HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-04-09; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 281; Blockbuster Video Store1 - P .&&+
HOUSING AdD REDEVELOPMENT COMlhSSION - AGENDA BILL &
DEPT. HD. i%- AB# 28 1 TITLE:
419196 MTG. ,
DEPT. H/RED
BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORE
RP95-02/CDP 95-02 CITY MGRS .
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If the Housing and Redevelopment Commission concurs, the action is to ADOPT Resolution
No.296 APPROVING RP 95-02 and CDP 95-02 for the Blockbuster Video Project.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On December 12, 1995, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission held a public hearing
to consider the major redevelopment and coastal development permit applications for the
Blockbuster Video Store proposed for property located at 660 Carlsbad Village Drive. The
project included the demolition of two existing buildings and construction of a 5400 square
foot retail building and site improvements.
At the December 12, 1995 meeting, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission denied the
application without prejudice. The applicant was instructed to revise plans, specifications and
renderings for the proposed project to provide for more architectural relief and then return to
the Commission for further consideration. The Commission suggested that the applicant
consider 1) the addition of benches in the courtyard area; 2) the addition of bay windows; 3)
provide for architectural articulation on the north elevation; 3) the addition of a drinking
fountain, a clock tower and roof overhang. The intent of the Commission was to obtain a more
architecturally pleasing building which provides for more visual architectural relief and details.
The applicant, Blockbuster Video Inc., considered the suggestions of the Commission as well
as some design change suggestions provided by City Staff and then redesigned the exterior
of the proposed building. Attached as Exhibit 4 are reduced copies of the revised site plan and
building elevations for the proposed Blockbuster Video Store. In the new plans for the
proposed store, the applicant has 1) added benches in the courtyard area; 2) revised the roof
line to reduce the height from 22 feet to 19 feet 3 inches, with the tower feature remaining
at the original height of 26 feet 3 inches; 3) the storefront windows were revised from a clear
glass, large single pane to a divided pane mullion system; 4) the previously identified “pop-
outs” on the south and west elevations have been revised from a flat roof to a gabled roof
with blue glazed tile accents; 5) the tower feature has been revised to include blue glazed tile
accents; 6) additional landscaping features have been provided in the form of clay planters
with large leaf plants (such as a Bird of Paradise or similar) within the courtyard/entrance area
for the store as well as other various locations on the site.
With the proposed changes to the building design proposed by the applicant, the new building
will be more visually appealing, more pedestrian-friendly and more consistent with the
architecture desired for the buildings within the Village Redevelopment Area as set forth within
the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual. Exhibit 5 to this report provides an analysis,
in the form of a narrative checklist, of how the project meets the design guidelines outlined
within the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual.
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. -!GBl-
If the Housing and Redevelopment Commission concurs, staff recommends that the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission approve the new design of the building as presented to the
Commission by the applicant on the date of this report and, subsequently, approve the
Blockbuster Video Project subject to the conditions set forth in Design Review Board
Resolutions No. 241 and 242 approved on November 1, 1995, with appropriate amendments
as approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on the date of this report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As stated previously, staff believes that the proposed project will have a positive financial
impact in terms of increased property tax and sales tax revenue and additional employment
opportunities. The applicant has indicated that 15 to 20 employment opportunities will be
created by construction of the new store. With estimated sales of $800,000 to $900,000 per
year, the additional sales tax revenue to the City would amount to approximately $8,000 to
$9,000 per year. The current value of the property, including the existing building, is
approximately $315,000; this provides property tax revenue of approximately $3,150 per
year. With the new improvements to the property, it is estimated that the value of the
property, including the new building, will increase to approximately $677,000. The increase
in value would result in additional tax increment revenue for the Carlsbad Redevelopment
Agency of approximately $3,620 per year; this provides for total property tax revenue of
$6,770 per year.
No cost will be incurred by the City or the Redevelopment Agency as a result of construction
of the subject project.
EXHIBITS:
1. Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 236 approving RP 95-02 and
CDP 95-02.
