HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-05-10; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; 371; Carlsbad Saturday Farmer's MarketTITLE: AB# 37 1 -
MTG. 5/10/05
DEPT. H/RED
CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMER’S MARKET
RP 94-05(A)X3
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
DEPT. HD.
CITY ATTY.
CITY MGR
That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission ADOPT Resolution No 393 I APPROVING
Major Redevelopment Permit RP 94-05(A)x3 to add an additional day to the weekly Farmer’s Market,
to be held on Saturdays in the Village Redevelopment Area as recommended by the Design Review
Board.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On March 28, 2005, the Design Review Board (DRB) conducted a public hearing to consider a
request to add an additional day to the weekly Farmer’s Market to be held on Saturday mornings in
the public parking lot located mid-block on the east side of Roosevelt Street between Carlsbad
Village Drive and Grand Avenue in Land Use District 1 of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area.
The proposal did not include a request to modify the configuration or general operations of the
Farmer’s Market.
The Carlsbad Village Business Association (CVBA) is the official sponsor of the Farmer’s Market
event. The Farmer’s Market currently takes place every Wednesday afternoon from 2:OO p.m. to 6:OO
p.m. from the second Wednesday in September through the second to last Wednesday in June, and
during the summer season from 2:OO p.m. to 8:OO p.m. from the last Wednesday in June through the
first Wednesday in September. The Farmer’s Market has been held every Wednesday from 2 p.m.
to 6 p.m. in the mid-block public parking lot on Roosevelt Street for over 10 years. Beginning in July
of 2004, the CVBA began operation of their summer hours from 2:OO p.m. to 8:OO p.m.
In order to offer greater shopping opportunities to residents and visitors of Carlsbad, the applicant,
CVBA, has requested the additional day to the weekly Farmer’s Market to take place on Saturday’s
from 8:OO a.m. to 11:OO a.m. As part of the proposal the CVBA did not request any modifications to
the configuration or general operations of the Farmer’s Market event. The event will continue to be
limited to the public parking lot located mid block on the easterly side of Roosevelt Street and the
maximum number of booths will remain at thirty-three (33) spaces.
At the public hearing, the Design Review Board members voted unanimously (3-0, Baker absent) to
recommend approval of the project as proposed.
The approvin resolution along with the Design Review Board staff report, and the draft minutes of
the March 28 meeting are attached for the Commission’s review. tF
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The Housing & Redevelopment Department has conducted an environmental review of the project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the
project has been found to be exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 1531 1 of the
State CEQA Guidelines as placement of a minor structure accessory to an existing facility. No
comments were received on the environmental determination. The necessary finding for this
environmental determination is included in the attached Housing and Redevelopment Commission
resolution.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 371
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed project will have a positive fiscal impact in terms of increased sales tax both within the
Farmer’s Market and the Village Area in general. The actual amount of the increased sales tax in
unknown at this time.
EXHIBITS :
1. Housing & Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 393 , APPROVING RP94-05(A)x3
2. Design Review Board Resolution No. 296, dated March 28, 2005
3. Design Review Board Staff Report, dated March 28,2005 with attachments
4. Draft Design Review Board Minutes, dated March 28, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 393
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MAJOR
DAY TO THE WEEKLY FARMER’S MARKET, TO BE HELD ON
SATURDAYS IN THE VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD VILLAGE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. RP 94-05(A)X3 TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL
CASE NO: RP 94-05(A)X3
WHEREAS, on March 28, 2005, the City of Carlsbad Design Review Board held a duly noticed
public hearing to consider Major Redevelopment Permit RP 94-05(A)X3 to add an additional day to the
weekly Farmer’s Market, to be held on Saturday’s in the public parking lot located mid-block on the east
side of Roosevelt Street, west of the alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue, and
adopted Design Review Board Resolution No. 296 recommending to the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission that the amendment to Major Redevelopment Permit RP 94-05(A)X2 be approved with
conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, on the date of
this resolution held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard all persons
interested in or opposed to an amendment to Major Redevelopment Permit RP 9405(A)X3; and
WHEREAS, as a result of an environmental review of the subject project conducted pursuant to
the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the project was found to be categorically exempt from the
requirement for preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 153 1 I of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as placement of a minor structure accessory to an existing facility, and will not have any
adverse significant impact on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. That Major Redevelopment Permit RP 94-05(A)X3 is APPROVED and that the findings
and conditions of the Design Review Board contained in Resolution No. 296, on file in
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the City Clerk’s Office and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the
Housing and Redevelopment Commission, except that Condition No. 1 of Housing and
Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 387 and Condition No. 11 of Design Review Board
Resolution No. 296 are not incorporated and instead the Conditions shall read as follows:
Condition No. 1 is amended to read as follows:
“The boundaries of the market shall be limited to the public parking lot located on the
east side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), west of the alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and
Grand Avenue. The total number of booth spaces shall be limited to the number (33) indicated
within the application. Two (2) of the booths may be utilized for the selling of hand made arts
and crafts. The Saturday Farmer’s Market hours of operation shall be every Saturday from
8:OO a.m. to 1:00 p.m. To set up for the event and clean up afterwards, the subject parking
lot will be closed from 7:OO a.m. to 2:OO p.m. The hours of operation for the Wednesday
Farmer’s Market are as follows: From the second Wednesday in September, through the
second to last Wednesday in June, the hours of operation shall be every Wednesday afternoon
fiom 2:OO p.m. to 6:OO p.m. To set-up for the event and clean up afterwards, the subject parking
lot will be closed from 1:00 p.m. to 8:OO p.m. every Wednesday. From the last Wednesday in
June through the first Wednesday in September, the hours of operation shall be every Wednesday
afternoon from 2:OO p.m. to 8:OO p.m. To set-up for the event and clean-up afterwards, the
subject parking lot will be closed from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. every Wednesday. During the
period of extended hours, the performance of live, non-amplified music will be allowed between
the hours of 5 p.m. and 8 p.m. The total number of booths, spaces or hours of operation for the
Wednesday Farmers Market and/or Saturday Farmer’s Market shall not be increased
without prior amendment to this major redevelopment permit.”
Condition No. 1 1 is amended to read as follows:
“The Saturday Farmer’s Market approval is granted based upon an understanding
that Major Special Event Applicant’s and/or Organizations that have utilized the public
parking lot, located on the east side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), west of the alley,
between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue, prior to the adoption date of this
resolution have a prior right to utilize said parking lot. Therefore, a Saturday Farmer’s
Market which interferes with a Major Special Event with such a prior right, may be
required to be shut down for that particular day.”
3. That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed,
analyzed and considered the environmental determination for this project and any comments thereon.
The Housing and Redevelopment Commission finds that:
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all
applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations;
HRCRESONO. 393 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(b) The proposed development is the placement of a minor structure accessory to an
existing facility, and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment;
(c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species;
(d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,
noise, air quality, or water quality; and
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
The Housing and Redevelopment Commission finds that the environmental determination
reflects the independent judgment of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad.
4. That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial
Review” shall apply:
...
...
...
..
NOTICE TO APPLICANT:
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought, or other exactions hereafter
collectively referred to, is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made
applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper
seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following
the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes
final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount
sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition
may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record
is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or hisher attorney of record, if he/she has one. A
written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City
of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008.”
