Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmpire Pipeline; 2010-03-31; PWS10-21ENG Part 3 of 3APPENDIX E GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION - STATE STREET tyinyo &yyv«ior e Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: Harris & Associates 750 B Street, Suite 1800 San Diego, California 92101 PREPARED BY: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants 5710RuffinRoad San Diego, California 92123 April 13, 2009 Project No. 106379001 57 1 0 Ruffin Road • San Diego, California-92123 • Phone (858) 576-1000 • Fax (858) 576-9600 San Diego • Irvine • Rancho Cucamonga • Los Angeles • Oakland • Las Vegas • Phoenix • Denver « El Paso • Tucson oore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants April 13, 2009 Project No. 106379001 Mr. Bob Sutherlin Harris & Associates 750 B Street, Suite 1800 San Diego, California 92101 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation CMP Replacement Project Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Sutherlin: In accordance with your authorization, we have performed a geotechnical evaluation for the Cor- rugated Metal Pipe (CMP) Replacement Project in Carlsbad, California. This report presents our geotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding the proposed project. Our report was prepared in accordance with our revised proposal dated August 28, 2008. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Sincerely, NINYO & MOORE Jeffrey T. Kent, P.E., G.E. Senior Project Engineer 'than Goodmacher, C.E.G. 2136 ager/Principal Geologist MAH/JTK/KHM/JG/ek fstribution: (4) Addressee CERTIFIED / • , . ENGINEERING ' \\,r,\ GEOUDGiSi Kenneth H. Mansir, Jr., P.E., G.E. Principal Engineer 5710 Ruffin Road • San Diego, California 92123 • Phone (858) 576-1000 • Fax (858) 576-9600 San Diego • Irvine • Rancho Cucamonga • Los Angeles » Oakland • Las Vegas • Phoenix • Denver • El Paso • Tucson CMP Replacement Project \ April 13,2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 3. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 4. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 4.1. Encountered Pavement Sections 2 4.2. Site Geology 3 4.2.1. Fill 3 4.2.2. Old Paralic Deposits 3 4.2.3. Groundwater 3 4.3. Excavation Characteristics 3 5. LABORATORY TESTING 4 6. CONCLUSIONS ..: 4 7. RECOMMENDATIONS 5 7.1. Site Preparation 5 7.2. Excavation Bottom Stability 5 7.3. Temporary Excavations, Braced Excavations and Shoring 5 7.4. Pipe Bedding and Pipe Zone Backfill 6 7.5. Materials for Trench Zone Backfill 7 7.6. Trench Zone Backfill 7 7.7. Pavement Section 8 7.8. Drainage 8 7.9. Pre-Construction Conference 8 710. Plan Review and Construction Observation 9 8. LIMITATIONS 9 9. REFERENCES 11 Table Table 1 - Encountered Pavement Sections 2 Figures Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Boring Location Map Figure 3 - Lateral Earth Pressures for Braced Excavations Appendices Appendix A - Boring Logs Appendix B - Laboratory Testing Appendix C - Typical Earthwork Guidelines 10637900) R.doc 7& CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 1. INTRODUCTION In accordance with your authorization and our revised proposal dated August 28, 2008, we have performed a geotechnical evaluation for the proposed Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) Replace- ment Project in Carlsbad, California (Figure 1). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the geotechnical conditions at the project site and provide geotechnical design and construction rec- ommendations for the proposed project. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services for this study included the following: • Reviewing available documents pertinent to this evaluation. • Obtaining a Right-of-Way permit from the City of Carlsbad. • Preparing and implementing a traffic control plan that was approved by the City of Carlsbad. • Coordinating and mobilizing for a subsurface exploration. Mark-out of the existing utilities was conducted through Underground Services Alert (USA). • Performing a subsurface exploration that consisted of the drilling, logging, and sampling of two small-diameter exploratory borings. The borings were logged by aNinyo & Moore rep- resentative and soil samples were collected and then transported to our in-house geotechnical laboratory for testing. • Performing geotechnical laboratory testing to evaluate design parameters. • Preparing this report presenting the findings from our subsurface exploration and laboratory testing and providing earthwork recommendations for trenching. 3. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION As shown of Figure 2, the project alignment runs along State Street from its intersection with Beech Avenue to a driveway at the North County Transit District's (NCTD) Coaster Station park- ing lot. Current improvements along the alignment include the existing two-lane roadways with curbside parking. Site elevations range from approximately 36 to 38 feet above mean sea level (MSL). 106379001 R.doc CMP Replacement Project Carlsbad, California April 13,2009 Project No. 106379001 We understand that the project will consist of the installation of approximately 780 lineal feet of storm drain, including the laterals. The new storm drain will consist of 18-inch, 24-inch, and 36-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipes. In addition to the new storm drain, the project will include the construction of five curb inlet systems. The new alignment will run along the center- line of State Street from its intersection with Beech Avenue and will continue northwest along an access road toward the intersection with the NCTD driveway. From there the alignment will turn west to run along the NCTD driveway. As planned, the depths of the storm drain inverts will range from approximately 3!/2 to 10 feet. 4. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Our subsurface exploration was conducted on March 31, 2009, and consisted of two small-diameter exploratory borings. The borings were advanced using a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with 8-inch diameter hollow-stem augers to depths up to approximately \61A feet. The purpose of the borings was to observe and sample the underlying earth materials. The borings were logged by a representative from our office. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on Figure 2, and the corresponding logs are presented in Appendix A. 4.1. Encountered Pavement Sections During the performance of our subsurface exploration, two different pavement sections were encountered. At boring B-l (within State Street), asphalt concrete (AC) was underlain by Portland cement concrete (PCC) and base materials. At boring B-2 (at the NCTD driveway) AC was underlain by base materials. A summary of the encountered pavement sections is presented in the following Table 1: Table 1 - Encountered Pavement Sections Boring No B-l B-2 Measured AC Thickness (inches) 2-'/2 6 Measured PCC Thickness (inches) 6 -- Measured Base Thickness (inches) 4 4 106379001 R.doc tyiny o CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 4.2. Site Geology The geologic units encountered during our subsurface evaluation included fill and old paralic deposits (Kennedy & Tan, 2005), which were formerly mapped as terrace deposits (Kennedy, 1996). Generalized descriptions of the earth units encountered are provided in the subsequent sections. Additional descriptions are provided on the boring logs presented in Appendix A. 4.2.1. Fill Fill materials were encountered underlying the existing pavement sections to depths of approximately 3 feet. As encountered, the fill generally consisted of gray and brown to olive-brown, moist, firm, sandy clay. 4.2.2. Old Paralic Deposits Old paralic deposits were encountered underlying the existing fill to the depths ex- plored. As encountered, the deposits generally consisted of shades of olive gray to light brown, moist to wet, medium dense, clayey and silty sand with scattered gravel and moist to wet, firm, sandy clay. 4.2.3. Groundwater Although groundwater was not encountered in our exploratory borings, seepage was en- countered in both borings at depths of approximately 10 and 14 feet. Although not observed, existing utility trenches may act as conduits for perched water conditions. Fluctuations in the groundwater level and local perched conditions may occur due to variations in ground surface topography, subsurface geologic conditions and structure, tidal fluctuations, rainfall, irrigation, and other factors. 4.3. Excavation Characteristics Our evaluation of the excavation characteristics of the on-site materials are based on the re- sults of our exploratory borings and our experience with similar materials. In our opinion, 106379001 Rdoc CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 the on-site soils are generally expected to be excavatable with heavy-duty earthmoving equipment in good working condition. 5. LABORATORY TESTING Geotechnical laboratory testing of samples obtained during our subsurface exploration included an evaluation of in-situ moisture content and dry density, grain-size analysis, shear strength, soil corrosivity, and sand equivalent. The results of the in-situ moisture content and dry density tests are shown at the corresponding sample depths on the boring logs in Appendix A. The results of the other laboratory tests performed are presented in Appendix B. 6. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our geotechnical evaluation, the proposed project is feasible from a geo- technical perspective. The following section provides our conclusions based on the geotechnical evaluation conducted for the project: • Boring B-l within State Street encountered concrete beneath the AC. The contractor should be prepared to address the removal of the concrete section during trenching operations. • The on-site materials encountered during our subsurface exploration should be generally ex- cavatable with heavy-duty earthmoving equipment in good working condition. • Seepage was encountered within our borings at depths of approximately 10 and 14 feet. In ad- dition to this seepage, existing utility trenches may act as a conduit for perched water conditions. The contractor should be prepared to address these water issues during construction. • Materials derived from the on-site excavations are considered to be generally suitable for reuse as trench zone backfill. Moisture conditioning (watering or aerating) of soils should be anticipated. • Materials derived from on-site excavations are not considered suitable for reuse as pipe bedding and/or pipe zone backfill as defined by "Greenbook" (Public Works Standards, Inc., 2006). • Based on the anticipated depths for the planned storm drain replacement, trenches are ex- pected to extend to depths of approximately 10 feet. Accordingly, shoring for the trench excavations should be designed using recommendations presented below. ,0637900, Rdoc 4 fJinUO* CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 7. RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections present our geotechnical recommendations for the design and construc- tion of the proposed improvements. We recommend that the site earthwork and construction be performed in accordance with the following recommendations and the recommendations pre- sented in the Typical Earthwork Guidelines included in Appendix C. In case of conflict, the following recommendations should supersede those outlined in Appendix C. 7.1. Site Preparation During excavation, the project site should be cleared of any loose, wet, or otherwise unstable soils, as well as surface soils containing organic material. Materials generated from the clearing operations should be removed from the site and disposed of at a legal dumpsite away from the project area. 7.2. Excavation Bottom Stability In general, we anticipate that the bottom of the pipeline trenches will remain stable and pro- vide suitable support to the proposed storm drain line. However, excavations that extend into zones of seepage or below the water table (if encountered) may be unstable. In general, un- stable bottom conditions may be overexcavated and replaced with gravel. Recommendations for stabilizing excavation bottoms should be based on evaluation in the field by Ninyo & Moore at the time of construction. 