HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-11-03; Planning Commission; ; CUP 172B - AIRPORT PARKING AREAS'me City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Application complete date: July 14, 2004
P.C. AGENDA OF: November 3,2004 I Project Planner: Michael Grim
Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno
SUBJECT: CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PARKING AREAS - Request for a Conditional Use
Permit Amendment to allow the use of three existing parcels for airport parking
areas on property generally located on the north side of Owens Avenue between
Camino Vida Roble and Yarrow Drive in Local Facilities Management Zone 5.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5776,
APPROVING Conditional Use Permit Amendment CUP 172(B), based upon the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The County of San Diego Public Works - Airports Division is requesting approval of a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment to allow the use of three existing parcels for parking
to serve the McClellan-Palomar Airport. Currently, the airport does not meet the physical and
operational standards set by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transportation Safety
Administration (TSA), and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with regard to
safety zones, security areas, and airplane maneuvering and parking. In order to comply with
these federal and state regulations, the airport is undergoing some modifications. These
modifications necessitate the use of the existing parking areas for airport operations and
structures; therefore, an area for replacement vehicular parking is needed. The parcels proposed
for the parking area are directly adjacent to the existing airport and are under County ownership.
The application also includes a Planned Industrial Permit (PIP), as required by the underlying
zoning of the subject properties, which is an administrative permit. The Planning Director is
prepared to approve the PIP contingent upon approval of the CUP Amendment.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The County of San Diego Public Works - Airports Division is requesting approval of a CUP to
allow the use of three existing parcels for parking to serve the McClellan-Palomar Airport. The
project site is located on the north side of Owens Avenue, east of its intersection with Camino
Vida Roble, directly adjacent to the airport. The 9.9 acre site is designated Planned Industrial
(PI) in the City's General Plan, zoned Planned Industrial (P-M), and is located within the
Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan (SP lSl(C)). The only existing use on the site is a
methane processing facility associated with the former landfill on the airport property. The pads
were graded in accordance with an approved industrial subdivision (CT 81-46, Unit 2) and are
surrounded by perimeter landscaping. The parcel to the west of the vacant pads is developed as
CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PARKING AREAS
November 3,2004
Page 2
an open parking area that serves an adjacent office building. To the south of the site, across
Owens Avenue, is the Courtyard by Marriott hotel, associated parking, and natural open space.
East of the site is Palomar Airport Road.
The proposal involves the adjustment of the existing airport CUP boundary to include the three
existing parcels for the sole purpose 'of parking. The physical development of the properties
would proceed in two phases: First, the two western lots (Lots 29 and 30) would be paved and
striped for temporary parking and an access ramp from the parking area to the airport would be
improved. Second, a permanent parking structure would be constructed on the easternmost lot
(lot 31). As conditioned, this second phase would necessitate an amendment to the PIP to allow
staff review of the parking structure function and aesthetics.
The parking area would be accessed from two locations: off of Owens Avenue and via an access
ramp from the airport property. The parking area would be intended for long-term parking. It
would be paved and illuminated by four light standards powered by mobile generators. The
existing perimeter landscaping would remain in its current state.
History of Airport and Scope of CUP
The McClellan-Palomar Airport was created in 1958 to replace the Del Mar Airport lost in the
mid-1950's due to the construction of Interstate 5. Since the County had received Grant
Assurances from the FAA to operate an airport in the area, they were obliged to relocate the
airport. In 1959, Palomar Airport was opened as a general aviation airport with a 3,700-foot
long, 100-foot wide runway. In 1962, the airport runway was extended to 4,700 feet long and
150 feet wide. Eleven years later, the FAA installed an air traffic control tower and, in 1977, the
instrument landing system and approach lighting were added to the airport.
The topography of the original airport site consisted of a mesa crossed by numerous canyons. Up
until 1986, the County used the canyons on the site as landfills. As these canyons filled up with
trash, the County Solid Waste Department leveled and capped the landfills and installed methane
extraction facilities on the adjacent property and monitoring wells over the landfill areas. The
airport subsequently began using these capped landfill areas for operations and aircraft parking.
In December 1978, the City annexed the 256-acre Palomar Airport site into Carlsbad, with a
General Plan designation of Governmental Facility (G). In 1980, the County applied for a Zone
Change from Limited Control (L-C) to Industrial (M) to implement the existing General Plan
designation. The County also applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 172) to make the
airport use consistent with the proposed underlying zoning. The CUP was structured to allow
some flexibility in airport development provided that the only structures and uses present on the
airport property were related to airport operations. These structures and uses are listed in Table
1 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1699 (Attachment 5). Provided that any proposed
development or use change on the airport property was in conformance with those structures and
uses listed in Table 1, no amendment to the CUP was required.
