdivideis agreement to pay the public facilities f
JU~Y 11,1990, copies of which are on Re with the City Clerk and are inco by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consis'
the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void.
The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approJ
final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrc:
part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee in effei.t at the time of building permit application.
Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service i
between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
25, 1983.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required bi
6 Local Fadties Management Plan approved by the city council On Se
1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facili
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposec
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as 1 Govenunertt Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is detern
invalid this; approval shall be invalid unless the City Council detennir
project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections o
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time
permit issuance.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9
10.
11.
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -4-
L_
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
lo
11
12
13
I*
15
16
17
18
19
a e
12. Approval of CT 90-23 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 90-23 an(
29.
The applicant shall provide the following note on the final map of the s'
and final m.ylar of this development submitted to the City:
"Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Mi
Control Poht for each General Plan land use designation. Developmc
exceed the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90.
use designation for this development is Residential Medium. The Grow Point for this designation is 6 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre.
13.
All parcels were used to calculate the intensity of development under t
Plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubdivision of these parcels must also include all parcels under the General Plan a
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code."
The applicant shall establish a homeowneis association and COI
covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&R's shall be submil
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval.
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City's
policy sub:ject to the Planning Director's approval prior to final map a]
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan wl
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuanc
or building permits, whichever OCCLWS kt.
AU landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving co
from weeds, trash, and debris.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot in1
all private and public street frontages in conformance with City
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
standards. The trees shall be of a variety selected from the approvec Lisr.
19. All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscar
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures o
Planning Department.
Trees shall be 15 gallon or larger and minimum shrub Size shall be 5
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and
plants (see Landscape Guidelines Manual) shall be limited to areas of
20.
21.
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
. I'7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
importance or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment anc
shall promote water conservation.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architt
be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping h,
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
AU herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of CaU
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as req
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include buildb
improvement plans and grading plans.
All landscape and inigation plans shall show existing and proposed contc
shall match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvemi
Prior to recordation of a final map, the applicant shall submit detailed r
wall and landscaping plans along Alicante Road for lots 3,4,9 and 10. Th
shall provide for views for the residences across Mate Road to the n
extent possible without compromising the privacy and safety of adjacent
.4thin the Fatways project- Said plans shall be reviewed and approve
'lanning Director.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be de:
conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the s?
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Di
All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall in
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, park, and streets.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the appli
include a reduced version of the approving resolutioxVresolutions on a blueline dnwing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a COF
applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building pennit, whichever comes fir
report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. If the SI
indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material then a sta
phased program, on file in the Planning Department, shall be undertake
22,
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -6-
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e a
possible significant impacts on paleontological resources under the direc
Plhg Department.
Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided.
The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing 1(
existing and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fj for approval.
An all-weather access road shall be maintained throughout constructio
All required fie hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be opera
to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with "Knox" key opera
switch, as specified by the Fire Department.
All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all timi
have posted "NO ParkhdFke Lane .) TOW Away Zone" pursuant
17.04.040, Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures.
Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications cor
City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual.
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automa
and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fir
for approval prior to construction.
The entire potable and non-potable water systedsystems for subjec
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure
landscaping and fie flow demands are met.
Tf;e developeis engineer shall schedule a meeting with the Water Di
and the City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system
preparation of the water system improvement plans.
The developer will be responsiile for all fees and deposits plus tht
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building perm
Existing water lines and easements at the easterly and westerly end
shall be relocated as necessary.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38,
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
4.
45.
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
rl) 1)
46. The project brigation system shall be desi ed to easil adapt to a red&(
he recreational vehicle storage area is tempo-. men the permanent :
completed at Amyo La Costa the on&e Fairways fadlity shall be ram
restd to a landscape open space which may include passive recreation
Design details not specificalty denoted as a part of this application sball be and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of Building 1
vt-4 -Nv%5co~ 9M4f )/ppceh?K W[ q
~~~i+tm~) WA~ I5 6~?&$ AU~V~Q d n-jt CN 47.
48.
Ennineerinn Conditions:
49. No grading pennits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordati final map.
The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commenceme
clearing or grading of the site.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior tc
of a building permit for the project, the applicant must submit and receivc
for grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards, be issued
permit and complete the grading work in substantial conformance
approved grading plans.
Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an "as-gradec
plan be submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all t'
as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures
constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both t
post site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engine engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a mylar or simil
film and shall become a permanent record.
50.
51.
52.
1
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
53. No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a gradj
eaiement i:j obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If tht
is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, he must either mer
map or change the slope so grading will not occur outside the proje
manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as
by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separ:
permit issued for any borrow or disposal site if located within the city
Prior to hading dirt or construction materials to any proposed cons1
54.
