HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-04-18; Planning Commission; ; 2001-04-18te City of Carlsbad Planning Departmen
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 18, 2001
Application complete date: October 6, 2000
Project Planner: Eric Munoz
Project Engineer: Skip Hammann
SUBJECT: CDP 00-47 - LEUCADIA DRAINAGE PROJECT - Request for a Coastal
Development Permit to modify and expand the existing surface drainage facilities
in the area of the South Carlsbad State Beach Parking Lot within Open Space
zoning and General Plan designations, in Local Facilities Management Zone 9,
within the Coastal Zone.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4957,
APPROVING CDP 00-47, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The City of Encinitas is the applicant on this permit which is intended to alleviate long-standing
drainage problems within the northern part of Leucadia, and along Coast Highway. Low scale,
but consistent flooding and ponding of waters frequently occurs in various areas of northern
Leucadia; this situation is worsened during storm runoff events. The project involves extensive
work in the City of Encinitas to reconfigure stormdrains, redirect flows, address sump areas and
assist with the northerly flow of this water until it reaches the city boundary with Carlsbad.
The City of Carlsbad portion involves reconfiguring the existing parking lot and drainage basins
at the State Beach Parking Lot to interface with the new storm drain system planned by Encinitas
with overflow pipes installed for major storm events.
The City of Encinitas is the Lead Agency for this project for CEQA purposes and approved this
project on October 24, 2000. In addition, various resource agencies including the Regional
Water Quality Control Board, the California State Department of Fish and Game and the US
Army Corps of Engineers have all issued permits for this project. Carlsbad's role as Responsible
Agency per CEQA is outlined below under Environmental Review. This coastal development
permit is subject to appeal by the California Coastal Commission.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project is shown on Exhibits "A" - "C" dated April 18, 2001. Exhibits "A" and "B" depict
the proposed improvements to the parking lot and the drainage basin areas. Exhibit "C" depicts
the existing parking lot configuration. The project's location is primarily within State Park
property and an existing southern basin area separated from a future northern basin area by the
entrance road at the State Beach parking lot. Also included are portions of the western edge of
DRAIN;CDP 00-47 LEUCADIA DRAINAGE PROJECT
April 18, 2001
Page 2
the Carlsbad Boulevard right-of-way and a portion of the Boulevard median south of Batiquitos
Lagoon.
The project description, as it affects the City of Carlsbad, has the following components:
(1) reconfigure the existing parking lot (to accommodate grade changes to the slope adjacent to
Carlsbad Boulevard and facilitate changes to the existing basin area);
(2) replace the existing 12" pipe coming north from Encinitas with a new 24" pipe and energy
dissipators;
(3) extend existing pipe area to provide net increase in wetlands per an approved wetland
mitigation program; and,
(4) provide an overflow pipe for extreme runoff events on the scale of a 50-year storm whereby
overflow from the northern basin would flow under Carlsbad Boulevard into a biologically
disturbed portion of the median. This is storm flow that would otherwise flow over the
Carlsbad Boulevard roadway which would accelerate its damage and poses a danger to
public safety.
The design and various components of this project represent the collective efforts of various
jurisdictions, coordinated by the City of Encinitas, to resolve their drainage and flooding issues.
Item (4) as outlined above is the only project element that has been added as a result of
Carlsbad's review of the project. This project addition is necessary to ensure public safety
during extreme storm and flooding events affecting Carlsbad Boulevard. In addition, the City of
Encinitas has agreed to incorporate this item into the project. It is an incidental change to the
project approved by Encinitas and does not affect the City's ability to make the coastal permit
findings, or support the project in general.
IV. ANALYSIS
The project is subject to the following:
A. Local Coastal Program
B. General Plan
Local Coastal Program
This project is located within the Mello II Local Coastal Program. As part of the permits issued
to the City of Encinitas, a temporary . 11 wetland impact (short-term construction impact) is
mitigated at 4:1 via an approved mitigation program. Also, public access will not be hindered in
the area. Therefore, this flood control project is consistent with the LCP since no development is
proposed that would affect coastal or wetland resources, habitat or public access. The project is
conditioned to avoid winter grading as well as avoid grading during sensitive bird nesting
seasons.
This permit is appealable to the Coastal Commission. Staff of both cities (Carlsbad and
Encinitas) have worked closely to propose a project that would be supported by the resource
agencies as well as the Coastal Commission staff. All of the findings required for a coastal
development permit, including the specific coastal overlay zone findings necessary for this
particular project's location, are made in the attached Planning Commission Resolution, and
summarized below.
CDP 00-47 LEUCADIA DRAINAGE PROJECT
April 18, 2001
Page 3
The project will not decrease the number of parking spaces at the existing state beach parking
lot. In addition, the project has been designed to prevent any long-term beach access impacts;
short-term beach access will be conditioned to not occur during summer months. In addition, the
project has been adequately designed to accommodate the increased flows to the area while not
creating significant environmental impacts. So, the project is consistent with the policies and
objectives of the LCP.
The project is also consistent with the applicable coastal overlay zones because adequate
hydrological analysis has been performed to ensure that drainage-related impacts will not occur
to Batiquitos Lagoon; and a condition to waive public liability against the City of Carlsbad or the
Coastal Commission has been placed on the project.
General Plan
The site is designated Open Space and accommodates the State Beach parking lot south of
Batiquitos Lagoon west of Carlsbad Boulevard. As part of a major flood control project, this
project is consistent with the General Plan by protecting public health and safety concerns during
flooding events. Specifically, Open Space Objective B.2 addresses the need to protect public
health and safety by preserving natural and man-made hazard areas as open space and taking
special precautionary measures to protect the public safety where development is possible and
permitted. In this case, the permitted development is the State Beach parking lot and Carlsbad
Boulevard roadway, both of which will receive improved protection while allowing for
reconfigured drainage facilities to alleviate a flooding problem in Encinitas.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City of Encinitas, acting as Lead Agency per CEQA, approved a Negative Declaration for
the project on June 10, 1999. The environmental approval was for the entire project including
the portions within the City of Carlsbad. The one exception to this is the project element that
involves the overflow pipe into the Carlsbad Boulevard median which is discussed below. The
City of Carlsbad, therefore, acting as a Responsible Agency, has made a finding in the attached
Planning Commission Resolution that the City concurs with the analysis, findings and
conclusions of the Negative Declaration issued by the Lead Agency.
