HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-04-16; Planning Commission; ; SDP 96-14|CDP 96-16 - LEGOLAND CARLSBAD?!ie City of CARLSBAD Planning DepartmeSi
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 16, 1997
Application complete date: January 16, 1997
Project Planner: Don Neu
Project Engineer: Sherri Howard
SUBJECT: SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LEGOLAND CARLSBAD - Request for a
recommendation of approval of a Site Development Plan and Coastal
Development Permit for a LEGOLAND Theme Park which includes theme park
attractions, retail, food and beverage service, associated support facilities, and
parking on approximately 129 acres located east of future Armada Drive and west
of future Hidden Valley Road on the north side of Palomar Airport Road within
Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan in the Coastal Zone and
Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4083 and 4084,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of SDP 96-14 and CDP 96-16, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
These applications propose developing Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan
with a LEGOLAND theme park. The project site is scheduled to be mass graded in April 1997
as part of Units 2 and 3 of the Carlsbad Ranch Master Tentative Map (CT 94-09). The proposed
land use was approved by the City Council on January 9, 1996, as part of the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan Amendment (SP 207(A)) and Development Agreement (DA 94-01). The Site
Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit applications are required for the City to
determine that the design of the project complies with all City standards including the
requirements of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, the Zone 13 Local Facilities Management
Plan, and the Local Coastal Program.
The project was analyzed in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Program EIR (EIR
94-01) and no new environmental impacts or changed circumstances have been identified for this
project. Screening of the perimeter of the site, particularly the parking area and service area, has
been accomplished by the use of heavily landscaped setbacks, fencing/walls, and changes in
grade. The proposed project is in compliance with all applicable plans, ordinances, standards and
policies.
The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan requires that the City Council make the final decision to
approve or disapprove the Site Development Plan. The City Council is also required to make the
final determination on the Coastal Development Permit pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code
o
SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LEGTLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGE 2
Section 21.201.120(8) since the City Council was given final approval authority on the Site
Development Plan application.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a site
development plan and coastal development permit for the LEGOLAND Carlsbad Theme Park
proposed for the north side of Palomar Airport Road, east of future Armada Drive and west of
future Hidden Valley Road. The project site is Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan. Planning Area 4 when combined with the private section of LEGO Drive equals
approximately 129 acres. LEGOLAND Carlsbad as proposed is primarily an outdoor
experience. Attractions are placed in landscaped settings themed to the attraction.
Approximately 47.5 percent of the total project area or 61 acres will be landscaped. Interior
attractions and "dark rides" are relatively few. For planning purposes the project is separated
into an Outer Park and Inner Park. The acreage for these two areas is as follows:
Outer Park:
LEGO Drive and perimeter setbacks: 21 acres
Parking lots: 43 acres
Future parking expansion: 10 acres
Inner Park:
Attraction areas (developed with the first phase): 35 acres
Future expansion areas: 15 acres
Service and Administration: 5 acres
Total Park Area: 129 acres
The Park will initially consist of nine themed areas and the administrative/service area (the
"Inner Park"), and the parking lots, access roads and perimeter setbacks (the "Outer Park"). The
project includes approximately 100 structures of various types for the provision of administration
and service, guest support, retail and various attractions such as rides, play areas and displays on
the initial development area of the inner park. Three areas have been reserved for expansion of
the Inner Park. Development of the future Inner Park expansion areas and the future parking
expansion area will require the approval of a Site Development Plan Amendment by the Planning
Commission. This requirement is contained in Section VLB.4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan. Approximately 187,813 square feet of building area is included in the current development
proposal. Facilities and development elements which are part of LEGOLAND include
approximately 25 rides and attractions, 8 show venues, 4 restaurants in addition to various stands
and carts, 4 main retail shops plus various stands and carts, heavy landscaping, a 90,000 square
foot lagoon, a paved parking area for a minimum of 4,160 vehicles to accommodate guests,
employees, buses, and recreational vehicles, and a parking expansion area that will accommodate
an additional 1,150 parking spaces.
SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LE<
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGE 3
AND CARLSBAD
The nine themed areas of the Inner Park include The Beginning, DUPLO Village, The Ridge,
Funtown, The Garden, Castle Hill, Miniland, The Lagoon, and the Imagination Center. The
Service and Administration Area is also located within the Inner Park area. A description of each
of the nine themed areas is provided in Attachment "A" to this report.
General Plan, Zoning & Existing Land Use for the Site and Adjacent Property
The following table lists the general plan, zoning and existing land use for the site and adjacent
properties:
Site
North
South
East
West
GENERAL PLAN
T-R
OS & T-R
PI&OS
OS&PI
O/PI, T-R/C, & OS
ZONING
C-T-Q
O-S & C-T-Q
L-C & P-M-Q
O-S & P-M
O-Q/P-M-Q,
C-T-Q/C-2-Q, & O-S
EXISTING LAND USE
Vacant
Agriculture &
CMWD Water Tank
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant & Agriculture
General Plan Land Use Categories: T-R (Travel/Recreation Commercial), OS (Open Space), PI
(Planned Industrial), C (Community Commercial)
Zoning Categories: C-T (Commercial Tourist), O-S (Open Space), L-C (Limited Control), P-M
(Planned Industrial), C-2 (General Commercial), Q (Qualified Development Overlay Zone).
Site Description
The project site is currently vacant. Historically part of this area has been utilized for agriculture.
Mass grading of the site was approved as part of the Master Tentative Map for the Carlsbad
Ranch (CT 94-09). Grading is scheduled to begin in April 1997. The only vegetation on-site
determined to be sensitive exists in a Coastal Deed Restriction Area adjacent to Palomar Airport
Road, east of future Armada Drive. The area is to be preserved and will include a 50 foot
riparian area buffer as required by Policy 3-8 of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal
Program.
