Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-06-05; Design Review Board; ; RP 91-03 - HALL MARTINAPPLICililDN COMPLETE DATE: Mav 9. 1991 STAFF REPORT DATE: JUNE 5, 1991 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RP 91-3 - HALL-MARTIN - Request for the conversion of two existing residential units into four offices and the construction of four private garages with surface parking and landscaping at 3179 Roosevelt Street in Sub Area 4 of the Village Redevelopment Area. 1. RECOMMENDATION That the Design Review Board ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution No. 169, APPROVING RP 91-3, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a minor redevelopment permit to allow the conversion of an existing one-story, two-unit residential structure to four commercial/professional offices, totalling 1,183 square feet. In addition to the interior improvements, the proposal includes an expansion to the existing structure to accommodate four one-car garages (approximately 20 feet by 14 feet in dimension) and a hallway for access. The development would also provide landscaping, fencing, and surface parking with access off of Tyler Street. The application is a minor redevelopment pennit because it involves a change of use in an existing building and improvements of less than $50,000.00 in value. Except for the existing residential building, the site is vacant and unimproved. Surrounding land uses are a mix of light industrial to the west, and residential to the east and north. The site to the south is currently vacant. The project site lies within Sub Area 4 of the Village Redevelopment Area and, as such, is designated for light manufacturing and heavy commercial uses. The properties in this area between Tyler Street and Roosevelt Street have typically served as a transition zone between the industrial uses west of Tyler Street and the residential and neighborhood commercial uses to the east. m % RP 91-3 - HALL-MARTI JUNE 5, 1991 PAGE 2 III. ANALYSIS Plaiming Issues 1. Is the proposed development in conformance with the goals and objectives of the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan and the development standards and design criteria of the Village Design Manual? 2. Is the proposed project consistent with the goals and objectives of the various elements of the General Plan? 3. Does the proposed development comply with all applicable zoning ordinances as contained in the Carlsbad Municipal Code? 4. Does the project deplete the amount of affordable housing within the City? DISCUSSION 1. VjHa^e Area Redevelopment Plan/Village Design Manual Conformance One of the primary objectives of the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan is to "eliminate blight and blighting influences that presently exist in the project area." The project site is currently blighted as it contains an unhabitable residenti^ structure that has boards covering the windows and is in general disrepair. Virtually no landscaping exists on the site and there is no improved parking area or access point. Considering the prominence of the site because of its three street frontages, redevelopment of this site would significantly alter the blighted image. The Village Design Manual caUs for all uses within Sub Area 4 to be neighborhood and general conmiercial and/or light industrial. As stated previously, the area between Tyler Street and Roosevelt Street acts as a transition area between these different uses. The proposed office uses with associated garage/storage areas fit nicely into the transition motif, as the offices are oriented towards Roosevelt Street while the garages and surface parking are exposed to Tyler Street. The uses allowed in the offices will be only those allowed by the land use standards in Sub Area 4 and will be controlled through certificates of occupancy and business licenses. The Manual also calls for all surface parking to be screened from residential uses and street views. To accomplish this goal, a six foot high solid wood fence is proposed along the northem property line of the site and a four foot wide landscaping strip will separate the parking area from Pine Street and Tyler Street. The applicant is conditioned to process landscape and irrigation plans prior to issuance of any building permit. This plancheck must not only conform to the requirements of the Village Design Manual, but also with the City's Landscape Guidelines Manual. RP 91-3 - HALL-MARTI JUNE 5, 1991 PAGE 3 Considering the project's elimination of blight, suitability of use, and provision of required landscaping and fencing, the proposal can be found to conform to both the Village Area Redevelopment Plan and the Village Design Manual. 2. General Plan Consistency The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires individual projects to be developed on sites large and level enough to provide ample onsite parking, appropriate landscaping and loading facilities. The Circulation Element states that safe, adequate, and attractively landscaped off-street parking facilities should be provided with all new development. The proposed seven-space parking area provides adequate surface parking, even if all garages are used for warehousing uses. All required circulation aisle widths and tumarounds are being provided and, as described above, the parking area will be landscaped in accordance to the Landscape Guidelines Manual. The proposed redevelopment is therefore consistent with the various elements of the General Plan. 3. Compliance with Zoning Ordinance The proposed project meets all applicable zoning requirements and no variances or exceptions are necessary. A total of seven parking spaces are required when the garages are parked at the standard for warehouse uses and these spaces are being provided in larger dimensions than required by code. Although no setback requirements are in place due to the commercial zoning, the building has side yards of seven to nine feet in width and an eight foot front yard setback. The landscaping strip screening the parking area meets the minimum four foot width required by code, and all fencing complies with the six foot maximum side yard fence height and the three and one half foot maximum height for front yard fencing. 