In its role as responsible agency, the City of Carlsbad in consultation with the City of Encinitas,
has determined that the storm drainage into the Carlsbad Boulevard median as shown on Exhibit
B is necessary. The proposed pipe underneath the Boulevard roadbed is designed to convey flow
that would otherwise overtop the road during extreme 50-year+ storm events. In addition, the
pipe outlet location is designed for a biologically disturbed area so as to have no adverse impacts
to the adjacent lagoon wetland habitat. Given the above, and also given the professional
biologist's statement of no impacts to the median for this component of the project (attached
memo from Burkhart Environmental dated March 21, 2001), the City will issue a Notice of
Exemption based on Class 3, Minor Alterations to Land.
Part of the Lead Agency's environmental action, as well as part of the permits issued by the
resource agencies, involves the responsibility of Encinitas to carry out and monitor a detailed
wetland mitigation program. Since this program is built-in to the project description for this
project as presented to the City of Carlsbad, it allows the use of the previous environmental
CDP 00-47 LEUCADIA DfSllNAGE PROJECT
April 18,2001
Page 4
review performed by the Lead Agency. The environmental and approval documents are attached
to this report.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4957
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure Form
4. City of Encinitas Negative Declaration dated June 10, 1999
5. City of Encinitas Notice of Decision dated October 24, 2000
6. Memo from Brad Burkhart, Environmental Consultant dated March 23, 2001
7. Exhibits "A" - "C", dated April 18, 2001
EM:cs:mh
BATIQUITOS LAGOON
SITE
LEUCADIA DRAINAGE PROJECT
CDP 00-47
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership. joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1 .
2.
APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person
Title
_ Corp/Part_
i ^^~ Title
TY O *J( I
Address Address
OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Ed\wor Corp/Part.
Title
Address Address.
^635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit oreanization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
I I Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):.
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
tify th&t all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.Lcertify th&HrH-/] 6(ActAb***
\^r n • f+Signature of owner/date Signatu$ of applicant/date
V
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ENCINITAS
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Title: Leucadia Drainage; Low Flow Storm Drain Systems.
Location: North Coast Highway 101 and Railroad Corridor from Sunset
Drive to South Carlsbad State Beach, Leucadia Community,
Encinitas, California.
Description: Low _ f low trunk and collection storm drainage
facilities.
Project Sponsor: Engineering Services
City of Encinitas
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
FINDING:
Based upon information provided in the Initial Study, along with
Comments and Responses to the Notice of Preparation of a Negative
Declaration which have been presented to the City Council, City of
Encinitas, at a duly called meeting on June 9, 1999 the Council
finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment .
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Mitigation measures included in the project as a condition of
project approval to avoid potentially significant effects include:
Site specific geotechnical and soils engineering investigations shall be
performed prior to project final design and construction activities.
Point source pollution control structures such as oil/water separators and water
quality inlets shall be considered for installation in certain locations to
remove petroleum compounds and grease as well as floatable debris and settleable
solids from storm water.
A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to substantiate the
finding.
Date Mayor, City Council
City of Encinitas
Notice- of Determination 90249 Appendix H
To:Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento. CA 95814
re!'".ry Clerk
County of 5AAJ
From: (Public Agency)
F?O. Sox
riTV OF F.NC1N1TA
Community Development Dept.
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024-3633
, CA
Subject:
Filing of Notice of Determination In compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title
Slate Clearinghouse Number
(If submitted to Clearinghouse)
Lead Agency
Contact Person
Area Code/Telephone/Extension
IO\
Project Location (inciude/county)
Project Description:Tfl.oN)KL S>roe_K
lOf
AMJ>
This is UD advise that the._has approved the above described project on
"raLead Agency Q Responsible Agency
_ and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project:
"(Date)
1. The project (OwiU^!5w»U not] have a significant effect on the environment.
2. O An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
S^A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to [he provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures tejwere Qwere not] made a condition of the approval of the project.
4. A statement of Overriding Considerations [Qwas Igjwas not] adopted for this project.
5. Findings tofwere r_3were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
This is to certify that the final
B.
widi comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at:
Arv'EL.
Signature (Public Agency)
Date received'for filing at OPR:
Date ftile
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON Htt 24 ig
POSTED__ REMOVED JUN 2 a B99
RETURNED TO AGENCY ON
DEPUTY
JUN 2 3
Revised October 1989
ATOCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH OK GAME
CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION-
De Minimis Impact Finding
project Title/Location [Kame anC Address of Project]: Located in City of
Encinitas. County of San Diego.
Project Description:
Findings of Exemption
No impacts have been identified which will adversely affect:
(A) Riparian land, rivers, streams, watercourses, and wetlands under state and
federal jurisdiction;
(B) Native and non-native plant life and the soil required to sustain habitat
for fish and wildlife;
(C) Rare and unique plant life and ecological communities dependent on plant
life; and
(D) Listed threatened and endangered plant and animals and the habitat in
which they are believed to reside.
(E) All species or plant or animals as listed as protected or identified for
special management in the Fish and Game code, the Public Resources Code,
the Water Code or regulations adopted thereunder.
(F) All marine and terrestrial species subject to the jurisdiction of the
Department of Fish and Game and the ecological communities in which they
reside.
(G) All air and water resources the degradation of which will individually or
cumulatively result in a loss of biological diversity among the plants and
animals residing in thar air and water.
Please see Negative Declaration/SIR initial study for more information.