Prior Actions
On January 9, 1996, the City Council approved the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment
(SP 207(A)) and related applications including a development agreement (DA 94-01). The
project site is designated as Planning Area 4 (LEGOLAND Carlsbad) in the Specific Plan. The
plan allows for the development of LEGOLAND Carlsbad and lists the uses permitted within the
park. The Planning Commission, in addition to recommending approval to the City Council of
the Specific Plan Amendment on December 6, 1995, approved the master tentative map (CT 94-
09) for Carlsbad Ranch. The master tentative map creates Lot 18 with an area of 128.32 acres
which is the site of the proposed project and Lot 19 the private section of LEGO Drive which
SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LEOTLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGE 4
provides access to LEGOLAND. The approval of the Final Map, grading plans, and
improvement plans for the master tentative map provided the approval for grading of the site and
the construction of the infrastructure to serve the project. Approval of the development
agreement vested the proposed use.
Applicable Regulations
The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards as analyzed
within the following section of this staff report:
A. Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207(A));
B. Travel/Recreation Commercial (T-R) General Plan Land Use Designation;
C. Commercial - Tourist, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (C-T-Q);
D. Site Development Plan findings required by the Qualified Development Overlay Zone -
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.06, Section 21.06.020 ;
E. Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport;
F. Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and the Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone - Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.203;
G. Growth Management Ordinance (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 13); and
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. Therefore, this section will
cover the project's compliance with each of the regulations listed above in the order in which
they are presented.
A. CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan establishes the permitted uses for the site as well as the
development standards and design guidelines. The project plans comply with the requirements
of the specific plan. The permitted uses for the project site include an entrance facility; toll
"plaza"; retail shops; restaurants; service buildings associated with park activities; business and
administration offices related to park activities; indoor and outdoor facilities related to
entertainment and education, but not including high speed thrill rides (those rides typically
oriented towards the teenage and young adult audience) for children; water features; lakes;
landscaped areas; guest services and facilities; parking; and other related uses. The uses
proposed for the site are within the list of permitted uses.
SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LE(WAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGES
The development standards of the specific plan have also been complied with as demonstrated in
the following table:
STANDARD
Building Setbacks
Landscape Setbacks
Parking Area Setbacks
Building Height
Parking Standards
Signage
Service/Loading Areas &
Trash Enclosures
Fencing & Walls
Lighting
REQUIRED
LEGO Drive - 50 ft. from
eastern curb
Northeast Boundary of the
Park - 35 ft
Hidden Valley Rd. - 20 ft.
Palomar Airport Rd. - 300 ft.
LEGO Drive - 35 ft. from
eastern curb
Northeast Boundary of the
Park - 35 ft.
Hidden Valley Rd. - 20 ft.
Palomar Airport Rd. - 140 ft.
LEGO Drive - 35 ft. from
eastern curb
Northeast Boundary of the
Park - N/A
Hidden Valley Rd. - 20 ft.
Palomar Airport Rd. - 140 ft.
35 ft.; allowed height
protrusions to 45 ft.
Automobiles 3410
Handicapped 45
RV 45
Employee 600
Bus 60
Subtotal .4160
Overflow 1150
Total 5310
Sign Information to be
submitted as part of SDP
Locate behind bldgs., screen,
& comply with City Stds.
Design & locations to be
approved as part of SDP
Designed to not spill over onto
other properties & directed
downward
PROPOSED
LEGO Drive- 100ft. +
Northeast Boundary - 40 ft. +
Hidden Valley Rd. -31ft. +
Palomar Airport Rd. - 1000 ft.+
LEGO Drive - 35 ft.+
Northeast Boundary - 35 ft. +
Hidden Valley Rd. - 20 ft. +
Palomar Airport Rd. - 140 ft.
LEGO Drive - 35 ft.
Northeast Boundary - N/A
Hidden Valley Rd. -20ft.
Palomar Airport Rd. - 140 ft.
35 ft. & less: height protrusions
to 45 ft. max.
Automobiles 3465
Handicapped 45
RV 45
Employee 622
Bus 60
Subtotal 4237
Overflow 11071
Total 5344
Signage proposed is in
conformance with SP 207(A)
Located within the Inner Park &
adequately screened
Proposed fencing & walls
recommended for approval
Max. light pole ht. 30 ft. with
lighting directed downward
1 A number of the required overflow parking spaces will be provided as fully improved spaces with the first phase
of development.
ittuSDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LEGWLAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGE 6
Design Guidelines
The specific plan also contains guidelines applicable to the project site. The guidelines address
building orientation, access, architectural character, building materials, and landscaping. The
project design complies with the design guidelines of the specific plan.
B. & C. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
The existing General Plan and Zoning designations for the site were adopted concurrently with
the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan to achieve consistency. The Travel/Recreation Commercial
(T-R) General Plan Land Use Designation provides for the use as the category addresses
commercial uses that provide for visitor attractions and commercial uses. The specific plan
implements the General Plan on the project site and includes required circulation improvements
and provisions for alternative modes of transportation such as public bus, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities. Zoning for the site is Commercial - Tourist, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (C-
T-Q). The specific plan list of uses modifies the permitted uses allowed for the site. The Q-
Overlay designation on the zoning map requires the approval of a site development plan. This is
consistent with the specific plan which was established with the requirement that each site
require approval of a site development plan.
D. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS REQUIRED BY THE O-OVERLAY
ZONE
The Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Q-Overlay) which is part of the zoning designation
for the property requires that a site development plan be approved for the proposed use prior to
the issuance of any building permit. Four findings are required by the Q-Overlay Zone. The
required findings with justification for each are contained in the Planning Commission resolution
for the project. This section summarizes the necessary findings and support for each.
The requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings as the
project design complies with the requirements of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan as
demonstrated in Section "A" of this report. Significant building and landscape setbacks around
the perimeter of the site as well as the location of the Inner Park at the northern portion of the site
and the Outer Park which includes parking and vehicle circulation areas on the southern part of
the site provides adequate buffers between the proposed use and planned adjacent uses. The site
is also adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use as all applicable code requirements
have been met as well as the landscaping of approximately 47.5 percent of the total site area, the
provision of all required parking as well as a parking expansion area on site, and building
coverage is proposed at approximately 3 percent. Approximately 5.3 percent of the parking area
will be landscaped while a minimum of 3 percent is required. The parking lot is divided into
cells separated by 28 to 30 foot wide landscape areas which run in an east/west direction. The
central pedestrian spine in the parking lot is 80 feet wide with a significant area devoted to
landscaping.
