HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-07; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 205; Presidential Centre - Professional Office Building&REE.IJ. HOUSING AND-REDEVELOPMENT COMMIS.FQN - AGENDA S&L
fi~#a- -RP 91-6 - PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE : APPROVAL
MTG. 417192 OF A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A PROFESSIONAL
OFFICE BUILDING PROJECT AT 2615 JEFFERSON STREET
DEPT. RED WITHIN SUB-AREA 1 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT ZONE. Cln MO
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission direct the City Attorney to prepare documents
APPROVING RP 91-6 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
Staff recommends that the current fee schedule- be applied.
RP 91-6, Presidential Centre, is a request for a Major Redevelopment Permit for an 8,700 square
foot two-story professional office building to be constructed above a larger, partially subterranean
garage structure which is not visible at ground level. A concrete slab covering the parking
structure 4.5’ above grade provides the sub-floor of the structures, walkways, courtyards and
landscaped areas.
As proposed, the project will provide 29 parking spaces designated for office uses only. Condition
18 of the Design Review Board’s Conditions of Approval states “Medical or dental uses shall not
be allowed in this project unless square footage is reduced proportionately to accommodate
parking for medical use.” If the building were to provide for medical uses, building square footage
would have to be reduced from 8700 square feet to 5800 (reduction of 2900 square feet). As an
alternative to reduction in building square footage, an additional 15 parking spaces would be
required for medical uses, bringing the total parking space requirement to 44 spaces.
The office project is consistent with the’ RMH/O General Plan Designation and all applicable
ordinances since the proposed development is oriented to pedestrian traffic, provides open space
amenities, and reflects the village theme as required by the Village Design Manual and all required
development standards for building/lot coverage, building height, landscape coverage, and parkirrg
spaces have been satisfied. The project’s 38% compact spaces falls below the maximum 40%
compact spaces allowed by Section IX of the Village Design Manual. Presidential Centre was
reviewed by the Design Review Board and unanimously recommended for approval on February
19, 1992.
The applicant for Presidential Centre requested, in his letter dated February 10, 1992 (Exhibit 5),
that the 1987 Fee Schedule be applied to the project. Periodically the City will conduct a fee study
to establish a link between the costs of providing City services and a fair fee rate. The City’s goal
with respect to development fees is complete cost recovery. The current Fee Schedule was
adopted by the City Council in August of 1990 (updated December l991), and represents the most
recent information available connecting development fees to the actual cost of development
services provided.
he applicant for Presidential Centre states that in 1988 a commercial project virtually identical to
his, and at the same location, was approved but never constructed. At the time of the project’s
approval, the 1987 Fee Schedule was in effect. The applicant for Presidential Centre,
recommended for approval in February 1992, has requested that consideration be given to
2 g ?einstatement of the 1987 Fee Schedule for ‘his project. He asserts that the request is reasonable
2 0 based on the fact that the project will generate additional tax dollars for the City, and the earlier
G c’ a pproved project did not have the. same fee requirements as his recently approved project.
s 2 s
00
PAGE2OFAB#,$@S
The applicants request has been reviewed and staff can find no justification or compelling reason
to recommend such an action to the City Council. In fact, permitting the use of an obsolete fee
schedule would not only establish a precedent for other projects, it would result in the loss of full
cost recovery for development and in effect require subsidization of the project utilizing City funds.
FISCAL IMPACT
Development of Presidential Centre will create an increase of approximately $888,835 in assessed
value (land and improvements) and would result in approximately $8,888 in additional
Redevelopment Tax Increment Revenues annually. This project will provide additional revenues
through development fees, business licenses and sales taxes. The applicant is requesting that the
Commission consider a reduction and/or waiver of development fees as outlined in Exhibit 5.
EXHIBITS
1. Design Review Board Resolution No. 178
2. Location Map
3. Staff Report dated February 19, 1992
4. Design Review Board Minutes dated February 19, 1992
5. Letter dated February 10, 1992
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 I~
21~
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
referred to t le Design Review Board; and
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 178
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING WITH
SUBTERRANEAN PARKING ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 2815 JEFFERSON STREET.
CASE NAME: PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE
CASE NO: RP 91-6
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carls,bad and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
~ 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
I WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board did, on the 19th day of February, 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing
to consider said application on property described as:
Parcel #l : The southwesterly 50.0’ of the northwesterly 241 .O’
of Lot 48 the seaside lands according to the map thereof No.
1722 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, July 28, 1921; except the southwesterly 120.0’. Parcel
#2: The southeasterly 15.0’ of the northwesterly 191.0’ of Lot 48
of seaside lands according to the map thereof No. 1722 filed in
the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28,
1921; except the southwesterly 120.0’.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board
considered all factors relating to RP 91-6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review
Board RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of RP 91-6 , based on the following findings and I I subject to the following conditions:
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findinns:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Village Design Manual
as detailed in the Staff Report dated February 19, 1992.
The project meets all the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including the goals
and design and development standards specified by the Village Design Manual for
the Village Redevelopment Zone, Sub-area 1, including Section IX, Offstreet Parking
Areas, of the Village Redevelopment Manual permitting up to 40% of the required
parking spaces to be compact at the election of the Housing & Redevelopment
Commission.