2. Design Review Board Resolution Nos. 240, 241 and 242.
3. Location Map.
4. Reduced copies of revised elevations of the proposed Blockbuster Video Store.
5. Housing and Redevelopment Commission Staff Analysis on the new design proposed for
the Blockbuster Video Project.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 276
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT (RP 95-02) AND A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (CDP 95-02) TO ALLOW FOR A CHANGE IN LAND USE AND THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO PERMIT A RETAIL VIDEO STORE ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 660 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE IN
SUBAREA 1 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO, INC. API: 203-304-26
CASE NO: RP 95.02/CDP 95-02
WHEREAS, on November 1, 1995, the Carlsbad Design
Review Board held a duly noticed public hearing to consider
a Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 95-02) and Coastal
Development Permit (CDP 95-02) for a change in land use and
construction of a new commercial building to permit a retail
video store at 660 Carlsbad Village Drive and adopted Design
Review Board Resolutions No. 241 and 242 recommending to the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission that Major
Redevelopment Permit (RP 95-02) and Coastal Development
Permit (CDP 95-02) be approved; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, on December 12, 1995 held a duly
noticed public hearing to consider the recommendations and
heard all persons interested in or opposed to Major
Redevelopment Permit (RP 95-02) and Coastal Development
Permit (CDP 95-02); and
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
,
HRC Resolution No. 276 Page 2
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
did on December 12, 1995 deny the applications for Major
Redevelopment Permit (RP 95-02) and Coastal Development
Permit (CDP 95-02) without prejudice and instructed the
applicant to revise plans, specifications and renderings for
the proposed project to provide for more architectural
relief and then return to the Commission for further
consideration; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for Major Redevelopment
Permit (RP 95-02) and Coastal Development Permit (CDP 95-02)
did revise plans, specifications and renderings to provide
for more architectural relief and did resubmit these
documents to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission for
further consideration; and
WNEREAB, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
did hold a public hearing on April 9, 1996 to consider the
revised plans, specifications and renderings for Major
Redevelopment Permit (95-02) and Coastal Development Permit
(CDP 95-02), as submitted by the applicant, and to consider
the recommendations and hear all persons interested in or
opposed to the subject permits; and
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HRC Resolution No. 276 Page 3
WHEREAS, as result of an environmental review of
the subject project conducted pursuant to the Guidelines for
Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad, a Negative Declaration was issued for the subject
project by the Planning Department on September 19, 1995 and
approved by Design Review Board Resolution No. 240 on
November 1, 1995.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HERgBY RESOLVED, by the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. The Major Redevelopment (RP 95-02) and Coastal Development (CDP 95-02) Permits are
avvroved as shown on the Exhibits **Au - **CW as presented to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on the date of this resolution and on file in the Housing and Redevelopment Department and incorporated herein by this reference. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed development substantially different from this approval shall require an amendment to this approval.
3. The Major Redevelopment (RP 95-02) and Coastal Development (CDP 95-02) Permits are approved as indicated in Paragraph No. 2 above and subject to conditions set forth in Design Review Board Resolution Nos. 241 and 242 approved on November 1, 1995 and with the following additional condition:
"The color of the building shall be changed from white to a more neutral, earth tone color which is compatible with surrounding buildings. The final color for the building shall be approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Director."
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HRC Resolution No. 276 Page 4
4. That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT“
"This time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008."
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a special meeting
of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad, California, held on the 9th day of April, 1996 by
the following vote to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Nygaard, Xulchin, Hall, and Finnila NOES: None
ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13 Ii
14 ;:
l 15’
16
17
la (
19 ii
20
21 ii
0 22 /I
23 '
24
25
26
27 I
28
1
-- EXHIBIT 2,
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO.240
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEWBOARDOFTHEClTYOF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLAMTION
FOR A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 5400
SQUARE FOOT C0lvlMERCIA.L BUILDING ON PROPERTY LiOCATED
AT 660 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE IN SUBAREA 1 OF THE
VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: IKOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORE
APN: 203-304-26
CASE NO: RP 95-02KDP 95-02
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 1st day of November, 1995
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request for a
Negative
Declaration; and,
I WHEREAS, at said public hearing and upon considering all testimony and
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE l’I’ HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
A.
B.
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby APPROVES the Negative Declaration according
to the one page notice and the EIA Part II Form attached hereto and
made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
FindinEs:
1. The Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and
considered Negative Declaration (RP 95-02), the environmental impacts
therein identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to approving
the project. Based on the HA Part-II and comments thereon, the Design
Review Board finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will have
a significant effect on the environment and thereby approves the Negative
Declaration.
. . . .
I
1. :
I
j
I
j
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2s
26
27
28
,-
DRB Resolution No. 240
Page 2
2. The Design Review Board finds that the Negative Declaration (RP 95-02)
reflects the independent judgment of the Design Review Board of the City of
Carlsbad.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of November, 1995 by
the following vote to wit:
AYE!&
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Vice-Chairperson Welshons, Board Members: Compas,
Marquez & Savary.
Board Member Vessey.
None.
None.
KIM iVELSHONS, VICE-CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
A’ITJZST:
Y
EVAN E. BECKER
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTR - 40.241
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 1
MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMlT TO ALLOW FOR THE ’ I
CONSTRUCTION OF A COhtMERCIAL BUILDING AM) RELATED
SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON PROPERTY mATED AT 660 CARLSBAD
VILLAGE DRIVE IN SUBAREA 1 OF THE VILLAGE ,
REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO
APN:203-304-26
CASE NO: RP 9542 I
WHEREAS, Blockbuster Video (“Developer”) has filed a verified application j
with the Housing and Redevelopment Department of the City of Carlsbad which has been
referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Major
Redevelopment Permit as provided by Chapter 21.35 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board, on the 1st day of November, 1995, did hold a duly noticed public hearing to I
consider said application on property described as:
Parcel A: Lots 27 and 28 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of
Carlsbad. County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map
thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, May 2, 1888.
Parcel B-l : The Westerly 50 feet of Lots 3 1 and 32 in Block 38 of the Town
of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to the map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888.
Parcel B-2: The Westerly 50 feet of Lots 29 and 30 in Block 38 of Townsite
of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California
according to the map thereof No. 365, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, February 2, 1887.
. . . .
. . . . . . . . .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.-
DRB Resolution No. &l
Page 2
Parcel B-3: That parcel of land that lies between the Westerly 50 feet and the
Easterly 50 feet of Lots 31 and 32 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad. in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to
the map thereof No. 535 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Diego County, May 2, 1888.
Parcel B-4: That parcel of land that lies between the Westerly 50 feet and the
Easterly 50 feet of Lots 29 and 30 in Block 38 of Townsite of Carlsbad. in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
map thereof No. 365 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, February 2. 1887.
