HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-01-05; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 222; Fish House Vera Cruz,‘;ILep--, J
HOUSING AND ~?EVEL~WUW~T co~nm~ss~~~ - AGENDA BILL
4B# xJ% TITLE: MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT 92-l 0 AND
l-5-93 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 92-08 FOR WTG. A FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ RESTAURANT AND
DEPT. RED FISH MARKET AT 417 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the Housing & Redevelopment Commission direct the City Attorney to prepare the
documents APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director;
APPROVING RP 92-10; APPROVING Coastal Development Permit 92-08 based on the
findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
RP 92-10 is a request for a Major Redevelopment Permit for demolition of an existing retail
building and construction of a new 3,348 square foot Fish House Vera Cruz Restaurant
and Fish Market at 417 Carlsbad Village Drive. The proposed redevelopment project is
located in Sub-Area 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area and includes demolition of
adjacent storage buildings and the construction of a new parking lot on site.
Parking will be provided for this project by construction of ten spaces on site, five spaces
on the adjacent lot and the leasing of eleven spaces from the City, on a lot which is
immediately south of the site. The lease with the City was authorized by the City Council
on September 8, 1992.
The proposed restaurant will enhance the area and meet the Sub-Area goal to “function
as the major . . . specialty, commercial center for the downtown area,” and the proposed
design includes a “high degree of landscaping” which is encouraged along “street front
setbacks.” The on site landscaping has been increased to 20% of the site, with
landscaping provided along Carlsbad Village Drive and along the side of the building
which is visible from the street.
The project complies with the development guidelines regulating building height, lot and
building coverage, landscape coverage as well as parking for a restaurant as well as the
standards specified in the Village Design Manual. Therefore, this project is consistent
with the General Plan, the Village Design Manual and the City’s adopted Local Coastal
Program.
On December 2, 1992, the Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed this project and
recommended approval of RP 92-10 and CDP 92-08 with changes to Design Review
Board Resolution Number 198 to delete condition 27 and add a new condition stating that
“parking for the building shall be provided in accordance with the figures stated in the
Design Review Staff Report dated December 2, 1992.”
Subsequent to the Design Review Board meeting, Staff discovered the review documents
were incomplete and one of the structures at this site was on the list for local historic
significance. Therefore, Staff recommends the addition of a condition to require Historic
Preservation Commission review for appropriate mitigation measures prior to demolition
of the structure. The following condition is proposed: “Prior to demolition of the barn
(historic structure), the Historic Preservation Commission shall review the project to
determine the appropriate documentation measures to mitigate the loss of the structure.”
FISCAL IMPACT:
The positive economic impact of the proposed Fish House Vera Cruz Restaurant and Fish
Market is significant for the City and the Redevelopment Agency. The City’s General
Fund would receive approximately $20,000 in sales tax revenues annually and the
Redevelopment Agency would receive approximately $4,000 in new tax increment
revenues each year.
EXHIBITS:
1. Design Review Board Resolution Number 197 and 198 and 199
2. Location Map
3. Staff Report Dated December 2,1992
4. Design Review Board Minutes dated December 2, 1992
EXHIBIT 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 197
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNtA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO REPLACE A RETAIL BUILDING
WITH A RESTAURANT AND RETAIL BUILDING AND
ANCILLARY PARKING ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 417 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA.
APPLICANT: FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
CASE NO: RP 92-lO/CDP 92-08
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 2nd day of December, 1992,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
and considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board. considered all
factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
Design Review Board hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative
Declaration according to Exhibit “ND”, dated October 22, 1992, and
“PIT’, dated October 1, 1992, attached hereto and made a part hereof,
based on the following findings:
Findings:
1. The i-itial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may
have a significant impact on the environment.
2. The adjacent street, Carlsbad Village Drive, a secondary arterial is adequate in size
to handle traffic generated by the proposed project.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located so as to be signifkantly
impacted by this project.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of December, 1992
by the following vote, to wit:
AyES: NOBLE, ERWIN, SAVARY, ROWLETT
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: GONZALES
ABSTAIN: NONE
ATTEST:
EVAN BECKER
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RESO NO. 197 -2-
-
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
‘14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 198
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO REPLACE A
RETAIL BUILDING WITH A RESTAURANT AND RETAIL
BUILDING AND ANCILLARY PARKING ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE 417 CARLSBAD VILLAGE
DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA.
CASE NAME: FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
CASE NO: RP 92-10
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the-Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board tild, on the 2nd day of December, 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing
to consider said application on property described as:
Lot 1, Tract 10G of the City of Carlsbad, Map No. 1710,
recorded in the office of the County of San Diego Recorder in
December 1919.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board
considered all factors relating to RP 92-10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on- the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review
Board recommends APPROVAL of RR 92-10, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
-
1
2
3
4
E
e
7
e
s
1c
11
1:
- 1:
14
1:
1E
li
U
1s
2c
21
21
2:
24
2f
2e
23
2E
Findims:
1. The proposed restaurant will enhance the co ’ 1 center function of the
downtown and enhance the street landscaping and is therefore consistent with the
goals and objectives of the Village Design Manual.
2.
3.
The project meets all the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
The engineering analysis by City staff indicates that points of traffic conflict have
been mitigated through onsite circulation design, median construction, and
movement restrictions on the public street.
4. The project proposes a restaurant in the downtown core commerchl area, close to
the beach Several amenities such as the addition of street landscaping and removal
of derelict buildings will occur as a result of this project. The proposal is therefore
consistent with the General Plan.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Approval is granted for BP 92-10, as shown on Exhibit “A” - “E”, dated
December 2, 1992, incorporated by, reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development’ shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise
noted in these conditions.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this
project within one year from the date of project approval.
Approval of RP 92-10 is granted subject to the approval of CDP 92-08.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates
pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the
Planning Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the
project to the satisfaction of the PlamGng Director.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, whichever occurs first.
DRE3 PESO NO. 198 -2-
.
1
2
3
4
E c
6
7
e
s
1c
31
.li
1:
14
1:
1E
17
1E
1:
2c
21
22
2:
24
25
26
27
28
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13..
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and
submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1
plants (see Landscape Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance
or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shall
promote water conservation.
The developer shall avoid trees that have invasive root systems, produce excessive
litter and/or are too large relative to the lot size.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shall
be submitted to the Planning Director certifying that all landscaping has been
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California.
The applictit shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans,
improvement plans and grading plans.
The minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallons.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall
include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24” x 36”
blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any
applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
Detailed mechanical equipment and mechanical equipment plans shall be submitted
for review and approval of the Planning Department prior to issuance of building
permits. Au mechanical equipment shall be screened.
Signs shall be subject to approval of a separate City sign permit application prior to
installation.
DR.8 RESO NO. 198 -3-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20. Detailed exterior li&ting plans (including fixtuns) shall be submitted for the
review and approval of the Planning Dep artment prior to issuance of Building
Pennits.
21. Parking for the building shall be provided in accordance with figures stated in
theDesignReviewStaffReportdatedDecember2,1992.
Engineering Conditions:
22.
23.
24.
25:
26.
27.
Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is
authorized by virtue of approval of this site plan.
The applicant shall comply with all rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.& E., Pacific Bell
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
The owner of the subject property shall execute a Hold Harmless Agreement
regarding drainage across the .adjacent property prior to approval of the building
permit for this project.
Pretreatment of the sanitary sewer discharge from this project may be required.
In addition to the requirement for a sewer connection permit the applicant shall
conform to the requirements of Chapter 13.6 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall apply for an industrial waste water discharge permit
concurrently with the building the building permit for this project.
Prior to occupancy of the site as a restauran~fish market the applicant shall
install parking lot improvements and re-stripe the existkg City leased parking
lot on the railroad right-of-way property as shown on the site plan to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Fire Dewuiment:
28. Prior to issuance of building pennits, complete building plans shall be approved
by the Fire Department.
Buildinn Dewsrtment:
29. Working drawings shall be submitted, prior to issuance of building permits,
which comply with requirements for the Uniform Building Code and Title 24
handicap person accessibility requirements.
-4-
DRB RESO. NO. 198
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1E
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Carlsbad Municid Water District:
30. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system, and sewer system shall
be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands
are met.
31. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be
collected at time of issuance of the building pennit. The San Diego County Water
Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for meter
installation.
32. Sequentially, the Developer’s Engineer shall do the following:
A. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection
requirements.
B. Prepare a colored re&imed water use area map and submit to the Planning
Department for processing and approval.
C. Schedule a meeting with the Distxict Engineer for review, comment and
approti of the preliminary system layout usage (G.P.M. - E.D.U.) plan for
potable, reclaimed aid :kver ‘systems prior to the preparation of
improti~t plans.
33.
34.
This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving
the development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are
available at the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will
continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the
final map.
The developer shall be responsible for the installation of backflow prevention and
sewer control requirements.
Police Demrtment:
35. Lighting - Aisles, passageways, and recesses related to and within the building
complex shall be ikunina ted with au intensity of at least twenty-five one
hundred&s (25) footcandles at the ground level during the hours of darkness.
Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism-resistant covers.
36. Open parking lots shall be provided with a maintained minimum of one (1) footcandle of light on the parking surface during the hours of darkness. Lighting
devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism covexs.
DRB FESO NO. 198 -5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
. 12
13
‘14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
~dscaping - The exterior landscaping should be kept at a minimal~height and fuUness giving police, secmity services and the general public Surveillance
capabilities of the area. It should also be designed so as to not provide coverage for
someone trying to hide.
Storage or dkposal bins - should be located away from the area: of any loading or
receiving area. Disposal bins should be designed in a manner as to not provide
coverage for someone trying to hide or sleep.
Doors - Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness
of one and tbree fourths inches. Hollow steel doors shall have a minimum sixteen
U.S. gauge and have su&ient reinforcement to maintain the designed thickness of
the door when any locking device is installed. Glass doors shall have fully tempered
glass or rated burglary resistant glazing.
All taving& exterior wood and steel doors shall be equipped with security hardware such as a dead bolt, reenforced strike plate and latch cover.
All double doors shall be equipped with an astmgal coustructed of steel a minimum
of .125 inch thick which will cover the opening between the doors. The astragal
shall be attached to the outside. by means of welding. or with non-removable bolts
spaced ~nart on irot more than ten inch cmtexs.
The inactive leaf shall be equipped with metal flush bolts having a minimum
‘embedment of five-eighths inch into the head and threshold of the door frame.
The jamb on all ah&num fi-ame swiqing doors shall be so constructed or
protected to withstand 1600 pcmlds of pITz%ure inbothaverticaldistanceofthree
inches and horizontal distance of one inch each side of the strike, so as to prevent
violation of the strike.
Panic hardware shall be installed whenever it is required by the Uniform Building
Code.
Cashier - Special attention should be given to the cashier area. It should be placed
to afford the cashier visibility of the entmnces and exits with no signs or obstacles
impeding surveillance.
The entrance and exits should be well defined and marked to avoid conflicts.
Viewers - the door to the rear should be equipped with a viewer. The entrances
should be given additional lighting during hours of darkness. All exterior lights
should be of the vandal resistant type.
DRB RESO NO. 198 -6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
:33
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
47. AllroofopeniDgsshallbed
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of December, 1992,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: NOBLE, ERWIN, SAVARY, ROWLETT
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: GONZALES
ABSTAIN: NONE
ATTEST:
EVAN BECKER
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RESO NO. 198 -7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13’
‘14
15
16 ”
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. lw
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO
REPLACE A RETAIL BUILDING WITH A RESTAURANT AND
RETAIL BUILDING AND ANCILLARY PARKING ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE 417 CARLSBAD VILLAGE
DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA.
CASE NAME: FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
CASE NO: CDP 92-08
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the. Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board u:d, on the 2nd day of December, 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing
to consider said application on property described as:
Lot 1, Tract 10G of the City of Carlsbad, Map No. 1710,
recorded in the office of the County of San Diego Recorder in
December 1919.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board
considered all factors relating to CDP 92-08.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board
as follows:
A> That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review
Board recommends APPROVAL of CDP 92-08, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
1
2
3
4
fi Y
6
7
E
S
1c
11
li
*. 1:
14
1E
1E
17
1E
1s
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
Find&s:
1. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Village Design Manual
and since the Manual is the implementing documen toftheLocalcoastalPro~
the project is consistent with the Local Coastal Program.
2.
3.
The project meets all the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
The engineering analysis by City staff indicates that pohts of traffic conflict have
been mitigated through onsite circulation design, median construction, and
movement restrictions on the public street.
4. The project proposes a restaurant in the downtown core commera ‘al area, close to the beach. Several amenities such as the addition of street landscaping and removal
of derelict buildings will occur as a result of this project. The proposal is therefore
cousktent with the General Plan
Conditions:
All conditions of approval of Design Review Board Resolution No. 198 are
incorporated herein.
DRB RESO NO. 199 -2-
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
22
I “i Iv
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of December, 1992
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: NOBLE, ERWIN, SAVARY, ROWLETT
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: GONZALES
ABSTAIN: NONE
ATIEST:
EVANBECKER
HOUSINGANDREDEVELOPMENTDIRECTOR
DRB RESO NO. 199 -3-
EXHIBIT 2
d li
;i .
:
c; 4
. -.
tl
.
. . .
jSIT&
ILL
F
6
1
_ .’ .’
w ,’
. evLLAQm ..
4
FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ IRP 92.lO/CDP 92-8
I
-_
- -= _-__-.e
EXHIBIT 3 APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
1.
OCTOBER 29. 1992
SIAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 2, 1992
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RP 92-lO/CDP 92-08 - FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ - Redevelopment Permit
and Coastal Development Permit for demolition of a retail building and
construction of a restaurant and retail building at 417 Carlsbad Village Drive
in the Village Redevelopment Zone and in the Local Facilities Management
Zone 1.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Design Review Board ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution No. 197,
recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and
ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution Nos. 198 and 199, recommending APPROVAL, of
RP 92-10 and CDP 92-08, to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission, based on the
findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECX DE!XR.IPTtON AND BACKGROUND
This application is for the demolition of an existing retail building and construction of a
new 3346 square foot restaurant and retail fish market on the pad; demolition of adjacent
storage buildings and the provision of an additional 10 space parking lot.
The structure will be one story with stucco walls and a terra cotta tile roof exterior in an
adobe style. Landscaping will be added to the street frontage and parking lot.
III. ANALYSIS
The proposal is for the demolition of an existing retail structure and associated storage
buildings. These structures will be replaced by a new restaurant and retail fish store on
the pad of the previous retail building. Additionally, ten new parking spaces will be
constructed on the site of the demolished storage buildings. A lease agreement which has
already been finalized with the City Council, will provide eleven spaces from the adjoining
public parking lot.
. RP 92-lO/CDP 92-08
FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
DECEMBER 2, 1992
PAGE 2
This project is subject to the following standards and policies:
A. Village Redevelopment Zone regulations, Village Design Manual, Coastal Program.
B. City of Carlsbad General Plan.
C. Carlsbad Municipal Code Title 21, Chapter 21.44.
D. Growth Management
VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT ZONE. DESIGN MANUAL, COASTAL PROGRAM:
A. The site is within the Village Redevelopment Zone which is governed by the
provisions of the Village Design Manual. This use is permitted by the Village Design
Manual. The goal of the manual for this portion of Carlsbad is to “function as the
major.... specialty, commercial center for the downtown area.” The proposed
restaurant will enhance this function. Designs which “utilize a high degree of
landscaping” are also encouraged along.. . “street front setbacks”. This development
proposed not only landscaping along the street, but landscaped ,areas along the side
,of the buildings which are visible from the. street. These elements will add to and
complimyx the existing iandscaping along Carlsbad Village Drive, and integrate the
project ;-,?to the downtown.
The Village Design Manual is the City’s adopted Local Coastal Program. As noted
above, the project complies with the manual and is therefore consistent with the
Coastal Program.
GENERAL PLAN:
B. This site lies within an area designated Central Business District on the General
Plan. The City’s General Plan contains the following guidelines which are pertinent
to this commercial development:
“Provide a variety of commercial and tourist recreational
activity in the downtown core commercial area, especially close
to the beach, in connection with special entertainment
facilities, restaurants and other uses...”
“Encourage cleanup, landscaping, beautification (and) utility
undergrounding in the downtown core commercial area.”
General Plan Commercial Guidelines 4 and 14.
This proposed restaurant is approximately 1500 feet from the beach. Two derelict
storage buildings will be demolished and, additional landscaping will be added, on
this site. The development is therefore consistent with the above goals of the
General Plan which encourages commercial development which beautifies the
downtown area and which is in close proximity to the beach.
.
RP 92-lO/CDP 92-08
FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
DECEMBER 2, 1992
PAGE 3
MUNICIPAL CODE:
C. This project is subject to the parking standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance.
Restaurants require 1 parking space for every 100 square feet of floor area, while
retail uses require 1 space for every 300 square feet. Staff review of the floor plan
indicates 2158 square feet of restaurant and 1188 square feet of retail space. 26
spaces are to be provided for this facility by construction of a ten space lot on the
site, five spaces on the adjacent lot, and the leasing of eleven spaces on an adjacent
lot from the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency. This lease arrangement was reviewed
and approved by the City Council acting as the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission at the meeting of September 8, 1992. Adequate parking will therefore
be available for this proposal.
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN:
D. The site is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The impacts on public facilities created by the proposed project and compliance with the adopted
performance standards are summarized in the tables below. This type of
commercial property replacement was anticipated by rhe Local Facilities
Management Plan, for thi> Zone.
FACXLJTY IMPACTS CoMPLlIANcE~
tClXNDARDS
. - -
RP 92-lO/CDP 92-08
FISHHOUSEVERACRUZ
DECEMBER2,1992
PAGE4
Iv. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The application proposes replacement of an existing commercial property. No significant
adverse environmental impacts will result, therefore, the Planning Director has issued a
Negative Declaration for this proposal on October 22, 1992 based on the requirements of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code, Environmental Protection Procedures, Title 19 and the
California Environmental Quality Act.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Fish House Vera Cruz project would generate positive economic impacts for the City
and the Redevelopment Agency. The City receives 1% of the total annual sales generated
as sales tax revenues. This project has been estimated to generate $20,000 annually in
sales tax revenues. In addition, the Redevelopment Agency receives 1% of the assessed
value of property located within the Village Redevelopment Area. This project is expected
to increase the assessed value (land plus improvements) of the site by approximately
$400,000. The tax increment revenue increzse would be about $4,000 and the total
ctinxted tax increment revenues to be generated annually would be about $5,976. The
total-amount of revenues generated by the proposed Fish House Vera Cruz project for the
City and the Redevelopment Agency would be approximately $25,976.
SUMhIARY
The Housing and Redevelopment Department is supportive of this project, which would be
a positive addition to the Village Redevelopment Area.
This project complies with all applicable City codes and policies. The staff is therefore
recommending approval of the project.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Design Review Board Resolution No. 197
2. Design Review Board Resolution No. 198
3. Design Review Board Resolution No. 199
4. Location Map
2: Disclosure Form
Background Data Sheet
7. Exhibits “A” - “E”, dated, December 2, 1992
RG:lh
October 8,1992
NEGATIVE DEQLARATlON
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 417 Carlsbad Village Drive
PROJECT DESCIWTI ON: Conversion of a retail building to a restaurant and retail fish
market; demolition of storage building and formation of a
parking lot.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have -a signiflc~:.
irr.=\act on. the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. .Justi.fication for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Robert Green in the
Planning Department at (619) 438-1161, extension 4442.
DATED: OCTOBER 22,1992
CASE NO: RI’ 92-lO/CDP 92-08
CASE NAME: FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1992
RG:lh
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-l 576 - (619) 438-l 161 69
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART 11
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
BACKGROUND
CASE NO. RP 92-lO/CDP 92-08
DATE: October 1. 1992
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CASE NAME: Fish House Vera Cruz
APPLICANT: Mr. Ron Butler & Mr. Rex Butler
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 1229 Linda Vista Drive
San Marcos. CA 92069
DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: Sentember 17.1992
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Conversion of a retail buildinn to a restaurant and retail fish
market: demolition of a storage building and formation of a ~arkinn lot.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, “NO” wiI.I be checked
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a signi.f&nt effect on the environment. The project may qualifv for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insknificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings “YES-s@’ and “YES-insig”
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
PHYSICAL ENvIRoNMFLNT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
(W (insig)
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substam+. changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a signifkant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-2-
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
(s&l (insig)
12.
13.
14.
1s.
16.
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prune, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
oi numbers of any species of animals (birds,.
land animals, .all water dwc%g organisms
and insects?
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration.or movement of animals?
HuMANENvIRoNMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECI’LY OR INDIRECTLYz YES
Csigl
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services?
x
x
x
x
x
NO
x
x
-3-
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
2s.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
.
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
Result in the need.for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
Increase existing noise levels?
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Generate substantial additional traffic? -.
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
big) (in@
-L -
x
x
x
x
x
-ii-.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
big1 (ins@
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
envirozment. is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period- of
time while. long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
3s. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively con-
siderable” means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
NO
X
x
x
x
-5
DiSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
S,8.
19.
26.
An underground gasoline storage tank has been removed from the rear of the existing building to
the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency and the City Fire Department. Therefore
any potential substantial adverse environmental impacts from this tank have been eliminated.
The City’s building regulations require the installation of a grease trap on the restaurant
sewer. This will prevent .adverse impacts from the use on the City sewer system.
The conversion of the use from retail to retail-restaurant will result in the need for
additional parking spaces to serve the proposal. Currently no parking spaces are
provided to the existing use. This proposal will provide an additional 10 spaces on the
site. A further 11 spaces are to be leased from an adjoining lot. This will provide a total
of 21 spaces which is adequate to serve the uses proposed based -in the requirements of
the City of Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance.
-6-
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed project, and
g) no project alternative.
-7-
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
x
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a signifkant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the
environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with
previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required.
Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an EIWIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
(0 ( 164%
Date . . . :,
p-6-~&-
Date
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
NONE
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
-8-
. 1
4 --
:
c; 2
.
t
f SITEq CARLSBAD VUAGE ill CARLSBAD VUAGE ill
El ILL
GRAND AVE
. .
I FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
City of lhbbd 1
1 RP 92-lo/COP 92-8 1
‘SENT BY:CITY OF CARLSBQD -.~ ; 11-10-92 12:00F’M ; c- -90894+ 619 471 1603;ft 4
APDCICAW-$ STAT~MRNT OP OlSCLOIURl OC e#mAJN OWNl~WC IW#RLltl ON Au APwnOw WWI~ WI& QqUq !
~mrflOMnY ACTION ON WR pm or twR CRV COUNCIL OCI ANY AwolNtto WAno, COMMla8lOY on CoMMrRat.
pmro Pmlf~
The lollowlng Informrtlon must bo dlrciorad:
Wing 8 fhntirl inbmt in th appllcrtion.
. .
Ljrt the nrmoa ,md 8ddtowo8. of alI pv8onr hrvlng 8ny ownW8hip intWHt in the pro&y Involved. A-e/tiPJ z n/ 7&--r/. i/G-’ 7r d;-t h/&-/p k f-2. d x-4 c-l, ,fl
/&M,. I- h/ k-i-,,7- ,- L?.- / a.4
G .& ,y r J&*&r
3. If my prmon ‘idMiMd punuant to (1) of (2) above h I wfpotitbn of puMf8hlp, Ii8t the dmem and
rddnrroa of 81 Indivldudr owning mon than 10% of the rhuor In the oorpor8tlon or Owning 8f?y putnanhip
4, IImy~non~purwlrntto(t)or(r~ira~~orq~orrmra,Ihtt)wnMIoamd
rddnsw of ury peaon 8orvlng m otflcu or dltWtOf of the nongrd)t orguWSm 01 Y trurtoa or bmaficiuy
. .
/ / . , . /
PO78 Lam Palmu Drlvo l Carlabad. Callfornla @2002-482@ . (me) 430-l 101
SENT BY:CITY OF CRRLSBaD - '11-10-92 12:01PM ; 6 3894+ 619 471 1603;tt 1
KW
Pago 2
3. l=hvI you had more than $250 WOIth Of bulinH8 trmSWt0d with my mombar of Civ staff, Boards Cmtmr~$iocu, Gommittoer and Council within the pat lweka months? Y@$ _ No A If yor, plwo indicrto por8on(r) .
w h dofinod y: ‘Ay ~WuYua!. km, ..mmofoW, joim wWws. wWof# wrW Uub, trm oqwwkn. o.maWm ootm. tfu8t
r880wt, 4yndiWt8, IlriO W w MU 8WMf. 8lQ Utd 4OWM 89 mUni@DdW, DMDM Of ockrr WWd WbdbVW6 Of WV @W (WO )I
8onlblnodoll Ucm( 0 8 ulllt’
I
--_ BACKGROUND DATA SHEET -
CASE NO: RP 92-lO/CDP 92-08
CASE NAME: FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
APPLICANT: RON & REX BUTLER
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 417 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 TRACT 10G OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. MAP NO. 1710,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RECORDER DECEMBER 1919.
APN: 203-296-07 Acres 0.17
(Assessor’s Parcel Number)
Proposed No. of Lots/Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Density Allowed Density Proposed
Existing Zone VR Proposed Zone
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements) .,
Z0Ilillg
Site VR
Land Use
COMMERCLAL
North VR
south VR
COMMERCIAL
PARKING LOT
East VR
West TC
COMMERCIAL
PARKING LOT/RAILWAY
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District CARLSBAD Water District CARLSBAD Sewer District CARLSBAD
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 17
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated DECEMBER 2. 1992
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACI’ ASSESSMENT
x Negative Declaration, issued OCTOBER 22. 1992
- Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other, RG:Ih
EXHIBIT 4
Minutes of: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Time of Meeting: 5:00 P.M.
Date of Meeting: December 2, 1992
Place of Meeting: CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Noble called the Regular Meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Noble, Members Erwin, Rowiett, Savary
Absent: Member Gonzales
Staff Present: Evan Becker, Housing and Redevelopment Director
Debbie Fountain, Senior Management Analyst
Robert Green, Principal Planner
Karen Hirata, Deputy City Attorney
Karen Sauer, Management Analyst
Eric Munoz, Associate Planner
Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Noble.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
ACTION: Motion by Member Erwin, and duly seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of October 7, 1992, as submitted.
AYES: Chairman Noble, Members Erwin, Savary
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Member Rowlett
ABSENT: Member Gonzales
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON tTEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA:
There were no requests to address the Board.
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. RP 92-l O/CDP 92-08 - FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ - Request for a Major Redevelopment Permit
and Coastal Development Permit for the demolition of a retail building and construction of a
restaurant and retail building at 417 Carisbad Village Drive in the Village Redevelopment Zone in the
Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
Karen Sauer, Management Analyst, reviewed the fiscal impacts of the request and stated that tax
increment revenues are estimated to increase by $4,000 and additional sales tax revenue for the City’s
general fund is estimated to be $20,000 annually.
Robert Green, Principal Planner, stated that the existing retail building and adjacent storage buildings
would be demolished and replaced by a new 3,346 s.f. building featuring a seafood restaurant and small
retail fish market. The architecture will be stucco (adobe style) with a terra cotta tile roof. There will be 26
, -
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 2,1992 PAGE 2
parking places provided in addition to extensive landscaping. He concluded his remarks by requesting that
Condition ##27 on page 4 of Resolution No. 198 be deleted.
At the request of Board members, staff clarified details regarding the parking space calculation, drainage,
and hardware for the emergency door.
Chairman Noble opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Ron Butler, applicant, was present but declined to speak.
Bill Skidmore, 143 So. Cedros, Soiana Beach, architect for the applicant, explained that the emergency
door would be located on the west side of the building and, for noise mitigation, the windows would be
made of plate glass but would be stationary and not able to be opened. Member Rowiett suggested that
some consideration be given to Plexiglas.
John Jones, 3044 State Street, Carlsbad, addressed the Board and stated that he is in favor of the Fish
House but is concerned about water runoff from the adjacent building due to the fire wail which is being
constructed. He also recommended that there be only one entrance and one exit to the parking lot (in a
loop manner), because he is concerned about cars traveiing west on Carisbad Village Drive which would
need to cross the median in order to enter the parking lot. He also hopes that the utilities will be
undergrounded prior to construction of the new building.
Bill Ryburn, 2019 Ester0 Street, Oceanside, addressed the Board and stated that he owns the adjoining
building. He is happy to see Fish House Vera Cruz come to Carisbad because he is very impressed with
the operation they have in San Marcos.
Steven LaF:e, Attorney, 2111 ‘Palomar Airport Road, Carisbad, representing Mr. Ryburn, addressed the
Board and stated that the runoff issue needs to be resolved during the design phase. He requested that a
condition be added requiring the applicant to work with the adjoining property owner. Mr. LaRue is also
concerned that heavy equipment used for the demolition may cause structural problems with Mr. Ryburn’s
building. He suggested a condition requiring a hold harmless bond. Mr. LaRue expressed concern about
the adequacy of restaurant parking once the commuter rail line is operational, since some of the parking
allocated to the restaurant will be from a public parking lot.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Board on this topic, Chairman Noble declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the members.
Chairman Noble responded to Mr. LaRue’s comment about parking for the commuter rail and stated that
NCTD will have its own parking lot for the commuter rail. As a result, the restaurant parking will not be
affected.
Karen Sauer, Management Analyst, responded to Mr. LaRue’s comment regarding heavy equipment being
used for the demolition phase and stated that the existing building will not be bulldozed; the plan is for the
materials to be dismantled and used elsewhere.
Robert Green, Principal Planner, responded that staff is aware of the runoff issue and that the applicant is
currently working with the adjacent property owner. Mr. Green does not believe that the Design Review
Board can legally regulate this issue.
Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer, indicated that a median is not included in the plans for Carlsbad
Village Drive between the railroad tracks and State Street, and that the utility pole referred to by Mr. Jones
is not included in Streetscape Phase V.
-
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 2,1992 PAGE 3
Karen Hirata, Deputy City Attorney, suggested that a condition could be added to the effect that I’the
applicant will design a building with an adequate drainage system which will not exacerbate drainage
problems on the adjacent property.”
Chairman Noble requested Mr. Skidmore (applicant’s architect) to comment on the proposed resolution to
protect the adjacent owner from a runoff problem. Mr. Skidmore generally agreed to the proposed
condition but could not offer to fix Mr. Ryburn’s roof. He was willing to arrange with his roofer to do the
work concurrently with the restaurant project, as long as Mr. Ryburn pays for it.
Robert Green, Principal Planner, stated that the existing buildings were constructed before there was a
requirement for a fire wall. At the present time, rain water from Mr. Ryburn’s roof runs off on to the
building to be demolished. The new fire wall being constructed will prevent runoff from the applicant’s
building onto Mr. Ryburn’s building. Mr. Green feels it is a private matter which needs to be worked out
between the parties.
ACTION: Motion was made by Member Erwin, and duly seconded, to adopt Design Review Board
Resolution No. 197, recommending approval of the Negative Declaration issued by the
Planning Director, and adopt Design Review Board Resolution Nos. 198 and 199,
recommending approval of RP 92-10 and CDP 92-08, to the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein, with the following changes: (1) delete Condition #27 of
Resolution No. 198; and (2) add a new condition to Resolution No. 198, following
Condition #20, which states that parking for the building shall be provided in accordance
with figures stated in the Design Review Staff Report dated December 2, 1992.
AYES: Chairman Noble, Members Erwin, Rowlett, Savary . : . .NOES: NC
ABSTAIN: Norie .
ABSENT: Member Gonzales
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS:
1. RP 84-04(A) - POLLOS MARIA DRIVE THRU - Request for a drive-thru window at the existing
Pollos Maria Restaurant located at 3055 Harding Street within Sub-area 7 of the Village
Redevelopment Zone in Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
Debbie Fountain, Senior Management Analyst, reviewed the background of the request and stated that
staff is recommending the requested amendment be denied due to their concern for safety issues. She
turned the time over to Eric Munoz of the Planning staff to explain the reasoning for the recommendation.
Eric Munoz, Associate Planner, stated that the proposed drive-thru does not meet City standards or
engineering guidelines because the lot is severely constrained and would not provide adequate queuing for
vehicles, the handicap parking space would be blocked, and circulation via the rear alley would be unsafe
to pedestrians and other vehicles.
Chairman Noble opened the public testimony and issued the invitation to speak.
Michael Winfield, Architura, 10457A Roselle Street, San Diego, representing the applicant, addressed the
Board and stated that he disagreed with staffs findings. He submitted drawings which portrayed how the
drive-thru could accommodate the necessary vehicles. Mr. Winfield feels that most people would not
purchase single items at this drive-thru but, in actuality, would probably purchase dinner for four persons.
As a result, he feels that the engineering requirement for queuing should be reduced.
There being no other persons desiring to address the Board on this topic, Chairman Noble declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the members.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 2,1992 PAGE 4
Member Savary feels that vehicles entering or leaving the rear alley from Carlsbad Village Drive or Oak
Street would be a hazard to oncoming traffic.
ACTION: Motion was made by Member Erwin, and duly seconded, to adopt Design Review Board
Resolution No. 200, denying RP 84-04(A), based on the findings contained therein.
AYES: Chairman Noble, Members Erwin, Rowlett, Savary
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Member Gonzales
Chairman Noble advised the applicant that she has the option of appealing the denial to the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission within 10 days.
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion, the Regular meeting of December 2, 1992 was adjourned at 6:02 p.m.
EVAN BECKER
Housing and Redevelopment Director
Cadsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication ’
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of 1ocaI news and intelIigence of a genera1 character, and ,which
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the
said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
preceding the date of publication of the
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING RP 9%KVCDP 928 FISHHOUSEVERACRUZ
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the My of Cerlsbed will hold a pubhr hearlog et the Cay Counetl Chambers. 1200 Carl- shad Village Drive. Cnrlsbnd. Cali- fornia, at 8:OO P.M.. on Tuesday. ~anusry 5.1ssS. lo consider an a~ plieation for P Major Redevelop men1 Permit and Coastal Develop men1 Permit for demoWon of e grade 3 historical structure and eonstmetion ofa restaurant and it- tail building on property generally located al 411 Carlsbad VLltege Drive. III the Village Redevelop men, zone. ~.~a1 cosrtal Zone. and in Local Facilities Management zone 1. and more partrcularly de- :scribed 88’ Lot1.Traet10CoftheCityofCarl- ‘(bad. Mar, No. 1710. recorded in the
Olflre of the San Diego County Re- corder. in December. MS. Those ~crsona wirbiIU to W-k on this +opoaal are cordially in- vited to attend the public bearit% Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 31.1662. If you have any questions regarding this matter. @earl call Robert Green in the Planning De- partment at 43&1161. ext. 4442. If you challenge the M4or mdc velopmeal Permit and/or Coastal Development Permit in court, you maybe limited lo nisingollly those isn~es raised by you or someone else et the public bcerlng dc acribed in this notice. or ia written correspondence delivered to the City of Culsbsd City Clerk’s Olllce st. or prior to. the publlc hearilrg Applicant: Rex and Ron Butler Filing Dale: September It. lSE? CITY OF CARLSBAD HOUSING AND FtBDEVFLOPMNT
“,! 1
a ; 2 . 2 -
I:..:‘,
CJI$4.% December P.lSS2
iotice hereinafter referr*ed to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in each regular
and entire issue of said newspaper and not
in any supplement thereof on the follow-
ing dates, to-wit:
December 23 19 92
39-
19-
19-
19-
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregcing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, Countyth;f :;r; Diego, State of
California on
day of UecemDer, 7
L ’ Clerk of the Printer
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RP 92-lO/CDP 92-8 - FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, January 5, 1993, to consider an application for a Major Redevelopment Permit and Coastal Development Permit for demolition of a grade 3 historical structure and
construction of a restaurant and retail building on property generally located
at 417 Carlsbad Village Drive, in the Village Redevelopment Zone, Local Coastal
Zone, and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1, and more particularly described as:
Lot 1, Tract 1OG of the City of Carlsbad, Map No. 1710, recorded in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder in December, 1919.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 31, 1992. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Robert Green in the Planning Department at 438-1161, ext. 4442.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit and/or Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the' public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Rex and Ron Butler
FILING DATE: September 11, 1992 PUBLISH: December 23, 1992
CITY OF CARLSBAD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FlSHHOUSEVERACRUZ RP 92-lo/COP 92-8
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY G
a public hearing at California, at 5:00 p.m. 0
Redevelopment Permit and C o consider approval of a
OC +Y a restaurant and retail building on property generally located at 417 Carlsbad Village
Drive in the Village Redevelopment Zen? and in the Local Facilities Management Zone 1
and more particularly described as: bl L.ataQ GCUAQ 264
Lot 1, Tract 10G of the City of Carlsbad, Map No. 1710, recorded in the
office of the County of San Diego Recorder in December 1919.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and afte
you have any questions, please call Robert Green in the Planning
ext. 4442.
If you challenge the Redevelopment Permit/Coastal Development Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at.
or prior to the public hearing.
:ASE FILE: ’ Rf’ +.L.-lO/CDP 92-8 /
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
RG:km
.~ ,n, ; , . -, ,: . . . . *. _ r. , . , . . ^ :- ‘C’ tq , ”
,’ .:1.,!c,
3 *
.: ,..1 ta L;.,i.‘. &p-$$+-J)-+
FROM FAX # (619),434-1982 TO FAX # (by)
DATE SENT: ‘%$h- TIME SENT:
NUMBER OF PAGES SENT, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: a
DEPARTMENT:&- dd
DEPARTMENT:
CONTACT PHONE: (619)
ANY PROBLEMS WITH RECEMNG THIS FAX, CALL
(619) 434-2803
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive l Carlsbad, California 92008-1989 - (619) 434-2808 @
,
d
f
? NM @s MVQ33) N3SNVllSIY~ 2
F
P
(II .I
n
8 : 3AV I r(l3 8
\ . . 8 PINE i: Airc.,r
I 1’ 7 -.
6%
I .g
i
Et% i- 25 * 4, a t 6 i VIb-. w :” b::s- :. “a 8 -qo;“> -yi 0 d . . a4--,e 0’ - qn9,.1 ,. :
J-l i
OAK ’ / a A’
p PINE
. . .
.
a (1.) 203-174-06 T I L LIMITED
P.0 BOX 1575
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
- (2.) 203-174-07
T I L LIMITED
P.0 BOX 1575
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
(3.) 203-175-01 GRANT, JOHN H & MARY C TRS 7173 OBELISCO CIRCLE
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
(4.) 203-175-02
SOTO. DANIEL C JR. &
COLLEEN F.
P.O.BOX 353
CARLSBAD, CA 92018
(5.) 203-175-03 THATCHER, CHARLOTTE L.. REVOCABLE TRUST 04-23-91;SONNEMAN.RBR-T. H. 325 CARLSBA;AVI;;;;; DRIVE #C2
CARLSBAD,
(6.) 203-175-04 RUNZO, FRANKIE G. 2044 PRESTON AVE.
LOS ANGELES, CA 90026
(7.) 203-175-05 TANAKA, TED T. & HO, DIANA Y.T. GREEN EAGLE ENTERPRISE 41 MARKET ST.
VENICE. CA 90291
(8.) 203-175-06 SHADER, TERRY G. & PHYLLIS M. 28655 MILLER RD.
VALLEY CENTER. CA 92082
;F (9.) 203-175-07
WIEHLE, DANIEL C. & VIOLET B.
395 ELM AVE.
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
+ (10.) 203-175-08 WIEHLE, DANIEL C. & VIOLET 8.
395 ELM AVE.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(11.) 203-260-04
BURNS, GEORGE A. & CELIA J.
26516 ROCKHURST LANE
RANCH0 PALOS VERDES. CA 90274
(12.) 203-260-05 BOWERS, GERALD M. TR & BOWERS, NORMA M. TR
3199 FALCON DR.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
r: (13.) 203-260-07 NIELSEN, ROBERT L. TR 545 ELM AVE.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(14.) 203-260-08
MC CABE, JEFFREY S. 267 LA VETA AVE.
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
* (15.) 233-260-12 NIELSEN. ROBERT i. TR 545 ELM AVE.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(16.) 233-260-13
TREVASK I S FAM I LY TRUST
05-05-90 7704 ROCIO ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
(17.) 203-260-16 SCHNEIDER TRST 09-Ol-83,PAUTCH TRST ll-25-86,SAN KATRINA TRST 7136 VISTA DEL MAR
LA JOLLA, CA 92037
(18.) 203-261-03 GREEN EAGLE ENTERPRISES CORP. TANAKA,TED & HO,DIANA Y.T. 20121 VALLEY BLVD.
WALNUT, CA 91789
(19.) 203-261-06-01 FEENSTRA. DIRK J. 8 JUNE M. 6531 AVENUE DELg;$;;lSO
CARLSBAD, CA
(20.) 203-261-06-02 CHASE FAMILY 1991 TRUST 05-02-91
4990 VIA MARTA
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
_-
.
(21.) 203-261-06-03 HEYNE, SUZANNE
998 CHURCH ST.
VENTURA, CA 93001
(22.) 203-261-06-04
DEEN. BILL & JULIANNE
741 E ST.
BRAWLEY, CA 92.227
(23.) 203-261-06-05 LUCIER. DANIEL D. 3080 LINCOLN ST. #5
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
(24.) 203-261-06-06 TRENT, EDWIN A. & BETH C.
2429 WINDWARD CIRCLE
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361
(25.) 203-261-06-07
BITONTI. TOM & MARIE 536 N. MISSION DR.
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91775
(26.) 203-261-06-08 BOONE, JAMES D. & LAURALEE N.
3955 SKYLINE RD.
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
(27.) 203-261-06-09 HODGES, THOMAS F.
RTE. 3 BOX 390
ESCONDIDO, CA 92025
(28.) 203-261-06-10
GIPNER, JAMES F. & GEORQIE
GIPNER. JOHN & VIRGINIA 161 LEMON GROVE DR.
FALLBROOK, CA 92028
(29.) 203-261-06-11 BITONTI, THOMAS D.,BITONTI. MARIE 536 N. MISSION DR.
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91775
(30.) 203-261-06-12 SEGAL, JERRY 620 w. SOLANA CIR. #olD
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
(31.) 203-261-06-13
MACPHERSON. STEVEN K. 8
MARGARET A.
P.O. BOX 1482
CARLSBAD, CA 92018
(32.) 203-261-06-14
GUERNSEY BRUCE A.,& BARBARA
5368 w. 9910 N
HIGHLAND, UTAH 84003
(33.) 203-261-06-15 LUCIER. PASCALE B. 3080 LINCOLN ST. #15
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(34.) 203-261-06-16 JOHNS, R. RONALD,& MARCIA L. 6565 BIRCH DR.
SANTA ROSA. CA 95404
(35.) 203-261-06-17
REISER. JAMES 3076 CARLSBAD BLVD.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(36.) 203-261-06-18 MARRANCA, JOSEPH & TERESA GERACI. ANGELA
P.O. BOX 1037
CARLSBAD. CA 92018
(37.) 203-261-06-19
GUERNSEY, GEORGE F.& MILDRED B.
TRUST
P.O. BOX 105
MIDWAY, UTAH 84049
(38.) 203-261-06-20 HORNE. DELORES R 342 S. KALMIA ST
ESCONDIDO. CA 92025
(39.) 203-261-06-21
OLIPHANT, GEORGE (LE), MORIN. VERA (JT) 8 OLIPHANT GEORGE (JT) 5151 ALZEDA DR
LA MESA. CA 91941
(40.) 203-261-06-22 CHASE FAMILY 1991 TRUST 05-02-91
4990 VIA MARIA
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
c .
.
(41. > 203-261-06-23 MC MORRAN, EVELYN 1500 E. BE;;AN;5;y;E RD. #loo
PHOENIX,
(42.) 203-261-06-24 CHANDLER, WILLIAM C. TR ZIMMERMAN, DONALD B. TR
1175 GAVIOTA APT. 2
LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651
(43. > 203-261-06-25
LASK I , ROSE
P.O. BOX 1965
CARLSBAD. CA 92018
(44.) 203-261-06-26 PHILIP, JAMES B. & DORA A. 1990 FAMILY TRUST 10-19-90 2964 PUENTE ST.
FULLERTON, CA 92635
(45.) 203-261-06-27 KNIPSTEIN, THOMAS W. TR KNIPSTEIN. NANCY J. TR 1557 PEDRIGAL DR
ESCONDIDO. CA 9.2025
(46.) 203-261-06-28
JOHNSON, WILIAM DAVID
P.O. BOX 376
ROGERSVILLE. MO 65742
(47. > 203-261-06-29 GIPNER. JAMES F.& GEORQIE A. 1024 S. CLEMENTINE ST.
OCEANSIDE. CA 92054
(48.) 203-261-06-30 BITONTI, THOMAS & MARIE 536 N. MISSION DR.
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91775
(49.) 203-261-07 CALIFORNIA PROPERTY BROKERS, LTD
P.O. BOX B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
4 (50.) 203-292-01 GRANT, JOHN H. TR GRANT, MARY C. TR
7173 OBELISCO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
A (51.) 203-292-02
GRANT, JOHN H. TR GRANT, MARY C. TR 7173 OBELISCO CIR
CARLSBAD. CA 92009
(52.) 203-292-03
GARCIA, OPHELIA G.
1438 LEMON ST.
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054
(53.) 203-292-04 GARCIA, ABEL C. 2960 STATE ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(54.) 203-292-05 PACHECO. LEO & DIANNA J. 2100 CHESTNUT ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(55.) 203-292-06 ANDERSON, CAROL A. 4783 FLYING CLOUD WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(56.) 203-292-07 GLASER.ELMER & MIRIAM:GLASER,MAX & BETTY;GLASER, HYMAN & MARILYN
420 S. HORNE ST.
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054
(57.) 203-292-08 CLARKE, HAROLD V.& CATHERINE J TRUST 824 CAMINITO DEL REPOSO
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
(58.) 203-292-09 HUMPHREYS, MARVIN S. & DELLA R. TRUST 140 ACACIA AVE.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(59.1 203-292-10 WILLIAMS. THELMA B.
3162 CARLSBAD BLVD.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(60.) 203-292-11 KNAPP, CLARK R. & SHELLY I.
2508 CONGRESS ST.
SAN DIEGO, CA 92110
+ (61.) 203-292-15 BOYER. ROY TRUST 02-19-87
BOYER, NANCY L. TRUST 602 S. PACIFIC ST
OCEANSIDE. CA 92054
y (62.) 203-292-16 BOYER. ROY TRUST 02-19-87 BOYER, NANCY L. TRUST 602 S. PACIFIC ST
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054
(63.) 203-292-17 BOYER, ROY TRUST 02-19-87 ’ BOYER, NANCY L. TRUST 602 s. PACIFIC ST
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054
(64.) 203-292-18 KASKLA. UNO: WOOD, FREDERICK TR
403 N. OAKHURST DR. #203
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210
;;r (65.) 203-292-19
BOYER, ROY TRUST 02-19-87
BOYER, NANCY L. TRUST
602 S. PACIFIC ST
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054
(66.) 203-292-21 CARLSBAD EQUITY PROPERTIES C/O BRYAN EVANS 2965 ROOSEVELT ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(67.) 203-293-01 BETZ, THOMAS R. & MARY M. TRS. & MC DANIEL, BEVERLY TR 3240 DONNA DR.
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
(68.) 203-293-04 ’ LAKRITZ,LEO & OPHIRA;BALSAM,BEN & YAFF;GILBOA.ELISHA & DAFNA ET AL C/O OSL INC.
P.O. BOX 4668
ORANGE, CA 92613
(69.) 203-293-05
’ LAKRITZ,LEO & OPHIRA;BALSAM,BEN
& YAFF;GILBOA,ELISHA & DAFNA ET
AL C/O OSL INC.
P.O. BOX 4668
ORANGE, CA 92613
;r (70.) 203-293-06
LAKRlTZ,LEO & OPHIRA;BALSAM,BEN
& YAFF:GILBOA,ELISHA & DAFNA ET AL C/O OSL INC.
P.O. BOX 4668
ORANGE, CA 92613
+ (71.) 203-293-08
LAKRITZ.LEO & OPHIRA:BALSAM.BEN
& YAFF:GILBOA.ELISHAv& DAFNA ET
AL C/O OSL INC.
P.O. BOX 4668
ORANGE, CA 92613
(72.) 203-293-09 ’ LAKRITZ,LEO & OPHIRA;BALSAM.BEN
& YAFF:GILBOA,ELISHA & DAFNA ET AL C/O OSL INC.
P.O. BOX 4668
ORANGE, CA 92613
(73.) 203-293-10 LAKRITZ. LEO & OPHIRA;BALSAM,BEN & YAFF;GILBOA,ELISHA & DAFNA ET AL C/O OSL INC. 820 W. FLETCHER
ORANGE, CA 92665
+ (74.) 203-294-06
CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 LAS PALMAS DR.
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
y (75.) 203-293-02
A.T.S. FE RAILROAD CATELLUS MANAGEMENT CORP. 1065 N. PA;;Fl;2;;;TER DR..STE.200
ANAHEIM,
(76.) 203-296-03 MITTLESTEDT, MIA
2929 FIRE MOUNTAIN RD.
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054
-# (77.) 203-296-04 CHESNER, JUDITH S. HEFNER, LELAND L. 1200 N. HARBOR Db#&6-B
OCEANSIDE, CA
2 CHESNER. JUDITH S.
HEFNER, LELAND L.
1200 N. HARBOR D;20f;6-B
OCEANSIDE, CA
(79.) 203-296-06 24
BAUMGARTNER, JEAN L. 6339 CORINTIA ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
(80.1 203-296-07 +!
KRENTZEL, NEIL & NANCY 20325 RAN;;0 ;;u; RD.
RAMONA,
# (81.) 203-296-08 RYBURN, BILLY F. & LAURAL J.
2019 ESTER0 ST.
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054
(82.) 203-296-09 -3
A.T.S. FE RAILROAD
CATELLUS MANAGEMENT CORP.
1065 N. PACIFIC CENTER DR.,STE.200
ANAHEIM, CA 92806
(83.) 203-297-01
WILLIS, GEORGE R. & JACKYE E. TR
539 ELM AVE #201
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
(84.) 203-297-02 GUZELIMIAN, NAOYA Z.;BALIAN.ZAVEN
& ANARIO;BANERIAN,GEORGE & APRI
P.O. BOX 206
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
(85.) 203-297-03 PETERS, JERRY 224 BIRMINGHAM DR # 18
CARDIFF, CA 92007
(86.1 203-297-04 ANDERSON, ELMER C. 3644 CAMPUS DR
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056
(87.) 203-297-05 CLARK, CATHLEEN M. 3060 STATE ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(88.1 203-297-06
DE LUCCI, SHIRLEY
3068 STATE ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(89.) 203-297-08
DE LUCCI. SHIRLEY 3068 STATE ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(90.1 203-304-09
DE LUCCI, SHIRLEY
3068 STATE ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(91.1 203-304-09
WILLIAMS, LOUISE
P.O. BOX 535
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(92.) 203-304-20 WILLIAMS, LOUISE
P.O. BOX 535
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(93.) 203-304-27 GILBERT, JODE 4350 HiGHLAND DR.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(94.) 203-305-09
NOBEL, JOHN I . TR
1150 GARNET AVE.
PACIFIC BEACH, CA 92109
(95.) 203-305-15 PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REALTY C/O SAN DIEGUITO NAT. BANK
P.O. BOX 230926
ENCINITAS. CA 92023
(96.) 203-305-16 MONTALBANO, JOHN: SAMUELS, ANN
2503 VIA RANCHEROS
FALLBROOK, CA 92028
(97.) 203-306-01 SIMS TRUST 01-31-91 2820 WILSON ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
. .
h
s
(98.) 203-306-02 ITT CONTINENTAL BAKING CO.
P.O. BOX 731
RYE, NY 10580
(99.) 203-306-06
MORALES, SARA C.
305 DATE AVE.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(100.) 203-306-07 MORALES, SARA C. 305 DATE AVE.
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
(101.) 203-306-08 ACUNA, G I LBERT
91 MAYNARD AVE.
NEWBURY PARK, CA 91320
(102.) 203-306-09 MANNO, ILARIO & MARIE
3067 ROOSEVELT ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(103.) 203-306-10 MADAMA, RICHARD V.
ROZANCE. EVELYN E.
P.O. BOX 1481
CARLSBAD, CA 92018
(104.) 203-306-11
MADAMA, RICHARD V.
ROZANCE, EVELYN E.
P.O. BOX 1481
CARLSBAD, CA 92018
(105.) 203-306-12
ITT CONTINENTAL BAKING CO.
P.O. BOX 731
RYE. NY 10580
(106.) 204-010-03
HALL/MATTHEW L. TR & HALL, NANCY L. TR: MARTIN, JOSEPH
2521 5 s. VISTA WAY, BOX 40
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
* (108.) 204-010-05
CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 LAS PALMAS DR.
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
3r (109.) 204-010-06
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 LAS PALMAS DR.
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
(110.) 204-010-07
r CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 LAS PALMAS DR.
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
(111.) 204-010-14
-I A.T.S. FE RAILROAD CATELLUS MANAGEMENT CORP. 1065 N. PACIFIC CENTER DR.,STE.200
ANAHEIM, CA 92806
+ (112.) 204-010-15
A.T.S. FE RAILROAD
CATELLUS MANAGEMENT CORP.
1065 N. PACIFIC CENTER DR.,STE.200
ANAHEIM, CA 92806
(113.) 204-010-16 VILNE. THOMAS D. 505 OAK AVE.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(114.) 204-085-01 BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARLSBAD
P.O. BOX 913
CARLSBAD, CA 92018
(115.) 204-085-02 NEVARES, EDWARD X. NEVARES, RONALD L. 3135 ROOSEVELT ST.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
&107.) 204-010-04 HALL, MATTHEW L. TR & HALL, NANCY L. TR: MARTIN, JOSEPH 2521 3 s. V;;TAg;;;le Box 40
CARLSBAD,
i - f ;j
I
: @ f@=
?. rl
*. m i(:
.= “.
P =, E
e s :: .?
E
f
i ; r
.e % 0
ST. *
w
T
G - B a
I
I .
a AVfi N3SNVllSltlH3 8
F
6
.I ,.N.#r”
t ‘.3/w aNVn3 t
1.11 - ,....OC.JS N g M’ I- w Ta 4
-‘M s ’ 5 -.q
s ,‘~‘W* I :s I I _
ELM
I
I * .o $ -0
/
I* / f
? .- c v .T
3. ;
E i
E
f
:$p
vii AVE. :
Ir
\
P
s
\
.
3
I
4
3
.
/ . ~~~~~~e&y~~~~
.: ‘c _. )PlM ti Ai%. ,,,,
I . .
u rl
.V UI,., .Y qT ) CL 9 5 .* $?1$- $ty sl. ; gq--!g -1. -(
i-
gr;-r; $0; cII , I ut74J 0 .i
-- ‘. - 0 q
ET
us : . -
” =
. -
I
(1.) 203-293-06
A
EXISTING PARKING LOT
(2.1 203-293-02
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY
(3.1 203-296-06
EXISTING PARKING LOT
(4.1 203-296-07
SUBJECT BUILDING LOT
(5.) 203-296-08
5 tNDlVlDUAL TENANTS ON LOT
PACIFIC COAST CYCLES 435 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR I VE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
IMAGES HAIR DESIGN
445 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
CARLSBAD VILLAGE CAMERA
457 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
THE WOODEN INDIAN
3019 STATE STREET
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
ANTIQUES JUNCTION
3021 STATE STREET
CARLSBAD, CA 92008