HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-11-19; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 52; Mc Comas - Office Buildingrc- ,. ,- : /’
HOUSING AND heDEVELOPMENT COMMISSI\-I - AGENDA Bb;L; (3
e Y RP 85-6 MC COMAS - OFFICE DEPT. HD. L3’ BUILDING AT MADISON STREET AND OAK AVENUE CITY Am=
CITY MGR.*
AB# 52 TITLE:
MT& 11/19/85
DEPT. RED I
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Housing and Redevelopment Commission adopt Resolution No. 059 APPROVING RP 85-6 MC Comas: Permit to develop a medical/professional office building at the northwest corner of Madison Street and Oak Avenue.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The applicant is requesting a major redevelopment permit to develop a medical/professional office building at the northwest corner of Madison Street and Oak Avenue in Subarea 7 of the Village Redevelopment Area. The project will consist of a 4,198 square foot office building located as described above. Parking exceeds requirements for the RP Zone. Engineering is recommending a vacation of a ten foot strip along the Oak Avenue frontage. A 3 foot reduction in setback along Madison was recommended by Design Review Board in exchange for exceptional landscaping. This setback is consistent with other buildings along Madison Street.
At their meeting of October 9, 1985, the Design Review Board heard a presentation on RP 85-6. The Design Review Board voted to adopt Resolution No. 057, recommending APPROVAL of RP 85-6, based on the findings contained therein.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
EXHIBITS:
l- Staff Report from Land Use Planning Office dated September 11, 1985, Supplemental Staff Report dated October 9, 1985.
2- Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 059, APPROVING RP 85-6 MC Comas.
3- Location Map
SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT
DATE: i)ctober 9, 1985
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
SUBJECT: RP 85-6 MCCOMAS- Request for approval of a Redevelopment Permit to develop a medical/professional office building at the northwest corner of Madison Street and Oak avenue in subarea 7 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
DISCUSSION
At their meeting of September 11, 1985, the Design Review Board heard a presentation on RP 85-6. The Design Review Board continued the item and requested additional information form staff and the applicant. The north and western elevations that were requested are included in this packet. Additional concerns regarding set-back and drainage will be discussed further at this meeting.
(
-. .-_... -
\ .,.. $A, -c \ &&,4&‘/
CHRIS SALOMONE
CS:al
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I.
APPLICATIC- SUBMITTAL DATE: 4 MARCH 18, ,985 " c- 5.
STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER 11, 1985
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE
RP 85-6 - MC COMAS - Request for approval of a Redevelopment Permit to develop a medical/professional office building at the northwest corner of Madison Street and Oak Avenue in Sub-area 7 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Design Review Board APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and ADOPT Resolution No. 057, recommending APPROVAL of RP 85-6, based on the findings contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a Redevelopment Permit to develop a 4,198 square foot medical/professional office on .19 acres, located as described above. The subject property is a level corner lot, fronting on both Madis\-,n Street and Oak Avenue.
The proposed two-story structure would be developed over four tuck-under parking spaces. Ten additional spaces would be provided at the rear of the lot with access taken from both C)ak Street and the alley.
A request for street vacation of 10 feet along Oak Avenue is also proposed by the applicant. Engineering staff has indicated this presents no problems because street improvements have already been installed on Oak at the site and the proposed vacation would occur behind the improvements and not affect them.
III. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) IS the proposed project consistent with the goals and standards of Subarea 7 of the Village Design Manual?
2) Does the proposed project conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance?
. .
giscussion
The proposed project is located on the southern boundary of Subarea + of the Village Redevelopment area. This subarea has accommodated both residential and office/commercial types of
uses. Both these uses occur in the immediate neighborhood of the project site but are separated by Oak Avenue. Properties on the north side of Oak Avenue contain office uses such as insurance and real estate offices. Properties to the south include single family dwellings and duplexes which will not be significantly impacted by the proposed office use.
The proposed structure is two stories in height and at the rear cantilevers over four parking spaces. Eleven parking spaces are required, fourteen have been provided. Six of the spaces are compact and will take access off the adjacent alley. The spaces will be set back five feet from the alley which will allow for adequate back up and turnaround.
