HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-07-24; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 163; Compete for Additional Section 8 Housing UnitsHOUSING AND “EDEVELOPMENT COMMIS:-IN - AGENDA BILL a ?
AB# 163 IITLE: AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO COMPETE FOR DEPT. Hti:(
MTG. 7/24/90 ADDITIONAL SECTION 8 HOUSING UNITS CITY AmY! -
1 DEPT. RED 1 1 CITY MGR..:d&
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If Housing and Redevelopment Commission concurs, your action is to adopt Resolution No. 173 authorizing the submittal of an application to compete for additional Section 8 Existing Housing units and authorizing the Housing and Redevelopment Director to execute documents.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On June 11, 1990, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) inviting applications to compete for additional Section 8 Housing Certificates/Vouchers.
Funds in the amount of $17,146,149 for 416 Certificates/ Vouchers are expected to be made available to Housing Authorities in San Diego County to provide assistance to low income families. Housing Authorities are restricted to applying for 10% of their present allotment or 50 units, which ever is greater. In contrast to past invitations to apply, this selection will be based on competition.
Currently, the City's Housing Authority subsidizes rents for 358 low-income families under the Section 8 Program. If the application is accepted by HUD, the total number of subsidized households could increase to 408 Certificates/ Vouchers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City could receive additional federal housing funding for up to fifty (50) more Certificates/Vouchers.
EXHIBIT:
l- Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 173 approving submittal of application and authorizing Director of Housing and Redevelopment Director to execute documents.
2- Notice of Funding Availability from HUD dated June 11, 1990.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2%
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 173
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO COMPETE FOR ADDITIONAL SECTION 8 HOUSING UNITS AND AUTHORIZING THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS.
WHEREAS, the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development has issued a Notice of Funding Availability for
competition for additional Section 8 Housing
Certificates/Vouchers; and
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad is committed to
continuing to provide low income housing in the City as is
outlined in the Housing Element of the General Plan and in
the Housing Assistance Plan (HAP), a three year plan to
increase assisted housing which is required by HUD.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad,
California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission hereby
approves the submittal of an application to the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development to compete for a
maximum of fifty (50) additional units of Section 8 Existing
Housing.
3. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission hereby
authorizes the Housing and Redevelopment Director to execute
documents required for the submittal of said application for
additional Section 8 Existing Housing units.
1 .
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a I%&%& meeting of
2 the Housing and Redevelopment Commission held on the 24th
3 day of July I 1990 by the folldwing vote, to wit:
4
5 AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Mamaux and
6 Pettine NOES: None
7 ABSENT: None
a
9
10
ATTEST:
~JR&YMOND R. PATCHETT, Secretary
17
18
19 I
20 II
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
r_l:. -_ . . . ..-__ _I _-.. . -_-------
. : -.
‘.
. .
. ,,:,
‘...
Mohday.. ’ .-. .: June 11, .1930 * .
:
. . . L . .
IQep~~tment Of : _
.
.- - ‘, . . . . _ a.. .
lious@~g and l!Jrban
De\reliogment .
Office cf the Secretary for ‘Housing- i
FecJeral Housing Commissioner
Section 8 Certificate Program ‘and
Housing Voucher Program; Notice of
Funding Availability .for. ff 1990 and
Procedures for Allocating Funds and
ApproFing Pi-IA. Applications
. .
.
:
. .
23684
.
Federal Regkte - Vol. 55, No. 112 / Monday, june .X1, : ^\ / Notices.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND the estimate&public reporting burden is (b) MetropoiitaqTNonniet~poiitaa
URBANDEVELOPMENT provided elsewhere in this document. ‘. Information on the burden hours for. ’ &y. Separate housing needs factors
Office of the Secretary for Housing- were developed for the metropolitan
Federal Housing Commissioner these requirements is provided as _. follows: Form HUD-52515, numb& of I and nonmetropolitan portions of each
[ihxket Nci. N-90-3073; F&2760-+01]
Field Office jurisdiction. On a responses, 1.000; hours per response, 4; total burden hours 4,006. Send : nationwide basis, approximately 22
comments regarding this burden :- : .,
percent of the Fiscal Year 1990 budget
Section 8 Certificate Program and authority for Certificate Program and
Housing Voucher Program; Notice of estliate or any other aspect of this :; . collection of information, including , Housing Voucher Program incremental
fbnding Availability for FY 1990 and. units are designated for nonmetropolitan
Procedures for Allocating Funds and suggestions for reducing the burden, io I :-areas. The nonmetropolitan housing
Approving PHA Applications the Department of Housing and Urban needs factors were applied to the
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Development, RGles Docket Clerk, 451 . : housing assistance budget authority
Secretary fbr Housing-Federal HousLng Seventh Street, SW., room 10276,. . : . . available for&e in ncnme’tropolitan
Washington, DC 20410, and to the Office areas, and metropolitan housing needs Commissioner, HUD. I
ACTION: Notice of funding availability of Information arid Regulatory Affair%, : : factors were applied, to the housing ... for PY 1990 and procedures for ( Office of Management a?d Budget, assistance budget authority available Washington, DC 20503. .’ . . for use ln metropo!itan areas. allocating funds and approvhg PXA applications. 1. Purpose (c)Allocation areas. The Field Offices
‘This Notice of Funding Availabilit;: ‘: are to allocate budget au’hority to
SUMMARY: This notice identifies the (a) Identifies the amourit of housing metropolitan and nonmetropolitan
amount’of housing assistance budget assistance budget authority for, _ allocation areas, as required by 24 CFR
authority for incremental housing part 791. The sl!ocation areas aif2
vouchers and certificates available for incremental housing vouchers and certificates available for HUD-. established to ensure sufficient
HUD-established aliocation areas (Le.. competition ainong PHAs [including
housing markets) during Fiscal Year established allocation areas (i.e.: State and regional or multi-county
1990. This notice also invites Public housing markets) during Fiscal Year
H0usir.g Agencies (PHAs), including 1990; and PHAs) operating housing programs
: within the HUD-established allocation
India. Housing Aiithorities, to submit (b) Invites Public Housing Age&es- (P.HAs), including Indian Housing : , _ areas. The formula allocation for each
applications for housing assistance Authorities; to submit applications for allocation area should’support at least
funds and provides instructions to PHAs 50 units end there should be at least
-- governing the submission of these housing assistance funds and : ., -;:I three pms wi* satisfactoj r
applications’. and describes prodedGes provides instructions to Pbbh gove@ng ..., a~~s~ative capability b the :..:
the submission of applications, and allocation area to, ensure meaningful 1 for rating, rankiig. and approval of PHA applications. The purpose of the . describes prbcedures fo! rating. ranking. competition.