HRCRESONO. 393 -3 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 10th day of May
, 2005 by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lewis
ABSTAIN: None
Commissioners Hall, Kulchin, Hall, Sigafoose
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN
MATT HALL, Vice-chairman
ATTEST:
HRCRESONO. 393 -4-
1
e
L
I
4
4 -
t
s
a
s
io
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 296
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
05(A)X3 TO ADD AN ADDITTIONAL DAY TO THE WEEKLY
FARMER’S MARKET, TO BE HELD ON SATURDAYS IN THE
VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMER’S MARKET
APPROVAL OF MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. RP 94-
APN: 203-304-02,03,04,05
CASE NO: RP 94-05(A)X3
WHEREAS, on September 27, 1994, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of
the City of Carlsbad held a duly noticed public hearing and approved Redevelopment Permit
RP94-05 to allow a weekly Farmer’s Market in the public parking lot located mid-block on the
east side of Roosevelt Street, west of the alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad did,
on the 20fh day of June, 1995, approve Resolution No. 270 extending the term of the Village
Farmer’s Market for five years ending on September 26, 1999; and
WHEREAS, in Resolution No. 270, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission did
authorize the Design Review Board to extend the permit for the Farmer’s Market for a reasonable
period of time not to exceed five (5) years upon written application of the permittee made no less
than 90 days prior to the expiration date; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board approved Resolution No. 269 for a request by the
Carlsbad Village Business Association (“Applicant”) for a time extension (Farmer’s Market
RP94-05(A)Xl) through September 26,2004; and
WHEREAS, the Housing & Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad did, on
the 13‘h day of July, 2004, adopt Resolution No. 387 extending the term of the Farmer’s Market
for five years ending on September 26,2009; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the applicant has filed an application to amend the permit for the Farmer’s
Market in order to allow for a weekly Saturday Farmer’s Market to be held in the morning hours
in the same location of the previously approved Farmers Market; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did, on the 28‘h day of March, 2005, hold a
duly noticed public hearing to consider said request on public property described as:
Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 38, amended Map of Town of Carlsbad in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map
thereof No. 775, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County.
WHEREAS, the Housing & Redevelopment Director has determined that the project is
EXEMPT from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per
Section 153 1 1 of the State CEQA Guidelines, as placement of a minor structure accessory to an
existing facility, and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon listening to and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board considered all
factors relating to Farmer’s Market RP94-05(A)X3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design Review
Board as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review Board
hereby recommends APPROVAL to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP 94-05(A)X3 to add an additional day to the
weekly Farmer’s Market, to be held on Saturday’s in the Village Redevelopment
Area, based upon the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
FINDINGS
1. The Design Review Board hereby determines that the previous findings for
Redevelopment Permit RP 04-05 and all subsequent approvals, on file with the City
Clerk, remain applicable to the project and are hereby incorporated by reference.
CONDITIONS
DRB RES0 NO. 296 -2- -7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
2.
3.
4.
If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented
and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all
approvals herein granted; deny or fiu-ther condition issuance of all future building permits;
deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of
approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation of the property title; institute and
prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their
violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s
approval of this Redevelopment Permit RP04-05(A)x3.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and
modifications to the application documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent
and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially
as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval,
shall require an amendment to this approval.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and
costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly or
indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Redevelopment Permit RP 04-
05(A)x3, (b) City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or
non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c)
Developer/Operator’s installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including
without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of
electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all
legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City’s approval is not
validated.
All previous conditions approved for the project shall remain in full force and effect,
with the following exceptions:
Condition No. 1 of Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 387 is further
amended to read as follows:
The boundaries of the market shall be limited to the public parking lot located on the east
side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), west of the alley, between Carlsbad Village Drive and
Grand Avenue. The total number of booth spaces shall be limited to the number (33)
indicated within the application. Two (2) of the booths may be utilized for the selling of
hand made arts and crafts. The Saturday Farmer’s Market hours of operation shall be
every Saturday from 8:OO a.m. to 11:OO a.m. To set up for the event and clean up
afterwards, the subject parking lot will be closed from 7:OO a.m. to 1200 p.m. The
hours of operation for the Wednesday Farmer’s Market are as follows: From the second
Wednesday in September, through the second to last Wednesday in June, the hours of
operation shall be every Wednesday afternoon from 2:OO p.m. to 6:OO p.m. To set-up for the
event and clean up afterwards, the subject parking lot will be closed from 1:00 p.m. to 8:OO
DRB RES0 NO. 296 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
p.m. every Wednesday. From the last Wednesday in June through the first Wednesday in
September, the hours of operation shall be every Wednesday afternoon from 2:OO p.m. to
8:OO p.m. To set-up for the event and clean-up afterwards, the subject parking lot will be
closed from 1 :00 p.m. to 9:OO p.m. every Wednesday. During the period of extended hours,
the performance of live, non-amplified music will be allowed between the hours of 5 p.m.
and 8 p.m. The total number of booths, spaces or hours of operation for the Wednesday
Farmers Market and/or Saturday Farmer’s Market shall not be increased without prior
amendment to this major redevelopment permit.
Condition No. 9 of Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 387 is further
amended to read as follows:
This time extension to amended Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP 94-05(A) with
regards to the Wednesday Farmer’s Market is granted for a period of five (5) years
beginning on September 27, 2004 and ending on September 26, 2009 and subject to
cancellation at any time upon 60 days written notice. The Major Redevelopment Permit
shall be reviewed by the Housing and Redevelopment Director on a yearly basis to determine
if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial
negative affect on surrounding properties including but not limited to parking provisions or
the public health and welfare. If the Housing and Redevelopment Director determines that
the use has such substantial negative effects, the Housing and Redevelopment Director shall
recommend that the Design Review Board, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be
heard, add additional conditions to reduce or eliminate the Substantial negative effects. This
permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a
substantial detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public’s health and welfare, or
the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended by the
Design Review Board thereafter for a reasonable period of time not to exceed five (5) years
upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration
date. The Design Review Board may not grant such extensions, unless it finds that there are
no substantial negative af€ects on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare. If
a substantid negative affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare is
found, the extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate or
substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Design
Review Board may grant.
The Saturday Farmer’s Market initial approval is granted for a period of six (6)
months. This permit shall be reviewed by the Housing & Redevelopment Director after
six (6) months to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the
use does not have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the
public health and welfare. If the Housing & Redevelopment Director determines that
the conditions of the permit are met and the use does not have a significant adverse
environmental impact, and does not have a substantial adverse affect on surrounding
land uses or the public’s health and welfare, this permit may be extended by the
Housing & Redevelopment Director for a reasonable period of time not to exceed five
years, including the initial six (6) month review period. This amendment, RP 94-
05(A)X3 is subject to cancellation at any time upon 60 days written notice. The Major
Redevelopment Permit shall be reviewed by the Housing and Redevelopment Director
DRE3 RES0 NO. 296 -4- 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the
use does not have a substantial negative affect on surrounding properties including but
not limited to parking provisions or the public health and welfare. If the Housing and
Redevelopment Director determines that the use has such substantial negative effects,
the Housing and Redevelopment Director shall recommend that the Design Review
Board, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional
conditions to reduce or eliminate the substantial negative effects. This permit may be
revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial
detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public’s health and welfare, which
cannot be mitigated or that the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This
permit may be extended by the Design Review Board thereafter for a reasonable period
of time not to exceed five (5) years upon written application of the permittee made no
less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The Design Review Board may not grant
such extensions, unless it finds that there are no substantial unmitigated negative affects
on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare. If a substantial negative
affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare is found, the
extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate or reduce
such effects to insignificant. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Design
Review Board may grant.
Condition No. 10 of Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 387 is further
amended to read as follows:
The Village Business Association shall be responsible for providing (at its own cost) and
posting a minimum of three (3) parking directional signs every Wednesday and Saturday
prior to the Farmer’s Market. The Association shall ensure that these signs remain in place
for the entire period of the Market every Wednesday and Saturday. These signs shall be of
professional quality and shall be at least three feet (width) by four feet (height) in size. A
minimum of one (1) sign shall be placed at the south entrance to the Alley (east of the project
site) and a minimum of one (1) sign shall be placed at the north entrance to the Alley (east of
the project site). A minimum of one (1) sign shall also be provided at the Madison Street
entrance to the Great Western Bank property located at 699 Grand Avenue. Sign copy and
placement must be pre-approved by the Housing & Redevelopment Director. The
Association shall also be responsible for distribution of information regarding other public
parking lots in the area for encouraging shoppers to park in these lots.