Certification:
I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact
and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as
defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
for Sandra L. Holder
Community Development Directo:
Title: Communiry Development Director
Lead Agencv: Citv of Sncinitas
Date: Si ft
> I
CR/03/PF2-319 WPS.1 (5/1/91-1)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FOR
DETERMINATION BASED ON INITIAL STUDY
The Determination Based on Initial Study to prepare a Negative
Declaration for the Leucadia Drainage Low Flow Storm Drain System
has been circulated for public and concerned agency review and
comment from 5 April to 4 May 1999. No comments were received. In
addition, a State Clearing House (SCH#99041060) review was
conducted from 13 April to 13 May 1999. None of the state agencies
have comments.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Gray Davis
GOVERNOR
Governor's Office of Planning and Research
1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044
916-322-2318 FAX 916-322-3785 www.opr.ca.gov Loretta Lynch
DIRECTOR
May 14,1999
Kipp Heftier
City of Encinitas
505 S. Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
Subject: Leucadia Drainage, Low Flow Storm Drain System
SCH#: 99041060
Dear Kipp Heftier:
The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for
review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter
acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft
environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the
environmental review process. If you have a question about the above-named project, please refer to the
eight-digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office.
Sincerely,
Terry Roberts
Senior Planner, State Clearinghouse
Mail 10: State
Notice of Completion and Environmental
Document Transmittal Form
ttmmcnm- CA 95814 ~
5« NOTT ferlo-r
SCH . 9904106'.
3. Contact P
3b.
Je. Ptnr-
-TO SOUTH O4gtsa«<>t>
40. Assessor's Farcel Neu
&*--**COSTA JOC Sb.
b. Ai
d.
Sa.
6. Within 2 miles: »-
QS. Q Snppjcmeiu/Siitmni'' i« EIR
OS.
06. Q Specific Plan07. rj Counuamw Plaa08. Q R
General PUn Upitol*Land DHicioa (Sobdivi
Paml Map. Tract Map. etc.)
». Devatopmoiit Typ»
Stamping/Commercial: i»A
Industrial:•WaurTnmponxioct:
•II. Total Jobs Cr*at>xlfO.Total
SocialEnnion
Solid W'ootic/Haiaitloui•raflic/Circulatiaa
'ecctation- Quality
Water Supply
OTprevlotf draft dontmeot) plesse nil k In.
for all new projcctt. If » SCH number already exisu for a project <«*. front a Notice of
an Xrvrrtr
State Clearinghouse Contact:
State Review Began: 1
Dept. Review to Agency
Agency Rev to SCH
SCH COMPLIANCE
Mosie Boyd
(916)445-0613
Project Sent to the following State Agencies
5 .
- // -
Resources
Boating & Waterways
Coastal Conun
Coastal Consv
Colorado Rvr Bd
Conservation .--—
Fish & Game # C?
Please note State Clearinghouse Number
(SCH#) on all Comments
SCH#: 99041 OfiQ
Please forward late comments directly to the
Lead Agency
AQMP/APCD /- 7?Resources: Hi ' ')
_ Delta Protection Comm
_ Forestry & Fire Prot
Historic Preservation
_ Parks & Rec
_ Reclamation Board
. Bay Cons & Dev Comm.
.DWR
. OES (Emergency Svcs)
Bus Transp Hous
Aeronautics
X Caltrans #
Trans Planning
. Housing & Com Dev
_ Food & Agriculture
. Health Services (H20)
State/Consumer Svcs
General Services
Cal EPA
ARB
Integrated Waste Mgmt Bd
SWRCB: Clean Water Prog
SWRCB: Water Rights
SWRCB: Water Quality
SWRCB: Bay-Delta Unit
X Reg. WQCB #__2_
Toxic Sub Ctrl-CTC
Yth/Adlt Corrections
Corrections
Independent Comm
Energy Commission
X NAHC
Public Utilities Comm
Santa Monica Mtns
X State Lands Comm
Tahoe Rgl Plan Agency (TRPA)
Other
Other:
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DETERMINATION BASED ON INITIAL STUDY
Name of Project:Leucadia Drainage; Low Flow Storm Drain
Systems.
Location: North Coast Highway 101 and Railroad Corridor from Sunset
Drive to South Carlsbad State Beach, Leucadia Community,
Encinitas, California.
Description:Low flow trunk and collection storm drainage
facilities.
Entity or Person Undertaking Project:Engineering Services
City of Encinitas
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
Staff Determination:
The City of Encinitas staff, having undertaken and completed an
Initial Study of this project in accordance with the City's CEQA
Guidelines for the purpose of determining whether the proposed
project might have a significant effect on the environment, has
reached the following conclusion:
1. The project could not have a significant effect on the
environment; therefore, a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
X
3.
The project could not have a significant effect on the
environment, due to mitigation measures accepted by the
applicant which include:
Site specific geotechnical and soils engineering investigations
shall be performed prior to project final design and construction
activities.
Point source pollution control structures such as oil/water
separators and water quality inlets shall be considered for
installation in certain locations to remove petroleum compounds and
grease as well as floatable debris and settleable solids from storm
water.
The project could have a significant effect on the
environment; therefore, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
will be prepared.
Date City of Encinitas
ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY
CHECKLIST FORM
Project Information
1. Project Title: Leucadia Drainage/-
Systems.
Low Flow Storm Drain
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Encinitas
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
3. Contact Person and Phone Number:Kipp Hefner
Project Engineer
(760) 633-2783
4. Project Location:North Coast Highway 101 and Railroad
Corridor from Sunset Drive to ^ South
Carlsbad State Beach, Leucadia Community,
Encinitas, California (see maps) .
Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Engineering. Services
City of Encinitas
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
6. General Plan Designation:
Residential 2.01-3.00 Units/Acre
Residential 5.01-8.00 Units/Acre
Residential 8.01-11.0 Units/Acre
Residential 11.01-15.00 Units/Acre
Residential 15.01-25.00 Units/Acre
Office Professional
Local Commercial
Visitor-Serving Commercial
General Commercial
Public/Semi-Public
Ecological Resource/Open Space/Parks
8. Description of Project:
7. Zoning:
Residential 3 (R-3)
Residential 8 (R-8)
Residential 11 (R-ll)
Residential 15 (R-15)
Residential 25 (R-25)
Office Professional (OP)
Local Commercial (LC)
Visitor-Serving Commercial
(VSC)
General Commercial (GC)
Public/Semi-Public (P/SP)
Ecological Resource/Open
Space/Parks (EROS)
This project consists of low flow trunk and collection storm
drainage facilities at three job sites. The first job site is a
combination of an open shallow drainage channel and storm drain
pipe. The drainage channel (South Channel) runs east of the Coast
Highway between the railroad tracks and Vulcan Avenue just north of
Encinitas Boulevard to Basil Street. This channel will collect
runoff from both the railroad corridor and Vulcan Avenue. At the
downstream end the channel will connect to an 18 inch RCP storm
drain which collects runoff from an existing sump at Hermes Avenue
and Cereus Street. This system then dumps into an 18 inch storm
drain that crosses the railroad to the west and ties into the storm
drain system in the Coast Highway.
