HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-10-19; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 314; South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project- " cc-/2 8
HOUSING Ah0 REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - AGENDA f31LL
,E# 314 TITLE:
ITG. 10/19/99 CARLSBADCOASTALREDEVELOPMENTPROJECT CITY Ally.
APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE SOUTH
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
ADOPT Resolution No. 316 , approving the Preliminary Plan for the South Carlsbad
Coastal Redevelopment Project and selecting the project area boundaries.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Backqround
In September of 1997, the City initiated a study to identify options for actions which would eliminate or
reduce the impacts of the Encina Power Plant on the community. At that time, one option identified was to
establish a second redevelopment area which would include the power plant and related properties.
Through redevelopment authority and powers, the City could address the blighting conditions represented
by, or created by, the presence of the power plant within this key coastline area. On December 8, 1998,
the City Council adopted a redevelopment survey area to study the feasibility of establishing a
redevelopment project area to include the power plant and related properties. During the stlJdy, it became
apparent to the staff team assigned to this project that there were other areas to the east and south of the
power plant which should be included in a redevelopment area. Therefore, on July 20, 1999, the
redevelopment survey area was expanded to include areas to the south and east of the power plant. At
the time the survey area was expanded, the City Council authorized staff to proceed with efforts to adopt
a second redevelopment area.
RedeveloDment Plan Adoption Process
Requirements for adopting and implementing redevelopment projects are established in the California
Redevelopment Law (CRL). The first step in the process for adopting a redevelopmerit project is to
designate a Survey Area and determine whether a redevelopment project area within such an area is
feasible. This step has been completed. The second step requires the Planning Commission, in
cooperation with the Housing and Redevelopment Commission, to select a Project Area comprised of all
or a part of the Survey Area and to formulate a preliminary Plan for its redevelopment. The Planning
Commission took action on October 6, 1999 to select the project boundaries and approved the Preliminary
Plan. The boundaries and Preliminary Plan are now being submitted to the Housing and F!edevelopment
Commission for approval.
Preliminan, Plan
The Preliminary Plan is a very brief document that establishes the precise boundaries of the proposed
Project Area and serves as the basic framework for preparation of the more detailed Redevelopment Plan.
The Preliminaty Plan contains general statements about the land uses in the area, layout of principal
streets, population densities, building intensities and standards proposed as the basis for the
redevelopment of the project area. The Prelimina/y Plan also outlines the purposes served through
adoption of the Redevelopment Project. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a copy of the Prelimhary Plan and
Project Area Boundary Map for review as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
AB# 314 -
Page 2
As outlined within the Preliminary Plan, the primary goals or reasons for considering the redevelopment
project are:
Assist in the removal, relocation or environmental enhancement of the Power Plant. 'The goal is to
facilitate the redevelopment of the Encina Power Plant to a smaller, more efficient power generating
plant. If a smaller facility is developed, the Commission could pursue new beach and coastal
recreation opportunities on the excess property.
Assist with the Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Project, if ultimately approved by the City Council.
Establishment of the Redevelopment Area can provide the funding for the realignment of Carlsbad
Boulevard. The project may yield excess property that could facilitate expansion of the Carlsbad State
Beach campground and other recreational facilities.
Assist in the redevelopment of the "Ponto Area". The goal is to promote the redevelopment of
underutilized properties in the area.
Project Boundaries
The project area boundaries proposed by staff and selected by the Planning Commissiorl (6-0) are the
same as those approved for the Redevelopment Survey Area in July, 1999. In their review of the
boundaries, as a separate motion, the Planning Commission recommended that the area be expanded to
include the State Parking Lot to the south of the State Campground. The proposed area can be included
within the project area boundaries following action by the City Council to approve expansion of the
boundaries for the Redevelopment Survey Area. On October I9lh, under separate action, the Council took
action to expand the Survey Area to the city limits to the south which allows inclusion clf the property
recommended by the Planning Commission. The project area boundary map attached to this report
includes property to the south to the city limits as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission
and reflects the same boundaries as the recently expanded survey area.
The proposed project boundaries provided within the Preliminary Plan may be changed as a result of input
received during the adoption process. As previously indicated, the boundaries may be modified to reduce,
or contract, the area during the Redevelopment Plan adoption process. However, it is important to note
that area may be added only after the boundaries for the Survey Area are amended and after reinitiating
the redevelopment plan adoption process.
Next SteD
With approval of the project area boundaries and the Preliminary Plan, the plan adoption process begins.
Within the recommended action, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission will direct and authorize
staff to prepare and transmit the necessary documents to the State, County and other taxillg agencies to
establish the 1999-2000 equalized assessment roll as the base year valuation roll for the Pmject Area.
The next significant step will be to complete the Preliminary Report and Report to Council which will
contain specific, detailed, and to the extent possible, quantifiable evidence of the conditions of blight within
the proposed project area. The report will also provide the scope and purpose of the Redevelopment Plan,
describe the project area in more detail, provide a financing plan and identify proposed proje!cts.
Planninq Commission Recommendation
On October 6, 1999, the Planning Commission approved the Preliminary Plan and seleci:ed the Project
Area Boundaries for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project Area. The Cclmmission has
recommended that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission approve the Preliminary Plan developed
for the redevelopment of the Project Area and select the recommended boundaries for the Project. 2-
AB# 314
Page 3
Environmental Review
The Planning Director has determined that the Preliminary Plan is exempt from environmental review per
Section 15262 of CEQA (Feasibility and Planning Study) because it only allows the City to complete the
feasibility study for creating a Redevelopment Project and to initiate additional review for establishment of
a second redevelopment project area. It has no legally binding effect. A complete Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) will be prepared in conjunction with the preparation of the Final Redevelopment Plan. A
consultant has been hired to prepare the EIR, which upon completion, will be submitted to the Planning
Commission and Housing and Redevelopment CommissionlCity Council for consideration.