Housing Voucher end the Certicate ’ and approval of PHA appiications. .-
Programs is to assist eligible families to 2: Applicability ‘* (d] Program &pe. This notice annotinces a separate allocation of
pay the rent for decent. safe, and. _ .. . s%nita-+ housing.. : The procedures*iei forth in this notice. housing assistance budget authority for the Housing Voucher Progrim and for.
FiJR FURkJiER lNFOR?4ATlO?i &?&ACT: ’
apply to PHA applications submitted for . funding for incremental units allocated the Certificate Program to each Fie!d
LatienEe Goldberger. Direct& Office - -under this notice for the Housing : ” : 1 O‘%ce designated allocatiori areap.
of E!derly atid Assisted Housing, . ’ -;. Voucher Program and the Certificate -- based on the housing needs factor?. The
Department of Housing and Urban :’ -: 1. Program dhg Fiscal Year 1996.. -... - allocation of housing assistance budget
DevelopTent, 451 Seventh Street. SW, authority to each allocation area,
*, ,Washington DC 204lC-f~090. telephone . .3.- BackgroLnd -
’ ,il (2!X) 7060720. Hearing- or speech- ;” impa.ired individuals may call HUD’s :. [a) .The iegulations governing’the _ :
._ however. is a total for both programs. The atiocations have been structured to
Housing Voucher Program and ai give Fie!d Offices fle.xibility in
TDD number (202) 70-594. (These Certificate Program are published at 24 : approving Pm applications for a telephone numbers are not toll-free CFR 667 and 24 CFR 662. The regulations specific Program type. It is not . numbers.) .: . . -- - ., :_ _ , for allocation of housirig ati?tarice necessary that each allocation area
SU?iY+WTARY INFOAMATSOH: ; budget authority are published at 24 : within a Field Office be provided both
Paperwork Re&ction Ad Statement 'CFR7Ql: . .L.. T h&sing vouchers and certificates. This
’ .. (b) The Debartment of Housi;ig and: .- .s~ notice also provides, for each alloca:ion
The’in.ormation collection . . . . . . , .‘.:. : ._ JJrban Development (HUB) Ref&n.Act ‘_ ‘. area, an estimate Of the total number Of , reqnirements contained in this have ..* of 1969 establishes additional :. housing vouchers and certificates that
been approved by the Office of-’ . . : :. I : 1. . . could be funded from the housing. Manageme.?t and Budget (Ohm) under requirements governing the use of
the Papemvoik Reduction Act of 1960 housing assistance budget authority in assistance available in the allocation
Fiscal Year 19% : area. These estimates are based on the and have been assigned Oh@ Control average fair market rents for two-
hTr;mber 25tl2-0123. 4. Initial Fund Allocations bedroom units in the Field Office’s Public reporting burden for this (a) Housirg needs formula. collection of information is estimated to --jurisdiction and assume a 56 percent
include the time for reviewing Approximately $1.5 billion of budget _ . nnthority available for incremental ‘. Certificate Program atid a 44 percent
instructions, searching existing data hoc&g vouchers and certificates is- Housing Voucher Program mix. These .. sources. gathering and maintaining the percentages reflect the nationwide
data needed, and completing and being allocated to HUD Field Offices l funding for each of these Programs. The
reviewkg the documents’ making up’- the; and ellocation areas using the housing . actual number of units assisted will vary needs factors established in accordance .from these estimates because of coiiectipn of information. Information on with 24CFR7ti.402. . ., . . ” . . differences in- t$e actual bedroom size,
_ _-..-. ____ _, _ ._ _,_^, .___ _ ._ .__-. _.__ .^_. - -I-- ..-...--..A ‘., .- .-_ . - -. - _---e-_-d- r----~~L.~-.F~~.‘~-~i-.* _-._ -A; *_ ..a
- .
Federal Register 1 Vol. .55, No. 112 / Monday, June ‘11, I!390 / Notices I ’ - 23685 ru
mix and the actual mix of housing :
vouchers and certificates that are funded in a given allocation area.
5. Rental RehabAtation Program Obligations
(a) Fir lower income families living in units rehabilitated under the Rental Rehabilitation Program (24 CFR par? 5?1], section 8(u) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 requires that: (I) Certificates or housingLouchers shall be made available for families who are required to move out of their units because of physical rehabilitation activities or because of overcrowding: (2) At the discretion of the PHA, cerZFica!es or housing vouchers may be made available for families who would have to pay more than 30 percent of adjusted income for rent after ‘. rehabili!ation whether they choose to remain in or move from the project; and (31 l-!LTL) shall allocate certificates or housing vouchers to ensure that aufficiezt resources are available to address the physical or economic displacement or pqtential economic displacement of tenants living ii rental rehabilitation projects. (b) Tne HUD-Independent Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Yeari (pub. L 101-144. approved November 9, 1989) reqluires that highest priority for fncremental housing vouchers shall be given to families who, as a result of rental rehabilitation actions, are involuntarily displaced or are or woald be displaced as a consequence of increased rents (i.e., rent burden exceeds 35 percent of adjusted income). (c) Determining Rental Rehobilitotr’on Assistance Needed In determining the minimum number of certificates or housing vouchers ‘to allocate to a PHA. ’ Field Office staff must first determine the total number of c.ertificates and housing vouchers needed during Fiscal -Year 19%) for families affected by rental rehabilitation activities and the amount of such housing assistance available to the PHA withqut additional funding. In reviewing the amount of assistance available to a PHA for rental rehabilitation families, the Field Office staff must make certain that the PHA hqs enough certificates for lower income families who are affected by rental rehabilitation activities, but who are not eligible for housing vouchers. The Field Office will determine the minimum amount of assistance to be’provided to a PHA during Fiscal Year 1990 as follows: (1) Identrfy the rental rehabilitation. projects to be completed by December
1990 and identify the number of eligible families liv’mg in the projects that will be physically displaced (i.e.,.forced to vacate a wit because of physical
construction, housing overcrowding, or a change in use of the unit as a iesult of : rental rehabilitation activities) or lvhose rerit would be more than 30 p¢ of income as a result of rental rehabi!itation activities. Fami!ies whose incomes are between 53 percent and 80 percent of median income and whose rent after rehabi!itation would be more than 30 percent of their adjusted income, but who are not physically displaced, are ineligible for housing vouchers. Because certificates must be made available tb these lower income families; these families should also be identified. (2) Fro? the number of eligiblk families affected by rental rehabilitation activities, subtract the number of housing vouchers and certif?cates under ACC, but not issued to families. Do not include any special allocations of certificateb’and housing vouchers’which were provided by HUD to be used for special purpos& such as optoats, renewals, or desegregation of public housing projects. (3) From the amount determined in ’ paragraph (2). above, subtract the number of certificates and housing ” vouchers that are expected to turn over (i.e., those housing voucher9 or certificates,that are expec!ed to be available for reissuance) during Fiscal’ Year 1990. The number of certificates approved by I-IUD for use in connection
with project-baaed assistance should - also be subtracted. 1 (4) The remainder. compu?ed in accordance with the above, equals.& minimum number of housing vouchers or certificates to be made available to the PHA d@g Fiscal Year 1990.
