HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-06-13; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 272; Village Farmer's Market Permit AmendmentAB# GC% TITLE:
MTG. 6/13/95 Amendment to Major Redevelopment Permit (945)
for the Village Farmer’s Market to extend term of
DEPT. H/RED permit and approve minor changes to conditions of
permit.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
HOkING Ad REDEVELOPMENT
DEPT. HD.
CITY All-Y. @-
CITY
That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission direct the City Attorney to prepare documents
APPROVING the amendments to 94-5 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On September 27, 1994, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission approved, with the unanimous
recommendation of the Design Review Board, a major redevelopment permit to allow a Certified Farmer’s
Market in the Village Redevelopment Area for a trial period of six (6) months. The six (6) month trial
period expired as of March 27, 1995. Per the approved major redevelopment permit 94-5, the Housing
and Redevelopment Director was required to review the permit and determine if all conditions of the
permit have been met and that the use did not have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding
properties or the public health and welfare. This determination was made by the Director. Therefore, an
application for an extension of the permit could be received and presented to the Design Review Board
and Housing and Red,evelopment Commission for approval following additional CEQA review by the
Planning Director. The permit may be extended for a period not to exceed five (5) years, including the
initial six (6) month review period; this means that the permit may be extended to September 27, 1999.
The Village Business Association submitted its application requesting approval of an extension of the term
of their permit to allow the continuance of the Certified Farmer’s Market held every Wednesday during
the hours of 2:OOpm to 6:OOpm in the Village; the market will be operated from 2:OOpm to 5:OOpm in the
winter months. As in the previous six (6) months, product sales will continue to be primarily limited to fresh
agricultural products such as fruit, nuts, herbs, vegetables, eggs, honey, cut flowers and nursery stock.
Non-produce items such as dried fruit, juice, dried beans, meat, fish and dairy products may be sold if
the producer has proof that he/she grew, raised or caught the product. The basic intent for the proposed
Market remains the same. It is to feature local growers who are certified farmers by the State of
California, Agriculture Department. However, due to the demand, the Village Business Association
requests approval to include four (4) non-certified, non-produce booths within the market to provide
such items as locally produced freshly baked bread, pastries and/or pasta. The total number of permitted
booths will remain at thirty-three (33) spaces. Staff believes that the requested new product sales are
consistent with the purpose of the market and will add to its success. Therefore, staff and the Design
Review supported this requested revision in product sales.
Parking
Although there remains more than adequate public parking within close walking distance to the site,
Market customers still have a tendency to disregard instructions and park in private parking lots
surrounding the site. This represented a more significant problem at the start of the Market than it does
today. However, to ensure that every effort is made to prevent shoppers from using private parking lots
the Design Review Board recommended that an additional condition be placed on the project to require
the Village Business Association to provide additional professional-quality signs at both entrances to the
Alley (running behind the site) and at the entrance to the Great Western Bank parking lot (east of the
site). The sign copy shall be approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Director prior to installation.
The Association shall also be required to continue efforts to encourage shoppers, through the distribution
of printed material, to use other public parking lots in the area and walk to the Market.
I -
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. DL? &
Environmental Review
The Planning Department has completed additional review of the project pursuant to the Guidelines
for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection
Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of this review, a Negative Declaration has been issued
by the Planning Director for the project. This declaration indicates that the longer term project will
not have a significant impact on the environment. A Negative Declaration was therefore issued on
March 16, 1995 and made available for public review. No comments were received on the
environmental document. The Design Review Board unanimously recommended approval of the
Negative Declaration by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission at their meeting on April 19,
1995.
Recommendation
On April 19, 1995, the Design Review Board unanimously approved a recommendation to the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission to approve the amendments to Major Redevelopment Permit
94-5 extending the term of the Market for a period of five (5) years, including the six (6) month trial
period, with the same conditions previously approved for the project in Design Review Board
Resolution No. 215 which was further amended by Housing and Redevelopment Commission
Resolution No. 258 and with the following additional revisions to conditions #I, #2 and #9 and the
addition of condition #lo:
Condition No. 1 of Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 shall be revised to change the
hours of the market from 3:OOpm to 6:OOpm to 2:OOpm to 6:OOpm.
Condition No, 2 of Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 shall be revised to allow the
sale of fish and the inclusion of four (4) non-produce, non-certified booths for consumable
product sales of such items as freshly made bread, pastries, and/or pasta. The total number of
booths and boundaries for the market shall remain the same.
Condition No. 9 of Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 shall be revised to extend the
original permit for five (5) years, including the six month trial period.
Condition No. 10 shall be added to Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 to require
additional directional signage for parking purposes. Signs shall be provided at both
entrances to the Alley and at the entrance to the Great Western Bank.
F’ISCAL IMPACT
At this time, there is no estimate of the amount of sales tax revenue which may be generated from the
project. The project has no other fiscal impact on the City or the Redevelopment Agency.
EXHIBITS
1. Design Review Board Resolution No. 223 recommending approval of the Negative
Declaration for the project.
2. Design Review Board Resolution No. 224 extending RP 94-05 and approving revisions to
previously approved conditions.
3. Location Map.
4. Design Review Board Staff Report dated April 19, 1995.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 1
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 223
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARISBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARQTION
FOR A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO EXTEND THE TERM
FOR THE WEEKLY FARMER’S MARKET AND TO ALLOW FOR TWO
NON-CERTIFIED, NON-PRODUCE BOOTHS AT THE MARKET
LOCATED WITHIN THE VILLAGE.
CASE NAME: FARMER’S MARKJZT
APN: RP94-5
WHEREAS; the Design Review Board did on the 19th day of April, 1995 hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request for a Negative
Declaration; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
and considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered all
factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby APPROVES the Negative Declaration according
to the one page notice and the EIA Part II Form attached hereto and
made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinps:
1. The Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and
considered Negative Declaration (RP 94-05), the environmental impacts therein
identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to approving the
project. Based on the EIA Part-II and comments thereon, the Design Review
Board finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant
effect on the environment and thereby approves the Negative Declaration.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2:
24
2E
tie
27
28
DRB Resolution No.223
Page 2
-
..*.
. . . .
2. The Design Review Board finds that the Negative Declaration (RP 94-05) reflects
the independent judgment of the Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad.
3. The Record of Proceedings for this project consists of the initial study, EIA Part
II, and Negative Declaration, which may be found at the City of Carlsbad
Community Deveiopment Building, 2075 Las Pafmas Drive, Carlsbad, California
in the custody of the City Clerk, Director of Planning.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of April, 1995,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Noble, Welshons, Savary, Vessey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Marquez
ABSTAIN: None
^y& &J$LqL
EVAN E. BECKER,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- EXHIBIT 2
/I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 224
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN
AMENDMENT TO MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT 94-05 TO
EXTEND THJZ TERM FOR THE WEEKLY FARMER’S MARKET AND
TO ALLOW FOR FOUR NON-CERTIFIED, NON-PRODUCE BOOTHS
ATTHE MARKET LOCATED WITHIN THE VILLAGE.
CASE NAME: FARMER’S MARKET
APN: 203-304-02, 03. 04, 05
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad Village Business Association has filed a request for
an extension of a Major Redevelopment Permit (94-05) to continue a Certified Farmer’s
Market to be held on a weekly basis in the public parking lot located mid-block on the
east side of Roosevelt Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 19th day of April, 1995 hold
a duly noticed public hearing to consider said request on public property described as:
Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 38, amended Map of Town of Carlsbad in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to
Map thereof No. 775, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon listening to and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review
Board considered all factors relating to Major Redevelopment Permit 94-05.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
DRB Resolution No. 224
Page 2
2.
-_
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby APPROVES a recommendation to the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission to approve an extension of Major
Redevelopment Permit 94-05 to allow the continuation of the Village
Farmer’s Market subject to the findings and conditions approved by the
Design Review Board on August 17, 1994 in Resolution No. 215 and
amended by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on September
27, 1994 in Resolution No. 258 with the following additions and/or
revisions to those findings and conditions:
A. The following finding is added to read as follows:
The Design Review Board has determined that there will be no
s’lgnificant adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health
and welfare as a result of the long term continuation of the permitted
use.
B. Condition No. 1 is amended to read as follows:
“The boundaries of the market shall be limited to the public parking lot
located on the east side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), west of the
alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue. The total
number of booths/spaces shall be limited to the number (32-33) indicated
within the application. The hours of operation shall be every Wednesday
afternoon from 2:OOpm to 6:OOpm. To set-up for the event and clean-up
afterwards, the subject parking lot will be closed from 1:OOpm to 8:OOpm
every Wednesday. The total number of booths, spaces or hours of
operation shall not be increased without prior amendment to this major
redevelopment permit. ”
C. Condition No. 2 is amended to read as follows:
“Product sales must be limited to fresh agricultural products such as
fruits, nuts, herbs, vegetables, eggs, honey, cut flowers and nursery
stock. Non-produce items such as dried fruit, juice, dried beans, meat,
fish and dairy products may be sold if the producer has proof that he/she
grew, raised, collected or caught the product. Also, a maximum of four
(4) non-produce, non-certified product sales booths may be provided for
such items as locally made fresh bread, pastries and/or pastas; these
booths shall be limited to pre-made local goods to be consumed off-site.
No food items shall be prepared on site. The market must not be used to
sell mass produced (commercial operations) food products which are
readily available within local grocery stores or markets. No booths for
crafts, antiques, or other retail items shall be permitted. An informational
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 224
Page 3
booth for Village Merchants will be allowed for the distribution of
advertisements, promotional items, brochures maps, etc. for other
merchants within the area, including restaurants. One (1) educational
booth may also be permitted.”
D. Condition No. 9 is amended to read as follows:
“This Major Redevelopment Permit is granted for a period of five (5)
years beginning on September 27, 1994 and ending on September 27,
1999. This Major Redevelopment Permit shall be reviewed by the
Housing and Redevelopment Director on a yearly basis to determine if
all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have
a substantial negative affect on surrounding properties or the public
health and welfare. If the Housing and Redevelopment Director
determines that the use has such substantial negative effects, the Housing
and Redevelopment Director shall recommend that the Design Review
board, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add
additional conditions to reduce or eliminate the substantial negative
effects. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing,
if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental affect on
surrounding land uses and the public’s health and welfare, or the
conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be
extended by the Design Review Board thereafter for a reasonable period
of time not to exceed five (5) years upon written application of the
permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The
Design Review Board may not grant such extensions, unless it finds that
there are no substantial negative affects on surrounding land uses or the
public’s health and welfare. If a substantial negative affect on
surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare is found, the
extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate
or substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of
extensions the Design Review Board may grant.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
..*.