7.3. Temporary Excavations, Braced Excavations and Shoring We recommend that trenches and excavations be designed and constructed in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. These regulations provide shoring design parameters for trenches up to 20 feet deep based on the soil types en- countered. Trenches over 20 feet deep should be designed by the Contractor's engineer based on site-specific geotechnical analyses. For planning purposes, we recommend that the following OSHA soil classifications be used: Fill/Old Paralic Deposits Type C 106379001 Rdoc CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 Upon making the excavations, the soil classifications and excavation performance should be evaluated in the field by Ninyo & Moore in accordance with OSHA regulations. Recom- mendations for temporary shoring can be provided, if requested. Temporary excavations should be constructed in accordance with OSHA recommendations. For trench or other excavations, OSHA requirements regarding personnel safety should be met by using appropriate shoring (including trench boxes). Temporary excavations that en- counter seepage should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. On-site safety of personnel is the responsibility of the contractor. Due to site constraints, temporary excavations may be shored or braced. Temporary earth re- taining systems will be subjected to lateral loads resulting from earth pressures. Shoring systems for excavations may be designed using the lateral earth pressure parameters pre- sented on Figure 3. These lateral earth pressures should be evaluated by a structural engineer for the design of the shoring systems. These design earth pressures assume that spoils from the excavations, or other surcharge loads, will not be placed above the excavations within a 1:1 (horizontal:vertical) plane extending up and back from the base of the excavation. For bracing subjected to surcharge loads, such as soil stockpiles or construction materi- als/equipment, an additional horizontal uniform pressure of 0.40q may be applied to the full height of the excavation, where "q" is the surcharge pressure. 7.4. Pipe Bedding and Pipe Zone Backfill It is our recommendation that the new pipelines (pipes), where constructed in open excava- tions, be supported on 6 or more inches of granular bedding material. Granular pipe bedding should be provided to distribute vertical loads around the pipe. Bedding material and compac- tion requirements should be in accordance with this report. Pipe bedding typically consists of graded aggregate with a coefficient of uniformity of three or greater. The pipe bedding should conform to the specifications presented for pipe zone backfill materials. Pipe bedding and pipe zone backfill should have a Sand Equivalent (SE) of 30 or greater, and be placed around the sides and top of the pipe. In addition, the pipe zone backfill should 106379001 R.doc tyinyo CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 extend one foot or more above the top of the pipe. In the instance that open-graded gravel is util- ized for the pipe zone material, we recommend that a layer of geosynthetic filter fabric be placed on top of the pipe zone material to separate it from the overlying trench zone backfill. 7.5. Materials for Trench Zone Backfill On-site soils with an organic content of less than approximately 3 percent by volume (or 1 percent by weight) are suitable for reuse as trench zone backfill. Backfill material should not generally contain rocks or lumps greater than approximately 3 inches, and particles not more than approximately 30 percent larger than 3/4-inch. Soils classified as silts or clays should not be used for pipe zone backfill or pipe bedding. Imported fill material, if needed for the project, should generally be granular soils with a low or very low expansion poten- tial. Import material should also have generally low corrosion potential. Materials for use as fill should be evaluated by Ninyo & Moore's representative prior to filling or importing. 7.6. Trench Zone Backfill Prior to placement of trench zone backfill, the contractor should request an evaluation of the pipezone backfill by Ninyo & Moore. The evaluation of compaction by Ninyo & Moore should not be considered to preclude any requirements for observation or approval by gov- erning agencies. It is the contractor's responsibility to notify Ninyo & Moore and the appropriate governing agency when project areas are ready for observation, and to provide reasonable time for that review. Trench zone backfill materials should be moisture conditioned to generally above the labora- tory optimum moisture content prior to placement. The optimum moisture content will vary with material type and other factors. Moisture conditioning of trench backfill soils should be generally consistent within the soil mass. Trench backfill should be placed in horizontal lifts of approximately 8 inches in loose thick- ness. Prior to compaction, each lift should be watered or dried as needed to achieve a moisture content generally above the laboratory optimum, mixed, and then compacted by 106319001 R doc CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 mechanical methods to a relative compaction of 90 percent as evaluated by American Soci- ety for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method D 1557. Successive lifts should be treated in a like manner until the desired finished grades are achieved. 7.7. Pavement Section Trenching within the street rights-of-way will result in the replacement of pavements for the project. In general, pavement repair should conform to the material and compaction require- ments of the adjacent pavement section, actual pavement reconstruction should conform to the requirements of the appropriate governing agency. Aggregate base material and the upper 12 inches of subgrade soil should be compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor dry density as evaluated by the latest edition of ASTM D 1557. Asphalt concrete should be com- pacted to 95 percent of the material's Hveem density as evaluated by ASTM D 1560. 7.8. Drainage Positive drainage should be considered in the design and construction of the project. Surface drainage on the site should generally be provided so that water is not permitted to pond. A gradient of 2 percent or steeper should be maintained over the site and drainage patterns should be established to divert and remove water from the site to appropriate outlets. If planters or landscaping are located adjacent to paved areas, measures should be taken to re- duce the potential for water to enter the pavement section. Care should be taken by the contractor during grading to preserve any berms, drainage ter- races, interceptor swales or other drainage devices on or adjacent to the property. Drainage patterns established at the time of grading should be maintained for the life of the project. 7.9. Pre-Construction Conference We recommend that a pre-construction meeting be held prior to commencement of grading. The owner or his representative, the agency representatives, the architect, the civil engineer, 106379001 Rdoc CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 Ninyo & Moore, and the contractor should be in attendance to discuss the project, the plans, and the proposed construction schedule. 7.10. Plan Review and Construction Observation The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on analysis of ob- served conditions in our core and boring. If conditions are found to vary from those described in this report, Ninyo & Moore should be notified, and additional recommendations will be provided upon request. Ninyo & Moore should review the final project drawings and specifications prior to the commencement of construction. The recommendations provided in this report are based on the assumption that Ninyo & Moore will provide geotechnical observation and testing services during construc- tion. In the event that it is decided not to utilize the services of Ninyo & Moore during construction, we request that the selected consultant provide the client with a letter (with a copy to Ninyo & Moore) indicating that they fully understand Ninyo & Moore's recommen- dations, and that they are in full agreement with the design parameters and recommendations contained in this report. Construction of proposed improvements should be performed by qualified subcontractors utilizing appropriate techniques and construction materials. 8. LIMITATIONS The field evaluation, laboratory testing, and geotechnical analyses presented in this geotechnical report have been conducted in general accordance with current practice and the standard of care exercised by geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in the project area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the conclusions, recommendations, and opinions pre- sented in this report. There is no evaluation detailed enough to reveal every subsurface condition. Variations may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during construction. Uncertainties relative to subsurface conditions can be reduced through addi- tional subsurface exploration. Additional subsurface evaluation will be performed upon request. Please also note that our evaluation was limited to assessment of the geotechnical aspects of the 10637900] R.doc CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 project, and did not include evaluation of structural issues, environmental concerns, or the pres- ence of hazardous materials. This document is intended to be used only in its entirety. No portion of the document, by itself, is designed to completely represent any aspect of the project described herein. Ninyo & Moore should be contacted if the reader requires additional information or has questions regarding the content, interpretations presented, or completeness of this document. This report is intended for design purposes only. It does not provide sufficient data to prepare an accurate bid by contractors. It is suggested that the bidders and their geotechnical consultant per- form an independent evaluation of the subsurface conditions in the project areas. The independent evaluations may include, but not be limited to, review of other geotechnical reports prepared for the adjacent areas, site reconnaissance, and additional exploration and laboratory testing. Our conclusions, recommendations, and opinions are based on an analysis of the observed site conditions. If geotechnical conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, our office should be notified and additional recommendations, if warranted, will be provided upon request. It should be understood that the conditions of a site could change with time as a result of natural processes or the activities of man at the subject site or nearby sites. In addition, changes to the applicable laws, regulations, codes, and standards of practice may occur due to government ac- tion or the broadening of knowledge. The findings of this report may, therefore, be invalidated over time, in part or in whole, by changes over which Ninyo & Moore has no control. This report is intended exclusively for use by the client. Any use or reuse of the findings, conclu- sions, and/or recommendations of this report by parties other than the client is undertaken at said parties' sole risk. 106379001 R doc IQ tyinyo CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 9. REFERENCES Harris & Associates, Undated, Project Plans: State Street Storm Drain Replacement, Sheets 3 and 4 of 6 (60% Design Submittal). Kennedy, M.P., and Tan, S.S., 1996, Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 96-02. Kennedy, M.P., and Tan, S.S., 2005, Geology of the Oceanside 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California, California Division of Mines and Geology: Regional Geologic Map Series, Scale 1:100,000. Norris, R.M., and Webb, R.W., 1990, Geology of California, Second Edition: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Public Works Standards, Inc., 2006, "Greenbook," Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1968, San Luis Rey 7.5-Minute Quadrangle: photorevised 1975. 106379001R.doc 11 mtimin&ttyinyo r« 4-s %'\.w*>/a^?rs/ PtfOtCOUMO RWODMW KPAS a ts MCUCUOSFASKCDUMSMS DC CUHITA?AS a nwcisco»*S CC li CMIFOMMCS ,* *y^ '^^ W> - Sg•SSyX-'il* > k ,i*JKA(»\K - REFERENCE: 2005 THOMAS GUIDE FOR SAN DIEGO COUNTY, STREET GUIDE AND DIRECTORY. NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS, DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE Map ® Rand McNally. R.L07-S-129 SITE LOCATION MAP CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ,w**VL ^*<f£a&Bvmm* ^ LEGEND -A-B-2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ^TD=16.5' EXPLORATORY BORING TD=TOTAL DEPTH IN FEET Am NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS, DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.REFERENCE: MICROSOFT LIVE SEARCH MAPS, DATED 2009. APPROXIMATE SCALE =5 60 120 FEET PROJECT NO. 106379001 DATE 4/09 BORING LOCATION MAP CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE GROUND SURFACE • SHORING c BRACES C H 12 INCHES OR MORE 12 INCHES OR MORE D NOTES: 4. 