6. bvitation for PHA Applications
AI1 PH.4s are invited by-this notice to submit applications for the Housing Voucher Program (24 CFKpart 837) and the Certificate Program (24 CFR part 882). PH.4 applications must be submitted to the local Field Office on Form m>52%5 in accordance with the, applicab1.e program regulations. The PHA application must identify the, number of housing vouchers and certificates requested for families living in rental rehabiIitation projects, operation bootstrap,’ the homeless; or other uses and include an explanation of hew the application meets, or will meet, the application selection criteria. The exhibit published at the end of this notice lists the alloc$ion areas and the
1 Operation bootstrap ire local pro&~ coordhetlng certificates and kouehg vouchen’wkb public end private nnourcw to enable femilier to achieve economic independence [see ~4 FR w?B. ;un014.1989]. ‘.
nmnber of units and budget a&&odty
avai!able for each allocation area. PH.48 should limit their applcations to a reasonable number of ce&ficates and : housing vouchers based on the capacity
of the Pm to Iease all of the units
within 12 months of ACC execution. The
number of units on the PHA application should not exceed the greater of: (a) ten (IO) percent of the total housing vouchers and certificates under ACC for
the PHA; or (b] 50 units. An application may exceed this limit only if the PH& cannot, within this limit, meet the needs of families affected by rental
rehabilitation activities under paragraph a.(d)(z). .
Cetifica~on Regarding Drug-Free
Workplaca :_.
The &g-Free Workilack Act of 1988 requires grantees of Federal agencies to certify that they will provide drug-free
workplaces. Thus, each PHA must f
certify that it will comply w@ the dr@ free workplace requirements in .. accordance with 24 CFR part 24, subpart
F. (There is no standard form for this certification.) . -
Certification Regarding Lobbyhzg
Section 319 of the Department of the Intedor Appropriations Act, Public Law
101-121, approved October 23,3989, (31 U.S.C. 1352) generally prohibita . recipients of Federal contracts, grants,
and loans from tising appropriated funds for lobbying the Ejtecutive or Legislative Branches of the.Federal Govebent in connection with a specific contract,
grant, or loan. G-n February 2% lti, at 65 FR 6736, the Department and other affected Federal agencies published an ’ interim final ruIe to impIement secdcn 319. The Department’s regulaiions on these new restrictions on lobbying are
codified at 24 CFR part 87 (see 55 FR at
6750). To comply with 24 CFR 87.110 (see 55 FR at 6739), any PHA applying under this NOFA for more than $100,000 of assist&e must submit the certification set out in appendix A of part 87 (see 55 FR at 6743) and. if required by part 87, must submit the disclosure form set iiut.in appendix B of part 87 (see 55 FR at 6745). Substantial penalties may be imposed for failure to file the required certific$ion or ‘disclosure (see’s 87.$00,55 FR at 67&j. Standard certification and diSdOSIIr8 language is attached to Notice H -27 (HUD), OMB’s Guidance on New Governniefit-Wide Restrictions on Lobby&g, @sued April 13; 1990. .,:: . :.
Federal Registe; /. Vat 55.. No. 112 ’ / Mo&y, itie ‘11; 1990 ‘1 Notices .
7. Applhti~n Doadlin6
PHA applications must be received in the HUD Field Office by 3:oO p.n local
time on July 2e,1990.
8. Appl&i~~~ Rating and !5eiecti& IhX?dureS
(a] Initial Screening. To be eligible for processing, a complete application must be received by the Fie!d Office within the time period specified id this notice. HUD will reject any application and supplemental information received after the deadline. Furthermore, the applications will be screened and will not be accepted for further pmcessing if one or more of the following conditions exist: . (1) The PI%4 application does not comply with the requirements of 24 CFR &%.294[a) or 887.55(b) and this notice. including the drug-free workplace certification and the antilobbying . certification and disclosure requirements: (2) The PI-IA has been notified that it is not eligible for new funding due to identified FHEO violations and the.PHA has not taken corrective actions acceptable to HUD: (3) The PI-IA has serious unaddressed, outstanding Inspector General audit findings or Field Office management review findings for any of its Section 8 housing voucher programs or certificate programs: (4) The leasing rate for certificatti and housing vouchen under ACC for at least one year is less than 75 percent; (5) The PI-IA is involved in litigation which will seriously Impede the ability of .&e PI-IA to administer the addition4 increment of housing vouchers and certifica te8. (b) LkxceptabIe Applicatiok The Field Office will disapprove PI-IA ’ applications that it determines, under paragraph (a) above, are not acceptable for processing. The Field Office letter must state the basis for the Field Offlice decision. [c) Locul Government Comments. ‘I%e Field Office will obtain section 213 comments from the unit of general local government which must be considered ’ before an application can be approved. (d) Review of Applications. (1) Geneml. To provide each applicant a fair and equitable opportunity to receive Fiscal Year 1990 housing voucher8 &d certificates, Field Offices will use the objective selection criteria stated in this notice to rate, within each allocation area, all applications found acceptable for further processing. After the Field Office has determined, under paragraph (2) below, the number of housing vouchers and certificates required for
families affected’by rental rehabilitation activities. if any incremental assistance remain8 avaiiable within an allocation area, the Field Office will rate and rank alI applications with respect to assistance sought for families other than families affected by rental rehabilitation activities. The Field Office will use selection criteria 1 through 5 in paragraph (3) below to rate‘and rank those applications. (2) Applicatkxs for families living in RentalRehabilitation Projects. The Field Office will identify the number of units in each application needed for-
(i) Families that will be physically displaced from unitsto be rehabilitated under the Rental Rehabilita!idn Program
(24 CFR Part 511); and - (ii) Families whd would have’to pay more than 30% of adjusted income for rent as a result of rental rehabilitation activities. The Field Office will compare the. PHA estimate and the Field Office estimate developed in accordance with the procedures identified in paragraph 5. The Field Office estimate shall be used unless it is clear that the Field Office estimate8 are incorrect. (3) ApplicqtionS for families other _ than families king in Ren tol
Rehobilitotion Projects. (i) Select& Criterion I: PHA Administrative Cupability (32 points). (A) Criteria: Overall PI-IA abilitv as evidenced by factors such as leaiing rates and correct administration of h&sing quality standards, tenant rent computation and ‘rent reasonableness requirements. (B) Rating 32points. Field Offlice rate8 overall PI-IA administration of the Section 8 Existing Housing Program as excellent; there are no serious. . outstanding Section e management review or Xnspector General audit findings; and the leasing rate for certificates and housing vouchers under ACC for one year was at least 95% as of Septe-mber 30,198s ZOpoints. Field Office rates overall PHA adrnlnistra tion of the Section 8 Existing Housing Program as good; any Section 8 management review or Inspector General audit findings are being satisfactorily addressed; and the leasing rate for certificates and housing voucher8 under ACC for one year was at least 90% as of September go, 1989; ZOpoints. Field Office rates overall PHA administration of the Section 8 Existing Housing Program as good; any Section 8 management review or Inspector General audit finfigs are being’satisfactorily addressed; and the ieasing’rate for certificates tid housing vouchers under ACC for one year was at least 85% as of September 30,1989;
o noints. If none of the above staiements applies, assign 0 points. (ii) Selection Criterion 2: ;. Underfuriding of Housing Needs (25 points).