The proposed building is 24 feet in height and has 15 foot setbacks on both Madison Street and Oak Avenue. Properties to the north have equivalent frontyard setbacks. The Village Design Manual states, "In exchange for exceptionally good landscaping, depth of the required setbacks may be reduced by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission." Because other buildings on Madison have a similar setback, staff feels the reduced setback is both consistent and compatible with other structures in the neighborhood. The applicant has agreed to provide exceptional landscaping and the approval ,has been so conditioned. ,
As previously stated, the applicant has requested a 10 foot street vacation on Oak Street and engineering staff has indicated this request presents no problems.- The vacated area will be landscaped as will the 10 foot front yard setback on Madison Street.' Landscaping will also be installed at the northern setback and at several locations in the parking lot.
Architectural Compatibility
The proposed architecture is English Tudor featuring dark brown, wood plant-ons over beige stucco. Paned, bay windows and a stone veneer will add visual interest to the building plans. The doors and eaves will be accented with teal blue paint. Staff has some concerns over the architectural compatibility of the proposed structure. Other than the bay windows, very little articulation has been provided to break up the building mass. Basically, the second floor is very boxy and unrelieved. The roof line is not typical of a traditional steeply-pitched Tudor roof. Staff feels the elevations could be improved by additional window treatment on the second floor and the removal of some of the exterior timbers. Although the proposed building offers a unique style of architecture, surrounding office uses are of a more contemporary stucco style. Staff believes that a more restrained design would be appropriate.
-2-
C
.
AS proposed, this use and building (with minor modifications) .'will be compatibl-e with the surrounding buildings, the design concepts of the Village Design Manual and the goals of Subarea 7 of the Village Redevelopment Area. Staff, therefore, recommends
approval of RP 85-6.
IV. ENvIRCNMENTAL -REVIEW
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, issued a Negative Declaration on June 10, 1985.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Design Review Board Resolution No. 051
:; Location Map Background Data Sheet 4) DiSClOSUre Form
5) Environmental Document
6) Reduced Exhibits 7) Exhibits "A" - "C", dated August 26, 1985
AML:ad 8/29/3S
-3-
1
‘.
.
1
2 _ 3
4
5
6
7
&
9
IC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 057
I A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF :CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 4,198 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MADISON STREET AND OAK AVENUE. APPLICANT: MC COMAS CASE NO.: RP 85-6
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad.and referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a
request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Design Review Board d,id, on the 1 !th day of September,
1985, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said
application on property described as:
Lots 31 and 32 in Block 39, City of Carlsbad, according to Nap 535 recorded in the Office of the County Recorder on May 2, 1888.
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to
be heard, said Board considered all factors relating to RP 85-6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the'Board APPROVES RP 85-6, based on the following findings:
Findings:
1) The proposed project is compatible with the goals of Subarea 7 of the Village Redevelopment area for reasons stated in the staff report.
:
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2)
'3)
4)
The project will comply with the design standards of the Village Design Manual and the intent of the V-R zone for reasons stated in the staff report.
The project is consistent with all City public facility pol- icies and ordinances since:
a) All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval.
b) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Land Use Planning Manager on June 10, 1985 and approved by the Design Review Board on September 11, 1985.
Conditions:
1)
2)
3)
4)
DRB
Approval is granted for RP 85-6, as shown on Exhibits "A" -
" c " I dated August 26, 1985, incorporated by reference and on file in the Land Use Planning Office. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
This project is approved upon the express condition that the appl.icant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for payment of said fee, a copy of that agreement, dated February 21, 1985, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance.
RESO NO.057 -2-
’ . 1
2
.'b
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
" 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other -applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building .x,,.. _I, -permit issuance.- :~* _.,. . . _
6) 'This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval.
7) Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Costa Real Water District, dated May 25, 1983.
8)
9)
10)
11)
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irriga- tion plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Land Use Planning Manager prior to the issuance of building permits. w
All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in size.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall ,require review and approval of the Land Use Planning Manager prior to installation of such signs.
12) Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Loca- tion of said receptacles shall be approved by the Land Use Planning Manager.
13) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall ha architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, pursuant to Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Land Use Planning Manager and Building and Planning Director.
14) Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
15) If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
DRB RESO NO.057 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
‘16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16) The proposed building-shall have,a setback as shown on-Exhibit "A?provided that exceptional land,sca~~.ng;~is:includedLand 6pprQv&..by the Land Use Planning Manager and the Redevelopmer Manager. :: . ..,
Engineering Conditions:
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
22)
The grading for this project is defined as "controlled grad- ing" by Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the City Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures. The erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall maintain the erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the City Engineer.
