HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-18; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; Resolution 2041
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
nul
gaog
OULa uug
$??
&Z& 13
QC*E
Yojs 5583 p
QO55 14 z
ma,, 15
5Z-J UU~ 16
NU 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
u I ad ,->ma WWO
l
a a
RESOLUTION NO. 204
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND A MAJOR
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT (RP 91-8) TO DEMOLISH THE
EXISTING RETAIL USE AND CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY
RETAIL BUILDING OF 3,000 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2933 ROOSEVELT STREET WITHIN SUB-AREA 1 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT ZONE. APPLICANT: MARK DAVIS CASE NO: RP 91-8 (GAMETOWNE)
WHEREAS, on December 18, 1991 the Carlsbad Design
Board held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a PI
Negative Declaration and a Major Redevelopment Permit (RP-91
a two story retail building of 3,000 square feet and adopted
Review Board Resolutions No. 176 and 177 respectively, recom
to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission that the N
Declaration and Major Redevelopment Permit (RP-91-8) be aF
and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commissiol
City of Carlsbad, on February 2, 1992 held a public hea
consider the recommendations and heard all persons interest1
opposed to RP 91-8; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued on Novc
1991 and submitted to the state Clearinghouse for a 30 da!
period. All comments received from that review period a:
incorporated into the conditions of approval for the redevi
permit. These conditions will be reviewed through a mo
program set up for the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the HOUE
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califo
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and cor
I
Om %Wm m>z &if& gang vu3 OLLa gogs gp:
OX
,w$dn gwmv
zoss 5kpj
ti 'ai >ma
gq
I/ a 0
1 2. That the negative declaration on the above ref(
2 ll project is approved and that the findings and conditions
3
4
5
6
7
8
Design Review Board in Resolution No. 176 marked Exhibit
attached hereto are the findings and conditions of the Hous
Redevelopment Commission.
3. That Redevelopment Permit RP 91-8 is appro'
that the findings and conditions of the Design Reviek
contained in Resolution No. 177 marked Exhibit B and a
hereto are the findings and conditions of the Housi
Redevelopment Commission.
9
10
11
12
13 -
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meetinc
Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbac
18th day of February 1992, by the following vote, to wit:
14
15
16
17
18
19
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton and
NOES: None
ABSENT : None
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 '1
15
16 1
I,7 I, 18 I/
19 11
20 (j
21 !I ii
I'
22 I 23
24
25
26
27
28
I
a (I)
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 176
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGAT
DECLARATION FOR A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEMOLISH 1
EXISTING RETAIL USE AND CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY RETAIL BUILD1
OF 3,000 SQUARE FEET AT 2933 ROOSEVELT STREET WITHIN SUB-ARE
OF THE VILLAGE REDEELOPMENT ZONE.
APPLICANT: MARK DAVIS
CASE NO: RP 91-8
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 18th day of December, 1'
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, anc
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testil
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by
considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Rev
hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration according
"ND", dated November 7, 1991, and "PII", dated October 28, 1991 attacf
and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
FindinES:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the PI
have a significant impact on the environment.
2. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposl
3. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located SO as to be si
impacted by this project.
."
...
...
/I e 0
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Desi
Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of December, 1 .1
2
3
4
I following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Noble, Board Members: Gonzales, Rowlett, Erwi~
5 ll NOES: None.
6 1’ ABSENT: None.
7
a
ABSTAIN: None.
9
10 &&($ :.1&! A
11
12
13
BAILEY NOBL Chairman
DESIGN REX W BOARD
ATTEST:
16 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
17
18 11
19 (1
2o li
21 I/
22! 23
24
25
26
‘
27 I/
28 DRB RES0 NO. 176 -2-
..