*...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.-
DRB Resolution No. 224
Page 4
4
E. Condition No. 10 shall be added to read as follows:
“The Village Business Association shall be responsible for providing (at
its own cost) and posting a minimum of three (3) parking directional
signs every Wednesday prior to the Farmer’s Market. The Association
shall ensure that these signs remain in place for the entire period of the
Market every Wednesday. These signs shall be of professional quality
and shall be at least three feet (width) by four feet (height) in size. A
minimum of one (1) sign shall be placed at the south entrance to the
Alley (east of the project site) and a minimum of one (1) sign shall be
placed at the north entrance to the Alley (east of the project site). A
minimum of one (1) sign shall also be provided at the Madison Street
entrance to the Great Western Bank property located at 699 Grand
Avenue. Sign copy must be pre-approved by the Housing and
Redevelopment Director. The Association shall also be responsible for
distribution of information regarding other public parking lots in the area
and for encouraging shoppers to park in these lots.”
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of April, 1995
by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Noble, Welshons, Savary, Vessey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Marquez
ABSTAIN: None
CHAIRPERSON
EVAN E. BECKER,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
;
4 zz 4
PUBLIC
PARKING
ii! E d a a 0 7
9 a
a 0 7
5 a
GRAND AVENUE SITE
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
7 r
CITY OF CARLSBAD
EXHIBIT 3
.................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. L ................... .................. .................. ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ...................
PUBLIC
PARKING
r I--
N
w +-I+ E
S
I L CARLSBAD VILLAGE FARMER’S MARKET RP
94-05 (A)
April 19, 1995 - EXHIBIT 4
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
G FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ‘3r:
SUBJECT: RP 94-5(A)- “VILLAGE FARMER’S MARKET” - Request to extend the
term of, and approve minor revisions to, Major Redevelopment Permit 94-S
to allow the continuation of the Village Farmer’s Market held every Wednesday afternoon in the public parking lot hxated on Roosevelt Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue in the Village Redevelopment Area.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Design Review Board ADOPT Resolution No. 223 APPROVING
the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Resolution No. 224
APPROVING a recommendation to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission to approve
a term extension for major redevelopment permit 94-5 to continue the weekly Farmer’s Market
held in the Village Redevelopment Area based on the findings and subject to the conditions noted
therein.
II. PROJECT DE!XXUPTION AND BACKGROUND
On September 27, 1994, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission approved, with the
unanimous recommendation of the Design Review Board, a major redevelopment permit to allow
a Certified Farmer’s Market in the Village Redevelopment Area for a trial period of six (6)
months. The six (6) month trial period expired as of March 27, 1995. Per the approved major
redevelopment permit 94-5, the Housing and Redevelopment Director was required to review
the permit and determine if all conditions of the permit have been met and that the use did not
have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare.
If the Housing and Redevelopment Director determined that the conditions of the permit were
met and the use did not have a significant adverse environmental impact, an application for
extension of the permit could be presented to the Design Review Board for approval following
additional CEQA review by the Planning Director. In granting a permit extension, the Design
Review Board must find that there will be no substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses
or the public’s health and welfare as a result of the long term continuation of the permitted use.
The permit may be extended for a period not to exceed five (5) years, including the initial six
(6) month review period; this means that the permit may be extended to September 27, 1999.
The Village Business Association has submitted its application requesting approval of an
extension of the term for their major redevelopment permit 94-5 for a Certified Farmer’s Market to be held every Wednesday during the hours of 2:OOpm to 6:OOpm; the market will be operated
from 2:OOpm to 5:00pm in the winter months. As in the previous six (6) months, product sales will be primarily limited to fresh agricultural products such as, fruit, nuts, herbs, vegetables,
eggs, honey, cut flowers and nursery stock. Non-produce items such as dried fruit, juice, dried
beans, meat, fish and dairy products may k sold if the producer has proof that he/she grew, raised or caught the product. The basic intent for the proposed Market remains the same. It is to feature local growers who are certified farmers by the State of California, Agriculture
Department. However, due to the demand, the Village Business Association requests approval
RP 94-05 - Staff Report
1 April 19, 1995 ;C
Page 2
to include four (4) non-certified, non-produce booths within the market to provide such items
as locally produced freshly baked bread, pastries and/or pasta. The total number of permitted
booths will remain at thirty-three (33) spaces. Staff believes that the requested new product sales
are consistent with the purpose of the market and will add to the success of the market,
Therefore, staff supports this requested revision in product sales.
‘I’be Village Business Association will continue to provide one booth for local Village businesses
to promote, with printed advertisements, their services or products. Also, for educational
purposes, the Association will continue to offer one (1) booth on a rotational, free of charge
basis to individuals and/or organizations that would provide educational materials on issues such
as soil conservation, recycling, composting, organic farming and sustainable agriculture-business
endeavors.
III. VILLAGE DESIGN MANUAL AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY
Tbe Design Review Board and Housing and Redevelopment Commission previously found the
use to be consistent with the Village Design Manual and Redevelopment Plan for the Village
Redevelopment Area. There have been no changes in the market which would impact this
consistency finding or require additional conditions on the project.
xv. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Design Review Board and Housing and Redevelopment Commission previously found the
use to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the various elements of the General Plan,
There have been no changes in the market which would impact this consistency fmding or
require additional conditions on the project.
v. PARKING ANALYSIS
Although there remains more than adequate public parking witbin close walking distance to the
site, Market customers still have a tendency to disregard instructions and park in private parking
lots surrounding the site. Although this represented a more significant problem at the start of the
Market than it does today, staff recommends that an additional condition be placed on the project
to require the Village Business Association to provide additional professional-quality signs at
both entrances to the Alley (running behind the site) and at the entrance to the Great Western
Bank parking. lot (east of the site). The sign copy shall be approved by the Housing and
Redevelopment Director prior to installation. The Association shall also be required to continue
efforts to encourage shoppers, through tbe distribution of printed material, to use other public
parking lots in the area and walk to the Market.
It was previously determined that the existing parking is satisfactory under the provisions of the
parking code because the project has been exempted from the standard on-site parking
requirements under section 21.35.130 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This determination was
based on the fact that the use is only operated once a week for three (3) hours and the land use
is very unique and should not be subject to the same parking standards as other projects. The
determination of parking exemption was also permitted based on the finding that there would be
no negative impact on access to other businesses, the beach or other attractions within the area.
RP 94-05 - Staff Report
1 Apr,il 19, 1995
Page 3
Initially, the project had some negative impact on access to other businesses in the immediate
area of the Market. However, by the,end of the six month trial period, the impact had been
substantially reduced due to increased signage and efforts by the Market Manager and Village
Business Association to direct traffic. Staff believes that with the additional conditions noted
above requiring more signage and continued efforts to direct patrons for parking purposes, the
previous findings remain valid and the parking exemption is still appropriate, The existing
parking remains satisfactory under the provisions of the parking code.
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Department has completed additional review of the project pursuant to the
Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of this review, a
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director for the project. This declaration
indicates that the longer term project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A
Negative Declaration was therefore issued on March 16, 1995 and made available for public
review, No comments were received on the environmental document. Adoption of Design
Review Board Resolution NO. 223 will recommend approval of the Negative Declaration to the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
VII. CONCLUSION
Staff remains supportive of activities .which will encourage pedestrian traffic in the Village
Redevelopment Area as well as offer a unique shopping opportunity for local residents and
tourists within the Village. The Farmer’s Market has provided, and will continue to provide, a
unique shopping experience and continues to assist in-the effort to create a Village atmosphere
within the downtown Redevelopment Area.
Since the Village Business Association has met the conditions of tbe previously approved petit
and additional environmental review has determined that the continuing project for a longer term
will have no adverse impacts on the environment, staff is recommending that the Design Review Board take action to extend the permit for five years, including the six (6) month trial period,
with the same conditions previously approved for the project in Design Review Board Resolution
No. 215 which was further amended by Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution
No. 258 and with the following additional revisions to conditions #I, #2 and #9 and the addition
of condition #lo:
0 Condition No. 1 of Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 shall be revised to change
the hours of the market from 3:OOpm to 6:oOpm to 2:OOpm to 6:OOpm.
l Condition No. 2 of Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 shall be revised to allow
the sale of fish and the inclusion of four (4) non-produce, non-certified booths
consumable product sales of such items as freshly made bread, pastries and/or pasta. The total number of booths and boundaries for the market shall remain the same.
lU 94-05 - Staff Report
April 19, 1995
Page 4
l Condition No. 9 of Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 shall be revised to extend
the original permit for five (5) years, including the initial six month trial period.
l Condition No. 10 shall be added to Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 to require
additional directional signage for parking purposes. Signs shall be provided at both
entrances to the Alley and at the entrance to the Great Western Bank.
EXHIBITS:
I- Design Review Board Resolution No. 223 recommending approval of the Negative
Declaration for the project
2- Design Review Board Resolution NO. 224 extending RP 94-05 and approving revisions
to previously approved conditions.
3- Design Review Board Resolution No. 215 and Housing and Redevelopment Commission
Resolution No. 258 approving the project.
4- Location Map and Project Description with Disclosure Statement
5- Environmental Review Documents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 '
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 223
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVIXG A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO EXTEND THE TERM
FOR THE WEEKLY FARMER’S MARKET AND TO ALLOW FOR TWO
NON-CERTIFIED, NON-PRODUCE BOOTHS AT THE MARKET
LOCATED WITHIN THE VILLAGE.
CASE NAMEz FARMER’S MARKET
APN: RP 94-S
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 19th day of April, 1995 hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request for a Negative
Declaration; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
and considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered all
factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RJZSOLVED, by the Design
Review Board’ as follows:
A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby APPROVES the Negative Declaration according
to the one page notice and the EL4 Part II Form attached hereto and
made a part hereof. based on the following findings:
Findings:
1. The Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and
considered Negative Declaration (RP 94-05), the environmental impacts therein
identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to approving the
project. Based on the EIA Pan-II and comments thereon, the Design Review
Board finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant
effect on the environment and thereby approves the Negative Declaration.
1
2
3
4
fi c
t
‘i
t
!
u
1:
1;
1:
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
i
3RB Resolution No.223
Page 2
,...
. . . .
3
I.
2
3
4
5
6
7
.8
.9
10
!l
12
r3
!4
!5
!6
!7
!8
2. The Design Review Board finds that the Negative Declaration (I&P 94-05) reflects
the independent judgment of the Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad.
