HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-06-07; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 100; Jefferson BuildingLB# joa TITLE:
flT& 6 -7-84+
RED RP 87-12 - JEFFERSON BUILDING IEPT.
$ (7 -,-.-/
HOUSQNG AND’XDEVELOPMENT COMMISC- N - AGENDA iILL 0 I
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If Housing and Redevelopment Commission concurs, your action is to adopt Resolution No. 106, APPROVING RP 87-12 - Jefferson Building and APPROVE the negative declaration issued by the Planning Director.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The applicant is requesting approval of a major redevelopment permit to develop an 8800 square foot professional office building with underground parking. The proposed project site is located at 2815 Jefferson in Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
Design Review Board heard this request at their meeting of April 6, 1988. The Board adopted Resolution No. 113ND recommending approval of the Negative Declaration and Resolution No. 113 recommending approval of a major redevelopment permit based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the Staff Report dated April 6, 1988. The Design Review Board did, however; impose three additional conditions of approval satisfying their concerns and issues.
ISSUES:
Uses: No medical or dental uses permitted in the building without an approved reduction in the square footage.
Trash: Trash must be picked-up and not allowed to accumulate in the designated containers.
Drainase: The roof water must be carried to the street by a gravity system.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No detailed economic impact analysis of this development has been determined.
EXHIBITS:
l- Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 106, approving RP 87-12- Jefferson Building.
2- Design Review Board Resolution No. 113ND and No. 113 dated April 6, 1988, with staff report.
, , STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 1988
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: RP 87-12 JEFFERSON BUILDING - Major Redevelopment Permit for two-story office building with underground parking at 2815 Jefferson Street, in Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Design Review Board adopt Design Review Board Resolution No. 113ND APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and recommend APPROVAL to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of RP 87-12, based on the findings and conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 113.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a major redevelopment permit for an 8800 square foot professional office building, located as described above, on the south side of the Psoriasis Center property. The building would be two-story, with redwood siding, cedar shingles, pane windows with wooden trim, open balconies with wooden rails, and some stucco on the side and rear walls. Butterscotch in color, the building will also incorporate white and light brown colors in the trim. The front of the building features a doorway at street level, planter boxes, a balcony, and an upstairs porch. Toward the rear of the building on the south side, an interior courtyard has been created, which will be open from the second story to the patio below.
Parking will be underground; 30 spaces would be provided. A layer of used brick will be placed on the walls leading into the garage to soften that typical concrete appearance.
The project is located in an area where a variety of uses are prevalent -- as mentioned earlier, the Psoriasis Center is next door to the north; further north is the Austin-Pacific office building. To the south is a three-story senior housing project under construction and other office buildings. To the east are small scale offices mixed in with residential. Both multi-family and single family residential are interspersed throughout the area.
The property lies in subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area which is the central business district and, as such, functions as a financial and commercial area. Professional offices are a permitted use. The Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan
I I APRIL 6, 1988 RP 87-12 JEFFERSON BUILDING PAGE 2
covers the Redevelopment Area. Residential Medium The General Plan designation is High/Office and zoning is Village- Redevelopment.
III. ANALYSIS
Plannins Issues
1. Does the project meet the goals of Subarea 1 and comply with the Village Design Manual development standards?
2. Does the project meet the standards in the Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance, including compliance with the Growth Management Program?
Discussion
Subarea 1
The primary goal of Subarea 1 is to provide uses which are in concert with a central business area such as offices, commercial retail, and restaurants. Development should be oriented to pedestrian traffic, have open space amenities, and generally portray a village atmosphere. The proposed project complies with these goals.' The design of the structure, and in particular the east elevation, is very l'street-friendlyl@. The front door is at street level, the building articulates, there are windows at a pedestrian level and window boxes and landscaping lend warmth to . the street scene along Jefferson. The front yard landscaped setback is almost 35 feet (23 feet on subject property, 10.5 feet of City right-of-way) -- that, in addition to the interior courtyard feature, will provide adequate open space amenities for the public as well as the tenants occupying the building. Unfortunately, the large evergreen tree in the front yard of the house which currently occupies the lot cannot be saved because it falls in the middle of the new driveway. To compensate, the project has been conditioned to plant larger size trees than normally would be required in the new front yard setback. Overall, the scale of the building (32 feet), the design as described previously, the materials, the features that relate to the street, and the landscaping depict a village atmosphere and will be compatible with the goals of Subarea 1.
Develonment Standards/Zoning Ordinance
Other technical standards relate to parking, setbacks, building height and coverage, and landscaping. Thirty parking spaces would be provided, in accordance with code. The building is
-
. 9 APRIL 6, 1988 RP 87-12 JEFFERSON BUILDING PAGE 3
adequately set back per R-P (Residential-Professional) standards, 23 feet in front, 13 feet in the rear, and 6.5 feet on each side yard. The concrete block retaining wall, which is part of the underground parking garage, extends three feet above grade within the side and rear setbacks. This is necessary because the parking structure can only be undergrounded 8 feet in order to meet an acceptable 11 percent grade for the ramp. Since the underlying zone is V-R, which allows some flexibility in setbacks, and since the building itself is set back appropriately, it is staff's opinion that setback requirements have been met. That wall would be painted a color complimentary to the structure. The area between the wall and the building would generally be open to the parking below, i.e., by a grate, to provide ventilation.
