HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-04-07; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 297; Join Hands Save-A-Life Youth Facility--L- GmaJ
HOUSiNG A’h3 REDEVELOPMENT COMMikON -AGENDA BI
AB# 297 TITLE. --
MTG. 417198 JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY
RP 97-03 DEPT. H/RED
I
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If the Housing and Redevelopment Commission concurs, the action is to ADOPT Resolution No.
295 APPROVING a major redevelopment permit RP 97-03, with variances, for the Join
Hands Save-A-Life Youth Facility, as recommended by the Design Review Board.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
A total of three public hearings were held by the Design Review Board to consider the major
redevelopment permit requested for a new youth facility proposed by the non-profit organization
known as Join Hands Save-A-Life. The new project is proposed for development on three
existing vacant lots located on the west side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block) between Pine and
Walnut . Streets.
At the first public hearing held on November 24, 1997, the Design Review Board reviewed the
original staff report which included a recommendation which would require the applicant to
redesign the proposed project to allow for minimum front and side setbacks and to allow for a
pitched roof on the gym portion of the building. As a result of their review and consideration, the
Board indicated that they would like to review the project again at a future public hearing to
consider findings required to grant approval of the variances requested by the applicant. In
addition to reviewing findings to grant the proposed variances, the Board also requested
additional information on the proposed lighting plan and bicycle rack location.
At the second public hearing held on January 26, 1998, the Board considered findings provided
by staff to allow approval of the following variances for the proposed project.
1.. Front and rear setbacks which exceed the standard range.
2. Front and side setbacks below the minimum of the standard range to zero feet.
3. Gym roof which does not meet the requirement for a 4:12 roof pitch.
4. An off-site loading/unloading area to be provided off Tyler Street at the sidewalk curb for
participants.
Due to the fact that the Design Review Board did not have all members present at the public
hearing on January 26th, a split vote (2-2) resulted in no action being taken by the Board. The
Board continued the hearing to February 23, 1998 to allow for review of the project with the
subject variances by the full Board membership.
At the third public hearing on February 23rd, the Design Review Board again considered the
proposed project and ultimately voted 3-2 (Welshons, Marquez - no) to recommend approval of
the project with the variances requested by the applicant. Following is a summary of the straw
votes taken by the Board on each of the requested variances:
AB# 297
Page 2
t
Variance #I: Front Setback below the minimum range to zero feet. Vote: 4-1, Welshons - No.
Variance #2: Front Setback exceeding the maximum of the acceptable range. Vote: 5-O.
Variance #3: South side setback below the minimum range to zero feet. Vote: 4-1, Welshons - No.
Variance #4: North side setback below the minimum range to zero feet. Vote: 3-2, Welshons, Marquez - No.
Variance #5: Rear setback exceeding the maximum of the acceptable range. Vote: 5-O.
Variance #6: Roof design (no 4:12 roof pitch for the gym portion of the building). Vote: 4-1, Welshons - No.
Variance #7: Off-site loading and unloading area. Vote: 3-2, Welshons, Marquez - No.
For the project to be approved, findings must also be made that the parking standard and the
number of spaces provided to meet that standard are appropriate. In a 4-l vote (Marquez - No),
the Board indicated that the elementary school standard of 1 space per employee with an
adequate loading/unloading area was appropriate for the subject project. In a 3-2 vote
(Welshons, Marquez - No), the Board indicated that the number of parking spaces proposed (3
total) was appropriate to meet the standard.
In summary, the Design Review Board had considerable discussion over the proposed project. In
the final vote, the Board approved a recommendation to the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission to approve the subject project with all of the variances requested by the applicant
subject to approval of the findings set forth within the related resolutions.
The property for the proposed project is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, a Coastal
Development Permit is not required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The Planning Department has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Negative Declaration was issued for the subject project by the Planning Director on September
19, 1997 and made available for public review. No comments were received on the
environmental document. The Design Review Board recommended approval of the Negative
Declaration for this project through adoption of Design Review Board Resolution No. 259.
Adoption of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution approves the Negative
Declaration.
FISCAL IMPACT:
In past years, the City has approved this proposed facility for public facility (acquisition and
construction) funding through the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program. To date, the City has approved the Join Hands organization for $82,000 in CDBG funds
for property acquisition for a new youth facility. The site of the proposed project was purchased
by Join Hands with the noted CDBG funds. In addition, the City Council has approved $197,000
to date in CDBG funds for construction of a new youth facility. An additional $20,000 in CDBG
funds (with a matching funds requirement) was recently recommended for approval by the CDBG
Advisory Committee. If the current allocation is approved, the Join Hands organization will
receive a total of $217,000 from the City of Carlsbad through the CDBG program for a new youth
facility.
AB# 297
Page 3
No expenditure of funds from the City of Carlsbad General Fund or the Carlsbad Redevelopment
Agency is authorized by approval of the subject project. While the project itself will have very little
financial impact on the City or the Redevelopment Agency due to the non-profit status of the
applicant (Join Hands), the project may serve as a catalyst for other private improvements in the
area, either through new development or rehabilitation of existing buildings. The proposed project
does provide for development on a currently vacant, blighted site and will provide for a social/
recreational facility for youths in the neighborhood.
EXHIBITS:
1. Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 295 approving RP 97-03.
2. Design Review Board Resolution Nos. 259 and 260, dated February 23, 1998
3. Design Review Board Minutes, dated November 24, 1997, January 26, 1998 and February
23, 1998
4. Design Review Board Staff Reports, dated November 24, 1997, January 26,1998 and
February 23, 1998, which include a location map and reduced copies of the project plan
exhibits.
II EXHIBIT 1 Ic4
II HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIOi RESOIiUTION NO. 295 I
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A MAJOR
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT (RP 97-03) I
AND REAR SETBACKS WHICH EXCEED THE M
FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS WHICH ARE BEL
A PORTION OF THE ROOF WHICH DOES.NOT
ROOF PITCH AND AN OFF-SITE LOADdVG/
PARTICIPANTS, FOR THE JOIN HANDS Y
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SID
BETWEEN PINE AND WALNUT, IN, LAND USE DISTRICT 5
REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVFiA-LIFE
APN: 204-081-08, 09, 10 ;.’
CASE NO: RP 97-03
8 and February 23, 1998, the
to consider a Major Redevelopment
Permit (RP 97-03), including signage, for”construction o w youth facility on property located on the
and adopted Design Review Board Resolution No.
260 recommending to the Housing &d Redev ent Commission that Major Redevelopment Permit (RP
d Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, on the
date of this resolution held/a duly n d public hearing to consider the recommendations and heard all
Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 97-03); and
ngs granting variances for the front
and rear setbacks whit eed the standard range, front and side setbacks below the minimum to zero feet,
the gym roof whit s not meet the requirement for a 4: 12 roof pitch, and an off-site loading/unloading
off Tyler Street at the sidewalk curb for participants; and
WHEREAS, as a result of an environmental review of the subject project conducted
the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
ental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, a Negative Declaration was issued for the
ect project by the Planning Department on September 19, 1997 and recommended for approval by
esign Review Board Resolution No. 259 on January 26, 1998 and February 23, 1998.
28 . . . .
. . . .
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
lo-
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission as follows: .i
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. /’
2. The Major Redevelopment (RP 97-03) Permit is amroved and thdt the findings and
conditions of the Design Review Board contained in Resolution No. 260, on file in the
City Clerk’s Office and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions
of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
3. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed,
analyzed and considered Negative Declaration (RP97-03), the environmental impacts
therein identified for this project and any comments thereon. The Housing and
Redevelopment Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will have
a significant effect on the environment and thereby approves the Negative Declaration.
The Housing and Redevelopment Commission finds that the Negative Declaration (RP97-
03) reflects the independent judgment of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of
the City of Carlsbad.
4. That this action is final the date this resolutionis adopted by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission. The provision bf Chapter 1.16 of the Car&bad Municipal
Code, “Time Limits for Judicial Review” shall apply:
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT”
“This time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil
Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal
Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate
court not later than the ninetieth day following the’date on which this decision becomes final; however, if
within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by
the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the
time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following
the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record,
if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the
City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carl&ad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008.”
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the ,City of Carlsbad, California, held on the day of
3 1998 by the followind vote to wit:
AYES: .’
NOES: .I’
ABSENT;.
ABSTAJ&:
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Chairman
ATTEST:
RAYMOND R. PATCHETT, Secretary
1
I 2
3
4
5
$
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17'
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28.
EXHIBIT 2
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 259
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT
PERMIT FOR THE JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY, WITH
VARIANCES FOR THE FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS WHICH
EXCEED THE STANDARD RANGE, FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS
WHICH ARE BELOW THE RANGE, A PORTION OF THE ROOF
WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED 4:12 ROOF PITCH AND
AN OFF-SITE LOADING/UNLOADING AREA FOR PARTICIPANTS,
ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT
STREET BETWEEN PINE AND WALNUT IN LAND USE DISTRICT
5 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY
APN: 204-081-08, 09, 10
CASE NO: RP 97-03
WHEREAS, Join Hands Save-A-Life, a California Non-Profit Corporation,
“Developer”, has filed a verified application with the Housing and Rddevelopment Agency of the City
of Car&bad regarding property owned by Join Hands Save-A-Life, a California Non-Profit
Corporation, “Owner”, described as Lots 27, 28, and 29 in Block 31, in the Town of Carlsbad, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 535,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888 (“the property); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Major Redevelopment Permit
and variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the standard range, the front and side
setbacks below the minimum to zero feet, the portion of the roof which does not meet the requirement
for a 4:12 roof pitch and an off-site loading and unloading area for participants, as shown on Exhibits
A-C, dated November 24, 1997 on file in the Housing and Redevelopment Department, “Join Hands
Project RP 97-03” as provided by Chapter 21.35.080 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the November 24, 1997, January 26,
1998 and February 23, 1998, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
request for a Negative Declaration; and,
1
c 2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21'
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-. .
WHEREAS, at said public hearings and upon considering all testimony and arguments,
examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written
comments received, the Design Review Board considered all factors relating to the Negative
Declaration on RP 97-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design Review Board as
follows:
A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review
Board hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration according
to the one page notice and the EIA Part II Form attached hereto and made a
part hereof, based on the following findings:
FINDINGS:
1.
2.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
The Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and considered
Negative Declaration (RP 97-03), the environmental impacts therein identified for this project
and any comments thereon prior to approving the project. Based on the EIA Part-II and
comments thereon, the Design Review Board finds that there is no substantial evidence the
project will have a significant effect on the environment and thereby recommends approval of
the Negative Declaration.
The Design Review Board finds that the Negative Declaration (RP 97-03) reflects the
independent judgment of the Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad.
DREi RESO. NO. 259
PAGE 2
- --
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review
Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 23’d day of February, 1998, by the following
vote to wit:
AYES: Board Members: Compas, Savary & Scheer.
NOES: Chairperson Welshons and Board Member Marquez.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
KIM WELSHONS, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST: ’ I
A/VI>
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RESO. NO. 259
PAGE 3
1
I 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO‘
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21'
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 260
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT, INCLUDING VARIANCES FOR FRONT AND
REAR SETBACKS WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM STANDARD
RANGE, FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS WHICH ARE BELOW THE
STANDARD RANGE, A PORTION OF THE ROOF WHICH DOES NOT
MEET THE REQUIRED 4:12 ROOF PITCH AND ‘AN OFF-SITE
LOADING/UNLOADING AREA FOR PARTICIPANTS, FOR THE JOIN
HANDS YOUTH FACILITY PROJECT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT STREET, BETWEEN PINE AND WALNUT,
IN LAND USE DISTRICT 5 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY
APN: 204-081-08, 09, 10
CASE NO: RP 97-03
WHEREAS, Join Hands Save-A-Life, California Non-Profit Corporation,
“Developer”, has filed a verified application with the Housing and Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Join Hands Save- k- Life, California Non-Profit
Corporation, “Owner”, described as Lots 27, 28 , and 29 in Block 31, in the Town of Carlsbad, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 535,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888 (“the Property); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Major Redevelopment Permit
and variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the maximum of the standard range, the
front and side setbacks which are below the minimum of the standard range, the portion of the gym
roof which does not provide the required 4:12 roof pitch and an off-site loading/unloading area for
participants, as shown on Exhibits A-C, dated November 24, 1997, on file in the Housing and
Redevelopment Department, “Join Hands Project RP 97-03” as provided by Chapter 21.35.080 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did, on the 24th day of November, 1997, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
1
, 2
3
4
5‘
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16'
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27.
28
.
DRB Resolution No. 26~
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did continue said public hearing on the 24” of
November, 1997 to the 26” of January, 1998 for additional consideration on the requested variances;
and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing on the 26” of January, 1998, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be’ heard, the Design Review
Board did continue said public hearing to the 23rd of February, 1998, to consider all factors relating to
“Join Hands Project” RP 97-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design Review Board as
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review
Board recommends APPROVAL of a Major Rebevelopment Permit for the Join
Hands Save-A-Life Youth Facility Project, RP 97-03, including variances for the
front and rear setbacks which exceed the maximum range, for the front and side
setbacks which are below the minimum range, for the portion of the roof which
does not provide for the required 4: 12 roof pitch and for an off-site
loading/unloading area for participants, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
GENERAL AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The Design Review Board has recommended approval of a Negative Declaration for the subject
project and has determined that the project will have no significant environmental impact.
The Project qualifies as a Major Redevelopment Permit with requests for variances under
Chapter 21.35 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code because the project involves new construction
of a building, or addition to an existing building, with a building permit valuation which
exceeds $150,000.
The Project is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, no Coastal Permit is required.
The Project is determined to be consistent with the land use plan, development standards,
design guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth with the Village Redevelopment
Plan and Village Master Plan’ and Design Guidelines, with approval of the following required
findings to allow for variances for no side setbacks, no setback for the front entry, a flat roof
for a portion of the building to accommodate the gym facility, the front and rear setbacks that
exceed the standard range and an off-site loading/unloading area for participants:
a) The application of certain provisions of this chapter will result in practical
1
z 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22.
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No
Page 3
b)
cl
difficulties or unnecessary hardships which would make development inconsistent
with the general purpose and intent of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Plan. A
need has been publicly expressed for additional youth activities within the
community which will provide a diversion to gang activities and other activities
which may have an adverse impact on the community. The Join Hands organization
purchased the subject site in an effort to tnaximize the use of its available funding,
while also locating the project in an area where the need for the facility currently
exists. It would be difficult for the applicant to sell the current site and locate an
alternate site that would be larger and would be still located within the same area
which would accommodate the type of facility that is desired and depicted within
the current plans. The organization has not been able to locate an alternate site
which is financially feasible or acceptable in terms of the proposed land use. The
requested variances are necessary in order for the applicant to construct a youth
facility which is appropriate for the type of programs to be offered to youths within
the neighborhood. The required roof pitch for the gym and the setbacks would not
allow for the appropriate height and length for the basketball court and gym room.
As related to the off-site loading/unloading area, the Board finds that the off-site
location will not impede vehicular traffic or create conflicts with pedestrians. In
addition, the proposed project is located mid-block in an area where vehicle speeds
are lower and the street is wide enough to accommodate the off-site
loading/unloading area. 1
There are exceptional circumstances or conditions unique to the property or the
proposed development which do not generally apply to other properties or
developments which have the same standard, restrictions, controls. The proposed
project represents a unique use with unique circumstances. Because the project
provides for a facility which is not typical in terms of other commercial buildings
in the area, there are certain facility design requirements such as the setbacks and
roof pitch which present a conflict for the applicant in terms of the programs to be
offered within the subject facility. The applicant has proposed a gym which has
minimum size requirements. This is not a typical problem for other commercial
projects in the area. Without the required setback variances, the applicant could not
provide an acceptable basketball court in terms of size. In addition, a pitched roof
on the gym would reduce the total buildable area by 10 to 15 %, which is not
acceptable and would be detrimental to the programs desired by youths within the
area. Because of the nature of the programs to be offered by the applicant, there
are also exceptional circumstances which result in less need for an on-site
loading/unloading area. The participants will arrive at differing times throughout
the afternoon and evening, which is much different than an elementary school
where students are arriving basically at the same time in the morning and leaving at
the same time in the afternoon and creating a much more significant potential for
traffic conflicts. A majority of the participants in the Join Hands programs will be
arriving as pedestrians or bicycle riders. The Board finds that the exceptional
circumstances due to the type of programs provided by the applicant justify a
variance from the subject development standards.
The granting of a variance will not be injurious or materially detrimental to the
public welfare, other properties or improvements in the project area. The reduced
setbacks will not be detrimental because the property to the south provides for a
1
c 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28.
I
DRB Resolution No. 26~
Page 4
commercial, car repair business. The reduced side yard setback will have no
negative impact in terms of noise or other conflicts. In addition, the residential unit
to the north is separated from the subject project by a driveway which is
approximately 25 feet in width, which allows for an appropriate separation between
the new and the existing buildings to the north. As related to the roof pitch, the
variance will not be detrimental because the building as currently designed does
provide for the desired mission style architecture both in materials and proportions.
Pedestrians will see the pitched roof at the front and rear of the building and will
generally not notice that the gym roof is flat in design. Since a significant portion
of the building is designed with the appropriate roof pitches, the flat portion of the
gym roof will not be materially detrimental or injurious to the public welfare, other
properties or improvements in the area. In addition, the limited hours of the facility
operation will reduce any impact on neighboring properties. The off-site loading
and unloading area will have no detrimental impact on surrounding properties due
to the already existing mixed use nature of the land uses within the area.
Employees of surrounding businesses will generally arrive at work prior to the
opening of the youth facility and will leave the businesses prior to the highest
anticipated usage period for the youth facility. The youth facility use hours are at
off-peak hours in terms of commercial compatibility and will provide for closure at
an hour which should have minimal impact on the neighboring residential.
d) The granting of a variance will not contradict Ihe standards established in the
Village Master Plan and Design Manual because those standards were intended to
be somewhat flexible in order to encourage diversity and variety. The Village
Master Plan and Design Manual does recognize that there may be circumstances
under which it is appropriate to grant variances in order to appropriately develop
any given site based on the specific facility needs within the area. As related to the
gym roof, the granting of the variance will not contradict the standards because the
entire front and rear elevations of the building have been designed with the
required 4: 12 roof pitch. Visually, pedestrians will still enjoy a pitched roof view
with the current project design. The combination of flat and pitched roofs allow for
diversity in design which is encouraged by the design guidelines within the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual. In total design concept, the granting of the subject
variances, including the off-site loading/unloading area will not contradict the
standards because the project has been designed in a manner consistent with the
pedestrian orientation which is desired for the area and set forth as an objective of
the Village Master Plan and Design Manual. There is adequate area to the rear of
the proposed building (within the public right-of-way, off of Tyler Street at the
sidewalk curb) to allow for participants to be dropped off and picked up safely
without having a detrimental impact on traffic flow within the area. These
conditions are all consistent with the standards set forth in the Village Master Plan
and Design Manual.
e) The project is in a location where adjacent buildings are setback further than the
permitted standard (range), adjacent buildings are likely to remain, and setting the
structure back to the desired standard will maintain and reinforce the Village
character of the area. The subject property is in a location which has varying
setbacks. To the north, the residential property is setback in the front by
approximately 15 feet. To the south, the commercial property is setback in the rear
1'
< 2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 2~
Page 5
5.
6.
by nearly 77 feet. It is .expected that these buildings will remain for many more
years. The larger setbacks in the front and rear of the building allow for a design of
the building which provides for more articulation in the building, which ultimately
results in a building which is more visually interesting and appealing. The larger
rear setbacks allow for a private outdoor patio and a rear parking lot, which are
both desirable features of the project.
fi The project is in a location which is in a transition area to residential development
and where increased setbacks would soften the .visual transition between
commercial and residential development or would protect the livability of the
residential development. The project is located in a very mixed use area with a
gradual transition into residential. The proposed project serves as a “bridge”
between the uses in terms of the mixed setbacks. The increased setbacks in the
front and rear help to create an appropriate transition from the residential to the
north to the commercial property to the south.
The Project has been determined to be consistent with the land use plan, development
standards, design guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth with the Village
Redevelopment Plan and Village Master Plan and Design Guidelines, with approval of the
findings noted above to grant the requested variances. The following required findings will
allow for the reduced front and yard setbacks, to the minimum of five (5) feet (of the
acceptable range): t
a) The reduced standard will not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties.
The project is located in an area which has a mix of uses, both commercial and
residential. The commercial property to the south has a similar (5 feet) setback.
The residential property to the north is setback approximately 15 feet from the
property line. The reduced setbacks will have no adverse impact on the residential
property to the north or the commercial property to the south.
b) The reduced standard will assist in developing a project which meets the goals of
the Village Redevelopment Area and is consistent with the objectives for the land
use district in which the project is to be located. The reduced standard is necessary
in order to allow the applicant to construct a building which can provide needed
services to the youths of the area. It allows for a more visually appealing design
and assists in the effort to create a gym area which is the appropriate size to
accommodate a boxing ring and related facilities.
c) The reduced standard will assist in creating a project which is interesting and
visually appealing and reinforces the Village character of the area. The project
design is consistent with the guidelines for the Village and the reduced setback
standard in the front will allow for articulation in the building which assists in the
effort to make the building visually interesting and more appealing.
The Design Review Board has found that the applicable parking requirement for the proposed
project shall be the same as that applied to elementary schools, as set forth within Chapter
21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project shall provide for a total of three parking
spaces which meets the applicable standard for elementary schools and will provide a loading
and unloading area at the curb off of Tyler Street, to the rear of the subject project. The Design
1
< 2
3
4
5
6
7.
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 26~
Page 6
Review Board has determined that the loading and unloading area to be provided off of Tyler
Street at the sidewalk curb is acceptable and meets the intent of the applicable parking standard.
The applicable findings, as noted above, have been made in order to grant a variance to allow
the loading/unloading area to be provided off-site.
GENERAL PLAN AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT FINDINGS:
I
2.
The Design Review Board finds that the project, as conditioned herein is in conformance with
the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the following:
4
b)
c>
d)
e)
That the General Plan identifies the “Village” and references the Village Master
Plan and Design Manual as the appropriate land use plan for the area. The project
is consistent with the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan and the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual, effective as of January 12, 1996, with approval of
the requested variances, because it will provide for a land use (youth facility) which
supports the residential units within Land Use District 5 of the Village
Redevelopment Area.
That the existing streets can accommodate the estimated ADTs and all required
public right-of-way has been dedicated and has been or will be improved to serve
the development. The pedestrian spaces and circulation have been designed in
relationship to the land use and available parking. Pedestrian circulation is provided
through pedestrian-oriented building design, landscaping, and hardscape. Public
facilities have been or will be constructed to serve the proposed project. The
project has been conditioned to develop and implement a program of “best
management practices” for the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter
into and/or are transported within storm drainage facilities.
The proposed project will not have an adverse impact on any open space within the
surrounding area. The project is being developed on a vacant lot which has
appropriate zoning for a youth facility. The project is also consistent with the Open
Space requirements for new development within the Village Redevelopment Area.
The proposed project has been conditioned to comply with the Uniform Building
and Fire Codes adopted by the City to ensure that the project meets appropriate fire
protection and other safety standards.
The proposed project is exempt from paying public facilities fees because the
applicant is a non-profit organization.
The project is consistent with the City-wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the applicable
local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
a) The project has been conditioned to ensure that building permits will not be issued
for the project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is
available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service
remains available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the
Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply
to sewer service for this project.
1
I 2.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
h -..
DRB Resolution No. 2~ Page 7
b) All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as
conditions of approval.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The project has been conditioned to pay any new construction tax, or development fees, and has
agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by the Local Facilities Management
Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, which are applicable to
the project. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any applicable requirement approved as part of
the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
The project is conditioned to comply and remain consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual,
adopted by City Council Resolution No.90-384.
The Design Review Board has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained
in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts
caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in
rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
GENERAL AND PLANNING CONDITIONS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The Design Review Board does hereby recommend APPROVAL of a Major Redevelopment
Permit, for the Join Hands Project, including variances for the front and rear setbacks which
exceed the standard range, front and side setbacks which are below the standard range, a
portion of the roof which does not meet the required 4:12 roof pitch and an off-site
loading/unloading area for participants, as provided for in RP 97-03 subject to the conditions
herein set forth. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all
necessary corrections and modifications to the Exhibits and/or other documents to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Developer shall develop
the property substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits for the project
The Developer shall provide the Agency with a reproducible 24” X 36”, mylar copy of the Site
Plan for the project as approved by the final decision making body. The Site Plan shall reflect
the conditions of approval by the Agency. The plan copy shall be submitted to the Planning
Director and approved prior to building or grading permit approval, whichever occurs first.
The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, a
reduced, legible version of the approving resolution on a 24” X 36” blueline drawing.
Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the District
Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer
permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
Prior to the issuance of the Redevelopment Permit, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice
of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the
Housing and Redevelopment Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest
that the City of Carlsbad’s Redevelopment Agency has issued a Redevelopment Permit by
Design Review Board Resolution No. 260 on the real property owned by the Developer. Said
1
c 2
3
4
5
6
7
8.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
DRB Resolution No. 26~
Page 8
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete
project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified
for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director or the Housing and
Redevelopment Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice
which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the developer or
successor in interest.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to
City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director or the
Housing and Redevelopment Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to
the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment
Director.
An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director or
Housing and Redevelopment Director approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect
downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property.
No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such
instance, a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning
Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director.
The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigatidn plan in conformance with the
approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s Landscape Manual. The plans shall be
sqbmitted to and approval obtained from the Planning Director or Housing and
Redevelopment Director prior to the approval of the grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first. The Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved
plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving conditions, free from weeds, trash
and debris.
The first submittal of detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be accompanied by the
project’s building, improvement and grading plans.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new buildings so as to be plainly
visible from the street; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background
color.
The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and local ordinances
in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
The Developer shall construct a six foot (6’) masonry block wall on the north side of the
common property line. The height of the solid block wall shall drop to forty-two inches
(42”) ten feet (10’) from the east and west property line for pedestrian visibility purposes.
The hours of operation for the subject facility shall be 3pm to lOpm, Monday through
Friday, and Sam to 1Opm on Saturday. No youths may remain in the facility after the
noted hours.
The applicant shall ensure that full-time adult supervision is provided at all times during
the hours of operation noted above.
1
c 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- . .
DRB Resolution No. ~LHJ Page 9
16. The applicant shall provide for the installation of permanent bicycle racks as noted on the
preliminary lighting plan submitted by the applicant and dated January 26,199s.
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:
1.
2.
The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within
this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the
proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City
Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
3. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply with the requirements of
the City’s anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formally
established by the City.
4. Prior to issuance of building permit(s), the developer shall file and receive approval of a
boundary adjustment application with the City to merge the three existing lots so that the
project site is situated on one lot.
5. Prior to issuance of building permit(s), the applicant shall obtain a City right-of-way
permit to install driveway aprons in the public right-of-way on Tyler Street.
WATER, SEWER AND FIRE CONDITIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be evaluated
in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands can be met.
The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits, and charges which will be collected
before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego County Water
Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for meter installations.
Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following:
a) Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements. Also obtain
GPM demand for domestic and irrigational needs from appropriate parties.
b) Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water improvement plans, a meeting
must be scheduled with the District Engineer for review, comment and approval of the ,
preliminary system layouts and usages (i.e., GPM - EDU).
This project is approved under the expressed condition that building permits will not be issued
for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the development
determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at the time of
application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be available until tune of
occupancy. This note shall be placed on the project plans.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall evaluate building plans for
1
r 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21'
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,- _-.. - ^.
DRB Resolution NO. 26~
Page 10
conformance with applicable fire and life safety requirements of the stand and local Fire Codes.
The plans must include a site plan which depicts the following:
a) Location of existing public water mains and fire hydrants.
b) Location of off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
c) Depiction of emergency access routes, driveways and traffic circulation for Fire
Department approval.
6. If any of the foregoing conditions fails to occur; or, if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time; if any such conditions fail to be so implemented and
maintained according to their terms, the Redevelopment Agency shall have the right to revoke
or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building
permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the
authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their
compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are
gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the Agency’s approval of this Resolution.
STANDARD CODE REMINDERS:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the
following code requirements.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
t
The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
30.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project
within 18 months from the date of final project approval.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance,
except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
The project shall comply with the latest non-residential disabled access requirements pursuant
to Title 24 of the State Building Code.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance
as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of
Planning and Building.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and
submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning Director.
The project shall comply with recycling collection area requirements pursuant to Section
21.105.060. The recycling area shall be noted on the final plans submitted for applicable
building permits for the project.
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO'
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- ,.*-
1 --
DRE3 Resolution No. 2~.
Page 11
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review
Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 23rd day of February, 1998, by the following
vote to wit:
AYES: Board Members: Compas, Savary & Scheer.
NOES: Chairperson Welshons and Board Member Marquez.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
KIM WELSHONS, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST: ’ t
. l-fl-tnlnzl
Dj!?BE@ FOUNTAIN
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
. ‘
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24,1997
EXHIBIT 3
Page I
* Minutes of: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Time of Meeting: 6:00 P.M.
Date of Meeting: November 24, 1997
Place of Meeting: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Welshons called the Regular Meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The pledge of allegiance was led by Board Member Scheer.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairperson Welshons, Members Compas, Scheer, Savary, and Marquez.
Absent: None
Staff Present: Debbie Fountain, Acting Housing and Redevelopment Director
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
Craig Ruiz, Management Analyst
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
ACTION:
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Motion by Member Marquez, and duly seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Joint Meeting of the
Design Review Board and the Planning Commission on September 17, 1997.
3-O-2
Welshons, Savary, and Marquez
None
Compas and Scheer
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA:
There were no comments from the audience.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. RP 97-03 - JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY - Request for a Major Redevelopment Permit to consider
approval, with a variance for rear and front setbacks which exceeds maximum range, to allow the construction
of a new 9587 square foot youth facility on property located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between
Pine and Walnut in Village Land Use District 5.
Acting Housing & Redevelopment Director, Debbie Fountain, summarized the project as follows: This is a Major
Redevelopment Permit for the Join Hand Youth Facility to construct a 9500 sq. foot youth facility on a vacant lot in
the Redevelopment Area. The property is located on the west side of Roosevelt St., between Pine and Roosevelt,
and contains three lots. A Condition of Approval requires those three lots be made into one lot. The facility will
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 2
provide for a variety of youth sport activities to serve “at risk”, lower income youths of Carlsbad. The site has a
‘commercial auto body shop on the south side and residential on the north side. To the rear, on Tyler St., are
industrial uses which adjoin some residential properties on the south. The project is located in Land Use District 5 of
the Village Redevelopment Area and youth facilities are permitted on a provisional basis. The site is not located in
the Coastal Zone so there is no Coastal Development Permit required. The project is consistent with the Village
Vision, Goals, and Objectives, and provides a place for youths to come and be a part of community events that are
sponsored by this organization. It provides for a comfortable and safe place to workshop, visit, and live, by providing
activities for youths living in that area. Staff believes that youths, and the community, benefit when youths are
involved in constructive activities such as those provided by this organization. This project is consistent with the
General Redevelopment Plan, in that it will provide recreational, civic, and cultural opportunities for youths in the
Village. It does reinforce a pedestrian orientation due to its design and it assists with an effort to create a distinct
identity for the Village which provides a wide variety of activities, including recreational.
There is no specific parking standard for youth facilities so staff recommends that the elementary school standard be
applied. This would provide one parking space for each employee. This facility will employ one full-time employee
and one part-time employee, hence there will be two parking spaces required. The project, as it is currently
proposed, will provide for a total of three spaces; two regular and one disabled. If the elementary school standard is
applied, then this project would meet the parking requirement. It is required that the Design Review Board make the
determination that the elementary school standard is the appropriate standard for this project. Some of the options
that were considered for other parking standards were gyms and health clubs, public assembly, and the high school.
For a number of reasons, staff decided that the options were not as applicable as the elementary school standard,
primarily because of the age group that will be served by this facility. The avera
9
e age of the participants at this
facility is fourteen. Also, this facility will be in a primarily residential area and the ch ldren will walk from home to the
facility. Based on the fact that this is a project focused on “at risk” and low income youth, staff believes the
elementary school standard to be the most appropriate.
This project would have a requirement for the front setback to be within the range of five to ten feet and the project
proposes a setback of zero to twenty feet. The twenty foot setback does not propose a problem and staff is
recommending approval of the twenty foot front setback proposed. However, staff is recommending that the project
be re-designed to allow for a minimum of a five foot front setback which will result in the reduction of the overall size
of the building. If the project is re-designed, the new setbacks under this condition, will range from five to twenty feet.
In terms of the side and rear setbacks, the range is also five to ten feet. The reason a range of setback footage has
been included is that, generally, the larger setback is the most desired but in some cases, especially in cases of
provisional uses, it makes sense to allow the minimum or anywhere in between the minimum and maximum. In the
event that the minimum setbacks are used, there are findings to support the minimums. As proposed, this project
has side setbacks of zero feet. The building is proposed to be built from property line to property line on the sides.
The rear setback range is from 31’3”, to 39’ to accommodate parking, a landscaped area, and some other things that
will require the setback to be that large. Staff is recommending that the rear setbacks be allowed to exceed the
range but again requiring a re-design to allow for a five foot setback on each side of the building. Findings must be
made to grant variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the range and those findings have been made.
Also, findings have to be made to allow the front and side setbacks to be reduced to the minimum of five feet. The
top of the range is considered desirable but five feet is acceptable as long as the findings can be made.
A minimum of 20% of the property must be maintained as open space which includes landscaped area, planter
areas, walkways, balconies, and a wide variety of other like spaces. This project, as proposed, provides for 23.32%
of the site for open space. If the redesign is done, there will probably be a slight increase in the amount of open
space. The desired percentage of building coverage is 60% to 80% and this project, as it is currently designed, has a
footprint coverage of 64.7%. This footprint, however, will be slightly reduced if the project is re-designed as staff has
suggested. The height limit of Land Use District 5, is 30 feet with a 4:12 roof pitch. At its highest point over the gym,
as indicated in the current design, the roof will be 30 feet in height. The project has been designed with pitched roof
features, at the front and rear, but the gym portion of the roof is flat. Staff has recommended that the applicant be
required to re-design the gym portion of the roof so that it meets the 4:12 roof pitch while maintaining the maximum of
30 feet in height. Access to the parking will be from Tyler Street and not from Roosevelt Street. Also, the project is
required to put in a solid masonry wall, between the project and the residential building to the north. The masonry
wall to the north has been included in the proposed design. Regarding the south side of the project, there is an
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 3
existing masonry wall at that location and a new one is not necessary. z
The project has been designed in a manner that is consistent with the City’s design principles and the proposed
signage is consistent with the standards that are desired for the Village character.
This is a Major Redevelopment Permit because the estimated building permit valuation is over $150,000. Because
all of the improvements are already in, the only additional public improvement required of this project is to install the
driveway apron off Tyler Street.
The environmental review was completed by the Planning Department and a Negative Declaration was issued on
September 19, 1997. No comments have been received from the public. This is a non-profit organization and
therefore no tax revenue will be realized.
In conclusion, staff recommends that the Design Review Board recommend that the variances for the front and rear
setbacks be granted, which exceed the maximum standard range and allow the front and side setbacks to be
reduced to the minimum of the acceptable range to five feet (but not to zero). Staff further recommends the approval
of the elementary school parking standard as appropriate for the facility. As a condition of the project, staff is
recommending a re-design to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director. If so desired, the Board
could recommend that the re-design be returned to the Board or the Housing and Redevelopment Commission for
approval, rather than the Director. Staff has recommended that the re-design include the reduction of the footprint of
the building to allow for the minimum 5 foot front and side setbacks and to allow for the change in the roof pitch over
the gym portion of the building to the required 4:12 with a maximum roof height of 30,feet.
Member Compas asked what the youth age range will be at this facility and how many children there will be in
attendance at any one time.
Ms. Fountain stated that the applicant has stated that the average age is fourteen (14) and that attendance ranges
from 20 to 30 at one time.
Member Compas asked Ms. Fountain what problems would arise if the front yard setback is zero and how much will
actually be at the zero setback.
Ms. Fountain replied that the problem is that a deviation from the standard would eliminate the opportunity for
landscaping. However, in this case it would only be a small portion of the overall front of the building (the twelve foot
wide entrance) and there will be at least five feet along the rest of the frontage available for landscaping. The area of
the zero front setback is a total of 12 feet of the frontage, per the plans.
Member Compas asked Ms. Fountain to address the subject of the flat roof over the gym area of the building.
Ms. Fountain replied that the problem is primarily in design. Staff is attempting to discourage the use of flat roofs,
wherever possible, because they would like to see the building have more character. The total design and look of the
building is the primary focus and they want to encourage the builder/developers to put more interest into the roof
lines.
Chairperson Welshons pointed out that the Design Review Manual only refers to minimums, in terms of front yard
setbacks, but does not state that the 10 feet is a “maximum” setback, and asked Ms. Fountain if she could explain
the lack of the term “maximum” for the setbacks. The other sections of the Master Plan specifically say “maximum”
for the setback.
Ms. Fountain responded by stating that it is more than likely an oversight. It is clear that the range for the setbacks is
5 to 10 feet, with 5 feet being the minimum and IO feet being the maximum.
Chairperson Welshons asked Ms. Fountain why the setbacks are fixed at 5 to 10 feet and why can’t there be a front
yard with a 15 foot setback, without having to request a variance.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 4
Ms. Fountain replied that it is possible that a front yard setback could be proposed which is so far from the street that
‘it tends to discourage or eliminate the preferred pedestrian orientation. With that in mind, the range of 5 to 10 feet is
designed to let the developer know that this is the setback range that staff considers acceptable to maintain the
pedestrian orientation. In this particular case, because of the mix of setbacks, it would be acceptable to exceed the
IO feet maximum setback.
Chairperson Welshons inquired as to whether Ms. Fountain’s office has a copy of the facility’s non-profit status on
file.
Ms. Fountain replied affirmatively, and added that they are a recipient of Community Development Block Grant
Funds so they have all of that documentation as well.
Chairperson Welshons also asked if staff had suggested that the facility provide bicycle racks.
Ms. Fountain replied that they had not suggested bicycle racks but if the Board wishes to add a condition requiring
bicycle racks, it certainly can do so.
Given the mixed use in this building, Chairperson Welshons asked if the Fire Department has examined the plans
and set a maximum capacity for occupancy.
Ms. Fountain explained that the Fire Department has reviewed the plan but that a detailed review takes place when
the construction drawings are presented for “plan-check”. At that time, the Fire Department will set the occupancy
requirements for the facility. The Fire Department does not typically make a detehination on the occupancy load
until building permit stage of processing.
Chairperson Welshons asked Assistant City Attorney, Rich Rudolf, if variances require separate action or if they can
be incorporated in the main Resolutions.
Mr. Rudolf stated that it can be done either way. He further explained that, in this case, the variance(s) were
incorporated as a matter of convenience.
Referring to Resolution No. 260, Page 2, Finding No. 4a, Line 22, Chairperson Welshons pointed out that it appears
that the word “side” should be plural and read “sides”, . . .
Ms. Fountain and Mr. Rudolf both agreed that Ms. Welshons’ correction is in order.
Chairperson Welshons further pointed out that Finding No. 5, Page 3, Line 15X./16, of Resolution No. 260, should
have the word “side” added to: ‘I. . .for the reduced front and side yard setbacks, . . .‘I Also, Ms. Welshons directed
Ms. Fountain’s attention to the last line of Condition No. 1, Resolution No. 260, Page 5, Line 23, ‘I. . .shall be
completed to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director.“, and asked her to explain why
Planning Director was not included in the same manner as in Conditions No. 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9.
Ms. Fountain replied that Conditions No. 5 through 9 are of standard wording and usually apply to every project.
However, because the re-design is a request of the Housing and Redevelopment Department, staff felt that there is
no significant reason to require the approval of the Planning Director and determined that the Housing and
Redevelopment Director was the appropriate party to review the re-design.
Chairperson Welshons, referring to Ms. Fountain’s statement that “youth facilities are allowed” and her use of the
word “provisional”, asked Ms. Fountain to explain the use of the word “provisional”.
Ms. Fountain explained that in the Redevelopment Area, the word provisional is used in place of the more commonly
used word “conditional” and it means that there are additional issues that should be reviewed in terms of compatibility
and operations. She pointed out that sometimes the location selected for these types of uses (provisional) are not
always the best location so the Redevelopment Agency will want to look more closely and make sure the use is
compatible with the surrounding uses. Placing a project in a “provisional” category means that the city may require
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 5
additional conditions that would tend to bring the project to a more compatible level. I
Chairperson Welshons inquired as to whether or not any “hours of operation” have been established by the city.
Ms. Fountain stated that there have been no limits set. Staff discussed the issue with the applicant but did not
pursue a condition for limits. She indicated that if the Board so chooses, limits on the hours of operation could be a
condition of approval.
Member Savary asked Ms. Fountain to explain the change in the parking requirement from 3 spaces to 2.
Ms. Fountain replied that the elementary school standard is one space per each employee. The organization has
indicated that they will have 2 employees. The requirement would then be for 2 parking spaces. However, the
applicant has proposed to provide an additional space for “disabled”, in the event they should employ someone with
a disability, or have a youth participant with a disability.
Member Marquez asked if there has been any provision made for parking when a child is being “dropped off” at this
facility and will this create an impact on Roosevelt.
Ms. Fountain responded by saying that there is a potential impact but because most of the youth will be walking from
their homes, staff did not require a “pick-up and drop-off’ area to be designed into the project.
Member Marquez pointed out that a lighting plan was not included in the informatiqn given to the Board and asked
Ms. Fountain if she could explain what the lighting will be.
Ms. Fountain statedithat the lighting plan always comes separately, as a part of the building permit plans, and is
always a standard condition of approval. Further, detailed lighting plans are normally not included in the plans at this
early stage.
Member Marquez asked if it would be possible to convert some of the open space, at the rear of the building, to
parking spaces.
Ms. Fountain replied that it is possible. However, if they were to make that conversion, then they would be faced with
the problem of not being able to meet the open space requirement. It is a very tight area and after many discussions
it has been decided that the configuration, as it has been presented, is the one that will work the best in terms of
access and fulfilling the parking requirement.
Member Marquez stated that the landscaped open space should be on Roosevelt Street, instead of Tyler Street, and
the number of parking spaces increased to accommodate children being dropped off and picked up at the facility.
Chairperson Welshons invited the applicant to address the Design Review Board.
Applicant, Frank Sorino, 3528 Madison Street, Carlsbad, began by stating that he started this youth program seven
years ago, in his garage, because there was no place for the children in his neighborhood to go in the evenings. He
pointed out that on an average of 300 days a year, 25 days a month, and 6 days a week his organization has
provided a place for these kids because this is the only way to keep them out of trouble. In reality, this is more of a
“gang prevention” program because they are primarily trying to reach the “at risk” kids.
Regarding parking, Mr. Sorino stated that he operates this youth program out of his home. He further stated that his
home is located on a very large lot, with 2 other houses, and that there is a combined total of ten automobiles owned
by the occupants of those houses. Even with that many vehicles, Mr. Sorino stated that there has never been a
parking problem because it is rare for any participant to drive and equally rare when a child is “dropped off’. Mr.
Sorino went on to suggest that if parking ever became an issue, the Senior Center parking lot is right around the
corner, it is always empty at night, and would be perfect for any overflow parking at the Join Hands facility. Also,
Tyler Street is almost totally vacant at night and would be perfectly suited for parking to pick up and drop off.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 6
With regard to setback variances, Mr. Sorino pointed out that when they bought this property, there were no set back
‘requirements. He also pointed out that they need every bit of space they can get in order to provide the activities that
are necessary for the success of this program.
Commissioner Savary asked Mr. Sorino how the Join Hands programs are financed.
Mr. Sorino replied that since they are a non-profit organization, they have various sources of income. There have
been auctions, fund-raisers, through various charitable foundations, United Way, and CDBG funds, just to name a
few.
Member Marquez, making reference to Mr. Sorino’s statement that the activities of his organization are geared
toward “gang prevention” and focuses on “at risk” kids, asked Mr. Sorino if Carlsbad really has gangs.
Mr. Sorino responded by saying that Carlsbad certainly does have gangs. He was very clear about the use of drugs,
drive-by shootings, and all of the other activities associated with gangs and drugs.
Member Marquez then asked Mr. Sorino during what days and hours they intend to keep this facility open.
Mr. Sorino answered by stating that the hours of operation will be primarily during the evening hours. Approximately
3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., with the peak hours from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m.
Member Marquez inquired as to other cultural activities they may have planned. I
Mr. Sorino stated that they have an art program and the equipment to conduct classes in video editing. There are
also areas set aside for arts and crafts, computers, study & reading, board meetings, etc. There will also be a body
conditioning area. All of this is in addition to various sports teams, such as basketball, volleyball, boxing, etc. There
will also be a small kitchen where some of the kids will learn to cook.
Member Marquez asked Mr. Sorino if he anticipates holding teen dances at the facility.
Mr. Sorino said that it is possible but it would be a rare event, and suggested that it would probably only happen once
or twice a year.
Member Compas asked what the average age of the participants will be.
Mr. Sorino replied that the average age is between 12 and 15.
Member Compas asked if they have a cut-off age.
Mr. Sorino stated that there is no cut-off age because they occasionally encourage the children to come to the facility
with an older sibling, or a parent.
Member Compas asked how many children Mr. Sorino expected to be on the premises at any given time.
Mr. Sorino stated that he estimates that there will be from 20 to 50 there at any given time.
Member Compas also asked what Mr. Sorino expects the hours of operation to be.
Mr, Sorino replied that they will not open until after school hours, probably at 3:00 p.m.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino to explain why they want to keep the building design the way it is, and
requesting a variance for the side yard setbacks.
Mr. Sorino stated that there is hardship involved, in that when they purchased this property, there were no setback
requirements. He also mentioned that there was quite a bit of confusion regarding the Barrio Specific Plan and when
-
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 7
it was all over, they felt they had not been given the opportunity to defend their property. He further pointed out that
*the neighboring property on the south has an existing 5 foot concrete wall and it does not make sense to erect
another wall 5 feet away from it. That would only serve to create a narrow, dark area that would not only attract trash
but would just be another place in which a kid could get into trouble. He suggested that the project, as a whole,
would look considerably better if they are allowed to build right up to the property line on both the north and south
sides, in addition to making the building more functional.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino how they intend to access the back of the building which houses the boxing
ring and the restrooms, without crossing the basketball court.
Mr. Sorino indicated that the primary access will be from a large sliding door on the Tyler Street side of the building.
There is also an entrance on Roosevelt into the gym and access will be available via the “out-of-bounds” areas on
the basketball court.
Chairperson Welshons also asked if the boxing ring is going to be elevated or at ground level.
Mr. Sorino replied that it will be adjustable.
Chairperson Welshons asked if they intend to have any professional fighters use the boxing ring.
Mr. Sorino responded by saying that they do not anticipate any professional use of the ring. However, he did say it
would be nice if someone like Oscar de la Hoya selected their boxing ring for a prof ssional match with the proceeds
donated to the Join Hands organization. 7
Chairperson Welshons asked if the organization provides all of the sports equipment and where do they intend to
store the equipment.
Mr. Sorino replied that they do provide the equipment and it will be stored in various locations throughout the building.
Chairperson Welshons asked how they intend to keep basketballs from entering the boxing ring if both activities are
occurring concurrently and do they expect to have spectators.
Mr. Sorino stated that they have worked out a routine whereby the two activities create very little conflict. Usually,
the kids playing basketball stop and watch the sparring so there is rarely a conflict. As for spectators, most of the
spectators are usually other kids.
Chairperson Welshons asked if they keep track of their membership and how many of their members are boys and
how many are girls.
Mr. Sorino stated that they are required to keep track of their membership. However, without looking at the actual
numbers, he is not aware of the ratio of boys and girls.
Chairperson Welshons pointed out that there is no indication of shower areas in the current plans and asked why
they have not included showers.
Mr. Sorino explained that at this time, the plans before the Board are preliminary plans and are subject to change.
He assured the Board that there will be showers in this facility. He further pointed out that by the time they are ready
for “plan check”, all the changes will have been made.
Chairperson Welshons then asked if the facility would furnish bike racks.
Mr. Sorino stated that there is room for bike racks.
Chairperson Welshons asked how many adult supervisors would be in attendance, should there be multiple activities
going on at the same time.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24,1997 Page 8
‘Mr. Sorino stated that the main activities of basketball (which requires minimal supervision) and boxing (several
supervisors/ coaches are required and will be present), will take place in the main section of the building. As for a
specific number of supervisors, Mr. Sorino did not specify.
Member Savary asked what activities are geared for the girls.’
Mr. Sorino stated that the girls are very interested in boxing along with physical conditioning, volleyball, and
basketball. Most of the activities at the center are for everyone, regardless of sex.
Paul Longton, Architect, 2909 Mesa Drive, Oceanside.
Member Compas, asked Mr.Longton what problems would be created if the Board does not grant the variances that
are being requested.
Mr. Longton replied that, in his opinion, several problems will result and listed them as follows:
1. By requiring the 5 foot setbacks on the front and side, 15% of the floor space will be lost resulting in:
2
the basketball court will be undersized, in terms of end to end length;
the upstairs space will be significantly reduce the available room for tutoring, computer work,
homework, etc.
2. Not allowing the flat roof will only change the overall look of the building. While the pitched roof
would certainly give the building more character, it is not really necessary because you won’t see a
real difference at street level. The pitched roof would also limit the amount of second story space
available.
Member Compas asked Mr. Longton if he could suggest findings that will support the granting of the variances,
Mr. Longton replied that the neighbor, to the south, has a flat roof and is built right up to the property line. Regarding
the side setbacks; if the building is required to be 5 feet from the property line, a unwanted dismal urban space will be
created and which will require a fence to try to restrict access. It will end up being unused, wasted space and will not
be visually pleasing. Ultimately, if the building is redesigned with all of the setbacks and the pitched roof, what will
result is a “roof design”. The roof will be the dominant feature and that is not seen as a significant advantage.
Member Compas asked Mr. Longton if, with the variances, he intends to build right up against the existing block wall
and Mr. Longton replied affirmatively.
Member Marquez asked if there is a railing around the roof and would he explain that detail.
Mr. Longton explained that it is not a railing but a parapet detailing, in keeping with a Spanish style, and made of a
clay tile material. Additionally, the flat roof will have the conventional cap sheet with the appropriate drains.
Member Marquez asked Mr. Longton to describe the proposed lighting for the site.
Mr. Longton stated that essentially, the lighting will be at the entries and in the parking area which are quite far from
the neighboring structures, but will be adequately shielded.
Chairperson Welshons opened Public Testimony and offered the invitation to speak.
Judy Barber, 2323 Ocean Street, Carlsbad. In response to the question of whether there is a gang problem in
Carlsbad, stated that she has worked with the County Office of Education for 25 years, serving “at-risk” kids. She
went on to say that the referrals she gets are from Carlsbad and, yes, there is a significant gang problem in Carlsbad.
There is a significant problem for “at-risk” kids because they have no place to go. Ms. Barber concluded by stating
that without places like Join Hands, kids will continue to be “at-risk”, and urged the Board to approve this application.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 9
‘Tom Saylin, 502 N. Ditmar St., Oceanside, a former resident of Carlsbad, stated that up until about 5 years ago he
assisted Frank Sorino in his efforts on behalf of the children. He went on to say how worthwhile this project is and
urged the Board to approve this application as presented.
Barry McGrath, 2685 Garfield St., Carlsbad, stated that he is on the Board of Directors of Join Hands, Save a Life,
and has worked in the San Diego County Juvenile Court System. He emphasized the importance of providing
supervised evening activities for children and without them, there will certainly be more problems than there are
today. He stressed that this organization provides supervised activities for the kids and urged approval of the project.
Jorge Alvarez, 3366 Roosevelt Street, Apt. 4, Carlsbad, stated that he thinks kids need a place to go when they have
nowhere else to go and asked the Board to approve this project.
Chairperson Welshons asked Jorge if he also attends the Boys and Girls Club. Jorge answered affirmatively,
Jose Jaime Garcia, 3350 Harding Street, Apt. 11, Carlsbad, stated that the Boys and Girls Club is only open until
6:00 in the evening and after that there is nowhere for the kids to go except to hang around on the streets. He said
the kids get lonely and join gangs. Jose also said that the kids need a place to go at night and asked the Board to let
Frank build this project.
Kathleen Apodaca Marquez, 3345 Madison Street, Carlsbad, stated that until a year ago she was employed by the
San Diego County Office of Education as a gang counselor and now works in 3 area,high schools. She further stated
that she has a problem labeling kids as “at risk” and would rather refer to them as “high potential”. Ms. Marquez
stated that Frank Sorino gives the kids the ability to build their self esteem and he needs a better place to carry on
the work that he and his volunteers are doing. Statistics show that the time of highest juvenile crime is between 3:00
p.m. and 9:00 p.m., and more facilities like this proposed project are needed.
Dominic Sorino, 1560 Sandalwood Lane, Carlsbad, stated that he is Franks father, and pointed out the self sacrifice
that Frank has gone through to accomplish what he has, thus far. Mr. Sorino also pointed out that to deny this
project would be to disappoint a very large number of kids and the community as a whole. Mr. Sorino urged the
Board to allow Frank to continue the work he has started and approve this project.
Magdalena Sagura, 3475 Roosevelt St., Apt. 10, Carlsbad, stated that she has been boxing with Frank for the past 4
years, in a garage. She further stated that there just is not enough room for everyone and they need the building that
is being proposed. Ms. Sagura told of all the good things Frank Sorino does for the kids in the neighborhood and
asked the Board to approve his project.
Charles Moreno, 3565 Madison St., Carlsbad, stated that he is living proof that the kids need the program and
facilities that Frank Sorino provides and wants to continue to provide. He further stated that he has been in and out
of prisons, all of his life, in part, because he had nowhere to go and ended up in trouble. Mr. Moreno went on to say
that he is going to make a special effort to educate the kids so they won’t end up in prison like he did. He urged the
Board to accept the project as presented.
Elizabeth Ramos, 415 Grant St., Apt. 801, Oceanside, stated that she grew up in Carlsbad in a time where there was
no place for kids to go. She went on to say that she is a third year college student and wishes to become a gang
counselor after graduation. Ms. Ramos urged the Board to consider all that Frank Sorino has accomplished and to
help him to continue his work by approving this project.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino to approach the podium and asked him to state specifically, what hours will
best suit the needs of the facility.
Mr. Sorino stated that normal hours are: Monday through Friday, 3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.; Saturday hours are flexible
because they frequently go on field trips instead of staying at the center. However, if they stay at the center, the
hours would probably be from approximately 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. l
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 10
‘Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if he has any objection to a Condition of Approval that states, “. . .
appropriate supervision will be on hand, at all times.”
Mr. Sorino responded that he has no objection to such a condition.
Chairperson Welshons asked if he will provide bike racks and he replied affirmatively.
Chairperson Welshons closed the Public Testimony and asked Ms. Fountain to give her opinion as to the visual
appearance at the south side of the building if the 5 foot setback is enforced.
Ms. Fountain responded that the applicant is correct in his assessment of the appearance of that area if a variance is
not granted.
Regarding the flat roof, Board Member Savaty called attention to Exhibit 5, Village Master Plan Design Guidelines
Checklist, Page 3, Item 4 under “Roof Forms”, and pointed out that the last sentence in the description states that “. .
staff believes that the added “railing” features, together with the effort to add some visual interest, the flat roof is
acceptable for this area of the Village.” She went on to ask Ms. Fountain to comment.
Ms. Fountain stated that staff struggled over this flat roof, in that from a visual standpoint it is acceptable, but from a
redevelopment standpoint, it does not meet the standards.
Member Savary asked Ms. Fountain if, in fact, there are 4:12 pitches on the front and back portions of the roof.
Ms. Fountain replied that there are 4:12 pitches at the front and back, but there is still a flat roof in between.
Member Savary then pointed out that the applicant stated a reason for the need to keep the flat roof.
Ms. Fountain agreed that the applicant has stated a need for the flat roof.
Member Marquez stated that there are several buildings in the downtown area that essentially have flat roofs with
facade treatments around the perimeter of the roof, and asked if some articulation could be added to this roof, that
would allow this project to have the flat roof.
Ms. Fountain replied that the applicant has a number of different options and it is a matter of looking at them to
determine which will be the best for all concerned.
Chairperson Welshons identified the subject for discussion as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The reduction in the building footprint
The 4:12 pitched roof for gym portion of the building
Parking Standard
The 20 foot front yard setback
If the Board decides to reduce the footprint, it can be brought back before the Board for approval, or
it can be approved “to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director” and sent on to
the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
6, The minor corrections to the Resolutions on Pages 2 & 3
7. Establish hours of operation
8. An appropriate statement that there will be adult supervision, on-site, at all times
Mr. Rudolf interjected that if the Board concludes that the elementary school standard is the proper standard for the
parking, the Master Plan and Design Manual does incorporate the standard as stated within the Municipal Code
which is “one space per employee, minimum, with an adequate loading and unloading area”. He continued by stating
that it is his understanding that a loading and unloading area has not been designed into the project. If, he continued,
it is the Board’s finding that the elementary standard should be applied, and the project is to be approved as currently
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 11
designed, another variance would need to be granted to waive the requirement for an adequate loading and
‘unloading area.
Chairperson Welshons stated that this may or may not be the time or place to redesign a project. With that in mind,
this Board can give input to staff and then have the project brought back at a later date.
DISCUSSION ON THE 5 FOOT SETBACK FOR THE SIDE YARDS:
Member Compas stated that the basketball court requires all the space it can get and since there is an existing 5 foot
block wall, he sees no reason why there should be a second wall erected. Therefore, he is in favor of allowing the
building to be constructed right up to the property line.
Member Scheer agreed with Member Compas’ statement and if a finding can be found to permit it, then construction
should be to the property line. He added that this is a special use building and any restrictions placed on the interior
will deter from its ability to work in the way it is intended.
Member Savary stated that while the south setback is being considered, the north setback should also be
considered. For that reason, Member Savary stated that she would be in favor of granting a variance for zero side
yard setbacks, while still requiring a 5 foot wall to be constructed on the north side and keeping the footprint as
presented.
Member Marquez stated that her understanding of the Village Master Plan is that i\ will allow flexibility, in regard to
side yards, and if an applicant makes allowances in other parts of his development, the city will look at allowing the
owner to build to the property lines. She further stated that by imposing the 5 foot setback, the Board would be
creating a nuisance rather than allowing beautification of this project.
ORIGINAL MOTION:
ACTION: Motion made by Member Compas, and duly seconded, to adopt Design Review Board
Resolution No. 259, recommending approval of a Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution
No 260 recommending approval of RP 97-03 to the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission, with variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the range, and
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including a condition to
redesign the project to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director to
provide for a gym roof which meets the requirement for a 4:12 pitch and minimum 5 foot front
and side setbacks.
ACTION ON AND DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENTS:
ACTION: Motion made by Board Member Compas, and duly seconded, to grant an additional variance
to waive the requirement for a minimum 5 foot setback on the south side of the property.
Mr. Rudolf interjected that this variance has not been properly noticed. However, the Board is free to discuss the
motion and if it is the pleasure of the Board, this item will be brought back after proper noticing has been
accomplished.
Chairperson Welshons pointed out that even if the Board approves this amendment, it will have to come back after
re-noticing. She went on to state that since the Board is making a recommendation to the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, it may not be wise to make this decision at this level. She suggested that, other than to
forgive the setback on the south, they should leave the decision of the north side setback to the Commission. Also,
the intent of the Master Plan and Design Manual is to not continue in perpetuity, the same designs already in
existence. Ms. Welshons also stated that if the building is too aggressive in its attempt to house too many activities,
maybe something has to be set aside in order to fit the rest in, including additional parking spaces.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24,1997 Page 12
Motion withdrawn by Member Compas. ,
Member Compas asked for a discussion and straw vote regarding the issues.
1. Zero setback on south side of building:
Yes:
Withholding:
No:
Compas, Scheer, Savary, Marquez
Welshons
None
2. 5 foot setback on north side of building:
Yes:
Withholding:
No:
Compas,
Welshons
Scheer, Savary, Marquez
3. Roof variance for a flat roof:
Member Compas - in favor of the design as presented
Member Scheer - in favor of the design as presented
Member Savary - in favor of the design as presented
,s Member Marquez - in favor of flat roof but would like to see more articulation, uch as dormers.
Chairperson Welshons -withheld
4. Elementary School Parking Standard: Q
Member Compas - in favor of elementary school standard with additional disabled space and drop-off area.
Member Scheer - concurred with Member Compas and asked if there is any way the drop off zone could be
designated by condition or some other method, to be on Tyler Street only, so it would be
away from the residential side.
Member Savary - concurred with Members Compas and Scheer and asked if the drop-off zone could be
incorporated into the disabled parking space.
Member Marquez- in favor of the location of the parking area but feels it is still under-parked and would like
the applicant to work with the City in reaching an agreement to allow the use of the Senior
Center parking lot, when events are held at the youth facility.
Chairperson Welshons -withheld
Chairperson Welshons asked the applicant to return to the podium and asked Mr. Rudolf to explain what has
transpired, regarding the need to re-notice for the variances.
Chairperson Welshons then asked Mr. Sorino if he is in agreement with a continuance to January 26, 1998.
Mr. Sorino stated that he would prefer to continue this item to January 26, 1998, when a full 5 member Board will be
present.
Main motion withdrawn by Member Compas.
5. Front yard setbacks:
Member Compas - prefers a 5 foot setback
Member Scheer - prefers the design as presented
Member Savary - prefers the 5 8 20 as recommended by staff
Member Marquez- prefers the design as presented
Chairperson Welshons -withheld
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 24, 1997 Page 13
*SECOND MOTION:
ACTION: Motion made by Member Compas, and duly seconded, to continue RP 97-03, to the regularly
scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board on January 26, 1998.
VOTE: 5-o
AYES: Welshons, Compas, Savary, Scheer, and Marquez
NOES: None
Chairperson Welshons noted that the next meeting of the Design Review Board will be on December 22, 1997, at
6:00 pm.
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion, the Regular meeting of November 24, 1997 was adjourned at 8:15 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN
Acting Housing and Redevelopment Director
\
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRIT-l-EN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
,
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26, 1998 Page 1
’ Minutes of: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Time of Meeting: 6:00 P.M.
Date of Meeting: January 26, 1998
Place of Meeting: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ,
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Welshons called the Regular Meeting to order at 6:06 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The pledge of allegiance was led by Board Member Savary.
ROLL CALL:
Present:
Absent:
Chairperson Welshons, Members Compas, Savary, and Marquez.
Scheer 1
Staff Present: Debbie Fountain, Housing and Redevelopment Director
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
ACTION:
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:.
ABSTAIN:
Motion by Member Marquez, and duly seconded, to approve the Minutes of the meeting of December
22, 1997, as amended.
3-0-l
Welshons, Compas, and Marquez
None
Savary
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA:
There were no comments from the audience.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
1. RP 97-03 - JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY - A request for approval of a Major Redevelopment Permit to
allow the construction of a new 9587 square foot youth facility. The requested permit includes requests for the
following variances: a) for rear setbacks which exceed the maximum range; b) a portion of the front and the
side setbacks to be reduced to zero feet, which are below the minimum requirement of 5 feet; c) a gym roof
which does not provide for the required 4:12 roof pitch; and, d) an off-site loading and unloading area for
participants. The project is proposed for property located on the west side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block)
between Pine Avenue and Walnut Street in the Village Land Use District No. 5.
