Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-02-02; Planning Commission; ; SDP 93-09 - AVIARA PLANNING AREAS 25 & 26 NORTH-. ., • APPLICATlON COMPLETE DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1993 STAFF PLANNER -MICHAEL GRIM STAFF REPORT ® DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1994 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SDP 93-09 -AVIARA PLANNING AREAS 25 & 26 NORTH -Request for approval of a Site Development Plan to construct 102 single family homes on pregraded, subdivided lots within Planning Areas 25 and 26 North of Phase II of the Aviara Master Plan, generally located south of Alga Road, on both the west and east sides of Kestral Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 19. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3617, APPROVING the Negative Declaration, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3618, APPROVING SDP 93-09, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION & BACKGROUND Warmington Homes is requesting a Site Development Plan to allow the construction of 102 single family homes in Aviara Planning Areas 25 and 26 North, within Phase II of the master plan. A Site Development Plan is required according to Section III(B) (2) of the Aviara Master Plan (MP 177), which states that no building permit may be issued within any planning area without the prior approval of a Site Development Plan. The intent of the Site Development Plan is to ensure that all applicable development standards and design criteria of the master plan are incorporated into any proposed construction. The two neighborhoods, Planning Areas 25 and 26 North, are located within Phase II of the master plan, south of Alga Road and on either side of Kestral Drive. They have both been graded and subdivided through the Master Tentative Map for Phase II (CT 89-37) and the individual tentative maps for Planning Areas 25 and 26N (CT 90-37 and CT 90-38, respectively). The respective tentative maps are about to be recorded and the improvements shown on those tentative maps will be in place shortly. ~ --SDP 93-09 -AVIARA PLANNING AREAS 25 & 26 NORTH FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 2 As shown on Exhibits 11A1 1 - 11H1 , dated February 2, 1994, each Planning Area takes access off of Kestral Drive and the grading scheme essentially follows the hillside terrain of the properties. The proposed Site Development Plan will not significantly change any of the tentative map access, grading, or lot lines. The only additional item is the placement of small retaining walls in the front, side and rear yards. None of the walls in the front or side yards exceed three feet in height and the rear yard retaining walls are necessary to direct reclaimed water drainage away from back yards. The proposed single family homes will range in size from 2,320 to 2,888 square feet and will include both one and two story products. As illustrated on Exhibits "I" -"W", dated February 2, 1994, the proposed architecture is a Mediterranean style with S-tile roofs and stucco exteriors. To add visual interest to the neighborhood, each plan proposes three different elevations which differ in the areas of window treatments and roof configurations. The units are arranged with varied front and side yard setbacks and orientations to provide a more pleasing street scene and street trees and interior slope landscaping will be installed by the developer. III. ANALYSIS The findings required for the approval of a Site Development Plan can be found in Section 21.06.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, as well as the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 3618. Therefore, the following analysis stresses the essential aspects of these findings. 1. Is the proposal consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, and the appropriate segments of the Local Coastal Program? 2. Is the proposal consistent with the applicable sections of the Aviara Master Plan (MP 177) and the Carlsbad Municipal Code? 3. Is the proposal consistent with the approved subdivision maps for Planning Area 25 and 26 North (CT 90-37 & CT 90-38)? 4. Will the proposal be properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings, not detrimental to existing or future uses, and not an adverse impact to the site, surroundings, or traffic circulation? DISCUSSION 1. General Plan and Local Coastal Program Consistency The proposed development is consistent with the various goals and objectives of the General Plan. The Land Use Element designates the property for residential uses of low- medium density (RLM). The project's density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre falls within --SDP 93-09 -AVIARA PLANNING AREAS 25 & 26 NORTH FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 3 the low-medium density range of 0.0 to 3.2 dwelling units per acre. Two of the objectives of the Circulation Element call for adequate sidewalks and traffic safety measures. The proposed development within Planning Areas 25 and 26 North will meet this objective by including sidewalks on both sides of the street, a local street designed to meet City Standards, and fencing that does not