Condition 11 is added to read as follows:
The Saturday Farmer’s Market approval is granted based upon an understanding that
Major Special Event Applicant’s and/or Organizations that have utilized the public
parking lot, located on the east side of Roosevelt Street (mid-block), west of the alley,
between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue, prior to the adoption date of this
resolution have a vested right to utilize said parking lot. Therefore, a Saturday
Farmer’s Market which interferes with a Major Special Event with such a vested right,
may be required to be shut down for that particular day.
**** ...
DRB RES0 NO. 296 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Design Review
Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 28'h day of March, 2005, by the following
vote to wit:
AYES: HEINEMAN, LAWSON AND MARQUEZ
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: BAKER
ABSTAIN: NONE
CARLSBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST:
c ---1 1
\=J&JAbT i
/---
CU <
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RES0 NO. 296 -6-
Exhlbit 3
A REPORT TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
AppliCATiON COMP~TE DATE 01/28/05
ENViRONMENTAI Rwim CATECjORiCAlly EXEMPT
STAFF: CliFf JONES
ASSiSTANT PIAMER
ITEM NO. 1
DATE: March 28,2005
SUBJECT: RP 94-05(A)X3 - “CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMER’S MARKET”:
Request to amend Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP 94-05(A)x2 to
allow for the Village Farmer‘s Market to be held every Saturday morning in
the public parking lot located mid-block on the east side of Roosevelt
Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue in Land Use
District 1 of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area.
1. RECOMMENDATION
That the Design Review Board ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution No. 296
recommending Approval of Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP 94-05(A)x3 to add an
additional day to the weekly Farmer’s Market, to be held on Saturday’s in the Village
Redevelopment Area.
II. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION
On September 27, 1994, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission approved, with
the unanimous recommendation of the Design Review Board, a major redevelopment
permit to allow a Certified Farmer’s Market in the Village Redevelopment Area. The
permit was approved for a trial period of six months and was then subsequently
amended to fine tune the conditions of approval and extended for a total period of five
(5) years ending on September 26, 1999. This amendment also allowed for the Design
Review Board to approve all future extensions to the term of the permit. In September
of 1999, the Design Review Board approved an additional extension to the permit
through September 26, 2004. In July of 2004, the Housing & Redevelopment
Commission approved, with the recommendation of the Design Review Board an
extension to the summer hours of operation, a modification to the operations of the
Farmer‘s Market, and extended the term of the permit through September 26,2009.
The current proposal is a request to add an additional day to the weekly Farmer’s
Market, proposed to be held on Saturday’s in the same parking lot that the
Wednesday’s Farmer’s Market is currently held. The proposal does not request any
modifications to the configuration or general operations of the Farmer‘s Market.
Because the proposal includes an addition to the days and hours of operation of the
I2
RP 94-05(A)x3 - CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMER’S MARKET
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 2
market, final approval of the amendment must be granted by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission.
Amendment to Time and Day of Operation
The Farmer’s Market currently takes place every Wednesday afternoon from 2:OO p.m.
to 6:OO p.m. from the second Wednesday in September through the second to last
Wednesday in June, and during the summer season from 2:OO p.m. to 8:OO p.m. from
the last Wednesday in June through the first Wednesday in September. The Carlsbad
Village Business Association (CVBA), as the official sponsor of the event, is requesting
an amendment to the major redevelopment permit to allow for an additional day,
Saturday, to operate the Certified Farmers Market within the Village. The proposed
hours of operation for the Saturday Farmer’s Market would bd from 8:OO a.m. to I1 :00
a.m. and would take place within the same public parking lot as the existing
Wednesday Farmer’s Market. The public parking would be reserved an hour prior to
and after the event, from 7:OO a.m. to 12:OO p.m., for set up and clean up.
The proposal does not request any modifications to the configuration or general
operations of the Farmer’s Market. The event will continue to be limited to the public
parking lot located mid block on the easterly side of Roosevelt Street. The maximum
number of booths will remain at thirty-three (33) spaces. Product sales will continue to
be primarily limited to fresh agricultural products such as fruit, nuts, herbs, vegetables,
eggs, honey, cut flowers and nursery stock. Non-produce items such as dried fruit,
juice, dried beans, meat, fish and dairy products may be sold if the producer has proof
that he/she grew, raise, collected or caught the product. Of the thirty-three (33) spaces,
a maximum of four (4) non-produce, non-certified product sales booths can be provided
for such items as locally made fresh bread, pastries and/or pastas; these booths are
limited to pre-made local goods to be consumed off-site. Two (2) of the thirty-three (33)
spaces can be arts and crafts booths. For educational purposes, the CVBA will
continue to offer one (1) booth on a rotational basis, free of charge to individuals and/or
organizations that would provide educational materials on issues such as soil
conservation, recycling , compost ing , organic farming and sustainable ag ricu I tu re-
business endeavors. The CVBA will also continue to provide one (1) informational
booth for local Village businesses to promote and advertise their businesses. Cynthia
Bueker, the current Wednesday’s Farmer’s Market Manager, will manage both the
existing and proposed Farmer’s Market.
City staff is supportive of the proposed day and time of the proposed Saturday Farmer‘s
Market. Since the Farmer’s Market configuration and operations will not change as part
of the proposed amendment, and the existing Wednesday’s Farmers Market Manager
will be managing the event, staff does not anticipate a substantial negative effect on
surrounding properties (including parking) or their public health and welfare. In order to
assure that the project does not pose substantial negative effects to surrounding land
uses or the public’s health and welfare staff has placed language within the conditions
of approval stating that the initial permit will be approved for six months and may be
permitted for up to five years if the Housing & Redevelopment Director determines that is
Rp 94-05(A)x3 - CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMER’S MARKET
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 3
the conditions of approval were met. All time extensions beyond the permitted five-year
period will be required to go to the Design Review Board for approval.
Sianage
The CVBA is requesting that new signage be installed in the parking lot to indicate the
days and times that the parking lot is reserved for both the existing and proposed
Village Farmer’s Market. As a condition of approval in the past, the CVBA has been
responsible for providing (at its own cost) parking directional signs and has been
required to pay for the replacement of vandalized or stolen “No Parking TOW AWAY”
signs which indicate the time and day parking is prohibited during the Farmer’s Market
event. Staff is recommending that the cost for construction and placement of new
required signage be the burden of the applicant as it has been a condition of approval
placed on the applicant in the past. Staff supports the proposed language to be placed
on the sign indicating that parking is prohibited on Wednesday from 1:00 p.m. to 6:OO
p.m. and on Saturday from 7:OO a.m. to Noon. These hours help to assure that the
Farmer’s Market Manager will be able to set up prior to the event and clean up after the
event
111. VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Design Review Board and Housing and Redevelopment Commission originally
found the use to be consistent with the Village Design Manual and Redevelopment Plan
for the Village Redevelopment Area. There have been no changes in the type of
proposed use or the governing regulations of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment
Master Plan and Design Manual, which would impact this consistency finding or require
additional conditions on the project.
IV. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Design Review Board and Housing and Redevelopment Commission originally
found the Certified Farmer’s Market to be consistent with the goals and objectives of
the various elements of the General Plan. There have been no changes in the
proposed type of use which would impact this consistency finding or require additional
conditions on the project.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Negative Declaration was previously approved by the Design Review Board for the
project on April 19, 1994. The Housing & Redevelopment Director has conducted the
required environmental review for the proposed amendment pursuant to the Guidelines
for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. The Housing &
Redevelopment Director has made a determination that the proposed project is
categorically exempt under CEQA Section 1531 1 as placement of a minor structure
accessory to an existing facility.
RP 94-05(A)x3 - CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMER’S MARKET
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 4
VI. CONCLUSION
Having operated the Farmer‘s Market for the past ten (IO) years, the manager, Cynthia
Bueker, has worked closely with staff and surrounding neighbors to mitigate any
impacts from the event. The market manager’s proactive approach to problem-solving
has aided in the overall success of the weekly event.
