Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-11-16; City Council; Resolution 2004-3721 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-372 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 04-02, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 04-01, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 04-03, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 04-02, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 04-04, AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 04-03 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF ALGA ROAD, EAST OF EL FUERTE STREET AND WEST OF XANA WAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. CASENAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 THROUGH 2.5 CASE NO.: CT 04-02/PUD 04-01 /CT 04-03/PUD 04-02/CT 04-04/PUD 04-03 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on October 6, 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider proposed Tentative Tract Map (CT 04-02), Planned Unit Development (PUD 04-01), Tentative Tract Map (CT 04-03), Planned Unit Development (PUD 04-02), Tentative Tract Map (CT 04-04) and Planned Unit Development (PUD 04-03); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 16'h day of November, 2004, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Tentative Tract Maps and Planned Unit Developments, and at the time received recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to CT 04-02/PUD 04-01KT 04-03/PUD 04- 02/CT 04-04 and PUD 04-03; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of Tentative Tract Map CT 04-02, Planned Unit Development PUD 04-01, Tentative Tract Map CT 04-03, Planned Unit Development PUD 04-02, Tentative Tract Map CT 04-04 and Planned Unit Development PUD 04-03 is approved by the City Council and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5734, 5735, 5736, 5737, 5739 and 5740, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council except condition 15(g) of Planning Commission 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 5736 which shall instead read: “Educational materials regarding the sensitivity of the HCPIOSMP shall be given to proposed project residents as part of the CC&Rs and, when a lot is purchased the purchasers shall acknowledge receipt of said educational materials prior to the close of escrow.” 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial Review” shall apply: “NOTICE TO APPLICANT” The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008.” PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the @-day of November 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall and Packard. NOES: None OD, City Clerk (SEAL) -2-