Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-06-06; City Council; Resolution 2000-1811 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2ooo-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. SDP 96-01(A) AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT NO. CDP 96-02(A) FOR THE ADDITION OF 24 HOTEL ROOMS TO THE GRAND PACIFIC PALISADES RESORT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD WEST OF ARMADA DRIVE WITHIN PLANNING AREA 3 OF THE CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 13. CASE NAME: GRAND PACIFIC PALISADES RESORTS CASE NO.: SDP 96-01 (AYCDP 96-02(A) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, on April 5, 2000, the Carlsbad Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a proposed Site Development Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit Amendment to allow for the addition of 24 hotel rooms to the existing Grand Pacific Palisades Resort, and adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4732 and 4733 recommending to the City Council that the Site Development Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit Amendment be approved; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 6 th day of June , 2000 held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard all persons interested in or opposed to the SDP 96-01(A) and CDP 96-02(A); and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared for the project and it was determined that the project had complied with the mitigation measures of Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR 94-01) certified, for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment and related applications, on January 9, 1996, by the City Council and that only one additional mitigation measure was needed and was later made inapplicable by the City Council’s repeal of the moratorium related to the traffic impacts for the intersection of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 3 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of Site Development Plan Amendment 96-01 (A) and Coastal Development Permit Amendment 96- 02(A) is approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4732 and 4733 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1 .I6 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial Review” shall apply: “NOTICE TO APPLICANT “The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court no later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not latter than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.” PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 6th day of June , 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Finnila, Nygaard and Kulchin NOES: None CLp&EWlZ t&&c? - ATTEST: (SEAL)