3. The Record of Proceedings for this project consists of the initial study, EIA Part
II, and Negative Declaration, which may be found at the City of Carlsbad
Community Development Building, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California
in the custody of the City Clerk, Director of Planning.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California. held on the 19th day of April, 1995,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
BAILEY NOBLE, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTESR
EVAN E. BECKER,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
1
2
3
4
F c
t
:
I
1
3
1:
1’
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
:
i
z
:
;
:
;
:
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLLlTION NO. 224
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNL4 RECOMAtENDING APPROVAL OF AN
AMENDMENT TO MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT 94-05 TO
EXTEND THE T-ERM FOR TKE WEEKLY FARMER’S MARKET AND
TO ALLOW FOR FOUR NON-CERTKFIED, NON-PRODUCE BOOTHS
. AT THE MARKET LOCATED WITHIN THE VILLAGE.
CASE NAME: FARMER’S MARKET
APN: 203-304-02.03, 04. 05
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad Village Business Association has filed a request for
an extension of a Major Redevelopment Permit (94-05) to continue a Certified Farmer’s
Market to be held on a weekly basis in the public parking lot located mid-block on the
east side of Roosevelt Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 19th day of April, 1995 hold
a duly noticed public hearing to consider said request on public property described as:
Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 38, amended Map of Town of Carlsbad in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to
Map thereof No. 775, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon listening to and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review
Board considered all factors relating to Major Redevelopment Permit 94-05.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
..,.
1
2
3
4
r
c
:
1
!
1(
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
I
2
2
2
2
:
;
:
:
:
Resolution No. 224
2
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby APPROVES a recommendation to the Housiug
and Redevelopment Commission to approve an extension of Major
Redevelopment Permit 94-05 to allow the continuation of the Village
Farmer’s Market subject to the findings and conditions approved by the
Design Review Board on August 17, 1994 in Resolution No. 215 and
amended by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on September
27, 1994 in Resolution No. 258 with the following additions and/or
revisions to those findings and conditions: *
A. The following finding is added to read as follows:
The Design Review Board has determined that there will be no
significant adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health
and welfare as a result of the long term continuation of the permitted
use.
B. Condition No. 1 is amended to read as follows:
“The boundaries of the market shall be limited to the public parking lot
located on the east side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), west of the
alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue. The total
number of booths/spaces shall be limited to the number (32-33) indicated
within the application. The hours of operation shall be every Wednesday
afternoon from 2:tIOpm to 6:OOpm. To set-up for the event and clean-up
afterwards, the subject parking lot will be closed from l:OOpm to 8:OOpm
every Wednesday. The total number of booths, spaces or hours of
operation shall not be increased without prior amendment to this major
redevelopment permit. ”
C. Condition No. 2 is amended to read as follows:
“Product sales must be limited to fresh agricultural products such as
fruits, nuts, herbs, vegetables, eggs, honey, cut flowers and nursery
stock. Non-produce items such as dried fruit, juice, dried beans, meat,
fish and dairy products may be sold if the producer has proof that be/she
grew, raised,‘collected or caught the product. Also, a maximum of four
(4) non-produce, non-certified product sales booths may be provided for
such items as locally made fresh bread, pastries and/or pastas; these
booths shall be limited to pre-made 1oca.l goods to be consumed off-site.
No food items shall be prepared on site. The market must not be used to
sell mass produced (commercial operations) food products which are
readily available within local grocery stores or markets. No booths for
crafts, antiques, or other retail items shall be permitted. An informational
!’
l
DRB
1 Page
2 . . . . ,...
3 . . . .
4
5
6
7
8
9
-10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 *-**
24 --"
25 -**-
26 *-'*
27 --**
28
Resolution
3
No. 234 c
booth for Village Merchants will be allowed for the distribution of
advertisements, promotional items, brochures maps, etc. for other
merchants within the area, including restaurants. One (1) educational
booth may also be permitted.”
D. Condition No. 9 is amended to read as follows:
“This Major Redevelopment Permit is granted for a period of five (5)
years beginning on September 27, 1994 and ending on September 27,
1999. This Major Redevelopment Pennit shall be reviewed by the
Housing and Redevelopment Director on a yearly basis to determine if
all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have
a substantial negative affect on surrounding properties or the public
health and welfare. If the Housing and Redevelopment Director
determines that the use has such substantial negative effects, the Housing
and Redevelopment Director shall recommend that the Design Review
board, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add
additional conditions to reduce or eliminate the substantial negative
effects. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing,
if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental affect on
surrounding land uses and the public’s health and welfare, or the
conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be
extended by the Design Review Board thereafter for a reasonable period
of time not to exceed five (5) years upon written application of the
permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The
Design Review Board may not grant such extensions, unless it finds that
there are no substantial negative affects on surrounding land uses or the
public’s health and welfare. If a substantial negative affect on
surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare is found, the
extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate
or substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of
extensions the Design Review Board may grant.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2c
21
2i
2:
24
2!
2t
2;
21
DRB Resolution No. 224
Page 4
. * . .
. . . .
E. Condition No. 10 shall be added to read as follows:
“The Village Business Association shall be responsible for providing (at
its own cost) and posting a minimum of three (3) parking directional
signs every Wednesday prior to the Farmer’s Market. The Association
shall ensure that these signs remain in place for the entire period of the
Market every Wednesday. These signs shall be of professional quality
and shall be at least three feet (width) by four feet (height) in size. A
minimum of one (1) sign shall be placed at the south entrance to the
Alley (east of the project site) and a minimum of one (1) sign shall be
placed at the north entrance to the Alley (east of the project site). A
minimum of one (1) sign shall also be provided at the Madison Street
entrance to the Great Western Bank property located at 699 Grand
Avenue. Sign copy must be pre-approved by the Housing and
Redevelopment ,Director. The Association shall also be responsible for
distribution of information regarding other public parking lots in the area
and for encouraging shoppers to park in these lots.’
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of April, 1995
by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
BAILEY NOBLE, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST:
EVAN E. BECKER,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
I4
1
2
3
4
I
f
:
4
!
IA
1:
1;
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
i
2
i
i
ii _ EXHIBIT 3
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 215
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORMA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW A WEEKLY
FARMER’S MARKET IN THE PUBLIC PARKING LOT ON THE EAST
SIDE OF ROOSEVELT STREET (MID-BLOCK) BETWEEN CARLSBAD
VILLAGE DRIVE AND GRAM) AVENUE IN THE VILLAGE.
CASE NAME: FARMER’S MARKET
Am 203-304-02,03, 04, OS
CASE NO: RP 944%
WHEREAS, a request for a Major Redevelopment Permit to allow a
Certified Farmer’s Market to be held on a weekly basis in the public parking lot located mid-
block on the east side of Roosevelt Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue;
and
WHl&EAS, the Design Review Board did on the 17th day of August, 1994 hold
a duly noticed public hearing to consider said request on public property described as:
Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 38, amended Map of Town of Carlsbad in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to
Map thereof No. 775, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County. .
WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon listening to and considering all I
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board
considered all factors relating to Major Redevelopment Permit 94-05.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
llll
IllI
Jill
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
. 25
26
27
.?8
DRB Resolution No. -
Page 2
2. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby recommends APPROVAL of a Major
Redevelopment Permit, W 9445 to allow a Certified Farmer’s Market
to be held on a week!y basis in the public parking lot located on the east
of Roosevelt Street, west of the Alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive
and Grand Avenue based on findings and subject to the following
conditions:
FINDINGS~
I. The proposed project will enhance the commercial center function of the
downtown and is rherefore consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Viilage Design Manual. The Village Centet, in which this project is
located, is to serve as a foca! point for the area and become the major
attraction for the downtown. The proposed project provides an attraction
which is consistent with the goals for the area. .
2. The project is located in Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Project
Area. The uses allowed in this area are the same as those allowed within
the C-l, C-2 and R-P zones. The proposed use is consistent with the
Village Design Manual.
3. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Genera!
Plan because. the project has a strong pedestrian orientation and will
foster a desirable community concept for the downtown core commercial
area in which this project is I&ted.
4. The use will be operated in a manner which does not have a significant
adverse impact on surrounding properties or the public he&b and
welfare.
5. The existing parking is satisfactory under the provisions of the parking
code because the project has been exempted from the requirement under
section 21.35.130 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code with the following
justification:
a. The application of certain provisions would result in practical
difftcultiw or unnecessary hardships which would make
development inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of
the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Plan.
Due to the fact that tbe Farmer’s Market will only be
operated one day a week for a few hours, it would’ be
!mpract!ea! to require tbe applicant to pay for and/or provide
1
2
3
4
5
e
'i
I
!
1t
1:
11
1:
1
1
.l
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
i
2
DRB RESOLUTION/NO. 215
Page 3
additional on-site or otf-site parking at the applicant’s own
cost. It also provides an unnecessary hardship on the
proposed project because there is adequate public parking
w4thi.n a reasonable distance of the proposed project. The
overall goal of the Village Redevelopment Project is to create
a pleasant, attractive, accessible environment for living,
shopping, recreation, civic, culti and service functions.
The proposed project is consistent with th& goal.
b. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions unique to the
property or the proposed development which do not generally
apply to other properties or developments which have the same
standards, restrictions and controls.
‘i%e proposed Farmer’s Market will be operated on public
property by a non-profit organization. The event win only be
held once a week for a maximum of three (3) hours. ‘Ibis
project & ery unique and should not be subject to the same
Standar
7liL
a business which is operating on a daily basis
from 9:0 to 5:OOpm. Based on tbe unique conditions of
the proposed project, it is necessary for the City to allow
exceptions to tbe noted standards, specilically on-site parking
requiremeilts, in order to ensure that the project is feasible.
It is anticipated that the proposed market will have a positive
impact on the Viiage Redevelopment Area by offering a
unique shopping opportunity for local residents and tourists.
C. The granting of an exemption will not be injurious or materially
detrimental to the public welfare, other properties or
improvements in the project area.
The proposed Certified Farmer’s Market wiIl operate one day
a creek for a maximum of three (3) hours per week. A
Market Manager will be hired to operate the market in a
manner which prohibits any activity which might be injurious
or materially detrimental to the public welfare, other
properties or improvements in the Village. A security guard
will also be on duty during the hours of the market.
d. The granting of an exemption will not contradict the standards
established in the Village Design Manual.
The proposed use is consistent with the Village Design
Manual. Uses allowed within ibis area are those which arr
. allowed by the C-2, C-l and R-P zones. Florist shops and
I,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB RESOLUTION au). 2!j
Page 4
fruit stores or other food markets are all allowed within the
noted zoning.
