HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-08-21; Planning Commission; ; CUP 91-01|PIP 86-02A - PAY-N-PLAY RACQUETBALL• APPL,TION COMPLETE DATE:
MAY 10. 1991
Sf AFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 21, 1991
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A) -PAYN PIAY RACOUETBAIJ.. -Request for a
Conditional Use Permit and Planned Industrial Permit Amendment to allow
the installation and operation of a 5,000 square foot, four court, automatic
racquetball facility within an existing industrial building at 2774 Loker
Avenue West.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Corn.mission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No's. 3286, and
3287 APPROVING CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A), based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow an automatic racquetball
center within an existing industrial building, and a Planned Industrial Permit Amendment
to adjust the proportions of uses and resulting parking ratio within the existing industrial
development. As shown on Exhibit "A", dated August 21, 1991, the racquetball center
would occupy 5,000 square feet of an approximately 25,000 square foot building and
would consist of four automatic racquetball courts, shower facilities, a rest room, and a
maintenance room.
The existing development was approved through PIP 86-2 on January 20, 1987 and
involved approximately 124,400 square feet of industrial uses (49,759 square feet of office,
59,710 square feet of manufacturing, and 14,928 square feet of warehouse use), and a 359
space parking lot. Since the construction of the project, however, the buildings have been
occupied with a significantly different proportion of uses. As summarized on Exhibit "A",
and elaborated on Exhibits "H" -"M", dated August 21, 1991, the existing breakdown of
uses is as follows: 35,707 square feet of office, 21,263 square feet of manufacturing, and
61,134 square feet of warehousing uses (not including the proposed racquetball facility).
The existing proportions of uses, therefore require only 262 parking spaces, leaving
97 spaces for future tenant improvements or conditional uses.
When analyzing this proposal, staff considered the parking availability for the use, as well
as the findings required for a Conditional Use Permit and a Planned Industrial Permit.
Below is a discussion of this analysis.
CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A.
PAY N PLAN RACQUETBALL
AUGUST 21, 1991
PAGE 2 .
III. ANALYSIS
•
1. Is the parking supply on the site adequate to accommodate the proposed racquetball
facility?
2. Can the four findings required for a Conditional Use Permit be made? Namely,
a) That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the
community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and
objectives of the general Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to
uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be
located;
b) That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the use;
c) That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in
the neighborhood will be provided and maintained;
d) That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly
handle all traffic generated by the proposed use.
3. Can the additional findings required for a Planned Industrial Permit still be made?
Namely,
a) That the improvements indicated on the Planned Industrial Permit are
located in such a manner to be related to existing and proposed streets and
highways;
b) That the improvements as shown on the Planned Industrial Permit are
consistent with the intent and purpose of the P-M zone and all adopted
development, design and performance standards as set forth by Chapter
21.34.
DISCUSSION
1. ADEQUACY OF PARKING
As discussed above, the existing proportions of uses within the industrial development
require a significantly lower parking supply than is provided on site. The owner is willing
to place a deed restriction over the site, restricting the proportion of uses to that which
would be allowed per the parking requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Since the
existing parking supply provides a surplus of parking, the only remaining task is to
determine the parking demand imposed by the racquetball facility.
CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A)-
PAY N PLAN RACQUETBALL
AUGUST 21, 1991
PAGE 3
I
There are no parking standards for racquetball courts in the Carlsbad Municipal Code,
however section 21.44.030 of the Code states that when parking requirements for a use
are not specifically defined then the parking requirements shall be determined by the
Planning Commission. Staff has arrived at a recommendation based upon the parking data
available on racquetball courts for comparison. According to information provided by the
applicant, the average parking standard for the existing Payn' Play Centers is 2.05 spaces
per court, or 1 space per 556 square feet. The racquetball courts within the Aviara Sports
Center, approved through SDP 86-2(A)/MP 177(C)/CUP 90-5, used a standard of 4 spaces
per court, or 1 space per 313 square feet. This proposal is a conditional use and may be
replaced with the more typical industrial tenant. Ideally, the parking required for this use
would match the future occupancy's demand and no future adjustments to the parking
demand requirements would be needed. The parking standard for a multi-tenant industrial
building is 1 space per 335 square feet (which, using the Payn' Play racquetball center as
a guide, translates to 3.75 spaces per racquetball court). Evaluating the above
comparisons, and considering the probable future occupancy of the industrial suite will be
a mix of office, manufacturing, and warehouse, parking the racquetball facility at the multi-
tenant parking standard of 1 :335 is both reasonable and practical.
