HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-02-21; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 27; Construct an Office/Retail Building- HOUSING AND :DEVELOPMENT COMMISS --N - AGENDA BILL ~
hB#L TITLE= RP 83-16 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN ATG. 2/21/84 OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING ON THE SOUTH
IEPT. RE AND WASHINGTON STREET.
SIDE OF ELM BETWEEN CARLSBAD BLVD.
w DEPT. HD.~
ClTy Am\]&
CITY MGR.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Housing and Redevelopment Commission adopt Resolution No. 035,
Approving RP 83-16.
ITEM EXPLANATION
A public hearing for RP 83-16 was held by the Design Review Board at their meeting of January 25, 1984. The a2plicant is requesting
a Redevelopment Permit to construct a 10,600 square foot, two-story
office/retail building on the south side of Elm Avenue, between
Carlsbad Boulevard and the railroad tracks. The project is
consistent with the encouraged uses in sub-area 5 of the
Redevelopment Area. The Coastal Commission has indicated that
this project is consistent with the Local Coastal Plan.
The Design Review Board voted to adopt Design Review Board
Resolution No. 27 recommending approval of a Redevelopment Permit
for this proposal.
FISCAL IMPACT
This action will result in no fiscal impact to the City.
EXHIBITS
1 - Staff Report from Land Use Planning Office dated January 25, 1984.
2 - Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 035,
approving RP 83-16.
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I.
January 25, 1984
Design Review Board
Land Use Planning Office
RP 83-16 - KAMAR CONSTRUCTION - Request to construct an office/retail building at 325 Elm Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Design Review Board APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager, and ADOPT Resolution No. 027 recommending APPROVAL of RP 83-16 to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The proposed project involves the construction of a 10,600 square foot, two story office/retail building, on the south side of Elm Avenue, between Carlsbad Boulevard and the railroad tracks where the Kamar Construction building presently exists. As shown on Exhibit "A", the project is proposed to be constructed with wood and plaster siding, and metal roofing. Exhibit "B" demonstrates the site plan and floor layouts. The ground floor includes parking, retail space at the front of the building, and some office space. The second floor, with 6600 square feet of office area, is situated over the ground floor as well as over much of the parking area.
A similar, three story building was approved for this site by the Design Review Board in April, 1982. This earlier project, however, had some difficulty in acquiring Coastal Commission approval. This revised, scaled down plan, is consistent with the Local Coastal Plan.
III. ANALYSIS
Planning Issue
1) Does the project meet the land use goals and design standards of the Village Design Manual?
Discussion
The proposed project is on the periphery of Sub-area 5 of the redevelopment area. This Sub-area focuses on the tourist trade, encouraging tourist-serving uses , particularly along Carlsbad Boulevard. Retail shops, such as that proposed by this project, are encouraged. Incidental and compatible uses, such as office
buildings are permitted. The site is one-half block from Sub-
area 1, the central business district, and would also be considered compatible with those permited uses.
Design concepts in this area include the encouragement of mixed
uses, easily accessible to pedestrians, with attractive and interesting building elevations. After reviewing the proposed development, staff concludes that this project, containing ground floor retail and upstairs office, with appealing building elevations, conforms particularly well to the land use goals and design standards, as stated in the Design Review Manual.
ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY
The building will be constructed of wood and plaster with a heavy emphasis on wood. There is currently a variety of building styles in the vicinity including Victorian (Twin Inns) and a modified tudor style (Runzo's Candy). Staff feels that the heavy emphasis on wood in this project will make it compatible with the surrounding buidings and an attractive addition to Sub-area 5.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Land Use Planning Manager has detemined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and has issued a Negative Declaration on January 11, 1984.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Design Review Board Resolution No. 027
2) Location Map
3) Disclosure Form
4) Environmental Documents
5) Exhibits "A" and "B", dated Januay 25, 1984
PJK:bw
l/12/84
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 027
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 325 ELM AVENUE. APPLICANT: KAMAR CONSTRUCTION CASE NO.: RP 83-16
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code,
the Design Review Board did, on the 25th day of January, 1984, hold
a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on
property described as:
Northeasterly 100 feet of Southwesterly 200 feet of Tract 98 of Carlsbad Lands, Map 1661 filed March 1, 1915, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Board considered all factors relating to
RP 83-16.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review
Board of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review Board recommends APPROVAL of RP 83-16 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
25 Findings: I/
26 1) The proposed project is consistent with the goals and design standards of the Village Design Manual. 27
2) The proposed project will increase the economic viability of the Redevelopment area.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
The project is consistent with all City public facility pol- icies and ordinances since:
a) The Design Review Board has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, insured that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition, the Design Review Board has added a condition that a note shall be placed on the final map that building permits may not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Design Review Board is satisfied that the requirements of the public facilities element of the general plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
b) All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval.