Chairperson Welshons asked the applicant, Frank Sorino, to step to the podium and asked him if he was agreeable
to having this item heard even though there were only four Board Members present. Mr. Sorino agreed to have the
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26, 1998 Page 2
item heard with only four members present. I
Acting Housing and Redevelopment Director, Debbie Fountain, presented the staff report, and slide presentation,
and summarized the project as follows: This is the second hearing on this item having been continued from the
meeting of November 24, 1997, so that the Board could consider variances for the project, At the first presentation,
staff recommended that the project be redesigned and some of the variances not be granted. The variances that
staff recommended be denied are the subject of this meeting. As supplemental report, in addition to the original
report, has been given to the Board for consideration. This is a request for a major redevelopment permit and is to
construct a 9587 square foot youth facility on a vacant lot. This property is located on Roosevelt Street, between
Pine and Walnut, and identified as three lots. The facility will provide for a variety of youth sport activities, to serve
at-risk lower income youths of Carlsbad. It is proposed as a two-story building with a variety of different programs
offered within its walls. This project is located in Land Use District 5 of the Village Redevelopment Area and youth
facilities are permitted on a provisional basis, which means the uses are examined, very closely, to ensure
compatibility with surrounding uses. If there are any special conditions for operation required, they can be placed on
the project as one of provisional use. The site is not located in the Coastal Zone so a Coastal Development Permit is
not required. The project is consistent with the Village Vision, goals, and objectives because it does provide a place
for people to come to be a part of community events. In this case, those people are youths. It is consistent with the
General Plan and the Redevelopment Plan. It re-enforces a pedestrian orientation, provides for recreational as well
as civic and cultural opportunities for youths, and it assists with the effort to create a distinct identity through the
design of the building and consistency with the Design Guidelines.
There is no specific parking standard for youth facilities so staff recommends that th
P
elementary school standard be
applied. This would provide one parking space for each employee. This facility wi I employ one full-time employee
and one part-time employee, hence there will be two parking spaces required. The project, as it is currently
proposed, will provide for a total of three spaces; two regular and one disabled. If the elementary school standard is
applied, then this project would meet the parking requirement. It is required that the Design Review Board make the
determination that the elementary school standard is the appropriate standard for this project. Some of the options
that were considered for other parking standards were gyms and health clubs, public assembly, and the high school.
For a number of reasons, staff decided that the options were not as applicable as the elementary school standard,
primarily because of the age group that will be served by this facility. The average age of the participants at this
facility is fourteen. Also, this facility will be in a primarily residential area and the children will walk from home to the
facility. Based on the fact that this is a project focused on “at risk” and low income youth, staff believes the
elementary school standard to be the most appropriate. If the Elementary School standard is accepted, a variance
would have to be granted for the loading and unloading area because there is no room for such an area on-site in the
current design. The applicant has proposed that the loading and unloading area be located off of Tyler Street, to the
rear of the building, but it is also possible that youths can be loaded and unloaded off of Roosevelt Street in front of
the center. Either way, it is off site and a variance would have to be granted in order to have it accepted as meeting
the parking standard.
The front setback requirements are set in a range of five to ten feet. The proposed front setback for this project
ranges from zero to twenty feet. In the original report, staff recommended that the Design Review Board approve the
front setback which exceeded the maximum range, to twenty feet. However, staff recommended a redesign of the
project to have a minimum of five feet on the front setback. As the project is currently designed, about 51% of the
building front is at the five foot setback, 33% is at the twenty foot setback, and 16% is at the zero setback (the
entryway into the building). Under the supplemental report, staff has provided findings for the Board’s consideration,
to be able to grant the variance that would allow 16% of the front of the building to be reduced to a zero front setback.
As proposed, this project has side setbacks of zero feet. The rear setback range is from 31’3”, to 39’ to
accommodate parking, a landscaped area, and some other features that will require the setback to be that large.
Staff recommended that the rear setbacks be allowed to exceed the range but again requiring a re-design to allow for
a five foot setback on each side of the building. The supplemental report provides findings needed to approve the
proposed zero side setbacks. Also, findings have to be made to allow the front and side setbacks to be reduced to
the minimum of five feet. The top of the range is considered desirable but five feet is acceptable as long as the
findings can be made.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26, 1998 Page 3
The project meets the open space requirement; a minimum of 20% of the property must be maintained as open
‘space which includes landscaped area, planter areas, walkways, balconies, and a wide variety of other like spaces.
This project, as proposed, provides for 23.32% of the site for open space. If the redesign were done, there would
probably be a slight increase in the amount of open space. The desired percentage of building coverage is 60% to
80% and this project, as it is currently designed, has a footprint coverage of 64.7%. This footprint, however, would
be slightly reduced if the project was re-designed as staff had originally suggested.
The height limit of Land Use District 5, is 30 feet with a 4:12 roof pitch. At its highest point over the gym, as indicated
in the current design for properties within the roof will be 30 feet in height. The project has been designed with
pitched roof features, at the front and rear, but the gym portion of the roof is flat. If the Board is willing to allow the
building to be constructed with a flat roof, a variance would have to be granted to relieve the project of having to meet
the 4:12 requirement. Findings have been again provided to aid the Board in granting the variance. The applicant
has provided information indicating that if they are required to provide that 4:12 roof pitch, they would not be able to
get the.30 foot height, in the gym, that they need. By their calculations, the pitched roof would reduce the total
building area by 10% to 15%.
Access to the parking will be from Tyler Street and not from Roosevelt Street, Also, the project is required to put in a
solid masonry wall, between the project and the residential building to the north. The masonry wall to the north has
been included in the proposed design. Regarding the south side of the project, there is an existing masonry wall at
that location if a new one is not necessary.
The project as been designed in a manner that is consistent with the City’s design principles and the proposed
signage is consistent with the standards that are desired for the Village character.
This is a Major Redevelopment Permit because the estimated building permit valuation is over $150,000. The
Design Review Board recommendation is required and will be forwarded to the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission. Again, the project is not in the Coastal Zone, so there is no Coastal Development Permit required.
Because all of the improvements are already in, the only additional public improvement required of this project is to
install the driveway apron off Tyler Street.
The applicant will also be required to make a Lot Line Adjustment to convert the three parcels into a single parcel, for
development purposes.
The EIR was completed and the Negative Declaration was issued on September 19, 1997. No comments have been
received from the public. This is a non-profit organization and therefore no tax revenue will be realized.
It is hoped that this project will be the catalyst for other improvements in the area.
Member Savary asked if the flat part of the roof could be seen from the front or rear of the building and Ms. Fountain
replied that it would not be seen.
In reply to a question from Chairperson Welshons, Ms. Fountain responded that the flat roof, however, would be seen
from the sides of the building and the adjacent properties.
Chairperson Welshons stated that she was not aware of a “fee exemption status” (with regard to make
improvements) and asked Ms. Fountain to clarify.
Ms. Fountain replied that it is possible that there is no longer an exemption for “non-profit” and, if so, there will be an
adjustment made.
Chairperson Welshons, while on the subject of non-profit, asked what would prevent an applicant from building under
a non-profit status (thereby avoiding the improvements fees), and when the building is complete, changing its use a
for-profit business.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26, 1998 Page 4
Ms. Fountain stated that there really is not prevention in place. However, if that should ever happen, it would
‘probably be up to Code Enforcement to deal with the problem.
Chairperson Welshons pointed out that the proposed window, on the south side of the building, appears to be so low
that the adjacent building somewhat obstructs it, and asked if that will be corrected.
Ms. Fountain stated that the window will probably have to be raised.
Chairperson Welshons asked if there are any additional city codes that would preclude the facility’s participants from
having a barbecue in the back area outside the building. Ms. Fountain replied that the project was designed to
include the rear landscaped area and the barbecue and it will be up to the Fire Department or the Building
Department to impose any regulations necessary.
Regarding the request for a variance for the rear setback, Chairperson Welshons asked how an applicant could
otherwise have parking, if the maximum setback must be exceeded in order to put that parking in.
Ms. Fountain replied that it would probably be pretty difficult, in most cases, unless the building could be placed in
another position to allow for the parking without exceeding the maximum acceptable setback.
Chairperson Welshons stated that the applicant had mentioned that the Senior Center parking lot could be used for
parking for special events or overflow parking and asked what the City’s position is regarding the use of another
facility’s parking. 1
Ms. Fountain replied that there is no specific policy governing that issue. Generally, public parking lots are available
for use when there are public events. It is suggested, she added, that if a situation like that should arise it would be
expected that one party would contact the other to make sure there will not be any conflicts. Staff would not suggest
that the applicant be required to obtain an agreement from the Senior Citizen Center. Agreements could be made on
a case-by-case basis.
Applicant, Frank Sorino, 3528 Madison Street, Carlsbad, submitted photographs of the property, a petition containing
a large number of signatures in support of the variances and the project as a whole, and a letter from the Carlsbad
Youth Enrichment Services to the Board, a copy of which is on file in the Office of Housing and Redevelopment.
Regarding Chairperson Welshons’ concern about the window in the south wall, Mr. Sorino stated that it will be
recessed and it not up against the wall of the adjacent property.
With regard to setback variances, Mr. Sorino pointed out that when they bought this property, there were no set back
requirements. In addition, he stated that they purchased this property specifically because there were no setback
requirements and although it would be a tight fit, they considered this property to be exactly what they wanted. He
also pointed out that they need every bit of space they can get in order to provide the activities that are necessary for
the success of this program. He emphasized that the gym is an integral part of the overall success of this project.
Member Compas asked Mr. Sorino if, in his talks with the neighborhood residents, he encountered anyone who is
against this project.
Mr. Sorino replied that he had not met anyone who is against it, as yet. He added that he is going to be discussing
the project with others in the very near future. Also, no one refused to sign the petition.
Regarding the proposed basketball court, Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if he knows what the dimensions
of a regulation court are and what will be the size of the court at the youth center.
Mr. Sorino stated that it depends on whether it is a professional, college, or high school court. The professional court
is 100 feet and a high school court is 84 feet. He further stated that the proposed court at the center will be
approximately 71 feet.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26,1998 Page 5
Chairperson Welshons asked why his court is short and why they chose not to turn the building around so they could
‘have a regulation sized court.
Mr. Sorino replied that they considered turning the building around but found that by doing so, the building became
misaligned; the two story portion would be looking into their neighbors’ windows; the sun-deck would be in the shade;
etc. He went on to state that short courts are not unusual and even though their court will be short, it will serve the
needs of the participants.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino to explain the meaning of the following statement that was made at an
earlier hearing. “We are a non-profit organization which is required to maximize the available contributions to the
organization, for the subject facility.”
Mr. Sorino’s response was that he is required to make every attempt to get the most benefit out of the contributions,
from negotiating for the lowest purchase price possible for the land, to building the largest and most functional
building.for the least amount of money.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if he has CDBG money pending to building this facility and if he has to build
this exact building or something smaller.
Mr. Sorino stated that they do have CDBG money pending and that they arrived at the size of the proposed building
because it will accommodate all the activities necessary to meet the needs of the youth of the neighborhood.
Chairperson Welshons asked if the kitchen is going to be a commercial style kitchenland is there going to be a hood
over the stove.
Mr. Sorino deferred to the architect, Paul Longton, to answer that question.
Chairperson Welshons asked what percentage of the participants are male and what percentage are female.
Mr. Sorino was unsure of the exact number but stated that there are many more boys than girls.
Chairperson Welshons asked where Mr. Sorino conducts his soccer program.
Mr. Sorino replied that they use empty fields, parks, etc.
Chairperson Welshons, indicating that membership is free, asked Mr. Sorino what his funding source(s) is (are) for
maintenance of the operation of his programs and what his predictions are for what funds will be necessary for its
maintenance in the future.
Mr. Sorino stated that they have concentrated on raising building funds through charity auctions and other fund
raising activities. Now that they have grant money pending for the construction, they are concentrating on various
fund raising activities as well as securing grants and other public and private contributions for the maintenance. As
for the operating budget, Mr. Sorino estimated their operating costs to be approximately $150,000 annually.
However, those costs will decrease depending upon how much money and/or equipment they receive each year.
Chairperson Welshons asked if Mr. Sorino expects this facility to ever be used by anyone other that youths and
teens.
Mr. Sorino replied that this is strictly a youth facility but that there may be times when adults may wish to attend some
type of exhibition, such as a professional boxing exhibition, or other special event at the facility. Also, if a parent
wishes to come with their child or children, occasionally, that would be acceptable.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if only one full time employee and one part-time employee is all that will be
necessary for adequate supervision.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26, 1998 Page 6
Mr. Sorino replied that there will be volunteers available to assist the paid staff. I
Chairperson Welshons asked how many supervisors would be necessary to adequately supervise the participants if
the facility was filled, or nearly filled, to capacity.
Mr. Sorino stated that on a normal day, no more than two would be required. However, in the case of a special
event, as many volunteer supervisors as necessary would be brought in.
Member Marquez asked where the weight equipment will be located. Ms. Marquez also asked what the ratio of
youths to supervisors will be.
Mr. Sorino indicated, on the exhibit, approximately where the weights will be located. As for the ratio of youths to
supervisors, Mr. Sorino indicated that it will probably be about 11 to 15 youths per supervisor.
Member Marquez voiced her concern for having many activities going on, all at the same time, and not having
enough supervision.
Mr. Sorino pointed out that he has been operating this program for seven years and there is a specific time allocated
to each activity so that the activities don’t overlap each other and give cause for additional supervision. In addition,
Mr. Sorino estimated that it would be unusual to have more than 20 to 23 kids, at the facility, at any given time.
Chairperson Welshons pointed out that the facility is being conditioned to provide appropriate adult supervision, at all
times, and if Mr. Sorino cannot provide the number of attendees, the Board will have to make the determination as to
what the ratio of youths to supervisors will be.
Mr. Sorino replied th& generally no more than two supervisors are required and if there happens to be an unusually
large group, the older teens of the group help supervise the younger kids.
Chairperson Welshons opened Public Testimony and offered the invitation to speak.
Arthur Sternberg, 3156 Harding Street, Carlsbad, stated that he is an adult volunteer and strongly favors the granting
of all of the variances so as to allow this facility to be constructed.
Oscar de la Riva, 3676 Harding Street, Carlsbad, enthusiastically stated his support for the granting of all variances
and the construction of this facility. He emphasized the need for such facilities not only in the barrio but it other areas
as well.
Reverend Tom Sallen, 502 N. Ditmar Street, Oceanside, urged the Board to grant the necessary variances and also
stated how great the need is for facilities, such as this one, for all of our youth.
Dennis Cunningham, 7105 Azalea Place, Carlsbad, reminded the Board that if this issue had come before the Board
before the setback ordinance revision(s), an approval of variances would not be necessary. With that in mind, he
asked that the Board be mindful of that fact and urged them to approve all of the variances so this project can
proceed as proposed.
Juan Flores, 965 Laguna Drive, Carlsbad, urged approval of this project, as a whole. He also assured the Board that
although the basketball court will not be of regulation size, it will be just fine for practice.
Antonio Deo, 677 Magnolia Avenue, Apt “A”, Carlsbad, stated that he has been associated with this program since its
inception, and credited Mr. Sorino for turning his life around. He urged the Board to approve the project so other kids
can benefit from it like he has.
Joe Finnini, 2370 Rising Glen Way, Carlsbad, stated that he is an adult volunteer and urged the Board to approve all
of the variances and to forward their approvals to the City Council so this project can become a reality.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26,1998 Page 7
Paul Longton, 2909 Mesa Drive, Oceanside, stated that he is the architect and in answer to the questions regarding
‘the kitchen, he said that they have not discussed the equipment to date. He stated that he will be talking with the
Building Department and they will do whatever is necessary according to the code. He pointed out that the kitchen is
too small to be used in a commercial way and whether they use any commercial style equipment is yet to be
determined. However, if the city requires a hood to be installed over the stove, then they will install one, regardless
of what style of equipment is used.
Member Marquez asked if it has ever been anticipated that the upstairs area would be used as a dwelling unit and
also if Mr. Longton knows what the occupancy load will be.
Mr. Longton replied that there has never been any mention of using the upstairs as a dwelling unit. As far as the
occupancy load, he stated that he does not know how it will actually be defined but that each room could have its
own occupancy maximums, the total of which would make up the building’s maximum occupancy load.
Seeing no one else wishing to testify, Chairperson Welshons closed Public Testimony.
Chairperson stated that when the Girl’s Club built their facility, they were required to install a very expensive exhaust
hood over their kitchen stove and asked if that was a requirement specific to the Girl’s Club or will that also be
required for this project.
Ms. Fountain stated that she was not involved with the Girl’s Club project, but it is her understanding that it was
always the intention of the Girl’s Club to not only used the kitchen for their own funct’ons, but to rent the facility out to
other organizations and for private parties. It was designed to be more of a comm L rcial type kitchen and therefore
required the exhaust hood.
MAIN MOTIOi’l:
ACTION: Motion by Member Compas, and duly seconded, to adopt Design Review Board Resolution
No. 259, recommending approval of a Negative Declaration and adopt Design Review Board
Resolution No. 260, recommending approval of RP 97-03, to the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, with variances for; 1) the front and rear setbacks which exceed
the range; 2) the front and side setbacks below the minimum to zero feet; 3) the gym roof
which does not meet the requirement for a 4:12 roof pitch; and, 4) an off-site
loading/unloading area to be provided off Tyler Street at the sidewalk curb for participants,
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
Straw Votes and Discussions on each variance and finding were as follows:
Variance #l : Front setback below the minimum range to zero feet.
VOTE: 3-l
AYES: Compas, Savary, and Marquez
NOES: Welshons
Variance #2: Front setback exceeding the maximum of the acceptable range.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
4-o
Welshons, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
None
Finding #I : To allow 51% of the building to drop to a minimum of five feet in front.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
4-o
Welshons, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
None
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26,1998 Page 8
‘Variance #3: Side setbacks below the minimum of the acceptable range.
(A). South Side (zero setback)
VOTE: 3-l
AYES: Compas, Savary, and Marquez
NOES: Welshons
W North Side (zero setback)
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
2-2 (Tie)
Compas and Savary
Welshons and Marquez
Variance #4: Rear setback exceeding the maximum of the acceptable range.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
4-o
Welshons, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
None
Variance #5: Roof Design
VOTE: 3-l
AYES: i Compas, Savary, and Marquez
NOES: Welshons
Finding #2: Parking
(4 Elementary School Parking Standard
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
3-l
Welshons, Compas, and Savary
Marquez
(B) Parking spaces based on the number of employees.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
2-2 (Tie)
Compas and Savary
Welshons and Marquez
Variance #6 Off-site loading and unloading area.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
2-2 (Tie)
Compas and Savary
Welshons and Marquez
Discussion:
Variance # 3(B) Zero setback - north side
Member Savary stated her support for the zero setback because they will be building a security wall to protect the
neighboring property.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26, 1998 Page 9
Member Marquez stated that she cannot support the zero setback because, in her opinion, it will not work well with
rthe neighboring dwelling unit.
Member Compas agreed with Member Marquez and stated his non-support for the zero setback on the north side.
Chairperson Welshons stated that she cannot support the zero setback, because there comes a time when the
Design Guidelines must be upheld, particularly in the event of an emergency, such as a fire.
VOTE: l-3
AYES: Savary
NOES: Welshons, Compas, and Marquez
Finding #2(B) Parking spaces based on the number of employees.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
2-2 (Tie) Motion failed
Compas and Savary
Welshons and Marquez
Member Marquez stated that, based on the testimony, it appears that there will be adult volunteers that will need
parking spaces and she believes that the volunteers should be counted in the number of employees, whether they
are paid employees or not. Also, it is her belief that the Elementary School Parking standard does not apply to this
project. I
Member Compas stated his support for the Elementary School Parking standard. He pointed out that for the vast
majority of the time; there will not be a large enough number of participants to require more than one or two
supervisors and therefore more parking will not be needed. He also pointed out that this is a very worthwhile project
and it is possible that it will not be completed if they are required to provide more parking.
Chairperson Welshons agreed with Member Marquez but added that it appears that there will be parents and adult
siblings that will also use the facility and they will require parking facilities as well as guest instructors and
volunteers. She further stated that she feels that they are definitely not meeting the parking requirements, based on
this evening’s testimony.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
2-2 (Tie) Motion failed
Compas and Savary
Welshons and Marquez
Variance #6 Off-site loading and unloading area.
Member Marquez stated that she had driven by the site at about 3 p.m., this date, and noted that there was only one
parking-space on Tyler Street and none on Roosevelt. She further stated that, in the interest of public safety, there
should be an on-site designated area for loading and unloading.
Chairperson Welshons asked if it is possible to require the applicant to provide a circulation plan that would designate
how children would be safely loaded and unloaded at this site, with the approval of the Housing and Redevelopment
Director.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
2-2 (Tie) Motion failed
Compas and Savary
Welshons and Marquez
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26, 1998 Page 10
Member Compas amended his original motion as follow: c
ACTION: Motion by Member Compas, and duly seconded, to adopt Design Review Board Resolution
No. 259, recommending approval of a Negative Declaration.
VOTE: 4-o
AYES: Welshons, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
NOES: None
DISCUSSION ON THE MERITS OF THE PROJECT:
Member Compas stated that this project should be approved because it is in the best interests of the City as well as
the youth of the city.
Member Savary agreed with Member Compas and stated that this is a needed facility and is beneficial to the city as a
whole. She pointed out that this Board is not the final authority and that the results of these public hearings should
be forwarded to the higher authorities for their consideration and their decision.
Member Marquez stated that she thinks the program is commendable, but, the problem she has is with the design of
the building. She went on to say that she does not think it meets the standards and the parking is going to be
inadequate which will result in impacting an already impacted area.
Chairperson Welshons agreed with Member Marquez but added that she feels that this project is a much too
ambitious in its attempt to satisfy all the activities at one time. She suggested that the project be scaled down to
include only two or three activities, thereby allowing the building to be scaled down so that all of the requirements
can be met. Also, Ms. Welshons pointed out that there are nine (9) different variances or findings that this Board is
being asked to approve and, in her opinion, that is just too much. She stated that she cannot, in good conscience,
approve of that many deviations from the norm and can’t overlook the Design Guidelines by circumventing them.
ACTION:
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
Motion by Member Marquez, and duly seconded, to recommend denial of Design Review
Board Resolution No. 260, RP 97-03, because it lacks adequate parking and an appropriate
on-site loading and unloading area.
2-2 (Tie) Motion failed
Welshons and Marquez
Compas and Savary
ACTION: Motion by Member Compas, and duly seconded, to recommend approval of Design Review
Board Resolution No. 260, recommending approval of RP 97-03, to the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, including all variances, except that variance for the north side
setback, and findings, based on the findings and subjects to the conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 2-2 (Tie) Motion failed
AYES: Compas and Savary
NOES: Welshons and Marquez
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if (in the interest of time) he would prefer that this Board recommend denial,
and send it on to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission, in an effort to break the deadlock, or would he prefer
this item be continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board on February 23, 1998, to
be heard by the full five-member Board.
Mr. Sorino asked what impact a recommendation of denial would have on the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission.
Chairperson Welshons explained that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission would receive the
recommendation for denial, with the understanding that the recommendation is as a result of a deadlocked vote AND
that the Board has acquiesced at the request of the applicant, and there would be no negative impact.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 26, 1998
- .
Page 11
‘Mr. Sorino stated that he would prefer to continue this item to the next meeting of the Design Review Board on
February 23, 1998.
ACTION: Motion by Member Savary, and duly seconded, to continue this item to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board on February 23, 1998.
VOTE: 4-o
AYES: Welshons, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
NOES: None
Chairperson Welshons’announced that the next meeting of the Design Review Board will be on February 23, 1998,
at 6:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion, the Regular Meeting of January 26, 1998, was adjourned at 8:ll p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN
Director of Housing and Redevelopment 1
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
Minutes of:
Time of Meeting:
Date of Meeting:
Place of Meeting:
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
6:00 P.M.
February 23, 1998
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONFERENCE ROOM
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Welshons called the Regular Meeting to order at 6:02 p:m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
None
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairperson Welshons, Members Compas, Savary, Scheer, and Marquez.
Absent: None
Staff Present: Debbie Fountain, Housing and Redevelopment Director
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
Ii
APPROVAL ?F MINUTES:
ACTION: Motion by Member Compas, and duly seconded, to approve the Minutes of the meeting of
January 26, 1998, as presented.
VOTE: 4-O-I
AYES: Welshons, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Scheer
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA:
There were no comments from the audience.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
1. RP 97-03 - JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY - A request for approval of a Major Redevelopment
Permit to allow the construction of a new 9587 square foot youth facility. The requested permit includes
requests for the following variances: a) for rear setbacks which exceed the maximum range; b) a
portion of the front and the side setbacks to be reduced to zero feet, which are below the minimum
requirement of 5 feet; and c) a gym roof which does not provide for the required 4:12 roof pitch; and, d)
an off-site loading and unloading area for participants. The project is proposed for property located on
the west side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block) between Pine Avenue and Walnut Street in the Village
Land Use District No. 5.
Housing and Redevelopment Director, Debbie Fountain, presented the staff report and summarized the project
as follows: This is the third hearing on this item, having been continued from the meeting of January 26, 1998,
so that the Board could consider variances for the project. At the first presentation, staff recommended that
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
the project be redesigned in “r-der to meet some of the setback requirements and roof pitch requirements. At
that time, the Design Review Board instructed staff to take a look at the findings that would need to be granted
for some of the variances related to the front, rear, and side setbacks and the gym roof. Some of the issues
voted upon, at the last meeting, resulted in tie votes and the applicant, Frank Sorino, exercised his option to
have this item continued to this date, in hopes that all five Board members would be present and the tie vote < broken. A recap of the variances before the board are as follows:
Variance #I is for the front setback, below the minimum range to zero feet, which is for the entryway.
Variance #2 is for the front setback which exceeds the maximum of the acceptable range.
Variance #3 is for the south side setback to zero feet.
Variance ##4 is for the north side setback to zero feet.
Variance #5 is for the rear setback exceeding the maximum of the acceptable range.
Variance #8 is for the flat roof over the gym portion of the building.
Variance #7 is for the loading and unloading area to be located off-site.
In addition to the above variances, there are three findings that need to be made, relating to other standards
for the project and they are as follows:
Finding #I is for the front setback to drop to the minimum of the acceptable range which is 5 feet.
Finding #2 is whether or not the Elementary School Parking Standard is the appropriate standard for
parking for this project.
Finding #3 is whether or not the number of parking spaces, that are being provided, meet that parking
standard.
During the last meeting, the Board agreed that the Elementary School Parking Standard is appropriate but did
not agree on the number of spaces that would be required to accommodate the employees as well as the
volunteers. ’ 1
Board Member Scheer addressed the audience and explained that even though he was not present at the last
meeting, he has listened to the audio tapes, read the minutes of the meeting, and has visited the project site.
He also stated that in his research he has consulted the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and after
taking a long, hard look at the project, he is very much abreast of the issues and is ready to cast his vote(s) on
the issues before the Board.
In response to a question from Chairperson Welshons regarding a “PFF (fee) exemption status”, Ms. Fountain
stated that she found that the exemption from the PFF for the applicant is referred to in City Council Policy
#17, and is not affected by the new fee schedule and therefore this project will be exempt from the Public
Facilities Fee, as a non-profit organization.
Applicant, Frank Sorino, 3528 Madison Street, Carlsbad, stated that he had no additional testimony and
wished to withhold any comments for response to public testimony.
Member Compas asked if Mr. Sorino had had an opportunity, to date, to speak with the neighbors.
Mr. Sorino replied that he has spoken to the neighbor on the north side of the property and that neighbor has
signed a petition for approval of the project. As for the neighbor to the south, Mr. Sorino stated that they have
been talking all along and he is waiting for the gentleman to get back to him. Mr. Sorino added that he has
discussed the project with this neighbor and has also given him copies of the designs.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if he now has the documents, verifying his funding sources, to
present to the Board. Mr. Sorino responded by stating that he has some of the documents and subsequently
presented them to the Board for its review.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if funds are available for not only the construction and completion of
the building, but also for operations and he replied that the funds are available. He pointed out that, unlike
some other projects, this project is not borrowing any money at all which is why it has taken so long to get
things started. He also stated that his organization’s goal was to have secured funds in place before the
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
project was started. Having achieved that goal, they are now concentrating on “fund-raisers” for the furnishing
and operational needs of the project.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if he could give more accurate membership numbers and what
percentage of the participants are female.
Mr. Sorino replied that there are 303 members and 25% of those members are female.
Chairperson Welshons opened Public Testimony and offered the invitation to speak.
Cecilia Leonard, 2422 Torrejon Place, Carlsbad, spoke very highly of the applicant and his project and urged
the Board to recommend approval of the project in it’s entirety. ’
Barry McGrath, 2685 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, stated that he is a member of the Board ‘of Directors of Join
Hands Save a Life. Mr. McGrath read a prepared statement (a copy of which is on file in the Office of Housing
and Redevelopment) and asked that the Board reach a majority agreement and recommend the approval of
this project.
Anne Ornelas, 3515 Strawberry Place, Oceanside, stated that she is the current owner of the residential
property located directly north of the proposed project, having inherited the property from her mother. Ms.
Ornelas stated that she is in favor of the project but asked if the organization could be required to provide
security around the building, particularly at night, to make sure that everyone has vacated the premises after
the center closes. She pointed out that the immediate neighborhood is made up of elderly citizens and they
should be afforded that small measure of security.
Member Compas asked Ms. Ornelas to respond to the question of the zero.setback on the north side of the
proposed project. 8 I
Ms. Ornelas responded that she was not quite sure how a zero setback would affect her property and
Chairperson Welshons suggested that she take a few minutes to study the exhibits and perhaps make her
comments later in the meeting.
Sal Velazquez, Board Member of Join Hands Save a Life, 1784 Troy Lane, Oceanside, stated that it has been
difficult to obtain funding because they currently are operating from Mr. Sorino’s garage and implied that
funding would be easier to obtain if and when they have a permanent and adequate facility. He pointed out
that the whole purpose of this project is to save lives and urged recommendation for approval.
In response to the earlier question from Member Compas, Ms. Ornelas stated that she has no objection to the
zero setback on the north side of the project, considering that there will be a security wall on the property line.
Applicant, Frank Sorino, gave a brief history of his organization, founded in 1990, and how they got started and
became a recognized non-profit organization. He also stated that in April, 1994, they found three sites suitable
for this project. They took all of the site information to the Planning Department and were advised that the site
they now own would be the one best suited for their needs. At the time of purchase (June, 1995) there were
no front, side, or rear setback requirements. He further pointed out that had they submitted their applications
in September, 1995, (rather than wait until they had acquired the proper funding) they would not have run into
the problem of setbacks. He pointed out that staff and the majority of the public are in favor of granting the
variances and urged the Board to cast their votes in favor of a recommendation to the City Council. As a point
of clarification, Mr. Sorino stated that the volunteer instructors do not always teach at the facility nor are they at
the facility on a daily basis. Many programs are always conducted off-site, such as sailing (at the harbor) and
the other programs are staggered with many of them conducted after the neighborhood businesses have
closed, thereby, making additional parking available to the volunteers, if necessary. Mr. Sorino firmly stated
that they need every square inch of space (without the setbacks) in order to maximize their effectiveness.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if he could agree to being limited to four “special events” per year and
a requirement that he provide a traffic circulation plan for loading and unloading during those events and he
agreed to the limitation and requirement.
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
Chairperson Welshons then asked staff if there is any indication as to what the capacity of the proposed
building will be.
Ms. Fountain replied that the capacity restrictions will be determined by the Fire Department at a later date,
, during the building plan check process.
Chairperson Welshons asked Mr. Sorino if Join Hands intends to provide van transportation services and if
they currently own a van, where is it parked.
Mr. Sorino replied that they do have a van and it is kept at his home. He also stated that transportation
services are usually used when there are younger children. In this case, the participants are usually in their
early teens and don’t require transportation and Mr. Sorino stated that he does not anticipate a demand for
more than one vehicle.
Seeing no one else wishing to testify, Chairperson Welshons closed the Public Testimony.
MAIN MOTION:
ACTION: Motion by Member Compas, and duly seconded, to adopt Design Review Board
Resolution No. 260, recommending approval of RP 97-03, to the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, with variances for; 1) the front and rear setbacks which
exceed the range; 2) the front and side setbacks below the minimum to zero feet; 3)
the gym roof which does not meet the requirement for a 4:12 roof pitch; and, 4) an off-
site loading/unloading area to be provided off Tyler Street at the sidewalk curb for
participants, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
’ I
Vote on each variance and finding:
Variance #I : ’ Front setback below the minimum range to zero feet.
VOTE: 4-I
AYES: Scheer, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
NOES: Welshons
Variance #2: Front setback exceeding the maximum of the acceptable range.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
5-o
Welshons, Scheer, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
None
Variance #3: South Side (zero setback) below the minimum of the acceptable range.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
4-1
Scheer, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
Welshons
Variance #4 North Side (zero setback) below the minimum of the acceptable range.
VOTE: 3-2
AYES: Scheer, Compas, and Savary
NOES: Welshons and Marquez
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
Variance #5: Rear setback exceeding the maximum of the acceptable range.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
5-O
Welshons, Scheer, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
None
Variance #6: Roof Design (eliminate the 4:12 roof pitch requirement)
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
4-l
Compas, Scheer, Savary, and‘Marquez
Welshons
Finding #2: Elementary School Parking Standard
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
4-l
Welshons, Compas, Scheer, and Savary
Marquez
Variance #7 Off-site loading and unloading area.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
3-2
Scheer, Compas and Savary
Welshons and Marquez
Finding #I To allow 51% of the building to drop to a minimum of five feet in front.
VOTE: 5-o 4
AYES: Welshons, Scheer, Compas, Savary, and Marquez
NOES:. None
Finding #3: Parking spaces based on the number of employees.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
3-2
Scheer, Compas and Savary
Welshons and Marquez
Subsequent Motions:
ACTION: Motion by Chairperson Welshons, and duly seconded, to limit the number of special
events to four (4) per year.
VOTE: 2-3 (Motion failed)
AYES: Welshons and Marquez
NOES: Scheer, Compas and Savary
ACTION: Motion by Chairperson Welshons to require a circulation plan for loading and
unloading at the site.
The motion was NOT seconded and the motion died.
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRIT-I-EN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
ACTION:
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
Motio,~ by Member Marquez, and duly seconded, to require the applicant to enter into
an agreement with an adjacent property owner, to provide additional parking for adult
volunteers whenever necessary.
2-3 (Motion failed)
Welshons and Marquez
Scheer, Compas and Savary
DISCUSSION ON MAIN MOTION:
Member Savary voiced her support for the project with the variances and findings.
Member Scheer agreed with Member Savary and expressed his support for the project.
Member Marquez stated that she cannot support the project because of the design and parking.
Member Compas stated his support for the project calling it very worthwhile and deserving.
Chairperson Welshons stated that she too feels it is a worthwhile program, but cannot support the project
because she feels it should be scaled down and also because there are, in her opinion, far too many variances
to be approved. Chairperson Welshons also reminded the applicant that staff did not originally recommend
approval of the requested variances as stated in the applicant’s comments. Staffs recommendation was for
the project to be redesigned with variances only for those setbacks which exceeded the standard range. The
Design Review Board requested that staff return with findings to grant the variances requested by the
applicant, and it is with the Board’s action on those variances that the project will go forward to the Council with
a recommendation for approval. Chairperson Welshons believes that we have standards and should abide by
them to the greatest degree possible. 1 1
VOTE ON M+IN MOTION:
VOTE: 3-2
AYES: Scheer, Compas, and Savary
NOES: Welshons and Marquez
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion, the Regular Meeting of February 23, 1998, was adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN
Director of Housing and Redevelopment
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
Feb.23,1998
First of all, I would like to thank the Design Review
Board for the time and energy they have given to make
Carlsbad a better community. I realize and I hope the
audience does also that you serve without pay, in a thankless
job.
In terms of the Join Hands project, I would like first
to briefly remind the design review board of the staff's
findings in terms of parking requirements. The staff believed
that the elementary school standard was the appropriate
standard to apply to our project and that a variance should
be granted to allow the loading/unloading area to be provided
off site at the curb on Tyler street. As the staff pointed
out it is a recreation center used primarily by neighborhood
kids who would normally walk or ride their bikfs to the
center.In fact, the average age of the youth is 14 thus few
have driving licenses, and generally don't have the income
for a vehicle or insurance.In addition, the daily activities
are staggered throughout the afternoon and early evening;and
many activities are held at off site locations.
Finally, Tyler Street businesses are closed at 5:00 PM
and Tyler Street provides both a good location, and a safe
place with an adequate curbside area for the few that might
be dropped off. In fact, as the staff has noted 11 a
loading/unloading area could be found to be unnecessary."
Also, as the staff recommended that the elementary school
standard be followed, the three parking spaces would be one
more than is required.
The staff's findings to grant the variance on the front
and to grant the side setbacks to 0 feet would not have been
needed for our project and are in fact ex post facto because
when we purchased our site at the recommendation of the city
planning commission, there were no setback requirements.
However, as member Marquez pointed out imposing a 5 foot
setback on the north and south sides" the board would be
r
creating a nuisance rather than allowing beautification of
this project." Furthermore, no adjacent property owner has
objected to our proposed project and its variances. In truth,
350 mostly neighborhood residents have petitioned the design
review board to approve the variances, many commenting about
the value in having a neighborhood place.for the kids to go
and how a vacant lot would be turned into an attractive and
beautifully landscaped building. As the staff report
(Jan.1998,p. 11) pointed out:
The absence of the side yards is actually a benefit. A five foot setback which is not visually or physically accessible to the public will not benefit the public. Additionally, the area would invite trash and bad behavior which is not desirable for the community. Allowing this setback area to be transformed into usable indoor facility space provides a more appropriate benefit to the community.
A
In addition, the staff indicated that the variances for
the front and rear setbacks were justified because the staff
believed the increased setbacks were consistent with the area
and allowed for ' a design of the building which is more
visually interesting and appealing." Furthermore, the staff
believed the increased setbacks were consistent with the area
and created ' an appropriate transition from the residential
to the north to the commercial property to the south."
In summary, we ask the design review board not to
penalize Join Hands for purchasing a lot recommended by city
planning before the Village Master Plan and Design Manual
were implemented; to value Debbie Fountain and her excellent
staff whose findings supported all the variances; to consider
the wishes of the adjacent property owners who supported all
of the variances; and to respect the 350 signatures of the
neighborhood residents who petitioned for the variances.But
most of all,when one considers that there has been no visible
community objections to the project,we ask the design review
board to join the community by approving a
social/recreational facility for U at risk" youths in the
neighborhood that should provide a catalyst for other
physical improvements in the area,but more importantly, that
will provide daily nurturing for youth who crave the
opportunity to grow and the opportunity for success.
Sincerely,
Barry McGrath
Baord of Directors
Join Hands Save A Life
.EXkilBIT 4 ~
IQ
City of Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Department
A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: FEBRUARY 23,1998
SUBJECT: RP 97-03 - JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY: Request for
a Major Redevelopment Permit, with variances on setbacks, roof pitch
and off-site loading/unloading area, to allow the construction of a 9587
square foot youth facility on property located on the west side of
Roosevelt Street between Pine and Walnut in Village Land Use District 5.
I: RECOMMENDATION 4
That the Design Review Board ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution No. 259
recommending APPROVAL of a Negative Declaration and ADOPT Design Review
Board Resolution No. 260 recommending APPROVAL of RP 97-03, to the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission, with variances for 1) the front and rear setbacks
which exceed the range, 2) the front and side setbacks below the minimum to zero feet,
3) the gym roof which does not meet the requirement for a 4:12 roof pitch, and 4) an
off-site loading/unloading area to be provided off Tyler Street at the sidewalk curb for
participants, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The public hearing on this project was continued from January 26, 1998 to February 23,
1998 for continued review and discussion by the Design Review Board. The original
report dated November 24,1997 and the supplemental report dated January 26, 1998
should be referenced for the details of the subject project. These reports were
previously distributed and, therefore, are not attached to this supplemental report.
Ill. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Department conducted an environmental review of the above described
project, as currently designed, pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the
RP 97-03 Staff Report
February 23, 1998
Page 2
City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration was issued for the
subject project by the Planning Director on September 19, 1997 and made available for
public review. No comments were received on the environmental document. Adoption
of Design Review Board Resolution No. awill recommend approval of the Negative
Declaration for this project to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
IV. CONCLUSION
Staff is recommending approval of Design Review Board Resolution No. 260 which will
recommend approval of the project to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission,
with the following:
1. Findings to grant the variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the
maximum of the range.
2. Findings to allow a portion of the front setback to be reduced to the minimum of the
acceptable range at 5 feet. *i
3. Findingsto grant the variances on the front and side setbacks which are to be
reduced to 0 feet.
4. Findings to grant a variance to allow a flat roof on the gym portion of the building,
rather than providing for the 4:12 roof pitch.
5. Approval of the elementary school parking standard as the appropriate, or
comparable parking standard, for the subject youth facility, with findings to grant a
. variance for the loading/unloading area to be provided off-site at the curb on Tyler
Street (to the rear of the building).
At the Design Review Board meeting of January 26, 1998, the Board took a straw vote
on the following individual decisions to determine majority support prior to approving
Design Review Board Resolution No. 260. The Board is asked to again consider these
individual decisions and then to make a final recommendation to the City Council on
whether or not to approve the Join Hands project with variances. The individual
decisions for variances are as follows:
Variance #I: Frpnt setback below the minimum range to zero feet for the entryway.
Variance #2: Front setback to exceed the maximum of the acceptable range.
Variance #3: South side setback below the minimum range to zero feet.
Variance ###: North side setback below the minimum range to zero feet.
Variance #5: Rear setback to exceed the maximum of the acceptable range.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
February 23, 1998
Page 3
Variance # 6: Flat roof on gym portion of the building; no 4:12 roof pitch for gym.
Variance #7: Loading/unloading area to be located off-site.
Findings required to recommend approval of project, in addition to above variances, are
as follows:
Finding #7: Front setback may drop to minimum of acceptable range of five feet for
51% of the building.
Finding #2: Elementary School Standard is appropriate standard to be applied for
determining parking requirement.
Finding #3: Appropriate number of required parking spaces based on 1 space per
employee is 2 spaces for the subject project; the applicant will provide 3 spaces total
and therefore meets parking requirement.
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
;
Design Review Board Resolution No. 259, recommending approval of the Negative
Declaration
Design Review Board Resolution No. 260, recommending approval of RP 97-03 with
variances.
1
2 I
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10'
11 WHEREAS, Join Hands Save-A-Life, California Non-Profit Corporation,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 260
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOivlMENDING APPROVAL OF A
MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PEIWIT, INCLUDING VARIAiiCES FOR
FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
STAeNDARD RANGE, FROtiT AND SIDE SETBACKS WHICH ARE
BELOW THE STANDARD RANGE, A PORTION OF TF ROOF
WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED 4:12 ROOF PITCH AND
AN OFF-SITE LOADING/UiVLOADING AREA FOR PARTICIPANTS,
FOR THE JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY PROJECT ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT
STREET, BETWEEN PINE AND WALNUT, IN LAND USE DISTRICT
5 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY
APN: 204-OSl-OS, 09, 10
CASE NO: RP 97-03
“Developer”, has filed a verified application with the Housing and Redevelopment Agency of
1 1
the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Join Hands Save-AiLife, California Non-
Profit Cbrporation, “Owner”, described as Lots 27, 28 , and 29 in Block 31, in the Town of
Carlsbad, in the City of CarIsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2,
1888 (“the Property); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Major Redevelopment
Permit and variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the maximum of the standard
range, the front and side setbacks which are below the minimum of the standard range, the
portion of the gym roof which does not provide the required 4: 12 roof pitch and an off-site
loading/unloading area for participants, as shown on Exhibits A-C, dated November 24, 1997
on file in the Housing and Redevelopment Department, “Join Hands Project RP 97-03” as
provided by Chapter 21.35.080 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
1
2 c
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
DRB Resolution No. 7y)
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did, on the 24th day of November,
1997, hold a duly noticed public hearin g as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did continue said public hearing on the
24”’ of November, 1997 to the 26* of January, 199s for additional consideration on the
requested variances; and .
WHEREAS, at said public hearing on the 26” of January, 199S, upon hearing
and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said
Board considered all factors relating to “Join Hands Project RP 97-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design Review
Board as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public bearing, the Design
Review Board RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of a Major Redevelopment
Permit for the Join Hands Save-A-Life Youth Facility Project, RP 97-03, t including variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the
maximum range, for the front and side setbacks which are below the
minimum range, for the portion of the roof which does not provide for the
required 4: 12 roof pitch and for an off-site loading/unloading area for
participants, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
GENERAL AND REDEVELOPkIENT PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The Design Review Board has recommended approval of a Negative
Declaration for the subject project and has determined that the project will have
no significant environmental impact.
The Project qualifies as a Major Redevelopment Permit with requests for
variances under Chapter 21.35 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code because the
project involves new construction of a building , or addition to an existing
building, with a building permit valuation which exceeds $150,000.
The Project is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, no Coastal
Permit is required.
The Project is determined to be consistent with the land use plan, deveropment
standards, design guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth with the
Village Redevelopment Plan and Village Master Plan and Design Guidelines,
r
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22'
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. ?“”
Page 3
with approval of the following required findings to allow for variances for 110
side setbacks, rzo setback for the from entry, a Jar rooffor a portiojl of the
building to accommodate the gym facility, the front and rear setbacks that
e.xeed the standard range and an off-site Loading/unloading area for
participants:
a) The application of certain provisions of this chapter will result in practical
difficulties or unnecessary hardships which would make development
inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Carlsbad Village
Redevelopment Plan. A need has been publicly expressed’for additional
youth activities within the community which will provide a diversion to
gang activities and other activities which may have an adverse impact on
the community. The Join Hands organization purchased the subject site in
an effort to maximize the use of its available funding, while also locating
the project in an area where the need for the facility currently exists. It
would be difficult for the applicant to sell the current site and locate an
alternate site that would be larger and would be still located within the
same area which would accommodate the type of facility that is desired and
depicted within the current plans. The organization has not been able to
locate an alternate site which is financially feasible or acceptable in terms
of the proposed land use. The requested variances are necessary in order
for the applicant to construct a youth facility which is appropriate for the
type of programs to be offered to youths within th$ neighborhood. The
required roof pitch for the gym and the setbacks would not allow for the
appropriate height and length for the basketball court and gym room. As < related to the off-site loading/unloading area, the Board finds that the off-
site location will not impede vehicular traffic or create conflicts with
pedestrians. In addition, the proposed project is located mid-block in an
area where vehicle speeds are lower and the street is wide enough to
accommodate the off-site loading/unloading area.
b) There are exceptional circumstances or conditions unique to the property or
the proposed development which do not generaiiy apply to other properties
or developments which have the same standard, restrictions, controls. The
proposed project represents a unique use with unique circumstances.
Because the project provides for a facility which is not typical in terms of
other commercial buildings in the area, there are certain facility design
requirements such as the setbacks and roof pitch which present a conflict
for the applicant in terms of the programs to be offered within the subject
facility. The applicant has proposed a gym which has minimum size
requirements. This is not a typical problem for other commercial projects
in the area. Without the required setback variances, the applicant could not
provide an acceptable basketball court in terms of size. In addition, a
pitched roof on the gym would reduce the total buildable area by 10 to
15 %, which is not ,acceptable and would be detrimental to the programs
desired by youths within the area. Because of the nature of the programs to
be offered by the applicant, there are also exceptional circumstances which
result in less need for an on-site loading/unloading area. The participants
will arrive at differing times throughout the afternoon and evening, which
1
2 r
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 20)
Pngc 4
d
d)
is much different than an elementary school where students are arriving
basically at the same time in the morning and leaving at the same time in
the afternoon and creating a much more significant potential for traffic
conflicts. A majority of the participants in the Join Hands programs will be
arriving as pedestrians or bicycle riders. The Board finds that the
exceptional circumstances due to the type of programs provided by the
applicant justify a variance from the subject development standards.
The granting of a variance will not be injurious or materially detrimental to
the public welfare, other properties or improvements in the project area.
The reduced setbacks will not be detrimental because the property to the
south provides for a commercial, car repair business. The reduced side
yard setback will have no negative impact in terms of noise or other
conflicts. In addition, the residential unit to the north is separated from the
subject project by a driveway which is approximately 25 feet in width,
which allows for an appropriate separation between the new and the
existing buildings to the north. As related to the roof pitch, the variance
will not be detrimental because the building as currently designed does
provide for the desired mission style architecture both in materials and
proportions. Pedestrians will see the pitched roof at the front and rear of
the building and will generally not notice that the gym roof is flat in design.
Since a significant portion of the building is designed with the appropriate
roof pitches, the flat portion of the gym roof will ,I-@ be materially
detrimental or injurious to the public welfare, other properties or
improvements in the area. In addition, the limited hours of the facility
operation will reduce any impact on neighboring properties. The off-site
loading and unloading area will have no detrimental impact on surrounding
properties due to the already existing mixed use nature of the land uses
within the area. Employees of surrounding businesses will generally arrive
at work prior to the opening of the youth facility and will leave the
businesses prior to the highest anticipated.usage period for the youth
facility, The youth facility use hours are at off-peak hours in terms of
commercial compatibility and will provide for closure at an hour which
should have minimal impact on the neighboring residential.
The granting of a variance will not contradict the standards established in
the Village Master Plan and Design Manual because those standards were
intended to be somewhat flexible in order to encourage diversity and
variety. The Village Master Plan and Design Manual does recognize that
there may be circumstances under which it is appropriate to grant variances
in order to appropriately develop any given site based on the specific
facility needs within the area. As related to the gym roof, the granting Of
the variance will not contradict the standards because the entire front and
rear elevations of the building have been designed with the required 4: 12
roof pitch. Visually, pedestrians will still enjoy a pitched roof view with the
current project design. The combination of flat and pitched roofs allow for
diversity in design which is encouraged by the design guidelines within the
Village Master Plan and Design Manual, In total design concept, the
granting of the subject variances, including the off-site loading/unloading
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 2-
Page 5
area will not contradict the standards because the project has been designed
in a manner consistent with the pedestrian orientation which is desired for
the area and set forth as an objective of the Village Master Plan and Design
Manual. There is adequate area to the rear of the proposed building (within
the public right-of-way, off of Tyler Street at the sidewalk curb) to allow
for participants to be dropped off and picked up safely without having a
detrimental impact on traffic flow within the area. These conditions are all
consistent with the standards set forth in the Village Master Plan and
Design Manual.
e) The project is in a location where adjacent buildings are setback further
than the permitted standard (range), adjacent buiIdings are likely to remain,
and setting the structure back to the desired standard will maintain and
reinforce the Village character of the area. The subject property is in a
location which has varying setbacks. To the north, the residential property
is setback in the front by approximately 15 feet. To the south, the
commercial property is setback in the rear by nearly 77 feet. It is expected
that these buildings will remain for many more years. The larger setbacks
in the front and rear of the building allow for a design of the building
which provides for more articulation in the building, which ultimately
results in a building which is more visually interesting and appealing. The
larger rear setbacks allow for a private outdoor patio and a rear parking lot,
which are both desirable features of the project. ~ i
3 The project is in a location which is in a transition area to residential
development and where increased setbacks would soften the visual
transition between commercial and residential development or would
protect the livability of the residential development. The project is located
in a very mixed use area with a gradual transition into residential. The
proposed project serves as a “bridge” between the uses in terms of the
mixed setbacks. The increased setbacks in the.front and rear help to create
an appropriate transition from the residential to the north to the commercial
property to the south.
5. The Project has been determined to be consistent with the land use plan,
development standards, design guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth
with the Village Redevelopment Plan and Village Master Plan and Design
Guidelines, with approval of the findings noted above to grant the requested
variances. The following required findings will allow for the reduced front and
yard setbacks, to the minimum of five (5) feet (of the acceptable range):
al The reduced standard will not have an adverse impact on surrounding
properties. The project is located in an area which has a mix of uses, both
commercial and residential. The commercial property to the south has a
similar (5 feet) setback. The residential property to the north is setback
approximately 15 feet from the property line. The reduced setbacks will
have no adverse impact on the residential property to the north or the
commercial property to the south.
1
2
3
4
5
6.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 DRB Resolution No. x1
Page G
b) The reduced standard will assist in developing a project which meets the
goals of the Village Redevelopment Area and is consistent with the
objectives for the land use district in which the project is to be located. The
reduced standard is necessary in order to allow the applicant to construct a
building which can provide needed services to the youths of the area. It
allows for a more visually appealing design and assists in the effort to
create a gym area which is the appropriate size to accommodate a boxing
ring and related facilities.
c) The reduced standard will assist in creating a project which is interesting
and visually appealing and reinforces the Village character of the area. The
project design is consistent with the guidelines for the Village and the
reduced setback standard in the front will allow for articulation in the
building which assists in the effort to make the building visually interesting
and more appealing.
6. The Design Review Board has found that the applicable parking requirement for
the proposed project shall be the same as that applied to elementary schools, as set
forth within Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project shall
provide for a total of three parking spaces which meets the applicable standard for
elementary schools and will provide a loading and unloading area at the curb off of
Tyier Street, to the rear of the subject project. The Design ,Review Board has
determined that the loading and unloading area to be prov,ided off of Tyler Street at
the sidewalk curb is acceptable and meets the intent of the applicable parking
’
standard. The applicable findings, as noted above, have been made in order to
grant a variance to allow the loading/unloading area to be provided off-site.
GENERAL PLAN AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT FINDINGS:
1. The Design Review Board finds that the project, as conditioned herein is in
conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the following:
a) That the General Plan identifies the “Village” and references the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual as the appropriate land use plan for the
area. The project is consistent with the Carlsbad Village Area
Redevelopment Plan and the Village Master Plan and Design Manual,
effective as of January 12, 1996, with approval of the requested variances,
because it will provide for a land use (youth facility) which supports the
residential units within Land Use District 5 of the Village Redevelopment
Area.
b) That the existing streets can accommodate the estimated ADTs and all
required public right-of-way has been dedicated and has been or will be
improved to serve the development. The pedestrian spaces and circulation
have been designed in relationship to the land use and available parking.
Pedestrian circulation is provided through pedestrian-oriented building
design, landscaping, and hardscape. Public facilities have been or will be
constructed to serve the proposed project. The project has been conditioned
1
2
I
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 2-Q’
Page 7
2.
i
3.
4.
5.
6.
to develop and implement a program of “best management practices” for
the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter into and/or are
transported within storm drainage facilities.
c) The proposed project will not have an adverse impact on any open space
within the surrounding area. The project is being developed on a vacant lot
which has appropriate zoning for a youth faciiity. The project is also
consistent with the Open Space requirements for new development within
the Village Redevelopment Area. ~ .
d) The proposed project has been conditioned to comply with the Uniform
Building and Fire Codes adopted by the City to ensure that the project
meets appropriate fire protection and other safety standards.
e) The proposed project is exempt from paying public facilities fees because
the applicant is a non-profit organization.
The project is consistent with the City-wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and
ordinances since:
a) The project has been conditioned to ensure that building permits will not be
issued for the project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer
service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless
sewer service remains available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that
the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have
been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
b) All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as
conditions of approval.
The project has been conditioned to pay any new construction tax, or
development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements
established by the Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, which are applicable to the
project. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any applicable requirement
approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
The project is conditioned to comply and remain consistent with the City’s
Landscape Manual, adopted by City Council Resolution No.90-384.
The Design Review Board has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to
the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough ’
proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
1
2 ,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1.8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No.-3
Piye s
GENERAL AND PLANNING CONDITIONS:
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
The Design Review Board does hereby RECOMMEND APPROVAL of a Major
Redevelopment Permit, for the Join Hands Project, including variances for the
front and rear setbacks which exceed the standard range, front and side setbacks
which are below the standard range, a portion of the roof which does not meet the
required 4: 12 roof pitch and an off-site loading/unloading area for participants, as
provided for in RP 97-03 subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is
authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all necessary
corrections and modifications to the Exhibits and/or other documents to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Developer
shall develop the property substantially as shown on the approved E,xhibits for the
project
The Developer shall provide the Agency with a reproducible 24” X 36”, mylar
copy of the Site Plan for the project as approved by the final decision making body.
The Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the Agency. The plan copy
shall be submitted to the Planning Director and approved prior to building or
grading permit approval, whichever occurs first.
The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plan
check, a reduced, legible version of the approving resolution on a 24” X 36”
blueline drawing. I I
Building -permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless
the District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of
application for such sewer permits and wilI continue to be available until time of
occupancy.
Prior to the issuance of the Redevelopment Permit, Developer shallsubmit to the
City a Notice of Restricti,on to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject
to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director, notifying all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad’s
RedeveIopment Agency has issued a Redevelopment Permit by Design Review
Board Resolution No. 260 on the real property owned by the Developer. Said
Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file
containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any
conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The
Planning Director or the Housing and Redevelopment Director has the authority
to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates
said notice upon a showing of good cause by the developer or successor in interest.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates
pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the
Planning Director or the Housing and Redevelopment Director. Enclosure shall
be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13‘
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 2-
Page 9
7. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning
Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director approval. All lighting shall be
designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or
property.
8. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief.
In such instance, a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief
and the Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director.
9. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation pian in
conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s
Landscape Manual. The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the
Planning Director or Housing and RedeveIopment Director prior to the approval
of the grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. The Developer shall
construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and maintain
all landscaping in a healthy and thriving conditions, free from weeds, trash and
debris.
10. The first submittal of detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be accompanied
by the project’s building, improvement and grading plans.
11. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new buildings so as
to be pIainly visible from the street; color of identification gnd/or addresses shall
contrast to their background color.
i2. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and
local ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
13. The Developer shah construct a six foot (6’) masonry block wall on the north
side of the common property line. The height of the solid block wall shall drop
to forty-two inches (42”) ten feet (10’) from the east and west property line for
pedestrian visibility purposes.
14. The hours of operation for the subject facihty shall be 3pm to lOpm, Monday
through Friday, and 8am to 1Opm on Saturday. No youths may remain in the
facility after the noted hours.
15. The applicant shall ensure that full-time adult supervision is provided at all
times during the hours of operation noted above.
16. The applicant shall provide for the installation of permanent bicycle racks as
noted on the preliminary lighting plan submitted by the applicant and dated
January 26, 1998.
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:.
17. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19'
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. v
Page IO
IS. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction
site within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
19. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply with the
requirements of the City’s anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when
such a program is formally established by the City.
20. Prior to issuance of building permit(s), the developer shall file and receive
approval of a boundary adjustment application with the City to merge the
three existing lots so that the project site is situated on one lot.
21. Prior to issuance of building permit(s), the applicant shall obtain a City right-
of-way permit to install driveway aprons in the public right-of-way on Tyler
Street. . .
WATER, SEWER AND FIRE CONDITIONS
1. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands can be met.
1 t
2. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits, and charges which will be
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego ,
County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for
meter installations.
3. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following:
a) Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the’ fire protection requirements.
Also obtain GPM demand for domestic and irrigational needs from appropriate
parties.
b) Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water improvement plans, a
meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for review, comment and
approval of the preliminary system layouts and usages (i.e., GPM - EDU).
4. This project is approved under the expressed condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at the
time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be available
until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the project plans.
~ 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall evaluate building plans for
conformance with applicable fire and life safety requirements of the stand and local Fire
~ Codes. The plans must include a site plan which depicts the following:
I a) Location of existing public water mains and fire hydrants.
1
2 r
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14'
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 2 -
Pngc 11
b) Location of off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
c) Depiction of emergency access routes, driveways and traffic circulation for Fire
Department approval.
6. If any of the foregoing conditions fails to occur; or, if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time; if any such conditions fail to be so implemented
and maintained according to their terms, the Redevelopment Agency shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the Agency’s approval
of this Resolution.
STANDARD CODE REMINDERS:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of Iocal ordinances, including but not limited
to the following code requirements.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
a...
. . . .
,...
t...
,...
,a.,
/..*
. . .
The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits ark not issued for this
project within 18 months from the date of final project approval.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
The project shall comply with the latest non-residential disabled access requirements
pursuant to Title 24 of the State Building Code.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets,
in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of
the Directors of Planning and Building.
1
2 ,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 ATTEST:
17
18
19 .
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. -3
Page I2
6. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Director.
7. The project shall comply with recycling collection area requirements pursuant to
Section 21.105.060. The recycling area shall be noted on the final plans submitted for
applicable building permits for the project.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 26th day of January, 1998 by
the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ai
JSIiM WELSHONS, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN, Acting Housing and Redevelopment Director
v0br-LZL (09L) 5
2
0t-50-0EL (09L) my v3 ‘avd1;Jv’3 tj
tsms v3 ‘3atstw330 - 80m6 v3 ‘av06-w3 u
34Ya ~7634 ~2 3 ‘16 NosIavw GZ5E -El&J ‘ONNOS %4VSl ‘3NICl7ltl~ NOllV~3351
9ClNVH NlOr P vi I t: x -___--_-__-_____-_______________________---.------------------~-----. , \ 4
r ; k? I
;
: .
: I ._ 0 -
5 ii! t t z u 3 Tn
0 ::
Ii J 3
w 7
f .: 4 . c
i
w it 5-
I *
;) ;: 1Li’
I I
. I: ”
J f {:
I
i x Ip I !ii d t
2 E I
if
i - 8;
i! i *v-l e
1 “i j”
i’
:[ -Ja 1:
h
d
f $yl e
i ; %.Q
I-, . . h i -- 98
; 2; ‘. 3
I I=,ZkLS L7zA3SOCa
if F Q > Y wI z :
$3
0 Q
?vG?-tu. C09L) u
P
0ve-OzL (09L) N
sax6 v3 ‘3awiv330 - 800t6 v7’aa9xv3 lu zwaa v’sw 6062 I ‘19 wsIavu QLOE STsd ‘ONlaos xw2&4
sewn woe -----
I
1
133alS 173&lsoo2l
13zkl152l37M
f { H] 111 tjj 9 :
" * ",. rL%
I
r*r z
ii
/ 0
%
41
>
ILILU
/I
ILlLll
%
LILU
luLlI
!ilL
%
CD
Qi!
IULU
)I
k
%
%
a
L!Lu
3
6 I -
II
$ -
lij
Q
i=i
-
r-II ‘--I
-I I II I
P ‘” HIL
q 11
%
5
-
d-l
.a
dL
!!I
Q
ILILU td
0 m .
City of Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Department
A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Application Complete Date:
May 30, 1997
Environmental Review:
Neg. Dec. 909197
Staff: Debbie Fountain
Christer Westman
Ken Quon
DATE: January 26,1998
SUBJECT: RP 97-03 - JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY: Request for
a Major Redevelopment Permit, with variances on setbacks, roof pifch
and off-site loading/unloading area, to allow the construction of a 9587
square foot youth facility on property located on the west side of
Roosevelt Street between Pine and Walnut in Village Land Use District 5.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Design Review Board ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution No. 259
recommending APPROVAL of a Negative Declaration and ADOPT Design Review
Board Resolution No. arecommending APPROVAL of RP 97-03, to the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission, with variances for I) the front and rear setbacks
which exceed the range, 2) the front and side setbacks below the minimum to zero feet,
3) the gym roof which does not meet the requirement for a 4:12 roof pitch, and 4) an
off-site loading/unloading area to be provided off Tyler Street at the sidewalk curb for
participants, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant, Join Hands Save-A-Life, has requested a major redevelopment permit to
allow the construction of a new 9587 square foot youth facility on a vacant lot located
on the west side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), between Pine and Roosevelt. The
proposed facility will provide for a variety of youth sport activities (i.e, basketball and
boxing) and other programs designed to serve at risk, lower income youths of Carlsbad.
The focus of Join Hands is on activities which will deter youths from criminal violence.
The primary clients are the under-privileged youths of Carlsbad which are living in close
proximity to the site selected for the proposed youth facility.