Adlditional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed as'may be required by the County Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the City Engi- neer.
The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map/any grading or building permit for this project.
I///
DRB RESO NO. 057 -40
.
IV 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23)
24)
25)
26)
///I
I///
////
////
///I
////
DRB RESO NO.057
Improvements listed in this section shall be installed or agreed to be installed by secured agreement by the developer before the issuance of any building permit. The developer shall obtain. approval of the plans from the City Engineer and pay all associated fees and performance guarantees prior to issuance of any building permit. The developer shall install said improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or occupancy of any portion of the project for any purpose. The improvements are:
Alley improvements to serve this project. Replacement curb/gutter and sidewalk access to this project. c) Wheelchair access ramp at the corner of Oak Avenue and Madison Street. d) Drainage system to serve this project.
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted "NO Parking/Fire Lane Tow Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Municipal Code.
All plans, specifications, and supporting documents for the improvements of this project-shall be signed and sealed by the Engineer in responsible charge of the work. Each sheet shall be signed and se-aled, except that bound documents nay be signed and sealed on their first page. Additionally, the first sheet of each set of plans shall h?vc the Eollci~~cii~g certificate:
"DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE"
I hereby declare that I am the Engineer of Work for this project, that I have exercised responsible charge over the design of the project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code, and that the design is consistent with current standards.
-5-
_
.-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
1'1
I.8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
‘_
27)
28)
. . ~.understand that the check of project drawings and specifications by the City of Carlsbad is confined to a reqiew,only and does not relieve me, as Engineer of Work, of my,responsibilities for project design. (Name, Address and Telephone of Engineering firm)
Firm:
Address: ',
City, St.:
Telephone:
BY (Name of Engineer)' ' Date:
R.C.E. NO. #
Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this site plan.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval of vacatibn of Oak Avenue. This approval is contingent upon approval of the vacation of Oak Avenue. Without approval of this street vacation, this project approval is null and void.
Fire Conditions:
lding 29) Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete bui plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire
J?e?artment. t
30) Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal.
31) The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fire, Marshal for approval.
32) All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
33) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
///I
////
DRB RESO NO.057 -6-
15 I/
. I j 16 1: 1;
1 Q 11 .-1 (I ;I :I 18 )/
19 /
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
34) All roof-top appurtenances shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the building and shielding to prevent noise and visual impacts, subject to approval before 'issuance of permit.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JOHN MC COY, Chairperson CARLSBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST:
-.--- CHRIS SAI,OF~??i%"------- C3lFUMITY RECCVEEOPMEFiT P?ANAGER
DRB RESO NO.057 -7-
,.. .,L .; --* ” .. ---*. .- . _ .
.
.
.-
- . : .-
CA& &j Rp t3f-6
BACKGKXJNDDATASHEEZ
APPLICANT: ~ “JcHNMcc[x?As
REQUEST AND -TIcN: Redevelopment Permit to con&uct a 4,991 & ft. medical/
p$fessional office building at the northwest corner of Madison St. & Oak Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIFTIaJ: Ijots 31 f 32 in Block 39, City of Carlsbad, according to Map
No. 535, recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, May 2, 1888
A.PN: 203-305-10
Acres .19 Proposed No. of Lots/hits N/A
GENERALPL?wAND2(3NItG . - Land Use Designation CBD. s .
Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A --.
Existing Zone VR&b-area 7 Proposed Zone N/A
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site VR Vacant ----
North VR Office --
South VR Residence
East VR Office
West VR Alley/Office
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District N/A Water Carl&ad Sewer Carl&ad ECU’S
Public Facilities Fee Agrement, dated February 21, 1985
ENVI-IMF'ACl!ASSE!ZS~
X Negative Declaration, 'issued June 10, 1985
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other,
cna znTOmt+O~ YOU rave su=Lct~ ha ken r-i-, it is d&-in&
au infO~f&d~% roquiradr you WiJJ be so =wyL ;->'L <' . .:
.
SPLIcAm: N~JP~ (individual, partnership, joint vent=*, corpra tion, syndication)
a5-&dhLt he @tbb;zd, @i&da pm
ButfnasS Addregs
/w 7?%33~0 .
Tel@imm Ntnakr
AGE@=8 hle&sa6ovc~ .
Nam.
. .
Busfne~s Address . . . . '- . .
Tehphm* Number .'
t%ne‘ . . . .