FISCAL IMPACT:
At this time, there is no additional financial impact related to approval of the Preliminary Plafl and selection
of the project area boundaries. Previous actions have appropriated funds in the amount of approximately
$200.000 for consultant services required to complete the tasks associated with the adoption of a
redevelopment project area.
EXHIBITS:
1. Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No 316 , approving the Preliminary Plan and
2. Project Area Map.
3. Preliminary Plan for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project.
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4656 selecting the project area boundaries and directing staff to
submit Preliminary Plan to Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
5. Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 6, 1999, with draft meeting minutes.
selecting the project area boundaries for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project.
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
h h
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 316:
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY
PLAN FOR THE SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, on July 20, 1999, the Carlsbad City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-265,
lesignating a Survey Area for redevelopment study purposes, and subsequently expanded that sllrvey area
m October 19, 1999; and
WHEREAS, a Preliminary Plan has been developed, and on October 6, 1999, by Resolution No.
1656, the Planning Commission selected the Project Area for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment
’roject and approved the Preliminary Plan prepared for the redevelopment of the Project Area; and
WHEREAS, the public health, safety, and welfare would be furthered by the redevelopment of
he proposed South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of
he City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. The Preliminq Plan prepared for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Proje:ct, as
ubmitted herewith and attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is hereby accepted and approved, with the
xclusion of the property upon which the Lanikai Mobile Home Park is currently located south of
‘6insettia Lane and west of the Railroad Tracks.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make such transmittals as may be required pursuant to
lection 33327 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, including a request to establkh the
999-2000 equalized assessment roll as the base year valuation roll for the South Carlsbad Coastal
:edevelopment Project.
3. Staff is authorized and directed to prepare a redevelopment plan for the South CarlslJad
:oastal Redevelopment Project.
71
71
[RC Resolution No. 316
:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Preliminary Plan Resolutiomdoc 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 19th day of October 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin
NOES: None /"
ABSENT Hall
ABSTAIN None
Chairman
(
i
$
1(
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c
T
\WINDOWS\TEMP\Prelirninary Plan Resolution.doc 2
EXHIBIT “A”
SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL
OCTOBER 19,1999
REDEVELOPMENTPROJECTAREA
PROJECT BOUNDARIES MAP
2
EXHIBIT 3
PRELIMINARY PLAN
FOR THE
SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
I. INTRODUCTION
This document is the Preliminary Plan (“Plan”) for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopnlent
Project (“Project”). The Plan’s primary purpose is to designate the boundaries of the proposed
South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project Area, and provide a general description of the
contemplated redevelopment initiative. If this Plan is approved by the City of Carlsbad Plantling
Commission and the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Commission (“Commission”), the
Commission will initiate an approximately 9 month process to establish a redevelopment projlect.
As part of this process, the Commission will identify the conditions of blight that justify fomiing
a redevelopment project, identify projects and programs that address the conditions of blight,
evaluate the financial feasibility of the redevelopment proposal, and assess the environnment
impacts that may result from implementing the projects and programs. The Commission will
also consult with affected environmental and taxing agencies (such as the State, County and
school districts), as well as the greater Carlsbad community.
The reasons the Commission is considering the Project are:
To facilitate the redevelopment of the Encina power generating facility to a smaller, more
efficient power generating plant. If a smaller facility is developed, the Commission could
pursue new beach and coastal recreation opportunities on the excess property.
To provide for the realignment of Carlsbad Boulevard which could yield excess property
that could facilitate additional open space and public recreational uses, visitor-serving
land uses and potential expansion of the Carlsbad State Beach campgrounds.
To facilitate the redevelopment of underutilized properties in the Ponto industrial area.
This Plan has been prepared in accordance with Section 33324 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law (“CRL”) which states that the Plan should
a Describe the boundaries of the project area;
Contain a general statement of land uses and of the layout of principal streets, population
densities, building intensities and standards proposed as the basis for the redevelopment
of the project area;
0 Show how the purpose of the Community Redevelopment Law would be attained by
redevelopment;
Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc Carlsbnd Redevelopment Agency
October 8,1999 Prelimhag, Plan
-
1
Show that the preliminary plan conforms to the community’s general plan, and;
Describe, generally, the impact of the Project upon residents of the project area and
surrounding neighborhoods.
11. PROJECT AREA LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Exhibit “A” presents a project boundary area map depicting the boundaries of the proposed
South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project Area (“Project Area”). The Project Area
includes the area generally bounded by Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the north, the Pacific Ocean to
the west, Interstate 5, and related properties to the east, and the city limits on the south.
The Project Area is predominantly urbanized pursuant to Section 33320.1 of the CRL. Existing
development includes the Encina power generating facility, storage and light industrial uses,
public uses, and residential uses. Physical and economic blighting conditions that are proposed
to be addressed through the Project include structural deterioration, substandard design, obscdete
buildings and facilities, incompatible land uses, impaired investments, and inadequate public
improvements.
111. GENERAL STATEMENT OF PROPOSED PLANNING ELEMENTS
As a basis for redeveloping the proposed Project Area, it is proposed that all planning elements
be those contained in the Carlsbad General Plan (“General Plan”), as amended from time to t:ime,
and all other applicable state and local codes and guidelines.
A. Land Uses
Within the proposed Project Area, land uses shall be those permitted by the General Plan.
Current permitted uses include: . Medium to High Density Residential; . Open Space; . Planned Industrial; . Public Utilities, and; . Travelmecreation.
B. General Statement of Proposed Layout of Principal Streets
The principal streets within the Project Area are shown on Exhibit “A”, Project Area
Boundary Map. In general, these include:
Palomar Airport and Cannon Roads (easuwest), and;
Carlsbad Boulevard (north/south).
Rosenow Spevacek Group, Zne.
Ouober 8,1999 2
Cari.sbadRedevelopmeni Agency
Preliminaq Plan
8
The layout of principal streets and those that may be developed in the future shall
conform to the General Plan as currently adopted or hereafter amended.