The proposed project consists of construction of a new, two story building which will
include a gym with a basketball court and boxing ring, an office and lobby area, a study,
training room, and a video and arts room for the Join Hands organization.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
Page 2 I
The applicant will need, and has requested, variances for 1) the front and side setbacks
which are below the minimum of the acceptable setback range, to zero feet, 2) the front
and rear setbacks which exceed the maximum of the acceptable setback range, 3) a
flat roof on the gym roof, which does not allow for the required 4:12 roof pitch, and 4) an
off-site loading/unloading area for participants. Staff originally recommended that the
Board grant the variance for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the maximum of
the acceptable setback range. Also, staff recommended that the Board condition the
project to be redesigned to allow for the minimum 5 foot front and side yard setbacks
and to provide for a pitched roof (4:12) on the gym. The issue of the off-site loading and
unloading area was not discussed in the previous report.
At the first public hearing held on November 24, 1997, the Design Review Board
reviewed the original staff report with the recommendations noted above and accepted
public testimony. As a result of their review and consideration, the Board indicated that
they would like to review the project again at a future public hearjing to consider findings
required to grant approval of the variances requested by the applicant. As a result of
the Board’saction on November 24’h, this project is being returned to the Board for an
additional public hearing to consider the granting of variances to allow the project to be
constructed as currently designed with no further modifications. The original staff report
dated November 24, 1997 is included as an attachment for reference purposes only.
This report provides supplemental information for the Board to consider prior to its
action on this item. The original report should also be referenced for information on how
the project meets the applicable policies and codes. In order to grant the requested
variances, the Board will be required to make appropriate findings as set forth in the
Village Master Plan and Design Manual and Carlsbad Municipal Code. Staff has
prepared this report in an effort to provide the Board with justification to grant the
required variances. Ultimately, it is a decision of the Design Review Board and/or the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission as to the adequacy of these findings and
justifications for granting the variances.
In addition to information to be considered on the requested variances, the Board
requested that the applicant provide a proposed lighting plan and identify a location for
bicycle racks. The applicant has submitted a proposed lighting plan which is attached
for review by the Board. On the proposed lighting plan is also information regarding the
bicycle racks. The applicant has proposed to provide bicycle racks which will
accommodate a total of 20 bicycles. The racks are to be located to the rear of the
building at the northwest property line, within the rear landscaped/open space area.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
Page 3
Ill. JOIN HANDS PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND RELATED INFORMATION
In an effort to provide the Board with more specific information on the clients served by
the Join Hands organization. Staff requested some additional information from the
organization. Based on information provided by the applicant, the following provides a
summary of the clients served by Join Hands.
Clients served. From July 1, 1996 to June 30, 1997, there were a total of 303
participating youths. The average age of these youths was 14.5 years. The average
family size of the participant households averages 6 people. Of the 303 youths served,
282 (93%) are Hispanics who reside in the Hispanic neighborhood surrounding the
location of the proposed project.
Income Levels. The average family income for the participants is $14,000 per year. In
total, the breakdown by income categories is: 77% (233) are from very low income
households, 16% (49) from low income households, 5% (15) from moderate income
householdsjand 2% (6) from above moderate income households.
Participation Numbers. The average number of participating youths per day for the 96-
97 fiscal year was 23. The average number of participating youths per week was 133.
The pattern for the participants is for the younger children to arrive early and then leave
early. The older youths come later in the evening and stay later. Although there is an
overlap period, the applicant has indicated that there is rarely a total number of
participants at the facility at any given time which exceeds the above numbers.
Pick UP and Drop Off of Participants. The Join Hands organization is currently operating
out of the private residence and garage of Frank Sorino, which is located on Madison
Street within the Old Carlsbad (Barrio) Area. Under the current operations, the youths
are dropped off at the sidewalk in front of the house and watched until they enter the
house. The parent or other guardian will then leave. Join Hands has proposed to have
youths dropped off and picked up from the rear of the new building, off of Tyler Street.
Proqrams to be Provided. The programs to be provided, or offered, by Join Hands
within the new proposed building include: arts/crafts, barbecues, basketball, boxing,
computer skills, cooking, cookouts, conditioning, homework, library, video filming and
editing. Special events will include athletic events, dances, and fund-raisers. The
organization anticipates that it will have no more than 4 special events per year. Join
Hands intends to make special arrangements for parking of attendees based on the
type of event. If appropriate and necessary, attendees to special events will be
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
< Page 4
encouraged to park within the public parking lot provided at the Senior Center/School
District Offices, which is located within easy walking distance of the proposed project
site.
Hours of Operation. The hours of operation for the proposed facility will be Monday
through Friday, 3pm to IOpm and Saturday 8 am to IOpm.
Fees: Join Hands has indicated that all of their programs will be offered at no fee to the
participant.
IV. BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
In discussing whether or not there is a need for an additional youth facility within the
subject area, the issue has been raised regarding the fact that the Boys and Girls Club
is located in close proximity to the subject site and offers similar youth programs and
services. In anticipation of this issue being raised again as the Board continues to
discuss the proposed Join Hands project, the following informati@-r is provided on the
Boys and Girls Club facility.
Location: The Boys and Girls Club facility is located on the southwest corner of Oak
Avenue and Roosevelt Street. It is located within the Old Carlsbad (Barrio) area and is
approximately 700 feet, or 1% blocks, from the proposed Join Hands facility site.
Clients served, income levels, participation numbers: Additional information on the
client statistics will be provided at the public hearing on January 26, 1998.
Pick up and Drop Off of Participants: Under the current operations, the youths are
dropped off in front of the facility on Oak Avenue. There is no on-site loading or
unloading area for participants.
Proqrams Offered: The Boys and Girls Club offers the following programs/activities. A
Guidance Program offers educational, social, artistic, aquatic, athletic and recreational
services for youths within the age range of 6 to 12 years. Specific activities include
learning with interactive, educational computers, instruction in drama, sports,
educational activities and experimenting in the kitchen. Also, homework assistance is
provided every day. The Sfreef Safe Program offers junior high students activities
created to address their particular needs including arts and crafts, sports, swimming,
special events such as dances and field trips. The Teen Scene Program provides high
school students with a broad array of assistance to help teenagers become productive
and healthy adults. Specific activities include volleyball, basketball, fitness room,
swimming, tutoring, counseling, workshops covering topics such as employment and
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
, Page 5
teen pregnancy prevention, community service, field trips and other educational and
social endeavors. The Build Program matches 12-I 9 year old youths with mentors from
the community. The mentor assists the youth with such life skills as goal setting,
problem solving and career development. The Boys and ,Girls Club also provides for a
free swim period on Tuesday and Thursday from 4:30pm to 530pm. In addition, a
water polo team for youths 14 years of age or younger meets on Saturdays from 3pm to
5pm.
Hours of Operation. The Boys and Girls Club has the following program schedule:
Program
Guidance/Street Safe
Teen Scene
Kids Kamp
Hours
2:30pm to 6:OOpm
1:30pm to 6:OOpm
2:30pm to 6:OOpm
2:30pm to 9:OOpm
7:OOam to 6:OOpm
Days
Monday - Friday
Thursday
Monday - Wednesday
Thursday and Friday
school holidays and
Proqram Fe&s: The Guidance and Teen Scene Programs are offered at no cost to
participant. The Kids Camp has a cost of $10 per day/$40 per week. The Boys and
Girls Club will consider a fee reduction for any individual demonstrating financial need.
V. CONSISTENCY WITH VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The Village Master Plan and Design Manual provides for two types of standards that
every project must be consistent with in order to receive approval. The first type is
known as “Universal Standards”. Every project within the Village Redevelopment Area
must comply with these Universal Standards. The second type is known as “Individual
Standards”. These standards are specific to the Land Use District in which the project is
located.
“Universal Standards” address 1) the issues of General & Redevelopment
Plan Consistency, Residential Density, lnclusionary Housing; and 2) special
instructions regarding the application of individual standards related to parking, building
coverage, building height and setbacks. The following information is provided to
indicate how the proposed project meets the “Universal Standards”.
General and Redevelopment Plan: The project is consistent with the Village Master
Plan and Design Manual and has also been determined to be consistent with the
General Plan, as related to the Village Redevelopment Area.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
Page 6 d
Residential Densitv and lnclusionary Housinq Requirements: There is no
residential proposed within this project. Therefore, residential density and inclusionary
housing requirements are not applicable to this project.
Parking: No specific parking standard has been established within the Village Master
Plan or the Carlsbad Municipal Code for Youth facilifies. Therefore, a determination
must be made by the Design Review Board as to whether or not there is a comparable
parking requirement which can be applied to the project. On similar projects in past
years, the parking requirement applied for youth facilities has varied. Per the Planning
Department, the Girls Club was parked at 1 space for each “major use” within the
facility. The recommendation for parking the Boys and Girls Club a year ago was 1
space for each full time employee and 2 guest spaces. These previously used parking
requirements were not specifically list within the zoning code or the Village Master Plan,
however. Therefore, for the Join Hands Youth Facility, staff has identified
a parking standard which is identified within the zoning code and within the Village
Master Plan and is more appropriate for the subject project. Staff is recommending that
the parking requirement for an Elementary School be applied to the project because the
children to be served by the non-profit organization, Join Hands, at the subject facility
will be elementary school age, or youths/teenagers without vehicles. The proposed
facility is instructional and client specific.
The parking requirement for an Elementary School is one (I) space per employee
minimum, with an adequate loading and unloading area. Join Hands intends to have 1
full-time and 1 part-time employee. Therefore, the application of the elementary school
standards results in a minimum parking requirement of 2 parking spaces. The applicant
has provided for 3 parking spaces total, one of which is a disabled space which will
provide for appropriate facilities for either a disabled employee or guest. Per the
applicant, the loading and unloading area can be located at either the front or rear of
the building at the curb. Youths may be dropped off on Tyler or Roosevelt Street and
enter through either the rear or front of the building. A separate designated
loading/unloading area has not been provided on-site. While staff believes that there is,
in fact, adequate public access to the site and that youths can be dropped off safely
from the street, at the curb either on Roosevelt or Tyler Street, a variance would need
to be granted to allow the loading/unloading area to be provided off site, from the public
right-of-way (curbside loading and unloading). If the Design Review Board is satisfied
that the off-site loading and unloading area is adequate, the Board would need to make
findings that the elementary school standard is the appropriate standard to apply to the
subject project and that a variance should be granted to allow the loading/unloading
area to be provided off-site at the curb on Tyler Street, as currently proposed.
Although staff has determined that the following parking requirements are not
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
Page 7
comparable, these options for an alternate parking standard are provided for further
consideration by the Design Review Board:
1. Gvms and Health Spas . The parking requirement for,a gym or health spa is 1 space
for each 35 square feet of gross floor space. Staff does not believe that this is an
appropriate parking requirement because it is applied to adult gyms and health
spas, which generally requires adults to drive to the location. The adult gym or
health spa is typically not allowed within residential areas; they are most often
located in commercial areas. The proposed youth facility is client specific in terms of
its age group (primarily elementary school-aged children) and is located to allow for
pedestrian access from the residential neighborhood near the site. In addition,
unlike a gym or health spa, many of the activities of the youth facility are held at off-
site locations as field trips or community activities. For example, many of the youths
will participate in fishing trips, graffiti clean up activities, picnics, etc. At a gym or
health spa, all of the activities occur at the site of the gym or health spa which has a
much greater impact in terms of parking demands.
1 1 2. Public Assemblv. The parking requirement for a public assembly use is 1 space for
each IO? square feet of gross floor space. Because this parking requirement is
typically applied to uses where there is a set time for a performance or speaker,
such as a performing arts center, and again typically focuses on activities for adults,
. staff did not believe that this was an appropriate standard for the subject youth
facility. The youths will be allowed to enter and leave the site throughout the day,
and will typically be arriving from the surrounding neighborhood rather than by
vehicle. Again, the youth facility offers a variety of programs, many of which are
located off site as part of field trips or community activities.
3. Hiqh School. The parking requirement for a high school is 1 space per employee
and 1 additional space per IO students. While it is anticipated that there will be high
school aged youths participating in the program at various times, staff did not
believe that this parking requirement was the most comparable due to the focus of
the youth facility and its efforts to attract at-risk, lower income youths from the
nearby neighborhood. Based on conversations between Staff and the organization
representatives, the focus of the organization’s gang diversion activities is on
elementary-aged youths. Due to the fact that the youth facility is focused on youths
which come from families with economic hardship, it is not anticipated that the high
school aged youths will be driving vehicles to the site.
Based on the age of the youths (14 years average) proposed to participate in the
programs at the subject facility and the focus on at-risk, lower income youths from the
nearby neighborhood, staff believes that the elementary school parking requirement is
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
c Page 8
the most comparable and results in a requirement of 2 parking spaces, with a
requirement to also provide for an adequate loading/unloading area. Staff is
recommending that the Design Review Board’find that the elementary school parking
requirement is applicable to the subject project. If the Board does not agree with staffs
analysis regarding the parking standard for the youth facility, the Board will need to take
action to identify the appropriate standard to be applied to the project. The applicant will
be required to redesign the project if an alternate parking standard is approved which
results in an increased parking requirement, or the Board will be required to grant an
additional variance to allow the project to have a substandard number of parking
spaces.
To approve the project as currently designed, the Design Review Board must find that
I.) the elementary school standard is appropriate; 2) the three parking spaces proposed
meet the requirement; and 3) that there is an adequate loading and unloading area to
serve the proposed project. Although the elementary school standard does not
specifically state that the loading/unloading area must physically be located on the
applicant’s property, it is generally understood that the area sho$d be located on the
site. The Board would, therefore, need to grant a variance to allow the loading and
unloading area to be located off-site at the rear of the subject building, off of Tyler
Street. The findings to be made to allow the loading/unloading area to be provided off-
site are detailed later within this report and set forth within the approving resolution.
Buildinq Coveraqe, Heinht and Setbacks: These standards are
established individually according to the applicable land use district within the
Village Redevelopment Area. The Universal Standards section of the Village Master
Plan and Design Manual provides information on variances and criteria to be used in
setting the standards for individual projects when a range is set forth for the subject
standard. The details of the subject standards are described below.
“Individual” development standards set forth specifically for new development within
Land Use District 5 are as follows:
Buildinq Setbacks: The Village Master Plan and Design Manual sets the fronf setback
standard as a range from 5 to IO feet for commercial land uses. The project as
proposed has been designed with a front setback which ranges from 0 to 20 feet, with a
majority (51%) of the building setback 5 feet from the property line. The entryway has
been designed to extend to the property line (0 setback), for design reasons, to allow
for some visual articulation in the building. However, this area requires approval of a
variance to allow for the reduced setback to 0 feet. Also, a variance is required to allow
the setback to exceed the standard of IO feet for one third of the front of the building.
The building setback to 20 feet is above the maximum for the range of the front
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
I Page 9
setback. Findings will need to be made to grant the variance for the front setback which
exceeds the range, and to allow for the front setback to be reduced to the minimum of
the acceptable range (5 feet), and to allow for a portion of the front setback to be
reduced to zero.
In the Master Plan, the side and rear setback standards are also indicated as a range
from 5-10 feet. The project as proposed provides for no side setbacks. Therefore, a
variance will be required to allow the building to be constructed as designed with no
side yard setbacks. The first story of the subject building provides for a rear setback of
39 feet from the property line, off Tyler Street. The second story is setback from the rear
property line by 31 feet 3 inches. There is also a 5 foot landscaped setback area to be
provided between the property line and the first parking space in the rear; this is
required because parking is not permitted in the rear setback area. Although the
significant rear setback is desirable in this case, the Village Master Plan and Design
Manual does require that a variance be granted for any setback which is above the
maximum or below the minimum. The rear setbacks proposed for the project are above
the maximum of IO feet. Findings will be needed to grant the valance for the rear
setback which exceeds the maximum of the range and for the side setbacks to be
reduced to zero.
As set forth in the Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual, the top of
the range is considered to be the desired setback standard. However, a reduction in the
standard to the minimum may be allowed if the project warrants such a reduction and
appropriate findings are made by the Design Review Board and Housing and
Redevelopment Commission. As previously indicated, the setbacks do drop to the
minimum 5 feet in the front for 51% of the building front. Therefore, to allow this
setback, the Design Review Board and Housing and Redevelopment Commission are
required to find as follows:
1. The reduced standard will not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties.
2. The reduced standard will assist in developing a project which meets the goals of
the Village Redevelopment Area and is consistent with the objectives for the land
use district in which the project is to be located.
3. The reduced standard will assist in creating a project which is interesting and
visually appealing and reinforces the Village character of the area.
Staff believes the above findings can be made to allow the reduced front setback to a
minimum of the range (5 feet) for the following reasons: I) The project is to be located
in an area which has a mix of uses, both commercial and residential. The commercial
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
I Page 10
property to the south has a similar (5 foot) setback. The residential property to the north
is setback approximately 15 feet from the property line. The reduced setback will have
no adverse impact on the commercial property to the south or the residential property to
the north; 2) The reduced standard is necessary in orders to allow the applicant to
construct a building which can provide needed services to the youthsof the area. It
allows for a more visually appealing design and assists in the effort to create a gym
area which is the appropriate size to accommodate a regulation-size basketball court
and related facilities; 3) The proposed design is consistent with the guidelines for the
Village and the reduced setback standard in the front will allow for articulation in the
building which assists in the effort to make the building visually interesting and more
appealing.
In addition to the above findings to allow for the reduced front yard setback to the 5 foot
minimum, the Design Review Board and Housing and Redevelopment Commission will
also be required to grant the following variances:
1. No side yard setbacks; 0 feet side setbacks. ’ 1
2. No setback for the front entry which makes up 12 feet (or 16%) of the building front.
3. Rear setbacks which exceed the maximum range of IO feet.
4. Front setbacks which exceed the maximum range of IO feet for approximately one
third of the building front.
The findings required to grant a variance for the front and side setbacks which are
below the standard (reduced to 0 feet) are as follows:
1. The application of certain provisions of this chapter will result in practical difficulties
or unnecessary hardships which would make development inconsistent with the
general purpose and intent of the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan.
2. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions unique to the property or the
proposed development which do not generally apply to other properties or
developments which have the same standard, restrictions, controls.
3. The granting of a variance will not be injurious or materially detrimental to the public
welfare, other properties or improvements in the project area.
4. The granting of a variance will not contradict the standards established in the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual.
A need has been publicly expressed for additional youth activities within the community
which will provide a diversion to gang activities and other activities which may have an
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
I Page 11
adverse impact on the community. The Join Hands organization intends to provide a
facility with structured activities for youths of lower income households within the
community. The following justifications for grahting the variances noted above have
been provided by the applicant for review and consideration by the Board:
1-. The subject property was purchased prior to the revisions of the regulations related
to building setbacks. At the time the Join Hands organization purchased the site,
there were no setback standards for buildings within the Village Area. Unfortunately,
for a variety of reasons, Join Hands was not able to quickly process a
redevelopment permit to remain subject to the previous standards. Without approval
of the variances requested, the Join Hands organization will not be able to build the
type of facility which will best meet the needs of the youths they wish to serve. The
organization has indicated that the site will be rendered “not useable” for the
proposed purpose. The financial hardship would then come in the attempt by the
organization to locate and purchase an alternate, suitable property in the
neighborhood from which the youths come. There are limited,sites within the Old
Carlsbad (Barrio) Area which would be appropriate for the proposed youth facility.
This is due to the fact that the area further south of the site is primarily residential in
nature. The site selected for the proposed site is located within a mixed use area
which allows for a variety of commercial, as well as residential uses, but remains in
close proximity to the residential area which is home for a majority of the
participants.
2. As designed, the length of the basketball court and the out of bounds area is 71
. feet, 6 inches. Using the minimum standard of a 3 foot out-of-bounds (between the
end line and the wall) area at each end, the court length is 65 feet, 6 inches. If the
Join Hands organization is required to provide 5 foot side setbacks, the court will be
reduced in size to 55 feet, 6 inches. At this length, the circles at the free throw line
would overlap each other; this is not a desirable situation.
3. The building as designed represents an architectural credit to the existing
community. The landscaped courtyard on Roosevelt Street is exactly the type of
streetscape which enhances a community’s appearance. The absence of the side
yards is actually a benefit. A five foot setback which is not visually or physically
accessible to the public will not benefit the public. Additionally, the area would invite
trash and bad behavior, which is not desirable for the community. Allowing this
setback area to be transformed into useable indoor facility space provides a more
appropriate benefit to the community.
The above justifications were provided by the applicant. While Staff does agree that the
applicant has financial hardship which results in practical difficulties for providing the
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
Page 12
setbacks required by the Village Master Plan and Design Manual, we do not believe
the fact that the property was purchased prior to the change in regulations is an
adequate justification for granting a variance; ‘many property owners could claim this
same type of hardship. Staff does, however, support the claim that Join Hands has not
had, and probably will not have, the organizational capacity to raise large amounts of
funding to assist with the effort to construct the desired facility and that the required
design changes would result in additional costs and create further financial hardship.
The organization is attempting to maximize the use of the property purchased with
Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) provided by the City of Carlsbad.
The primary problem, as identified by staff, is that the Join Hands organization has
purchased a site which is in fact too small for the type of desired facility. However, the
organization purchased the subject site in an effort to maximize the use of its available
funding, while also locating the project in an area where the need currently exists. Staff
does believe that it would be difficult for the Join Hands organization to sell the current
site and locate an alternate site within the same area which would accommodate the
type of facility that is desired and depicted within the current plans. This is due to the
fact that there are not many sites within the subject area which would be appropriate, in
terms of land use and compatibility, for the proposed project. The project site, as
currently proposed, is located within a mixed use area which allows for the subject use
(youth facility). The organization has not been able to locate an alternate site which is
financially feasible or acceptable in terms of the proposed land use.
Staff does believe that the organization could simply choose to eliminate the basketball
court and some of the other proposed uses within the building. With a change in
programs offered, the building could be reduced in size to meet the required setbacks.
However, if the Design Review Board is convinced by the applicant and the community
of the need for the Join Hands organization to provide a wide variety of activities to
maintain the interest of the youths, staff believes the Board could make the findings of
financial hardship and exceptional circumsfances, based on the information provided
above by the applicant and staff, to allow for the variances in the setbacks to be
reduced to zero on the sides and for a portion (12 feet) of the front.
The front and side setbacks which are below the minimum (to zero feet) will not have a
detrimental impact on neighboring properties because I) the property to the south
provides for a commercial, car repair business. The reduced side yard setback will have
no negative impact in terms of noise or other conflicts; and 2) the residential unit to the
north is separated by a driveway which is approximately 25 feet in width, which allows
for an appropriate separation between the new and the existing buildings to the north.
The granting of the variance for the front and side setbacks will not contradict the
standards established in the Village Master Plan and Design Manual because those
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
Page 13
standards were intended to be somewhat flexible in order to encourage diversity and
variety. Although it is not desirable to continue to grant variances from the standards,
the Village Master Plan and Design Manual does recognize that there may be
circumstances under which it is appropriate to grant variances in order to appropriately
develop any given site based on the specific facility needs within the area.
The findings required to grant a variance for the rear and front setbacks which exceed
the standard (range) are as follows:
1. The project is in a location where adjacent buildings are set back further than the
permitted standard (range), adjacent buildings are likely to remain, and setting the
structure back to the desired standard will maintain and reinforce the Village
character of the area.
2. The project is in a location which is in a transition area to residential development
and where increased setbacks would soften the visual transition between
commercial and residential development or would protect thelliveability of the
residential development.
3. Restaurant uses where a larger front setback will be utilized for outdoor dining
space subject to approval by the Design Review Board and/or Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, whichever is the appropriate approving body. (This
finding is not applicable to the subject project.)
The first two findings noted above for allowing the rear and front setbacks which
exceed the maximum standard (range) are justified as follows: I) the subject project is
in a location which has varying setbacks, To the north, the residential property is
setback in the front by approximately 15 feet. To the south, the commercial property is
setback in the rear by nearly 77 feet. It is expected that these existing buildings will
remain for many more years. Therefore, staff believes that the increased setbacks are
consistent with the area. These larger setbacks allow for a design of the building which
is more visually interesting and appealing. The large rear setbacks allow for a private
outdoor patio area and a rear parking lot, which are both desirable features for the
project. 2) The project is located in a very mixed use area with a gradual transition into
residential. The proposed project serves as a “bridge” between the uses in terms of the
mixed setbacks. The increased setbacks in the front and rear help to create an
appropriate transition from the residential to the north to the commercial property to the
south.
Open Space: A minimum of 20% of the property must be maintained as open space.
The open space must be devoted to landscaped pedestrian amenities in accordance
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
I Page 14
with the City of Carlsbad’s Landscape Manual. Open space may be dedicated to
landscaped planters, open space pockets and/or connections, roof gardens, balconies,
patios and/or outdoor eating areas. No parking spaces or aisles are permitted in the
open space. The project, as proposed, provides for a total of 2449 square feet of open
space/landscape area, which represents 23.32% of the site (10,500 square feet); this
exceeds the 20% requirement.
Building Coverage: The range of building footprint coverage permitted for all projects
in Land Use District 5 is 60% to 80%. The bottom of the range is considered the desired
standard. However, similar to the setback standards, an increase in the standard to the
maximum may be permitted if the project warrants such an increase and the same
findings can be made as noted above for the setback standards.
For the proposed project, the building coverage is 64.7%. This is consistent with the
desired standard at the bottom of the range.
Building Height: The height limit for Land Use District 5 is 30 feet with a 4:12 roof
pitch. At the peak of the gym building, the project is 30 feet in height. The building has a
varying roofiline with pitched roof features (4:12) at the front and rear of the building.
The gym facility portion of the building has a flat roof. However, architectural features
have been added which are complimentary to the roof pitches at the front and rear of
the building. The building height and roof pitches are consistent with the standards set
forth within the Village Master Plan and Design, with the exception that a portion of the
building (the gym facility) has a flat roof. A variance is required to allow the subject
portion of the building to be constructed with the flat roof. The following findings must
be made to approve the variance:
1. The application of certain provisions of this chapter will result in practical difficulties
or unnecessary hardships which would make development inconsistent with the
general purpose and intent of the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan.
2. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions unique to the property or the
proposed development which do not generally apply to other properties or
developments which have the same standard, restrictions, controls.
3. The granting of a variance will not be injurious or materially detrimental to the public
welfare, other properties or improvements in the project area.
4. The granting of a variance will not contradict the standards established in the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
< Page 15
Because the project provides for a facility which is not typical in terms of commercial
buildings, there are certain requirements which present a conflict for the applicant in
meeting all of the design standards set forth within the Village Master Plan and Design
Manual. The applicant has proposed a youth facility which provides for a gym. The gym
building for the Join Hands organization must be constructed as designed in order to
allow for the height required for a basketball court and boxing ring within the interior.
This is not a typical problem for most commercial projects in the area. The requirement
to add a pitched roof to the gym facility would result in practical difficulties and an
tinnecessary hardship for the non-profit organization proposing the project. To provide
for a 4:12 roof pitch, the applicant has indicated that the lower part of the framing would
be at approximately 15 feet above the floor, or possibly lower. A 20 foot height is
considered a minimum roof height for a gym, .while a 24 foot height is preferred. The
required 4:12 roof pitch would also have a negative impact on the amount of buildable
area available for the second floor. Since the roof line from the gym continues over the
study and administrative offices in the rear, a pitched roof area would reduce the total
building area by 10% to 15%, per the applicant. The building design as currently
presented does provide for an appearance of Mission Style architecture both in
materials and proportions. The pedestrian will see the pitched tile roof and most likely
not notice that the gym roof is flat. The applicant has indicated that they do not believe
that a long exposed roof, which would be created with a pitched gym roof, would be
desirable because it would present itself as a chief design element (it would stand out,
rather than blend in) and not be particularly attractive.
Since the applicant has made a good effort to design the remainder of the building with
appropriate roof pitches, staff believes that the flat roof on the gym will not be injurious
or maferially detrimental to the public welfare, other properties or improvements in the
area. The applicant should, however, be required to add some additional architectural
(facade) treatments to the roof line in an effort to add more visual interest, in exchange
for the variance to allow for the flat roof.
In total design concept, the granting of the variance for the flat gym roof will not
contradict the standards established by the Village Master Plan and Design Manual
because the entire front and rear elevations of the building have been designed with the
required 4:12 roof pitch. Visually, pedestrians will enjoy a pitched roof view. Also, the
combination of flat and pitched roofs allow for diversity in design which is encouraged
by the design guidelines within the Manual. The applicant has made an effort to design
the entire project in a manner which.is visually appealing and architecturally interesting.
Parkinq: As stated above, staff is recommending that the elementary school parking
standard be applied to the subject project which results in a parking requirement of 2
spaces. The project has proposed a total of 3 parking spaces to accommodate one full-
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
x Page 16
time and one part-time employee as well as a disabled client or employee. Based on
the information provided by the applicant on the total number of employees to be
present within the building, staff has determined that the 3 parking spaces provided
satisfies the elementary school parking standard (I space per employee). The
additional requirement to provide an on-site loading and unloading area (per Chapter
21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code), however, has noJ been met. Therefore, the
Board will be required to grant an additional variance to allow for the loading/unloading
area to be provided off-site at either the front or rear entrance, at the curb off of
Roosevelt Street or Tyler Street. The applicant has indicated that the primary
loading/unloading area shall be provided at the rear of the building, at the curb off of
Tyler Street. Therefore, the Board will need to find that this is an appropriate location for
the loading/unloading area for this project. Also, the following findings must be made by
the Design Review Board and ultimately by the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission in order to grant the required variance for the loading/unloading area to be
located off-site:
1. The application of certain provisions of this chapter will resultrin practical difficulties
or unnecessary hardships which would make development inconsistent with the
’ general purpose and intent of the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan.
2. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions unique to the property or the
proposed development which do not generally apply to other properties or
developments which have the same standard, restrictions, controls.
3. The granting of a variance will not be injurious or materially detrimental to the public
welfare, other properties or improvements in the project area.
4. The granting of a variance will not contradict the standards established in the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual.
As mentioned previously, staff believes that the primary problem faced by the applicant
is that the site purchased for the subject project is actually too small to accommodate
the type of facility proposed for construction. This was due to the fact that the applicant
is a non-profit organization which is required to maximize the available contributions to
the organization for the subject facility. As indicated for the findings related to the
variance for the zero setbacks, it would be difficult for the applicant to sell the current
smite and locate an alternate site within the same area which would accommodate the
type of facility that is desired and depicted within the current plans. The area needed for
the building, open space and parking lot consume the entire site. Therefore, there is not
adequate area available on site for the required loading/unloading area. The applicant
is consequently faced with practical difficulties (site constraints) which simply do not
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
< Page 17
allow him to add a loading/unloading area and maintain the current design for a fully
“useable” building. In order to maintain consistency with the intent of the Village
Redevelopment Area Plan, it is most important for the proposed project to be consistent
with the goals and objectives for the Village, which encourage pedestrian orientation
and community orientation. Therefore, the loading/unloading area is less important than
the building design and open space requirements. Because there is adequate curbside
area for the loading and unloading activities related to the proposed facility, staff does
not believe it is necessary to require an on-site loading and unloading area. The
proposed project is located mid-block in an area where vehicle speeds are lower and
the street is wide. Therefore, the curbside loading/unloading area will not impede
vehicular traffic or create conflicts with pedestrians.
Because of the nature of the programs offered by the applicant, there are excepfional
circumsfances which result in less need for the loading/unloading area to be provided
on the site. The open space areas are much more desirable for this type of facility and
the type of activities to be conducted on the site. Also, due to the lower volume of
participants served, in comparison to an elementary school, the loading and unloading
area is not as critical. The participants will arrive at differing times throughout the
afternoon and evening, which is much different than an elementary school where
students are arriving at basically the same time in the morning and leaving at the same
time in the afternoon and creating a much more significant potential for traffic conflicts.
Although the age group is similar which results in the recommendation to apply the
elementary school standard to the subject project, the operation of the facilities are
different in nature and result in an exceptional circumstance under which a
loading/unloading area could be found to be unnecessary. A majority of the participants
in the Join Hands programs will be arriving as pedestrians or bicycle riders. If the
Design Review Board finds that these are exceptional circumstances, a variance to
allow the loading and unloading area to be located off-site can be deemed acceptable.
The limited hours of the facility operation should reduce any impact on neighboring
properties. With the mixed use nature of the area which already exists, there will be no
detrimental impact on surrounding businesses since their employees will generally
arrive prior to opening of the facility during the week and most likely leave at varying
times in the afternoon or evening. This is a mixed use area which already provides for a
combination of commercial and residential uses. The youth facility use hours are at off-
peak hours in terms of commercial compatibility and will provide for closure at an hour
which should have minimal impact on the neighboring residential.
In total design concept, the granting of the variance for the off-site loading/unloading
area will not contradict the standards established by the Village Master Plan and
Design Manual because there is adequate area to the rear of the building (within the
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
z Page 18
public right of way) to allow for participants to be dropped off and picked up safely
without having a detrimental impact on traffic flow within the area. The project has been
designed in a manner consistent with a pedestrian orientation which is desired for the
area and set forth as an objective of the Village Master Plan and Design Manual.
Other Miscellaneous Requirements: The “Individual Standards” for Land Use District
5 include a statement that access to parking will not be allowed from Roosevelt Street
unless no other access is available. The proposed project will have access off of Tyler
Street. Therefore, the project is consistent with this requirement. In addition, there is
also a miscellaneous development standard which requires that for any lot proposed for
non-residential development which adjoins an existing residential lot, the project shall
include construction of a solid masonry wall along common lot lines. The project has
been designed to include a new masonry wall along common lot lines on the north side
of the property. A masonry wall already exists on the south side of the property.
VI. CONSISTENCY WITH DESIGN GUIDELINES
.i
As stated in the original report, the project is consistent with the design guidelines for
the Village Redevelopment Area. The original report dated November 24, 1997 may be
referenced for the detailed summary of the design features for the subject project.
VII. CONSISTENCY WITH SIGN STANDARDS
The proposed signage meets the standards set forth within the Village Master Plan and
Design Manual. See original report for details.
VIII. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS
The proposed project requires a major redevelopment permit because it involves new
construction of a building which will have a building permit valuation which is greater
than $150,000. The project must have a recommendation from the Design Review
Board and final approval by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
A public hearing was initially held on November 24, 1997 to consider the proposed
project. At that time, staff recommended redesign of the project to allow for the required
minimum setbacks and 4:12 roof pitch on the gym roof. The Design Review Board
indicated that they would like to consider the project again with findings drafted to
approve the requested variances. The project has been returned to the Board at this
time for additional consideration following a second public hearing. The public hearing
was renoticed with the indication that variances would be considered for the project.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
, Page 19
The Design Review Board is now asked to hold the second public hearing on the
permit requested, consider the public testimony and staffs recommendation on the
project, discuss the project and then take action to recommend approval or denial of the
project with the requested variances. If the Board so chooses, the original resolutions of
approval presented on November 24, 1997 which require the redesign of the project
could also be considered for approval. If the Board decides to deny the project, staff will
need to be instructed to prepare new resolutions and return to the Board for action on
those resolutions to deny the project.
The proposed project is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, a Coastal
Development Permit is not required for the subject project.
IX. TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION, SEWER, WATER, RECLAIMED WATER AND
OTHER SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
See original staff report dated November 24, 1997 for information on traffic, circulation,
sewer, water, reclaimed water and other special considerations, i
X. ENVCRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Department conducted an environmental review of the above described
project, as currently designed, pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the
City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration was issued for the
subject project by the Planning Director on September 19, 1997 and made available for
public review. No comments were received on the environmental document. Adoption
of Design Review Board Resolution No. mwill recommend approval of the Negative
Declaration for this project to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
XI. ECONOMIC IMPACT
As indicated in the original staff report, the proposed project will have very little financial
impact on the City or the Redevelopment Agency due to the non-profit status of the
applicant (Join Hands). However, the project may serve as a catalyst for other
improvements in the area, either new development or rehabilitation of existing buildings.
The proposed project does provide for development on a currently vacant, blighted
sight and will provide for a social/recreational facility for youths in the neighborhood.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
January 26, 1998
Page 20
XII. CONCLUSION
Staff is recommending approval of the project, with the following:
1. Findings to grant the variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the
maximum of the range.
2. Findings to allow a portion of the front setback to be reduced to the minimum of the
acceptable range at 5 feet.
3. Findings to grant the variances on the front and side setbacks which are to be
reduced to 0 feet.
4. Findings to grant a variance to allow a flat roof on the gym portion of the building,
rather than providing for the 4:12 roof pitch.
5. Approval of the elementary school parking standard as the appropriate, or
comparable parking standard, for the subject youth facility, with findings to grant a
variance; for the loading/unloading area to be provided off-site at the curb on Tyler
Street (to the rear of the building).
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Design Review Board Resolution No. m, recommending approval of the Negative
Declaration
Design Review Board Resolution No. a, recommending approval of RP 97-03 with
variances.
Location Map.
Staff Report to Design Review Board, dated November 24, 1997
Lighting Plan, dated October 14, 1997.
Project Plan Exhibits “A” - “C”, dated November 24, 1997 (distributed with original
report).
1
I 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 259
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT
PERMIT FOR THE JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY, WITH
VARIANCES FOR THE FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS WHICH
EXCEED THE STANDARD RANGE, FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS
WHICH ARE BELOW THE RANGE, A PORTION OF THE ROOF
WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED 4:12 ROOF PITCH AND
AN OFF-SITE LOADING/UNLOADING AREA FOR PARTICIPANTS,
ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT
STREET BETWEEN PINE AND WALNUT IN LAND USE DISTRICT 5
OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY
APN: 204-081-08, 09, 10
CASE NO: RI’ 97-03
11 WHEREAS, Join Hands Save-A:,Life,. a California Non-Profit Corporation,
12 “Developer”, has filed a’verified application with the Housing and Reddvelopment Agency of
13
14
15
16
17.
the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Join Hands Save-A-Life, a California Non-
Profit Corporation, “Owner”, described as Lots 27, 28, and 29 in Block 31, in the Town of
Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2,
18 1888 (“the property); and
I/
19 WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Major Redevelopment
20 Permit and variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the standard range, the front
21 and side setbacks below the minimum to zero feet, the portion of the roof which does not meet
22 the requirement for a 4:12 roof pitch and an off-site loading and unloading area for
23 participants, as shown on Exhibits A-C, dated November 24, 1997 on file in the Housing and
24 Redevelopment Department, “Join Hands Project RP 97-03” as provided by Chapter 21.35.080
25 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
26
27
28
I
I
1
r 2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1C
1;
II
l!
2(
2'
2;
2:
2s
21
21
2
2
i z
5
7
3
3
3
1'
2,
3 :
4
5
6
7
8
. . . .
. . . .
,...
. . . .
. . . .
*,..
,...
. . . .
*...
. . . .
,...
,...
!...
. . . .
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 26th day of January,
1998 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request for a
Negative Declaration; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing and upon considering all testimony and
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration on RP 97-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
I
FINDINGS:
1.
A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the Negative
Declaration according to the one page notice and the EIA Part II Form
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following
findings:
The Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and
considered Negative Declaration (RP 97-03), the environmental impacts therein
identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to approving the
project. Based on the EIA Part-II and comments thereon, the Design Review
Board finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will have a
significant effect on the environment and thereby recommends approval of the
Negative Declaration.
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18'
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. The Design Review Board finds that the Negative Declaration (RP 97-03)
reflects the independent judgment of the Design Review Board of the City of
Carlsbad.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 26th day of January, 1998 by
the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
KEV WELSHONS, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST: 1
1
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN, Acting Housing and Redevelopment Director
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Address/Location: A through lot between Tyler Street and Roosevelt Street north of
Walnut Street in the City of Carlsbad.
Project Description: A 9,974 square foot recreation center with associated offices.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents if on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are
invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date
of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department
at (760) 43 8- 116 1, extension 4448.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 19,1997
CASE NO: RP 97-03
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS
PUBLISH DATE: SEPTEMBER 19,1997
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-l 576 - (619) 438-l 161 l FAX (G 19) 438-0894
ENVIRONMENTAL ItiPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: RP 97-03
DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1997
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVE A LIFE
2. APPLICANT: FRANK SORINO
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 3525 Madison Street, Carlsbad.
California 92008
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: Mav 30,1997
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 9.974 sauare foot recreation building which urincipal space is a
basketball court on an existing infill lot within the Citv of Carlsbad redeveloument area.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTtED:
The summary pf environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
13 Land Use and Planning
0 Population and Housing
0 Geological Problems
q Water
q Transportation/Circulation [3 Public Services
0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities & Service Systems
c] Energy & Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
0 Hazards cl Cultural Resources
q Air Quality Cl Noise 0 Recreation
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Rev. 03/28/96
-.
DETERM [NATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
w
cl
cl
cl
El
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An Negative
Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a, significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Negative Declaration
pursuaht to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
Planner Signature
Rev. 03/25/96
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
.- effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an,Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
0 A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
“No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
0 “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
0 “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” appliei where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a
“Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
a “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there. is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant.
l Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment, but & potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated
Negative Declaration, incIuding revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
0 When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of
Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
l A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
3 Rev. 03/28/96
,
0 If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant. and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this
case. the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated”
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
0 An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce
the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant. 3;
Rev. W25196
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source #(s): (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible
land uses? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01)
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a)
b)
d
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectk (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)? (General Plan
Master EIR 93-O 1)
Displace existing housing, ‘especially affordable
housing? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
a>
b)
4
d)
e)
f-l
!a
h)
0
expose people to potential impacts involving:
Fault rupture? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
Seismic ground shaking? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (General Plan
Master EIR 93-01)
Landslides or mudflows? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Erosion, changes in topogrtiphy or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
Subsidence of the land? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Expansive soils? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Unique geologic or physical features? (General Plan
Master EIR 93-O 1)
Potentially Significant Impact
0
Cl
cl
cl
cl
0
Cl
cl
cl q
cl
El
q
cl
q
cl cl
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated
Cl
cl
0
cl
cl
(3
’ I
0
Cl
cl
0
cl
cl
Cl
cl
0
0
cl
Less Than Significan t Impact
cl
cl
cl
Cl
cl
Cl
cl
cl
cl
0
0
cl
cl
cl
cl
cl
cl
No impact
•l
Ix1
El
lzl
‘El
1x1
lxl
w
lz
Rev. 03128196
Issues (and Supporting Informai.,ll Sources).
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: ,
a>
b)
c)
4
e>
0
s>
h)
i>
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff? (General Plan
Master EIR 93-O I)
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
Impacts to groundwater quality? (General Plan Master
EIR 93-O I)
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies? (General
Plan Ma&er EIR 93-O 1)
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
b)
4
d)
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (General Plan
Master EIR 93-O 1) ’
Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Create objectionable odors? (General Plan Master EIR
93-01)
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
4
b)
c>
4
e)
proposal result in:
Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous, intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g. farm equipment)? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Insufficient parking ‘capacity on-site or off-site?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
Potentially Significant Impact
cl
0’
0’
Cl
0
0
0
cl
0
El
Cl
cl
0
Ix1
0
0
0
0
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated
0
cl
q
cl
q
0
0
a
cl
0
Cl
cl
Cl
Cl
0
cl
cl
0
Less Than Significan t Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
cl
0
0
cl
cl
El
0
Cl
0
cl
No Impact
El
lxl
1x1
Ix1
El
El
lx
(XI
Ix)
IJ
(XI
‘El
El
cl
w
Ix)
lxl
q
6 Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (General Plan
Master EIR 93-O I)
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result
b)
c>
4
e>
VIII.
a)
b)
c>
in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (General Plan Master EIR
93-o I) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal?
Conflict ( with adopted energy conservation plans?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State? (General Plan Master EIR
93-01)
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
b)
cl
4
d
A risk oi’ accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan Master
EIR 93-01)
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazards? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Potentially Significant Impact
0
0
0
q
q
0
q
q
0
0
q
q
0
0
0
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated
cl
0
cl
0
q
0
cl
pi
q
0
0
El
q
0
0
0
Less Than Significan t Impact
0
0
0
0
0
III
0
q
cl
0
q
cl
0
q
cl
No Impact
Ix1
El
(x1
1x1
El
lxl
El
Ix1
El
IXI
El
lxl
(x1
IXI
Ix1
Rev. 03128196
Issues (and Supporting Informatron Sources).
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: , a) Increases in existing noise levels? (General Plan Master
EIR 93-O I)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
b) Police protection? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
c) Schools? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O 1)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
(General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
e) Other governmental services? (General Plan Master
EIR 93-O 1)
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
a)
b)
4
4
4
f)
g)
XIII.
a)
W
c>
XIV.
a)
b)
c>
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
Power or natural gas? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Commuliications systems? (General Plan Master EIR
93-o 1)
Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? (General Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
Sewer or septic tanks? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Storm water drainage? (General Plan Master EIR 93-
01) Solid waste disposal? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Local or regional water supplies? (General Plan Master
EIR 93-01)
AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-01)
Create light or glare? (General Plan Master EIR 93-01)
CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
Disturb paleontological resources? (General Plan
Master EIR 93-01)
Disturb archaeological resources? (General Plan Master
EIR 93-O I)
Affect historical resources? (General Plan Master EIR
93-01)
Potentially Significant
Impact
Cl
0
cl
0
cl 0
0
q cl
cl
0
0
cl cl
0
0
0
Cl
q
0
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated
cl
0
0
cl 0
0
0
4
q El
Cl
0
0
cl cl
cl
0
0
cl
q -
0
Less Than Signifkan t Impact
0
0
0
0 0
0
cl
0
cl
cl
0
cl
q 0
0
0
0
cl
cl
cl
No Impact
Ix]
Ix1
E3
Ix1
El
El
lx
El
IXI
El
Ix1
Ix1
El
El
El
Ix1
Ix1
El
El
lxl
8 Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
, 4
4
Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-O I)
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (General Plan Master
01)
XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
4 Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
b)
parks or other recreational facilities? (General Plan
Master EIR 93 -0 1)
Affect existing recreational opportunities? (General
Plan Master EIR 93-01)
XVI.
a)
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
b)
c>
XVII.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
EARLIER ANALYSES.
EIR’93-
Potentially Significant Impact
0
0
q
cl
0
Cl
0
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated
0
cl
0
cl
Cl
’ I
cl
0
Less Than Significan t Impact
0
cl
cl
0
Cl
No Impact
cl la
cl El
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D
Rev. 03128196
DISCIJZSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
GENERAL:
I The project is the construction of a single building less than 10,000 square feet. The site is zoned
for commercial development and is vacant. Development of the site will not require significant
modification to the land. There are no natural or historical significant resources onsite, therefore
there will be no significant impacts due to development of the property.
The development will not create significant impacts. There will not be a significant increase in
traffic from the use in that most users will not be of driving age. Noise will be contained within
the structure, no hazardous materials will be used or stored onsite, the project will be constructed
according to the requirements of a redevelopment permit which included review of the building
for aesthetic compatibility in the existing neighborhood.
AIR OUALITY:
The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated
1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles
traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive
organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the
major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San D&go Air Basin. Since the
San Diego Air Basin is a “non-attainment basin”, any additional air emissions are considered
cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the
updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region.
To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety
of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions
for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures
to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand
Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass
transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5)
participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and
appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the
design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Operation-related emissions are considered cumulativeIy significant because the project is
located within a “non-attainment basin”, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked
“Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the
preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-O 1, by City
Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for air
quality impacts. This .“Statement Of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent
projects covered by the General Plan’s Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no
further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the
Planning Department.
10 Rev. 03/28/96
CIRCULATION:
The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated
1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate
I to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely
impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These
generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad
Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections
are projected to fail the City’s adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout.
To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous
mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include 1)
measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to
develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks,
pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation
strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or
State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to
control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either
been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumuIativeIy significant because of the
failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore,
the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentialiy Significant Impact”. This project is
consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the
recent certific&ion of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included
a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for circulation impacts. This “Statement Of
Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan’s
Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation
impacts is required.
11 Rev. 03/28/96
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10‘
WHEREAS, Join Hands Save-A-Life, California Non-Profit Corporation,
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 260
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT, INCLUDING VARIANCES FOR
FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
STANDARD RANGE, FRONT AND SIDESETBACKS WHICH ARE
BELOW THE STANDARD RANGE, A PORTION OF THE ROOF
WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED 4:12 ROOF PITCH AND
AN OFF-SITE LOADING/UNLOADING AREA FOR PARTICIPANTS,
FOR THE JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY PROJECT ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT
STREET, BETWEEN PINE AND WALNUT, IN LAND USE DISTRICT
5 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY
APN: 204-081-08, 09, 10
CASE NO: RP 97-03
12 “Developer”, has filed a verified application with the Housing and Redjvelopment Agency of
13 the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Join Hands Save-A-Life, California Non-
14
15
16
17
18
19
Profit Corporation, “Owner”, described as Lots 27, 28 , and 29 in Block 31, in the Town of
Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2,
1888 (“the Property); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Major Redevelopment
2O Permit and variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the maximum of the standard
21. range, the front and side setbacks which are below the minimum of the standard range, the
22 portion of the gym roof which does not provide the required 4: 12 roof pitch and an off-site
23 loading/unloading area for participants, as shown on Exhibits A-C, dated November 24, 1997
24 on file in the Housing and Redevelopment Department, “Join Hands Project RP 97-03” as
25 provided by Chapter 21.35.080 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
26
27
28
1
I 2
II DRB Resolution No. 2~
-
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did, on the 24th day of November,
1997, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
3 WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did continue said public hearing on the
4 24”’ of November, 1997 to the 26* of January, 1998 for additional consideration on the
5 requested variances; and
6 WHEREAS, at said public hearing on the 26” of January, 1998, upon hearing
7 and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said
8 Board considered all factors relating to “Join Hands Project RP 97-03.
9 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design Review
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Board as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public iearing, the Design
Review Board RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of a Major Redevelopment
Permit for the Join Hands Save-A-Life Youth Facility Project, RP 97-03,
including variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the
maximum range, for the front and side setbacks which are below the
minimum range, for the portion of the roof which does not provide for the
required 4: 12 roof pitch and for an off-site loading/unloading area for
participants, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
18
/I
GENERAL AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. The Design Review Board has recommended approval of a Negative
Declaration for the subject project and has determined that the project will have
no significant environmental impact.
2. The Project qualifies as a Major Redevelopment Permit with requests for
variances under Chapter 21.35 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code because the
project involves new construction of a building , or addition to an existing
building, with a building permit valuation which exceeds $150,000.
3. The Project is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, no Coastal
Permit is required.
4. The Project is determined to be consistent with the land use plan, development
standards, design guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth with the
Village Redevelopment Plan and Village Master Plan and Design Guidelines,
1
I 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 26C -
Page 3
-
with approval of the following required findings to allow for variances for no
side setbacks, no setback for the front entry, a fzat rooffor a portion of the
building to accommodate the gym facility, the front and rear setbacks that
exceed the standard range and an off-site loading/unloading area for
participants:
a) The application of certain prdvisions of this chapter will result in practical
difficulties or unnecessary hardships which would make development
inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Carlsbad Village
Redevelopment Plan. A need has been publicly expressed for additional
youth activities within the community which will provide a diversion to
gang activities and other activities which may have an adverse impact on
the community. The Join Hands organization purchased the subject site in
an effort to maximize the use of its available funding, while also locating
the project in an area where the need for the facility currently exists. It
would be difficult for the applicant to sell the current site and locate an
alternate site that would be larger and would be still located within the
same area which would accommodate the type of facility that is desired and
depicted within the current plans. The organization has not been able to
locate an alternate site which is financially feasible or acceptable in terms
of the proposed land use. The requested variances are necessary in order
for the applicant to construct a youth facility which is appropriate for the
type of programs to be offered to youths within the neighborhood. The
required roof pitch for the gym and the setbacks would not allow for the I appropriate height and length for the basketball court and gym room. As
related to the off-site loading/unloading area, the Board finds that the off-
site location will not impede vehicular traffic or create conflicts with
pedestrians. In addition, the proposed project is located mid-block in an
area where vehicle speeds are lower and the street is wide enough to
accommodate the off-site loading/unloading area.
b) There are exceptional circumstances or conditions unique to the property or
the proposed development which do not generally apply to other properties
or developments which have the same standard, restrictions, controls. The
proposed project represents a unique use with unique circumstances.
Because the project provides for a facility which is not typical in terms of
other commercial buildings in the area, there are certain facility design
requirements such as the setbacks and roof pitch which present a conflict
for the applicant in terms of the programs to be offered within the subject
facility. The applicant has proposed a gym which has minimum size
requirements. This is not a typical problem for other commercial projects
in the area. Without the required setback variances, the applicant could not
provide an acceptable basketball court in terms of size. In addition, a
pitched roof on the, gym would reduce the total buildable area by 10 to
1.5 %, which is not acceptable and would be detrimental to the programs
desired by youths within the area. Because of the nature of the programs to
be offered by the applicant, there are also exceptional circumstances which
result in less need for an on-site loading/unloading area. The participants
will arrive at differing times throughout the afternoon and evening, which
1
I 2
3
4
5.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 2(
Page 4
is much different than an elementary school where students are arriving
basically at the same time in the morning and leaving at the same time in
the afternoon and creating a much more significant potential for traffic
conflicts. A majority of the participants in the Join Hands programs will be
arriving as pedestrians or bicycle riders. The Board finds that the
exceptional circumstances due to the type of programs provided by the
applicant justify a variance from the subject development standards.
c) The granting of a variance will not be injurious or materially detrimental to
the public welfare, other properties or improvements in the project area.
The reduced setbacks will not be detrimental because the property to the
south provides for a commercial, car repair business. The reduced side
yard setback will have no negative impact in terms of noise or other
conflicts. In addition, the residential unit to the north is separated from the
subject project by a driveway which is approximately 25 feet in width,
which allows for an appropriate separation between the new and the
existing buildings to the north. As related to the roof pitch, the variance
will not be detrimental because the building as currently designed does
provide for the desired mission style architecture both in materials and
proportions. Pedestrians will see the pitched roof at the front and rear of
the building and will generally not notice that the gym roof is flat in design.
Since a significant portion of the building is designed with the appropriate
roof pitches, the flat portion of the gym roof will no be materially 4
detrimental or injurious to the public welfare, other properties or
improvements in the area. In addition, the limited hours of the facility
operation will reduce any impact on neighboring properties. The off-site
loading and unloading area will have no detrimental impact on surrounding
properties due to the already existing mixed use nature of the land uses
within the area. Employees of surrounding businesses will generally arrive
at work prior to the opening of the youth facility and will leave the
businesses prior to the highest anticipated usage period for the youth
facility. The youth facility use hours are at off-peak hours in terms of
commercial compatibility and will provide for closure at an hour which
should have minimal impact on the neighboring residential.
d) The granting of a variance will not contradict the standards established in
the Village Master Plan and Design Manual because those standards were
intended to be somewhat flexible in order to encourage diversity and
variety. The Village Master Plan and Design Manual does recognize that
there may be circumstances under which it is appropriate to grant variances
in order to appropriately develop any given site based on the specific
facility needs within the area. As related to the gym roof, the granting of
the variance will not contradict the standards because the entire front and
rear elevations of the building have been designed with the required 4:12
roof pitch. Visually, pedestrians will still enjoy a pitched roof view with the
current project design. The combination of flat and pitched roofs allow for
diversity in design which is encouraged by the design guidelines within the
Village Master Plan and Design Manual. In total design concept, the
granting of the subject variances, including the off-site loading/unloading
II DRB Resolution No. 26r”‘
Page 5
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
area will not contradict the standards because the project has been designed
in a manner consistent with the pedestrian orientation which is desired for
the area and set forth as an objective of the Village Master Plan and Design
Manual. There is adequate area to the rear of the proposed building (within
the public right-of-way, off of Tyler Street at the sidewalk curb) to allow
for participants to be dropped off and picked up safely without having a
detrimental impact on traffic, flow within the area. These conditions are all
consistent with the standards set forth in the Village Master Plan and
Design Manual.
e) The project is in a location where adjacent buildings are setback further
than the permitted standard (range), adjacent buildings are likely to remain,
and setting the structure back to the desired standard will maintain and
reinforce the Village character of the area. The subject property is in a
location which has varying setbacks. To the north, the residential property
is setback in the front by approximately 15 feet. To the south, the
commercial property is setback in the rear by nearly 77 feet. It is expected
that these buildings will remain for many more years. The larger setbacks
in the front and rear of the building allow for a design of the building
which provides for more articulation in the building, which ultimately
results in a building which is more visually interesting and appealing. The
larger rear setbacks allow for a private outdoor pati? and a rear parking lot,
which are both desirable features of the project.
I n The project is in a location which is in a transition area to residential
development and where increased setbacks would soften the visual
transition between commercial and residential development or would
protect the livability of the residential development. The project is located
in a very mixed use area with a gradual transition into residential. The
proposed project serves as a “bridge” between the uses in terms of the
mixed setbacks. The increased setbacks in the.front and rear help to create
an appropriate transition from the residential to the north to the commercial
property to the south.
5. The Project has been determined to be consistent with the land use plan,
development standards, design guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth
with the Village Redevelopment Plan and Village Master Plan and Design
Guidelines, with approval of the findings noted above to grant the requested
variances. The following required findings will allow for the reduced front and
yard setbacks, to the minimum of five (5) feet (of the acceptable range):
a) The reduced standard will not have an adverse impact on surrounding
properties. The project is located in an area which has a mix of uses, both
commercial and residential. The commercial property to the south has a
similar (5 feet) setback. The residential property to the north is setback
approximately 15 feet from the property line. The reduced setbacks will
have no adverse impact on the residential property to the north or the
commercial property to the south.
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 2t
Page 6
b) The reduced standard will assist in developing a project which meets the
goals of the Village Redevelopment Area and is consistent with the
objectives for the land use district in which the project is to be located. The
reduced standard is necessary in order to allow the applicant to construct a
building which can provide needed services to the youths of the area. It
allows for a more visually appealing design and assists in the effort to
create a gym area which is the appropriate size to accommodate a boxing
ring and related facilities.
c) The reduced standard will assist in creating a project which is interesting
and visually appealing and reinforces the Village character of the area. The
project design is consistent with the guidelines for the Village and the
reduced setback standard in the front will allow for articulation in the
building which assists in the effort to make the building visually interesting
and more appealing.
6. The Design Review Board has found that the applicable parking requirement for
the proposed project shall be the same as that applied to elementary schools, as set
forth within Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project shall
provide for a total of three parking spaces which meets the applicable standard for
elementary schools and will provide a loading and unloading area at the curb off of
Tyler Street, to the rear of the subject project. The DesignQeview Board has
determined that the loading and unloading area to be provided off of Tyler Street at
’
the sidewalk curb is acceptable and meets the intent of the applicable parking
standard. The applicable findings, as noted above, have been made in order to
grant a variance to allow the loading/unloading area to be provided off-site.
GENERAL PLAN AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT FINDINGS:
1. The Design Review Board finds that the project, as conditioned herein is in
conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the following:
a) That the General Plan identifies the “Village” and references the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual as the appropriate land use plan for the
area. The project is consistent with the Carlsbad Village Area
Redevelopment Plan and the Village Master Plan and Design Manual,
effective as of January 12, 1996, with approval of the requested variances,
because it will provide for a land use (youth facility) which supports the
residential units within Land Use District 5 of the Village Redevelopment
Area.
b) That the existing streets can accommodate the estimated ADTs and all
required public right-of-way has been dedicated and has been or will be
improved to serve the development. The pedestrian spaces and circulation
have been designed in relationship to the land use and available parking.
Pedestrian circulation is provided through pedestrian-oriented building
design, landscaping, and hardscape. Public facilities have been or will be
constructed to serve the proposed project. The project has been conditioned
1
r 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2:
24
25
2E
2i
2t
DRB Resolution No. 261
Page 7
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
to develop and implement a program of “best management practices” for
the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter into and/or are
transported within storm drainage facilities.
c) The proposed project will not have an adverse impact on any open space
within the surrounding area. The project is being developed on a vacant lot
which has appropriate zoning for a youth facility. The project is also
consistent with the Open Space requirements for new development within
the Village Redevelopment Area.
d) The proposed project has been conditioned to comply with the Uniform
Building and Fire Codes adopted by the City to ensure that the project
meets appropriate fire protection and other safety standards.
e) The proposed project is exempt from paying public facilities fees because
the applicant is a non-profit organization.
The project is consistent with the City-wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and
ordinances since:
a) The project has been conditioned to ensure that buil+ing permits will not be
issued for the project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer
service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless
sewer service remains available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that
the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have
been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
b) All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as
conditions of approval.
The project has been conditioned to pay any new construction tax, or
development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements
established by the Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, which are applicable to the
project. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any applicable requirement
approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
The project is conditioned to comply and remain consistent with the City’s
Landscape Manual, adopted by City Council Resolution No.90-384.
The Design Review Board has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to
the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough ’
proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1.8
19
2a
21
22
22
24
2E
2E
2i
2E
DRB Resolution No. 2~
Page 8
GENERAL AND PLANNING CONDITIONS:
1.
2.
3.
4i
5.
6.
The Design Review Board does hereby RECOMMEND APPROVAL of a Major
Redevelopment Permit, for the Join Hands Project, including variances for the
front and rear setbacks which exceed the standard range, front and side setbacks
which are below the standard range, a portion of the roof which does not meet the
required 4: 12 roof pitch and an off-site loading/unloading area for participants, as
provided for in RP 97-03 subject to the conditionsherein set forth. Staff is
authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all necessary
corrections and modifications to the Exhibits and/or other documents to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Developer
shall develop the property substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits for the
project
The Developer shall provide the Agency with a reproducible 24” X 36”, mylar
copy of the Site Plan for the project as approved by the final decision making body.
The Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the Agency. The plan copy
shall be submitted to the Planning Director and approved prior to building or
grading permit approval, whichever occurs first.
The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plan
check, a reduced, legible version of the approving resolutio’p on a 24” X 36”
blueline drawing.
Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless
the District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of
application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of
occupancy.
Prior to the issuance of the Redevelopment Permit, Developer shall submit to the
City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject
to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director, notifying all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad’s
Redevelopment Agency has issued a Redevelopment Permit by Design Review
Board Resolution No. 260 on the real property owned by the Developer. Said
Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file
containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any
conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The
Planning Director or the Housing and Redevelopment Director has the authority
to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates
said notice upon a showing of good cause by the developer or successor in interest.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates
pursuant to City standards..Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the
Planning Director or the Housing and Redevelopment Director. Enclosure shall
be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director.
1
2'
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13‘
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 i
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 26C
Page 9
7. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning
Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director approval. All lighting shall be
designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or
property.
8. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief.
In such instance, a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief
and the Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director.
9. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in
conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s
Landscape Manual. The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the
Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director prior to the approval
of the grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. The Developer shall
construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and maintain
all landscaping in a healthy and thriving conditions, free from weeds, trash and
debris.
10. The first submittal of detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be accompanied
by the project’s building, improvement and grading plans.
11. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on, 111 new buildings so as
to be plainly visible from the street; color of identification and/or addresses shall
contrast to their background color.
t
12. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and
local ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
13. The Developer shall construct a six foot (6’) masonry block wall on the north
side of the common property line. The height of the solid block wall shall drop
to forty-two inches (42”) ten feet (10’) from the east and west property line for
pedestrian visibility purposes.
14. The hours of operation for the subject facility shall be 3pm to lOpm, Monday
through Friday, and Sam to 1Opm on Saturday. No youths may remain in the
facility after the noted hours.
15. The applicant shall ensure that full-time adult supervision is provided at all
times during the hours of operation noted above.
16. The applicant shall provide for the installation of permanent bicycle racks as
noted on the preliminary lighting plan submitted by the applicant and dated
January 26, 1998.