MENBEBS~ . rfama .(inaividual, partner, joint. Hom~Adf3reas
venture, corporation, syndication)
Business hidress . e
Telephone Nmbef Telephone Yumbm
- 3;siness :icidzcfSs
fsi2@3C* NC&~ --I- -*- Tclaptine 2Itier
.
.a’
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
z/we daclh-c ur.der penalty of perjury that the infomation contaimd in this dis-
closure is tsxe and correct and that it will remain true and correct and nay ba’
relied upor\ as being trus and correct until aaended.
. .
BY
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
LAND USE PLANNING OFFIC$
1200 ELM AVENUE
CAALSBAD, CA 920081989
(619) 438-5591
ditg of GarI$bab .
?!EGATIVE DECUiRA’.?IClN
PROJECT ADDRESS/Ixx3ATICN: 3095 Madison, northeast o3rner of Madison Street and Oak Avenue.
PROJECrr DESCRIEYrICN: Request for a redevelopment permit to construct a 4,991 sq. ft. medical/professional office building.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project wrsuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carl&ad. As a result of said
review, a Nqative Geclaration (declaration that the project -will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Land i?se Planning Office.
. .
-:
A cqy of the Negative Ceclaration with supportive documents is on file in tile Land Use Pknni;w Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carl&ad, CA. 92008. C-en& from the public are invited. Please allkit mmrents in britirq to the Lard C:se Phnnirq Office within ten (?G) days of date .of issuance.
DATED: June 10, 1955
CASE No: RP 85-6 MICHAEL J. RX&MI 7
Land Use Planning Manager
PUBLISH WTE: June 15, 1985
S/81
.
T I. .I = -$-zT/‘\-: -2.; 3 7 ‘,
$$j$:li ” / ii \ : ,I_ *, 9’ L 1, ~ II ‘)/ iI ,d I ‘\f Ij ‘\ i j c ii \k i>
1: -1 j& /\ N /‘, ’ 1 /‘T i , ,,w / \ 1 . / ,\, ii , i ’ 1 ;
J
*i]i’ ‘.\I,
1!_/i’. ---\;f \$’ : ‘,I\, /. /, \I
A.., -- +L~~j~.~~.+L!J -:- ?.- +3: :,--71 ii , .2-A ,,?,j - .“---ye--- 9a 6 & 0.; .+.
‘h I> :: -Iv/-- -.I .l , I 5 10’ . I’
-%qy>>‘~> E
/* 1 --‘-T-z - -L’.Q
: .:’ 1;7 i 39 7.r. -g $2 35-
&II\ k$l
qTp/ \ */;I\ ;/ .I$ 1 \., ‘;, / i
I\ I . I v-j-j-~ ,il
)f.[ \i
‘\ a ji,
4 t-L
\ ’ 4 r,T )-.. ‘i ‘I 2 /!’ It? I 4Q
\/I \ ,: \, /’ \, i \’ I A 1 ? ?I i’ ‘i, ,I’ 1. /I \ =rr* 9 ” -T= 1
? - ; ;/
1 / \ I 3 +-- 9
--.-WC,
‘I i .\< ,L-
-pl, .- > ,.&Ff.a 7-1
? 4 : ;!
A
,g$ I Y _-___
:!
I :I )a Ii
]/ ;i ii
4 s. II ii i i I
./ il II I I I
.
, -- -.
. . ‘.
’ y:. -. 1’
~ . 1. . -
.r’., .v .I
b,
‘.’
.‘\
.* .
. .
,‘, 1. *. ‘,.’ ‘, . ‘..’ , . . p. h_ .f i , . . 1 .,, +, &, . . r-. . . . ‘: - . . . $. * .: ‘. 2 : u..’ -. . .; -.
_< . 1. .y ‘, :. .
.* . .
,_. -:. .
-.
-t ., .
.,.. . t\. _’ . .
!< * ,‘ ‘. .: .: . . 1-4.: ; . , :. .:‘.‘-b
: “’ .>,..y
. . ;:. 1 * ‘..., -_ . . ‘, . . .
I .:
.* ;
. . ; ‘. : . .’
I
:
.
.
1 ~ I’ ‘I !