LE^oLjSDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LEG^LAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGE?
All features necessary to adjust the use to existing and permitted future uses will be provided.
Screen walls, berming and landscaping are proposed to screen service areas for the park.
Adequate vehicle circulation has been provided to accommodate vehicle, truck, recreational
vehicle and bus turning movements on-site. In addition, a service road has been provided around
the perimeter of the Inner Park for operational needs. Several access points have been provided
to the service road for emergency vehicles. Pedestrian connections to the overall pedestrian
circulation system of the Carlsbad Ranch have been provided.
The planned street system is adequate to handle all traffic generated by the use. The proposed use
is consistent with the use analyzed in the circulation analysis prepared for Program EIR 94-01 for
the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. Visitors will be directed by signage to reach the park using
Cannon Road to LEGO Drive. The private section of LEGO Drive south of the roundabout will
contain four lanes and toll plaza structures with a total of six windows. An analysis has been
prepared for the proposed private section of LEGO Drive by KAKU Associates, a firm
specializing in transportation planning, traffic engineering, and parking studies which completed
the traffic analysis for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Program EIR and the Zone
13 Local Facilities Management Plan. The analysis concluded that a total of 5,695 feet of
queuing will be needed to accommodate the anticipated conditions along LEGO Drive during
summer weekend conditions. The proposed design of LEGO Drive utilizing reversible lanes will
function with 3 inbound lanes and one outbound lane during the peak inbound period. The
proposed design will provide a total of 7,310 feet of queuing area therefore, all vehicles will be
off the public streets. A meandering sidewalk set within landscaping is proposed on the east side
of LEGO Drive.
E. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FOR McCLELLAN - PALOMAR
AIRPORT
The project site is located within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan - Palomar Airport.
Areas of the project site are within the 60 and 65 CNEL noise contours. The site is
approximately 4,900 feet west of the airport. The airport land use plan identifies the use as being
compatible with the noise levels for the site. The project was sent to SANDAG staff and the
Palomar Airport Manager for review. SANDAG staff reiterated their comments on the Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207(A)) in which they determined the LEGOLAND use to be consistent
with the airport land use plan.
F. MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
As designed, the proposed project is consistent with the relevant policies of the Mello II Segment
of the Local Coastal Program, The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan which serves as partial
implementation for the Mello II Segment for the project site, and the Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone (Zoning Ordinance Section 21.203). The project site has been previously
disturbed by agricultural activity and is approved for grading. No steep slopes or native
vegetation exist on-site with the exception of the riparian vegetation which is located within a
coastal commission deed restriction area at the northeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and
Armada Drive. The riparian vegetation will be preserved and include a 50 foot buffer as required
by Policy 3-8 of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program. The project will not have
SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LE
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGES
AND CARLSBAD
drainage impacts on coastal resources as the project includes a detention basin within the 140
foot landscape setback from Palomar Airport Road. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System facilities to separate oil and other contaminants from site runoff will be constructed.
Additional project grading will be conditioned to comply with the grading provisions of the
Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone which prohibits grading between October 1st and
April 1st.
G. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE fLFMP - ZONE 13)
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 13 in the northwest
quadrant. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and compliance with the
adopted performance standards are summarized as follows:
FACILITY
City Administration
Library
Wastewater Treatment
Capacity
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection System
Water Distribution System
|_ IMPACTS
N/A
N/A
524 EDU
$.40/sq. ft.
Basin C
6,630 ADT - Avg. Fri.
1 0,680 ADT-Avg. Sun.
Station 4
N/A
Payment of non-residential
school fee at bldg. permit
issuance
524 EDU
6 1,486 -69,51 6 GPD.
COMPLIANCE \\Tffl STANDARDS
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project was analyzed in the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR 94-01)
certified for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment and related applications on January 9,
1996, by the City Council. A statement of Overriding Consideration was adopted for cumulative
impacts to air quality, agriculture, and traffic which cannot be fully mitigated. The cumulative
impacts are regional in nature and occur in areas outside the jurisdiction of the City. Mitigation
measures required for the grading plan and final map for Master Tentative Map CT 94-09 have
been applied. Mitigation measures incorporated into this site development plan include adequate
on-site circulation to reduce vehicle queuing, provision of a shuttle to major rail transit centers,
bicycle parking facilities, showers for bicycling employees' use, pedestrian connections to the
site, review by the Police Department of security plans for the project, use of reclaimed water for
landscape watering, preparation of a solid waste management plan for City review and approval
and implementation of that plan, and circulation system improvements necessary for the project
such as the I-5/Cannon Road interchange improvements. As a result, the environmental analysis
LEGm^SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LEGmAND CARLSBAD
APRIL 16, 1997
PAGE 9
for the site development plan included an Initial Study (Environmental Impact Assessment Form
- Part II) focusing on any changes from approved plans and the project contemplated in the EIR
to what is proposed with this site development plan. No additional significant adverse impacts
were identified in the initial study for this project, therefore, no further environmental review is
required. A Notice of Prior Compliance was prepared for the project and published in the North
County Times Newspaper. A Notice of Determination will be filed upon the final action being
taken on the project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4083
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4084
3. Location Map
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
6. Disclosure Form
7. Prior Environmental Compliance
8. Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Part II
9. Exhibit "A" - Project Description (Revised 3/5/97)
10. Reduced Site Plan Exhibit
11. Exhibits "1" - "157" dated April 16, 1997.
DN:bk
AGUA HEDJONDA LAGOON
GOLF COURSE AREA
^SITE
LEGOLAND CARLSBAD
SDP96-14/CDP96-16
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET W
CASE NO: SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16
CASE NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad
APPLICANT: LEGOLAND Carlsbad. Inc.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit for
a LEGOLAND Theme Park which includes theme park attractions, retail, food and beverage
service, associated support facilities, and parking on approximately 129 acres located east of
future Armada Drive and west of future Hidden Valley Road on the north side of Palomar
Airport Road.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 18 and 19 of Carlsbad Tract 94-09 of Carlsbad Ranch
Units 2 & 3.