Existing streets within the Project Area may be widened or otherwise modified and
additional streets may be created as necessary for proper pedestrian and/or vehicular
circulation per the General Plan.
C. General Statement of Proposed Population Densities
Permitted densities within the Project Area shall conform to the Carlsbad General Plan
and Zoning Code, as currently adopted or as hereafter amended, and other app1ic;lble
codes and ordinances. This Plan and the Project do not propose any changes to
population densities, development densities, or land use designations.
D. General Statement of Proposed Building Intensities
Building intensity shall be controlled by limits on: (1) the percentage of the building site
covered by the building (land coverage); (2) the size and location of the buildable are,% on
the building site, and; (3) the height of the building. The limits on building intensity shall
be established in accordance with the provisions of the Carlsbad General Plan and Zoning
Code, as they now exist or are hereafter amended. This Plan and the Project do not
propose any changes to population densities, land use designations, or building
intensities.
E. General Statement of Proposed Building Standards
Building standards shall conform to the building requirements of applicable codes and
ordinances.
IV. ATTAINMENT OF THE PURPOSES OF THE LAW
The properties included in the proposed Project Area boundary were selected because an irlitial
survey indicated the existence of blight, as defined by the CRL. Redevelopment of the Project
Area would attain the purposes of the CFX by alleviating blighting conditions that to date: the
private sector, acting alone, has not remedied. Blighting conditions include the following:
Structural deterioration and dilapidation;
Defective design;
Substandard design;
Incompatible adjacent uses;
Parcels of irregular form and shape and inadequate size which are under multiple
ownership;
Stagnating property values;
Low lease rates, and;
Impaired investments.
Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency
October 8,1999 Preliminary Plan
J_e
3
,-
In addition, public infrastructure, such as streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, are substandard
and existing capacity is insufficient.
Redevelopment of the proposed Project Area pursuant to this Preliminary Plan will attain the
purposes of the CRL. through 1) the elimination of blighted conditions and correction of
environmental deficiencies, economic dislocation and disuse; 2) the replanning, redesign and/or
redevelopment of undeveloped or underdeveloped areas which are stagnant or improperly
utilized, and which would not be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without public
participation and assistance; 3) the participation of owners and tenants in the revitalization of'the
proposed Project Area; 4) the protection and promotion of sound development and
redevelopment of blighted areas and the general welfare of citizens of the City of Carlsbacl by
remedying such injurious conditions through the employment of appropriate means; and 5) the
installation of new or replacement of existing public improvements, facilities and utilities in
areas that are currently inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and
utilities.
V. CONFORMANCE TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY
This Plan conforms to the General Plan. All land uses, roadways and public facilities will be
those set forth in the General Plan.
VI. GENERAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT UPON THE RESIDENTS
OF THE PROJECT AREA AND SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS
Project impacts on residents within, and adjacent to, the proposed Project Area will generally be
improved environmental conditions, recreational and economic opportunities, and tr;Bk
circulation. Through the Project, the Commission desires to facilitate the redevelopmerlt of
existing uses to better suit the adjoining coastal environment, while improving beach access,
recreation opportunities and the street system that serves the Project Area.
Project development and implementation will be subject to further review and approval by the
City Council, Commission, Planning Commission, and other non-City environmental and taxing
agencies. Further, the Commission will conduct a community outreach process during the
Project formation and implementation phases to gain the insight and perspectives of affated
property owners, business owners, residents, and other interested parties.
Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc
October 8,1999
4
Cnrlsbnd Redevelopment Agency
Preliminarv Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- EXHIBIT 4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4656
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PLANNING COMMISSION ,DETERMINATION TO SELECT
THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND APPROVING A
VELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA GENERALLY
BOUNDED BY AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON ON THE
RELATED PROPERTIES ON THE EAST AND JUST SOUTH
OF PONTO DRIVE ON THE SOUTH.
CASENAME: SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL REDEVEL-
OPMENT PROJECT AREA
CASE NO: PCD 99-03
PRELIMINARY PLAN FORMULATED FOR THE REDE-
NORTH, THE PACIFIC OCEAN ON THE WEST, 1-5 AND
. WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified application with the City
of Carlsbad regarding property generally described above; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1998, as modified and expanded on July 20,
1999, the Carlsbad City Council adopted Resolutions No. 98-409 and 99-265, designating a
Survey Area for redevelopment study purposes; and
WHEREAS, the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and
Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) provides for the Planning Commission to select a
redevelopment project area from the boundaries of a survey area and formulate a
preliminary plan for the redevelopment of the selected project area; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for Planning
Commission to select the project area boundaries (as shown on Exhibit “A” to the
Preliminary Plan) and adopt the Preliminary Plan for the South Carlsbad Coastal
Redevelopment Project Area, (attached hereto and incorporated by this reference), on file
in the Planning Department, SOUTH CARLSBALI COASTAL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA, PCD 99-03, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 333;!2; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of October, 1999,
consider said request; and I1
1
2
2 -
4
4 -
6
7
8
s
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planning Commission Determination; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That the Commission hereby selects the project area generally bounded by
Agua Hedionda Lagoon on the North, the Pacific Ocean on the West, 1-5 and
related properties on the East and just South of Ponto Drive on the South, as
shown on the “Project Area Map” attached to the Preliminary Plan as
Exhibit “A” and incorporated by reference herein.
That based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Commission hereby
APPROVES the Preliminary Plan formulated for the redevelopnlent of the
selected project area.
That the Staff is hereby authorized and directed to submit the Preliminary
Plan for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project to the Carlsbad
Housing and Redevelopment Commission (Redevelopment Agency) for the
preparation of an official redevelopment plan for the South Carlsbad Coastal
Redevelopment Project.
That the Planning Director has determined that the Preliminary Plan is
exempt from environmental review per Section 15262 of CEQA.