I I I
IL;
1 i i
‘[ii *:,! ; ‘1: Ii ’ i 1.l i ) I![ i IIt , I ! ; Iii ! ’ ;!’ i j’ ,;j I
jiij
I ,‘1 1 I : :: I ! i ,. ! ! I , I’,;
‘ii’ !;I; ;j//
i i I Ti 1 i
j
I : ,! ! 1 i
’ I i 1 Ii i Ii i
!,j j
k
i I - 1 I
L’
I,
.I
1:
i
I 1
i 1 i
1 b
w
LOCATION MAP 1
I . I
&
,I\\
I -- i 1 ; ; I .+.&b ..“I s ** ; i . _-.\ _ .i $I: !
I
1
!
. w n
TI
n
0
n
m
w
t
i
SITE
V-R ZONE. (UNDERLYING ZONE RP)
McCOMAS
.
RP 85-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEVELOP A MEDICAL/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MADISON STREET AND OAK AVENUE. CASE NO.: RP 85-6
APPLICANT: MCCOMAS
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City
8 of Carlsbad and referred to the Housing and Redevelopment
9 Commission; and
10 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as
11 provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: and
12 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code,
13 the Housing and Redevelopment Commission did, on the 19th day of -
14 November, 1985, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider
15 said application on property described as:
16 Lots 31 and 32 in Block 39, City of Carlsbad, according
to Map 535 recorded in the Office of the County 17 Recorder on May 2, 1888.
18 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
19 I considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
20 desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
21 relating to RP 85-6.
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and
23 Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California as
24 follows:
25 1) That the above recitations are true and correct.
26 2) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
27 the Commission APPROVES RP 85-6, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 28 057, attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
.
a -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
1 Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad,
California, this 19th day of November, 1985, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Casler
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
CLAllDE A. LEWIS, Vice Chairperson
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
///I
///I
////
/I//
WRITE IT-DON’T SAY IT INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO DATE Y 7 / 19 yc PA;::
REPLY ON THIS SHEET FROM i*’
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed a Legal Newspoper by the Superior Court of Son Diego County
3138 ROOSEVELT ST. . P.O. BOX 248. CARLSBAD, CA 92008. 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a oeriod exceedina one vear
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers. 1200 Elm Avenue. Carlsbad. California. at 6:06 p.m. on Tuesday. November 19. 1965. to consrder approval of a Re- development Permit to develop a medical/professional office build- ing on property located at the northwest eorne~ ofMadison Street i and Oak Avenue in Sub-area 7 and t more partwularly described as: Lots 31 and 32 in Block 39. City of . Carlsbad. according to Map 535 re- i corded in the office of the County L Recorder on Mav 2. 166%
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially in- vited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions please call Redevelopment Office at 438. 5593 If you challenge the Redevelop- ment Permit in court. you may be limited to raising only those iSSUeS you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice. 0~ in written corre- spondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. Case File: RP 65-6 Applicant. MeCOMAS .ClTY OF CARLSBAD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
next preceding the’ date of publi&tion of’ the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
YZOZ-ZM
: )- :
: :!
il
: I
: : : : t : I I i -F *
b. L L
:,
:-
l c.
-- LOCATiON MAP
McCOMAS
r 4672. November 9.1985
1 RP 85-6
November 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198.5..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 9th
Clerk of the Printer
JTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City
. Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 PM on Tuesday, November 19, 1985, to consider approval of a Redevelopment Permit to develop a medical/professional office building on property
located at the northwest corner of Madison Street and Oak Avenue in
Sub-area 7 and more particularly described as:
Lots 31 and 32 in Block 39, City of Carlsbad, according to Map 535 recorded in the office of the County Recorder
on May 2, 1888.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions please call the Redevelopment Office at 438-5593.
If you challenge the Redevelopment Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: RP 85-6 APPLICANT: MC COMAS PUBLISH: November 9, 1985
CITY OF CARLSBAD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
-.-.
LOCATION MAP
McCOMAS I RP 85-6
I-
.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
OCTOBER 9, 1985 5:00 PM ******************************************************************~*
CALL TO ORDER ABSENT Rombotis
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1) RP 85-6 - MC COMAS - Request for approval of a Redevelopment Permit to develop a medical/professional office building at the northwest corner of Madison St.
and Oak Ave. in Subarea 7 of the Village
Redevelopment Area.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
2) RP 85-20 - MC WHA- Request for a minor
redevelopment permit to approve a seafood retail use on the southeast corner of Carlsbad Blvd. and Oak Avenue in subarea
5 of the Villaae Redevelopment Area. _ -- ---- ~~~ L
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of September 11, 1985
RESO. NO. 057 ACTION: Approved w/change VOTE: 3-2(Ho1m%stain CC DATE: 11/19/85
RESO. NO. 459 ACTION: Denied (tie vote VOTE: 2-2-l(absent) CC DATE:
Return to DRB 11/85
ACTION: Approved VOTE: 4-l-l (a_llSent)
TIME: ADJOURNMENT 5:40 PM
a+jo5-10
-c Mc&nq #AnM.