(A] Criteria: The degree to which the housing need8 of the area specified in the PI-IA’s application have previously been underfunded relative to the need8 of other localities withii the allocation area, taking into account such factors as the number of assisted housing units, the number of very low income renter households eligible for such assistance. and *he degree of economic distress in the area. The Field Office will if possible, consider program experience in all federally assisted rental housing programs, including the FmHA Section 515 Rural Rental program but will, as a minimum, consider experience under the Certificate Program. the Hdusir;g Voucher Program, other Section 8 Programs, and the Public Housing Pr0gralrL~ -...
(B(1) Rating: Underfunded Assisted Hous@ (ZOpointsJ The Field Office will make judgments whether housing needs in the community or communities specified in the application have been underfunded with respect to assisted housing provided to other communities in the allocation area. .?Opoints. Housing need8 & the area(s) specified in the application have been severely underfunded..
IOpoints. Housing needs in the area(s) specified in the.application have been moderately underfunded. Opoints. Housing needs in the area(s) epeciied in the application have _ received a proportionate share of . funding or have been overfunded. (2) Rating: Economic Distress [S points): The percentage of persons with incomes below the poverty threshold in the area specified in the application is greater than the percentage of persons with incomes below the poverty level in the allocation area. Assignment of points is to be based on the foilowlng tab&e, using a ratio described below: spoints. Poverty-based ratio of 2.0 or greater 4points. Poverty-based ratio of 1.8 to 1.9. 3points. Poverty-based ratio of 1.6 to
1.7 zpoints. Poverty-based ratio of 1.4 to
1.5 I points. Poverty-based ratio of 1.1 to
1.3 Opoints. PO&y-based ratio of 1.0 or less :
The Field Office will determine the percentage of persona. with incomes below the poverty level, as determined in the 1980 Census, for the allocation
,,‘L.. .% . .,., .;‘:I ._._.’ .’ ’ Federal Register / ‘V&i ‘$5, No. 112 /- hiotiday; i&e. 11, 1990 / Nott& ( 22G%7 , .
aiea and for the area(s) specified in the
PIIA’s application. If, for example, 15 percent of the population of the allocation area was below the poverty threshold in 1900, and 24 percent bf the population of the area(s) specified iri the PI-IA’s application was below the : poverty Ievel, the application would be assigned an economic distress ratio of : 1.6 and would receive 3 points.
(iii) Selection Criterion 3: Operation Bootstmp.Progmm (2Opoints). (A] Crjbria: (1) The percentage of units in the application which will be used for opera!ion bootstrap, a local program coordinating certificates and housing vouchers with public and private resources to enab!e families to achieve economic independence. (2) Actual commitment in writing of resouices of private industry, for profit and nonprofit entities, and local public agencies to provide services and as&a&e appropriate to operation bootstrap; Services include: career and personal counseling, job training and placement, child care, transportation, adult basic education, and literacy training: (.’
(B)(l) Rnting: Percent ofHOusing ’ .,. Vouchers/Certificates:
lopoints. 75-100~~ of the residual units (i.e., units other thim units for rental rehabilitation purposes) being applied for will be used for an operation ,bootstrap program.
Ibpoints: 5044% of the residual units being applied for will be used for @e homeless.
lopoints. 149% of 01.4 regiduil units biing applied for will be used for the homeless. .. .:
Opointi. None of the isiduil tits being applied for will be used for the
homeless.
(C) Field Office Assessmenf The Field Office shall evaluate the capacitj of the PI-IA to have a homeless program . . . operational within six months of ACC exe&ion. If the Field Office determines that the PI-IA does not have the capacity to coordinate the necessary services and to lmplement a homeless program of the size Indicated in the PI-IA applicetion, up to one-half of the points assigned to the PI-IA under this criterion may be
deducted. (v) Selection Criterion 5: ‘Lo&d Initiatives (3pointsJ
fur rental rehabiliation purposes) in the a&cation which will be targeted to any remomlng assistance based on the
homeless fami!ies other than those . ranking of the applications. The Field
homeless families included under Office may approve, in rank order until
selection criterion 4, operation bootstrap ail of the housing assistance budget
program. authority are used, either 100 percent or
(B) Rating: ZOpoints. 75-100% of the some lower pdrcentage of the units in
.residual units being applied for will be each application. The Field Office must
used for the homeless. apply the same percentage to each ., applicntion that is funded..
Ppoints. ~~74% of the residual &its being app1ied for will be used for an operation bootstrap program.
Ipoints. 119% of the residual tinlts beicg applied for will be used for an operation bootstrap program. : Opoints. None‘of the residual units being applied for will be used for an operation bootstrap program,
(2) Rating: Service Commitments:
1Opoicts. Commitments In writing to provide 6 or more services.
ipoi-qts. Commitments in writing to provide 3 to 5 services. 4poi.b. Commitments in kiting to provide 1 or 2 services.
Opoints. No written service commitments.
(A] Criteria. (1) Extent to which PI-Ma provide families with greater housing opportunities (e.g., State or regional PHAs, or local PHAs participating In voluntary exchange programs and iaterjurlsdictional mobility prograx&). (2) Exlent to which PI-Ms demonstrate locally initiated efforts In support of their housing voucher and certificate programs or comparable tenant-based rental assistance programs. Evaluation of a locality’s contribution is mea&red competitively by the extent to which a localitjr i’s able to provide ge&cea or cash contributions or demonstrate its 1 Intention to provide this kind of support in the future, as compared to services or contributions provided by other. loca!ities of like program size. (T3) Rating: dpoints. PHA is a State or region31 PHA or local PI-IA participating in voluntary mobility prograns and provides local support to its housing voecher or certificate prosam.
