HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-05-21; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 185; Funding Update for Street Name ChangeHOUSING AND-REDEVELOPMENT COMMIWION - AGEi--$&ILL J fl d
= FUNDING UPDATE FOR
STREET NAME CHANGE FROM
DEPT. CD ELM AVE - CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. \ 7 \ approving the allocation of an additional $37,000,
bringing the total allocated funding for the project to $190,000, for revision of (9)
nine existing freeway signs to accommodate the renaming of Elm Avenue to Carlsbad
Village Drive.
ITEM BACKGROUND
In November 1986, the Carlsbad Downtown Merchants Association petitioned the
Redevelopment Agency to process a street name change, proposing Elm Avenue be
renamed Carlsbad Village Drive to increase awareness of the Village Area.
On February 17, 1987, at a public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
8969, approving Sign Name Change(SNC) 25 - Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village
Drive, from the eastern terminus to the ocean. The name change was approved as
a means of broadening the City’s commitment to the Village Redevelopment Project
Area by focusing attention and commerce to the Village. At the time Council
approved the change, there had not been a determination by the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans), of the full costs of engineering design,
construction and installation of the nine (9) affected freeway signs.
On August 15, 1989, staff presented the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
with a cost estimate provided by Caltrans, totalling $143,000. The funding for the
signs was to be made available from the Redevelopment Tax Increment Fund. The
Commission adopted Resolution No. 143 allocating $143,000, plus a $10,000
contingency, for SNC 25.
At their meeting of April 10, 1990, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
adopted Resolution No. 166, approving Cooperative Agreement No. 11-0422 with
Caltrans, for the revision of nine (9) existing freeway signs on Interstate 5 to
accommodate the renaming of Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village Drive. The revisions
were to include freeway signs from Cassidy Street in Oceanside, south to Carlsbad
Village Drive, and Palomar Airport Road in Carlsbad, north to Carlsbad Village
Drive. Per that agreement the City of Carlsbad is responsible for 100% of the costs
associated with the name change, not to exceed $153,000 or 7% of the original
estimate, unless at the City’s discretion a greater amount is authorized. To date,
Caltrans has expended a total of $84,610 for engineering work,
administration/overhead, and sign panels for the project.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 18 5
The City was recently notified by Caltrans that contractor bids for modification of the
freeway guide signs have been received and that the new revised estimate exceeds
$153,000. Contractor bids range from approximately $74,600 to $105,700. Utilizing
the low bid for sign modification, adding structural design work which was not
anticipated or estimated by Caltrans, and including an administrative overhead factor
(62%) which was omitted from the original estimate, Caltrans now estimates the total
cost of the project to be $190,000, or 33% above their original estimate.
FISCAL IMPACT
The new estimated project cost of $190,000 represents a $37,000 increase above the
approved allocation. According to the Cooperative Agreement signed by the
Commission, the Commission must reimburse Caltrans for all costs incurred on the
project. To date Caltrans has expended a total of $84,610 for engineering work and
sign panels. In order to complete the project, allocation of an additional $37,000 is
required. Funding can be made available from the Redevelopment Tax Increment
Fund, leaving an estimated available balance at the end of FY 90-91 of $450,000.
EXHIBITS
1. Resolution No. \ q 1
2. Project Estimate
3. Contractor Bids
4. Correspondence to Caltrans
. .