The Village Design Manual requires that adequate provisions
for off street parking be provided when any building or
structure is erected, enlarged or intensified in use. Although
no structure is being erected, enlarged or intensified, a public
parking lot will be used temporarily for a retail operation
which results in an intensitication of use and a loss of public
parking,’ However, since there is adequate public parking
within 300 feet of the proposed market, there wiU be no .
negative impact on access to other businesses, the beach or
other atttractions within the area. The granting of the noted
extiptions wiiI not contradict the standards e&b&bed
within the Village Design Manual becairse this b only. a
temporary modification of laud use.
CONDITIONS:
1. The boundaries of the Market shall be limited to the public parking lot
located on the east side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), west of the
alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue. Tbe total
number of booths/spaces shall be limited to the number (32-33) indicated
within the application. The total number of booths/spaces shall not be
increased without prior amendment to this Major Redevelopment Permit.
2. Product sales must be limited to fresh agricultural products such as
fruits, nuts, herbs, vegetables, eggs, honey, cut flowers and nursery
stock. Non-produce items such as dried fruit, juice, dried beans, meat
and dairy products may be sold if the producer has proof that h&he
grew, raised, collected or caught the product. The market must not be
used to sell commercially produced products. No booths for crafts,
antiques. or other retail items shall be permitted. An informational both
for Village Merchants will be allowed for the distribution of
advertisements, promotional items, brochures maps, etc. for other
merchants within the area, including restaurants.
3. A complete set of “Farmer’s Market Rules and Producer Agreement”
must be submitted to the Housing and Redevelopment Director for
review and approval. The rules must include information on clean-up and
set-up, vendor parking locations. signage, and disposal of waste, These
rules must be approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Director at
least fourteen (14) days prior to the fmt day of the proposed Farmers’
Market.
23
1
2
3
4
F Y
e
'i
t
!
1t
1:
11
1:
1,
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
. 2
2
2
2
3
3
1
2
3.
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
:2
:3
!4
!5
!6
!7
!8
DRB RESOLUTIO-‘40. 215
Page 5
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The Village Business Association shall be solely responsible for the set-
up and clean-up of the event. These responsibilities include posting of
signs as well as trash collection and disposal. Any damage to the parking
lot(s), landscaping or irrigation shall be repaired by the City but must be
paid for by the Association (as sponsor of event).
The Village Business Association shall provide at least one security guard
which shall be on duty at all times during hours of the market.
A complete signage and traffic &trol plan must be approved by the
City’s Traffic Engineer and the Housing and Redevelopment Director at
least fourteen (14) days prior to the first day of the proposed Farmers’
Market. The plan must include dimensions of signs, total number of
signs and exact locations on the public street and within the parking lot.
The Association will be required to provide commercial general liabihty
insurance including claims for injuries to persons or damage to property
which may arise. This insurance shall not be less than $1 million.
combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury
and property damage, This shall be primary insurance and shall include
an endorsement to the policy naming the City of C&bad, its offtcen,
and employees as additional insure& The certificate of insurance,
including additional insured’s endorsement, must be received by the City
at least ten (10) days prior to the start of market operations.
“No parking TOW AWAY ' signs which include the date and time of
restriction must be posted 72 hours in advance of the beginning of the
parking restriction. The Village Business Association shall be comptetely
responsible for posting the signs and ensuring that they remain in place
during the entire 72 hour period; missing or vandalized signs must be
replaced by the applicant. The Association shall also be responsible for
notifying the Carlsbad Police Department each week when the signs are
instalted. These signs are temporary and must be removed each
Wednesday at the end of the market and re-installed as noted herein
The parking lot shall be closed from 1:OOpm to 3:OOpm for the event.
Initial permit approval is granted for a period of six (6) months. This
permit shall bk reviewed by the Housing and Redevelopment Direcror
after six (6) months to determine if all conditions of this pennit have
been met and that the use did not have a significant detrimental impact
on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If the
Housing and Redevelopment Director determines that the conditions of
the permit were met and the use did not have a significant adverse
environmental impact, an application for an extension of this Permit may
be presented to the Design Review Board following additional CEQA
(environmental) review by the Planning Director to determine the effect
3
2
3
4
I
c
:
I
1
11
1:
11
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
z
2
i
i
:
3
4
5
6
.7
.8
.9
!O
!l
!2
!3
!4
!5
!6
17
E8
DR3 Resolurion No--Z_11
Page 6
_I
of a longer term project on surrounding land uses or the public’s health
and welfare. In granting such permit extension, the Design Review Board
shall find no substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the
public’s health and welfare will result because of the long term
continuation of the permitted use. This permit may be extended for a
reasonable period of time not to exceed five years, including the initial
six (6) month review .period. If subsequent environmental review
discloses any subsrantial adverse affect, the extension application shall be
considered as an original application for a redevelopment permit. After
providing the applicant the opportunity to be heard, conditions shall be
added to the permit to require compliance with all feasible measures to
mitigate any significant adverse impacts which might be identified during
subsequent CEQA review.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of August, 1994 by the
following vote to wit:
AYES: Savary, NobIe, Welshons, Vessey, Marquez
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
DESIGN REVlEW BOARD
EVAN E. BECKER,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
10
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 258
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT (RP 94. 5) TO ALLOW A FARMER'S MARXET IN THE PUBLIC PARKING LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT STREET (MID-BLOCK), WEST OF THE ALLEY, BETWEEN CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE AND GRAND AVENUE. APPLICANT: FARMER'S MARKET CASE NO: RP 94-5
WHEREAS, On August 17, 1994 'the Design Review Board of .
the City of Carlsbad held a duly noticed public hearing toconsider
a Redevelopment Permit (RI? 94-5) to allow -a Farmer's Market in the
public parking lot located on the east side of Roosevelt Street
(mid-block), west of the alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and
Grand Avenue and adopted Design Review Board Resolution No. 215
recommending to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission that
Redevelopment Permit (RP 94-5) be approved; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the
City of Carlsbad, on September 20, 1994, held a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the recommendations and heard all persons
interested in or opposed to RP 94-S; and
WHEREASP the project was categorically exempt from
environmental review per Section 15304(e) of the State of
California Environmental Quality Act. If the project becomes a
permanent/on-going activity, an additional CEQA review will be
completed to determine the effect of a longer term project on
surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare.
NOW, THEREFQRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, as
followst
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
.0
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
18
2c
21
22
25
24
2f
2f
2;
21
2. *Ihat the above referenced project is approved and
that the findings and conditions of the Design Review Board in
Resolution No. 215 approving Redevelopment Permit RP 94-5, on file
with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the
findings and conditions of the Rousing and Redevelopment Commission
with the following changes:
A. Condition No. 1 is amended to read as follows:
"The boundaries of the market shall be limited to the public parking lot located on the east side of Roosevelt Street '(mid-block), west of the alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue. The total number of booths/spaces shall be limited to the number (32-33) indicated within the application. The hours of operation shall be every Wednesday afternoon from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.. To set-up for the event and clean-up afterwards, the subject parking lot will be closed from lrO0 p.m. to 8:08 p.m. every Wednesday. The total number of booths, spaces or hours of operation shall not be increased without prior amendment to this major redevelopment permit."
B. Condition No. 4 is amended to read as follows:
@*The Village Business Association shall be solely responsible for the set-up and clean-up of the event. These responsibilities include posting of signs as well as trash collection,, removal and disposal so that the parking lot is completely free of trash and debris at the conclusion of the event. Any damage to the parking lot(s), landscaping or irrigation shall be repaired by the City but must be paid for by the Association (as sponsor of event)." .
c. Condition No. 8 is amended to read as follows:
"'NO Parking TOW AWAX' signs which include the date and time of restriction must be posted 72 hours in advance of the beginning of the parking restriction. The Village Business Association shall be completely responsible for posting the signs and ensuring that they remain in place during the entire 72 hour period; missing or vandalized signs must be replaced by the applicant. The Association shall also be responsible for notifying the Carlsbad Police Department each week when the signs are installed. The Association shall also notify local businesses to provide vehicle identification and will not request that a vehicle be towed without first attempting to notify the vehicle owner of this parking requirement. These signs are temporary and must be removed each Wednesday at the end of the market and re-installed as noted herein. The parking lot shall be closed form 1:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. for the event."
2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
1s
16
17
18
19
2c
21
22
2E
24
2f
2(
2;
21
3. This action of approval is final the date this
resolution is adopted by the City Council. The provision of
Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for
Judicial Review" shall apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
"The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required - deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on-which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, city of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008."
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad on the
27th day of SEPTEKBER .1994, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Commissioners Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin, Nygaard, Finnila
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC
PARKING
m:
?5- .
2 I$ l- : 3 : d 2.Q gi;
l 3 $a
CT:
t-- If: E v, w z cn
LA-J
GRAND AVENUE
t
E co 3 LIJ zi 8 2
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
r
CITY OF CARLSBAD
EXtilBlT 4
SITE
.................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ................. .................. ................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................
PUBLIC
PARKING
N
W
+
E
S
ZARLSBAD VILLAGE FARMER’S MARKET RP 94-w
is . c
PROJECT OESCRIPTION/EXPUNATlON
. . .
PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Village Certified Farmers' Market
APPLICANT NAME: Carlsbad Village Business Association
Please describe fully the proposed prsject. Include any details necessary to adeqLat$y
explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also inc!Lc!e =,ry
background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons fcr, c:
appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary.
Description/Explanation.
SEE ATTACHED n4. ‘.
ATTACHMENT #4
Carlsbad Village Business Association
Description of Project
Sponsor
The Carlsbad Village Business Association is a non-profit
organization comprised of downtown village business people and
other concerned citizens for the purpose of preserving yet
advancing the Carlsbad Village area, its’ businesses and
merchants. The “Association” is dedicated to the promotion of
the Village of Carlsbad as both a tourist and local destination in
terms of recreation, shopping and every other community and
business endeavor.
The Carlsbad Village Business Association (hereafter abbreviated
CVBA) is the sponsor for the Carlsbad Village Certified Farmers’
Market. The funds gained from the Market profits are used to
help promote “all” businesses in the Village area.
Location
The Farmers’ Market occupies the Public Parking lot mid-block on .
Roosevelt between Carlsbad Village Drive to the south and Grand
Avenue to the north. Between Roosevelt to the west and the
alley (between Roosevelt and Madison) to the east. It is adjacent
to the Barrio, and located within walking distance of the
downtown Village Shopping and Business district. Central to the
tourist trade, i.e. hotels, timeshares and motels. It is also in
close proximity to the new Transit Commuter Rail Station.