The proposed project will contribute to the economic revitalization of the
Redevelopment Area.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for RMH/O Medium High Residential/Office
development on the General Plan.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
Planning Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Approval is granted for RP 91-6, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “.I’, dated
February 19, 1992, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise
noted in these conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of
the site plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The site plan shall reflect
the conditions of approval by the City. The site plan copy shall be submitted to the
City Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement plan submittal, whichever
occurs first.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended
from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance
adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement
DRB RESO NO. 178 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated
June 3, 1991, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by
this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with
the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone
1 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on September 1,
1987, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this
project within one year from the date of project approval.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the
satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building.
No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief.
In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and
the Planning Director.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading
or building permits, whichever occurs first.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and
submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1
plants (see Landscape Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance
or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shall
promote water conservation.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall
be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
DRB RESO NO. 178 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for his review and approval prior to occupancy of any building.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Medical or dental uses shall not be allowed in this project unless square footage is
reduced proportionately to accommodate parking for medical use.
Roof water shall dram to the street by a system of dram gutters and drainage
channels to be approved by the City Engineer.
entry driveway shall include a 5’ wide decorative used brick element.
Entieerin~ Conditions:
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is
authorized by virtue of approval of this site plan.
The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
Prior to approval of any grading or building’permits for this project, the owner shall
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of
the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping
District No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
Prior to or concurrently with issuing a building permit, the applicant shall obtain
a right-of-way permit for the work of removing the driveway approach on the
southerly project frontage and replacing with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Prior to occupancy, the work in the public right-of-way shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Fire Conditions:
26. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted
to and approved by the Fire Department.
DFLB RESO NO. 178 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Additional public and/or site fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by
the Fire Marshal.
Applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing
and proposed fire hydrants and onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for
approval.
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior
to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers,
and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department
for approval prior to construction.
Buildings exceeding 10,000 square feet aggregate floor area shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings therein which shall split the building
into 10,000 square feet (or less) areas.
Water Conditions:
32.
33.
34.
35.
. . .
. . .
. . .
The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject project shall
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic,
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
The developer’s engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Engineer and the
City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout prior to
preparation of the water system improvement plans.
The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The
Developer shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge which will
be collected at issuance of application for meter installation.
‘This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving
the development determines that adequate water and service is available at the time
of application for water services and will continue to be available until time of
OCCUp~cy”.
DRB RJZSO NO. 178 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 II
20 I/
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 1992
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Noble, Board Members: Gonzales, Rowlett, Erwin &
Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
KATHY GRAHAM
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 DRB RESO NO. 178 -6-
.
.
City of Chbd
PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE RP 91-6
APPLIL,\TION COMPLETE DATE:
DECEMBER 26. 1991
& STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1992
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: RP 91-6 - PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE - Request for a Major Redevelopment
Permit to allow the construction of an 8,700 square foot two-story office building
with subterranean parking at 2815 Jefferson Street in Sub-area 1 of the Village
Redevelopment Zone.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Design Review Board ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution No. 178
recommending APPROVAL of RP 91-6 to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a major redevelopment permit for an 8,700 square foot
professional office building located on the west side of Jefferson Street, south of the Psoriasis
Center in Sub-area 1 of the Village Redevelopment Zone. This area functions as the Village
area’s financial and commercial center and is designated by the General Plan for both medium
high density residential and office development (RMH/O). The vacant parcel is surrounded by
a mixture of single and multiple family residential and office uses.
A very similar project was approved for this site by the Design Review Board and Housing and
Redevelopment Commission on June 7, 1988, however, the project expired due to the former
applicant’s failure to comply with a condition requiring the issuance of a building permit for the
project within one year of the approval date.
The proposed project consists of a two-story office building to be constructed above a larger,
partially subterranean garage structure. The buildings have elements of the Cape Cod architectural style and are designed with a combination of blue wood siding and peach colored
stucco, wood-trimmed paned windows, wood-trimmed single lite french doors, open balconies
with blue metal railings, used brick trim, and a street level entry foyer. Walls surrounding the
project will be stucco coated and capped with used brick including the walls siding the garage entry ramp which provides ingress from Jefferson Street.
RP 91-6 - PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 2
III: ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. Does the project comply with the RMH/O General Plan Designation and Village
Redevelopment Zone?
2. Does the project meet the goals of Sub-area 1 and comply with the development and
design standards specified in the Village Design Manual?
3. Is the project consistent with the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan?
4. Will the project contribute to the economic revitalization of the Redevelopment Area?
DISCUSSION
General Plan/Zonirig
The proposed professional office project is consistent with the RMH/O General Plan designation
since it is intended that offices designed for compatibility with single and multiple family uses
will be developed in the area. The professional office use is permitted by right in Sub-area 1
of the Village Redevelopment Zone and is consistent with the Sub-area’s goal to function as the
major commercial center for the downtown area.