Building height, 32 feet to the top of a pitched roof, is within code. The Design Review Manual has as a guideline that lot coverage should not exceed 80 percent. Lot coverage is about 85 percent, but is deceiving because that includes the underground parking which is wider than the building but cannot be seen. The landscaped area is adequate and includes, in addition to what is shown on the landscape plan, the courtyard area which will have seating areas. In summary, the project complies with the goals and standards of the Design Review Manual and the technical requirements.of the Zoning Ordinance.
There are two other conditions that will be discussed. The first one relates to the office building (Austin-Pacific) several lots to the north at Jefferson and Arbuckle which originally was approved with wood siding. The subsequent change to stucco substantially altered the character of that building, somewhat negatively in that it now looks like it should be located in an industrial area. That building is no longer compatible with the Willage" style architecture. In order to ensure compatibility, a condition has been added that should the proposed project request any changes to the building materials, the project would be brought back to the Design Review Board.
The second condition relates to the landscape requirements. It was mentioned earlier that the large evergreen tree, which is a holly or mesa oak, could not be saved because of its unfortunate location in the middle of the proposed driveway. The driveway is located as such because that location yields the highest parking space scenario, i.e., two aisles of parking rather than one aisle, which in turn allows a higher square footage yield in the building. The large statuesque oak tree is estimated to be 30- 40 years old and is one of several prominent trees along this portion of Jefferson Street. This tree should be replaced with a
- -
. , APRIL 6, 1988 RP 87-12 JEFFERSON BUILDING PAGE 4
large, similar specimen to compensate for this loss. The project has been conditioned to provide one 70-inch box tree similar to the one lost and the remaining proposed trees to be 36 inch box specimens.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 was approved on September 1, 1987. The proposed project complies with that plan in terms of being well within the future estimated square footage for office in the Redevelopment Area. Thus, the impacts of that office use were considered in the facilities analysis.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined this project will have no significant impacts on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on February 26, 1988. The Negative Declaration was issued based on field checks by staff and the fact that the site is already developed with a residence and associated buildings, there are no sensitive resources on or adjacent to the site, and the project would be located in an urban, developed area with structures of similar sizes and uses. In addition, no comments were received in response to the notice for a Negative Declaration.
Summary
The project, as proposed and conditioned, will meet the goals set
forth in the Design Review Manual and complies with technical standards. Staff recommends approval of RP 87-12.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Design Review Board Resolution No. 113 2. Design Review Board Resolution No. 113ND 3. Location Map 4. Background Data Sheet 5. Disclosure Form 6. Environmental Documents 7. Exhibits "AW - I'DIt, dated March 18, 1988
NER:dm 3/14/88
1 .
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
-
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 113ND
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT ESTABLISHING AN OFFICE BUILDING AT 2815 JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT: JEFFERSON HOUSE CASE NO.: RP 87-12
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 6th day of
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
all testimony and arguments, examining the initial II study, analyzing the information submitted staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Design Review
Board considered all factors relating to the Negative
Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review
Board as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review Board hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration according to Exhibits "ND" and "PII", dated February 26, 1988, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
I/Findinas:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant impact on the environment.
2. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed project.
3. There are not sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly impacted by this project.
-
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 6th day of April, 1988, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
MATTHEW HALL, Chairman CARLSBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CHRIS SALAMONE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RESO NO. 113ND -2-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 113
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REDEVELOPHENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING WITH
UNDERGROUND PARKING ON PROPERTY I0CATED AT 2815 JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT: KEVINEELSO CASE NO.: RP 87-12
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Design Review Board did, on the 6th day April,
1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said
application on property described as:
PARCEL 1: The southeasterly 50 feet of the northwesterly 241 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet. PARCEL 2: The southeasterly 15 feet of the northwesterly 191 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet. Both parcels are according to the Map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921.
WHEReAs, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring
to be heard, said Board considered all factors relating to RP
87-12.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
(A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
(B) That based on the evidence presented at public hearing, the Board recommends APPROVAL of RP 87-12, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findims:
1. The project complies with the overall goals of Subarea 1 of the Village Design Manual and the development
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
a.
b.
standards of the V-R Zone.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate commercial development at the density proposed.
The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Design Review Board has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer services remains available, and the Design Review Board is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval.
c. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fees will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
4. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since surrounding properties are designated for office development on the General Plan.
5. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on February 26, 1988 and approved the Design Review Board on April 6, 1988. In approving this Negative Declaration the Design Review Board has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the environment.
6. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
7. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to
2
1 comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
2 Conditions:
3 Plannina Conditions
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1. Approval is granted for RP 87-12, as shown on Exhibits "A"-"D" dated March 18, 1988, incorporated by reference and on file in the Redevelopment Office. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
2. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24"x36" 100 scale mylar copy of the site plan as approved by the Design Review Board. The site plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
3. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of .
application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
4. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider's agrement to pay the public facilities fee dated December 3, 1987, and the agreement to pay the Growth Management Fee dated December 3, 1987, copies of which are on file with the City Clerk and are incorporated by reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void.
22 5. Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the
23 Water Service agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Costa Real Water District, dated May 25, 1983.
24 6. This project shall comply with all conditions and
25 mitigation measures which may be required as part of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any
26 amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
27
28
7. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, in lieu thereof, or the payment of any fees imposed by this approval or imposed by
3
-_
4 8 .
5
6
7
8 g*
9
10
11 lo-
12
13
14 11*
15
16
17 12*
18
19
20
21
22 13.
23
24 14. II 25
26
2711 15.
28
law on this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 65913.5 If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, pursuant to Building Department Policy No. 80- 6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Redevelopment and Building.
An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted Redevelopment and Planning Director approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or
property,
The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions or overcrowding as part of building permit application These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit application.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Director prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, whichever occurs first.
All proposed trees shown on the approved landscape plan (ExhibitlID") shall be 36 inch box specimen size except for one which shall be a 70 inch box specimen similar in style to the destroyed evergreen. Shrubs shall be five gallon minimum size. applicant shall submit, with the final landscape plan, a program to protect existing trees proposed to be saved during construction. Final landscape plan shall also show the canopies at a mature diameter, which may reduce the number proposed in the front yard.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Housing and Redevelopment Director prior to installation of such signs.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road: color of
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
The project shall provide upgraded bus facilities, i.e. a bench at Jefferson and Home northbound to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District.
This project is specifically approved with the use of wooden siding building materials. Any change from the building materials. Any change from the building materials that have been approved will be subject to additional discretionary review by the Design Review Board.
The three foot high concrete block extending above the parking garage around the side and rear walls of the building shall be painted a color complimentary to the building, to the satisfaction of the Redevelopment Director.
If building permits for this project are not issued within one year from the date of approval, then this approval shall be considered null and void.
Medical or dental uses shall not be allowed in this building unless square footage is reduced proportionately to accommodate required parking for medical use.
Roof water shall drain to the street by a system of rain gutters and drainage channels to be approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall provide the City with proof that a janitorial service will take the trash on a daily basis, as well as an alternative to that, such as Coast Waste Management's ability to pick up trash more than once a week if necessary, so that more than 4 cans of trash do not accumulate between pick-ups.
Ensineerina Conditions:
23. The grading for this project is defined as "controlled grading" by Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading
plan, submit required reports to the City Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
24. No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of thee affected properties.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located with the city limits.
All slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:l.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regard to the hauling operation.
Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed as may be required by the City Engineer.
The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to the approval of the building or grading permit for this project.
Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this project.
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirement of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
Prior to occupancy of any portion of this project, the developer shall repair/replace curb, gutter, or sidewalk or A.C. pavement found to be defective during construction of this project.
All telephone power service to this project shall be undergrounded to facilitate future conversions of overhead facilities.
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
The entire water-system for subject project shall be evaluated by Costa Real Municipal Water District in detail as assurance that adequate capacity for domestic landscaping and fire flow demands are addressed and resolved.
The Developer's Engineer shall schedule a meeting with the Water District's Engineer and the City Fire Marshall and review the preliminary water system layout prior to preparation of the water system improvement plans. If applicable, the developer shall be responsible for the
6
1
2
2
4
E c
E
'i
E
S
1C
11
If
12
14
15
1E
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
major facility charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit.
Fire Department;
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
////
////
I///
/I//
////
////
////
////
////
I///
////
////
/I//
Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department.
Additional public and/or site fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshall.
The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for approval.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction..
Building exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. aggregate floor area shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000 sq. ft. (or less) areas.
7
, 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held
on the 6th day of April, 1988, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MATTHEWHALL,Chairman CARMBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST:
CHRIS sALOI4oNE, Housing and Redevelopment Director
///I
////
////
////
////
8
II
PLPNNING DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT “ND”
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
(619) 438-1161
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 2815 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Two story office building, 8800 square feet with underground parking. Located in Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. .
DATED: February 26, 1988 a MICHAEL J. H%ZMItiER CASE NO: RP 87-12 Planning Director
APPLICANT: JEFFERSON BUILDING
PUBLISH DATE: February 26, 1988
- EXHIBIT”PII”
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. RP 87-12
DATE: 2-17-88
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: Kevin Kelso
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 3350 Ridoecrest Dr.
Carlsbad. CA 92008
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: December 9. 1987
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil?
Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features?
Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site?
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a.
b.
c.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
The creation of objectionable odors?
Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally?
3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
h.
NO
X
X
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?
X
X
w
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-2-
4. Plant Lifg - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have
a.
b.