Traffic/parking
There is ample free public parking located on the southwest
corner of Roosevelt and Carlsbad Village Drive and other free
public parking within a two block radius. The issue of traffic
congestion and use of private parking in the area is always
page 1 of 3
31
Traffic/parking (cont.)
something the market manager and the CVBA are constantly
working on to minimize any negative impact on the community,
the local merchants and businesses.
Time of Event
The Market will always take place on Wednesday afternoon from
2 PM to 6 PM during Daylight Savings Time (April to October)
and from 2 PM to 5 PM during Pacific Standard Time (October to
March).
Description of Products Sold
The Market will only feature freshly grown produce (mostly
locally grown), some fresh fish, flowers, plants, fruits,
&% FM vegetables, honey, eggs, olives, herbs and provide non- cd3if1cd
non- produce booths for bakery items& Cwn l 4* ti.
Other Items *
There will also be a small booth space to provide local Village
businesses to promote, with printed advertisements, their service
or product. This is on a voluntary basis and can be used by
anyone interested in bringing their information to the market .
manager.
Who is Featured
Ideally, we would like to feature Carlsbad Farmers. To that end
we contact Carlsbad growers first. CVBA feels strongly that part
of Carlsbads’ appeal is the openness of its’ agricultural areas.
Tantamount to those areas remaining agricultural and open is
their respective financial success. CVBA hopes to provide a local
venue for that success that will mutually benefit the entire
community; the farmers that grow here, the residents who live
here, the tourist who visit and the business community that serves
us all.
page 2 of 3
Who is Featured (cont.)
In addition to the regular vendors, CVBA will provide , on a
rotational and schedules bases, free of charge to individuals
and/or organizations that would further to educate and serve the
general public on issues such as soil conservation, recycling,
cornposting, organic farming, and sustainable agricultural and
business related endeavors. CVBA would like to inspire the
community involvement and attract local schools as a field trip
destination and real life experience. In the process CVBA hopes
to internalize the political awareness that is necessary to
ecologically transform the world, one individual at a time.
In Conclusion
The continued success of the Market is dependent on evbryone’
support and the CVBA is continually striving to improve the
Market and will continue to survey the impact on the local
community as a whole. This means “talking to our neighbors” all
the time. The Market manager is aware of all the pertinent issues
and will always listen to our customers and friends. The CVBA
and “Market Manager” will help to provide an atmosphere that
will be indicative to our civic pride, promote our beautiful
community and the Carlsbad Village Cetified Farmers’ Market.
page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENTtf.>
Carlsbad Village Business Association
Traffic & Sign Plan for
Carlsbad Village Certified Farmers’ Market
Parking Restrictions:
Every Sunday at noon (72 hours prior to the event)
the parking lot at mid block where the “Farmers’
Market” is to be held, will be posted with “No
Parking on Wednesdays from 1:00 P.M. till 7:OO
P.M.” signs at various and obvious locations. These
will be checked daily.
These “Posted No Parking” signs could be perma-
nently posted by the City in this lot in two obvious
locations (on the light standards now existing in the
lot). This would pose no danger to the public if
these signs were attached to these two light stan-
dards and would conform with the cities existing
signs in these locations.
Market Parking:
Everyone Shopping at the market will be directed to
park in the Free Public.Parking lots located in the
area. ( The lot at the southw5:st corner of Carls.bad
Village Drive and Roos.evelt .)
Information will be available on market day from
the market manager and staff to the public on the
locations of near area Free Public Parking.
page 1 of 2
Signs: .
TWO special “Farmers’ Market” signs are placed, one
at the entrance (mid-block on Roosevelt) to the
Farmers’ Market lot and one at the southwest corner
of Roosevelt Street and Carlsbad Village Drive.
Also at each entrance of the alley between Roosevelt
and Madison at Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand
Avenue respectively. These are signs directing
traffic for parking in the public lots. The signs will
be placed each Wednesday at about 1:00 P.M.
directing traffic to Market parking. Enclosed are
diagrams of each prospective area. Sign placement
is indicated by X’s and notes.
page 2 of 2
3s
- .
Carlsbad Village Farmers’ Market
555 Beech Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008
Phone (619) 720-9161 Fax (619) 720-9520
Market Manager Cynthia Bueker
Marker Rules and Producer Agreement
The Carlsbad Village Farmers’ Market is certified through the State of California Department of
Food and Agriculture and has been organized to benefit both the farmer and consumer. The
market is operated by the Carlsbad Village Business Association (CVBA) , a local non-profit
organizatidn. Markets are held every Wednesday, rain or shine, fromZOO P.M. to 6:00 P.M., in
the mid-block public parking lot on Roosevelt Street, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand
Avenue in the Village of Carlsbad. Sellers should arrive by I::45 P.M. so they may be set up and
ready to sell promptly at ZOO P.M. No sates may take place before 2;OO P.M.
A producer is defined as anyone with proper proof that they are selling what they grew,
. ,llgcted, raised, or caught. Each vendor of certifiable aqricultural oroducts must obtain a Certified
-oducers Certificate, endorsed by the San Diego Agricultural Commissioner, from the State of
alifornia of Food and Agriculture. They have offices in Vista (945-4043), San Diego (694-2739) ,
allbrook (728-7488), and Ramona ‘(738-2436). Certifiable aaricultural products include fresh
Jits, nuts, herbs, vegeta bles, eggs, honey, cut flowers, and nursery stock. Non-certifiable
lricuttural oroducts, such as dried fruit, juice, dried beans, meat, fish, and dairy products may be
.ld, provided the producer has proof he grew, raised, collected, or caught the product. A
ocessed product that orianated from a fresh certifiable product must have the fresh product listed
I a Certified Producers Certificate. For example, a vendor of apple juice must be certified for
)ples. Non-aaricultural products, commercially produced products such as bakery goods, and
aft items may not be sold at the market. Products sold as organic, naturally-grown, pesticide-
:e, etc. must be certified or registered as such by the proper agency. In addition to their Certified
oducers Certificate, sellers of nursery stock and flowers need a State of California License to sell
rsery stock. Avocado growers will need additional certification from the State Avocado *
;pection and Certification, available in Escondido (7434712) and Fallbrook (728-l 817). Sellers taxable items (including plants, flowers, and other non-food items) must have a sellers permit
esale Number) from the State Board of Equilization (744-1330) , and are responsible for
Yecting sales tax.
Sellers must post, in a visible place, an embossed photocopy of their original Certified Producers
rtificate, which lists & the commodities being sold by the producers. As required by the State
partment of Agriculture, the embossed certificate must be displayed at point of sale. Non-
tifiable producers must also have all required certificates, licenses, and permits dispiayed.
pies of all required documents, a signed copy of the market rules, a city of Carlsbad Business
ense, and proof of current liability insurance must be on file with the market manager. The
urance policy must be a $l,OOO,OOO liability limit per occurrence, and include Droducts liabilitv.
3 insurance policy must also name 1) City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad
92008 and 2) Carlsbad Village Business Association 555 Beech fivenue Carlsbad CA 92008
additional insured. Certificates of Insurance must be received by Additional lnsureds prior to
-ticipation and must state that coverages extend to participant as a vendor.
All products sold must be of reasonably high quality and meet the requirements of the California
Id and Agriculture Code. Poor quality products hurt the market as a whole, and the manager
- .
Teserves the right to halt sales of any product. Quality control may also be regulated by thi
tppropriate agency of the Department of Agriculture and/or a Carfsbad Village Farmers’ Market
luality Control Committee.
. Products may be sold by the producer, a member of his immediate family, or a paid employee.
:mployees cannot be paid on a commission basis; they must receive a regular salary. One certified
reducer may sell for up to two other certified producers, provided all certificates are posted, and all
roducts are separated so they can be identified by their certificate(s). The certified producer selling
jr other certified producers must also sell his or her own product . The market manager must also
ave written permission that the certified producer selling for other certified producers has
crthorization to do so, and be informed in advance that a vendor will be selling for another certified
-oducer. A non-certified producer may not sell for any other producer.
AIt prices must be posted and clearly visible to consumers. If products are to be sold by weight,
e scale must be sealed with a current yearly stamp by the County Sealer of Weights. All products
)M in prepackaged, closed containers must be labeled with the common name of the product,
ame and address of producer including zip code, and a declaration of net quantity. Selling space
to be determined and assigned by the market manager, and must be maintained in a clean, safe,
Id sanitary manner. Producers offering samples must make sure a trash receptacle is available.
I items to be sold must by placed at least 6 inches off the ground. At the close of the market,
4ters are required to thoroughly clean up their stall area and take all trash with them,
To secure a place to sell, a producer must contact the manager no later than 7 P.M. Monday, or
indicating so on their previous week’s load list. Producers will be admitted to the market as
ace allows. Any and all certifiable and non-certifiable agricuftural products may be sold at the
uket. Please notify the market manager if you will be selling any new or different products. The
lrket manager reserves the right to assign stalls to create a mix of agricultural products in the
lrket. Producers or their representatives must notify the manager before 9 A.M. Wednesday if
?y cannot be at the market as scheduled. In the case of an emergency, notification immediately
3t the market is required. Load lists must be completely filled out and the market fee of six
-cent (6%) of gross sales (minimum $5) paid to the market manager. Each producer will be
tied a receipt weekly.
Producers and their representatives are responsible for conformance to all local, state, and
eral laws. No animals are allowed in the market except seeing eye dogs. Consumption of
Dholic beverages if forbidden on the market premises. The market manager and any other .igned agent has the right to issue warnings and take appropriate action, including suspension
I expulsion form the market, against any participating producers/representatives who violate
se market rules and other regulations and laws.
4VE RECEIVED, READ, AND AGREE TO FOLLOW THE RULES OF THE CARLSBAD VILLAGE
3MERS’ MARKET.
..’
qature of Producer Date
t Name Name of Company
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
, WME’R’S bjARKET - . -
SPOf’iSORED BY THE
CAR&BAD
VILLAGE
BUSINESS
ASSOCIATION .
EVERY WEDNESDAY FROM
2ooP’M TO 6:ooPM
32 spaces total
15’ X 25’ spaces
GRAND AVENUE
Public Parking Lot (55 Spaces)
/ ad&* *a** k me@ mrrt Wdmmal Sign Sign 1 *p*. a CARLSBAD VILLAGE .DRIVE . %!zt ‘5 El -
Slgne: .
4 - 3’X4’ Double Sldcd Valet
1 - 2X8’ Banner (on info 800th)
/-
X = Barricades
.
City
. . . . l . .
DISCLOSURE STATE.zIE.YT
A?=LICANT’S S~A:EUEh~ CF ~6C:CSL’RE OF CERTAIN OWNE~LSHIP INTE~;ES;S ON AU ~ppu~ris ~0 wktL zcCu,;t
XC2E;iCNA;iY ACfCh Ch E-E PA8T CF WE Crry CCL’NC:L OR AN’f Appc~~lZo @CuO, CO#.&SS]CN OR CZM~EE
c
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed: -. . .