Village RedeveloDment DeveloDment and Design Standards
The primary goal of Sub-area 1 is to provide uses which are consistent with a central business
area such as office and commercial uses. Development should be oriented to pedestrian traffic,
have open space amenities, and reflect the village theme. The proposed office building is
oriented to pedestrian traffic by providing a 23’ landscaped front yard setback, a street level
entry, and pedestrian friendly architectural features including an interesting roof line variation,
wood siding with stucco and used brick trim, large paned windows, and a front balcony and
porch with french doors opening toward the street. The project’s open space amenities include
a large central courtyard consisting of decorative paving, bench seating and large 5’x 5’ planter
boxes containing trees and shrubs. Second story balconies overlook the courtyard, and
additional landscaped areas along both sides of the structures consist of a combination of
hardscape, planter boxes, and benches.
A
-
RI’ 9 l-6 - PRESIDENI lriL CENTRE
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 3
The proposed development complies with the following Village Redevelopment design and
development standards specified in the Village Design Manual:
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
Lot Coverage
Building Coverage
Building Setbacks
Front Yard
Side Yard
Rear Yard
Building Height
Landscape Coverage
Parking
REQUIRED/MAX. PROVIDED
80% *82%
80% 41%
20’ 23’
6.5’ 6.5’
13’ 13’
35’ Max. 32’
20% 29%
29 spaces 29 spaces
* The two-story buildings will be constructed above a partially subterranean garage
structure (5.5’ below grade and 4.5’ above grade). Although the subterranean garage
covers approximately 82 % of the lot, building coverage above the garage is only 4 1% .
A concrete slab covering the garage structure 4.5’ above grade provides the sub-floor of
the structures, walkways, courtyard, and landscaped areas around the building.
ECONOMIC IMPACT
The positive economic impact of the Presidential Centre is significant (approximately $8,668
annually). The Village Redevelopment Agency receives one percent of the increase in total
assessed value of property (land plus improvements) in the form of tax increment revenues. The
total assessed value of this site would increase to approximately $923,165. The development
of the Presidential Centre will result in an increase of about $866,835 in assessed value,
therefore, the annual tax increment revenues generated would be approximately $8,668.
Additionally, as a result of this development, eight to ten professional businesses (law offices,
architectural firms, consultants) will be located within the Village Redevelopment Area and 45
new jobs will be created for Carlsbad.
RP 91-6 - PRESIDENTlwL CENTRE
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE4
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The impacts on
public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the adopted performance
standards are summarked below:
FACILITY IMPACTS
City Administration Facility N/A
Library N/A
Wastewater Treatment Capacity N/A
Parks N/A
Drainage 1
Circulation 174 ADT’s
Fire Station #l
Schools N/A
Sewer Collection System 4.8 EDU’s
Water Distribution System 1100 GPD
open space 29%
COMPLIANCE
WITH STANDARD
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The proposed office building project is consistent with the underlying RMHIO General Plan
designation, as well as the goals, development, and design standards specified in the Village
Design Manual for the Village Redevelopment Zone/Sub-area 1. Staff therefore recommends
approval of RP 91-6 as conditioned.
The Planning Director has determined that the environmental impacts of the project have already
been considered in the issuance of a Negative Declaration dated February 26, 1988.
Rp 91-6 - PRESIDENTJ - CENTRE
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
PAGE 5
.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Design Review Board Resolution No. 178 2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Statement
5. Local Facilities Assessment Form
6. Exhibits “A - “S’, dated February 19, 1992.
AH:vd:lh
January 20, 1992
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET _
CASE NO.: RP 91-6
A
CASE NAME: Presidential Centre
APPLICANT: Robert Mance
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Reauest for a maior redevelonment nermit to allow the
construction of an 8.700 souare foot 2-storv office building and subterranean narking
garage in Sub-area 1 of the VR zone.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel #l : The southwesterly 50.0’ of the northwesterlv 241 .O’ of
Lot 48 of the seaside lands according to the man thereof No. 1722 filed in the office of the
Countv Recorder of San Dieno Countv. Julv 28. 1921; extent the southwesterlv 120.0’.
Parcel #2: The southeasterlv 15.0’ of the northwesterlv 191.0’ of Lot 48 of seaside lands
according to the man thereof No 1722 filed in the office of the Countv Recorder of San
Dieno County. July 28. 1921: extent the southwesterly 120.0’.
APN: 203-l lo-29
Acres .30
(Assessor’s Parcel Number)
Proposed No. of Lots/Units N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RMH/O
Density Allowed 8-l S/at. Density Proposed N/A
Existing Zone VR Proposed Zone N/A
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements) Zoning Land Use
Site VR
North VR
Vacant
Office
south VR Single Familv
East VR MultiDle Familv
West VR Side Family
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 4.8
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated June 3. 1991
Sewer District Carlsbad
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, nreviouslv issued on Februarv 26, 1988
- Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other, AH:Vd
DISCLOSURESTATEMENT .
1 1
APPLICANT’S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INiERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REOUIRE
DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED EOAAD. COMMISSION OR COMMi-lTEE.
.
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. Applicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
Robert F. Mance
4540 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 213
San Dieno, CA 92123
619-560-0800
2. Owner
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. George and Betty Kelso Kevin and Anna Kelso 6831 Carnation Street 3350 Ridgecrest Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009 Carlsbad, CA 92008
--FrFn l-0266 - - /
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names ant addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names ant
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary
of the trust.