The Village Farmer’s Market appears to have been well received by local merchants,
residents, and visitors alike. The popular weekly event continues to attract many
people to the Village every Wednesday afternoon by offering a unique shopping
opportunity not afforded elsewhere in the City of Carlsbad. The nature of the use has
also helped to encourage greater pedestrian activity in the area, therefore, enhancing
the overall Village character.
Through the passage of the proposed amendment, the Saturday Farmer’s Market will
offer an additional opportunity for residents and visitors alike to experience the unique
shopping opportunity afforded through the Farmer’s Market. In particular, the Saturday
Farmer’s Market will allow working residents and visitors of Carlsbad an opportunity to
shop outside of normal working business hours generating more shopping activity and
livelihood within the Village.
The Carlsbad Village Business Association has met the conditions of the previously
approved permit. Therefore staff does not see any reason to make any major changes
to the original conditions of approval. However, since the affects that the Saturday
Farmer’s Market may have upon surrounding properties is not known, staff is
recommending a condition of approval stating that the initial permit will be approved for
six months and may be permitted for up to five years if the Housing & Redevelopment
Director determines that the conditions of approval were met. In addition, staff
recommends that the applicant pay the cost for construction and placement of new
required signage since this has been a condition of approval of the permit in the past.
Staff recommends the Design Review Board find that, as proposed by staff, there are
no substantial negative affects on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and
welfare associated with the proposed use and approve Design Review Board
Resolution No. 296 recommending Approval of Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP
94-05(A)x3 to add an additional day to the weekly Farmer’s Market, to be held on
Saturday’s in the Village Redevelopment Area.
EXH IBlTS
A. Design Review Board Resolution No. 296 recommending approval of Major
Redevelopment Permit No. RP94-05(a)x3 to add an additional day to the weekly
Farmer’s Market, to be held on Saturday’s in the Village Redevelopment Area.
B. Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 387, Design Review Board
Resolution No. 293, Design Review Board Resolution No. 269, Design Review Board
Resolution No. 269, Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 270,
RP 94-05(A)x3 - CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMER’S MARKET
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 5
Design Review Board Resolution No. 224, Design Review Board Resolution No. 223,
Housing & Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 258, and Design Review Board
Resolution No. 215.
C. Letter from the Carlsbad Village Business Associations dated October 26, 2004
requesting an amendment to RP 94-05 to add a weekly Saturday Farmer’s Market to be
held in the Village Redevelopment Area.
D. Location Map, Site Plan
Exhibit 4
Minutes of: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Time of Meeting: 6:OO P.M.
Date of Meeting: MARCH 28,2005
Place of Meeting: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Heineman called the Meeting to order at 6:Ol p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairperson Heineman asked Board Member Marquez to lead the group in the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Chairperson Heineman proceeded with the roll call of Board Members.
Present: Board Members: Tony Lawson
Sarah Marquez
Chairperson: Courtney Heineman
Absent: Julie Baker
Staff Present: Housing and Redevelopment Director: Debbie Fountain
Assistant Planner: Cliff Jones
Assistant Engineer: David Rick
Assistant City Attorney: Jane Mobaldi
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
ACTION: The Board was unable to approve the minutes. The minutes could only be voted on
by two members of the Board, as Board Member Marquez was not present at the February 28, 2005,
meeting.
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
There were no comments from the audience.
NEW BUSINESS
Chairperson Heineman asked Ms. Debbie Fountain, Director of Housing and Redevelopment, to present
the item on the agenda tonight.
Ms. Fountain said the first item is a redevelopment permit amendment to address a request from the
Carlsbad Village Business Association for the Village Farmer’s Market to be extended to a Saturday
event. Cliff Jones, our Assistant Planner in the Housing and Redevelopment Department, will make the
presentation tonight.
Mr. Cliff Jones said the applicant, Carlsbad Village Business Association, is requesting an amendment to
the existing major redevelopment permit for an additional day to the weekly Farmer’s Market proposed to
be held on Saturdays in the same parking lot the Wednesday’s Farmer’s Market is currently held.
Because the proposal includes an addition to the days and hours of the operation of the market, final
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 2 of 12
approval of the amendment must be granted by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission. In
accordance with redevelopment permit procedures, the major redevelopment permit is being brought
forward for a recommendation by the Design Review Board and for final approval by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission. The proposed Saturday Farmer’s Market will be held in the public parking
lot located mid-block on the east side of Roosevelt Street, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand
Avenue in Land Use District 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area.
The Farmer’s Market was originally established on September 27, 1994. The Carlsbad Village Business
Association, as official sponsor of the event, has aided in operations of the event since that time. With the
help of the current Farmer’s Market manager, Cynthia Bueker. The current Wednesday Farmer’s Market
is not due to expire until September of 2009. The Farmer’s Market currently takes place every Wednesday afternoon from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m. from the second Wednesday in September through the
second to last Wednesday in June. During the summer season, from 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. from the last
Wednesday in June through the first Wednesday in September.
The maximum number of booths for the Farmer’s Market is 33 spaces. Product sales are primarily limited
to fresh agricultural products such as fruit, nuts, herbs, vegetables, eggs, honey, cut flowers and nursery
stock. Non-produce items such as dried fruit, juice, dried beans, meat, fish, and dairy products may be
sold if the producer has proof that he or she grew, raised, collected or caught the product. Of the 33
spaces, a maximum 4 non-produce, non-certified product sales booths can be provided for such items as
locally made fresh bread, pastries and/or pastas, and these booths are limited to pre-made local goods to
be consumed offsite. Two of the 33 spaces can be arts and crafts booths, and for educational purposes,
the CVBA operates one booth on a rotational basis free of charge to individuals and organizations that
would provide educational materials on issues such as soil conservation, recycling, composting, organic
farming, and sustainable agricultural business endeavors. Finally, the CVBA also provides one
informational booth for local village business to promote and advertise their businesses.
The CVBA, as official sponsor of the event, wishes to amend their existing major redevelopment permit to
allow an additional day for Farmer’s Market to be held on Saturdays from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. in the same
public parking lot that the current Wednesday’s Farmer’s Market is held. The public parking lot would,
therefore, need to be reserved an hour prior to and after the event from 7 a.m. to 12 p.m. in order to set up
for the event and for cleaning up after the event. The configuration and operations of the proposed
Saturday Farmer’s Market will not change as part of the amendment. The same number and types of
booths will remain. The same parking lot and boundaries will be utilized. The same Farmer’s Market manager, Cynthia Bueker, will continue to operate the Farmer’s Market and the placement of signs will
remain in the same place.
As part of this amendment, new signage reflecting the new day and hours of the proposed Saturday
Farmer’s Market will need to be installed. A slide was shown to indicate the proposed language for the
parking lot signage. Staff supports the proposed language to be placed on the sign indicating that parking
is prohibited on Wednesdays from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m. and on Saturdays from 7 a.m. to noon. These hours
help to assure the Farmer’s Market manager will be able to set up prior to the event and clean up after the
event.
The Police Department has reviewed the proposed language for the parking lot signage and has determined that the proposed language is appropriate. The CVBA has been responsible as a condition of
approval for the existing permit to pay for the cost of the construction and the placement of new signage
as needed. The CVBA has agreed to pay for the cost of the construction and installation of that new
signage.
The Village Farmer’s Market appears to have been well received by local merchants, residents and
visitors alike. The popular weekly event continues to attract many people to the village every Wednesday
afternoon by offering a unique shopping opportunity not afforded elsewhere in the City of Carlsbad. The
nature of the use has also helped to encourage greater pedestrian activity in the area. Therefore, it
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 3 of 12
enhances the overall village character. Through the passage of the proposed amendment, the Saturday
Farmer’s Market will offer an additional opportunity for residents and visitors alike to experience the
unique shopping opportunity afforded through the Farmer’s Market. In particular, the Saturday Farmer’s
Market will allow working residents and visitors of Carlsbad an opportunity to shop outside of normal
working business hours, generate more shopping activity and livelihood within the village.
In conclusion, staff is recommending approval of the project with the following conditions:
0 First the initial approval will be granted for a six month period and can be extended up to five
years if the Housing and Redevelopment Director determines that those conditions have been met
and the project has no detrimental affect on surrounding properties.
