HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-10-04; Design Review Board; Resolution 2341
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 234
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMITTO ALLOW THE CONTINUED
USE AND FUTURE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE ARMY
AND NAVY ACADEMY ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF
CARLSBAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN MOUNTAIN VIEW
DRIVE AND BEECH AVENUE.
CASE NAME ARMY AND NAVY ACADEMY
MASTER SITE PLAN
CASE NO: CDP 94-02
WHEREAS, the Army and Navy Academy has filed a verified application with
the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit as provided by Chapter 21.81 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board did, on the 6th day of September, 1995, and 4th day of October, 1995, hold
a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on property described as:
Lot 46 and a Portion of Lot 47 of Granville Park According to
Map Thereof No. 1782, February 21, 1924; Lots 58-73,75, 76,
94-96, 98-101, 102-130, 131, 153-170, 177-198 Inclusive of
Granville Park No. 2, According to Map Thereof No. 2037, June
18,1927; A Portion of Block 3 of Town Carlsbad, According to
Map Thereof No. 755, February 15,1894; That Portion of Block
1 and 2 of Oceanside Addition To Carlsbad, According to Map
Thereof No. 893, April 8,1903; That Portion of Lot 1, Block "A"
of Hayes Land Company Addition to Carlsbad, According to
Map Thereof No. 1221, November 4, 1909; all Filed in the
Offce of the County Recorder of San Diego County, and all in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board
considered all factors relating to CDP 9442.
...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review
Board as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
PERMlT/CDP 94-02, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
F'indinps:
1. The Design Review Board finds that the project will have no significant impact on
the environment, and has recommended approval of the Negative Declaration for the
Project.
2. The Design Review Board finds that the project, as conditioned herein for CDP 94-
02, is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General PladRdevelopment
Plan, based on the following:
a. Land Use - A private school is a permitted conditional use in the V-R Zone
with a Mqjor Redevelopment Permit;
b. Circulation - The project would provide roadway and frontage improvements,
and there would be no operational deficiencies at intersections and roadways
serving the project;
c. Open Space and Conservation- Based on an archaeological survey and
historical inventory, the project would not significantly impact cultural
l=eSOUrCeS.
3. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and
ordinances since:
The project has been conditioned to ensure that building permits will not be issued
for the project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is available,
and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available,
and the District Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities
Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service
for this project.
4. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as conditions
of approval.
5. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part
of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
DRB RES0 NO. 234 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
6. The project is consistent with the intent of the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment
Plan and the development standards and design criteria required by the Village
Design Manual and Village Redevelopment LCP. The school land use is compatible
with surrounding commercial and residential land uses, and a private school is
allowed in the Village Redevelopment Zone with a Redevelopment Permit. A portion
of the proposed project is located within Sub-area 5 of the plan. Permitted land uses
in Sub-area 5 include visitor serving commercial uses and uses allowed in the R-3
Zone, which includes private schools with a Redevelopment Permit. In the Village
Area Redevelopment Plan the Army and Navy Academy site is not designated for
commercial usage, therefore, the LCP requirement for property with commercial
land use designations such that "the entire ground floor of all projects shall be
devoted to visitor commercial uses" is not applicable to this project.
7. The Design Review Board has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the
project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to
the impact caused by the project.
Plannine Conditions:
1. The Design Review Board does hereby recommend approval of the Coastal
Development Permit for the CDP 94-02 project entitled "Army and Navy Academy
Master Site Plan". (Exhibits "A - "J" on file in the Planning Department and
incorporated by this reference, dated September 6, 1995) subject to the conditions
herein set forth. Staff is authorized and directed to make or require the Developer
to make all corrections and modifications to the approved Documents, as necessary
to make them internally consistent and conform to Housing and Redevelopment
Commission final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as
shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed development substantially different
from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
2. Prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit, which ever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of
the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying
all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued
a Coastal Development Permit by Resolution No. 234 on the real property owned
by the developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description,
location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval
as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an
amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing
of good cause by the developer or successor in interest.
3. Approval of CDP 94-02 is granted subject to: 1) Approval of the Negative
Declaration, Resolution No. 232; 2) Approval of the RP 94-02; and 3) Planning
Commission approval of CUP 94-02. CDP 94-02 is subject to all conditions
DRB RES0 NO. 234 -3-
1
2
2
4
E
- I
E
E
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 233 and Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3797.
4. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, for
development shown within the V-R Zone on the master site plan, the developer shall
obtain an individual permit and/or an amendment to this permit CDP 94-02. All
development shall be consistent with the adopted master site plan, the Design
Guidelines (Exhibit "J"), and the conceptual landscape plan (Exhibit "I"). The
Design Guidelines, Exhibit "J" shall be amended to state that the implementation
and interpretation of the Design Guidelines shall also be subject to the review and
approval of the City's final decision-maker for all applicable development."
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of October, 1995 by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Vice-Chairperson Welshons, Board Members Compas,
Marquez, Savq, and Vessey
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST
EVAN BECKER
Housing and Redevelopment Director
DRB RES0 NO. 234 -4-
-Chairperson
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD