HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-12-20; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 114; California Builders.
Q @ HOUSING AND-“EDEVELOPMENT COMMIS,c”)N - AGENDA BILL
AB#A TITLE: Rp 85-19 (A)/CDP 88-7 CALIFOR?JIA
MTG. 12/20/88 BUILDERS
DEPT. RED I ICITY MO&&
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If Housing and Redevelopment Commission concurs, your action is to adopt Resolution No. 119 approving RP 85-19 (A) California Builders, Resolution No. 120 approving negative declaration and Resolution No. &JJ approving CDP 88-7 California Builders.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
This projectqwas ,originally approved‘by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission at your meeting of March 25, 1986; As originally approved, the project'was a Major Redevelopment to construct a 70, unit hotel complex above a commercial area with underground parking.
The applicant requested an amendment to this permit through! the Design-Review Board to.,add 18 units by dividing 18 of'the hotel. suites. Twenty-seven additional parking spaces were provided' on an adjacent lot to accommodate increased needs.
The Design Review Board at their meeting of November 16, 1988, unanimously recommended approval of RP 85-19 (A)/CDP 88-7 California Builders based on the findings and subject to the condition contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 122.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No detailed economic analysis of this development has been determined However, staff has determined by inclusion of appropriate finding, that the proposed project will contribute to the economic revitalization of the Redevelopment Area. .
EXHIBITS ,: 1
1. Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 119, approving RP 85-19 (A) California Builders.
2. Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution 120, approving a Negative Declaration.
3. Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 121 / approving CDP 88-7 California Builders.
4. Design Review Board staff report dated November 16, 1988, with Design Review Board Resolutions 121, 122 and 123, recommending approval, attached.
, _-
I
1
2
3
4
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
23 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
24
25
26
27
28
.
HOUSING AND REDEVEI;OPMENT COMMISSION RFSOLUTION NO. 119
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARISBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAJOR REDEVEIx)PMENT PERMITTOADD18 HOTELUNITS MD 27
PARKING SPACES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WOR
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY XXATED AT THE SOUTHEAS T CORNEROF CARLSBADBOULEVARDANDBEECH
STREET. APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA BUILDERS CASE NO.: RP 85-19 (A)
WHEREAS, The Design Review Board did on the 16th day of
November, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law to consider recommendation of approval for
a Major Redevelopment Permit and adopted Design Review Board
Resolution No. 122; and
WHEREAS, pursuant of the Municipal Code, the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission did, on.the 20th day of December,
1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said
application on property described as:
Portions of Block 5, Map 775 (365,535) Town of Carlsbad, Amended ROS 8648.
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring
to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating
to RP 85-19 (A).
NOW, THEXEFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing and
2. That the findings of the Design Review Board contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 122 shall constitute the findings of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
3. That RP 85-19 California Builders, for the addition of 18 hotel units and 27 parking spaces is approved subject to all of the conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 122.
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at regular meeting of the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad,
California, held on the 20th day of December, 1988, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cjl erk
(SE=4
I///
~ ////
////
//I/
Housing and Redevelopment Commission No. 119
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOUSING AND REDEVEI&PMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 120
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ADD 18 HOTEL UNITS AND 27 PARKING SPACES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REDEVEWPMENT PERMIT (RP 85-19) TO ALLOW A 70 UNIT HOTEL/COMMERCIAL COMPLEX. APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA BUILDERS CASE NO.: RP 85-19 (A)
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 16th day of
November, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, examining the
initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
and considering any written comments received, the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission considered all factors relating
to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitation are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission hereby APPROVES the Negative Declaration according to Exhibits t'ND*l and ItPII" dated October 28, 1988, on file in the Redevelopment Department, based on the following findings:
Findinss:
1:
2.
3.
///I
///I
The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant impact on the environment.
The streets are adequate in size to handle the approximate 144 ADT traffic generated by the proposed project.
There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly impacted by this project.
--
1
2
3
4
5
6
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of December, 1988,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
7 mm: None
8 ABSTAIN: None
9
10
11
/ggyl,,/~~
-ODE A. WIS, Chairperson
12 ATTEST:
13
14
15
16 ALETHAL.RA ~TENRRMZ, city cllerk
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
II HOUSING AND REDEVEIAPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 120
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOUSING MD REDEVEMPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 121
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELX)PMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARISBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FORAN 88 UNITHOTELOVERA
COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AND UNDERGROUND PARKING. APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA BUILDERS CASE NO.: RP/CDP 88-7
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
a provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission did, on the
16th day of November, 1988, hold a duly noticed public
hearing to consider said application on property described
as:
Portions of Block 5, Map 775 (365, 535) town of Carlsbad Amended ROS 8648.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all
persons desiring to be heard, said Housing and Redevelopment
Commission considered all factors relating to RP/CDP 88-7.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That the findings and conditions of the Design Review contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 123 shall constitute the findings and conditions of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
//I/
//I/
////
//I/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of December, 1988,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAGENKRANZ, City plerk
(SE=4
- ITEM 1
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE: NOVEMBER 1. 1988 <i-y
STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1988
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: RP B5-19(A)/CDP 88-7 - California Builders - Amendment to add 18
hotel units and 27 parking spaces to a previously approved
redevelopment permit for a 70 unit hotel/commercial complex at the southeast corner of Carlsbad Boulevard and Beech Street and Coastal Development Permit in Subarea 5 of the V-R zone of Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1.
I. RECOWENDATID?( L
That the Design Review Board ADOPT Resolution No. 121 recommending APPROVAL of
the Prior Compliance/Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and
ADOPT Resolution Nos. 122 and 123 recommending APPROVAL to the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of RP 85-19(A)/CDP 88-7, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained herein.
II. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION
On March 25, 1986, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission approved a major
Redevelopment Permit to construct a 70 unit hotel complex above a commercial area
with underground parking. The applicant is currently proposing to add an
additional 18 units by dividing 18 of the hotel suites. Twenty-seven parking
spaces are being proposed on an adjacent lot to accommodate the increased parking needs.
The original hotel/commercial complex received environmental review when the
project was processed in 1986. This review determined that the project would
not create any adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Oeclaration was
issued. At the time the original project was reviewed by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, the City did not have coastal permit authority; however, the City has subsequently received certification and permit authority for the Redevelopment Area. In addition to the Redevelopment Permit Amendment,
the applicant is now requesting approval of the required Coastal Development Permit for the entire project.
The attached environmental documents include a Prior Compliance for the original
proposal and an initial study and Negative Declaration for the additional 18 units and parking lot.
RP 85-19(A)/CDP 88-7 - California Builders
' / 1 November 16, 1988 PAGE 2
III.
Plannina Issueq
1. Does the proposed project comply with the standards and conditions of RP
88- 19?
2. Does the proposed project provide the required parking?
3. Can the existing circulation system adequately handle the increased traffic generated by the additional hotel units?
4. Has the site of the stonecutting operation been adequately preserved as required under Title 22 of the Municipal Code?
5. Is the proposed project consistent with the segments of Carlsbad's Local
Coastal Plan pertaining to the Village Redevelopment Area?
6. Does the project comply with the requirements of the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone l? L
DISCUSSION
Standards and Conditions of RP 85-19
The proposed project complies with all development standards and conditions established for RP 85-19. The project has remained basically the same with the
exception of the adjacent lot used for additional parking. The building
footprint and square footage have not increased or changed. The architectural
style, and detailing have all remained the same. The only difference between
the approved plan and the proposed plan is that the 18 larger suites have been
divided thereby creating 18 additional units and the need for 22 more parking
spaces. These spaces will be accommodated on an adjacent lot (See location map)
now owned by the applicant.
Parking
The proposed project complies with the parking requirements established for hotels at 1.2 spaces for each unit and for retail uses at 1 space for each 300
feet of gross floor area. The additional 18 hotel units will require an additional 22 spaces above the 116 spaces required for the original project. The applicant is providing 142 spaces or an excess of 26 spaces. The parking is located as follows: 115 spaces in the interior of the building; 27 spaces
on the adjacent lot. The parking area of Building B has been slightly modified so that ingress and egress can also be obtained through the open parking lot. The parking and circulation provided comply with all planning and engineering requirements.
RP 85-19(A)/CDP 88-7 California Builders November 16, 1988
Traffic
The applicant provided a traffic study when RP 85-19 was originally reviewed. At that time the transportation planner made the determination that the project would have no significant adverse traffic impacts. The project's primary traffic distribution on Carlsbad Boulevard can be efficiently absorbed through the traffic signals at Carlsbad/Grand, Carlsbad/Elm, and Carlsbad/Tamarack. The additional 18 units will create an additional 144 trips per day. This is a very minimal impact and easily absorbed by the existing circulation system.
Stonecutter's House
The site of the proposed open parking lot is currently occupied by an older single family dwelling and accessory buildings used for a former stone cutting operation. On June 13, 1988 the Historic Preservation Commission added this site
to its Historic Resource Inventory. This means the site has the potential to be designated as a Point of Interest which requires the site to be photographed
and documented. At the same time, any artifacts the Historical Preservation Commission may want to see preserved would then be relocated to another site. The Commission is presently uncertain of what actions they will take with regard to the site, however, the project has been conditioned to comply with any future
recommendations of the Commission prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Coastal Development Permit
The proposed project is consistent with the two segments of the Local Coastal Plan that pertain to this area of the City. These segments include: 1) the provision of adequate visitor-serving facilities within the Redevelopment Area; and 2) the provision of adequate parking consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed project implements the Local Coastal Plan by providing additional
visitor-serving facilities near the western terminus of Elm Avenue. The proposed
hotel, including the additional 18 units, provides adequate parking facilities and actually exceeds the parking requirements established in the Zoning Ordinance. In summary, the proposed project is a visitor-serving use which meets the parking requirements established by both the City and the Coastal Commission.
LFMP 7~one I.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 was approved on September 1, 1987. The project originally approved for this site was included in the calculations used in preparing the Zone 1 plan. The increased facility.demand
created by the additional 18 units complies with that plan in terms of being well within the future estimated square footage for commercial uses in the
Redevelopment Area. All performance standards continue to be met or exceeded
within Zone 1.
RP 85-19(A)/CDP 88-‘, California Builders November 16, 1988 ’ r ' PAGE 4
The subject site was previously approved to construct 70 hotel units over a
commercial complex and underground parking. This approval is presently being
amended by the addition of 18 units and 27 parking spaces on an adjacent lot.
The subject site is located in an infill area of Redevelopment and currently in
transition from older residential uses to commercial development. Based on field
checks by staff and the fact that the site is already developed with a residence
and accessory structures it was determined that there are no sensitive resources
on or adjacent to the site. The Planning Director has determined that this
project will have no significant impacts on the environment and, therefore,
issued a Prior Compliance/Negative Declaration on October 28, 1988. In addition,
no comments were received in response to either the previous or present Negative
Declaration.
ATTACHMENTS
:: 3: ;: ;: 1:: :::
Design Review Board Resolution No. 121 (Negative Declaration) Design Review Board Resolution Nos. 122 and 123
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form Exhibit "X", dated November 16, 1988
Exhibit "Y", dated November 16, 1988
Item 3, dated January 21, 1987 Staff Report dated March 5,1986 Reduced exhibits Exhibits "A" - “I” , dated October 19, 1988
AML:af October 26, 1988
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_-
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 121
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ADD 18 HOTEL UNITS AND 27 PARKING SPACES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT (RP 85-19) TO ALLOW A 70 UNIT HOTEL/COMMERCIAL
COMPLEX. APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA BUILDERS CASE NO.: RP 85-19(A)
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 16th day of November, 1988,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Design
Review Board considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board as
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review Board hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration according to Exhibit "ND" and “PII”, dated October 28, 1988, attached
hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinqs:
1. The initial. study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the
project may have a significant impact on the environment.
2. The streets are adequate in size to handle the approximate 144 ADT traffic generated by the proposed project.
3. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly impacted by this project.
////
////
///!
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review
Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of November,
1988, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MATTHEW HALL, Chairperson CARLSBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST: r
CHRIS SALOMONE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RESO. NO. 121 -2-
1 * 207; LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, cA 92009-4869
PLANNlNG DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT "ND"
TELEPHONE
(619) 438-l 161
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE/NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Please Take Notice:
The Plann'ing Department has determined that the environmental effects of a
portion of the project described below have already been considered in
conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore,
no additional environmental review will be required and a notice of determination
will be filed.
Project Title: RP 85-19(A)/CDP 88-7 - Califdrnia Builder
Project Location: Southeast corner of Carlsbad Boulevard and Beech Street:
A previously approved 70 unit hotel over commercial complex and undergroind
parking increased by the addition of 18 interior hotel units and adjacent lot
to accommodate 27 parking stalls. A Coastal Development Permit is also requested
for the entire project.
In addition, the City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance
of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration
(declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the
'environment) is hereby issued for the amended subject project. Justification
for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the
Planning Department, Community Development, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad,
California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments
in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance.
Dated: October 28, 1988
Case No.: RP 85-19(A)/CDP 88-7
MICHAEL 3. HOLZMiLLER
Planning Director
Applicant: California Builders
Publish Date: October 28, 1988 .
I.
1.
2.
3.
II.
1.
- EXHialT "p11"
]w 0 90 - PART II
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. RP 85-19(A)
DATE: October 28, 1988
BACKGROUNQ
APPLICANT: California Builders
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: P.O. Box 142
Carlsbad. CA 92008
DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: Se&ember 15. 1988
ENVIRONMENTAL
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE m-
Earth- Will the proposal c
have significant results in:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil?
Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
The destruction, covering of modification of any-unique geologic or physical features?
Any increase in-wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site?
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
X
X
X
X
X
.
. ,
2. u - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally?
3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in:
X
X
X
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g*
h.
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by.cuts or excavations?
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?
X
4l
X
X
X
X
X
-2-
- -
YES NO
4.
a.
b.
c.
d.
5.
a.
b.
c.
d.
6.
7.
,. a.
Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in:
Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants?
Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
1 fife - Will the proposal have significant results in:
Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)?
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals?
Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? .
Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels?
. and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare?
Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area?
-3-
X
X
X
X
c
X
X
X
X
X
X
MAYBE
9. Watm Resourceg - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
X
X
10. Risk of Unset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
11. Ponulatioq - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? -x
12. yousinq - Will the proposal signif- c icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X
13. Transnortation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Generation of additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking?
c. Impact upon existing transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
X
X
X
X
X
X
-4-
-
14.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
15.
a;
b.
16.
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
17.
YES MAYBE NQ
es - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or other recreational facilities?
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
Other governmental services?
Enercrv - Will the proposal have significant results in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy?
Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
Water?
Sewer or septic tanks?
Storm water drainage?
Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-5-
-
18.
19.
20.
21.
a)
b)
cl
d)
e)
f)
9)
Aesthetica - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view?
. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
Archeoloaical/Historical/Paleontolouica~ - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building?
X
X
X
Analyze viable alternatives to the DroDosed Droiect such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,- c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- c nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
The parking lot is too small to be phased. The 18 additional hotel units will be constructed at the time the hotel itself is constructed. Given the L-shaped configuration of the parking lot, there are no alternative site designs possible. Surface striping of the parking is not a significant design feature. The proposed parking lot is a minimum scale of development for a commercially-designated site. The subject site is designated for commercial types of uses. These types of uses would be difficult to develop due to the small size of the property as well as a difficult lot configuration that has little street frontage. Development later would have little change in the environmental impacts. The subject site is well situated to be developed in conjunction with the previously-approved hotel project. A "no project" alternative would leave the subject site with a rather rundown single family dwelling, shed, and deteriorating equipment. The site has the potential, given its CBD land use designation, to develop as a commercial site.
-6-
22.
.a.
b.
C.
d.
YBB NO . .I Mandatorv fi,.u&inus of sianiflcance -
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment?
Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.)
Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.)
Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
X
X
Lx
X
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The subject site was previously approved for the construction of 70 hotel units over a commercial complex and underground parking. This approval is presently being amended by the addition of 18 hotel units and 27 parking spaces on an adjacent lot. The subject site is located in an infill area of Redevelopment and currently is in transition from older residential uses'to commercial development. Based on field checks by staff and the fact that the site is already developed with a residence and accessory structures it was determined that there are no sensitive resources on or adjacent to the site.
Potential impacts from the additional18 units and the 27 parking stalls include:
(1) Noise generated from the parking lot on adjacent property owners.
-7-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) .
(2) Impact upon existing roadways.
Potential noise impacts from the parking lot will be mitigated by the construction of a solid masonry wall on the perimeter property lines of the parking lot. This is considered adequate because surrounding property is designated for commercial rather than residential land uses and likely to be redeveloped in the future at a higher land use intensity.
The amended project, which includes the additional 18 hotel units, will generate 144 ADTs more than the original project. While this is an incremental increase of traffic along Carlsbad Boulevard, this impact is not considered a significant impact in that it doesn't meet the test for significance per Section 15064 of CEQA.
Overall, the environmental analysis and field checks conducted by staff indicated that because there are no sensitive resources on the subject property and because the site has been previously developed and is within an urban area no significant project environmental impacts are anticipated. There were no public comments received in response to the Notice for a Negative Declaration.
c
-a-
IV. PETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find the proposed project m have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Signature /
/ ' hi\ &%a Plann-g DHector c
V.MITIGATINGmASURES (If Applicable)
-9-
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 122
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ADD 18 HOTEL UNITS AND 27
PARKING SPACES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND BEECH STREET.
APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
CASE NO.: RP 85-19(A)
6
7
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad
and .referred to the Design Review Board; and
8
9
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
10
11
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board did, on the 16th day of November, 1988, hold a duly noticed-public
12 hearing to consider said application on property described as: c
13 Portions of Block 5, Map 775 (365, 535) Town of Carlsbad, Amended
14 ROS 8648.
15 WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
16 arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Board considered
17 all factors relating to RP 85-19(A) '_
18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board of the
19 City of Carlsbad as follows:
20 (A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
21 (B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board recommends APPROVAL of RP 85-19(A), based on the following findings and
22 subject to the following conditions:
23 Findinas:
24 1) The proposed project is consistent with the goals of Sub-area 5 of the Village Redevelopment Area by providing-tourist serving commercial uses
25 in the downtown area.
26 2) The project complies with the segments of the Local Coastal Program
relating to this area of the City by providing tourist-serving types of
27 uses.
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
12
14
15
15
17
1E
1s
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
2:
28
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
The project is consistent with the parking regulations specified in the Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance.
The Design Review Board has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Design Review Board is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met
insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required
as conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of
that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The proposed project is compatible,with the surrounding future land uses
since surrounding properties are designated for tourist/connercial
development on the General Plan.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impactsand a
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on October
28, 1988, and reconmnended for approval by the,Design Review Board on
November 16, 1988. In approving this Negative Declaration the Design
Review Board has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the environment.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public
facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has
agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of
public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
Conditions
1) Approval is granted for RP 85-19(A) as shown on Exhibits"A"-"I", dated October 19, 1988, incorporated by reference and on file in the Housing and Redevelopment Department. Development shall occur substantially as
shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
2) The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", 100 scale mylar copy of the site plan as approved by the Design Review Board. The site plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of
building permits or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
DRB RESO NO. 122 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
////
////
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the
City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider's agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated April 15, 1988, copies of which are on file with the City Clerk and are incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this
application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void.
The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit
application.
Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Costa Real Water District, dated May 25, 1983.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on September 1, 1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not
issued for this project within one year from the date of project
approval, unless an extension is approved by the Design Review Board.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, pursuant to Building Department
Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and
Building.
DRB RESO NO. 122 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
18)
19
20
21)
Compact parking spaces shall be located in large groups in locations to
the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Compact parking areas shall
be clearly marked with signs to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property.
No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading permits. Such plan shall include the planting of 48" box Queen Palms along Carlsbad Boulevard.
All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in size.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals along all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List.
A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Housing and Redevelopment Director for his review and approval prior to occupancy of any building. Said .program shall comply with the restrictions of the Local Coastal Program.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their
background color.
The project shall provide bus stop facilities at locations subject to the
satisfaction of the North County Transit District. Said facilities shall
at a minimum include a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract from the basic architectural theme of the project and said design- shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director and North County Transit District.
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever comes first, a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Carlsbad. If the soils report indicates the presence of potential fossil bearing material then a standard two phased program, on file in the Planning Department, shall be undertaken to avoid possible significant impacts on paleontological resources under the direction of the Planning Department.
DRB RESO NO. 122 -4-
‘ .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
22) Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit, the applicant shall agree to allow the Historical Preservation CoAlrission to document and photograph the former site of the stonecutting operation and to allow the ConuGssion to relocate any equipment associated with the structure.
23) The applicant shall construct a 6' slump block wall around the perimeter
of the parking lot and along the east side of the driveway. The design
of said wall shall be approved by the Planning Director.
Enqineerina Conditions
24)
25)
26)
27)
28)
29)
30 1
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as approved by the City Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or
approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall maintain the
temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time
DRB RESO NO. 122 -5-
The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site.
The grading for this project is defined as "controlled grading" by
Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Grading shall be
performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility
it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the City Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties.
A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a 'separate
grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within
the city limits.
All slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:l.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
.. 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
31)
32)
33)
34)
35)
36)
37)
38)
39)
40)
..-
satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the City Engineer.
Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed as may be required by the City Engineer.
The owner of the subject property shall.execute a hold harmless agreement
regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to the approval of
any grading for this project.
The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all
public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the
site development plan. The offer shall be made prior to issuance of any building permit for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost
to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
Carlsbad Boulevard shall be dedicated by the developer along the
subdivision frontage based on a center line to right-of-way width of 51
feet and in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior to
occupancy of any buildings.
The developer shall obtain the City Engineer's approval of the project
improvement plans and enter into a secured agreement with the City for completion of said improvements prior to issuance of any building permit within this project. The improvements shall be constructed and accepted for maintenance by the City Council prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit within the project. The improvements are:
Full half street improvements to Beech Street and Christianson Way along the project frontage including offsite transitions to the approval of the City
Engineer.
Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City
Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this site plan.
The developer shall install street lights along all public and private
street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design
requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 12 months of the
improvement plan approval or prior to occupancy, whichever occurs first.
The export/import operation shall occur between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. No hauling shall occur on weekends or City observed holidays.
DRB RESO NO. 122 -6-
,-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
41)
42)
43)
44)
45)
46)
47)
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Carlsbad Boulevard shall be waived prior to the issuance of building permits other than the entrance and exit shown on the site plan.
Prior to building permit issuance the developer shall design a sump pump
back up system subject to the approval of the City Engineer for
installation with the building.
Prior to issuance of a building permit the owner shall legally consolidate the two existing lots into one lot.
Prior to building permit issuance the owner shall enter into an agreement
to pay for the under-grounding of existing overhead utility lines along
his frontage and across the street from this project.
Prior to issuance of a building permit the owner shall apply for and
obtain approval of a 10' street vacation along the frontage of Beech
Avenue.
Prior to building permit issuance the developer shall enter into a
reimbursement agreement with the City for half street improvement of
Carlsbad Boulevard from centerline of Beech Avenue to centerline of
Christianson Way.
Prior to building permit issuance the developer shall enter iito'an
agreement to pay drainage area fees.
Fire Conditions
48)
49)
50)
51)
52)
53)
Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall
be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department.
Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed
necessary by the Fire Marshal.
The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for approval.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted "NO Parking/Fire Lane - Tow Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Municipal Code.
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic
sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted
to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
DRB RESO NO. 122 -7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 ‘_
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
54) Building exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. aggregate floor area shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000 sq. ft. (or less) areas.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review
Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of November,
1988, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
CHRIS SALOMONE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RESO NO. 122 -8-
MATTHEW HALL, Chairman = CARLSBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
.-
1
2
3
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOIJJTION NO. 123
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THR CIm OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIARECOMKENDINGAPPROVALOFA COASTALDEVE~PMENTPERWITFORAN88UNITHOTEL OVERACOEIMERCIALCOMPIgXAND~~~O~PARKING. APPLICANT: CALIFORNIABUILDRRS CASE NO.: RP/CDP 88-7
WREXRAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Design Review Board; and
WRRRRAS, said verified application constitutes a request
a provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WRRRRAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Design Review Board did, on the 16th day of
November, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing to
consider said application on property described as:
Portions of Block 5, Map 775 (365,535) town of Carlsbad, Amended ROS 8648.
WEIEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all
persons desiring to be heard, said Housing and Redevelopment
Commission considered al factors relating to RP/CDP 88-7.
NOW, THEREFORE RR IT RRRRBY RESOLVED by the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the board recommends approval of RP/CDP 88-7, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinus:
1) The project is consistent with the goals and policies established by the City's Local Coastal Plan for this area.
2) The proposed project complies with the segments of the Local Coastal Program relating to this area of the City by providing tourist-serving types of uses.
3) The project is consistent with the parking regulations
- _-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3)
4)
5)
The project is consistent with the parking regulations specified in the Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance.
The project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and has undergone previous environmental review for a 70 unit hotel/commercial complex, therefore, the Planning Director has issued a Notice of Prior compliance and a Negative Declaration on October 28, 1988, for the additional 18 hotel units and 27 parking spaces.
The project is consistent with the Local Coastal Plan for the Redevelopment Area based on compliance of the following conditions:
Conditions:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
////
////
////
////
////
The proposed project shall provide 142 parking spaces.
The proposed project shall not increase in height over the approved plan.
The detailed sign program for the proposed development shall be submitted to the Housing and Redevelopment Director for his review and approval prior to occupancy for any building. No pole signs shall be allowed.
Because the Redevelopment Area drains to Buena Vista Lagoon and Agua Hedionda Lagoon, the proposed project shall provide erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to minimize sedimentation impacts to the lagoons.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval unless an extension is approved by the Design Review Board.
DRB RESO. NO. 123 .
. i
^ .I ‘L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
._ I8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED MD ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held
on the 16th day of November, 1988, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MATTHENHALL, Chairman Carlsbad Design Review Board
ATTEST:
CHRIS sAIm!oNE Housing and Redevelopment Director
DRB RESO. NO. 123 - 'i - T - . ; t
0 5 - 6 ;; c> 6 Y p 4 ,t ‘$ *n l
* k+J *.a . ,* D I. . d\: I& - - %a c F
L0cATi0~ MAP
ZYAGEEPARX
I
CYPRESS AVE
ca
@\
l
s 0 ‘I
0 m
samI 0 4
CHRISTIANSEN WAY
> CAREBAD BY :
AMENDMENT
AREd
I
I
. -
i I
RP 85=19(A)
‘CIALIFORNIA BUILDERS SF-Single Family V-Vacant
C-carmercial
- -
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: RP 85-19/A)
APPLICANT: . California Builders
REQUEST AND WCATION: endment of a Dreviouslv annroved
redevelopment nermit to add 18 hotel units and 27 Darkins snaces
to a 70 unit hotel/commercial comDlex.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of block 5. MaD 775 (365. 535) town
pf Carlsbad. Amended ROS 8648 APN: 203-172-21.22
Acres 1.1
units
Proposed No. of Lots/Units 18 additional hotel
GENERAJo PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation CBD
Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A
Existing Zone VR Sub-area 5 Proposed Zone N/A t Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zonina
Site VR Vacant
North VR School nlavina field
South VR Commercial
East
West
SFD/ADts.
Commercial/Lutheran Home
PUBJJC FACILITIES
Costa Real/ School District-Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad
EDU's 18 AdditionalPublic Facilities Fee Agreement, Date 8/15/88
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative declaration, issued October 28. 1988 X
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other, Prior Comnliance dated October 28. 1988
/
- DISCLOSURE FORM
APPLICANT: Carl&ad Boulevard Hotel General Partnership
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
P-0. Box 142, Carl&ad, CA 92008
6USiness Address
619-434-312s
Telephone Number
AGENT: Peter J. Lmganbach, managing partner
Name@a-k3~e; E: ~,Iy,sqen~ Corporation
619-434-3125
MEMBERS:
Telephone Number
Please see attached
Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
c
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
l/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, l/we will apply
for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development.
l/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be
necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board
members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the
subject of this application. l/We consent to entry for this purpose.
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure
is .true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon
as being true and correct until amended.
Carl&ad Boulevard Hotel General Partnership
Peter J. Lmganbach - Managing Partner P.O. Box 8193
Ranch0 Santa Fe, CA 92067
Dave Ball 1935 National Avenue National City, CA 92050
Tony McCune 2340 National City Boulevard National City, CA 92050
Phone 756-4284
Phone 474-6431
Phone 477-1101
Lee T. Nordan, M.D. 9834 Genesee Avenue Suite 209 La Jolla, CA 92037 Phone 457-2220
Charles F. Rowe Investment Corporation California Charles F. Rowe, president 3-23-87 P.O. Box 142 #1582529 - no shareholders Carl&ad, CA 92008 Phone 434-3125
Sheman Simnons 3725 South Industrial Las Vegas, NV 89109
Ted Tollner 5299 Chestnut Ridge Road Apt. A Orchard Park, NY 14127
Phone l-702-731-1011
Phone 1-716-649-2117
mAssessaJr (TbTZkZZZhDavalel~ Application)
HXUECFDANDWm-:
FILBNAMEANDNO.: RI' 85-19(A)
ImALF7iamrY~zoNE:~~ PLAN: CBD ZONING: V-R
rImmcorn'S NAME: edlifornia
m: Bx 142
PIma m.: 434-3125 ASSBSCR'S PAEECEL EEO. 2030172-a22
CWWlTIYOFL?4NDusE/DEVELDH'lR?l! (AC., SQ. FT., ar): 1.1~
*A.
*B.
c.
*D.
**E.
F:
G.
H.
*1.
J.
K.
City Addnktmtive Facilities; Demand in Squam Foutage = N/A %
Library: bmnd in Squam Footage = N/A
WasbwaterTreaixmt Capacity (CalculatewithJ. Sewer)
Parks; lkxmd in Acreage = N/A
DlLaimp; Demand in CES = N/A IcbtifyDrainageBasin =w (Idmtify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation; Demand in Am% = 144 (Identify Trip Distributionon site plan)
Fire; ServedbyFireStatiunNo. = 1
-space: AcreagePruvided -ExemtuMer~ Citywide Facilities Plan
i5cA%Jols; - -N/A (Dmlmdstobedeterminedbystaff)
-; -inEuJs - 10.8 IdentifySubBasin - VC9 (Identifytnmkline(s) impacted cn site plan)
water: &snarxlinGPD - 2376
*N&z qlicable to -ial Developrrent **TobemitigatedbyfeeshsedonnewMasterD+.nagePlan
EXHIBIT X 11/16/8i 8
I
nl I
SITE
r n
n
4
n
0 n m >
z
I
.; TAMARACK 81
b.
a ~I’“:‘::‘“I l%i
ONANO AW
Elii El
EXHIBIT “Y= 11/M/88
Building
Paving Coverage
Landscaping Coverage
SITE INFORHATI~
Sauare Feet % of Total Site
31,680 63.0%
4,336 8.5%
14,514 28.5%
PARKING
Previous RP 85-19
Reauired
Retail 9,620 sq.ft. @ 1:300 - 32
Hotel 70 units @ 1.2:1 = @!I
116
ProDosed RP 85-19(A) Reauired
Retail 9,200 sq.ft. @ 1:300 = 31
Hotel 88 units @ 1.2:1 = 106
137
Provided
36
&!I
120
Provided
31
106
142 [27 open - 115 enclosed]
/
-. .
.
- f ’ IltM 3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
INFORNATION ITEM
JANUARY 21, 1987
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE
RP 85-19 - CALIFORNIA BUILDERS -Condition amendment and addition of driveway.
The Design Review Board approved RP 85-19 on March 5, 1986, with the Housing and Redevelopment Commission approval following on March 25, 1986. Condition number 5 of Design Review Board Resolution No. 068 which approves this project requires building permits to be issued within one year from the date of project approval or the approval becomes null and void. The applicant is asking for a one year extension of the approval to March 25, 1988. The reasons for the request include the complexity of completing the 57 conditions of c approval to the satisfaction of the City, the pursuit of proper financial commitments, and a delay of several months caused by an engineering and planning staff review of a proposed design change. The proposed change,is the addition of a driveway through the Porte cochere. The attached document from the engineering department refers to that change. Staff supports the addition of the driveway as conditioned.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter, dated January 6, 1987, from California Builders
2. Engineering Department memo
.>I-CLILL.lA Ziibl SEPTEMB- 9 ;“u.‘.*L i;lu n .. .
I 1985
.
STAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 5, 1986
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJBCT: RP 85-19 - CALIFORNIA BUILDERS - Request for approval of a redevelopment permit to construct a 70 unit hotel complex above a commercial area with underground parking at the southeast corner of Carlsbad Boulevard and Beech Street in Sub-area S of the V-R zone.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That.the Design Review Board recommend APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 068, recommending APPROVAL of RP 85-19, basedthe finding8 and subject to the conaltlons contained therein.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . : . . II. c
The applicant is requesting approval of a redevelopment permit’to develop a 70 unit hotel complex above a commercial area on 1.1
acres, located as described above. The subject property,. which is irregularly shaped, presently vacant and slopes slightly to the east. The site fronts on three streets - Carlsbad Boulevard, Beech Street, and Christiansen Way.
The proposed three-story structure, averaging 32 feet in height, would be developed over semi-subterranean parking. Access to this parking area would be derived from both Beech Street and Christiansen Way.
Surrounding land uses include assorted commercial uses to the south, and school offices to the north. Small, older, single family dwellings are located to the east. To the west, small
commercial uses exist as well as a church and the Lutheran Home. Other, larger, commercial developments in the general area include the Twin-Inns, Carlsbad Inn, the Rombotis office-
commercial project, and the Tamarack Beach Resort.
III. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
.
1) Does the proposed project conform with the goals of Sub- area 5 of the Village Redevelopment Area?
2) Does the project comply with the development standards of the Village Design Manual?
3) Can the existing circulation system adequately handle the increased traffic generated by this project?
Discussion
V-R Area Goals
The proposed project is located towards the northern end of Sub- area S in the Village Redevelopment area and is "envisioned as serving as the major tourist/tourist commercial center" for this portion of the City. It also falls within the Carlsbad Boulevard Special Treatment area which encourages pedestrian traffic, ',specialized commercial uses and heavy streetscaping along Carlsbad Boulevard. Staff believes the proposed project meets these goals. Small specialty shops catering to tourists have been proposed at the ground-floor of the structure along Carlsbad Boulevard. A 70 unit hotel is planned,for the upper two stories of both the front and the rear building. It is expected that tourists utilizing the hotel will also patronize the tourist- 'oriented shops. Staff believes the proposed project is consistent with: both'the goals and permitted uses of Sub-area 'S.% '
Village Design Manual Standards
The proposed project does meet all requirements of both the Zoning Ordinance and the Design Guidelines Manual. Setbacks are not required in a commercial zone, however, the applicant has provided generous, landscaped setbacks of 19' - 20' on Beech Street, Carlsbad Boulevard and Christiansen Way. A 10' setback has been provided along the interior property line. Approximately 36% of the site consists of landscaping. One hundred sixteen parking spaces have been required for this project, 120 spaces have been provided. This parking has been located in a semi-subterranean parking garage. Staff finds this acceptable, even for the retail uses, because similar situations have worked successfully in other areas (i.e. Old Town San Diego and Carlsbad Inn). ‘Access to the parking garage can be taken from either Beech Street or Christiansen Way. Through
circulation to either street has been incorporated into the traffic design. -
Land Use and Compatibility
As previously stated, the project site provides uses stipulated in Sub-area 5 of the Redevelopment area. This site is also designated for tourist-commercial uses under the Local Coastal Plan. It should be noted, however, that this particular block is in an area of transition. Although the subject site is vacant,
-2-
many lots in this block consist of older, single family homes. Since this area is desingated for tourist commercial development by the Village Design Manual, it is likely that these older
single family homes will eventually be replaced with commercial
uses. staff believes, the proposed use is still justified and
desirable based on other projects which have been approved for this general vicinity (listed earlier). Staff sees this project ag a continuation of tourist/commercial uses on Carlsbad Boulevard and an encouragement for intervening sites to develop in a similar fashion.
Architecture
The three-story StCUCtUte, featuring a contemporary Spanish style of architecture, has an average height of 32'. This complies with the 35' height limit of the Village Redevelopment Area. The buildings themselves will be an off-white stucco with Spanish tile roofs. As previously stated, the ground floor of the most westerly building will house specialty shops which are entered from an arched arcade accented with promenade planters and trellises for climbing vines. The roof line has been varied and augmented with a tower to add interest. The major architectural feature along the Carlsbad Boulevard frontage will be a simula?ed porte'cochere at the'entry backdropped by a two-story glass c atrium over the lobby area. All the hotel units will have private balconies and the occupants will also be able to utirize the interior courtyard. This has been designed for outdoor eating and lounging, featuring both a spa and lap pool. Staff believes the modulated facade emphasized with cobalt blue tile, lattice and railings and accented with 48" box Queen Palm trees will handsomely compliment the downtown area.
Traffic
The transportation planner believes this project will have no significant adverse traffic impact. The typical peak hour traffic generation does not coincide with normal street peak traffic hours, thus the project's primary traffic distribution on Carlsbad Boulev,ard can be efficiently absorbed through the traffic signals at Carlsbad/Grand CarlsbadIElm, and Carlsbad/Tamarack (see attached traffic plat).