C.
d.
6.
7.
8.
significant results in:
Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)?
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals?
Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels?
Liaht and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare?
&and Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area?
MAYBE NO
X
X
-3-
- -
MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in:
Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? a.
X
X
Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? b.
10. Risk of Unset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
11. Ponulatioq - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housinq - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13.
a.
b.
C.
d.
Transnortation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in:
Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? X’
X Impact upon existing transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X
X Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? e.
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X
-4-
-_
14. . erviceq - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
15.
a.
b.
16.
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
17.
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or other recreational facilities?
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
Other governmental services?
Enerav - Will the proposal have significant results in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Demand upon existing sources of
energy t or require the development of new sources of energy?
Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
Water?
Sewer or septic tanks?
Storm water drainage?
Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x .
X
X
X
X
X
-5-
-.
18.
19.
20.
21.
YES MAYBE NO
Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view?
Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
Archeolouical/Historical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building?
Analyze viable alternatives to the KXoDosed project such as:
X
X
X
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
a) The project is too small to be phased.
b) The design is consistent with the guidelines of the Village Design Manual.
c) The scale of the project has been reduced.
d) There are other office buildings in the vicinity.
e) N/A
f) WA
9) N/A
-6-
YES MAYBE NO
22. Eandatorv findinas of sianificance -
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? X
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.)
C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of c those impacts on the environment is significant.) X
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The project will not result in any significant, environmental impacts because:
(1) The site is developed already with a residence and associated buildings.
(2) There are no sensitive resources on or adjacent to the site.
(3) The project is located in an urban, developed area with structures of similar sizes and uses.
(4) The project is lower than the allowed maximum height limit of 35' (Coastal)
-7-
'D1ScbSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAI1 EVALUATION (Continued)
-8-
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
' On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
La+88
Date
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-90
MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued)
VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
-lO-
GENERAL PLAN ZONING
RL RLW
IL:: RH
E R5 c
ii
a:: PI cl c RC
E I.
RESIDINTIAL LOW DE?&ITT (0.13) LOW.MEDICY DENSITYtO-4) ~1EDIC.H DENSITY (4.8) MEDIC.%! HIGH DENSllY(R-IS) HIGH DENSllY ( ‘923)
COMMfRCIAL ISTENSIVE REGIONAL RETAIL (CR. EXTENSl%X REGIONAL RETAIL (q REGIONAL SERklCE COWMUNITY COMMERCIAL SEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TRAVEL SERVICES COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL RELATED CEFiTRAL BCSINEY DISTRICT PLANNED INDCSTIUAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES PCBLIC CTILITIES RECREATlON COMMERCIAL
SCHOOLS ELP.WENTARY II’SIOR HIGH
RRSIDENTIAL P.C PLANNiD COMMLNllY ZONE &A RE5IDEM-lAl AGRKCL~RAL ZONE ll.E RLRU WIDEM’IM EST+TE ZONE It. I OW.FA.WILY RESIDESTLAL ZOM! I.2 lV’O.FMILY RXSIDE.XllAL ZONE R.3 ML’LTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE R-3L LLWITED YL’LlTF.4WILY RESIDEMl.U ZONE RD.M RESIDENi-LU DEMlTYaWCLTlPLE ZONE RDtl RESlDENllAl DENSIlYHIGH ZONE RWHP RESIDEHTIU .WOBILE HOME PARK ZONE R.P RE.SIDE%I’IU PROFESSIONAL ZONE RT RESIDEVML TOCRJST ZONE RW RESIDEM-LU =ATERWAY ZOhE
COMMCRCIAL 0 C.i XFlCE ZONE .~EIGH8ORHOOD COMMERCLU ZONE c.2 GENERAL COMMERCW ZOXE C.T COM.WERCLU.TI OCRlSTtOKE C-M HUW CO.H.WE; lcLu.LLwITED lNDmrRLAl ZONE
P.ii
- ‘N%S,-RLU ZONE PL4NNED INDCSTMAL ZONE
Plaza CamIn Rcrl I Car Country Culsbad )
. ._ H HIGH SCHOOL P PRIVATE
OS OPEN SPACE NM NON REStDENTIAL RESERVE
OTHRR F.P FLOODPLuh- OVERLAY 2Oh-E LX UwTED coKrRoL OS OPENSPACE P.U FLBUC LllLnY LONE
city of larkbad
JEFFERSON BUILDING RP 87-12
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: BP 87-u
APPLICANT: Jefferson Building
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Major Redevelonment Permit for a two-storv 1 office bui d' with unde
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: The southeasterlv 50 feet of the northwesterlv 241 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Tands, extent the southwesterlv 120 f et northwesterlv 191 fzet tnf d Parcel 2: The southeasterlv 15 feet of the Lot 48 of Seaside lands, both narcels accordina to the MaD thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the Countv Recorder of San Dieao. Julv 28. 1921 APN. . . 203-110-29
Acres .30 Proposed No. of Lots/Units n/a
GENERAL PJM AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RMH/O
Density Allowed Existing Zone /a V2R Density Proposed Proposed Zone
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Joninq Land Use
Site V-R SF Residence
North V-R Office/Residential
South V-R Office/Residential
East R-P-Q/R-3 Office/Residential
West V-R Office/Residential
PUBIJC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbaa Water*Costa Real Sewer m EDU's 5
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated 12-3-87
(*The City of Carlsbad will provide water service to all projects in Carlsbad except those located in the Olivenhain and San Marcos Sewer Districts.) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, issued 2-26-88
E.I.R. Certified, dated Other,
DISCLOSURE FORM
II APPLICANT: Kwtti D. KE2.50
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
33m ELlwe~T D&’ ‘ m. ‘#4 qms
Business Address
(Q(4) 7z4/ 847 Telephone Number
AGENT: Name
Business Address
Telephone Number
MEMBERS:
Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone, Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, l/we will apply
for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development.