Besides regulating the structures and uses allowed on the airport property, the CUP also
regulated the designation of the airport, thus limiting the type of aircraft allowed under the CUP.
--
CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PARKING AREAS
November 3,2004
Page 3
Condition No. 11 of Planning Commission Resolution 1699 states that the “existing designation
of the airport as a General Aviation Basic Transport Airport shall not change unless an
amendment to this CUP is approved by the Planning Commission.” The designation of General
Aviation Basic Transport airport includes two classes of aircraft. General aviation refers to all
types of aircraft other than certified air carriers and military aircraft. These aircraft could be used
for personal use, instructional use, business transportation (such as executive airplanes), and
commercial purposes (such as aerial photography, advertising, or emergency medical
transportation). Basic transport refers to commuter or air carrier aircraft that seat up to 30
people, excluding the pilot. Current examples of the basic transport operations at the airport
include the United Express and America West Express commuter flights.
One important aspect of the airport that the CUP does not and cannot regulate is the airport
operations. The airport is operated by the County of San Diego and regulated by the FAA.
Attempts have been made in the past to adjust the airport operations to potentially increase its
compatibility with the other land uses in the area through the Comprehensive Land Use Plan
(CLUP) process; however, since the FAA has the final word on operations, some of these
adjustments were not allowed to occur. (For background information on the CLUP, see Section
C below). Examples of this are found in Appendix C of the CLUP which contains a listing of
recommended noise abatement and mitigations measures. These measures included increasing
the glideslope and altitude of incoming aircraft, changing the location of the aircraft engine
maintenance run-up area, and restricting the number of aircraft queuing up for take off. All of
these measures were denied by the FAA. Some measures, such as a hiring an airport noise
abatement officer and installing a permanent noise monitoring system, were approved. Others,
such as restricting flight patterns after take off and a nighttime jet departure curfew time, were
approved as voluntary measures only, leaving it up to the pilots to follow the recommended noise
mitigation measures.
Since before annexation, the airport has been a topic of concern for many local residents due to
the noise generated by the aircraft and the potential safety issues related to aircraft accidents. In
1975, the County prepared an Airport Master Plan that outlined the long-term development plans
for the Palomar Airport. Those plans included the extension of the existing runway and
acquisition of approximately 160 acres north of the airport property for an additional runway,
airport operations buildings, and taxiways. Implementation of this long-term acquisition and
development plan would have necessitated legislative actions such as a General Plan
Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Zone Change by the City since the land use and
zoning designations of the property to the north did not allow uses such as airport runways or
taxiways.
In reaction to the concerns about the airport and the potential of an additional runway, the
citizens of Carlsbad sponsored an initiative petition that, if passed, would require any expansion
of the airport to require a vote of the people. Responding to the citizen’s concerns, the City
Council adopted Ordinance No. 9558 (Attachment 6) in August of 1980. This ordinance stated
that the City shall not approve any Zone Change, General Plan Amendment, or any other
legislative action necessary to authorize expansion of the airport without a majority vote of the
electorate of the City of Carlsbad. Therefore, to necessitate a vote of the people a proposal must
CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PARKING AREAS
November 3,2004
Page 4
include both an expansion to the airport and the need for a corresponding legislative action for
land use consistency.
In 1997, the County Board of Supervisor’s approved an updated Airport Master Plan that showed
long-term development confined to the existing airport property. The County applied for a CUP
amendment (CUP 172(A))to update the permit to reflect these new long-term plans. The CUP
amendment was subsequently withdrawn in 1999 as the Airport Master Plan did not include any
structures or uses that were not included in Table 1 of the existing CUP. While the Master Plan
did identify additional property to be acquired, this property would be used solely for runway
protection zones for increased safety of landing and approaching aircraft. According to the
CLUP, the only uses allowed in runway protection zones are agriculture, storage of non-
flammable materials, low intensity industrial or office uses, public rights-of-way, and natural
open space. Since the underlying zone of the properties proposed for expansion allows all of
these uses, no legislative actions would have been necessary to implement the Master Plan. The
County never acquired these properties and most have since been privately developed in
accordance with their zoning and General Plan designations.
Current Status of Airport
The McClellan-Palomar Airport continues to operate as a general aviation basic transport airport.
It is one of three airports in San Diego County with a precision instrument approach, which
allows the ability to arrive and depart in coastal fog andor marine layer conditions. It is
classified as a Primary Airport in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems since it has
more than 10,000 annual passenger boardings (or enplanements). The airport has become a
critical link in the regional aviation system and is supported and regulated by the FAA.