PC RES0 NO. 4656 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
s
1c
11
12
13
14
15
It
li
1E
IS
2(
21
2;
2:
2L
2:
2t
2:
2t
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of October 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Vice Chairperson Compas, Commissioners L’Heureux, Nielsen,
Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman
ABSTAIN:
WILLIAM COMPAS, Vi
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
!*
MICHAEL J. H ZMI ER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4656 -3-
- -
The City of CARLSBAD Planning Department EXHIBIT 8
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. @)
P.C. AGENDA OF: October 6,1999
Application complete date N/A
Redevelopment: Debbie Fountain
Planner: Michael Hoizmille:
Eneineer: NIA
SUBJECT: PCD 99-03 - SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL REDEVELOPMEIQ
PROJECT AREA - Request for approval of a Planning Commission
Determination to select the project area boundaries and to adopt the
Preliminary Plan for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4656,
APPROVING PCD 99-03, selecting project area boundaries and directing Staff to submit the
Preliminary Plan to the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
11. INTRODUCTION
California Health and Safety Code, Sections 33322 and 33325, require the Planning
Commission to select the project area boundaries and approve a Preliminary Plan formulated for
the redevelopment of the selected Redevelopment Project Area, known as the South Carlsbad
Coastal Redevelopment Project Area. The Preliminary Plan is an initial step in establishing a
Redevelopment Project Area. The Preliminary Plan is not required to be a detailed documznt
and is intended primarily to identify the project boundaries, the land uses within the boundaries
and the general purpose for considering the Redevelopment project.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
In September of 1997, the City began to identify options for actions to eliminate or reduce the
environmental impacts of the Encina Power Plant on the community, and ,to achieve more
compatible land uses in this key coastline area. One action considered was the establishment cf a
second redevelopment project area which would include the Power Plant and other surround:.ng
properties owned by SDG&E. To initiate this action, the City Council took the first plann:.ng
step by adopting a resolution to create a redevelopment survey area on December 8, 19'38.
Adoption of the redevelopment survey area allowed the City to begin its efforts to study the area
and determine whether a redevelopment project within the subject area is feasible. Subsequenl. to
this initial action, the staff team working on this project determined that it would be appropriate
to consider expanding the project area to include the area which is also being studied as part of
the Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Study. Redevelopment could also assist with the
realignment of Carlsbad Boulevard if the realignment project is ultimately approved by the City
Council. On July 20, 1999, the City Council considered the inclusion of this additional area and
approved an expanded redevelopment survey area boundary.
- -
PCD 99-03 - SOUTH CAhSBAD COASTAL- REDEVELOPMEN I PROJECT AREA
October 6, 1999
Paee 2
The proposed Redevelopment Project boundaries are shown on the Project Area Boundary map
attached as Exhibit “A” to the Preliminary Plan, and are generally described as being bounded by
Agua Hedionda Lagoon on the north, the Pacific Ocean on the west, 1-5 and related propertie!; on
the east, and just south of Ponto Drive on the south. It includes the Encina Power Plant and
related properties previously owned by SDG&E and now owned by DynegyNRG. It includes:
1) several vacant properties still owned by SDG&E at the intersection of Cannon Road and [-5;
2) the, Carlsbad Boulevard right-of-way and related adjoining properties from Cannon Road to
the Batiquitos Lagoon which are also being studied as part of the Carlsbad B.oulevard
Realignment Project; and 3) the properties which are within the “Ponto Area” north of Aver.ida
Encinas and fronting on Carlsbad Boulevard. The project boundaries do not include any existing
residences except for the Lanakai Mobile Home Park which was added to swey area boundaries
by the City Council on July 20, 1999.
The next step .in moving forward with studying the feasibility of this area as a Redevelopment
project is for the Redevelopment Agency to approve a Preliminary Plan after review by the
Planning Commission. The Preliminary Plan is attached to the Staff Report as Attachment 3.
IV. ANALYSIS
One of the primary purposes of the Preliminary Plan is to identify the proposed boundaries of the
Redevelopment Project Area. The boundaries are as described above arid shown on the Project
Area Boundary Map, Exhibit “A” to the Preliminary Plan. These are the same boundaries
approved by the City Council on July 20, 1999, as the study area boundaries. It should be noted
that properties can be removed or deleted f?om the boundaries as the subsequent Redevelopment
Plan is formulated but properties cannot be added. Staff believes that the Preliminary Plan
adequately identifies the maximum extent of the area which could be included if a
Redevelopment project is ultimately approved.
Another purpose of the Preliminary Plan is to identify land use within the project area. The
Preliminary Plan contains the General Plan ,land use designations withm the proposed project
area. The intent of a redevelopment project for this area is not to change or modify the permit1:ed
land uses of the General Plan but to assist in the orderly development of those uses. Except for
the Lanikai Mobile Home Park which was added to the project study area by the City Council to
determine if inclusion could be of any assistance to the Park, no residential uses are included.
The. land use densities, building intensities and development standards for the area are not
proposed to be effected by the Redevelopment Project. It should be noted that with the sale of
the Power Plant now completed, Staff, the new owner of the Plant and SDG&E may be
reviewing the general plan and zoning designations on the original Power Plant properties in
order to make the designations more consistent and up-to-date. However, this review will not
occur as a part or a product of the consideration of the creation of a redevelopment area and will
be addressed as a separate, distinct project.
A final, major purpose of the Preliminary Plan is to identify the goal or reason for considering a
redevelopment project for the area. Generally, there are four reasons identified by Staff and the
consultant team. The first and primary reason is to assist in the removal, relocation or
environmental enhancement of the Power Plant, Second is to assist with the Carlsbad Boulevard
Realignment Project if ultimately approved by the City Council. Third, to assist in
redevelopment of the “Ponto Area” portion of the project. This area was developed when it was
_- -
PCD 99-03 - SOUTH CALSBAD COASTAL REDEVELOPMEN I PROJECT AREA
October 6, 1999
still in the county and has a number of older, non-conforming uses and buildings. The major
property owner in this area participated at the Council meeting when the survey area boundaries
were being considered and spoke in support of moving forward with the Ponto Area included.