Cal-Trans Expenditures and Estimated Costs
Elm Avenue - Carlsbad Village Drive
1989 Cost Estimate:
Approved Contingency 7%:
MAXIMUM AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE:
CAL-TRANS EXPENDITURES:
Engineering
Administration/Overhead @62%
Sign Panels
CAL-TRANS TOTAL EXPENDITURES TO DATE:
REMAINING EXPENDITURES:
Engineering (estimate)
Modification of Signs (Bid item)
Traffic Control (estimate)
Contingencies (estimate)
TOTAL REMAINING EXPENDITURES:
SUMMARY OF COSTS:
Original Revised
$143,000
$ 10,000
$153,000
$ 36,850
$ 22,760
25,000 $
$ 84,610
$ 13,390
$ 75,000
$ 11,000
6,000 $
$105,390
Engineering Estimate:
Construction Estimate:
Total
$ 42,000 Engineering Estimate: $ 50,240
Administration/Overhead $ 22,760
Construction Estimate
Total
EXHIBIT 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 191
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE
ALLOCATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR REVISION OF EXISTING
FREEWAY SIGNAGE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NAME CHANGE OF ELM
AVENUE TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
WHEREAS, it has been the intent of the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission to draw attention to the Carlsbad Village Area; and
WHEREAS, on February 17, 1987, the Carlsbad City Council approved the
street name change of Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village Drive to demonstrate its
commitment to increasing the recognition of the Village Area; and
WHEREAS, on August 15, 1989, the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission reviewed the Caltrans $143,000 project estimate and contingency for
modification of 9 freeway signs along Interstate 5 and allocated $153,000 to fund the
name change; and
WHEREAS, on April 10, 1990 the Commission entered into a cooperative
agreement, with the State, which outlined funding responsibility and authdrized
Caltrans to begin design and construction of the project; and
WHEREAS, $84,610 in Caltrans expenses have been incurred by the City to
date, and Caltrans original estimate has been revise to $19O,ooO; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans has represented that $190,000 is the total cost of the
project and that any financial obligation which exceeds the $190,000 cost estimate will
be born solely by Caltrans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
2. That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission authorizes the
Financial Management Director to allocate an additional $37,000 from
the Redevelopment Agency fund.
3. That the total funding allocation for the name change of Elm Avenue
4 II to Carlsbad Village Drive shall not exceed $190,000.
-
5
6 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
7 Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Commission held on the 18th day of June,
8 1991 by the following vote, to wit:
9
10
11
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, and Stanton
12
13
NOES: Commissioners Larson, and Nygaard
14 II
ABSENT: None
21
22
23 ATTEST:
24
27 RAYl&ND R. PATCHETT, Secretary ‘-
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Chairman
28
City of Carlsbad
May 3, 1991
Mr. Jesus Garcia
Director - District 11
Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 85406
San Diego, CA 92138
Elm Avenue/Carlsbad Village Drive Replacement Signs
Dear Mr. Garcia:
We have received and reviewed the Cal-Tran’s revised “estimate” of costs and contractor
bids, for the Elm Avenue/Carlsbad Village Drive name change. This information was
requested to assist us with the preparation of a report to be presented with a staff
recommendation to the Carlsbad City Council for their action.
According to the information provided, the original estimate of $143,000, has been revised
to $190,000. This $47,000 increase equates to a 33% adjustment from the estimate provided
to the City in January 1989. Initially we speculated that the increased estimate was
attributed to rising construction costs over the two (2) year period, however, upon further
investigation it appears that the primary force behind the increase is Cal-Trans engineering
costs. These costs have increased more than $31,000 or 73% during the period.
It is my understanding that Cal-Trans is requesting this item be presented to the City
Council for action, as soon as possible. In anticipation of Council questions pertaining to
the new estimate and a request for increased funding, we would appreciate your submittal
of a detailed summary of all engineering costs incurred to date and/or estimated in the
future by Cal-Trans, for this project. Furthermore, we are puzzled by the fact that the
original cost was underestimated by as much as $47,000, and are concerned that the new
“estimate” of $190,000 could be subject to further revision at a future date.
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009 - (619) 438-l 161
-*a t
, :.
May 3, 1991
Mr. Jesus Garcia
Page 2
Since your staff has indicated that time is of the essence, any assistance you can provide in
forwarding this information to us, will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
p ,/ ,’
I’k i $& jp-- /bRENy!g- ----.