1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:’
I 17. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19'
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
DRB Resolution No. 26
Page IO
18. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction
site within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
19. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply with the
requirements of the City’s anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when
such a program is formally established by the City.
20. Prior to issuance of building permit(s), the developer shall file and receive
approval of a boundary adjustment application with the City to merge the
three existing lots so that the project site is situated on one lot.
21. Prior to issuance of building permit(s), the applicant shall obtain a City right-
of-way permit to install driveway aprons in the public right-of-way on Tyler
Street.
WATER, SEWER AND FIRE CONDITIONS
1. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and fl.o’jv demands can be met.
2. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits, and charges which will be
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego
County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for
meter installations.
3. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following:
a) Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements.
Also obtain GPM demand for domestic and irrigational needs from appropriate
parties.
b) Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water improvement plans, a
meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for review, comment and
approval of the preliminary system layouts and usages (i.e., GPM - EDU).
4. This project is approved under the expressed condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at the
time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be available
until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the project plans.
5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall evaluate building plans for
conformance with applicable fire and life safety requirements of the stand and local Fire
Codes. The plans must include a site plan which depicts the following:
a) Location of existing public water mains and fire hydrants.
28
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2a
21
22
2:
24
2e
2f
2;
2t
DRB Resolution No. 26L
Page 11
b) Location of off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
c) Depiction of emergency access routes, driveways and traffic circulation for Fire
Department approval.
6. If any of the foregoing conditions fails to occur; or, if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time; if any such conditions fail to be so implemented
and maintained according to their terms, the ‘Redevelopment Agency shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the Agency’s approval
of this Resolution.
STANDARD CODE REMINDERS:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited
to the following code requirements.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
..,.
..I.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this
project within 18 months from the date of final project approval.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
The project shall comply with the latest non-residential disabled access requirements
pursuant to Title 24 of the State Building Code.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets,
in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of
the Directors of Planning and Building.
1
* 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
_-
DRB Resolution No. 2c
Page 12
6. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Director.
7. The project shall comply with recycling collection area requirements pursuant to
Section 21.105.060. The recycling area shall be noted on the final plans submitted for
applicable building permits for the project.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 26th day of January, 1998 by
the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
KIM WELSHONS, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN, Acting Housing and Redevelopment Director
24
25
26
27
20
- EXHIBIT 3
I I i/,
I I
I I
I I
I I I-
I I
I I 2 OAK AVENVE
I I
I I 1 ri
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I f
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I -I PINE STREET
N
I I u
II
-1 I I 4
I I I I I I W+t+E
I I v I I S I I
I I
I I I 3 parcels I CITY OF CARLSBAD
I I WALNUT AVENUE
ti II-
IL
JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY
LIT
I
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE ‘7j
r
EXHIBIT 4
City of Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Department
A REPORT TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Application Complete Date:
May 30, 1997
Environmental Review:
Neg. Dec. g/19/97
Staff: Debbie Fountain
Christer Westman
Ken Quon
DATE: November 24, 1997
SUBJECT: RP 97-03 -JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY: Request for
a Major Redevelopment Permit to allow the construction of a 9587 square
foot youth facility on property located on the west side of Roosevelt Street
between Pine and Walnut in Village Land Use District 5.
I. RECOMMENDATION
7 I
That the Design Review Board ADOPT Resolution No. mrecommending
APPROVAL of a Negative Declaration and ADOPT Resolution No. mrecommending
APPROVAL of RP 97-03 to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission, with
variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the range, and based on the
findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including a condition to
redesign the project to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director to
provide for a gym roof which meets the requirement for a 4:12 pitch and minimum 5
foot front and side setbacks.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant, Join Hands Save-A-Life, has requested a major redevelopment permit to
allow the construction of a new 9587 square foot youth facility on a vacant lot located
on the west side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), between Pine and Roosevelt. The
proposed facility will provide for a variety of youth sport activities (i.e, basketball and
boxing) and other programs designed to serve at risk, lower income youths of Carlsbad.
The focus of Join Hands is on activities which will deter youths from criminal violence.
The primary clients are the under-privileged youths of Carlsbad which are living in close
proximity to the site selected for the proposed youth facility.
The proposed project consists of construction of a new, two story building which will
include a gym with a basketball court and boxing ring, an office and lobby area, a study,
training room, and a video and arts room for the Join Hands organization.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 2 I
The applicant has requested variances for 1) the front and side setbacks which are
below the minimum of the acceptable setback range, 2) the front and rear setbacks
which exceed the maximum of the acceptable setback range, and 3) a flat roof on the
gym roof, which does not allow for the required 4:12 roof pitch.
The details of the requested variances for the setback and roof pitch will be described
in further detail later within this report. Staff is recommending that the project be
approved with variances granted for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the
acceptable range. However, staff is not recommending approval of the front and side
setbacks which are below the minimum acceptable setback or for the flat roof on the
gym portion of the building. Although unusual, staff is recommending that the project be
approved but conditioned to require a redesign of the gym roof to allow for the required
4:12 roof pitch and to allow for the minimum 5 foot front and side setbacks. Within the
approving resolution, staff has recommended that the redesign be completed to the
satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director. This action would allow the
proposed project to move forward while also assuring that the minimum standards have
been met by the project. 4
Ill. VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL, LOCAL COASTAL PLAN
AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Village Master Plan and Design Manual allows for youth facilities on a provisional
basis within Land Use District 5. This means that the project must be given much more
consideration in terms of compatibility with surrounding land uses.
The Village Redevelopment Plan authorizes the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission to permit the establishment and expansion of facilities which provide for
recreational facilities or programs provided by charitable institutions.
The site is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, consistency with the Village
Local Coastal Program is not applicable to this project.
IV. CONSISTENCY WITH VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA VISION, GOALS
AND OBJECTIVES
The proposed project will satisfy several components of the Vision Statement for the
Village Redevelopment Area of Carlsbad. First, it will provide a place for people
(youths) to come to be a part of important community events. Second, the project will
help in the effort to create a Village which provides for a comfortable and safe place to
work, shop, visit and live by developing a project which provides activities for the youth
who live in the area. The youths will benefit and the community benefits when youths
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 3 <
are involved in constructive activities which do not result in adverse impacts on
surrounding shopping and employment areas.
The proposed project will be able to address a variety of ,objectives as outlined within
the Village Master Plan and Design Manual as follows:
Goal 1: Establish Carlsbad Villaqe as a Quality Shoppina, Workinq and Living
Environment. The proposed project will result in development of a new facility which will
have a positive visual impact on the area. The positive visual appeal assists in the effort
to create a quality shopping, working and living environment. In addition, the project will
increase a very important use (youth activities) which serves Carlsbad residents.
Goal 2: Improve the Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation in the Villaqe Area. The
project has been designed to minimize the pedestrian/vehicular conflicts along major
pedestrian walkways (Roosevelt Street). The project will provide for parking at the rear
of the site and will have no driveways off of Roosevelt Street.
4
Goal 3: Stimulate Propertv Improvements and New Development in the Villaqe.
The Master S)lan and Design Manual was developed in an effort to stimulate new
development and/or improvements to existing buildings in the Village. The intent is that
new development or rehabilitation of existing facilities will then stimulate other property
improvements and additional new development. The proposed project will assist in the
continued effort to improve the Village Redevelopment Area, specifically the area from
Carlsbad Village Drive to Walnut.
Goal 4: Improve the Phvsical Appearance of the Villaqe Area. The applicant has
made a very good effort to design a project which will convert a vacant, blighted site
into a physically attractive project. The proposed project promotes the objective of
creating a sense of design unity and character while also encouraging design diversity.
V. CONSISTENCY WITH VILLAGE LAND USE PLAN
The site of the proposed project is located within Land Use District 5 of the Village
Redevelopment Area. Youth facilities are permitted within Land Use District 5 on a,
provisional basis.
The goal of Land Use District 5 is to provide both residential units and residential
support services for the area. All uses permitted within the area, as identified within the
Village Land Use Plan, have been determined to be compatible with existing residential
uses. In the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual, it is intended that Land Use
District 5 provide for neighborhood commercial and support the residential character of
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 4 ,
the area. At this time, staff believes that the youth facility provides for a very important
use which supports the residential character of the area by providing activities designed
to be attractive to youths and teenagers who live within the adjacent neighborhoods.
VI. CONSISTENCY WITH VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The Village Master Plan and Design Manual provides for two types of standards that
every project must be consistent with in order to receive approval. The first type is
known as “Universal Standards”. Every project within the Village Redevelopment Area
must comply with these Universal Standards. The second type is known as “Individual
Standards”. These standards are specific to the Land Use District in which the project is
located.
“Universal Standards” address 1) the issues of General & Redevelopment
Plan Consistency, Residential Density, lnclusionary Housing; and 2) special
instructions regarding the application of individual standards related to parking, building
coverage, building height and setbacks. The following informatig is provided to
indicate how the proposed project meets the “Universal Standards”.
Gem&al and Redevelopment Plan: The General Plan includes the following
goals for the Village: 1) a City which preserves, enhances and maintains the Village as
a place for living, working, shopping, recreation, civic and cultural functions while
retaining the village atmosphere and pedestrian scale; and 2) a City which creates a
distinct identity for the Village by encouraging activities that traditionally locate in a
pedestrian-oriented downtown area. The General Plan objective is to implement the
Redevelopment Plan through the comprehensive Village Master Plan and Design
Manual.
The proposed project is consistent with the goals and objectives for the Village, as
outlined within the General Plan, because it provides for recreational as well as civic
and cultural activity opportunities for youths and teenagers of the Village community.
Also, since the project is located in close proximity to a residential neighborhood and
schools, it reinforces the pedestrian-orientation desired for the downtown area and
assists with the effort to create a distinct identity for the Village as an area which
provides a wide variety of activities for residents and visitors.
In summary, the proposed project supports the Village character for the area and the
mixed use nature (commercial mixed with residential) of the immediate area. The
project is located within easy walking distance of residential neighborhoods with
families who will benefit from the services provided by Join Hands. The project is
consistent with the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and has also been
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 5 I
determined to be consistent with the General Plan, as related to the Village
Redevelopment Area.
Residential Density and lnclusionary Housinq Requirements: There is no
residential proposed within this project. Therefore, residential density and inclusionary
housing requirements are not applicable to this project.
Parking: No specific parking standard has been established within the Village
Master Plan or the Carlsbad Municipal Code for Youth Facilities. Therefore, a
determination must be made by the Design Review Board as to whether or not there is
a comparable parking requirement which can be applied to the project. On similar
projects in past years, the parking requirement applied for youth facilities has varied.
Per the Planning Department, the Girls Club was parked at 1 space for each “major
use” within the facility. The recommendation for parking the Boys and Girls Club a year
ago was 1 space for each full time employee and 2 guest spaces. These previously
used parking requirements were not specifically list within the zoning code or the Village
Master Plan, however. Therefore, for the Join Hands Youth Facijity, staff has identified
a parking standard which is set forth within the zoning code and Village Master Plan,
and is morejappropriate for the subject project. Staff is recommending that the parking
requirement for an Elementary School be applied to the project because the children to
be served by the non-profit organization, Join Hands, at the subject facility will be
elementary school age, or youths/teenagers without vehicles. The proposed facility is
instructional and client specific. The parking requirement for an Elementary School is
one (1) space per employee. Join Hands intends to have 1 full-time and 1 part-time
employee. Therefore, the requirement would be for 2 parking spaces. However, the
applicant is providing 3 parking spaces total, one of which is a disabled space which will
provide for appropriate facilities for either a disabled employee or guest.
Although staff has determined that the following parking requirements are not
comparable, these options for an alternate parking standard are provided for further
consideration by the Design Review Board:
1. Gyms and Health Spas . The parking requirement for a gym or health spa is 1 space
for each 35 square feet of gross floor space. Staff does not believe that this is an
appropriate parking requirement because it is applied to adult gyms and health
spas, which generally requires adults to drive to the location. The adult gym or
health spa is typically not allowed within residential areas; they are most often
located in commercial areas. The proposed youth facility is client specific in terms of
its age group (primarily elementary school-aged children) and is located to allow for
pedestrian access from the residential neighborhood near the site. In addition,
unlike a gym or health spa, many of the activities of the youth facility are held at off-
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 6 <
2.
site locations as field trips or community activities. For example, many of the youths
will participate in fishing trips, graffiti clean up activities, picnics, etc. At a gym or
health spa, all of the activities occur at the’site of the gym or health spa which has a
much greater impact in terms of parking demands. ~
Public Assemblv. The parking requirement for a public assembly use is 1 space for
each 100 square feet of gross floor space. Because this parking requirement is
typically applied to uses where there is a set time for a performance or speaker,
such’ as a performing arts center, and.again typically focuses on activities for adults,
staff did not believe that this was an appropriate standard for the subject youth
facility. The youths will be allowed to enter and leave the site throughout the day,
and will typically be arriving from the surrounding neighborhood rather than by
vehicle. Again, the youth facility offers a variety of programs, many of which are
located off site as part of field trips or community activities.
3. Hiqh School. The parking requirement for a high school is 1 space per employee
and 1 additional space per 10 students. While it is anticipated that there will be high
school aged youths participating in the program at various times, staff did not
believe that this parking requirement was the most comparable due to the focus of
the youth facility and its efforts to attract at-risk, lower income youths from the
nearby neighborhood. Based on conversations between Staff and the organization
representatives, the focus of the organization’s gang diversion activities is on
elementary-aged youths. Due to the fact that the youth facility is focused on youths
which come from families with economic hardship, it is not anticipated that the high
school aged youths will be driving vehicles to the site.
Based on the age of the youths proposed to participate in programs at the subject
facility and the focus on at-risk, lower income youths from the nearby neighborhood,
staff believes that the elementary school parking requirement is the most comparable
and results in a requirement of 2 parking spaces. Staff is recommending that the
Design Review Board find that the elementary school parking requirement is applicable
to the subject project. If the Board does not agree with staffs analysis regarding the
parking standard for the youth facility, the Board will need to take action to identify the
appropriate standard to be applied to the project. The applicant will be required to
further redesign the project, if an alternate parking standard is approved.
Buildins Coverage, Heiqht and Setbacks: These standards are
established individually according to the applicable land use district within the
Village Redevelopment Area. The Universal Standards section of the Village Master
Plan and Design Manual provides information on variances and criteria to be used in
setting the standards for individual projects when a range is set forth for the subject
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 7 r
standard. The details of the subject standards are described below.
“Individual” development standards set forth specifically for new development within
Land Use District 5 are as follows:
Building Setbacks: The Village Master Plan and Design Manual sets the front
setback standard as a range from 5 to 10 feet for commercial land uses. The project as
proposed project has been designed with a front setback which ranges from 0 to 20
feet, with a majority (51%) of the building setback 5 feet from the property line. The
entryway has been designed to extend to the property line (0 setback), for design
reasons, to allow for some visual articulation in the building. However, this area would
require approval of a variance to allow for the reduced setback to 0 feet. Also, a
variance is required to allow the setback to exceed the standard of 10 feet for one third
of the front of the building. The building setback to 20 feet is above the maximum for
the range of the front setback. Staff is recommending that the variance be granted for
the front setback which exceeds the maximum of the range. However, staff is also
recommending that the footprint of the building be reduced to allow for a minimum 5
foot front setback in all areas, including the front entrance. This would mean that the
range of the front setback would be 5 to 20 feet, rather than the proposed 0 to 20 feet.
Findings will need to be made to grant the variance for the front setback which exceeds
the range, and to allow for the front setback to be reduced to the minimum of the
acceptable range (5 feet).
In the Master Plan, the side and rear setback standards are also indicated as a range
from 5-10 feet. The project as proposed provides for no side setbacks. Therefore, a
variance would be required to allow the building to be constructed as designed with no
side yard setbacks. The first story of the subject building provides for a rear setback of
39 feet from the property line, off Tyler Street. The second story is setback from the rear
property line by 31 feet 3 inches. There is also a 5 foot landscaped setback area to be
provided between the property line and the first parking space in the rear; this is
required because parking is not permitted in the rear setback area. Although the
significant rear setback is desirable in this case, the Village Master Plan and Design
Manual does require that a variance be granted for any setback which is above the
maximum or below the minimum. The rear setbacks proposed for the project are above
the maximum of 10 feet. Staff is recommending that the variance for the rear setback
which exceeds the maximum of the range be approved. However, staff is also
recommending that the footprint of the building be reduced to allow for the minimum 5
foot side setbacks.
As set forth in the Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual, the top of
the range is considered to be the desired setback standard. However, a reduction in the
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 8
standard to the minimum may be allowed if the project warrants such a reduction and
appropriate findings are made by the Design Review Board and Housing and
Redevelopment Commission. As previously indicated, staff is recommending that the
front and side setbacks be allowed to drop to the minimum 5 feet. To allow for this
minimum 5 foot setback on the front and side, the Design Review Board and Housing
and Redevelopment Commission is required to find as follows:
1. The reduced standard will not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties.
2. The reduced standard will assist in developing a project which meets the goals of
the Village Redevelopment Area and is consistent with the objectives for the land
use district in which the project is to be located.
3. The reduced standard will assist in creating a project which is interesting and
visually appealing and reinforces the Village character of the area.
Staff believes the above findings can be made to allow the reduked front and side
setbacks to the minimum of the range (5 feet) for the following reasons: 1) The project
is to be located in an area which has a mix of uses, both commercial and residential.
The commercial property to the south has a similar (5 foot) setback. The residential
property to the north is setback approximately 15 feet from the property line. The
reduced setback will have no adverse impact on the commercial property to the south
or the residential property to the north; 2) The reduced standard is necessary in order to
allow the applicant to construct a building which can provide needed services to the
youths of the area. It allows for a more visually appealing design and assists in the
effort to create a gym area which is the appropriate size to accommodate a boxing ring
-. and related facilities; 3) The proposed design is consistent with the guidelines for the
Village and the reduced setback standard in the front will allow for articulation in the
building which will assist in the effort to make the building visually interesting and more
appealing.
In addition to the above findings to allow for the reduced front and side setbacks to the
5 foot minimum, the Design Review Board and Housing and Redevelopment
Commission will also be required to make appropriate findings to grant the following
variances:
1. Rear setbacks which exceed the,maximum range of IO feet.
2. Front setbacks which exceed the maximum range of 10 feet for approximately one
third of the building front.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 9 <
The findings required to grant a variance for the rear and front setbacks which exceed
the standard (range) are as follows:
1. The project is in a location where adjacent buildings are set back further than the
permitted standard (range), adjacent buildings are likely to remain, and setting the
structure back to the desired standard will maintain and reinforce the Village
character of the area.
2. The project is in a location which is in a transition area to residential development
and where increased setbacks would soften the visual transition between
commercial and residential development or would protect the liveability of the
residential development.
3. Restaurant uses where a larger front setback will be utilized for outdoor dining
space subject to approval by the Design Review Board and/or Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, whichever is the appropriate approving body. (This
finding is not applicable to the subject project.) ’ t
The first twq findings noted above for allowing the rear and front setbacks which exceed
the maximum standard (range) are justified as follows: 1) the subject project is in a
location which has varying setbacks. To the north, the residential property is setback in
the front by approximately 15 feet. To the south, the commercial property is setback in
the rear by nearly 77 feet. it is expected that these existing buildings will remain for
many more years. Therefore, staff believes that the increased setbacks are consistent
with the area. These larger setbacks allow for a design of the building which allows for
more articulation in the building, which ultimately results in a building which is more
visually interesting and appealing. The larger rear setbacks allow for a private outdoor
patio area and a rear parking lot, which are both desirable features for the project. 2)
The project is located in a very mixed use area with a gradual transition into residential.
The proposed project serves as a “bridge” between the uses in terms of the mixed
setbacks. The increased setbacks in the front and rear help to create an appropriate
transition from the residential to the north to the commercial property to the south.
Open Space: A minimum of 20% of the property must be maintained as open
space. The open space must be devoted to landscaped pedestrian amenities in
accordance with the City of Carlsbad’s Landscape Manual. Open space may be
dedicated to landscaped planters, open space pockets and/or connections, roof
gardens, balconies, patios and/or outdoor eating areas. No parking spaces or aisles are
permitted in the open space. The project, as currently proposed, provides for a total of
2449 square feet of open space/landscape area, which represents 23.32% of the site
(10,500 square feet); this exceeds the 20% requirement. This percentage of
/ 0
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, I997
Page 10 I
landscaping will increase with the condition of approval which requires reduction of the
footprint of the building to allow for the minimum 5 foot front and side setbacks.
Buildina Coveraqe: The range of building footprint coverage permitted for all
projects in Land Use District 5 is 60% to 80%. The bottom of the range is considered
the desired standard. However, similar to the setback standards, an increase in the
standard to the maximum may be permitted if the project warrants such an increase
and the same findings can be made as noted above for the setback standards.
For the proposed project, as currently designed, the building coverage is 64.7%. This is
consistent with the desired standard at the bottom of the range. The building coverage
will be reduced slightly by the condition of approval which requires reduction of the
building footprint to allow for a minimum front and side setback of 5 feet.
Buildinn Heiqht: The height limit for Land Use District 5 is 30 feet with a 4:12
roof pitch. At the peak of the gym building, the project is 30 feet in height. The building
has a varying roof line with pitched roof features (4:12) at the fr&t and rear of the
building. The gym facility portion of the building has a flat roof. However, architectural
features have been added which are complimentary to the roof pitches at the front and
rear of the building. The building height and roof pitches are consistent with the
standards set forth within the Village Master Plan and Design, with the exception that a
portion of the building (the gym facility) has a flat roof. A variance would be required to
allow the subject portion of the building to be constructed with the flat roof.
Staff is not recommending approval of a variance for the flat roof on the gym portion of
the facility. Staff is recommending that a condition be approved for the project which
requires redesign of the gym roof to provide for the required 4:12 roof pitch and to
remain under the 30 foot height limit for the area.
For consideration purposes, the following information on the applicant’s justification for
granting a variance for the flat roof on the gym is provided to the Design Review Board.
Because the project provides for a facility which is not typical in terms of commercial
buildings, there are certain requirements which present a conflict for the applicant in
meeting all of the design standards set forth within the Village Master Plan and Design
Manual. The applicant has proposed a youth facility which provides for a gym. The
applicant has indicated that the gym building requires a maximum height of 30 feet in
order to allow for a basketball court and boxing ring within the interior. This is not a
typical problem for other commercial projects in the area. Per the applicant, the
requirement to add a pitched roof to the gym facility would result in practical difficulties
and a financial hardship to the Join Hands organization. Since a good effort has been
made to design the remainder of the building with appropriate roof pitches and add
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 11
attractive architectural features to the gym roof, the applicant believes that the flat roof
on the gym will not have an adverse impact on the Village or other properties within the
area. In fact, the Boys and Girls Club, which is located approximately 2 blocks north
from the proposed Join Hands facility, has a similar gym facility which also provides for
a flat roof. The applicant believes that the Join Hands organization should be able to
have a gym facility similar to the Boys and Girls Club in terms of roof design.
Parking: As stated above, staff is recommending that the elementary school
parking standard be applied to the subject project which results in a parking
requirement of 2 spaces. The project has proposed a total of 3 parking spaces to
accommodate one full-time and one part-time employee as well as a disabled client or
employee. For a complete discussion of the alternate parking standards which were
considered prior to selecting the elementary school standard, please see Section VI
above.
Other Miscellaneous Requirements: The “Individual Standards” for Land Use District
5 include a statement that access to parking will not be allowed,ffom Roosevelt Street
unless no other access is available. The proposed project will have access off of Tyler
Street. Therefore, the project,is consistent with this requirement. In addition, there is
also a miscellaneous development standard which requires that for any lot proposed for
non-residential development which adjoins an existing residential lot, the project shall
include construction of a solid masonry wall along common lot lines. The project has
been designed to include a new masonry wall along common lot lines on the north side
of the property. A masonry wall already exists on the south side of the property.
VII. CONSISTENCY WITH DESIGN GUIDELINES
All new projects within the Village Redevelopment Area must make a good faith effort to
design a project which is consistent with a village scale and character. The Design
Review Board and the Housing and Redevelopment Commission, as appropriate, must
be satisfied that the applicant has made an honest effort to conform to ten (IO) basic
design principles. These design principles are:
1. Development shall have an overall informal character.
2. Architectural design shall emphasize variety and diversity.
3. Development shall be small in scale.
4. Intensity of development shall be.encouraged.
5. All development shall have a strong relationship to the street.
6. A strong emphasis shall be placed on the design of the ground floor facades.
7. Buildings shall be enriched with architectural features and details.
8. Landscaping shall be an important component of the architectural design.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 12 ,
9. Parking shall be visibly subordinated.
10. Signage shall be appropriate to a village character.
The proposed project is consistent with the design principles outlined above. The
project has provided for an overall informal character in design. The architectural design
provides for variety and diversity through varying roof lines, varying window treatments,
arches, building articulation in the front and rear and patio/balcony areas. There is also
landscaped areas which add to the variety and diversity of the design. The
development is small in scale in terms of its design. The building has a very strong
relationship to the street in that it is physically located in close proximity to the public
sidewalk area and encourages pedestrian access. The ground floor facades are
designed in an attractive manner with brick treatment, open arches, landscaping,
balconies and interesting window treatments. The building provides for a variety of
architectural features and details as previously described. The parking is visually
subordinate in that is located at the rear of the property, off of Tyler Street. It is not seen
from Roosevelt Street. The proposed signage is consistent with the standards and the
desired Village character. A summary of the design features related to the project is
provided as an exhibit to this report.
VIII. COkISTENCY WITH SIGN STANDARDS
The property will be allowed a total of 75 square feet of signage for the subject building.
The applicant has proposed a total of 4 wall signs - two on the front of the building and
two on the rear of the building. The signs provide information on the name of the
organization (“Join Hands Save a Life”) and the type of facility (“boxing gym”/“gym”).
The total amount of signage proposed is 75 square feet. The signage meets the
standards set forth within the Village Master Plan and Design Manual.
IX. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS
The proposed project requires a major redevelopment permit because it involves new
construction of a building which will have a building permit valuation which is greater
than $150,000. The project must have a recommendation from the Design Review
Board and final approval by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
The Design Review Board is asked to hold a public hearing on the permit requested,
consider the public testimony and staffs recommendation on the project, discuss the
project and then take action to recommend approval or denial of the project.
The proposed project is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, a Coastal
Development Permit is not required for the subject project.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 13
X. TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION, SEWER, WATER, RECLAIMED WATER AND
OTHER SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Traffic. The total projected average daily traffic for the project is 13 ADTs, based on the
most recent SANDAG Trip Generation calculations.
Circulation. Circulation for the project is designed with an entrance and exit onTyler
Street.
Sewer. The total number of sewer Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) required for the
project is calculated to be 1 .OO, with the application of the same calculation used for
school facilities. Sewer service to the project will be provided by an existing sewer line
on Tyler Street. The sewer pipe size is 8 inches.
Water. The total number of EDUs required for the project is calculated to be 1.00, as
noted above, with water usage estimated at 220 gallons per dayiThe water service
requirements for the subject project are calculated by multiplying the EDUs times the
estimated gallons per day which amounts to 220 gallons per day. Water service will
be provided by an existing 6 inch water main on Tyler Street.
Reclaimed Water. The use of reclaimed water is not a requirement for this project due
to its low demand for irrigation water.
Gradinq: Grading for this project will be very minimal. It will consist primarily of building
pad preparation and establishing the desired drainage pattern for the site. There are no
slopes or retaining walls on this project.
Drainaqe and Erosion Control: The property will drain to the east and west of the
property. No erosion control required.
Improvements. Sidewalks have already been installed on the west and east sides of the
proposed project. The applicant will need to obtain right-of-way permits to remove and
install driveway aprons in the public right of way.
Propet-tv Lines. The applicant will be required to process a lot line adjustment to
convert three parcels (single ownership) into a single parcel (single ownership) for
development purposes.
XI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 14 1
The Planning Department has conducted an environmental review of the above
described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration was issued for the subject
project by the Planning Director on September 19, 1997 and made available for public
review. No comments were received on the environmental document. Adoption of
Design Review Board Resolution No. mwill recommend approval of the Negative
Declaration for this project to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
XII. ECONOMIC IMPACT
The proposed project will have very little financial impact on the City or the
Redevelopment Agency due to the non-profit status of the applicant (Join Hands). The
property will most likely be exempt from property taxes and no sales tax will be
generated by the establishment. However, the project may serve as a catalyst for other
improvements in the area, either new development or rehabilitation of existing buildings.
Therefore, it could have financial impact in terms of the interest. it may generate for
other private development in the area. The project will result in the construction of a
new development and the elimination of a blighting influence within the area, as a result
of the development on a vacant site. In addition, the facility will provide constructive
activities for area youth.
XIII. CONCLUSION
Staff is recommending approval of the project, with the following:
1. Findings to grant the variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the
maximum of the range.
2. Findings to allow the front and side setbacks to be reduced to the minimum of the
acceptable range at 5 feet.
3. Conditions requiring the redesign of the project, to the satisfaction of the Housing
and Redevelopment Director, to reduce the footprint of the building to allow for the
minimum 5 foot front and side setbacks, and to allow for a roof pitch of 4:12 on the
gym portion of the facility with a maximum height of 30 feet at the peak of the roof.
4. Approval of the elementary school parking standard as the appropriate, or
comparable parking standard, for the subject youth facility.
RP 97-03 Staff Report
November 24, 1997
Page 15
With the conditions requiring redesign of the roof and reduction of the building footprint
to allow the minimum front and side setbacks (5 feet), the proposed project will meet all
of the minimum development standards. Although it is somewhat unusual, staff is
recommending that the Design Review Board recommend approval of the project to the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission with the requirement for the redesign as
noted above, to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director. By taking
the recommended action, the Design Review Board will provide the applicant with
appropriate direction as to the acceptable design standards, and also allow the
organization to continue with the processing of the permit without further delays at this
point in time.
Although the project may have little financial benefit, the new facility will offer very
important services to the community through the activities sponsored by the
organization for at risk youths within the immediate neighborhood.
EXHIBITS:
1.
ai Design Review Board Resolution No. 259, recommending approval of the Negative
Declaration
2. Design Review Board Resolution No. m, recommending approval of RP 97-03
3. Location Map.
4. Project Description with Disclosure Statement.
5. Staff Analysis of Project Consistency with Village Master Plan Design Guidelines.
6. Reduced Site,,Plan and Elevation Exhibits
7. Signage Site Plan and Elevations
8. Full Size Project Plan Exhibits “A” - “C”, dated November 24, 1997.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 259
< 2
3
4
5
6
7
a
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT
PERMIT FOR THE JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY, WITH
VARIANCES FOR THE FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS WHICH
EXCEED THE STANDARD RANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT STREET BETWEEN PINE AND
WALNUT IN LAND USE DISTRICT 5 OF THE VILLAGE
REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY
APN: 204-081-08, 09, 10
CASE NO: RP 97-03
9 II WHEREAS, Join Hands Save-A-Life, a California Non-Profit Corporation,
10 “Developer”, has filed a verified application with the Housing and Redevelopment Agency of
11 the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Join Hands Save-A-Life, a California Non-
12
Profit Corporation, “Owner”, described as Lots 27, 28, and 29 in Blocks 31, in the Town of 13
,4 Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
, 5 map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2,
16 1888 (“the property); and
II
17 WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Major Redevelopment
18 Permit and variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the standard range, as shown
19 on Exhibits A-C, dated November 24, 1997 on file in the Housing and Redevelopment
20 Department, “Join Hands Project RP 97-03” as provided by Chapter 21.35.080 of the Carlsbad
21 Municipal Code; and
22
23
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 24th day of November,
1997 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request for a
24
25 Negative Declaration; and,
26
27
28
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing and upon considering all testimony and
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration on RP 97-03,.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing; the Design
Review Board hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the Negative
Declaration according to the one page notice and the EIA Part II Form
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following
findings:
FINDINGS:
1.
2.
The Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbaq has r vrewed, analyzed and ‘k.
considered Negative Declaration (RP 97-03), the environmental impacts therein
identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to approving the
project. Based on the EIA Part-II and comments thereon, the Design Review
Board finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will have a
significant effect on the environment and thereby recommends approval of the
Negative Declaration.
The Design Review Board finds that the Negative Declaration (RP 97-03)
reflects the independent judgment of the Design Review Board of the City of
Carlsbad.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 24th day of November, 1997 by
the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
KIM WELSHONS, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVlEW BOARD
ATTEST:
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN, Acting Housing and Redevelopment Director
1
I 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 260
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT, INCLUDING VARIANCES FOR
FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
STANDARD RANGE, FOR THE JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY
PROJECT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST,SIDE OF
ROOSEVELT STREET, BETWEEN PINE AND WALNUT, IN LAND
USE DISTRICT 5 OF THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
CASE NAME: JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE YOUTH FACILITY
AF’N: 204-081-05, 09, 10
CASE NO: RP 97-03
WHEREAS, Join Hands Save-A-Life, California Non-Profit Corporation,
“Developer”, has filed a verified application with the Housing and Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Join Hands Save-A-Life, California Non-
Profit Corporation, “Owner”, described as Lots 27, 28 , and 29 in Block 31, in the Town of
Carlsbad, ;in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
map thereof No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2,
1888 (“the Property); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Major Redevelopment
Permit and variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the maximum of the standard
range as shown on Exhibits A-C, dated November 24, 1997 on file in the Housing and
Redevelopment Department, “Join Hands Project RP 97-03” as provided by Chapter 21.35.080
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did, on the 24th day of November,
1997, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Board considered all
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
15
1:
1L
If
1t
1;
II
l!
21
2
2:
2
i
4
;
:
:
P
3
I
5
3
7
3
3
D
1
2
!3
!4
!5
!6
!7
28
)RB Resolution No. 2@-
age 2
actors relating to “Join Hands Project RP 97-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design Review
loard as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of a Major Redevelopment
Permit for the Join Hands Save-A-Life Youth Facility Project, RP 97-03,
including variances for the front and rear setbacks which exceed the
maximum range, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
GENERAL AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS:
1.
2.
I
3.
4.
The Design Review Board has recommended approval of a Negative
Declaration for the subject project and has determined that the project will have
no significant environmental impact,
The Project qualifies as a Major Redevelopment Permit,under Chapter 21.35 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code because the project involss new construction of
a building , or addition to an existing building, with a building permit valuation
which exceeds $150,000.
The Project is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, no Coastal
Permit is required.
The Project is determined to be consistent with the land use plan, development
standards, design guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth with the
Village Redevelopment Plan and Village Master Plan and Design Guidelines,
with approval of the following required findings to allow for variances for the
frant and rear setbacks that exceed the standard range:
a) The granting of a variance will not contradict the standards established in
the Village Master Plan and Design Manual. The variances for the front
and rear setbacks which exceed the range do not create a situation which
contradicts the intent of the standards established in the subject document.
With the condition that the proposed project be redesigned to provide for
the minimum 5 foot setbacks on the front and side, and to provide for a
gym roof which meets the 4:12 roof pitch requirement, the final project
will be consistent with the minimum development standards for the area
and meet the needs of the youth of the community which is consistent with
the goals and objectives of the Village Master Plan and Design Manual.
b) The project is in a location where adjacent buildings are setback further
than the permitted standard (range), adjacent buildings are likely to remain,
and setting the structure back to the desired standard will maintain and
4
1
I 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resoldon No. 26C -
Page 3
reinforce the Village character of the area. The subject property is in a
. location which has varying setbacks. To the north, the residential property
is setback in the front by approximately 15 feet. To the south, the
commercial property is setback in the rear by nearly 77 feet. It is expected
that these buildings will remain for many more years. The larger setbacks
in the front and rear of the building allow for a design of the building
which provides for more articulation in the building, which ultimately
results in a building which is more visually interesting and appealing. The
larger rear setbacks allow for a private outdoor patio and,a rear parking lot,
which are both desirable features of the project.
c) The project is in a location which is in a transition area to residential
development and where increased setbacks would soften the visual
transition between commercial and residential development or would
protect the livability of the residential development. The project is located
in a very mixed use area with a gradual transition into residential. The
proposed project serves as a “bridge” between the uses in terms of the
mixed setbacks. The increased setbacks in the front and rear help to create
an appropriate transition from the residential to the north to the commercial
property to the south.
5. The Project has been determined to be consistent with the land use plan,
development standards, design guidelines and other applicadle regulations set forth
with the Village Redevelopment Plan and Village Master Plan and Design
’ , Guidelines, with approval of the conditions set forth herein requiring redesign of
the building, to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director, to
allow for minimum front and side setbacks of 5 feet and to allow for a gym roof
which provides the required 4: 12 roof pitch while remaining under the 30 foot
height limit. The following required findings will allow for the reduced front and
yard setbacks, to the minimum of five (5) feet (of the acceptable range):
a) The reduced standard will not have an adverse impact on surrounding
properties. The project is located in an area which has a mix of uses, both
commercial and residential. The commercial property to the south has a
similar (5 feet) setback. The residential property to the north is setback
approximately 15 feet from the property line. The reduced setbacks will
have no adverse impact on the residential property to the north or the
commercial property to the south.
b) The reduced standard will assist in developing a project which meets the
goals of the Village Redevelopment Area and is consistent with the
objectives for the land use district in which the project is to be located. The
reduced standard is necessary in order to allow the applicant to construct a
building which can provide needed services to the youths of the area. It
allows for a more visually appealing design and assists in the effort to
create a gym area which is the appropriate size to accommodate a boxing
ring and related facilities.
1
c 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
DRB Resolution No. 26
Page 4
c) The reduced standard will assist in creating a project which is interesting
and visually appealing and reinforces the Village character of the area. The
project design is consistent with the guidelines for the Village and the
reduced setback standard in the front will allow for articulation in the
building which assists in the effort to make the building visually interesting
and more appealing.
GENERAL PLAN AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT FINDINGS:
1. The Design Review Board finds that the project, as conditioned herein is in
conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the following:
4
b)
cl
4
d
That the General Plan identifies the “Village” and references the Village
Master Plan and Design Manual as the appropriate land use plan for the
area. The project is consistent with the Carlsbad Village Area
Redevelopment Plan and the Village Master Plan and Design Manual,
effective as of January 12, 1996, because it will provide for a land use
(youth facility) which supports the residential units within Land Use
District 5 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
That the existing streets can accommodate the estimated ADTs and all
required public right-of-way has been dedicated and has been or will be
improved to serve the development. The pedestrian 4 paces and circulation
have been designed in relationship to the land use and available parking.
Pedestrian circulation is provided through pedestrian-oriented building
design, landscaping, and hardscape. Public facilities have been or will be
constructed to serve the proposed project. The project has been conditioned
to develop and implement a program of “best management practices” for
the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter into and/or are
transported within storm drainage facilities.
The proposed project will not have an adverse impact on any open space
within the surrounding area. The project is being developed on a vacant lot
which has appropriate zoning for a youth facility. The project is also
consistent with the Open Space requirements for new development within
the Village Redevelopment Area.
The proposed project has been conditioned to comply with the Uniform
Building and Fire Codes adopted by the City to ensure that the project
meets appropriate fire protection and other safety standards.
The proposed project is exempt from paying public facilities fees because
the applicant is a non-profit organization.
2. The project is consistent with the City-wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and
ordinances since:
1
, 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
.17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
DRB Resolution No. 26C-
Page 5
a) The project has been conditioned to ensure that building permits will not be
issued for the project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer
service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless
sewer service remains available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that
the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have
been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
b) All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as
conditions of approval.
3. The project has been conditioned to pay any new construction tax, or
development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements
established by the Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, which are applicable to the
project. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities.
4. This project has been conditioned to comply with any applicable requirement
approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
5. The project is conditioned to comply and remain consistent with the City’s
Landscape Manual, adopted by City Council Resolution No.90-384.
6. The Design Review Board has reviewed each of the exaLtions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
I exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to
the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough
proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
GENERAL AND PLANNING CONDITIONS:
1. The Design Review Board does hereby RECOMMEND APPROVAL of a Major
Redevelopment Permit, for the Join Hands Project, including variances for the
front and rear setbacks which exceed the standard range, as provided for in RP 97-
03 subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is authorized and directed to
make, or require Developer to make, all necessary corrections and modifications to
the Exhibits and/or other documents to make them internally consistent and in
conformity with final action on the project. Developer shall develop the property
substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits for the project, with the exception
that the building footprint shall be reduced to allow for a minimum 5 foot
front and side setback, and the gym roof shall be redesigned to allow for the
required 4:12 roof pitch while remaining under the 30 foot height limit for the
area. The required redesign shall be compIeted to the satisfaction of the
Housing and Redevelopment Director.
2. The Developer shall provide the Agency with a reproducible 24” X 36”) mylar
copy of the Site Plan for the project as approved by the final decision making body.
The Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the Agency. The plan copy
shall be submitted to the Planning Director and approved prior to building or
grading permit approval, whichever occurs first.
28
II DRB Resolution No. 26
1
. 2
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Page 6
3. The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plan
check, a reduced, legible version of the approving resolution on a 24” X 36”
biueline drawing.
4. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless
the District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of
application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of
occupancy.
5. Prior to the issuance of the Redevelopment Permit, Developer shall submit to the
City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject
to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director, notifying all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad’s
Redevelopment Agency has issued a Redevelopment Permit by Design Review
Board Resolution No. 260 on the real property owned by the Developer. Said
Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file
containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any
conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The
Planning Director or the Housing and Redevelopment Director has the authority
to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates
said notice upon a showing of good cause by the developer 3 r successor in interest.
6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates
i pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the
Planning Director or the Housing and Redevelopment Director. Enclosure shall
be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director.
7. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning.
Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director approval. All lighting shall be
designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or
property.
8. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief.
In such instance, a storage plan will be submitted for apprdval by the Fire Chief
and the Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director.
9. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in
conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s
Landscape Manual. The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the
Planning Director or Housing and Redevelopment Director prior to the approval
of the grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. The Developer shall
construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and maintain
all landscaping in a healthy’ and thriving conditions, free from weeds, trash and
debris.
10. The first submittal of detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be accompanied
by the project’s building, improvement and grading plans.
28
II DRB Resolution No. 260 - I/ Page 7
1
, 2
11. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new buildings so as
to be plainly visible from the street; color of identification and/or addresses shall
contrast to their background color.
3
4
12. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and
local ordinances in effect at the time bf building permit issuance.
8
9
10
11
12
13. The Developer shall construct a six foot (6’) masonry block wall on the north
side of the common property line. The height of the solid block walI shall drop
to forty-two inches (42”) ten feet (10’) from the east and west property line for
pedestrian visibility purposes.
14. The Developer shall reduce the footprint of the proposed building, to the
satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director, to allow for a
minimum front and side setback of five feet (5’). The range of the front
setback will subsequently be 5 feet to 20 feet.
15. The Developer shall redesign the roof of the gym portion of the subject facility,
to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment Director, to allow for
the required 4:12 roof pitch, while also maintaining the thirty foot (30’) height
limit. q 1
13
II ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: i
14
/I 16. he developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
17. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction
site within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
18. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply with the
requirements of the City’s anti-graffiti program for wail treatments if and when
such a program is formally established by the City.
19. Prior to issuance of building permit, the developer shall file and receive
approval of a boundary adjustment application with the City to merge the
three existing lots so that the project site is situated on one lot.
23
II
20. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall obtain a City right-of-
way permit to install driveway aprons in the public right-of-way on Tyler
24 Street.
25 WATER, SEWER AND FIRE CONDITIONS
26
27
1. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands can be met.
28
1
I 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 26
Page S
-
2. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits, and charges which will be
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego
County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for
meter installations.
3. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following:
a) Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the .fire protection requirements.
Also obtain GPM demand for domestic and irrigational needs from appropriate
parties.
b) Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water improvement plans, a
meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for review, comment and
approval of the preliminary system layouts and usages (i.e., GPM - EDU).
4. This project is approved under the expressed condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at the
time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be available
until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the project plans.
5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall eva uate building plans for f
conformance with applicable fire and life safety requirements of the stand and local Fire
Codes. The plans must include a site plan which depicts the following:
a) Location of existing public water mains and fire hydrants.
b) Location of off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
c) Depiction of emergency access routes, driveways and traffic circulation for Fire
Department approval.
If any of the foregoing conditions fails to occur; or, if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time; if any such conditions fail to be so implemented and
maintained according to their terms, the Redevelopment Agency shall have the right to revoke
or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building
permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the
authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their
compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are
gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the Agency’s approval of this Resolution.
STANDARD CODE REMINDERS:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited
to the following code requirements,
1. The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
1
8 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution No. 26C-
Page 9
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this
project within 18 months from the date of final project approval.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
The project shall comply with the latest non-residential disabled access requirements
pursuant to Title 24 of the State Building Code.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets,
in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of
the Directors of Planning and Building.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Director.
The project shall comply with recycling collection area requirements pursuant to
Section 21.105.060. The recycling area shall be noted on the final plans submitted for
applicable building permits for the project. 5 1
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 24th day of November, 1997 by
the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
KIM WELSHONS, CHAIRPERSON
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST:
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN, Acting Housing and Redevelopment Director
EXHJBIT 4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
I
PROJECT NAME: J-err-’ Ahw~~ S&&G K9 L/~tY
APPLICANT NAME: - fw/sl~~ ‘&/YiweJ y 5002 /*a
Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately
explain the scope anz=/or operation of the proposed project. YOU may also include any
background information and suppoking StatementS regarding the reasons for, or
appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary.
Description/Explanation.
Rev. 4i91
This proposed project is a 9,974 SF Recreation Building. The principal space is a
basketball court. This will be used for other purposes as well such as; volley ball
and a boxing ring. Interior spaces include office space, storage, locker rooms,
kitchen and bathrooms.
There are 3 parking spaces, including a handicapped space. The architectural
and landscape style is Spanish.
The intent is to build into the side yard setbacks to accommodate an already
undersized basketball court. Although the roof over the gymnasium will be flat it
will be concealed behind a parapet with decorative tile treatment.
D[SCLOSL’RE STAEMENT
~?o~IcAms STAXVEhT =F ~::stkc%% OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP IWEPESTS ON ALL APPC!CAf;Cb,S WHICH .&,LL “EC~,~~
;,SCR~iCNAilY ACTICN CN :hE PART CF THE CrrY CCUNCIL OR ANY AP!%lN-iEO SOARO, CCMMlSSlCN 0~ CC~,,,jflEg,
iPlease Prrnf)
The fcllowmg information must be disclosed:
1. Applicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
,&f/H I
2. Owner
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
cror *cl f/AJ-fDS T&f525 B .//FL5 3s 22? rnHd/lsO~ s7.
c~L;G!.eksw CA, 92-a -so39 .
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) .or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any parrnersirlp
interest in the partnership.
4. If any person idiom pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses Of any person serving a~ officer or director of the non-profit orgmization or as trustee or beneficlaq
of the trust.
2075 Las Palmas Orive l Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 * (619) 438-l 161
VILLA\-, MASTER PLAN DESIGN GUIDEim.,dES EXHIBIT 5
CHECKLIST
Provide variety of setbacks along any single commercial
block front
Provide benches and low walls along public pedestrian
frontages.
Maintain Retail Continuity along Pedestrian-Oriented
frontages
Avoid Drive-Through Service Uses
Minimize Privacy Loss for Adjacent Residential Uses
Encourage off-street courtyards accessible from major
pedestrian walkways
Emphasize an abundance of landscaping planted to
create an informal character
Treat structures as individual buildings set within a
landscaped green space, except for buildings fronting on:
Carlsbad Village Drive, State Street, Grand Avenue,
Carlsbad Boulevard and Roosevelt Street
Provide landscaping within surface parking lots
Provide access to parking areas from alleys wherever
possible.
Project: Join Hands Youth Facility
The area the project is located has a mix of uses,
including residential and commercial. Due to this mix,
there are and will continue to be a variety of Set-backs
on the Roosevelt Block. The proposed project has front
setbacks on Roosevelt Street which range from 0 to 20
feet. The adjacent residential and commercial proper-tie
also provide for varying setbacks off of Roosevelt.
Although the proposed project will not provide for
pedestrian amenities such as benches or low walls, the
project will provide for attractive landscaping and facad
design. These features are important to creating a
strong pedestrian orientation in the area.
This is a mixed use area. The proposed project will not
conflict with retail continuity.
No drive through service included in project.
A 6’ Masonry Wall will be constructed on the north side
of the property to pbovide privacy for the residential unit
located adjacent to and north of the proposed project.
Also, there are not design features (ie balcony) on the
north side of the building which would result in any loss
of privacy. The balconies or patios face either Tyler
Street or Roosevelt Street.
The project has been designed to be pedestrian friendly
and encourage pedestrians to walk into the front of the
property.
Landscaped areas are provided in the front and rear of
the proposed building. The low level ground cover and
trees will provide for an informal character/setting.
This project has been designed in a manner which
provides for “green space” in the front and rear of the
building. This will create visual interest and also create
pleasing area for youths to gather as part of the
activities provided at the facility.
Landscaping is provided within the parking lot area.
No Alley. This project is bordered by Roosevelt on the
east and Tyler on the west.
I- Locate parking at the rear of lots.
I
With Roosevelt as the front of the lot, the parking is
located at the rear of the lot off of Tyler Street.
Devote all parking lot areas not specifically required for All areas not required for parking spaces or aisles or
parking spaces or circulation to landscaping. driveways or the trash enclosure have been
I landscaped.
Avoid parking in front setback areas No parking proposed in front setback.
Avoid curb cuts along major pedestrian areas. Roosevelt is a major pedestrian area and no curb cut is
to be constructed on it.
Avoid parking in block corner locations The parking lot will not be visible from the corner.
Provide setbacks and landscaping between any parking A Setback which includes a 5 foot landscape area was
lot and adjacent sidewalks, alleys or other paved provided between the parking lot and the adjacent
pedestrian areas. sidewalk.
Avoid buildings which devote significant portions of their Not applicable to this project.
ground floor space to parking uses.
Place parking for commercial or larger residential
projects below grade wherever feasible.
At this site, it was not feasible or necessary to place
parking below grade. To be feasible, a much larger/talle
building would need to be constructed. Staff could not
support a larger or taller building on this particular site.
/I Enhance parking lot surfaces. The parking lot su,4aces will most likely be asphalt. The
proposed landscaping will assist in the effort to enhanc
Provide for variety and diversity. Each building should
express its uniqueness of structure, location or tenant
and should be designed especially for their sites and not
mere copies of generic building types.
The proposed new design of the building provides for
articulation in the building, varying roof forms, and othe
architectural features which provide for a unique
character. The proposed building will not look like any
other building currently in the area. However, it will also
blend into the area in a complimentary manner. The
site was taken into consideration in terms of its
constraints. Also the location within the Village and
Barrio Area were important in development of the
design.
Step taller buildings back at upper levels.
II Break large buildings into smaller units.
At its peak, the proposed project is 30 feet in height.
The taller portion of the building (the gym) is set-back
from the sidewalk and the roof line has been varied to
reduce any negative impact on pedestrians.
The applicant has made a good effort to design the
building in a fashion which creates a sense of division.
However, due to the nature of the use (youth facility), it
would be quite difficult to actually break the building into
smaller units.
than the neighboring buildings to the north and south.
Utilize simple building forms. Trendy and “look at me”
design solutions are strongly discouraged.
The building has been designed with simple lines and
forms but allows for representation of the Village
character desired for the area. The building is not trend
or “look at me” in design.
Emphasize the use of gable roofs with slopes of 7 in 12
or greater.
Gabled-type roofs and roof features with the desired
pitch have been provided within the project.
II Encourage the use of dormers in gable roofs.
Emphasize wood and composition shingle roofs, with the The project provides for a red tile roof. The project is
exception that in the Land Use District 5 clay tile roofs located in Land Use District 5 which allows for clay tile
are acceptable. roofs.
Avoid Flat Roofs While the building does provide for a portion as a flat
roof, staff believes that the added “railing” features
together with the effort to add some visual interest in th
flat roof is acceptable for this area of the Village.
While no dormers are used within the roof, staff believe
the design is consistent with the type of roof desired for
this area of the Village.
II
I
Screen mechanical equipment from public view. I This will be a requirement of the project. II Avoid mansard roof forms. I Mansard roof not designed into project.
Emphasize an informal architectural character. Building
facades should be visually friendly.
Design visual interest into all sides of buildings.
By providing for an attractive front facade and
landscaping, the entry to the project is very visually
appealing. Visual interest is added to the building
through attractive building colors, many windows with
varying shapes and architectural features, and varying
entrances.
The building facades which are visible from the streets
have been given special design attention by the
variation in facade fronts and entrances. recessed
entrances, a varying roof line and a variation in
landscaping. To provide some visual appeal to the rear
of the building, the parking lot will be landscaped and
there will be outdoor patio areas and balconies.
Decorative doors will be used for the front and rear
entrances. The sides of the building is not visually
interesting, with the exception that the applicant did
attempt to provide a little more interest on the north sid
of the building with some arch-like projections for
articulation purposes. The sides, in general, however
must remain solid walls for sound attenuation purposes.
Therefore, staff finds the lack of visual interest on the
building sides to be acceptable.
Utilize small individual windows except on commercial
storefronts.
Provide facade projections and recesses.
The proposed project provides for smaller, individual
window openings at the front and rear of building.
The building design provides for recesses and
projections which will create some shadows and
contrast.
Give special attention to upper levels of commercial
structures.
The upper level of this commercial building does provid
for balconies and attractive window features which
reflects special attention in design.
Provide special treatment to entries for upper level uses. The upper levels of this building will be accessed
through internal stairways and accessed internally.
Therefore, no special treatment of upper level use
entries is necessary.
Utilize applied surface ornamentation and other detail
elements for visual interest and scale.
Detail elements have been incorporated into the entire
project by design. The window and entrance designs all
provide for detail which adds visual interest. The
balcony areas and central entry way were also designe
to provide for detail in architecture.
II
Respect the materials and character of adjacent The materials and colors proposed for the building will
development. not conflict with adiacent developments.
Emphasize the use of the following wall materials: wood
siding; wood shingles; wood board and batten siding;
The walls will have’s white/cream stucco finish. The
windows will have brown wood trim. Also decorative
stucco brick will be used on the front facade.
Avoid the use of the s;mulated materials; indoor/outdoor At this time, none of the noted materials have been
carpeting; distressed wood of any type indicated for use.
Avoid tinted or reflective window glass. The windows are clear glass.
Utilize wood, dark anodized aluminum or vinyl coated The applicant will be using dark wood window s and
metal door and window frames. trim.
Avoid metal awnings and canopies. The applicant has proposed no awnings or canopies.
Utilize light and neutral base colors. The building walls will have a white/cream stucco finish.
Limit the materials and color palette on any single The colors and materials are limited to stucco, brown
building (3 or less colors) wood window frames and red tile roof.
Provide significant storefront glazing. Due to the type of commercial facility, a youth facility,
this design feature is not applicable.
Avoid Large Blank Walls. The project provides for blank walls on the north and
south side. This is primarily due to the type of facility
proposed for construction. However, an effort has been
made by the applicant to provide some visual interest
within the roof line and on the north side with some
arch-type features.
/
d I I
_
/ Encourage large window opening: r restaurants Not applicable, .a restaurant proposed within the
project.
~ Encourage the use of fabric awnings over storefront
windows and entries.
Emphasize display windows with special lighting.
Encourage the use of dutch doors.
No fabric awnings to be used; not a retail or storefront
operation.
No display lighting. Not applicable to project.
Dutch doors not proposed. The applicant believes that
the doors as designed are more appropriate for the
selected style of the building and the type of use for the
facility.
Utilize small paned windows
Develop a total design concept.
The applicant is using small divided paned windows.
All facade design elements are unified. The applicant
was able to develop a total design concept with is also
functional and visually interesting.
Provide frequent entries.
Limit the extent of entry openings.
The project does provide for variation in entrances by
providing for two entrances - on to the office area and
another to the gym.
The extent of the entry openings has been limited
through the design.
Avoid exterior pull down shutters and sliding or fixed
security grilles over windows along street frontages.
Emphasize storefront entries.
The project does n?t include pull down shutters or
sliding or fixed security grilles over windows along the
street frontage.
The primary entrance to the facility is emphasized with
an arch feature and decorative door. The entrance is
immediately adjacent to the sidewalk which also create
an emphasis.
Integrate Fences and walls into the building design. . . Fences and walls have been incorporated into the
building design.
Encourage front entry gardens Not applicable.
Locate residential units near front property lines and Not applicable.
orient entries to the street.
Provide front entry porches. Not applicable.
Provide windows looking out to the street. Not applicable.
Utilize simple color schemes. Not applicable.
Provide decorative details to enrich facades. Not applicable.
Emphasize “cottage” form, scale and character Not applicable.
Emphasize an abundance of landscaping. Not applicable.
Limit access drives to garages or surface parking areas. Not applicable.
ched garages whlbn are subordinate in 1 Not applicable.
visual imbortance to the house itself. I
Provide quality designed fences and walls. Not applicable.
Vi,sually separate multi-family developments into smaller Not applicable.
components.
- 0 s; 1 . c1 ii ?JJ 8 s ?
9
3 F
I 2 c T iz n 1 e
ROOSEVELT STREET
b \ \ \
8
JOIN HMDS
; RECREATION BUILDING
if
FRMC SORINO. FWES.
2 ROOSEVELT STREET 3528 HADIXU 4T.
i PAUL LCWGTCFI
I: 2203 PlESA DRIM
5 CARLSBAD, CA
m CARLSBAO. CA 92-a 2 OCEANSIDE. CA. 92054
a (760) 120-0540 m 0 fl60., 122-494
-I
\ r ! 4 c
f
4 \ r
c
\
TYLER STREET
.-
. pg. .p& ! ,.._*. “S.4.
RDOSEELT STREET
-
1 ?
;:
% 0 Iu
li 2 w ?n 6r
‘8 io
P
P
P
rAu la&Tad
BT- MteADae -CL,- -,a CydJ- CYOJrnJw
f n
i ’ p ,., i.- .I” * -
f i 1 6 gf iii iii i ;i
TYLER STREET
ROOSEVELT STREET I I ROOSEVELT STREET 7
= c ii Y f ; $ 1 5 e :
TYLER STREET
_---
i?i $8 2 RECREATION BUILDING
JOIN u4J-ws
l=FsHz 3oRlND. RZEb. ii P4JJL LONClTCN
f ta 9 ROOSEVELT STREET 35m rl4Dlsm e+T. g l509 MS4 DRIVE
8 ‘;% 5
m c-aA0m. CA Yeme Zi OCEWSIDE. c4 32-4
CARLSBAD , CA a (-IQ@) ‘Ii!@--40
!
Cl60) -KS’-4304
2
EXHIBIT 7
PAUL LON~TON, h&-fiTECT AIA
2909 MESA DRivE
OcEANSidE,
CAfifORNiA
92054
(619) i-22-4904
FAX (619) 722-4903
November 12, 1997
Ms. Debbie Fountain
Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency
2965 Roosevelt St., Suite B
Cartsbad, California 92008
Reference: Join Hands
Dear Debbie;
Enclosed are elevations are information regards the proposed signage for the
Join Hands project.
The letters will be IO” tall. They will be black plastic fastened to the walls. 1 have
enclosed the approximate linear dimensions of each sign.
The signs facing Roosevelt Street will total 43 SF. The signs facing Tyler Street
will total 18.5 SF.
Please call with any questions or comments.
II - -70 64 3 0 0 CP lt-nll i lm n- -It
CP -%
Irut m -It
lnlll u- lt-nll < \
.
000
FT OEIO 0
EEB
0
:t
0
E lrnli CP -it
-+I
-3 It- II-n
70
CP --It
xl ll-l-u lllll -It
ltlll lt- n-lnl
<
lb -4
0 7
I
BOXING GYM
I l/2 II =
LOIN tiAND5’
5AvE A LIFE
FRANK’S ’ Gh,‘G <;.. 1:‘. :T: : a’
3228
Join Hands Save A Life
3528 Madison Street
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 720-0540
# Mayor
City Council City Manager city Attorney
Frank Anthony Sorino
Executive Director
April 2,199s
Mayor Claude Lewis
Mayor Pro-Tern Ramona Finnila
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Lewis and Mayor Pro-Tern Ramona Finnila:
Thank you for taking the time to share with us your concerns regarding the Join Hands
Save A Life Recreational Facility. As a result of our meeting, we have asked for a
continuance in order to provide more information that will clarify for both of you and the
city council members, the legitimate issues you both raised.
By providing copies of our handbook, elaborating on the duties of the Board of Directors,
on the employee and financial organizations, ledger set up, the 1995 Federal
Government’s required CDBG Independent Auditor’s Report on Join Hands Save A
Life’s internal control structure, tax preparation, and future funding plans; we hope you
will gain a greater sense of who we are and our viability as a long term organization
committed to all the youth of Carlsbad, regardless of race, color, creed or economic
status.
Sincerely,
Frank Sorino
Executive Director
Join Hands Save A Life
JL. a- 3 %-9b@
Dr. J. Barry McGrath
Treasurer
Join Hands Save A Life
PROOF OF PUBLIC rON
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
North County Times
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad,
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
March 27, 1998
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
San Mlmrcos Dated at California, this
of March, 1998
A
27th day
/iii&~ --------------------- ------ Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space is . the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Notice of Public Hearing
CITY OF CAR- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
JOIN HANDS YOUTH FACILITY
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that ths Housing and Redevelopment Cammission of the City of Cadsbad will hold a public hearing at the CONFERENCE CENTER, CARLSBAD SAFETY CENTER, 2560 ORION WAY, CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA at 6:oO p.m. on Tuesday, April 7, 199~ to mnsider approval of a ~a]w Redevelopment Permit (97-03) to allow the mtmcllon of a new 9587 square fwt youm facility. The requested permit includes requesb for the following variances: 1) for (BIT setbacks which excaed the maximum range; 2) a portion of the front and the side whacks to bs reduced to zero feet whieh am Wow the minimum requirement of 5 feet; 3) a gym mof which does not pmvtde for the required 4:12 rwt pitch. and 4) an $-site loading and unloading area for parhhdpants. The project is proposed for property located on the west side of Roosevelt Street (mid-black) between Pine and Walnut in village Land Use D&id 5, mwa particularly described as:
Lots 27.28 and 23. in Block 31, in the Town of C&bad. in the Cii d Cadsbad. Camty of San Diego, State of CaMcinia, acmrding to the map lhmof No. 535, filed in the OfTIce of the County Recorder of San -0 County. May 2. 1986.
Those persOns wishing to speak on this pmp~sa are cordially inwted to attend the public hearing. Ccpi6s of the staff report will b-3 available on and afler April 3.1998. If you have any questions or wld like a copy d the staff report for the pmjed please contact Debbie Fountain in the Housing and Redevelopment Department at (619) 434-2815.
As a result of environmental review under the Cakfomia Environmental Ctualtly Act (CEoA) and the Environmental Prct&on Ordinance of the City of Cadsbad. the Planning Director issued a N6@bve Dedaratii far the subject pmjad on September 19, 1997. The D&in Rev& Board recommended a~val of the Negative Declaration on January 26, 1998.
If you challenge tba Maja Redevelopment Permit in court. you may be limited to raising only those issws you or meow else raised a the public hearing described in this notice 01 in witten cormspondena delivered to the CI@ of Cadsbad at or prior to the puMic hearing.
Case File: RP 97-03 Case Name: Join Hands Youth Fadlii DESIGN REVIEW BOARD,
Legal 58060 March 27,1998
March 9, 1998
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice JOIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE
YOUTH FACILITY 97-03 for a public hearing before the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission.
Please notice the item for the regular Housing and Redevelopment Commission
meeting on as directed bv Citv Manauer’s Office.