FRMOOo13 8/9Q
2075 Las Palmas Drive * Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 - (619) 436-l 161
p-
‘1.. --
m
Disclosur8 Statement
(Over)
Page 2
5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards,
Commissions,‘ Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes - - No x If yes, please indicate person(s)
Perron is defined U: *Any individual, firm, copartnrrrhip, joint venture. association, social club, fraternal organizetion. corporation. eatate, trust.
receiver. syndicate, thir and any other counry, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision, or any other group or
combination acting aa a unit’
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
Signature of Owner/date Signature of applicant/date
eor:pe Kelso
Print or type name of owner
Betty kelso
FRMooo13 8/90
Print of type name of applicant
. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CIlYOFcARlsBAD
LOCAL FACLlTIFS MPACI’S ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE - RP 91-6
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: ‘1 GENERAL PLAN: RMH/O ZONING: VR
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Robert Mance
ADDRESS: 4540 Kearnv Villa Road. Suite 213 - San Dieno. CA 92123
PHONE NO: (619) 560-0800 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 203-l lo-29
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 13.000 sauare feet
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Februarv 1993
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Achmmstrafive Fachtles: Demand m Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. =
Open Space: Acreage Provided -
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
174
1
29%
N/A
4.8
1-F
1100
The project is N/A units the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. AH:vd:lh
Minutes at:
Time of Meeting:
Date of Meeting:
Place of Meeting:
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
5:oo P.M.
FEBRUARY lQ,lQQ2
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Noble called the Regular Meeting to order at 503 p.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by
Member Savary.
ROLL CALL
Present: Members Noble, Gonzales, Erwin (arrived at 5:QQ P.M.), Rowlett, Savary
Staff Present: Kathy Graham, Housing and Redevelopment Director
Karen Hirata, Deputy City Attorney
Debbie Fountain, Senior Management Analyst
Robert Greene, Principal Planner
Anne Hysong, Assistant Planner
Karen Sauer, Management Analyst
PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no requests to address the Board.
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
There were no requests to address the Board.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Erwin arrived at 5:OQ P.M.
ACTION: Motion by Member Erwin, second by Member Savary, to approve the Minutes of the Regular
Meetings of December 18, 1991, and January 27, 1992, as amended.
AYES: Members Noble, Erwin, Gonzales, Rowlett, Savary
NOES: None
ABSTAINED: Member Rowlett (Minutes of January 27, 1992)
PUBLIC HEARING:
Chairman Noble announced that now was the time and place set for the Public Hearing regarding RP 91-8
Presidential Centre.
Kathy Graham, Housing and Redevelopment Director, informed the Board that the applicant had written a letter
requesting that fees imposed be waived. Staff had informed the applicant that the Cii Council had the authority to
waive City fees and that the letter would be referred to the Cii Council.
Anne Hysong, Assistant Planner, referred to Page 3 of the staff report dated February 19, 1992, and noted that the
lot coverage should read 41%, not 82%. She reviewed the specifics of the redevelopment permit request.
Karen Sauer, Management Analyst, stated that this permit request would place a new professional building in the
redevelopment area and would bring economic and employment benefits to the Cii and Redevelopment Agency.
Member Erwin stated that Resolution 178 refers to Exhibits A-J, but that Exhibits A-l are attached. He requested
that Condition No. 1 read Exhibits A-l.
-
Ms. Graham responded to Member Erwin’s inquiry regarding 46% compact car parking by stating that in the past
the Design Review Board had followed the Village Redevelopment Manual which stated that all new developments
may grant credit for a maximum of 40% of the total number of spaces for compact car parking.
Robert Greene, Principal Planner, stated that the Design Manual allowed for flexibility in the guidelines regarding
compact car parking and noted that the project had 38% compact parking.
Karen Hirata, Deputy Cky Attorney, stated that the 40% figure was merely a guideline and that the Board could
request that the percentage of parking be clearly stated through findings.
Chairman Noble stated that k was sufficient to state in the Minutes that, for the record, the Board had given
authorii for compact parking and that it did comply.
The Deputy City Attorney stated that a general finding with more specific wording could be included in the motion.
Member Erwin stated that the 38% compact parking was justified by the Village Design Manual, as noted in Section
IX, Page 9.
Member Rowlett inquired as to whether there was sufficient room for vehicles in the turn around.
Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer, responded to Member Rowlett’s inquiry regarding turn around, said that it had been
determined that there was sufficient turn around room.
Chairman Noble opened the public hearing.
Robert Mance, 4540 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 213, San Diego, informed the Board that he understood the letter
requesting a waiver of fees was being referred to the City Council for action. Mr. Mance stated that this
redevelopment project would create jobs and sales tax dollars during construction.
Chairman Noble closed the public hearing.
Member Erwin stated he was in support of the proposed redevelopment but was concerned with high density of
compact parking underground and that the Board review the use of compact space parking in this community.
MOTION: Motion by Member Erwin, second by Member Row&t, to adopt Design Review Board Resolution
178 recommending approval of RP91-6 to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Further, that said resolution be
amended on Page 2, line 16, to read, ’ . . . as shown on Exhibits A - J.