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECI' ADDRESS/U)(=ATION: 2933 Roosevelt Street
APN: 283-2924 1
PROJECT DES(=RIPTION: Demolition of an existing single story retail use
construction of a two-story retail building of 3,000 square
within Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Zone,
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described pr
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a sigrd
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification fo:
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Pla
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments fron
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department F
21 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Eric Munoz i
Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4441.
pursuant to rhe Guidehes for Implemenration of the California Environmenral Qualir
/i'
DATED: NOVEMBER 7,1991
CASE NO: RP 91-8
e54L-g
J. HOLZMI
47 p1mni.n Director
APPLICANT: GAMETOWNE
PUBLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 7,1991
FJ"h
2075 La9 Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 920094859 (619) 43s'
I
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOL 8 ON NO. 177
1
21 I
4 3l I
5 !I !l .I! 61
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE
CIN OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEMOLISH
. THE EXISTING RETAIL USE AND CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY
RETAIL BUILDING OF 3,000 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT
BETWEEN CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE AND GRAND AVENUE
AT 2933 ROOSEVELT STREET.
CASE NAME: GAMETOWNE
CASE NO: RP 91-8
7 I1 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of C
8 11 referred to the Design Review Board; and ii 9 I( I WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as pro&
10 I/
11 I1
I/ 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
12 // WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code,
13 11 Review Board did, on the 18th day of December, 1991, hold a duly noticed pu
l4 i I
to consider said application on property described as:
15 1
16 ;
17
18 !i
20 // relating to RP 91-8.
Lots 21 and 22, Block 34 of Town Carlsbad, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to Map No. 535 as
recorded on May 2, 1888.
j: WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all te
19 ;I
21 !I NOW, THEREFORE7 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review
/' arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Board considere
/I
22 /I City of Carlsbad as follows:
23 11 (A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
24
25
26
2'1
28
(B) That based on the evidence presented at public hearing
Recommends APPROVAL of RP 91-8, based on the following
subject to the following conditions:
iI 0 a
.1 2I 3
5/ 6
4
7
8 1,
Findinns:
1. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Village Redeve
Plan and Village Design Manual because the project provides a specialty r
while enhancing the architectural aesthetics of the area as encouraged
Village Center special treatment area within Sub-area 1 of the
Redevelopment Area and all applicable development standards and desig
are being incorporated into the project.
2. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the various eleme
General Plan because the project is consistent and compatible with th Business District land use designation for the area.
3. The project meets all the applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance I the provision of adequate parking and landscaping and no variances are re
I I the project.
9 4. The proposed project will contribute to the economic revitalizatic
10 Redevelopment Area by substantially redeveloping and enhancing the PI
l1 1 5. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be rz
X II conditions of approval.
13 11 6. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion- of an a
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract an
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
141 of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will bt
l5 1
l7 11
16 ! 7. . This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and
recommended for approval by the Design Review Board on December 1I
approving this Negative Declaration the Design Review Board has con 18 jj initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and 2
comments received regarding the significant effects this project could k
I1 Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on November 7
!j
19 jj
I! environment.
20
21
22
23
24
25
11 8. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public fac
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to ab-
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management P1
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any curnula'
created by the project.
II jl II 1 ... I
26 j/ DRB RES0 NO 177 -2-
27 I!
28 II
. /I
ll e a 9. This project is consistent with the Civs Growth Management Ordinan
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part c
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1. -1
2
4
1. Approval is grated for RP 91-8, as shown on Exhibits "A" - 3
Conditions:
December 18, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in tl Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unles
5 noted in these conditions.
-6
7
8
9
10
11
2.
3.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", m
the site plan as approved by the Design Review Board. The site plan
the conditions of approval by the City. The plan copy shall be submitte
Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement plan submittal
occurs first.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building pern
be issued for development of the subject property unless the Cil
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of applicati
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupanc
12 " 4. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applil
13 public facilities fee adopted by the' City Council on July 28, 1987 and !I from time to time, and any development fees established' by the ( 14
15
! pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or othe
adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and il
plan and to fulfill the applicant's agreement to pay the public facilities fc
16 19, 1991, a copy of which is on fle with the City Clerk and is incorpo~
reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistc
17 General Plan and approval for this project will .be void.
18 Il I: 5. Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Servicc
between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water Dis
May 25, 1983.
2o 11 6. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation requil
September 1,1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Dep
any future amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of build
19 !i
21 I! Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City I 22
23 ...
