HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-12-19; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 144; California Builders - Permit ExtensionHOUSING AND - /c; ffrc j t.. EDEVELOPMENT COMYISS-,N - AGENDA BILL 0 4
AB# 144 TITLE:
MTG. 12/19/89 ONE YEAR PERMIT EXTENSION -
RP 85-19(A)/CDP 88-7 DEPT. RED CALIFORNIA BUILDERS I __~~ RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If Housing and Redevelopment Commission concurs, your
action is to adopt Resolution No. 157, APPROVING an
extension of a Redevelopment Permit for one year.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The applicant, California Builders, is requesting that
they be given an extension of a major redevelopment permit
for hotel development proposed for properties located on
north Carlsbad Boulevard.
The Redevelopment Permit was approved by the Commission at
your December 20, 1988, meeting. The applicant has
notified the City that the property is currently in escrow
and is anticipated to close before the end of the year.
Because this closing date conflicts with the current
permit expiration date, the developer has officially
requested a one year extension on the redevelopment
permit.
The Design Review Board at their meeting of December 6,
1989, adopted Resolution No. 149 recommending approval of
a one year extension to this major redevelopment permit.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No detailed economic impact of this project has been
determined.
EXHIBITS:
1 - Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution
No. 157 approving one year extension of
Redevelopment Permit.
2- Letter to Housing and Redevelopment Department
dated October 26, 1989.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 157
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT A 70 UNIT HOTEL/COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND
BEECH STREET
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application was recommended for approval
and forwarded to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission;
and
WHEREAS, at their meeting of December 20, 1988, the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission, did approve RP 85-
lS/CDP 88-7(A) CALIFORNIA BUILDERS.
WHEREAS, said applicant has requested a one year
extension of RP 85-19/GDP 88-7(A) to expire December 20,
1990.
WHEREAS, at its meeting of December 6, 1989, the Design
Review Board adopted Resolution No. j.49 recommending
approval of a one year extension to Redevelopment Permit 85-
19(A) CDP 88-7.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad as
follows:
1 . That the foregoing recitations are true and
correct.
1 2. That based on the request as presented by the
2 applicant, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
3 APPROVES, a one year extension to RP 85-19/GDP 88-7(A)
4 CALIFORNIA BUILDERS.
5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
6 the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
7 Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of December,
8 1989, by the following vote, to wit:
9 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
10 NOES : None
11 ABSENT : None
12
13
14
ABSTAIN: None
15
ATTEST : 16
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HRC RESO. NO. 157
-2-
*
.
P.O. Box 142
Carlsbad, California 92008
(619) 434-3125 l FAX (619) 729-7717
:..:.r .i . . . ‘,: : . * .
/
October 26, 1989
City of Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
: . .* 0 4
<t
:. ‘.‘p
.-. ‘_. c 1 %,“~~> i? -s .‘ . ?G ..s 3%.
!,
/ 4 4 ‘t.’ ’ ,-.; Y\ -I ., 2 xi*. 1 \.p ‘/ .a. __
Attn: Mr. Chris Salomone, Manager
RE: Design Review Board Resolution No. 122;
Case No. RP 85-19 (A) (DP 88-7)
Dear Mr. Salomone:
This project was approved on November 16, 1988 and
approval expires on November 16, 1989.
Per the "Conditions"set forth in Resolution No. 122,
Item No. 8:
"This approval shall become null and void if building
permits are not issued for this project within one
year from the date of project approval, unless an
extension is approved by the Design Review Board."
We currently have this project in escrow and anticipate it closing before the end of the year. As this closing
date conflicts with the expiration date, November 16,
1989, we hereby request a one year extension as required
by the Buyers.
Your prompt .attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. _, -
CFR:dj
cc: Peter J. Longanbach