The remainder of the industrial site is parked according to the proportions of office,
manufacturing, and warehouse uses specified in the original Planned Industrial Permit. As
mentioned above, the proportion of uses is significantly different than approved and a total
of 97 extra spaces currently exist. As derived above, the racquetball facility will require
15 spaces. Subtracting the 15 spaces from the existing 97 extra spaces leaves a balance
of 82 extra spaces still remaining in the center. Considering this balance, no impacts to
parking will result from this proposal.
2. FINDINGS FOR CONDffiONAL USE PERMIT:
a. Desirability and Harmony of Use
The industrial area currently has very little public active recreational opportunities.
Since there exists a large daytime work force that would benefit from the increase
in active recreational opportunities that the racquetball facility would provide, the
proposed use is desirable for the community. The industrial guidelines outlined in
the Land Use element of the General Plan call for services and functions that serve
the employment base of the industrial area and the zoning ordinance conditionally
allows for such amenities as eating establishments, athletic clubs, and retail uses
serving the occupants of the industrial zone. As discussed above, the parking
demand for the automatic racquetball facility does not adversely impact the parking
supply. The courts are located along an exterior wall and are separated from the
adjacent suite by a hallway and sound attenuating wall. The conditional use is
therefore essentially in harmony with the General Plan and not detrimental to
existing or future uses.
CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A)'
PAYN PLAN RACQUETBALL
AUGUST 21, 1991
PAGE4
b. Adequacy of Site
As discussed above, and shown on Exhibits "H" -"M", dated August 21, 1991, there
is sufficient parking on site to accommodate the facility and the owner is
conditioned to place a deed restriction on the property, limiting the proportion of
uses to that which the parking supply could allow. The proposed improvements are
completely within the building and require no exterior alterations, anti no
modifications to the existing traffic and pedestrian circulation is needed. The site
is therefore adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use.
c. Provision of Yards, Setbacks, and Other Features
Since all of the proposed modifications are within the existing, conforming building,
all of the yards, setbacks, landscaping, and fences required for the proposal are
being provided and maintained. The facility include§ sound a~te1.1uation materials
that will adjust the noise levels for adjacent suites. Based on the existing and
proposed improvements, all features required to adjust the proposed racquetball
facility with existing and future uses are being provided and have been conditioned
to be maintained.
d. Adequacy of Street System
The street serving the project site, Loker Avenue West, is an industrial street that
can accommodate approximately 10,000 average daily trips, which is enough to
accommodate the 160 additional average daily trips generated by the racquetball
facility.
3. FINDINGS FOR PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PERMIT:
a. Relation of Improvements to Streets
The proposed use requires no additional infrastructure and only minor interior
tenant improvements. As stated previously, no alteration to the existing traffic or
pedestrian circulation is needed, therefore, all improvements properly relate to
existing streets.
b. Consistency with Adopted Standards
The tenant improvements require no exterior alteration of the approved building or
site development, therefore the project still complies with all development standards
and design criteria of the P-M zone. The P-M zone allows for recreational uses and
these uses do fulfill a need. in the industrial area. The project is therefore consistent
with the intent and purpose of the P-M zone.
CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A)-
1, PAYN PLAN RACQUETBALL
AUGUST 21, 1991
PAGE 5
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Since the project involves the conversion of use in an existing building with no exterior
building expansion, the Planning Director has determined that the project falls under the
Categorical Exemption stated in Section 15303(c) of the California Environmental Quality
Act and has, therefore, issued a Notice of Exemption, dated July 30, 1991.
SUMMARY
Considering that the parking will be adequate for the proposed use, the findings required
for both a Conditional Use Permit and a Planned Industrial Permit can be made, and no
environmental concerns exist, staff recommends approval of CUP 91-1/PIP 82-2(A).
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3286
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3287
3. Location Map
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Disclosure Statement
6. Notice of Exemption
7. Exhibits "A" -"M", dated August 21, 1991
MG:lh
July 29, 1991
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
•
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3286
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CI'IY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF A 500 SQUARE FOOT
AUTOMATIC RACQUETBALL FACILI'IY ON PROPER'IY
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2774 LOKER AVENUE WEST.
CASE NAME: PAYN PLAY RACQUETBALL
CASE NO: CUP 91-1
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad
and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 21st day of August, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing to
consider said application on property d~scribed as:
Lots 10 -13 of Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21 in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Com.mission
considered all factors relating to CUP 91-1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Com.mission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Com.mission
APPROVES CUP 91-1, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
I
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the
community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of
the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located because it
provides for needed active recreational areas in the industrial zone while not
requiring any alterations to the existing development;
That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the use since no external improvements are required;
That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the
neighborhood will be provided and maintained as all existing conforming
improvements are remaining and are sufficient to fit the use within the
development;
That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use since Loker Avenue West can accommodate
the 160 average daily trips generated by the project.
13 Conditions:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
Approval is granted for CUP 91-1, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" -"M", dated
August 21, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise
noted in these conditions.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of
the Site Plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The Site Plan shall reflect
the conditions of approval by the City. The Plan copy shall be submitted to the
City Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement plan submittal, whichever
occurs first.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may
be required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any
amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of
building permit issuance.
Approval of CUP 91-1 is granted subject to the approval of PIP 86-2(A).
PC RESO NO. 3286 -2-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6.
7.
8.
9.
•
This conditional. use permit is granted for a period of 5 years. This conditional use
permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine
if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a
significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and
welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use has such significant
adverse impacts, the Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning
Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add
additional conditions to mitigate the significant adverse impacts. This permit may
be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a
significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and
welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be
extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed 5 years upon written
application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration
date. In granting such extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no
substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and
welfare will result because of the continuation of the permitted use. If a
substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and
welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as an original application for
a conditional use permit. There is no limit to the number of extensions the
Planning Commission may grant.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally
integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent
properties and streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No.
80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building.
No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief.
In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief
and the Planning Director.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free
from weeds, trash, and debris.
10. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
11. All building permit applications for tenant improvements within any building on
the site as shown on Exhibit "B", dated August 21, 1991 shall be accompanied with
a parking assessment showing the restrictions required by this resolution are being
met.
PC RESO NO. 3286 -3-
)..
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
• I
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carls bad, California, held on the 21st day of August, 1991, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
MG:lh
PC RESO NO. 3286
TOM ERWIN, Vice-Chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
-4-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
' •
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3287
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CI1Y OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PERMIT TO
ALLOW A 5000 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATIC RACQUETBALL
FACILI1Y ON PROPER1Y GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2774
LOKER AVENUE WEST.
CASE NAME: PAYN PLAY RACQUETBALL
CASE NO: PIP 86-2(A)
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 21st day of August, 1991, consider said request on property
described as:
Lots 10 -13 of Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to PIP 86-2(A).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
APPROVES PIP 86-2(A), based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
I
Findings:
1.
2.
The improvements indicated on the Planned Industrial Permit Amendment are
located in such a manner to be related to existing and proposed streets and
highways as they are interior improvements within an existing, conforming
industrial development.
The improvements as shown on the Planned Industrial Permit Amendment are
consistent with the intent and purpose of the P-M zone and all adopted
development, design, and performance standards as set forth by Chapter 21.34 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code because it provides for needed active recreation area
in the area without requiring a modification to an existing, conforming
development.
9 Conditions:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
2.
3.
Approval is granted for PIP 86-2(A), as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" -"M", dated
August 21, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
Approval of PIP 86-2(A) is granted subject to the approval of CUP 91-1.
PIP 86-2(A) is subject to all conditions of CUP 91-1 as contained in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3286, incorporated herein by reference and on file in
the Planning Department.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit there shall be a deed restriction placed
on the deed to this property subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director
notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad
has issued a Planned Industrial Permit by Resolution No. 3287 on the real property
owned by the declarant. Said deed restriction shall note the property description,
location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval
as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the deed
restriction. Said deed restriction(s) may be modified or terminated only with the
approval of the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council of the City
of Carlsbad whichever has final decision authority for this project. Said deed
restriction shall restrict the proportions of uses within the site as shown on Exhibit
"B", dated August 21, 1991, to the maximums allowed per the parking standards of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
PC RESO NO. 3287 -2-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
' •
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 21st day of August, 1991, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOE.S:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
MG:lh
PC RESO NO. 3287
TOM ERWIN, Vice-Chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
f
'\
I
'
I
I~"?:'.'!
City of Carlsbad
PAY N PLAY RACQUETBALL CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A}
'
BACKGROUNb DATA SHEET • CASE NO.: CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A)
CASE NAME: · PAYN PLAY RACQUETBALL
APPLICANT: PAY N PLAY RACQUETBALL
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Installation and operation of a 5000 sq. ft. automatic Racquetball
facility.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 10 • 13 of Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21 in the City of Carlsbad, County
of San Diego, State of California
APN: 209-081-25 Acres 8.5 Proposed No. of Lots/Units ...... N ..... ( ....... A _________ _
(Assessor's Parcel Number)
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation Planned Industrial
Density Allowed ___ N__.( ....... A ____ Density Proposed .... N .... I .... A....__
Existing Zone __ P_·M=------Proposed Zone .... P .... -M..__ __ _
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site P-M Industrial
North P-M Open Space
South P-M Industrial ·
East P-M Industrial
West P-M Industrial
PUBLIC FACILmES
School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad _ ___._____________ _........____________ _ __ ......._ ________ __
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) -----------------------
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated --F_.e=bru......,a...,rv......,27 .... ....,1.,.9 ..... 9 __ 1 _____________ _
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
_ Negative Declaration, issued------------------------
_ Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated----------------
Other, Notice of Exemption, dated June • 1991
MG:lh·
• City
I
.qf Carlsbad ma rntmtmm ·tttttt~~
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
;.,;::;::ucANT'S STATE'.IE!'.'T OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH 'NILL f:ECU,Pi:
::SCclE'ICNARY ACTION ON T'r-1i: :,ART OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD. COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE.
rPtease Pnnr)
7he following information must be disclosed:
Applicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
Charles L. Hohl 23165 Vista Way
tl Toro, Ca 92630
2. Owner
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
Charles L. Hohl
23165 Vista Way
~1 Iara, Ca 92630
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names anc
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnersrup
interest in the partnership.
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names anct
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary
of the trust.
FR..'100013 8/9')
2075 Las Pal mas Drive ,. Carlsbad. California '92009-4859 .. (6, 9) -133.1 1 6 ~
,~ •
(Cver)
·:!osura Statement Page 2
!/ /,.
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Soares
Commission~ Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes _ No _ If yes, please indicate person(s) ___________________ _
P(!r,on is defined u: 'Any indi\lidual. firm. c:opartn1rship, joint \11mur1, u14ciatlon, social c:lub. fraternal organization. corporation. 11tat1. :rust.
~r. syndicate, thi• and any other county, city and county, city municipality, diatric;t or other political 1ubclr,,i1ion, or any other group or
combination acting u a unit.•
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
Signature of Owner/date
Charles L. Hohl Char.les L, HabJ
Print or type name ot owner Print or type name of applicant
~V.00013 8/90
Notice of Exempt.
To: Office of ,Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk
County of San Diego
Attn: Mail Drop C-11
220 West Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101
I
From: City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
Project Title PAYN PLAY RACQUETBALL -CUP 91-1/PIP 86-2(A)
Project Location • Specific 2774 LOKER AVENUE WEST
Project Location • City: _C=A'-""R=-==LS=B.::...:A=D~------Project Location -County SAN DIEGO
Description of Project: INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF 5,000 SQUARE FOOT, FOUR
COURT, AUTOMATIC RACQUETBALL FACILITY IN AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: __;::C-=-ITY~....:O~F:........::;C:.=....A=R..;.:LS::::.=.=B=A...;..:D:;._ _________ _
Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project: PAY N PLAY RACQUETBALL
Exempt Status: (Check one)
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268); .
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: -'1=5=3=03....,,(=3)....,..("""c).__ _______ _
Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
Reasons why project is exempt:
Lead Agency
CONVERSION OF EXISTING INDUSTRIAL TENANT
SPACE FROM ONE USE TO ANOTHER WITH NO
EXTERNAL BUILDING EXPANSION.
Contact Person: ___ M __ IKE___. .... G ......... R __ IM ........ _______ Area Code!felephone/: (619) 438-1161, X 4499
If filed by applicant: Extension
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? _Yes_ No
Signature: ~l1Ji_, Date: '=f-/-50/q / Title: Planning Director
MICHAEL J. HO MI ER I I
Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR:
D Signed by Applicant MG:rvo:lh
Revised October 1989