-3
c/
_- 5
A
c
3
x
. %w?-o~
7 fLUen, fVL&h & $ne L.
1533 Lyz Line
&d &mi (&.&!bti $321
/O
203-3i%-a2
I77 c;ntind &Thil=y CQ*
w Lb% 731
Rye, N&w Yonh /05&J
// 2o+p-?h-c-ti ,“hzh, &de/& 7. & sana c.
$5 &de Avenue
CahtdbcLdd c+h 92008
&3+5--/O
9 ongcLi3,11urie16hFb
WRc>XlG68
Cdbca$ &LL+tiu 9axB
. 2033xw
/s ~,ami.dcfAnnF~
WLhh558
&QA&&$c&+h9m
Lajq%/2
/6 177 &Ixl.cRti Lbhin.g com,,~~
/v I%% 73/
Rye! Neiu Ywzk 10560
&3c)j)-jrl-O4
[ V Pm,h, Fmd a0 & Anne $i
~4&8 Rue l)lonaw
UC/i! b2.q &4!qmia 92014
?293-~/&
r/ “/ a%-+, Uo$M; cf ,Sz&ixa ff,
549 sous ul.Lm! Avenue .
:.. Avoa.& ‘lki#&, &.Li~& 9/7/1’&
2033345
Siegel, &y-e N,,
49F &A &hm Luvd
SWL vG2q.i~~ &s7-l#LNtia 92//5
2o$~t-/G
S*.el, &gene 4
493.7 CY c+@n L&i
San Diego, &LqQmia 92/J5
.
26
2.7
28
27
30
-7
3w
2%.j5l-/7
Mddeg, Fec&~oC.
p39/ ~ef!j!~on Skeet klf
&!&G!d,C&~~9rn
“r ‘I-. 0
a+jy-/8
/cc ~ucond ~mcmt colconpj
w is% 35910
iLmi&Ue, KcmUy402g
Ro+egt Filmen& di &mdo H,
675 &A Avenue
C&&b&, (&&+%ti 9im8
204 4%4-a
$mpz.le~j A, M+ad Cp ~mn~~~cm
3//7-B h&Aon Sakeeat
(+?A!%&, &4!q!L/otDz $?a98
2ocMf84 -04
Fhn.a, ffW
3145 /likuab.on She;t
(iiid&dj &d+!hfLkz 9x08
2Yl4-084-05
Sd, t!%m+A 0.3
805 /%irddk, culurt #G
San ~??esr), @-.&!imb $WO$
; ‘.
.
. ~204-0%44%
3-3 Punme~, Vi&R Fe tf lIlanie Me
mad74 '
(irxA!sM, (jdLc)c?mh 9x08 I
204-084-07
3 Y san;taha, Ld cf l!.ub
3183 /ka!Aon-Sheet
(+Lum$ &ili.j%& 92m
205co84 42
74 hShe,~wim
.3/50 %oAev&S;tnee;t
&R/L&dgc&fi&9m8
-,.s ;, ., # I ._I
. 2cW8W3
5% &o+ Sh&n I,.
492 7&m S&eet
&id&p3 &&!hda 92103
. 203%~12
+w occclpur;t
35.5 lfhdLml .x +A A
&&J%ua!e GQ* 9m8
*a Occupan;t~
$55 l%zm!iAun SA A& I!?
(LxLhu$ (Lz. 9-ma
Lf- y $55 hlcw!!un S-& .+A!+ I)
(&?.A%d!! &I. 92im
203j%-o~S
. Occu@’
co fl/ RumeveL.2 S.-L A* B
&ddku$GQe 9Z~8
OCCU@!
9 jq'/ Ruam&S&. A& c.
&7/L&64 c;. 9rn8
.
