Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-05-17; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; Resolution 3941 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 394 A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING VARIANCES FOR REAR AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM STANDARD RANGE, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 7,128 SQUARE FOOT LOCATED AT 507 PINE AVENUE IN LAND USE DISTRICT 5 OF THE CARLSBAD VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. APPLICANT: FRANCIS HELMUTH APPROVING MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. RPO4-17, MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM ON THE PROPERTY CASE NO: RP 04-17 WHEREAS, on March 28, 2005, the City of Carlsbad Design Review Board held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 04-17) for the construction of a 7,128 square foot multi-family condominium on the property located at 507 Pine Avenue in Land Use District 5 of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1, and adopted Design Review Board Resolution No. 297 recommending to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission that Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 04-17) be approved; and WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, on the date of this resolution held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard all persons interested in or opposed to Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 04-17); and WHEREAS, the recommended approval includes findings establishing the High Residential (HR) density range of 15-23 dwelling units per acre for the subject property; and WHEREAS, the recommended approval includes findings granting variances for the rear and side yard setbacks which exceed the standard range; and WHEREAS, as a result of an environmental review of the subject project conducted pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act HRC RES0 NO. 394 PAGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26. 27 28 and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the project was found to be categorically exempt from the requirement for preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines as an in-fill development project on a site of less than five acres in an urbanized area that has no habitat value and is served by adequate facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: 1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 2. That Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 04-17) is APPROVED and that the findings and conditions of the Design Review Board contained in Resolution No. 297, on file in the City Clerk’s Office and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission with the addition of two conditions to read as follows: a. That the developer prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to noise from the railroad, among other things, in a form meeting the approval of the Housing and Redevelopment Director and that this Notice shall be placed in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. b. That the developer shall mitigate the noise with the use of dual pane windows, landscaping and/or other appropriate measures to attenuate the noise to an acceptable level to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director. 3. That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and considered the environmental determination for this project and any comments thereon. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission finds that: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; HRC RES0 NO. 394 PAGE 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission finds that the environmental determination reflects the independent judgment of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad. 4. That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial Review” shall apply: NOTICE TO APPLICANT: “The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to, is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill HRC RES0 NO. 394 PAGE 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or hisher attorney of record, if hehhe has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008.” PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Housing and day of Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17 May ,2005 by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Lewis and Hall ABSTAIN: None MATT HALL, Vice-chairman ATTEST: RAQ@ND R. P’ATCHETT, SECRETARY HRC RES0 NO. 394 PAGE 4