4. Affordable Housing Supply The existing residential stmcture is currently unoccupied and in disrepair. The units are uninhabitable without significant improvements and, therefore, are not considered part of the existing housing supply. The long range plan for this sub area calls for commercial uses and would not be a likely future source of housing. Given this, the conversion of these units does not deplete the City's supply of affordable housing. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Since the project is a minor conversion of the use within an existing building and involves only minor constmction, the Planning Director has determined that the project is exempt from environmental review as stated is Section 15303(c) of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and has, therefore, issued a Notice of Exemption on May 14, 1991. RP 91-3 - HALL-MARTI JUNE 5, 1991 PAGE 4 SUMMARY As shown above, the proposal is in conformance with the Village Design Manual and the Village Area Redevelopment Plan and is compatible with the surrounding uses. Based upon this confonnance, staff recommends that the Design Review Board approve RP 91-3. ATTACHMENTS 1. Design Review Board Resolution No. 169 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Disclosure Statement 5. Notice of Exemption, dated May 14, 1991 6. Exhibits "A" - "B", dated June 5, 1991 May 13, 1991 MGrrvo _1 LLJ J L MADISON uJ ROOSEVELT !5ITE-^ TYLER ST. ST. ST. LLJ I lllilllillllilllliilll A.T.&S.F. R.R. I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I M I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lllllllllllllll V Gity of Garlsbad HALL/MARTIN PROJECT RP 91-3 mt ACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO.: RP 91-3 CASE NAME: HALL-MARTIN APPLICANT: Joseph J. Martin and Matthew Hall REQUEST AND LOCATION: Conversion of two existing Residential Units to four Office and Constmction of four Private Garages. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 30. 31 and 32 of Tract No. 106. according to Map 775 recorded March 17. 1915 in Countv of San Diego. APN: 204-085-08 Acres 0.22 Proposed No. of Lots/Units N/A (Assessor's Parcel Number) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation CBD Density Allowed N/A Existing Zone VR Density Proposed N/A Proposed Zone VR Sunounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements.) ZONING LAND USE Site VR RESIDENTIAL North VR RESIDENTIAL South VR VACANT East VR RESIDENTIAL West VR INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 1.28 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated April 1. 1991 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, Notice of Exemption, dated Mav 14. 1991 MG:rvo:lh of Carlsbad ^f* la nni nlQ;:}Pe|jiiiij^^ DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPLlCA^f^S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAH^ OWNERSHIP IhfTERESTS ON ALL APPUCATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITV COUNCIL, OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION Ofl COMMfTTEE. (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1 2. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. />77^rr7/jfi,j 7. 77/>A7^ .^79.^ ry//f^ Ar/>7^/crr/^^^/^y^^.a^ 9^7>o} .^.^^/VvTT .^79^ 7-</X7-^ ^777^/-^r^7^^y^/Sy^y^.^ 9^'^^ /?779/'7t77r<^' <r,/(?:?/^/'r/4^ .^/^^ rS^^^.S7:^^^7r^.^//^zJ^?^ Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. ^ 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. If any person identifled pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. FRM00013 8/90 2075 Las Paimas Orive • Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 Disclosure Statement (Over) Page 2 5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Councii within the past twelve months? Yes No If yes, please indicate persQn(s)____ Peraon is defined as: 'Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint verrtura, association, sociai club, fratarnal organization, corporation, estate, trust, racaivar, syndicata, this and any othar county, city and county, city municipality, district or othar political subdiviaion, or any othar group or combination acting as a unit* (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) /Yl/^HmJ live Print or type name of owner gnature of appiicant/date Print or type name of applicant FRM00013 8/90 Notice of Exemption From: City of Carlsbad Planning Depaitment 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 To: _ Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of San Diego Attn: Mail Drop C-11 220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101 Project Title Hall-Martin Project Location - Specific 3179 Roosevelt Street Project Location - City: Carlsbad Project Location - County San Diego Description of Project: Conversion of two residential units to four offices and constmction of four private garages. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Citv of Carlsbad Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project: Hall-Martin Exempt Status: (Check one) Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268); _ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)); _X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15303(c) _ Statutory Exemptions. State code number: Reasons why project is exempt: Conversion of use within a small building and minor constmction on a level infill pad. Lead Agency Contact Person: Mike Grim Area Code/Telephone/: r6l9^ 438-1161. X 4499 Extension If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by-Jlie public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ^'^UJ^ii(]IX]J/^^ Date: ^ji^j^^ Title: Planning Director MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER ,6 Signed by Lead Agency • Signed by Applicant Date received for filing at OPR: MG:rvo Revised October 1989