APN: 211-022-10. 11.16 & 212-041-05 Acres: 129 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: T-R (Travel/Recreation Commercial)
Density Allowed: N/A Density Proposed: N/A
Existing Zone: C-T-Q Proposed Zone: C-T-Q
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site C-T-Q Vacant
North O-S & C-T-Q Agriculture &
CMWD Water Tank
South L-C & P-M-Q Vacant
East O-S & P-M Vacant
West O-Q/P-M-Q, Vacant & Agriculture
C-T-Q/C-2-Q, & O-S
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 524 EDUs
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: December 17, 1996
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_
|2<] Other, Prior Compliance with EIR 94-01 certified January 9. 1996
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LEGOLAND Carlsbad-
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 13 GENERAL PLAN: T-R
ZONING: C-T-0
DEVELOPER'S NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad, Inc.
ADDRESS: 5600 Avenida Encinas. Suite 130. Carlsbad. CA 92008
PHONE NO.: 438-5570 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 211-022-10.11.16 & 212-041-05
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 129 acres. 187.813 sq. ft.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Spring 1999
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = N/A
B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = N/A
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 524 EDU
D. Park: Demand in Acreage = $.40/sq. ft.
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A
Identify Drainage Basin - C
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 6,630 August Friday
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) 10.680 August Sunday
G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 4
H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = N/A
I. Schools: Non-res, school fee
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer: Demands in EDUs 524
Identify Sub Basin = 13B & 5H
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K. Water: Demand in GPD = 61.486-69.516
L. The project is not proposing any dwelling units thereby not impacting the Growth
Management Dwelling unit allowance.
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANTS STATEMENTOFDISCLOSUREORCERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTSON ALL APPLICATIONS
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY
APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. Applicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
2. Owner
List the names and addressees of all person having anv ownership interest in the property involved.i - . ^. /*> I / /|J. * < f^ / £ I t .^. I I rl i rl i * i
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names
and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning
any partnership interest in the partnership.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or
as trustee or beneficiary of the trust.
DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of 2
2O75 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 - (619) 438-1 161
(Over)
Disclosure Statement Page 2
5. Have you had more than $250.00 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff.
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes No X If yes, please indicate person(s) ;
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization,
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other
political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
(NCXTE: Attach additional pages as necessary)
Signature of Owner/date Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of 2
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Please Take Notice:
The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the
project described below have already been considered in conjunction with
previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional
environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed.
Project Title:
Project Location:
Project Description:
LEGOLAND Carlsbad
East of future Armada Drive and west of future Hidden
Valley Road on the north side of Palomar Airport Road
A Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit
for a 129 acre LEGOLAND. The project includes theme park
attractions, retail, food and beverage service, associated
support facilities, and parking.
Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las
Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited.
Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of
date of publication.
DATED:
CASE NO:
CASE NAME:
FEBRUARY 4, 1997
SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16
LEGOLAND Carlsbad
PUBLISH DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1997
MICHAEL J.HOL
Planning Director
2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16
BACKGROUND
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
CASE NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad
APPLICANT: LEGOLAND Carlsbad, Inc.
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPICANT: 5600 Avenida Encinas. Suite 130.
Carlsbad. CA92008 (619)438-5570
DATE El A FORM PART I SUBMITTED: December 19, 1996
PROJECT DESCRIPTON: A Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit for a 129
acre LEGOLAND located east of future Armada Drive and west of future Hidden Valley Road
on the north side of Palomar Airport Road. The project includes theme park attractions, retail,
food and beverage service, associated support facilities, and parking.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
|^| Land Use and Planning
| | Population and Housing
| | Geological Problems
fVl Water
Air Quality
|^| Transportation/Circulation ^ Public Services
| | Biological Resources [x] Utilities & Service Systems
| | Energy & Mineral Resources | | Aesthetics
fxl Hazards [Vl Cultural Resources
| | Noise | | Recreation
| | Mandatory Findings of Significance
Rev. 03/28/96
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
| | I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
| | I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
| | I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
| | I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An Negative
declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
[>^| I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier environmental impact
report (EIR) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
/-30-97
Planner Signature Date
Planning Director's Signature Date
Rev. 03/28/96
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
• A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
"No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
• "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
• "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
• "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant.
• Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated
Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
• When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of
Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
• A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
Rev. 03/28/96
• If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this
case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated"
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
• An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce
the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant.
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source #(s): (1; pg. 5.7-1 through 5.7-18)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project? (1; pg.5.4-5 through 5.4-13, 5.7-1 through 5.7-
18, and 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
(l;pg. 5.7-8 and 5.7-9)
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible
land uses? (l;pg. 5.1-1 through 5.1-16)
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)? (1; 5.7-1 through 5.7-18)
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? (1; pg. 7-1 through 7-4)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)? (1; pg. 7-8 and 7-
9)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? (1; pg. 7-8 and 7-9)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significan
t Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
No
Impact
D
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? (1; Appendix A)
b) Seismic ground shaking? (1; Appendix A)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (1;
Appendix A)
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (1; Appendix A)
e) Landslides or mudflows? (1; Appendix A)
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (1;
Appendix A and pg. 5.12-6 and 5.12-7)
g) Subsidence of the land? (1; Appendix A)
h) Expansive soils? (1; Appendix A)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? (1; Appendix A)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff? (1; pg. 5.12-1
through 5.12-7)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (1; Appendix A)D D D
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? (1; pg. 5.9-13 through 5.9-22 and 5.12-1
through 5.12-7)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (1;
pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through
5.12-7)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies? (1; pg.
5.9-13 through 5.9-22)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
Less Than
Significan
t Impact
D
D
D
D
No
Impact
D
D
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (1; pg. 5.2-1
through 5.2-8)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (1; pg. 5.2-1,
5.2-4, 5.2-6, and 5.2-7)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate? (1; Appendix A)
d) Create objectionable odors? (1; Appendix A)D
D
D
D D
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (1; pg.
5.5-1 through 5.5-30)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g. farm equipment)? (1; pg. 5.5-1 through 5.5-30)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
(1; pg. 5.5-1 through 5.5-30 and 5.9-1 through 5.9-4)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (1; pg.
5.5-25 and 5.5-26)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (1;
Appendix A)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (1; pg.