AYES: Members Noble, Erwin, Gonzales, Rowlett, Savary
NOES: None
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion, the Meeting of February 19, 1992 was adjourned at 630 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
d- 1
-k
t
KATHY GRAHAM
Housing and Redevelopment Director
lsabelle Paulsen
Minutes Clerk
February 10, 1992
rj+O Keamy Villa Road Suite 213
San Diego. Calitixni~ 92123
FAX 619/560-54%
L/C a’i 79101
619/560-0800
Mr. Bailey Noble Design Review Board 5470 10s Robles Drive Carlsbad, CA. 92008
Re: Presidential Centre RP 91-6
Dear Mr. Noble,
This letter is written to introduce myself and the project (Presidential Centre) scheduled to be heard before the Design Review Board on February 19, 1992. Enclosed is an elevation of the building and a copy of the letter written to the Redevelopment Agency and Planning Department upon submission for the Major Use Permit.
I assume you will have read the staffs recommendation "For Approval" of the project prior to the hearing. The enclosed letter addresses the questions I sought to have answered prior to processing the discretionary permit (RP 91-6). I was told by the staff that answers must come from the Board and/or the City Council.
PREVIOUS PROJECT AND PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE
The table following is from the staffs report for their recommendations. Please note that I have added the Kelso's approved standards to compare with the current plan.
RP 91-6 Development Standard Recr'd Max Provided Kelso's
Lot Coverage Building Coverage Building Set backs Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Building Height Landscape Coverage Parking
80% 82% 82% 80% 41% 41%
20' 23' 23' 6.5' 6.5' 6.5' 13' 13' 13' 35' 32' I
20% 29% iii% 29 spc 29 spc 30 spc
The table shows that the project is identical to the
construction Finance Investment Safes/Leasing Property Management
project previously approved by the 1988. City for the Kelso's in
DEVELOPMENT IS BASED ON TEE TENANT AFFORDING THE COST
The developer, Ford Mance, is working with a tenant to occupy and buy the building upon completion of construction. As well, additional tenants and/or partners are being sought to take the balance of the building. A long term permanent mortgage from the Small Business Administration has been applied for. Both tenants/owners and the S.B.A. mortgage are crucial factors in order for the project to be developed.
Their criteria to either occupy or invest are determined by the desirability and cost that the project development ~111 bring to the Redevelopment District of the project. Please consider the following benefits and weigh them in your determination to support my request that the permit costs be lessened.
ECONOMIC IMPACT
The project will have a positive impact (significant) of $8,668 annually. This represents $86,680 over the next 10 years. The value of the property will be increasing to $830,000 . Currently, the value will increase from $250,000 which is generating real property taxes of $2500 per year.
Jobs will be generated in two phases of the project 1) construction and 2) occupancy. During construction, $429,000 will be spent on labor for all facets of the project including laborers, machine operators, carpenters, finishers, drivers, steel erectors, assemblers, electricians, plumbers, mechanics, masons, landscapers, roofers, painters, sheet metal fabricators, tilers, drywall placers, and even building inspectors. Estimated at $2O/hr for labor, this represents 2681 man/days of labor, $47,190 in State income taxes, $64,350 in Federal income taxes and $79,365 in purchases to local merchants during construction.
Once completed, "as a result of this development", eight to ten professional businesses will be located in the Village Redevelopment Area and 45 new jobs will be created. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of all office workers shop during the day and 60% take trips to do errands durin over z the lunch hour. The average office worker spends 1900 per year on lunch, retail purchases, dinner and -entertainment purchases near their office. This office worker spends 10% of total income near their workplace on food, clothing, jewelry, accessories, etc. This represents $85,500 per year spent in Carlsbad each year
thus generating retail economic sales by local commerce and $7267 per year in sales taxes.
The S.B.A.'s criteria for lending is predicated on creating employment and on the building's tenant owning the building for conducting business. The tenant(s) currently considering owning/occupying have been in downtown Carlsbad for ten years.
Presidential Centre can be a model project for the City of Carlsbads Redevelopment efforts, striving to keep small business in the core, keep jobs and maintain a viable commercial sector where tenants do not have to drive to conduct shopping, etc.
NO LOCAL FACILITY BURDEN
The project will not burden the public facilities at all. The table following is taken from the staffs report "for recommendation". The lessening of fees is justified based upon this assessment alone. To charge fees, assessments, taxes, and tariffs in return for permission to develop causes severe economic burden for this private development.
Facilitv 'Imnact Compliance With Standard
City Administration Facility Library Waste Water Treatment Plant Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Schools Sewer Connection System Water Distribution System Open Space
None Yes None Yes None Yes None Yes 1 Yes 174 ADT's Yes Station #l Yes Kane Yes 4.8 E.D.U.'s Yes 1100 GPD Yes 29% Yes
SEVERE PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BURDEN
Time Time The previous project (Kelso's) was submitted to planning The previous project (Kelso's) was submitted to planning in 1987 during the summer. in 1987 during the summer. approval in late 1988. approval in late 1988. It eventually received It eventually received A request for extension was denied A request for extension was denied after the year elapsed within which the previous after the year elapsed within which the previous applicant, applicant, Kelso, had to pull building permits. Kelso, had to pull building permits.
In April 1991, the new applicant, Mance, applied for preliminary concept review and was promptly told that re-issuance would be most likely. By June 3, 1991 the application for a major use permit was submitted. At that time a letter was submitted requesting certain concessions
.
and/or waivers which focused on cost savings and time savings be made in order to jump start the project into beginning.