EXCEPT the Northwesterly 5 feet of said Lot 29.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board
considered all factors relating to Major Redevelopment Permit 95M.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design Review
Board as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby RECOMMJZND S APPROVAL of Major
Redevelopment Permit, RP 95-02, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
FINDINGS:
1. The Design Review Board finds that the subject project will have no
significant impact on the environment and has approved a Negative
Declaration for the subject project.
2. The Project qualifies as a Major Redevelopment Permit under Chapter 21.35
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code because the project involves a structural
change which exceeds $50,000.
3. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the various elements
of the Genera1 Plan because it assists in the effort to create a distinct identity
for the Village Redevelopment Area by encouraging activities that traditionally
is
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution N 1
Page 3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
locate in a pedestrian-oriented downtown area, including offices (general and
medical), restaurants and specialty retail shops.
The project is consistent with the City-wide Facihties and Improvements Plan,
the applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility
policies and ordinances since:
a)
b)
a
The project has been conditioned to ensure that building permits will
not be issued for the project unless the District Engineer determines
that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the
project unless sewer service remains available, and the District
Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities
Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to
sewer service for this project.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required
as a condition of approval.
The Developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an
appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that
contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that
public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by
the General Plan.
The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by the Local Facilities Management Plan
prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will
ensure continued availability of public facilities.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as
part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
The project is consistent with the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan
and the Village Design Manual because it will provide for an encouraged use
within Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Project Area. The uses
allowed in this area are the same as those allowed within the C-l, C-2 and R-
P zones, with retail shops permitted by right.
The project is in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code as demonstrated by the processing of the appropriate
discretionary permits, maintenance of compatibility with surrounding land (
uses, and the provision of adequate parking and landscaping.
The Design Review Board has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to
I’
1
2 i;
3
4
5
6.
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14 1:
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 241
Page 4
the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough
proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
GENERAL AND P J&WING/ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:
1. The Design Review Board does hereby recommend approval of the Major
Redevelopment Permit, RP 95-02, for the retail video store project entitled
“Blockbuster Video” as shown on Exhibits “A” - ‘C” on file in the Housing
and Redevelopment Department, dated November 1, 1995 and incorporated
herein by this reference and subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is
authorized and directed to make or require the Developer to make all
corrections and modifications to the Redevelopment Permit Documents, as
necessary to make them internally consistent and conform to the Design
Review Board’s recommended action on the project. Development shall occur
substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed development
substantially different from this approval shall require an amendment to this
approval.
2. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and
local ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
3. The Developer shall provide the Agency with a reproducible 24” X 36”,
mylar copy of the Site Plan as approved by the final decision making body.
The Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the Agency. The plan
copy shall be submitted to the Planning Director and approved prior to
building or grading permit approval, whichever occurs first.
4. The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit
plan check, a reduced, legible version of the approving resolutions on a 24” X
36” blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of
any applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
5. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property
unless the District Engineer determines that sewer.facilities are available at the
time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available
until time of occupancy.
6. The Developer shall pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council
on July 28, 1987 (amended July 2, 1991) and as amended from time to time,
and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to
implement a growth management system or Facilities and Improvement Plan.
If the fees are not paid, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
' 15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_-
DRB Resolution h &
Page 5
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
The Developer shall pay traffic impact fees based on a generation rate of 120
ADT/lOOO square feet. The City Engineer may approve a lesser fee if the
developer submits a study which shows a lower generation rate. The study
must be conducted in a manner approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to building permit issuance, the owner of the subject property shall
execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding drainage across the
adjacent property.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed
construction site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive
approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The Developer
shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may
impose with regards to the hauling operation.
Concurrent with on-site construction and prior to occupancy, the Developer
shall install the following improvements in accordance with City standards:
(a) Removal of the existing driveway apron located on Madison Street and
replacement with sidewalk to match the existing sidewalk
improvements.
(b) Installation of a new driveway apron on Madison Street.
For the installation of these improvements, concurrent with building permit
issuance, the Developer shall obtain a City right-of-way permit.
Prior to the issuance of the Redevelopment Permit, Developer shall submit to
the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County
Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment
Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City
of Carlsbad’s Redevelopment Agency has issued a Redevelopment Permit by
Resolution No. 241 on the real property owned by the Developer. Said Notice
of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file
containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as
any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Housing and Redevelopment Director has the authority to
execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates
said notice upon a showing of good cause by the developer or successor in
interest.
Approval of RP 95-02 is granted subject to the approval of CDP 95-02.
If any of the foregoing conditions fails to occur; or, if they are, by their
terms, to be implemented and maintained over time; if any such conditions
fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the
Redevelopment Agency shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals
1
2'
3
4 I
5
I/
6 /I 7 ::
II a ii 1:
9 j[
‘0 ;
11 /j .
12
Ii 13 ;
Ii 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
is
?6
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 241
Page 6
herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building
permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued
under the authority of approvals herein .granted; institute and prosecute
litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for
their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in
interest by the Agency’s approval of this Resolution.
STANDARD CODE REMINDERS:
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
. . . .
. . . .