The second job site involves a network of storm drain pipes that
collect runoff from several sumps west of the Coast Highway, the
highway itself, and the drainage areas in the first job site. The
site (Leucadia Drainage No.l) extends from Basil Street northerly
along the Coast Highway to South Carlsbad State Beach just north of
La Costa Avenue. Runoff from the first job site and Basil Street
is picked up with an 18 inch RCP storm drain pipe and dumped into
the main storm drain that runs north along the Coast Highway.
Next, an 18 inch storm drain will collect runoff from the sump area
on Cadmus Street and dump into the main storm drain which will be
increased in size to a 24 inch RCP.
A parallel system will begin at this point to collect runoff from
sump areas in the alley running from Daphine Street to Diana"
Street. This system will consist of several catch basins and an 18
inch RCP storm drain. The parallel system will also collect runoff
from the sump area located in the park located west of the Coast
Highway at Leucadia Boulevard. The system will eventually dump
into the main storm drain along the Coast Highway at Diana Street.
North of this point a series of catch basins collect runoff from
the highway. The main storm drain will run along the highway and
tie into an existing 24 inch storm drain which discharges into two
detention/percolation basins at the South Carlsbad State Beach
parking lot.
The third job site consists of a combination of storm drain pipes
and an open shallow drainage channel. The drainage channel (North
Channel) runs east of the Coast Highway between the railroad tracks
and Vulcan Avenue from just north of Leucadia Boulevard to opposite
of Grandview Street. The system starts with an 18 inch RCP storm
drain that cross Leucadia Boulevard and dumps into the new channel,
and ends with a connection to an existing channel continuning north
to and under La Costa Avenue. In addition inlets and a storm drain
will be installed in Union Street and Orpheus to convey ponding
water from a sump at that location.
Improvements within each job site may be constructed in phases
depending on job site and overall project costs and capital
improvement budget allocations.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Development along the North Coast Highway 101 and Railroad corridor
consists predominately of residential and commercial uses. The
commercial district is located almost entirely along the west side
of the highway. Residential neighborhoods of varying densities
occur to the west of the highway and east of the railroad across
Vulcan Avenue.
Topographically/ the -corridor is relatively flat north to south
along the highway and railroad. There are several depressed areas
and sumps in the corridor along the highway and railroad as well as
in alleys west of the highway and along Vulcan Avenue east of the
railroad. There is also a nearby related depressed area at Orpheus
Avenue and Union Street. These locations have inadequate or
nonexistent drainage facilities to relieve chronic ponding and
flooding problems.
There is an existing storm drain discharge detention and
percolation basin and connected- detention and percolation area at
the South Carlsbad State Beach parking lot. Certain existing 24
inch storm drains along the corridor are connected to the basin.
In addition a pump station on the west side of the highway north of
Phoebe Street conveys seasonal ponding waters through a 12 inch
pressure line which joins the 24 inch system.
10 . Other agencies whose approval is required and permits needed:
California Coastal Commission California State Parks and
City of Carlsbad Recreation
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors listed below would be potentially
affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a
"Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless
Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
Geological Problems Water
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
A brief explanation is provided for all checklist answers supported
by information sources cited in the parentheses following each
question. References are listed following the checklist. All
answers take account of the whole action involved including onsite
as well as off site, project as well as cumulative/ direct as well
as indirect/ and construction as well as operational impacts.
A "No Impact" answer is appropriate if referenced sources show that
the impact simply does not apply to the project. "Less Than
Significant Impact" describes an applicable effect which does not
cross the threshold of significance. "Potentially Significant
Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant. If there are one or more of such impacts
when the determination is made an EIR is required.
"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies
where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an
effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than
Significant Impact." Associated mitigation measures are described
in bold type in the checklist.
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the envi-r-onment7 there--will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described in the
following checklist have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
Signature Date
Printed Name For
LeuciEidia^
Encinitai Beach,,.,
Count* ParklCount* ParkVS
\ \ \ • V\ u A •
g, MOON1JGHT V
\STATE BEACH'
\ \ \
PROJECT VICINITY
Resource Issue Impact Checklist
laauea and Supporting Information Sources
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (sourceMs):
1,2,3,5,8)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted
by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (2,3,5,8)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (3,5,8)
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations? (3,5,8)
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community? (3,5,8)
Potentially
Significant
Inpaat
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Leas Than
Significant
Impact
No
Inpaot
X
X
X
X
X
EXPLANATION
a,b)xProject drainage improvements are consistent with street classifications and standards established by the Encinitas
General Plan Circulation Plan. Project improvements will not conflict with surrounding general plan land use designations,
zoning classifications, or adopted goals and policies.
c) Project drainage improvements will be compatible with existing residential, office, commercial and other land uses in
the area.
d) There are no agricultural resources or operations in the area that will be negatively affected by project drainage
improvements.
e) Project improvements will be almost entirely underground within existing street and drainage easements and will not
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projections? (2,3,8)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly? (2,3,8)c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(2,3,5,8)
X
X
X
laauea and Supporting Information Sources Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Leas Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
EXPLANATION
a) Project improvements are intended to collect and dispose of storm waters which pond and flood depressions therebv
reducing absorption rates and altering the existing drainage pattern. The improvements will not increase or decrease therate or amount of surface runoff. u«<-i««ioe i_ne
b) Project improvements will reduce or eliminate seasonal flooding in the project corridor.