After four rejections for having submitted an "incomplete" application, the project was finally scheduled for Design Review Board presentation in late February 1992, over 8 1\2 months later!
The project is almost identical to the 1988 project excepting color and minor cosmetic variations.
PERMIT PROCESSING
Concurrently, the building working drawings were submitted on June 15, 1991 for processing a building permit. Review of plans was completed in July and returned for corrections. However, we have been unable to resubmit because engineering must wait for final Major Use-Permit approval before they can be sure that all 35 conditions of the permit will be approved.
We desire to initiate construction as soon as possible after the discretionary permit is ratified.
PERMIT COSTS HAVE RISEN 200%
The co+ of permits have skyrocketed and the usage of the money is headed toward payment for services rendered outside the downtown Redevelopment Area.
In 1988, Kelso was given estimates for permit costs. Mance was given estimates too in February 1992.
Kelso 1988 Mance 1992 Change
Building Permit Plan Check x xi Strong Motion Fee $ ' 65 Public Facility License Tax Traffic Impact Fee P5b201 E.D.U.'s $ 6,392 Sewer $ 5,025 Plumbing, Elec., Mech. School Fee Total
+ 27% + 27% + 289% + 206% +5600% + 173% + 161% + 419% + 176% + 199%
This represents nearly twice the estimated cost in three years. In fact, the growth of the general economy during that time has been less than 10% during the entire period.
SUMMARY
The previous developer Kelso and the current developer
Mance have spent over 18 months of processing time on this project combined. The costs for the time spent have been at our sole expense. processing, Separate from personal expense for over $50,000 has been spent for consultants time and materials for complying with City permit processing requirements.
Now, upon arriving to meet these requirements the cost of permits has risen from $33,000 to $64,000!
The results of this projects benefit to the City of Carlsbad represents a significant contribution:
Item Now Completed
Jobs During Const. 0 Payroll During Const. 0 Purchases During Const. 0 :4;+;
Fed Taxes During Const. 0 $ 64;350 State Taxes During Const. 0 Purchases Yearly After Const. 0 $ x'o: Sales Tax Revenue Property Taxes $2,:00 8 p;
Jobs Upon Completion 0 ;5
I urge you to grant the applicant his two simple requests:
REQUEST NO. 1
1)
2)
3)
4)
- 5)
6)
7)
That the City Engineering Department determine that sewer facilities are available and be kept available through to occupancy.
That the amount payable to the City for building permits, plan check, strong motion fee, E.D.U.ls, sewer and plumbing, electrical and mechanical fees be held to the schedule of fees dated July 28, 1987 and December 7, 1987.
That the amount payable to the City for the public facilities (P.F.F.) be held to that same schedule applicable to the Kelso permit (1987).
That no Traffic Impact Fee be assessed.
That fees paid for public facilities be used in the Redevelopment area only.
That sewer and water hookup costs be waived since the property paid for years for those services prior to this Redevelopment permit.
That parcelization of the building (such as a condominium office) or a P.U.D. be allowed without
ility of the City of Carlsbads Chapter X&47 NwWfwxdential Planned Development ordinance. processing and definition would follow the Subdivision Map Act which specifically waives any jurisdiction by the State regarding commercial or industrial property (ie. a public report, notice etc. is not necessary). Fees for compliance to define the buildings' ownership into more than one parcel are currently assessed at $6,000 and months of processing time. We request it be waived.
REQUEST NO. 2
To expedite the processing of the ministerial building permits in order to mitigate any delay which might occur in obtaining the permit in order to start construction. As well, to promote quick response by building inspection and a spirit of collaboration during construction so that it can occur rapidly and smoothly.
Development of this project represents one of its first kind in the Redevelopment District. very supportive and responsive. The agency has been Hopefully, Presidential Centre can set an example for Redevelopment efforts by Carlsbad.
Sincerely,
Robert F. Mance Ford Mance
--
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RP 91-6 - PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, April 7, 1992, to consider an application for a Major Redevelopment Permit to allow the construction of an 8,700 square foot two-story office building with subterranean parking on property generally located at 2815 Jefferson Street, in Sub-area 1 of the Village Redevelopment Zone, and more particularly described as:
Parcel #l: The southerly 50.0' of the northerly 241.0' of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, according to Map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921; except the southwesterly 120.0'.
Parcel #2: The southeasterly 15.0' of the northwesterly 191.0’ of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, according to Map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921; except the southwesterly 120.0'.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Anne Hysong in the Planning Department at 438-1161, ext. 4477.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Robert Mance PUBLISH: March 26, 1992
CITY OF CARLSBAD HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
4
_ City d CIW~
PRESDENTIAL CENTRE I RP 91-6
._ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING _
“d.~ t”...-a NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN&at the Design Review Board of the‘City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm
Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 19, 1992, to consider
approval of a Major Redevelopment Permit to allow the construction of an 8,700 square
foot two-story office building with subterranean parking on property generally located at
2815 Jefferson Street in Sub-area 1 of the Village Redevelopment Zone and more
particularly described as:
Parcel #1 : The southwesterly 50.0’ of the northwesterly 241 .O’ of Lot 48 the
seaside lands according to the map thereof No. 1722 filed in the office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921; except the
southwesterly 120.0’. Parcel #2: The southeasterly 15.0’ of the
northwesterly 191 .O’ of Lot 48 of seaside lands according to the map thereof
No. 1722 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
July 28, 1921; except the southwesterly 120.0’.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after February 11, 1992. If you
have any questions, please call Anne Hysong in the Planning Department at 438-l 161, ext.