The airport and its leaseholders are currently undergoing a major refurbishment. Some of this
refurbishment is due to the upgrading of existing private businesses operating at the airport (also
known as fixed based operations or FBOs) such as Magellan Aviation and Jetsource. Much of
the refurbishment by the County and FBOs, however, is to bring structures and airport layout into
conformance with state and federal requirements. For example, the airport restaurant had been
located across a taxiway necessitating the general public to walk across an area used by propeller
airplanes for circulation. Its location also offered the general public access to portions of the
airport that, according to federal regulations, should be controlled. The ability of unauthorized
personnel to access restricted areas is also known as runway incursions and this is one of the
FAA’s primary concerns. To address this particular issue, the restaurant has been temporarily
relocated to a tent and mobile office directly adjacent to the terminal drop off area and will be
placed in an unrestricted area once a permanent building is constructed.
In addition to the safety and security nonconformities related to the restaurant location, the area
that has been designated for long-term parking is in a location that, according to the FAA, is
designated for aircraft. The parking areas have been so close to the access gates that
unauthorized vehicles could potentially enter the taxiways and other aircraft circulation areas.
With regard to TSA safety issues, the airport is currently operating under waiver to TSA
requirements for passengerhaggage security screening, which cannot continue indefinitely.
CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PARKING AREAS
November 3,2004
Page - 5
These safety and security issues are exacerbated when the Homeland Security Threat Advisory is
raised to Code Orange, necessitating increased security measures at airports.
With regard to physical space, the existing airport administration and maintenance facilities are
45 years old and inadequate to meet current requirements and user expectations. There is no
provision for administrative spaces for TSA personnel and the present facilities are inadequate to
meet restroom requirements for airport customers and employees. In addition, the current
facilities do not meet the requirements of the automobile rental agencies, public transportation, or
air carriers. Some of the buildings housing the FBOs do not meet current building and/or fire
codes
Many of the aircraft circulation areas also do not meet current federal and state requirements.
There are particular standards for airplane wing clearances from buildings and other structures as
well as aircraft turnaround areas. In conjunction with some of the current refurbishment and
relocation of hangers and other buildings, the County is realigning some of the taxiways to meet
the circulation requirements. Another safety issue arises with the lack of structural stability
under the landfill areas, thereby eliminating these areas from being allowed by the FAA as
parking for larger and heavier corporate jets.
Taken together, all of the modifications to the airport structures and aircraft circulation and safety
areas necessary to conform to requirements create the need for more space than currently exists
on the airport property, leaving no room to accommodate the automobile parking area. Therefore
the County is in need of replacement space for passenger, customer, and employee parking to
maintain current airport operations.
The Airport Parking Areas proposal is subject to the following regulations:
A. General Plan;
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan (SP 18l(D));
Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for McClellan-Palomar Airport;
P-M - Planned Industrial Zone (Chapter 21.34 of the Zoning Ordinance);
Conditional Use Ordinance (Chapter 2 1.42 of the Zoning Ordinance); and
Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and
tables.
A. General Plan
The Airport Parking Area project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the
General Plan. Particularly relevant to the proposed parking area are the Land Use, Circulation,
-
CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PARKING AREAS
November 3,2004
Page 6
and Public Safety Elements.
particular elements of the General Plan.
Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with these
ELEMENT
Land Use
Circulation
Public
Safety
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
USE CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR
PROGRAM
To encourage the continued
operation of McClellan-Palomar
Airport as a general aviation
airport.
Provide safe and adequate
parking facilities.
Review development proposals
in the Airport Influence Area to
ensure that design features
which specifically address
aircraft crash hazards are
incorporated.
A City which minimizes injury,
loss of life and damage to
property resulting from
hazardous materials.
PROPOSED USE AND
IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed parking area
is necessary to
accommodate the
modifications required at
the airport to comply with
FAA, TSA, and Caltrans
standards.
The proposed 280 space
parking area will contain
adequate vehicular
circulation and lighting for
pedestrian safety.
The proposed parking area
will not create any
obstructions to the flight
path and all illumination
will be directed downward
to avoid conflicts with
aircraft operations.
The existing methane
extraction and elimination
system is accommodated in
the parking lot design and
will continue to operate.
COMPLIANCE
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Given the above, the Airport Parking Area proposal is consistent with the applicable portions of
the General Plan.
B. Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan
The site for the proposed parking area is located within the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan
and is therefore subject to the regulations contained in SP 181 and its amendments. The Specific
Plan calls for industrial and commercial development as well as typical support facilities, such as
parking areas. The Specific Plan is silent on the allowance of conditional uses, therefore the
regulations of the underlying zoning apply (see Section E below for a discussion on Conditional
Use Ordinance consistency).
CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PAKKING AREAS
November 3,2004
Page 7
The use of industrial lots within the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan for parking areas to
serve adjacent or offsite uses has already occurred on two occasions. The PSB Lending project
(PIP 95-06(A)) allowed the conversion of an industrial building with office, manufacturing, and
warehouse uses into one containing all office uses, thereby greatly increasing its parking
requirement. The adjacent lot was acquired and used purely for providing required parking to
serve the office uses. The Lot 23 Auto Storage Facility project (CUP 02-05PIP 02-01) allowed
the use of a parcel on Dryden Place for automobile storage to serve offsite automobile
dealerships in Car Country Carlsbad.
The Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan also required the preparation of covenants, conditions
and restrictions (CC&Rs) prior to development within the SP area. These CC&Rs contain
development and operational restrictions that would apply to any use occupying the project site.
The CC&Rs are administered by the Carlsbad Airport Centre Owner’s Association. The County
has agreed to abide by all CC&R provisions and the Owner’s Association has expressed general
support for the parking lot use on the site. It has also conditionally approved the parking areas,
subject to review and approval of the design plans. Given the above, the proposed Airport
Parking Areas project is consistent with the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan.
C. Comprehensive Land Use Plan - McClellan-Palomar Airport
State law requires that all counties containing public airports form an Airport Land Use
Commission (ALUC). California Public Utility Code states that the purpose of the ALUC is to
protect “public health, safety and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the
adoption of land use measures that minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety
hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted
to incompatible uses.” To achieve that purpose, the ALUC must prepare a comprehensive land
use plan based upon the long-range master plan of the airport. The CLUP must contain analysis
of the projected air traffic and fleet mix of aircraft and the resulting flight patterns and
anticipated noise generation. The flight patterns and projected noise levels are plotted on a map
and used for future land use decision-making by the local jurisdiction. The CLUP also establishes
an Airport Influence Area around the airport, within which all land use revisions must be referred
to the ALUC for consistency determinations.
The Airport Parking Areas project site is located within the Airport Influence Area and is
therefore subject to the provisions of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the
McClellan-Palomar Airport. For evaluation of excessive noise, the CLUP identifies the
anticipated cumulative noise equivalent levels (CNEL) for ranges from less than 60 dBA CNEL
to over 75 dBA CNEL. For evaluation of safety hazards, the CLUP identifies flight activity
zones and runway protection zones. While the proposed parking area is adjacent to the airport, it
is not within the projected noise contours nor is it located within the flight activity zone or
runway protection zone. In addition, due to their lack of development intensity and low human
occupancy over time, the CLUP allows parking lots in all noise impact areas and the flight
activity zone. The proposed parking area does not include any tall structures that would cause an
obstruction to airspace. Therefore, the proposed Airport Parking Area project is consistent with
the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP.
CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PARKING AREAS
November 3,2004
Page 8
D. Planned Industrial Zone
The Airport Parking Area site is located within the P-M zone and is therefore subject to the
regulations contained in Chapter 21.34 of the Zoning Ordinance. As discussed below, the
assemblage of large numbers of automobiles is allowed in the P-M zone, with the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, the compliance of the use with the underlying zone is
discussed in Section E below. In addition to the use allowances and actual development
standards, the P-M zone also contains performance standards to preclude impacts that may be
associated with industrial development. These performance standards include regulations
controlling noise, odors, vibrations, humidity, heat, glare, high-intensity illumination, air quality,
outdoor storage, and waste discharge.
Since the proposed parking area involves only surface improvements and no structures, the P-M
zone development standards regulating building height, property line setbacks, and lot coverage
are not applicable. With regard to performance standards, the parking area proposal does include
lighting for surface illumination of the parking lot. This lighting is designed to be directed
towards the ground and is conditioned to not spill over onto adjacent properties or public rights-
of-way. In addition, the County as airport operator also has an interest in keeping the lighting
from interfering with aircraft operations. Therefore the proposal would not include high-
intensity illumination that would violate the P-M zone performance standards. Given the above,
the Airport Parking Areas proposal is consistent with the P-M zone.
E. Conditional Use Ordinance
Section 21.42.010(5)(E) of the Zoning Ordinance states that uses involving the large assemblages
of automobiles are allowed in all zones except residential and Community Facilities with
approval of a Conditional Use Permit. In addition, parking areas are allowed within the
boundaries of the airport CUP (CUP 172), as indicated in Table 1 attached to Planning
Commission Resolution No. 1699. Four findings must be made in order to approve a CUP.