c) Because project improvements will collect and dispose of some storm waters currently evaporating or percolatina throuah
soils to groundwater there may be an increase in urban pollutants discharged into the receiving South Carlsbad State Beach
detention/percolation basins. Anticipated pollutant increases are expected to be minor and will be contained within the
basins and not reach the nearby Pacific Ocean or Batiquitos Lagoon. The project must meet the waste discharge reouirements
for storm water and urban runoff established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to meet the Clean Water
Act NPDES permit regulations and California Water Code. Requirements include among other elements, prohibitions storm
water and non-storm water discharge specifications, receiving water limitations, comprehensive storm water and urban runoff
management programs, illicit connection and illegal discharge detection program, best management practices programs, wet
weather monitoring and reporting program, and monitoring requirements. Point eouroe pollution control structures ouch aa
oil/water separators and water quality inleta ahould be considered for installation in certain locations to remove petroleum
compounds and greaae aa well aa floatable debris and aettleable aolida from storm water.
d) The increased amount of runoff into the basins will be minor and not appreciably affect surface water amount.
e) Project improvements will change the course of water movements by draining areas subject to ponding and flooding.
f) Groundwater conditions in the project area are characterized by frequent perched water zones with levels fluctuating
with seasonal rains, local irrigation practices, and site specific conditions. Seeping water is visible along the seacliff
face. Although project improvements will collect and dispose of storm waters currently percolating through soils to
groundwater, the reduction in quantity will be relatively minor.
g,h) Project improvements may slightly decrease the rate of flow but will not alter the direction of groundwater movement
or affect groundwater quality.
I) Project improvements will not draw on or reduce the amount of groundwater supplies otherwise available for public water
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or
projected air quality violation? (2,3,5,8)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (1,3,5,8)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change
in climate? (3,5,8)
d) Create objectionable odors? (3,5,8)
X
X
X
X
EXPLANATION
a,b,c,d) Project improvements consist almost entirely of underground drainage facilities which will have no affect on air
Quality standard violations, sensitive receptors, climate conditions, or odors. ______
laauea and Supporting Information Sources
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (3,5,8)
b) Hazards to safety from design features? (3,5,7,8)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (3,5,7,8)
d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite or offsite? (3,5,8)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (3,5,7,8)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation? (2,3,5,8)
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (3,5,8)
Potentially
Significant
Inpact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Y/i
X
x
X
No
Ittpaot
x
x
EXPLAHATION
a,d,f) Project improvements consist principally of underground drainage facilities and will not increase vehicle trips or
parking demands, or conflict with general plan adopted transportation policies.
b,c,e) The contractor will be required to control traffic during construction activities in accordance with the Caltrans
Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones. Traffic flow must be maintained in both directions,
access^provided to private driveways, and pedestrian flow kept unobstructed.
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats? (3,5,8)
b) Locally designated species? (3,5,8)
c) Locally designated natural communities? (3,5,8)
d) Wetland habitat? (3,5,8)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (3,5,8)
X
X
X
X
X
EXPLANATION
a,b,c,d) With the exception of the South Carlsbad State Beach detention/percolation basins, project improvements will
occur'almost entirely within existing street and drainage easements and railroad right-of-way in an urbanized area and no
biological resources will be affected. The detention/percolation basins support highly disturbed mixed native and exotic
riparian and salt marsh vegetation. These basins will not be disturbed by construction and the anticipated minor increase
in water volume and urban pollutants will have little or no anticipated negative impacts on the vegetation therein.
e) There will be no impacts on wildlife dispersal and no migration corridors are_involved.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially
Significant
Irtpaot
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Iitpaot
No
Inpact
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (2,3,5,8)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner?
(3,5,8)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the
state? (3,5,8)
X
X
EXPLANATION
. a) Project improvements consist of drainage facilities and are in compliance with adopted general plan conservation
policies.
b) The project involves standard drainage improvement construction and will not use resources in a wasteful manner.
c) There are no known mineral resources in the project area.
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
V
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances?
(3,5,8)
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan? (3,5,8)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard?
(3,4,5,8)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards? (3,4,5,8)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or
trees? (3,5,8) . .
X
X
X
X
laauea and Supporting Information Sources
I
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
I ncorpor a ted
Lea a Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
EXPLANATION
a) Project improvements consist of drainage facilities and will not involve ha2ardous substances.
b) Project improvements will be almost entirely within existing street and drainage easements and will not interfere with
adopted emergency response and evacuation plans.
c,d) Anticipated pollutant increases are expected to be minor and although the South Carlsbad State Beach discharge
detention/percolation basins are near locations where people engage in beach related recreational activities, human exposure
will be minimal. One basin has steep banks and is not accessible. The other basin is not attractive from a'recreational
standpoint and access is limited by partial fencing. Discharges are expected to be limited almost entirely to the winter
rainfall season when the beach is least visited. The project must meet the waste discharge requirement's for storm water and
urban runoff established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to meet the Clean Water Act NPDES permit
regulations and California Water Code. The San Diego County Health Department monitors recreational and nearby water bodies
and posts warnings for unhealthy conditions. Point aouroe pollution control atruoturea ouch aa oil/water separators and
water quality inleta should be considered for installation in oertain locations to remove petroleum compounds and grease aa
well aa floatable debris and settleable aolida from storm water.
e) There will be no increase in fire hazard due to project improvements.
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (3,5,6,8)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (3,5,6,8)
X
X
EXPLANATION
a,b) Project improvements consist of drainage facilities and will not result in increased noise levels or expose people to
severe noise levels. Short-term project construction noise will be controlled by the Encinitas Municipal Code noise
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the
following, areas:
a) Fire protection? (3,5,8)
b) Police protection? (3,5,8)
c) Schools? (3,5,8)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (3,5,8)
e) Other governmental services? (3,5,8)
X
X
X
X
X
EXPLANATION
a,b,c,e) Project improvements consist of drainage facilities and will not result in the need for new or altered fire,
police, school, or other governmental services.
d) Project improvements will require a nominal increase in long-term storm drain maintenance costs to the City.
laauea and Supporting Information Souroea Potentially
Significant
Inpaot
Potentially
Significant
Unleaa
Mitigation
Inoorporated
Leas Than
Significant
Inpaat
No
Inpaat
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a
need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (3,5,8)
b) Communications systems? (3,5,8)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities?