1. ADplicant
~~~r,ebn,asl~i~~a~~dr~~~~~~ ,“i pgrsSs6S% E%!.Il a finan~~~~~~~~n~~~~~~a~~~iness Associat:
2727 ROOseVdt St. '-Carlsbad, Ca 92008 % Tom Coe
2. Owner
t&t the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the proper?y involved. City of Carlsbad
3. If any person identifi.ed pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names ar,c
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partcersn:;
interest in the partnership. N/A
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names ar.d
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiq
of the trust. Ron Moore-Board'of Directors P 0 Box 4307 Carlsbad, CA 92018-4307
2075 Las Palmas Owe l Car&bad. California 92009-4859 l (619) 438-l 161
Oisclosuce Statement .
5.
. . .
!Ovefj
Page 2 . .
Have you had mere than $250 worth Of business transacted with any member of City staff. z~;:=~
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past Welve months?
Yes _ No X If yes. please indicate person(s)
Penon ~a Mind u: ‘Any indiviaurl. firm. co~artnrrrhip. @+I v~tw@. urOci~tio% #ociJ club. Irrtrm*l orgM~r~. corgor,uon. ,,ut,. fist
t~*lvof. syndicrtr. ths and l - othof countf. c* ti county. Cw munictgrli. dirtnet w othrr @iticsJ s&&wir&n, 01 fry 0~ grovO or i
combmatron acting u a unh* I
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
.
@l-H nl= (zl+wLsm
Signature of Owner/date
Print or type name of owner
- __..’
::-.. a._
: - . . -
. . . _-.
-. . ._.
. --.. -.
a _ . . . . . . . . :... . . - . 2 -
--
_. -
- a - - - . _- .a .-.. -a
: ‘1 j>...T, ; - . .
: ..- ..” l -s :-
. * _. , .* . _ ”
.
+L9 I I 24%-
Signature cl appridih
f?m MWS?E , VIU&& &~w~eas
Print or type name of applicant Assoc lAT’ ‘I4
. ._. .-. .-. -. --
- . ..-- --.
. .-es
.- -
-
-..a _.,, -.
_, _ -. : . : .‘. .*
. - .-4 .--. ----.
. _- - . . - - .- . -_-. --
- . - -.A- . -.- -.-
- - _ -. -.-v--i-.- -- ---
-..- ._ -. - . . --- . -_ - _
-. c . -. . -.*” 2 *:- > . -.. : . . - . r; 1.‘. -. -, .-. i
. ._. : . . . - - ., , . : .’ .._ . .*- . . ..*
.t . . .
-. .v
.
.- .
..- .
. FRMOOO13 800
tz~Hlt3IT 5 .
NEGATIVE DECLAMTIO~
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: West side of Roosevelt Street, between Carlsbad
Village Drive and Grand Avenue, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A weekly Certified Farmer’s Market for a maximum of 33
booths within an existing commercial parking lot, resulting
in lot closure from 1:OO PM to 8:OO PM every Wednesday.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pummnt to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009.. Comments from the public
are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of
date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department
at (619) 438-l 161, extension 4499.
DATED: MARCH 16, 1995
CASE NO: RP 94-05
MICHAEL J. I%Z!&LLER
Planning Director .
CASE NAME: VILLAGE CERTIFIED FARMER’S MARKET
PUBLISH DATE: MARCH 16,1995
Mcmad
2075 Las Palmas Drive l Cartsbad, California 92009-l 576 l (619) 438-l 161
41
ENVIRONMEb=‘AL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR- - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANMNG DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. RP 94-05
DATE: MARCH 1.1995
lACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: tilsbad Village Certified Farmer’s Market
2. APPLICANT: Carlsbad Village Business Association
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANTz 2774 Jefferson Street. Carl&ad. CA 92Ot)g
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I 5&JBMI‘ITED: Februarv 1.1995
5. PROJECI’ DES-ION: A weekly Certified Farmer’s Market for a maximum of 33 booth within an
existing commercial Darking lot. resultina in tot closure from 1~00 PM to 8%) PM every Wednesday.
JMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACl-0R.S POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
e summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentiaXy affected by this project, involving at least
2 impad that is a “Potentially Significant Impact’, or “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
xxporated’ as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
I Land Use and Planning - Tranq+ation/Ciiculalion _ Public services
_ Population and Housing - Biological Resources - Utilities and Service Systems
Geological Problems __ Energy tid Mineral Resources - Aesthetics
Water
Air Quality
- Hazards __ Cultural Resources
- Noise _ Recreation
- Mandatory Findings of Significance
I-l Rev. lpops
42
>ETERMINATION. -.
,To bc completed by the LRad Agency).
)n the basis of this initial evaluation:
fmd that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
7d a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
fid that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
erc will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an t&d sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared,
find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
WTRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
?iid that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect
has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable 1egaI standards, and 2) has
cn addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the
fed is a ‘potentially significant impact” ar ‘potentially significant unless mitigated’ An
WIFtONlKENTAL IMPACT REPORT/MITIGATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION is required, but it mu
lalyze only the effeds that remain to be addressed.
%nd that although the proposed projed could have a significant effect on the environment, there WM,
X be a significant effed in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyixd
equately in an earlier EIR / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards
d (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR / MJTIGATED NEGATIVE
XLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project,
erefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
,
X
q
0
cl
0
3- 7+!5i
Date
. 1 1 l\ ,; .
nning Dire&r-‘Sig@ure Date I I
I-2 Rev. 1pops
43
ENViRONMENTAL IMPAm -
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental
Impact Assessm ent to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental
Impact AAssessment appears in the following pages in the forni of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical,
biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information
to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an E%vironmenti Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration,
or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative D&ration.
. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact’ answers that arc adequately supported by
an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact’ answer is adequately
supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like
the one invoIvd. A ‘No Impact’ answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to,
or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
b Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not
adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies.
, ‘Pot.entially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated applies where the incorporation of mitigatiogl
measures has reduced an effect from ‘Potentially Significant Impact’. to a ‘Less Than Significant Impact’
The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
TtientiaUy Significant Impact’ is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant,.
l&sad on an ‘E&Part r, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the
environment, but fl potentially @@‘icant effects (a) have been anal@ adequately in 80 earlier EIR or
Mitigated Negative D+aration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures
that are imposed upon the proposed project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior
Compliance).
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any
of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are
mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures arr
agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate ‘Potentially Significant Impaa
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
When “PotentiaIly Significant Impact” is checked the projec? is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR
if the signifiqt effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier ElR pursuant to applicable standards and
the effect will be mitigated, or a ‘Statement of Overriding Considerations’ has been made pursuant to thar
earlier EIR.
I-3 Rev. 1pops
An EIR~Js~ be prepared if ‘Pc?tially Significant Impact” is checked,- d including but not limited to the
fol]o+ng ci.rcumstances: (1) the psentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier
EIR purmant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce
the impact to less than significant; (2) a ‘Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact
has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact
to less than significant, or, (4) through the E&Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of ~gnificance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in
re&rcing a potentially significant effti to below a level of significance.
discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
:ISCUSSTON OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Particular attention should be given to discussing
itigation for impacts which would otherwise be determin.4 significant.
.
I-4 Rev. lf30/95
Jues (md’Sqlpmihg lda7n~600 sources): -
POWltidlJ
Signifkxa
et
LAND. USE AND PIANMNG. Would the proposal:
a)
W
a
d)
d
Conflict with general plan designation
or 2ming? (source t!(s): 1
Conflict with applicable environmental plans
or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( 1
Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( 1
Affect agricultural resources or operations
(e.g. impacts to soils or farmtands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? ( 1
Disnrpt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-
income or minority community)? ( 1
POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a)
b)
cl
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( 1
Induce substantial growth in an arena either
directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects
in an undeveloped area or extension of major
infhdmcture)? ( 1
Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( 1
didly
siitim
UdesS Mitigatial
Wad
Lcs-lh Signifiaat
h=t
No
lnwt
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
I-5 Rev. l/30/95
9Jcs (al&xpport~ lnfamarim salrccs):
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the
proposal result in or expose people to potential
impacts invoK.ng:
a) Fault rupture? ( )
b) Seismicg~oundshaking?( )
c) Seismic ground failure, including
liquefaction? ( )
d) &i&e, tsunami, or VOICZLGC hazard? ( 1
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( )
f) Erosion, changes in topography or
unstable soil conditions from excavation,
-grading, or fill? ( )
g) Subsidence of the land? ( )
h) Expanke soils? ( )
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( )
. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( )
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( )
enthlly siinifii
Potenfillly UdeS
siinifll . MitJptkm
lmpbct m-d
LesThn Significant No
w=t hpect
x
J-
x
x
X
-x
x
x
x
x
x
1-6
.
Rev. l/30/95
-ma (a &pa& Idamatim SarrusX
a Discharge into surface waters or other
alteration of surface water quality (e.g.
temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)? ( )
d) Changes in the amount of surface water
in any water body? ( )
cl Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( )
9 change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwafer recharge
capability? ( )
8) Altered direction or rate of flow of
groundwater? ( )
h> Impacts to groundwater quality? ( )
0 Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for
public water supplies? ( )
PcJmtidly
SiilifkUlt
Impact
lItidly SigDifii
U&U k5slta.n hlitigatkQ Signifiaat No
facarparad w=t hpoct
x
x
x
AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) _I
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature,
or cause any change in climate? ( )
d) Create objectionable odors? ( )
2.
x
x
x
- x
- x
- x
I-7 Rev. lpops
49
lies (ad slqlpmrdg lnfcamatial sams):
I. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a)
b)
d
4
e)
9
g)
Increkd vehicle trips or trafIk congestion? (
Hazards to safety from design features
(e.g. sharp cunm or dangerous intersections)
or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (
Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( )
InsufGcient parking capacity on-site or
off-site? ( )
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or
bicyclists? ( )
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( )
Rail, waterborne or air traffic
ilnpact.s?( )
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
PUCntirll~ Sigllifii
m=t
1 -
1 -
Would the proposal result in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, iminds, and birds? ( )
Locally designated species (e.g. heritage
-=I? ( )
tU%CDtidly
Sigllihllt
Udat
Migatial
ma@f
-
ksllnn
Significant
w=t
No
w=t
x
x_
x
x
x
2
x
x
x
I-8 Rev. Ipop
laues (ad Sqpdng Infamatim Sources): -
e) Increase ftre hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( 1
<. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise
levels? ( )
3. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposai have an
a)
W
cl
4
4
effect upon, or result in a need for new .or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
Fire prot&ion? ( )
Poke protection? ( )
Schools? ( )
Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? ( )
Other governmental services? ( )
Pum.idly
SiitlifWlt
w=t
U.Iltidly
SigtiCUlt
UdCSS k5snlan htitigaticm Signi fkmt No
lnmporad bprct m=t
fI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following
utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( )
b) Communications systems? ( )
x
x.