cl The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Land Use Planning Manager on January 11, 1984 and approved by the Design Review Board on January 25, 1984.
onditions:
) Approval is granted for RP 83-16, as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", dated January 25, 1984, incorporated by reference and on file in the Redevelopment Office. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
) This project is approved upon the express condition that the applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for payment of said fee, a copy of that agreement, dated January 12, 1984, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void.
1 Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance.
RB RESO NO. 027 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Redevelopment Conditions
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Redevelopment Manager prior to the issuance of building permits.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Redevelopment Manager prior to installation of such signs.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and shielded from view and the sounc buffered from adjacent properties and streets, pursuant to Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Redevelopment Manager and Building and Planning Director.
ALL colors (roof, siding, stucco and wood) to be as shown by samples viewed by the Board and on file with Community Redevelopment Manager's office.
Enqineering Conditions
9) This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewel capacity is available at the time of application for such permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
10) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site.
11) The developer shall provide a cross drain per City of Carlsbad Standard DS-2 or an approved alternate, for stormwater passing under the sidewalk.
12) The developer shall replace all sidewalk, curb, and gutter along the property frontage as directed by the City Engineer, prior to ooccupancy of the building.
Fire Conditions
13) Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department.
14) Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with "Knox" key operated override switch, as specified by the Fire De- partment.
DRB RESO NO. 027 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
16) Building exceeding 10,000 sq.ft. aggregate floor area shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000 sq.ft. (or less) areas.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
3esign Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the
25th day of January, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MARY MARCUS, Chairperson
ATTEST:
ZHRIS SALOMONE ZOMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER
)RB RESO NO. 027 -4-
1 LOCATION MAP
J GRAND AVE I . .I I
I:
.-. 3 ? *
-4 a : QI 0 % P : d
ELM AVE I- I - .
T
I-. .-.%5.. . . . .:.:.:.:. ::y:::: :::::: .-.*.- ::::::::: .-2.. .‘A. y:::::: :::::: .-, :.:.:.:.: :::::: .*.*.-2. .-2.. .:.>:.:. .-.a.* . . . 55..*.a :::::::::
IUR
x.:. .5-.- . . . ::::::::: 55:. *.5*.-.a :::y
h
SUBJECT PROPERTY
i I
KAMAR CONSTRUCTION RP 83-1.6
l
If after the
.thdt further . .
infon;cation you ham submitted has been reviewd, it is determined
information ;? required, you will be so ad&cd,
APPLXCANT: Kamar Construction Co., Ince
~-0 (individual, partnership, joint Venture, Corgmration, syndication)
p. 0. BOX 1755, Carlsbad, CaY92008
Burines8 Addmu . .
729-7911
AGEWF:
Telephone Numbu
Jerry L. Rombotis
Name
. w
p, 0, BOX 1155, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 - - . Busirmsr Address . . . .
729-793 *- _ -- -. . . _ . - _
Telephone NUplkr . ..' - : B . -. . . . . MEMBERS: Jerry i. Rombotis . 1730 Calavo Ct., Carl&& . . Name G@ividual, putnu, joint . Home Addrrsm . . ventur8, cozporati& syndication)
Same as above
Busin. Address : .
729+%80 . - .
Telephone Number Telephone &amber
'Robert L. Rombotis
Zim
2341 Nicklaus Dr., We-
Borne Address
P. 0. Box 1155, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
. 3~sineu Address
729-7911 . 433-3130 '. . ,.
Telephor.8 N&U Telephone Z:m .- .
‘.
- . .
. . .
(Attach more sheets if necessary) . .
. I/We declare unde- *,panalty of perjury that the infoneation contained in this dis-
closurs is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and nay ba'
relied upon as beizq true and correct until amended. .
. . Kamar ConstructiopYQ Inc. .
. .
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92000-1989
(619) 438-5591
NEGATIVEDECLARATICN
P~IECT ADDFU%B/ICCATICN: 325 Elm Avenue.
PRJJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of 10,600 square foot office/retail building.
'TheCityof Carlsbad has mnducted an enviromental reviewof the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Enviromental Quality Act and the Envimmnental protection Ordinance of the City of Carl&ad. As a result of.said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant @act cm the enviroment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Land Use Planning Office.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive dxuments is on file in the Land Use Planning Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carl&ad, CA. 92008. Ccmnents fran the public are invited. Please suhnit amnents in writing to the Land Use Planning Office within ten (10) days of date of issuance.
INm: January 11, 1984
CASENO: RP 83-16
APPLICANT: KamarConstruction
PUBLISH DATE: January 18, 1984
Land Use Planning Manager
NLh4
5/81
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
~ I 21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~
~ i
~
I
RESOLUTION .NO. .O 3 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE; HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A REDEVELOPL3ENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
AN OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 325 ELM AVENUE. APPLICANT: KAMAR CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. : RP 83-16 - ~~ ~
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with
of Carlsbad and referred to the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a re(
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipa
the Housing and Redevelopment Commission did, on the 21st
February, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to con
application on property described as:
Northeasterly 100 feet of southwesterly 200 feet of
98 of Carlsbad Lands, Map 1661 filed March 1, 1915,
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and c
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desir
1 heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housi
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follo
i
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public the Housing and Redevelopment Commission recommends of RP 83-16 based on the following findings and sub the following conditions:
i
Findin'gs:
1) The proposed project is consistent with the goals a standards of the Village Design Manual.
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
LO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
2) The proposed project will increase the economic vial
3) The project is consistent with all City public faci
the Redevelopment Area.
policies and ordinances since:
a) The Design Review Board has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, insured
final map will not be approved unless the Housi:
Redevelopment Commission finds that sewer servii
available to serve the project. In addition, t: Review Board has added a condition that a note placed on the final map that building permits m8
issued for the project unless the City Engineer
that sewer service is available, and building c'
occur within the project unless sewer service rj available, and the Housing and Redevelopment COI is satisfied that the requirements of the publis facilities element of the General Plan have bee:
insofar as they apply to sewer service for this
b) All necessary public improvements have been pro will be required as conditions of approval.
c) The applicant has agreed and is required by the of an appropriate condition to pay a public fac
fee. Performance of that contract and payment 1 will enable this body to find that public facil
be available concurrent with need as required b:
General Plan.
4) This project will not cause any significant environ impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued
Land Use Planning Manager on January 11, 1984 and a:
by the Design Review Board on Janaury 25, 1984.
Conditions:
1) Approval is granted for RP 83-16; as shown on Exhib
IIB", dated January 25, 1984, incorporated by refere:
file in the Redevelopment Office. Development shal
substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in th
conditions.
2) This project is approved upon the express condition
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as requ
City Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on
the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference according to the agreement executed by the applican payment of said fee, a copy of that agreement, date January 12, 1984, is on file with the City and inco
herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as pr
this application will not be consistent with the Ge
and approval for this project shall be void.
0 0
1
City ordinances in effect at time of building permit 2
3) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other appli
3 Redevelopment Conditions
4
6
by the Redevelopment Manager prior to the issuance o 5
4) The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and
5) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a health 7 thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debr
irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and appr
building permits.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
6) Any signs proposed for this development shall be des conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall
review and approval of the Redevelopment Manager pri
installation of such signs.
7) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, architecturally integrated and shielded from view ar
sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets,
to Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satis of the Redevelopment Manager and Building and Planni
Director.
8) ALL colors (roof, siding, stucco-and wood) to be as samples viewed by the Design Review Board and Housir Redevelopment Commission and on file with the Commur
Redevelopment Manager's Office.
Engineering Conditions
9) This project is approved upon the express condition building permits will not be issued for development subject property unless the City Engineer determine: sewer capacity is available at the time of applicatj
such permits and will continue to be available until
occupancy.
21 10) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior tc
22 commencement of any clearing or grading of the site.
21 10) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior tc
22 commencement of any clearing or grading of the site.
23
24
25
26
11) The developer shall provide a cross drain per City c
Standard D5-2 or an approved alternate, for stormwal
passing under the sidewalk.
12) The developer shall replace all sidewalk, curb, and along the property frontage as directed by the City
prior to occupancy of the building.