Community Developm%t Director
MO:CH
C. Tarbell Martin
City Manager
f , &AA&ly *
/+na/ #aad. is ni X+-e 3 .A? iqo,ouo . 3_7?? v ,
. . .--- __.._,.__- -._, . ---
Name debate heats up
Several want ‘Elm Avenue’ gone or good A By Doug Desjardins
Staff Writer
Members of the business
community made it clear this
week they want the City Council
to follow through on plans to
rename Elm Avenue to Carlsbad
Village Drive.
A decision on the name change
was postponed Tuesday and
rescheduled for the June 18 coun-
cil meeting. Members of the public
here tonight,” said Hope Risely $86 000
uay signs that will have
that total to design the
‘This was supposed to be a fait
accomplit when it was decided to be changed. With Councilwom-
upon in 1987.” en Margaret Stanton and Ann
Risely and other supporters Kulchin absent from Tuesday’s
said the name change would bring meeting, Mayor Claude “Bud”
business and tax dollars to down- Lewis suggested the matter be
town Carlsbad and give the rede- continued.
veloped downtown “village” the ‘? would feel more comfortable
name recognition it does not get if we had a full council here so
everyone can participate in this
,decision,” Lewis said.
who opted not to w
week said they wan
There was one person who
spoke against the idea and she
suggested the business people
” said John Forsythe. who will benefit from the name who will benefit from the name
embers two weeks \. change finance it.
ed to the idea of a name dumb idea when it was
ggested the business people
0 here proposing their budget and
maybe they should take $109,000
&WCHO VZSTA NATD/UAL &cINK
June 10, 1991
Mayor Bud Lewis
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Lewis,
This letter is in support of the name change of Elm Avenue to
Carlsbad Village Drive. The city has accomplished much during
the past few years revitalizing the downtown Village of Carlsbad.
The name change is critical to the success of the downtown
redevelopment and in attracting individuals to our charming
area.
Carlsbad has a lot to offer in our beautiful Village and the
name change will provide excellent exposure for the downtown.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Vice President
DLE/du
300 Carlsbad Village Drive (Elm Avenue) l Suite 123 l Carlsbad, California 92008 l 619/72%1566 l Fax 619/7291874
!’
i / / iI
I
/
ii
( , ~ ! .+
. t
!, -1--.-..... #. ._-_. --_l_--_____ .--
LETTER TO THE EDITOR 3 June 1991
Being a business owner in Carlsbad Village, I would like to comment on the name change of Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village Drive.
This name change was supported by the Village Merchants Associa-
tion, the Chamber of Commerce, The Visitors and Tourist Bureau,
many individuals and the Carlsbad City Council and was considered
a great idea. We have been waiting four years for the change and still consider it a great idea.
This change was part of the redevelopment effort to assist in the much needed revitalization of the old down town. Much has been accomplished in the last few years and many signs of success are [low in evidence. We are grateful and pleased with the support and accomplishments; however, this doesn't mean that the many new :.(and old) businesses located here don't need the added exposure and in- come that the name change will offer.
Elm Avenue is a very common residential street name in most every community throughout the country and is not viewed by most passers-by on I-5 as the entryway to a charming and unique shopping
area. With the added exposure offered by the name change, it has been estimated that of the 200,000 cars that pass by each day, at
least a percentage (would now discover this beautiful village by the sea.
While downtown Carlsbad now has much to offer and every pros-
pect for a great future, it is still in the revitalization process
and still needsall the help it can get. I believe the name change
will provide the extra identity and exposure that is still needed.
The village is the historic and original down town, a unique and striving area', and it is hoped that the city council will con- tinue to support the name change as part of the on-going and im- portant redevelopment effort.
Thomas R. Betz
3240 Donna Drive
Carlsbad, CA. 92008 434-4341
CARLSBAD VILLAGE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION
June 8, 1991
Mayor Bud Lewis City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA. 92008
Dear Mayor Lewis:
Members of the Carlsbad Merchants Association who have invest- ed and are business owners in the village have greatly appreciated the City's support and redevelopment efforts to revitalize the
downtown area. As an important part of this process, we hope for
the Council'n continued support for the name change to CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE.