5.7-16)
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (1; pg. 5.7-1
through 5.7-18)
D
D
D
D
D
D
n
n
n
n
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result
in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds? (1; pg. 5.4-1 through 5.4-13)
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (1; pg.
5.4-1 through 5.4-13)
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (1; pg. 5.4-1 through 5.4-
13)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
(l;pg. 5.4-1 through 5.4-13)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (1; pg. 5.4-1
through 5.4-13)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
Less Than
Significan
t Impact
No
Impact
D
D
D
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal?
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (1;
Appendix A)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (1; Appendix A)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State? (1; Appendix A)
D
D D
D
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)? (1; pg. 5.6-1 through 5.6-7)
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? (1; 5.9-1 through 5.9-4)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazards? (1; pg. 5.6-1 through 5.6-7)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (1; pg. 5.6-1 through 5.6-7)
e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (1; pg. 5.7-8 and 5.7-9)
D
D
D
D
D
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (1; pg. 5.8-1 through
5.8-7)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (1; pg. 5.8-1
through 5.8-7)
D
D
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? (1; pg. 5.9-1 and 5.9-2)
b) Police protection? (1; pg. 5.9-2 through 5.9-4)
c) Schools? (1; pg. 5.9-7 through 5.9-13)
D
D
D
D
D
D
7 Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (1;
pg. 5.7-2, 5.7-3, and 5.7-16)
e) Other governmental services? (1; pg. 5.7-2 and 5.7-16)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
Less Than
Significan
t Impact
D
No
Impact
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (1; Appendix A)
b) Communications systems? (1; Appendix A)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? (1; pg. 5.9-4 through 5.9-7)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (1; pg. 5.9-4 through 5.9-7)
e) Storm water drainage? (l;pg.5.12-l through 5.12-7)
f) Solid waste disposal? (1; pg. 5.10-1 through 5.10-5)
g) Local or regional water supplies? (1; pg. 5.9-13
through 5.9-22)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (1; pg. 5.11-1
through 5.11-7)
b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (1; pg.
5.11-1 through 5.11-7)
c) Create light or glare? (1; Appendix A)
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (1; pg. 5.3-1
through 5.3-8)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? (1; pg. 5.3-1 through
5.3-8)
c) Affect historical resources? (1; pg. 5.3-1 through 5.3-8)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (1; pg. 5.3-
1 through 5.3-8)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (1; pg. 5.3-1 through 5.3-8)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
n
n
XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? (1; pg. 5.7-2
through 5.7-3 and 5.7-16)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (1; pg. 5.7-2
through 5.7-3 and 5.7-16)D n
n
n
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
Less Than No
Significan Impact
t Impact
D D
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the
following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available
for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist
were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant
to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-
specific conditions for the project.
Rev. 03/28/96
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
LEGOLAND Carlsbad is proposed for Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan.
Planning area 4 contains approximately 129 acres and the proposed land use of a LEGOLAND
Park was established in the specific plan in addition to the development agreement approved by
the City Council. LEGOLAND Carlsbad as proposed is primarily an outdoor experience.
Attractions are placed in landscaped settings themed to the attraction. Interior attractions and
"dark rides" are relatively few. For planning purposes the project is separated into an Outer Park
and Inner Park. The acreage for these two areas is approximately as follows:
Outer Park:
LEGO Drive and perimeter setbacks: 21 acres
Parking lots: 43 acres
Future parking expansion: 10 acres
Inner Park:
Attraction areas (developed with the first phase): 35 acres
Future expansion areas: 15 acres
Service and Administration: 5 acres
Total Park Area: 129 acres
The Park will initially consist of nine themed areas and the administrative/service area (the
"Inner Park"), and the parking lots, access roads and perimeter setbacks (the "Outer Park"). The
project will include approximately 100 structures of various types for the provision of
administration and service, guest support, retail and various attractions such as rides, play areas
and displays on the initial development area of the inner park. As listed above areas will be
reserved for future expansion. Approximately 164,000 square feet of building area is included in
the current development proposal. Facilities and development elements which are part of
LEGOLAND include approximately 25 rides and attractions, 8 show venues, 4 restaurants in
addition to various stands and carts, 4 main retail shops plus various stands and carts, heavy
landscaping, a 90,000 square foot lagoon, a paved parking area for a minimum of 4,160 vehicles
to accommodate guests, employees, buses, and recreational vehicles, and a parking expansion
area that will accommodate an additional 1,150 parking spaces.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed project was evaluated in the "Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Final
Program Environmental Impact Report, dated November 1995 (EIR 94-01)." EIR 94-01
evaluates the environmental effects of the development and operation of: The Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan; improvements to the I-5/Cannon Road Interchange; and the development of a 24.2
acre parcel immediately adjacent to the northern boundary of the specific plan site. The Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan is a planning document which will guide the development of a 447.40 acre
area through the provision of a comprehensive set of guidelines, regulations, and implementation
programs. The proposed land uses for the Specific Plan include office, research and
development, related light manufacturing, commercial, hotel, destination resort, golf course,
10 Rev. 03/28/96
agriculture, a vocational school campus, and LEGOLAND Carlsbad. The 24.2 acre parcel
adjacent to the northern boundary is proposed as a continuation of the Specific Plan golf course.
EIR 94-01 analyzed the following environmental issue areas: Agricultural Resources, Air
Quality, Archaeological and Paleontological Resources, Biological Resources,
Traffic/Circulation, Hazardous Waste/Pesticide Residue, Land Use Compatibility; Noise, Public
Services and Utilities, Solid Waste, Visual Aesthetics/Grading, and Water Quality. The Initial
Study prepared for the Specific Plan Amendment is contained in Appendix A of EIR 94-01 and
analyzed additional issues which were determined not to have a significant environmental
impact. EIR 94-01 was certified by the Carlsbad City Council on January 9, 1996. At that time
Candidate Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation and
Monitoring Program were approved. All mitigation measures applicable to the LEGOLAND
Carlsbad project proposed for Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch have been incorporated
into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project.
References to the applicable section of EIR 94-01 are provided next to each item on this
environmental impact assessment form. A brief explanation is provided in the following section
for each item checked as having a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigation incorporated":
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING
d) Agricultural Resources
The project site includes approximately 93.35 acres that were approved for tentative
cancellation of a Williamson Act Land Conservation Contract. The analysis in EIR 94-
01 concluded that no mitigation measures are necessary as project impacts will be
reduced to a level less than significant through the payment of fees consistent with the
coastal program, the preservation of 53 acres within the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan
area, and through the implementation of policies contained in the specific plan.
The EIR analysis concluded that the conversion of the existing agricultural lands on the
Carlsbad Ranch and cumulative areas to urban uses will result in a significant incremental
impact to agricultural resources. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted
for this cumulative impact.
V. AIR QUALITY
a) Air Quality
No significant impacts as a result of construction activity are anticipated. Implementation
of the air quality mitigation measures will lessen long-term operation air quality impacts
to a level less than significant. It was concluded in the analysis for EIR 94-01 that the
development anticipated under the proposed specific plan amendment together with the
development of other related projects will have a significant and unavoidable cumulative
impact on the region's air quality. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted
for this cumulative impact.
11 Rev. 03/28/96
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
a) Increased Vehicle Trips
A series of circulation system improvements are required as part of the development of
the Carlsbad Ranch property. With the implementation of the improvements identified in
EIR 94-01 all of the analyzed intersections and street segments are projected to operate at
acceptable levels of service. It was determined that the Carlsbad Ranch project in
conjunction with cumulative build-out forecasts, will result in a significant cumulative
impact to the 1-5 freeway and SR-78. A statement of overriding considerations was
adopted for this cumulative impact.
IX. HAZARDS
d) Exposure to existing sources of potential health hazards
Evidence of surface staining and possible pesticide contamination was observed at
several locations on the project site. Although no significant levels of soil contamination
from pesticides or herbicides were detected during soil testing in 1989 and 1995, the
potential for undetected contamination does exist due to the fact that the project site has
been historically used for agricultural production. Exposure of persons to unremediated
soils is a potential impact. Implementation of mitigation measures listed in EIR 94-01
will reduce this potential impact to less than significant. The mitigation measures
require soil monitoring and remediation of any affected soils during site development.
These mitigation measures will be implemented during the mass grading for Tentative
Map 94-09.
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES
b) Police protection
The EIR analysis concluded that the conversion of an agricultural area to an urban area
which will attract visitors will require additional law enforcement and crime prevention
services. The potential increase in demand on police services is a significant impact.
This demand for police protection will be reduced through implementation of a
mitigation measure requiring security measures to be incorporated into the proposed
developments. The applicant has prepared the first phase of a security plan which has
been submitted to the Carlsbad Police Department for review and approval.
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
f) Solid waste disposal
;
The generation of additional solid waste is a potentially significant impact. The
mitigation measure identified in EIR 94-01 which has been applied to the project will
reduce this impact to a level of less than significant. The mitigation measure requires the
submittal of a solid waste management plan to address the project's needs for recycling
facilities and diversion programs/measures which can be implemented.
12 Rev. 03/28/96
g) Local or regional water supplies
The project will require the construction of onsite water lines. The impacts from buildout
of the Carlsbad Ranch project to water supplies is potentially significant. Implementation
of the mitigation measures contained in EIR 94-01 will reduce impacts to a level of less
than significant. The mitigation includes utilizing reclaimed water for landscaping on the
project site. The LEGOLAND project will not have impacts which would cause the EIR
94-01 established threshold for determining significance of water supply/reclaimed water
to be exceeded.
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES
a) Paleontological resources
Areas of the Carlsbad Ranch contain geologic formations with a high potential for
yielding significant paleontological resources. Mitigation measures requiring a
paleontological monitor are required for the project and will be implemented during the
mass grading for Tentative Map 94-09.
b) Archaeological resources
A data recovery program has been completed for sites which will be impacted by the
grading of the LEGOLAND Planning Area. Mitigation measures requiring an
archaeologist to monitor the grading operation are required and will be implemented
during the mass grading for Tentative Map 94-09.
SOURCE DOCUMENTS - (NOTE: All source documents are on file in the Planning Department
located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, Phone (619) 438-1161)
1. "Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Final Program Environmental Impact Report, City
of Carlsbad, November 1995."
13 Rev. 03/28/96
EXHIBIT "A'
Project Description (revised 3/5/97):
The focus of LEGOLAND Carlsbad will be on the provision of fun and creative, educational experiences
for children in the age group 2 through 13 and their families. The planning and design is based on the
following goals:
• Establish the child as the focal point
• Provide for family interaction and fun
• Facilitate participation and creativity
• Create a world of learning
• Develop themed areas corresponding to LEGO brands
• Create a "park within a park"
• Provide comfort and quality for guests and staff
• Provide environmental sensitivity including designing with nature, energy conservation, reuse and
recycling
• Create synergy with the local community and environment
LEGOLAND Carlsbad is primarily an outdoor experience. Attractions are placed in landscaped settings
themed to the attraction. Interior attractions and "dark rides" are relatively few. Special emphasis is
placed in developing as much interactivity into the attractions as possible - all designed to entertain and
educate young guests by actively involving them in the attractions.
Basic project statistics:
Acreage (approximate):
• Outer Park:
LEGO Drive and perimeter landscape setbacks: 21 acres
Parking Lots: 43 acres
Future parking expansion: 10 acres
• Inner Park:
Attraction Areas (developed with the first phase): 35 acres
Future expansion areas (to be mulch-covered in the interim): 15 acres
Service & Administration: 5 acres
Total Park Area: 129 acres
Rides, Shows and Attractions*:
• approximately 25 rides and attractions, 8 show venues
Facilities and development elements:
• 187,813 square feet of buildings (1st Phase; allowable construction at buildout per Specific Plan is
425,750 s.f.)
architecture: one- and (2/3 scale) two-story facades with theming on attraction buildings and
associated structures (associated structures include queue shade structures, and open shade/shelter
structures, and various stands)
• 4 restaurants, plus various stands and carts
• 4 main retail shops, plus various stands and carts
• heavy landscaping, including a 90,000 square-foot lagoon
• parking for 5344 vehicles, including future expansion
• screened "back-of-house" structures (Plant rooms, maintenance sheds, utility structures/enclosures)
• Administration and Services area designed to accommodate views from future offsite areas
• New infrastructure (utility corridors, LEGO Drive)
All structures are within the heights proposed for LEGOLAND in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan.
The Site:
The site is of rolling terrain which varies about thirty feet inside the park. The terrain inside the park is
used to contain vistas within the park to enhance the experience of having "left the real world behind."
Landscape is much more integral to the concept of a LEGOLAND than in other theme parks. The "Guest
Experience" is paramount in LEGOLAND, and the orientation toward children ages 2 to 12 is felt to be
greatly aided by the use of plantings. Per the Specific Plan, landscaping around the park perimeters is
used to screen views into the park from adjacent development to the west.
The Park will initially consist of nine themed areas and the administrative/service area (the "Inner Park"),
and the parking lots, access roads and perimeter setbacks (the "Outer Park").
Inner Park:
Themed areas:
The Beginning
DUPLO Village
The Ridge
Funtown
The Garden
Castle Hill
Miniland
The Lagoon
Imagination Center
Service and Administration Area
Outer Park:
Lego Drive
Parking Toll Booths
Guest Parking Lot
Employee Parking Lot
Perimeter Landscape
Following are more detailed descriptions of the above areas:
Inner Park
The Beginning:
All guests enter the Inner Park through The Beginning. Facilities include:
• entry plaza
• ticket kiosks and turnstiles
• guest services (information, group sales, stroller rentals, ATM's, lost and found, first aid, lockers, rest
rooms, etc.)
• retail shop
• food carts
• retail carts
• seasonal exhibit
• the "marketplace"
• LEGO "stop and wonders" (humorous LEGO model exhibits)
• plaza overlooking The Lagoon
The Lagoon:
As guests pass through the Beginning, one of their first and most dramatic views will be of The Lagoon.
The Lagoon is the dominant landscape feature in the park and will help to give the guest a point of
reference and orientation as well as a beautiful amenity. The Family Boat Ride in the lagoon takes guests
on a "world tour." Around the shoreline will be famous scenes from around the world depicted in LEGO
bricks. Several themed pedestrian bridges cross the lagoon. Waterfalls and weirs add drama to the
scene. The Lagoon will appear to flow into various clusters and attractions, such the Safari Ride, Miniland
Harbor and Boating School.
DUPLO Village:
DUPLO Village is designed as the Imaginary Garden of the Child with themed elements, patterned after
the DUPLO brand of toys that are designed for the youngest age group. The attractions in this area
include:
• Safari Ride: a tour through the wilds of Africa where the lifelike animals are made of LEGO bricks.
• Fairy Tale Brook: Guest float along a stream in "leaf boats. Scenes from popular fairy tales are
depicted in LEGO bricks.
• Waterworks: Interactive LEGO sculptures & water features.
• DUPLO Play Town: a fun area of play featuring a maze, train, and other features for young children.
• Magic Theater: A "behind the scenes" look at a magic show.
• Outdoor Show: a small amphitheater for live shows.
• Puppet show cart
• DUPLO Retail Shop
• Pasta Patch Restaurant: freshly-prepared food on real dinnerware
• Food and retail carts
Funtown:
A town setting provides an environment where children can role play and imagine they are doing such
grown-up things as driving a car, piloting a helicopter, going on an explorer's expedition, or skippering a
boat. The most "architectural" of the clusters, Funtown has themed building facades set around a city
"parkette", or town square. Components include:
• Driving School: children learn the rules of the road and receive a LEGO driver's license
• Mini Driving School: driving school for the younger child
• Boating School: learn to skipper a boat
• Helicopters: fly up in the air and sneak a look into the Robin's nests
• Fire Engine Show: a live show around a fire engine
• Explorers Institute: go on an expedition to ancient Egypt, the North Pole, and the jungles of Africa.
• LEGO Factory Tour: learn how LEGO bricks are made
• LEGO Play Pavillion: fun with LEGO
• Traffic yam: a fun and zany traffic jam
• Cool Cafe: the coolest Cafe in town, dude
• City Parkette Feature
• Brick Brothers Retail Shop
• Marche Restaurant (incl. staff canteen): the park's largest restaurant, with freshly-prepared food
• Baby Care Center
• Food stands & carts
• Retail carts
• Rest rooms
The Ridge:
The Ridge is a prominent topographic feature in the park and provides a beautiful landscaped backdrop to
the lagoon. Located atop the ridge is a large outdoor maze where guests must find their way to the
reward in the center. The ridge is a "passive" cluster that provides a pleasant break between the active
clusters. Lush landscaping and interesting earth sculpture are featured here. Food and retail carts are
located along the main pathways.
The Garden:
Another of the "passive" clusters, this area features the Garden Restaurant with an outdoor dining terrace
overlooking the lagoon and Miniland. Other features of the Garden cluster are Lombard Walk (a curvy
walkway down the hill), Hopscotch Walk, food carts, retail carts and rest rooms.
Castle Hill:
This cluster is themed after the "Castle" LEGO toy line. Medieval images of kings & queens, knights and
Robin Hood are used. The attractions include:
• Castle Sensory Coaster: not a high speed thrill ride, but a coaster to delight all your senses
• Dungeon Maze: make your way down through the dungeon and watch out for the dragon!
• Breath Taker: more kid-powered fun
• Robin Hood Tree and Rope Climb: the ultimate jungle gym
• Horse Ride: hop on your horse for some medieval jousting
• Gem Wash: try your luck at panning for gemstones
• Enchanted Walk: stroll through the forest full of wild creatures
• Royal Pavilion
• LEGO Play
• Castle Inn Food Court
• Food Stands and Carts
• Retail Carts
Miniland: Miniland is the heart and soul of LEGOLAND and is its best known attraction. This area
illustrates the creative uses of LEGO bricks with miniature scale models of famous buildings, landmarks
and scenes from around America. The Miniland models are alive with movement and sound. Miniland is
arranged in mini-clusters, each themed after a particular American region:
• New York
• Washington D.C.
• New Orleans
• California
• Harbor, New England
An indoor minicluster around the "space" theme has been incorporated within the miniland plantroom
facility. Outside, a model maker takes questions and answers from guests. The overlook plaza has
dramatic views of miniland from above. Miniland includes food and retail carts, as well as expansion
areas for future models.
Imagination Center:
This cluster emphasizes learning and exploration. Children and adults can participate in building activities
with LEGO products. Expert LEGO staff are available to work with the participants. Attractions and
components include:
• LEGO Workshops: LEGO workshops are places where children and adults are involved in fun and
creative play with LEGO building projects and classes, most with an educational emphasis..
• LEGO Experience Show: The audience is treated to an interactive, humorous show in a 4,696 s.f.
theater building.
• Family Boat Ride: the queue and boat launch facility is located in the Imagination Center cluster. See
"Lagoon" cluster for description.
• Construction Site: a LEGO construction site with interactive construction equipment & vehicles
• Imagination Cafe
• School Picnic Area
• Corporate Picnic Area (later in First Phase)
• Retail stands and carts
• Food stands and carts
• Rest rooms
Inner Park Infrastructure buildings:
Throughout the park there are various support buildings for electrical, mechanical, water and control
systems. These are designed to be as inconspicuous as possible through a combination of placement,
landscape and/or earthwork concealment. Should one of these structures be so situated that it cannot be
minimized with such strategies, it will be themed in concert with its cluster.
Future Inner Park Expansion Areas
The LEGOLAND site has been planned to allow for future growth. Expansion areas have been set aside
to accommodate future attraction development and parking lot expansion. The expansion areas will be
mass graded during the initial park construction and temporary berming and landscaping installed to
screen the expansion areas from the first phase of development.
Service and Administration Area
Service, maintenance and administration functions are grouped together at the eastern end of the park.
Access to the park for all deliveries and other service needs will be from Hidden Valley Road and
processed through the Service and Administration area. Components include:
• Administration Building: 25,537 s.f., one story, tilt-up construction. Management offices, meeting
rooms, employee training facilities and dressing areas.
• Maintenance & Storage Building: approx. 20,516 s.f. single story with mezzanine, tilt-up construction.
Flexible, multi-use facility, loading dock.
• Gardening Shed & Yard & Paint Booth
• Refuse Collection Area: trash compactors, recyclable materials separation & storage, equipment wash
down areas.
• Outdoor Storage yard
• Utilities: Primary electrical switch gear & meters, emergency electrical generators, and connections to
natural gas, reclaimed water, fire flow and potable water.
Outer Park
The Outer park includes the main entry road (LEGO Drive), the guest and employee parking lots, and
landscape setbacks around the park perimeter boundary. Specifics of these areas are listed below:
• LEGO Drive approx. 1500 lineal feet, four lanes. Privately owned and maintained by LEGOLAND
from the southern end of the roundabout, to the parking lot. LEGO Drive is heavily landscaped to
provide a pleasant entry experience to the park and screen adjacent land uses. LEGO "Welcome
Letters" are a special feature along the road.
• Parking Kiosks: Guests will purchase parking passes at the toll kiosks located at the end of LEGO
Drive before entering the parking lot. Parking attendants will direct parking during peak hours.
• Parking lot: approx. 43 acres in the first phase, with an additional 10 acres for future expansion.
Lighted and landscaped. Parking statistics are as follows:
Required by Specific Plan Provided
Phase 1 Guest parking*: 3,500 spaces (min.)
Employee parking: 600 spaces
Bus parking: 60 spaces
Future parking expansion: 1,150 spaces
("includes autos, RVs and handicapped spaces) 5,310
The parking area is divided by a series of hedgrerows and a center spine into what have been referred to
as "outdoor rooms". The hedgerows, in addition to offering a user-friendly conceptual organizing element
to this large lot, offer screening of the parking lot superior to the normal shopping-center landscape, and
are also used to absorb a good deal of the grade change across the site. Parking is also enhanced by the
use of the large "rooms" in that a speed-parking procedure will be used to handle the large inflow of
parking at opening. Speed-parking is familiar to those who have visited any of Southern California's
theme parks, consisting of personnel directing vehicles to spaces in order by use of hand signals and
traffic-cone-defined aisles which are shifted as the lot fills.
The northeast quadrant of the main lot is for bus and RV parking, with access from both LEGO Drive and
from Hidden Valley Road.
• Landscape setbacks are required by the City around the perimeter boundary of the park. These
setbacks will be landscaped to screen adjacent land uses and public roads. The setbacks vary from
20' wide at Hidden Valley Road to 140' wide along Palomar Airport Road. Storm water detention
basins and pollution control basins are within the Palomar Airport Road setback, as required.
Park-wide Systems
Automated security systems will be located throughout the park utilizing fiber-optic transmission and
central closed circuit TV monitoring at critical areas. See the Security Planning section.
Communication systems for point-of-sale and other communication needs will be installed.
Utilities: Primary and secondary utility corridors and distribution systems will run throughout the park.
Sewer, storm drainage, fire flow, potable and reclaimed water, electrical and natural gas utilities will be
developed. 12 kva is the primary electrical service. Reclaimed water will be utilized from the City's
municipal system for landscape irrigation.
LEGOLAND
CARL3BAD
SITE PLAN McGraw/Baldwin Architects
t
The City of CARLSBAD Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 2, 1997
Application complete date: January 16, 1997
Project Planner: Don Neu
Project Engineer: Sherri Howard
SUBJECT: SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16 - LEGOLAND CARLSBAD - Request for a
recommendation of approval of a Site Development Plan and Coastal
Development Permit for a LEGOLAND Theme Park which includes theme park
attractions, retail, food and beverage service, associated support facilities, and
parking on approximately 129 acres located east of future Armada Drive and west
of future Hidden Valley Road on the north side of Palomar Airport Road within
Planning Area 4 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan in the Coastal Zone and
Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
WORKSHOP
The LEGO developers will present an overview of the LEGO project to the Commission. No
staff report will be given and no action will be taken. This is an opportunity for the public and
the Commission to look at the model and hear the proposal for the interior and exterior of the
park plan prior to the regular meeting of April 16, 1997 at which time the project will be
presented by Staff at a regular public hearing.