(iv] Selection Criterion 4: Homeless PiogTam (20 points).
[X) C?iteric: The percentage of the residual units (i.e., units other than units c . . . .
Zpoints. PI-IA prdvideeither broader hozsing choice or local support. Opoints. PHA does not provide broader housing choice or local support. (e) F’ndkg Applications. Within each eliucation area, the Field Office shall approve applications In accordance with HlJ’D requirements in amounts needed for fami!ies affected by Rental Rehabilitation activities under paragraph &Cd)@). above..The Field Office shall approve applications for . .
-9. Reallocations of Funds
It m3y be necessary to’ reallocate funds from one allocatioh area to another allocation area when the funds cannot be used In the allbcation area to. which they were Initially assigned, In . ’ such cases, the fo1lowing procedures shell be followed:
(a) Reallocations within the Same . State. If the allocation of funds to an :.
area cannot be used, the Field Office ’ must reallo&tefundsfroGthat ’ alloccition area to another allocation .’ .: aMwithin the Field-Office’s ’ jurisdiction; Similarly, if an allocation of funds to a Field Office cannot be used within that Field Office, the Regional Offices must reallocate those funds to another Field Office, for use in the same Sta!e. In making these reallocations priority must be given to those’ all&&ion areas where additional funds are needed for families affected by Rental Rehabilitation Program activities. -
(b) Reallocations Between States. If a Regional Office c¬ use f!unds from an allocation area within the same
State, the Regional Office may req&st Headquarters approval to reallocate funds to an&her State within the jurisdiction of the Regional Office. In approving such a reallocation, . . . Headquarters must consider whether these funds 31-e needed within the same Region or other Regions for families affected by Rent31 Rehabilitation hogmn activities. . -.
A request for Headquarters approval cf a reallocation between States must explain the’reasons that funds cannot be used in the original State, the amount being withdrawn from the original State, the program type, the metropolitan/ nonmetropolitan mix. and the amount to be reallocated subseqiently to each State. Such requests must be submitted to Headquarters (ATTEXFION: Funding - Co&o1 Division, HPFC) for approval.
(c) Reuiiotiations Between Metropolitan and Nonmetropor’itan Areus. The Regional Office must follow the original fund assignments to metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas when it reallocates unused budget authority. If there are no approvable applications for the designated area, the Regional Ofice may switch the budget authority betiN,een a metropolitan and a nonmetropolitan area within the same State provided that an offsetting switch can be made in another State wit&in f&e same Region. If an offsetting switch cannot be made and the metropolitan o: nonmetropolitan amounts requ,&e changes to the regional fund assignments, the Regional Office must obtain the approyal of the Funding
I . 23m Federal Register Vol. 55, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 1~ / Notices
ControI division before switching budget authority between a metropolitan and a nonmetropolitan area.
10. Notification of Funds Awarded
After the Field Offices have reviewed rated, ranked, and approved the applications. Regional Offices must submit to Headquarters a list of alI approved applications for the Federal Fiscal Year quarters ending December. Mar& june, and September, listed by Field Office. The Regional Office application approval list for each calendar quarter is due in Headquarters (ATTENTXON: Funding Control Division, HPFC) on tie tenth working day of April, July, October, and January. (i.e., the months following the end of each calendar quarter).
The Regional Offices must provide the following information for each application approved: (a) The name and address of the PHA;
(bJ The project number, the number of housing vouchers and the number of certificates, as applicable. approved for the PHA; (c) The amount of contract authority and budget authority stated separately for housing vouchers and certificates; ’ (d) The number of housing vouchers and the number of certifi&tes for each of the following: rental rehabilitation, operation bootstrap, and the home!ess.
It Administrative Fees
The Fiscal year 1990 Appropriations Act provides funding for PI-IA administration of the Certificate
Program and Housing Voucher Pmggam us fouows: .
. Hosing
,- VoochB(P
{e)FY199okuremenbd
(1) cm-go+--..-- 8.2 (2) ReIii~ry,~ $275 (3’Hard-.---. MS
’ @, PY 1990 cptw Public ffakg
Lk!noflti
m6plscwhws and
t?dUC8fiOfl~/t?8K!8W8/S (I) ongoinp----- 6.5 (2) Refii-- (31 Hard-tdwrsa-
1
8.2 5275 $45
7.65
sz
For budget preparation. submission of requisitions and approving year-end operating statements, PHAs shouId use the March 13,1989, Housing Notice &I-- 84-7). Administrative Fee Requirements for the Section 8 Housing Voucher and Certificate Programs, to determine the blended rate for all ceriificate or’ _ ._. housing voucher ,$zrem&t‘s for a g@@ . WA. ’ : _
12. Headquarters Reserve
. The Department is retaining approximately $160 million of the budget authority available for incremental housing vouchers and certificates in a Headquarters Reserve for use in connection with natural disasters, litigation, desegregation, projects converted to cooperatives owned by tenants or resident management corporations, the Robert Woods Johnson demonstration program, and other housing emergencies. (There will be a separate Notice of Funding Set-Aside issued for the Robert Woods Johnson demonstration program and for the use of certificates in connection witp the conversion of public housing to cooperatives owned by tenants of resident management corporations.)
13. Other Allocations
In’addition to the budget authority for incremental certificates and housing vouchers, the Dep+ent has $2.0 billion of budget authority for certificates and housing vouchers available for allocation on an as-needs basis for the following purposes: (a) Opt-Out/Prepayments. Assisting families that are adversely affected by an owner’s decision to opt-out or prepay a mortgage as follows: (1) Families living in a Section 8 &an Management Set-Aside Project where the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Contract ends. (2) Families living in a Section 8 New Construction or Substantial Rehabilitation Project where the owner has sole discretion to “opt-out” of an additional term of assistance under the Section 8 Housing Assistance Paymcnls Contract and does so. (3) Families living in a below market rate project insured under Section 221(d)(3) or in a project insured under, Section 238 of the National Housing Act when the owner prepays themortgage % wi’lh prior HUD approval. Fie!d Office requests for funding under this category will be approved on a first-come; first-served basis. Field Offices should indicate whether certikates. housing vouchers, or both are needed and should include all neck&y data required to determine ._ the amount of funds required. (b) Public Housing Demolilion and Disposition [Relocation and Replacement]. Assisting families thtG are living in public housing’projects that are being demolished or disposed of . with HUD appmv.al. Relocation. _ assistance may be provided in the form of fu#ing for S-year certifi&tes or. liousinj v&&eti. ]?epla‘cement I+oisihg may be provided in the form of funding
for 15-year certificates. The Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian housing, before approving a PHA demolition or disposition pmposd witi request from the Assistant Secretary for Housing the number of certificates and housing vouchers required by families living in the public housing project for relocation
and for replacement (c) Renewals. Headquarters will allocate funds directly to the Field Offices to provide for the renewal of housing voucher and certificate funding increments exptig in Fiscal Year 1990 and Fiscal Year 1991. Renewal funding will be provided in-kind [i.e., certificates for certificates and housing vouchers for housing vouchers). Funding increments will be renewed in the order they exppire.