Community Development Dire&or DATE
JOHN I NOBEL TR 4 j0HN LMONTALBANO JdIN HANDS SAVE-A-LIFE
3096 ROOSEVELT STREET ANN SAMUELS - SITE ADDRESS
C.ARLSBAD CA 92008 I 3060 ROOSEVELT STREET MAILING LABELS
CARLSBAD CA 92008 DRB: JAN 26,1998
GILBERT ACUNA ILLARIO & MARIA MANN0
3055 ROOSEVELT STREET 3067 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
R. MADAMA;E.ROZANCE i+ MAR VISTA TRUST
MAR VISTA TRUST 3091 ROOSEVELT STREET
3085 ROOSEVELT STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MATTHEW HALL TRUST
NANCY HALL
3135 TYLER STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MATTHEW HALL TRUST MATTHEW HALL TRUST MATTHEW HALL TRUST
JOSEPH MARTIN J TRUST MARTIN JOSEPH J TRUST MARTIN JOSEPH
2604B EL CAMINO REAL #334 3161 TYLER STREET 3195 TYLER STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 1 t
ANTONIA MEZA MATTHEW HALL TRUST , DU SHAUNE JESSICA MARTIN JOSEPH J.
3215 TYLER STREET 26048 EL CAMINO REAL #334
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
SOILS ORGANIC SOLUTION SOILS ORGANIC SOLUTION CAROLINE NESTA
3235 TYLER STREET 3265 TYLER STREET 3120 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 ‘CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
CAROLINE NESTA GERALD & NORMA BOWERS
3130 MADISON STREET RICHARD BOWERS
CARLSBAD CA 92008 3144 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GUARDIAN FEDERAL SAVINGS
3183 JEFFERSON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
& NOBEL INTERNATIONAL
3170 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KENNETH & PAM CRISMAN
740 PINE AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
IilBE & CLAUDIA GAY
- 3281 TYLER STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOBE,& CLAUDIA GAY JOBE & CLAUDIA GAY
3261 TYLER STREET 3259 TYLER STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOBE & CLAUDIA GAY
3253 TYLER STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOHN C SCHILLING TRUSTEE PETER LOPEZ
PO BOX 417 3213 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92018 CARLSBAD CA 92008
DAVID C MCCHESNEY ANNA E ORNELAS
3235 ROOSEVELT STREET 3255 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
ANNA E ORNELAS JOIN HANDS SAVE A LIFE RUBEN & M. GASTELUM
3258 TYLER STREET 3528 MADISON STREET 3290 TYLER STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
’ t
, ERNEST & NANCY REYES
3243 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GILBERT & TERESA MIRANDA
3293 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EM JOHNSTON TRUST
3222 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ELEUTERIA CAMPA TRUST WILLIAM SCHNEIDER
3234 ROOSEVELT STREET 3256 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARK & EDEE LUPER
635 PINE AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOEL A URETA JAVIERA A URETA
3280 ROOSEVELT STREET 3280 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
w FRANCES MORENO
CONSUELO TREJO
3286 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
- MANUEL & EVA GASTELUM
JAIME SYLVIA
640 WALNUT AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STANLEY & KWAN JEONG JOHN &JULIE HARLAND HYUNG &YOUNG YANG
3279 MADISON STREET 3265 MADISON STREET 3255 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
MONICA I’ MIER
3231 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GUADALUPE F MUNOZ
3250 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CELIA C RAMIREZ
735 PINE AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
REYNALDO BARRERA
REGINA M CRUZ
3221 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARTINEZ FAMILY TRUST
3274 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PACHECO FAMILY TRUST
3216 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STEVE F RODRIGUEZ
3207 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
c MARIE DAVIES
3237 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FELIPE & TONY HERNANDEZ
3230 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 ’ I
GERADo & ABIGAIL GOMEZ ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP SD PHILLIP & MARY RODRIGUEZ
GOMEZ ALFONSO: ELEA 3256 MADISON STREET 3240 *MADISON STREET
3270 MADISON STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KATHLEEN PALMER FLORENCIO RODRIGUEZ MIGUEL & F GONZALEZ
3292 MADISON STREET 675 OAK AVENUE 3119 MADISON STREET #B
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
MAURO & RAMONA FLORES HILARIO FLORES STEPHEN & GINA RUGGLES
3143 MADISON STREET 3145 MADISON STREET 3159 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
VICTOR & MARIE MONTANEZ SANTANA FAMILY TRUST MACK 0 STOUT
3167 MADISON STREET 3183 MADISON STREET 650 PINE ‘AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
VALDEZ FAMILY TRUST MARY J PINAMONTI TRUST THOMAS JR MONREAL
3190 ROOSEVELT STREET 3170 ROOSEVELT STREET 3160 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
‘JESSICA DU SHAUNE
3150 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BOYS & GILRS CLUB CSBD
3115 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOYCE JAMES A TR
3155 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ELVA M CASTRO
MAYME V SCOTT
3176 TYLER STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROBERT & J. CARREON
3309 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOSEFA MARTINEZ ’
1292 AMADOR AVENUE
VISTA CA 92083
JOHN & CONSUELO GONZALES
3320 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARIA L APODACA TRUST
3345 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WILLARD C & SUE PETERSON
3315 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
REFUGIO L CAMPA
3322 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SHELDON I BROCKETT T
3138 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EDWARD X NEVARES
3135 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NANCY HALL L ET AL .
MARTIN JOSEPH J; MA
3163 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MATTHEW HALL TRUST
JOSEPH MARTIN
3179 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RAYMOND & F ANGEL
3329 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FRANCES MORENO
CONSUELO TREJO
3304 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DOLORES A JAUREGUI
CONSUELO TREJO
3328 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
VICTORIA R MACEDO
3331 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROY & HOPE GASTELUM
665 WALNUT AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PORFIRIO & ISABEL RIVERA
3340 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
- F~~VIDENT BANK TR
3110 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EDWARD X NEVARES
RONALD L NEVARES
3147 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DAVID & DORA VALADEZ
3177 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KATHERINE BALZNO
SYLVIA BALINO
511 WALNUT AVENUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WILLIAM & P. TOI’JIAN
3333 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008 * t
OFELIA ESCOBEDO
THERESA E CHALFANT
3304 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RUBEN PACHECO TR
SELMA PACHECO TR
3357 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ALFONSO & C. SENTENO
3323 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
THOMAS & M. ALMANZA
3306 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOHN & VIOLET DIAB TRUST
3354 MADISON STREET
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOSEPH P JR. KRATCOSKI c : ErtIC L MURPHY - ’ f&B & RONEE KOZLOWSKI
1302 PINE AVENUE 396 N COAST HIGHWAY 101 3306 DONNA DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINJTAS CA 92024 CARLSBAD CA 92008
Tohn Nobel
PO Box 99550
San Diego, CA 92 169
-
Ilario & Marie Manno
3067 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Matthew Hall & Nancy Hall
2604B El Carnino Real #334
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Matthew Hall t Joseph & Ma Martin
2604 El Camino Real #334
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SOILS ORGANIC SOLUTION lNC
3235 Tyler St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
John Montalbano & Ann Samuels
20 N Raymond Ave
Pasadena, CA 91103
Richard Madama & Vista Mar
PO Box 1481
Carlsbad, CA 92018
Matthew Hall & Joseph Martin
2604B El Camino Real #334
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Antonia Meza& Shaune Jessica Du
3215 Tyler St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SOILS ORGANIC SOLUTION MC -
3265 Tyler St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Gilbert Acuna
91 Maynard Ave
Newbury Park, CA 9 1320
Vista Mar
PO Box 1481
Carlsbad, CA 92018
Matthew Hall & Joseph Martin
2604B El Camino Real #334
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Matthew Hall & Joseph & Ma Martin
2604B El Camino Real #334
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Nesta Caroline
2040 Lincoln St
Oceanside, CA 92054
Caroline Nesta Gerald Bowers & Richard Bowers
2040 Lincoln St 3 199 Falcon Dr
Oceanside, CA 92054 Carlsbad, CA 92008
NOBEL INTERNATIONAL CO
PO Box 99550
San Diego, CA 92 169
GUARDIAN FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSN
170 11 Beach Blvd
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Kenneth & Pamela Crisman
PO Box 723
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
Jobe & Claudia Gay
PO Box 727
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
- Jobe & Claudia Gay
PO Box 727 .
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
Jobe & Claudia Gay
PO Box 727
Carlsbad, CA 92018
Jobe & Claudia Gay
PO Box 727
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
John &hilling
PO Box417
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
Anna Grnelas
35 15 Strawberry Pl
Oceanside, CA 92056
Peter Lopez
1343 Tower Dr
Vista, CA 92083
Anna Omelas
3 5 15 Strawberry PI
Oceanside, CA 92056
David McChesney
3235 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
JOIN HANDS-SAVE A LIFE
3528 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
- .
JOIN HANDS-SAVE A LIFE
3528 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Ernest & Nancy Reyes
4180 La Jolla Village Dr #255
La Jolla, CA -92037
E M Johnston
3 1250 Ranch0 Amigos Rd
Bonsall, CA 92003
Joel Ureta & Javier Ureta
80 11 Crossridge Rd
Dublin, CA 94568
Stanley Jeong t Yarn Fung Wong
1720 Oak St
South Pasadena, CA 9 1030
Monica Mier
323 1 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
M Guadahrpe Munoz
3250 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Celia Ramirez
735 Pine Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Gerard0 & Abigail Gomez
Alfonso & Elea Gomez
4765 Gateshead Rd
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Kathleen Y Palmer
3292 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
JOIN HANDS-SAVE A LIFE
3528 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Gilbert & Teresa Miranda
3870 Valley St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Eleuteria Campa
3234 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Frances Moreno & Consuelo Trejo
1611 James Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
John & Julie Harland
2932 Gaviota Cir
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Ruben & Margaret Gastehun
1975 Magnolia Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Mark & Edee Luper
PO Box 2084
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
William Schneider
3448 Camden Cir
Carlsbad, CA 92008
-.---
Manuel & Eva Gastehun
Sylvia Jaime
640 Walnut Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Hyung & Young Yang
2915 Cacatua St
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Reynaldo Barrera & Regina Cmz Steve Rodriguez
3221 Madison St 3207 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Family Martinez
3274 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Marie Davies
3095 Monroe St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Family Pacheco
9 10 Woodlake Dr
Cardiff, CA 92007
Felipe Hem&dez &-Tony Hemandez
3230 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
R&AN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF S D
PO Box 85728
San Diego, CA 92186
Philhp & Mary Rodriguez
4304 W La Madre Way
North Las Vegas, NV 8903 1
Florencio Rodriguez
675 Oak Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
A Miguel & Francisca Gonzalez
3 119 Madison St #B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
.
Mauro & Ramona Flores Hilario Flores Stephen & Gina Ruggles PO Box 80 3 145 Madison St PO Box 1352 Carlsbad, CA 920 18 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 920 18
,
Victor & Marie Montanez
PO Box 874
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
Family Valdez
2506 San Clemente Ave
Vista, CA 92084
Shaune Jessica Du
3 150 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
CIRCLE K STORES lNC
3 110 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Edward Nevares & Ronald Nevares
3 135 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
David & Dora Valadez Jr.
435 Partridge Cir
Vista, CA 92083
Katherine Balino & Sylvia Balino
5 11 Walnut Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
William & Patricia Topjian 5800 Lake Murray Blvd #59
La Mesa, CA 9 1942
Ofelia Escobedo & Theresa Chalfant
1611 James Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Family Santana Mack Stout
3 183 Madison St 29 14 Luana Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008 . Oceanside, CA 92056
Mary Pinamonti
2244 S Santa Fe Ave #B02
Vista, CA 92084
Thomas Monreal Jr.
3 160 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Sheldon Brockett
4522 Trias St
San Diego, CA 92 103
Sheldon Brockett
4522 Trias St
San Diego, CA 92 103
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARLSBAD
PO Box 913
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
Edward Nevares & Ronald Nevares
. t 3 135 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Joyce James
393 1 Garfield St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Nancy Hall & Joseph & Ma Martin
2604B El Camino Real #334
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Elva <aka Alva M> Castro & Mayme Scott 3 176 Tyler St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Matthew Hall & Joseph & Ma Martin
2604B El Camino Real #334
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Robert & Josephine Carreon Sr.
3309 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Raymond & Florence Angel
3329 Roosevelt St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Josefa <le> Martinez
1292 Amador Ave
Vista, CA 92083
Frances Moreno & Consuelo Trejo
1611 James Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
John & Consuelo Gonzales
1364 Broken Hitch Rd
Oceanside, CA 92056
Dolores Jauregui & Consuelo Trejo
PO Box 281
Carlsbad, CA 920 18
,
Ruben Pacheco & Selma Pacheco
3357 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Alfonso 8z Crespina Senteno
3323 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Thomas & Magdalena Ahnanza
3306 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
John Diab 8 M Family Violet
11652 Corinth Cir
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Maria Apodaca
3345 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Willard & Sue Peterson Jr.
7428 Avila Ave
Ranch0 Cucamonga, CA 91730
Refugio Campa
3322 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Joseph Kratcoski Jr.
1302 Pine Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Victoria Macedo
3331 Madison St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Roy & Hope Gastelum
667 Walnut Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Porfiiio & Isabel Rivera
3275 Donna Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Eric Murphy
396 N Coast Highway 101
Encinitas, CA 92024
Bob & Ronee Kozlowski
3306 Donna Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
(J.H.S.A.L.)
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NAME
Frank A. Sorino
Executive Director
Juan Velasquez
CounselorKarlsbad High
Dr. J. Barry McGrath
Teacher
Judy Barber
Teacher
Salvador Velazquez, M.D.
Sheila J. Barrow
Dominick Sorino
Retired
Rose Rademacher
ADDRESS
3528 Madison Street, Carlsbad
942 PaIm Avenue, Carlsbad
2685 Garfield Street, Carlsbad
28 19 Monroe Street, Carlsbad
1784 Troy Lane, Oceanside
Ass. VP Mgr., Home Savings, Carlsbad
1560 Sandalwood Lane, Carlsbad 729-0406
3366 Roosevelt Street, Carlsbad 729-5 160
ADVISORS
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
Karen Gleason HUSS, Atty. 1739 Sorrel Court, Carlsbad 438-4082
Capt. Jim Hawks Carlsbad Police Department 931-2115
Linda Ledesma Guide Program Carlsbad Police Dept. 931-2162
Dennis E. Cunningham III VP Planning Systems 93 l-0780
PHONE
720-0540
434-590 1
434-3026
434-0840
722-0908
729-7 111
J
May 11,1998
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
3528 Madison Street /j&c, + #&it$
Carlsbad, CA 92008 AGENDA lTEM # /
a Mayor City Council
City Manager
CZy AZtorney
Mayor Bud Lewis
Mayor Pro Tern Ramona Finnila
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
city Clerk
Dear Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tern Finnila and City Council members:
Attached to the note please find Join Hands - Save A Life’s 5 year Financial Plan and 5 year
Projected Expense Budget. This is the completed information that Mayor Lewis and Mayor Pro
Tern Finnila suggested we provide to you and the City Council members to help provide the City
Council with specific information about our organization.
You should have already received our handbooks and additional related information.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Frank Anthony Sorino
Executive Director
Enclosures
.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
3528 Madison Street
Carlsbad, CA 92008
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN
(In Dollars)
Car Washes 500 600 700 800 1,000
Athletic Tournaments 2,000 2,500 3,000
Modular Building 5,000
TOTALS 24,700 31,100 44,500 56.300 68,500
In Kind Services: Many people and companies have made verbal commitments to volunteer labor,
such as electrical engineers, electricians, plasterers, plumbers, painters, cement contractors,
Disability Act contractors.
Material Donations: We are anticipating material donations and at-cost savings from different
suppliers.
Equipment/Furniture: We have purchased and donated equipment and furniture. in storage. We
are also aware of foundations that donate equipment and we will be applying to those organizations.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
3528 Madison Street
Carlsbad, CA 92008
PROJECTED FIVE YEAR EXPENSE BUDGET
TOTALS 39,953 252,103 149,540 137,925 177,265
SAVINGS 19,247 7,997 11,960 21,875 21,735
,
CARLSBAD YOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES
January 22,1998
Dear Design Review Board and Housing Commission:
At the January 21 st meeting of the Carlsbad Youth Enrichment Services
Organization ( Y.E.S. ) , discussion occurred related to the up-coming review of
building plans submitted by the Join Hands - Save A Life Program. Following
that discussion, a motion was brought forward and approved to formally petition
you to display flexibility with the variances necessary in the current building plan.
Y.E.S. was formed to establish or support community prevention and intervention
programs/projects that address the needs of all youth, but in particular , those
needs of youth who are ” at-risk”. Our organization includes representatives from
all levels of civic and coummunity agencies and groups.
We understand and appreciate the complexities of your task , and hope that you
will find a way to approve this petition as requested.
Thank you for your consideration.
MarthA Law-Edwards
Y.E.S. Chairperson
720 - 0373
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. b
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE cm*
T&J&g@& 73x7 &JAY 379 7s f6 @chums
43J- a $/ ee+Jd.
729-5dJ-0 A?/2fedr~ .-
?“?~‘qta( ‘?ad;& 3530 cv\~bi5srt.. <ye - 729- 03ss
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. L
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. .
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
-- me....l-..“e..v.- _..- ~,. I_.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. L
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
a
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. .
Thank you for your support.
-.-.-. --.--,~.Y-Il~‘~-,“,.-“I,I.I. -.-- -.
JOIN HANDS - SA+E A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad. to
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. I
-. _
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. L
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE SIGNATURF
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
Dear Neighbors;
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. l
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
2. pc,-, -&--J&Q \i 0 -:‘.;I 7 5 I‘.~icj~.~-&& i -f ‘3 f f//.> f
(_3~~-- Qi
-swx-mcms;t, yaq--ld2G\ Cac\eca
2. -3. ,- I* ; : 4 * .yTz ..-* , c f : ‘1 .- . ’
I ‘. * _ \’ *‘, _.+- 3 ‘i _ .., , ’ : . f-, .Y \t)f ‘I >,! L c!,ch. ,-’ LA <> .: ,1 +> ‘7, I;([ (~-+g-r L /..[ [-Y ‘qvy ‘,~? IV _.,% I * ’ ,‘.,:
3475,.., t. “I .-,.>,..> ,* : - cf /!Q++ &jq i q+J-x :. , i
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth ccnter to provide free servic& to the disx-lvmtaged youth of the Barrio of Cnrlsbad.
Our centcr has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and vet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to’invitp
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and I-Iuusing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the vari‘lwcs that ICY
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME // ADDRESS PHONE
.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. . .
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE _ . ‘. ----y _ ,-- _ I& .-)I ‘ii Iii ; i -j .?-+-I ii g _ f 1 .JJ -3 .: ._ c.r yi,q : i ’ 22 -. c( , 2!. ( - (_II‘>&( ’ / ,,; i 1 2 , ,A.:<- - ._I
/ 1.. ; ‘,I “/ ; .; ) ;‘,*:- L ‘7 ..$ p c j%-~_-/bL ). .,
J/,-~_~ ;-i * J- 4 i,--,ea‘L '--r 3 ALI -. 'z / -_
rl , *? > i i :,; ,' .q--3,: : '- 7
“' ,' -,' CL. <, 2, b L/ - j+. -cc I, -&- .,&& l" c) ,--i A-cc- (--< 8.
+o 7#914453 -
-. .-. .-. , ..-, ^. _.__... .
Dear Neighbors;
OIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE I I-
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
QT lQQ.Qf%.*r3 4 ,pL/- qj@y rlw,JoGn , c -I l(LnsIn~r+ qI#3077_9 GfcE?=le
z ~~iQ~k&& 72417~ c
< -
f [/Sk t Lorra’\fle OJlcy, n 5~YI! MO J c izwyt7&? ,73, 2&kbq~ , wa3 2 mid3 mQoNln 57-t 7-3 cl -1 7.SQ c~rlsbad.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in .petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. .
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
.----*-L-.-._L.--,.“.- . . .
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
M&he1 +p,! -333A4 ~FM-%m s4,cs L&d Cf
c,\or;~ -hnvs ,C,A 43kj901
sc;icP. erSGn % f4VtSb ci4.730-qr0’6
cM.JBcr- 942 \%.I, EIdr_ c.r,AA& c n %ti-S Go/. . (x 3323 JGfkrson -
a&m
&id Amai e. 3m cdul AAl 3 Cm\sh*cl c 72042%3
~e+ottt~ &,b~.rsoti ?+&I-bd ,d. \: rf5' 79+Q(O~ . - M- 38 . l-l ~l~S~~~ti~* ww!.l~~ .
P,n* cYY/Y ;taWh&in ~Xl7?nrhhnd.C,./3 XXH53-~
~/u4eea 33&b w be/d CT CQ &B&D Sn 6 r e c rl . 7ta-/v53
mc) Is3ico naa= \I@ Sk Car\g@Ad 729 c V 4 M
!%wtr 5krnr 35-a om3jS~ ST. C#rLsPRD. @a 73 0 -d r y4
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. I
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE SIGNATURE
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. b
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
to
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. 8
Thank you for your support.
.
JOXN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. .
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS cpn ,-+/+ PHONE I
4 f -@&.A~" ~,3>wvn*~; sm3fa T-34 - 7535/f
‘tie Av c$j D.. <-Cl ?~q-.~c,~
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. L
Thank you for your support.
NAME I ADDRESS PHONE
&Jy<
r-P p‘ 7 ,,$ ‘_ ,
.3,&p >&Lri-Y/ p$!T SL. 5--j-
P q
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. I
Thank you for your support.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
Dear Neighbors;
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. s
Thank you for your support.
Dear Neighbors;
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. b
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE SIGNATURF
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. 1
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME
/
.
F-OrewO ~cfi-
ADDRESS CITY PHONE SIGNATURE . , J&
37/L KeLccrvLod 51% Gr/Shd ~zY-JYRF~~ TZ
J%P RRJ
1’
I I
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
PRINT
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our cenier has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. ti
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS CITY_: PHONE -2 c s-r- SIGNA/Tm- .e+-, -
: ,. l ’ , , _ ,---” ,
, .- ; I
. ‘-.&+
--& ;s+i//fl #g; jgpz&.? &&g:---
73T.37 2 e/#r6- +g
df a- myf
m
c33s-u
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. I
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE SIGNATURE /
u \ i 5 c 5 k a &,~c; ( ‘?a@ %wc,c~~ kvlt. I’,:& i ~3~-032%. &f&f&&!& / c nlc ’ 3 / 3-m ) W--W&-K (I * ‘13q-037 a XcnyA /A-‘h
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. L
Thank you for your support.
c, q
JOIN HANDS - SAW A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. .
Thank you for your support.
Dear Neighbors;
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. 8
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE SIGNATURE
.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. .
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
C‘I f-J c. ! ,-..-** 4 .* . 2 =
JOIN HANDS - SAW A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carl&ad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the varimces th‘lt we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
. . ..-__. ,... . . ._ .._ . . . .
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE e Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. .
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
* * 1 : CI 3
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. l
Thank you for your support.
-PRINT NAME
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
. Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. S
Thank you for your support.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our cent.er has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have reauested. t
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. I
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE SIGNATURF
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. I
Thank you for your support.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
PRINT NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE SIGNATURE
R y fl ,,$“/ky’d~ c &xz &.~-~7#. L&J-=-d ii~y-~~g,y 2,s
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested. .
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
-..-... -- _... “.+ti_ _._..” --_-_, I..
-
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of Carlsbad.
Our cenfer has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Dear Neighbors;
After seven (7) years of effort, we at Join Hands - Save A Life, are finally
approaching our goal of building a youth center to provide free services to
the disadvantaged youth of the Barrio of CarIsbad.
Our center has been designed to blend in with the neighborhood and yet
maximize the space available for indoor activities. We would like to invite
you to join us in petitioning the Design Review Board and Housing
Commission in accepting the plans as submitted with the variances that we
have requested.
Thank you for your support.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
-. -...._ _ .aY.-+.._- . .._ .._...e--..
/):;i 15 -/ ,/-f/L ‘/ 7L.L L , (f-t c ‘ C‘, I
---
J
.‘J
l-7
9,
T
/“:
\m. ..,&dW! ”
< 9 $E
a-l-l
eg s= 0=
a
pg
.
I yd [ xv3 . cn =r . I
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
‘Join Hands - Save A L(f2 ” is a community based youth service program designed to be a community effort to enhance he
lives of the youth in our community.
Our goal is to help relieve stress in the homes of the lowest income families by providing free services for their youth.
Our objective is to provide a constructive alternative to the “at-risk” youth of our community that meet in the streets with no
place to go and nothing to do, that out of boredom or a search for excitement, will not have to turn to destructive behavior
like recreational drug experimentation, alcohol abuse, g&X, robbery or gang violence.
Presently our program extracurricular activity’s include: FREE TO ALL PARTICIPANTS!
. Boxing . Community Services l PivaNight
l Art l Guest Sp&ers l Probation Services
l Field Trips . Youth Board Meetings l Police Department Workouts
a Study Hall l Neighborhood Watch l Free Transportation
l Dances . HireAYouth l 24 Hour Hotline
l Counseling l Attending City Council . MedicalExamhations
l Mentoring Meetings l Video Production
l Basketball l Weightlifting ! Conditioning . Fishing Trips
l Job Training . GrafEti Clean-ups * l Drug Awareness
l Conflict Resolution l Mediation 0 WorkProjects
l Music l Picnics
Our program started out with just a boxing team. this symbolizes our willingness to fight in hopes that one day our little
brothers and sisters won’t have to fight to catch the attention of our community leaders to show them that there is a dire
need to constructively channel the energy of our under-privileged youth who cannot afford the specialized programs and
entertainments that have been designated. Economic hardship is the most accurate predictor of criminal violence.
We need to “Join Ham&” in a cmmunity effort to save the lives of our youth. People are getting shot, stabbed and
victimized everyday!
We need to seriously support this program as a preventative measure, because it is too late when they are lying dead in the
streets.
All glory and honor to the Mbst High God who created the heavens and the earth, and who is the only
true source of strength, wisdom, courage and love to the people of dust who try to do good.
If everybody gives a little, we will be able to accomplish a lot.
Frank Anthony sorino
President
For information, please cali 720-0540.
For donations and monthly or yearly pledges, please send check or money order to:
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE ’
3528 Madison
Carlsbad, CA 92008
* All donations are tau deductible. 100% of your donation will directly benefit the youth.
JOIN HANDS -- SAVE A LIFE
PARTICIPANT APPLICATION AND
PARENT/GUARDIAN
AUTHORIZATION AND RELEASE FORM
NAME (First, Middle, Last):
BIRTH DATE: Month .----Day- - Year AGE: SEX: Cl Male El Female
Cl Hispanic Non-Hispanic: Cl White Cl Black Cl American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 Asian or Pacific Islander q Other:
ADDRESS: Apt #: -
CITY: STATE: ZIP: HOME PHONE: EMERGENCY PHONE: (~pamucmwtbem~)
Do you live with your 0 Mother q Father Cl Grandparent Cl Other, specify
Number of Cl Brothers El Sisters How many people live in your home?
Father’s Name:
Employed at: Work Phone
Mother’s Name:
Employed at: Work Phone
Your family’s approximate yearly income $
Name of your school: Grade you are in:
Are you currently taking medications ‘? Cl Yes Cl No Do you have any health problems? Cl Yes Cl No
If yes, explain:
PARENT/GUARDIAN AUTHORIZATION AND RELEASE: I/We do hereby give our son/daughter,
age , permission to participate in activities sponsored by
Join Hands - Save A Life. I understand that the Join H’ands - Save A Life, its personnel, Board of Directors, employees, and
program volunteers are not insured for injury that may be sustained by my child, or for any property loss that might be sustained
by my child or me. We assume the risk of any and all injury that might be sustained as a result of my child’s participation in
this program. My child and I hereby release Join Hands - Save A Life, its affiliates, its Board of Directors, its employees, its
volunteers, and any other person involved in its activities from any and all harm, claims, actions, or other obligations which
might arise as a result of my child’s participation in the Join Hands -- Save A Life programs arising for whatever reason to
include negligence on the part of the aforementioned entities and individuals. As the parent/guardian of the child named herein,
I further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Join Hands -- Save A Life, its personnel, Board ofDirectors, employees,
and program volunteers from any claim my child may have that survives this release.
I also give permission for my child to be transported in a Join Hands -- Save A Life vehicle to any and all activities involving
Join Hands -- Save A Life when supervised by an employee and/or volunteer agent of Join Hands -- Save A Life.
I further give my permission for the administration of emergency first aid by Join Hands - Save A Life or emergency medical
treatment by a licensed doctor or hospital and to arrange for emergency transportation for treatment purposes at my expense.
To the best of my/our knowledge, the information above is true and correct.
Signature of Parent or Guardian
Printed Name of Parent or Guardian
STAFF USE ONLY
Accepted by
Enter in Computer
Date Participant ID#
WBHOX
3528 Madison Street 9 Carlsbad, CA 92008 9 (Phone) 760-720-0540
Participant Survey
1. I participated in Join Hands Save a Life times a week.
2. Join Hands Save a Life helped me stay away from
a.) Drugs
b.) Gangs
c.) Alcohol
d.) Trouble
Totally Somewhat Not at all
3. Which recreational and social activities did you continue after leaving Join Hands Save a Life?
4. Did Join Hands Save a Life benefit you in raising your self-respect and self-esteem? Yes Somewhat Not at all
5. What activities would you like to see added to the Join Hands Save
a Life program?
6. What activities did you enjoy most at Join Hands Save a Life?
7. What is your highest level of education?
High School College Trade School
8. What is your employment?
9. Are you still in contact with Join Hands Save a Life participants?
Yes- No- Comments
Parent Survey
1. How many of your children participated in Join Hands Save a Life?
2. Did Join Hands Save a Life have a positive effect on your children?
Yes - No- How?
3.IXd your child’s attitude towards school, home, or community change as a result of Join Hands Save a Life? Please explain.
4. Did you feel Join Hands Save a Life encmraged your child to stay
away from
Yes No
Dwi3J Alcohol -
Gangs
trouble t
5. Would you like to see changes in Join Hands Save a Life? If so, what?
6. Did the fact that Join Hands Save a Life was free, encourage
participation in this program? Yes No-
Comments
FRANK ANTHONY SORINO
3528 MADISON STREET
CARLSEAD, CA 92008
(6 19) 720-0540
AREAS OF EXPERTISE
GANG PREVENTIONANTERVE~JON CONFLICT RESOLUTION, MEDIATION
DRUG AWARENESS SOCIAL WORK GANG AWARENESS
SPECIAL SKILLS
STRONG ABILITY TO RELATE WELL TO TEENAGERS, PARTICULARLY THOSE WITH PROBLEMS.
U~CELLENT PHYSICAL TRAINING KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS. ESPECIALLY IN THE AREA 0~ BOXING.
EXPERIENCE
1991 - PRESENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - PRESIDENT
“JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE” (J.H.S.A.L.)
. FOUNDED THE NON- PROFIT CHARITABLE CORPORATION.
l AWARDED SEVERAL CITY AND C.D.B.G. GRANTS.
l SPECIALIZE IN GANG PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION.
l SUPPORTED BY THE CARLSBAD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CARLSBAD YES AND HOME
SAVINGS OF AMERICA.
1993 - PRESENT GANG PREVENTION SPECIALIST
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
l TEACH GANG PREVENTION/INTERVENTION CLASSES.
l EMOM PROGRAM (EDUCATE, MOTIVATE, ORGANIZE AND MOBILIZE).
1993 - PRESENT CORE MEMBER
CARLSBAD YOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES (CARLSBAD YES)
l COMPOSED OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS FROM VARIOUS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE AGENCIES,
BUSINESSES AND CONCERNED CITIZENS.
l EEFsEG;Y MEET TO NETWORK AND REVINV ExISTING SERVICES FOR THE YOUTH OF
.
1994 - PRESENT SCHOOL Bus DRIVER
CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
1992 - 1994 VICE PRESIDENT
CALIFORNIA BORDER ASSOCIATION, U.S.A. BOXING
l OVERSEE AND HELP GOVERN AMATEUR BOXING IN SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL
COUNTIES.
1992 PRESIDENT
COACHES ASSOCIATION, U.S.A. BOXING
1988 - 1990 COUNSELOR
NEW HAVEN HOME, VISTA, CA
l SUPERVISED AND MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETWEEN RESIDENTS OF THIS GROUP HOME
FOR TEENAGE BOYS.
l TRAINED TO RESTRAIN AND ASSIST THOSE SHOWING HARM TO HIMSELF OR OTHERS.
l PROVIDED SUPPORT, UNDERSTANDING AND DIRECTION TO RESIDENTS.
1980 - 1984 PROGRAM DIRECTOR CHI-ALPHA (OUTREACH PROGRAM FOR TROUBLED TEENS)
l COUNSELED TEENS.
l DEVELOPED AND SUPERVISED PROGRAMS TO HELP TEENS WHO WERE RUN-AWAY&
GANG MEMBERS, OR HAD DRUG, ALCOHOL OR FAMILY AND EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS.
CURRICULUM VITAE
J. BARRY McGRATH, Ph.D.
EDUCATION
1992 Ph.D. Human Behavior, U.S.I.U.
1971 MA English Literature, San Diego State
1962 MED Worcester State College 1959 BS, Boston College
WORK EXPERIENCE
Court School (Summit School), Vista., CA Program Director
1991-1995
Court School (Summit School), Oceanside, CA
Program Director
1990-1990
Girls Rehabilitation Facility, Juvenile Hall, Sand Diego, CA 1989-1991
Program Director
Grossmont College, El Cajon, CA
Part-time English Instructor
University of San Diego High School, San Diego, CA
Engiish Teacher, English Depmtment Chaiqoerson
Basketball and Tennis Coach
1964-1988
President Teachers Aswciation, A&ninistrative Council
VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE
Join Hands - Save a Life, Carlsbad, CA
Board of Directors
1993-1995
Netherlands West Homeowners Association, Carlsbad, CA
President
1983-1995
Collwood Townhouse Homeowners Association, San Diego, CA
President
1978
PUBLICATIONS
Influence of Homework on Malbeth Test Scores
Doctoral Dissertation
Hawthorne and Reform
Masters K+esis
1992
1971
Salvador Gomes
1764 Trov Lane Oceanside. CA
(6191 722-0908
EDUCRTION~
1980-1982
1979-1980
1975-1979
1971-1975
CURRICULUM VITCSE
Velazauez. MD
92054
CA STATE LIC: G43914
DEA NO.: 6V2029379
AAFP BOARD CEAT: 1988-95
Resident physician. San Bernadino County Medical
Center. Family Practice Proqram. AAFP Boards 07182
Internship, San Bernadino County Medical Center
Family Practice Proqram
Received M.D.. University of California at It-vine. California Colleqe of Medicine
Bachelor of Science. Physiology from the University of
California at Berkelev
WORK EXPERIENCE:
4190 to present Primary Care Phvslcian, SCPMG
Carlsbad Clinic. Carlsbad CA
Primary Care (full-time)
7128186 to Primary care physician. The Mission Park Clinic
3115190 Oceanside. CA
Primary Care (full time)
1984 to
07186 Primary care physician. Pacific Community Medical
Group? Ranch0 California. CA
Minor trauma and orimary care (full time)
1984 to Primary care Dhysician. Fallbrook Communitv Clinic
07/86 Fallbrook. CA Primary Care (part time)
1983-1984 Emergency room physician, Calexico Community Hospital
Calexico, CA
Trauma and Drimary care (part time)
1984
1933-1984
192:-19Ej4
Primary care physicran, California Health Plan.
Mission Medical Center. El Cajon, CA
Minor trauma and primary care (full time)
Primary care Dhysician, rri-Community Family Practice
Group, Wriqhtwood. CA Minor trauma and primary care (part time)
Pr lmarv care ph’/SlCldn, Redlands Urgent Care Cllnrc
Redlands. CA
Minor trauma and orlmary care (part time)
WORK EXPERIENCE: (continued)
1983 Emerqency room physician T Santa Fe Communitv Hosoital
Los Angeles. CA
Trauma and orimary care (part time)
1982-1983 Primary care ohysician. Snowline Family Care Center
Wrightwood. CA
Minor trauma and primary care (part time)
1982 Emergency room physician, San Antonio Community
Hospital, Upland. CA
Trauma and primary care (part time)
1980-1982 Emergency room physician. San Bernadino County Medical
Center, San Bernadino. CA
Trauma and primary care (part time)
VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE:
1983 t0
oresznt
Mec!oer of Advisory Board. Adamic Institute Center
for Attudinal Healing, Redlands. CA
Counselinq of children and families with cancer
1982-1983 Game-side physician, Serrano High School footbali games, Phelan, CA
1981-1982 Ringside physician, local and regional AAU boxing matches in San Bernadino County
1978-1979 Primary care provider as fourth year medical student
for Placentia Community .Clinic, Placentia, CA
1972-1975 Laboratory technician and supervisory for tlinica
de la Raza. Oakland, CA
PUBLICATIONS:
1981-1982 AAFP Monograph on Thyroid Disease. contributed to
sections on fetal-maternal interaction and oediatric
thyroid dysfunctions
PERSONAL BACKGROUND: --
1 was raised in the Imoerial Valley and spent my entire youth
there nurtured by strong family ties. I am fluently bilingual in
Soanish arid English. I currently pursue interests in Philosoohy.
comoarztive theology, jazz, classical music, and woodworkinq.
JUDY ANN BARRKR 8013 Ramblewood Way Citrus Heights, California 95610 (916) 726-5291
PERSONAL:
Single U.S. Citizen
EDUCATION:
Administrative Credential, California State University, Sacramento, January, 1984 M.S., Education, University of Southern California, May, 1975 California Standard Secondary Teaching Credential, 1975 California Standard Elementary Credential, 1974 B.A., Sociology, minor, Psychology, Fullerton State University, June, 1973 -.
CERTIFICATE:
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), June 1975
AREAS OF SPECIALJZED TRAINING:
Corrxtions Education, Special Education, Teaching Survival Education, Sociology, Coun&eling, and Program Administration .
EXPERIENCE: .-a . . .
. - ‘. January 1985 to Present .
COMMUNITY SCHOOL, SACRAMENTO COUHTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
, a..? 7.: :c ”
. Pilot Project - helped to pioneer Sacramento County Community School by establishing and implementing the school curriculum peculiar to this pilot program. Duties include teaching math, English, history, and science in a self-contained junior and. senior high school program. Programs are individualized to accommodate the age, range and subject requirements ofZenrolI- ed students. Additionally, I teach a coping skills program to improve students social, employ- ability and survival skills. Contract independent study is also available aa an alternative in meeting educational needs. Moreover, I‘ am involved in administrative and coordination of. school activites with district personnel, probation department personnel and student’s parents.
January, 1984 - June, 1984 SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, EDUCATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Administrative Intern (Special Assignment) - Cbordinated 15th Annual Sacramento County Junior High Spelling Championship and 2nd Annual Sacramento County Elementary !$eUing Championship. Served as Master of Ceremonies for both contest. Served as judge at The Sac- ramento Bee Spelling Championship. Coordinated and attended Chapter 2, federall-x conferenc=for private school extension programs. Atied as consultant to Sacramento County Kindergarten Steering Committee. Participated in Sacramento County Justice System Advisory Gkoup meetings. -.--- ‘5’ . . .c
1975 - 1977 . ,-’ .. -- . .
EL CENTRO JR. SR. HIGH SCHOOL, JUVENILE HALL, SACRAMENTO, CA .
Long-Term Substitute Teacher - Teaching classes in the communication arts, social’studies, and an art expression class. .i _ ;. 7.‘. - *. 1974 - 1975 ._ .._
EL CENTRO JR. SR. HIGH SCHOOL, JUVENILE HALL, SACRAMENTO, CA Teacher Corps Intern - Teacher, developing. and teaching Survival Education Curriculum, teach- ing high school social studies, individualized tutoring, one-to-one counseling, and home visita- tion. Administering and developing a juvenile hall based commrinity re-entry program designed to lower juvenile recidivism rate.
.-
JUDY ANN BARBER PAGE 2
1973 - 1974 NORTE DEL RIO HIGH SCHOOL, SACRAMENTO, CA Teacher Corps Intern - Teacher. Teacher, teaching high school sociology in conjunction with Master Teaching Survival Education class of EMR (Educationally Mentally Retarded)
students, in conjuction with Master Teacher.
July 1974 - December 1974 JUVENILE HALL, SACRAMENTO, CA Volunteer Probation Officer, supervising two women on probation, one-to-one counseling, home visitation, enrolling women in classes and acting as educational liaison between ‘probation office and women’s school. . .
September 1972 -May 1973 ‘. ..,T . ?
STARBUCK JR. HIGH SCHOOL, L,4 HABRA, CA Volunteer Teacher Aide, tutoring individual students with reading problems, helping to motivate and build self-concept. ; .-
June 1968 -September 1968 .A..
BREA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL Volunteer Aide for mentally ill, participation in recreational activities with patients, facilitat- ing their personal health hygiene. ._ I.
SPECIAL PROJECXS: -* - -a.:’ , . . .y_ .:i**.iz-.
In 1985 I was one of six educators klected by the Sacra&nto County Office of‘Eklu&tion
,
< to produce a master Educational Technology Plan. . .- ystaiG -? ,. ‘I ..- _ _ . ..>r.& :‘ ’
As a member of the Educational Technology and Advisory Committee I helped establish the goals and objectives for the educational plan that has been adopted by the Road of-Bdu,q$ion for implementation by administrators and teachers. . : .+# 3. ..::- -A:.&<: . , -
The document developed through research of the needs of the students address..$$onal occupation programs, juvenile court schools, community schools, outdoor education and a variety of programs in special education. :-. ._‘, - :. -. s.. f. ?i,. ‘r.
: .!A<
_.._ ,. T _ . i.- -:
. ~ . . :-.. -. ..” :. ; .$
: 1 . -’ . .<-*;;. : .. ~
In 1983 I was chosen‘by the Sacramento &unt’~ Office of Education as a- cornmitt&’ f&m-’ ber to help revise the Sacramento County Office of Education Elementary and SecOridary~ Course of Study. ;r’i,w .-
The primary pur&se.of the committee w2 to bring the’ course of study into contpliak’ with Senate Bill 813 mandates. The committee established the courses of study required to comply with the state approved curriculum guidelines developed by the state department staff and approved by the State Board of Education. ’ -a... . ,.* .- . . . ,-;, _, *’ ;;.
pEm()Nfi INTg&: .’ : “. . . . ‘.’ -;- -. . ‘. 5.. 7’6’ ,.-.-* : 1 ._ .,, .- :- --. ..- .~,., -‘-:; . :‘--.‘; .,g.:. . ; *-].:: -.?; :.
Golf, Sewing, Continuing Program of Higher Education for Self Improvement and Enjoyment. ; : . . ..+T .A . -. -*+ ‘.; j ,) ,
INNOVA’IIONS OF EDUCATION: .. -3 .“. . --, ‘.. .-: . - ._ --;.;e :
Development of Survival Education Curriculum - I4 - :3, .-<, ..,. es ._ . . . PUBLICATIONS: n F’;,-‘; ,;< ?. ‘r-1 f & I-. : -:
JWENILEHALLBASED COMMUNITYRE-ENTRYPROGRAM, . 1,: -. 4. .-
Masters’ Thesis, University of Southern California, May 1975. . . : . L a.> A._
REPERRNCRS:
References available on request. .
--. h 2 .; . ..- . ._ <- a S’ . . . 1. ‘.
. . . : ., _. -. c-d . .__,
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
ORGANIZATION HANDBOOK
One of the common problems with the financial management of non-profit organizations
is the lack of continuity that often times occurs in the keeping of financial records, the
maintenance of a strong and consistent system of internal controls and the ongoing efforts
to provide adequate and informative financial reports for use by the Directors and others.
This lack of continuity is the result of the constant change in personnel of Organization
staff and changes in the Board of Directors that is a common place occurrence in non-
profit organizations. Additionally, the non-profit organization has a heightened
responsibility to have an adequate system of internal controls and to providing timely and
accurate financial data to all concerned. This is because a typical non-profit organization
is reliant upon the general public and upon individual donors for a large if not
predominant source of its revenues. Accordingly, the general public and specifically
individual donors need assurance that the resources provided to the non-profit
organization by their donations are expended in a responsible and efficient manner.
And therefore, with the objective in mind of maintaining the continuity in financial
management and record keeping so necessary for a non-profit organization and of
providing for the maintenance of a system of financial management for Join Hands-Save
a Life, it has become necessary to develop an organization handbook for this purpose.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND RECORD KEEPING
INTERNAL CONTROL: Join Hands-Save a Life has established and maintained a
system of internal control designed to safeguard the assets of the organization and to
insure that expenditures are made efficiently and with proper authorization. And in
accordance with all Federal, State, and local requirements especially CDBG fUnded and
allocation requirements by contracting with an independent bookkeeper to maintain and
supervise its financial records and an independent CPA to maintain and supervise its
accounting.
SEPARATION OF DUTIES: (A) The duties of collecting revenues and recording
deposits shall be carried out by the Treasure. Reporting the revenues (deposits) shall be
carried out by the Executive Director. (B) The duties of writing checks will require the
Executive Director and Treasurer’s signature. The duties of preparing bank
reconcilitations and the presentation of monthly financial reports will be supervised and
maintained by the Treasurer.
CASH RECELPTS JOURNAL: Join Hands-Save a Life will keep a Cash Receipts
journal for all deposits made during the month. The journal will list a date and a
description of the source of the revenue, and amount and a code for the classification of
each revenue item in the financial reports. This journal will be maintained by the
Treasurer. The Cash Receipts journal will be totaled by the Treasurer for the month and
should be reconciled with the deposits listed on the bank statement. Each bank statement
will have a separate Cash Receipts journal and the total for cash receipts for the month
will be used in the monthly bank reconciliation.
CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL (Check Register): Join Hands-Save a Life will
have a Cash Disbursements journal for each bank account to be maintained by the
Treasurer . The Cash Disbursements journal will list the check number, the date,
description of each transaction, an amount and a code for the classification of each
expenditure. This journal will be kept on a monthly basis and the Cash Disbursements
journal will be used in verification of information in monthly bank reconciliation,
DUAL AUTHORIZATION ON CHECKS: All checks with the exception of the
Executive Director’s checking account will require two signatures. One signature will be
the Executive Director’s, the other will be by the Treasurer.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S CHECKING: The Executive Director will have a
checking account with only his signature necessary for authorization. Transfers from the
other accounts will be made at his request. Transfers will not exceed $500 per month
unless otherwise directed by the Board of Directors when necessary.
BANK RECONCILIATIONS: A monthly Bank Reconciliation between Join hands-
Save a Life’s book balances and its bank balances for each bank account will be kept by
the Treasurer. The Bank Reconciliation will be kept in a legal-sized file for each bank
account, labeled “Bank Reconciliations”. These files will be kept by the Treasurer along
with the other financial data.
ORIGINAL BANK STATEMENT: Original Bank Statements will be kept along with
cleared checks in a separate file. Bank Statements will be arranged in order by date.
OPEN INVOICES FILE: A file will be kept of all unpaid invoices in an “Open
Invoices” file. These invoices should be arranged in alphabetical order. The Executive
Director should present original unpaid invoices to the Treasurer of the Board of
Directors once a week for authorization. No invoice will be paid unless properly
authorized by a Board Member.
PAID INVOICES: When invoices are paid, a date and a check number should be written
on the copy of the invoice to be filed or a copy of a check needs to be attached to the paid
invoice. All copies of paid invoice will be kept alphabetically by vendor. Copies of paid
invoices will be kept for three years. The vendor receiving payment will receive copy of
the associated invoice along with their payment,
MONTHLY REPORTING: A management report consisting of a “Statement of Cash
Flows” and an “Income Statement” will be presented by the Treasurer to the Board of
Directors on a monthly basis. This report should be reviewed and approved by the
financial committee or the till Board of Directors at their monthly meeting.
BUDGET: At the meeting prior to the beginning of Join Hands-Save a Life’s calendar
fiscal year-end, a budget enumerating projected revenues and expenditures for the
coming fiscal year should be provided to the Board of Directors. As of the first meeting
of the Board of Directors, in the new fiscal year, a thoroughly reviewed final budget
should be presented to the Board of Directors for review and approval. If possible, on a
quarterly basis, budget revenues and expenditures should be compared to actual revenues
and expenses and a variance report prepared and presented by the Executive Director to
the Board of Directors at their quarterly meeting.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
3528 Madison Street
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Duties of JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE Officers
Executive Director:
The Director maintains petty cash in the Executive Director checking account. Our other Join
Hands Save a Life checking account (main account) requires Treasurer and Executive signatures.
The Executive’ Director account will only be refunded when the Director shows the Board of
Directors $500 in receipts for the previous funding. The following can be purchased with pett!
cash by the Executive Director not to exceed the amount of $100 except with board approval:
l Office supplies l Recreational supplies
l Computer software l Field trip costs
l Word processing l Cash reimbursements
l Nutrition for J.H.S.A.L. clients l And/or any other emergency
l Gas for van, van maintenance
*In the case of emergency the $500 may be spent. Then must be presented to the Board of
Directors for approval.
All other expenditures will require dual authorization. In addition, original bank statements will
be kept along with cleared checks in a separate file. Bank statements will be arranged in order by
date. In addition, the Executive Director will maintain all property purchased by CBDG funds
which will include inventory of property with property tags on all equipment and these property
records will be maintained on a yearly basis. The Executive Director makes all purchases. The
board of directors approval is required on all purchases over $100. CBDG funds will submit an
invoice to the Director of Housing and Redevelopment she then reimburses Join Hands Save a
Life and that reimbursement is transferred into our main checking account as a deposit.
Treasurer:
The Treasurer records, deposits in a cash receipts journal. This is to be totaled and reconciled
each month with a deposit statement. The Treasurer will also keep a cash disbursement journal
on a monthly basis to verify information on the monthly bank reconciliations. In addition.
monthly bank reconciliations will be kept by the treasurer for bank balances and bank statements.
Bookkeeper:
The Bookkeeper will provide quarterly maintenance and supervision of financial records.
Accountant:
The Accountant will maintain and supervise the Bookkeeper’s records annually.
PROCUREMENT PROVISIONS
Procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and other services in
whole or I part rvith Federal funding will be obtained as economically as
possible, and in such a way as to promote open and free competition within
the market placed.
Every attempt will be made to use businesses that employ low and very lotv-
income persons residing within the area of the Agency.
All ground work and expectations for soiicitation of bids must be done prior
to bidding and in as much detail as possible. Solicitations will be based on a
clear and accurate description of material, product or service desired, with no
features that will restrict competition.
Examples include:
0 Placing unreasonable qualifying requirements 0 Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding 0 Specifying brand names only vice products of equal quality 0 Non-competitive pricing
l Non-competitive awards to consultants on retainer contracts
Contracts will only be awarded to those who return bids and are
advantageous to the agency. The award will be selected on the merit of being
able to meet all the terms and conditions in the contact and be able to
successfully complete the contracts. Federal requirements for non-profit
organization for procurement are found in 24 CFR Part 84.44.
The following provision must be included in the contract:
a. Specific procurement records and files for purchases in excess of $10,000
must included the basis for contractor selection, justification for lack of
competition when competitive bids are not obtained, and basis for the award
cost or price. : .- =’
b. Contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, invitations for bids and/or requests for proposals from
competing for such procurement will be rejected.
C. That a “cost plus percentage of cost” pricing for contracts will not be
used.
d. There must be a written code of conduct governing employees, officers
or agents engaged in the award or administration of contracts.
including contracts modifications, and documentation is mainta
files.
e. A cost or price analysis is performed for every procurement action
ined in the
Other general requirements listed in 24 CFR 85.36 include:
a. Contractors will not be awarded to any party which is debarred or
suspended or is otherwise excluded for/or ineligible for participation in
Federal assistance programs.
b. Purchase of unnecessary or duplicate items is avoided.
C. Use excess or Federal surplus property.
d. Contractors are signed by authorized officials.
e. Items delivered and paid for are those specified in contract.
f. Timely payment of con&actors.
g. Profit or fee is negotiated separately from price where competition is
lacking or a cost analysis is performed.
h. Protest procedures must be in place to resolve disputes.
I. A document system of contract administration.
Purchases
Under Federal regulations small purchases of $25,000 or less may be made
through oral or written bids. Documentation that a minimum of three or
more bids form various qualified sources must be documented.
Purchases in excess of $25,000
Sealed bid .will be used in these purchases with formal advertising to open the
bidding to the public.
Using Local Businesses, Contracting wit Small Minority Owned and /or
Women Owned Businesses, And Section 3 businesses.
This agency will make every effort to use local business firms and contract
Lvith small minority owned and /or women owned business or labor surplus
area forms, and Section 3 businesses, in compliance with
the agency's Section 3 plan,
materials whenever possible. in Contracting for services a'nd
I’ROC‘L’REMEST GUIDELINES
Purpose of procurement standards set forth standards for use by recipients in
establishing procedures for the procurement of supplies and other expendable
propert,y, equipment, real property and other services with Federal funds.
These standards are furnished to ensure that such materials and services are
obtained in an effective manner and in compliance with the provisions of
applicable Federal statutes and executive orders. No additional procurement
standards or requirements shall be imposed by the Federal awarding agencies
upon recipients, unless specifically required by Federal statute or executive
order or approved by OMB.
Recipient responsibilities. The standards contained in this section do not
relieve the recipient of the contractual responsibilities arising under its
contract(s). The recipient is the responsible authority, without recourse to the
Federal awarding agency, regarding the settlement and satisfaction of all
contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements entered ’
into in support of an award or other agreement. This includes disputes,
claims, protests of award, source evaluation or other matters of a contractual
nature. Matters concerning violation of statute are to be referred to such
Federal, State or local authority as may have proper jurisdiction.
Codes of conduct. The recipient shall maintain written standards of conduct
governing the performance of its employees engaged in the award and
administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent shall participate in
the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by Federal
funds if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. Such a
conflict would arise when the employee, office, or agent, any member of his
or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which
employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a
financial or other interest in the firm selected for an award. The officers,
employees, and agents of the recipient shall neither solicit nor accept
gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors, or parties
to subagreements. However, recipients may set standards for situations in
lvhich the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item
of nominal value. The standards of conduct shall provide for disciplinary
actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or
agents of the recipient.
Competition. All procurement transactions shall be conducted in a manner
to provide, to the maximum extent practical, open and free competition. The
_-
recipient shall be alert to organizadonal conflicts of interest as well as
noncompetitive practices among contractors that may restrict or eliminate
competition or otherwise restrain trade. In order to ensure objective
contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage,
contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of
work, invitations for bids and/or requests for proposals shall be excluded
from competing for such procurements. Awards shall be made to the bidder
or offered whose bid or offer is responsive to the solicitation and is most
adlrantageous to the recipient, price, quality and other factors considered.
Solicitations shall clearly set forth all requirements that the bidder or offered
shall fulfil1 in order for the bid or offer to be evaluated by the recipient. Any and all bids or offers may be rejected when it is in the recipient’s interest to do
so.
Procurement procedures.
(a> All recipients shall establish written procurement procedures. These
procedures shall provide for, at a minimum, that (11, (21, and (3) apply.
(1) Recipients avoid purchasing unnecessary items.
(2) Where appropriate, an analysis is made of lease and purchase alternatives .-
to determine which would be the most economical and pr’actical procurement
for the Federal Government.
(3) Solicitations for goods and services provide for all of the following.
(i> A clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the
material, product or service to be procured. In competitive procurements,
such a description shall not contain features which unduly restrict
competition.
(ii) Requirements which the bidder/offerer must fulfil1 and all other factors to
be used in evaluating bids or proposals.
(iii> A description, whenever practicable, of technical requirements in terms
of functions to be performed or performance required, including the range of
acceptable characteristics or minimum acceptable standards.
(iv> The specific features of “brand name or equal” descriptions that bidders
are required to meet when such items are included in the solicitation.
(VI The acceptance, to the extent practicable and economically feasible, of
products and services dimensioned in the metric system of measurement.
(vi) Preference, to the extent practicable and economically feasible, for
products and services that conserve natural resources and protect the
environment and are energy efficient.
(b) Positive efforts shall be made by recipients to utilize small business, minority-owned firms, and women’s business enterprises, whenever
possible. Recipients of Federal awards shall take all of the follolving steps to
further this goal.
(1) Ensure that small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women’s
business enterprises are used to the fullest extent practicable.
(2) Make i n f ormation on forthcoming opportunities available and arrange
time frames for purchases and contracts to encourage and facilitate
participation by small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women’s
business enterprises.
(3) Consider in the contract process whether firms competing for larger
contracts intend to subcontract with small businesses, minority-owned firms,
and women’s business enterprises.
(4) Encourage contracting with consortiums of small businesses, minority-
owned firms and women’s business enterprises when a contract is too large
for one of these firms to handle individually.
(5) Use the services and assistance, as appropriate, of such organizations as the
Small Business Administration and the Department of Commerce’s Minority
Business Development Agency in the solicitation and utilization of small
businesses, minority-owned firms and women’s business enterprises.
(c) The type of procuring instruments used (e.g., fixed price contracts, cost
reimbursable contracts, purchase orders, and incentive contracts) shall be
determined by the recipient but shall be appropriate for the particular
procurement and for promoting the best interest of the program or project
involved. The “cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost” or “percentage of construction
cost” methods of contracting shall not be used.
(d) Contracts shall be made only with responsible contractors who possess the
potential a&&y to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of the
proposed procurement. Consideration shall be given to such matters as
contractor integrity, record of past performance, financial and technical
resources or accessibility to other necessary resources. In certain
circumstances, contracts with certain parties are restricted by agencies’
implementation of E.O.S. 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension”.
(e) Recipients shall, on request, make available for the Federal awarding
agency, pre-award review and procurement documents, such as request for
proposals or invitations for bids, independent cost estimates, etc., when any of
the folIowing conditions apply.
(1) A recipient’s procurement procedures or operation fails to comply with
the procurement standards in the Federal awarding agency’s implementation
of this Circular.
(2) The procurement is expected to exceed the small purchase threshold fixed
at 41 U.S. 403 (11) (currently $25,000) and is to be awarded without
competition or only one bid or offer is received in response to a solicitation.
(3) The procurement, which is expected to exceed the small purchase threshold, specifies a “brand name” product.
(4) The proposed award over the small purchase threshold is to be awarded to
other than the apparent low bidder under a sealed bid procurement.
(5) A proposed contract modification changes the scope of a contract or
increases the contract amount by more than the amount of the small
purchase threshold.
Cost and price analysis. Some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and
documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement
action. Price analysis may be accomplished in various ways, including the
comparison of price quotations submitted, market prices and similar indicia,
together with discounts. Cost analysis is the review and evaluation of each
element of cost to determine reasonableness, allocability and allowability.
Procurement records. Procurement records and files for purchases in excess
of the small purchase threshold shall include the following at a minimum:
(a) basis for contractor selection, (b) justification for lack of competition when
competitive bids or offers are not obtained, and (c) basis for award cost or
price.
Contract administration. A system for contract administration shall be
maintained to ensure contractor conformance with the terms, conditions and
specifications’of thecontract and to ensure adequate and timely follow up of
all purchases. Recipients shall evaluate contractor performance and
document, as appropriate, whether contractors have met the terms,
conditions and specifications of the contract.
Contract provisions. The recipient shall include, in addition to provisions to
define a sound and complete agreement, the following provisions in all
contracts. The following provisions shall also be applied to subcontracts.
(a) Contracts in excess of the small purchase threshold shall contain
contractual provisions or conditions that allow for administrative,
contractual, or legal remedies in instances in which a contractor violates or
breaches the contract terms, and provide for such remedial actions as may be
appropriate.
(b) All contracts in excess of the small purchase threshold shall contain
suitable provisions for termination by the recipient, including the manner by
which termination shall be effected and the basis for settlement. In addition,
such contracts shall describe conditions under which the contract may be
terminated for default as well as conditions where the contract may be
terminated because of circumstances beyond the control of the contractor.
(c) Except as otherwise required by statute, an award that requires the
contracting (or subcontracting) for construction or facility improvements
shall provide for the recipient to follow its own requirements relating to bid
guarantees, performance bonds, and payment bonds unless the construction
contract or subcontract exceeds $100,000. For those contracts or subcontracts
exceeding $100,000, the Federal awarding agency may accept the bonding
policy and requirements of the recipient, provided the Federal awarding
agency has made a determination that the Federal Government’s interest is
adequately protected, If such a determination has not been made, the
minimum requirements shall be as follows.
(1) A bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to five percent of the bid
price. The “bid guarantee“ shall consist of a firm commitment such as a bid
bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as
assurance that the bidder shall, upon acceptance of his bid, execute such
contractual documents as may be required within the time specified.
(2) A performance bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the
contract price. A “performance bond” is one executed in connection with a
contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor’s obligations under such
contract.
(3) A payment bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the
contract price. A “payment bond” is one executed in connection with a
contract to assure payment as required by statute of all persons supplying
labor and mat&ial in the execution of the work provided for in the contract.
(4) Where bonds are required in the situations described herein, the bonds
shall be obtained from companies holding certificates of authority as
acceptable sureties pursuant to 31 CFR part 223, “Surety Companies Doing
Business with the United States”.
,
(d) All negotiated contracts (except those for less than the small purchase
threshold) awarded by recipients shall include a provision to the effect that the recipient, the Federal awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the
United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have
access to any books, documents, papers and records of the contractor which are directly pertinent to a specific program for the purpose of making audits,
examinations, excerpts and transcriptions.
(e) All contracts, including small purchases, awarded by recipients and their
contractors shall contain the procurement provision.
.-
.
/
I I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. General Information . . Mission Statement 1 1 . . . A. . .
II. Organization, Purpose and Structure . . . .
A. Introduction. . . . . .
B. Scope. . . Affirmative Action Statement : . .
C. . .
D. Definitions . . . . . .
III. Board Of Directors . . . .
2 Purpose Officers and ‘Committees : :
IV. Employment. . . . . .
A. Job Descrintion and Classification
. .
. .
. .
Systems 1 _- _ B. Selection df Personnel . . .
:: New Employment Orientation . . Transfer and Reassignment . .
FE: Hours Of Work Staff Performance Evaluations :
. .
G. Personnel Records. . . .
V. Staff Responsibilities
k Job Requirements : : : : Personal Relations. . . . C. Tips Or Gratuities . . . .
E”: Drug Free Work Place . . . Telephone Use . . . . Equipment Discounts .
Smoke Free Environment: : .
::* Breaks I Meals Conflict Of Interest 1 1 1
J. Controversial Issues . . .
LK: Political Involvement . . Life Threatening Illnesses . .
VI. Employment Conduct . . . . .
k Purpose Managerial And Supervisory Conduct : C. Termination . .
D. Serious Infractions’ 1 1 . E. Separation From Employment . .
VII. Problem Solving . . . .
k Internal Problem S’olving: . . Progressive Discipline . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8 8
;
l’o 10 10 10 10 10 10 11
:: 14 14
:z
iz 17
Join Hands - Save A Life
l/26/98 T&e Of Conknfs
VIII. Classification / Compensation / Leave. .
BA: Employment Classification . Salary . . . . C. Administration Of Salaries .
ii: Vehicle Reimbursement Use Of Club Owned Vehicles : F. Salary Payment And Deductions G. Payment Of Overtime .
F* Paid Vacations . . Holidays . . .
J. Sick Leave . . . K. Leaves Of Absence .
L. Benefits . . . M. Social Security . . N. Worker’s Compensation . 0. Job Expenses . .
:: Retirement Plan IRA, TSA, And 4OiB Plans
s”: Contributions . . Employment Discount .