I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be
necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board
members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the
subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose.
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure
is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon
as being true and correct until amended.
APPLICANT
BY OWN
Agent, Owner, Partner
2075 LAS PALMAS DRtVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
(619) 438-l 161 PLqNNlNG DEPARTMENT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 2815 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Two story office building, 8800 square feet with underground parking. Located in Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: February 26, 1988 MICHAEL J. H%ZMIaER CASE NO: RP 87-12 Planning Director
APPLICANT: JEFFERSON BUILDING
PUBLISH DATE: February 26, 1988
-
RFSOLUTION NO. 106
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAIUSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NAJOR RF,DEVEI&PMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING WITH UNDERGROUND PARKING ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2815 JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT: KEVINEELSO CASE NO.: RP 87-12
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 6th day
of April, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law to consider recommendation of approval for
a Major Redevelopment Permit and adopted Design Review Board
Resolution No. 113; and
WHEREAS, pursuant of the Municipal Code, the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission did, on the 7th day of June I
1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said
application on property described as:
PARCEL 1: The southeasterly 50 feet of the northwesterly 241 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet. PARCEL 2: The southeasterly 15 feet of the northwesterly 191 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet, Both parcels are according to the Map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921.
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring I
to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating
to RP 87-12, Jefferson Building.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings of the Design Review Board contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 113 shall constitute the findings of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
3. That RP 87-12, Jefferson Building, for the construction of an 8,800 square foot office
1 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
building with underground parking is approved subject to all of the conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 113.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at a special meeting of
the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of June I
1988, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
.
I ATTEST:
/ ALETHA L. &JTENKEUiNZ, City Clerk
(S-u
~ ////
///I
////
////
Reso. No. 106 -2-
1
2
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
‘X
RESOLUTION 106ND
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A REDEVELOPXENT PERMIT ESTABLISHING AN OFFICE BUILDING AT 2815 JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT: KEVINEELS CASE NO.: RP 87-12
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 6th day of
April, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed
by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, examining the
initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
and considering any written comments received, the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission hereby APPROVES the Negative Declaration according to Exhibits I'ND" and llPII1l I dated February 26, 1988.
3. That the findings of the Design Review Board contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 113ND shall constitute the findings of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
///I
////
///I
///I
////
////
9
. .
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of
the Housing and Redevelopment Commission held on the 7th day
of June, 1988, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
msmm : None
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SE=4
///I
//I/
////
////
Reso. No. 106ND -2-
10
. .
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Supenor Court of Sun Diego County
Mail all correspondence regordmg public notlce advertismg to
North Coost Publishers, Inc corporate offices: P 0. Box 878, Enclnltas, CA 92024
(619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesald;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a porty to or Interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is publlshed for the dissemination of local newsand intelligenceof a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still hasa bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals In
the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
preceding the date of publication of the notice -
hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of
which the annexed IS a printed copy, has been
published in each reqular and entire issue of said
NOTICE OF PUBLIC PARCEL 2. The southeasterly 15
HEARING feet of the northwesterly 191 feet of newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
RP 87.12 Lot 48 of Seaslde Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet. . the following dates, to-wit:
Both Parcels arc NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that ! according to Map thereof No. 17: U. filed in the the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission of the City of Carlsbad Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28.1921. will hold a public hearing at the If you have any questions, please May. .??. 19ss ,.,.............~..
City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue. Carlsbad. California. at call the Redevelopment Depart- ment at 434.zall. 6.00 P.M.. on Tuesday. June 7.1939. If you challenge the Maior Rede- to consider an application for a Ma jw Redevelop&nt Permit for a velo~mentPermitineourt,you may be limited to raising only those two-story office building with issues you or someone else raised underground parking on property generally localed at 2915 Jefferson at the public hearing described in this notice or in written corres- Street. in Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area. and more pondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad City Clerk’s Office at or particularly described as: prior to the public hearing. PARCEL 1: The southeasterly 50 feet ofthe northwesterly 241 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet.
., ., .., 19
19
APPLICANT: Jefferson Building CARLSBAD HOUSING AN?) REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 19..