5. APPARENT LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE, P Pa = 30 H psf CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC INDUCED SURCHARGE PRESSURE, Ps P. =120 psf PASSIVE LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE, P Pp = 250 D psf ASSUMES GROUNDWATER IS NOT PRESENT SURCHARGES FROM EXCAVATED SOIL OR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ARE NOT INCLUDED H AND D ARE IN FEET NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. 106379001 DATE 4/09 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES FOR BRACED EXCAVATION CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 APPENDIX A BORING LOGS Field Procedure for the Collection of Disturbed Samples Disturbed soil samples were obtained in the field using the following methods. Bulk Samples Bulk samples of representative earth materials were obtained from the exploratory borings. The samples were bagged and transported to the laboratory for testing. Field Procedure for the Collection of Relatively Undisturbed Samples Relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained in the field using the following methods. The Modified Split-Barrel Drive Sampler The sampler, with an external diameter of 3.0 inches, was lined with 1-inch long, thin brass rings with inside diameters of approximately 2.4 inches. The sample barrel was driven into the ground with the weight of the hammer of the drill rig in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method D 3550. The driving weight was permitted to fall freely. The approximate length of the fall, the weight of the hammer, and the number of blows per foot of driving are presented on the boring logs as an index to the relative resistance of the materials sampled. The samples were removed from the sample barrel in the brass rings, sealed, and transported to the laboratory for testing. 106379001 R doc J*~_ Q_ B 0 5-SAMPLES JI1 : | I 1 \n BLOWS/FOOTXX/XX MOISTURE (%)9 .sz DRY DENSITY (PCF)SYMBOL 11 CLASSIFICATIONU.S.C.S.SM tyinyo&tfib BORING LOG EXPLANATION SHEET Bulk sample. Modified split-barrel drive sampler. No recovery with modified split-barrel drive sampler. Sample retained by others. Standard Penetration Test (SPT). No recovery with a SPT. Shelby tube sample. Distance pushed in inches/length of sample recovered in inches. No recovery with Shelby tube sampler. Continuous Push Sample. Seepage. Groundwater encountered during drilling. Groundwater measured after drilling. ALLUVIUM: Solid line denotes unit change. Dashed line 3enot.es material change. Attitudes: Strike/Dip b: Bedding c: Contact j: Joint f: Fracture F: Fault cs: Clay Seam s: Shear bss: Basal Slide Surface sf: Shear Fracture sz: Shear Zone sbs: Sheared Bedding Surface The total depth line is a solid line that is drawn at the boring. bottom of the BORING LOG l»»y lS EXPLANATION OF BORING LOG SYMBOLS PROJECT NO. Of Rev.\TE FIGURE01/03 U.S.C.S. METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES COARSE-GRAINED SOILS(More than 1/2 of soil>No. 200 sieve size)O " Nco -3 « Q M gw i; 5 ^ c OT III IX GRAVELS (More than 1/2 of coarse >.* fraction 1' • . > No. 4 sieve size) !_•• 'm111•HI SANDS |B| (More than 1/2 of coarse ||fj|J fraction <No. 4 sieve size) [||| fj/$jr /$%** SILTS & CLAYS ^ Liquid Limit <50 \/y^, ISILTS & CLAYS ^ Liquid Limit >50 •^ 1 "-•»»• HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS » 1:/ GP > GM |GC • sw III sp I SM •/<*x .xSx' ML % CL •H • °L MH iCH 8 °Hp, Well graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, ittle or no fines Poorly graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures Well graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands or clayey silts with Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silty clays, organic silts Peat and other highly organic soils GRAIN SIZE CHART CLASSIFICATION BOULDERS COBBLES GRAVEL Coarse Fine SAND Coarse Medium Fine SILT & CLAY RANGE OF GRAIN SIZE U.S. Standard Sieve Size Above 12" 12" to 3" 3" to No. 4 3 "to 3/4" 3/4" 10 No. 4 No. 4 to No. 200 No. 4 to No. 10 No. 10 to No. 40 No. 40 to No. 200 Below No. 200 Grain Size in Millimeters Above 305 305 to 76.2 76.2 to 4.76 76.2 to 19.1 19.1 to 4.76 4.76 to 0.075 4.76 to 2.00 2.00 to 0.420 0.420 to 0.075 Below 0.075 PLASTICITY CHART i B4° §^ L J / / / Cl- N / L / / CL /^^ ML / / 1OL / / / CH / A MH, / OH / 0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 BO BO 100 UQUID LIMIT (IX), % U.S.C.S. METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION USCS Soil Classification Updated Nov. 2004 '5.ff X Q_01Q 0 SAMPLESCO 6 f 5- 10- 90 |BLOWS/FOOT34 40 35 MOISTURE (%)10.4 ^2^ 11.7 13.0 iDRY DENSITY (PCF)1 115.0 113.3 116.0 _jOm to 1 I Ay <yy<fry Yyfy ty\tr'/'/ ''// xXX/y./' /•/•/,/•'/'/. /// 1 FICATION3.C.S.CO _;3o GM CL SC CL SM Ningo&M& DATE DRILLED 3/31/09 BORING NO. B-l GROUND ELEVATION 36'±(MSL) SHEET 1 OF 1 METHOD OF DRILLING 8" Diameter Hollow Stem Auger (Tri-County) DRIVE WEIGHT 140 Ibs. (Auto-Trip) DROP 30" SAMPLED BY MAH LOGGED BY MAH REVIEWED BY Rl DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION \ASPHALT CONCRETE: (Approximately 2.5 inches thick.) PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE: (Approximately 6 inches thick.) Brown, moist, medium dense, silty GRAVEL. FILL: Gray, moist, firm, sandy CLAY. OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS: Olive gray, moist, medium dense, fine to medium SAND; many carbonate nodules. Moist to wet. Olive gray, moist to wet, firm, sandy CLAY. Light brown, wet, medium dense, silty tTne to coarse SAND; withTew gravel. Moist. Gravelly. Total Depth = 1 5 feet. Seepage encountered at approximately 10 feet. Groundwater not encountered during drilling. Backfilled with hydrated bentonite chips and capped with permapatch shortly after drilling on 3/3 1/09. Note: Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a hisher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report. BORING LOG i>%Wh^% CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT !%BM ^5 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. DATE FIGURE 106379001 4/09 A-l 1 8*" I aUlQ toLU_1 a. <CO ^3m ca> Q ' 0 5- 10- 15- 20 1 "BLOWS/FOOT30 " '.MOISTURE (%)17.2 15.9 9 10.9 DRY DENSITY (PCF)112.0 112.8 118.2 _i Om 2 C/) B 1pIIi$5i> S 1 1 1i! •/VV/£/CLASSIFICATIONU.S.C.S., GM CL SC ~ ~CL~ ~ SC yinyo flfp DATE DRILLED 3/31/09 BORING NO. B-2 GROUND ELEVATION 3T±(MSL) SHEET 1 OF 1 METHOD OF DRILLING 8" Diameter Hollow Stem Auger (Tri-County) DRIVE WEIGHT 1 40 Ibs. (Auto-Trip) DROP 30" SAMPLED BY MAH LOGGED BY MAH REVIEWED BY R] DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION ASPHALT CONCRETE: (Approximatelv 6 inches thick.) BASE: ( Approximatelv 4 inches thick.) iprown, moist, medium dense, silty GRAVEL. FILL: Brown to olive brown, moist, firm, sandy CLAY. OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS: Olive brown to reddish brown (mottled), moist, clayey fine to medium SAND. Few carbonate nodules. More clay. Dense; micaceous. Ofive brown, moist to wet, firm, sandy CLAY. Light brown, moist, dense, clayeyTine to coarse SAND. Total Depth = 16.5 feet. •Seepage encountered at approximately 14 feet. Groundwater not encountered during drilling. Backfilled with hydrated bentonite chips and capped with permapatch shortly after drilling on 3/3 1/09. Note: Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, mav rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report. BORING LOG ,ff\V*^& CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT I%BB \m CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. DATE FIGURE 106379001 4/09 A-2 CMP Replacement Project April 13, 2009 Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Classification Soils were visually and texturally classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method D 2488. Soil classifications are indicated on the logs of the exploratory borings in Appendix A. Iii-Place Moisture and Density Tests The moisture content and dry density of relatively undisturbed samples obtained from the ex- ploratory borings were evaluated in general accordance with ASTM D 2937. The test results are presented on the logs of the exploratory borings in Appendix A. Gradation Analysis Gradation analysis tests were performed on selected representative soil samples in general accor- dance with ASTM D 422. The grain-size distribution curves are shown on Figures B-l and B-2. These test results were utilized in evaluating the soil classifications in accordance with USCS. Direct Shear Test A direct shear test was performed on a relatively undisturbed sample in general accordance with ASTM D 3080 to evaluate the shear strength characteristics of the selected material. The sample was inundated during shearing to represent adverse field conditions. The results are shown on Figure B-3. Soil Corrosivity Tests Soil pH, and resistivity tests were performed on a representative sample in general accordance with California Test (CT) 643. The soluble sulfate and chloride content of the selected sample were evaluated in general accordance with CT417 and CT 422, respectively. The test results are presented on Figure B-4. Sand Equivalent A Sand Equivalent (SE) test was performed on a selected representative sample in general accor- dance with CT 217/American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials T 176. The SE value reported on Figure B-5 is the ratio of the coarse- to fine-grained particles in the selected sample. 10637900) Rdoc GRAVEL Coarse Fine SAND Coarse] Medium | U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 3. 2- 1%" r ys wyf A 8 16 30 50 t 700 -- 52 £0 0- 50 0 - - LL Z LU O UJ Q_ 0 0 - I I I I I I I I I I 100 1symbol • I I »- I I I I 1r I I 10 Sample Location B-1 Depth (ft) 5.0-6,5 ~~T- I \\ V\\ rine FINES SILT CLAY HYDROMETER 100 200 \ \ \ \ \ I I I I i T I 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 00001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS Liquid Limit - Plastic Limit - Plasticity Index - PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D D,0 -- cu - '• - 422-63 (02) Passing No. 200 24 uses SC Af/nyO&typWT* GRADATION TEST RESULTS PROJECT NO. 106379001 DATE 4/09 CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE B-1 10637900) SIEVE B-1 8 5.0-6.5.»>s GRAVEL Coarse Fine SAND Coarse Medium Fine U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 3" 2 1VS" 1" '/•" TV V 4 8 16 30 50 X 70 0 - - UJ QZ 50 0 - - ^_ 40 0 - -, UJ0 UJ CL 0.0 L- 100 ISymbol • | -» I 11 1 1 ' T~-•\ \ \i K> FINES SILT 100 200 \\ V\, • 1 CLAY HYDROMETER 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS Sample Location B-2 Depth (ft) 5.0-6.5 Liquid Limit - Plastic Limit - Plasticity Index - D,0 -- D30 - Deo - cu -- , - Passing No. 200 40 uses SC PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 422-63 (02) jy/nyo«/yVf}OrB GRADATION TEST RESULTS PROJECT NO. 106379001 DATE 4/09 CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA FIGURE B-2 106379001 SIEVE B-2 9 5 0-6 5.xls 3000 U_ CO COCOlila: CO 2000 1000 1000 2000 NORMAL STRESS (PSF) 3000 Description Clayey SAND Clayey SAND Symbol - -X - - Sample Location B-2 B-2 Depth (ft) 5.0-6.5 5.0-6.5 Shear Strength Peak Ultimate Cohesion, c (psf) 700 290 Friction Angle, 4> (degrees) 27 26 Soil Type SC SC PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 3080-04 PROJECT NO. 106379001 DATE 4/09 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE B-3 106379001 SHEAR B-2 @ 5.0-6.5 xls SAMPLE LOCATION B-1 SAMPLE DEPTH (FT) 1.0-5.0 pH1 7.7 RESISTIVITY 1 (Ohm-cm) 1,700 SULFATE CONTENT 2 (ppm) 30 (%) 0.003 CHLORIDE CONTENT 3 (ppm) 355 1 PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA TEST METHOD 643 2 PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA TEST METHOD 417 3 PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA TEST METHOD 422 NiilUO &/y\OQri£ PROJECT NO. 106379001 DATE 4/09 CORROSIVITY TEST RESULTS CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA FIGURE B-4 106379001 CORROSIVITY Page 1.XIS SAMPLE LOCATION SAMPLE DEPTH (FT)SOIL TYPE SAND EQUIVALENT B-1 10.0-11.5 SM 18 PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO T176/CT 217 ^//7y/7^oore PROJECT NO. 106379001 DATE 4/09 SAND EQUIVALENT VALUE CMP REPLACEMENT PROJECT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE B-5 106379001 SEP8Q5l.xls CMP Replacement Project Appendix C Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 APPENDIX C TYPICAL EARTHWORK GUIDELINES 106379001 Eanhwork.doc CMP Replacement Project Appendix C Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. GENERAL 1 2. OBLIGATIONS OF PARTIES 2 3. SITE PREPARATION 3 4. TRENCH BACKFILL 3 5. SITE PROTECTION 4 6. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS 6 106379001 Earthwork doc ; Rev 12/05 CMP Replacement Project Appendix C Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 TYPICAL EARTHWORK GUIDELINES 1. GENERAL These guidelines are presented as general procedures for earthwork construction. They are to be utilized in conjunction with the project plans. These guidelines are considered a part of the geo- technical report, but are superseded by recommendations in the geotechnical report in the case of conflict. Evaluations performed by the consultant during the course of construction may result in new recommendations which could supersede these specifications and/or the recommendations of the geotechnical report. It is the responsibility of the contractor to read and understand these Guidelines as well as the geotechnical report and project plans. 1.1. The contractor shall not vary from these Guidelines without prior recommendations by the geotechnical consultant and the approval of the client or the client's authorized rep- resentative. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant and/or client shall not be considered to preclude requirements for approval by the jurisdictional agency prior to the execution of any changes. 1.2. The contractor shall perform the earthwork operations in accordance with these speci- fications, and shall be responsible for the quality of the finished product notwithstanding the fact that earthwork will be observed and tested by the geotechnical consultant. 1.3. It is the responsibility of the contractor to notify the geotechnical consultant and the jurisdictional agencies, as needed, prior to the start of work at the site and at any time that earthwork resumes after interruption. Each step of the earthwork operations shall be observed and documented by the geotechnical consultant and, where needed, re- viewed by the appropriate jurisdictional agency prior to proceeding with subsequent work. 1.4. If, during the earthwork operations, geotechnical conditions are encountered which were not anticipated or described in the geotechnical report, the geotechnical consult- ant shall be notified immediately and additional recommendations, if applicable, may be provided. 1.5. An as-built geotechnical report shall be prepared by the geotechnical consultant and signed by a registered engineer. The report documents the geotechnical consultants' observations, and field and laboratory test results, and provides conclusions regarding whether or not earthwork construction was performed in accordance with the geotech- nical recommendations and the plans. 106379001 Earthwork doc 1 Rev 12/05 CMP Replacement Project Appendix C Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 1.6. Definitions of terms utilized in the remainder of these specifications have been pro- vided in Section 6. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF PARTIES The parties involved in the projects earthwork activities shall be responsible as outlined in the following sections. 2.1. The client is ultimately responsible for each of the aspects of the project. The client or the client's authorized representative has a responsibility to review the findings and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. The client shall authorize the contrac- tor and/or other consultants to perform work and/or provide services. During earthwork the client or the client's authorized representative shall remain on site or remain rea- sonably accessible to the concerned parties to make the decisions that may be needed to maintain the flow of the project. 2.2. The contractor is responsible for the safety of the project and satisfactory completion of pipeline installation and other associated operations, including, but not limited to, earthwork in accordance with the project plans, specifications, and jurisdictional agency requirements. The contractor shall further remain accessible during non- working hours times, including at night and during days off. 2.3. The geotechnical consultant shall provide observation and testing services and shall make evaluations to advise the client on geotechnical matters. The geotechnical con- sultant shall report findings and recommendations to the client or the client's authorized representative. 2.4. Prior to proceeding with any earthwork operations, the geotechnical consultant shall be notified two working days in advance to schedule the needed observation and test- ing services. 2.4.1. Prior to any significant expansion or reduction in the grading operation, the geotechnical consultant shall be provided with two working days notice to make appropriate adjustments in scheduling of on-site personnel. 2.4.2. Between phases of earthwork operations, the geotechnical consultant shall be provided with two working days notice in advance of commencement of ad- ditional operations. 10637900] Earthwork doc CMP Replacement Project Appendix C Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 3. SITE PREPARATION Site preparation shall be performed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the following sections. 3.1. The client, prior to any site preparation or earthwork, shall arrange and attend a pre-construction meeting between the contractor, the design engineer, the geotechnical consultant, and representatives of appropriate governing authorities, as well as any other involved parties. The parties shall be given two working days notice. 3.2. Demolition in the areas to be graded shall include removal of pavements, and other manmade surface and subsurface improvements. Demolition of utilities shall include capping or rerouting of pipelines at the project perimeter. 3.3. The debris generated during demolition operations shall be removed from areas to be graded and disposed of off site at a legal dump site. Demolition operations shall be per- formed under the observation of the geotechnical consultant. 4. TRENCH BACKFILL The following sections provide recommendations for backfilling of trenches. 4.1. Trench backfill shall consist of granular soils (bedding) extending from the trench bot- tom to 1 or more feet above the pipe. On-site or imported fill which has been evaluated by the geotechnical consultant may be used above the granular backfill. The cover soils directly in contact with the pipe shall be classified as having a very low expansion po- tential, in accordance with UBC Standard 18-2, and shall contain no rocks or chunks of hard soil larger than 3/4-inch in diameter. 4.2. Trench backfill shall, unless otherwise recommended, be compacted by mechanical means to 90 percent relative compaction as evaluated by ASTM D 1557. Backfill soils shall be placed in loose lifts 8 inches thick or thinner, moisture conditioned, and com- pacted in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and of these guidelines. The backfill shall be tested by the geotechnical consultant at vertical inter- vals of approximately 2 feet of backfill placed and at spacings along the trench of approximately 100 feet in the same lift. 4.3. Jetting of trench backfill materials is generally not a recommended method of densifi- cation, unless the on-site soils are sufficiently free-draining and provisions have been made for adequate dissipation of the water utilized in the jetting process. 4.4. If it is decided that jetting may be utilized, granular material with a sand equivalent greater than 30 shall be used for backfilling in the areas to be jetted. Jetting shall gener- 106379001 Eanhwork.doc CMP Replacement Project Appendix C Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 ally be considered for trenches 2 feet or narrower in width and 4 feet or shallower in depth. Following jetting operations, trench backfill shall be mechanically compacted to the specified compaction to finish grade. 4.5. Trench backfill which underlies the zone of influence of foundations shall be mechani- cally compacted to a relative compaction of 90 percent as evaluated by ASTM D 1557. The zone of influence of the foundations is generally defined as the roughly triangular area within the limits of a 1:1 (horizontal:vertical) projection from the inner and outer edges of the foundation, projected down and out from both edges. 4.6. Trench backfill within slab areas shall be compacted by mechanical means to a relative compaction of 90 percent as evaluated by ASTM D 1557. For minor interior trenches, density testing may be omitted or spot testing may be performed, as deemed appropri- ate by the geotechnical consultant. 4.7. When compacting soil in close proximity to utilities, care shall be taken by the contrac- tor so that mechanical methods used to compact the soils do not damage the utilities. 4.8. Clean granular backfill and/or bedding materials are not recommended for use in slope areas unless provisions are made for a drainage system to mitigate the potential for buildup of seepage forces or piping of backfill materials. 4.9. The contractor shall exercise the specified safety precautions, in accordance with OSHA Trench Safety Regulations, while conducting trenching operations. Such pre- cautions include shoring or laying back trench excavations at 1:1 or flatter, depending on material type, for trenches in excess of 5 feet in depth. The geotechnical consultant is not responsible for the safety of trench operations or stability of the trenches. 5. SITE PROTECTION The site shall be protected as outlined in the following sections. 5.1. Protection of the site during the period of construction shall be the responsibility of the contractor unless other provisions are made in writing and agreed upon among the concerned parties. Completion of a portion of the project shall not be considered to preclude that portion or adjacent areas from the need for site protection, until such time as the project is finished as agreed upon by the geotechnical consultant, the client, and the regulatory agency. 5.2. The contractor is responsible for the stability of temporary excavations. Recommenda- tions by the geotechnical consultant pertaining to temporary excavations are made in consideration of stability of the finished project and, therefore, shall not be considered to preclude the responsibilities of the contractor. Recommendations by the geotechni- 106379001 Earthwoik.doc CMP Replacement Project Appendix C Carlsbad, California Project No. 106379001 cal consultant shall also not be considered to preclude more restrictive requirements by the applicable regulatory agencies. 5.3. Precautions shall be taken during the performance of site clearing, excavation, and grading to protect the site from flooding, ponding, or inundation by surface runoff. Temporary provisions shall be made during the rainy season so that surface runoff is away from and off the working site. Where low areas cannot be avoided, pumps shall be provided to remove water as appropriate during periods of rainfall. 5.4. Following periods of rainfall, the contractor shall contact the geotechnical consultant and arrange a walk-over of the site in order to visually assess rain-related damage. The geotechnical consultant may also recommend excavation and testing in order to aid in the evaluation. At the request of the geotechnical consultant, the contractor shall make excavations in order to aid in evaluation of the extent of rain-related damage. 5.5. Rain- or irrigation-related damage shall be considered to include, but may not be lim- ited to, erosion, silting, saturation, swelling, structural distress, and other adverse conditions noted by the geotechnical consultant. Soil adversely affected shall be classi- fied as "Unsuitable Material" and shall be subject to overexcavation and replacement with compacted fill or to other remedial grading as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. 106379001 Eanhwork.doc CMP Replacement Project Carlsbad, California Appendix C Project No. 106379001 6. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS ALLUVIUM: AS-GRADED (AS-BUILT): BEDROCK: BORROW (IMPORT): CIVIL ENGINEER: CLIENT: COLLUVIUM: COMPACTION: CONTRACTOR: DEBRIS: ENGINEERED FILL: Unconsolidated detrital deposits deposited by flowing water; includes sediments deposited in river beds, canyons, flood plains, lakes, fans at the foot of slopes, and in estuaries. The site conditions upon completion of grading. Relatively undisturbed in-place rock, either at the surface or beneath surficial deposits of soil. Any fill material hauled to the project site from off-site areas. The Registered Civil Engineer or consulting firm responsible for preparation of the grading plans and surveying, and evaluating as-graded topographic conditions. The developer or a project-responsible authorized represen- tative. The client has the responsibility of reviewing the findings and recommendations made by the geotechnical consultant and authorizing the contractor and/or other con- sultants to perform work and/or provide services. Generally loose deposits, usually found on the face or near the base of slopes and brought there chiefly by gravity through slow continuous downhill creep (see also Slope Wash). The densification of a fill by mechanical means. A person or company under contract or otherwise retained by the client to perform, excavation, pipeline installation, and other site improvements. The products of clearing, grubbing, and/or demolition, or contaminated soil material unsuitable for reuse as compacted backfill, and/or any other material so designated by the geo- technical consultant. A fill which the geotechnical consultant or the consultant's representative has observed and/or tested during placement, enabling the consultant to conclude that the fill has been placed in substantial compliance with the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant and the governing agency re- quirements. 