IX. Additional Information . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ii: Emergency And Media Response Procedures Club Liability Insurance . . . . C. Training D. Join Hands -* Save A Life’ : : :
X. Guideline On Discrimination Because Of Religion Or National Origin. . . . . . .
18
:i
it 19 20 20 20 21 22 22 24 24 24 25 25 25 25 25
25 25 26 26 26
27
Join Hands - Save A Lqe
l/26/98 Table Of Conlcnts
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. MISSION STATEMENT
“Join hands - Save A Life” is a community based youth service program
designated to be a community effort to enhance the lives of the youth in our
community.
Our goal is to help relieve stress in the homes of the lowest income families
by providing free services for their youth.
Our objective is to provide a constructive alternative to the “at-risk” youth of
our community that met in the streets with no place to go and nothing to do,
that out of boredom or search for excitement, will not have to turn to
destructive behavior like recreational drug experimentation, alcohol abuse,
graffiti, robbery or gang violence.
PARTICIPANT’S
OUR FACILITY WELCOMES ALL PERSONS OF ANY RACE, COLOR,
GENDER, RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, HANDICAP, ILLNESS OR
DISEASE AS LONG AS THEIR PRESENCE IS NOT A THREAT TO
THEMSELVES OR OTHERS.
II. ORGANIZATION, PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE
A. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this policy manual is to provide a systematic approach to
administering organization policies and practices. The manual is designed to
act as a communications tool for members of the Board, staff and volunteers
to help clarify policies and practices. All of The Join Hands - Save A Life
policies, including policies in this manual, are intended as guidelines for
personnel relations between the organization and its employees. Changes,
deletions or exceptions to any of The Join Hands - Save A Life policies may
occur at the organization’s discretion without prior notice.
B. SCOPE
The personnel policies contained herein will apply to all Board, staff
members and applicants for employment with Join Hands - Save A Life.
join Hands - Sme A Life l/26/99 1
C. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION STATEMENT
It is the policy of Join Hands - Save A Life to afford equal employment
opportunities, development and promotion on the basis of relative
qualifications and ability, free of discrimination on the basis of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, or any other basis prohibited by any statute or
regulation applicable to the operation of Join Hands - Save A Life. All
employees are expected to read and become familiar with the Affirmation
Action Statement.
D. DEFINITIONS
Participant --Any individual taking part in any activities and programs
of Join Hands - Save A Life.
Board Member - A person who has been elected to serve as a member
of the corporate Board of Directors.
ADolicant - A person who has filed a formal application for a position
of employment.
Conflict of Interest - A conflict between the private interests of an
individual and that individual’s official responsibilities in connection
with a position of trust.
Immediate Familv - Persons who are related, whether by blood,
marriage, or legal adoption, or who occupy the same household,
including parents, siblings, grandparents, children, step-parents, and
step-children of the spouses or co-habitants of the same household.
Layoff - The separation of a Join Hands - Save A Life employee from
the organization for reasons of insufficient workload or funds.
Part-time Employee - An employee hired on a basis of less than eight
hours per day and/or less than 40 hours per week.
Executive Staff - Includes Executive Director, Assistant Executive
Director, and Executive Secretary.
Junior Staff - Junior Staff consists of students who work under the ’ direct supervision of regular staff, and whose school and work hours L-1.
comply with all requirements established by the Board of Education
and the State Department of Labor. Continued school attendance is a
mandatory condition of employment. These employees are entitled to
benefits as required by law.
Join Hmds - Save A Life l/26/95 2
College Work Studv - A college work study student is an employee
who has been referred by a college or university and placed in a part- time position, whose duties, hours, and salary are defined in a contract
with the educational institution. These employees are entitled to
benefits required by law and those offered in the contract with the
college or university.
Community Worker - A person who is assigned hours of community service by a Judge or quasi-judicial body as a sentence or set of
consequences levied upon the person because of a violation committed
by that person. No person who has been charged with, convicted, or
who is under investigation for child molestation, child abuse, drugs, or
any crime involving violence will be eligible to perform community
service hours at Join Hands - Save A Life as a community worker.
Performance Evaluations - The periodic evaluations of the
performance of employees and staff at all levels by one or more persons
having supervisory responsibility for the performance of the employee
or staff member being evaluated.
Performance Report - A written record or report of any award,
commendation, recommendation, or of any warning, reprimand,
imposition of probation or other action taken with reference to
employment, compensation, promotion, transfer, layoff, suspension,
termination, or other action affecting the status of employment.
Personnel Action - Any action taken with reference to employment,
compensation, promotion, transfer, layoff, suspension, termination, or
other action affecting the status of employment.
Regular Emplovee - An employee who is on Join Hands - Save A Life
payroll.
Suspension - The removal from duty with or without pay, of a staff
member for purposes of corrective action or pending investigation.
Termination - the involuntary cessation of employment for reasons
other than insufficient workload or funds. The Join Hands - Save A
Life reserves the right to terminate any employee at any time and for
any reason, with or without cause or advance notice and without compensation of any kind except wages and benefits for hours actually
worked.
Volunteer - An individual who donates time, labor or services to
further its operations and programs. Before serving as a volunteer,
Joirl Hmds - Sme A Life
l/26/98 3
an individual must be interviewed and accepted by either the
Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director.
III. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A. PURPOSE
As provided in the Bylaws, Art. III, Sec. 1 through 20, Join Hands - Save A Life
is governed by its Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is the ultimate
manager, responsible for the conduct and control of the business of the
corporation. It is the board’s responsibility to select and supervise the
Executive Director.
B. OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES
Each committee chair is appointed by the Board President. Committees and
officers of the board are listed as follows:
Officers Committees
Chairman of the Board
President Executive Committee
Property Management Committee
Secretary Finance Committee
United Way Committee
Treasurer Marketing Committee
Board Development Committee
IV. EMPLOYMENT
The employment policy of Join Hands - Save A Life is to hire the best
qualified persons available. Once hired, each staff person’s continued
employment should be guided by the following principles.
The orientation period lasts for three months from the date of hire. During
this time the staff has an opportunity to evaluate The Join Hands - Save A
.Life and management has the same opportunity to evaluate the staff member.
If work quantity, quality or work habits are not acceptable during this period
of employment with Join Hands - Save A Life, the staff member may be
dismissed, without statement of reason or cause.
/oh Hands - Snve A Life
l/26/98 4
Introductorv Period - The period of time after the hiring or promotion of a
staff member during which the staff member’s new position is probationary
and conditional upon the staff member’s demonstration of adequate skills
and ability to satisfactorily perform the duties of the new position. The
introductory period shall continue for a period of six months after the end of
the orientation period.
A. JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Join Hands - Save A Life has a position classification plan based upon a
written description of each position which contains a specific job title, an
analysis of the diversity and complexity of tasks performed, the location of the
position within the channel of authority and the qualifications required. The
Executive Director and other employees participate in the development and
periodic review of position descriptions and classifications.
Join Hands - Save A Life uses the following classifications for employees:
1. Exempt Emplovees are employees whose positions meet
specific tests established by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
and state law. They are paid on a salary basis and are not eligible for
overtime pay. They include executive, administrative, and
professional staff whose normal duties require the exercise of
discretion and independent judgment in performing their
primary work.
2. Non-exempt Emplovees are paid an annual salary and are
eligible for overtime, as may be required by applicable laws and
regulations.
3. Non-exempt Hourlv Emplovees are paid an hourly rate and
are eligible for overtime, as may be required by applicable laws and
regulations.
4. Seasonal Emplovees are paid an hourly rate or salary and are
eligible for overtime, as may be required by applicable laws and
regulations. They are employed for a specific purpose and a limited
period of time, i.e. Summer Program personnel. Seasonal employees
are not eligible for benefit programs due to the short duration of the
position.
B. SELECTION OF PERSONNEL
Experienced employees are one of the most valuable resources. Our
organization may fill positions from within. We stress that it is up to the
join Hands - Save A Life
l/26/98 5
employee, through personal growth and performance, to qualify for a
position.
Recruitment is in accordance with generally accepted ethical practices and insures equal opportunity of employment and, when appropriate, utilizes the
resources of Join Hands - Save A Life and other recognized organizations,
agencies and professional groups in seeking out and identifying prospects for employment - we encourage women and minorties to apply.
C. NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION
Each new professional employee is to be provided an orientation by the
appropriate member of the Executive Staff, prior to undertaking the duties of
the position.
D. TRANSFER AND REASSIGNMENT
Employees are subject to transfer from one department to another.
E. HOURS OF WORK
Working hours will be based on a 40-hour work week starting Monday
12:Ol AM to Sunday 12 midnight PM.
Overtime
All Non-exempt employees are covered by the overtime provisions of the
Federal Fair Labor Standards Act or any applicable state laws. Non-exempt
employees are entitled to premium pay (premium pay equals one and a half
of regular hourly rate - $4.00 hourly rate equals $6.00 premium pay) for work
in excess of 40 hours in a work week or eight hours in a work day.
F. STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
Written performance evaluations provide an opportunity for each employee
to maintain and improve job effectiveness, motivation, satisfaction and
morale. These performance evaluations are to be conducted by the
employee’s supervision.
Performance evaluations describe how effectively job assignments are
completed and provide direction for future work efforts and responsibilities.
Successful performance evaluations:
1. Fairly evaluate employee’s current work performance;
2. Maintain and improve job satisfaction and morale;
loin Harrds - Save A life l/26/98 6
3. improve performance;
4. Provide direction for future emphasis and performance;
5. Coordinate individual efforts and goals to The Join Hands - Save
A Life goals and programs.
The Executive Director will be evaluated by the Chairman of the Board on a
annual basis. (December). The performance evaluation of the Executive
Director will be reported to the Board of Directors.
Each full time staff member shall be evaluated at least once during each
calendar year. Staff supervisors may stagger the performance evaluations of
various staff members in order to even out the workload of the supervisor.
A schedule for the performance evaluations of all staff members shall be
submitted to the Assistant Executive Director for approval. The Assistant
Executive Director shall coordinate the schedules for performance
evaluations of all staff members and shall insure that all performance
evaluations are made as required.
Each employee who has not completed the orientation period of employment
shall be evaluated at least once just prior to the end of the orientation period.
That performance evaluation shall determine, among other things, whether
the employee is advanced to introductory period, or is terminated. Each
employee who has not completed the introductory period of employment
shall be evaluated quarterly, or more often, as recommended by the Assistant
Executive Director. Each employee who has not completed the introductory
period of employment shall be evaluated just prior to the end of the
introductory period. That performance evaluation shall determine, among
other things, whether the employee is advanced to non-introductory status,
or is terminated.
Procedure and Responsibility
All employees normally receive written performance evaluations quarterly
during their first year of employment and annually thereafter.
The Executive Director evaluates all Administrative Staff.
An immediate supervisor and or the Executive Director or the Assistant
Executive Director, as appropriate, will review the evaluation with the staff
member. The staff member will sign the evaluation indicating that a review
has been performed and acknowledge an understanding of the evaluation.
Signature by the staff member does not signify concurrence or non-
concurrence with the conclusions reached in the evaluation. The employee
loin Hands - Sme A Life l/26/95 7
is encouraged to attach a statement regarding the evaluation. The evaluation
is to be placed in the individual’s personnel file.
G. PERSONNEL RECORDS
A personnel record will be maintained for each employee. It will contain
pertinent information on all matters relating to qualifications in the areas of work-experience, education, salary, and evaluations. Personnel records are to be kept up-to-date and are to contain written records of all adjustments in
title, salary, and training.
All personnel records are to be maintained in a locked file and will only be
accessible to those authorized by the Executive Director. An employee may
review his or her own personnel record available as soon as is reasonably
practical. Employees are able to make copies of documents which include
their signature. Any attempt by any employee to alter a personnel record will
be grounds for immediate termination.
V. STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES
Employees are encouraged to read all publications of Join Hands - Save A Life
and other related publications. All employees are encouraged to pursue their
professional development by attending courses and training sessions of Join
Hands - Save A Life and/or professionally related seminars. Employees are
encouraged to accept appointments on the various committees of Join Hands
- Save A Life and other related groups in order to participate in program
development and to increase their own knowledge. Reimbursement for
some of the programs may be approved in the discretion of the Executive
Director.
A. JOB REQUIREMENTS
Implied in the employment of every member of the staff is the competent
discharge of one’s duties and responsibilities, conformance with the general
operating policies and practices, attendance at staff meetings and a genuine
interest in the work consistent with the underlying philosophy of a character
building organiza tion.
B. PERSONAL RELATIONS
More than we realize, we are closely observed and copied by youth. The way
we dress, our grooming, behavior, even the neatness of our offices, may have
a profound effect on their attitudes and habits. These matters should be given
serious consideration on our day to day relations with youth, our personal
join Hards - Snve A Life l/26/98 8
appearance plays a big part in community relationships and our appearance
should be acceptable to the youth and adults in the area we serve.
C. TIPS OR GRATUITIES
No member of the staff will accept a tip or payment from a member, or their
families for services provided by or through the charitable corporation.
Acceptance of tips or payments is inconsistent with the principles of our
work. All such offerings shall be reported t the Executive Director of the
Assistant Executive Director immediately.
D. DRUG FREE WORK PLACE
The Join Hands - Save A Life has an obligation to its staff members and
clients to take responsibility to assure a drug free work place. To this end, the
following are strictly prohibited:
1. Reporting to work under the influence of any intoxicants, drugs,
or controlled substance.
2. The use, possession, transfer, or trafficking of intoxicants, illegal
drugs or controlled substances in any amount or in any manner on the
Join Hands - Save A Life premises or during any sponsored activity,
other that the authorized serving and consumption of alcohol at Join
Hands - Save A Life special events. Provided , however, that any
intemperate use of alcohol or the serving of any alcoholic beverage to
any minor or to any obviously intoxicated person on the premises is
forbidden, no matter what the occasion.
3. Any use or possession of illegal drugs at any time, or possession
of any firearm, other than by law enforcement’s officer, or of any other
illegal weapon by any member of the staff or by any boy or girl
participant are all prohibited upon the premises of Join Hands - Save A
Life, or any activity conducted off the premises.
All staff personnel must inform their immediate Supervisor[ when taking
prescription medications which might interfere with the safe and effective
performance of their assigned duties and responsibilities.
Any staff member or employee who violates the foregoing policies relating to
drugs, alcohol and controlled substances will be subject to disciplinary action,
which can include immediate termination.
joirl Hmds - Snvc A Life
l/26/98 9
E. TELEPHONE USE
Incoming and outgoing telephone calls should be limited to business except
in cases of emergency. Personal toll calls are not to be made. When
circumstances necessitate the placing of toll calls, either for program or
personal reasons, they should be reported to the Assistant Executive Director.
F. EQUIPMENT DISCOUNTS
No staff member will purchase personal equipment through Join Hands -
Save A Life or in the name of Join Hands - Save A Life, in order to obtain a
discount.
G. SMOKE FREE ENVIRONMENT
The Join Hands - Save A Life employees, volunteers, youth, parents, and
guests are to be able to enjoy a smoke free environment during normal
working and program hours.
H. BREAKS/MEALS
Staff members will receive one ten minute break during each half day while
on duty. Staff members who work more than five hours in one day will
receive a one hour non-paid break each work day. All other breaks or times
off during a work day must be approved in advance by the Assistant
Executive Director.
I. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Employees must exercise good judgment and insure they do not engage in
any activity that constitutes a conflict of interest. Existing or potential
conflicts of interest must be immediately disclosed tot he Executive Director
for final evaluation.
J. CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES
All employees, including volunteers, are free to exercise their full liberties as
citizens, including the right to express their personal convictions on social,
economic, religious and political issues. Employees must never give the
impression that their personal views and positions are those of either Join
Hands - Save A Life or their co-workers.
K. POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT
In order to retain its tax exempt status, Join Hands - Save A Life cannot
support or oppose any candidate for elective office. None of Join Hands -
{oirr Hnrrds - Save A Li e I l/26/98 0
f.B-v-m-_-----.-.-.. ..--. _- _ .- . .._~ .__._ -. -. ------.--~-.- _ _... ---. -_.. - _-...._ -._ _--- .._. _ . .._
Save A Life equipment or space shall be used to further the candidacy of any
specific candidate for public office. Employees and volunteers are free to work
on behalf of candidates for public office during hours not related to their
employment. Employees may accept positions to appointive or elective
public office provided it does not interfere with their assigned responsibilities.
L. LIFE THREATENING ILLNESSES
Join Hands - Save A Life recognize that staff members suffering with life
threatening illnesses, including but not limited to cancer, heart disease, HIV
infection or AIDS, may wish to continue to engage in as many of their
normal pursuits as conditions allow, including work. As long as staff
members are able to meet and maintain performance standards, and current
medical evidence indicates that their continued presence is not a threat to
themselves or to others in the work place, they will be allowed to remain in
their position. All staff should be sensitive to the condition of any such staff
members and ensure that they are treated fairly.
All legal requirements and considerations related to a life threatening illness
will be adhered to, including confidentiality and non-discrimination.
Employees having a life threatening illness shall be offered the same benefits
as other employees to the limit allowed in the current health benefit package.
VI. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT
A. PURPOSE
Employees of Join Hands - Save A Life are expected to meet acceptable
standards of conduct and performance in order to be successful. Satisfaction
of these standards not only promotes productivity and efficiency, but also
helps to ensure that all employees will enjoy a pleasant and cooperative work
environment. Consequently, violation of the following rules may lead to
disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination.
These standards are intended to address situations which have the potential
to affect the safety, health, welfare and self-esteem of employees, and/or pose
problems for the effective and safe operation of the organization and the
quality of its service.
The infractions listed in the Section are samples only, and do not in any way
limit the discretion of Join Hands - Save A Life with regard to discipline or
termination of employment. These are simply general statements of policy
and nothing contained herein is intended to be part of the, employment
relationships.
loin Hands - Save A Lije l/26/95 11
The general standards of conduct fall into several major groups:
Harassment
All employees of Join Hands - Save A Life have a right to work
in an environment free of harassment. In support of this right,
Join Hands - Save A Life is committed to a policy prohibiting
unlawful harassment in any form against an employee, whether
verbal, physical, or visual. Harassment in any form by an
employee or Join Hands - Save A Life representative towards
another may result in disciplinary action, including dismissal.
Any employee who believes he or she has been harassed should promptly
report the incident(s) and name(s) of the individual(s) involved to his or her
immediate supervisor. It is the obligation and responsibility of all
management personnel to take immediate and corrective action on all
reported complaints of harassment. Such complaints must be reported
immediately to the Executive Director.
In the event an employee experiences such treatment and cannot for reasons
of sensitivity or confidentiality report it to his or her own supervisor or
Executive director, the incident should be reported to the Chair of the
Personnel Committee, who then shall inform the Personnel Committee in
order that an investigation and, where appropriate, corrective action be
initiated.
Sexual Harassment
Sexual harassment is defined generally as unwelcome sexual advances, either
verbal or physical, whenever:
A. Submission to the conduct is either an explicit or implicit
term or condition of employment
B. An employee’s reaction to the conduct is used as a basis for
employment decisions affecting that employee.
C. The conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably
interfering with the employee’s work performance or making
the job environment hostile, intimidating, or offensive.
Sexual harassment is not limited to express demands for sexual favors. It
may also include such actions as:
A. Provocative or suggestive “kidding”, “teasing”, or “jokes”.
loin Hattds - Save A Life l/26/98 72
B. Offensive sexual flirtations, comments, advances or
propositions.
C. Verbal abuse of a sexual nature.
D. Graphic or degradin, 0 comments of a sexual nature about an
individual or his/her appearance.
E. The display of sexually suggestive objects or pictures.
F. Subtle pressure for sexual activity.
G. Physical contact such as patting, pinching, or brushing against
anther’s body.
Sexual harassment does not refer to occasional compliments of a socially
acceptable nature. It refers to a pervasive pattern of behavior which is not
welcome, which is personally intimidating, hostile or offensive, which
debilitates morale, and which, therefore, interferes with work effectiveness.
Perception of sexual harassment may occur when managerial staff or board
members engage in dating or a romantic relationship with employees. These
relationships may be completely welcome on the part of both manager and
subordinate, but could be perceived by others as interfering with an exercise of
impartial judgment.
Safety
Violations of safety rules, improper or non-use of safety equipment, failing to
report an on-the-job injury or accident or to report for first aid, carelessness
and working under the influence of any substance that impairs mental or
physical capability, and failure to report a life threatening illness are examples
of disciplinary infractions.
Honesty
Falsification of organization or employee records, or dishonesty in any work
related matter are examples of unacceptable conduct in this area.
Security
Being in Join Hands - Save A Life after hours and using it for personal gain
or in an unauthorized manner; allowing use of a facility by an adult group
without having on duty an employee, or a responsible party designated in
writing, are examples of security related violations,
-
Work Performance
Inadequate performance and insufficient productivity and inattentiveness to
the job are examples of work deficiencies.
Attendance and Punctuality
Lateness and absences, leaving early and misuses of meal and break times are
examples.
Other Work Rules
Disregard of others standards, such as smoking in unauthorized areas, or
inappropriate attire are examples of such rules.
B. MANAGERIAL AND SUPERVISORY CONDUCT
High expectations apply particularly to managerial and supervisory staff
because of their authority over and responsibility for effective motivation and
management of the organization’s employees.
1. Awareness
Supervisors are expected to display awareness of and sensitivity to the
impact of their own style and conduct of relationships with other
employees, particularly subordinates.
2. Fairness
Treatment of subordinates with consistency and without favoritism.
This includes demonstrating sound judgment in relationships with
other employees, particularly subordinates.
3. Application of Policies and Procedures
Accountability for knowing, understanding, and applying corporate
policies and procedures consistently within the work group.
C. TERMINATION
Employees may be terminated at any time and for any reason, with or
without cause or advance notice, and without compensation of any kind
except wages and benefits for hours actually worked and earned vacation hours.
Join Hands - Save A Life l/26/95 I4
,- I
3
)
b
J
)
)
)
1
1
1
1
)
1
)
1
1
1
1
1
)
)
)
1
)
D. SERIOUS INFRACTlONS
Some employee actions are sufficiently serious that they may result in
termination by organization without prior warning. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:
1. False information, material omissions or misrepresentation made
in the process of becoming an employee.
2. Theft or misuse of organization funds, equipment, supplies, or other
assets, or personal belongings of other employees, guests, contractors,
clients or customers.
3. Falsifying club or employee records.
4. Misuse of sick leave or other leaves of absence.
5. Serious safety violations.
6. Intentional or grossly negligent damage to organization property or property for which the club is responsible,
7. Reporting for work or working under the influence of alcohol,
illegal drugs, controlled substances or any other substance which alters
state of mind or impairs mental/physical abilities. The use, possession,
transfer or trafficking of intoxicants, illegal drugs or controlled
substances in any amount or in any manner on club premises, other
than the temperate use or authorized dispensing of alcohol at
authorized special events.
8. Unlawful or discriminatory harassment or treatment of employees,
parents or youth.
9. Failure or refusal to comply with legal instructions of supervisors.
10. Engaging in criminal activity as defined by law.
11. Any willful, intentional or grossly negligent behavior which
injures or endangers the physical or emotional well being of any boy or
girl participant of Join Hands - Save A Life.
These examples of serious infractions do not in any way limit the discretion
of Join Hands - Save A Life in the imposition of discipline or the termination
of employment. Join Hands - Save A Life does not have to prove a serious
infraction before terminating an employee without prior warning.
join Hands - Snue A L.i e / l/26/95 5
?
)
! 1
)
:
)
J
)
)
)
I
)
1
)
)
J
)
I
J
J
J
J
1
I
J
1
1
1
)
I
I
)
1
I
1
I
)
)
)
1
E. SEPARATION FROM EMPLOYMENT
Any employee may resign at his/her option or be terminated with or without
cause. Other than employees who have formal written agreements that they
specify a particular term of employment, no employee has a contract for any
particular term of employment.
Emplovee-Initiated Separation
If an employee decides to leave the organization permanently
(not including a leave of absence or layoff), the employee should
notify his or her supervisor in writing at least two weeks in
advance of the expected date of separation. An exit interview is
to be scheduled by the supervising staff member. At the exit
interview, the supervisor is to discuss with the departing
employee the process for leaving the organization, including
return of keys, organizational equipment and property. The
final paycheck is to include earned wages, vacation and any
other appropriate adjustments.
Organization-Initiated Separation
Although the organization attempts to schedule work
assignments so as to avoid layoffs, situations do occur where
layoffs and other forms of work reductions may be necessary.
The organization reserves the right to take such actions as are
appropriate, including but not limited to:
a. Reduction in work hours or work weeks.
b. Office, unit or club closure for specific periods.
Exit Interview
The Executive Director may conduct an exit interview before the
employee leaves his/her employment. The purpose of such an
interview is to gain information which will improve
operational procedures.
VII. PROBLEM SOLVING
A. INTERNAL PROBLEM SOLVING
Join Hands - Save A Life is committed to the principle that each
employee has individual worth and value, and that open
loin Hmds - Save A Li c
/ l/26/98 6
* *
iQ) e * a IQ + 8 8 0 l *
: * e a 0 B D
D D
D
D
D
D D
D
P
B 1 B
)
)
b 3
)
) J
J
)
1
communication and prompt responses to employee concerns and
complaints are the best problem solving techniques.
B. PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE
Insofar as it is practical to do so in the administration and supervision of the
personnel of Join Hands - Save A Life, the Executive Director, the Assistant
Executive Director and all other supervisory staff shall utiiize a system of
progressive discipline in dealing with infractions by the employees under
their supervision.
1. Verbal Warning
Verbal warnings are to be utilized in the case of first time and relatively
minor infractions.
2. Written Warning
Written warnings are to be utilized in the case of repeated minor
infractions or first time commissions of more serious infractions.
3. Written Reprimand
Written reprimands represent the next more serious form of
progressive discipline, and are to be used in the case of repeated
commissions of minor infractions or first time commissions of
infractions that are serious, but do not call for suspension.
4. Suspension Without Pay
Suspension without pay is to be used in the case of chronic repeated
commissions of minor infractions or commission of serious
infractions not justifying termination without warning. In all cases of
suspension without pay, the employee shall be informed that any
further infractions or need for disciplinary action will result in
termination.
5. Termination
Termination of employment is to be utilized when the infraction of
the employee is so serious that management cannot depend upon the
employee to carry out assigned duties without the fear of repetition of
that or another serious infraction, or when there has been a repeated
pattern of less serious infractions, and it does not appear that further
progressive discipline will likely render the employee free from future
discipline problems.
VIII. CLASSIFICATION/COMPENSATION/LEAVE
A. EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
Join Hands - Save A Life has adopted a Salary Administration Plan, the goal
of which is to strive to see that wages and salaries are commensurate with the
diversity and complexity of the tasks performed, the amount of responsibility
and judgment exercised, the location of the position within the channel of
authority and the qualifications required for each position. Compensation
and working conditions are to conform with all applicable Federal and State
of California minimum wage and hour laws.
B. SALARY POLICY
It shall be the policy of Join Hands - Save A Life to:
1. Compensate employees adequately through a sound wage and salary
administration program.
2. Establish and maintain salary ranges and actual salaries at levels that
will attract and retain qualified and efficient employees.
3. Assign each job a salary range in accordance with its duties and
overall responsibilities.
4. Review regularly the level of performance of each employee and
adjust salaries to an appropriate level within the applicable salary range
based upon individual job performance.
C. ADMINISTRATION OF SALARIES
Starting salaries will be determined by the Executive Director based on
education, experience, position responsibility, diversity, and established salary
ranges for the position. A total salary plan for the following year will be
presented to the Personnel Committee and Finance Committee and approved
by the Board of Directors prior to December 30 of each year.
Salary increases are to be reviewed and recommended so as to be effective,
insofar as practical, on the anniversary date of employment of each respective
employee and shall consist of:
1. Merit increases are based upon job performance evaluations, and
achievement of performance goals.
b
i
)
j
1
)
)
)
)
1
1
)
)
1
)
1
)
)
)
1
2. Individual within each job category will be given a performance rating. Each will or will not qualify for merit raise based upon
achievement of performance goals.
3. Salary increases may not result in exceeding the maximum of the
salary range for his/her job title. Once the maximum has been reached,
individuals may only receive general wage increase until promoted
into a new position with a higher salary range, or until the salary
ranges are upgraded.
4. Advance pay may be given upon approval by the Executive Director.
(Exempt employees only). However, no one’s pay advance may exceed
the amount of one month’s salary for an individual. Further, no
employee may receive more than two separate pay advances during the
fiscal year. Salary advances may be approved if funds are available and
based upon past service to the organization.
5. The Executive Director will annually review the job descriptions
and establish performance goals. However, it is suggested that the
adjustments be in keeping with policy, Join Hands - Save A Life
standards and with the financial ability of the organization to pay.
D. VEHICLE REIMBURSEMENT
Professional staff members may receive reimbursement at the IRS allowed business mileage rate on a monthly basis for vehicle mileage when using
their personal automobiles for club activities. Personal vehicles shall not be
used to transport members. Staff members using personal vehicles assume
primary liability in case of an accident. No staff member shall be authorized
to use a personal vehicle in the conduct of any business or activity of or on
behalf of Join Hands - Save A Life until and unless that staff member has
obtained permission from the Executive Director.
E. USE OF CLUB OWNED VEHICLES
Join Hands - Save A Life vehicles are to be used for business use only,
including transporting participants for activities, picking up supplies, and
attendance at events and meetings related to job responsibilities.
Employees assigned a vehicle are responsible for arranging for routine
upkeep, maintenance, and keeping accurate records of maintenance of that
vehicle. Major repairs or replacements needed should be reported to the
Assistant Executive Director as soon as the need arises.
Parking tickets and traffic violations are the responsibility of the driver, and
Join Hands - Save A Life will not pay fines imposed.
Join Hands - Save A Li c I l/26/98 9
P
P
D
D
)
1
)
1
)
1
1
1
1
1
)
1
)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
)
)
I
)
1
).
)
)
Drivers of Join Hands - Save A Life vehicles shall be at least twenty-one (21) years of age and have a valid drivers license as required by the State of
California, with a Class B drivers license, youth or school bus drivers
certificate. The club will arrange the required medical exam at no charge or
will reimburse the employee not more than $55.00 for a medical exam
performed by the employee’s own physician. There shall be one seat for each
passenger and overloading shall not be allowed. All riders are required to
wear seat belts.
A signed parent or guardian release form is required before a participant may
travel on an official Join Hands - Save A Life trip. An annual release form is
sufficient for activities. Copies of a list of participants on trips and copies of a release authorizing hospital or medical care if needed, for each participant on
the trip, are to be carried with the driver. A duplicate list of participants on
the trip shall be retained at Join Hands - Save A Life.
F. SALARY PAYMENTS AND DEDUCTIONS
Salary checks will be available on the 15’h and the 30th of each month, after 2:00
p.m. The payroll period, however, is cut off two business days before each pay
period. Should the payroll fall on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, pay checks will be available on the previous work day. It is the responsibility of each
employee to see that the secretary is in possession of accurate information
about dependents and such other deductions which should be made for tax
purposes (W-4 forms). Any real or apparent discrepancy in the salary
paycheck should be reported to the secretary immediately.
G. PAYMENT OF OVERTIME
If a non-exempt employee works over 40 hours in a work-week or in excess of
eight hours in a work day, the overtime will be compensated at a “time-and-
a-half” basis, i.e., on and one half times the normal hourly rate of pay.
All overtime for a non-exempt worker must be authorized by the employees
supervisor before it is worked.
H. PAID VACATIONS
All salaried employees will receive 80 hours of vacation after one year of
service. There will be no pay in lieu of vacation. The vacation entitlement
for salaried employees will be based upon length of employment, measured
from one employment anniversary to the next in accordance with the
following table based on a 40 hour work week or equivalent time for part
time employees.
YEAR 1 THROUGH 5 - 80 HOURS YEAR 6 THROUGH 9 - 120 HOURS
YEAR 10 AND AFTER - 160 HOURS
All vacations will be scheduled with the Executive Director. Hourly
employees may receive the equivalent of one week of paid vacation, based
upon their average hours worked in the three months preceding the month
in which the vacation is scheduled, after the completion of one full year of
service, at the discretion of the Executive Director. All vacation time must be
taken with in the 12-month period for which it was earned, and cannot be
cumulative or carried over to a later period. Vacation entitlement is
measured from the anniversary date of the commencement of employment.
No employee shall be paid additional income to work during vacation. All
requests for vacation must be approved in advance (two weeks) by the
immediate supervisor. Employees who terminate from the organization will be paid for earned but unused vacation during the applicable period. Part-
time employees, working less than one thousand hours per year and seasonal
employees do not earn vacation.
I. HOLIDAYS
Insofar as is consistent with keeping Join Hands - Save A Life open and its
program in operation, schedules will be arranged to allow staff absences on
the holidays listed below; Hourly employees will not be paid for holidays. If a
designated holiday falls on a non-work day, the holiday will be observed on
the nearest day to the designated holiday and employees will have that day
off.
NEW YEAR’S EVE - CLOSE AT 4:00 P.M.
NEW YEARS DAY
PRESIDENTS DAY
GOOD FRIDAY - CLOSE AT 3:00 P.M.
MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY
MEMORIAL DAY
INDEPENDENCE DAY
LABOR DAY
THANKSGIVING DAY
CHRISTMAS DAY
One floating holiday per year will be designated by the Executive Director and
will be given to each employee as he/she sees fit. Exempt employees who are
required to work on a legal holiday will normally, at the discretion of the
Executive Director, be granted a day of vacation for each holiday worked. The
vacation day should be taken within 15 days following the holiday.
SICK LEAVE
During the first year of employment, full time employees will receive on
eight hour day per month sick leave to a maximum of 48 hours (6 days) per
year. Hourly employees will be given sick leave based on scheduled standard
hours. Sick leave will stop accruing once 60 days are met. Sick leave time
should be strictly for sick leave purposes and there will be no trade-offs for
other benefits. Accrued but unused sick leave may be used for time off to care
for a child of the employee under the age of 18 with a health condition that
requires treatment or supervision in accordance with state law. Accrued but
unused sick leave is not compensable upon termination of employment.
Accounting of used sick leave will be done by noting sick leave usage upon
the Attendance Record in each employee’s personnel record and on a Sick
Leave Verification Form submitted to the Executive Secretary. A doctor’s report may be requested after an absence due to illness, at the discretion of the
Executive Director.
K. LEAVES OF ABSENCE
On occasion, a situation may arise which necessitates an employee being
absent from work for reasons other than vacation or sick leave. Under such
circumstances, an employee may request a leave of absence to be allowed time
off without resigning his or her position at Join Hands - Save A Life. In most
cases, leaves of absence are without pay. However, in certain specified
situations, leaves of absence with pay may be granted. The maximum
amount for any leave is six months.
1. Definition
A leave of absence is a predetermined and authorized period of time
which an employee is allowed to be absent from work.
2. Personal Leaves of Absence
Leaves of absence for personal reasons are leaves without pay and must
be approved in advance by the Executive Director. Requests for leaves
of absences will be considered in view of the urgency of the need,
length of service, attendance, and the effect the absence would have on
departmental operations. A personal leave will be considered only
after all accrued vacation time has been utilized. Vacation and sick
leave does not accrue for any complete calendar month during leave is
in effect.
6
1
D
)
b
)
)
)
)
)
)
1
)
I
1
)
‘)
1
1
1
)
1
1
)
1
)
1
1
b
j
3. Disabili tv Leave
An employee who is unable to work for medical reasons may be
granted unpaid disability leave, based upon certification by a licensed
physician that the employee is unable, for medical reasons, to work. Before disability leave can be granted, all accrued sick leave must be
first utilized. Through Join Hands - Save A Life, Join Hands - Save A
Life offers benefits for its employees to meet their basic needs for
protection against illness or injury, which provides security and which
develops an excellent work environment. Long term disability
insurance is available for full-time employees who meet eligibility
requirements.
4 Maternitv Leave
Disabilities due to pregnancy and childbirth are treated the same as any
other temporary medical disability under the policy on Disability Leave; provided that pursuant to California law, women shall be
granted an unpaid leave of absence for the full period of actual sickness
or temporary disability due to pregnancy or childbirth as certified by
their doctor. Maternity leave is for the period of disability only, and
not for child rearing after the disability ends.
5. Bereavement Leave
Absence due to death in the family. A maximum leave of three (3)
days with full pay may be taken for the death of a member of the
immediate family and one day for non-immediate family. The
immediate family is defined as grandfather, grandmother, mother,
father, spouse, child, brother, sister, including an adopted or foster
child. Addition days may be taken from earned vacation. Special cases
may be considered by the Executive Director.
6. Jurv Dutv Leave
No paid leave for jury duty is provided.
7. Subpoena Leave
Employees will be entitled to be excused from their duties and paid
regular salary when required to appear as a witness under a subpoena,
in any legal proceeding in which Join Hands - Save A Life is a party in
interest.
8. Militarv Leave
Military leave is leave without pay which is granted to members of
active reserve training to allow the employees to meet annual training
commitments.
9. Suecial Leave
A limit of six months unpaid leave is considered maximum. All
special leaves must be approved by the Executive Director at his/her
discretion.
10. Benefit Status
Employees on approved unpaid leaves of absences must self-pay,
month by month, in advance, the full cost (employer plus employee
contribution) of their insurance benefits for any calendar month in
which no pay is received.
L. BENEFITS
Exempt and non-exempt full time employees are eligible to participate in Join
Hands - Save A Life Life Insurance, Group Medical Insurance, Pension (based
upon eligibility) and Dental Insurance Plans, may be provided through Join
Hands - Save A Life . Due to the various periods of employment required for
eligibility, costs incurred by Join Hands - Save A Life and those of the eligible
employees, a full and detailed explanation of available medical and dental
insurance and retirement plans are not set forth in this Personnel Manual.
Benefit booklets setting forth the currently available plans and options are
available through the office of the Executive Director.
Employees electing not to join the programs offered must so state in writing,
thereby waiving entitlement to those programs. A signed original of the
waiver shall be delivered to the Executive Director. The employee shall
retain a copy. The original is to be placed in
M. SOCIAL SECURITY
Each paid employee participates in the Socia
pays 50% and the employee pays 50%.
N. WORKERS COMPENSATION
1 Security Plan. The employer
the employee’s personnel record.
Worker’s compensation insurance is carried by Join Hands - Save A Life, in
accordance with applicable California law.
0. JOB EXPENSES
Employees who incur legitimate expenses in the conduct of approved Join
Hands - Save A Life activities will be reimbursed. Receipts, attached to
proper forms, containing an explanation, must be submitted for consideration
by the Executive Director. Prior approval for expenses should be obtained
whenever possible.
P. RETIREMENT PLAN
The Join Hands - Save A Life retirement plans may be available to all
qualifying employees upon completion of specific eligibility requirements.
Participation is optional. Employees not wishing to participate must sign a
release form annually. An employee shall be eligible to participate on the
next anniversary date (July 1 of each year) after the employee has attained the
age of twenty-one (21) years and has completed two years of full time
employment. The terms of Join Hands - Save A Life Pension Trust Plan are subject to revision from time to time by Join Hands - Save A Life, and any
such revisions shall be controlling over the terms set forth in this Personnel
Manual.
Q. IRA, TSA AND 403B PLANS
Individual Retirement Accounts and Tax Sheltered Annuities or 403B Plans
are available through payroll deduction on a voluntary basis.
R. CONTRIBUTIONS
During the fall of each year, the United Way Campaign is conducted.
Employees who wish to donate may make their contributions by cash, check,
or payroll deduction.
S. EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT
All professional and part-time staff with children in club programs are
authorized to receive a waiver of membership and program fees.
IX. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. EMERGENCY AND MEDIA RESPONSE PROCEDURES
The designated spokesperson for Join Hands - Save A Life shall be the
Executive Director.
join Hands - Save A Li e 1 l/26/98 5
B. CLUB LIABILITY INSURANCE
JOin Hands - Save A Life carries comprehensive public liability insurance
coverage which protects the employees and Join Hands - Save A Life in legal
actions which might develop as a result of an injury sustained in program or
on the premises. However, employees are expected to exercise care and
caution when conducting an activity or supervising an area of the building
and to follow safety guidelines. The liability insurance maintained by Join
Hands - Save A Life may not provide protection to the employee against
liability for willful, intentional, or grossly negligent acts.
C. TRAINING
Join Hands - Save A Life maintain a continuous program of training to
include staff meetings, individual guidance, provisions for attending
workshops, training sessions offered by Join Hands - Save A Life and other
groups relating to professional growth. Employees will be enrolled in
training sessions based on appropriateness, need and available funds.
Tuition refunds may be provided for outside study directly related to
professional growth in an employee’s current position, provided that a grade
of C or better is achieved. Approval to participate in the tuition refund
program must be secured from the Executive Director prior to enrollment in
the course of study or training.
D. JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
Regular and full time employees of Join Hands - Save A Life are encouraged
to attain certification by Join Hands - Save A Life. Join Hands - Save A Life
will pay the application fee when an employee fulfills the requirements for a
certification. A brochure on the requirements of certification is available.
THESE POLICIES ARE NOT INTENDED TO AND DO NOT CREATE A
CONTRACT BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND JOIN HANDS - SAVE A
LIFE.
EMPLOYEES OF JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE ARE EMPLOYEES AT-
WILL.
EMPLOYMENT MAY BE TERMINATED BY EITHER PARTY AT ANY TIME, WITH OR WITHOUT CAUSE AND WITH OR WITHOUT
NOTICE.
THESE POLICIES ARE SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR REVISION
AT ANY TIME.
loin Hmds - Snve A Lie 1 l/26/98 6
I
)
3
)
)
b
1
) )
1
1
1
4
1
)
)
)
t
1
1
1
1
1
)
1
1
1 1
)
)
1
1
I
)
)
)
t
I
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE.
EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK
RECEIPT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The information you just read is to be used as a guide to help you understand more about the operations, your benefits and the policies of
Join Hands - Save a Life. YOU may still, however, have questions from
time to time that can be answered by the Executive Director.
I, , have received a copy of Join
Hands - Save a Life Employee Handbook, dated January 1998. The handbook contains policies and regulations which I have read,
understand and agree to follow during my employment with Join
Hands - Save a Life.
I understand that I am governed by the contents of the handbook and
that Join Hands - Save a Life may change, rescind or add to any
policies, benefits or practices described in the handbook, other than the
employment at-will policies, from time to time in its sole and absolute
discretion with or without prior notice. Join Hands - Save a Life will
advise employees of material changes within a reasonable time.
Employee’s Signature Date
X. GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE
OF RELIGION OR NATIONAL ORIGIN
A. It is the policy of Join Hands - Save A Life to provide equal
employment opportunity to all persons without regard to their religion
or national origin. Such action includes, but is not limited to, the
following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment
or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other
forms of compensation; and selection for training, including
management training.
B. Join Hands - Save A Life is reviewing its employment practices to
determine that all members of the employment force are receiving fair
join Harrds - Save A Li e
1 l/26/98 7
consideration for job opportunities. Special attention will be directed toward executive and middle management levels to be sure there are no problems relating to religion or national origin.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Internal communication of the Join Hands - Save A Life obligation
to provide equal employment opportunity without regard to
religion or national origin will be communicated to all
management level employees.
Join Hands - Save A Life policies expressly indicate that there is to be no discrimination against any employees - this applies to
reiigion and national origin as well.
Employees will periodically be informed of the Join Hands - Save A Life commitment to equal opportunity for all persons without
regard to religion or national origin.
All recruiting agencies will be notified of the commitment of Join
Hands - Save A Life to provide equal employment opportunity
without regard to religion or national origin.
Reasonable accommodation will be made for religious observances.
Join Hands - Save A Li e i l/26/98 8
POLICIES
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
It is our goal to try to establish and maintain a work environment free from
discriminations, coercion and harassment. Join Hands-Save a Life is committed to a
policy of equal employment opportunities for all individuals and will make ev’ery effort
to give to individuals. with the necessary qualitications, equal employment opportunit>
without regard to race, co/or, religion, sex. national origin, ancestry. age. marital status.
sexual orientation. physical or mental disability. veteran status. medical condition.
including pregnancy, or other characteristics protected by law. This applies to all
personnel practices, including recruitment. hiring, training, promotion. compensation.
benefits, transfers. educational assistance, and social and recreational activities.
Join Hands-Save a Life will also take all necessary steps to comply with the Americans
With Disabilities Act. To comply with applicable laws ensuring equal employment
opportunities to individuals with a disabilities, Join Hands-Save a Life will also make
reasonable accommodations for the known physical or mental disabilities of an otherwise
qualified applicant or employee. unless undue hardship would result.
Discrimination in the workplace based upon protected characteristics is illegal and
against Join Hands-Save a Life policy. If you believe that you have been subjected to any
form of discrimination, please discuss this with your supervisor or a director of Join
Hands-Save a Life immediately. Appropriate investigation and action will be taken.
The Board of directors will try to ensure that Join Hands-Save a Life is truly an
organization of equal opportunity for all employees and potential employees. All
employees are encouraged to become familiar with Join Hands-Save a Life’s equal
employment opportunity policy. This policy is fully supported by the management and
staff of Join Hands-Save a Life. An infraction of this policy is treated as a serious
violation and will result in disciplinary action, possibly termination.
.
EMPLOYMENT
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY POLICIES
j-SJ!- dV.,& ~~1i-y s to recr:tt. h:re. $romcte. a?d trarp all prscns ;n all job classlEcat#cns /qit?ck
-;gara ia race, creed. coior. religron. sender, mar :a! sta!Qs. age. natIonal origin, apc3s:T,
;c:!t,cal afifillaticq. veteran status disac.lity or sexual preference Discrlminatiop against a
-7errlber cf ary protected class is st:k!!y prsblbl!ed Reasonable accommodation WI! be rv-e,, I w :?d upon request, to aavawe employment cpportun!ties for Individtials with dlsati;lt;es
Jd5J.L ~,/ili ensc;re that a11 ;jersoPrel actions including h/ring. promotlons. ccmpersatlon
senefits. iayoys, trainirg, social and recrea!ioral prcgrams, are administered ,n a manrer
ions stent wvlth.this policy.
RECRUITMENT and INTERVIE’WS
Recruitment
Hiring is conduc!ed in an tinbiased way and In a way that will ensure that positions are Fiied :,a,lth
qualified individuals. An active recruitment of minority applicants WIII be conducted as par-I 2f the
selection process. The recruitment process w:ll include:
. Tb,e posting and publicizirg of ,ob openings
l An adequate opportunity to apply
0 Realistic and appropriate job qualifications.
Open positions are always posted internally first (for five working days) for current employees
and are usually advertised in local newspapers If a position opening is wlthin the same job
ciassificaticn of one that has been opened and advertised within the last six months, it is not
required to be re-advertised; applications received from the previous opening may be
considered. Applications must be received in writing and will remain active for six months Job
openings that are a result of an agency reorganization may be filled on a provisional basis prior
to posting Auxiliary aids and services woul d be available !o applicants with disabilities upcn
reqLest.
Pcsltions classified as “Temporary” need not be posted nor advertised
I-!efv;ewinq Process
The Hiring Authority (Program Director, Mar\ager or her/his designee) reviews ail appiicaticns to
‘determine applicants’ skills, knowledge and abllities. Most applicants selected for further
consideration are interviewed by a panel of at leas! two staff members with program specific
expertise, The selection process includes a ranking of candidates based on their ability,
qualifications and suitabrlity for the position. Once a finalist has been determined, references
WIII be contacted JHSAL reserves the right to condclct a background investigation on all
candidates for employment. candidates will be required to authorize this investigation and to
sign a waiver of liability for pnor employers Employees are selected based upon their selection
process rank, skill tests and references. All applicants will be given equal opportunity without
.
regard to age, race, disabliify, Veteran Status religion political affiliation, nationa[ origrn. Ser,der
or sexual preference Upon hire. all tndivldLals l?tist prcvide proof of identification 2nd sl;g~C,i,ty
for em@oyment in the United States Students under !Fe age of 13 must Fresent a ?lgh schcol
d;pYoma, a G E El or tiork permit ‘swed by an au?hcr’- ILKI school in order to be employed
I il _ _ .-_ _ --- - --_ EUMPiES OF GOOO-FA1 I n w-!-OH IS I I’ !i
Prinrities-
i” mrli/infl nnpd igiiih offf7rTq ?p qteajprti nflnfrqprq tn Sprtipq *i htuclnpqqpc 3nn njrd C:art~nn .j .:.;:‘.:, j .L+‘_,__ -. . _ - - . - -. -. I --. . __._ .: ---..-. - “WV .----- -. ‘- -‘w -.._ _ . . . . rl! 9!!wW rPcqPniS yinrifi;l ~bpl_cifj ‘39 givpn fp fhp $rp.z++ aftent ?w~i~i~ ip, ~ - - - - - - _
7 Cot-vinn 3 i\l ~cinpqqpq reAM++i? tyflt.,~i.qo prnppp7ir pr~ppfl! Initipe. fcr i~~~4jvin0nm~ ‘w - -..i.’ i;--:. ._____ ..-. - .__ - __. ._. ._ norq.nnc: --.
rPq!n!ny! jl, ihn flrpjprt ,arpa
r- -- -
.‘_-.-,: .J ‘.’ -i:.- r-‘-l--- -‘--’
*3 . . . .- . . ,.
i. HI II I ym ltnnfrlly! r?rflfl. 9. (, : .i i r m .~naflpioc cnnjjyfl ii-90 nmlprf qrp? ._L.. :Lii::- r-J“-... J -..- :‘-; _._:: . ..= . .._ p ‘L,--. -. --.
- 4 -. iZaci&nrq ni hni 8cj-q +\l+innmpnic i? if-~e r\miori 9rp.a .‘--;:‘.A’-:::__ ._: ::.-.i-.. J --.-._ r ..._...I r-’ -,--- - --.
A 7. +maiocc nprcy\pq ii~~tipfl in t’pp qmippt 2re2, .:..:‘-:---1 rl:’ -.._ J . ..- I-.-,---
Gtfr gmnnnv wiii nrttlv~iv nariicinnte in .Geciinn :Is effhes hv- - -. r-..J . . . . . --_. . -., f--- -.-. r--- . . ---_. -.. -, .
iwnmnbs\ \-“-“‘I-‘--,
a
r -.
f-i -.
P -.
i :
r-i J’
h .
i 4hw-ti~inn !bP traiei;g 2nd m?v?!~w?l??~~ pQsi?iQTs by f+skribl!tj!~ iiyp5 (vJ-+h +mji~] I . I . - ‘J -.‘I rhe nnsitinrw tn be !!!!ee r - I’_‘-. ‘- .- ihe nl triifir.2tinns rec!l!irod 2nd y&jwe !o nhtqin .2riditipn.3i ~-- ..- - ..-. .- ‘--l-“--I --._... - --...-.. -
inffymatiry &nr_rf tb 2nniiqaiifyi pv~f-yssj to rj;wpi!ing IJniis in iiy neigh&h~arl in which - -l-l- f& .%rtinn :i rnwr~~ nmicvt is inr2wd -vIs ._.. - _“. -. -- r.e,e-’ .- .- --.- -.
Acjvy-ti~ipq the tr2iniy 2nd empiqmpnt.pnSitip~ at fk site fy prr?pcllpyj pr+yj sita -
anrj ai ~IJQ!I~ and pnvafe agpy9ps w’fihln the neighhnr’nnod s!_!c’n 23 r!rnc+w ~ipry J -_- I +nnninn writes d-wxjs, horn&y~ sheifpm 2nd chl_rr&?es -rr. J -- .-- -, -- - -, -
!Z:nntartipr! npinhhnrhnnr! nronni-ratinns vdvr~ thou pyist .J .._. J”” l...--v -‘J -...--.._..-. . . .._._ _ ..‘, __..-., ip tb .%v+nn 3 nrnioc+ .qr~cac . ..- ---..-.. - r .-,-‘-. -.--_,
.3nfi rent wxtinn the assist2nnnP nf thew nrflani-tatinng in n&fying nei~hbfyh~rl\fj r@jpn& - ---.- - - - -. - - - - 3- -_. _ nf ~p~~~~.&j~~~&-i emn!nvmfw-?t nnsitinns tf~ he id!pf!, - -“‘r ‘-,...-“’ rl- ..-..-
9;rhdlriinn 2t-d a&p-kkgg 2 job ‘- -. .I__... .J -. .- infnrm2tinn.71 nnfi rppyi$fig mpdjng . - - . _ -. -. .- irJ !f-q
winhhnrhnnci .-.3’ .- -. .-_ _.
r3ntaf~jin~ HiJJ Yn~$hh~~iid pmymps and ryge~!jpg !heir assktan~ in re~-~pjjing
vnl rthh! !iid nw-nnnrentirul nrnnr2m nnrtirin.2nts : --... --..- r.- ‘-TT .-....-- r.-~.-‘.. r -...-. r _,.__.
fTnrw riiiwi with r-nmm! !nitv !~.~d!‘prq ‘-’ -’ .-‘-. . .J fvmm~ !fwv nmnni7ntinw . . - - -. . , .-- -_._, _-, ,, ,_, ,I: rnq+ippt ppl !ppiiq anri
ro+-iont m2nnnPmfwt nrnl ms tn nscist in rvr! !itirSn
-.J -..__ - .._..-, .‘-_.- -... _--. -..- -: ‘2
Y--1:- -... ‘..-..-J-... -... J’--rl .- ---. -. .--. - . J.
c?nrw fit with InMl nl !hiir j-h~i~n A! hnritv wnicvtc fnr @~P-I! nnrririnnnts jr~ 2 “.9pp- vs..--.- . .._.. .--i-. r -w..w J .-- ..-.. ‘, c. -,--.- ._. r-.“-‘P-‘“- i In” nre-qnnrpntiwshin nrnnr~m. -I- I- - -rr _ . _ - - I- I- -.x -
c?nntwt InMl TFPA f! !ndd nnnnrnfit inh trqininn ag.ap~jr=e, - -. ._-_. .__-. _. .v. .-WC .-. ‘~. -... ,-- .’ -” “. ‘J
It 11 11 JOIN HANDS-SAVE A LIFE i/ II II II 11 Section 3 impiementation Plan
II 24 CFR Part 135, Revised
11
11
!n jgg jhp i”!.S, lr!cT!aftmPnt r\f H!Jusjpn .qnd ! !rhs!r! !~~~Pjbp~Pnt (g-D) 7!r!nntfM rwgjqijgpq !c “-r- ._... -..- -. a -.‘- -‘-I.. ---r*-- nns! IfP fhl! WhnnofFr nnssihio I?!-“-’ ir??Te rwidcv?is .zqd j!?c$ .p!Jsihesyc 2~0 .+ir+ ‘p yf”‘m ‘“. .-“.” . ,“_, ::. :‘“: ic i “. -r _““.” .-( WC.* paid fQr hv l-i! IL! T!JfldS. : ; ,___ Tips@ rnn!!k!tinns rpfnmd to 19 ‘Grtjifl :y: wnrp rorrisod in imui ‘“=- .“.._.. -, .“.“..” - _- -- ” . _ _ - _ _
tn #rpcj y&&gj~~ $1 yi”lrr f!Jp& tn !p& 2nd tg !QCZ! !yJsjnPseS th&‘&p[2y jp# jpy??r!$
persons.
For Swtinn 2 ” I ” . ” ” , 10~ inmmp means 2 fami!y (inc!urfing sin@ prsnns) whnse mn?binpd igmme
rinks nnt n~r~cvi +?W! nf the mwiian inrnmp fnr the aria ac: rwfinwl hv !-ii iT1 I !nrbr S:Pcti.nn ‘i “““” ..“.” ..““““““. 3”. -..- . ..““._.. . ..““...” .“. _..” -.__, _” “” . ...“” “, . .“_. “..““. “““_._._ ”
the !pyp ‘!gw in~Qflp” a& inclQ&s tpry !Qw immp” hgnSehQ!&, i.SPp inrnmo infnrmntinn \““” .““...” ..“. . ..__.“.
table nn Fnrw-t 1). _..
i hinr %&inn :7 rertnin inw inc$m~ rpsifbnts shnldfi hp given nrpforonrp whpn “‘rjk~ for I:~G& “..““. . “““.. “.. “( ““.__... .“.. .““.““. ..” “..““.” “” J.m”” ‘- .“.“. “..“” . . . .“..
CUW5?d by !-U!J fI_rnc!s. The HiJO ptinrities are Imv inmme inc!ivi~~-mi~ wh (1) !ive in :qp pr?jeci
Wi?El; or (2) are parficlpants in a ‘v’outhbxtild prqrzm; or (2) are r&&g& in Hi-!D a~~s&j
hnL!sing.
A. S&g-j 3 busi%s ic: a busjnps t.ha! (1) & sjo& ny mnrp nwnprl_ by .S@jnn :3 rcrririentc. or (2) . - ” ” ” . . ” ,
has a! !egst Tjcp; wJ-lp!dypes who wprp swtjnn :7 o!inihie d1~rin3 thpjr fi-st ?j yeas ?!f -“a’-‘- PmplnpPnf; CIr (3) has !mla!!y rn!?-irnit!Pd tc! award 25% nr mnre n! ?.k !??nney frnm !hP
CQntr.zCf tn nrr~ntrarinr: ihat fleet (1) ny (2) Afive. !-jl-iiJ’s intpnt is fnr pr&pnce to be giver! .” “” _“.... -“.” i .
fi!9 tc! bl!sinessP3 in !!?P prnjPrt area, SWX~C! !r! huSi%?SseS Withi!? i!?e C i t y o f
anrf fina!!v tn hr t9ineswn in .3ar! iJipgo CQQ~&
C a r 1~6 dd ,
, . ” ” ” ” . . ” ” ” ” ” I’
,l!yn cr.anfjs-SayP 2 L#p Is rqjired !Q pyJp!y witif ti?e rpyispd Spriinr! :-? rq!_!l.z!inm ?” -!&
grpafp~! pytpnt feaqihb Thpsp qy!&n~ $rp rnnslstnnt with thP goa!s nf ‘J/-SAL’ .“M”.“.“. ““..“.“.“... . . . . . . . ..” -hi?
Ha&-&p a I ifcAav0 a I ifp ic: !fly@~d in iflpr~yin.g egn~mi~ mndrvi!i~~ in cgy C~rnmyn$j ” - “..” --.- - -..- .” 2nd fnstwinn ri?i-rpn cartirinatinn in neinhhnrhnnr! wvrtali?atinn ! !nd!or the runt !!atinnr : h c j’~ . ““. _. . . .J “...“” r _._.“. ‘--..-.. . .-.=. .““. . .““” .” . ..-..“__.“... “..” “. . ..” “..“. ” ic: ron!rird tn s~~hrpit .a wrCflpfi ~~-llJ Sectinn .2 Fmnnmir r%nnrtr!nitv EInn .~~a’~~~rdc-:<.sw 7 .” .“~“““” .” “““. . . . - ““” _.“..” -“” ..“....” -rr- ..“.“‘, . .-... 4 “... . ._..“” “_.” - Lif&nv~ a I ifP ha9 .ri~p!~)p& 2 @a.~ tg zcfj@v imnbmen? thg pr.ckikps of ihe .%4nn ‘2 - -..- .._” “” “““..“.. - rent datinrs This lmnbmentatinn Pian nnnibs the I-.-“‘-“‘ aJ “.__.“. .“. . . ..” . ‘r.“. ..“. .---.-. . . .-.. 4 .“’ ortinn ? rpn! !Iatinns in .G rngww rtosinnnti f~ “pp ..“” . ..” “.“.“..“.. L ‘“J “.__.“..” . . . - . ..-....“. “.‘“’ J ..“”
st!m!r!aip pmmmic nnnnrtr mitifx in inw !flmmp rpslgpn& .z& ~~~~i-m~~p~ in !~.dsk.~fl, ‘“4 pn “yr”. .“. ..-.“” &Q pemp$y3 px?nm!zefj sectinn 2 activiiios in m2wimbe those wqp$~gi$es in n+iohhnmnni -- . . . . . .“” _” . .._....... “” ..,““” rovit.2lrmtinn arpaq ‘“.3. .- -. .- - ”
” . ..-..-- _.“. . “. ““_.
.SpCfjQn 3 p&y Statement. .” _ ” . ” . ” _
The Jnin i+nrk-S,=we 3 ! if0 ir cnmmiitw! tn rbvdnninn and maintainirw .2 diveme rd ho?ith .-..-” ““.” ” _._” .” “_.........“” .- ““.“._ r .,.= “. .” . ..-.. ..“.. ‘3 - -..-.-- “,.” ..“-.. w-ennmir has@ whirh nrf-q4&c: prnninvm+nt tn the rPsid+nts nf !‘nrishM -nnnr+ vit9iiiw in fi- ir--..- . ...” “““” . . . ..-.. r.” f-‘-I”‘-“’ .- -..I .I”.“” .._” -. -‘_..-- ““. ---. .-. . -
mnmuniiy,
: . ” . , . _
2nd thP nwwx?rv rwwn!!w to s!~ppnfi City spvirez . ..” ..“” ----., . ” . ” .” “” . .“““. JHSAL v~iii adi\@'
inp!empflt Swtinn 13 mgddtions tn $rp~i wryk paid fnr by Hi I!"! fr mdc tn jnfy .znrj ify+ -----.. -. .-- .-...--
!?Jsinesses ma! emp!ny !nw innnme pecE"nS.
$?~tiQn ?I biirinn !?nni. JHSAL ’ .s WC!! /c tc fi!i WC?- nf s!!! ww w!Qitinnc Crpatpd @h !-ji-i~! fl,+c - . .” .. ‘a “.““.. a---’ ‘- -- . . “_ with Sortinn R P!inihb rc&-bntti _ _. “.. .” . . r _“...“. .I
- . V”“..“.. ” “.‘J.“‘” .““.” “...“.
.SPcti!y 3 Blrcinm Goa!: Thp gcn! is tc! L?i!iZP .spcti”n 3 e!igib!e bsinP~S !c! ?,qgirp ? c;w= nf !k materials s~upp!ies, 2nd setices req~ir& by pmjtis r~ceiting more than Sin0 nfm in !-!ll!J .-__. ._.“, -. ““,““” funds.
TQ &~jpye thp Sertinn 2 gnajs estah!ishPrl fnr the rf lrront war -““-.“.. “-” ““.M” I”. .“” .“. _..” ““..“... , --., .&in Hands-Save a I ifp-Save 2 .“..“” “_.” - -..- ““.” ” Life will require the fn!!nwing:
A . . All mntrwtnm QI hrnntrartn~ 2nd p&yp~inifwt~ wi!!: . . . ““.._. - “.“.“, “““” “.... -- --.“, I-‘“’ .--
1 . . &~kp a nnnfl fnith dfnrt !Q ia@, rpflgii, ,?yj hire S&ion 2 oiinih!o r&!pn!s for =““” .- . . . . ” ..-..
wnrt: s!Jppnflerf hy CII”!D f!Jn&. -“a’-‘-
2, &r(&p 2 nnnri faith offct tn dijize SopGbn 3 djnihle h! ~in+ce~ fnr r?rnicdq 91 !nnnrbd ” J--” .“._.. “.._.. J .“.” “” “...” “““” .-. r .-,--.- --l-r-‘--- by ~!“I~ fl !rvk “. .I”.
3. .2111-nfi a pnnrt nf Swtjny! 3 p&fjqd intiiviril!?lc: bird w$h !-!l-In f~t~ds pppj~& fmm
!hp J(TN $~&j’$$ .A. LIFE.
. ..“...““L.” . . . . “”
4. pn4 a nntif-9 nf nartirjnatinn in Sp@jcJg 2 !jdyI nreferonlul 2nd effl!a! nnnnrtl lnitv ““_ - ..“..“” “. ‘+ -... “‘SM ..“.. J ‘e. “.“. “. .“” “q-m. “r’s”. -C. “‘,
pTa&j@s.