. . . . . . . . . . 19..
JEFFERSON BUILDING RF 07-12
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct, Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California on The 27th
day of -- -3.988 Ma
Clerk of the Printer
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RP 87-12
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, June 7, 1988, to consider an application
for a Major Redevelopment Permit for a two-story office building with underground parking
on property generally located at 2815 Jefferson Street, in Subarea 1 of the Village
Redevelopment Area, and more particularly described as:
PARCEL 1: The southeasterly 50 feet of the northwesterly 241 feet
of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet.
PARCEL 2: The southeasterly 15 feet of the northwesterly 191 feet
of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet.
Both Parcels are according to Map thereof No. 1722, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921.
If you have any questions, please call the Redevelopment Department at 434-2811.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit in court , you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's
Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Jefferson Building
PUBLISH: May 27, 1988 CARLSBAD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION
JEFFERSON BUILDING I RP 87-12
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINti
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 6, 1988, to consider approval of a Major Redevelopment Permit for a two-story office building with underground parking on property generally located at 2815 Jefferson Street, in Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area, and more particularly described as:
PARCEL 1: The southeasterly 50 feet of the northwesterly 241 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet. PARCEL 2: The southeasterly 15 feet of the northwesterly 191 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the southwesterly 120 feet. Both parcels are according to Map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Redevelopment Department at 434-2811.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: RP 87-12 APPLICANT: JEFFERSON BUILDING PUBLISH: MARCH 27, 1988
CITY OF CARLSBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
. .
DAVIS JAMES R P 0 BOX 915, CARLSBAD CA 92008
TABATA ISOKAZU 4929 PARK DRIVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOHNSON ROBERT HLPATSY L 1440 GILBUCK ST, ANAHEIM CA 92802
MORROLJ TRANQUIL&DINAH 2715 MADISON ST APT 3, CARLSBAD CA 92008
TEEJO RUBEN s&MADELINE C 2607 MADISON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
ALLEN BRUCE 0 2737 MADISON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
BARLOIJ KAREN J 2726 FRANKFORT ST, SAN DIEGO CA 92117
JACKSON VIRGINIA L,JACKSON GARY L,JACKSON RANDAL
k718 ROOSEVELT ST APT F, CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHANEY KEITH A 9098 203-110-05 2712 MADISON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
HOENIG SETH 9098 203-110-08 P 0 BOX 2401, LEUCADJA CA 92024
JEFFERSON PROFESSIONAL BLDG 2755 JEFFERSON ST P103, CARLSBAD CA ‘92008 9098 203-110-09
HARRIS TOMMY J&GLADYS L 722 ARBUCKLE PLACE, CARLSBAD CA 92008 9098 203-110-12
MALIKOlJSKI JON J,MALIKOWSKI JOSEPH PaMARY L 752 ARBUCKLE PLACE, CARLSBAD CA 92008 9098 203-110-13
YATES CHARLES A 9098 203-110-14 2753 JEFFERSON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
MULLICAN MARY R 9098 203-110-15 750 ARBUCKLE COURT, CARLSBAD CALIF 92008
KAPSALIS HARRIET,KAPSALIS MARY 3385 GARIBALDI PLACE, CARLSBAD CA 92008 9098 203-110-20
YERKES DONALD E&DIANE A 2942 HARDING ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008 9098 203-110-21
BAIRD PEARL E 9098 203-110-25 2785 JEFFERSON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