(d) Section .?3 Conversions. Headquarters will allocate certificate funds directly to the Field Offices to probride replacemert housing for Section
23 leased housing for which leases are expiring or have been terminated by owners. Field Office requests for funding under this category will be approved on a first-come, fust-served basis. Field Offices should include all necessary data required to determine the amount of funds required. (e) Section 8Amhfment.s. Certifkate Fmgram cost amendments provide budget authority increases to PHA certificate programs to support increases in housing assistance payments . resulting from rent increases or . : decreases in tenant incomes. Funds are . allocated on a needs basis using housing costs and tenant contributions data available in the Department’s automated
systems.
Other Matters
An environmental finding under the National JZnvkcmmental Policy Act (42 USC. 4321-4347) is unnecessary SiriCe the Certificate Program and the Housing Voucher Program are part of the Section 8 Existing Housing Program, which is categorically excluded under HUD regulations at ZM CFR 5t).20(d). HUD has determined, in accordance with FLO. 12612, Fedemlism, that this notice does not have a substantial, direct effect on the States or on the relationship between the Federal government and the States. or on the distribution of power or responsibilities among the various levels of government because this rule would pot, substantially alter the established roles. of HUD the States and local . . :.
governmen*& including Pfis., - -’ - EIUD has determine-d that thiJ notice ia not likely to. have a sigriificant impact: . oli f&y foimatiod maintenance; and .. . . genera1 well-being within the meaning of
, - Federal RegkJer / Vol. 55, No. 112 / Monday, June 1%1990 / N&ices 23683
E.O. 12606, The Family, because it is a Authority: Sets. 3.5.8, United States -. Ilate: June1,199cl .,
funding notice and does not alter Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437~. c Austin Fitts, , _’
program requirements concerning family 1437fJ. 1 - eligibility. . Assistant Secretary for HousirpFeded
Housing Commissioner.
. . ._
Fscal year 1990 section 8 and voucher allocetion
HUD Region I (Boston)
Boston, Masszchusetts office:
Metropoiitan allocation arear
Western Massachusetts ._.__.._: ..___...
Won ._.-....... _ . . . . . . . . . . . .l..._......_..........
.i
Nort%ast~..“” ._^... L” . . .._ I . . . . . “l....
Nonmetropthan aiiocaf& -..A,
Nonmatropstaut statewida .----
:
Hartford. cJJrJloc6cut office:
Metroplii al!ocation aress:
- bdgeport-Milford. Norwaily. Stem fmd
Bristol Danbucy. New &itain, Wa tefwry.
Hartford...- . ..._.” “” . . ..-...--.--.
Middletown, N. Londoq Nor&t
N. Haven-Merid.
COl!XS
5.849.178 1
4.539.951 1
29.471,?55 E
8,032.111 . 1
5.458.740 1
I
6337,983
5,165,385 I
i ! 3.700,44a
5279,582
5.874.86? i
34-
08-
se...
14-L
127..
icl..
137-
98.“.
141-
.
156.
-
lnits
-
L
Component parts of a!!ocation area
krkstke crWr,ty lowm of: Cheshire, D2hon, Hinsdafe, Lanesborough. Lee, Lenox, Phttheld. Richmond. Stockbridge; Hampden county towns of: Agawam. Chicopee. East Longmeadow, kkn$den. Hofyoke, Longmeadow, Ludlow. Monaon, Montgomery, Paimer. Russell, SoutMck.
Springfiild Westtfeld, West Springfield. Wilbraham; Hampshire county towns of: Belchertown.
Easthampton, Gmnby, Huntington, Northampton, Southampton, South Hadtey.
Aiddlesex county towns ot Ashby. Worcester county towns ct: Ashbumham, Frtchburg. Leominster,
Lunenburg, Wes!mi&ter; Wmester county towns oh Auburn. Bane. Boyfstori. Brookfield. charltcn.
Clinton, Douglas, Dudtey, East Brookfieid. Grafton, Holden. Leicester, Millbury, Northborough.
Fionhbr%fge. North Brookfmld. Cxford, Paxton, Princeton, Rutland, Shrewsbury. Spencer, S!erling, Suftt Uxbridge, Webster..Wes?berough. West Boyts~on, Worcester.
3ristd comty towna of: MansLId Norton. Raynham; Essex county towns of: Lynn, Lynnf%M.
btant %qw Middla~ county towns of: AC, Arlirgton. Ashtand, Ayer. Be&r& B&nor& Boxborough, Burtfngtoq &mbddge. Carffsle. Concord, Everetf Framingham, Groton, Hotfiiton. Hopkinton, Hudson, L&@or~, Lincoln, Uttfeton. Malden. Martborough. Maynard, Medford, Met- rose, Natic% Newtat North Reading, Reading, Sherbom. SMey, Somervilte. Stoneham, Stow, Sudbq. Townsend, Wakefield, Waltham, Wa:ertown, Wayiand, Weston, Witmington, Wtckdw,
Woburn; Norfolk County towns of: Beilingham. Braintree, Brookifne. Canton. C&asset, De&am, . COVW, F~ough, FrarMn, Hotbrook, Medfield, Medway, Milli, Milton, ‘Needham, Norfotk, Nomood. Ouff, Randolph, Sharon, Stoughton, Walpote. WeU&ey, Wesbuocd, W+symmt& WrerItI-am Ptymoulh county towns of: Carver. Duxtnay. Hanover, Hanson. Hinghsm Hutt, IG-ga
ton. LakhSO. Marshfiid, Middleborough, Norwell, Pembroke, Pbrnouth, Ptympton, FtcMand,
Scite; Suffolk coonty towna ok Boston, Cheteea, Revere, Winthrop; Worchester county town-s
of: Ber5% Bolton, Harvard, Hopedab. Lancaster, Mendon, Mitford. Souttbcrough, Upton
3~6X cOiu;ty ~OWM Ot Rmasbuy. Andover. Boxford. Georgetown. Groveland, Haverhitt, Lawrence.