0
.
bc
A/
6Z
A3
b-
uca*
~91 $$+wa~S& +A. c &zLdad, ca. 923008
2O~~l-//
G- occupant
j-J?/ ~e#mkm. S;t,
&u%& CQ. 9-2~8
2ojq/-/4
6 b occupant
337 p{p=w~ f;t,
C&W ca. 9m8
~325w5
67 occiLpan;t
321 ~ej!&mun S;t,
&i!4~~ Ca. 92fW%
a35/-/7-
M Ocm@
jW ~e#mon~SA Ap;t A
Cd@, ca. 9a
, *A i ,
-.
L
dP
ocw,ti
pc3/ ~e{+z4un SL A).& 6
&?xhbbd, La. ,92W?
OCCU@
7 1 JIM/ J7e@2mun- S;t, A$ D
&ddS~ Cam 92m
20~4-0844/
?z- Qccyd
675 CM’ Ave,
&udhx$ La. 9%‘8
2oQ8442
73 Om!f~
3119 lItion S;t, Apt, A
(&2A!A6a$, &z, 9x+@
7y ecqm.2
3//9 i~a.~'hun S& A,DY B
~W~bcm!~ & $2ms
2&=&%-~3
7/!c OCCUI,~
3143 /b3Lt!bn S&
Cd&d cu. 9fm8
204-9@%04
?/ Occur
3145 l&2n!dhn SA
Cd@# ca. 92008
204-08445
7 7 0cu.f~
3159 lfha!.&on .I&
&AXd, (jam 92&k!?
. . I... !“,.L., ‘i:’ ,%.>, ( , .’ , ,I.,‘^ .. , _ L..+.
.
3467 /fha!&on SA r_ _
Cd@, la. 9m
: -m4m47 ,..
77 ~ccupurt
3i83 iflm!Lmn SL
(@d.dbhd, ca. 92008
204a4.08
6-o OccupvLf
650 Pine Ave,
&-h%zu, la. $?&‘8
-4-m
&/ ucu+
3190 Rumeve& S&.
&u56ad, &a 92&X?
2&43&-lo
d 2 Ocuf@
3//7U Roo4ev& APL #I
C&W CQ, 92m
J 3 ~=wQJf
?/70 Ruo4eved2 Ap;t. #2 e-
(&A.-L&, CU. 92008
sp 0y-f
3170 ii'oo4eveb A& #3
C&lad, (& 92008
-' 83 OccryxuLt?
3f70 Roo4ev&Apd i#
C&W CL 9m
,
‘ ’
1
*
4
. i
.._ 8 \
‘i . ..?.i . k .; -‘I, ,..“. ,. ,.. . ‘ -_
a 2caosWl U$ Occu@ i _ 3/6i3 i%uAev&
C&W & 9aw3
201’f-o54L/2
“7 QC*
3/5-o Rimev&
C&W (5 9m .
-
OCCUpLf
3120 bbd.~4~~ Sk
&ddka!~ (@e 92~x18 d - -
OCCUpfL2
3144 Mcidi~on S& A{DX #i
~wdhkdj & 922~8
Occu@
3144 iftiun S& #2
(j7.cb~ ca. 92W8
OCCU,d
3144 MzG!!Lmr2 s-t, #3
jxz- QccuplLt ._ . 31-4 4 Maahon s?L #G
&z&&d 62. 9=2W8 c
$e? Q-P=f II 3f4 4 ifkm!Lmn S;d #j . Cd4 cu. 9- ‘\
..--.
I
-..
.
Y”t QcurpuLt 3144 i%I?B!L40~ S-f* #5
(+cMaci, Ga, 9am
occLLp(uLt
3170 tion sit #I
cd& Ca. 926k38
0-w 3/70 l%2chhn;S& #2
ldb;ad, ca, 9ma
L?c”Limnf
3170 Dhdhon S.& if3
&&bad, GQO (92~08
OCCUp?.2
3/7G AzdLmz S.& #5
c&bad Ch 9m8
-
“/Gf
La 9
~0-r
/OL
‘O7
PS
.I
-.
occuIRzR;t 3170 Ition- S& # 9
Cd6a.4, &a 9m
ecu*
3170 rtion s2.a # /o
&dAci# CQ. 92x8
Occur
3/70 MiLa!hotl SA # //
cd@’ (Ji. 92~8
OCCU@
3170 MTi!Qb?rz~S& #/2
&d&d, cat+ 9m8
Oca.irpz~~
673 t2Lh Ave.
[whbut$ &o 92~~8