Subsequent time extensions, up to five years, will be subject to the Design Review Board
approval.
Finally, the CVBA is to pay for the cost of the new construction and placement of the signage as it
has been a condition of approval in the past.
0
0
Mr. Jones thanked the members of the Board.
Chairperson Heineman asked if the Board had any questions.
Board Member Marquez asked if we have any kind of parking studies related to that parking lot utilization
during Saturdays? I know we do have a parking lot in-lieu fee and some developers have bought into that
parking lot. I was wondering what kind of legalization this would entail.
Ms. Fountain said the City does surveys twice a year in February and in August on all of our public parking
lots. I don’t have the figures in front of me, but the weekends are actually one of the lower utilization rates
so I think the Saturday won’t have as great an impact as the Wednesday’s Farmer’s Market does right
now. When we do the parking in-lieu fee program, actually we don’t have any property owner buy into
specific parking lots. They pay a fee that says they are going to be using public parking to help meet their
needs, and those public parking spaces can be at any public parking lot in the village area. The two lots
on Roosevelt Street are probably the least utilized on weekends. The closer ones still tend to be on State
Street and in those surrounding areas right there.
Board Member Marquez asked about signage. The signage they are proposing does not reflect the
summer hours, which I believe were extended till 8 in the evening during the summer time. It looked like it
was only till 6 p.m. for the Wednesday’s market.
Mr. Jones said that is true, and that was a request of the applicant. I believe the intent was the booth
would still be set up at that time so people would not be able to park there.
Board Member Marquez agreed, but won’t the booths still be there at 8 in the evening? So wouldn’t we
want to modify those signs to reflect that?
Mr. Jones said that is something we can do.
Board Member Marquez said those are her only questions.
Board Member Lawson asked Mr. Jones to clarify with respect to any conflicts for any of the special grandfathered events. If you could offer some clarification of that.
Mr. Jones said condition number 11 of the Design Review Board agenda requires that major special event
applicants that have utilized the public parking lot in the past prior to the adoption date of the resolution
when it does get adopted will have a vested right to use that parking lot.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 4 of 12
Board Member Lawson said it was his understanding when the Carlsbad 5000 happens, all those farmers
will be properly notified to not plan on working that day.
Mr. Jones said correct.
Board Member Lawson stated that he saw the applicant submitted their request back in October. Is this a
typical amount of time that is needed? It seems like a simple request, though I know there is a lot more to
it behind the scenes that you have to do.
Mr. Jones answered that it did take some time for our Police Department and staff to review the proposed
signage. That was one thing that we had to pull the appropriate sections of the law, and that did take
some time. Typically, with a major redevelopment permit application, it does take some time to prepare the staff report and resolution.
Chairperson Heineman asked if the Board can assume, in view of the question about the closing time, that it is 8 p.m. now on Wednesdays? Is it 1 to 8, rather then 1 to 6?
Ms. Fountain said the later hours are only in the summer. It is not year around. We will need to correct it
and state the summer hours, maybe temporary signage.
Chairperson Heineman asked if this approval would be conditioned on the production of the signage,
which would take into account the changes.
Ms. Fountain said yes it would properly state for the summer as well.
Chairperson Heineman asked if that would be appropriate?
Ms. Fountain answered yes.
Board Member Lawson noticed the existing signage is noon to 7 and then the proposed is 1 to 6. What
should it be? Noon to 7 still? Or is that something we should just assume you will get cleared up, and I
don’t want to make a big issue out of it.
Chairperson Heineman said he thinks the Board will have to depend on staff going over all of the signage,
because it does appear that we have some problems.
Ms. Fountain said when the Farmer’s Market has been 2 to 5 and in the summer hours it is extended. The setup is really the issue. Whether they set up at noon or they set up at 1, and we don’t want it too
early because the farmers get there early anyway, they just start setting up a little bit earlier. We will
double check to see when we actually need to have it closed, which is usually about an hour before the
event starts.
Chairperson Heineman commented that the Design Review Board can assume the signage will be
changed to conform to the correct hours.
Ms. Fountain said correct. Staff will make sure those are the current and correct hours.
Chairperson Heineman asked if there is an applicant available to make a presentation?
Ms. Fountain said only if you have questions.
Chairperson Heineman wanted to point out to the applicant that the Design Review Board has only three
members, a bare quorum, and is that satisfactory? Since we have no applicant, we will proceed.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 5 of 12
ACTION: Motion by Board Member Marquez, and duly seconded by Board Member
Lawson, to adopt Design Review Board Resolution number 296, recommending approval of the major
redevelopment permit, RP 94-05(A)X3, and add an additional day to the Farmer’s Market to be held on
Saturday in the Village Redevelopment area, with appropriate signage.
VOTE: 3-0-0
AYES: Heineman, Lawson and Marquez
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Baker
Chairperson Heineman stated the next item will be presented now.
Ms. Fountain said the next item is another major redevelopment permit. This is a request to allow
construction of a new project on Pine Avenue. Cliff Jones, our Assistant Planner, will make the
presentation.
Mr. Jones said the applicant, Frank Helmuth, is requesting a major redevelopment permit for the
construction of a 7,128 square foot, two-story, four unit condominium located at 507 Pine in Land Use
District 5 of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area. The proposed project requires a major
redevelopment permit because it involves new construction of a building that has a building permit
valuation that is greater than $1 50,000. In accordance with the redevelopment permit procedures, the
major redevelopment permit is being brought forward for a recommendation by the Design Review Board and for final approval by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission. The subject property is located at
the corners of Pine Avenue and Roosevelt Street and Pine Avenue and Tyler Street.
The subject property is currently vacant totaling 11,781 square feet with building frontage along Pine
Avenue, Roosevelt Street and Tyler Street. According to city records, the last known use for this site was
a multi-family apartment complex, which was demolished in 1990. The subject property was sold to a new
owner who applied for a redevelopment permit in 1995 to construct a mixed use project containing
residential and retail uses. The project was not constructed due to financial reasons. To this date, the lot
has remained vacant.
The property is bordered by two single-family residential units to the south. To the east of the proposed
project are residential uses across Roosevelt Street. The property to the north contains a commercial
use, and the properties to the west of the proposed project, across Tyler Street, are the Carlsbad Village
Storage and an auto repair store.
As mentioned previously, the application is for a proposed two-story, four unit condominium project,
totaling 7,128 square feet. Access to the residences is to be provided off of Tyler Street. The Village
Master Plan and Design Manual includes the regulations governing development within the village. The
proposed project is within Land Use District 5 of the Village Redevelopment Area. Multi-family residences
are classified as provisional uses within Land Use District 5. Considerations that must be addressed to
assess the appropriateness of this particular provisional use are:
0
0
The multi-family residential use is appropriate to the site and adjacent to development.
The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate on-site parking without adversely
affecting the visual environment of the Village.
Staff concludes the proposed project complies with both of these considerations. First the multi-family use is consistent with many of the surrounding adjacent residential uses. Second, the site is adequate in
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 6 of 12
shape and size for the proposed multi-family use, and has parking that is visually subordinate with the
garages at the rear of the residents, and will therefore, not affect the visual environment of the Village.
Staff believes the proposed resident's units and garages assist in satisfying the goals and objectives set
forth for Land Use District 5 through the following actions:
It provides a desireable use.
It serves as a catalyst for future development.
It provides development of a vacant lot.
It is compatible with the surrounding residential area.
It increases the number of quality and diversity of housing types.
The proposed project meets all of the required development standards outlined within the Village Master
Plan excluding setbacks, which I will address shortly. The project provides for an abundance of open space and landscaping through reduced building coverage. The building height of the project is in
compliance with the established standard set just below the permitted maximum height. Adequate parking is provided through the use of two-car garages and two guest spaces.
In Land Use District 5, the front yard setback is five to twenty feet. The side and rear yard setback are
both five to ten feet. The proposed project falls within the required setback ranges, except for the rear and
side yard setbacks. The Design Review Board will be required to make appropriate findings to grant
variances for the rear and side yard setbacks to exceed the maximum range of ten feet.
Staff offers the following justification for variance finding number 1 :
The proposed project provides an increased setback on the rear of the proposed building of 27
feet. This necessary to provide parking access that is visually subordinate as specified within the
Village Design Manual and that meets the required driveway width of 24 feet.
The additional three feet will be devoted to landscaping to help buffer the edge of the property.
Providing increased side yard setbacks of 12 feet along Roosevelt Street and 24.5 feet along Tyler Street
is necessary to make the project consistent with the existing and proposed development along these
streets. Both side yard setbacks of the subject property affectively function as front yard setbacks. Due to the fact that both side yards have building frontage along residential streets. By allowing the east side
yard setback to be set within the range for a front yard setback, between five and twenty feet, the proposed project will be consistent with existing and future developments along Roosevelt Street.
Tyler Street has been designated as an alternative design street where sidewalk and street improvements
are no longer necessary as of the year 2000. The street and sidewalk improvements in the amount of five
feet were required along Tyler Street as they had been in the past. The west side yard setback would be
19.5 feet; the 24.5 feet, and subtract the 5 feet. This is within the range for a front yard setback of five to
twenty feet. Therefore, considering the west side yard setback is a front yard setback for the proposed
project will be consistent with existing and future developments along Tyler Street. The increased
setbacks are similar to what is enjoyed by many properties with building frontage along Roosevelt and
Tyler Street. In addition, the increased setbacks provide ample space for the required recreational space
to be placed within the side yard setbacks.
Staff offers the following justification for Variance Finding number 2:
The unique condition associated with the subject project is that it has building frontage on three
sides; Roosevelt Street, Pine Avenue, and Tyler Street. Each frontage effectively functions as a
front yard setback. By allowing the proposed setbacks, the subject property will more closely
match the setbacks of the surrounding residential properties.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 7 of 12
Staff offers the following justification for variance finding number 3:
0 The increased setback on the rear of the property will not have a detrimental impact on
neighboring properties because it allows for additional space for landscape buffering and allows
the required parking to be located at the rear of the residents.
In addition, the increased side yard setbacks of 12 feet along Roosevelt Street and 24 % feet
along Tyler Street will not have a detrimental impact on neighboring properties because it is
consistent with the front yard setbacks enjoyed by adjacent properties and properties in the
immediate vicinity.
The increased setbacks provide for greater landscaping opportunities and recreational space for
the new residents, which staff believes will have a positive affect on nearby residents and not a
negative one.
0
0
Staff offers the following justification for variance finding number 4:
0 The standards established in the Village Master Plan and Design Manual were identified to be
somewhat flexible in order to encourage diversity and variety of development and to take into
consideration the unique conditions associated with many of the properties in the redevelopment
area.
The placement of the building is setback similar to the surrounding properties, maximizing outdoor
recreation opportunities for the subject property and providing increased landscape buffering,
which is consistent with the Village Master Plan and Design Manual’s goal of establishing
Carlsbad Village as a quality living environment.
0
These necessary findings for the request of variance have been included in the attached Design Review
Board Resolution. In addition to the development standards set forth in the Village Master Plan, the plan
development ordinance provides development standards for recreational space, lighting, utilities,
recreational vehicle storage, tenant storage space and antennaes. The project was found to comply with
each of the development standards and design criteria of the plan development ordinance.
The proposed project is also consistent with the design principals outlined in the Village Design Manual.
The project provides for an overall informal character in design. The proposed development is small in
scale. The project incorporates several design features to achieve the desired village character, which include various sized windows, decorative trim, recesses, multiple roof elements with four and twelve roof
pitch, rod iron fencing and decor, and varied stucco colors.
The project also provides for an abundance of open space and landscaping along all sides of the
residence. Parking is also visually subordinate and contained within the two-car garages at the rear of the
property.
The Housing and Redevelopment Department has conducted an environmental review of the project
pursuant to the guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of the said review, the project has been found to be exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 of the State Sequa
Guidelines as an infill development project. The necessary findings for this environmental determination
is included in the attached Design Review Board Resolution.
The proposed project is anticipated to have a positive financial impact on the City and the Redevelopment
Agency.
0 The redevelopment of what was previously an underutilized vacant lot will result in increased
property taxes and thus an increase in property tax will further result in an increased increment to
the Redevelopment Agency.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 8 of 12
0 It is anticipated the new project will serve as a catalyst for other improvements in the area; either new development or rehabilitation of existing buildings through the elimination of a blighted vacant lot and the construction of a quality multi-family residential project.
In conclusion, staff is recommending approval of the project with findings for variances for the rear and
side yard setbacks to exceed the standard range. Development of the site will have a positive financial
impact on both the City and the Redevelopment Agency and will assist in fulfilling the goals and objectives
of the Village Redevelopment Master Plan.
Board Member Lawson said Mr. Jones talked about the setback and there are some private areas along
the sides. Within that area, is there a height limit for fences or wall, especially along the Roosevelt edge
because that is up against the sidewalk?
Mr. Jones answered yes. It is 42 inches.
Board Member Lawson asked if that was within the proposed plan?
Mr. Jones said yes.
Board Member Lawson asked about the slide Mr. Jones showed on the elevation. Is that Roosevelt or on
Tyler Street?
Chairperson Heineman said it would have to be Tyler Street.
Mr. Jones said yes, that is Tyler Street.
Board Member Lawson said he wanted to clarify that because it is showing vegetation in front of that patio
area. On Roosevelt Street, that wall being right up against the back of the sidewalk, was there any
consideration for trying to create a buffer so that wall isn’t right against the sidewalk? Those tend to be
vulnerable for vandalism.
Mr. Jones said he believes there is a minimal amount of landscaping along that right area.
Board Member Lawson commented he couldn’t tell based upon the site plan. It looks like the columns are
right up against it and equally the wall. That is just an area of concern I would have. I would like it if we
could address that. Secondly, I am trying to understand how these outdoor patios are to be utilized. In
sheet number 2 it shows the two internal patios, the two in between, you can’t see the walls and how they are actually utilized to get into those areas. I am wondering if the southern one is land locked and
trapped? Does that create any kind of code problem from that standpoint? Because they can’t get out
through the garage based upon the walls, or there appears to be some kind of wall there.
Mr. Jones said during the review of the project, the Building Department did not mention that there were
any codes being violated where that recreational patio space is proposed. We can double check.
Board Member Lawson said he would just like to make sure of that. The northern one, which is the one
that is open to the north side, my concern would be that appears to be patio for unit B, but it has windows
right into the living room of Unit C, and I would just want to be sure that is still a viable space for someone
to have as their private area. Typically when you have a zero lot line type of outdoor use area, you don’t
have windows there. You would have a solid wall, and I would be concerned about that. If that could be
looked into to verify, that would be good. I don’t typically see that when I look at other plans.
Mr. Jones said we can look into that.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 9 of 12
Board Member Marquez asked Mr. Jones to refer to Page 1 of the document. It says we are requesting a
minor redevelopment permit to allow construction of a 4,371 square foot building.
Chairperson Heineman said that is the lot coverage.
Mr. Jones agreed that was the lot coverage.
Board Member Marquez continued that she felt staff was saying they want the variance because they are
considering Pine and Roosevelt Street and Tyler Street major frontage streets. What are City standards concerning parking in your front yard setback. I always thought you couldn’t have parking in your front
yard setback.
Mr. Jones said the parking is within the two car garages.
Board Member Marquez said she was talking about the guest parking.
Chairperson Heineman said that is in the rear.
Board Member Marquez said it is accessed from the rear but it uses the front yard setbacks. I thought
there was a City standard concerning parking in your front yard setback.
Mr. Jones commented there is a setback of 14 feet.
Board Member Marquez said right. There is a setback of 12 feet on Roosevelt and there is the setback,
once we put in the sidewalk, of 19 feet 5 inches, but they have parking spaces in both of those front yards.
In one, we are calling it a front yard rather then a side yard. On the other hand, it‘s really a side yard. So
the variance I don’t think should be utilized then.
Chairperson Heineman asked Mr. Jones which is the front yard and which is the rear yard?
Mr. Jones answered the front yard is off of Pine Avenue.
Chairperson Heineman said the parking is in the back is it not?
Mr. Jones said yes it is in the rear of the residence.
Chairperson Heineman said it is in the rear, and not in the front yard at all.
Board Member Marquez said for variance purposes, they want us to allow them instead of between 5 and
10 foot setback to go 12 feet because they are calling it a front yard setback on Roosevelt. Then on Tyler
Street, they are also calling that a front yard setback. On one hand, we are calling it a front yard, and then
on the other hand when we try to apply our parking standards and our conditions for homes, we are saying
it is really a side yard. You can park in a side yard, but you can’t park in a front yard setback.
Assistant City Attorney Jane Mobaldi, said she is correct that normally the City standard doesn’t allow parking in the front yard setback. I think Mr. Jones meant to say it was a front yard setback, but for
purposes of the variance, he is making an analogy saying it is a unique property because it has frontage to
the three streets on three sides. In essence, there is only one front yard setback on this project and it is
on Pine.
Board Member Marquez commented that is right, but we are being asked to give them a variance. Part of
the justification for that variance is this is a unique property and we want to apply the front yard setback
rule to it because they are main streets. My second question concerned the two covered guest parking
spaces in the center of the project.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 10 of 12
Chairperson Heineman said there is one parking space on Tyler and one in the rear.
Board Member Marquez commented that it looked like the one space is covered so there will probably be
some considerations from the Fire Department on that being covered as opposed to being open to the air.
Mr. Jones said the project was reviewed by the Fire Department, and that wasn't an issue of concern they
brought up, but I can bring it up to them again.
Chairperson Heineman asked if the suggestions met Board Member Marquez's approval as far as her
objections?
Board Member Marquez said she was concerned we are bending the rules for this as far as when they
apply for a variance, what we call a front yard setback and side yard setback. Now that Assistant City
Attorney Mobaldi has told me no, the front yard setback is in the front, I will go with that.
Chairperson Heineman asked Ms. Mobaldi if she feels the setback approvals are fine.
Ms. Mobaldi said yes, she thinks they are justifiable because I think Mr. Jones was making an analogy,
and he was saying it is a unique property. It looks like you have three sides and you wouldn't ordinarily have that. I don't think he was actually saying they are front yard setbacks. They are similar to a situation
where you have a front yard. That is where the confusion came in.
Chairperson Heineman asked about something on the small drawing. It appears the patio on Roosevelt
Street, which Mr. Lawson was concerned about, does indeed have a 42 inch wall around the edge, does it
not?
Mr. Jones answered the building wall can go up to 42 inches.
Chairperson Heineman said then it will have a wall. What Mr. Lawson was concerned about was that it
was right on the sidewalk, and there was nothing between the patio and the sidewalk. Is that indeed the
case? It looks to me from the drawing, there is actually a wall there.
Frank Helmuth is the applicant and lives at 12902 Via DelToro in Poway, California. He explained the
dotted line indicates the east side of the sidewalk. There is about a 2 and % foot side area. There will be
a wall put in there.
Chairperson Heineman asked if a wall will be in there?
Mr. Helmuth said the wall is in there.
Chairperson Heineman commented there is a wall in there. That is what I thought from the drawing I
could see.
Mr. Helmuth said it doesn't run right up to the sidewalk. We left about 2 and %feet of planting area.
Chairperson Heineman commented that is plus the wall on the patio.
Mr. Helmuth said yes.
Board Member Lawson said he was just trying to get clarification because the drawing itself does not
indicate any kind of a setback.
Chairperson Heineman said it is on the little drawing but not on the big drawing.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 11 of 12
Mr. Helmuth said while we are talking about setbacks, on the other side on Tyler Street, there are two of
the parking spaces.
Chairperson Heineman asked Mr. Helmuth if the dotted line was the edge of the sidewalk. That would
answer the question right there. The applicant was asked if he wanted to make a presentation.
Mr. Helmuth said he would just like to respond to questions.
Board Member Marquez asked about the trash pickup. Will that be accessed off the curb on Pine
Avenue? I’d like to know how your residents or your occupants will access trash service from the City.
Will they just be putting their cans out on the curb?
Mr. Helmuth said yes on the curb.
Board Member Lawson said he raised a question about the two internal patios. The issue of the one unit’s
windows facing directly into that, do you see that as a potential conflict or not?
Mr. Helmuth asked if the Board had a full size floor plan?
Board Member Lawson said yes, he is looking at it.
Mr. Helmuth said the windows are on one side.
Chairperson Heineman asked if the windows are high windows on one side.
Mr. Helmuth answered yes.
Board Member Lawson said that is to face in towards the patio that is not his patio.
Chairperson Heineman said the windows are above eye level.
Mr. Helmuth said they are 9 foot ceilings. This way we get ventilation and light.
Board Member Lawson commented that he was concerned about the legitimacy of having some private
outdoor space with being right up against somebody’s living room. He asked what the height of the wall is
that separates those two patios?
Mr. Helmuth said 6 foot.
Board Member Lawson said they have a lower 42 inch similar to the other’s.
Mr. Helmuth said it is actually a fence.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES
MARCH 28,2005
PAGE 12 of 12
ACTION: Motion by Board Member Lawson, and duly seconded by Board Member
Marquez, to adopt Design Review Board Resolution number 297, recommending approval of RP 04-1 7 to
the Housing and Redevelopment Commission based on findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES: ABSTAI N :
ABSENT:
3-0-0
Heineman, Lawson and Marquez
None
None
Baker
DIRECTOR’S REPORT
The Director wanted to remind the Board the next meeting is on April 18, 2005, at the Senior Center.
Because we had to move the date from our normal meeting date, the Council Chambers were not
available so it will be at the Senior Center in the Cafeteria.
ADJOURNMENT
By proper motion, the Regular Meeting of March 28,2005, was adjourned at 7:OO p.m.
Respectfully submitted.
Debbie Fountain
Housing and Redevelopment Director
PATRICIA CRESCENT1
Minutes Clerk
May 1 1,2005
TO: Clerk of the Housing Commission
FROM: City Attorney
SATURDAY FARMERS MARKET RP 95-05(A)X3
Attached to this memorandum, please find the resolution that has been revised in
accordance with the Commission’s actions at its meeting of Tuesday, May 10,
2005. If it meets with your approval, please present it to the Chairman for his
signature and file it according to your usual and normal procedures.
Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
RONALD R. BALL
Counsel
rmh
attachment
c: Housing and Redevelopment Director
(with attachment)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I ani a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
April 30th, 2005
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN NIARCOS California
This 02"d Day of May, 2005
Signature
Jane Olson
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
i
CARLSBAD HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION NCT 1790863 April 30,2005 1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - RP 94-05lA) X3 CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMERS MARKET
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the
Housing & Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad in the City
Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, May 10,2005, to consider a proposed Amendment
to Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP 94-05(A) X2 to allow the Village Farmer's Market to be held every Saturday morning from 8:OO a.m. to
11:OO a.m., in the public parking lot located mid-block on the east side of
Roosevelt Street, between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue, in Land Use District No. 1 of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available after May 6, 2005. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Cliff Jones, in the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Department, at
As a result of environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the Planning Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirement for preparation of
environmental documents pursuant to Section 15311 of the State CEQA
Guidelines as placement of a minor structure accessory to an existing facility. The Commission will consider approval of the environmental determination during the public hearing.
If you challenge the approval of the environmental determination or the request for approval of the Major Redevelopment Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence
delivered to the City of Carlsbad, City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
PUBLISH: April 30, 2005 CARLSBAD HOUSING 8 REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
(760) 434-281 3.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CARLSBAD SATURDAY FARMERS MARKET - RP 94-05(A) X3
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the Housing 8,
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad in the City Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, May 10, 2005, to
consider a proposed Amendment to Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP 94-05(A) X2 to allow
the Village Farmer's Market to be held every Saturday morning from 8:OO a.m. to 11:OO a.m., in
the public parking lot located mid-block on the east side of Roosevelt Street, between Carlsbad
Village Drive and Grand Avenue, in Land Use District No. 1 of the Carlsbad Village
Redevelopment Area.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available after May 6, 2005. If you have any
questions regarding this matter, please call Cliff Jones, in the Carlsbad Housing and
Redevelopment Department, at (760) 434-281 3.
As a result of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the Planning Department has
determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirement for preparation of
environmental documents pursuant to Section 15311 of the State CEQA Guidelines as placement of a minor structure accessory to an existing facility. The Commission will consider
approval of the environmental determination during the public hearing.
If you challenge the approval of the environmental determination or the request for approval of
the Major Redevelopment Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence
delivered to the City of Carlsbad, City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr., Carlsbad, CA
92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
PUBLISH: April 30, 2005
CARLSBAD HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SI
Village Farmer’s Market
Jam Free Printing
Use livery@' TEMPLATE 5160@ - Www.avery.coiri - 1-800-GO-AVERY
AHRONEE
4440 CATHER AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92122
DOUGLAS M AVIS
550 LAGUNA DR #B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ACUNA
91 MARYNARD AVE
NEWBURY PARK CA 91320
NANCY L BOYER
602 S PACIFIC ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
SHERYL F BULLOCK
24012 CALLE DE LA PLATA #3
LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653
CATHERINE J CLARKE
824 CAMINITO DEL REP0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DONALD & LJ DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DUNHAM
4028 PARK DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MOJTABA & VAKIL1 AZITA
ESFAHANI
1952 CREST DR
ENCINITAS CA 92024
OPHELIA G GARCIA
2960 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ABEL C GARCIA
1502 ROLLING HILLS DR
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
JOHN & BARBARA GOMBAR
775 MARSOPA DR
VISTA CA 9206:
VERMILYEA GSD
11620 KISMET RD
SANDIEGO CA 92128
GOL,L
18 GETTYSBURG
IRVINE CA 92620
MARVIN S HUMPHREYS
140 ACACIA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HARY & ALICE GUZELLIMIAN
PO BOX 206
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
MARITAL HOWARD-JONES
2785 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HYLEN
5 146 CHELTERHAh4 TER
SANDIEGO CA 92130
WILLIAM K JESSEE
2075 CORTE DEL NOGAL #S
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CLARK R & SHELLY I KNAPP
215 W PALM ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92103
IRIS P KORNBERG
509 N MAPLE DR
BEVERLY HILLS CA 902 10
LEOR & OPHIRA LAKRITZ
PO BOX 1029
TUSTIN CA 92'781
PROPS LP MACDONALD
2898 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MICHAEL K MURPHY
400 N LA COSTA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MCCOMAS
1265 CYNTHIA LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARGUERITE MONTALBANO
750 B ST #1500
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LEO & DIANNA J PACHECO
2 100 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OAKLEY G & JOHNELLE PARKER
560 HIGHLAND DR
DANVILLE CA 94526
PARKER
3215 MAEZEL LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Jam Free. Printing
Use Averye TEMPLATE 5160@ - www.awry.com - 1 -800-GO-AVERY
JERRY PETERS
PO BOX 1091
CARDIFF CA 92007
JACK D PHILLIPS
2667 OCEAN ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PAUL & TEN J RAPPAPORT
2963 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PETER A & GEORGETTE ROCK
2421 S EL CAMINO REAL
SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672
BILL F RYBURN
2019 ESTER0 ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
GENE S & MARGARET A RAY
2959 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCANLON
7306 BORLA PL
CAKLSBAD CA 92009
AMINAT & MAHACHEV GADJI
786 GRAND AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SIMS
2820 WILSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STEVEN M & C RENEE TAGUE
280 1 JEFFERSON ST
CAKLSBAD CA 92008
SARA C TERAN
305 DATE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHIN LUNG & W 0 TSAI
2958 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TUPPER
2785 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CORNER LLC VILLAGE
2998 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TUCKER 2810 MADISON ST
CAKLSBAD CA 92008
CLIFFORD D WARD JR
945 S ORANGE GROVE BLVD
PASADENA CA 91 105
GEORGE R & JACKYE E WILLIS
2050 LAURIE CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WALKER-GILBERT
4350 HIGHLAND DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STUART C & MARILYN WILSON
4920 COLLINGWOOD DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92109
DAVID R ZULICK
2010 BASSWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JEANENE ENTERPRISES INC
PO BOX 2258
CARLSBAD CA 92018
DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BIERI A VIS VI LTD
550 LAGUNA DR #B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROOSEVELT TAM INVEST
6 VENTURE #2 15
IRVINE CA 92618
MISSION SQUARE SHOP CNTR
169 1 CAMINITO ALIVIADO
LA JOLLA CA 92037
ROOSEVELT LTD CA
7040 AVENIDA ENCINAS #lo4
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GUNTER
PO BOX 749
SANPEDRO CA 90733
ALL AMERICAN ENG & TU
721 MCGAVRAN DR
VISTA CA 92081
BUTLER PROPERTIES LLC
3285 CORPORATE VW
VISTA CA 920081
PACKARD BUILD PART
725 GRAND AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
% Jam Free Prlntin
Use Avev TEM LATE 5160@
MCMILLIIN REAL ESTATE
2727 HOOVER AVE
NATIONAL CITY CA 9 1950
GORDON
6741 MALLEE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BANK OF AMERICA NT&SA
750 B ST #1500
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
EHS ENTERPRISES LLC
5553 TRINITY WAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92120
- www.avery.com
1 -800-GO-AVERY -
BANK OF COMMERCE
1381 E VISTA WAY
VISTA CA 92084
GREAT WESTERN BANK
PO BOX 7788
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658
CARLSBAD VILL PART LL
872 CHELSEA LN
ENCINITAS CA 92024
KFC NATIONAL MNG CO
PO BOX 35370
LOUISVILLE KY 40232
CARLSBAD GRAND LLC
701 B ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
SECURITY PACIFIC BANK
300 LAKESIDE DR
OAKLAND CA 94612
CNTY HEALTH PROJECT M
150 VALPREDA RD
SAN MARCOS CA 992069
Saturday Farmer’s MarketHousing & Redevelopment CommissionMay 10, 2005
SITE
Existing Wednesday Farmer’s Market•Established in 1994•Operated by the CVBA•Operations:–Non-Summer; Wednesday 2-6pm (2ndWed. in Sept. –last Wed. in June). Setup 1pm & Clean Up by 8pm –Summer; Wednesday 2-8pm (last Wed. in June –1stWed. in Sept.). Setup 1pm Clean Up by 9pm•Current Permit Expires in September 2009
Requested Saturday Farmer’s Market•Day & Time: Saturday’s from 8am to 11 am. Setup 7am & Clean Up by 12 Noon.•Configuration & Operations of Farmers Market will not change.–Same # and type of booths–Same parking lot and boundaries•New signage reflecting new day & hours proposed.
Farmer’s Market•Maximum No. of Booths -33–4 Non Produce Booths–2 Arts & Crafts Booths–1 Educational Booth–1 Promotional Booth for Village Businesses
Village Farmer’s Market•Well received by local merchant’s, residents, and visitors of Carlsbad.•Provides unique shopping opportunity not afforded elsewhere in the City.•Encourages greater pedestrian activity.•Day & Time accommodates working persons.
Staff Recommendation•Recommending approval of project with the following conditions:–Initial approval for 6 months. •Extended for up to 5 years if H&R Director determines that conditions have been met and the project has no detrimental effect on surrounding properties. •Subsequent time extensions (of 5 years) will be subject to DRB approval.–CVBA pay for the cost of new signage construction and placement–Major Special Events that have utilized parking lot in the past will have a vested right to utilize the lot.