(3,5,8)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (3,5,8)
e) Storm water drainage? (3,5,8)
f) Solid waste disposal? (3,5,8)
g) Local or regional water supplies? (3,5,8)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
EXPLANATION
a,b,c,d,f,g) Project improvements consist of drainage facilities and will not result in the need for new systems or
supplies, or alterations to power or natural gas, communications, water treatment or distribution facilities, sewer or
septic^ systems, solid waste disposal, or water supplies.
e) Project improvements will result in a more efficient storm water drainage in the project area.
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (3,5,8)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? (2,3,5,8)
c) Create light or glare? (3,5,8)
X
X
X
EXPLANATION
a,b) Project improvements will be almost entirely underground within existing street and drainage easements, will not be
visible from a scenic vista or scenic highway, and will have no negative aesthetic effects.
c) Project improvements will be almost entirely underground within existing street and drainage easements and will not
create light or glare.
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (3,5,8)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? (3,5,8)
c) Affect historical resources? (3,5,8)
d) Have the potential to cause physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? (3,5,8) _
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area? (3,5,8J
X
X
X
X
X
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Leaa Than
Significant
Impact
No
Inpaot
EXPLANATION
a,b,c,d,e) Project improvements will be almost entirely within existing street and drainage easements in an urbanized area
and no known cultural resources will be affected.
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other
recreational facilities? (3,5,8)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (3,4,5,8)Xx
EXPLANATION
a) Project improvements will be almost entirely underground within existing street and drainage easements in an urbanized
area and will not increase the demand for recreational facilities.
b) Anticipated pollutant increases are expected to be minor and although the South Carlsbad State Beach discharge
detention/percolation basins are near locations where people engage in beach related recreational activities, human exposure
will b,e minimal. One basin has steep banks and is not accessible. The other basin is not attractive from a recreational
standpoint and access is limited by partial fencing. Discharges are expected to be limited almost entirely to the winter
rainfall season when the beach is least visited. The project must meet the waste discharge requirements for storm water and
urban run'off established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to meet the Clean Water Act NPDES permit
regulations and California Water Code. The San Diego County Health Department monitors recreational and nearby water bodies
and posts warnings for unhealthy conditions. Point source pollution control structures auoh as oil/water separators and
water quality inleta should be considered for installation in certain looationa to remove petroleum compounds and greaae aa
well aa floatable debris and aettleable aolida from storm water.
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal, or eliminate important examples of major periods of
California history or prehistory? (3,5,8)
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? (2,3,5,8)
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (3,5,8)
d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly? (3,5,8) _
X
X
Issues and Supporting Information Souroes Potentially
Significant
Inpaot
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Iitpaot
Ho
Inpaot
EXPLAHATIOK
a) Project improvements will be almost entirely within existing street and drainage easements and other than at the South
Carlsbad State Beach discharge site, no biological resources or known cultural resources will be affected. Increased water
volume and urban pollutants will be minimal and will not be expected to negatively impact existing vegetation in
detention/percolation basins.
b) Project improvements will reduce or eliminate ponding and flooding in the project area and will achieve both short and
long term adopted general plan storm drainage goals and policies.
c) Impacts of project improvements will be both individually and cumulatively limited.
d) Although project improvements may result in an increase in urban pollutants in the receiving detention/percolation
basins, there will be no substantial direct or indirect effects on human beings.
00
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analysis is used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration [Section 15065(c)(3) (D) ] as follows:
a) Earlier analyses used: None
b) Impacts adequately addressed: Not Applicable
. c) Mitigation measures; Not Applicable
Information Sources
The following information sources were consulted and referenced for
this Initial Study.
(1) City of Encinitas, 1989 updated. "Encinitas General Plan
Program Land Use Policy Map" and "Encinitas Zoning Map."
Blackline/Blueline maps prepared for the City of Encinitas,
Encinitas, California.
(2) City of Encinitas, 1989 updated. Encinitas General Plan.
City of Encinitas: Encinitas, California.
(3) Barrett Consulting Group, 1995. "Draft Highway 101 Corridor
Drainage Improvements Report." Prepared for the City of Encinitas,
Encinitas, California.
(4) California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego
Region, 1995. "Tentative Order No. 95-76 (NPDES Permit No.
CA0108758) Waste Discharge Requirements for Storm Water and Urban
Runoff from the County of San Diego, the Incorporated Cities of San
Diego County, and the San Diego Unified Port District." Draft
waste discharge requirements prepared for the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, San Diego,
California.
(5) Curtis Scott Englehorn and Associates, 1998. Inspection of
North Coast Highway 101 and Railroad Corridor and vicinity for
Engineering Services, City of Encinitas, Encinitas, California.
(6) Encinitas Municipal Code, 1993 updated. "Chapter 9.32, Noise
Abatement and Control" and "Chapter 30.40, Performance Standards."
Municipal Code, City of Encinitas, Encinitas, California.
(7) Caltrans, 1995. "Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction
and Maintenance Work Zones." Manual prepared for Caltrans,
Sacramento, California.
(8) W.A. Pasco Engineering, 1998. "Draft Leucadia Drainage, Low
Flow Drainage Plans." Prepared for the City of Encinitas,
Encinitas, California.
19
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The following mitigation measures shall be completed and
incorporated into final plans and construction documents as
appropriate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Site specific geotechnical and soils engineering investigations
shall be performed prior to project final design and construction
activities.
Point source pollution control structures such as oil/water
separators and water quality inlets shall be considered for
installation in certain locations to remove petroleum compounds and
grease as well as floatable debris and settleable solids from storm
water.
20
CITY OF ENCINITAS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
(760)633-2775
NOTICE OF DECISION
DCD 2000-104
October 24,2000
This letter is to inform you that the Director of Community Development has approved your
application for
00-235 CDP (Leucadia Drainage Project) - Coastal Development Permit to allow the
construction of a low flow storm drainage system along North Coast Highway 101 between
Encinitas Boulevard and La Costa Avenue.