Merrimac. Mehen Newbury. Newburyport, Nor91 Andover, S&buy, west w Hidoesex
county towns of: Bitlerica, Chelmsford, Dracuf, Dunstable, Lowell, Pepperen, Tewksbuy, Yynsbcr-
Ough, Westford; Essex munty towns of: Beverly. Danvers, Essex. Gloucester, Hampton, Ipswkh, Manchester, Marrlehead, Miieton. Peabody. Rockport, Rowfey, Salem. Swan;pscotff Tops9e.Q Wenh2rn
Bristol wunty towm of: Eastor& Norfolk county towns of: Avon, Ptymouth county town2 ot Abiion. Briogawater. Brockton, East Bddgewater, HaMax, West Bftigewater. Whitman; Bristol county towns ,ok Faft River. Somerest, Swansea Westpr?rt; Bristol county towns of: AcushneL Danmouth.
Fdtiven, Freetown, New Bedford; Ptymouth county towns ot: Ma-ion, Mat@x+se& &&aster Bristol COunty ~OWIU Ot AWo. North Meborough, Rehoboth, Seekonk; Norfolk county &
ot Plafrwii; Wcmes’&r county towns of: Btackstone, Millville.
3smsthabte. Be&&e c&ntytowns of: Adams, Alford. Beckef. Uarksburg. Egromwt Flor& Great Ba>on, Hanco& JJonterey, Mcunt Washiiton, New Ashford, New Mar%onxgh, North
-Adams, Otis Peru, SandMmd, Savoy. Sheffietd. Tyringham, Washiqnlon, West, Stockb&ge. Wiltiamstowrb Wndson Briitd county towns of: Bed&y, Dfghton, Taunton DUKES FRANKUN, HAMPDEN county towns ot Biandford. Brimfield. Chestar, Gratille. Holland, ToFind, Wa;aS;
,H@JPSHlRE county towns ot Amherst, Chesterffetd. Cummingfon, Goshen, Hadfey. Hatfrelr$
Middlefield Petham, Plainti@& Ware, Westhampton. Williimsburg. Worthington; NANTUCKET.
PLYMOUTH county towns ofz Wareharn; WORECESTER county tcws oft Atclo. GvZner,
Hardw%k, Hubbardston, Ne# Braintree, Oakham. Petersham. Phillipston, Royalston, S+hbrfdge.
Sturbddge. 72mptaft Warren, West BrooMmId, Wmchendon.
Fairfield county towns ZBricfgeport, Easton. Fairfield, Monroe, Shetton, Bratfcrd, Trumt& New He~coontytormsGt:~BeacDnFaHf~,h~i~~~sayroUr;Fatfreld~ towns ob Nom&, We- Westport, Wtion; Fairfield county town2 oh Darien. GreenwM, New camarb Stamford
Hartford county towns of: Bristol Budington;: Litchfiild county towns oh Ptymouth: Fatrfieid county bwm ok Bethel BroohiWd, Danbury. t!ew Fakfiekf, Newton, Redding. AidgerM% Shemarx
LKchfreid county tcwns ok Bridgewater, New f&ford: Hartford county towns ofz Berlin. New Brittn.
Plaimdla SOLO UlchSeld county towns 05 Bethlehem, Thomaston. Watertown, WOO&W~~ New Haven county towns ot. Mfdebury. Naugatuck, Prospect, &utMnry, waterbuy. WokotL
Hartford oxmty towm oi: Awn BloomfiekL Canton, East Grabby. East H&ford. Emat widsor. Enfieki Farrmngton, Glastonbuy. Granby. Hartford Manchester. Marfborough, New%3cax Rocky Hill, Simsbury. South Wmdsor, SuffTeld. West Hartford, Wetharsfw Winosor. Wvdfa Loc& Litchfiefd county towns of: Barhhamsted. New Hartford; Middlesex county towns or: Easf Hadtam; New London county towns ot: Colchester. Toltand counri towns ot. Andover. Botton, Cakrmbia,
Covenby. Ellington. Hebron. Somers. Stafford, Tol!and, Vernon, W%tiion.
Middlerer com’rty tmwta ct Cmrmvett, Durham, Eas& Hampton, Haddam, MfdlefMd, Middtetcan
Portland: New London county towns oh Baxsh. East Lyme. Franklin. Grfswotd. Gmton, Lecfymd Ubon, MmtviWe..New London North Stmnington, Nonwch. old Lyme. Pres%m, Set- Spr-agze, Storing~Wa~wkdhuncoculty~oF:canterbury;L(idc~x~tarract:cMq Killingworth: New Haven county towns ot: Bethany. Branford, Chemise. East Havan. C%rff Hamden. UidisoR Meride% New Haven. Norvl Branfmd, North Haven. 0arrge. WaMgford. West Haven.wwdbridge.
*. e.-. --a .dCL,J w.-,- -..4 u s;; *;-,,~~~:-.,;:;;;-,.~~~;~i~ 1 _-.~&.~~~,..-..-i~%d ~.::‘~..~~~-;~.~-~~~z ‘zz.?~.rdi ___-. ~__. __.__ _ A ,
./- -4.
\/
Federal Register 1 Vol. 55, No. 112 / Monday, June ‘11, 19%) j Notices 23697 *
F& year 1990 section 6 and voucher all,~tion
Nonmetropkitaln allocation areas:
Nonmebopolitan Atlocaiton Area..-
HUO Region VItI (Denver)
* Denver. Colorah regional off&
Metrop&an allocation areas: Denver colorado PMSA . . . . . . . I.“........ Colorado Northern Front Range M&O.
Cokxado Southern Front Range
MHJO.
MMsna metro areas . ..-............. -. EkrsI Dakota Metro &eas---... siodl Dakota Metro Areas-.-.- Utah Metro areas.-.-.-,-....- Wyoming Metro Areas I_..-....-.. -
Nonmetropiitan allocation are&s:
f Cdcrado Nonmetm Area -.- . . . ..-..
itlonba Nonmetro Area--..
NO&I Oakom Nonmeb-o Area.--
2kaJm alam NomnebD Area --
Lkah Nonmetro Area- -..--.-
Wyoming Nonmetro Area .-.-. --. 2.011,731 62.”
HUD Region IX (San Franc&co)
Honotuhs Hawafl office:
Metropolll &tcalbn areas
HonoMu HI MSA-.....-.--., onmeWp%tan aitocation area:
+ >$?$2zvi~~-a--
be Angeles Gxmty. CA 2 .-_....