GARRETT HERBERT E&MARTHA S 10391 LOS ALAMITOS BLVD, LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720 203-110-26
SCANLON JAMES A&IDA E 7306 BORLA PLACE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
9098
9098 203-110-27
FEINBERG JONATHAN A ND INC,FITZPATRICK RICHARD E MD INC 9098 203-110-28
317 N EL CAMINO REAL t305, ENCINITAS CA 92024
SMITH HUBERT E&JCYCE w 2815 JEFFERSON ST, CARLSBAD CALIF 92008 9098 203-110-29
TUCKER HUSTON H&HELEN M 2810 MADISON ST. CARLSBAD CA 92008 9098 203-110-30
9098 203-102-11
9098 203-102-12
I 9098 203-102-14
9098
9098
203-102-16
203-102-18
9098 203-102-20
:. * -
HAIBY GABRIEL&SUZANNE 1,SHAKED YEHEZKELCTLALIT R HAIBY GABRIEL&SUZANNE 1,SHAKED YEHEZKELCTLALIT R ET Al ET Al P 0 BOX 4668, ORANGE CA 92613 P 0 BOX 4668, ORANGE CA 92613
HEALEY EDITH P,GOLL PAULINE H HEALEY EDITH P,GOLL PAULINE H 1621 E COMMOt~tdEALTH AVE #205, FULLERTON CA 9268 1621 E COMMOt~tdEALTH AVE #205, FULLERTON CA 9268 1 1
JEANENE ENTERPRISES INC JEANENE ENTERPRISES INC 2879 JEFFERSON ST #J, CARLSBAD CA 92008 2879 JEFFERSON ST #J, CARLSBAD CA 92008
HAIBY GABRIEC8SUZRNNE I ,SHAKED YEtIEZKEL&TLALIT R HAIBY GABRIEC8SUZRNNE I ,SHAKED YEtIEZKEL&TLALIT R ET AL P 0 BOX 4668, ORANGE CA 92613 -- -.. _-.... -.._. -~ - . - - - - - . . - - _ -
KEENAN JAMES W&JUDY N,RULE PAUL A 1231 S HILL ST, OCEANSIDE CA 92054
HIRSCHBERG JAMES S LTD 2942 HARDING ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
DEWHURST DONALD K&LAEL J 2747 ROOSEVELT ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
HOWARD-JONES ARTHUR T TR 2748 WATERBURY WAY, CARLSBAD CA 92008
HOIJARD-JONES ARTHUR T TR
2748 WATERBURY WAY, CARLSBAD CA 92008
DEWHURST DONALD K&LAEL J 3425 SEACREST DR, CARLSBAD CA 92008
SMITH SIDNEY M&FRANCES L,HORWITZ DAVID A&HAZEL, MACLEOD MARGARET H EST OF
p 0 BOX 864, CARLSBAD CA 92008
DEWHURST WALTER AflDEWHURST VIRENE A TRS
5646 RUTGERS ROAD, LA JOLLA CA 92037
117
iARGER DONALD W&NANCY 2754 JEFFERSON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
)E LOS SANTOS GUADALUPE&JOSEFINA
2770 JEFFERSON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
>E GOOYER MELVIN H 2615 CLAIREMONT DRIVE, SAN DIEGO CA 92
‘DRSYTH EUGENE S JR,WHITMER SANDRA L 3204 VIA PESCADO, CARLSBAD CA 92008
1EbJHURST DONALD K&LAEL J 3325 SEACREST DRIVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
1EIJtIURST DONALD K&LAEL J 3325 SEACREST DRIVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
‘ERKETT CALVIN RLMALINDA J 812 HOME AVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
JILLJAMS FLORENZA M,BULLINGTON CATHERINE C CAKA 2835 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH STE 300, SAN DIEGO CA 92108
9098
9098
9098
9098
203-110-31
203-110-32
203-110-33
203-110-34
I I 9098 203-110-44
9098
9098
9098
9098
9098
9098
9000
9000
>03-181-07
203-181-08
203-181-09
203-181-10
203-181-12
203-181-16
203-201-01
203-201-02
9000 203-201-03
9000 203-201-04
9000
9000
9000
9000
,203-201-05
203-201-06
203-201-07
203-201-08
. II .
.OPEZ DAIIIEL D&IRENE M ’ 928 HOHE AVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
JINDRUfl GEORGEtRITA TRS 4230 CLEARVIEW DRIVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
.AMB TERAtWOOD JUNE P 0 BOX 2134, LEUCADIA CA 92024
STONEHEDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS IV 7929 CAFIPUS DRIVE t135, SAN MATE0 CA 94403
SUBSIDIZED HOUSING CORP OF AMERICA C/O VILLA MANAGEMENT, 13440 VENTURA BLVD, SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403
CAPITOL PROPERTIES LTD III 1120 SILVERADO ST, LA JOLLA CA 92037
RUSSELL PAUL A 3530 MADISON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
MC KAY JANIS L
880 HOME AVE #B, CARLSBAD CA 92008
RUSSELL PAUL A 3530 MADISON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
RUSSELL PAUL A 3530 MADISON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
RUSSELL PAUL A 3530 MADISON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008 .