R -. Pnntrartnm CI Ihmntrartnre 4” . . . . . ..---.-. and 91 rhmrinbnts whn rpeSvo .!.jQQ,@-J Q! mnre for “““““..-.-“.” “, _..” “““.““.r.“..‘” . ...” . “““. -”
t-qjeds finand in wh& fy in part with !-!\-I!3 fern& wiii:
1 . .~Q&I@ Sg~!i~n 3 f~mg 2s r~1lirr3j !y .&&r! 3, !he mntract anre~mont and the
JQ!N !j.A.Nns s.A.yE A. L!FE.’ -l-“-
-a.““...“... _..”
2. Snbmi! a written .sPctinn 3 GnK! Fai?!-! nction P!an in arrQrrjanE with the
inntrt rrtinnsifnrms in the mntrart rfnr!Jmpn!s. . .“.. ““_.“. .L:.-. . ..I . . . -. .” ““.._. --_ ““I
3. !dentify me sites where fhey wi!! adw?isP, rpcp-# sod Wpgpvpr nn4hle hirp spctjon 3 p!igjb!p pgp!nyees. .“. r”““.“.” . ...“.
4. !&nqJ p@jb!p SP@iQn 3 hLjigp?pS !hll! #/id! bp l!S!d in the pmjpc?.
Section 3 identified Contact Sites
i-In&r Sectinn .? renrlintintx when kiting 3 ~35~ g mrqlny !Q do WC* !ht3! is finzn+rJ jr! -““-.“.. ” .“J”.-““..“,
whnie gr in par! by Hi-10 fl_rnfjs, prpfprenrp mtj$ b given to inw inmme reSi&ntS ati to local,
qu#yyinn hr rcinsxces /SOP !n!m&!&r! nn page 1 for pr&?rg-!rr) req!ir~m~n&) J “““.. .“““““. ,““”
.A.s pafi of ff-t~ JQ!r\r g.A.dlJ.3 SAVE A, LIFE’s lmnbm~ntatinn Wan, mntrartn~ s~hmntrndnm r’“...” ..__.. “.. ““. .-. ““.“. “, ““““” . . ““.“.“, 2nd s~rhrerinionts fnr nrniortq re&yjnn !Rif717 f-07 nr mnw in jj-1~ fl!nrls mrlst irbntifv sites “““.““.r.“. ._” .“. ‘“‘“,““‘” J ” .““,.““” “. . ..“.” .“.. “” . ..““_ .“” . ..“. _.__”
~hpro thov will xivcu-tiqo rernrit and bike Sectin~ 3 dinihb pmninv@pc: To apsis! N\ntmrtnm - “‘“/ . . . . . -“. “...““) “V.“.., “..J.” .” “. .‘” .-, ” :“’ - - . ” - . - ” (
CI rhmntradnrc and CI rhrerinjenfs wfih this renl !iremPnt the j-jn~gng anri P.pdpvcd~pmpn! “” “““,.._.” - _“.” 1 -..- ---‘--.f- . ..” .“‘l-.. -...- .._,
Bnartmrwt nf the Citv has @gdJj~d arjv&rGi-g anri rwn ritinr? sijgs !@prg vnr I IW !iks!v tn find r- ._... “,.. “. . ..” ““, ..-” J -..- .“_.” . . . . J I-- -.- I .- ““- inriividI talc: whn nl t.qlifv fnr spctjgn 3 wpfnronro @!QW is a nartinl iis? nf nntenti.3! qitw . ..-...---.- . . ..- ~-- . . . . .“. r’-‘-‘--“--‘ - f--’ _‘-’ r -.-.. _.-. -..--.
1. NQfl!“! f?l_tg/ f;zrpqy 1:pqiqr
531 c; .A,ymjda Egwi-tzs fj 4!:!
partshari C.A, 92Q<!g -‘-..----, $jQ-2~)0
?-!nlJrs: 8-30 a f-p - 4:3n p-m
Thp hJneh Pn! I~V r’larmv Ppy?tor (N!~f~(~) is 2 ‘~n~-stq ~hnp” for emp!~pgt sppjm. The . ..” . ” . . . j,, I --‘““’ --’ -- rPntPr hnl RPQ a varidv nf wvviwc fnr emnlnvm6nt ricwdnnm~nt anfi tralninn ““...“. ..““““” - ._.. “., “. ““. ..““” .“. “..“” ‘“,...“.. - ““. “.“r . ..“... “..” -.-..... .J. Pn-lnrdd in the “” ____. “” . .”
faci!ity are:
State nf Califnrnia Emp!nymen! lJp@Qnrr?ent &nafimg-?t Q@s!$iQa (EDEli “---” “. ” _...” . ...-)
Wbn r~lbri thP “I rrwmnlnvmPnt nffiw” -.--.. “i-..“” . ..” FIX3 nffom inh ri!xdnnmont crrooninn ‘..“““...” ,“. “... “...“” , --- “..“.” ,“” ““. “.“y..‘“. .-, ““. ““. . .=,
and refma! servic !n incmidua!s whn are c!!!Ten!!y L!nemp!nyeri nr w&Y-
~gp!nvd “, ““_ A. !ead am staff member, !OE!fPd at !!?e !NCCC c3n he!p !nt.?!e
czsna! iahnrom anri t~mpnmy ny permanent p~p!gypps. .-““.“.“) “..” !$K!n req!Psf, Em
ran !-tp!n irkntifv indivi!j!~& phg resirip in th@ nrn!Pct -rin rr?fb r .” “. . . . , . . .“. . . .““.“” . . . . ..” r .-,--- -.r “” ““.
Partirinants in Yn! tthhl M nrnnramn rpc&p pkrii fnr hiipg cpjpr the Ser&n. 3 . -. .,“. c-. ._” . . . . ““...” A..” r. “J .“...”
rqn!a!in!-!s. Tr?p ynLrQ-!btri!d s!aff at !fqCCc: can hp!p to !C)m&! pJrrpnt trainpps
ami nraf-ii IatPS of Y~~-!~rti?ht-!i!d for temrnp~rary ny pemanegt pgsiti~w. - a.-------
San njpnn f?nneWi! !m! Private inrir ?drv C?!pr+! inh Trzimim pmflmfl$ iJlp,Ai ” ““. .““. _.” . . . . . - __” . .“““_. ““”
J-P.4 ~ffprs a s@p varjptv nf omnlnvmont re!atd sorviws Sgm.e.pqrams &fer , “. “..““.” ,,.. “.._ :“.-.‘” ““. ..“““.
both empinyprs and f3Tq!oyees rinanf3:!! yjpp0b-j Cy parkyp~tlng in fhe
prqrzms. Many JiP.A pati~c~pants hzyp heen ~s~q~~~ fgr r@jpncy, inmmp
stati& gv-l i& skiiis fnr specific occ!!-!pti~ns. lJ$n rqps!, .-iT?A stair ~zn heip
identifv in&i&& wt?~ reside in fhe prt-+d Tincnrie -- ..I -,--- -.I-----
2. T-h-e City of CarlsbadHiting Center
WW FI Caminn Rxl “““” -. i- . . . ...” .“W. Cw!sbad C.A. 92gg.s
Wsc-~l~l _ - .-. _
3. QylnJlJ~itv RPsn! IfCP CPntPr ..-, .““““.“- “‘” ..-“. -7 i Wi-!-! Finr?srw~!t Street ‘“.“” ..“_““.“.. “..““.
Carlshad (-6. 92!J@. “-...““--“, “‘. .
747~!333 I
4. The City of Carlsbad i?nuSin3 .AsthQrity ’
c; “.
Fi “.
7w5 Rnn-vM Street. S?jite B -““” “““” “. Carteha& C.A. m8 “w...““S
434-2810
Ls Pnsah de Gwda!lme !-!cme!ecc Shel!er l . ““w-e 2472-2476 Impala Orb&
Calsbad. C.A 92DOR
929-2322 !am?r nm pm.!
mm R!~W :Q r)2v shdk~ * ” --, 17613 Prnd~ &inn Avbn! IP .---- .““““..“., . ..“..“”
CkEmside CA 43054 4391244
‘R~sirbntc: livik in hnl !sinn h! litt nr w w-mnrta-4 hv HI-lo fyris 21~ e!i@h!p fnr .~cJ~J!Q~ 3 .““.” “.._” . . . . ..- . . . . .“““..._ ” “.._ “. -----.--- -;’ cy!ifi&inn .~nrj-qr~ qivep $yity by the ry!j&nnS. Thor a~nci& cnnnqy ‘h~!-~inq --_ -__ - -- --_
nrncrr3ms ! knr! l-ii !iJ fr Innis 2nd may hP ahip tn help ynl_i finfj ternznqry fy p~rrr?,~ncy~j - -_ -.. - ““. ._ _- “. _” - -- -- - .- pmnlnveps whn no !liifv fnr Sertinn R nrDferonrP “...y’“e, ““” _ . ..” y “-...e. .“. “““..“.. ” r’“.“.“..““.
JOiN HANDS SAVE A LIFE
II HOUS-fNG AN5 REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
II SECrnON 3 REQUfREME%-rS
!I i 2 USC 5 701 u (Section 3)
!3jring !!y ,perf~rmam of this mntr=t~t the mnie,dnr, g&qnt&!gr, nr sr_lhr&$pnl rnl-tct
eflQ .zwJ yenrownt that !!yy wi!! acjhprp !Q Sp&q 2 pmvisi~~ nf the j-llgsic~ 2nd i-i&aq
&vdnnment ?6irnl“As~-~f jw $s &w?j?erj in 24 CFR Par! ?35, R~viswi .I! Ino 313 1944 All .“.“r..‘“..‘ ,. ‘“-, .“_ “. .“..“U” --.._ __, .__ ., ,.
mntmrtnrc: QI rhmntnrtnrs 2nd ~&ycinionts 21p yen! rird tr\ 91 !hmti 2 ygtb-bn y!-lQ +c!inn 3 --. . . -“.“.“l ““““” .._.““.“. “, I-‘-’ ‘-- “~ “..” - .- -- “.....
Em-mnic Tmnnrti mitv Plan ifnrmg arp ~~~~~e$. -TT”’ .“. ..‘, .“.. \.-’
The ~r+trastnr 91 rhrc?ntrrrtnr nr 91 !hrwiniont rertijv that thw wiii nrnvirio !n tfip nr~tod ouinnt , . ..-_ . ..“. r’ -. .“” J -- .““. -...-. .
fo.?+hlo
, _____._.. - “.“., “. ” --.-,-. r.“’ .
- - I ” - ( nnnnt-t~initi+as fnr emninvmont tn !flwcy jnmmp C.2-kb.~~ r&dppts. “TT”‘~ “.....“” _.,. ‘r .-, .“. . . ~l,d-m i#> !+I? L. _. :‘” i ,
nrontwt e-tent fwrihb mntr7rtq in ccyg~+i~c with @se pjp@s 3’9 in be .pqr&cj ye iwqi ,_ “_“.“._, “” . . . . ““_” .- --.
g;-~~~,S~-“Minirni~rn rjnals fnr pa& nrniwt are 30 ppr1ylnt pmpinymg7t qpc!lpity ipvpi fflr r- -,-- :!le 3 :tt/ 3 F C a r i s bad ~~k!enfg ant! ! 5 percen! eccv?nrr!!c q~pnrtnnity !pvg! fr?r Tb e
City o f Car 1 s b a d !xsineS mnr~rn~. The JQ!N !-!AN!X SP.VE .A !-!FE wi!! imp!ement 2
spclfic @an !nr gr?hiwing this nnal --...-. a--.-
Pati r~f the Sertinn 2 Imnbmentatinn p!sfl req’~ires mntrnrtnm 91 rhmntr~rtnm b..” w--e.-.. ” . . . r.““‘” . ..__. “. ““. .-. _“.“. “, “““““. . .._“.“.“. and
91 thrPrinionts tn make nnnri faith dfnrtc: tn tarn& rwrl lit anti hire Sadinn 2 .aros rPsirbnts fnr “““.““.r.“.‘-” .” . .._..” J’“” .-.-.. “..“..” .” ‘-.J“, . ““: “..( _..” . ...” “‘““..“.. ” -. “- ““.““. ._” .“.
$+~ai!ahIc nnsitinns. .A.!! mnfr&np $1 rhmnfr@nrs, 2nd gjy@jpiytr: prfic$p&ing in mntra& - I---‘-‘- - ” , ” ” ” - -
of $100 I)03 or more in HlJD assistant-e must advertise and actweiv recrwt eliaibie Section 3
nnrtirinnnts in awnrrianw with ft~e .JQ!N H.A.NiJ.2 s,A.VE .A. L!FE Sect& .? jmr?iorn&aMing r>!an. r -’ -‘-‘r- -. ‘-- . . . --_-. “-..“” I-““‘-
Aririitinnallv all S&ii!! 3 pyr tird fnrms mc tst ho mmnbfwJ jr! fu!! 2nd g$mcwi nrinr tn rdcc+w nf . .““._.” ..-..,, _.. -“..“” .” . ...” . ..““.“” ““...p.” 3.‘“” r.‘“. -” .“.“_“” “.
flJnds. When there is an item c!r! the ffym that is nnt qydir2b!p tn )mlJr husinesr:, n!wsp infjir$p I- ---- with “N/.A .I’ Ail mnfrwtfnr- sfJhntra3nrS, - - “, and yJy&gients are rpqCr(lrl/ to fii! in zli
infnrmntinn If there Rro any q~y&in~, . .,” . . ..--. “... . . . . .“.” _.” _.. nbww roll thP Cl3FlG /4.rjminisjr.&r jg the Hnlrsinn and is.“-“” “i.. . ..” “-- -
Redevelopment Department at $19) 434-281i
. ..” .““..‘J _..”
It II CERTlFiCATiON FOR CONTRACTS 1
II ii HUD SECTION 3 REGULATIONS II
THE CCM?!?.ACT~R -. .( S!JXOfVTR.ACTO!?, $1 iWF~-.iP!El\rr, fWNFR ‘---. ._“‘.. ” . . . .-. ., nEljEl_nPFR -. .,
NcN??OF!?, m SE.RV!CE !3=0?!!33? !?v !-!!S!HE!? S!GNA.T!!PE~S) A.FF!XED HEI?ETlZ, I-IFCI ARFS i-lNn!=R PENALTY (:)F PEf?JiJRY C)R N~N-Q(J\.J!~L!ANC:E E&FQR~El$=r\rr -A;- . .--
Tl+AT-
A . .
R -.
c.
n -.
F L.
F .
r: -.
The wnrk tn he nwfnmwd IJ~&T !hjr c~qrra* is s1~~jpc1 ?9 the rqt~~rpm~qts of sejnq 2 ..“... _” “” r “.._....“”
of t!-tp Hf~~sjnn and I lrhnn rww4nwvv-e :A.,3 cf ?cs;R 7~ 7rl?a~4ad ‘2 i i c I- .J -..- “.“-.. -” .“._ r . ..“.._ ___, “” -...-. .-“_, j7{31 iI I’! “.“‘.‘j. - ,-,
(.seJtiQE 3). pip p’-‘r$fJsp of SgC!jny! 3 js t?J pfls’ryp rh!mt py$ovm , .W? ?r?d mer ??2nF?%c
nnnnrt! ~nitip+ npamatpri hv +!-!iJ ,zssik!.2nc~ ~7 ij!-ilz-sssjciprj nr~?jp~t~ r+!~pe 5~ -TC-‘.- . ..“__ J-.‘-.-‘-- -, (-. -, - - _-
Swtinn 2 - - _. - - , sf-d! tn th@ nre.?teqt pytpfl! &sib@, he dirpctpd !n !QW- age yerq j~w-iqc~mp ( -- _..- =.-- _--_ . . .- pqynns narric! !/,a& ner+rmg y&c .2rp rocinients nf “I-I!-! accist.znrs for ~~3j~r! - -. ,_, r- ..,-“‘“.‘, r-‘--. --‘r-‘-“-- -’ ‘2’
The nnrties tn thk cnr!!r=rc! .?T?rpe jn cnmniv @h :VlJD’s regn!=r?jnns in 24 CFP. pgfi j?C;, . ..- r- ._.-- .- . ...” --. -a’ -- --“‘P’,
ejcj! imnlamfw-tt Spytim 3, As ~~~~&~~pd by @jeir ~x~fx&m of !hjr mgtra$ thq n.anips I-‘-“‘-“- --- I--‘“--
!r~ this r.nn!rgct tyy?jfy jhaf they gre gn&r En contracbxj! or other imrrdimpnt tb! uy01~irj . . . . r - “.... -. ._
ppvent tham frnm cnmnlvinn y@h ihe pati 3~35 +gt~!.gti~_ns. “. “.._ -.-... . . -... --“.r.,“‘a
The r.nnt_rac!fy snreps to rend !n egch !.7hg ~rggnizatin!! nr rc4re4Pnt2tkq of byp+prs -a’ --- WT. ---..___._
tith i&j& tj?~ copjractnr h.g$ .q fyd!&ve h.~rnnininn .3nrePment or @her !~g+rst.2-dinn a-” ... ‘J -a’ - -.“-.‘- ‘-“‘a! If any, a n&ice a&ising Lhp la&r nr~.gqi~&n~ ny wn*.& rPnrccent.MivP nf tt~p . “r’ ---. _.--. . -
cng?r.gc?&s r.ng-~mi!.Een!s IJ-@~ this .$efli~r~ 3 c!.~IJs~, .2nd ti!! nnst mniw nf the q@i& P--- --I-.--
in r.nngnici inr I$ dams ai. t.hs *Q&. s]!p y&prp _hgtj emninwes 2nd .gpp!ican!s for !r.2imipg r.----- r’---- -..‘r’-, ---
and emninvment nncitinns c-2!! see the ~Q!~cP. r .-,...-... ,“--...-..- ThP nnticp shdl dcecrih@ thy Spctinn 3 :..- ..-.. -- -..-.. A---..-- . ..- ” --_.-.. -
nrnference I-- -. -’ qhnll sp! fnrth minim1 rm nt rmher at-d inh titles $1 thicct tn hire pgj!.~$!j~ nf , -..-.. .-._.. . . . . . . . . . -... ..-.... L-. “..” ,-- _. _. - - - ” ” , - - _ _ - . - ,
annrenticeshin .zgd !r$nigg p~+t.inps, !hp nt~~iifirdinn~ fnr each; .ggd thp q.2~4 .2ycj -rr. -..----... ~ ~-‘_...._ - --..-
!nc&& of Be nnrennic\ trkinn nnnlkxtinn~ for pa& of the nnqitinnc;. and thy pticjjnated r _.” _. .\“, _-. . . J -r~ ..---.-. .- r - -. . . - - , -. ” ” - I- --- -
date !!-!P wnrl! Sh.?!! hejrin.
The mntrartnr anr@eS tn indt I+ this Sectinn ? ciat ISF! in w~rv st&mn!ract ~II+W! @ . ..” --.._. -d--. -cr. - -- -- . ..-.--- . . ..- -” “..“.. L -.---- . . -. -.,
rnmnlianre with rent riatinns in 7d PFR nnr? ?f4ii .smi .qnrees tc @cp nnnrnnrinte nrtinn ““... r..- ..“” . ..“. .“3”.-I”..” - . _. . . r-.‘ .__( _..” -J.““” _” -rT. -r ..“_” ““_._..,
as p&&j ir! an app!ic&!e prc$&n nf the srthcnntrart nr jn this Sortinn 3 &ygp, -- “““.._. --- “. “““..“.. ”
IJ~QR 2 findinn th.d the CI thrnntrartnr is in viniatinn nf thP TORI !!atinns in 24 (?FR ~26 i.35. J _.-_ -..- “““” “..“____, _.“._““.. “. _..” ‘“3 “.“_.“..”
The cnntractor wi!i nnt s~!bccMr~r.t with any suhc.ontr8ctor where the r.gntrar,!c?r has
notice nr knowiwiw thd fhe s&cnnjrg,r.tnr h.gs ‘h*n fg!_~ncj in vioia!iga gf the r~nr!i.~tinr?s --a- -’ -- -a-. -.- - in ?4 (‘Fi? nnrt 1135 - I j. . r-. _ ” “.
The cnn!ra&r wi!! certify th8 any vacant empigyment pgsiiions, ind! Iding irzininc _ _
nnsitions I- - - -’ that are fi!ied id) .zfkr the ccntr.xtnr is sei&ej c!.I! &fcye the Cgnir.gri is , -. .-.- _ _. _ _ _
PYPC Ited, 2nd (2) y&h p~cgfl~ &py ?,bag thnce tn whnm the Ron! t!ntinnc nf 24 (ZFR ~25 -. .” ““.” “.““” _” ..,.“, :. _..” ‘“3”.- _._..” _.
135 rtwt tire empinyment qyz,rt!_!ni!ier: tc he @rty+i, were nd fVip+ t5 Cir!yirnvpr?j jhq - -I... - rnntmrtnic nhiinatinnc g&r 24 CFE pan 135. - -..-.----. ” --..= - _.“..”
Ng3cr3mnlianrcr with Hi-ID’s ren! rin?inns in r”-“-- ‘“J-‘- _._..” . 24 l?FR nart *:i5 mrv res! vi? in c=3r~?inn~ “, . . r”.‘ ‘-- “‘-, “-“._ ,.. -- ..-_.-. -,
termination of this c,c!nk2ti fnr defagit. and deh.~rmenj or s!jspension frgm fyj!jrp iii-it!
assisierj c.onjr.~cts
With rwnw? tn wnrk n~rfnrmd in rnnnertinn with Sortinn .2 ~nvcrrpi lqdiqq h-1 !qian . ..-.. .““c”“‘ _” .I “... r “..“....” - . . . --....--_._.. . .._._ ____.“.. ” .“.“” ___“. -.. ..-- -...=
%ciSt?n?e sectinn 7ihi of tf?~ !ndian Sdf-!3~terminntinn nnri F4 !rw/w A SC~S?QVO A et L”“.” _“..““, ” ___“.. ,“, . ..“.-.. --.. -“-” . . . - _.-.. “..” --: ----.-.. ._- .-_-..-- .-_
(25 !“!.S.r:. dsgp) .71sc! ap!iss ?Q f@ WQ& !n be p@Qrmp’I under t.hhs y!gr~,!e. SV!j3?
7(b) require,s that to t!!e greatest sknt fePasib!e (i) prdew7ce and nppcu?!unities hr t_aining and employment ha!! lx 3&r! ?n !ndians, and (ii) preferenc. in the award nf mntrads and S~bcmtEEtS sha!! he given to !ndian organizations and !!-!diEmmvPxi Economic Enterprises. Parties to this mntract that are subject tcr the provisions of S&inn 3 and sec?.hn 7(b) .7flme tn mmp!y with Sectinn 3 ta the maximum e.xen! -=. --
feasih!e, srrt m? in dPrn3&&
!%?C
Cat2
if r.~mniinn& witj7 wcfjQq 7th). r . -. - - . . . . - - -
Pnntr~.~tnr’c!Mirmr’c Cinnqtf IT* ""I IIIUVIVB 3,Y*ll-4 .J "'.j'IU,",~
(~~&y rq$~d)
rr.r.+r~.~tr.r'.l'A~i.-.-.~~ hl-FP..- -,nrl -!-it!.-, ""I IL, cLbL"I a#"t,l-I 3 0 .UI IIG cl, ty I ,,,G
DrrrinA /@!.1*.-.? Tlrn..r .*r Dn'ntl I I",GU (' rGc43G I y/Jc; "I I #,d II,
Nn?e: The nwsnn siflninfl mm? he ai_?im!zpci by nwnfy,
f~fint.~&t&-‘ $&A; jj &pa Emnflmic c%nnfh rnitv Pbn
&plop3 or mntrzc@r to erry 01-6 !M
..-. -rr-. .-‘..‘, . .-..,
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
(760) 7204540
FAX (760)720-0540
3528 Madison St Carlsbad CA 92008-5034
ii SECTION3 DOCUMENTS - ii
c)~~ring the tpfnmancp of this mntrxt, the cp-#-a&y pyVfips and rpprespnts that fk
mntrartnr nnri 0ad-1 41 rhmntrnrtnr wj!! adhere !c .SP@~Q~ 3 pr~visjnns Q! the &y$pg 2nd l-l~rh~ -- . . ..----. -.._ ---.. -----. . ..--.-. lkvelnnmont AC! nf 1 sg 2nd wi!! mmn!v with the J(S,!r\i !-jzd,Nn.3 s.A,vE :4, LiFE .~oc!i~~ 3 --.w.- I-“‘-“- --“‘I-‘, lmnl~m~ntatinn P!ag. .A.!! mn!.~!cinrs are rpz]ujrp~ !n ~r_l~~fi 2 yr@pn H!_ID Sydc-j 3
~&~&.ZGbinvm~nt c%nnrtl tnitv P!ar! fp fhpse &fnes (fnm~ .zre $&f-b&). _.,. r .-,...-.._ -rr-. .-. ...I .-..
D&P:
f+tmdfwn . -...-. -‘a’
Cnr!ta!zt Persnn:
.AddrPSS:
Pmject Name:
A fiflr~C~~ . .VL. s-s.
Genera! (z~fitrsc!Qr imnstrr lrtinn nmiw+2i : \-w ..--. -- -.-.. r .-,----,
!-!!A3 SECT!ON 3 ECONO!d!C.EMPLOYME!W OPP@RTUN!TY PLAN
Piannd C0rfif-q 3 hjrps: . .-...._ c *v,, .-
in columns 1 & 2 indicate, by trade, the number sf newpositinns crfsted by the
nrniw-3 Fnter the nr ynj?pr of nlanncwi .Swtinn 2 hire in ml! !mn ‘2 r. ‘, _ __. -. -. _. . - . . - fd.- . . . . -- S”_.._.. - . . .._- . . . --.- . . . . . i.
I I I I I 1 I I I I
!
I i 4 I
I I i I
I 1 1 I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
SECTjoN 2 PIAN irmntint rwl\ --.._.._--- iAtt?ch arkGtinna! ncwo~ if r-wcwx~M ,. . ..--.. -- _...-.. -. r-~-- . . ,.---- --.,,
R -. n!Jwacr! P!an
1 . . !ndlm!P site th& will be u& !n afjvPrr*, recruit and hire SPdiw! 3 emp!Oyps for this grojed:
7 -. List any sowces or m&!-&s of rwrM-9ent of Section 3 poten!ial emp!oyes th& wi!! tx used in additinn tc! !he JH SAL Sectlnr! 3 !mp!emeniatinr! !‘!a~.
(SPP samp!e nf Gocd Faith Effnrt - attached).
4. i_ikf .j& Trmidpn Partnershin A.ct nr v~vthbwj!d nrnnrams in he gji!izse it anv .J -. . .I. -. ..r .-. -. T.-J’-...- .- -- ’ ” -’ ‘I
r; 91 !nnlicvs 91 fhmntrartnm v. jik! of Sp~tbn 54 ” digihio _.. ,-.- --rr ..-. -, v----..-.--.-.-, v~nrjnrs 2nd servi~ pr~vkici~
to !?e Lltilized.
Address
Dhnnfi I I I”, Ix4
Nqrne , .i...- Amcrunt S
Address
Dhnnn I ll”lIU
Name s...-
Address
Amnl !nt $ . . . . --. ._
i ii EXAMPLES OF GOOD-FAi-i-ii EFFORTS fl II
in makinrr nnt-wi faith dfnrts !Q ~~3rd mn!ra& ?Q G&inn 3 hl tsinewec . . ..:“..’ .J J ____ ._._. ., ‘... _. __ ad hire SD&inn .2 -w--,w.. e 1-v. ----w -..- . . .._ l__.._.. _
nt Ialtfiwj rm!denk, pn”nty s!-IQ~J!~ hp givpn, tn VIP greatest extent feasih!e, tr\. -I--“-
1 . . .Spytbv 3 h~3inpspg \p,rhj& prnvifjp ~~ny~ic nnnnrtrfnitbc fQr !~&~-incnrnP pprsnz -rr-.‘-...‘.-- _ _ . _
r&rfi~ in the nrnject zrp.7. ‘2 ..’ -..- I-
7 -. !-jlJfJ Ynt-tihhuj!d pgr:?m qen&s sgying fhP propa zrpz.
? .v . Rcrqidprrtc nf hn! sinr! &wcrin~monts irk ti?e t?rniort ,~re.~ : :. __,__._._ -. ..-- -...= v-.-.- + ..-...- I-.-,--- -.--.
4. wQme!es p?r!3nns !ivincJ in the pmfec? area.
Our cnmpmy wi!! active!y participate In section 3 efforts hy:
a -.
h -.
r 4.
rt -.
P -.
f . .
n J’
h . . .
Advertising the trzinlng and emp!nymen! positinns hy distri!~Jiq f!ym (whkh identi!y the p&ifim to be fi!!pd, ?hP q!ja!ifi@lnnc: ypy?$!jrpyl, ad Whprp !Q nhtnin afiriitinnai -- ._... - __._._.. -.
inf~mati~n a!m_r! the app!irz&?n pmcess! tn dwe!!!ng t~n?s in the neighb-hnMf in which
thP Sectinn ‘4 mvercwj pgjpd is !nrafgd. -. .- ire-.-. . i -- - w. -
.Adver!islng the train@ and emplnyment positinns at the site nr pmpcwxl project site, and at p~b!ic and pnvate agencies with!n the n@gh&rhwd such 2s 3rwyy stryps,
shopping centers, schmls, hnme!ess sheltm, and churches.
Contacting neighborhood ~r3anizatiws, whpre my PYlSf, in the Sectinn n prnfert 2re2s, and recywtirg the as&tarw of these or3anizations in notifying neighhorkwd residents nf the trainin arxi emp!nymw-!t pnstiin9s to he fi!!ed.
Schedn!in3 and adwtisin3 a j~lh infnrmatinna! and remi?irw~ meeting in the nei3hbnrhond.
Cnntac?ing !-!!J!I Ynuthhni!d pm3r~ms and reql-lesting their assistance ir! rwnAin3
Yn,rthhUj!d pp-qqr&jrP progr2rr! rpfiisinants I--’ ‘--’
Cnnst~!tinc~ with ~~rnmcrnity !eaders, cnmmunity nrffanitatinrw psi&n! ~~nci!s and
resident mana3~ment 3mups tn assist in recruiting. -. =-. ..-- ..-. .-,
hntnrt lnrvl . ITPA fr rnrid nnnnrnfit inh traininn anpncios --. .---- .-.---. _ . .-. .--- ._. .p. _... ,-- .._.. . . .J w=-. .s.-e.
il
II JOIN HANDS SAVE A UFE I
II !-KMJSsIffi AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1)
SECl-!OF! 3 REPORTS II
1.
7 -.
? -- .
4.
E; “.
SECT!C)N 3 EMPLOYEE !!WORMAT!CW .m.m ?
P.4 I?? 1 : EMPLOYMEN-I- Am TRA!N!NG !=o!?n 2 CnNTF?.ACTnR’s!si~R~~~~~.~T~~‘S CFCTli7N 2 CC)\&‘L!A.NcE REpC)RT - j-, . .-
PART !!: CnmRncTs n!N.N?PEn .!=b??? 3
CO~R.A.CToR’S!Si~BCOh~~.~T~~~ SEC-j-!Or\l 3 CQ~#l_!;4,~CE REPQRT
sECT!oN 3 !?ES!PEW !NCOME CERT!l=!CAT!i?N !=n!?hA Fri... 4
g=C:T!Qfq 3 RI_IS!NE$.S r:g3T!E!!3!Tli754 FQRM Fwm 6 . “..,. _
I MA11 DCD DTSTg: I.IrbIL I IL. a I I f
I
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
(760) 720-0540 Frank Anthony Sorino 3528 Madison St - Carl&ad CA 92008-5034
Please note that a!! Section 3 required fc?rms must bb cnmpieted In ful! and signed.
Forms must be submitted prinr ?n release of fronds. When there is an item or! the form that is ret applicabie tn your business, piease indic&e with ‘WA..” A!! cm!trz!dnrs, srJb-mntra!dnrs, and subrecipients are rqulred to fi!l in a!! infnnnatinn.
!! is the r~spomihi!Q nf the mn!ractnr, suhmntmrtnr or s~~bcipipnt !n emurp tha! these fnms -- -..-.--.-., are mrnn!eted Dy 3!! parties invn!wd in the pmjec?. !f !here are any cjw~%inns re3ardin3 tbse fnrms, &se mntad the CDRc, .4dministrztnr in t!w !-!ousin3 and Redeve!npment nPFE!rtmP?t at (8! 9) 442811.
JUiN HANDS SAVE A LiFE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SECTION 3 CUMPLAlNT PROCEDURE
.A mmp!ain?, fnnm!!y m!!ed a 3r!evance, may her filecl a!!eging a vio!atinn nf Sectinn 3 rmyirp- merits. Grkvances may he fi!ed by S&inn 3 residents and Qf-tinn 3 husines5 mncems. -4-..-.. GrkYancPs are in?lPrtigatPri by l-IL0 and w!wre appreciate, ve!un?ary rc?s!wtinnc are sm$t. T!?ese nriP~f?ceS !!-!.a? are mt reSe!Yc! vn!untati!y cnn result in an administratiyp i?P?_rjfl$ a”- .-’
A nriwanrP S~KIIJ!~ bp jn wjtjng 2nd jnc!~~dp ?h f&y+yjg: . a”-‘-“-- - namp and a&If-s of Infjiyidr_.~! issuing mmp!a!nt
- name and a&jr- of rpqipienti=ntrador
- &sqiptinn nf ads or orn!ssions
- mrrpdive wtinn sn! !nht - ----- ---=.. -
Time of Filinn:
A mmnlaint must !E recdved nclt !a?er t??an 180 days frsm the date nf tk adinn or nmi~@n --.-r.. gpfi pyh!& !h~ mmy?!aint Jo hnspd, !~n!es !hp !jl~?p for fi!i~ is ~fien&rj by the Awistant SPPW- - v-w- - . .ws.---... --w.-
?ary fnr good !z!!se Shmm.
A mmn!aint may prtwjde inforrnatinn to be mn?ained in a ccrmp!ain? by tekphene te WC) er any
j-+lJS l%ld Miw 2nd HI !I7 wi!! g~mmxizp thp in!g-gatior! prnyided hv ttdcrdww in yurfidtn3 ny! . -. - - . . . - - ( -. . - . . - - -, .-.vr .,I. :_ . . . the preper fern fnr Si3!-!&Lm hy mmp!ainant.
Fpdpm! !-II !I3 fVfiw* .I- - . ..__.
Assisttan! Secre?ary !or Fair Heusing and Equa! Qprtun:.
i1.S. &pa&gent of HQI,IS~~~~ 2p-i I khan fby&nment-So x - S.-e . --
451 .SevtY!th strppt, SW
inn 3 @mp!l~n~ r . ..-. ._ ---.. _
?rVnshin@gn, DC 2f)jj O-~@]QIJ ..-_ . . . . .
&yjgn !,Y H1 II7 fbffiw- . . .-- - . ..- “.
Mm P~Wens Speciaiict .W.M. LCS. !Iepartmen! of Housin3 ancl !jrtxm Deve!npmen!
161 E; bVk& fdvmnir! Bnl_rley&
Les :4.~&g “$y,‘- QQfJl5
The City of Carlsbad
The City of Carlsbad
NV?: mm Administra!nr NM Rtmnnv~lt Str@, Sufip e L- -- . .--- -.-._. -_.- (:+&A, CA.. Q7f-M-M v-v --
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A WE
(760) 720-0510 Frank Anthony Sorino
3528 Madison St Carlsbad CA 92008-5034
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
‘FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 34; 1995 ,’
J.B. PAM
CERTIFIED PUBLlC ACCOUNTANT
MASTERS IN TAXATION
800 Grand Avenue, Suite A-S l G&bad, California 92008 l (619) 434-6167 l Fux (619) 434-0817
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountant
I have audited the accompanying Statement of Financial Position of Join
Hands - Save a Life as of December 3 1, 199 5, and the related statement of
activities and of operating expenses and cash flows for the year then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Organization’s
management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on my audit.
I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts of disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used by signilicant
estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. I believe my audit provides a reasonable
basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Join Hands - Save a Life as of
December 3 1, 199 5, and the results of its operations for the year then ended
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a
consistent basis.
J.B. Pani
Certified Public Accountant
Carlsbad, California
October 3, 1996
- JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
DECEMBER 31,199s
1995
ASSETS
Cash
Grants Receivable
Fixed Assets (Notes 1 & 6)
Investment in Improved Land
TOTAL ASSETS s
364
7,000
12,474
81,519
101,357
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Expenses
Wages Payable
Deferred Donor Revenues (Note.3)
s 722
3,200
7.000
TOTAL LIABILITIES $ 10,922
EQUITY
Unrestricted Equity (Note 1)
Equity in Fixed Assets and Land (Note 1)
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ (3,558)
93,993
$ 90.43 5
$ 101,357
See Notes to Financial Statements
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 3 1,199s
PUBLIC SUPPORT
Contributions
Grants Released From Restrictions
TOTAL PUBLIC SUPPORT
OPERATING EXPENSES
Program Salaries
Payroll Taxes
Program Supplies and Expense
Telephone and Utilities
Oflice and Bank Charges
Maintenance
Auto and Travel
Annual Dinner, Conferences and Meetings
Taxes and Miscellaneous
Depreciation
s 2 3,040
2.303
2,773
44
1,261
424
3,626
1,816
623
1,940
TOTAL EXPENSES $ 37.850
CHANGES IN EQUITY (RESULTS OF OPERATIONS)
EQUITY BEGINNING OF YEAR
EQUITY END OF YEAR
s 23,293
90.013
s 113.306
75,456
14,979
$ go,43 5
See Notes to Financial Statements
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,199s
SOURCES OF CASH
FROM OPERATIONS
Changes in Equity
Item not elrecting cash in the
current period - Depreciation
TOTAL SOURCES FROM OPERATIONS
OTHER APPLICATIONS (3r SOURCES OF CASH
Donated Equipment
Decrease in Grants Receivable
Increases in Wages Payable and Other Payables
Increase in Deferred Income
Purchase of Land
NET OTHER APPLICATIONS AND SOURCES OF CASH
DECREASE IN CASH
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE
ENDING CASH BALANCE
s 75,456
1.9%)
s 77,396
$ (5,000)
(3.586)
3,427
3,586
(81,519)
$ (83.092)
(5,696)
6,060
s 364
See Notes to Financial Statements
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A Lk, E
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,199s
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
GENERAL
Join Hands - Save A Life is a non-protit charitable organization organized and operated
esclusi\rel!. to provide community based youth service programs to youth of lower - income
and at - risk families in the Carlsbad area. These programs’ objective is to prolvide
constructive alternatives in the form of recreational and educational activities to these
youths who might otherwise engage in destructive behavior such as drug and alcohol abuse
and gang iriolence. Counseling and mediation services are also provided. The organization
is esempt horn income taxes pursuant to section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue code.
ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
The Club prepared its financial statements in the accrual basis of accounting, which
recognizes support and revenue in the period in which they are earned, not necessarily in
the period in which they are collected. Expenses are recognized in the period they are
incurred, not necessarily in the period they were paid. The accrual basis of accounting is in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
FIXED ASSETS
Fised assets are recorded at cost when purchased and at fair value when donated.
Significant improvements to these lked assets are capitalized ,whereas normally recurring
repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
DEPRECIATION
Depreciation, which is systematic allocation of the cost or donated value of fixed assets over
their estimated useful lives, has been recorded by use of the straight-line method over a
seven year period for the vehicle and equipment.
RESTRICTED REVENUES
The Organization receives and solicits grants and contributions from The City of Carlsbad,
private individuals, charitable trusts and foundations. Oftentimes these grants and
contributions are donated with specilic restrictions as to the use of funds. Recognizing its
responsibility to these donors the Organization holds these restricted net assets apart from
assets that have no restrictions as to use in the Organization’s operations (See Note 3). As
of December 3 1, 199 5 Join Hands - Save a Life reported the following net assets.
Unrestricted negative equity of $ 3,s 5 8 which represents the balance of the Organization’s
net liquid assets, with no restrictions as to the use. These assets fund the operations of the
Organization.
Fixed assets and land equity of $ 93,93 3, which represents the Organization’s investment
in the cost and donated values of the land, automobile and equipment located at its two
Carlsbad sites. Fixed assets are generally considered to be unrestricted equity and arc
normally included in the unrestricted equity figure. Join Hands - Save a Life has chosen to
separate it’s unrestricted fixed assets from its unrestricted liquid assets. This is a minor
divergence from generally accepted accounting principles but believed necessary so as not
to create confusion about the Organization’s liquid assets available for future operations.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
XONTINUED-
MATCHING OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Organization’s financial
statements attempt to match support and revenues with related expenditures. Therefore, a
restricted contribution that is recorded as received is recorded as deferred donor
revenue, (a liability on the Statement of Financial Position), rather than as grant revenue,
(a support item on the statement of activities), until the expenditures related to that
grant are made.
2. DONATED SERVICES
No amounts have been reflected in the statement for donated services in as much as no
objective basis is available to measure the value of such services. However, a substantial
number of directors and other volunteers have donated significant amounts of their time in
the Join Hands - Save a Life programs,
3. DEFERRED DONOR REVENUES
Deferred Donor Revenues consisted of the following as of December 3 1, 199 5:
Community Development Block -
A grant from the Federal Government through the City of Carlsbad for the operation of a
youth diversion / gang prevention program for underprivileged and at risk youths of
Carlsbad. This grant was received in January of 1996.
tr; 7.000
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- CONTINUED -
4. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
CLASSIFICATIONS OF THE EQUITY SECTION
Not-For Profit Organizations when reporting linancial position and results of operations
generally prepare a ‘Statement of Financial Position’ along with other financial data. The
‘Statement of Financial Position’ provides relevant information about an organization’s
assets, liabilities and net worth and about their relationships with one another at a moment
in time. The information provided in a statement of tinancial position, used with related
statements and linancial disclosures directors, organization, staff and others.
Join Hands - Save a Life has chosen to report it’s net worth as equity. A non-protit
organization’s net worth, which is the net of it’s assets and liabilities, is required to be
reported as it’s net assets or as it’s equity on the Statement of Financial Position, if it is to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Generally accepted accounting principles also require the separation of the Statement of
Financial Position into three types of equity; Unrestricted Equity, Temporarily Restricted
Equity, and Permanently Restricted Equity.
Unrestricted Equity - Unrestricted Equity is the net worth of a non-profit organization
available for the daily operations of Join Hands - Save A Life. These net assets are not
restricted as to use by the donor.
Temporarily Restricted Equity - Temporarily restricted equity is the net worth of Join
Hands - Save a Life which have restrictions as to their use placed upon the assets by the
donor. Generally, these assets come to Join Hands - Save a Life in the form of cash
contributions from donors; which can be governmental agencies such as the Federal
Government through it’s Community Development Block Grants, The City of Carlsbad. or
through private foundations or private individuals who place restrictions as to the use of the
contributions. Contributions which have restrictions as to use would for most not for protit
organizations be reported as restricted revenue and be included in Temporarily Restricted
Equity on the Statement of Financial Position, (but See Note 5).
Permanently Restricted Equity - Permanently Restricted Equity are the net assets of a
non-prolit organization that are permanently restricted by the donor. These donations
come with a stipulation, (A) that they be used for a specilic purpose, be presemed. and not
to be sold or (B)assets donated with the stipulations that they be invested to provide a
permanent source of income. Such gifts or requests are normally found in ‘endowment
funds’. Join Hands - Save a Life does not have assets with permanent restrictions attached
as of December 31. 1995.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- CONTINUED -
5. REPORTING OF CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED
Generally accepted accounting principles require that not-for-profit organizations shall
distinguish between contributions received with permanent restrictions, those received with
temporary restrictions and those received without donor imposed restrictions. However,
donor restricted contributions whose restrictions are met in the same reporting
period may be reported as unrestricted support, provided that an organization
reports consistently from period to period and discloses it’s accounting policy.
Join Hands - Save a Life chooses to report restricted contributions as unrestricted
support when restrictions are met in the same period as the receipt of the contribution.
(See FAS. 116 AICPA Industry Standards).
EFFECT UPON THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES - The effect upon Join Hands - Save a
Life Statement of Activities for anp period, is to preclude the need for a separate accounting
of restricted revenues and expenses in the Statement of Activities. Omitting a separate
accounting of restricted revenues and expenses is the result of the interaction of two
accounting principles adopted by Join Hands - Save a Life. The first principle, mentioned
above, includes restricted contributions in unrestricted support if the restrictions are
satisfied in the same period as the receipt of the contributions. The second principle
adopted is the matching of revenues with their related expenses, (See Note 3). Grants and
contributions received are not recognized as support until the related expenditures are
made. Instead, these revenues are deferred and reported on the Statement of Financial
Position as ‘Deferred Donors Support’. The matching of restricted contributions with their
related expenditures in the same period prevents the financial statements from having an
uneven effect from one period to the next.. (This could occur whan a restricted
contribution is reported as revenue in one period and the expenses related to the
contributions are reported in another period).
In conclusion, a restricted contribution is not recognized as support until the
related expenditures are made. When this occurs, both the contribution and the
expenditures are included as unrestricted activity.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFL
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- CONTINUED -
6. FIXED ASSETS
Fixed Assets consisted of the following as of December 3 1, 1994 and 199 5:
Automobile (Van)
Equipment
Less Accumulated Depreciation 0
5,000 14,414
(1,940)
NET FIXED ASSETS 9.414 12.474
1994 ADDITIONS 1995
6,000
3,414
9,414
6,000
5 000 - 8414 -
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
STATEMENT OF FUNCTIONAL EXPENSES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,199s
SALARY RELATED EXPENSES
Program Salaries
Payroll Taxes
TOTAL
YOUTH EXPENSES
SERVICES MANAGEMENT 1995
22,929 111 23,040
2,291 12 2,303
TOTAL SALARY RELATED EXPENSES 25,220 123 25,343
EXPENSES BEFORE DEPRECIATION
Program Supplies and Expenses 2,773 2,773
Telephone and Utilities 32 12 44
Oflice and Bank Charges 1,261 1,261
Maintenance 424 424
Auto and Travel 3,626 3,626
Annual Dinners, Conferences and Meetings 1,816 1,816
Taxes and Fees 623 623
TOTAL EXPENSES BEFORE DEPRECIATION 33,891 2,019 35,910
Depreciation 1,940 1.940
TOTAL EXPENSES 35,831 2,019 37,850
See Notes to Financial Statements
QlJ0lIN HANDS = SAVIE A ILIFE
FIINANCIIAL STATIEMIENTS
lIDEClEMlE3ER al, n99cQ ‘* k %_)...., ,, ,” .--*c*.-”
J.B. PAN1 -
CERTFIED PUBLlC ACCOUNTANT
800 Grand Avenue, Suite A-S l Carlsbad, California 92008 9 (760) 434-6167 l Fax (760) 434-087 7
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountant
I have audited the accompanying Statement of Financial Position of Join
Hands - Save a Life as of December 31, 1996, and the related statement of
activities and of operating expenses and cash flows for the year then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Organization’s
management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on my audit.
I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts of disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used by significant
estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. I believe my audit provides a reasonable
basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Join Hands - Save a Life as of
December 3 1, 1996, and the results of its operations for the year then ended
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a
consistent basis.
Certified Public Accountant
Carlsbad, California
July 16, 1997
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS OF DECEMBER 31,1996 AND 1995
1996 1995
ASSETS
Cash
Grants Receivable
Fixed Assets (Notes 1 & 6)
Investment in Improved Land
Costs of Construction - Carlsbad Site
4,521 $ 364
2,287 7,000
13,674 12,474
81,519 81,519
4,569
TOTAL ASSETS $ 106,570 s 101,357
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Expenses $ 1,521
Wages Payable 3,200
Deferred Donor Revenues (Note3) 2,287
Loans from Directors 3.100
$ 722
3,200
7,000 m
TOTAL LIABILITIES $ 10,108 $ 10,922
EQUITY
Unrestricted Equity (Note 1)
Equity in Fixed Assets and Land (Note 1)
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTALLIABILITIESANDEQUITY
$ 1,269
95,193
% 96,462
$ 106,570
$ (3,558)
93,993
$ 90,435
$ 101,357
See Notes to Financial Statements
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
STATEMENTS OF ACTIVITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,1996 AND 1995
PUBLIC SUPPORT
Contributions
Grants
TOTAL PUBLIC SUPPORT
$ 6,243
14.043
1995
$ 23,293
90.013
$ 20,286 $ 113,306
OPERATING EXPENSES
Program Salaries
Payroll Taxes
Program Supplies and Expense
Property Taxes
Office and Bank Charges
Maintenance
Auto and Travel
Annual Dinner, Conferences and Meetings
Taxes and Miscellaneous
Depreciation
Accounting and Bookkeeping
TOTAL EXPENSES
s 1,600
(324) 3,285
2,146
613
183
3,519
$ 23,040
2,303
2,773
47
1,840
1.350
1,305
424
3,626
1,816
623
1,940
$ 14.259 $ 3 7,850
CHANGES IN EQUITY s 6,027 % 75,456
EQUITY BEGINNING OF YEAR 90.43 5 14.979
EQUITY END OF YEAR % 96,462 % go,43 5
1996
See Notes to Financial Statements
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,1996 AND 1995
1996 1995
SOURCES OF CASH
FROM OPERATIONS
Item not effecting cash in the
current period - Depreciation
TOTAL SOURCES FROM OPERATIONS
$ 6,02 7
1,840
$ 7,867
OTHER APPLICATIONS & SOURCES OF CASH
Costs of Construction - Carlsbad Site
Acquisitions of Equipment
Decrease in Grants Receivable
Increases in Wages Payable and Other Payables
Increase in Deferred Donor Revenues
Purchase of Land
$ (4,569)
(3,040)
(4,713)
Increase in Accounts Payable & Other Accrued Expenses
Loans From Directors
4,713
799
3,100
s m
(5,000)
(3,586)
3,427
3,586
(81,519) -
-
NET OTHER APPLICATIONS AND SOURCES OF CASH $ (3,710) $ (83,092)
INCREASE IN CASH FOR ‘97 4,157
DECREASE IN CASH FOR ‘96 (5,696)
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE 364 6,060
ENDING CASH BALANCE % 4,521 s 364
s 75,456
1.940
s 77,396
See Notes to Financial Statements
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A J-E L~OTES TO FINANCIAL STAT1 aMENTS
DECEMBER 31,1996
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
GENERAL Join Hands - Save A Life is a non-profit charitable organization organized and operated
exclusively to provide community based youth service programs to youth of lower -
income and at - risk families in the Carlsbad area. These programs’ objective is to provide constructive alternatives in the form of recreational and educational activities to these
youths who might otherwise engage in destructive behavior such as drug and alcohol
abuse and gang violence. Counseling and mediation services are also provided. The organization is exempt from income taxes pursuant to section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue code.
ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
The Club prepared its financial statements in the accrual basis of accounting, which
recognizes support and revenue in the period in which they are earned, not necessarily in
the period in which they are collected. Expenses are recognized in the period they are incurred, not necessarily in the period they were paid. The accrual basis of accounting is in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
FIXED ASSETS Fixed assets are recorded at cost when purchased and at fair value when donated.
Significant improvements to these fured assets are capitalized ,whereas normally recurring repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
DEPRECIATION Depreciation, which is systematic allocation of the cost or donated value of fixed assets
over their estimated useful lives, has been recorded by use of the straight-line method over
a seven year period for the vehicle and equipment.
RESTRICTED REVENUES The Organization receives and solicits grants and contributions from The City of Carlsbad,
private individuals, charitable trusts and foundations. Oftentimes these grants and
contributions are donated with specific restrictions as to the use of funds. Recognizing its
responsibility to these donors the Organization holds these restricted net assets apart from
assets that have no restrictions as to use in the Organization’s operations (See Note 3). As
of December 31, 1995 Join Hands - Save a Life reported the following net assets.
Unrestricted equity of $ 1,269 which represents the balance of the Organization’s net
liquid assets, with no restrictions as to the use. These assets fund the operations of the
Organization.
Fixed assets and land equity of $ 95,193, which represents the Organization’s investment
in the cost and donated values of the land, automobile and equipment located at its
Carlsbad sites. Fixed assets are generally considered to be unrestricted equity and are normally included in the unrestricted equity figure. Join Hands - Save a Life has chosen to
separate it’s unrestricted fixed assets from its unrestricted liquid assets. This is a minor divergence from generally accepted accounting principles but believed necessary so as not
to create confusion about the Organization’s liquid assets available for future operations.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-CONTINUED-
MATCHING OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Organization’s financial statements attempt to match support and revenues with related expenditures. Therefore, a
restricted contribution that is recorded as received is recorded as deferred donor
revenue, (a liability on the Statement of Financial Position), rather than as grant revenue,
(a support item on the statement of activities), until the expenditures related to that
grant are made.
2. DONATED SERVICES
No amounts have been reflected in the statement for donated services in as much as no
objective basis is available to measure the value of such services. However, a substantial
number of directors and other volunteers have donated significant amounts of their time in
the Join Hands - Save a Life programs.
3. DEFERRED DONOR REVENUES Deferred Donor Revenues consisted of the following as of December 3 1, 1996:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT -
A grant from the Federal Government through the City of Carlsbad for the operation of a youth diversion / gang prevention program for underprivileged and at risk youths of
Carlsbad. This grant was received in June of 1996.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- CONTINUED -
4. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
CLASSIFICATIONS OF THE EQUITY SECTION
Not-For Profit Organizations when reporting financial position and results of operations
generally prepare a ‘Statement of Financial Position’ along with other financial data. The
‘Statement of Financial Position’ provides relevant information about an organization’s
assets, liabilities and net worth and about their relationships with one another at a
moment in time. The information provided in a statement of financial position, used with
related statements and financial disclosures directors, organization, staff and others.
Join Hands - Save a Life has chosen to report it’s net worth as equity. A non-profit organization’s net worth, which is the net of it’s assets and liabilities, is required to be
reported as it’s net assets or as it’s equity on the Statement of Financial Position, if it is
to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Generally accepted accounting principles also require the separation of the Statement of Financial Position into three types of equity: Unrestricted Equity, Temporarily Restricted
Equity, and Permanently Restricted Equity.
Unrestricted Equity - Unrestricted Equity is the net worth of a non-profit organization
available for the daily operations of Join Hands - Save A Life. These net assets are not
restricted as to use by the donor.
Temporarily Restricted Equity - Temporarily restricted equity is the net worth of Join
Hands - Save a Life which have restrictions as to their use placed upon the assets by the
donor. Generally, these assets come to Join Hands - Save a Life in the form of cash
contributions from donors: which can be governmental agencies such as the Federal
Government through it’s Community Development Block Grants, The City of Carlsbad, or through private foundations or private individuals who place restrictions as to the use of
the contributions. Contributions which have restrictions as to use would for most not- for
profit organizations be reported as restricted revenue and be included in Temporarily
Restricted Equity on the Statement of Financial Position, (but See Note 5).
Permanently Restricted Equity - Permanently Restricted Equity are the net assets of a non-profit organization that are permanently restricted by the donor. These donations
come with a stipulation, (A) that they be used for a specific purpose, be preserved, and not to be sold or (B)assets donated with the stipulations that they be invested to provide a
permanent source of income. Such gifts or requests are normally found in ‘endowment
funds’. Join Hands - Save a Life does not have assets with permanent restrictions attached as of December 31, 1996.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- CONTINUED -
5. REPORTING OF CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED
Generally accepted accounting principles require that not-for-profit organizations shall
distinguish between contributions received with permanent restrictions, those received with temporary restrictions and those received without donor imposed restrictions.
However, donor restricted contributions whose restrictions are met in the
same reporting period may be reported as unrestricted support, provided that
an organization reports consistently from period to period and discloses it’s
accounting policy.
Join Hands - Save a Life chooses to report restricted contributions as unrestricted
support when restrictions are met in the same period as the receipt of the contribution.
(See FAS. 116 AICPA Industry Standards).
EFFECT UPON THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES - The effect upon Join Hands - Save a Life Statement of Activities for any period, is to preclude the need for a separate
accounting of restricted revenues and expenses in the Statement of Activities. Omitting a separate accounting of restricted revenues and expenses is the result of the interaction of two accounting principles adopted by Join Hands - Save a Life. The first principle,
mentioned above, includes restricted contributions in unrestricted support if the restrictions are satisfied in the same period as the receipt of the contributions. The second
principle adopted is the matching of revenues with their related expenses, (See Note 3). Grants and contributions received are not recognized as support until the related
expenditures are made. Instead, these revenues are deferred and reported on the Statement
of Financial Position as ‘Deferred Donors Support’. The matching of restricted contributions
with their related expenditures in the same period prevents the financial statements from
having an uneven effect from one period to the next.. (This could occur whan a restricted
contribution is reported as revenue in one period and the expenses related to the contributions are reported in another period).
In conclusion, a restricted contribution is not recognized as support until the
related expenditures are made. When this occurs, both the contribution and
the expenditures are included as unrestricted activity.
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A L-7
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEBacNTS
- CONTINUED -
6. FIXED ASSETS
Fked Assets consisted of the following as of December 3 1, 1995 and 199 6:
1995 ADDITIONS 1996
Automobile (Van)
Equipment Purchased and Donated
Less Accumulated Depreciation
NET FIXED ASSETS
S 6,000 $ 6,000
8,414 3,040 11,454
14,414 17,454
fL940) 11,840) /3,7801
12.474+ $ -
.
I‘
NOTICE REGARDING
EQ.lhl’ OPPORTUNITY ‘and
SECTiON 3 PREFERENCE
.
Dij3iTg +hh ilit ~~ifGiiiiGi7C~ Gf this COiiti&, ihe
nhn+fnA+hw- ham narnnr/ +rr mrlhmrrr +n CIUIILI~~~~VI 1la3 aylccu iv aulicic iv s * Wtiofi 3 Gf
hhn l-ln*1n;nC1 rrmrl I Irkcrm !3h. IhlAmMhn+ h h4 hF 4 h2Q 11 IC I 1uu311 iy al IU UI uai I ucvcrup~ I ICI IL r\bi VI I QUW.
s h*b;hm . * * CblIUI I 3 encourages hiiimj low iixmme, IAAA iubal .
residents and bumesses tG ~NfGiill LL'Oik that
i2Sii 1tS 4 IiGlT cl-4 11e funds invested by the L'.s. .
DSpa;tmeilt Gf HGLiSing Gi7d !JI %an Devebpment
W I in\ uu/.
Th2 CCIiTtiSCtCX GISG agi%eS tG CGidbiT73 tG eCJL.lal The CGntiXtGr dSG XJeeS tG CGiJfGrm tG H&Id
eil’@G);i’l’lei;~ prSCtiCeS. The CGi’ltiXtGi Zind Zd’l empbymei;t practices. The CGi’ltiXtGi and each
SUbCGil~iaC~G~ SUbCGiltiaCtG~ will take affirmative action to will take affirmative action to
eiWiii2 that ii3 a!I Mii~IG)‘iiiHlt FiadiCM i;2iSGfiS ei’lSiii2 that ii3 a!I M’l@G)‘iVHlt FiadiCM i;2iSGfiS
are employed are employed and employers are treated equally and employers are treated equally
and WithGUt regard and WithGUt regard tG Gi b%aLJSe Gf iaCe, ie!igiGil, tG Gi b%aLJSe Gf iaCe, ie!igiGil,
ancestrjf, national Giigin, sex, sexual orientation;, ancestrjf, national Giigin, sex, sexual orientation;,
age oi physical handicap. age oi physical handicap.
For add itio n-1 ;nFn-r(+;* 1 Iat II IIUI I I iacid CGiltXt CDl3G
Administrator at the City of Carlsbad -
l-busing a nd RedevefGpment Department.
434-2811
I This Notice must be posted at site 1 I
AP :: rn-!z 3 -i3 q a 0- r
pi! T I I I
I
I
iif
I w
I
I I
I
I
I
-I-
I
I
!i2 a3 T 3 i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
t
/ 1
T ii
I
T j: IS
c 1
I
i
I c
I t i
GOiN HANDS-SAVE AliCE
(79 7204540 =AX(75#3)720-0540
3528 Madison St Carbbad CA 920084034
ii CERTWICATION OF PARTICIPATION IN HUD HOUSING PROGRAMS 1
II
.’ : : : :. : .:.. :,. :
11
FOR RESIDENT SEEKiNG SECTiON 3 PREFERENCE
jN IRAiNiNG AND EMPLOYMENT II II
I ‘,
aridrecc- MM_. ---.
am 2 r&&f-j! at the fn!ln\.wir?P “““““J
i hareby U3tify iii& - .__ i alrl 8 ciliie,-,t pa,^licipai-,i in a iO=i ‘r’outhbuiid oi houSirig
program supported by funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
nnrt Imontntinn ic nvai[ahb tn v~r-& the nhnve infnrmatinn -I-- ,.,-,,.-.. “.. *w s.-. -.- .- .-‘“, . ..v ---.- .,.I-.*..-.,-...
Signature of Section 3 Rasideiit Data
Prifl t i+iXlie
1 (L’eriiication Documents description:
I
I
I
I I I
JOIN HANDS - SAW A UFE
(760) 7204540
FAX(760)720-0540
3528 Madison St Cartsbad CA 92008-5034
INCOME CERTIFICATION
FOR RESIDENT SEEKIMG SECTlON 3 PREFERENCE
IN TRAiNiNG AbiD EiMPLGYiMENT
I am a recident at the fnllnwinn adrlrecc. -1 -... - .--. VW... I. . ..- .-..-..... J ---.-__.
-
i hW&y CWtifjf tiiat iiiy t&i biiiiiy iiiCOilE iOi ii33 piWiOuS 72 ~10~1tiE W85
$ I and the total number of adults contributing towards my family support
is The total number of individuals in my family is
nnrr jmentatinn ic awailahle tn \IPT~~\/ the ahnve infnrmatinn ----,..-. ..-.,-. * .- -.-I*--*- .- .-... J .* .- Me-.- . . .._I .,.-..-. *.
Signature of Section 3 iiesideni
Fiitit bii3ttif3
h -‘- Udlt:
‘tier ifiG3iiOn iiocurti&its &SCr$ii0ri:
A.\Sect 3 form da i7evised’ March 1697
i .
: b z
-
I I I I t I I I I I I c I I I I I I : I i
1
:
: I
r
-
d
I
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
9
g . . ! I
!
I
1
I , I 1
I
!
I
I
I I I I 1
I
1
!
I I !
I I i I
! !
I ,
I
ig j
u ! 0 ! 1 j i i
. ;
m CQ UY . . 6 ! , I
t?iD / 0 I
‘2 I ,
I
R
i
E
i
i
I
I
I
I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I I /
I I I I I 1 I I
I
I
r 9 8 u
lm” .x 5
I
/ b ! / I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
8 I I I I I I
I I I
I I , , I I i i I I I I 1 I I I I I i i I i i / I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I
I I
I ! !
n
2 3
0
P .$
a w n
i
‘9
; izg g! 2 rir D $Tfzccr, 3 T p IfrJ $ p lb 5’ I g 4’ ‘E f 3. la
18.5 1
I
ii? s-
I’$1 I
1 =I 1
TIT
/ iI
1 I I /
I I I
I II I I I I I I
-l--H-
I II
I II 1 II I I
I II
I II 1 ! 1 I I
I I I I I
I II
/ I/
I i i
I I I
I I I I / I I
I
I I 1 I I !
--l-n- I I I , I
I if
4
oO:‘hg f 5 -= 3 ppd= z 3 0 QY z
gzi -
31 I I I I a ! I
$1 1 i
L? I I 1 .. I I I ! I I ! i l I ,
i i j j
I 6 ; i
I j ; i
i ; ’ : i I 1 I , I
I t I t ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I ! I / I I I i 8 6 I ! , 1 I i 1 I 1 I ! , I I I I ! i I i i I 1D/ I I fi 1 I 1! j I PI I I I ci i
5’1 I I Ii
I I i 00
I 0
I
= 2
1
! fi 82
1 ! --
?, ” ! f oiii
I ; 35
! : un
I sg I -.