These findings, elaborated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5776 attached, deal mostly
with the project’s consistency with the General Plan, desirability for the community, and
compatibility with its site and surroundings.
The proposed parking area is desirable in that it is necessary to maintain current operations at the
McClellan-Palomar Airport. As stated in Section A above, the City’s General Plan calls for the
encouragement of the continued operation of the airport as a general aviation airport. The
parking area would be surrounded by similar and compatible uses; those being a parking area to
the west, major arterial to the east, airport to the north, and parking area and hotel to the south.
As discussed in Sections B and D above, parking as a primary or accessory use is consistent with
the underlying zoning and Specific Plan. All of the proposed improvements can fit within the
project site and the existing perimeter landscaping would remain. Lighting required for
pedestrian travel and safety would be provided and parking lot striping would clearly delineate
parking aisles and spaces.
Given that the proposed parking area would be for long-term parking, the Average Daily Trips
(ADT) generated by the use would be less than that generated by industrial and commercial
CUP 172(B) - AIRPORT PAKKING AREAS
November 3,2004
Page 9
development. Using Growth Management projections for vacant land within Local Facilities
Management Zone 5, the project site could generate between 1,400 to 2,800 ADT. To reach this
ADT, the entire 280 space parking area would need to empty and refill five to ten times per day.
Therefore, the proposed Airport Parking Areas project is consistent with the Conditional Use
Ordinance.
F. Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan
The project site is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 5. No special development
requirements, such as roadway construction or other infrastructure requirements, apply to this
parking lot construction and operation. The LFMP does require that all facilities and services
required to serve the project be in place concurrent with, or prior to, need. Given that the site is
located on a fully improved, publicly dedicated street and that the traffic generated by the
proposed parking area is less than would be generated by industrial and possibly commercial
development on the site, all existing facilities and services are adequate to accommodate the
proposed use. Therefore, the Airport Parking Area proposal is consistent with the Zone 5 Local
Facilities Management Plan.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the pavement of existing, graded lots and their use as parking
areas. The construction of small parking lots which are accessory to existing facilities is exempt
from environmental review pursuant to Section 153 1 1 of the State CEQA Guidelines. A Notice
of Exemption will be filed upon final project determination.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure Statement
4. Background Data Sheet
5.
6.
7.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5776
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1699, dated September 24, 1980
Ordinance No. 9558 dated August 5, 1980
Exhibit “A” dated November 3,2004
c
SITE
MCCLELLAN-
PALOMAR AIRPORT
AIRPORT PARKING AREAS
CUP 172(B)
- City of Carlsbad
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. your project cannot
be reviewed.unti1 this information is completed. Please print.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a cornoration or uartnershb, include the-
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares.-IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned comoration, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
person Peter Drinkwater
INDMDUALS OWN MORE 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
Corp/part County of San Diego
~itl~ Airport Director Title Dept. of Public Works Airports
Address E Address 1960 Joe Crosson Drive m:zpP,f, 3 fgli ie go
1960 Joe Crosson Drive El Cajon, CA 92020 El Cajon, CA 92020
2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
comoration or uartnershiu, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE T” 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE @/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned comoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
corp/part County of San Diego
Title Dept. of Public Works Airports
Person
Title
Address Address 1960 Joe Crosson Drive
El Cajon, CA 92020
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 @
c e
3. NON-PROFIT 0, ANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonmofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profiflrust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? 0 Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owneddate Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Peter Drinkwater for County of San Diego
Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CUP 172(B)
CASE NAME: Airport Parking - Areas
APPLICANT: County of San Diego Public Works - Airports
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the use of three
existing parcels for airport parking on property generally located north of Owens Avenue,
between Camino Vida Roble and Yarrow Drive.
LEGALDESCRIPTION: Lots 29 - 31 of Carlsbad Tract No. CT 81-46 (Unit No. 2),
according to Map No. 11288, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on
July 16, 1985, in the City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego, State of California.
APN: 212-093-06, -07, -08 Acres: 9.9 Proposed No. of LotsAJnits: N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: Planned Industrial (PI)
Density Allowed: N/A
Existing Zone: P-M
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Density Proposed: N/A
Proposed Zone: P-M
Zoning General Plan
Site P-M PI
North M G
South P-M PI
East P-M PI
West P-M PI
Current Land Use
Vacant, methane processing facility
County airport
Open Space, Hotel, Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other, Exempt pursuant to Section 153 11 of the State CEOA Guidelines