PURKISS THOMAS W&CHRISTINE S G 880 HOi’lE ST tF, CARLSBAD CA 92008
ANDREATTA RUBIN A 0
880 HOME AVE BG, CARLSBAD CA 92008
MANHART LOUISE M : 882 HOPlE AVE :A, CARLSBAD CA 92008
SHEHAB EDMOND T,SHEHAB SANDRA S 910 S LOS ANGELES ST, LOS ANGELES CA 90015
JEFFERSON HOUSE II 5620 FRIARS ROAD, SAN DIEGO CA 92110
JEFFERSON HOUSE II 5620 FRIARS ROAD, SAN DIEGO CA 92110
JEFFERSON HOUSE II 5620 FRIARS ROAD, SAN DIEGO CA 92110
GETZE FLORENCE M 1981 TRUST C/O JAMES GETZE, 1001 PINE ST #409r SAN FRANCISCO CA 94109
SOOHOO GEORGE M&ADRIENNE R H 3682 HERMAN ST, SAN DIEGO CA 92104
CERDA DANIEL J&ERNESTINE C 1743 LOTUS AVE, EL CENTRO CA 92243
SWYS CORP,TURNER TOM H
C/O ANKIRK DEVELOPMENT, 15 BROOKHOLLOW DRIVE, SANTA ANA CA 92705
SHEHAB EDMOND T,SHEHAB SANDRA S 910 S LOS ANGELES ST, LOS ANGELES CA 90015
9000 203-201-11
9000 203-201-12
9000 203-201-14
9000
9000
9000
9000
9000
9000
9000
9000
9000
9000
9000
9000
9098
9098
9098
9098
9098
9000
9000
9098
!03-201-20
!03-201-22
103-201-29 /
203-201-30-01'
?03-201-30-02 1
203-201-30-03
203-201-30-04
203-201-30-05
203-201-30-06
203-201-30-07
203-201-30-08
203-202-03
203-202-04
203-202-05
203-202-06
203-202-07
203-202-13
203-202-15
203-202-17
203-202-18
SMITH SIDNEY M&FRANCES L,HDRWITZ DAVID A&HAZEL, 1 9098/203-291-01
MACLEOD MARGAF’=~ H EST OF
C/D DAVID A H ITZ, P 0 BOX 864, CARLSBAD CA 2008
t\URPHY HOWARD F&BARBARA M,KELLY GERALD G TR 400 N LA COSTA DRIVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
MURPHY HOWARD FtBARBARA M,KELLY GERALD G TR - 400 N LA COSTA DRIVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
JEANENE ENTERPRISES INC
752 GRAND AVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
WILSON STUART C&MARILYN
1846 AVOCADO ROAD, OCEANSIDE CA 92054
: KINGSTON JOSEPHINE R
786 GRAND AVE, CARLSBAD CALIF 92008
PEARSON ROBERT C&DARLENE M 2125 WOODWIND DRIVE, OLIVENHAIi CA 92024
MATSUBARA SACHIO&TAEKO 1360 FOREST AVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
MATSUBARA SACHIO&TAEKO,RAY GENE S&MARGARET A 1360 FOREST AVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
PERL LEONISONJA 215 N PALM DRIVE, BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210
PERL LEON&SONYA 215 N PALM DRIVE, BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210
PACKARD DEVELOPMENT CORP 725 GRAND AVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
VENUS INVESTMENTS C/O SALIM ISRAWI, 425 N ARDEN BLVD, LOS ANGELES CA 90004
HOME SAVINGS&LOAN ASSNCCORP)
3731 WILSHIRE BLVD S-970, LOS ANGELES CA 90010
VERMILYEA VEBLEN P,VERMILYEA- NATALIE H
645 GRAND AVE, CARLSBAD CALIF 92008
City of Carlsbad, Redevelopment
2965 Roosevelt St., Suite B,
Car&bad, Ca. 9,mo8
PARKER OAKLEY
3215 NAEZEL LANE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
PARKER OAKLfY 3215 MAEZEL LANE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCEANSIDE FEDERAL SAVINGS&LOAN ASSN 1901 NEWPORT BLVD, COSTA MESA CA 92627
OCEANSIDE FEDERAL SAVINGS&LOAN ASSN C/O PACIFICA MANAGEMENT, 1901 NEWPORT BLVD, COSTA MESA CA 92627
OCEANSIDE FEDERAL SAVINGS&LOAN ASSN C/O PACIFICA MANAGEMENT, 1901 NEWPORT BLVD, COSTA MESA CA 92627
CRObJLEY MILDRED R 2928 JEFFERSON ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
NORMAN FRED AsPHYLLIS E TRS 2673 VANCOUVER ST, CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCANLON JAMES A&IDA E 7306 BDRLA PLACE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
9098 203-301-05
9098 203-302-01
9098 203-302-02
9098 203-302-03
9098 203-302-04
9098 203-303-16
9098 203-303-17
9098 203-303-18
9098 203-303-19
9098 203-303-20
9098 203-303-21
9098 203-303-24
9098 203-303-26
9098 203-304-01 I I.
203~30&02,03,04,05
9098
9098
9098
9098
9098
203-304-15
203-304-16
203-304-17
203-304-18
203-304-19
9098 203-354-05
9098 203-354-07
9098 203-354-08
BESAW JAMES A&LANA D 2221 WIMBLETON LANE, LA HABRA CA 90631
GRANT JOHN H&PlARY C TRS 7173 OBELISCO CIRCLE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
LARSEN GORDON A&MARILYN J C/O FIITSUBISHI BAIIKIACCT DEPT, P 0 BOX 60261, LOS ANGELES CA 90060
METROS DOROTHY,CARRUTHERS MARILYN B C/O KIM HEARN, 2747 ROOSEVELT AVE, CARLSBAD CA 92008
9098
9098
9098
9098
203-354-13
203-354-14
203-354-15
203-355-01
*- .*
. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
/ . I
REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE 2965 Roosevelt Street Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 434-2811
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: Housing and Redevelopment Dept.
Rl3: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
RP 87-12 Jefferson Builidng
for a public hearing before the eilp-Courrcil-.Housing and Redevelopment
F4S%%Y%eeting of
Commission.
Please notice the item for the
Thank you.
CbMM[JNITY DEWEXAJPMEiNT DIRECTOR Date