106379001 Earthwork doc Rev Tl'05 CMP Replacement Project Carlsbad, California Appendix C Project No. 106379001 ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST: EROSION: EXCAVATION: EXISTING GRADE: FILL: FINISH GRADE: GEOFABRIC: A geologist registered by the state licensing agency who ap- plies geologic knowledge and principles to the exploration and evaluation of naturally occurring rock and soil, as re- lated to the design of civil works. The wearing away of the ground surface as a result of the movement of wind, water, and/or ice. The mechanical removal of earth materials. The ground surface configuration prior to grading; original grade. Any deposit of soil, rock, soil-rock blends, or other similar materials placed by man. The as-graded ground surface elevation that conforms to the grading plan. An engineering textile utilized in geotechnical applications such as subgrade stabilization and filtering. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT: The geotechnical engineering and engineering geology con- sulting firm retained to provide technical services for the project. For the purpose of these specifications, observations by the geotechnical consultant include observations by the geotechnical engineer, engineering geologist and other per- sons employed by and responsible to the geotechnical consultant. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: GRADING: LANDSLIDE DEPOSITS: A licensed civil engineer and geotechnical engineer, regis- tered by the state licensing agency, who applies scientific methods, engineering principles, and professional experience to the acquisition, interpretation, and use of knowledge of materials of the earth's crust to the resolution of engineering problems. Geotechnical engineering encompasses many of the engineering aspects of soil mechanics, rock mechanics, geology, geophysics, hydrology, and related sciences. Any operation consisting of excavation, filling, or combina- tions thereof and associated operations. Material, often porous and of low density, produced from instability of natural or manmade slopes. 106379001 Earthwork doc CMP Replacement Project Carlsbad, California Appendix C Project No. 106379001 OPTIMUM MOISTURE: RELATIVE COMPACTION: SITE: SLOPE WASH: SLOUGH: SOIL: The moisture content that is considered optimum relative to compaction operations. The degree of compaction (expressed as a percentage) of a material as compared to the dry density obtained from ASTM test method D 1557. The particular parcel of land where earthwork is being per- formed. Soil and/or rock material that has been transported down a slope by gravity assisted by the action of water not confined to channels (see also Colluvium). Loose, uncompacted fill material generated during grading operations. Naturally occurring deposits of sand, silt, clay, etc., or com- binations thereof. 106379001 Earthwork doc Rev. 12/05 APPENDIX F PROJECT SIGN - STATE STREET 4'-0" PAINT FRONT ft BACK OF SIGN WITH ONE COAT WHITE PRIMER ft TWO COATS GLOSS WHITE ENAMEL BORDER ft LETTERING WITH GLOSS BLACK ENAMEL /2" DIA x 5" LAG BOLT WITH WASHER. 6 REQUIRED, DRILL PILOT HOLES IN POSTS I , 3/4" STRUCTURAL 1 DOUGLAS FIR A-C PLYWOOD, TOUCH SANDED EXTERIOJ!! GLUE \\ GILDING CARLSB^j- STATE STREET STORM ! DRAIN REPLACEMENT ! ! i CONTRACJT@Rf~ QWERTY, INC. - COMPLETION: DATE JOpAJRY 20UN 1'-6" r-6" CLAUDE A. "BUD LEWIS MAYOR AJNN J. kULCHIN 1 MAYOR PRO-TEM I ll<ARK PIACKARD ~^~COUNCIIJM MATT | HALL COUNCIUMEMBER KEITH BUACKBU&N KAWAY FEATURE PER CALTRANS STD.DWG S42-15 6"x6" DOUG FIR N0.1 PRESSURE TREATED POST PROJECT SIGN APPENDIX G PROJECT SIGN - OAK AVENUE -PAINT FRONT ft BACK OF SIGN WITH ONE COAT WHITE PRIMER ft TWO COATS GLOSS WHITE ENAMEL, BORDER ft LETTERING WITH GLOSS BLACK ENAMEL V2" DIA x 5" LAG BOLT WITH WASHER, 6 REQUIRED. DRILL PILOT HOLES IN POSTS y 3/4' STRUCTURAL 1 DOUGLAS FIR A-C PLYWOOD, TOUCH SANDED EXTERIO* GLUE II 3" \f\GILDING CARLS OAK AVENUE STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT CONTRAC[T§Rf~ QWERTY, INC. - COMPLETION: DATE JOJNf^RY 200N 3/4" r-6 CLAUDE A. "BUD" LEWIS MAYOR ANN J. kuLCHIN 1 MAYOR PRO-TEM I HlARK l4cKARD ©—I— COUNCIl'uFUBFR MAn|HALL COUNCILMEMBER KEITH BUACKBUfcN COUNCIllMEMBER—t-W I ^-SEAL DECAL PROVIDED Bl EAKAWAY FEATURE PER CALTRANS STD.DWG 542-15 6*x6' DOUG HR NO.) PRESSURE TREATED POST (TYPICAL PROJECT SIGN APPENDIX H NCTD PERMIT 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMIT THIS RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMIT ("Permit"! entered into as of June 4, 2009, between the NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT ("NCTD") and CITY OF CARLSBAD, ("Permittee"). RECITALS A. NCTD is the owner of certain railroad right-of-way assets extending from Orange County to San Diego and from Oceanside to Escondido (the "Right-of-Way"). The Right-of-Way is in active use for the operation of freight trains (by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company ["BNSF"]), intercity passenger trains (by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ["AMTRAK"], and Southern California Regional Rail Authority ["METROLINK"D, and commuter trains (by NCTD). B. Permittee desires to enter onto and use that portion of the Right-of-Way more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Permit Area"). C. NCTD is willing to allow Permittee to enter onto and use a portion of the Right-of- Way, provided that Permittee's entry and use do not interfere with the NCTD's operations, including response to emergencies and routine maintenance, or the safe use of the Right-of-Way by NCTD or its agents, BNSF, AMTRAK, and METROLINK, and provided that Permittee's entry and use are in strict accordance with terms and conditions set forth in this Permit. NOW THEREFORE NCTD and Permittee agree as follows: 1. Basic Permit Terms. 1.1 Permit Fee: $500.00 1.2 Expense Reimbursement Deposit: NONE 1.3 Permit Expiration Date: August 1, 2010 1.4 Permitted Use: Construct the State Street Storm Water Improvements per plans on file with NCTD. 1.5 NCTD Permit Coordinator: Edward J. Singer, Real Estate Asset Administrator Telephone number: (760) 966-6556 1.6 Permittee's Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Telephone Number: 760-602-2756 1.7 Emergency Number: (760) 966-6700 Revised 02-02-09 Page 1 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL 2. Grant of Permit. NCTD hereby permits Permittee to enter upon and use the Permit Area for the purpose and during the time periods set forth in this Permit. 3. Permit Fee. Permittee shall pay to NCTD, in advance, the non-refundable Permit Fee set forth in section 1.1 as partial consideration for the rights and privileges set forth in this Permit. The Permit Fee is payable to North County Transit District on or before execution of this Permit. 4. Cost Reimbursement. In addition to the Permit Fee, Permittee shall reimburse NCTD for all costs and expenses incurred by NCTD in the review of Permittee's request for this Permit, Permittee's entry upon and use of the Permit Area, and review and inspection of any work performed in the Permit Area; markout of railroad facilities; inspection, flagging, and security services; and installation, removal, repair, and restoration of the Right-of Way and railroad facilities. Upon execution of this Permit, Permittee shall deposit with the NCTD the Expense Reimbursement Deposit amount set forth in section 1.2. NCTD may deduct the costs and expenses from the Expense Reimbursement Deposit as such costs and expenses are incurred. Costs of services provided by NCTD employees will be charged at the employees' fully loaded productive hourly rate (monthly salary and benefits divided by 150 hours). Services provided by NCTD consultants, equipment rentals, and other third party costs will be charged at cost plus a 7.2% administrative fee. Upon demand by NCTD, Permittee shall make any additional deposits that NCTD determines are necessary to reimburse NCTD for the costs and expenses incurred by NCTD. In the event that the costs and expenses incurred by NCTD exceed the amounts deposited, Permittee shall reimburse NCTD for all such costs and expenses within 30 days of invoice. 5. Use of Right of Way. 5.1 Permitted Use. Permittee's entry upon and use of the Permit Area is solely for the purpose set forth in section 1.4. 5.2 Time of Use. a. Permittee shall not enter upon or use the Permit Area or any Right-of-Way until Permittee has paid the Permit Fee set forth in section 1.1, paid the Expense Reimbursement Deposit set forth in section 1.2, satisfied the safety conditions set forth in section 5.3(d), and delivered to NCTD the evidence of insurance set forth in section 8. b. Permittee shall deliver to NCTD a written Flag Protection Right-of-Way Work Request, in the form attached as Exhibit B, not less than three (3) business days prior to each entry upon the Permit Area. The need for flag protection shall be determined in the sole discretion of the NCTD's Manager of Maintenance of Way. In the event that the Manager of Maintenance of Way determines that flag protection is necessary, Permittee shall not enter upon or use the Permit Area until flag protection has been provided. NCTD shall use reasonable Revised 02-02-09 Page 2 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL efforts to provide flag protection on the dates and times of Permittee's requested entries, provided that any work by NCTD or its agents, BNSF, AMTRAK or METROLINK that requires flag protection shall take priority. NCTD shall not be liable for any costs, expenses, or claims if flag protection is not provided on Permittee's requested dates or times of entry. c. The NCTD's Manager of Maintenance of Way has the right to approve the dates and times that Permittee may use the Permit Area. d. This Permit and Permittee's rights hereunder shall terminate automatically upon the completion of the purpose stated in section 1.4, or at 5:00 p.m. on the Permit Expiration Date set forth in section 1.3, which ever is first to occur. 5.3 Restrictions on Use. a. Permittee has no right to use any portion of the Right-of- Way other than the Permit Area for any purpose. b. No use by Permittee shall interfere with or delay any railroad operations on the Right-of-Way or interfere with or cause damage to any railroad facilities. c. Permittee shall protect all railroad facilities, public and private improvements, utilities, communication lines, survey and subdivision monuments, and other facilities of like character, existing or constructed during the term of this Permit upon, over, under, or across the Right-of-Way from damage from Permittee's use. Permittee shall promptly replace or repair all such improvements or facilities which are destroyed or damaged as a result of any entry by Permittee under this Permit. Permittee shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repairs of any and all improvements and facilities damaged or destroyed by reason of Permittee's use under this Permit, whether such improvements or facilities are owned by NCTD or any other owner. Any repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval of NCTD or the owner of the improvements or facilities. d. Every individual who will be entering upon the Right-of-Way under this Permit, .before entering onto the Right-of-Way, shall first attend a class conducted by the NCTD or the NCTD's designee on Railroad Worker Protection Safety rules and regulations. Permittee shall comply with the SDNR rules and regulations of the San Diego Northern Railway and the Track Safety Standards, Part 213, Subpart A-F, Class of tracks 1-5, Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) at all times while on the Right-of-Way. Such rules and regulations include, but are not limited to, the wearing of hard hats, protective goggles, reflective vests and steel-toed (or equivalent) shoes at all times while working on the Right-of-Way. All costs of the safety training and of complying with the NCTD's safety requirements will be at the expense of the Permittee. Revised 02-02-09 Page 3 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL e. Permittee shall be solely responsible for compliance with all federal, state, and local laws, regulations, rules, and orders applicable to Permittee's entry upon and use of the Right-of-Way. Permittee shall obtain all federal, state, and local permits and approvals applicable to Permittee's entry upon and use of the Right- of-Way. f. Permittee shall not cause or permit any hazardous material to be used, stored, transported, generated, or disposed in or about the Right-of-Way by Permittee, Permittee's agents, employees, contractors, licensees, or invitees. "Hazardous Material" means any hazardous, toxic, or infectious substance, material, or waste which is or becomes regulated by any local governmental entiry, the State of California, or the United States government under any law, regulation or ordinance. g. No object which can be moved by two persons shall be left on the Right-of- Way unattended. This requirement also applies to objects above and/or outside the Right-of-Way on the uphill side which can be thrown or rolled downhill onto the track(s). 