HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-18; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 202; Gametowne - Retail ProjectHOUSING AND FDEVELOPMENT COMMISS-3 - AGENDA BILL
AB# aQL APPROVAL OF A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT TITLE: PERMIT TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING RETAIL
MT& Z/18/92 USE AND CONSTRUCT A 2 STORY 3,000 SQUARE FT. RETAIL BUILDING AT 2933 ROOSEVELT STREET
DEPT. CA APPLICANT: MARK DAVIS/RP 91-8 GAMETOWNE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If the Housing and Redevelopment Commission concurs your action
is to adopt Housing and Redevelopment Resolution No. &Oy
approving a negative declaration and a major redevelopment
permit (RP 91-8).
ITEM EXPLANATION
The Housing and Redevelopment Commission, at your meeting of
February 4, 1992, directed our office to prepare a resolution
approving a negative declaration and a major redevelopment permit (RP 91-8). That document is attached. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission should satisfy itself that the findings and conditions accurately reflect your intentions in the matter.
EXHIBIT
Resolution No. $07
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 204
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT (RP 91-8) TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING RETAIL USE AND CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY RETAIL BUILDING OF 3,000 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2933 ROOSEVELT STREET WITHIN SUB-AREA 1 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT ZONE. APPLICANT: MARK DAVIS CASE NO: RP 91-8 (GAMETOWNE)
WHEREAS, on December 18, 1991 the Carlsbad Design Review
Board held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a proposed
Negative Declaration and a Major Redevelopment Permit (RP-91-8) for
a two story retail building of 3,000 square feet and adopted Design
Review Board Resolutions No. 176 and 177 respectively, recommending
to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission that the Negative
Declaration and Major Redevelopment Permit (RP-91-8) be approved:
and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the
City of Carlsbad, on February 2, 1992 held a public hearing to
consider the recommendations and heard all persons interested in or
opposed to RP 91-8; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued on November 7,
1991 and submitted to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 day review
period. All comments received from that review period are fully
incorporated into the conditions of approval for the redevelopment
permit. These conditions will be reviewed through a monitoring
program set up for the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, as
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
.
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
2. That the negative declaration on the above referenced
project is approved and that the findings and conditions of the
Design Review Board in Resolution No. 176 marked Exhibit A and
attached hereto are the findings and conditions of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission.
3. That Redevelopment Permit RP 91-8 is approved and
that the findings and conditions of the Design Review Board
contained in Resolution No. 177 marked Exhibit B and attached
hereto are the findings and conditions of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad on the
18th day of February 1992, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Stanton and Nygaard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
RAYMOND R. PATCHETT, Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
- -.
PESlGN - 0OAR.D tt.F~LUTION NO. 176
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATm DECLARATION FOR A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING RETAIL USE AND CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY RETAIL BUILDING OF 3,000 SQUARE FEET AT 2933 ROOSEVELT STREET WITHIN SUB-W 1
OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT ZONE.
APPLICANT: MARK DAVIS
CASE NO: FU’ 91-8
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 18th day of December, 1991, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board as
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review Board hereby recommends APPROVU of the Negative Declaration according to Exhibit
“ND”, dated November 7, 1991, and “PII”, dated October 28, 1991 attached hereto
and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: .
21 /I
il
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial have a significant impact on the environment.
evidence that the project
22 !’ 2. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed project.
23 3. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be significantly
24 impacted by this project.
25 ’ . . .
26 m..
27
28 ‘.’
L
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review
1 Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of December, 1991 by the
2
3' following vote, to wit:
4 AYES: Chairman Noble, Board Members: Gonzales, Rowlett, Erwin & Savary.
II 5, NOES: .None.
6 ABSENT: None.
7 ABSTAIN: None.
8
9
10
11
12 ATTEST:
4
19 1: II
20
21 4 22 11
23
24
25
26
27
28 DRB RESO NO. 176 -20
,
.
GATIVE DEClARAnON
PROJECT ADDRBSSLLOCATION: 2933 ,Roosevelt Street APN: 203-292-l 1
PROJECT DESCRWTI ON: Demolition of an existing single story retail use and construction of a two-story retail building of 3,800 square feet within Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Zone.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carl&ad. hs a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a signifkant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department. .
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Deparanent within 2 1 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions,. please call Eric Munot in the
Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4441. 1,’
DATED: NOVEMBER 7,199l
CASE NO: RP 91-8 a
APPLICANT: GAMBTOWNB
PUBUSH DATE: NOVEMBER 7,199l
ENM:Ih
2075 Las Palmu Drive l Carbbrd, California 92009-4859 l (618) 438-l 161
. PESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 177
-.