The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in
conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s
Landscape Manual. The plans shall be submitted and approval obtained by the
Planning Director prior to the approval of the grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first. The Developer shall construct and install all
landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and maintain all landscaping in a
healthy and thriving conditions, free from weeds, trash and debris.
This approval shah become null and void if building permits are not issued for
this project within 18 months from the date of project approval.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable
sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in
effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically
provided herein.
The project shall comply with the latest non-residential disabled access
requirements pursuant to Title 24 of the State Building Code.
The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required
by Section 10.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first submittal of landscape and irrigation plans shall include building
plans, improvement plans and grading plans.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and
approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on the existing
building so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall pay the local drainage
area fee in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan.
i
I
/
I
!
i
I ,
,
I
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution b’- 241
Page 7
23. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which
will be collected before and/or after the time of issuance of the building
permit. The San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge will be
collected at issuance of application for meter installation.
24. Prior to the preparation of sewer and water improvement plans, the
Developer’s Engineer must meet with the District Engineer for review,
comment and approval of the prehrninary system layouts and usages (i.e.,
GPM - EDU).
25. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall evaluate
building plans for conformance with applicable fire and life safety
requirements of the state and local Fire Codes. The plans must include a site
plan which depicts the following:
ta)
(b)
w
Location of existing public water mains and fire hydrants.
Location of off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
Depiction of emergency access routes, driveways and traffic
circulation for, Fire Department approval.
26. Prior to building occupancy, private roads and driveways which serve as
required access for emergency service vehicles shah be posted as fire lanes in
accordance with the requirements of Section 17.04.020 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of November, 1995 by
the following vote to wit:
AYES: Vice-Chairperson Welshons. Board Members: Compas,
Marquez & Savary.
NOES: Board Member Vessey.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
K&VELSHONS, VICECHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVLEW BOARD
EVAN E. BECKEti
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
I I i I
I
I
j I
I
/ t I I
I
1
1
I?”
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 242
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARDOFTHECITYOF
CAIUSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOhJMENDtNG APPROVAL OF A
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A CGMMERCIAL BUILDING AND REMTED
SITE Ih4PROVEMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 660 CARLSBAD
VIUAGE DRIVE IN SUBAREA 1 OF THE VILLAGE
REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: BJ-QCKBUSTER VIDEO
APN:203-304-26
CASE NO: CDP 95XJ2
WHEREAS, Blockbuster Video (“Developer”) has filed a verified application
with the Housing and Redevelopment Department of the City of Carlsbad which has been
referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit as provided by Chapter 21.81 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board, on the 1st day of November. 1995, did hold a duly noticed public hearing to
consider said application on property described as:
Lots 25 and 26 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 775,
filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 15,
1894.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board
considered all factors relating to Coastal Development Permit 95-02.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution Nc. 242
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
1.
2.
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby APPROVES a Coastal Development Permit.
CDP 95-02, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
FINDINGS:
1. The Design Review Board finds that the subject project will have no
significant impact on the environment and has approved a Negative
Declaration for the subject project.
3 w. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the various elements
of the Local Coastal Program and the General Plan because it assists in the
effort to.create a distinct identity for the Village Redevelopment Area by
encouraging activities that traditionally locate in a pedestrian-oriented
downtown area, including offices, restaurants and specialty retail shops.
3. The project is consistent with the City-wide Facilities and Improvements Plan,
the applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility
policies and ordinances since:
a)
b)
cl
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
The project has been conditioned to ensure that building permits will
not be issued for the project unless the District Engineer determines
that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the
project unless sewer service remains available, and the District
Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities
Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to
sewer service for this project.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required
as a condition of approval.
The Developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an
appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that
contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that
public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by
the General Plan.
I
8 f ,
i
j
I
I !
j
1
I
j
I
1
! 1
I
‘7
c ‘! 1 ‘,
2 t iI
3 //
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No 242 .-
Page 3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by the Local Facilities Management Plan
prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will
ensure continued availability of public facilities.
The project is consistent with the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan
and the Village Design Manual because it will continue to provide for an
encouraged use within Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Project Area.
The uses allowed in this area are the same as those allowed within the C-l, C-
2 and R-P zones, with specialty retail shops permitted by right.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as
part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
The project is in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code as demonstrated by the processing of the appropriate
discretionary permits, maintenance of compatibility with surrounding land
uses, and the provision of adequate parking and landscaping.
The Design Review Board has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to
the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough
proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
CONDITIONS:
1. The Design Review Board does hereby recommend approval of -the Coastal
Development Permit, CDP 95-02, for the project entitled “Blockbuster Video
Store” as shown on Exhibits “A” - “C” on file in the Housing and
Redevelopment Department, dated November 1, 1995, incorporated herein by
reference and subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is authorized and
directed IO make or require the Developer to make all corrections and
modifications to the Coastal Development Permit documents, as necessary to
make them internally consistent and conform to the Design Review Board’s
action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on -the
approved exhibits. Any proposed development substantially different from this
approval shall require an amendment to this approval.
. . . .
” 1
4
5
6 PASSED, APPROVED, AND AD0PPED at a regular meeting of the Design
7 Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of November, 1995 by
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
l 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
DRB Resolution NC ;2
Page 4
_-.
2. Approval of CDP 95-02 is subject to approval of RP 95-02. CDP 9542 is
subject to all conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No.