4477.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice
or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public
hearing.
CASE FILE: RP 91-6
APPLICANT: PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE
PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 6, 1992
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
AH:km
I; :,. I:.. > !. "' ]I ii-!I)ii+,'d {{j
:' / ., . (' ; 8' .I ,f );,,.,;I; i:‘.‘, ,,; I?.:, . * - q -Y -a . ..” . . : 17j !: I!;; LL %*
- h
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK ‘S OFFICE
FROM: ~N9(pQ~Q:/p~Jpjf~~;r HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
RP 91-6 - PRESIDENTIAL CENTRE
for a public hearing before the City Council. I
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
April 7, 1992 .
Thank you.
MARTY ORENYAK
Assistant City 312192
Date
nwul al 105 zu* UOC
s 9
8 $ i? s
8 m
7pww i?wps 3 03 a om
w”*
EFD =I’ 1 P *et
*x D1 i
ifrn C’D
so”, n =bJ: 00 al 1
3 g E. mc= ulu 19
xc
klr 3 -0 *91 ii w’g
1 2 u al n
:: 3
June Wood
P 0 Box 2134
Leucadis CA 92024
Robert E & Arlene Olivas
Rte 3 Box 318 College Station TX 77849
Subsidired Housing Corp Of Ame
777 E Tahquitz Way Ste 200 Palm Springs CA 92262
John 3 & Hogan Giroux 2521 S Vista Way 422 #l/2 Carlsbad CA 92008
Arlene S Berman 880 Home Ave D
Carlsbad CA 92008
Rubin A Andreatta
880 Home Ave G
Carlsbad CA 92008
Dan I P ane Magtira
P 0 Box 4239
Carlsbad CA 92018
Ramiro Contreras 1650 W Linda Vista Dr #105
San Marcos CA 92069
Banning T Cantarini
905 Laguna Dr Carlsbad CA 92008
Thomas G & Vickee Duncan
1789 Shamrock
Upland CA 91786
Ib J L Kathleen Jensen
6523 Westchester St
Houston TX 77005
Paul A Ik Louise Russell
882 Home Ave ttag211
Carlsbad CA 92008
Edmond T Trust 1989 OS-23 Sheh 6321 Esplanade
Playa De1 Rey CA 90293
Joseph P Sandy
2892 Jefferson St Carlsbad CA
Daniel J 81 Ernestine Cerda
1743 Lotus fwe
El Centre CA 92243
swys Carp
P 0 Box 90789
San Diego CA
. Pgp Carlsbad Seniors Ltd Ii 1120 Silverado
La Jolla CA 92037
92008
92169
**w 34 Label(s) Printed *+*
Prepared for: JEANNIE
Virginia L Jac Jn Keith Chaney
2718 Roosevelt St #f 2712 Madison St
Carl sbad CA 92008 Carlsbad CA 92008
John Cianciarulo 4644 Telescope Ave
Carlsbad CA
Charles A Yates
2753 Jefferson St Carl sbad CA
92008
Tommy J & Gladys Harris
722 &buckle Pl
Carlsbad CA 92008
Mary R vullican 750 Arbuckle Pl 92008 Carlsbad CA 92008
Daniel R Swem
4807 Elm Tree Dr Oceanside CA 92056
Jack D Phillips 3702 Ingraham St
San Diego CA 92109
Feinberg Jonathan A Md Inc
477 El Camino Real #b-303 Encinitas CA 92024
Huston H & Helen Tucker 2810 Madison St
Carlsbad CA 92008
Edith P Healey 334 West Ave
Full erton CA 92632
Jeanene Enterprises Inc
2879 Jefferson St
Carlsbad CA 92008
W Scott Rogers Melville W Hone
2715 Morning Glory Ln 826 Orange Ave #601
Carl sbad CA 92008 Coronado CA 922 18
*+* 26 Label(s) Printed +**
Prepared for: JEANNIE
d-11_ --~~-~-~~ .--. -.-_ -... a - ..-.. --
T
.----IIIC . ..-._.. .- ._ I . .-y.-.-..- _____ ___ . ..-A!5
Western Nutual Mortgage II,,
2945 Harding St #IO7
Car lsbad CA )r 92008
Donald K & LaeL Dewhurst 3425 Seacrest Dr
Carlsbad CA 92008
Daniel D & Irene Lopez
928 Home Ave
Carlsbad CA 92008
aerald G Kelly 400 N La Costa Ave
Carlsbad CA 92009
Josephine R Kingston
786 Grand Ave Carlsbad CA 92008
u Donald W & Nancy Harger
2754 Jefferson St
Car 1 sbad CA
Swef Properties
2774 Jefferson St
Carlsbad CA
Florenza M Williams
P 0 Box 9872 Ranch0 Santa Fe CA
92008
92008
92067
Jeanene Enterprises Inc
2879 Jefferson St Wj
Carlsbad CA 92008
Robert C & Darlene Pearson 2123 Woodwind Dr
Olivenhain CA 92024
imes R & Caroline Davis fsokazu Tabata
0 Box 91s 4929 Park Dr
arl sbad CA 92018 Carlsbad CA
-:z3
.qnquil & Dinah Morrow Allen Bruce 0 Est Of
!5 Madison St 2737 Madison St
%lsbad CA 92008 Carlsbad CA