5.4 As-Built Drawings. Permittee shall provide NCTD with a set of as-builts, hard copy, and electronic file, if available, within 30 days of acceptance of work. No excess deposited funds will be released until as-builts are submitted and signed by a licensed engineer in the State of California. 6. Improvements and Work. 6.1 No Permanent Improvements. This Permit does not authorize Permittee to place any improvements or facilities in the Right-of-Way that will remain in the Right-of- Way after the termination of this Permit. Any such improvements or facilities can be authorized only by a separate written license or agreement between NCTD and Permittee or the owner of the improvements or facilities, which license or agreement shall contain such other terms, conditions, covenants, representations, and warranties as NCTD, in NCTD's sole and absolute discretion, determines to be appropriate, including, without limitation, provisions relating to maintenance, term, payments for use of the Right-of-Way, relocation, indemnity, and insurance. 6.2 Approval of Work. Permittee shall deliver to NCTD, for NCTD's review and approval, drawings, specifications, and other construction documents describing any proposed work in the Permit Area in sufficient detail to enable NCTD to determine the scope and nature of the proposed work and the potential effect of such work on the Right-of-Way and the train operations. NCTD may approve or disapprove any work in NCTD's sole and absolute discretion, and NCTD may require such changes or impose such conditions as NCTD, in its sole and absolute discretion, deems necessary or appropriate. In the event that NCTD approves any proposed work, the work by Permittee in the Permit Area shall be done in compliance with the drawings, specifications, and documents approved by NCTD, Revised 02-02-09 Page 4 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL with the terms and conditions set forth in this Permit, and with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, permits, and orders. Permittee shall only use a contractor approved by NCTD. NCTD shall have the right inspect the work to determine whether the work is performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Permit and to order Permittee to correct or remove any work that does not comply with the terms and conditions of this Permit. Permittee shall reimburse NCTD for the costs of inspections and costs of furnishing any flag protection for the work. 6.3 No Representation or Warranties Regarding Work. NCTD's review and inspection of the drawings, specifications, construction documents, and work is for the purpose of examining the general arrangement, design, and details of the work for potential impact on the Right-of-Way and railroad operations. NCTD and NCTD's employees, consultants, and agents assume no responsibility for and make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the design, condition, workmanship, or adequacy of the drawings, specifications, construction documents, or work. No review, comments, requirements, or inspection shall relieve Permittee or Permittees engineers, contractors, subcontractors, or consultants from the entire responsibility for the errors or omissions in the drawings, specifications, or construction documents, or for the quality or adequacy of the work. 6.4 Permittee's Notification Requirements. a. Permittee shall contact the NCTD Permit Coordinator named in section 1.5 of the Basic Permit Terms prior to the start of any construction work for a markout of NCTD facilities. Please be advised that NCTD is not a member of Dig Alert. b. Permittee shall contact Dig-Alert at (800) 422-4133 prior to any excavation in the Right-of-Way. c. Permittee shall contact Underground Service Alert for MCI Telecommunications installations at (800) 227-2600 prior to any excavation in the Right-of-Way. d. Permittee shall immediately stop work and notify NCTD Permit Coordinator if Permittee encounters any Hazardous Materials or suspected Hazardous Materials in the Permit Area. Permittee shall not take any remedial action in response to the presence of any Hazardous Materials in or about the Permit Area, nor enter into any settlement, consent decree, or other compromise in respect to any claims relating to any Hazardous Materials, without NCTD's prior written consent. 7. Exculpation and Indemnity. 7.1 Exculpation of NCTD. NCTD shall not be liable to Permittee for any damage to Permittee or Permittee's property from any cause. Permittee waives all claims Revised 02-02-09 Page 5 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL against NCTD or its agents, BNSF, AMTRAK, METROLINK, and their respective directors, officers, employees, and agents for damage to person or property arising for any reason. Permittee acknowledges that the Right-of-Way is used for operation of trains operating at high speeds. 7.2 Indemnity. Permittee hereby indemnifies, defends, and holds NCTD and its agents, BNSF, AMTRAK, and METROLINK and their respective directors, officers, employees, and agents, harmless from and against any and all liability or claim of liability, loss or expense, including defense costs and legal fees and claims for damages of whatsoever character, nature and kind, whether directly or indirectly arising from or connected with an act or omission of Permittee, or any employee, agent, invitee, contractor of Permittee, or other person acting by or on behalf of Permittee on or about the Right-of-Way, including, but not limited to, liability, expense, and claims for: bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage; provided, however, that nothing herein shall relieve any party indemnified hereunder from liability to the extent that such liability arises from such party's sole established negligence or willful misconduct. This indemnity shall not require payment of a claim by NCTD or its agents, BNSF, AMTRAK, METROLINK or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, or agents as a condition precedent to the NCTD's recovery hereunder. Permittee's obligation to indemnify hereunder shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by NCTD or its agents, BNSF, AMTRAK, METROLINK, or their respective directors, officers, employees, or agents. 7.3 Delay/Cancellation of Trains. Without limiting the indemnity set forth in section 7.2, Permittee agrees to pay all costs associated with the delay or cancellation of trains caused by Permittee. Delay charges are estimated to be $2,000 per passenger train delayed over 30 minutes and may include the cost of busing passengers around the work area, if necessary. 7.4 Indemnity Not Limited to Insurance Coverage. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Permittee as required by section 8, and any approval of such insurance by NCTD, are not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Permittee pursuant to this Permit, including but not limited to the provisions concerning indemnification. 8. Insurance. Permittee, at Permittee's sole cost and expense, shall procure and maintain the following insurance: 8.1 Railroad Protective Liability Insurance. a. Railroad Protective Liability Insurance covering the operations performed by Permittee or any subcontractor of Permittee within fifty (50) feet vertically or horizontally of railroad tracks. Revised 02-02-09 Page 6 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL b. The AAR-AASHTO (ISO/RIMA) Occurrence Form (claims-made forms are unacceptable) shall be issued in the names of the North County Transit District, San Diego Northern Railroad, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, and National Railroad Passenger Corporation. c. The Railroad Protective Liability Insurance policy shall have limits of liability of not less than $5 million per occurrence, combined single limit, for Coverages A and B, for losses arising out of injury to or death of all persons, and for. physical loss or damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof. Additionally, Policy Endorsement CG 28 31 - Pollution Exclusion Amendment, is required to be endorsed onto the policy. A $5 million annual aggregate shall apply. d. At NCTD's request, Permittee shall submit the original Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Policy to NCTD prior to entry upon the right-of-way 8.2. Commercial General Liability Insurance. a. Commercial General Liability Insurance covering liability of the Permittee with respect to all operations to be performed and all obligations assumed by the Permittee under the terms of this Permit. Products-completed operations, independent contractors, and contractual liability coverages are to be included, with the contractual exclusion related to construction/demolition activity within fifty (50) feet of the railroad and any X-C-U exclusions deleted. b. Coverage for commercial general liability shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). c. Coverage for completed operations on Form CG 2037 10, for a period not less than two (2) years after construction of permanent facilities installed over, under, upon or across NCTD property. d. The commercial general liability policy must name North County Transit District, San Diego Northern Railroad, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Southern California Regional Rail Authority, and their respective directors, officers, employees, contractors and agents as additional insureds. e. Limits shall be no less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply to the Right-of-Way (with the ISO CG 2503, or ISO CG 2504, or insurer's equivalent endorsement provided to NCTD) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Revised 02-02-09 Page 7 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL 8.3 Automobile Liability. a. Automobile liability insurance covering the liability of Permittee arising out of the use of all owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles which bear, or are required to bear, license plates according to the laws of California and which are not covered under the Permittee's Commercial General Liability insurance. Coverage under this policy shall have limits of liability of not less than $2 million per occurrence, combined single limit, for bodily injury and property damage (including loss of use) liability. b. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability Coverage (Form CA 0001), covering Symbol 1 (any auto). c. The automobile liability policy must name North County Transit District, San Diego Northern Railroad, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Southern California Regional Rail Authority, and their respective directors, officers, employees, contractors and agents as additional insureds. d. Limits shall be not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury and property damage each accident limit. 8.4 Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance. a. Workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance complying will the requirements of all applicable laws relating to workers' compensation insurance, covering or insure all of the Permittee's employees working on or about the Right-of-Way. b. Limits shall be no less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and disease. c. By his/her signature hereunder, Permittee certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and it will comply with such provisions in connection with any work performed on the Site. d. Any persons providing services with or on behalf of Permittee shall be covered by workers' compensation (or qualified self-insurance). 8.5 Policy Forms. All of the insurance shall be provided on policy forms and through companies reasonably satisfactory to NCTD. Revised 02-02-09 Page 8 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL 8.