241 dated November 1, 1995 for RP 9542, the Blockbuster VideoStore
project.
the following vote to wit:
AYES: Vice-Chairperson Welshons, Board Members: Compas,
Marquez & Savary .
NOES: Board Member Vessey.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ah4 WEISHONS, VICE-CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ATTEST:
EVAN E. BECKER
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
!
Li I
P cf) w I 5
w I
co
1 I PUBLIC
PARKING II
CARLS BAD VI LLAG E DRIVE Project Site
-LL / -I I
N
w
+
E
S
GRAND AVENUE
II=
-~ - - 1 EXHIBIT 3 .
CITY OF CARLSBAD
BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORE RP 9502/CDP 95-02
e E
20
EXHIBIT 4
3’ :.
u- :
d
:
--.
--’ ?
j ;,!:I II c =cJ z.:. . 5;;; 1: ; - ulu-,.* 6 -m:. P*r z 0 YI” ..s
- - EXHIBIT 5
VILLAGE MASTER PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
CHECKLIST
Project: Blockbuster Video Store
Provide variety of setbacks along any single commercial
block front
The building to the east of the proposed
Blockbuster Store is built to the public
sidewalk; Blockbuster building is set back from
the sidewalk from 3% to 5 feet. This provides
for a variety along a single commercial block
front.
Provide benches and low walls along public pedestrian
frontages.
Blockbuster has provided for a courtyard area
with benches and raised planters which
provide for low walls. This is provided along
and adjacent to the public sidewalk on CBVD.
Maintain Retail Continuity along Pedestrian-Oriented
frontages
Avoid Drive-Through Service Uses I
Blockbuster Store is a retail operation which
No drive through service included in project.
maintains the retail continuity along CBVD.
Minimize Privacy Loss for Adjacent Residential Uses I No adjacent residential uses.
Encourage off-street courtyards accessible from major
pedestrian walkways
A courtyard area is provided adjacent to the
public sidewalk on CBVD and across the alley
from a public parking lot.
Emphasize an abundance of landscaping planted to
create an informal character
The project provides for landscaped areas
throughout the project. There are landscape
planters, low level ground cover, landscaping
throughout the parking lot and espalier trees
against the back wall of the building (these are
trees trained to grow flat against a wall). All of
these various types of landscaping provide for
an informal character/setting.
Treat structures as individual buildings set within a
landscaped green space, except for buildings fronting
on: Carlsbad Village Drive, State Street, Grand Avenue,
Carlsbad Boulevard and Roosevelt Street
The site plan for the Blockbuster store
provides for a good balance of landscaping
and building but it does not provide for a “park
like” setting which is consistent with this
guideline.
Provide landscaping within surface parking lots
Provide access to parking areas from alleys wherever Access to the parking is provided from the
possible. Alley.
Locate parking at the rear of lots. The parking is provided on the side and in the
rear of the building; this was a compromise to
assist the business in operational needs.
Devote all parking lot areas not specifically required for
parking spaces or circulation to landscaping.
Landscaping is provided within the parking lot
areas.
All areas not required for parking spaces or
aisles or driveways or the trash enclosure have
been landscaped.
Avoid parking in front setback areas
Avoid curb cuts along major pedestrian areas.
Avoid parking in block corner locations
Provide setbacks and landscaping between any parking
lot and adjacent sidewalks, alleys or other paved
pedestrian areas.
Avoid buildings which devote significant portions of their
ground floor space to parking uses.
Place parking for commercial or larger residential
projects below grade wherever feasible.
Enhance parking lot surfaces.
Provide for variety and diversity. Each building should
express its uniqueness of structure, location or tenant
and should be designed especially for their sites and
not mere copies of generic building types.
Step taller buildings back at upper levels.
Break large buildings into smaller units
Maintain a relatively consistent building height along
block faces,
Utilize simple building forms. Trendy and “look at me”
design solutions are strongly discouraged.
4
No parking proposed in front setback.
No new curb cut on Carlsbad Village Drive;
relocating curb cut on Madison,
The Blockbuster Store represents a building
with parking and is not on a block corner.
Wherever possible on the site, setbacks and/or
landscaping were provided between adjacent
sidewalks and/or the alley.
Not applicable to this project.
Not feasible or necessary to place parking
below grade at this site. If this had been
feasible, a larger building would have most
likely been the result.
The parking lot surfaces will be asphalt to
match existing asphalt within the alley. Staff
did not believe that enhanced surfacing was
necessary.
The proposed new design of the building
provides for articulation in the building, varying
roof forms, a tower feature, awnings and other
architectural features. The building is
substantially different from the
standard/generic store constructed by
Blockbuster at other locations within other
cities. The site was taken into consideration in
terms of its constraints and location within the
Village.
Blockbuster has not proposed a very tall
building. However, the building is set-back
from the sidewalk and the roof line has been
varied to reduce any negative impact on
pedestrians.
This is a 5400 square foot building. Recessed
facade areas were used in an attempt to break
the building (visually) into units similar in size
to smaller lot developments.
The height of the building is consistent with the
other building on the same commercial block
as well as other buildings in the immediate
area.
The building has been designed with simple
lines and forms but allows for representation of
the Village character desired for the area.
Zmphasize the use of gable roofs with slopes of 7 in 12
It- greater.
3-rcourage the use of dormers in gable roofs.
Zmphasize wood and composition shingle roofs.
4void Flat Roofs
Screen mechanical equipment from public view.