Finally, redevelopment is anticipated to assist in the provision for potential beach improvements
in this southerly portion of Carlsbad (e.g. public parking and access).
At ths time, the Planning Commission is being asked to select the.project area boundaries ;and
adopt the Preliminary Plan only. Approval of the Preliminary Plan will allow the City to init:iate
the process to establish a secoxd redevelopment area. Much additional work needs to be
accomplished but it cannot be started until the project area boundaries are selected and the
Preliminary Plan is approved by the Planning Commission and Housing and Redevelopment
Commission. At a later date, the Planning Commission will be asked to review and consider the
Final Redevelopment Plan, its conformity with the General Plan and the Environmental Impact
Report which will be prepared for the project.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Preliminary Plan is exempt from environmental review per Section 15262 of CEI?A
(Feasibility and Planning Study) because it only allows the City to complete the feasibility study
for creating a Redevelopment Project and to initiate additiona1,review for establishment clf a
second redevelopment project area. It has no legally binding effect. However, a complete
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be prepared in conjunction with the preparation of the
Final Redevelopment Plan. A consultant has been hired to prepare the EIR which upon . completion, will be submitted to the Planning Commission for consideration.
VI. SUMMARY
In summary, staff recommends that the Planning Commission select the project area boundaries
and approve the Preliminary Plan for the consideration of Redevelopment Project Area I1 :md
submit it to the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Commission.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4656 (PCD)
2. Location Map
3. Draft Preliminary Plan for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project
MJH:eh
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
23
25
26
21
28
PLAh’NING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4656
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATION TO SELECT
THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SOUTH CARCSBAD COASTAL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND APPROVING A
PRELIMINARY PLAN FORMULATED FOR THE REDE-
VELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA GENERALLY
BOUNDED BY AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON ON THE
NORTH, THE PACIFIC OCEAN ON THE WEST, 1-5 AND
RELATED PROPERTIES ON THE EAST AND JUST SOUTH
OF PONTO DRIVE ON THE SOUTH.
CASENAME: SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL REDEVEL-
OPMENT PROJECT AREA
CASE NO: PCD 99-03
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified application wilh the City
of Carlsbad regarding property generally described above; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1998, as modified and expanded 011 July 20,
1999, the Carisbad City Council adopted Resolutions No. 98-409 and 99-265, desilgnating a
Survey Area for redevelopment study purposes; and
WHEREAS, the California Community Redevelopment Law (Ht:alth and
Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) provides for the Planning Commission to select a
redevelopment project area from the boundaries of a survey area and formulate a
preliminary plan for the redevelopment of the selected project area; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for Planning
Commission to select the project area boundaries (as shown on Exhibit “A?’ to the
Preliminary Plan) and adopt the Preliminary Plan for the South Carlsbad: Coastal
Redevelopment Project Area, (attached hereto and incorporated by this reference), on file
in the Planning Department, SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA, PCD 99-03, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33322; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of October, 1999,
consider said request; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
23
25
26
21
28
arguments, i
WaREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all test:imony and
.f any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planning Commission Determination; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A)
B)
C)
D)
E)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That the Commission hereby selects the project area generally bcunded by
Agua Hedionda Lagoon on the North, the Pacific Ocean on the We!& 1-5 and
related properties on the East and just South of Ponto Drive on the South, as
shown on the “Project Area Map” attached to the Preliminary Plan as
Exhibit “A” and incorporated by reference herein.
That based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Commission hereby
APPROVES the Preliminary Plan formulated for the redevelopment of the
selected project area.
That the Staff is hereby authorized and directed to submit the Preliminary
Plan for the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Project to the Carlsbad
Housing and Redevelopment Commission (Redevelopment Agency) for the
preparation of an official redevelopment plan for the South Carlsbad Coastal
Redevelopment Project.
That the Planning Director has determined that the Preliminary Plan is
exempt from environmental review per Section 15262 of CEQA.
PC RES0 NO. 4656 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2s
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of October 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES :
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COURTNEY E. HEINEMAN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4656 -3-
SOUTH CARLSBAD COASTAL
,REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
PCD 99-03
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999 -1 Pale 1
U
1. PCD 99-03- REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA II - Request for approval of a Planning
Commission Determination for the Preliminary Plan for the establishment of Redevelopment.
Project Area II.
Commission determination that is a requirement of Redevelopment Law. The City is requesting the
Mr. Wayne stated that technically Item #1 is not a public hearing item. It is request for a Planning
Commission to approve the boundaries that are being recommended for a second redevelopment area.
Staff presentation will be by Planning Director - Michael Holzmiller. Housing & Redevelopment Director -
Debbie Fountain and Redevelopment ExperVConsultant Frank Spevacek of the Rosenow Spevxek
Group.
the Carlsbad City Council made an initial action to create a redevelopment survey area in Carlsbad to
Housing & Redevelopment Director, Debbie Fountain, presented Item #1 as follows: In December '1998
consider this second Redevelopment Project Area. The primary focus was on actions relating tc, the
Encina Power Plant. Subsequent to that action in July 1999, the Council decided to expand that
redevelopment survey area, looking at areas to the south of the Power Plant property. The proposed
to the Preliminaty Plan, and are generally described as being bounded by Agua Hedionda Lagoon 011 the
Redevelopment Project boundaries are shown on the Project Area Boundary map attached as Exhibit "A"
north, the Pacific Ocean on the west, 1-5 and related properties on the east, and just south of Ponto Drive
on the south. It includes the Encina Power Plant and related properties previously owned by SDG&E and
now owned by DynegylNRG. It includes: 1) several vacant properties still owned by SDG&E at the
intersection of Cannon road and 1-5; 2) the Carlsbad Boulevard right-of-way and related adjoining
properties from Cannon Road to the Batiquitos Lagoon, which are also being studied as part oi the
Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Project; and 3) the properties which are within the "Ponto Area" north of
Avendia Encinas and fronting on Carlsbad Boulevard. The project boundaries do not include any existing
the City Council on July 20, 1999.
residential areas except for the Lanakai Mobil Home Park, which was added to survey area boundaries by
area. There are approximately 3 to 5 residences in the Ponto Area. This correction will be made ill the
Ms. Fountain stated further that a correction was needed in the report relating to the residences ill the
Preliminary Plan before it is submitted to the City Council for final approval.