Project Description and Discussion: The City of Encinitas Engineering Department proposes
to construct a low flow storm drain system along N. Coast Highway 101. The project consists of
low flow trunk and storm drainage collection facilities at three sites. The first site consists of a
combination of an open shallow drainage channel and storm drainpipe. The drainage channel
(South Channel) will run east of N. Coast Highway 101 between the railroad tracks and Vulcan
Avenue just north of Encinitas Boulevard to Basil Street This channel will collect runoff from
both the railroad corridor and Vulcan Avenue. At the downstream end, the channel will collect
to an 18-inch RCP storm drain that will collect runoff from an existing sump at Hermes Avenue
and Cereus Street This system will then drain into an 18-inch storm drain that will cross the
railroad to the west and tie into a storm drain system in N. Coast Highway 101.
The second drainage site involves a network of storm drain pipes that will collect runoff from
several sumps located within and west of N. Coast Highway 101, and the drainage areas in the
first drainage site. The second drainage site extends from Basil Street northerly along N. Coast
Highway 101 to South Carlsbad State Beach just north of La Costa Avenue. Runoff from the
first site and Basil Street will be picked up with an 18-inch RCP storm drain pipe and drained
into the main storm drain that runs north along N. Coast Highway 101. Next, an 18-inch storm
drain will collect runoff from the sump area on Cadmus Street and drain into the main storm
drain, which will be increased in size to a 24-inch RCP. An 18-inch storm drain will run down
Europa Street and tie into the 24-inch trunk line on N. Coast Highway 101. The storm drain on
Europa Street collects runoff from the alley between Europa Street and Daphne Street 18-inch
storm drains will also be installed on Leucadia Boulevard and Jasper Street to collect runoff on
the alleys between Europa Street and Diana Street. Both of these 18-inch storm drains tie into
the trunk line on N. Coast Highway 101. North of Diana Street the rest of the runoff will be
collected in catch basins on N. Coast Highway 101 and drain to the trunk line via 18-inch RCP
connector pipes. The main 24-inch trunk line runs along N. Coast Highway 101 and drains into
two detention/percolation basins at the South Carlsbad State Beach parking lot. As part of the
project, the upstream detention basin is being enlarged so that the storm drain flows don't
encroach into the sensitive salt marsh habitat that exist in the downstream detention basin.
0.11 acres of wetlands are being removed as part of the enlargement of the upstream detention
basin. However, 0.44 acres of wetlands habitat is being restored/created in the enlarged
upstream detention basin. Finally, the existing parking lot is being restriped to add 4 additional
parking spaces.
The third drainage site consists of a combination of storm drainpipes and an open shallow
drainage channel. The drainage channel (North Channel) runs east of N. Coast Highway 101
between the railroad tracks and Vulcan Avenue from just north of Leucadia Boulevard to the
alignment of Grandview Street. The system starts with an 18-inch RCP storm drain that crosses
Leucadia Boulevard and drains into the new channel, and ends with a connection to an existing
channel continuing north to and under La Costa Avenue. In addition, inlets and a storm drain
will be installed in Union Street and Orpheus to convey ponding water from a sump at that
location.
Oil/Water separators will be installed in all catch basins on the project
Existing development within and adjacent to the project site consists primarily of residential and
commercial uses. The commercial uses are located almost entirely along the west side of N.
Coast Highway 101. The railroad runs along the east side of N. Coast Highway 101. The
residential uses are located west of N. Coast Highway 101 and east of Vulcan Avenue.
Topographically, the project site is relatively flat north to south along N. Coast Highway 101 and
the railroad. There are several depressed areas and sumps in the corridor along the highway
and railroad as well as in alleys west of the highway and along Vulcan Avenue east of the
railroad. There is also a nearby-related depressed area at Orpheus Avenue and Union Street.
These locations have inadequate or nonexistent drainage facilities to relieve chronic ponding
and flooding problems. The proposed storm drain system will reduce these ponding and
flooding problems.
The proposed drainage improvements are part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan. The
Engineering Department has conducted an environmental analysis of the project, which resulted
in a Negative Declaration that was approved by the State Clearinghouse on May 13,1999.
A standard public notice was issued for the Coastal Development Permit, which allowed for a
10-calender day public review and comment period. Because the project is located within the
Coastal Appeal Zone Public Hearing was held on October 16, 2000. Several members of the
public were present at the hearing. All were in favor of this drainage project that will improve
drainage and flooding problems that currently exist along N. Coast Highway 101.
FINDINGS FOR A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
STANDARD: Section 30.80.090 of the Municipal Code provides that the authorized
agency must make the following findings of fact, based upon the information presented
in the application and during the Public Hearing, in order to approve a coastal
development permit:
1. The project is consistent with the certified Local Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas;
and,
2. The proposed development conforms with Public Resources Code Section 21000 and
following (CEQA) in that there are no feasible mitigation measures or feasible
alternatives available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact
that the activity may have on the environment.
3. For projects involving development between the sea or other body of water and the
nearest public road, approval shall include a specific finding that such development is in
conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Section 30200 et.
Seq. Of the Coastal Act
4. To mitigate 0.11 acres of temporary wetland impacts associated with the expansion of
the project outfall sedimentation basin at Carlsbad State Beach, the Wetland Mitigation
Plan for the Leucadia Low Row Storm Drain System Project (October 2000) will be
implemented by the City. This plan requires the creation/restoration and monitoring of
impacted wetlands at a 4:1 ratio consistent with California Coastal Commission
standards. Implementation of this plan is also a part of the conditions of U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 43, California Department of Fish and Game
1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement #5-291-00, and California Water Quality Control
Board 401 Water Certification #OOC-114 authorizations for this project. The new
detention basin design will be large enough to hold all additional peak storm outflows
created by the project As a result outflow rates will remain the same as the existing
conditions at the site. This design will prevent potential impacts from higher storm flows
to sensitive plant species found along the margins of a second detention basin down
stream of the impacted basin at the State Beach site.