J!L
x
x
x
I- 10 Rev. l/30/95
ISSUCS (&I suppaiing lnkfmath sources): -
c) Local or regional water treatment or
distribution facilities? ( )
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( )
e) Storm water drainage? ( )
f) Solid wastedisposal? ( )
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( )
‘XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic
highway? ( )
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic
effed? ( 1
c) Create light or glare? ( )
CTV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a)
b)
d
4
e)
Disturb paleontological resources? ( )
Disturb archaeological resources? ( )
Affect historical resources? ( )
Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values? ( 1
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area? ( 1
Pactxidly
siinrii
w=t
0lCntillly
SignifW
UlllCS¶ l&sTbrm
Mitigrt’m Significant No
Iamporad m=t w=t
x
-2L
x
-2L
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
I- 11 Rev. 1pop5
~SFUCJ (a4 Suppcrt’hg lnfwatim Scum): -
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
( 1
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( )
WI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wild life species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant Or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(Tumulatively considerable’ means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in mnnection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
Pcuntiany
Signifii
bpact
tentidly
sipifii
UIlkSS Lessnut
Mitigatioa Significant No
lncnpar-d m=t lmpect
- x
- x
-
x
x_
x
I- 12 Rev. 1PW
>-VII. Ej9RLlEk ANALYSES.
No earlier analyses apply directly to the Village Certified Farmer’s Market. The proposal was found by the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission to be consistent with the Village Area Redevelopment Plan and the
Village Design Manual, which were reviewed through an Environmental Impact Report, number EIR 567, on file
in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department.
I- 13 Rev. l/30/95
DIS&SldN OFENWRONMEN. .LEVALUATION - r-L. I
The Carl&ad Village Certified Farmer’s Market proposal involves an open market in an existing parking lot, one
afternoon per week. The total parking area is consumed by the market, effectively occupying SS spaces from the
hours of 1:OO pm to 8:00 pm, on every Wednesday afternoon. The project was approved on a temporary trial basis by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on August 17, 1995 and was determined to be exempt from
environmental analysis per Section 15304(e) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Since the market has been operational for several months, staff has had the opportunity to evaluate the land use compatibility, adequacy of parking and circulation, and need for public services. The market is a commercial
operation and serves to enhance the existing diversity of commerce within the Village Redevelopment Area.
Despite the loss of parking spaces, all displaCea vehicles are accommodated within the existing parking supply
during the Wednesday afternoon event. The parking lot circulation and cleanliness is maintained by the operators
of the market and no additional public services are required.
Considering that the existing market poses no potential environmental impacts and has been operating for several
months without evidence to the contrary, a Negative Declaration is king processed.
LAND USE AND PLANNING:
Being a commercial land use, the Farmeis Market is consistent with the existing general commercial general plan
and zoning designation, the Village Area Redevelopment Plan, and the Village Design Manual. The surrounding
iand uses are commercial in nature and the proposed market is compatl%le with these uses. No agricultural
-esources or operations exist within the project area and use of the parking lot does not disrupt or divide an
tiblished community.
‘OPULATION AND HOUSING:
rhc Farmer’s Market does not increase population, induce growth or displace existing housing since no additional
Iwelling units are associated with the market and no housing exists within the parking lot.
;EOLOGICAL PROBLEMS:
here are no significant geologic forms or features in or around the Farmer’s Market site. No exposure of people 3 fault rupture, seismic ground shaking or failure, or volcanic hazards could occur. Since the site is completely
eveloped and no grading is involved in the market, no risk of landslides, mudflows, land subsidence, expansive A problems, or disruption of unique geologic features could occur.
/ATER:
he operations of the Fanner’s Market do not change the absorption rates, drainage patterns, rate of runoff or flood >tential from the existing parking lot conditions. No surface water or groundwater sources exist in or near the
arket site, therefore no impacts to such could occur.
IR OUALITY:
I- 14 Rev. l/30/95
The F&-ner’s *Market does not, in an+f itself, generate additional traffic trip, -Id the displaced parking does not
significantly increase traffic circulatiorl or cause congestion. ‘l’be market has not energy production or consumption
require&&s, therefore no emissions ‘due to power generation are created because of the market. Although the
Village area is within the San Diego Air Basin, a non-attainment air basin, the lack of increased traffic trips and
energy consumption means that no emissions are introduced into the atmosphere by virtue of the market. No
adverse impacts to air quality should occur.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATfON;
The Farmer’s Market does not generate any additional traffic trips and involves no street or roadway improvements.
No emergency access routes traverse the developed parking lot and no rail, waterborne or air traffic use the marka
site. The market is contained within the parking lot and does not pose any hazards or barriers for pedeshians using
the adjacent sidewalks There are no conflicts .with adopted policies on alternative transportation since no impacts
to nearby bus stops or bicycle racks will occur. The market does occupy some parking spaces for a seven hour
period each .week Based upon fieId investigations, all displaced parking is accommodated within the surrounding
parking supply and, therefore, there is sufficient parking off-site and no significant impacts to parking supply will
occur.
BlOLGGICAL RESOURCES;
No endangered, rare, or designated plant, fish, animal, insect or bid species live within the develop4 parking lot. Neither are there any natural communities; wetlands or established wildfife dispersion corridors in the area.
Therefore, the Farmer% Market could have no impact on biological resow
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES:
No mineral or other non-renewable resource is required for the operations of the Farmer’s Market and, since no
additional energy is required, the market. does not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans
HAZARDS;
No hazardous or unhealthful substances are involved with the Farmer’s Market operations and no existing sources
of potential health hazards exist within the developed commercial parking lot. The parking lot is not used for
emergency response or evacuation routes and no flammable vegetation, such as brush., grass, or trees, exists within
the market area. Therefore the market will not expose people to any significant hazards.
NOISE:
The use of the parking lot for a Fanner’s Market may slightly increase the ambient noise level on Wednesday
~fiemoons, but the increze is short-term and incremental. The market will not expose any people to severe noise
levels or noticeably increase existing levels.
2UBLTC SERVICES;
Ihe Famm’s Market is self-sufficient with regard to traffic and crowd control. No additional Fire, Police or other
public services are needed to support the market use. The parking lot is cleaned by the market operator therefore
90 city maintenance crews are needed. since the market does not involve the creation of dwelling units or jobs,
I - 15 Rev. l/30/95
no impacts on, schools could occur. -
y’ITil+%S AND SERVICE SYSTEMS;
The Farmer’s Market does not umsume any power or natural gas and requires no communication systems. The
market operations produce no sewerage, wastewater and uses very little potable or reclaimed water. The small
amounts of solid waste and storm water drainage are easily accommodated within the existing systems and no
alterations of such are required to support the market.
r JasrHEr1cs;
TIE existing parking lot dpes not constitute a scenic vista nor does it offer any views of scenic areas. The market xmsists of trucksand booths for one afternoon per week and does not create an aesthetically offensive view. No
3ghts or reflective devices are involved in the Farmer’s Market, therefore no impacts from such will occur.
WTURAL RESOURCES;
The project site is a developed parking lot in a developed commercial area. No archeological, paleontological,
!tistorical, cultural, or religious resources exist on or near the Farmer’s Market and the market operations are
~nfined to the parking lot. Therefore no impacts to such resources will occur.
XECREATION;
ZI the Farmer’s Market does not involve any dwelling units, no increased park or recreational demand is
generated and no rtxr&onal opportunities exist within the parking lot. No impacts to recreational facilities will
xxur.
+lANDATORY Fl?WNGS OF SIGNIFICANCE;
‘here are no natural featnres, fish or wildlife habitats, rare or endangered plants, or examples of California history
n the fully developed parking lot. Therefore, the Farmer’s Market causes no impacts to such. Since the market
as no impacts, there are also no cumulative effects. As discussed above, no direct or indirect environmental
npacts to humans will result from the periodic Farmer’s Market in the developed parking lot.
I - 16 Rev. 1/3q%
LIST hJITIGA.TING MEASURES UFiAPPLICABLE~
ATTACH MITIGATTON MOMTORMG PROGRAM (TF APPLICABLE1
4PPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MlTlGATION MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE h4lTIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES To THE PROJECT.
late
I- 17 Rev. l/30/95
. . . . . . . .
l
L
cni
8.
.
d ig
I-: 3
c3 : ;f
4’
0: 2
5:s
-m
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
I
, g
:Q
4
CL
PUBLIC
PARKING I
-.
L-J
GRAND AVENUE
e
I
I
.
I
1
/ .
L 4
CARLSBAD VILIAGE DRIVE
r ‘l--
CITY CiF CARLSBAD
SITE
. .... . . . . . .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ................... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ... . . . . . ..........
PUBLIC
PARKING
/ I
CARLSBAD VILLAGE FARMER’S MARKET
._... _.. \,.I. ..‘. “1-l rL*\l.I,AA.* L “L 1 l.JLI .,, 8” k.J.-\.biL
I’0 UOX 944209
- SACRAMENTO CA 932W2090 /-
CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION
De Minimis Impact Finding
Project Title/Location (iclude county): RP W-05
VILLAGE CERTIFIED FARMER’S MARKET
West side of Roosevelt Slreet, between Carl&ad Village Drive and Grand Avenue, in the City of Carl&ad, County of
San Diego, State of California
Name and Address of Applicant: Carl&ad Village Business Association
2774 Jefferson Street
Carl&ad, CA 92008
Project Description: A weekly Certified Farmer’s Market for a maximum of 33 booths
within an existing commercial parking lot, resulting in lot closure from
1:OO PM to 8:00 PM every Wednesday.
Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary):
1. The City of Carlsbad Planning Department has completed an Environmental Initial
. Study for the above referenced property, including evaluation of the proposed project’s
potential for adverse environmental impacts on fish and wildlife resources.
2. Based on the completed Environmental Initial Study, the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department finds there is no evidence before the City of Carlsbad that the proposal will
have potential for an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the
wildlife depends.
3. The City of Carlsbad has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption
of adverse effect contained in AB 3158 Chapter 1706 Section 753.5(d).