4void mansard roof forms.
fmphasize an informal architectural character. Building
acades should be visually friendly.
Iesign visual interest into all sides of buildings.
Jtilize small individual windows except on commercial
storefronts.
+ovide facade projections and recesses.
Give special attention to upper levels of commercial
Structures.
%ovide special treatment to entries for upper level uses.
Jtilize applied surface ornamentation and other detail
elements for visual interest and scale.
Gabled roofs and roof features with the desired
pitch have been provided within the project.
No dormers used within the proposed gabled
roofs.
The project provides for a wood shingle roof.
The building does not have a flat roof. It has
varying levels of pitch.
This will be a requirement of the project.
Mansard roof not designed into project.
By adding colorful and a variety of
landscaping, a courtyard area, decorative
paving, and some visual interest to the
building facade, the building appears to be
“friendly”.
The facades which are visible from the street
have been given special design attention by
adding divided paned windows, variation in
facade fronts, glazed tile features and a
varying roof line. To provide some visual
appeal to the rear of the building, the parking
lot is to be landscaped and the back wall will
have espalier trees.
The proposed project provides for smaller,
individual window openings with a divided
pane design.
The building design provides for recesses and
projections which will create some shadows
and contrast. A desirable feature of the design
is the tower entrance. The entryway to the
building is recessed which is considered
desirable in the new Village Design Guidelines.
Proposed building does not provide for an
upper level.
No upper level.
The project provides for some glazed tile
design treatments which will help to provide
more richness and small scale detail to the
building facades. In addition, the applicant is
providing for some planter boxes which add
interest to the project.
2s
.-
?espect the materials and character of adjacent
ievelopment.
Zmphasize the use of the following wall materials: wood
siding; wood shingles; wood board and batten siding;
StUCCO
4void the use of the simulated materials; indoor/outdoor
:arpeting; distressed wood of any type
4void tinted or reflective window glass.
Jtilize wood, dark anodized aluminum or vinyl coated
netal door and window frames.
4void metal awnings and canopies.
Jtilize light and neutral base colors.
Jmit the materials and color palette on any single
luilding (3 or less colors)
‘rovide significant storefront glazing.
4void Large Blank Walls.
Encourage large window openings for restaurants
:ncourage the use of fabric awnings over storefront
windows and entries.
Emphasize display windows with special lighting.
Incourage the use of dutch doors.
The materials and colors proposed for the
building will not conflict with adjacent
developments.
The walls will have a stucco finish.
At this time, none of the noted materials have
been indicated for use.
The windows are clear glass.
The applicant will be using dark (bronze)
anodized aluminum door and window frames.
The applicant has proposed blue fabric
awnings to add color and interest to the
building.
The building will have a white stucco finish,
with a dark wood roof and blue accents in the
form of glazed tiles and awnings.
The colors and materials are limited to stucco
and wood and blue tiles. This will allow the
awnings and flower landscaping to be given
proper emphasis.
The west and south elevations are devoted
almost entirely to display windows and entries.
This is consistent with the design guideline to
devote a minimum of 60% of the ground floor
to storefront glazing.
The south elevation provides for no blank
walls. The west elevation provides for a small
area of blank wall but this will be offset by the
trees included in the landscaping for this area.
The north elevation (or rear of the building) is
a large blank wall. However, the applicant has
proposed to plant espalier trees which are
trained to grow flat against walls; this will
soften the impact of the wall.
Not applicable.
Fabric awnings to be used over windows.
No display lighting proposed at this time.
Dutch doors not proposed and would not work
well for proposed business.
- ?
Utilize small paned windows
If Develop a total design concept.
Provide frequent entries.
II Limit the extent of entry openings.
Avoid exterior pull down shutters and sliding or fixed
security grilles over windows along street frontages.
Emphasize storefront entries.
Integrate Fences and walls into the building design.
II Encourage front entry gardens i Not applicable.
Locate residential units near front property olines and
orient entries to the street.
II Provide front entry porches.
II Provide windows looking out to the street.
)IIe simple color schemes. .
Provide decorative details to enrich facades
Emphasize “cottage” form, scale and character
II Emphasize an abundance of landscaping.
Limit access drives to garages or surface parking areas.
Encourage detached garages which are subordinate in
visual importance to the house itself.
Provide quality designed fences and walls.
’ Divided pane windows being provided which
lends a traditional feel to the building and
reinforces the Village character.
’ All facade design elements are unified.
The Blockbuster operations require close
monitoring of inventory and customers.
Therefore, only one entrance/exit point is
desired by Blockbuster. The corner entrance of
the building was a compromise to “break up”
the storefront to preserve the small scale and
character of the Village.
The entry opening is limited as indicated
above.
The project does not include pull down
shutters or sliding or fixed security grilles over
1 windows along the street frontage.
The storefront entry is emphasized through the
tower feature and the fact that it is recessed
from the street. Also, the entryway is designed
with decorative paving, a courtyard area and
landscaped planters as well as landscaping in
clay pots.
The wall around the trash enclosure on the site
has been integrated in appearance into the
building. No other walls or fences are
i proposed for the project.
Not applicable.
II
~ Not applicable.
