HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-08-13; Planning Commission; ; ZC 214 - SUDAN INTERIOR MISSIONDA?E:
TO:
FROM:
(
S'I'AFF REPORT -----------·
August 13, 1980
Planning Commission
Planning Department·
\
SUBJECT: ZC--214 -SUDAN 'JN'l'ERIOR MISSION ·-Request for
~rezoning from existing San Diego County S-90 zone
to R-1 zone.on property located southwest of the
intersection o·f Palomar Airport Road and Laurel
•rree Road.
I. : PRO,JECT DESCRIP'I'ION
The applicant is requesting to prezone the subject property
4
from the County zone of s~-90 to R---1 in order· to alJ.ow subsequent
annexation and development in the city. The subject property
is a 12. 36 acre parcel located off Laurel trree Road approx·-·
imat:.ely a quarter of a mile south of Palomar Airport Road.
Most of the property consists of sloping land covered with
native vegetatfon.r however, the southwesterly third of the
property has been previously graded and is devoid of any
native veg·etation. l'J. large si.ngle family dwelling is located
on the southwesterly portion of the property. In the past,
thi.S. building was utilized as an off ice and heavy equipment
wa,s stored on the property. 'I'he -hOusE:~ is being used a;,'. a
single family residence at the ·present time. ·
The properties to th~ east, wesf, and south are vacant at
the present time. ·while the· p:roperty to the north is being
utilized for agricultural purposes and has an agricultural
proc~ssing plint on it. The applicant h~s indicated that
hrs orgariization wishes to eieritually constiuct a retirement
borne on this property l consisting of chlSter housing.
Cqn~truction o~ thi~ facility w6uld require subsequent
a,pproval of a Planned Unit Development by the Planning
Cornroission.
II. ANALYSIS
1. Is the proposed R-1 zon~ consis.tent with t~e RLM
Gerieral Plan des~gnation?
2. Is the propose~ R-1 zone consistent with existing
surroundin9 zoning and land use?
3~ Is the proposed R-1 zone premature at this time
and would a,nothe.r zone b(~ rn.orc Rppropriate:~·;
I,
( (
Discussion
'l'he RLM (Residential Low-Medium Density, 0·-4 du/ac) designation
of the General Plan is intended to allow the type of residential
development that would occur in the requested R--·1 zone.
Therefore, R-1 zoning would be consistent with the General
Plan designation for this property. Staff is concerned,
however, as to whether the R-1 zone would be consistent with
the existin~ surrounding zoning and land use in the irea and
whether the requested R-1 zone is premature at this timeo
The subject property is rather isolated from the nearest
residentially developed property and approximately a mile
from the nearest existing R-1 zone. The nearest existing·
residential deve·t -Jpment is located at Alt.a Mira, approximately
a half mile tot west of the subject property. The
subject property .s contiguous to the City of Carlsbad along
its northern bounoary only. However, this propqrty has a
zoning of E-A (Exclusively Agricultural) which ha.s a minimum
lot size of 10 acres. ·
It is the staff's feeling that a zoning of R-1 would not b~
appropriate for this parcel at the present time. Approval
of the requested zoning would resul~ in an isolated R-1
£:oning district completely surrounded on all four sides by
z011ing permit.ting a much lower density of development than
would be pe:i;mitted in the R-1 zone and requiring a much
lower level of pub~ic services.
Plann :'._ng staff feels :that a zoning of L-C (Lirni ted Control)
would be the appropriate zoning for this property at t~is
·time. The L-C (Limited Control) zone is an interim type of
zoning which would allow the property to annex into the
city, but would not allow it to be used for other than
agricultural type purposes. At a future date, when the
surrounding area is also ready to develop ai a more intense
level and a higher level of public services are availabler
the applicant wquld be able to apply for a zone change frorn
L-C to R-1. .
It shou~d be pointed out that although the applicant h1s
indicated an intention to develop the property with a specific
use, the Planning Commission's consideration should focus on
the proper zoning for the property given the major planning
issues listed above.
III. RECOMMENDA'I'ION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission l\DOP'l1 Resolution
No. 16 7 6, recommending to the City Counci 1 APPROVhl--of zc-
214 forthe L-C zone rat.her than the requested R-1 zone
based on the findings contained therein.· ·
Ii
(
Attachments .. -
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form
Location Map
PC Resolution No. 1676
MH:ar
7/31/80
(
--3-
I'·
/ BA.CKC,RDUND DA'I'.A. SHE8I' \
CASE. NO: ZC-214.
APPLICANT:· SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION
REQUEST AND I.022.\.TION: ZU\JE CHANGE FROM S-90 (COUNTY) TO CITY o;= CARLSBAD R--1 __ ..,_ ______________ _
LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMA~ AIRPORT RO~D, EASi" OF H-JTERSTATE 5.
LEG.n.L JJ.:SSC?.:I2I'ION: A PORTION OF LOT 11G11 OF THE RAl'-lCHO AGUA HEiOIONDA, SAN DIEGO· ------
COUNTY, MAP NO. 823.., DATED NOVEMBER 16, 18%'.
· Assess.'.J::S ?2.r<"'..el Nurober: . 21 2 040 23
Acres-12. 36 N/A ---
GENERAL PLAN A"ND ZONT.NG
R-M
De:!Si ty Allc.we-.:: L~-10 DU ' S / AC Density Proposa! -----~-NIA
Existins Zor.e A-1( 1) C_OUNTY Proposed Zone R---1 -----
Sur:r.oucr=~::g Zoning 2.:::c ~--::c_ Use:
Zoninc,.-____ .,:.__
North E-A
P-C & E-A (COU_ NTY) South
Bast E-'-1-A ( COUNTY)
West P-C -----
CITY OF CARLSBAD, DATED:
Land Use
PACKING SHED
VAC/INT
VACft.NT
VACANT
SchcoJ. .. Iz.st:-.:--i.ct ------'-'-" ____ :__..., ______ ~ .. ~--
CITY or= CARLSBAD ---------~----------·
CITY OF CARLSBAD EJJU's -----~· .. ___ _
?.:!:ilic Pa.cili.Hss Fee A,;-=::.:::T.:e1t, dated APRIL 2, 1980 _______ ,__ _____________ _
__ x ___ Nega\::Lve Decla1~c1tion, issue.~ dULY 28, 1980 Log No. ,----73G ____ , _________ ..,..,
-----·-..,.:_ __ E. :r:. R. Ccr t.i f.i.ed, dated _________ _
Other, ------------------------....
1.r ,,: t.,/,· 11,1, ·.111r·,.-,,·p1;i1..i1•1/
L •·;._: : . " C: n-L: h 1: r j_ \') :.· '.) ~·n.:tl: i , ., 11
,u li,tV:'.' !:td,;•d.L~etl lh1t; h(!C·11
.i..!_; re:qu.i.1-,.:·U., ~,ou \•1.ill Ll:~ so
re{ ,.,,d,
dd v i :-:• :d "
iL J ,. -· d c: \: L!r."!lli ll(.!({
P,J'i.' I, I CT1,,l'i':
N::1:t•l'l':
,·,,·cl.. ·t· 1•• ..... ~ ·•· f,.l''"' :. , . ..,.·-.f~-!--Jl"· J ,.,..~ .,. C ·,· ··~·l--1 .,, _ --~'-~· .•::,/.1 ... XI. c,•,;a •. ~0.L ... c. ~, . .:,J_O.n ... _u. _T\.1.1-,l:·. p.~.C, . .LL_ ,:;.vL. e.: •.. :.\...;;f .... ,O:Z:J,•).l.,_ -~,C~ y-··------·-----
i-J,,.,,;(: (i;1di.v.i<_.l1:,1ll p,:u·tncr:·;}lip, jc,·int venl\11:1~, cu,L,UL1l·ion, :3yndic,tl'.ioa)
·,··1c•,~r-·1·"'·-·1·'·t•··1 i'•'o i-·,1,1 ·_..,. '.J6. lt..,,"Jl · . .. _l ..,,,. --1~1,..½.r.'"'(,..,,,.__:_ . ., 1.L --J .. ;j '---i,) )'t. .
__ _2 __ JI0~yt,·~,;i;;q. -~-'---:~-2.,jJ:i:.~.G.:rn_•t.fu_._..HQH ...... :T_~J:· sov -<l:Z.Q12.9 ....... _(2..!'-l.l.) f.152:-~110..D ____ _
Bu!=d.nes~_; /\d(-tL~e~;~.i ·
___ (2_01 ) .. HYl~-1100 ·---·-----------------·
'l'e l epho: 1c, Num}Jel~
J:-tml lo . .dd -----·-· _______ .. ___________ _ --~_ .. _____ ._ ... ____ ---------------
___ _!.:_o:~-=:~:~~~--.:~'roe Ibad · (P • 0 : _ _::.:!?_98) ---_qa.1:lsb8.d. Q __ CA. __ 92008 -~------
13u~_;i11(:~.i::.i i~•~ld>.·c·ss
____ ('?Jh) l}Jo-•J360 -·------------------·-
'l'E.:lephonc t.!(unber
l~cl'tlC:: (j,uC:livJ_clucd, parl:n-:ir, jo:i.nl
v0ntui·(:, coqx1rc1.t.ic1n, ~;yndicc1.lion)
--.. -·------------------------·--· --------------------··------------·---------~
----·-------------··-·· ·•--· ----------· --------------···---·-----------------------------------~------'l'cdephor,r~ l·!uiabui: 'i'e] c1•;;on0 l·:uwucr
--------·-----------Homu /ddrcs.s
'l'c·] c:p!1one 1-l1 uril.>cr 'felt.! 1_,i1u:1c! i~umbc-t;.1, ·
-.. ·------···---------
... _, ___________ ._,.. ..... -·---~-----· ·--·--· ------. . -·--·-·•--·--·----------·----
(l l . ·•J . r '·, •··I ' l·•• 'l' 1 .,., ·r•'· ·••) II .. d<.. 1 ln,.ll.l .• , )l-,C ... , l lh..l,,.!,.,,ll.J
.i.,-'•,'., rt<.:<.:.l,.1n: lt:\:,.i:· iai11i1.\ t·;' ,,,l' p(:1::i11:t"/ t:11,1\·. l'lt(s .i11fo1·r;1<1l.i(H1 ,:,,:,,~1.i.1:,;,! .i.11 Lh.i.:j c'1:i.e-..
c.:·.,:.1it·v .ii.: tn1u ,,n,t c1,,·?·,!vl. •i 1J<: 1 l1i1L .i.t. \J.U.I. rv111..ii1: ·L1 u.-.: ii!, i ,:l11·1·<.:,:t. ill:t1 i11:1_y lie.•·
... · · : · l · · · '· l ,; 1 • • '· • • • ·, .. 1 • • < • ... , • t· l \· ' ·1 1 . •• • 1 , \, lljl(.111 d., ., .. L 1,•j 1.l 1.,1. ,.\11-.,. , ... ll II 1. , I II .. I .. , i!IIII\J't( CII .
HY
. ')'
'· .,,!-·,-,·, ,:
' ) ( ·,· ,; ·-r ,. .r l
..
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18'
19
20
21
22
I
• •
PLANNING COMM,ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1676
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE
CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-1-10,000-Q ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LAUREL
TREE ROAD, SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD.
APPLICANT: SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION
CASE NO: ZC-214
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to
wit:
A portion of Lot "G 11 of Rancho Agua Hedionda, San Diego
County, Map No. 823, dated November 16, 1896
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided
by Tit 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 13th day of
August, 1980, August 27, 1980, and September 10, 1980, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as
said request; and
scribed by law to consider
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to
be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to
the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
23 Commission as follows:
24
25
26
27
28
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission recommends APPROVAL of ZC-214, based
on the following findings:
Findings:
1) That the proposed zone of R-1-10,000-Q is consistent with
The General Plan Land Use desiqnation of RLM -Residential
Medium Low Density (0-4 du's/AC).
•
l 2)
2
3 3}
4
5
• •
That the zoning designation of R-1-10,000 limits the
density so that existing public facilities can adequately
serve the property.
That the Q overlay designation will ensure that the
density, design and type of development will not create
an excessive demand on public facilities.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
6
7
8
9
the Planning Commission the City of Carlsbad, California,
held on the 10th day of September, 1980, by the following vote
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
20 ,
21 l/
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO # 1676
Schick, Larson, Priestedt and Leeds
None
Rombotis, Jose and Marcus
i'\
None
-2-