Certification:
I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact and that based on
the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulativelj have an adverse
effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
MICHAEti. H&MILLER
Title: Plannina Director
Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad
Date: March 13. 1995
Section 711.4, Fish and Game code
DFG: 12190
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of
Blade-Citizen
This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Public Hearing
a mepaPer Of general circulation, printed and
published daily in the City of Oceanside and qualified for the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial
district with substantial circulation in Bonsall, Fallbrook,
Leucadia, Encinitas, Cardiff, Vista and Carl&ad of San Diego, and which newspaper I, Cou&
a newspaper of general circulatidn b)
Court of the County of San Diego, St& under the date of June 30, 1989, cas that the notice, of which the annexed (Set in type not smaller than nonpare.
published in each regular and entire i newspaper and not in any supplemer following dates, to-wit:
lfyOUddlWlgttbtM&IBsdprdoRnsstpadt-
LEGAL42381Juncz,m5
. .
June 2, 1995
I certify (or declare) under penalty of j
foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at Oceanside,Califomia, this _ of June, 1995
A
- r
-----e-we-- --- _ d m-w wm t / Signature ’
BLADE-CITIZEN Legal Advertising 1722 South Hill Street
P.O. Box 90 Oceanside, CA 92054
(619) 433-7333
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RP 94=5(A)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, June 13, 1995, to consider an amendment to a Major Redevelopment Permit to extend the term of the permit for five (5) years, and consider minor changes to conditions of the permit for the weekly Carlsbad Village Certified Farmer's Market, located on public property on the east side of Roosevelt Street, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue, in the Village Redevelopment Area, and more particularly described as:
Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14, Block 38, amended Map of Town of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 775, filed in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder.
The Market was initiated in October, 1994, and was originally granted a six (6) month trial period only. The Village Business Association has requested a five (5) year extension of the permit for the weekly Village Farmer's Market.
The Association is also requesting that four (4) booths be allowed for non-produce, non-certified product sales at the Market which will include such items as fresh bread, pastries or pasta. The total number of booths will still be limited to thirty-three (33).
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Debbie Fountain in the Housing and Redevelopment Department, at 434-2935 or 434-2811.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Carlsbad Village Business Association PUBLISH: June 1, 1995
CITY OF CARLSBAD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
0: s : g I-: z : a 2. n c& 2
l 3)
ii? . . . . . . . . . . .
l
PUBLIC
PARKING
4
GRAND AVENUE
A
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
SITE
c
, .............. ..i .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................
PUBLIC
PARKING
CITY OF CARLSBAD
N
w
+
E
S
CARLSBAD VILLAGE FARMER’S MARKET
ii
RP
94-05 (A)
DONALD & LAEL DEWHURST 3425 SEACREST DRIVE CARLSBAB CA 92008
TAMARACK INVESTMENTS SMITH FRANCES L TRUST II ROOSEVELT CENTER-CAR JOHN DAVIS III 4 VENTURE #310 PO BOX864 IRVINE CA 92718 CARLSBAD CA 92018
JOHN GRANT&MARY GRANT CAROL ANDERSON MARVIN HUMPHREYS 71773 OBELISCO CIRCLE 4783 FLYING CLOUD WAY IDELLA HUMPHREYS CARLSBAD CA 92009 CABLSBAD CA 92008 140 ACACIA AVENUE CARLSBAD CA 92068
CJ HELTIBRIDLE RALPH & MARJ SHICK PO BOX 599 OCEANSIDE CA 92049
HORACE FELKINS DOLPBINE FELKINS PO BOX 431 OCEANSIDE CA 92649
PETER & GEORGETTE ROCK 2421s EL CAMINO REAL SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672
ARTHUR HOWARD-JONES 2748 WATERBURY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92068
MENAHEM t ESTERAHRONEE 560 GRAND AVENUE CARLSBAD CA 92098
OPHELIA GARCIA 2960 STATE STREET CARLSBAU CA 92068
MISSION SQUARE SHOPPING 2916 STATE STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008
THELMAWILLLAMS 3162 CARLSBAD BLVD CARLSBAD CA 92068
HOYT PARDEE 614 ALMA REAL DRIVE PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272
LALLAIU&LAFTONJANDRO PO BOX.245 CARLSBAD CA 92018
MARJORIE DUNHAM 4028 PARK DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92098
WARD FAMILY TRUST 01-20 PAMELA PERDUE 945 S ORANGE GROVE BLVD#D PASADENA CA 91105
SHEHAB EDMOND TTRUST 19 SANDRASHEHAB 6321 ESPLANADE STREET PLAYA DELREY CA 90293
DONALD MACDONALD LEO &DIANA PACHECO JEAN MACDONALD 2100 CHESTNUT AVENUE 2016 SHERIDAN ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92068 ENCINITAS CA 92024
HAROLD CLARKE CATHERINE CLARKE 824 CAMINITO DEL REPOSO CARLSBAD CA 92009
CLARK & SHELLEY KNAPP 215 W PALM STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92103
SIMS TRUST 01-31-91 2620 WILSON STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008
GILBERT ACUNA 91MAYNARDAVENUE NEWBURY PARK CA 91320
THATCHER CHAHLOTTE LREV CARLSBAD VILLAGE PARTNER - ROBERT SONNEMAN 505 N TUSTIN AVENUE #2S2 3490 SEACREST DRIVE SANTAANA CA 92705 CARLSBAD CA 92098
VERA SOT0 & INEZAPODACA PO BOX 299 OCEANSIDE CA 92049
SARAMORALES 305 DATE AVENUE CARLSBAD CA 92008
MOTEL 6 OPERATING LP JOHN&MAHYGRANT 750 TERRADO PLAZA&i% COVINA CA 91723
’ . , L
BOYER ROY TRUST 02-19-87 602 S PACIFIC STREET OCEANSIDE CA 92054
LEOR & OPHIRA LAKRITZ ELISHA & DAFN GILBOA 820 W FLETCHER AVENUE ORANGE CA 92665
PETERS 1993 LIVING TRUST PO BOX 1091 CARDIFF CA 92007
JEANENE ENTERPRISES INC. PACKARD BUILDING PARTNER 2679 JEFFERSON STREET #J 725 GRAND AVENUE CARLSBAD CA 92006 CARLSBA CA 92008
CARLSBAD GRAND GENERALP PO BOX 8193 RANCH0 SANTAFE CA 92067
JOHN&NINA GORDON JOANNE GILBERT MCCOMAS FAMILY TRUST 05 PO BOX 1055 WALKER-GILBERT 1265 CYNTHIALANE CARDIFF CA 92007 4350 HIGHLAND DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
FREDERICK WOOD UN0 KASKLA PO BOXB2794 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90213 .
SATTERLY FAMILY TRUST 05 GEORGE &JACKYE WILLIS 1349 MELROSE WAY 539 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR #201 VISTA CA 92083 CARLSBAD CA 92008
MURPHYHOWARDFTRUSTlO GERALD KELLY 400 N LA COSTA DRIVE' CARLSBAD CA 92009
STUART &MARILYN WILSON IsRAWI BROTHERS 1846AVOCADO ROAD 425 N ARDEN BLVD OCEANSIDE CA 92054 LOS ANGELES CA 90004
VEBLEN VERMILYEA 645 GRAND AVENUE CARLSBAD CA 92008
GREAT WESTERN BANK 9200 OAKDALE AVENUE CHATSWORTH CA 91311
OAKLEY PARKER 3215 MAEZEL LANE CARLSBAD CA 92008
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL PO BOX 230926 ENCINITAS CA 92023
CARLSBAD EQUITY PROPERTIES BAUMGARTNER FAMILY TRUST 2965 ROOSEVELT STREET SUITE A 6539 CORINTIA STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009
NADYA GUZELIMIAN ZAVEN & ANABALIAN PO BOX 206 SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
JOSEPHINE KINGSTON PO BOX884 CARLSBAD CA 92018
HOME SAVINGS&LOAN ASSOC. 4900 RIVERGRADE ROAD #550 IRWINDALE CA 91706
LOUISE WILLIAMS PO BOX 535 CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARK&MARYGOMBAR JOHN &BARB GOMBAR PO BOX 1667 CARLSBAD CA 92018
BANK OFAMERICANT&SA - PO BOX 37000 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94137
E REED ADLER 3833 GAVIOTAAVENUE LONGBEACH CA 90807
*DALJITSARKARIA [PFj SHELLY ELAINE PO BOX 5766 ORANGE CA 92613
WALTER TUCKER 2810 MADISON STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008
1 . ,’
: . .
,, ‘.
;:
. . ., * .
.
,
’ : _.
: ‘,
. -.
,
.,‘. / *
- -. I ./ :. I’ .,’
._., *..,,I .
.- _.I * ‘. ;
., . ,: : \ I. ‘..
,_ ;.. _.,, I.‘( : . ..~,
(. “.,. . ./
(’ : ‘.
_. :.
. . . . :‘. *
4
. ‘( di.
, : .
. . .,I.:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CARLSBAD VILLAGE CERTIFIED FARMERS’ MARKET
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad will hold
a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California
at 5:OOpm on Wednesday, April 19, 1995 to consider approval of a term extension for Major
Redevelopment Permit 94-05 to continue the weekly Village Certified Farmers’ Market on public
property located on the east side of Roosevelt Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand
Avenue in the Village Redevelopment Area and more particularly described as:
Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 38, amended Map of Town of Carlsbad in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map
thereof No. 775, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County.
The Village Business Association has requested a five (5) year extension of the subject permit
for the weekly Village Farmer’s Market. The Market was initiated in October, 1994 and was
originally granted a six (6) month trial period only. After completing its evaluation of the
project, staff is recommending approval of the five (5) year extension for the permit. The
Association is also requesting that four (4) booths be allowed for non-produce, noncertified
product sales at the Market which will include such items as fresh bread, pastries or pasta. The
total number of booths will still be limited to thirty-three (33). Staff is also recommending
approval of the request to include four (4) non-produce, noncertified booths in the Market.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after April 13, 1995. If you have any
questions, please contact Debbie Fountain in the Housing and Redevelopment Department at
434-2935 or 434-2811.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
Case File:
Fw 94-05
Case Name:
Carlsbad Village Certified Farmers’
Market
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. 6 l Carlsbad, CA 920082389 * (619) 434-2810/2811 l FAX (619) 720-2037 @
-
.
April 25, 1995
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice Amendment to Maior RedeveloDment
Permit (94-S for the Villape Farmer’s Market for a public hearing before the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission.
Please notice the item for a regular Commission meeting on Mav 16, 1995 or alternate date
selected bv Citv Manager.
Thank you.
DATE