Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-01-22; Design Review Board; Resolution 0661 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 066 RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FOR A MINOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO REMODEL EXISTING STORE BUILDINGS AT 1978-1998 STATE STREET AND 540-548 ELM AVENUE. CASE NO. : RP 86-2 APPLICANT: VILLAGE CORNER (GRANT) WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Cardsbad and referred to the Design Review Board; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design Review Board did on the 22th day of January, 1986, hold a public hearing to consider said application on property described as: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Blk 34, in the Town of Carlsbad County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 535, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888. WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Board considered all factors relating to RP 86-2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: ?INDINGS : That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board recommends APPROVAL of RP 86-2 based on the following findings and subjects to the following conditions. The proposed project satisfies all the development standards and design criteria of the V-R (RP) Zone. . 4 k. 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 22nd day of January, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES : Commissioners McCoy, Marcus, Holmes, and Schlehuber . NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : None 2) That the proposed project is compatible with the goals and policies of the Village Design Manual. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3) That the project. is compatible with the surrounding uses. Community Redevelopment Manager //// //// //// //// 5 CONDITIONS: ll 6 7 4) All uses shall be limited to retail only, bonafide restaurants are not approved by this permit. 16 (1 ATTEST: 17 18 / CHRIS SALOMONE- 26 27 JOHN MC COY, Chairman