Fire Conditions
27 13) Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete 28 plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire
I
0 0
1 14) Proposed security gate systems shall be provided wil key operated override switch, as specified by the Fj 2 Department.
3 15) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishin!
prior to construction.
automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent tc 4 project shall be submitted to the Fire Department fc
5
16) Building exceeding 10,000 square feet aggregate floc 6
7
shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls w:
openings therein which shall split the building intc
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting 0 a
square feet (or less) areas.
9
AYES: Cdssioners Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Presc 12
following vote, to wit: 11
California, held on the 21st day of February, 1984, by th 10
Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carls
13 NOES : None
14 ABSENT : None
15 ABSTAIN: Wne
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTEST :
x""?/w Je
MARY H. FASLER, Ch
(Seal)
////
////
////
//// i
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3138 ROOSEVELT ST. l P.O. BOX 248. CARLSBAD, CA 92008 0 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC “E.4IIJG
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad will bold a public bearing at the City Council Chambers. 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California. at 6:OO P.bf. on Tuesday, February 21, NM, to consider a request to con-
e__- struct an officeketail building on
Prope~~~~rlrj;Toeatcd-a~325 Elm Avenue and more particularly described as:
Nwtheaaterly 106 feet of south- westerly 200 feet ol Tract SS of Carhbad Lands, Map 1~61 filed March 1. 1815, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. Applicant: Kamar Construction
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMEIW C0bfMISSION CT WZZJ: February 8. ~g~.q
. . . . . . . . . F.ebruar.y; .8.. . . . . . . . . . . 19.84.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Oiego,
State of California on -8th
day of ,, .~=)~; ‘I 9% ’ .s3, i..Jc-u,i-. i c;: 2 1 -i Clerk of the Printer
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RP 83-16
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, February 21, 1984, to consider a request to construct an office/retail building on property generally located at 325 Elm Avenue and more particularly described as:
APPLICANT: PUBLISH:
Northeasterly 100 feet of Southwesterly 200 feet of Tract 98 of Carlsbad Lands, Map 1661 filed March 1, 1915, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego.
Kamar Construction February 8, 1984 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION '
. . _. _
LOCATION MAP
SUBJECT PROPERTY
I-
KAMAR CONSTRUCTION 0 RP 83-16
-
Cdr.4 .& ,: i__ ’ > 6 *- --k,
Wl'ICE OF PUBLIC HFJUUNG
NCXlXE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Design Review Board of the City of Carl&ad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Charmbers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carl&ad, California, at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, January 25, 1983, to uxsider approval to construct an office/retail buildirrg on property generally located at 325 Elm Avenue and mre particularly described as:
Northeasterly 100 feet of Southwesterly 200 feet of Tract 98 of Carl&ad Lands, Map 1661 filed March 1, 1915, City of Carl&ad, County of San Diego.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are axdially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions please call the Redevelopment/ Land Use Planning Office at 438-5591.
CASE FILE: RP 83-16
APPLICANT: Kamar Construction PUBLISH: January 14, 1984
c1TyGFCARLSBADnESrGNREvIEwExW?D --^- -. ..i_". -T:.- 1. s
PROPERTY O~JNERS LISTING 300 FT. RADIUS 325 ELM AVENUE
Michael A. Steiner 336 E. 17th Street Costa, CA 92627
Johnson, Dorothy K. 3140 Lincoln St. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Walsh, Harold F. Highland Paper Co. Inc. 5845 Malt Avenue Commerce, CA. 90040
Miller, Edward G & Kopperda\e Lorna & Miller Lee, Dorothy D TRS 2978 Carlsbad Blvd. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Jay C & Tosuner - Fikes Lebriz 3390 Donna Drive Carlsbad; CA 92008
Highland Paper Co. Inc. 5845 Malt Avenue Commerce, CA 90040
Wiehle, Daniel C. & Violet B 395 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Shader Terry G & Phillis M 377 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Cox, Maurine V 363 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Runzo James E.T. & Frankie G 363 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Thatcher, Charlotte L, Sonneman, Robert H c/o Kamar Constr. Co 325 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Maldonado, Frank & Patricia A TRS 4213 Beach Bluff Rd. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Charles H & Sarah !I, Garner Charles H, Garner M 25775 Toluca Drive San Bernardino, CA 92404