Orange Cwnty, CA...- --. -.. Riverside and San Bernardino
cwnw CA
Kent-Ventura-Santa Barbara Court
thfx San Dkgo County, CA... . . ..-_ .._- Nonmetmponmn alloc&on awes:
SL&¶~k$$-lmp&4nyo-Mol%
Fhoenbc AA-kcM offlce Metrcponmn dloca~ areas Metropolii Arkona ..-.I --..
Nonmetropo(i allocation area%
8,040,39i 160.
5.238,33! 136.
100,677,36( 13,482.24! 965964
9.666.36:
17,146.14!
4,732,43!
_ Nonmetropoli Arizona Allocattol
AreaEast
~Jonntetropolitan Arizona Allccab Area West, Sacameto. California cfftcez Metropolitan allocati~ area*
Me~qMitan Allocation Area 1 -_ MeLmpolll Altocatfon Area 2 -.....
San Franc&o, California office:
MewpoUan allocation areas: Metropoltkan Altocation Area 1 _-.
9,075p:
2294.~2
2,292.10:
4.934.63 5,416.13.
o.soi ,71
244:
327. 239.
235.
416.
t30.
261,
88..
67..
136
162
223
Dollars
4.849,356 254..
5.971.439 217.. 2371,414 57....
1.746.667 M....
759,623 23- 921,496 34-.. 61 ‘I.@97 23-m
4295.223 156-
394f6E l5.-.
4.063.789 164..
4.766,2x 193.
239120.! 99-
3.769967 152.
1.704.66: 89...
Jnits Componinl parts d aYocaSon area
Ad&r. Audrain. &ttin&. iutter. Cataway. Caps Gimrdeau, Carter, CM& Cole., r&oper Crawford,
Dent. Douglas, Dunklii Gasconada, Howard, Howti. ken, Knox, Lewis, Lincot~ Macon, Madison, Marks, Ma&n, Mississippi. Moniteau. Monroe, Montgomery, New Madrid, Cregon. @age. &ark, Pemiscot Peny. IJhelps. Pike, RaI!q Rand&la Reynolds, Ripley, Sta Genwiew, St Franc&
Schqier. SccHand, Scott, Shannon. Shelby, &ddard, Texas, Warrsq WasMngt~q Wayne. wright.
Adams, Arapahoe, Denver. Douglas, Jefferson Boutder, Lsn’msr. Weld.
El, ,Paso. Pueblo.
Yellowstone. Cascade. Burfeigh, Morton, Cass, Grand Forks. Penning&n Minnehaha
Utah, Davis, Salt lake, Weber.
Natrona, taamia.
Namosk Amhuleta, Baca. Bent. Chaffee. Che&nne. Clear Creek. Cone@. Costita Cm&y. Custer,
bh Dolores. Eagfe, m Frenwnt, Gartieid, Gilpin. Grand. Gum&n, HkwAle. Huarfano,
Jackson. Kia Kit Carson, Lake, La P&ta, Las Animas, Lincotn. Logan, Mesa Minerat. Moffat,
Montez;lma Montrose, Morgan. Ctero. Curay. P* Phiitiis, Piim, Rowers. Rio Bknco. Rii
Grarwe. Routt Seguache. San Juan, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Summit, Tetler, Washington, Yuma. bavehad, eig Hon’& &ins. Broadwater, Carbon, carter, Chouteau, Custer, Danisis, Oawson, Anaconda-Deer Lodse Court. Fallon, Fergus, Flathead. Gailattn, Garfield, Gtacier. Golden Valley,
Granite, HiA. J8tlersg Judh Bar&~. laka Lewis and Clark Liberty, Lincoln, McCone. Madison, Meagher. Mineral. Mita, Mussekhett, m Petroleum. Phillips. Pondera, Powder River, Pcwe!l, FWie. RamIrk Rihnd. i%osedt Rowbud. Sanders, Sheridan, wtte-sti~er e0w. st’Tlwat6f. So& Gras% Teton. T&e, Treasure, VatMy. Wheattand. Wibaux. Yellowstone National Park.
AdamS Bamg BenSXi, Bi!!ii. Bottfneau, Brnrrm& Burke, Cavalier, Oickey. Diode. Dunn Eddy.
Emmons., Foster, Golden Valley, Granb Griggs. Hettinger, Kiisr. La Mowe, lqan, MCHenry,
McIntosh, McKenzie. McLean. Marker. Mountrail. Nelson, Oliver, fembina, Piice. Ran-w,
~~ Renville. RicMand, Rdette. Sargent Sheridan, Siox, Slops, Stark, Steele, Stutwq Towner, Traiil, Walsh, Ward, Wells, Williams
Aurora. Beadle. Bennett, Bon Homme, Broom Brown, Brute, Buffalo. Butte, Campbett. C-hades Mix. Clark. clay. Codington, Carson. Custer, Davison> Day, Deuel. Dewey, Couglas. Edmounds, Fatl Rker. Faulk. Grant Gregory, Haakcn, Hamtin, Hand, Hanson, Harding. Hughe& Hutchinson, Hyde. JWkscR Jerauld, Jones lOngsbury. lake. Lawenoa. Lincoln, Lyman. McCook. McPherson,
)rhrshau. Meads. Mdktte. A4iiner. Mod+. Perkins. Potter, Roberts, Sanborn Sttannoo, Sp!nk
Stanley Sully, Todd. Tdpp, Turner, Union, Wahvmth, YBnkton. Ziich.
BWder, BOX Elder, Cache, Carbon, Daggett, Duchesne. Emery. Garfield. Grand, Iron. Juab. Kane, Millard. Mocgan, Piute. Rioh, San Juan, Sanpete, Sevier. Summit, Todete. %tah, Wasatoh. Washington, Wayne.
Albany Big Hot-n. Campbett. Carbon, Converse, Crook Fremont Goshen. Hot Springs, Johnson,
Lincoln, Niobrata, Pti matte. Sheridara Subtette, Sweetwater. Teton, Uinta, Wash&ii, Weston
Honotulu
Hawaii, KauaL Maui Guam
x
Los Angeles. Orange. Riverside, San Bernardino.
Kern, Ventura. Santa Barbara
San Dlego.
San Lull Cbkpo. Impedal. Inyo, Mona
Madcapa Pima
Apache. cochise, Gila Graham. Greentee, Pii, Santa CIur
(haJnin0. &have. Navajo. Yavapet. Yuma, La Par
Butte, Shasta, San Joaquin, Sutter Yuba El Dorado. Placar, Sacramento, Yokx
Fresno, Merced, Stanlstaus, T&ire.
.’ : .i . . I