interfere with sight distance requirements. Due to the project's proximity to Alga Road, an arterial roadway, several units have been required to include mechanical ventilation so that windows need not be opened and interior noise levels can be lowered to 45 dBA CNEL. By doing so, the project conforms with the goal of the Noise Element, which seeks to achieve and maintain an environment which is free from excessive or harmful noise. All public facilities will be in place prior to or concurrent with development, in conformance with the objective of the Public Facilities Element. By adding housing stock to the City, the proposed single family development is consistent with one of the goals of the Housing Element, which calls for the development of sufficient new housing to meet the City's share of the total regional housing need. By continuing to preserve the native open space areas and allow room for the adjacent master plan trail, the project is maintaining consistency with several goals, objectives, and policies of the Open Space and Conservation Element and the Parks and Recreation Element. As discussed in the attached environmental review, all potentially hazardous soil or earth conditions have been eliminated by the grading approved through the previous maps. Also, all potentially hazardous substances on site during construction will be monitored by the Carlsbad Fire Department, therefore the proposed single family development is consistent with the various goals and objectives of the Public Safety Element. There are no scenic highways, historic sites or structures, or opportunities for artistic or cultural development in proximity to Planning Areas 25 and 26 North, therefore the Scenic Highways, Historic Preservation, and Arts Elements do not apply to the project. Considering the above justifications, the Aviara Planning Area 25 and 26 North proposal is consistent with the various elements of the General Plan. 2. Master Plan and Municipal Code Consistency The Aviara Master Plan contains most of the development standards and design criteria that guide development within Planning Areas 25 and 26 North. In addition to the master plan criteria, the two single family neighborhoods are subject to the provisions of the R-1 Single Family Residential Zone. As demonstrated in Exhibits "A" -"W", dated February 2, 1994, the proposal incorporates all required setbacks and rear yard open space requirements. All units in Planning Area 25 have at least the required 20 to 24 foot front yard setbacks, the standard side and rear yard setbacks of 10 percent and 20 percent of lot width, respectively, and the 25 foot setback from the western and eastern planning area boundaries. In addition, all proposed homes have been oriented to allow at least 15 percent of the lot to be used as open recreation space. All units in Planning Area 26 North also have at least the required 20 to 24 foot front yard setbacks, the standard side and rear --SDP 93-09 -AVIARA PLANNING AREAS 25 & 26 NORTH FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 4 yard setbacks, the 50 foot setback from Alga Road and the 15 foot setback from Kestral Drive. As shown on Exhibits "I" -"W", dated February 2, 1994, all units within both planning areas are limited to the maximum height of 30 feet, with the required 15 percent of homes in each planning area being limited to one story and 22 feet in height. Some models have an interior loft (Exhibits "O" -"Q", dated February 2, 1994), but this loft does not contain the necessary square footage to qualify as a story and the building height with the lofts does not exceed 22 feet maximum. The architectural style is in keeping with the master plan design criteria, which call for rectangular building forms, varied massing, and stucco exteriors with clay tile. The architectural elevations have also been approved by the Aviara Master Association Architectural Review Committee. All units have at least a 20 foot by 20 foot, two car garage, with the majority containing a three car garage. Some of the driveways for these three car garages consume over 40 percent of the street frontage and an Engineering Standards Variance was required. The maximum percentage of lot frontage covered by any driveway is 43 percent and, despite the increased amount of depressed curb, there remains sufficient drainage and more than ample on-street parking. The City Engineer has made the necessary findings for the issuance of the Standards Variance and, since there is still ample on-street parking and enough room for front yard landscaping, the Planning Department staff has no objections to this variance. All of the large slopes along the perimeter of the two planning areas have been or are in the process of being planted with the permanent landscaping approved by the previous subdivision maps. As shown on Exhibit "I", dated February 2, 1993, the project landscaping conforms to the provisions of the master plan and the City's Landscape Manual by providing street trees and slope planting. The individual homeowner landscaping will be installed by the homeowner and each landscaping palate could vary. The perimeter planting contains trees and shrubs that will accomplish the necessary landscaped screening along Alga Road and the fire suppression zones were established through the approved subdivision maps. No internal trail systems exist within the single family neighborhoods, however, there is a master plan trail that will be installed along the western boundary of Planning Area 25 concurrent with the development of that Planning Area. By incorporating these various aspects into the project, the Aviara Planning Area 25 and 26 North proposal has demonstrated consistency with the provisions of the Aviara Master Plan and the R-1 Single Family Residential Zone. 3. Consistency with Approved Subdivision Maps The proposed construction of the 102 single family dwellings does not include any changes to the approved lot lines or perimeter landscaping and involves only minor adjustments to the existing, approved grading plans. These adjustments do not significantly alter the pad elevations, street grades, or project slopes. The previously approved subdivision maps SDP 93-09 -AVIARA PL!~TNG AREAS 25 & 26 NORTH - FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 5 contained a condition that no retaining walls over two feet in height would be allowed in the front or side yard unless approved by the Planning Commission through Site Development Plan review. The Aviara Planning Areas 25 and 26 North project proposes a total of 20 side and front yard retaining walls. Of these 20 walls, five are proposed to be over two feet high, however none exceed a height of three feet. The intent of this condition was to preclude the development of buildings too large for the lots on which they are placed. Considering that less than 10 percent of the lots contain retaining walls, and there has been sufficient planting area provided adjacent to those five walls that exceed two feet in height, the project is consistent with the intent of the condition restricting retaining walls. No alterations to the approved street, storm drain, sewer, or water line improvements are proposed with this development. Therefore, since no significant changes to the existing approvals are proposed, the Aviara Planning Area 25 and 26 North Site Development Plan is consistent with the approved subdivision maps. 4. Proper Relation to Site and Surroundings Aviara Planning Areas 25 and 26 North are in the process of being graded and improved per the approved subdivision maps (CT 90-37 and CT 90-38). The open space boundaries have already been established and all access points and internal circulation patterns have been set. The proposed construction of the homes within these two planning areas does not include any substantial changes to the existing grading plan, open space system, or circulation patterns. The single family residential products will be a mix of one and two stories and will incorporate a variety of setbacks. Since no substantial changes to the approved grading and circulation plans are proposed, and the buildings will be varied in size, shape, and position on the lot, the proposed development in Planning Areas 25 and 26 North is property related to the site, surroundings, and environmental setting. The proposed single family residential development will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed project is to be located because all surrounding land uses are the same as the proposed use and all are consistent with the Aviara Master Plan and the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed single family development will not adversely impact the site, surroundings, or traffic circulation since Aviara Planning Areas 25 and 26 North have been significantly designed for single family development of the proposed scale. N. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The site has been cleared of all native vegetation and graded to accommodate the single family development, and all areas of sensitive resources have been flagged and fenced to preclude encroachment. All public facilities required to support the development will be in place prior to or concurrent with development. As fully explained in the attached Environmental Impact Assessment, the Planning Director determined that no significant, e e SOP 93-09 -AVIARA PLANNING AREAS 25 & 26 NORTH FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 6 adverse environmental impacts will result because of this project and, therefore, issued a Negative Declaration on December 23, 1993. V. SUMMARY Considering that the proposed single family development meets all applicable development standards and will not have any adverse, environmental impacts, staff is recommending approval of SDP 93-09. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3617 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3618 3. Location Map 4. Background Data Sheet 5. Disclosure Statement 6. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 7. Exhibits "A" -"W", dated February 2, 1993. MG:lh:vd December 29, 1993 A~PORT :-uu: 11111111111: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ··········= : ...... : • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -. • • • • • • 1111111111• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ........... . ,,. s,111111111• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Fl) BATIQUITOS LAGOON AVIARA PLANNING AREAS 25 & 26N • • City of Carlsbad SDP 93-09 .J c( LIJ a: -BACKGROUND DATA SHEET • CASE NO: __ S--=D ..... P ..... 9 __ 3 __ -0"""9 ___________________ _ CASE NAME: Aviara Planning Areas 25 and 26 North APPLICANT: Warmington Hornes REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Site Development Plan for the construction of 102 single family homes on pregraded, subdivided lots within Planning Areas 25 and 26N of the Aviara Master Plan, located south of Alga Road and either side of Kestral Drive. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 and 4 of Carlsbad Tract No. CT 89-37, Aviara Phase II, City of Carlsbad, according to Map No. 12967 filed on September 16, 1992, in the Office of the County Recorder, County of San Diego, State of California. APN: 215-643-02, 03 Acres 56.1 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 107 lots/102 units (Assessor's Parcel Number) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation -"RL=M=/-"RM-==/ ___ O=S=/...aa.R:=C""""/ ___ N ________________ _ Density Allowed 0.0 -3.2 dus/acre Density Proposed 1.8 dus/acre Existing Zone ____ P-...;:C::;...._ ___ Proposed Zone __ P_-C=---- Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site P-C Vacant, graded North P-C Alga Road/vacant lots South P-C Vacant, graded East P-C Aviara Golf Course West L-C Field agriculture PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) ....,1:...::0=2=.0=--------------- Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated -"M-==-ay,__,_4.,_, -=1 ..... 22~3""-------------- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT _x_ Negative Declaration, issued .... Da;...e=c=e=rn=b...aa.e __ r -=2=3.,_, -=12 ..... 2~3""-------------- -Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated _____________ _ Other,----------------------------~ MG:lh -• City of Carlsbad _.,s;,;,;;,t-1•24•Eiiieet4eii DISCLOSL'RE STATEMENT :,;,CL·c..:.NTS sr..:.-=~Er-.'T '.:F :1sct.::::su~e OF CERTAIN OWNE~SI-IIP INTERESTS ON Al.I. APl=IL!CAT!ONS WHICH Nill. RECu,AE :,SCRET1CNArlY ACTICN CN -:"i-,E ?AFl'T CF THE crrv COUNCIL. OR ANY APPOINTEO 80ARO, COMMISSION OR CCMMITiEE. P'ease Pr,nr) i'he follow1ng information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Narrninqton Homes 3090 Pullman st. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 2. Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Aviara Land Associates 2011 Palomar Airport Road Limited Partnership Carlsbad, CA 92009 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names ana addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. tJi m YYarmi ogton 3090 Pullman St, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving u officer or director of the non-profit organization or u trustee or beneficiary of the trust. N/A FRMOOOll 8/90 2075 Las Palmas Orive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 -• • , .. .Over) Disclosure Statement Page 2 5. Have you had more than 5250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Scar~s Comm1ss1ons, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes _ No ~ If yes, please indicate person(s) ______________________ _ ~,,defined u: 'A.ny 1nd1v1dual. firm. coeartnersnIc:i. 101nt venture. u1ociat1on. social club. fratemal organ,zatJon. coreorataon. 111a1e. m,st. 'ece,ver. syndicate, tn,, and any 01ner county, crty and county. crty munic,palrty. dlltnc:t or other potrtIcal 1utx11VI1Ion. or any otner ;rowc or com01nat1on ac11n9 as a unit.' (NOTE: A additional pages as necessary.) ) --1 lvV: Signature ot,Qwf,ertdate D.L. Clemens. Vice President/ Print or type name of owner General Manager FRM00013 8190 -...-:: ...... , 17 . j ------:::_" u ·1 -;, JI C c~ /_, · ~ 1 J 'O Signature of applicant/date L.J. Edacornb Vice President Print or type name of applicant " l .. CITY OF CARLSBAD • GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Aviara Plannin£ Areas 25 & 26N -SDP 93-09 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE:-12_ GENERAL PLAN: RLM/RM/OS/N/RC ZONING: P-C DEVELOPER'S NAME: Warmin£ton Homes ADDRESS: 3090 Pullman Street Costa Mesa. CA 92626 PHONE NO: (714) 557-5511 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 215-643-02, 03 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 56.67 acres, 102 dwelling units ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Seotember 1994 A. City Actm1mstrat1ve Fac11It1es: Demand m Square Footage = 236.4 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 189.1 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 22,440 D. Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.71 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = NIA Identify Drainage Basin = N/A (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 1.020 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 4 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided -NiA I. Schools: NiA (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs -102.0 Identify Sub Basin -NiA (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD -22,440 L. The project is at the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. MG:lh:vd