Not applicable.
i Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
~ Not applicable. II
-
Visually separate multi-family developments into smaller Not applicable.
components. II
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
SJAJE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
North County Times
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad,
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
March 29, 1996
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at California, this 29th day
of Marrh, lq=lfi
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Notice of Public Hearing --_-________-___--_--- ----
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RP 93-2 / CDP 95-2
BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORE
Pewnil and/of Cc&d D&pmmi Pa&in wmi, you mny liwdbyyouarscmrmLDil!Qpuk~~in dE4vadhlCGtyafcidbndGlyOark’rof#aclt,w~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RP 93=2/CDP 95-2
BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Cartsbad
will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California
at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 9, 1996, to consider an application for a Major Redevelopment Permit
(95-2) and Coastal Development Permit (95-2) to allow construction of a new building for a Blockbuster
Video Store on property located at 660 Carlsbad Village Drive, and more particularly described as:
Parcel A: Lots 27 and 28 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, according to the map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, May 2, 1888.
Parcel B-l: The Westerly 50 feet of Lots 31 and 32 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888.
Parcel B-2: The Westerly 50 feet of Lots 29 and 30 in Block 38 of the Townsite of Carlsbad, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 365, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, February 2, 1887.
Parcel B-3: That parcel of land that lies between the Westerly 50 feet and the Easterly 50 feet of Lots 31 and
32 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to the map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888.
EXCEPT the Northwesterly 5 feet of said Lot 29.
Parcel C: The Northwest 5 feet of Lot 29, Block 38 of the Townsite of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 365, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, February 2, 1887.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Debbie Fountain in the Housing and
Redevelopment Department at 4342935.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit and/or Coastal Development Permit in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s
Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Applicant: Blockbuster Video Store
Publish: March 29, 1996
GRAND AVENUE
PUBLIC
PARKING
Off ice
PUBLIC
PARKING
Bank
Office/Retail
Office
:::::::::i::::::::::/iiiii ::::i: . . . . ::::::::::::r:~::::r::::&::~: :::::::~:::::::::::::::::::: . . . . :::::.:::~:i:i:~::::~:::,:::~: :::::::/:::::::::::::::::::: Zi”‘li”ilililililisi”iii :iiiiiiiQiiisiEiiiiiiiiiii I”i’ii’3’Eili”i”:lisi”ili iiiiiiilililiiiiiiiiiiiiiii BiliBiBIBlil!l!‘ii”:iil: . . . . . . . . . i..iiiiiiiiil . . . . . . . . 1.r: :::::::::::::::::: .,.,_, . . . . . . . . . .1.:.:. I _,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_, ,_,_, .I EIEil.3iiiii!iiii!i:iiiii ::/:~:::::~:/::::: ::::: /:/:i:::::::::::::ii::::: ::~:i:/:::/:i:::::ii::::: ::::::~:::~:::~:i::::~~::: i:l:5i:i:i:i:i:i:~iiiii :::::::::::~:~::::::::::~:::::: ......::::i:::~:::i:~:::: jili”;-i~i-iri-i-iri-iii
~
~~~~~ 0 ffic, :::::::::::::.:::. . . . . . . . . $-Ilii . . . . . . . . . ., ._ iiiii’p’$@;ll’&j~ ~~~ Retai zx:li, : :-:-:::::~::::
Bank
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE Project Site
Office
Retail/Off ic
Restauran
I
Bank
CITY OF CARLSBAD
BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORE I RP 9502/CDP 95-W
CITY OF CARLSBAD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 1996 to consider approval of a Major
Redevelopment Permit (95-02) and Coastal Development Permit (95-02) to allow construction of
a new 5400 square foot commercial building for a Blockbuster Video Store at 660 Carlsbad Village
Drive and more particularly described as:
Parcel A: Lots 27 and 28 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, May 2, 1888.
Parcel B- 1: The Westerly 50 feet of Lots 31 and 32 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office
of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888.
Parcel B-2: The Westerly 50 feet of Lots 29 and 30 in Block 38 of the Townsite of Carlsbad, in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 365, filed in the Office
of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 2, 1887.
Parcel B-3: That parcel of land that lies between the Westerly 50 feet and the Easterly 50 feet of Lots 31
and 32 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to the map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May
2, 1888.
EXCEPT the Northwesterly 5 feet of said Lot 29.
Parcel C: The Northwest 5 feet of Lot 29, Block 38 of the Townsite of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 365, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, February 2, 1887.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing.
Copies of the staff report will be available on and after 1996. If you have
any questions, please contact Debbie Fountain in the Housing and Redevelopment Department at
434-2935.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit or Coastal Development Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public
hearing.
Case File: RP 95-02KDP 95-02
Case Name: Blockbuster Video Store
February 26, 1996
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice Maior Redevelopment Permit
195-02) and Coastal Development Permit (95-02) for a Blockbuster Video Store for a
public hearing before the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
Please notice the item for a Commission meeting on date selected bv Citv Manaqer.
Thank you.
DATE
RANCH0 VISTA NATIONAL i 11381-E Vista Way
Vista, CA 92084
Veblen Vermilyea Veblen Vermilyea 645 Grand Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT John & Nina Gordon 405 Oak Ave PO Box 1055 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Cardiff, CA 92007
Oakley Parker 3215 Maezel Ln Carlsbad, CA 92008
Walker-Gilbert 4350 Highland Dr Carlsbad, CA 92008
-..