In addition, Ms. Fountain explained, that the Planning Commission is being asked to consider for approval
the Preliminary Plan for the area, which will adopt the boundaries of the second redevelopment are21 and
set forth the general information required to initiate the process of studying the area.
Ms. Fountain stated that there were several reasons for considering the Redevelopment Project Area including: 1) assisting in the removal, relocation or environmental enhancement of the Power Plant; 2)
assisting with the Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Project, if it is ultimately approved by the Counc:il; 3)
assisting in the redevelopment of the Ponto Area and 4) assisting in the provision for potential beach
improvements, including parking and access in the area.
Ms. Fountain stated that the action being requested, is setting of the boundaries and adoption of the
Preliminary Plan. This will begin the process of forming a second redevelopment area. The Preliminary
Plan is typically a very brief general document. There are several steps following the Preliminary Plan.
The process is fairly complicated and time consuming, taking approximately a year to complete. Staff
anticipates the process should be completed in August of 2000. The next step will be to forward the
which will contain specific detailed and quantifiable evidence of the conditions of blight in the area. It will Preliminary Plan to the Council. The studies will provide the basis to prepare a final Redevelopment Plan
provide the scope and purpose of the redevelopment plan, describe the project area in more cletail,
provide a financing plan and identify proposed projects to the extent possible.
-
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999 Pa!3e 2
Furthermore, stated Ms. Fountain, elimination of blight is the public purpose serviced by redeveloprnent
and will need to be properly documented in the next part of the process. The primary goal is to induce
private investment over time and take actions, which will eliminate blighting influences. This action may
require some assistance through the Redevelopment Agency.
In Summary, Ms. Fountain affirmed that Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution #4656, selecting the Redevelopment Project Area boundaries and directing Staff to submit the
Preliminary Plan to the Housing & Redevelopment Commission for approval.
Commissioner Segall wanted to know if Grand Pacific Resorts was part of the proposed area.
Ms. Fountain informed the Commission that Grand Pacific Resorts was not included
Commissioner Segall, referring to page 3 of the draft, wanted to know if the eight bulleted items were the
definition of blight or if these bulleted blight items were found in the area.
Consultant Frank Spevacek declared that the eight bulleted blight items define the broad array of
of the Project Area. Various degrees of these conditions have been noted in the proposed areas.
conditions of blight that can be found in a redevelopment project. There has not been an extensive survey
Commissioner Trigas questioned if the funds could be used in surrounding area that have a direll or
indirect impact.
Ms. Fountain replied that the funds could be used outside of the redevelopment area if benefit were stlown
to the redevelopment area.
Commissioner Trigas asked for a clarification.
Mr Spevacek explained that the redevelopment funds could be used if: 1) public street improvements for
roadways that served the project area were needed, i.e. improvements needed at intersection or to
increase capacity outside of the project area, redevelopment funds from the project area could be used to
fund those improvements. Showing that the improvements would benefit circulation within the project area
itself could do this. 2) Housing funds, 20% of the tax increment generated within a project area, must be
the Redevelopment Plan is being considered for adoption for the agency to use those monies within the
pledged to increase and improve the supply of affordable housing. The law provides the option at the time
Project Area and in the greater Carlsbad Community.
Commissioner Welshons wanted clarification regarding the duration of a Redevelopment Plan and how
funding would work in the area under a Redevelopment Plan.
Mr. Spevacek stated that redevelopment has been active in the State of California since 1948. In ' 952,
California voters approved a constitutional amendment that allows Redevelopment Agencies to fund
redevelopment through what is known as tax increment financing. 80% of the revenue generated from
increases in assessed values, beyond what is currently in place today, would be redirected to the
Redevelopment Agency to address blighting conditions and promote affordable housing opporturlities.
That revenue, by law, must be dedicated to affordable housing, i.e. prepare building sites, low-interest first
loans and mortgages or to offset the direct cost of developing housing itself.
the Carlsbad City Council would serve as the Redevelopment Agency and make decisions regarding
Mr. Spevacek advised the Commissioners that, if a redevelopment project were established in this area,
projects and programs within the area. In addition to housing, the funds may be used for: 1) Infrastructure
improvements; 2) Purchase of property; 3) Rehabilitation loans; 4) Reduce cost of development to
facilitate the recycling of existing uses.
22
PUNNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999 Page 3
Mr. Spevacek informed the Commissioners that if the Redevelopment Project was adopted, the
Commission would have twenty years in which to enter into contracts and agreements to pledge tax
increment revenue for the agreed upon purposes. The Commission would have a duration of forty-five
years from the date of adoption to receive tax increment revenue generated from properties within that
area. Tax increment revenue is not adding additional assessments or increasing the property tax rate or
to the County, and to the School Districts is allocated to the Redevelopment Agency for reinvestment back
creating an assessment district. Per the State Constitution, revenue that otherwise would go to the 'City,
the County, the City and the School Districts and the remaining 80 cents is paid to the Redevelopment
into the project area. Approximately 20 cents out of every dollar of the aforementioned revenue is paid to
Agency. The public purpose is that the redevelopment effort directed by the agency will stimulate
reinvestment, will raise properly values within the project area and generate increased economic activity
that will benefit the other public jurisdictions.
Commissioner Welshons wanted to know if there was revenue lost to City school districts.