The driveway entrance on Beech Street is closer to the corner than is desirable, but Beech is a lightly traveled street, extending only one block easterly from Carlsbad Boulevard. Even though the developer's frontage on Beech Street is only 95 feet wide, a driveway there is a fair trade-off for not having 'any driveway access to the property from Carlsbad Boulevard.
As proposed, this use is consistent with the design concepts of the Village Design Manual and the goals of Sub-area 5 of the Village Redevelopment Area, therefore, staff recommends approval of RP 85-19.
-3-
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on February 15, 1986.
ATTACHMENTS
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
f’,
8) 9)
Design Review Board Resolution No. 068 Location Map Vicinity Map Exhibit "B", dated January 26, 1986 Traffic Plat Background Data Sheet Disclosure Form Environmental Document Exhibits , dated
AML:bn
2/19/86
. . . . . . c
-49
AVM N3SNVllSlYW
*.
t: 1
p/
I
:
I
I , .I
1 :. - I , I
1 i
: I
1; ]
: ;
I I
I
- I
*ii II'
2:
1 yi
4f-l
i 1
t: 11 El ! I, r,; le
0
*,'
I
Q
-0 D -1 3
__ __.. -- -.- __ _ _ _._ __.. --
-. i r : ?I yi ;i L
,.I i
!
I -J-l- -
r-F-- SE id/ 7J
i
I
I
i
I .
1 I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
,H I
I
! I I
!a ! I
LI’ I I -
4 I u&i ~---+vl-7- I Ml
-E&
EE ,*;-,I-
--I i --’
+
GJ---
( --c-F
/ Ii LL. .a
-,GZI
i’ 41 -_ - ( ! ;
w- ,--l- - I
.-
--
’ .
Q *yf: -2 -t-z - ii c iii ? t t, !ti i" L: 4 t. i)
I i I
, I’ I I ’ I
I !
i
I I I
I
:
I I I I .-- --
11
-i
wBL:cL 1
j
i
I 1
I: /
. c
!
j iii
I1w -..I i i.?
. j
I ! &lh!--U-~ /
t, $3
;, ;-,,;1. I ! 1” $r7:i:+7~ *in
I
I I I I ’ I III i U4 I\“! :. _
,jz: gi _I 1’
f
; ’
,_I II
1 ! ]i
If
I
I
1 1 I -w-.-
1 1, d i
I i !I’ I -
/
- - -- - --. ._.-_ -._--. --
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RP 85-19 (A)/CDP 88-7
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, December 20, 1988, to consider an amendment to add 18 hotel units and 27 parking spaces to a previously approved
Redevelopment Permit for a 70 unit hotel/commercial complex at the southeast corner
of Carlsbad Boulevard and Beech Street and a Coastal Development Permit in Subarea 5
of the V-R zone of Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 and more particularly
described as:
Portions of Block 5, Map 775 (365,535) town of Carlsbad,
Amended ROS 8648.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Redevelopment
Department at 434-2811.
If you challenge the Amendment or Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: California Builders
PUBLISH: December 9, 1988 CARLSBAD HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
LOCATION MAP
..IC” r-t-7 mf14
SITE 1
AMENDMENT
AREA)
I I’ RP SS- 1 @(A) *mm* v-w (CYU. CALIFORNIA BUILDER!
-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the
hold a public Qaring at the Council California,.at@@p.m. on m, *
of the City of Carlsbad wil 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad
9 1988, to consider approva
1
i of an amendment to add 18 hotel units and 27 parking spaces to a previously approved Redevelopment Permit for a 70 unit hotel/commercial complex at the
southeast corner of Carlsbad Boulevard and Beech Street and a Coastal Development
Permit in Subarea 5 of the V-R zone of Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 and more particularly described as:
Portions of Block 5, Map 775 (365, 535) town of Carlsbad, Amended ROS 8648
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Redevelopment Department at 434-2811.
If you challenge the Amendment or Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: RP 85-19(A)/CDP 88-7 APPLICANT: California Builders PUBLISH: November 4, 1988
CITY OF CARLSBAD
l HOkING AND REDEVELOPMENT
Mitg af (lhulsba8
REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE
2965 Roosevelt Street
Suite B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 434-2811
TO: CIW CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: Housing and Redevelopment Director
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
RP 85-19 (A)/CDP 88-7 California Builders
for a public hearing before the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission. Please notice the item for the Commission
meeting of December 20, 1988 .
Thank you.
CHRIS SAmMONE Housing and Redevelopment Director DATE
42. 203-141-08 56. - 203-172-05 _ kzf+x, Gloria A. Mndy, Vladislava M. 518 Fernleaf Avenue 2733 Washington Street prom Mel Mar, CA 92625 Carlsbad, CA 92008
42. 203-141-08
-E=nt 2668 Ocean Street carlsbad, CA 92008
57,58 2o3-i72-o4,203-172-03 Tcmaro, Anthmy F. 367 Beech Avenue car&bad, CA 92008
43. 203-141-15 Street, AM & Sigrid V.
2669 Garfield Street Carl&ad, CA 92008
57. 203-172-04 Occupant i 385BeechAvenue Carl&ad, CA 92008
44. 203-141-16 203-172-02 67. 203-172-12
bbphy , Edward E. & &&?lh3 yaung, Mary c* 1147 Escondido Avenue f&h Mary A 351 EL&h A&we 352 Christiansen Way
Vista, CA 92083 / Carl&ad, CA 92008 Carl&ad, CA 92008
44. 203-141-16 60. 203-172-20 occupant Caan,RobertH. 61 Joann E. 2661 Garfield Street 333 Beech street Car&had, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
46,50,51,52,54,55, 61. 203-172-21
F-2 "Bi!zo"6fpd"y E&mu-m, Charles R.