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
l4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
al a
within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval fro.
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall compk conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with rega
hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phi
project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall b
in accordance with the Carlsbad MuniCipal Code and the City Engineer.
Chap 11.015.
The developer shall place the following notes on the final map:
Geotechnicd Caution:
A.
55.
56.
Slopes steeper than two parts horizontal to one part vertical exis
boundaries of this subdivision.
The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its s
interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of C
any action that may arise through any geological failure, gl
seepage or land subsidence and subsequent damage that may
adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction, a
maintenance.
The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold hade5
regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of
for this project.
Prior to approval of the final map the developer shall enter hto ~II ag
the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of tht
Master Drainage Plan Update.
The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all put
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative IT
sh-all be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All 1
shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrancc
cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to k
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Alicante Road and Corte de 1
waived on the final map.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improver
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval c
in accordance, with City Standards the Developer shall install, or ad Secure with appropriate security as provided by law, hproven
B.
57.
58.
1 I 59.
60.
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ab - the tentative map and the following improvements:
k All imp1mvement required to serve this subdivision, as shown on the tt
map*
Relocation of sewer and water facilities as required by the respective 4
Replacement of half width frontage improvements on ficante ib
corte ~)e ~a Vi found to be defective during the design pm~ construction period.
A note to this effect shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the hal
the provisions of Sections 66434.2 and 66445 of the Subdivision Map Ac
Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of f
approval, whichever occurs first.
All conditions listed above require a right of way permit, traffic control
appropriate securities prior to issuance of any building permit.
Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City St:
authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map.
The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved 1
Engineer prior to approval of final map for this project. The structural
all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based c
tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by thc
the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be pa
approval of the final map for this project.
The developer shall install a wheelchair ramp at the public street corn
the subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior to
of any buildings.
The developer shall comply with all the des, regulations and design re
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the p
This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase.
The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining th
within th~ subdivision and all the private streets, sidewalks, street 1
drain faciljities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute the 1
maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the unitl
subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be inclui
B.
C.
61.
62.
63.
64,
65.
66.
67.
68.
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -10-
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ab w
CC&R's subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the o
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the bot
the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and I;
District No. 1. The form shall be provided by the City during the im
plancheck process.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) montT
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extens
requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or de
discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City C
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant
20.12.110(a)(Z) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The secondaxy access road at the southeast end of the project shall b
locked in accordance with the requirements of the fire marshal.
The devdoper shall offer to dedicate r;gkt-of-way, slope and drainage e:
the future atension of Corte de la Vita and the future realip
emergency access road. Said offer and design shall be to the approw Engineer. The offer shall be made by certificate on the final map for All lands so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of i
encumbrances and without cost to the City.
Prior to building permit issuance a deed restriction shall be placed on
project to notify potential owners that Coae de la Via may be me
emergency access road realigned.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner's i
on comrnonly owned property] or the individual property own'
individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly ir
responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R's.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
.--
...
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -11-
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
- w
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 1
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, '
the following vote, to wit:
AYES; Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners Schlehuber,
McFadden, Marcus and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Cornmissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
-- - --..-
,&/?A SilARbN EiXh
-
3
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RES0 NO. 3018 -12-
~
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
(mb w
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3019
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 149 LOT SUBDMSION ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CORTE DE LAWSTA AND
EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD AND NORTH OF LA COSTA GOLF
COURSE.
CASE NAME: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO.: PUD 90-23
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, according to map thereof filed in the
10, I981 as file no. 81-322184 of official records.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commis:
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provic
office of the County Recorder of san Diego County on October
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of Octc
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said reqm
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering a1
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission COI l8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
I I factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development.
-
as follows:
A)
B)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plaqhg C
That the albove recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the <
recommends APPROVAL of PUD 90-23, based on the following findings
to the following conditions:
EXlldl
9 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2a
I) .)
Findins:
1. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan since the proposed de
4.0 du's/acre is within the density range of 4-8 du's/acre specified for thc
indicated on rhe Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or be
growth control point of 6.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development s
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential developmer
density proposed.
The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinanct
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition project, ensured building pennits will not be issued for the project unless
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannc
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the 1
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Elemei
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in
Marcos School District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be reqi
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an app
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and 1
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be B
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the City's Planned Development Or
and also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land us
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the
Plan.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
*.'
*a*
PC RES0 NO. 3019 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 :;
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ab w
11. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on Augus
and Recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on Octobe
In recommending approval of this Negative Declaration the Pl&g C
has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigatioi and any written comments received regarding the significant effects t
could have on the environment.
12. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public far: new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abi
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Pla
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This I
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulati
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinan
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part c
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 6.
This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Co Ordinance') and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure t
treatment of the City's hillside resources.
