HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-02-07; Design Review Board; Resolution 2441
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 244
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY
OF CAFUSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
INSTALLATION, AND USE, OF A GRAIN SILO AS AN
ACCESSORY STORAGE FACILITY AT AN EXISTING
RESTAURANT/MICROBREWERY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 571
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
ROOSEVELT STREET AND CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE.
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD VILLAGE BREWERY AND PUBLIC
HOUSE
APN: 203-306-02, 12
CASE NO: CDP 94-08(A)
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of
Carlsbad and referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board, on the 7th day of February, 1996, did hold a duly noticed public hearing
to consider said application on property described as:
The northeasterly 80 feet of lots 17 thru 19 in Block 33 and all of lots 20,
21, 22 in Block 33 of City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to Map Nos. 775 and 535, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder February 15, 1894 and May 2, 1888, respectively.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all
testimon! and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review
Board considered all factors relating to Coastal Development Permit 94-08(A).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
...
...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.-
2. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
Design Review Board hereby recommends APPROVAL of an amendment to Coastal
Development Permit, CDP 94-08, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
FINDINGS:
1. With original project approval on April 4, 1995, the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission made a finding that the environmental effects of the project had
already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental
documents for the Village Redevelopment Plan. This original environmental
review included the four previously approved grain display containers as
accessory structures. The installation of the new single, large grain silo on the site
as an accessory storage facility does not reflect a land use or building structure
change which would result in additional environmental review requirements for
the project.
2. The addition of the Grain Silo to the previously approved restaurant and
microbrewery represents no change to land use which would make the originally
approved project inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the various
elements of the General Plan because it continues to create a distinct identity for
the Village Redevelopment Area by encouraging activities that traditionally locate
in a pedestrian-oriented downtown area, including offices, restaurants and
specialty retail shops. The Grain Silo represents an accessory storage facility
which is permitted by the Village Design Manual and Local Coastal Program.
The Grain Silo also adds a unique architectural feature to the building which is
currently not present at any other site within the Village and is reflect of the
unique type of business (microbrewery) operated on the site.
3. The original project was found to be consistent with the City’s Growth
Management Ordinance because the project was conditioned to comply with any
requirement approved as part of the Local facilities Managmeent Plan for Zone
1. The addition of the Grain Silo, as an accessory structure, creates no additional
requirements per the Growth Management Ordinance. Therefore, the project
remains consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
4. The original project, including grain display containers, was found to be
consistent with the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan, the Village
Design Manual and the Local Coastal Program because it provided a permitted
and encouraged use within Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Project Area.
The addition of the single large Grain Silo to the site represents an accessory
structure, a storage facility, which is necessary to the operations of the
microbrewery and, as such a use, is permitted by and consistent with, the
Carlsbad Area Redevelopment Plan, the Village Design Manual and the Local
Coastal Program.
DRB RESO. NO. 244 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5. By inclusion of appropriate conditions on the original project and consistent with
the Carlsbad Parking Ordinance, the Design Review Board previously found that
adequate off-street parking will be provided for the project. The addition of the
single large Grain Silo, as an accessory structure, creates no additional
requirement for on-site parking nor does it reduce on-site parking. Therefore, the
project remains consistent with the Zoning Code as related to the satisfaction of
on-site parking requirements.
6. The original restaurant/microbrewery project remains in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal Code as demonstrated by the
processing of the appropriate discretionary permits, maintenance of compatibility
with surrounding land uses, and the provision of adequate parking and
landscaping. The original permit included the approval of four small grain display
containers. With approval of this amendment to the original permit, the new
single, large Grain Silo has been determined to be acceptable in terms of design
and land use. Therefore, the addition of the Grain Silo reflects no change in the
project which would make the project inconsistent with the applicable codes noted
herein.
CONDITIONS:
1. Approval is granted for CDP 94-08, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "C", dated
February 7, 1996, incorporated by reference and on file in the Housing and
Redevelopment Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown
unless otherwise noted in these conditions, and approved by the Housing and
Redevelopment Director or City Engineer.
2. Approval of CDP 94-08(A) is subject to approval of Rp 94-07(A). All conditions
of RP 94-07(A) as contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 243 dated
February 7, 1996, on file in the Housing and Redevelopment Department, are
incorporated herein by reference.
3. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the
Zoning Ordinance, the Village Design Manual, and all other applicable City
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
...
...
....
...
...
DRB RESO. NO. 244 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_-
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of February, 1996
by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons, Board Members: Compas, Marquez,
Savary & Vessey.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
KIM WELSHONS, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST:
EVAN E. BECKER
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RESO. NO. 244 -4-