The Village Merchants Association addressed this issue at our last meeting on June 4, voted and were unanimously in favor of the name change.
We believe that real progress has been made, but that we still have a way to go and that the name change is a vitally important part of the process.
Your support for this is needed and will be greatly appreciat- ed.
Very sincerely,
ULynneCook, Co-Chairman
. . -
29 May 1991
FROM: CARLSBAD VILLAGE MERCHANTS ASSGCIATION
TO: CITY OF CALRSBAD
RE: ELM AVENUE NAME CHANGE TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
1. We the below.signed Carlsbad Village Merchants and Carlsbad. residents are strongly in agreement with and support of the plan
to implement the name change from Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village
Drive.
2. We also believe that this name change will support the on-going city/community effort to revitalize the village area and will be
cost effective through increased revenues:
29 May 1991
FROM: CARLSBAD VILLAGE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION
TO: CITY OF CALRSBAD
RE: ELM AVENUE NAME CHANGE TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
1. We the below.signed Carlsbad Village Merchants and Carlsbad residents are strongly in agreement with and support of the plan
to implement the name change from Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village
Drive.
2. We also believe that this name change will su port the on-going city/community effort to revitalize the village % rea and will be
cost effective through increased revenues: r
AME ADDRESS
29 May 1991
FROM: CARLSBAD VILLAGE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION
TO: CITY OF CALRSBAD
RE: ELM AVENUE NAME CHANGE TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
1. We the below signed Carlsbad Village Merchants and Carlsbad residents are strongly in agreement with and support of the plan
to implement the name change from Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village Drive.
2. We also believe that this name change will support the on-going city/community effort to revitalize the village area and will be
cost effective through increased revenues:
NAME ADDRESS
-
29 May 1991
FROM: CARLSBAD VILLAGE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION
TO: CITY OF CALRSBAD
RE: ELM AVENUE NAME CHANGE TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
1. We the below signed Carlsbad Village Merchants and Carlsbad residents are strongly in agreement with and support of the plan
to implement the name change from Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village Drive.
2. We also believe that this name change will support the on-going city/community effort to revitalize the village area and will be
cost effective through increased revenues:
ADDRESS
14.
15.
16.
17.
29 May 1991
FROM: CARLSBAD VILLAGE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION
TO: CITY OF CALRSBAD
RE: ELM AVENUE NAME CHANGE TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
1. We the below signed Carlsbad Village Merchants and Carlsbad residents are strongly in agreement with and support of the plan
to implement the name change from Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village Drive.
2. We also believe that this name change will support the on-going city/community effort to revitalize the village area and will be
cost effective through increased revenues:
NAME ADDRESS
1.
2.
9. I i
10.
12.
13.
14. VT
15.
16.
17.
. . l
. *
‘, .
29 May 1991
FROM: CARLSBAD VILLAGE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION
TO: CITY OF CALRSBAD
RE: ELM AVENUE NAME CHANGE TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
1. We the below signed Carlsbad Village Merchants and Carlsbad residents are strongly in agreement with and support of the plan
to implement the name change from Elm Avenue to Carlsbad Village
Drive.
2. We also believe that this name change will support the on-going city/community effort to revitalize the village area and will be
cost effective through increased revenues:
NAME ADDRESS
5.
7.
8.
- 9:
10.
16.
. June 11, 1991
TO: MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Marilyn Strong
ELM AVENUE NAME CHANGE
Dr. and Mrs: H.C. Gregg (2739 State Street) called to state their preference m to have Elm
Avenue changed to Carlsbad Village Drive, due to the cost factors.
c+fq, - .+ ,j //’ ([/f/L L i ‘r&/,
MARILYN STRONG
mhs
c: City Manager
City Clerk