Mr. Spevacek affirmed that there was revenue lost to the City and to the County and districts of that
nature. To the City it is an indirect lost, because the goal is to forego some of the property tax revtfnue
that would otherwise go to the City, that now goes to the Redevelopment Agency in hopes that the public
investment will increase other revenues. To the County it is revenue lost from the standpoint that the
County does not have other fees or sales tax revenue that it receives from the area. Since 1968, sc:hool
districts must be funded on an equal basis throughout the State of California. If property tax revenue is
stabilized, receives funds from the State General Fund. School Districts do not lose out in terms of not received from local sources, the School Districts, in order to have its per student funding level
revenue for operations. In some respects the School Districts gain funds because the revenue the agency
must pay to the School Districts, roughly 50% of the revenue does not have State mandates or stings
attached. Schools Districts have used that revenue to fund rehab projects or new school construction
Commissioner Welshons wanted to know if a Redevelopment Agency could abuse the terms and keep the
funds, rather than use the funds for public purpose to institute improvement and rid the area of blight.
Mr. Spevacek asserted that the Redevelopment Law, in order to ensure and provide an incentive that a
City does not create a Redevelopment Agency to receive funds without using the funds for the intelided
purpose, states that the Redevelopment Agency must go in debt before revenue can be received. Tax
increment revenue is paid on an annual basis. Each year the Redevelopment Agency must submit a
statement that is reviewed by the County and the State of California Controllers ofice. The statement
and as such have incurred debt. The Redevelopment Agency is eligible to receive tax increment revssnue
declares that the City has entered into obligations to address the redevelopment needs in the Project Area
after the County and the State of California have reviewed this statement.
Mr. Spevacek further stated, redevelopment is a very public process, dealing with property owners rights.
It has been his experience that the public comes forward and creates a great deal of input at the Planning
Commission level and at the City Council level precluding any abuse.
Referring to the map indicating the areas to be included, Commissioner Welshons wanted to know if the
State parking lot was to be included in the Redevelopment Area.
Ms. Fountain explained that Staff had discussed including it in the Redevelopment Area. The Ccuncil
would have to expand the survey area to include the state parking area.
Commissioner Welshons wanted this area included in the Redevelopment Area, because if it was deemed
not feasible it could be taken out at a later date.
Commissioner Segall wanted to know if there was any reason that this area should not be added.
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6,1999 Page 4
Ms. Fountain replied that it could be included
Commissioner Nielsen asked why the mobile home park was included.
Ms. Fountain informed the Commissioners, that it was not Staffs original intention to include any
residential property in the Redevelopment Area. Staff was directed by Council to determine if it would be
appropriate to include it in the area. Funding can be provided to the mobile home park without it being
part of the Redevelopment Area. Boundaries cannot be added but can be reduced at a later date.
Vice-chairman Compas asked if there was anyone in the audience to testify on Item #1
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
Louis Taschner 1533 Hill Street, Oceanside, California - is representing Dale Schreiber who owns
approximately 11 to 13 acres in the Redevelopment Area. He has been working with Mr. Schreiber :;ince
1982, and has recognized problems in the area that he has not figured out how to overcome in ternis of
development. There is no sewering in the area and there may be a hazardous waste potential in the area.
More detailed studies will identify these problems. As these items are identified it will assist in determlning
the blight conditions. Once the blighting conditions are established, it can be ascertained at that time if
you want to go into a Redevelopment Area. He requested very strongly that the Commission continue
with the process, in order to get to the next step and begin to identify the real problems which have
inhibited redevelopment in that area. In the 1950s it was developed and there are many uses there that
are non-conforming, with industry and residential next door to each other. The situation cannclt be
changed without the proper vehicle to act upon the problem. Mr. Taschner stated that he was in support
of Item #I.
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning Associates, 5900 Pasteur Court, Carlsbad, California, spoke in favor of
Staff recommendation. It would offer a tremendous benefit to that area of town. Redevelopment in the
downtown Carlsbad area has made positive difference in the past 20 years. It was a painless
redevelopment and it can be done in the same manner in this proposed area.
Tim Stripe, 5900 Pasteur Court, Carlsbad, California, encourages the Commission to support the request
of Staff. He believes that the proposed redevelopment project would be a fantastic enhancement to the
City.
California stated that he has never viewed the Power Plant area as blighted. It is one of the nicest Power
David Lloyd, Secretary of Cabrillo Power, LLC owner of the Power Plant, 7077 Surfbird Circle, Carlsbad,
does, because it does have an impact on the community. The Power Plant is not a public utility per se, as
Plants in California along the coast. Mr. Lloyd moved to Carlsbad to share in whatever the Power Plant
public utilities in California are regulated. The Power Plant was built pursuant to a state authorizaticmn. It
was sold pursuant to a state law requirement supervised by the Public Utilities Commission. It is being
operated by San Diego Gas & Electric for the next year and a half under orders of the Commission,
required as it is a "must run" facility. It is necessary to keep the lights on in this city and in all of the cities
in San Diego County.
Mr. Lloyd advised the Commission that the Power Plant was a very important electric power genelation
resource in the State of California and it is not likely to go away voluntarily anytime in the near future.
Plans are on the horizon to put in more efficient units as it is warranted. There are plans to go before
groups, such as yours, to address environmental cleanup issues for air emissions.
Mr. Lloyd explained that the Power Plant was sited in this community due to the importance of Agua
Hedionda Lagoon. A source of cooling water is very important for power generation. It is an important
location and is vital to the community. It would be very difficult to relocate the Power Plant elsewhere.
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999 Page 5
Roughly $375,000,000 was paid for the plant. The benefits went to SDGBE, which in turn passed the
benefits to the ratepayers who paid for the Power Plant to begin with.
Expressing surprise that the redevelopment was going forward, Mr. Lloyd explained further: The State has
determined that the taxes paid by the Power Plant would no longer be sent to the state and redistributed,
but instead the taxes are passed on directly to the community. The benefits of the large investment will go
to Carlsbad. He was not sure what additional benefits would be forthcoming from the Power Plant parse
as part of a redevelopment area.
