HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-01; Design Review Board; Resolution 2181
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 218
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION AND OCCUPATION OF A MINERAL
SPRINGS SPA, OFFICE, AND APARTMENT ON PROPERTY
GENEMLLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND CHRISTIANSEN WAY IN
CASE NAME: SUB-AREA 5 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CARLSBAD MINERAL SPRINGS SPA
CASE NO: RP 94-O3/CDP 94-04
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 1st day of February, 1995,
hold a duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to consider said request for a
Negative Declaration, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review
Board as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration
according to Exhibit “ND”, dated July 6, 1994, and “PII”, dated June 17, 1994,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinm:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have
a significant impact on the environment.
The site has been previously graded and contains no sensitive animal or plant species
as is typical for most downtown, infill properties.
2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. The existing and proposed streets are adequate in size to handle the anticipated
traffic of approximately 80 Average Daily Trips (ADT) since the site is served by a
major arterial and local street.
4. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly
impacted by the proposed development.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of February, 1995, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Board members Marquez, Savary, Vessey,
Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN
ATTEST:
EVAN BECKER
Housing and Redevelopment Director
DRB RES0 NO. 218
BAILEY NmLE, Chairperson
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
-2-