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A-, VII or equivalent or as otherwise approved by NCTD. 8.7 Evidences and Cancellation of Insurance. a. Prior to entry on the Right-of-way, Permittee shall file with the Permit Coordinator a certificate of insurance for the commercial general liability, automobile liability, and railroad protective liability policies required by section 8, with an original signature of the insurer's representative . An endorsement shall be attached to the certificate demonstrating that the policy was changed to reflect the additional insured requirements. b. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall state or be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be amended or canceled, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by U.S. mail has been given to NCTD. 9. Default: Termination. 9.1 Default. If Permittee uses the Right-of-Way for any other purpose than as stated in section 1.4 of the Basic Permit Terms, or fails to act strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Permit, then NCTD may immediately and without prior notice to Permittee terminate this Permit and prevent Permittee from using or remaining upon the Right-of-Way, with or without process of law. In the event that Permittee fails to perform any obligation under this Permit, Permittee shall pay all costs and expenses incurred by NCTD in obtaining performance of such obligations, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees. 9.2 Removal of Work. If Permittee fails to complete any work in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Permit, NCTD may remove such work and restore the Right-of-Way at the expense of Permittee, and Permittee shall be liable to NCTD for all costs and damages occasioned thereby. 9.3 Permittee's Obligations on Termination. Upon termination of this Permit, and at Permittee's sole expense, Permittee shall remove any and all equipment, tools, vehicles, materials, and other personal property placed on the Right-of-Way or used in connection with Permittee's entry onto or use of the Right-of-Way and Permittee shall restore the Right-of-Way in a manner satisfactory to NCTD. Should Permittee fail or refuse to comply with the terms of this section, NCTD may, at its option, perform such work. Permittee shall reimburse NCTD for the cost so incurred. Failure on the part of NCTD to perform the obligations of Permittee shall not release Permittee from liability hereunder for loss or damage occasioned thereby. 9.4 Continuing Obligations of Permittee. No termination or cancellation of this Permit shall relieve or release Permittee from any liability or obligation (whether of indemnity, payment of costs, or otherwise) which may have attached or accrued Revised 02-02-09 Page 9 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL previous to or which may be accruing at the time of such termination or cancellation. 10. Notices. Except as otherwise provided in this Permit, any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and may be given by personal delivery or by certified or registered mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if delivered or addressed to Permittee at the address in section 1.6 of the Basic Permit Terms or to NCTD at North County Transit District, 810 Mission Avenue, Department R, Oceanside, CA 92054. Mailed notices shall be deemed given upon actual receipt at the address required, or forty-eight hours following deposit in the mail, postage prepaid, whichever first occurs. Either party may by notice to the other specify a different address for notice purposes. 11. Permittee's Agents. Any contractor or subcontractor performing work on, or in connection with the Permittee's use of or entry onto the Right-of-Way pursuant to this Permit, shall be conclusively deemed to be the servant and agent of Permittee, acting on behalf and within the scope of such contractor's or subcontractor's employment for Permittee. 12. NCTD Agents. Except as otherwise provided in this Permit, the term "NCTD" shall include NCTD's staff and employees. 13. NCTD Contacts. The NCTD Permit Coordinator named in section 1.5 serves as a liaison between NCTD staff and Permittee to assist NCTD staff in the coordination of the reviews, approvals, and scheduling of NCTD activities in connection with this Permit. The NCTD Permit Coordinator does not have the authority make agreements on behalf of NCTD or bind NCTD to any decision. 14. Covenant of Non-Discrimination. Permittee covenants for itself, and its successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under and through Permittee, that there shall be no discrimination or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of sex, marital status, race, color, creed, religion, national origin, or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of any portion of the Right-of- Way. 15. No Partnership, Joint Venture or Principal-Agent Relationship. Nothing contained in this Permit shall be deemed or construed to create the relationship of principal and agent, or of joint venture, or of partnership between Permittee and NCTD. 16. General Provisions. 16.1 No Further Rights. a. This Permit constitutes a permit only to enter upon and use the Right-of-Way for the purpose set forth in section 1.4 of the Basic Permit Terms and shall not Revised 02-02-09 Page 10 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL be construed as granting to Permittee any right-of-possession, estate, title or interest whatsoever in or to the Right-of-Way, or any part thereof. b. Permittee hereby acknowledges that it has been informed that NCTD is a public entity and that the subject property has previously been acquired by NCTD for a public purpose. Permittee further acknowledges that any rights acquired under this Permit arose after the date of acquisition of the subject property and that such rights are subject to termination when the property is needed by NCTD for the public purpose. Permittee hereby acknowledges and agrees that at the time of termination of this Permit by NCTD, Permittee will not be a "displaced person" entitled to any of the relocation assistance or benefits offered to displaced persons under State or Federal law. 16.2 Modification of Permit. This Permit and any provision, covenant, condition, or restriction contained herein may be extended, modified, or amended with the unanimous consent of the Parties. No such extension, modification or amendment will be effective until a written instrument setting forth its terms has been executed by NCTD and Permittee. 16.3 Captions The captions of this Permit are inserted only as a matter of convenience and for reference. It does not define, limit or describe the scope of intent of this Permit, and they shall not affect the interpretation thereof. 16.4 Agreement for Exclusive Benefit of Parties Except where expressly provided otherwise in this Permit, the provisions of this Permit are for the exclusive benefit of the Parties hereto and not for the benefit of any other person nor shall this Permit be deemed to have conferred any rights, express or implied, upon any other person. Neither Permittee, its heirs, legal representatives, successors or assigns, nor any subsequent assignee, shall assign this Permit or any interest herein, without first securing the written consent of NCTD in each instance, and that at the option of NCTD, this Permit shall be forfeited by any such unauthorized assignment, transfer or lease or by any assignment or transfer thereof by operation of law. 16.5 Waiver of Default. A waiver by any Party of any default by another Party must be in writing, and no such waiver shall be implied from any omission by a Party to take any action in respect of such default. No express written waiver of any default shall affect any default or cover any period of time other than the default and period of time specified in such express waiver. One or more written waivers of any default in the performance of any provision of this Permit shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default in the performance of the same provision or any other term or provisions contained herein. The consent or approval by a Party to or of any act or request by another Party requiring consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the consent or approval to or of any subsequent similar acts or requests. Revised 02-02-09 Page 11 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL 16.6 Successors. This Permit shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns of the parties. 16.7 Governing Laws. This Permit shall be construed, interpreted, governed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 16.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of each of the covenants and agreements contained in this Permit. 16.9 Severability. If any clause, sentence, or other portion of the terms, conditions, covenants, and restrictions of this Permit becomes or is declared to be illegal, null, or void for any reason, or be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be so, the remaining portions of this Permit will remain in full force and effect. Emergency Number. Permittee shall immediately notify the Dispatcher at the Emergency Number set forth in section 1.7 if the tracks become fouled in any way. NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT CITY OF CARLSBAD By: By:_ Matthew O. Tucker Sherri Howard Executive Director Title: Associate Engineer Approved as to Form Best Best and Krieger NCTD General Counsel Revised 02-02-09 Page 12 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL EXHIBIT "A" Permit Area Revised 02-02-09 Page 13 229.0-0609-ROE-CARL Exhibit B Job Name: Control Number: [•tillable Party: Hours Authorized: FLAG PROTECTION RIGHT-OF-WAY WORK REQUEST 1, Work performed on the NCTD RIGHT-OF-WAY which involves personnel or equipment must have an NCTD-supplied flagperson for duration of the work, unless specifically waived by NCTD. Cost of the flag person shall be borne by the party requesting the the work. Depending on the extent of the work, NCTD may require the requesting party to provide a deposit to cover the estimated cost of the flag protection. Work Request form MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND RETURNED TO NCTD A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE WORK. PLEASE RETURN FORM TO: North County Transit District 810 Mission Avenue Oceanside, CA 92054 Attention: ED SINGER PHONE: (760)966-6556 FAX: (760)754-0644 3. Depending on the nature of the work, NCTD may request a meeting at the job site prior to approving the work request, 4. Contractor shall sign time cards of personnel providing flag protection. 5. Contractor requesting a flag person will be charged a minimum of four hours show-up time if no Contractor personnel is on the jobsite at the time and date specified in this request. NAME OF CONTRACTOR: PHONE: BILLABLE PARTY: Address: City: State: CA Zip: PURPOSE OF WORK: LOCATION OF WORK: EQUIPMENT TO BE USED: WORK START DATE: TIME:_ COMPLETION DATE: TIME:" PERSON IN CHARGE AT WORK SITE: CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE: DATE: APPROVED BY: DATE; PRINT NAME: MPfc Revised 02-02-09 Page 14 APPENDIX I NO DUMPING STENCIL NOTES: 1. STENCIL SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL ASTM 8727 MONEL OR EQUAL 2. WHITE PAINT SHALL BE NON-WATER BASE STRIPING PAINT APPLIED 15 MILS WET FILM THICKNESS. 3. OWNERSHIP OF STENCIL SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY AT THE END OF THE JOB. PAINT COLOR: WHITE STENCIL BY: PIPELINE PRODUCTS SAN MARCOS, CA. PH: 1-800-998-1079 STENCIL TYPE "A" FOR USE ON STANDARD SIZE BOX 12" 2"NO DUMPING 4" 10" V DRAINS TO OCEAN 24" APPENDIX K STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN 223-1 °) CONCRETESUPPORT WALL (SEE NOTE 10) CASE A 2 ^SjT / UNDISTURBED EARTH - FILLER ^-25 mm (1") SANDCUSHION OR APPROVEDEXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 8) QASE_D_ -CONCRETE SUPPORTWALL (SEE NOTE 10) CASE B OPTIONALCLEANOUT(SEE NOTE 11)- ••p- ™INT UNDISTURBED EARThj CASE E 25 mm (1" THICK EXPANSIONJOINTFILLER UNDISTURBED EARTH 25 mm (1") SAND CUSHION OR APPROVED EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 8) •25 mm UNDISTURBED EARTH (1") SAND )N OR APPROVED SADDLE CASE C -25 mm (1 ) THICK CUSHIOl, w,< ,-,. , . EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT FILLER MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 8 CASE F STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PMMULOMEO BY THE PUBLIC STANDARD PLAN METRICssss- IHOUSE CONNECTION REMODELING! 