24 !
25
26 DRB RES0 NO 177 -3-
...
27 !j I
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 ! I
i!
1.
19 I/
201 21 I
I I 22
23
24
25
26
27
2a
0 m
7. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facifitic
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed 1
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as prc
Govement Code Section 65913.5. tf any such condition is (jete&
invalid this approval shall be 'invalid unless the City Council determines
project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
8. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of tl Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time 01
permit issuance.
9. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issuc
project within two years from the date of project approval.
10. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall v
pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approv
Planning Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materi:
project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
11. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally i
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent propt
streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80
satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building.
12. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the E
In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire
the Planning Director.
13. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan whicl
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance c
or building permits, whichever occurs first.
14. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condi
from weeds, trash, and debris.
15. All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Mz
submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Department,
16. The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as re.
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
...
DRB RES0 NO 177 4-
I
~
a e 17. Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape arc1
be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans. .1 2l 18. Any signs proposed for this development SM at a minimum be dl
confomance with the City's Sign Ordinance and Village Redevelopme
installation of such signs.
3 regulations and shall require review and approval of the Planning Direct
4
5 19. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new a1
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access roac
6 identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color
7 20. As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the apF
include a reduced version of the approving resolutiorVresolutions on :
blueline drawing. a
9i 21. This development has provided 10 parking spaces. Any use or uses wh
10 more than 10 parking spaces to be provided (per section 21.44 (Park Zoning Ordinance shall be prohibited. 11
12
13 I' 23. The enclosed garage space containing two spaces shall be used for empk 14 only. Any conversion of this space to a use other than employee
15
22. No restaurant, food senrice, medi&denta/chiropractic/htopractic/psycho thm~
be allowed with this project.
specifically prohibited.
16 I Ennineerinn - Conditions:
17 I 24. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City I l8 II
authorized by virtue of approval of this Redevelopment Pennit.
19 ii 25. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design I
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the I
2o 11 26. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G<
21 I Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
22
23
27. Prior to or concullwtly with issuing a building permit, the applicant
a right-of-way permit for the work of removing the driveway a
replacing with curb, gutter, and sidewalk matching the existing stree!
24 as shown on the site plan. Prior to occupancy the work in the public
shall be completed to the satiskction of the City Engineer. 25
26 DRB RES0 NO 177 -5-
27
28
e .. Fire Conditions:
e1
2
28. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be z
to and approved by the Fire Department.
29. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, whic 3 location of required, proposed and existing hydrants.
4 30. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operati,
5 to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
6 31. Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, exti
systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent 'to the projec 7 submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
8
9
10
11
12
13
Carisbad Municipal - Water District:
32. The entire potable and non-potable water systedsystems for subject prc
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
33. The developeis engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Engine
City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout
I I preparation of the water system improvement plans. I 14
15
34. The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the ma:
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit.
16
17
l6 I
19 j
2o I -21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
DRB RES0 NO 177 -6-
e d PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the De!
.1 Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of December, 1
2 following vote, to wit:
I 3’
NOES: None. 4
AYES: Chairman Noble, Board Members: Gonzales, Rowlett, Erwi
5
61
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None. 7
a
91
d ’,
7 1
&f, j!
BAILEY NZbCkk&
DESIGN
10 11 ATEST:
11 \
12-, -&. - L 1 K/ 7
.,?kATHY GRAHAM
13 1 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
14 I‘
15
I? 7 1
18 iI
19 ji
20 11
21 jj li 22
23
I
24
. 25~ 26 1 27
2a
DRB RES0 NO 177 -7-
8 cb
4
I J Ld i7
GRAND AVE
+ 9 I .
d d c v) z, 4 2 w t 4 a SITE >
+
.a 0, v) a 0 t
I r J JI I
J
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
*Y - i 1 r1 r''
SITE
a CAMS8AD vU*(Y b(l
5
3 OAK f! 4VE
9 H
il - 3 m 4- 4
r City d cIr~
GAMETOWNE RP 91-