HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-01-21; City Council; Resolution 92-271
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
w 0
RESOLUTION NO. 92-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
AND ADOPTION OF ALIGNMENT 2 FOR THE WIDENING
AND REALIGNMENTOF OLIVENHAIN ROAD FOR RANCHO
SANTA FE ROAD TO EL CAMINO REAL.
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 21 st day of January 1992 hear and rc
the finding of the Environmental Impact Report for Olivenhain Road widening
realignment, and
WHEREAS, the proposed Alignment 2 is the environmentally preferred alternz
and
WHEREAS, the proposed project has no significant unmitigatable environmr
impact.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carl:
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
6) That based on the evidence presented in the final Environmental Im
Report presented at its January 21 st, 1992 meeting, the City Council hereby recommc
to the City Council of the City of Encinitas California Certification of the
Environmental Impact Report for the Olivenhain Road widening, realignment and F
Control Project (SCH #91011035) dated January, 1992.
C) That Council recommend approval of Alignment 2 for final adoption
implementation and approves variance of design speed standards to allow a 50 mile
hour design speed and reduction of street and right of way widths to match exi:
conditions.
Findinqs:
1. The reduction of design standards are required to protect the environr
reduce increased noise impacts and to better relate to existing de
configuration.
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
x0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
w a
2. Standards variances will not result in unusually restrictive traffic j
characteristic and fall within generally accepted engineering practice:
3. Appropriate signing will adequately indicate roadway conditions.
4. That the granting of such variance will not cause substantial drain
problems.
5. That the granting of such variance will not conflict with existing or fu
traffic and parking demands or pedestrian or bicycle use.
6. That the granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the PI
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity in wI
the variance is granted.
7. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect
comprehensive general plan.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad
Council held on the 21stday of Janua~~ , 1992 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton ar
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Nygaard
ATTEST:
t City Clerk