I j OaJ Y: I I i ui I ! ! S! ’ 1 I .z 1
I I I I I 1 I I I
I I i ! I I
I i I I
I 11 I ’ 2’ ’
13; !
! ij; j
I g/ )
I ifi j
I
: nn I I .L’ “X j ! q z ’ =cD ” Zh i I E = I! “p I I / ‘8
3 i i 02 1 c I 1 3.1
I I I I , I I n
I I I I 4 4 4 ; i I -n
.
I ’ JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
(760) 72cM540
FAX(760)720-0540 3528 Madison St Carlsbad CA 92008-5034
CERTiFlCATlON OF SECTION 3 BUSINESS CONCERN F
If-m “MI site Arlrlrocc, , ._“1 ““V.
.I---- IY~III~ Of EuSiiWSS
ACWPSS of Business
Te!ephme No.
Se-t&-e PI tyrhaewi & Amnt tnt . u Y. I”-“” , .I..-“* I.
Type nf Business: Corpora!ion Partqwchin - -*-* -‘-‘**r
Sde Prpriotnrchin r*’ .“I”, “I *my inint \/efl!ure ““*a I.
4 I . 5! percent ovmed by Section 3 low-income residents, or
3 -. Permafleflt, f~!!-!i,qe e,qp!qees iflc!u& at !east 3@4 Sortinn ? “YYIlVl I Y
!ow-income residents, Of
3. Written cotimitment to subc-m?ract mm than. 20?4 cf dc!!ar
Cwaid COni iiie JOiN HANES SKvE A ME, io business ConceiTis who riieai aGoi&
number 1 or 2 Section 3 qualifications.
i hp&y mfirt; !h& 1 8% at rthnrisrd tn art nn hehalf of --...-*I--- . . -w. -.a e-.0-..
the hi reineec indicated ahnve* that thP ahnw infnrmatinn is arrrrmtw and thnt ! car! .* .- e.9.s.. .--w ..s-.- -I-. -, .* I_. ..I_ v-v.- . . . . . . . . ..-..-.a *- --.P-.-.-, -..w ..I_.
pgyi& dnC!dmpnfgIgn to y&y the ahnve infnrmatinn .a.- s-s. - . . ..-.a..-.,-...
Sigilatiiie
Pi r,: Name
k\Sect 3 Form 5
m-i- Udlt:
RQV!'SQ& March 1997
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
SINGLE ITEM AUDIT REPORTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 3 1, 199 5
jOIN HANDS - SAVE A Lii
SINGLE ITEM AUDIT REPORTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 3 1,1995
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE
(Related to the Financial Statements and the Federally Assisted Community
Development Block Grant) 2,3
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE
(Used in Administrative Federal Awards) 4,5,6,7,8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON COMPLIANCE
(Based Upon an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance
with Government Auditing Standards)
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON COMPLIANCE ( WITH THE GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO FEDERAL AWARDS PROGRAMS) 10
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO NON-MAJOR FEDERAL AWARDS
PROGRAM TRANSACTIONS) 11
8 0
G
5 3
J.B. PAM
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
MASTERS IN TAXATlON
800 Grand Avenue, Suife A-S l Carlsbad, California 92008 l (619) 4346167 l Fax (619) 434-0817
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
STRUCTURE BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING
STANDARDS
To the Board of Directors Join Hands - Save a Life
3 5 2 8 Madison
Carlsbad. CA. 92008
I have audited the financial statements of Join Hands - Save a Life for the year ended
December 31, 1995 and have issued my report thereon dated October 3, 1996.
I have conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards and
Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the linancial statements are free of material misstatement.
The management of Join Hands - Save a Life is responsible for establishing and
maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal
control structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an internal control
structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute,
assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or
disposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with
management’s authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Because of inherent limitations in any control structure, errors or
irregularities map nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any
evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures map
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design
and operation of policies and procedures map deteriorate.
In planning and performing my audit of the iinancial statements of Join Hands - Save a Life,
for the year ended December 31. 1995, I obtained an understanding of the internal control
structure. With respect to the internal control structure, I obtained an understanding of the
design of relevant policies and procedures and whether they have been placed in operation,
and I assessed control risk in order to determine my auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing my opinion on the financial statements and not to provide an opinion on the internal control structure. Accordingly, I do not express such and opinion.
iLily consideration of the internal control policies and procedures used in administering
federal awards would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might constitute material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control structure elements
does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that noncompliance with laws and regulations that would be material to a federal award program may occur and not bc
detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their
assigned functions, I noted no matters involving the internal control structure
and its operations what we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above.
This report is intended for the information of management and agencies providing federal
awards. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is
not limited.
J.B. Pani Certified Public Accountant
Carlsbad. California
October 3, 1996
J.B. PANI
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
MASTERS IN TAXATlON
800 Grand Avenue, Suite A-5 l C&bad, California 92008 l (629) 434-6167 l Fax (619) 434-0877
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE USIZD
IN ADMINISTERING FEDERAL AWARDS
To the Board of Directors
Join Hands - Save a Life
3 5 2 8 Madison
Carlsbad, CA. 92008
I have audited the financial statements of Join Hands - Save a Life as of and for the year
ended December 3 1, 1995 have issued my report thereon dated October 3, 1996.
I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards:
Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States:
and Oflice of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of Institutions of Higher
Education and Other Nonprofit Institutions. Those standards and OMB Circular A-l 33 require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement.
In planning and performing the audit for the year ended December 3 1, 1995, I considered the Organization’s internal control structure in order to determine auditing procedures for
the purpose of expressing my opinion on the financial statements of Join Hands - Save a Life and to report on the internal control structure in accordance with OMB Circular A-133.
This report addresses my consideration of internal control structure policies and procedures
relevant to compliance with requirements applicable to federal award programs. I have
addressed internal control structure policies and procedures relevant to my audit of the
financial statements in a separate report dated October 3, 1996.
The management of Join Hands - Save a Life is responsible for establishing and maintaining
an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgements b!
management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal control structure policies and procedures, The objectives of an internal control structure
are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are
safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, that transactions are
executed in accordance with management’s authorization and are recorded properly to
permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that federal award programs are managed in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations. Because of inherent limitations in any control structure.
errors, irregularities, or instances of noncompliance map nevertheless occur and not bc
detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures map become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that
the eff’ectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate.
For the purpose of this report, I have classilied the significant internal control structure
policies and procedures used in administering federal award programs in the following categories:
ACCOUNTING SYSTEM -
1. Identifying and recording all valid transactions - The organization’s outside
bookkeeper prepares a detailed general ledger. All transactions are coded by her from her understanding or from input from the executive director.
3 -. Describing on a timely basis the transactions in suikient detail to permit
proper classification of transactions for financial reporting - This Organization’s
monthly activity is so low at this point as to preclude the necessity of timely monthly
accounting, but the auditor has recommended quarterly accounting.
3. Measuring the value of transactions in a manner that permits recording their
proper value in the financial statements - The Organization has an outside bookkeeper who has the requisite objectivity necessary to make a conservative valuation of donated
assets.
4. Determine the time period in which transactions occurred to permit
recording of transactions in the proper time period - This control function
performed by the Organization’s auditor who reviews pear end and subsequent transactions
and classifies transactions in their proper time period.
5. Present properly the transactions and related disclosures in the financial
statements - This control function performed by the Organization’s outside bookkeeper in
conjunction with her work in preparation of a general ledger. The auditor who has final
responsibility at this point, and the number of financial transactions is low enough so that
the auditor could catch all misclassifications.
CONTROL PROCEDURES
1. Proper authorization of transactions and activities - The Organization has an
active Board of Directors that meet quarterly and review data and confer with the
Organization’s Executive Director in the planning and performing of Organization programs,
social functions and related activities. Again, the Organization’s level of activities appears to be too small to require a monthly meeting or monthly financial statements at this time.
2. Segregation of Duties that reduce opportunities to allow a person to be in a
position to both perpetuate and conceal errors and irregularities in the normal
course of his duties - The Organization as an outside bookkeeper that performs the
requisite function of review of all financial activity in the course of the preparation of her
general ledger. This review function includes a review of bank statements. journals, and petty cash activity. The auditor does a final review of financial activity, especially in the
area of cash expenditures which is a major form of expenditure for this group based upon
their system at this time. The petty cash espenditure controls are fairly secure.
3. Design and use of adequate documents and records to ensure the proper
recording of transactions and events - The design of the accounting system is still continuing as the organization grows. The auditor has prepared a detailed and estensi\re
letter to address these concerns. There are no problems of a material nature at this point but new systems have been recommended.
4. Adequate safeguard over access to and use of assets and records - The Organization has an Inventory List detailing the cost, date of purchase, and description of
each major item of furniture and equipment. The inventory list is updated twice each year.
5. Independent checks on performance and proper valuation of recorded
amounts - The organization’s active Board of Directors are providing checks on
performance. The auditor also provides this function.
The Organization which is a recipient of Community Development Block Grant Revenues from the Federal Government is reviewed by the City of Carlsbad, the sub-recipient of these
funds and the responsible party regarding the use of theses revenues. The City of Carlsbad
reviews require a quarterly report of all activity. All expenditures require invoices and other
relevant reports be submitted along with the request for reimbursement.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -
Personnel Files - The Organization’s executive director is its only employee. The
organization uses an outside payroll processing service that provides monthly, quarterly and yearly payroll reports.
Financial Records - The Organization through its outside bookkeeper keeps a general
ledger and an up-to-date chart of accounts and source documentation such as invoices for
expenditures, canceled checks kept with monthly statements, Bnancial statements and all
records kept for three years.
Project / Case Files - All information documenting the CDBG expenditures to be
reimbursed are kept in a file by request, reviewed by the City of Carlsbad Community Development personnel and the auditor.. A file containing donor requests and restrictions
is kept for every Grant that comes to Join Hands - Save a Life and is reviewed periodically
by the Board of Directors.
GENERAL STAlNDARDS FOR THE CDBG -
Record keeping - Records are kept accurate, complete, and orderly. The City of Carlsbad
Community Development o&e monitors C.D.B.G. record keeping compliance, including
demographic reports. On-site inspections are routine. Drawdown requests are complete. General Requirements - The Club is in compliance with the Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (in the understanding of the auditor). There is no evidence 01 discrimination of any kind by the Organization’s personnel, its directors or its authorizcd
agents. This information was obtained by inquiry and inspection during the course of the
audit. The Club is, (in the understanding of the auditor), in compliance with the Davis -
Bacon Act that requires the sub-contractor to pay ‘prevailing wages’ where construction
work in performed Ibr an amount in excess of $2,000. There was no construction in
1995,
Join Hands - Save a Life has not, (In the understanding of the auditor), engagcd in
partisan political activities such as sponsoring a candidate for city office, printed or mailed brochures for any candidate for public olfice nor allowed the Organization’s premises or equipment to be used in a political activity. This information was obtained by inquir!. during the course of the audit.
Join Hands - Save a Life is in compliance with costs allowable under Federal
rules and regulations for those costs spent from CDBG grants for projects within the
period January 1 to December 31, 1995. There were no questioned costs. There was
adequate documentation to support each espenditure. The expenditures were related to the
grant project.
I obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures and whether they haire been placed in operation, and assessed control risk.
During the year ended December 31, 1995, Join Hands - Save a Life had no major federal
award programs and expended 100 percent of its total federal awards under the following
nonmajor program: Community Development BIock Grant.
I performed tests of controls, as required bp the OMB Circular A-133 to evaluate the
elIectiveness of the design and operation of internal control structure policies and
procedures that I considered relevant to preventing and detecting material noncompliance
with specific requirements, general requirements, and requirements governing claims for
advances and reimbursements and amounts claimed or used for matching that arc
applicable to the Community Development Block Grants, which are identified in the
accompanying Schedule of Federal Awards. Mp procedures were less in scope than would
be necessary to render an opinion on these internal control structure policies and
procedures. Accordingly, I do not express such an opinion.
M!7 consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters
in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certilied Public Accountants. A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control
structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the linancial statements
being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in a
normal course of performing their assigned functions. I noted no matters involving the
being audited map occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in a
normal course of performing their assigned functions. I noted no matters involving the
internal control structure and its operations that I consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.
This report is intended for the information of management and agencies providing federal
awards. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is
not limited.
Carlsbad, California
October 3, 1996
J.B. PAN
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
MASTERS IN TAXATION
800 Grand Avenue, Suite A-S l G&bad, California 92008 l (619) 434-6167 l Fax (629) 434-0817
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON COMPLIANCE BASED ON AN AUDIT OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT
AUDITING STANDARDS
To the Board of Directors
Join Hands - Save a Life
3 5 2 8 Madison
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
I have audited the financial statements of Join Hands - Save a Life for the pear ended
December 31, 1995 and have issued my report thereon dated October 3, 1996.
I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and
Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States,
Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
Compliance with laws, regulations, and grants applicable to Join Hands - Save a Life is the
responsibility of the Organization’s management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, I performed tests
of the Organization’s compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. However, the objective of my audit of the financial statements was not to provide
an opinion on overall compliance with such provisions. Accordingly, I do not express such an opinion.
The results of my tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to
be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
This report is intended for the information of management , and agencies providing federal
awards. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is
not limited.
Certified Public Accountant
Carlsbad, California October 3, 1996
J.B. PAN-1
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
MASTERS IN TAXATlON
800 Grand Avenue, Suite A-5 l Carlsbad, California 92008 l (619) 434-67 67 l Fax (61914340817
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON COMPLIANCE
WITH THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE
TO FEDERAL AWARDS PROGRAMS
Board of Directors Join Hands - Save a Life
3 5 2 8 Madison
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
I have audited the Gnancial statements of Join Hands - Save a Life for the year ended
December 31. 1995 and have issued my report thereon dated October 3, 1996.
I have applied procedures to test the Organization’s compliance with the following
requirements applicable to its federal award programs, which are identified in the Schedule
of Federal Awards for the pear ended December 3 1, 1995. General requirements involve the following:
Political Activity
Civil Rights
Cash Management
Federal Financial Reports
Allowable Costs / Cost Principles
Drug Free Workplace Act
Administrative Requirements
My procedures were limited to the applicable procedures described in the Office of
Management and Budget’s Compliance Supplement for Audits of Institutions of Higher Learning and Other Nonproiit Institutions. My procedures were substantially less in scope
than an audit, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion on the Organization’s
compliance with the requirements listed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, I do not
express such an opinion.
With respect to the items tested, the results of those procedures disclosed no material
instances of noncompliance with the requirements listed in the second paragraph of this
report. With respect to items not tested, nothing came to my attention that caused me to
believe that the Organization had not complied, in all material respects, with those
requirements.
This report is intended for the information of management and agencies providing federal
awards. However, this report is matter of public record and its distribution is
not Iimited.
Carlsbad, California
October 3, 1996
-
CERTIFlED PUBLlC ACCOUNTANT
MASTERS IN TAXATION
800 Grand Avenue, Suite A-5 l Carlsbad, California 92008 l (619) 434-6167 l Fax (629) 434-0817
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON COMPLIANCE
WITH SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO
NON-MAJOR FEDERAL AWARDS PROGRAM TRANSACTIONS
To the Board of Directors
Join Hands - Save a Life 3528 Madison, Carlsbad, CA. 92008
I have audited the financial statements as of and for the pear ended December 3 1, 1995
and have issued our report thereon dated October 3, 1996.
In connection with our audit of financial statements of Join Hands - Save a Life and with
my consideration of the Organization’s control structure used to administer federal awards
programs as required by the Oflke of Management and Budget Circular A-l 3.3, Audits of Institutions of Higher Education and Other Nonprofit Institutions, I selected certain
transactions applicable to certain non-major federal awards programs for the pear ended
December 31, 1995.
As required by OMB Circular A-133, I have performed auditing procedures to test
compliance with requirements governing types of services allowed or unallowed, eligibility.
and the reporting requirements that are applicable to those transactions. My procedures
were substantially less in scope than an audit, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion on Join Hands - Save a Life’s compliance with these requirements, Accordingly, I
do not express such an opinion.
With respect to the items tested, the results of those procedures disclosed no material
instances of noncompliance with the requirements listed in the preceding
paragraph. With respect to items not tested, nothing came to my attention that caused
me to believe that Join Hands - Save a Life had not complied, in all material respects, with
those requirements. Also, the results of our procedures did not disclose any immaterial
instances of noncompliance with those requirements.
This report is intended for the information of management and agencies providing federa
awards. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is
not limited.
A2
AL-’
Carlsbad, California
October 3, 1996
. . Pani Certified Public Accountant
Fofm 990 Retr of Organization Exempt Frorr--%ome Tax
Under secwn Sol(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (exc&. black lung benefit trust or private foundation) or section 4947(a)(l) nonexempt charitaMe trust
oeoanmem Of me Treasury I”IN”11 Ae*cnuc scrvcc Note: The organrzatron may have to use a CODV of rh~s return to satlsfv sfate rtoortmg recwremenrs. 00.0 to PUblK lnsQealon
A For the 1995 calendar year. OR tax year period btginnmg ,199S.andtiing * 19
8 Chxkd: PC- C Name of c-rganuatmn D l3nfMoyer fcianwbuborl number
0 Change Of address - IRS *war LOU HANn.q - SAVF a t~rr 33 io592140
pnnt or Nm0er and street (or P 0. box II maii IS not UeWereQ to street aaamssl RooWwrte E Stmta regmtrsbon nomtm Wm. sea 3528 MADISON D-1857764 svcek CRy. town. or post office. state. ena ZIP code (rwuma aka for hSbvc- CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 F Check t 0 rl exemown agpcatm
State rewnlng~ (ione. A If L7ewllng
G Type of organzatlo+ 0 Exempt under sectton 5Ol(c)( 3 ) 4 (Insert number) OR k 0 sectIon 4947(a)(l) nonexempt chantable tmst
Note: Section 501 (c)@j exempt organizations and 4947(a)(l) nonexempt charitable trusts MUST attach 8 compltttd Schedule A Fom, W).
H(a) Is this a grouo return flkd for affillatn? . . . . . . _ . . ClYes BNO I If mthtf bx ICI H IS checked ‘Yes.’ entw far-dqn g-
-m’wtH3n number (GEN) b . . . . . . . . . _ .___. . . _ _. ._
(b) If ‘Yes.’ enter the number of affiliates for whtch thts relum IS filed:. . b J Account!ng m-ethod: 0
0 Other bwctil t
Cam I3 Accrual (c) Is this a separate rettim filed by an oqanzation covered by a group rung? q Yes 0 No
K Check here b 0 11 the organzatlon’s gnxs recetpts are normally not more ttun %~m. The ofganUatlon need rWt fde a return wrtn the IRS. bm rl R rece~vea
iG
E
Fern 990 Package in the matl. it should file a return wrthout linanclal data. Some states rwuire I corndote return.
Form 990-EZ may be use0 by orgaruzabons wjth gross recelpfs less than S7#.~ and tot& assets less than S2.5O.Doo at end of year
Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Net Assets or Fund Balances (See instructtons on pages g-14.)
1 Contnbutions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts received:
a Direct public support . . . , . . . . . . . . . la
b Indirect public support . . . . . . . . . . . .
L!!i%EE c Government contributions (grants) . . . , . . . . lc
d Total (add lines la through lc) (attach schedule of contributors)
(cash $ noncash $ .-) . . .
2 Prograrn service revenue including government fees and c
3 Membership dues and assessments . . . . .
4 Interest on savings and temporary cash inve 3
. . . . . . . 113,306
i : a
. 0
Tiz@
(from Part VI, line 93)
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
5 Dividends and interest from securities
6a Gross rents . . . . . . . . . .
b Less: rental expenses . . . , . ,
G
.
. : iii.. . . . . .
. . , .
c Net rental income or (loss) (subtract line om line 6a) . . . . . . . . . .
7 Other Investment income (descnbe k 1 -
&a Gross amount from sale of assets other . (A) Secunties (e) omef
than inventory . . . . . . . . . . 8a
b Less: cost or other basis and sales expenses. 8b
c Gain or (loss) (attach schedule) . , . . l&z
d Net gatn or (loss) (combine line 8c, columns (A) and (B)) . . . . . . . . . .
9 Special events and activities (attach schedule)
a Gross revenue (not including $
contributions reported on line la) . . . . . . . .
b Less: direct expenses other than fundraising expenses
“I I*
.
c Net income or (loss) from special events (subtract line 9b from line 9a) . . , . .
Oa Gross sales of inventory, less returns and allowances . . 10a I
b Less: cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . lob 1
c Gross profit or (loss) from sales of inventory (attach schedule) (subtract line 1 Ob from line 10a) .
1 Other revenue (from Part VII, line 103) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 Total revenue (add lines Id. 2. 3. 4, 5, 6c. 7, Ed. 9c. 10~. and 11) . . . . . . -
f d
-
i 3 5 z
3 Program setvlces (from line 44, column (6)) . . . . . . . . , . . . . .
4 Management and general (from line 44, column (C)) . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 Fundraising (from line 44, column (D)) , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6 Payments to affiliates (attach schedule) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7 Total expenses (add lines 16 and 44, column (A)) . . . _ . . _ . . . . 17 37,850
6 Excess or (deficit) for the year (subtract line 17 from line 12) . . . . . . . . . _ 18 75,456
9 Net assets or fund balances at beginning of year (from line 73. column (A)) . . . . 19 14,979
!O Other changes in net assets or fund balances (attach explanation). . . . . . . , 20
!I Net assets or fund balances at end of year (combine lines 18, 19. and 20) . . 21 90,435
For PaPework Reduction Act Notice, soa page 1 of the separate instructions. Cat. No. 11282Y Form 990 (19951
Form S90 !19951 PYcp 2
m Statement of . kl cQlanQatlolls mlm tzu7yxic cowlnn N). ccdlmns A. lC1. am ll-nnve miuul Icr seztml 50llCW3) n-a 141 Functional Expenses erg :xxlsanasu3lulaQd7(~l)~~~mmsb xYukxana%~- OnpagCldl
Do not include amounfs repofled on line Is) Roorvn m- 6b, 8b. 9b. lob. or 76 of Part 1. or- -
22 Grants and allocations (attach schedule) . .
(cash S noncash S 1 .=
Spmftc assistance to mdividuals (anach schedule) _ 23
Benefits patd to or for members (attach schedule). 24
Compensation of officers. directors, etc. . . 25 i 23,040 ! 22,929 111
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
b
C
d
e
u
Other salarres and wages .......
Pension plan contributions ......
Other employee benefits .......
Payroll taxes ...........
Professronal fundraising fees ......
Accounting fees ..........
Legal fees ............
Supplies ............
Telephone ............
Postage and shipping ........
Occupancy ...........
Equrpment rental and maintenance ....
Printing and publications .......
Travel .............
Conferences, conventions, and meetings . .
Interest .............
Depreciation, depletion, etc. (attach schedule)
Other expenses (itemize): a ...................
.... Qf.f.i.c.e. ...................................
.. ..A~.f.o...~.n~d...T.r.avel~ ................ .. ..L,i~c.e.l?.s.e.s...and..SSax.e .s.. .........
261 I
27 f
32
33 2,773 2,773 34 44 32 12
361
37 I 424 424
.________....___.___.......---..---------.--..------
Total fwtknal em (add lines 22 thrwgh 43) Orpnkatforu
39 I 40 1,816 1,816
41
421 1,940 I 1,940 !
43a
,43b 1,261 1,261 43c 3,626 3,626 43d 623 623 43e
ampktingcdumns~HDJ,~~fo~~~f~15 . 144137,850 35.831 I J.Ql.3
Repotting of Joint Costs.-Did you report in column (B) (Program services) any joint costs from a combined
educational campaign and fundraising solicitation? . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b 17 Yes 0 No
If “Yes,” enter (i) the aggregate amount of these joint costs $ ; (ii) the amount allocated to Program services $
(iii) the amount allocated to Management and general S ; and (hr) the amount allocated to Fundraising S . -statement of Program Service Accomplishments (See instructions on page 17.)
What is the organization’s primary exempt purpose? . . ..Educa-tian...recKeation.fos...~aut~ -mm SM+XJ
All organizations must describe their exempt purpose achievements. State the number of clients served. (R~%I ati
publications issued, etc. Discuss achievements that are not measurable. (Section 501(c)(3) and (4) organizations
and 4947(a)(l) nonexempt charitable trusts must also enter the amount of grants and allocations to others.)
(4~~.~$,~a,$1
’ otnm.1
a ..Yaxi.o.us..p.r.o.gr;ama..n.~.ch..as...dan~~=al..~~.s.~.et-~al!,,...job..tr-~.~.~.~.?q,.. . ..ca.un.s.e.l.i.ns....m~dia~i.on.,..p.~nza..nigh~.l..g.S.O.~a~~,(?r!..serv.~c-~-s-,..---.-. ..w.ork..~~~~acts,..d~u~.-a~a~eness.......-..-..----.....--j. (Grants and allocatlons % NONE 35,831
b ______._ ______ _______ _ ___..._..._____.__.._.____._._. _ __.___._______._.___~~~..~~~~.........~._._.____..._.___.__.~~....~~
. . . . . . . ..__.._______~.~.~.~~~.~~~~......~~~~~......~.~~~~~~.~.~~.~....~~.~....~~~~~~~.~~..~.~~~..~..~.....~~~~~~~~.~~..~...
. . . . . ..__.____..____....~.......~~.....-------..-....~..--...~------.~~~~~......~-.....-....-.-..-----..~...~-~--~--...~... (Grants and allocations S 1 I
._____....__._.____....-..---.-.-....--~----..--....-.------...-.---..........-..--..~......----.-.-.----.-.--.---.-------. (Grants and allocations $ ) I
d ...........................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................
.-.-..----..._..__..__..-_-.--___._._.____--_..._....-_-.-_...._____.__..~~..~..--~.~-.--~~-.~.~.....~.~~~.~~~~-~-~~~~~.~.. (Grants and allocations $ 1
e Other program services (attach schedule) (Grants and allocations S 1 35,831
f Total of Program Service Expenses (should equal line 44. column (B), Program services). . . b
Form 990 II 9951
m Balance Sheets (Sei - jtK4CtlOnS on pages 17-l 9.)
Note: Where n3qured, attached schedules and amounts with fhe descnDtJon
column should be for end-of-year amounts only. Beg~nmi~ of year .-I End of year -
a
s 3
-
g E E Q z
-
cn
z Q
f P 5 IL
b n z t: u b z
-
w
((s Cash-non-interest-bearing . . . . . . . , . . . . . . 6 ’ 0 6 0 145 364
46 Savings and temporary cash investments . . . . . . . . . 146
47a Accounts receivable . , . . . . . . 47a 1
b Less: allowance for doubtful accounts . ,
48a Pledges recervable . . . . . . . .
b Less: allowance for doubtful accounts . .
49 Grants recervable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
60 Receivables from officers, directors, trustees, and key employees
(attach schedule) . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .
51a Other notes and loans receivable (attach
schedule). . . . . . . . . . . .
b Less: allowance for doubtful accounts . .
52 Inventories for sale or use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63 Prepaid expenses and deferred charges . . . . . . . . . .
64 investments-securities (attach schedule) . . . . . . . . .
55a Investments-land, buildings, and
equipment: basis . . . . . . . . .
b Less: accumulated depreciation (attach
schedule). . . . . . . . . . . .
66 Investments-other (attach schedule) . .
57a Land, buildings, and equipment: basis . .
b Less: accumulated depreciation (attach
schedule). . . . . . . . . . . .
58 Other assets (describe b
e..................
63 Loans from officers, directors, trustees, and key employees (attach
schedule). , . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
64a Tax-exempt bond liabilities (attach schedule) . . . . . . . .
b Mortgages and other notes payable (attach schedule) . . . . .
55 Other liabilities (describe b Waqes 9avabie
57 Unrestricted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
58 Temporarily restricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39 Permanently restricted . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
Drganizations that do not follow SFAS 117, check hem b 0 and
complete lines 70 through 74.
70 Capital stock, trust principal, or current funds . . . . . . . .
71 Paid-in or capital surplus, or land, bldg., and equipment fund . . .
12 Retained earnings. accumulated income, endowment, or other funds
13 Total net assets or fund balances (add lines 67 through 69 OR lines
70 through 72; column (A) must equal line 19 and column (B) must RI
equalline21) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,14=979 ,3 90,435
14 Total liabilities end net assets/fund balances (add lines 66 and 73) 18 m 74;01,357
Fm 99C :!995!
Financial Statements wrth Revenue per Financial Statements with Expenses per
Return
Total revenue, gains. and other support
per audlted financral statements. W
Amounts Included on llne a but not on
line 12. Form 990:
Net unrealrzed gains
on Investments S
Donated services
and use of factlitres S
Recoveries of pnor
year grants . . S
Other (specrfy):
a
Return
b
(1)
(2)
. ..-........_-.__.___.
S . . . . . . . . . . . .._.___.___
Add amounts on lines (1) through (4) b
(3)
(4)
Total expenses and losses per
audrted flnanctal statements b
Amounts Included on lrne a but not
on line 17, Form 990:
Donated services
and use of facilities S
Prior year adlustments reported on llne 20.
Form 990 . . . s
Losses reported on
fine 20, Form 990 . S
Other (specrfy):
a
b
(11
PI
(3)
(4)
C
d
(1)
Line a minus line b. . _ . . b
Amounts ncluded on line 12.
Form 990 but not on lrne a:
Investment expenses
not Included on lrne
6b, Form 990 . . . s
(2) Other (specify):
..--....--...___._.___
S .-..-.._.._._...___.__
Add amounts on lines (1) and (2) b
8 Total revenue per line 12, Form 990
S _____.._....____...__.
Add amounts on lines (1) and (2) b
Total expenses per line 17, Form 990
I I e (line c plus line d) . . . b j e 1 (line c plus line d) . . . . b
List of Officers, Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees (List each one even if not compensated; see Instructions
on paoe 19.)
C
d
(1)
(21
0
S _____......-......_.._
Add amounts on lines (1) through (4),
Line a minus line b . . . . . b
Amounts included on line 17,
Form 990 but not on lme a:
Investment expenses
not included on line
6b. Form 990. . . s
Other (specify):
/b!
dl 17,850
(C) ccfnpensatKxl (A) Name and address @‘zEk ~e~,sY,~v~~nF (ll not paid, enter AZ 6 acc%YaYT%ef - -o-L.- -- alkwances Frank S orlno Exec. ulrector L3,u4u NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~.~~..~______________f.~~_...~._....._.._...~ 3528 Ma&son. C-ad
. . ..Dx....Simo.n..~E.lasqu~tz..................... D/R k'C7- e -e
. . ..Kar.en..Huss....................................... / AdwUUR I -e I e I
.. ..Bar~..Mc..Gra~h ............................... //p&u~~ -8 8- /
.. ..Sheila.Barra~~ ................................ D/AEC/~~ 8 5 . . . ..______.____________.__..____.___~___........._..___........ I I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..____.__..~.~~~~.........~~~........... I I I
................................................................
................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .._.........____._......__.._.____....._..__..~~~~.
75 Drd any offcer, director, trustee, or key employee receive aggregate compensation of more than SlOO.096 from your
organizatron and all related organizatlons, of which more than $10,000 was provided by the related organizations. 7 b ci Yes @No
If ‘Yes,” attach schedule-see instructions on page 20.
--- Other Information Eke mstructrons on paqes X+23.) TdS n-0
76
77
78a
b
79
80a
b
81a
b
82a
b
83a
b
a4a
b
85
b
86
a
b
87
b
88
89
90
91
92
Did the organrzatlon engage -my actMy not previously reporlecl to the IPS2-lf ‘Yes,’ attach a oetared
descnpbon of each actMy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Were any changes made tn the organizing or governing documents but not feportad to the IRS? . .
lf “Yes,” attach a conformed copy of the changes.
Did the organrzatron have unrelated busrness gross Income of $1,000 or more dunng the year covered by
this return? . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
If “Yes,” has it filed a tax return on Form 990-T, Exempt Organrzatron Business income Tax Return, for thus
year?, . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Was there a Irqurdatron. dissolution, termination. or substantial contractlon dunng the year? If “Yes,” attach
a statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Is the organlratlon related (other than by association with a statewide or natronwrde organization) through
common membership, governing bodies, trustees, officers, etc., to any other exempt or nonexempt
organzatlon? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
If “Yes,” enter the name of the organzation F __ ____. __ _______. _ _..._ ____ ______. _ _._..._._ _ ____ __ _.____ ____ __.._._
_ ._ _.___.______ _ ..__ _ ___.___ ____.__ ..____..__. _ _____ and check whether it IS [? exempt OR c] nonexempt.
Enter the amount of political expenditures. direct or indirect. as described in the
instructions for line 81. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
Did the organrzatron file Form 1120-POl, U.S. Income Tax Return for Certain Politr
this year? , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .
Did the organizatron receive donated services or the use of materials,, equipment, or facilities at no charge
or at substantially less than fair rental value? , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
If “Yes.” you may indicate the value of these items here. Do not include this amount as
revenue rn Part I or as an expense in Part II. (See instructrons for reportrng rn Part Ill.).
Did the organrzation comply with the public inspection requirements for returns and exe
Did the organizatron comply with the disclosure requirements relating to quid pro quo contnbutions? . _
Did the organrzation solicit any contributions or gifts that were not tax deductible? . . . . . .
If “Yes,” did the organrzation include with every solicitation an express statement that such contnbutions
or gifts were not tax deductible7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 501(c)(4), (51 or (6) oqanizations.4 Were substantially all dues nondeductible by members? . . . .
Did the organisation make only in-house lobbying expenditures of $2.000 or less? . . . . . , . ,
If “Yes” was answered to either 85a or 85b, do not complete 85~ through 85h below unless the organizahon
received a waiver for proxy tax owed for the prior year.
Dues, assessments, and similar amounts from members . . . . . . . . . .
Section 162(e) lobbying and political expenditures . . , . . . . . . . . .
Aggregate nondeductible amount of section 6033(e)(l)(A) dues notices . . . . ,
Taxable amount of lobbying and political expenditures (line 85d less 85e) . . . .
Does the organrzation elect to pay the section 6033(e) tax on the amount in 85f?. . . . . . . .
If section 6033(e)(l)(A) dues notices were sent, does the organization agree to add the amount in 651 to Its
reasonable esttmate of dues allocable to nondeductible lobbying and political expenditures for the followlng
tax year? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 501(c)(7) organizations.-Enter:
Initiation fees and capital contributions included on line 12 . , . . , . . . .
Gross receipts, included on line 12, for public use of club facilities, . . . . . .
Section 507@)(72) organizafions.- Enter: a Gross income from members or shareholders
Gross income from other sources. (Do not net amounts due or paid to other sources
agarnst amounts due or received from them.) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At any time during the year, did the organization own a 50% or greater interest in a tax
partnership? If “Yes,” complete Part IX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . .
Public interest law firms.-Attach information described in th in tru tions
List the states with which a copy of this return IS filed b 53SIEorriia . .___.._ _ .___.__._____._ _ _____.___________ _ _______._ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _.. . . . . -.
The books are in care of b . ..J?x&..Sorino . .._____._._.____.. _ _..___.______ Telephone no. b (..f;..l:.9)...4~.lf.~.6.1.6.! . . . .
Located at F 3528..M&im ,... Carl6bad .,.. cJ& ,.....-.-- _ . ..__. ___ _.._ _ _._._________ ZIP Code b ...?.?.~.r?.S...-..
Section 4947(a)(7) nonexempt charitable trusts tiling Form 990 in lieu of Fom, 7041, U.S. Income Taw Return for Estates
end Trusts--Check here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .E -- and enter the amount of tax-exempt interest received or accrued dunnq the tax year . ) I 92 I
%e 6
ducing Activities (See uxtnxtlons on pager;!%24 )
Unreiated business Income / Exc!uL I Kc2017 512. 513 of 514 El
(4 (W 07 (0) ’ ReMed or
bsmess code Amount Excluston cede Amount , exempt functton InCOme
Enter gross amounts unless otherwrse
indicated.
93
a
b
C
d
e
f
9
94
95
96
97
a
b
98
99
100
101
102
103
b
C
d
8
Program service revenue:
Fees and contracts from government agenctes
Membership dues and assessments . .
Interest on savings and temporary cash investments
Dividends and interest from securities . . .
Net rental income or (loss) from real estate:
debt-financed property . . . . . . . .
not debt-financed property . . , . . . .
Net rental income or (Ibss) from personal properly
Other investment income . . . . . . .
Gain or (loss) from sales of assets other than inventory
Net income or (loss) from special events . .
Gross profit or (loss) from sales of inventory ,
Other revenue: a
104 Subtotal (add columns (B). (D), and (E)) . . .
105 Total (add line 104. columns (B). (D), and (E)) .
I I I I i
I
!
Une No. Explain how each activity for which income is reported in column (E) of Part VII contributed importantly to the accomplishment
v of the organzatlon’s exempt purposes (other than by providing funds for such purposes). (Gee instructions on page 24.)
I I NOT APPLICABLE
m l Information Regarding Taxable Subsidiaries (Complete this Part if the “Yes” box on line 88 is checked.)
Name. address, and employer identificatron number of corporation or partnershIp Percentage of ownership interest
%
%
Nature of Total business activities Income End-of-year assets
I %I
Please IJncler penalties of p6q~t-y. I declare thal I have exarTItncd tnlS return. tnCludlng accompanying SClWduleS and SUtEmentS. and 10 the DeSt Of my knowledge and belief. rt IS tme. correct. and comolete. Declaration oi preparer (othef man offcwl rs basad on all mfonnatm of whbch preparer has
Sign any know!dge. (See Speak InstrucMns. page 9.)
Here b Sagnature of otfrer Date b Type OT pnnt name and title.
Reparar’s 1
Date Checkd Pruoarer’s YxIpl sacunty no. Paid sqnature !mff-
Preparer’s - mplow,~ 565 72 ;7450
Uss Only Firm’s name (or yours Ii ¶elf-employad~ EIN b - J.B. PAM
and address CERTIREDPUBLICACCOUNTANT ZIP co90 b 8OOGRANDAVENUE,SUITE A-5 CARLSBAD, CA
w 92008
SCHEDULE A
(Form 990) I
Orga&ation Exempt Under Section 501( c)( 3)
( tot Privata Foundation\ and Zkction 501 Ial. 501 f-71 O& 01 I-===- .
section 4947(s)(1) Nocwx.mpt cha&* TrL .-
Supplementary Information ottanmem Of ?h9 Trmawy hternal RevCOW sw-mca See separate instructions. b Must be compkted by the above organlrations and attached to thk Form gg0 (01 990-m.
Name of the organtzattor~ I EJwoyw mcttmJftcttlon tnmumf JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
I 33 : 059?140 Compensation of the Five Highest Paid Employees Other Than Officers, Directors, and Trustees
(See instructions on page 1. List each one. If there are none, enter “None.“)
(a) Name ana address of each employee peti more (b) Title and avtfagt hours (1) Cantr~au~mns to It) ExPense
than $50.000 per WOOk devOted t0 WSrtMn (cl Compensation nlD@We benel~l DlanS 6 accoun: ana othsr dderred comomat~on all0wamt.s
. . . . ..-.....--...-.-_..__.~....._.--..--___......_-..---.
NONE
. . . . .._.._____._..__-.........-*--.--.-----.-.-....--....
. . ..-.__._.._.._____......-..-.......-.----.---....~~.-~.
Total number of other employees paid over
550,000 , . . . . . . . . . . . b ] \:
mmofthet Paid Independent Contractors for Professional Services l .
(See instructions on page 1. List each one (whether individuals or firms). If there are none. enter “None.“)
(t) Name and address of mch indapmdftnt ~~nlmct~ paid more than SSJ.ooO (bj Type4 of sttvict (cl CompensatKm
NONE . . . ..__-__.__.....__..------...-...------.-----....---...-....--....~-~.-....-.......--.
. . . . . . . . . . . . ..-....--.-.--.-..-..-.----...-~---........-..~..-..-.........-...-.-....--. 1 I
-.--.--_-_.....____.--..-..---.--...---.--..---.-....-....--..---..-.-......--~- . .._ -._.
Total number of others receiving over $50.000 for
professlonal services . . . . . . . . b , \
For Pavmork Reduction Act Notice, SW p1ge 1 of UMJ lnrtmctions for Form WI (or Form Sso-u). Car. No. 1 lZB5F schtdultArFamQ90) 1995
. 1 During the year. has the organrzatlon attempted to influence natIonal. state. or local legtslatron, lncludtng any
attempt to influence publrc opinron on a legislatrve matter or referendum? . . . . . . . . .
If “Yes,” enter the total expenses patd or incurred in ConnectIon wtth the lobbyrng activities b $
Organlzatlons that made an election under section 501(h) by filing Form 5768 must complete Part VI-A. Other
organrzatrons checkrng “Yes,” must complete Part VI-S AND attach a statement glvlng a detarled descnptron of
the lobbying actrvrtles.
2 During the year. has the organization. either directly or indirectly. engaged in any of the fotlowrng acts with any
of its trustees. directon. officers, creators, key employees, or members of their famllles. or with any taxable
organtzation with which any such person is affiliated as an officer, director, trustee, malonty owner, or pnnclpat
beneficiary:
a Sale. exchange, or leasing of property? . . . . . . _ . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .
b Lending of money or other extension of credit? . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . .
Furnishing of goods, services, or facilities? . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of compensation (or payment or reimbursement of expenses if more than %l,OOO)? . . . . . .
Transfer of any part of its income or assets7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
If the answer to any questton is “Yes,” attach a detailed statement explaining the transactions.
Does the organtzation make grants for scholarships, fellowships, student loans. etc.? . . . . . . . . .
Attach a statement to explain how the organization determines that individuals or organizations receiving grants
ScM~uw A \Fom 9901 ‘995
Ban Statements About Actir I’s
‘=?a 2
NO
[2c! ! x
/2dl I x
2e X l-H--
m Reason for Non-Private Foundation Status (See instructions on pages 2 through 5.)
The organization IS not a private foundation because it is (please check only ONE applicable box):
5 [3 A church, convention of churches, or association of churches. Section 170(b)(l)(A)(i).
6 0
7 0
6 0
9 Cl
10 0
lla IId
llb fl
12 cl
13 cl
A school. Section 170(b)(l)(A)(ii). (Also complete Part V, page 4.)
A hospital or a cooperative hospital service organization. Section 17O@)(l)(A)(iii).
A Federal, state, or local government or governmental unit. Section 170(b)(l)(A)(v).
A medical research organization operated in conjunction with a hospital. Section 170(b)(l)(A)(iii). Enter the hospital’s name, city,
and state b . ..____..____.______--.--.-..--.---..-.--.---........-..-...--.....---....-...-...--...-..~.-..~-.....-.-.....-.-.-..-.---...~
An organization operated for the benefit of a college or university owned or operated by a governmental unit. Section 17O(b)(l)(A)(iv).
(Also complete the Support Schedule in Part IV-A)
An organrzatron that normally receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or from the general public.
Section 170(b)(l)(A)(vi). (Also complete the Support Schedule in Part IV-A.)
A community trust. Section 17O(b)(l)(Aj(vi). (Also complete the Support Schedule in Part IV-A.)
An organization that normally receives: (a) no more than 33X% of its support from gross investment income and unrelated
business taxable Income (less section 511 tax) from businesses acquired by the organization after June 30. 1975, and @) more
than 33%% of its support from contributions, membership fees. and gross receipts from activities related to its chantable. etc..
functions--subject to certain exceptions. See section 509(a)(2). (Also complete the Support Schedule in Part IV-A.)
An organization that is not controlled by any disqualified persons (other than foundation managers) and supports organizations
described in: (1) lines 5 through 12 above; or (2) section 501(c)(4), (S), or (6), if they meet the test of section 509(a)(2). (See
section 509(a)(3).)
Provide the following information about the supported organtzatrons. (See instructions on page 4.)
(a) Name(s) of supported organization(s) (b) Line number
from above
14 Cl An organiration organized and operated to test for public safety. Section 509(a)(4). (See instructions on page 4.)
PpOrt sdM?dUk3 (Complete Only d you checked a box OCI lrne 10. 11.~ 12.) Use cash methodof~n~9.
Note: You may use the--?rWteel /n the ~nstrvcrrons for converting from 1F -- .crvaltO the cati mtnOdof accounhng,
Calendar year (or fi8ul year beginn. , in) . k (a) 1994 (II) 1993 ,-I 1992 (d) 1991 (e) Total
15 Gifts. grants. and contnbutions received. (Do
not include unusual grants. See line 26.). 29,060 4,299 33,359 .
16 Membenhip fees recerved . . . . .
17 Gross recerots from admasions. I merchandise i&d or services performed. or fumrshrng of facilities in any activity that is not a business unrelated to the oraanrzation’s chantable, etc., purpose . . . - . . . .
16 Gross income from interest. dividends. 1
amounts recetved from payments on securities loans (section 5 12(a)(S)). rents, royalties, and unrelated business taxable income (less
sectron 511 taxes) from businesses acqurred by the organlzatlon after June 30. 1975 . )
19 Net Income from unrelated business )
activities not included in line 16 . , . . 1 I I I I
20 Tax revenues levred for the organrzation’s
benefit and either paid to it or expended on
its behalf. . . . . . . . . . .
21 The value of services or facilities furnished to the organization by a governmental unit wrthout charge. Do not include the value of services or facilities aenerallv furnished to the public without charge. . *. . , . . .
22 Other income. Attach a schedule. Do not
include gain or (loss) from sale of capital assets
23 Total of lines 15 through 22. ..... 39.nfin 4,249 33.359
24 tine 23 minus line 17. ....... 79-nF;n 7,799
26 Enterl%ofline23 ........ 391 47
26 Organizations described in lines 10 or 11: a Enter 2% of amount in column (e), line 24 . . . . W
b Attach a list (which is not open to public inspection) showing the name of and amount contributed by each
person (other than a governmental untt or publicly supported organitation) whose total gifts for 1991 through
1994 exceeded the amount shown in line 26a. Enter the sum of all these excess amounts. . . . . k
c Total support for section 509(a)(l) test: Enter line 24. column (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . b
d Add: Amounts from column (e) for lines: 16 3 n 19 S n
22 J n 26b .a799 . . . . . . b
e Public support (line 26c minus line 26d total) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b
f Public support percentage (line 26e (numerator) divided by line 26c (denominator)) . . . . . b 96.1%
27 Organizations described on line 12: a For amounts included in lines 15, 16. and 17 that were received from a “disqualified person,” attach a list to show the name of, and total amounts received in each year from each “disqualified person.” Enter the sum of such amounts for each year:
b
(1994) ..--...-......--..-_-----_. (1993) .-.-..--.-..-.__-......_-_-. (1992) ---.-.---...._-..-_......-- (1991) _.._..._.. _.._.._ --.._.. _...
For any amount included in line 17 that was received from a nondisqualified person, attach a list to show the name of, and amount
recetved for each year, that was more than the larger of (1) the amount on line 25 for the year or (2) $5,000. (Include in the list organizations described in lines 5 through 11, as well as individuals.) After computing the difference between the amount received and the larger amount described in (1) or (2), enter the sum of these differences (the excess amounts) for each year:
(1994) ._..._ _._____..--_--.---.-. (1993) _ -......._._._.___...__.____ (1992) . . . . ..--.-..... _ . .._..._.__ (1991) _._ . . .._....._._..._ __.._...
C Add: Amounts from column (e) for lines: 15 s 16 =
17 s 20 s 21 t
Add: tine 27a total , S and line 27b total . . S
Public support (line 27c total minus line 27d total). . . . . . . . , . . ,
Total support for section 509(a)(2) test: Enter amount on line 23, column (e) . . W
Public support percentage (line 27e (numemtor) divided by line 271 (denominator)). . . . . . b I27g I %
Investment income percentage (line 18, column (e) (numerator) divided by line 27f (denominator)). b 1 m ( %
26 Unusual Gmntsz For an organization described in line 10, 11, or 12 that received any unusual grants during 1991 through 1994,
attach a list (which is not open to public inspection) for each year showing the name of the contributor, the date and amount of the
grant, and a brief description of the nature of the grant. Do not include these grants in line 15. (See instructions on page 5.)
;chxiu+e A ~Fcrm 9’321 ‘995 =‘9e J
Private School QueF-mnaire (See fnstructlons on page 5.) -
(To be completed 0. f by schools that checked the box on 6 in Part IV)
29
30
31
s2
a
b
C
d
33
If you answered ‘No” to any of the above, please explain, (If you need more space, attach a separate statement.)
..-._..--__~~~.......___..._____~____.~_._...__._.____.._____-~~.~~~~~~-.-...--..---.---..--...~---~.~~~....~~..~~.-._.-~._
--.....--___._..___..-....-.-------.-.-~--...---....--...-------.-----.--...---...-.---.-..-..---...----..----~...--.~...--
Does the organization discnminate by race in any way with respect to:
a Students’ rights or privileges?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b Admissions policies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C Employment of faculty or administrative staff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d Scholarships or other financral assistance? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Educatronal policies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Use of facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Athletic programs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other extracurricular activities? . . . . . . . , . _ . , . . . . . . . , . . . .
34a Does the organrzation receive any financial aid or assistance from a governmental agency? . . . . . ,
b Has the organization’s right to such aid ever been revoked or suspended7 . . . . . . . . . . . .
If you answered ‘Yes” to either 34a or b, please explain using an attached statement.
35
NOT APPLICABLE
Does the organrratron have a racrally nondiscnminatoty policy toward students by statement In rts charter. bylaws,
other govemrng rnstrument. or WI a resolution of its govemrng body? . . . . . .
Does the organrzatron include a statement of its racially nondrscnmrnatory policy toward students in all its
brochures, catalogues, and other wntten communrcatrons wrth the publrc dealing wrth student admrssons.
programs, and scholarshIps? . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
Has the organrzation publicized its racrally nondiscrimrnatory policy through newspaper or broadcast media dunng
the pet-rod of sokcitatron for students, or during the regrstratron penod If it has no Solicitation program, in a way
that makes the policy known to all parts of the general communrty tt serves?. . . . . . . . . .
If “Yes,” please describe; if ‘No.” please explain. (If you need more space, attach a separate statement.)
. . . . . . . . . .._._.___...._....___..~._...~~...~.~~~.~..~....~~......~~-..~~~~..........~~~.-.....~....~-~.....~.~.~~~......~..
. . . . . . . . . ..___.________...___.._-________.....--....-...._........_......__......_~..-.~....-......._............_........_
..~~.~~...___..____~_____...__.~~..~~.~~__..~.~~.~...~...~~.~...~~~~~...~~~....~...~...~.~.~...~~~...~.~~...~~~.....~.......
Does the organizatron maintatn the following:
Records indicating the racial composition of the student body, faculty, and administrative staff? . . .
Records documenting that scholarships and other financial assistance are awarded on a racially nondiscnminatoty
basrs?........................ . . . . . . . . . .
Copres of all catalogues, brochures, announcements, and other wntten communlcatiOns to the public dealing
with student admfssrons. programs, and scholarships?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Copies of all material used by the organization or on its behalf to solicit contributions? . . . . . . . .
If you answered “Yes” to any of the above, please explain. (If you need more space, attach a separate statement.)
__.___..__._._._________...._.._.__.....______._____._.___.___________.__......__.~~-_...-.__._-.....~~_..._____.._._...._.
. . . . . . . .._.....__._..____..__....._____....._.._.._..__.__.______...__....._......-.---.....~............_...._........~.-.
Does the organization certify that It has complied with the applicable requirements of sections 4.01 through 4.05
of Rev. Proc. 75-50. 1975-2 C.E. 587, covenng racial nondrscnmination? If “No,” anach an exolanatlon . . .
Yes 1 No
324 i
33h I I
Scfwoum A Form 940) 1995
M Lobbying Expem . res by Electing Public Charities (See In-.. ~ctlons on page 5.)
(To be completed ONLY by an eligible organlzation that filed Form 5768)
Check here b a 0 11 the orgawatton belongs to an affiliated group.
Check here F b 0 if you checked “a” above and ‘limIted control” provIsions aDply. I
36
37
36
39
40
41
42
43
44
Limits on Lobbying Expenditures NOT APPLICABLE (*I @I AMytea grout Ta be comcleleo totals (The term “expenditures” means amounts pard or Incurred.)
I36 Total lobbying expenditures to influence public optnlon (grassroots lobbymg)
Total lobbying expenditures to Influence a legislative body (direct lobbyrng) . . . .
Total lobbying expenditures (add lines 36 and 37) , . . .
Other exempt purpose expenditures . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total exempt purpose expenditures (add lines 38 and 39). . . . , . . . . . .
Lobbying nontaxable amount. Enter the amount from the following table-
If the amount on line 40 is- The lobbying nontaxable amount is-
Not over $500.000 . . . . . . .20% of the amount on line 40. . . . . .
Over 3500,OW but not over $1.000.000 . .$lOO.OOO plus 15% of the excess over $5OO,OClO
Over $1.040.000 but not over %1.500,000 .$175,000 plus 10% ofthe excess over$1.000,000
Over$1,5OO,OOO but notover$17,000.000 .$225,000 plus 5% of the excess 0vef$1,500,000
Over 517,WO.ooO . . . . . . . .%l,OOO.OOO . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Grassroots nontaxable amount (enter 25% of line 41) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subtract line 42 from line 36. Enter -0- if line 42 is more than line 36 , . . . . . .
Subtract line 41 from line 38. Enter -O- if line 41 is more than line 38 , . . . . . ,
--
37 I -. 361 39 I
431 /
(or ALL Mectlnq oqanua1lons
Caution: If there is an amount on either line 43 or line 44. file Form 4720.
4-Year Averaging Period Under Section 501(h)
(Some organizations that made a section 501(h) election do not have to complete all of the five columns below. See the Instructions for lines 45 through 50 on page 7.)
Lobbying Expendttums During CYear Averaging Period
Cakndar year (or (4 @I (4 Ml (4 fiscal year beginning in) l 1995 1994 1993 1992 Total
45 Lobbying nontaxable amount. . . . . .
46 Lobbying ceiling amount (150% of line 45(e)),
47 Total lobbying expenditures . . . . ,
49 Grassroots ceiling amount (150% of line 46(e))
50 Grassroots lobbying expenditures . . . . I I I . -Lobbvina :
(For reporting only by organitations that did not complete Part VI-A) (See instructions on page 7.)
During the year, did the organization attempt to influence national, state or local legislation. including any Yes No Amount attempt to influence public opinion on a legislative matter or referendum, through the use of:
a Volunteers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
b Paid staff or management (Include compensation in expenses reported on lrnes c through h.) . . . . m \
c Media advertisements , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d Mailings to memben. legislators, or the public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e Publications, or published or broadcast statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
f Grants to other organizations for lobbying purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
9 Direct contact with legislators. therr staffs, government officials, or a legislative body , . . . . .
h Rallies, demonstrations, seminars. conventions, speeches, lectures, or any other means . . . .
i Total lobbying expenditures (add lines c through h). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
If “Yes” to any of the above. also attach a statement giving a detailed descnption of the lobbying activities.
, k?uaule A ‘Fcfm 9901 19% ~~906 . m Information Regardin .ansfeo To and Transactions and Rela ships Wii Noncharitable Exempt Organirations
51 Did the repomng organrzatron drrectly or mdirectly engage In any of the followmg wrth any other organrzatron described rn sectron
501(c) of the Code (other than sectron 501(c)(3) organrzatrons) or n section 527. relatrng to poktical organrzatjons?
a Transfers from the reporting organiratlon to a noncharitable exempt organizatron of:
0) Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(ii) Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
b Other transactrons:
(i) Sales of assets to a nonchantable exempt organrzation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(ii) Purchases of assets from a nonchantable exempt organization , . . . . . . , . . _ , . .
(iii) Rental of facrlities or equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . .
(iv) Reimbursement arrangements , . . . , . . . . . _ . . . 1 . . . . . . . .
(v) Loans or loan guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
(vi) Performance of servrces or membenhip or fundraising solicitations . . . . . . . . . . . .
c Shanng of faciltties, equipment, mailing lists, other assets. or pard employees . . . . . . . . . . .
d If the answer to any of the above IS “Yes,” complete the following schedule. Column (b) should always show the farr market value of the
goods, other assets, or services given by the reporting organizatron. If the organization recerved less than fair market value in any transaction or shanng arrangement, show in column (d) the value of the goods, other assets, or services recetved:
(4 @I Ltne no. Amount mvolved
(d Name of nonchanlable cxempl oqanu.atKxl (crl
Chncnptm of transfers. transact0ns. and tinng anartgemem
NOT APPLICABLE
I I I I I I
52a Is the organrzation directly or mdirectly affiliated with, or related to. one or more tax-exempt organizations
described in section 501(c) of the Code (other than section 501(c)(3)) or in section 5277 . . . . . . b 0 Yea 0 No
b If “Yes,” complete the following schedule:
w @I (Cl
Name of organrzatron Type of oqanrzation Dascriptlon of mlatmlmP
I NOT APPLICA
- JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
SCHEDULE A - FORM 990
LINE 26 (6)
Frank Violi
Marjorie Mosher Schmidt Foundation
Salvador Velasquez
$ 1.000
1,300
1.000
$ 3,300
. VEAA California Exrpt Organization ‘f P \(
1995 Annual Information Statement or Return 199 “ONTH
) “til 1 “E.R uOllr* 2.r
For calendar or fiscal year beginning 01 1995. and endmg 12 , 31i “9’; i
Attach Preaddressed Label
or See Instructions
A FInal re!sJr?T
0 DlSSOlWd WIthdrawn Mergea Reor;anlzed tattdc:, ex:;ara: c-1
If a box 1s inecked. enter date l
B Check ferns filed this vear Stale: 109 loo JCCS
Federal- X990 _ 99OEZ _ 99GT - 99WF _ 1%~ _ 11xr( Calllornta ccrDorallon numoer “2’: FEIN D-1857764 33-0592140 C Ii organlratlon IS exempt under ABTC Section 237016 ana IS a scnoo sL: ‘C
CorporattonIOrgan~zalion name cnanty reilglous organcratlon or Is controllea by a rellglous organlratlon
JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE cneck tmx. Se Generai Instrucrion F. No filing let is requrrcd. l z
D Is this a group fllmg’ See General lnstructlon M 7 Yes xii No Address 3528 MADISON E Is thus a nonexempt chantable trust as oexnwd In IAC Secbcn 4947ia\t,11?
Z Yes X No
W State CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 “’ ‘Ode F Anounrtng method used Af’f UTAT.
Part I Complete Part I unless not required to file this form. See General Instructions B and C.
i
1 Gross sales or receipts from other sources. From Side 2. Part II, line 6. .....................
2 Gross dues and assessments from members and affiliates .............................
3 Gross contnbutlons. gifts. grants, and similar amounts received. See InsVuctrons page 2 ...........
This line must be completed. If the result IS less than $25.000, see General I
7 Total costs. Add line 5 and fine 6 ..............
14 If exempt under RBTC Section 237014, has the organizatlon dunng the year: (1) participated in any political campaign.
or (2) attempted to influence legislation or any ballot measure, or (3) made an electlon under R&TC Section 23704.5
(relating to lobbying by publtc chantles)? If “yes.” complete and attach form FT8 3509
15 Did the organrzation have any changes in its activities, govemmg instrument, articles of incorporatlon or bylaws that have
not been reported to the Franchise Tax Board? If “Yes,” complete an explanation and attach cupies of revised documents
16 Is the organization exempt under RBTC Section 237Olg?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
If “yes.” enter amount of gross receipts from nonmember sources $
17 Did the organizabon file Form 100, Form 100s or Form 109 to report taxable Income? . . . .
If “yes.” enter amount of total income reported $
ZYes ENO
. 5Yes ENO
. LYes E No
#IYes tLNo
18 The books are In care of Frgnjc Soa Daytime telephone( 619 770-0’=140
located at IMadison.. 92008
Please
Sign
Here
Under penallIes of perfury. I declare that 1 have eramIned thus return. lncludlng accompanymg sc??baules ana stalements and 10 Ine be51 of my knowMcqe and bel~el. 1:
1s INe. Correcr ana comolete Declararlon 01 preparer (other than taxpayer) IS basea on all fntonnallon 01 wn~ch preparer has any knOwM9e
I
.-
b Sianature 01 officer D I( 1
Date Title Davtlme leieonone
Preparer’s Date Preparer s sccIaI secumy no
Pald Check rf
Preparer’8 stgnature b setf-employed _X 566 1721 7450
Ulle Only Fin’s name (or yours. If . T-R- mi. C-!-P-A. FEIN
seff-employed) and address FIna v A-5 Dayllmetelephone( 619 434-6167
Carlsbad, CA. 92008
Form 199 cl 1995 Side 1
-
Part II Organizations with gross race of more than $25,000 and private foundation:. gardless of amount of gross
receipts - complete Part II or furnish substitute information. See Specific Line Instructions.
1
2
3 Receipts 4 from Other
Sources i
7
8
Gross sales or recelprs from all busmess actmes. See ms1rucflons page 3
MereSI
Dwdends
Gross rents
Gross royalttes
Gross amol;nt recetved from sale of assets
Other Income. Attach schedule .
Total gross sales or recelpfs from other sources. Add line 1 through line 7. -
I I
4 I
9
10
Expenses i:
and 13
Disburse 14
ments 15
16
17
Contnbutions, gifts. grants. and slmllar amounts paid. Attach Scnedule
Disbursements to or for members. ....................
Compensation of officers. directors and trustees. Attach schedule.
Other salanes and wages .........................
Interest .... _ ..............................
Taxes.. ..................................
Rents ....................................
DepreclaLon and depletion. ....... _ ................
Other. Attach schedule. ...........................
.
( 18 Total expenses and disbursements. Add line 9 throuqh ltne 17. Enter here and on Side 1. Part I. line 9. I 18 I 3 7 , 8 5 0 j
Schedule L Balance Sheets Beginning of income year End of Income year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Cash . . . . . . . . . .
Net accounts receivable. . . . . . . .
Net notes receivable. Attach schedule. .
lnventones . . . . . . . .
Federal and state government obligations .
Investments in other bonds. Attach schedule
Investments in stock. Attach schedule. . . . .
Mortgage loans (number of loans -1.
Other investments. Attach schedule
a Depreciable assets . . .
b Less accumulated depreciation
Land . . . . .
Other assets. Attach schedule .
Total assets . . .
18 Other liabilities. Attach schedule .Defe.rl;ed
19 Capital stock or pnnclple fund . . . .
fund . . .
Schedule M-l Reconciliation of income per books with income per return
Do not complete thts schedule ii the amount on Schedule L. line 13, column (dl, is less than S25.000.
Liabilities and net worth
14 Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15 Contnbutions. gifts, grants payable. . . . . . . .
16 Bonds and notes payable. Attach schedule. . . . _
17 Mortgages payable . . . . . . . . . . .
2 Federal income tax .
3 Excess of capital losses over capital gains . .
4 Income not recorded on books this
year. Attach schedule . . . .
5 Expenses recorded on books this year not
deducted in thus return. Attach schedule. . . .
6 Total. . I
not included in thus return.
Attach schedule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8 Deductrons in UIIS return not charged
against book income this year.
Attach schedule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . :
9 Total. Add line 7 and line 8 _ , .
Side 2 Form 199 ci 1995 95 20845
. JOIN HANDS - SAVE A LIFE
D-1857764
SCHEDULE TO FORM 199
OTHER EXPENSES -
PART II. LINE 17
Ol’fice s 1.2Gl
1Maintenance 424
Telephone 44
Supplies 2,773
Auto and Travel 3,626
Conventions and Meetings 1.816
s 9,944