HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-01-26; City Council; Resolution 2016-0181
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
follows:
EXHIBIT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-018
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT RP 15-10 TO
ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY, 2,579 SQUARE
FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH ATTACHED TWO CAR
GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
ROOSEVELT STREET BETWEEN LAGUNA DRIVE AND BEECH
AVENUE IN LAND USE DISTRICT 8 OF THE VILLAGE REVIEW ZONE
AND WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1
CASE NAME: ROOSEVELT STREET RESIDENCE
CASE NO.: RP 15-10
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on December 16, 2015, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law
to consider a Major Review Permit RP 15-10 and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No.
7136, recommending approval of Major Review Permit RP 15-10; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the ___lL day of January
2016, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider adoption of a Major Review Permit RP 15-
10;and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors
relating to the adoption of a Major Review Permit; and
WHEREAS, as a result of an environmental review of the subject project ~ ¥.· •
conducted pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the project was
found to be categorically exempt from the requirement for preparation of environmental
documents pursuant to Section 15303 (Construction of a single-family residence in urbanized
areas) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
1
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
2
California as follows:
3
4 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
5 2. That Major Review Permit RP 15-10 is approved and that the findings and
conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Resolution No. 7136 on file in the City
6 Clerk's office and incorporated herein by reference are the findings and conditions of the City
Council.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review"
shall apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed
by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of
Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16, Any petition or other paper seeking review
must be filed in the appropriate court not tater than the ninetieth day following the date on
which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final
a request for the record is filed with a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated
cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is
extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either
personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written
request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk,
City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA, 92008.
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
-2-
1
2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City
of Carlsbad on the day 26th day of January, 2016, by the following vote to wit:
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AYES: Council Members Wood, Schumacher, Blackburn, Packard.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Council Member Hall.
ATTEST: