HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-07-23; City Council; Resolution 2002-2211
t
2
5
1(
11
12
1:
14
1:
1f
1;
18
1s
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2oo*-*21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AMENDMENT SDP 94-06(A) AND COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 02-10 TO PERMIT THE HEIGHT OF AN EXISTING TOWER TO INCREASE FROM 43’ TO 55’, LOCATED
AT THE GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA AT 5345
ARMADA DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
CASE NAME:
13.
GIA TOWER ADDITION
CASE NO.: SDP 94-06(A)/CDP 02-1 0
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on June 19, 2002, hold a duly noticed
public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Site Development Plan Amendment SDP
94-06(A) and Coastal Development Permit CDP 02-10 to increase the height of an existing
tower located at the Gemological Institute of America from 43’ to 55’. The Planning Commission
adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5210 and 5211 recommending to the City
Council that they be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 23rd day of JULY
2002 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Site Development
Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit, and;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors
relating to the Site Development Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit;
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does hereby resolve as
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval of
Site Development Plan Amendment SDP 94-06(A) and Coastal Development Permit CDP 02-10
is approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5210 and 5211 on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2 i
25
26
27
28
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
Review” shall apply:
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT”
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
filed in the appropriate court no later than the ninetieth day following the
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be
date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days afler
the decision becomes final a request for the record of proceedings
accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the
estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such
following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day
mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written
request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed
with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Carlsbad, California 92008.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 23rd day of JULY 2002, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Nygaard, Hall
NOES: None
SENT: Council Kulchin, Finnila
Page 2 of 2 of
Resolution No. 2002-221 -2-