1
2j
3” ‘1
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE
cm OF CARLsBm, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEMOLISH
THE EXISTING RETAIL USE AND CONSTRUCT ATWO STORY
RETAIL BUILDtNG OF 3,000 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERIY
9 41
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT
BETWEEN CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE AND GRAND AVENUE
5 ii AT 2933 ROOSEVELT STREET. I
6 11 CASE NAME: GAMETOWNE
CASE NO: RP 91-8 I
II I
7 !I II WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and i
I I!
8 ij
Ii referred to the Design Review Board; and
9 !I
I WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as prodded by Title
10;
11 II 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
12 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
13 Review Board did, on the 18th day of December, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing II .
14 ;: to consider said application on property described as:
15: Lots 21 and 22, Block 34 of Town Carlsbad, in the City of
16;1 Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to Map No. 535 as
17 I!
recorded on May 2, 1888.
1ei; WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
19 !I arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Board considered all factors
20
21
Ii 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
relating to RP 91-8.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board of the )
City of Carlsbad as follows:
(A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
(B) That based on the evidence presented at public hearing, the Board Recommends APPROVAL of RP 91-8, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
-.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
:I
ii ‘I ,I
11
II
I/
!!
i!
201
21 /i II
22i/ 23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
. . .
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Village Redevelopment
Plan and Village Design Manual because the project provides a speciaity retail use while enhancing the architectural aesthetics of the area as encouraged for the Village Center special treatment area within Sub-area 1 of the Carlsbad Redevelopment Area and all applicable development standards and design criteria are being incorporated into the project.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the various elements of the ( General Plan because the project is consistent and compatible with the Central i
Business District land use designation for the area. I
The project meets all the applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance including the provision of adequate parking and landscaping and no variances are required for the project.
The proposed project will contribute to the economic revitalization of the Redevelopment Area by substantially redeveloping and enhancing the project site.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion- of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on November 7, 1991 and recommended for approval by the Design Review Board on December 18, 1991. In
approving this Negative Declaration the Design Review Board has considered the
initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the
environment.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
DRB RESO NO 177 -2-
/I
-.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,i
/I
j/
I j
!I
9. This project is consistent with the CiVs Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the u:& Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
. . .
. . .
Approval is granted’ for RP 91-8, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “E”, dated December 18, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Plating Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise
noted in these conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the site plan as approved by the Design Review Board. The site plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement plan submittal, whichever
occurs first.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building petmits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the’ City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended from time to time, and any development fees established’ by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfil1 the applicant’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated July
19, 1991, a copy of which is on fiIe with the City Clerk and is incorporated by this
reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with the
General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, dated
May 25, 1983.
ti project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on ! September 1,1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Depanment and i
any future amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits. I
DRB PESO NO 177 -3-
1
2
3
4 *
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7.
a.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
. . .
If any condition for construction Of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by 1a.A an this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. . Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with ah sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within two years from the date of project approval.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from* adjacent properties and
streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the
satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building.
No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, whichever occurs first.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and subr&ed per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
DRB B&SO NO 177 49
1
2
3
4 " 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
-.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shd be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and Village Redevelopment signage regulations and shah require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
AS pan of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing.
w development has provided 10 parking spaces. Any use or uses which requires
more than 10 Parking ices to k provided (per sectiotl21.44 (Parkin& of the Zoning Ordinance shall be prohiited.
No restaurant, food sexvice, medicaUdmtal/chiraaraftid45YCho therapy uses shall be allowed with this project.
The enclosed garage space containing two spaces shall be used for employee parking only. Any conversion of this space to a use other than employee parking is spkkally prohibited.
24. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is
authorized by virtue of approval of this Redevelopment Permit.
2s. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
26. Th8 developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
27. Prior to or co ncurrently with issuing a building permit, the applicant shall obtain a right-of-way permit for the work of removing the dtiveway approach and
. replacing with curb, gutter, and sidewalk matching the existing sm?etscape design as shown on the site plan. Mar to occupanq the work in the public rightaf-way
shall be completed to the satisfktion of the City Eagheer.
DRBRESONO177 -5
-
1
2
3
1 4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
28. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department.
29. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts location of required, proposed and existing hydrants.
30. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior
to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
31. Plans and/or specifications for fke akm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing
systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
Carlsbad MUII~C~DZ~~ Water Distria:
32.
33.
34.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic,
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
The developeis engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Engineer and the
City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout prior to
preparation of the water system improvement plans. .
The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit.
DRBRESONO177 -6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
l?
13
14;’
15
16
l7 !
18 j/
23
24
25
-_
PASSED,APPROVED,AND ADOPTED at a reghr meeting of the Design Review
Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of December, 1991, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Noble, Board Members: Gonzales, Rowlett, Erwin, & Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None. ] . 7, _,, I
ATTEST:
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
2611 DRBRESONO177 -7-
27
28
4
t
GRAND AVE
4 SITE
I r
, c
CARLSBAD VHLAGE DR
1 II
q 1
L
1
.
\
r
GAMETOWNE RP 91-8