223-1IB14 I I ^fm\J I R£V. tM« |^_J SHEET 1 OF 3 EXPANSION JOINT FILLER UNDISTURBEDEARTH 25 mm (1") SAND CUSHION OR APPROVED EXPANSION JOINTMATERIAL (SEE NOTE 8) CONCRETE ENCASEMENTAS DETAILED HEREONSHALL BE USED FORTEES OR WYES AND PIPE WHERE THE SLOPE OF THE PIPE IS STEEPERTHAN 1:1 OR SEE NOTE 6 -NEW SEWER f n, MIN. CASE G CASE R CAP(SEE NOTE 9) CONCRETE ENCASEMENTAS DETAILED HEREONSHALL BE USED FORTEES OR WYES AND PIPE WHERE THE SLOPE OF THEPIPE IS STEEPER THAN1:1 OR SEE NOTE 6 TEE OR WYE NEW SEWER MIN. -25 mm (1") THICK EXPANSION JOINT FILLER CASE H -EXIST. SEWER CASE S •25 mm (1") THICKEXPANSION JOINT FILLER 25 mm (1") SAND CUSHION OR APPROVED EXPANSIONJOINT MATERIAL(SEE NOTE 8) NOMINAL DIAMETER OF PIPEmm (INCHES) 150 (6) 200 (8) 250 (10) 300 (12) MINIMUM DIMENSIONSXmm (INCHES) 75 (3) 100 (4) 125 (5) 150 (6) CASE K SECTION A-A CONCRETE ENCASEMENT DETAIL (SEE NOTE 5) STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION HOUSE CONNECTION REMODELING STANDARD PLANMETRIC 223-1 SHEET 2 OF 3 NOTES 1. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE INDICATED HEREON OR ON THE PLANS, ALL HOUSE CONNECTION REMODELING SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF SPPWC 222, HOUSE CONNECTION SEWER. 2. SEE PROJECT PLANS FOR VALUES OF D, L, V, AND W. (DIMENSION L IS THE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF THE HOUSE CONNECTION REMODELING). 3. EXISTING SEWERS ARE INDICATED BY DASHED LINES. HOUSE CONNECTION SEWERS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ARE INDICATED BY SOLID LINES AND SHALL BE OF THE SAME MATERIAL AS THE EXISTING SEWER. THE CONTRACTOR MAY CONSTRUCT THE SEWER WITH OTHER MATERIALS ALLOWED BY SPPWC 222 PROVIDED APPROVED ADAPTORS ARE UTILIZED. 4. 1/16 (22.5') OR 1/8 (451) BENDS SHALL BE USED TO REMODEL OR CONSTRUCT ANY SEWER ON A CURVE OR AT ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT. WHERE PHYSICAL OR GEO- METRIC LIMITATIONS PRECLUDE THE USE OF 1/16 (22.5") OR 1/8 (45') BENDS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL THE PROPOSED METHOD OF REMODELING OR CONSTRUCTION. 5 ALL HOUSE CONNECTION SEWERS TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER A PROPOSED CONDUIT SHALL BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE AS SHOWN HEREON. WHEN THE HOUSE CONNECTION SEWER SLOPE EXCEEDS 1:1 THE CONTRACTOR MAY. AT ITS OPTION, PLACE A CIRCULAR CROSS SECTION WITH MINIMUM COVER EQUAL TO DIMENSION "X" AS SHOWN ON SECTION A-A HEREON IN LIEU OF A SQUARE CROSS SECTION OF CONCRETE. CONCRETE BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT SHALL BE CLASS 250-C-14 (450-C- 2000) AND SHALL EXTEND TO THE FIRST PIPE JOINT AT LEAST 300 mm (1') BEYOND THE OD OF EACH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONDUIT. 6. FOR CASE R AND S, WHEN THE SLOPE OF THE PIPE EXCEEDS 1:1, THE CONTRACTOR MAY, AT ITS OPTION, CONSTRUCT A CHIMNEY CONFORMING TO SPPWC 220 ON THE NEW SEWER IN LIEU OF CONSTRUCTING THE ENCASEMENT SHOWN HEREON. 7 FOR CASES E AND F, SADDLES SHALL BE CONNECTED EITHER TO THE LENGTH OF PIPE CONTAINING THE EXISTING TEE OR WYE OR TO THE ADJACENT DOWNSTREAM PIPE LENGTH. 8 CONDUITS TO BE INSTALLED OVER OR WITHIN 25 mm (1") OF ANY CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR STRUCTURE, WHETHER EXISTING OR TO BE PLACED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS HEREIN, SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A 25 mm (1") SAND CUSHION OR APPROVED EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL CONCRETE ENCASEMENT INSTALLED PURSUANT TO THIS STANDARD PLAN SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM EXISTING CONDUIT WITH 25 mm (1") THICK EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL. 9. THOSE PORTIONS OF AN ABANDONED PIPE LOCATED BENEATH OR WITHIN 150 mm (6") OF A RELOCATED HOUSE CONNECTION SEWER SHALL BE REMOVED. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE REFILLED TO THE GRADE OF THE NEW PIPE INVERT WITH CLASS 60-E-0.7 (100-E-100) CONCRETE. THE CONTRACTOR MAY, AT ITS OPTION, SUBSTITUTE MECHANICALLY COMPACTED BACKFILL IN LIEU OF THE CLASS 60-E-0.7 (100-E-100) CONCRETE. THOSE PORTIONS OF ABANDONED PIPE NOT REMOVED SHALL BE SEALED. WHERE CAPS ARE USED. THEY SHALL BE SEALED BY FILLING THE SPACE ABOVE THE CAP WITH SAND AND A 25 mm (1") THICK COATING OF TYPE "F" MORTAR. 10. SUPPORT WALLS SHALL CONFORM TO SPPWC 224. 11. WHEN INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, A CLEANOUT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH CASE E AS FOLLOWS: A. SUBSTITUTE A "Y" FOR THE 45' BEND. B. PLACE A 45' BEND ON THE UPPER END OF THE "Y". C. CAP TOP OF 45' BEND WITH A CAP AND SEAL WITH 25 mm (1") THICK TYPE "F" MORTAR AROUND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE CAP. STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION HOUSE CONNECTION REMODELING STANDARD PLAN METRIC 223-1 SHEET 3 9F 3 APPENDIX L CCTV REPORT Tabular Report of PLR CB9D-3 for CHy of Carlsbad Work Order Contract Video 1 Setup 1 Facility Operator JNL VanRef 10 Surveyed On 09/02/2008 Street Name OakAve Location type IN Street Surface Paved Survey purpose Pipe Use Storm Shape Material Concrete Lining General note Location note Video Count CD Code 00000 00000 00000 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 57.5 60.4 84.4 89.5 89.5 City Carlsbad Weather Dry Sched length Ft Size 18 by 18 ins Joint Spacing Ft Year laid Fromm m FT Depth Ft To CB9D-3 Depth R Direction Up Pre-clean Y Last Cleaned Structural Service Constructional Miscellaneous Hydraulic Sev Fr To Value Remarks ST Start of Survey MH Manhole/Node WL Water level CB Break in Connection DE Debris MU Manhole, Undocumented LL Line deviates left GO General observation SA Survey abandoned M 11 0 UNDOC DRAIN OUTLES in mh NOT ON DWG BLOCKED BY GROUT AT BEND IN L... BLOCKED BY GROUT 89.5 Ft Total Length Surveyed Scores Structural: Service: Total 0 Total 25 Mean Defect 0 Mean Defect 12.5 PeakO Peak 25 MeanPlDeO Mean Pipe 0.3 IFFIIIIILEPIPELINE SERVICES Affordable Pipeline Services Phone: 858-689-4000 Fax: 858-689-4035 Pipe Graphic Report of PLR CB 9D-3 for City of Carlsbad Wwfc Order Contract Facility Operator JNL Street Name OakAve City Location type IN Street Surface Paved Survey purpose Pipe Uee Storm Schedule tengtti Shape Size 18 by Material Concrete Joint spacing Unlng Year laid General note Location note Video 1 Setup 1 VanRef 10 Surveyed On 09/02/2008 Carlsbad Weather Dry R From UNDOC DRAIN Depth 18 ins To £¥irf5 Depth Ft Direction Upstream Pre-clean Y Last cleaned Ft Ft Structural Service Constructional Miscellaneous Hydraulic OFt (ft I V 89.5 Ft A E E Start of Survey 0.0 Ft Manhole/Node [UNDOC DRAIN OUTLES] Water level 0 25.2 R Break in Connection 11 o'clock 57.5 Ft Debris [in mh] 60.4 Ft Manhole, Undocumented [NOT ON DWG] 84.4 Ft Line deviates left 89.5 Ft General observation [BLOCKED BY GROUT AT BEND IN LINE] Survey abandoned [BLOCKED BY GROUT] Affordable Pipeline Services PhOtl* 858-689-4000Fax: 868-689-4035 Tabular Report of PLR CB9D-3 for City of Carlsbad Work Order Contract Video 1 Setup 2 Facility Operator JNL VanRef 10 Surveyed On 09/02/2008 Street Name OakAve Location type IN Street Surface Paved Survey purpose Pipe Use Storr Shape Material Com Lining n General note Location note Video Count CD Code 00000 00000 00000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 11.2 13.6 16.2 16.2 16.2 68.6 67.5 67.5 City Cartebad Weather Dry Scried length Ft She 12 by 12 Ins Joint Spacing Ft Year laid FromCB9D-3 Depth ft - unuuourvMN rv«*h c*To mmPT DeP|h " Direction Down Pro-clean Y Last Cleaned Structural Service Constructional Miscellaneous Hydraulic Sev Fr To Value Remarks ST Start of Survey MH Manhole/Node WL Water level H Hole in pipe DE Debris < DE ' Debris H Hole in pipe H Hole in pipe H Hole in pipe LR Line deviates right DE Debris GO General observation SA Survey abandoned L L L L L L L 09 03 03 09 0 CB9D-3 DIRT TRASH ROCKS BLOCKED BY LARGE DEBRIS BLOCKED BY ROCKS 67.5 R Total Length Surveyed Scores Structural: Service: Total 0 Total 0 Mean Defect 0 Mean Defect 0 PeakO PeakO Mean Pine 0 Mean Pipe 0 ft F F 0 fi 0 ff BIEriFELINt 11KVICII Affordable Pipeline Services Phone: 858-689-4000 Fax: 858-689-4035 Pipe Graphic Report of PLR CB 9D-3 for City of Carlsbad Work Order Contract FacNtty Operator JNL Location type IN Street Surface Paved Survey purpose Pipe Use Storm Schedule length Shape Size 12 by Material Corrugated Metal Pipe Joint epaclng Lining Year laid General note Location note Video 1 Setup 2 VanRef 10 Surveyed On 09/02/2008 Carlsbad Weather Dry R From CB9D-3 Depth 12 ins To UNDOC DRAIN Depth R Direction DoWnstream Pre-ctoan Y Last cleaned Ft Ft Structural Service Constructional Miscellaneous Hydraulic OFt in Io V 67.5 Ft 0.0 Ft El V 67.5 R Start of Survey Manhole/Node [CB 9D-3] Water level 0 Hole In pipe 09 o'clock 7.9 Ft Debris [DIRT] 11.2 R Debris [TRASH] 13.6 Ft Hole in pipe 03 o'clock Hole in pipe 03 o'clock 16.2 Ft Hole in pipe 09 o'clock Line deviates right 66.6 R Debris [ROCKS] General observation [BLOCKED BY LARGE DEBRIS] Survey abandoned (BLOCKED BY ROCKS] RFFORflftBLEpiriLrxi titvicts Affordable Pipeline Services Phone: 858-689-4000 Fax: 858-689-4036 APPENDIX M PLANING DEPARTMENT REVIEW City of Carlsbad Planning Department MARCH 10, 2009 TO: SHERRI HOWARD, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER FROM: CHRIS GARCIA, JUNIOR PLANNER SUBJECT: EA 09-02 - CMP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM - OAK AVENUE Thank you for submitting an Early Assessment for a storm drain replacement project proposed on Oak Avenue between Lincoln Street and Washington Street. The project site is entirely within the existing improved public street right-of-way. The proposed project includes the replacement of an existing storm drain approximately 450 feet in length. The project would connect to existing facilities at either end. The existing 12" corrugated metal pipe (CMP) is being replaced with a slightly larger, 18" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). The 18" size is the minimum City Standard for storm drains within the public right- of-way and is not intended'to expand capacity. The construction will take place within the improved City right-of-way using a traditional open trench method. In response to your application, the Planning Department has prepared this comment letter. Please note that the purpose of an Early Assessment is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. This Early Assessment does not represent an in-depth analysis of your project. It is intended to give you feedback on critical issues based upon the information provided in your submittal. This review is based upon the plans, policies, and standards in effect as of the date of this review. Please be aware that at the time of a formal application submittal, new plans, policies, and standards may be in effect and additional issues of concern may be raised through a more specific and detailed review. Planning: 1. The project is located in the coastal zone. However, repair and maintenance activities not described in C.M.C. Section 21.201.070 do not require a Coastal Development Permit. This includes repair and maintenance activities that are not located in sensitive habitat areas or adjacent to coastal bluffs or waters. The project is within the existing improved City right-of-way and not adjacent to or near any sensitive habitat. In addition, the existing pipe is being replaced with a slightly larger size (12" to 18") due to construction standards. This alone will not cause an increase in capacity and therefore will not require a Coastal Development Permit. 2. The project will not need any permits from Planning. 3. A portion of the project is located within the Village/Redevelopment zone. The Housing and Redevelopment office has reviewed the project and has determined the project is exempt from a Coastal Development Permit and a Redevelopment Permit. Please contact the Housing and Redevelopment Department for additional information. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us EA 09-02 - CMP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM - OAK AVENUE March 10,2009 Page 2 4. The project is exempt from environmental review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(b), concerning repair and maintenance of existing facilities. All necessary application forms, submittal requirements, and fee information are available at the Planning counter located in the Faraday Building at 1635 Faraday Avenue or on line at www.carlsbadca.gov. You may also access the General Plan Land Use Element and the Zoning Ordinance online at the website address shown; select Department Listing; select Planning Home Page. Please review all information carefully before submitting. If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss this letter with the commenting departments, please contact Chris Garcia, Junior Planner, at (760) 602-4622. Sincerely, JARY T. BARBERIO Assistant Planning Director GTB:CG:lt c: Don Neu, Planning Director Dave de Cordova, Principal Planner Scott Donnell, Senior Planner Bill Plummer File Copy Data Entry