92008
92008
Howard F Trust 10-06-89 Murphy
400 N La Costa Ave
Carl sbad CA 92009
Stuart C & Marilyn Wilson 1846 Avocado Rd Oceanside CA 92054
(12-27-85) Johns0 Family Trust St 1440 Gilbuck 92802
Anaheim CA
-90 Barlow
92117
_ Seth Hoenig
. P 0 Box 2401 s Leucadia CA 92024
George G & Sharon Marhoefer
4437 Mayfair Ct
Carlsbad CA 92008
Richard S & Leslie Landreth
22s Plaza St
Solana Beach CA 92075
Family Trust 12-18-90 Scanlon
7306 Borla Pl
Carlsbad CA 92009
Peter A & Georgette Rock
2421 S EL Camino ReaL
San Clemente CA 92672
Peter A & Georgette Rock 2421 S El Camino Real
San Clemente CA 92672
Otto H & atherine Bandemer
2720 Jefferson St
Carlsbad CA 72008
Family Trust 09-14-90 Klett
P 0 Box 4086
Carlsbad CA 92018
Capitol Properties Ltd Iii 1120 Silverado St
La Jolla CA 92037
Clifford J Bergman 3836 Altura Ave
La Crescenta CA 91214
Thomas W & Christine Purkiss
. 880 Home Ave F
Carlsbad CA 92008
Dean-ross Schessler
882 Home Ave B Carlsbad CA 72008
George M & Adrienne Soohoo
2879 Hope Ave
i Carlsbad CA 72008
Edmond T Trust 1989 05-23 Sheh
i-- -
-----J ‘, 6321 Esplanade
t
Playa De1 Rey CA 90293
--
Gordon A SC Marilyn La-1 an Attni Controllers Div. -8th Fl
400 Ca Ornia St*san Fr 94104
I.
Melvin H De ooyer la23 La Jolla Ranch0 Rd La' Jolla CA 92037
Calvin R & Malinda Perkett 812 Home Ave Carlsbad CA 92008
- --
George & Rita Windrum . 4230 Clearview Dr
Carlsbad CA 92008
John H & Mary Grant 2949 Harding St Carlsbad CA 92008
*** 13 Label(S) Printed ***
Prepared for: JEANNIE
Dorothy Metros
919 Peck &ve
Manhattan Beach CA
. *
.
. l
90266 *
9
3
r-
_-.,.
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of loca1 news and intelIigence of a genera1 character, and which
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the
said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BP Old - PRESIDENTIAL CBNTRB
NOTICB IS HEREBY GIVEN th.t the HOUSI~ nad Redevelopmeat Commiuloa of the City of Carlsbad will bold l public bearing at the City Council Cbamkn. lZO0 Carla- bnd Villlpe Drive, Carlsbad, Cali- fom1*. It 0:oo P.Y., on Tlwday, April 1. ISSS, to consider .II ,p. Plicatton for I Major Redevelop. m*nt Permit to allow the conatr~c- uoo Of .n &Too rpu*re root two- story oftke buildinS with #ubterra- n*mPukIn$onpmgcltyOenenuy hatad et %315 Jefferson Street, in Sub-area I of tbe Villa@ Rcde- valopment Zone. and more pmilcu- larlr deaertbed .I: Farce1 II: Tbt mMbcrlY 50.0’ of tbcnortherly~l.0’ofLot~ofSc~- lideLlad8,~erordi~(oM~ptbcrr- 0fN0. i722,nkd inth~ornc~~fth~ County Recorder of San Diego
County, July 28, 1911; except Lbe soutbresterly 11o.w. Parcel cg: The routheartcnly 15.0’ of the notiwerterly lDl.O’of Lot 4S of Seaside Lands. accordlag toHaPtbereofNo. 1m.nkdin tne olnce Of the county Recordcrbf San D1ea.s County, July ZB. 1921; .& cept the wuthwester1y 120.0’. If you have any questions reg&- bu this matter, pleaat call Allme HYrong in the Planning Depart- ment at 43alllJl. CXt 4477. - If you challebge the M4or &de- vllopment Permit in court. you mPy be limited to raising only thoje 1ama~s raised by you or ~meo,,e else at the public hearing de- uxibed in tbie notice. or in written correspondence delivered to the CitY of Carllbad City Clerk’s OtTIce at or prior to the public hearing; Applicant: Robert Ymxce CITY OF CAItLSBAD : - : HOUSING AND :.
RBDEVEw-NT - : : COYWSSION - .-.
4 ..
.-
. -
PRESIDENTML CENTRE RP 91-6 -
I - cl SlzR Ylrcb 24. lssz :.
preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in each regular
and entire issue of said newspaper and not
in any supplement thereof on the follow-
ing dates, to-wit:
March 26 19 92
19-
19-
19-
19-
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California on the 26th
day of Yarch 1992
lvlY.,~t i.4.t I’ I Clerk of the Printer