GREAT WESTERN BANK 9200 Oakdale Ave Chatsworth, CA 91311
Mark & Mary Gombar John & Barb Gombar PO Box 1667
Carlsbad, CA 92018
John Nobel
7714 Esterel Dr La Jolla, CA 92037
Family McComas 1265 Cynthia Ln Carlsbad, CA' 92008
Bobby Robinson 3081 Madison St Carlsbad, CA 92008
Leon Per1 SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONA BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA 215 N Palm Dr PO Box 230926 PO Box 37000 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Encinitas, CA 92023 San Francisco, CA 94137
John Montalbano Ann Samuels 20 N Raymond Ave Pasadena, CA 91103
Sims 2820 Wilson St Carlsbad, CA 92008
CARLSBAD VILLAGE PARTNER
CARLSBAD VILLAGE PAR
7752 Anillo Way Carlsbad, CA 92009
Sara Morales 305 Date Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008
Richard Madama Vista Mar
PO Box 1481
Carlsbad, CA 92018
MOTEL 6 OPERATING L P John & Mary Grant 750 Terrado Plz #231 Covina, CA 91723
Gilbert Acuna 91 Maynard Ave Newbury Park, CA 91320
Vista Mar PO Box 1481 Carlsbad, CA 92018
Charlotte Thatcher Robert Sonneman PO Box 285 Houston, TX 77001
Lloyd & Barbara McCarthy Family Atkin 549 S 3rd Ave 3565 Trieste Dr La Puente, CA 91746 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Ilario & Marie Manno
3067 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Vera Soto & Inez Apodaca
PO Box 299 Oceanside, CA 92049
Marion Williams 2871 Cottingham St Oceanside, CA 92054
Martha Barker Family Barker
3039 Jefferson St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
_1 C & Margaret Heltibridll" E Reed Adler 383.3 Gaviota Ave Family Shick PO Box 599 Long Beach, CA 90807 Oceanside, CA 92049
Horace Felkins r
George Hreha L Allan & L'Afton Jandro PO Box 431 PO Box 245 Oceanside, CA 92049 Carlsbad, CA 92018
Lyon CALAVERA HILLS DEVELOPME
Copley Carlsbad Lyon 1965 Pratt Blvd 4490 Von Karman Ave Elk Grove Village, IL
Newport Beach, CA 92660 60007
John Grant & Mary Grant Thelma Williams 7173 Obelisco Cir 3162 Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad, CA 92009 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Frederick Wood
Roy Boyer Uno Kaskla
602 S Pacific St PO Box 2794 Oceanside, CA 92054 Beverly Hills, CA 90213
Hoyt Pardee PO Box 748 Pacific Palisades, CA 90272
Daniel Ryan
1727 Oceanside Blvd #A
Oceanside, CA 92054
Frances Smith John Davis III PO Box 864 Carlsbad, CA 92018
Clark & Shelley Knapp
215 W Palm St
San Diego, CA 92103
CARLSBAD EQUITY PROPERTI
2965 Roosevelt St Carlsbad, CA 92008
Leor & Ophira Lakritz
Elisha & Dafn Gilboa
820 W Fletcher Ave Orange, CA 92665
Family Baumgartner
6539 Corintia St
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Nadya Guzelimian
George & Jackye Willis Zaven & Ana Balian
2050 Laurie Cir PO Box 206 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Solana Beach, CA 92075
PETERS 1993 LIVING PO Box 1091 Cardiff, CA 92007
Rosalie Kopp Mary Barry PO Box 764 Oceanside, CA 92049
Lawrence Successor Kelly 640 Grand Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008
Pearson 1296 Rue Saint Martin San Marcos, CA 92069
Gene & Margaret Ray 2959 Jefferson St Carlsbad, CA 92008
Kim Marvin PO Box 4343 Palm Desert, CA 92261
PACKARD BUILDING PARTNER ISRAWI BROTHERS HOME SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN 725 Grand Ave 425 N Arden Blvd 4900 Rivergrade Rd #550 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Los Angeles, CA 90004 Irwindale, CA 91706
i- Frank Vitalie
*I 3037 Jefferson St
- Carlsbad, CA 92008 .
E H S INVESTMENTS CO KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT 5553 Trinity Way PO Box 35910 San Diego, CA 92120 Louisville, KY 40232
Fred & Anne Parker Mat & Venable Morris II GOOD SHEPHERD ASSEMBLY 0
14088 Rue Monaco 3640 Feliz Creek Rd PO Box 1035 De1 Mar, CA 92014 Hopland, CA 95449 Carlsbad, CA 92018
Raymond Kelley Gordon Larsen Harriett Kelley Steve Larsen Nesta Caroline
9917 Gerald Ave PO Box 45000 2040 Lincoln St
Sepulveda, CA 91343 San Francisco, CA 94145 Oceanside, CA 92054
Caroline Nesta 2040 Lincoln St Oceanside, CA 92054
Gerald Bowers Richard Bowers 3199 Falcon Dr Carlsbad, CA 92008
Florencio Rodriguez 67.5 Oak Ave Ca'rlsbad, CA 92008
A & Francisca Gonzalez Mauro & Ramona Flores Hilario Flores 3119 Madison St #B PO Box 80 3145 Madison St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92018 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Stephen & Gina Ruggles Victor & Marie Montanez PROVIDENT BANK PO Box 1352 PO Box 874 PO Box 52085 Carlsbad, CA 92018 Carlsbad, CA 92018 Phoenix, AZ 85072