Various ideas were presented regarding camouflaging the Power Plant. The Power Plant can not reduce
In addition, Mr. Lloyd said, he is skeptical about the finding of blight. The Power Plant cannot be moved.
its size because of the requirements imposed by the State of California. Voicing his concerns regarding
blight, he indicated that Cabrillo Power is open to exploring with Staff, the Planning Commission ancl the
Community regarding any cleanup measures necessary to be good neighbors.
Mr. Lloyd reaffirmed that although he is cautious, he is not opposed to the redevelopment, but tle is
concerned and supportive of whatever the City would like to do.
Commission Segall asked Mr. Lloyd if he was concerned that the City would close down the Power Plant.
Mr. Lloyd said that if the City did make that request, his company would defend the $375,000,000
investment and aggressively oppose the closing of the Power Plant. By the same token they are
interested in what the Staff recommends and they are flexible.
Commissioner Welshons wanted to know what period of time that the taxes did not go to the City
Mr. Lloyd informed Commissioner Welshons that the law was a recent occurrence within the last 3 or 4
months. The purpose of the redevelopment statute was to get rid of extremely bad urban areas. Areas
where people did not live, crime was high and other urban problems. That situation does not exist around
the Power Plant.
for SDG&E to maintain these development rights. SDG&E although cautious, is supportive of Eloing
Frank Urtasun, with SDG&E, stated that as the major property holder east of the freeway, it was important
through the process with the City.
Commissioner Segall wanted to know what properties belonged to SDG&E east of the freeway and if they
were electric generation..
Mr. Urtasun responded that the properties were due east of the Power Plant property, north of Calnon
Road and adjacent to the Lagoon.
Vice-Chairperson Compas asked if any one else wished to speak on the agenda item. As there was no
from staff.
additional persons wanting to speak, public testimony was closed. Mr. Compas asked for additional input
Ms. Fountain noted the concerns of the speakers tonight. Ms. Fountain believes that as the project moves
forward staff would be able to answer a great deal of the questions in terms of what will happen ovar the long term. Staff is not proposing anything that would take away any development rights. Quit(? the
contrary, the goal is to encourage development and facilitate that happening and guiding the
dealt with in a cooperative effort.
redevelopment. Ms. Fountain stated that eliminating the blight and improving the areas needed I:o be
Commissioner Trigas asked for a clarification of the distribution of the new assessed taxes
25
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6. 1999 Page 6
Ms. Fountain explained that when the Power Plant was under the Public Utilities Commission, it was being
taxed in the unitary tax structure, which is a different structure than property tax. That money was
allocated differently throughout the County than property tax is, and that benefit is shared throughoul: the
County based on a complex formula. The City did not receive a substantial portion of that. The State Board of Equalization made the decision, that when the Power Plant goes to private property ownership it
would be under the property tax structure. That is when it changed the benefit to the City and now more
of that revenue will come directly to the City or the County or other agencies that typically receive property
tax benefits.
Commissioner Trigas asked if a 100 percent of the funds would go to the City.
agencies. In prior years Redevelopment Agencies had the ability to negotiate, but this can no longer be
Ms. Fountain stated that the law stipulates specifically how the tax increment is distributed to the taxing
done under Redevelopment Law. There are now specific percentages as to how revenue is shared
among the taxing agencies that receive property tax.
Commissioner Segall voiced the concern that Mr. Lloyd raised, as to the Power Plant being placed in the
Redevelopment Agency and the potential of it being in a blighted area. What kinds of things coulcl the
Redevelopment Agency do to the Power Plant that would raise his concerns?
Ms. Fountain explained that the largest fear is imminent domain power. The property could be
Staff would like to work with the property owners to reduce the impacts. Staff realizes that this would be
condemned and taken by the City. Considering the value of the Power Plant, this is an unlikely scenario.
long-term, not an immediate change to the Power Plant. Removal of blight is the public purpose that the
serves the Redevelopment Area.
of the Power Plant.
Commissioner Segall asked if the Redevelopment Agency could address enhancing the aesthetic beauty
Ms. Fountain replied that his assumption was correct.
Commissioner Welshons wanted clarification of the existence of blight as defined by the CRL. She asked
if the bullet points in the staff report were what is defined by the law as being blight or do they represelit an
overview of the area.
actually seen at the Redevelopment Area. In addition, staff must document the blighting conditions ill the
Ms. Fountain referred to the initial survey work and noted that the bulleted points were the types of things
next part of the process.
Vice-Chairperson Compas asked if there were any other questions of staff. Seeing none, Commission
discussion was opened.
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney, made a legal clarification. The boundaries could not be adjusted
without the Council taking action to amend the survey boundaries. Mr. Rudolf wanted to know If the
property was within the survey boundaries so that no amendment is required.
Ms. Fountain explained that the Council would need to take action first to amend the survey area and then
Council would take action to approve the Preliminary Plan with the project boundaries as being proposed.
recommendation for the Council to include it; thus not actually amending the boundaries.
Mr. Rudolf then stated that the manner in which the motion was made was in deed correct, because it is a
MOTION:
26
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999. Page 7
AMENDMENT Motion by Commissioner Welshons that the Commission make a
recommendation to Council to include the State Beach parking lot in the
redevelopment boundaries. The motion was duly seconded.
VOTE: 6-0
AYES;
NOES:
Compas. L'Heureux, Segall, Trigas, Welshons. Nielsen
ABSTAIN:
None
None
MAIN MOTION:
VOTE:
AYES;
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Welshons, and duly seconded, that the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4656, approving PCD 99-03,
selecting project area boundaries and directing Staff to submit the
Preliminaly Plan to the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment
Commission.
6-0
Compas, L'Heureux, Segall, Trigas, Welshons, Nielsen
None
None