C&&ad, CA 92008 4140 Skyline Road Car&bad, CA 92008 203-142-06,203-041-01,203-051-03, 203-052-01,02, 203-053-01 47. 203-141-17 61. 203-172-21 Gronquist,RichardtJUneJ, occupant 2651 Garfield Street / 327 Beech Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carl&ad, CA 92008
48. 203-142-03 62. 203-172-06 McLauqklin, Jess & Carol A. Wright, Severine E. P. o.-Bax i33 Carl&ad, CA 92008 2510 chestnut Avenue 1 carlsbad, CA 92008
49. 203-142-02 Castens, Glenn D. 2424 Jefferson Street Carl&ad, CA 92008
49. 203-142-02 occupant 2645 Carl&ad Blvd. Car&bad, CA 92008
53. 203-171-01 State of Calif. Dept. of Forestm
62. 203-172-06
Occupant 2747 Washington Street Carl&ad, CA 92008
63,64 203-172-07, 08 Vollmr,Harry Jr. & Imine M 3990 Highland Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008
64. 203-172-08
occupant 382 Christiansen Way Carlsbad, CA 92008
- 65. 203-172-16 Mahoney, John & Sibert Ellen 380 Cedar Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
66. 203-172-11 chow,cary s. & Roberta Mifsud,TerryC. P. 0. Box 5085 Fulkrton, CA 92635
66. 203-172-11
occupant 370-72 Uxristiansen Way Carlsbad, CA 92008
68,69,70,71,78,74,
203-)72:14,15, 203-173- 1 chr1stlansen,catheryn P&3 2,
P. 0. Bax 188. Car&bad, CA 92008 203-173-05,203-173-08 72. 203-173;03 Fikes,Jay C & Tbsuner, Fikes, Lebriz 2421 Buena Vista Circle Carl&ad, CA 92008
72. 203-173-03 occupant 381-85 Cedar Street Carl&ad, CA 92008
73. 203-173-04 Fasenstock,Donald & Ibnna 10690 camin De1 Venado Valley Center,cA 92083
73. 203-173-04 Occupant 390 Grand Avenue Carlskad, CA 92008
74. 203-173-05 Occupant 380 Grand Avenue Car&bad, CA 92008
75,76,77 203-173-03,13,12
Burnette, Ral@~ F. Jr. 390 Grand Avenue Car&bad, CA 92008
-1 .-’ 20X-054-25 1. 203-054-25 * "&l~e&ni,Mario E. t Barbara occupant 1753 supset Drive 2677 State Street
Vista, CA 92083 Carlsbad, CA 92008
2. 203-054-07 Hill, Rich& L. & Sara M. P. 0. Box 385 Carl&ad, CA 92008
3&4. 203-054-27 Arthur&AliceBr&m 2691-99 State Street Carl&ad, CA 92008
5. 203-054-04
SanDiegoGas & EhctricCo. 5315 Avenida Encinas Car&bad, CA 92008
6. 203-054-03 Martin, Dorin & Billie J. Nelson, George &Martha 2725 State Street car&bad, CA 92008
7. 203-054-24 HenqC. &MaryE. 2739 state street Carl&ad, CA 92008
8. 203-054-01 Daniel & Ann Orrgais P. 0. Box 1668 Carl&ad, CA 92008
8. 203-054-01 occupant 2763 State Street Carl&ad, CA 92008
9. 203-295-01 Bauer, Anna TR &I Richard REis, Dorothy P. 0. Box 8 Carl&ad, CA 92008
10,11,19, 203-054-28,203-296-
A.T. & S.F. Railway Co. 09, 1 Santa Fe Plaza 02 5200 E. Sheila Street I.03 Angeles, CA 90040
12,14,15,16,17,18,45
City of Carl&ad 203-296-10,02,03, 203-294-04,05,06
_-
2. 203-054-07 -pant 2685 State St.& Carl&ad, CA 92008
20,21 203-174-07,06 TILLtd.
C/O Fbbert B. Burke 630 Grand Avenue Carl&x-i, CA 92008
22,23 203-174-01,03 Security Title InsuranceCo.TR / P. 0. Box 1590 San Diego, CA 92112 ! ,
24,25 203-174-04,05 Jensen, Harold & Shirley Y. 2924 Carl&ad Blvd. Carl&ad, CA 92008 1
26,27 2b3-232-04,03 Garner, Charles & Sarah M. Garner, &arks N. EZ! AL 25775 Toluca Drive San Bernardino,cA 92404
26. 203-232-04
-Pt 2939 Carlsbad Blvd. Carlsbad, CA 92008
27. 203-232-03
occupant 2935 carlsbad Blvd. Carl&ad, CA 92008
28,29 203-232-15,203-231-01 i Californiahkheran Hams Inc. 2400 S Fremnt Avenue Alhahra, CA 91803 ! I
28. 203-232-15
-pant 201 Grand Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
29. 203-231-01
-P=t 2855 Carl&ad Blvd. carlshad, CA 92008
30. 203-144-03 Tbbo Invesbmts 2785 Wsevelt street Carl&ad, CA 92008
31. 203-144-01 Havens, Fred 2. Jr.-Barbara TRS 2139 Archdale Street Riverside, CA 92506
32,33,34,35 203-143-07,06,02, St. Michaels-Byrne-sea 01 Episcopal Church P. 0. Bax 127 Carl&ad, CA 92008
X,39 203-141-25,26
Netherlands West General Partnership c/o WGrath 2685 Garfield Street Carlsbad, CA 92008
37. 203-141-11 Joanne M. Eady P. 0. Box 3074 Carl&ad, CA 92008
37. 203-141-11 occupant 2668 Ocean Street Carl&ad, CA 92008
38. 203-141-10 Bixby, Mary L. 2141 E. Vine Avenue west cbvina, CA 91791'
40. 203-141-14
Neely,Jennie B. &Debra L. Neely,Bohbie P. 0. Box 191 We&em Falls, OK 74470
t&u 203-141-14 pant 2677 Garfield Street Cahbad, CA 92008
41. 203-141-09 Gordon,Irving J. & Doris A. 10952 Rathborne Avenue Northridge, CA 91324
41. 203-141-09 occupant 2678 Ocean Street Carl&ad, CA 92008
19. 203-173-09 - 'Eel&e, 'Ihw.5 F & Kathleen I?. 6. i!?ac 2243
Mission yiejo, CA 92675 ' J
79. 203-173-09
Occupant 2858 Carlsbad Blvd. Chrlsbad, CA 92008
#5966 BRIAN SMITH ENGINEERS‘ INC.
2656 State street Carl&ad, CA 92008
Owner: Sea Horse Investments P. 0. Ebx 142 Carlsbad, CA 92008
13. 205-294-01 !Satter1y,chester & Lahana 1349 Melrose Way Vista, CA 92083
L3. 205-294-01
occupant 2825 State Street Chrlsbad, CA 92008