Facts: The City's General Plan and Municipal Code are applicable components of the City's
Local Coastal Plan. The project consists of the construction of a low flow storm drain system
along N. Coast Highway 101 from Encinitas Boulevard to La Costa Avenue. The Public Safety
Element of the General Plan specifies goals and policies for the City to develop and implement
a master plan for drainage and flood control and to improve local drainage systems. The
proposed drainage improvements implement the goals and policies of the General Plan.
Conclusion: Since the project complies with the goals and policies of the General Plan, the
Community Development Department finds that the project is consistent with the certified Local
Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas. In addition, required finding #2 is not applicable since
no significant adverse impact is associated with the project. In regard to finding #3, the
drainage improvements located at the northern portion of the project site are to be constructed
between the first public road and the sea. However, the drainage improvements will not impact
any public access to coastal resources. No aspect of the project has been identified which
could have an adverse impact on coastal resources or any natural resources.
The approval of this Coastal Development Permit satisfies the requirements of the Encinitas
Local Coastal Program.
Approval of this Coastal Development Permit applies only to the portions of the drainage project
contained within the boundaries of the City of Encinitas.
Environmental Review:
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project, and was acknowledged by the State
Clearinghouse on May 13, 1999 (SCH#99Q41060), and adopted by the City Council on June 9,
1999.
This approval is subject to the following conditions:
SCI SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
SC2 This approval will expire on October 24, 2002 at 5:00 p.m., two years after the
approval of this project, unless the conditions have been met or an extension of time has
been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code.
SC6 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and project
plans dated received by the City on September 22, 2000 consisting of 26 sheets
including Drainage plans along N. Coast Highway 101 from north of Encinttas Blvd. To
South Carlsbad State Beach, all designated as approved by the Community
Development Director on October 24, 2000. Approved plans shall not be altered without
the express authorization of the Community Development Department.
SCA A Coastal Development Permit must also be obtained from the City of Carlsbad
for this portion of this project located within the City of Carlsbad. All mitigation measures
specified in the negative declaration prepared for the project shall be complied with.
G1 STANDARD CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
G2 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 15 calendar days from the date
of this approval in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. The appeal
must be filed, accompanied by a $100.00 filing fee, prior to 4:00 p.m. on the 15th
calendar day following the date of this notice of decision. The action of the Community
Development Department in reference to the above item may be appealed to the
Coastal Commission.
G3 This project is located within the Coastal Appeal Zone and may be appealed to the
California Coastal Commission pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603 and Chapter
30.04 of the City of Encinrtas Municipal Code. An appeal of the Planning Commission's
Decision must be filed with the Coastal Commission within 10 days following the Coastal
Commission's receipt of the Notice of Final Action. Applicants will be notified by the
Coastal Commission as to the date the Commission's appeal period will conclude.
Appeals must be in writing to the Coastal Commission, San Diego Coast District office.
This notice constitutes a decision of the Community Development Department only. Additional
permits may be required by the Building Department or other City departments. It is the
applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of project
proposed.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Kipp Hefner at the
Engineering Department by telephoning (760) 633-2775.
Sandra Holder
Director, Community Development
EEC
Burkhart Environmental
Consulting
PO Box 420358
San Diego, CA 92142 March 23, 2001
Eric Munoz
City of Carlsbad Planning Department
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314
Dear Mr. Munoz,
You requested Burkhart Environmental Consulting (BEC) to provide you with an opinion
regarding the environmental impacts which would result from adding a 50-year storm
overflow pipe to the design of your Leucadia Lowflow Storm Drain Project. It is our
understanding this pipe is being added to project design as a result of City of Carlsbad
Conditions of Project Approval for the portion of the project located within their
jurisdiction at Carlsbad State Beach. They are requiring this overflow pipe be added to the
project in order to conduct high storm flows under the Highway 1 southbound lane and
into the median drainage to prevent storm overflows from disrupting roadway access.
The design for this pipe runs from the roadside bank at the northeast end of the second
detention basin at the State Beach at a slight angle northeast across and under the Highway
1 south bound lane to the highway median. This design is shown on City of Carlsbad
Planning Commission's Exhibit B for project number CUP 00-47, dated April 18, 2001.
On Tuesday March 13, 2001 a site meeting was held to review any additional
environmental impacts which might be caused by constructing or operating this overflow
pipe. Present at this meeting were Eric Munoz and Don Rideout representing City of
Carlsbad planning and environmental review staff, Kip Hefner and Alan Archibald
representing the City of Encinitas Engineering staff, and myself representing BEC. It was
determined by consensus at this meeting there would be no significant environmental
impacts resulting from the construction of this overflow pipe since its southwestern inlet
would be constructed in an area of bare ground recently cleared of exotic weed species and
presently containing only a few native shrubs found in such disturbance areas (Isocoma
veneta); and, its northeastern outlet in the median would be in an area covered by non-
Page 1 of 2
native ice plant (Carpobrotus edulis). In addition the City of Encinitas agreed to set specific
limits of work on the construction plans to assure there would be no damage to sensitive
wetland vegetations on either side of the road (see plans for the designation of these limits).
Finally, the City agreed to have a biologist present during construction to assure these
limits were staked properly and not violated.
BEC also considered the long-term potential fresh water impacts to native saltmarsh
habitats located in the median which might be caused by overflow through this pipe. It is
our judgement that flows through this pipe will cause no additional impacts beyond what
already exist since storm flows above the capacity of the detention basins currently pass
over the highway into the median. All this pipe does is route these flows under the
roadway so that they do not block traffic. In any case, it is unlikely such infrequent
freshwater overflows could permanently dilute the high soil salinity which assure salt
marsh survival in the median.
Based on this analysis, it is my opinion that the addition of this overflow pipe to the project
will cause no additional significant environmental impacts and that the wetland mitigation
and monitoring plan developed by BEC for this project, and presently permitted with the
California Department of Fish and Game, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Regional
Water Quality Control Board, and the California Coastal Commission (under Encinitas
jurisdictional review) will be adequate to mitigate all environmental impacts of this project.
Sincerely,
Brad Burkhart, Principal
Burkhart Environmental Consulting
Page 2 of 2