13.
14.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of P- Commission Resolution No. 3018 for (TI
applicable to this approval and incorporated through this reference.
.'.
1 1::
...
...
...
---
-e.
PC RES0 NO. 3019 -3-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
I.3
ab - PASSEID, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October,
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber,
McFadden, Marcus and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
- ---
&-& 1
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
, 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2a
I
PC RES0 NO. 3019 4-
.
*
m *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
. 17
(I, w
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3020
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CORE RE J.,A
VISTA EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD AND NORTH OF LA
COSTA GOLF COURSE.
CASE NAME: FAIRWAYS
CASE NO.: HDP 90-29
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 11722, in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to
map thereof filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County on October 10,
1981 as file no. 81-322184 of official records,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning CommisSrc
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as prov
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of Octobe
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testin
19
l8
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission consir
factors relating to he Planning Commission Determination; and I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Cor
as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Co
recommends APPROVAL of HDP 90-29, based on the following kc
subject to the following conditions:
...
WdM
.,
I. k
L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
. 14
25
16
. 17
18
19
m w
Findinns:
1. That those areas of 40% slope have been identified and new slopes onsite wil
designated as open space.
That the propod project is consistent with the purpose, intent and requirem
of the Hillside Ordinance.
That the development is consistent 4th the provisions of Section 21.53.230
240 of the carlsbad Municipal Code.
That the site has been distltrbed by praTiously approved grading.
That remedial grading which is exempted from the provisions of the Hil
Ordinance is necessaxy to stabilk the existing conditions for residt
development.
That the site is impacted by unusual geotechnical and soils conditions
necessitate corrective work which results in slopes greater than 30 feet.
2,
3.
4.
5.
6.
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for HDP 90-29, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "H", dated Oc
3, 1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Depart
Development shall OCCW ~bstmtially as shown on the approved exhibits.
proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this apI
as determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment r
Hillside Development Pennit.
All conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3018 for (3' 90-;
applicable to this approval and incorporared through this reference.
2.
i
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. The grading as proposed, shall occur substantially as shown on Exhibits "C dated octobet 3,1990.
...
...
..I
-..
PC RES0 NO. 3020 -2-
. ’.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
v
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
rn 7)
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pli
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of October, 15
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, I-
McFadden, Marcus and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Cornmissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
-_
T
.&4- .&
SHARON SCHRAMM, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
$~* 17fFM4zMm*R L J HOLZMILL~~
PC RES0 NO. 3020 -3-
& - - APPLl. -RON COMPLETE DATE:
JULY27, 1989 '. .
s @
F
STAFF REPORT
0 DATE: OCTOBER 3,1990
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPAR'MENT
SUBJECT: CT 90-23/PUD 90-23/HDP 90-29 - FAIRWAYS - A request for approval of a 149 lot
Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development and Hillside Development Permit for 132 single family detached homes on 41.09 acres of land in the RDM Zone and
Local Facilities Management Zone 6 located south of Corte de la Vista, east of
Alicante Road and north of the La Costa Golf Course.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commksion Resolution No. 3017 recommending
APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Plafming
Commission Resolution Nos. 3018, 3019 and 3020 kcommending APPROVAL of CT 90-23, PUD
90-23 and HDP 90-29, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
z
11. PROJECT DES-ON AND B~KGROUND
/
The project site is vacant and has been previo#sly graded into large pads that step down from Corte
de la Vista toward the La Costa Golf Coursd to the south. 8.15 acres of land have been deducted
from the gross acreage for density calculz$ions. There are sewer and water easements which run
from north to south in the central portion and the westerly end of the site. Single family homes
(ALicante Hills) exist to the north and,condominiums (the Jockey Club and Spyglass Point) exist
to the west and northwest. j
d
. The project is 149 lots with 132 single family detached homes. Proposed homes range in size from
1,900 to 2,900 square feet. There are four floorplans, three of which are two story models. The
two story models have three car garages and the single story model has a two car garage. The
Monterey, Mediteranian and Ranch architectural styles are typical for southern California. Materials
include stucco, wood trim, concrete tile roofs, and stone veneer.
The project is proposed as a gated neighborhood. There is one main entrance/exit located off of
Corte de la Vista. A second entrance which is for emergency access only is located at the easterly
end of the site and connects to the terminus of Corte de la Vista. That access will be gated at the
Corte de la Vista right-of-way andl at the beginning of the access road onsite.
The property is zoned as residential density-multiple and density is proposed at 4.0 units per acre.
The growth control point is 6 DV:; and the General Plan range is 4-8 dwelling units per acre. This
project is subject to the following:
1. The Planned Development Ordinance. 2.
3. Hillside Development Orhce.
Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 6.